ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc

Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc (WGBA34M)

0.00
0.00
( 0.00% )

Your Hub for Real-Time streaming quotes, Ideas and Live Discussions

Premium

Key stats and details

Current Price
-
Bid
-
Ask
-
Volume
-
0.00 Day's Range 0.00
0.00 52 Week Range 0.00
Previous Close
-
Open
-
Last Trade
Last Trade Time
-
Average Volume (3m)
-
Financial Volume
-
VWAP
-

WGBA34M Latest News

No news to show yet.
PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
10000000DR
40000000DR
120000000DR
260000000DR
520000000DR
1560000000DR
2600000000DR

WGBA34M - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the current Walgreens Boots Alliance share price?
The current share price of Walgreens Boots Alliance is R$ 0.00
What is the 1 year trading range for Walgreens Boots Alliance share price?
Walgreens Boots Alliance has traded in the range of R$ 0.00 to R$ 0.00 during the past year

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
NORD3Nordon Inds Metalurgicas Sa
R$ 6.35
(18.03%)
2.8k
EKTR3Elektro Redes SA
R$ 44.00
(9.92%)
200
TXRX4Texteis Renaux Sa (ex Inds Texteis Renaux Sa)
R$ 1.97
(9.44%)
600
BALM4Baumer Sa
R$ 14.80
(9.23%)
600
AMOB3Automob Participacoes Sa
R$ 0.26
(8.33%)
20.44M
RCSL4Recrusul Sa
R$ 1.17
(-18.75%)
4.36M
GFSA3Gafisa S.A.
R$ 1.37
(-12.18%)
12.56M
RCSL3Recrusul Sa
R$ 2.59
(-11.30%)
1.33M
LAND3Terra Santa Propriedades Agricolas S.A.
R$ 12.43
(-8.74%)
544.9k
REAG3REAG Investimentos S.A.
R$ 3.78
(-8.47%)
23.9k
AZUL4AZUL SA
R$ 1.95
(-0.510204%)
278.01M
HAPV3Hapvida Participacoes Investimento SA
R$ 2.44
(1.24%)
82.53M
COGN3CognaEducacao SA
R$ 2.53
(1.20%)
41.73M
ELMD3LEletromidia SA
R$ 28.59
(0.00%)
38.92M
BEEF3Minerva SA
R$ 7.48
(-4.47%)
31M

Discussion

View Full Feed
imafan imafan 43 seconds ago
Eeyore has spoken! AKA professed lying short. Real News: HUUUUGE ANNOUNCEMENTS of HUUUUGE ACCOMPLISHMENTS IMMINENT!!! WHALES LURKING!!!
HHSE
StockItOut StockItOut 1 minute ago
Another SmartyPants/Quester lie, or you have a filing to support your assertion?
XERI
fuagf fuagf 2 minutes ago
LOL Figured that comment would grab you. 🙃 Qualification to mine would be, of course, unless they had firm numbers wrapped up with more security than Fort Knox. While fully appreciating the gravity you see in the situation, and though I've read little lately, still am guessing it's better t
glenn1919 glenn1919 2 minutes ago
CTMX..............................................a/h
CTMX
dia76ca dia76ca 2 minutes ago
"Blarcamesine and Anavex 3-71 are changing the paradigm for the treatment of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases."
Nice summary georgejjl !
Paradigm shifts are very exciting but some folks see them before others!
The rest of this year will be pivotal.
2026 s
AVXL
Lykiri Lykiri 2 minutes ago
Actually, there’s a bit of confusion here. Under the old regulation, both positive and negative recommendations were referred to the CHM for review. However, the new regulation (effective after 3 April 2025) stipulates that only applications with serious concerns are now referred to the CHM. Therefo
NWBO
I-Glow I-Glow 3 minutes ago
And the Hindenburg report.- https://hindenburgresearch.com/mullen/.

Plus, TenKay was all over the preferred shares and the financials.

IG
MULN
boi568 boi568 3 minutes ago
Even if an ADL "odds ratio" claim could normally be considered disqualifying in lieu of a comparison of the means, it just seems to me irrelevant to the EMA here, since ADL itself is a not ready for prime time EMA endpoint in an early AD trial.
AVXL
dennisdave dennisdave 3 minutes ago
I agree with your points . However there were medicines last year which got approved by MHRA but NICE decided not to get them covered by NHS same day or so. Those companies would have been in discussions with NICE before MHRA approval . So not really sure it is absolutely comforting Ok interesting
NWBO
hedge_fun hedge_fun 4 minutes ago
That’s what I said, you’re smarter than……

the markets.

In your opinion of course!
TSLA
WarMachine WarMachine 4 minutes ago
I couldn't imagine making such a fool of myself every day on a public forum.
You don't need to imagine it. LOL
they are beyond clueless about what's really happening here
Explain, IN DETAIL, with PROOF to validate your claims, EXACTLY what is going on here. Or is it YOU who is
MONI
Uncle Monkey Uncle Monkey 5 minutes ago
wow! huge MAGA action today. FSR

hahaha
CBRF
Natural Trader Natural Trader 5 minutes ago
it does with high PT
exwannabe exwannabe 6 minutes ago
Impossible, they have to by law. They cant simply stop discussion because NWBO "might" get refusal.
I do not claim to know how the MHRA-NICE communications work.

But I do think I understand the NICE process well enough. They are at hold waiting for the evidence submission. Ever
NWBO
Truenorth2016 Truenorth2016 6 minutes ago
Any Dip Before News IMO is a Golden Opportunity Set-up!!!
CAVR
skitahoe skitahoe 7 minutes ago
There have been many bashers here saying that NICE wouldn't even speak to the company, and it would be next year or later before they would be able to treat patients with payment from the UK healthcare system. It seems like they're very wrong and the system may be ready for patients very shortly af
NWBO
dennisdave dennisdave 7 minutes ago
so it's your belief Linda dares not to disclose negative material news Ofcourse she will but I think they will probably do that when there is no more escape route IF there is bad news to report. The 10K left them no option had they prior to that received bad news so I am pretty sure they didn't rece
NWBO
manibiotech manibiotech 7 minutes ago
I agree with your points . However there were medicines last year which got approved by MHRA but NICE decided not to get them covered by NHS same day or so. Those companies would have been in discussions with NICE before MHRA approval . So not really sure it is absolutely comforting . Looks like the
NWBO
fwb fwb 7 minutes ago
You have issues,
find a woman
Let her HELP YOU get RIGHT... if you know what I mean
PLTR
I-Glow I-Glow 8 minutes ago
I believe there is a caveat to that provision as the company also has to be Deficienct in another listing requirement.

TK, can explain it much better as well as others.

IG
MULN
ddls ddls 8 minutes ago
4/28/25, Buy: 525,000, Neutral: 4,076,000, Sell: 11,275,500

One last day buy ask slap trade to make this junk look good.
BIEL
archilles archilles 8 minutes ago
Isn’t there a newly graduated law student recently passed the bar exam lawyer who will take on this case for experience for small pro bono fees. This should be a relatively easy to identify the bad guys and the victims. What we have here are the victim shareholders, who got ripped off, versus the
ENZC