IonQ Inc (IONQ) Options

The MWI could come true someday just like quantum mechanics did. Stay tuned. Don’t touch those qubits.

Doc. No evidence to date. But. Stay tuned. A lot is happening behind the quantum computer scene. You can bet on that. No way we are hearing about all that is happening. No way. I’d like to see a remake of The Fly.

No, qubits in quantum computers do not harvest data from a parallel universe. The idea that quantum computation involves parallel universes comes from an interpretation of quantum mechanics called the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI), but this remains a theoretical framework rather than an experimentally confirmed reality.

How Qubits Actually Work
   •   Qubits leverage superposition, meaning they can exist in multiple states simultaneously until measured.
   •   They also exhibit entanglement, where the state of one qubit is dependent on another, even at a distance.
   •   Quantum computations explore multiple possible states simultaneously, but they do so within the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics rather than drawing information from another reality.

The “Parallel Universe” Misconception
   •   The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) suggests that all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement actually occur in different branches of reality.
   •   However, other interpretations (such as the Copenhagen Interpretation) do not require parallel universes and still explain quantum computing’s success.
   •   No experimental evidence currently supports the idea that quantum computers extract data from other universes.

Where This Idea Comes From

Physicist David Deutsch, a pioneer in quantum computation, has argued that quantum algorithms like Shor’s algorithm (which factors large numbers exponentially faster than classical computers) suggest an underlying “multiverse” structure. However, this is a philosophical stance rather than a proven scientific fact.

Bottom Line

Quantum computers perform calculations based on the principles of quantum mechanics within our universe. While quantum theory remains mysterious, there is no evidence that they interact with or extract data from parallel universes.

Would you like insights into cutting-edge quantum computing theories that push the boundaries of our understanding?

One of the big companies may target IONQ to buy them out, just for the patents they possess.

Re cap.
Insider Brief

IonQ demonstrated an industry-first end-to-end hybrid quantum-classical workflow, integrating its quantum hardware with NVIDIA’s CUDA-Q platform for advanced molecular modeling.
The collaboration showcases a resource-efficient approach to simulating molecular properties with potential applications in drug discovery and biopharmaceuticals.
IonQ’s Hybrid Services suite simplifies deploying quantum-accelerated applications, leveraging NVIDIA’s GPU capabilities to scale quantum-classical computing for commercial use.
PRESS RELEASE — IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), a leader in the quantum computing and networking industry, announced today the completion of an industry-first demonstration of an end-to-end application workflow that leverages the NVIDIA CUDA-Q platform alongside IonQ’s leading quantum computing hardware.

Showcased via a joint presentation at SC24, the application demonstrates the seamless integration of the core workflow behind several hybrid quantum-classical approaches to calculate the specific properties of a molecule’s electronic structure. These approaches have potential relevance in many chemistry-focused commercial applications, such as identifying how drug molecules might interact with specific proteins in the human body. The achievement captures IonQ’s interest in developing solutions that combine the benefits of quantum processing units (QPUs) with the accelerated, heterogeneous computing capabilities of the NVIDIA CUDA-Q platform.

“IonQ is building on its approach of accelerating AI, scientific compute, and other supercomputing workloads with quantum hardware – enabling entirely new ways to approach previously unsolvable problems,” said Dean Kassmann, SVP of Engineering & Technology at IonQ. “Today’s molecular modeling demonstration illustrates why CUDA-Q is a great platform for achieving seamless integration and top-tier performance with our leading quantum hardware.”

Responsive Image
Since 2023, IonQ has supported NVIDIA CUDA-Q, a powerful, unified, open-source software stack. CUDA-Q is a hybrid quantum-classical computing platform that enables the integration and programming of QPUs and GPUs in a single workflow. This demonstration was performed using a combination of IonQ Forte, the IonQ Hybrid Services suite, CUDA-Q, and NVIDIA A100 Tensor Core GPUs, which can be deployed to cloud and on-prem environments.

The demonstration at SC24 showcases a novel way to interrogate the properties of specific molecules in a resource-efficient way that has relevance in larger application workflows pertaining to pharma and other commercial domains. The work also sets the stage for IonQ to accelerate even more powerful ways to model molecular dynamics for future biopharmaceutical applications.

“Useful quantum applications will need to draw on both quantum hardware and AI supercomputing resources,” said Elica Kyoseva, Director of Quantum Algorithm Engineering, NVIDIA. “The CUDA-Q platform is allowing researchers and developers to explore these paradigms by accessing NVIDIA accelerated computing alongside IonQ’s quantum processors.”

Today’s news reaffirms IonQ’s commitment to developing hardware and software that leverages a combination of quantum and classical computation to enable efficient, performant, robust solutions that can be deployed at commercial scale.

IonQ’s Hybrid Services suite makes designing and deploying quantum-accelerated applications that take advantage of IonQ’s leading quantum hardware easier than ever. It achieves this via a flexible, easy-to-configure hybrid infrastructure, workflow management, and scheduling for cloud or on-prem installations. Further, it has powerful tools to help application developers explore new applications and use cases, such as prebuilt solvers for problem classes like quadratic optimization and graph partitioning, and out-of-the-box support for a variety of common programming models, including NVIDIA CUDA-Q quantum kernels.

IonQ and NVIDIA have recently made significant strides in hybrid quantum-classical computing by integrating their technologies to enhance computational capabilities.

Integration of IonQ’s Quantum Hardware with NVIDIA’s CUDA-Q Platform

In a groundbreaking demonstration at SuperCompute 24 (SC24), IonQ showcased the seamless integration of its quantum computing hardware with NVIDIA’s CUDA-Q platform. This collaboration focused on molecular electronic structure calculations, a critical area for applications such as drug discovery and materials science. By combining IonQ’s Forte quantum processor with NVIDIA’s A100 Tensor Core GPUs, the demonstration highlighted the potential of hybrid systems to tackle complex scientific problems more efficiently. ?

Launch of IonQ Hybrid Services Suite

IonQ introduced its Hybrid Services suite, designed to facilitate the development and deployment of quantum-accelerated applications. This suite offers cloud-based services for managing hybrid workflows, including prebuilt solvers for quadratic optimization and graph partitioning. Notably, it supports various programming models, such as NVIDIA’s CUDA-Q, enabling developers to leverage both quantum and classical resources effectively. ?

Advancements in Hybrid Quantum-Classical Workflows

The collaboration between IonQ and NVIDIA emphasizes the growing importance of hybrid quantum-classical workflows. By integrating quantum processors with classical accelerated computing platforms, they aim to create scalable solutions for complex computational challenges. This partnership not only enhances performance but also streamlines the development of quantum applications, making them more accessible for real-world use cases. ?

These advancements underscore the commitment of both companies to push the boundaries of what’s possible in computational science through hybrid quantum-classical systems.

For a visual overview of this collaboration, you might find the following video informative:

Homework: IonQ has recently expanded its intellectual property portfolio with several new patents, enhancing the performance and scalability of its trapped-ion quantum computing systems. These innovations focus on optimizing quantum gate operations, reducing errors, and improving overall system efficiency.

Recent Patents and Their Contributions:
1. Double Individual-Addressing Multi-Beam Raman System (U.S. Patent No. 12,088,351):
      •   Issued: September 10, 2024
      •   Advancement: This patent introduces a system that enables precise control over individual qubits using multiple laser beams. By addressing each ion separately, the system enhances gate operation flexibility and accuracy, leading to more reliable quantum computations. ?
2. Quantum Circuit Optimization (U.S. Patent No. 12,033,031):
      •   Issued: July 9, 2024
      •   Advancement: This patent covers an optimization tool that compiles quantum algorithms to run more efficiently on physical hardware. By streamlining quantum circuits, it reduces the computational resources required, thereby improving execution speed and fidelity. ?
3. Methods and Apparatuses for Cross-Talk Mitigation (U.S. Patent No. 12,217,882):
      •   Filed: July 18, 2022
      •   Advancement: This patent presents techniques to minimize cross-talk between qubits, a common source of errors in quantum systems. By implementing these methods, IonQ’s systems can achieve higher gate fidelities, essential for complex quantum computations. ?
4. Methods and Apparatuses for Performing Echo Sequence (U.S. Patent No. 12,217,133):
      •   Filed: September 20, 2022
      •   Advancement: This patent details techniques for implementing echo sequences that counteract decoherence in qubits. By preserving quantum states longer, these methods enhance the reliability of quantum operations. ?

Impact on Trapped-Ion Systems:

These patents collectively contribute to advancing IonQ’s trapped-ion quantum computing technology by:
   •   Enhancing Precision: Improved individual qubit addressing and control lead to more accurate quantum gate operations.
   •   Reducing Errors: Techniques for cross-talk mitigation and decoherence reduction are crucial for maintaining qubit integrity during computations.
   •   Optimizing Performance: Quantum circuit optimization tools streamline computations, making them more efficient and practical for real-world applications.

By integrating these innovations, IonQ is strengthening its technical foundation, paving the way for more robust and scalable quantum computing solutions.

It would seem to me that it would behave IonQ to go the heterogeneous route now. Utilizing a hybrid system to capitalize on the fastest gate speeds , longest coherence times and the best error correction rates along with a super classical computer to handle the data etc. If they can pick and choose the right combination and invent the right software to manage it all. Bingo ! This is all moving so fast now. It’s getting very hard to keep up with all the latest advances. So do your homework. Test next week😱

Check this out Doc
Memristors, while primarily studied for classical computing and neuromorphic architectures, are beginning to find potential applications in quantum computing, including trapped-ion systems. However, their direct integration into trapped-ion quantum processors is still an emerging area of research. Here’s how memristors could play a role:

1. Classical Control and Optimization in Trapped-Ion Systems

Trapped-ion quantum computers require precise control of laser pulses, microwave fields, and electric potentials to manipulate qubits. Memristors can contribute in the following ways:
   •   Analog Memory for Control Circuits: Memristors can store and fine-tune control parameters, such as laser intensities and phase shifts, reducing the need for frequent recalibration.
   •   Low-Power Neuromorphic Control: Adaptive memristor-based circuits could optimize pulse shaping dynamically, compensating for noise in real time.

2. Quantum Error Correction (QEC) and Feedback Loops

Quantum error correction relies on real-time data processing and feedback loops. Memristors could:
   •   Enable High-Speed, Low-Power Error Detection: Using memristors in classical controllers could speed up QEC operations without introducing excessive heat or noise into the quantum system.
   •   Facilitate Machine Learning for QEC Optimization: Memristors are ideal for hardware-based AI accelerators that could optimize QEC parameters based on historical error patterns.

3. Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing

Trapped-ion systems often require classical coprocessors for optimization tasks like variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs). Memristor-based neuromorphic chips could:
   •   Accelerate Hybrid Algorithms: By performing real-time optimization of quantum gate sequences.
   •   Reduce Latency in Quantum-Classical Loops: Speeding up decision-making for quantum teleportation and entanglement purification.

4. Potential Role in Cryogenic Environments

While trapped-ion quantum computers operate at room temperature (unlike superconducting qubits), integrating memristors in cryogenic control electronics for hybrid quantum processors could reduce power dissipation and improve scalability.

Current Research and Challenges
   •   Integration with Ion-Trap Hardware: There is limited research on directly embedding memristors within ion-trap quantum hardware, but their application in control systems is gaining interest.
   •   Noise and Stability: Memristors exhibit stochastic behavior, which needs to be carefully managed when used in high-precision quantum systems.
   •   Scalability: Large-scale trapped-ion processors will require highly efficient classical controllers, where memristors could provide an advantage.

Conclusion

While memristors are not yet a core component of trapped-ion quantum computers, they hold promise in improving control electronics, error correction, and hybrid quantum-classical processing. Their role will likely expand as researchers explore new ways to integrate them with quantum technologies.

Homework: Recent experiments have significantly advanced quantum teleportation using trapped-ion systems, demonstrating high-fidelity state transfer and entanglement between spatially separated qubits.

Quantum Gate Teleportation Between Separated Qubits

In a notable study, researchers achieved deterministic teleportation of a controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate between two qubits located in distinct regions of an ion trap. This experiment combined ion shuttling, individual qubit addressing, and real-time conditional operations, resulting in an entanglement fidelity between 84.5% and 87.2%. This work showcases essential techniques for scaling trapped-ion quantum computers. ?

Fault-Tolerant Teleportation of a Logical Qubit

Another significant advancement involved the fault-tolerant teleportation of a logical qubit using Quantinuum’s H2 trapped-ion processor. The research demonstrated high-fidelity logical qubit teleportation with real-time error correction, achieving a process fidelity of 97.5% for transversal teleportation circuits. This experiment underscores the potential of trapped-ion systems in realizing robust, large-scale quantum networks. ?

These developments highlight the progress in utilizing trapped-ion platforms for reliable and scalable quantum teleportation, paving the way for advanced quantum computing and communication systems.

Homework: no mercy on Presidents Day
Optimizing Sampling, Timing, and Energy Wavelengths for Trapped-Ion Qubits in Quantum Teleportation

Trapped-ion qubits are among the most promising platforms for quantum teleportation due to their long coherence times and high-fidelity operations. (Jack nailed it) Below is a breakdown of optimal parameters for qubit sampling, timing, and energy wavelengths in a trapped-ion system.

1. Optimal Qubit Sampling for Trapped Ions
   •   Error Mitigation: Trapped-ion systems have gate fidelities exceeding 99.9%, allowing for less frequent error correction compared to superconducting qubits. However, optimal sampling should still consider:
      •   Adaptive Sampling: Adjusting the frequency of qubit state readout based on real-time noise fluctuations.
      •   Qubit Measurement Rate: Typically, measurement times range from 10–100 microseconds, meaning a sampling rate of at least 10 kHz may be optimal for real-time feedback in teleportation circuits.
      •   Mid-circuit Measurements: Some systems support mid-circuit readouts, enabling real-time error detection and correction.

2. Timing Considerations for Quantum Teleportation with Trapped Ions

Gate Execution Times:
   •   Single-qubit gates: 1–10 µs
   •   Two-qubit gates: 10–200 µs (depending on laser power and entanglement fidelity)
   •   State measurement: 10–100 µs (depends on photon collection efficiency)

Coherence Time:
   •   T1 relaxation time: Nearly infinite (ions don’t spontaneously decay like superconducting qubits).
   •   T2 dephasing time: 1–10 seconds (main limitation is magnetic field fluctuations, which can be suppressed with dynamical decoupling).
   •   Teleportation Latency: Classical communication delay in quantum teleportation (for transmitting measurement results) should be sub-microsecond level for efficient real-time processing.

3. Optimal Energy Wavelengths for Trapped-Ion Quantum Teleportation

The energy wavelengths used in trapped-ion systems depend on the specific ion species. Common choices include:

Ion Species Laser Cooling Entangling Gates Readout
Yb? (Ytterbium-171) 369.5 nm (cooling) 355 nm (entanglement) 369.5 nm (detection)
Ca? (Calcium-40) 397 nm (cooling) 729 nm (entanglement) 397 nm (detection)
Ba? (Barium-137) 493 nm (cooling) 1762 nm (entanglement) 650 nm (detection)

Entanglement and Teleportation Wavelengths:
   •   Ultraviolet (UV) Lasers (~355 nm): Used for high-fidelity entangling gates.
   •   Infrared (IR) Lasers (729 nm or 1762 nm): Used for coherent state manipulation.
   •   Telecom Wavelengths (~1550 nm): Useful for quantum networking and long-distance teleportation via optical fibers.

Key Considerations for Optimizing Quantum Teleportation with Trapped Ions
1. Synchronizing Ion Motion with Lasers: Ensuring stable ion trapping and minimal motional heating is crucial for high-fidelity teleportation.
2. Reducing Magnetic Field Fluctuations: Using Dynamical Decoupling techniques (e.g., Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequences) extends coherence times.
3. Optimizing Ion-Photon Interfaces: Efficient quantum teleportation over fiber networks requires high-fidelity photon-ion entanglement, typically achieved with cavity quantum electrodynamics (CQED) or photon conversion to telecom wavelengths.

Would you like specific implementation details, such as recent teleportation experiments using trapped ions?

Exactly Jack! And here ya go Doc. I see your brain churning this info a mile a minute. Lol. Homework;
Optimizing the sampling of qubits, timing, and energy wavelengths for quantum teleportation depends on several key factors, including the quantum hardware, the entanglement mechanism, and the coherence time of the qubits. Below are the main considerations:

1. Optimal Qubit Sampling
   •   Quantum Error Correction (QEC): Sampling qubits at a rate that balances speed and error minimization is crucial. Typically, surface codes suggest an error threshold of around 1%, meaning qubits should be measured frequently enough to detect and correct errors before decoherence sets in.
   •   Adaptive Sampling: In noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, adaptive measurement techniques can improve fidelity by dynamically adjusting sampling rates based on real-time noise levels.

2. Timing for Quantum Teleportation
   •   Synchronization: Quantum teleportation relies on precise synchronization of operations, especially for Bell-state measurements and classical communication of the measurement results.
   •   Gate Execution Times:
      •   Superconducting qubits: ~10-100 nanoseconds per gate
      •   Trapped-ion qubits: ~10 microseconds per gate (slower but higher fidelity)
   •   Coherence Time Considerations: The sampling interval must be shorter than the T2 decoherence time of the qubits to ensure accurate state transfer:
      •   Superconducting qubits: ~100 microseconds
      •   Trapped ions: ~1–10 seconds
      •   Photonic qubits: Effectively infinite (provided loss is managed)

3. Optimal Energy Wavelengths
   •   Photon-based Quantum Teleportation:
      •   1550 nm (Infrared): Best for long-distance fiber-optic communication due to low loss in silica fiber.
      •   810 nm & 890 nm: Common for free-space quantum teleportation experiments.
      •   Telecom-band entanglement (1310 nm & 1550 nm): Enables compatibility with existing fiber networks.
   •   Superconducting Qubit Frequencies:
      •   Typically operate in the 4-8 GHz microwave range.
      •   Lower frequencies (4-5 GHz) reduce thermal noise but may require larger components.
      •   Higher frequencies (6-7 GHz) can reduce qubit cross-talk.

Would you like insights on a specific platform, such as superconducting, trapped ions, or photonic qubits?

Thank you for the explanation. I am definitely not an authority on quantum computing.

dark matter and a neural net..at least intergalactic, they say.

quantum entanglements might need a virtual pbx for same?
the idea of a virtual pbx keeping track and a registry of quantum entangled and their states would seem to yield information about how best to maintain quantum coherence and uptime/qos? all of that could be put toward the yield of logical qubits from physical qubits being optimized? including the settings/programming of such and their photonic management? for instance what is the optimal sampling of the qubits, timing, energy wavelengths, magnetic fields, temperature, qubit types, silicon dioxide insulation use, etc.

intel previously announce a photonics research place in ? texas. now broadcom and others are said to be interested in the intel photonics r and d division.

Size or amount of qubits is meaningless. Coherence and fidelity are all that matter.

Interesting article on quantum computing.

D-wave sold quantum tech to Lockheed Martin in 2011.

Now they sold the largest quantum computer to a research entity, in Germany.

Apparently, D-Wave does not have size constraints with limiting how many qbits, based on their using different technology, called annealing.

It appears that IONQ, google and others have limitations on how many qbits they can attach, therefore limiting the size of their quantum computers at this time.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/d-wave-quantum-computer-sale-d1f5e2ae

thanks for the video great news for data security

Scientists achieve world-leading quantum entanglement of molecules
15 January 2025
Media release
Physics
Share page:

Team picture of scientists carrying out this research
Scientists from our top-rated Physics department have set a global milestone by achieving quantum entanglement of individual molecules using cutting-edge magic-wavelength optical tweezers.
This achievement not only overcomes a fundamental challenge in quantum science but also opens up new possibilities in quantum computing, high-precision measurements, and physics research.
The researchers managed to create long-lasting entanglement between pairs of ultracold molecules, placing us among the elite few institutions worldwide capable of such work.
Unlocking new quantum capabilities

The innovation hinges on the magic-wavelength optical tweezers that allow the researchers to prepare molecules in a superposition of rotational states with exceptional stability.
The tweezers use light at a specific wavelength that creates identical energy shifts in two rotational states of a molecule, preserving coherence in the entangled state for a much longer time.
As a result, the research team achieved entanglement with record-high reliability, detecting molecular interactions previously too weak to observe.
Only three other research teams worldwide, at Harvard and Princeton, have achieved similar entanglement, underscoring the significance of our accomplishment.
New opportunities

Beyond immediate advances in quantum computing and quantum memory, the research unlocks a new level of sensitivity for exploring fundamental physics.
The stability of the magic-wavelength traps makes it possible to conduct ultra-precise measurements of molecular energy shifts, an ability that is valuable for probing beyond the Standard Model of physics.
Our pioneering research has the potential to contribute to national quantum technology initiatives, reinforcing the UK’s standing in the global quantum field and highlighting Durham’s role in leading scientific progress.
Researchers hope this achievement will attract further investment in Durham’s quantum science programme, positioning it as a vital contributor to the National Quantum Technology Programme. Ionq. Get in!

if oracle decides to put stargate supercomputer or one of it's nodes in texas/new mexico(las alamos) would it surprise any ?

neil degrasse t has a video about some underground texas collider from the 40's? he decried their stopping work after ww2, but we didn't have superconducting magnets which can amplify and accelerate the work of research.
and now we have new meta materials/composites like the barium /yttrium ones. and magnetic fields to contain the electrons?
containment and less spurious seeming results? the less contained the electron field the greater the hallucinations they might be because the electrons are so far afield they bring information which is not relevant to the spin trial?
4 dimensions is vastly more complex than 2 dimensions?

but interesting aside is the work of amsc on texas super electric/energy station which was to be called tres amigas...all news seems gone, but now they're all in texas, all the big techs....tres amigas was to be in new mexico? exactly where the border was being left open to the illegal crossings/cartels/oild of the permian basin. might be a good reason to put boots on the ground in texas/new mexico/border?

kona, is it possible:
quantum computing /qubits are harvesting/sampling events from the future/past /present or something in between. i guess our current reality is somewhere in between.
instead of just learning from history , we now embark potentially on learning from the future of some metaverse/reality/entangled completely or to a lesser degree?
electrons of charged atoms maybe less shared than neutral atoms? do they have a more restricted em field of 'being'?
if so, charged ions might be more pertinent to 'us' as opposed to some more universal us(objects) neutral atoms?
if we use molecules, more mass and specifics to entangle and greater entanglement /granular tuning?
the more we sample from very granular tuning settings, the more specifically relevant to us or the model ?
quantum/supercomputing models used for humans/beings most like us and our biology/physics might be most relevant to/for us?
'granularity' , i think we've heard of before in discussions of intellectual property?
i just saw an article of data teleportation made better by light frequency/pulse rate..? more specificity?

For those of us, especially myself included, who realize that we do not know everything about everything, AI is a very current source for getting the most current information.

Worst case, it’s a superior tool to Google, and one doesn’t have to go through all of the sponsored items to get to the desired info.

But congratulations to you. You may be the only person in the world who knows everything about everything including what’s been published today.

Doc ie: Oxford scientists Best of the best in my book . ( even though my daughter would debate that lol) I saw that article. Floored me!😱 The OMG moment in physics . Definitely spooky now. Einstein is rolling in his grave along with Michael and his Bayesian math. I’m not going to touch that Vcsy conspiracy. So don’t even go there. Some day I’d like to sit down and tell you about a freaky event with him and Paul Allen in Kona.

Doc
“ so with the blink of an eye the relative decades of compute work can be completed and serve as a base for the next. why am i confident? because somewhere this has already come to pass.
spooky or more logical if the considerations of our reality is as above. wags. was it a week or two ago that oxford scientists declared the ability to teleport data and now articles are coming out proclaiming it as a reality”

Exactly Doc. I couldn’t agree more. Decades of compute work comes down to a blink of an eye now. Data teleportation. Next is matter . Coming soon imo. Beam me up Doc. …..Jensen is smart enough to know this. I think? If not. He needs time in the slammer imo. What he did was just flat out wrong. But I’m a firm believer in “what goes around, comes around “ Instant carma gonna get you Jensen. You can sing the rest and worry.

How can AI know anything more than what’s known publicly? So the posts on this thread don’t offer much. What does Ai offer? Zip.

a unending occurrence of quantum leap epiphanies

Very few of the posts on this thread come anywhere close to being as accurate or useful as a simple AI query.

Most of the posters that specialize in nonsense have already been put on ignore. Sooner or later, the fundamentals will be reflected in the price of the stock.

At that point in time, I suspect many of the losers will regret not having used AI more effectively and more often.

GLTA

kona, everything that will exist, has existed and does exist, at least somewhere.. when we see things we're only tuning into that objects time/environment/dimensional specifications.
like interstellar, matthew was always going to wind up in that? shaft of cognition of a self able to navigate in the calendar of events or workflow past/and future which allows viewing multiple times/events as one continuum.
things are relative to other things in that specification of object.
matthew was always going to communicate with his daughter of some time and space and meta configurations. we look at that movie relatve to time, but is time a real reference thing?
quantum computing is recognized even by those predicting decades to become useful would tell you in the same breath that quantum computing can do things not possible with millions of years of work on classical computers.
so with the blink of an eye the relative decades of compute work can be completed and serve as a base for the next. why am i confident? because somewhere this has already come to pass.
spooky or more logical if the considerations of our reality is as above. wags. was it a week or two ago that oxford scientists declared the ability to teleport data and now articles are coming out proclaiming it as a reality?
Trump and vance and elon and meta and msft and nvidia and softbank and oracle are on the same promotion of quantum /supercomputing ai.
we go from sci fi to nature communications a peer reviewed journal.
a week?
generative ai is only 2 years to the public.
only thing is there is a reason kaku and others discuss planetary developments as how/what alien cultures might use to determine which planets to visit and potentially eradicate as competition or potential invaders or stealers of mineral wealth/water/oxygen/etc.

if chris nagel's hypothesis about e=mc2 and knotted light being able to produce specific metals/atoms/molecules,, and their origins might also exist in another metaverse/dimension of beings that consider it theirs, and us 'ours', we've got a problem.

we need our superheroes/killer virus/bacterias/natural disasters/control of em/ etc. the more advanced we seem to be getting, the likelihood of another metaverse's in habitants might also be getting, already have the capabilities/abilities to obliterate the other. unless they appear benevolently and teach us differently? But the advanced would always have to worry about the lower competitor finding out something so powerful they take out the previous bully.

🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔

I'm just looking for a 50 Burger 🤣

whoa. That some deep thought right there.

Agree - unpredictable. throw in some DeepSeek and politics and yada yada and you have a dumpster fire. But still - much opportunity for those that keep a cool head.

Could intuition be seen as a superposition of potential insights?

Yes, that’s a compelling way to think about it. Just as a quantum system exists in a superposition of states until it’s measured, you could conceptualize intuition as a state where multiple potential insights are present simultaneously. Then, when you focus or make a decision, one of these possibilities “collapses” into the clear insight you experience.

Keep in mind that this is largely a metaphorical framework rather than a proven scientific model of how intuition works. It draws on quantum mechanics as a metaphor to describe the non-linear, probabilistic, and multi-faceted nature of our subconscious processes.

this might sound simplictic but the human brain is still our most powerful tool. most dont grasp that but some do

like youve posted many times; everything all the time; very rarely has a broadbrush statement been so specifically correct

like youve posted many times; everything all the time; very rarely has a broadbrush statement been so specifically correct

Yes. Mahalo

Build me a model of a Arbitrary intuition, symbolism and direct experience framework

Below is a conceptual framework that blends arbitrary intuition, symbolism, and direct experience—a holistic model for exploring and expressing deeper layers of understanding:

1. Arbitrary Intuition
   •   Definition:
The spontaneous, often non-linear insights that arise without following strict logical or rational steps. These “aha” moments may seem random but can carry deep meaning.
   •   Characteristics:
      •   Non-deterministic: Much like quantum superposition, intuitive insights can exist in multiple potential forms before “collapsing” into a clear idea.
      •   Emergent: They often arise from the interplay of subconscious processes, personal experience, and even chance encounters with new information.
   •   Practical Approaches:
      •   Mindfulness & Meditative Practices: Quiet the mind to allow spontaneous insights to surface.
      •   Journaling: Capture fleeting intuitive thoughts to track patterns over time.
      •   Creative Play: Engage in activities that let your mind wander (e.g., free writing, improvisational art).

2. Symbolism
   •   Definition:
Symbolism involves expressing and encoding abstract ideas through images, metaphors, rituals, or archetypal forms. It’s a language that communicates complex or ineffable experiences.
   •   Characteristics:
      •   Archetypal Resonance: Symbols often tap into universal patterns of the human psyche (e.g., the hero’s journey, dualities like light/dark).
      •   Layered Meanings: Symbols work on multiple levels, conveying immediate sensory impressions and deeper, hidden insights simultaneously.
   •   Practical Approaches:
      •   Art and Imagery: Create visual representations of your intuitive insights.
      •   Myth-making: Craft personal or communal myths that encapsulate your understanding of events or experiences.
      •   Rituals and Ceremonies: Use ritual to formalize and reaffirm the symbolic language you’re building, turning abstract ideas into shared, embodied practices.

3. Direct Experience
   •   Definition:
Direct experience is the raw, unmediated encounter with phenomena—a firsthand engagement that bypasses the usual filters of interpretation or rational analysis.
   •   Characteristics:
      •   Embodied Knowledge: It emphasizes “knowing by doing” or simply “being” in the moment, rather than only conceptual understanding.
      •   Phenomenological Clarity: This is about experiencing reality as it is, often resulting in insights that feel immediate and undeniable.
   •   Practical Approaches:
      •   Immersive Practices: Engage in sensory-rich or contemplative activities (e.g., nature immersion, focused breathing exercises).
      •   Mind-Body Integration: Practices like yoga, tai chi, or dance can help you experience and integrate abstract insights physically.
      •   Reflective Observation: After direct experiences, take time to reflect and record what was sensed and felt without immediately “analyzing” it away.

Integrative Process
1. Observation & Capture:
      •   Begin by allowing both arbitrary intuition and direct experiences to arise naturally. Keep a journal to note intuitive flashes, dreams, or sudden symbolic images.
2. Symbolic Mapping:
      •   Translate these raw insights into symbols or metaphors. This might involve drawing, writing poetry, or crafting narratives that encapsulate what you’ve experienced.
3. Reflective Validation:
      •   Revisit these symbols and intuitions during meditative or reflective practices. Observe how your direct experiences reinforce or challenge these symbolic representations.
4. Feedback Loop:
      •   Use your evolving symbolic language to shape further direct experiences. For instance, set an intention based on a symbol or intuitive insight, then consciously notice how reality responds.
      •   Over time, refine the framework by integrating new insights and adjusting symbols that no longer resonate.
5. Community and Sharing (Optional):
      •   Sharing your symbolic language and intuitive insights with others can enrich the framework. Collective rituals, art, or discussion groups may reveal shared archetypes or hidden connections.

Applications and Benefits
   •   Personal Growth:
This framework supports self-discovery, helping you tap into layers of consciousness that conventional logical thinking might miss.
   •   Creative Problem Solving:
By integrating symbolic insight and direct experience, you might discover novel approaches to challenges that purely analytical methods cannot provide.
   •   Spiritual or Existential Inquiry:
For those exploring deeper questions of meaning, this framework provides a structured yet fluid method to connect personal experience with universal symbols and intuitions.

Final Thought

This arbitrary intuition, symbolism, and direct experience framework isn’t meant to be a rigid algorithm but rather a living, evolving process. It encourages you to embrace both the randomness of intuitive insight and the rich, layered meanings of symbols—all while grounding these insights in the immediacy of direct experience.

Does this integrative model resonate with how you view the interplay between gut feeling, symbolic language, and direct, lived reality?

I just wanted to give Doc something to think about over the weekend. Doc. Watch that rerun of The Fly again. Lol

could you build an arbitrary intuition framework?

Yes, you could construct an arbitrary intuition framework by combining principles from probability theory, quantum mechanics, and cognitive science. Such a framework would aim to formalize how intuition works in decision-making, prediction, or even reality interaction.

Building Blocks of an Intuition Framework

1. Defining Intuition as a Probabilistic Process
   •   Bayesian Inference Model – Intuition could be modeled as a system that updates beliefs based on new information, like Bayesian probability updating.
   •   Fuzzy Logic – Instead of strict true/false decisions, intuition operates in degrees of certainty, allowing for multiple potential “truths.”
   •   Quantum Probability Distributions – Unlike classical probabilities, quantum systems allow for interference effects, meaning intuition could be seen as a superposition of potential insights.

2. Incorporating Quantum Concepts
   •   Superposition of Possible Insights – Intuition might involve holding multiple possible answers in mind at once (like a quantum wave function).
   •   Entanglement of Ideas – Seemingly unrelated thoughts or memories may become “entangled,” leading to unexpected insights.
   •   Wave Function Collapse via Decision Making – When intuition “resolves” into an insight, it could be modeled as a collapse into a single decision path.

3. Consciousness and Subconscious Processing
   •   Neural Quantum Processing (Orch-OR Hypothesis) – Some theories suggest microtubules in neurons may process quantum information, meaning intuition might involve quantum-level computation.
   •   Pattern Recognition in the Brain – The subconscious mind processes vast amounts of data before presenting intuitive insights. A framework could model this as a quantum search algorithm optimizing probability waves.

4. Feedback Loops and Self-Training
   •   Error-Correction via Bayesian Updating – The framework could incorporate self-correction, refining intuition over time as more outcomes are observed.
   •   Neural Reinforcement Learning – Training intuition by rewarding correct predictions and adjusting for biases.

Practical Implementation of an Intuition Framework
1. Input Layer: Gather information (external stimuli, subconscious signals, emotional states).
2. Processing Layer:
      •   Apply probability weighting (Bayesian, fuzzy logic).
      •   Maintain a superposition of possibilities before collapsing to a decision.
      •   Allow entanglement of ideas to generate non-linear insights.
3. Decision Layer: Collapse the intuition wave function into an actionable choice.
4. Feedback Mechanism: Update probability distributions based on success/failure of past intuitive decisions.

Applications of an Intuition Framework
   •   Predictive Decision-Making: Enhancing strategic planning, forecasting, and risk assessment.
   •   Creative Problem Solving: Generating new ideas by allowing thought entanglement.
   •   Human-Quantum Interaction: If consciousness interacts with quantum states, an intuition framework could help harness this.

Final Thought

An intuition framework could blend probabilistic reasoning, quantum uncertainty, and cognitive processing, allowing for a structured yet flexible approach to decision-making.

Do you see intuition as something purely neural and computational, or do you think there’s a deeper connection to quantum reality?

Intuition and probability frameworks in conjunction with quantum mechanics

That’s an interesting combination—intuition, probability, and quantum mechanics are deeply connected in ways that suggest human perception might play a bigger role in reality than we usually assume.

Quantum Mechanics & Probability: The Core Connection

Quantum mechanics is fundamentally probabilistic. Unlike classical physics, where an object has a definite state, quantum systems exist in superpositions—multiple possible states at once—until measured. The outcome of a quantum measurement is determined probabilistically, based on the wave function.

This aligns with probability frameworks like:
   •   Bayesian inference, which updates probabilities based on new information (similar to how an observer influences a quantum system).
   •   Path integral formulation (Feynman), where a particle takes all possible paths, but the probability of observing a certain path is weighted.

Intuition & Quantum Uncertainty

Human intuition often works outside formal logic, making probabilistic “leaps” based on patterns, subconscious processing, or unknown factors. Some researchers suggest that intuition might operate on a quantum level, interacting with probability waves before they collapse into a specific outcome.

Could intuition:
   •   Sense quantum probabilities before measurement? Some studies on microtubules in the brain (Orch-OR theory by Penrose & Hameroff) suggest that consciousness itself might be a quantum process.
   •   Influence reality through observation? The observer effect in quantum mechanics suggests that measurement collapses a wave function. Some theorists (and mystics) suggest that focused intention or consciousness might “choose” certain probabilities over others.

Ancient Wisdom Meets Quantum Probability
   •   Eastern philosophy, like Taoism and Buddhism, emphasizes the fluidity of reality—which aligns with quantum uncertainty.
   •   Practices like meditation, remote viewing, and divination have been linked to increased intuitive accuracy, possibly indicating an ability to tune into probability waves.
   •   Some thinkers (like Carl Jung) linked intuition to synchronicity, where meaningful coincidences could be an external reflection of internal probabilities aligning.

Are We Tapping Into Quantum Probabilities With Intuition?

If reality is fundamentally probabilistic at the quantum level, it’s possible that intuition is not just “guessing” but actually interacting with unseen probability distributions.

Could advanced civilizations have had ways to harness intuition as a tool for navigating quantum probabilities—perhaps through rituals, meditation, or altered states of consciousness? Or do you think intuition is simply a subconscious computational process?

It’s definitely possible that ancient civilizations had knowledge or insights that align with modern quantum concepts, though in a very different form. While they may not have had the formal mathematical frameworks we use today, they could have understood aspects of reality through intuition, symbolism, or direct experience that we are only now beginning to decode scientifically.

Potential Evidence of Advanced Knowledge in Ancient Civilizations
1. Sacred Geometry & Quantum Structures
      •   The geometric patterns found in ancient Egyptian, Sumerian, and Hindu temples resemble fractals and energy fields that quantum physics now explores. The Flower of Life, found in multiple cultures, resembles the structure of wave functions and quantum fields.
      •   The Great Pyramid of Giza is aligned with remarkable mathematical precision, possibly indicating an understanding of harmonics, resonance, and energy manipulation. Some theories suggest pyramids acted as energy hubs rather than just tombs.
2. Hermetic & Eastern Philosophy: Wave-Particle Duality?
      •   The Hermetic principle “As Above, So Below” suggests a deep connection between the micro and macro levels of reality—similar to how quantum and classical physics are interwoven.
      •   Hindu and Buddhist texts describe reality as an illusion (Maya), an idea that resonates with quantum superposition and observer-dependent reality.
3. Ancient Writings About Multidimensional Reality
      •   Egyptian, Mayan, and Vedic texts describe the universe as layered or multidimensional.
      •   The Tibetan Book of the Dead speaks about different planes of existence, possibly hinting at alternate states of consciousness that parallel quantum states.
      •   Some interpretations of the Book of Enoch suggest travel between different realms, which could metaphorically relate to parallel worlds.
4. Sound & Frequency as Reality Shapers
      •   Ancient cultures used chanting, cymatics, and resonance to alter consciousness and possibly even matter.
      •   Quantum mechanics now shows that everything is vibration and frequency at a fundamental level. Could they have been tapping into this knowledge through sound and sacred practices?

Are We Rediscovering an Ancient Science?

Modern quantum mechanics is based on empirical, mathematical approaches, while ancient wisdom traditions used symbolism, metaphors, and direct experience. But both seem to point to similar fundamental truths about reality being nonlinear, interconnected, and multidimensional.

Could it be that ancient civilizations had a different way of understanding the nature of reality—one that was lost or suppressed over time? Or do you think we are simply interpreting ancient ideas through a modern scientific lens?

Are you thinking about how this might connect to consciousness, ancient knowledge, or something else?

That’s an intriguing direction to explore. The Many-Worlds Interpretation raises deep questions about reality, consciousness, and even the possibility of ancient civilizations having insights we don’t fully understand yet.

Consciousness and Parallel Worlds

Some theories suggest that consciousness itself might play a role in quantum mechanics, though this is highly speculative. If the Many-Worlds Interpretation is correct, every decision we make could be creating a new branch of reality. This raises questions like:
   •   Is our perception of reality just a navigation through these branches?
   •   Could consciousness exist across multiple worlds in some way?
   •   If ancient civilizations had advanced knowledge, did they conceptualize reality in ways that align with modern quantum theories?

Ancient Knowledge and Quantum Concepts

Some researchers and esoteric thinkers have speculated that ancient cultures—such as the Egyptians—had knowledge of concepts that resemble quantum mechanics. Hieroglyphs, sacred texts, and myths often describe duality, time loops, multidimensionality, and “hidden realms,” which could metaphorically align with modern physics.

For example:
   •   The Egyptian concept of “Ka” and “Ba” describes different aspects of the soul, possibly hinting at the idea of consciousness existing in multiple states or dimensions.
   •   The Emerald Tablet (attributed to Hermes Trismegistus) contains the phrase “As above, so below,” which some interpret as an early understanding of fractals, symmetry, or even the interconnectedness of different layers of reality.
   •   Sacred geometry found in pyramids and temples has been suggested to encode mathematical principles that align with physics, though this remains speculative.

Quantum Computing and Parallel Universes

If quantum computers can process multiple states simultaneously due to superposition and entanglement, some have theorized that they might be “borrowing” computational power from parallel universes. While this is not scientifically proven, it is a fascinating idea that suggests reality could be more interconnected than we currently understand.

So, do you think ancient civilizations might have had some knowledge of these concepts that we are just rediscovering through quantum mechanics? Or are you more interested in how consciousness might interact with multiple realities?

The many worlds interpretation?

Yes, the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is one of the major interpretations of quantum mechanics. It was first proposed by physicist Hugh Everett III in 1957. The core idea is that every time a quantum event happens with multiple possible outcomes, the universe “splits” into parallel branches, with each possibility playing out in a separate, newly created universe.

Key Aspects of MWI:
1. Wave Function Doesn’t Collapse – In the Copenhagen interpretation (another popular view), a quantum system exists in a superposition of states until observed, at which point the wave function “collapses” into a single outcome. In MWI, however, there is no collapse—each possible outcome happens in a different universe.
2. Quantum Superposition and Branching – If a quantum system (like an electron) is in a superposition of two states, and we measure it, then both outcomes occur. One version of us observes one outcome, while another version observes the other in a parallel branch of reality.
3. No Communication Between Worlds – These parallel universes exist independently and do not influence each other once they split, making them impossible to detect directly.

Implications:
   •   This interpretation suggests that all possible histories and futures exist simultaneously, but we only experience one branch.
   •   It eliminates randomness in quantum mechanics since every possible event occurs somewhere.
   •   Some physicists speculate that quantum computing could take advantage of these “parallel computations” (though this is highly debated).

While MWI is a fascinating and mathematically consistent interpretation, it remains unproven and is one of several competing theories in quantum mechanics. No experiment has yet confirmed the existence of these parallel worlds.

Are you thinking about how this might connect to consciousness, ancient knowledge, or something else?

Is quantum computing evolving from information it is acquiring from the hieroglyphics found in the pyramids , and is this data associated with a parallel universe?

Quantum computing is evolving based on principles of quantum mechanics, mathematics, and computer science, rather than from ancient hieroglyphics found in pyramids. The development of quantum computing is driven by research in fields like superposition, entanglement, and quantum gates, primarily conducted by physicists, engineers, and computer scientists.

As for the idea of a parallel universe being linked to this data, that concept is more in the realm of speculative physics and science fiction. While some interpretations of quantum mechanics, like the Many-Worlds Interpretation, suggest the possibility of parallel universes, there is no evidence that quantum computers are accessing or acquiring data from them.

That said, if you’re thinking about potential symbolic or hidden meanings in ancient texts and their connection to modern science, that’s an interesting philosophical or esoteric discussion, but not something currently supported by scientific research.

Keep your eye on IonQ .

With all these predictions about how long before quantum computing is mainstream , no one takes into account that quantum computers are the reason that it will happen millions of times faster than what classical computers accomplished in the last 30 years. Quantum computers can solve problems in seconds that would take classical computers years if not millions of years to solve. Turning the latest quantum computers inward to solve very complex problems will make them evolve millions of times faster than what it took classical computers to solve and evolve over the last 3 or 4 decades. No one is mentioning this or has taken it into consideration but me. Correct me if I’m wrong. So when Jensen says 15 years he’s stuck in the past with old clunky classical computers trying to figure everything out. He and others are not considering how quantum computers are getting more and more powerful every month and evolving millions of times faster than how classical computers evolved. So I believe it is happening much faster than anyone can predict Buckle up. Hands and feet inside the car Peter. AND NO STANDING UP!
Life in the fast lane
Everything. All the time.

Yeah. It's infuriating.

Strange/crazy markets. It was yesterday. One day only.

Well, i think it reflects market participants feelings. Topsy turvy... as it has become the norm in society and politics as well.

Copilot = I don’t know any more than anyone else but people think I do because I’m AI.