NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Options

NVDA ☝️😎 NVDG$

is our world non-linear but the way we measure it is via linear measurement? we destroy the entanglement as we do our measurements?



Show thinking
Okay, let's break down these two interesting questions based on our understanding on Tuesday, April 29, 2025, here in Boston.

1. Is our world non-linear but the way we measure it is via linear measurement?

This is a nuanced question, but there's a lot of truth to it.

The World is Largely Non-Linear: Yes, many, if not most, phenomena in the universe behave non-linearly. This means cause and effect aren't directly proportional, small changes can have large (and sometimes unpredictable) effects, and the system's behavior isn't just the sum of its parts. Examples abound:  

Physics: General Relativity (gravity warping spacetime), fluid dynamics (turbulence), chaos theory, interactions between particles in quantum field theory, plasma physics, weather systems.
Biology: Population dynamics, gene regulatory networks, neural network activity, ecological interactions.  
Chemistry: Reaction rates often depend non-linearly on concentrations.  
Social/Economic Systems: Market dynamics, social network effects, epidemics. Even simple systems like a pendulum become non-linear at large angles.  
Measurement Often Aims for Linearity: We often design our measurement tools to have a linear response within their intended operating range. Why?

Simplicity: Linear relationships are easier to understand, calibrate, and interpret. A ruler has linear markings; we want a thermometer or pressure gauge to ideally give a reading directly proportional to the quantity measured.
Comparability: Linear scales make comparisons straightforward (e.g., 2 meters is exactly twice 1 meter).
Mathematical Models: We frequently use linear approximations to model complex non-linear systems, especially for small changes or within certain limits, because linear equations are much easier to solve and analyze (think Hooke's law for springs, Ohm's law for resistors).
Limitations: However, it's not true that all measurement is linear.

We use non-linear scales when appropriate (logarithmic scales like pH, decibels, Richter scale).  
Our analysis methods (mathematics, computational modeling) are fully capable of dealing with non-linearity, even if we often start with linear tools or approximations.
The measurement process itself can sometimes introduce non-linearities or be based on fundamentally non-linear interactions, even if the final readout is presented linearly.
Conclusion for Q1: The behavior of the world is predominantly non-linear. While many of our measurement instruments are designed to be linear for convenience and interpretability, and we often use linear models as powerful approximations, our understanding and analysis are not restricted to linearity. We actively study and account for the world's non-linear nature.

2. We destroy the entanglement as we do our measurements?

Yes, this is a standard way of describing the effect of measurement on entangled quantum systems.

Entanglement: This is a quantum mechanical link between two or more particles. They share a single quantum state, meaning their properties (like spin or polarization) are correlated in a way that defies classical explanation, no matter how far apart they are. Before measurement, individual particles in an entangled pair might not have a definite property (e.g., spin up or spin down), but their states are perfectly correlated (e.g., if one is measured as spin up, the other is instantly known to be spin down).  
Quantum Measurement: The act of measuring a quantum system forces it to "choose" one of its possible states (eigenstates) related to the property being measured. This is often called the "collapse of the wavefunction."  
Measurement Destroys Entanglement: When you measure a property of one particle in an entangled pair, you force it into a definite state. Because its state was correlated with the other particle(s), the state of the entire system changes instantaneously. The specific, delicate superposition of correlated states that defined the entanglement before the measurement is broken. The system is no longer described by that particular entangled state; instead, it's now described by the specific outcome you measured (and the corresponding state of the other particle).
Think of it like this: Entanglement represents a specific set of potential correlated outcomes held in superposition. Measurement actualizes one of those potential outcomes, thereby destroying the superposition that represented the original entanglement. This is also closely related to the concept of decoherence, where interaction with the environment (a form of measurement) causes quantum systems to lose their entanglement and superposition.

Conclusion for Q2: Yes, in the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, performing a measurement on a subsystem that is part of an entangled state typically breaks or "destroys" that specific entanglement."

jensen, you've been thinking on this a long time and are developing as we evolve or scenes evolve in this gaming environment we call our existence. now you're moving to cuda-q and cuda integration or measurement of cuda-q via cuda/classical/human interface. disguising the movement/development of unified universe? if you didn't/hadn't, the plebs would have tied you upside down on a stick of wood.
notice how others are being treated who defy the forces against the knowledge..........in modern times the tormented are, trump, musk, zuck, tesla, and even more celestial objects........can't measure it cuz it breaks down when you try to know it directly......you must use tools to infer? .

I put him on ignore days ago. He’s among the worst fudsters I’ve ever read. Almost comical. Huawei introduced a knock off of the H100 chip. I wonder how long it took for them to reverse engineer it?

Missed my chance in early April to add more shares
Lets see if NVDA will hit my trigger

Great call.....

NOT!

Just like all the rest of the crap thrown up against the wall.

reversal AH may go green 112.00 would be nice NVDA

China is a big lying cheating country, NVDA picked a few @108.91

Can't tell you how many times AI has twisted my words!
You got a long way to go...

Billy, Chill, NVDA isn't going to 800
I said below 50.00 already

Lets see who is right

The 8 EMA is the buy/sell line for trading developed by a person in Steve Bigalow's trading group. Looking at the hourly chart, it came down and bottomed five days ago and reversed to the upside.

OH NOI..... BLACK MONDAY IS COMING< BLACK MONDAY IS COMING!!!!!

Run and dive under your bed and stay there. The Atomic Person is coming!!!!!! We will never recover....We are a failed NATION!!!

Signed: Chicken Little

We had a pretty good week considering what we've been through 

the nvidia book called, the thinking machine is all about the jensen.
he is ai, who knew?

90s I loaded looking good now

Well, tough to guess.
I would be a buyer in low $90's (and under), should price fall to that area.
Chart is in Low Pole Reversal mode since yesterday 23-Apr-2025. That is positive.
However, in such times of uncertainty, any thing can happen. We shall see. GLTY

Black monday next week a collapse is coming

Hynix sees insane chip  demand and Nvidia is their largest customer

Is the dip over?

New holder of NVDA for the long term

"Elon's FSD with our new AI could end everything..."-Jensen Huang



Weekly Chart

Might want to buy LEAPS (calls) on NVDA. Then patiently wait.

Agreed!

As trade deals get done and the tariff controversy subsides, both the markets in general, and NVDA, will rise.

The second half of the year has the potential to be rewarding, in the markets.

Nope, NVidia overhyped just like worldcom scam of the fiber optic

those are not measure of valuation.

Currently best valuation based on PEG and other ratios of all mag 7 stocks.

I think you are confusing NVDA with TSLA

We can always count on JJ8 (or is it JJLate) for his excellent market analysis...after the event occurs.

Doesn't look like today.

Do you have an idea of when, approximately?

The bottom is about to give up all support, collapse time,

Double Bottom Breakdown on 21-Apr-2025. BLTA

The bubble is about to burst

Way overvalued price adjustment correction in the works 50$ incoming

KEY DATA
MARKET CAP
$2.48T
SHARES OUTSTANDING
24.4B
PUBLIC FLOAT
23.42B

Nvidia is a overhyped hot air balloon, collapse time is here

DAMMM!!!!!!!!!!! 75 BUCKS IS ON TARGET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! REAL SOON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A.I. TECH BS STOCKS WILL BE HIT HARD THIS WEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY MIGHT HAVE TO SUSPEND TRADING!!!!! BLACK MONDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MUAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nvidia Is the Second Cheapest "Magnificent Seven" Stock Right Now Based on 1 Key Valuation Metric. Is It a No-Brainer Buy?
By Keith Speights – Apr 21, 2025 at 4:48AM

Only Meta Platforms has a lower PEG ratio than Nvidia among the "Magnificent Seven" stocks.
Nvidia's valuation is so low because of a steep decline in its share price and continued expectations of strong earnings growth.
The stock isn't a no-brainer pick, but it's still a good pick for long-term investors.

For a long time, the last description most people would use to describe Nvidia (NVDA -3.01%) was "cheap." Some still wouldn't describe the stock with that term. For example, NYU finance professor Aswath Damodaran, known as the "Dean of Valuation," thinks Nvidia remains overvalued by roughly 23%.

However, Nvidia is the second-cheapest "Magnificent Seven" stock right now based on one key valuation metric. Is the stock a no-brainer buy?

Taking Nvidia down a peg (in a good way)
If we only considered Nvidia's trailing 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 35.5, the stock would seem quite expensive. The chipmaker's trailing P/E multiple is the second-highest in the Magnificent Seven, trailing only Tesla with a sky-high P/E ratio of 118.4.

Looking to earnings over the next year makes Nvidia's valuation much more palatable. Its shares trade at roughly 23.3 times forward earnings. Within the Magnificent Seven, only Google parent Alphabet and Facebook parent Meta Platforms have lower forward earnings multiples.

But peering even further into the future makes Nvidia appear even more attractive. The stock's price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio, which is based on analysts' earnings growth projections over the next five years, is a low 1.02. Nvidia is running neck-and-neck with Meta for the lowest PEG ratio. Meta's PEG ratio is only a hair lower at 1.01.

Why Nvidia's valuation is so low
The obvious reason why Nvidia's PEG ratio is so low is that the stock has fallen sharply. Nvidia's share price is now down more than 30% below its previous high set early in 2025. This steep decline is due to several factors.

In January, Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) company DeepSeek's introduction of a powerful large language model (LLM) developed at a low cost raised concerns about the future demand for Nvidia's expensive GPUs. President Trump's tariffs caused a major sell-off of stocks, with tech stocks such as Nvidia getting shellacked. Most recently, U.S. restrictions on exports of Nvidia's H20 AI chips to China resulted in the company taking a hit of $5.5 billion.

But a lower share price is only one factor behind Nvidia's low PEG ratio. The other key ingredient is strong earnings growth expectations. Despite worries about increased competition and the Trump administration's trade policies, many Wall Street analysts still think Nvidia will continue to deliver exceptional earnings growth.

Nvidia's largest customers, including several of its Magnificent Seven peers, remain committed to investing heavily in AI. Nvidia's GPUs are still the most powerful chips for powering AI models, especially with the launch of its new Blackwell platform.

While AI is Nvidia's primary growth driver, it isn't the only one. CEO Jensen Huang believes that the shift from general-purpose computing to accelerated computing presents a $1 trillion opportunity for his company.

Is Nvidia stock a no-brainer buy?
With Nvidia nearly tied for the lowest PEG ratio among the Magnificent Seven stocks, is it a no-brainer buy? I wouldn't go that far.

It's hard to say that no thinking is required to buy a stock when a prominent valuation expert such as Damodaran believes the stock can go significantly lower. Wall Street's five-year earnings growth projections could prove to be overly optimistic. The uncertainty and fears of a recession created by the Trump administration's tariffs also raise legitimate concerns about investing in Nvidia right now.

That said, a stock can be a good pick even if it's not a no-brainer pick. I think Nvidia falls into this category. My view is that AI adoption isn't going to taper off. Although other companies will develop competitive AI chips, I don't expect them to overtake Nvidia's GPUs anytime soon. Nvidia will also almost certainly continue to roll out even more powerful GPUs.

If you're a long-term investor, I think Nvidia's sell-off presents an excellent buying opportunity. This AI company just might be the most magnificent choice among the Magnificent Seven right now.

You can only be sure of one thing, when they awaken me, things are about too change!



Nice day

https://www.wptv.com/news/technology/stargate-ai-project-could-help-create-cancer-mrna-vaccine-oracle-ceo-larry-ellison-says

What happened to stargate cure to caner Ai platform

You nailed it on the button,, It reminds me of worldcom piece of garbage

Or it will collapse to 70$ instantly, overhyped trillion dollar airtank

You sound like you are shorting the stock. Good luck with that. If there is any type of PR that reduces the China risk for NVDA, expect to see the PPS back up to 125+

Those hype days are over, get ready for the rude awakening collapse next week

This scam box of the century will collapse to 10$ by next week

Yes, stocks for the most part, take the stairs going up and the elevator going down.

That being said, retreating quickly doesnt necessarily mean dropping that far. A $25 price target is very unlikely.

Could it drop below $100 and into the $70 - $80 range? Yes, that is possible. But $25 is very unlikely, unless there was a full on world depression.

super micro computer being touted, but what do they do/sell/buy from nvidia?

stargate/openai/softbank and nvidia infrastructure.

He maybe right, stocks go retreat faster than they go up, I'm looking at 25.00 by next year

OPPS!

$5 Billion revenue write off caused by that China Thing! I think the 114% revenue growth figure is a little high.

So in 6 weeks you think we will be at $50? Let's revisit that issue in June. It is in a downtrend at the moment, but $50 may be a stretch.