Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) Share Price

Malik still has a billion shares. Just need a little cash.

It was definitely a pump fake by VP, but maybe it's time to pay the legal team and they need $$$. If they are confident about their hand they should file immediately and full court press the defendants, as they can reach a settlement at any time during a trial. This delay is not coming from a position of strength in my opinion. The question I ask is if their weakness is financial, or is there no quantifiable path towards monetization of the patents? I sincerely hope I'm wrong.

Que the dumping of 36+ million shares by Babs in 3...2...1...

Anyone think the timing might be a bit suspicious on this one? 

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1410738/000010747625000004/xsl144X01/primary_doc.xml

Ppl just don't get it......even after decades of the same diversionary bullcrap. Vplm is built on delays, push backs, rehashes, redos, extentions .......ANYTHING.......to divert shareholders attention away from the reality of a successful share selling scheme. Look up... Look down.... See my thumb, gee your dumb.
Ppl here seem to have no memory.

My interpretation is this... "they asked for an extension, we gave it to them" (perhaps based on some level of negotiations). "we don't trust them, so we have no intention of extending this out for the entire 90-days if no progress has been made in a month"

Getting interesting again!

"Is a Combined $350 Billion Resolution for VoIP-Pal Antitrust and Class Action Complaints Getting Closer?

My editorial analyzes the two significant complaints filed by VoIP-Pal, and I caution readers to form their own conclusions. My perspective could be wrong, half-right, or entirely correct—only time will tell."

What a dingleberry...

Here is the catch in this article:

VoIP-Pal aims to explore opportunities for meaningful settlement discussions to achieve its primary objective: a fair financial resolution. The Company is striving to make progress by February 28, 2025, recognizing this as a goal subject to the inherent complexities of litigation.

I also aim to explore opportunities.... What the hell, LMAO!!!

VoIP-Pal Announces Objective for Financial Settlement by February 28, 2025
Press Release | 01/27/2025
WACO, Texas, Jan. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VoIP-Pal.com Inc. (“VoIP-Pal,” “Company”) (OTCQB: VPLM) is pleased to provide shareholders with an update on the Company’s ongoing antitrust and Class Action litigation against major telecommunications providers. https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VPLM/news?id=465752

Why not give your own? Certainly been enough info thrown out here...

Sure would like to hear Rap's read on all this...

Oops... "....which resulted in a steady, nonstop decrease in pricing and features and choices.“

SHOULD READ:

“....which resulted in a steady, nonstop decrease in pricing AND addition of features and choices."

As I was writing my feelings/opinions, I couldn't help but realize what you just pointed out. I purposely left it alone, not because it negated my whole posture that the lawsuits were ridiculous and bogus, but because I also realized what you should've realized and noted.. And that is that 1st of all, if you carefully read st8-talks story and responses to my questions, it became obvious at least to me that he was not being as forthcoming as I thought he should have and the story was full of holes, to which I couldn't tell if it was just his not paying attention to what he was ordering, in the sense of "hey, just gimme the works and bill... I don't care about the details" ....or.....if he instead chose one of the 3 plans (which I posted what they were) and got connected with an unscrupulous salesman who said to himself: "hmmm, looks like I've got a live one here so lemme sock it to him and see if he signs". Obviously it was 1 or the other it appears. Well, I'd have to say your point, that either way, it would not be the policy of AT&T nor the rest of the carriers/industry. That should be obvious when you know and see that all the carriers have straightforward published deals and could never get away with a policy of treating customers that way on a regular and ongoing basis. IF THEY DID, THEN I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU 100%........BUT ITS NOT ONLY NOT THE WAY THEY OPERATE, BUT IF YOU STUDY THE LAWSUITS, YOU SEE THAT THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH A SCENARIO LIKE THAT WHICH I JUST DESCRIBED. Therefore, it's either purposely or unpurposely that you have applied a very disingenuous bent to it, as that's not what the suits claim. They claim collaboration and being in cahoots with ea other and sweeping antitrust violations and how the carriers are a monopoly, none of which is even remotely true in fact just the opposite is the case. The simple truth, aside from any unsmart buyers and/or unscrupulous salesmen, there is lots of diversity, healthy competition, vast increases in speed, clarity, reliability, functionality, etc etc AND....which resulted in a steady, nonstop decrease in pricing and features and choices. THAT......is why the lawsuits are frivolous and are nothing more than more diversion from Vplm to divert ppls attention away from their share selling scheme which has gone on for many years.

If you multiply that kind of behavior over several to tens of millions of customers, that adds up to some serious money....RICO worthy I would say!

The funniest and most ironic thing is that all the shareholders who ignore facts and common sense built up for near 3 decades, are quick to jump on the bandwagon to blame all the telecoms, but not see the possibility of being scammed by vplm.
Hahahahahahahaha

Isn't that amazing! So I am solely responsible, due to my knowledge and research, for you getting $380 refund and with new discounts noted, likely well over $400, not to mention (so I will) the unknown amount of money you would have kept on paying ea month, which could very well have amounted to several thousand dollars easily........and your best appreciation for that is "thanks for the nudge"....

wow.

Your kindness and generosity is matched only by your good looks and charming personality...

If someone had done the same for me, I would've been so blown away and embarrassed, I wouldn't have known what to say. Guess that's the difference between you and I.

Also, my original post was designed to support my contention that the idea of a monopoly and antitrust violations was pure bull that will not stand a chance in a non corrupt court. It was very important, in my opinion, to backup and support my view of the lawsuits. You thought that your allowing yourself to be ripped off by your carrier supported your view that I was wrong. I proved to you that when you know what you're doing and dealing with an honest salesman, the prices are indeed cheap for what you get....even from the known most expensive carrier out there...

.....and yet you did not acknowledge that either.

Your welcome..

NYT- after an 1 hour and 29 mins. Got the AT&T Bill squared away. Got $380 credited back and a few discounts added. Appreciate the nudge!

I had posted the information to you in the morn around 8:30. You had no problem replying to greenback club in the afternoon, but no reply to me for the whole day. By the time I said something about it, it was late night. Also, most airlines have wifi available.
All 3 family plans from AT&T, as the details I posted show, include internet. It is not extra. That's true of pretty much all cell plans...they come with internet. It's not extra, so I don't know why you say you're paying an additional charge of $90. They simply do not charge extra for internet. Support does not cost extra either. All cellphone deals have support available. I'm sure the law says they must offer some kind of support when something isn't working right or you have questions. My guess is that would be universal with all cell phone plans. So you must be talking about having purchased other premium services, like I said in my orig post. For example:

No, support doesn't cost extra on AT&T cellular family plans. However, there may be additional costs for apps and data plans.
Apps
AT&T Secure Family: This app costs $7.99 per month, with the first 30 days free. The subscription renews automatically each month unless canceled.

So THAT is not "support", it's a way to spy on your kids...

Also, as I mentioned, ea one of the 3 family plans comes with data. It's not extra. They have some special extra data that can be purchased but I don't see where that is needed on the family plans.

So bottom line is most likely some salesman thought he got "a live one" on the line when you called for service and sold you all kinds of unnecessary or mostly unnecessary extras which, if you really pay $470 per mo, they cost you more than double the cost of the family plan, regardless of which of the 3 plans you have. If it's the top of the line plan at $50.99 per line, you're paying more than double! If the middle tier plan at $40.99, then you're paying near triple and if it's the cheapest family plan at $35.99 per line, your paying closer to 3 and a half times the price. Which plan do you have? If you actually wanted all those extras, then it's not at all fair for you to state how cellular family plans cost $470 or more, like you said in OP. And if you did not need or want all those extras they got you for, then it looks like I've been able to save you over $250 per month very easily...

The high end family plan on AT&T, which comes with ALOT, is only $50.99 per mo. And THEY are the most expensive carrier out there currently. This goes to my original point, that due to competition and fair market practices, it resulted in the most value for your money than ever before and more choices, features and functions, NOT the other way around! Looks like you called them and said "gimme 4 lines with all the toppings and sock it to me good, thankyou very much!!!

Was on planes most of day. Beat me to the punch. Looked at bill, and I’ll be dang. Every phone has insurance and support fees! Definitely making a call to AT&T in the morning! It did include $90 internet which I do need. Glad you pointed it out.

No reply from you. Hmmmmm

That’s what Captain Cut & Paste does…it’s all he does. I think he may be a bot running on poorly written software.

$.00878, VWAP $.0089, UP 7%...GREEN, GREEN, GREEN; three in a row! Well, all I am hearing is GREAT! Different sources, but all GREAT and the stock is picking up a bit!

Again, the VWAP is volume weighted average price and it gives a better idea of trading in a stock, vs. open/close, over the given period. VPLM will show in PPS when things really heat up and I don't think that will be too long! No new lows and trading around 75% above the recent low of $.005...

It has gone pretty quiet here and that is fine. When the VPLM 🚀 blasts off, wonder what will be said then... You know ROARING🦌🏀z will be up for some smack-talk...

Don't forget, we still have the reconsideration hanging, as is the HUGE amzn lawsuit... MANY CATALYSTS...Target still $.85/share(nearly100 to one from here)......ROARING🦌🏀z out!

Ongoing settlement talks and finding a resolution to the rico claims were the just cause reasons for requesting the extension

Like that statement

Means nothing. Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.

Something is very wrong here. You should not be paying anything close to $470, even tho AT&T is the most expensive carrier out there, by far. So again, I must ask you...are you paying for other things also, like insurance, cost of phones, or an other special fees above and beyond 4 line including data? If so, you can't count extras when looking at service line cost. If you do have any of those extras, it sounds highly exorbitant. If you do not have any extras, then I have to say you are either greatly mistaken about what your bill is or you're being ripped off somehow...

My carrier is Visible. They are an MVNO and a subsidiary of Verizon. My service is on the Verizon network. I get the same service as regular Verizon with these exceptions: my bill is $25 all inclusive of any taxes and fees. My internet is truly unlimited with no throttling or data caps. It does have what is known as "prioritization", which means that at times when traffic/usage is heavy, the system automatically lowers my data speed so that that regular Verizon customers continue to recieve full speed. Most of the time it's not noticeable. If you need it, I'm sure your plan gives you faster data speeds.

AT&T has 3 family plans currently. Here they are:

Our best plan

AT&T Unlimited Premium® PL
$
50.99/mo. per line
when you get 4 lines
Unlimited talk, text, & high-speed data that can’t slow down based on how much you use
AT&T ActiveArmorSM advanced security
Free app with Spam Call Blocking, Public Wi-Fi Protection, Identity Monitoring, and more.
See details
60GB hotspot data per line per month
Unlimited talk, text & high-speed data in 20 Latin American countries
No extra cost.

4K UHD streaming available
AT&T Signature Program member

With the Signature Program, you’ll save $10/mo. or $120 per year, per line, when you get up to 5 lines.
_____________________________

AT&T Unlimited Extra® EL
$
40.99/mo. per line
when you get 4 lines
Unlimited talk, text, data + 75GB of high-speed data
After 75GB, AT&T may temporarily slow data speeds if the network is busy.

AT&T ActiveArmorSM advanced security
Free app with Spam Call Blocking, Public Wi-Fi Protection, Identity Monitoring, and more.
See details
30GB hotspot data per line per month
Standard streaming
__________________________

AT&T Unlimited Starter® SL
$
35.99/mo. per line
when you get 4 lines
Unlimited talk, text & data
AT&T may temporarily slow data speeds if the network is busy.

AT&T ActiveArmorSM security
Free app with Spam Call Blocking and more.
See details
5GB hotspot data per line per month
Standard streaming available
______________________________________________

AT&T bases their family plans on a per line basis, so the top plan is $50.99 per line for a total of slightly over $200 per mo. Taxes and fees are extra. There are certain limitations such as your Hotspot are limited, depending on which plan used. My Hotspot is unlimited but likely slower speed than yours.

Your next level down on family plans is $40.99. Has some limitations. So that would be slightly over $160 per.

The 3rd level is $35.99 so around $140 p/m

So you have $200, $160 and $140 per mo on AT&T's 3 available family plans. How do you come up with $470?


Verizon has a 4 line family plan for $100.

myPlan for just $25/line - Switch and save at Verizon - Our most flexible plans ever
Unlimited Welcome $25/line/month for 4 lines with Auto Pay. Plus taxes & fees. When you bring your own phones. Terms apply. Choose Your Plan Perks. Special Offers.

Tmobile has two 4 line family plans. The budget one is $120 and the top plan is $240

Let’s not forget there’s Amazon with a pending trial date, yet to be determined. New “bet the farm” attorney (LMAO), joining the fight.

A joint venture with these three companies, would be the logical course to take. A few billion each, Win-win, IMHO. Take over the RBR patents, and recoup their investment.

I can’t imagine anyone one of these companies would want Amazon owning VPLM!

It’s going to get interesting, IMHO

I use AT&T. The $470 is family of 4 unlimited with Internet. Please tell me your who your carrier is with! I recently changed from Verizon.

Forgot to mention, my deal also incl 5G coverage and working service. Not everyone has yet.

If you are paying $470 for a family plan, I'll venture you are being ripped off royally! Or if you just believe that's the kind of costs out there, you're sorely mistaken and believing someone's major BS. I pay $25 for everything, unlimited, no throttling, a hotspot, no taxes or other fees, texting to Canada and Mexico, etc. There is no family plan so a family of 4 would pay $100 flat. I know Verizon postpay has 2 lines for $55.

As of early 2025, the average cost for a cellular family plan with multiple lines of unlimited data is around $100 per month for a four-line plan, with carriers like T-Mobile often offering the most competitive pricing, while Verizon and AT&T may be slightly higher depending on the specific plan chosen; remember to factor in potential taxes and fees when comparing prices.
Key points about average family plan costs:
Variation by carrier:
T-Mobile generally offers the most affordable family plan options, followed by Verizon and then AT&T.
Number of lines:
A four-line family plan typically costs around $100 per month for unlimited data, while a two-line plan might be significantly cheaper.
Consider promotions:
Check for current promotions and discounts when comparing plans, as carriers often offer deals to attract new customers.

It is all the competition that has been out there that has resulted in the cheapest prices ever, in the history of cellular plus ever increasing functions and services.

I'd love to hear exactly what you're getting for $470?....who charges that for what? And as, I've already pointed out, who would want a standalone wifi calling plan? Especially with a family, you will always need the network calling when away from home. So wifi calling by itself is a stupid idea. Instead, you get the tremendous value of network AND wifi calling, whichever is needed at the time.

You sound highly misinformed. There is no monopoly. There is no antitrust. There is no huge unfair profits such as, you suggest. My phone and all the services I get with it, is easily the best bargain and value I've ever gotten from anything..

What do you have, a family of 12 plus a bunch of expensive phones to be paid off as part of your bill.

$.00825, VWAP $.0083, UP 2%: Green again, I LIKE IT!

"Not newsworthy"? Well, my feeling is that might be about to change... VPLM "not newsworthy", but worth the time for thousands of posts...🙃🤔? Whatever...

So, we get the service extension and still waiting on the reconsideration... All good!

Got to keep throwing this out there: If I'm wrong(YEAH, RIGHT!!!🤣), 100% down from here... Now, if I'm correct, we hit my $.85/share target, that's 100+ times on $$ investment or 10,000% return... Put in $100, it becomes $10,000...$1000 becomes $100,000...$10,000 becomes a $MIL. Most can figure this out, but don't think about it. VPLM, for many, will be very positively meaningful... THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE! Some don't and that's what makes a market.

All the chatter is just that until the end. Asking/receiving a service extension is HUGE; it ain't happening without positive conversations between litigants, in my belief.

"Not newsworthy" with the largest class-action/anti-trust/RICO lawsuits ever, just simmering below the surface??? REALLY? OK, we will see...

Ah, what the heck: PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE AND VPLM IS SITTING IN ITS BEST POSITION EVER... I heard that somewhere before... ROARING 🦌🏀z OUT!


I really don't think Ray Leon and others signed on for chump-change!

NYT - $470 for family plans or even higher is a simple reason for why! A nice article on the cost of Bundle-a-Rooski plans and how they effect the huge margins of these large companies.

Str8t-talk, VPLM will probably have more news coverage once things start to heat up with these court cases, especially if/when we get a favorable ruling/s.

Why? State your case for why an obviously frivolous and diversionary case would make national news. Vplm has, never made the news because it's not newsworthy.

Something tells me this should have more National News coverage?

Thank you, GreenBackClub, for posting these court filings. You are providing a valuable service to the VPLM community.

No.

Do you work for big tech? That is what many posters say. 

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
District Of Columbia District Court
Judge: Randolph D Moss
Case #: 1:24-cv-03051
Nature of Suit 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust
Cause 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Filed: Oct 25, 2024
Docket
Parties (54)
Docket last updated: 9 hours ago
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
order Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Set/Reset Deadlines Tue 01/21 8:00 PM
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's First Motion to Extend the Time for Service of Process, Dkt.8 , it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and that Plaintiff must effectuate service of process on Defendants on or before April 23, 2025. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/21/2025. (lcrdm1)
—

INZA et al v. AT&T INC. et al
District Of Columbia District Court
Judge: Randolph D Moss
Case #: 1:24-cv-03054
Nature of Suit 410 Other Statutes - Antitrust
Cause 15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Filed: Oct 25, 2024
Docket
Parties (56)
Docket last updated: 9 hours ago
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
order Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Set/Reset Deadlines Tue 01/21 7:26 PM
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' First Motion for Extension of Time to Serve, Dkt.6 , it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may effect service on or before April 23, 2025. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/21/2025. (lcrdm2)

More silliness...

The USPTO approved every patent application vplm gave it... and....

The ptab, an arm of the USPTO, gave a positive decision on every IPR vplm got hit with.

DUH!

$.0081, VWAP $.0081, UP 8%: A double GREEN $.0081, that's got to be GREAT, right?

Hearing some great things, but it's a "he said", "he said", "he said" situation, so just take it for that...

Looking for some developments soon... I would guess the chats must be going well...

Looking forward... ROARING🦌🏀z OUT!

Great news for patent holders and VPLM shareholders. President Trump names new acting director to uspto.
https://ipwatchdog.com/2025/01/20/trump-names-coke-stewart-acting-director-uspto/id=185229/

Let me clarify this, if I could predict what’s going to happen, I’d be loading up! lol

Let’s see how this plays out! Hopefully, it’ll be a win, win for all parties.

IMHO

Nobody knows what’s going to happen! If I did, I’d be loading up!

IMHO

Laughable how some who lack intelligence openly show it to the world by trying to sound intelligent and failing. That's what too much processed cheese does to them. You are quite right and it's an important overarching point......that NO ONE has shown any concern for vplm for all these yrs. Says it all, rather than all the pseudo intellectualizing over ea and every smaller point. I'll never forget how Vplm was afraid to send out infringement letters for a very long time while being urged to do so. Then finally they sent some of the letters BUT they were not serious. They informed the accused infringers that "they might be" infringing and should look into it. They were basically love letters not infringement letters. And one by one, ea company told vplm they were not infringing and they should go pound salt. The companies were not the least bit concerned then and haven't been since. Sometimes you hear the dumb argument that goes "then why do they fight back against vplm in court"......because they can't process the simple idea that when accused you have to defend yourself or be found guilty by default. And we mustn't forget that these same dumb cheeseheads keep donating monies to the emus go fund me page so there's always plenty of cash or shares at vplm disposal to keep the WHOPPERS coming that seem to support their scheme ongoing.

Common sense should tell truly intelligent peeps that if the patents were really all they've been cracked up to be by the lying vplm, ie, worth more than pretty much ANYTHING been on the market ever, when all considerations are taken into account, one or more of the big dog telecoms would've snatched up the patents long ago and in doing so, secured an untold fortune PLUS at the same time, made sure that none of their competitors snatched up the patents out from under them. I've been saying for the last 8 to 10 years that human nature dictates that a mountain of gold would never be left sitting in the middle of the road just waiting to get snatched up. That is very common sense. It just doesn't happen. So that overarching truth negates any and all of the smaller arguments that try to explain how and why vplm is doing well in this fight.

You’ll be shocked, not me. Although I might be shocked with the PPS amount! lol

Your post (s) lack intelligence! You just can’t process what’s happening! Therefore, you bash with fake news!

VPLM isn’t the one shaking in their shoes and high heels!

IMHO

If this doesn’t concern both T-Mobile and Amazon, I’d be shocked!

Be prepared to be shocked. No one has been concerned about VPLM for the last 20 years and they certainly are not about to be. Obviously your post was lacking common sense. Oh, are we really going to start with the Euro patents again?? LMAO!!

But, that’s me.

Yep, you and about a dozen other practical thinkers, LMAO!!! The rest of the world disagrees.

History shows that this is just talk and that nothing will happen. Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.

Well, in case you haven’t heard, VPLM is requesting that the Court grant a 90-day extension of the time for service of process, with Verizon and AT&T.

This extension will allow the parties to discuss Verizon and AT&T’s REQUEST, and NEGOTIATE a settlement to this dispute!!!!

And that pal, is a LMAO!!!

If this doesn’t concern both T-Mobile and Amazon, I’d be shocked! I can’t imagine either company would want Verizon and AT&T owning VPLM’s patents, aka RBR ‘606 plus the ‘815/‘005, Euro patents and the antitrust/RICO cases!….. But, that’s me.

IMHO

Mandate...no mandate....who gives a shit? If the public likes and wants EVs, the manufacturers will build and sell them. Trump doesn't even understand the meaning of the word mandate. He claims he was given a mandate by the voters....meanwhile he won by how much....1.5% or something like that? I think all the previous recent presidents had much larger percentages than that. I don't call that a mandate.

When Vplm hired that Aussie boutique bank or whatever it was, to go ahead and try to sell the patents, it claimed to have a mandate from Vplm to do so. At the time, I posted there was no mandate, just a request or an allowance for them to try. The response to me was I was making something out of nothing. There is so misuse of words. Meanings count. Meanings matter.

Could it be maybe...that a patent friendly judge is only friendly to patents that have proven to be what they've been cracked up to be by their hypesters and not so friendly to those only interested in selling shares via a "story"?