Stratos Renewables Corporation (PK) (SRNW) Share Price

Great volume today 433 shares total volume.

IG

Obviously you don't understand that Sharp filing an S-1 under the 1940 Act will never pass SEC comments.

The 1940 Act’s heavy compliance load—detailed investment policies, leverage limits, board requirements—clashes with the lean, scrappy nature of OTC firms. They’d rather wrestle with a 1933 Act S-1 than touch 1940.

OTC companies—especially microcaps like those George Sharp often digs into—tend to stick to the Securities Act of 1933 for initial offerings or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for ongoing reporting and secondary offerings. The 1940 Act is more niche, usually reserved for entities like mutual funds or hedge funds, not the typical penny stock operating company you see on the OTC markets.

This is another excuse not a reason for withdrawing the S-1.

IG

I would think that if GS wished for someone to cease doing something he disliked (and they cared about him) they would grant him his wish. Don't you?

Just wondering.

Obviously you don't understand that Sharp filing an S-1 under the 1940 Act will never pass SEC comments.

The 1940 Act’s heavy compliance load—detailed investment policies, leverage limits, board requirements—clashes with the lean, scrappy nature of OTC firms. They’d rather wrestle with a 1933 Act S-1 than touch 1940.

OTC companies—especially microcaps like those George Sharp often digs into—tend to stick to the Securities Act of 1933 for initial offerings or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for ongoing reporting and secondary offerings. The 1940 Act is more niche, usually reserved for entities like mutual funds or hedge funds, not the typical penny stock operating company you see on the OTC markets.

This is another excuse not a reason for withdrawing the S-1.

IG

That means Sharp needed cash for his horses.

When Sharp does anything it is to benefit himself - he doesn't care about shareholders.

IG

You really are just a bottom feeding pumper boy.

Don has been around a long time and a very vocal supporter of Sharp. He has earned the right as a long time shareholder of SRNW - Sharp doesn't have any excuse for doing anything positive for SRNW.

Only an idiot pumper boy would tell Don to move on. You are a classless pumping clown.

IG

SRNW is a Sharp shell that he doesn't have any excuses for doing a reverse merger etc.

SRNW should complain. Demand Sharp to provide details on why it is taking so long to do something positive.

IG

Been here years so yeah if I wanna moan I will thanks.  Been a big supporter of this for long time.   Sharp needs to deliver and start bringing this share price up period 

Well, hit the bids and go away if all you can do is moan and groan. sheesh

I've got way more shares that you and been here a lot longer thanks.   

Why don't you just hit the bids and go away?

All I see is a lot of chatter here.   If your confident slap the fking ask.   Period 

ok now thr pooch will be upset...pls don't send him to " already done almost a half a million dollars in business converted to performance equity and in the process removed $2 million dollars worth of debt off the balance sheet.

About to do $3 million plus in business for the year from just one division of the four divisions they have.

A CEO that works 80 hour weeks for no pay has invested almost two and a half million dollars of his own money. Never sold a share has kept dilution to a minimum and is building a public corporation that has four companies with a monster future in front of them. All under one umbrella."

aka the #1 scam of the OTC :)

Thanks MrSmith18 for this great analysis.

Earlier you had mentioned that mergers could be delayed by tariffs. But if SRNW incoming is an international company looking to bypass tariffs and move to USA, then tariffs could actually accelerate an SRNW merger? Thanks again

This is what we knew prior to this tweet...
Forwardly, Inc. (OTCMKT: FORW) has invested $400,000 in Stratos Renewables Corporation (OTCPink: SRNW) by purchasing 2,000,000 units. Each unit comprises one share of SRNW common stock and two warrants:
- Warrant A: Allows the purchase of one additional share at $0.30, exercisable by December 31, 2024.
- Warrant B: Allows the purchase of one additional share at $0.50, exercisable by December 31, 2026.
Therefore, FORW holds a total of 4,000,000 SRNW warrants—2,000,000 at each exercise price.

What remains and has changed is the following:
2m warrants...
- Warrant B: Allows the purchase of one additional share at $0.10, exercisable by December 31, 2026.
----------------------------
GS’s latest tweet about repricing SRNW warrants to $0.10 is definitely a welcome development. The fact that he’s already exercised 200,000 of the remaining 2M warrants at this price means FORW just moved $20K into SRNW—and likely establishes SRNW’s new floor at $0.10.

What does this mean? A couple of key takeaways:

1️⃣ GS is signaling confidence. By transferring $20K into SRNW, he’s implying a firm floor price of $0.10. More importantly, by exercising only 200K warrants instead of all 2M, he’s showing that he plans to **let the remaining 1.8M appreciate** post-merger. If that weren’t the case, he could have simply repriced all of them without exercising any.

2️⃣ FORW stands to gain significant liquidity. Those 200K shares will be sold post-merger, adding much-needed cash to FORW’s balance sheet. The big question: How high does SRNW open?

- If the merger is with a crypto startup, it could debut at $1, giving GS $2M in immediate liquidity, while his remaining 1.8M warrants would be worth $18M on paper. At that level, the merged company would have a $50M market cap.
- If SRNW merges with an international firm looking to enter the U.S. market to bypass Trump’s tariffs, we could be looking at a $10 opening price—and a $500M market cap, ...or much higher!

Big moves ahead.
JMHO.

Hi MrSmith18, did you see the follow-up that he lowered the strike price for SRNW warrants to 10 cents and FORW exercised 200,000 of the warrants? What do you think that means? Thanks

LOL - exactly the response I expected from the 🤡 crew.

The long-awaited PR has finally arrived, and it was pretty straightforward. GS's S-1 filing under the 1940 Act may see "changes" in 2025, with the key adjustments likely being internal.

My take? Ligand seems to be approaching significant approvals in Q2, while SRNW's warrants could gain traction with a merger. If either of these materializes, GS may continue treating FORW as an investment company and maintain the 1940 Act filing. If not, he could remove both investments and switch to filing under the 1934 Act.

Meanwhile, he's still hunting for deals. As I mentioned earlier, despite crypto’s recent surge, its near-term trajectory remains uncertain. With Trump locked in a tariff battle, I’d say crypto as well as any potential mergers are on the back burner for now.

JMHO

What has Sharp accomplished - issuing a fluff filed press release - talk is cheap.

I believe your opinion on the press release isn't $0.02 but more like trips.

Providing is providing a PR from a non-reporting company that doesn't have any disclosure regulations.

Generally, it’s easier to get an S-1 approved under the 1933 Act than under the 1940 Act, assuming you’re not an investment company.

Here’s why:
Scope: The 1933 Act focuses on disclosure for one offering. The 1940 Act demands ongoing regulatory alignment—your whole business gets dissected.

SEC Questions: Under 1933, comments are about clarity (e.g., “Define your market risk”). Under 1940, they’re structural (e.g., “Prove you’re not over-leveraged”), requiring deeper analysis and often operational changes.

Cost and Time: A 1933 Act S-1 might take 2-6 months and $100K-$500K in fees for a small firm. A 1940 Act filing doubles or triples that due to specialized legal work and compliance—Forwardly’s withdrawal proves the point.

Flexibility: The 1933 Act lets most companies pass with good paperwork. The 1940 Act locks you into a narrow lane—deviate, and you’re stuck.

Investment Company Act of 1940: S-1 in Context
Purpose: Regulates companies whose primary business is investing in securities (e.g., mutual funds, hedge funds). If the SEC deems you an “investment company,” you must register under this act, even for an S-1 offering.

Process: Filing an S-1 under the 1940 Act means you’re not just disclosing an offering—you’re registering as an investment company. This piles on extra requirements: investment policies, portfolio details, compliance with leverage and diversification rules, and often a separate Form N-1A (for mutual funds) or similar. The S-1 becomes a hybrid, blending 1933 Act disclosure with 1940 Act obligations.

Scrutiny: Much higher. The SEC doesn’t just check disclosure—they evaluate your structure against 1940 Act rules. Are you really an investment company? Do your investments comply? This can lead to existential questions, not just clarifications.

Difficulty: Significantly harder. The 1940 Act’s rules are complex—legal and accounting burdens soar. Forwardly withdrew their S-1 because the “burden of work and expense” was too much, a common reaction when hit with this shift.

Hopefully that helps you understand the Act of 1940 and reduce your giddiness about Sharp duping you once again.

IG

My 2 cents on the PR. It has the bashers in a frenzy now, as they can't claim that Sharp has abandoned his tickers anymore. lol

"Forwardly continues to entertain additional partnerships with legitimate enterprises".

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/forwardly-inc-provides-shareholder-150500402.html

Hi MrSmith18, what did you think of the FORW PR that was just announced? Seems like there was not as much info as we expected. The website that it links to is also down.

What do you think this means for FORW and SRNW? Thanks

That was my understanding as well.  Thought I was missing something. Who cares really.  It's tradeable.  He can apply when he has something for the shell. 

And what was the price in November? Just avoiding your obvious wrong statement like a 🤡. Incredible!

The MM sponsored 211 comes when the new business entity comes, ATVK did it. You should know this. The OTC Link sponsored 211 now is just fine. We all see quotes and we are free to trade it on our brokerage accounts. The OTCLink sponsored 211 is no issue.

Is he actually allowed to file that form when the stock is a shell ?

The price on 12/06/2022 $0.4380.

But the real question is why hasn't Sharp brought a merger candidate to the table in over 3 years.

And why hasn't Sharp filed a 211 in those 3 years? They are still a Unsolicited Quotes Only stocks and why is it still a shell after all these years.

IG

Friday night (on this side of the planet) cheers 🍷 to all of us who still "Believe in George"

I do...

"Prost" & may the remainder of 2025 belong to us and SRNW 

Yes it was, but:
Search Labs | AI Overview

The forward split for SRNW (Stratos Renewables Corporation) was effective on December 16, 2022, with a split ratio of 5:1.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Split Date: December 16, 2022
Split Ratio: 5:1
Refinitiv Data: Refinitiv data indicates the last split factor was 5:1, with the last split date being 2022-12-16
Was there TWO of them in 2022?
Search Labs | AI Overview

Stratos Renewables Corporation (SRNW) had a forward stock split of 5:1 on January 13, 2022.
Here's a breakdown of the details:

Date:
The split was effective on January 13, 2022.

Type:
It was a forward stock split, meaning the company increased the number of outstanding shares and proportionally decreased the stock price.

Ratio:
The split was a 5-for-1 split, meaning for every one share held before the split, shareholders received five shares after the split.

Effect:
The stock price per share decreased to one-fifth of its pre-split price, while the number of shares outstanding increased fivefold.

Ticker Symbol:
The ticker symbol for SRNW, Stratos Renewables Corporation, remained the same.


This is what the 5-year SRNW chart at Barcharts now looks like:

LMAO-re"When was SRNW in dollarland" Most of the second half of 2022 $SRNW was well over 1 dollar and over 2 dollars. Just about 25X from today's prices...

And of course I back it up with FACTS!

You are posting about 10X runs on all of the Sharp scams. But you never back it up with facts.

When was SRNW in dollarland.

"Just patiently waiting for the 10X first move here back to dollar land. Then upon completion of the deal, maybe a 50X move..."

You are a pathetic bottom feeding pumper. None of your Loony predictions are ever true.

IG

OMG-REALLY?-You-forgot?-LMAO-re"When was SRNW in dollarland" Most of the second half of 2022 $SRNW was well over 1 dollar and over 2 dollars. And you post facts huh? Sad really...

LMAO - I 💕 the bashays here. They keep the dialog fresh and keep attention focused on the Sharp Reverse Merger shells. Without them the boards would be dead and desolate. next...

Dude why you spewing this.   Just sit back and relax.  By you saying this stuff you kick the hornets nest and then bashers come back out and bash non stop.   If your positive bout it great sit back no need to be giving out price targets and all of that.  No one knows when exactly does this reverse merger. Till then be nice for a drama free zone.  Thanks 

You are posting about 10X runs on all of the Sharp scams. But you never back it up with facts.

When was SRNW in dollarland.

"Just patiently waiting for the 10X first move here back to dollar land. Then upon completion of the deal, maybe a 50X move..."

You are a pathetic bottom feeding pumper. None of your Loony predictions are ever true.

IG

Smart investors always cut their losses but OTC investors keep holding and watch their investment disappear.

Now you are left begging for a miracle.

Sharp has gone silent except yammering about other scams - when he has devastated investors in his scams.

IG

Just patiently waiting for the 10X first move here back to dollar land. Then upon completion of the deal, maybe a 50X move...

I think you need to pay more attention to detail. I'm not the one bashing any of the Sharp shells.

Ohhh i see now The. Beloved GVSI down to 0034 and down -8percent and you thought it would be a good idea to come here and share your positive energy.  Ohh ok. 

What's funny ?   Go back to gvsi board.   Real people have real money here.  Bashing one shell over the other makes a lot of sense

01234 sp 😁

Your statements are lies, and your assumptions are nonsense. Otherwise it sounds like 🤡 talk. Just insane...

Still here.   Not saying much.   Bashers can bash.   10k due at the end of the month.  

So far in 6 years as the CEO of FORW - Sharp hasn't accomplished anything but enriching himself

He has been the CEO of the 3 hijacked shells and has accomplished anything.

I know but this time it is going to be different - just how gullible are you?

You keep waiting for the pumping PR.

Damn, you are underwater on all of the Sharp square selling schemes. But keep trying to pump this garbage.

IG

The pending PR. And, of course, the 🤡s that say it will never happen will be scrambling to try to diminish the deal, whatever it is... LMAO

BULLSHIT! the pending PR?.

Keep an eye on FORW—someone has been steadily accumulating large blocks at the offer over the past few weeks. We might find out why once GS releases the pending PR.

Quick rundown:
- GVSI was a shareholder-driven pump-and-dump. Never liked the ticker, still don’t, and won’t unless GS cleans up the mess with at least a 1:10,000 reverse split.
- WNFT had potential until Callesse derailed it. Might be worth holding, but if its future hinges on NFT adoption, give it another year or two. A name change by GS could make its share structure attractive for a solid deal.
- SRNW moves with FORW—when one runs, the other will follow.

JMHO.

MrSmith18, this is the best question. There was no direct update about this deal. Share structures for SRNW are exactly the same as back then. No evidence of a new deal after this.

What's going on?

Whatever became of this?

Just wondering.

TIA

Call him and ask him.  No one knows why here 

Sharp has to file a Form 211 before they can do a reverse merger.

It has been over 3 years and Sharp hasn't accomplished anything of value for SRNW.

On September 8, 2021 when the price was $0.1900.

So the price is down 35% but there isn't any volume today is 300 Buys and 1000 Sells.

Why won't Sharp announce why he hasn't done anything with SRNW?

IG