ADVFN ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.

Warren Buffett made over $600m in three years in the 1980s

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

Before examining the purchase of shares in Capital Cities/ABC by Berkshire Hathaway it’s instructive for investors today to consider how it was that Warren Buffett could easily sign a cheque for $517.5m only 20 years after taking over the tiny textile company then with net assets of a mere $22m.  It’s a story of smart capital allocation away from low returns on capital employed businesses to other equally understandable businesses selling at reasonable prices generating high rates of return.

First note that Buffett at the outset was not expecting great inflows of cash in the mid-1980s. Between August 1983, when he bought Nebraska Furniture Mart, and the end of 1985 Buffett was warning his shareholder/partners that they must get used to much lower returns than in the past. In the 1984 letter to shareholders he was adamant:

“I have told you in the past of the drag that a mushrooming capital base exerts upon rates of return. Unfortunately, my academic voice is now giving way to a reportorial voice.  Our historical 22% rate is just that – history (over 22 years).  To earn even 15% annually over the next decade … we would need profits aggregating about $3.9 billion.  Accomplishing this will require a few big ideas – small ones just won’t do.  Charlie Munger, my partner in general management, and I do not have any such ideas at present, but our experience has been that they pop up occasionally. (How’s that for a strategic plan?)”

Of course, we now know that Buffett and Munger far exceeded their target.  The general movements in the stock market helped a little in the mid-1980s – see chart – but hardly accounts for the near doubling in net book value over this period.

Dow Jones Industrial Average October 1982 to December 1985

 

What really counted were the extraordinary capital gains made on shares bought and sold by the insurance subsidiaries, together with the large flow of dividend and interest income and the rising profits of Buffalo News, Nebraska Furniture Mart, See’s Candies and Wesco – see table.

Net earnings after taxes attributable to Berkshire Hathaway from operating businesses

$m 1983   1984   1985
Insurance underwriting -18.4 -26.0 -23.6
Insurance investment income (dividends and interest) 39.1 62.1 79.7
Realised security gains 45.3 71.6 325.2
Buffalo News 8.8 13.3

………………To read more subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

 

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Ltd. ADVFN Ltd does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com