Proposed Accounting Standards
A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently being studied by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, the Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of such proposed standards would have on its consolidated financial statements.
2.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On March 4, 2016, the Company and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Willdan Energy Solutions (“WES”) acquired substantially all of the assets of Genesys Engineering P.C. (“Genesys”) and assumed certain specified liabilities of Genesys (collectively, the “Purchase”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase and Merger Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and among Willdan Group, Inc., WES, WESGEN (as defined below), Genesys and Ronald W. Mineo (“Mineo”) and Robert J. Braun (“Braun” and, together with Mineo, the “Genesys Shareholders”). On March 5, 2016, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, WESGEN, Inc., a non-affiliated corporation (“WESGEN”), merged (the “Merger” and, together with the Purchase, the “Acquisition”) with Genesys, with Genesys remaining as the surviving corporation. Genesys was acquired to strengthen the Company’s power engineering capability in the northeastern U.S., and also to increase client exposure and experience with universities.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, WES or WESGEN, as applicable, paid the Genesys Shareholders an aggregate purchase price (the “Purchase Price”) of approximately $15.1 million, including post-closing working capital and tax adjustments. The Purchase Price consisted of (i) $6.0 million in cash, paid at closing, and $2.9 million paid in cash after closing for working capital and tax adjustments, (ii) 255,808 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Willdan Group, Inc. (the “Common Stock”), with a fair value on the date of closing of $2.2 million, (iii) $4.6 million in cash, payable in twenty-four (24) equal monthly installments beginning on March 26, 2016 (the “Installment Payments”), and (iv) offset by a $0.6 million receivable paid to WES for working capital adjustments. Until the third anniversary of the Closing Date (the “Closing Date”), the Genesys Shareholders are prohibited from transferring or disposing of any Common Stock received in connection with the Acquisition.
The Agreement contains customary representations and warranties regarding the Company, WES, WESGEN, Genesys and the Genesys Shareholders, indemnification provisions and other provisions customary for transactions of this nature. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company and WES also provided guarantees to the Genesys Shareholders which guarantee certain of WESGEN’s and Genesys’ obligations under the Agreement, including the Installment Payments.
The Company used cash on hand to pay the $8.9 million due to the Genesys Shareholders at closing.
Genesys continues to be a professional corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, wholly-owned by one or more licensed engineers. Pursuant to New York law, the Company does not own capital stock of Genesys. The Company has entered into an agreement with the post-Closing Date owners of Genesys pursuant to which such owners will be prohibited from selling, transferring or encumbering their ownership interest in Genesys without the Company’s consent. Notwithstanding the Company’s rights regarding the transfer of Genesys’ stock, the Company does not have control over the professional decision making of Genesys’ engineering services. The Company has entered into an administrative services agreement with Genesys pursuant to which WES will provide Genesys with ongoing administrative, operational and other non-professional support services.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805. Under ASC 805, the Company recorded the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at their estimated fair value with the excess allocated to goodwill. Goodwill represents the value the Company expects to achieve through the operational synergies and the
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We are a provider of professional technical and consulting services to utilities, private industry, and public agencies at all levels of government. We enable our clients to realize cost and energy savings by providing a wide range of specialized services. We assist our clients with a broad range of complementary services relating to:
|
·
|
|
Energy Efficiency and Sustainability;
|
|
·
|
|
Engineering and Planning;
|
|
·
|
|
Economic and Financial Consulting; and
|
|
·
|
|
National Preparedness and Interoperability
|
We operate our business through a nationwide network of offices in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington and Washington, DC. As of March 31, 2017, we had 831 employees which includes licensed engineers and other professionals.
We seek to establish close working relationships with our clients and expand the breadth and depth of the services we provide to them over time. Our business with public and private utilities is concentrated primarily in California and New York, but we also have business with utilities in Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, Utah and Washington. We currently serve 19 major utility customers across the country. Our business with public agencies is concentrated in Arizona, California and New York. We provide services to many of the cities and counties in California. We also serve special districts, school districts, a range of public agencies and private industry.
We were founded in 1964 and Willdan Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed in 2006 to serve as our holding company. Historically, our clients have been public agencies in communities with populations ranging from 10,000 to 300,000 people. We believe communities of this size are underserved by large outsourcing companies that tend to focus on securing large federal and state projects and private sector projects. Since expanding into energy efficiency services, our client base has grown to include investor-owned and other public utilities as well as substantial energy users in government and business.
We consist of a family of wholly-owned companies that operate within the following segments for financial reporting purposes:
Energy Efficiency Services.
Our Energy Efficiency Services segment consists of the business of our subsidiary, Willdan Energy Solutions, which offers energy efficiency and sustainability consulting services to utilities, public agencies and private industry and is offered to clients under a variety of business names, including Willdan Energy Solutions, Abacus Resource Management, 360 Energy Engineers and Genesys Engineering. This segment is currently our largest segment based on contract revenue, representing approximately 73.3% and 56.0% of our consolidated contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016, respectively.
Engineering Services.
Our Engineering Services segment includes the operations of our subsidiaries, Willdan Engineering, Willdan Infrastructure and Public Agency Resources (“PARs”). Willdan Engineering provides civil engineering‑related and city planning services, geotechnical and other engineering consulting services to our clients. Willdan Infrastructure, which was launched in fiscal year 2013, provides engineering services to larger rail, port, water, mining and other civil engineering projects. PARs primarily provides staffing to Willdan Engineering. Contract revenue for the Engineering Services segment represented approximately 21.0% and 33.2% of our consolidated contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016, respectively.
Public Finance Services.
Our Public Finance Services segment consists of the business of our subsidiary, Willdan Financial Services, which offers economic and financial consulting services to public agencies. Contract
revenue for the Public Finance Services segment represented approximately 4.7% and 8.8% of our consolidated contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016, respectively.
Homeland Security Services.
Our Homeland Security Services segment consists of the business of our subsidiary, Willdan Homeland Solutions, which offers national preparedness and interoperability services and communications and technology solutions. Contract revenue for our Homeland Security Services segment represented approximately 0.9% and 2.0% of our consolidated contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016, respectively.
Components of Revenue and Expense
Contract Revenue
We generally provide our services under contracts, purchase orders or retainer letters. The agreements we enter into with our clients typically incorporate one of four principal types of pricing provisions: time and materials, unit based, fixed price and service-related contracts. Revenue on our time and materials and unit based contracts are recognized as the work is performed in accordance with specific terms of the contract. Approximately half of our contracts are unit based or based on contractual rates per hour plus costs incurred. Some of these contracts include maximum contract prices, but contract maximums are often adjusted to reflect the level of effort to achieve client objectives and thus
the majority of these contracts are not expected to exceed the maximum. Contract revenue on our fixed price contracts is determined on the percentage of completion method based generally on the ratio of direct costs incurred to date to estimated total direct costs at completion. Many of our fixed price contracts involve a high degree of subcontracted fixed price effort and are relatively short in duration, thereby lowering the risks of not properly estimating the percent complete. Our service-related contracts, including operations and maintenance services and a variety of technical assistance services, are accounted for over the period of performance, in proportion to the cost of performance.
Adjustments to contract cost estimates are made in the periods in which the facts requiring such revisions become known. When the revised estimate indicates a loss, such loss is recognized currently in its entirety. Claims revenue is recognized only upon resolution of the claim. Change orders in dispute are evaluated as claims. Costs related to un‑priced change orders are expensed when incurred and recognition of the related contract revenue is based on an evaluation of the probability of recovery of the costs. Estimated profit is recognized for un‑priced change orders if realization of the expected price of the change order is probable.
Our contracts come up for renewal periodically and at the time of renewal may be subject to renegotiation, which could impact the profitability on that contract. In addition, during the term of a contract, public agencies may request additional or revised services which may impact the economics of the transaction. Most of our contracts permit our clients, with prior notice, to terminate the contracts at any time without cause. While we have a large volume of contracts, the renewal, termination or modification of a contract, in particular contracts with Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. and the Dormitory Authority-State of New York, may have a material effect on our consolidated operations.
Some of our contracts include certain performance guarantees, such as a guaranteed energy saving quantity. Such guarantees are generally measured upon completion of a project. In the event that the measured performance level is less than the guaranteed level, any resulting financial penalty, including any additional work that may be required to fulfill the guarantee, is estimated and charged to direct expenses in the current period. We have not experienced any significant costs under such guarantees.
Direct Costs of Contract Revenue
Direct costs of contract revenue consist primarily of that portion of technical and nontechnical salaries and wages that have been incurred in connection with revenue producing projects. Direct costs of contract revenue also include material costs, subcontractor services, equipment and other expenses that are incurred in connection with revenue producing projects. Direct costs of contract revenue exclude that portion of technical and nontechnical salaries and wages related to marketing efforts, vacations, holidays and other time not spent directly generating revenue under existing contracts. Such costs are included in general and administrative expenses. Additionally, payroll taxes, bonuses
and employee benefit costs for all of our personnel are included in general and administrative expenses since no allocation of these costs is made to direct costs of contract revenue.
Other companies may classify as direct costs of contract revenue some of the costs that we classify as general and administrative costs. We expense direct costs of contract revenue when incurred.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include the costs of the marketing and support staffs, other marketing expenses, management and administrative personnel costs, payroll taxes, bonuses and employee benefits for all of our employees and the portion of salaries and wages not allocated to direct costs of contract revenue for those employees who provide our services. General and administrative expenses also include facility costs, depreciation and amortization, professional services, legal and accounting fees and administrative operating costs. Within general and administrative expenses, “Other” includes expenses such as provision for billed or unbilled receivables, professional services, legal and accounting, computer costs, travel and entertainment, marketing costs and acquisition costs. We expense general and administrative costs when incurred.
Critical Accounting Policies
This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or GAAP. To prepare these financial statements in conformity with GAAP, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses in the reporting period. Our actual results may differ from these estimates. We have provided a summary of our significant accounting policies in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016. We describe below those accounting policies that require material subjective or complex judgments and that have the most significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Our management evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon information currently available and on various assumptions management believes are reasonable as of the date of this report.
Contract Accounting
We enter into contracts with our clients that contain various types of pricing provisions, including fixed price, time-and-materials, unit-based, and service related provisions. The following table reflects our four reportable segments and the types of contracts that each most commonly enters into for revenue generating activities.
|
|
|
Types of Contract
|
Segment
|
(Revenue Recognition Method)
|
Energy Efficiency Services
|
Time-and-materials, unit-based and fixed price
(percentage-of-completion method)
|
Engineering Services
|
Time-and-materials, unit-based and fixed price (percentage-of-completion method)
|
Public Finance Services
|
Service-related contracts
(proportional performance method)
|
Homeland Security Services
|
Service-related contracts
(proportional performance method)
|
Revenue on fixed price contracts is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based generally on the ratio of direct costs (primarily exclusive of depreciation and amortization costs) incurred to date to estimated total direct costs at completion. Revenue on time-and-materials and unit-based contracts is recognized as the work is performed in accordance with the specific rates and terms of the contract. We recognize revenues for time-and-material contracts based upon the actual hours incurred during a reporting period at contractually agreed upon rates per hour and also include in revenue all reimbursable costs incurred during a reporting period for which we have risk or on which the fee was based at the time of bid or negotiation. Certain of our time-and-material contracts are subject to maximum contract
values and, accordingly, revenue under these contracts is generally recognized under the percentage-of-completion method, consistent with fixed priced contracts. Revenue on contracts that are not subject to maximum contract values is recognized based on the actual number of hours we spend on the projects plus any actual out-of-pocket costs of materials and other direct incidental expenditures that we incur on the projects. In addition, revenue from overhead percentage recoveries and earned fees are included in revenue. Revenue is recognized as the related costs are incurred. For unit-based contracts, we recognize the contract price of units of a basic production product as revenue when the production product is delivered during a period. Revenue for amounts that have been billed but not earned is deferred and such deferred revenue is referred to as billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Adjustments to contract cost estimates are made in the periods in which the facts requiring such revisions become known. When the revised estimate, for contracts that are recognized under the percentage-of-completion method, indicates a loss, such loss is provided for currently in its entirety. Claims revenue is recognized only upon resolution of the claim. Change orders in dispute are evaluated as claims. Costs related to un-priced change orders are expensed when incurred and recognition of the related contract revenue is based on an evaluation of the probability of recovery of the costs. Estimated profit is recognized for un-priced change orders if realization of the expected price of the change order is probable.
We consider whether our contracts require combining for revenue recognition purposes. If certain criteria are met, revenues for related contracts may be recognized on a combined basis. With respect to our contracts, it is rare that such criteria are present. We may enter into certain contracts which include separate phases or elements. If each phase or element is negotiated separately based on the technical resources required and/or the supply and demand for the services being provided, we evaluate if the contracts should be segmented. If certain criteria are met, the contracts would be segmented which could result in revenues being assigned to the different elements or phases with different rates of profitability based on the relative value of each element or phase to the estimated total contract revenue.
Applying the percentage-of-completion method of recognizing revenue requires us to estimate the outcome of our fixed price and long-term contracts. We forecast such outcomes to the best of our knowledge and belief of current and expected conditions and our expected course of action. Differences between our estimates and actual results often occur resulting in changes to reported revenue and earnings. Such changes could have a material effect on future consolidated financial statements. We did not have material revisions in estimates for contracts recognized using the percentage-of-completion method for any of the periods presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Service-related contracts, including operations and maintenance services and a variety of technical assistance services, are accounted for over the period of performance, in proportion to the costs of performance. Award and incentive fees are recorded when they are fixed and determinable and consider customer contract terms.
Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts based upon our review of all outstanding amounts on a
quarterly basis. Management determines allowances for doubtful accounts through specific identification of amounts considered to be uncollectible and potential write-offs, plus a non-specific allowance for other amounts for which some potential loss has been determined to be probable based on current and past experience. Our credit risk is minimal with governmental entities and large public utilities, but disputes may arise related to these receivable amounts. Accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recorded when received. For further information on the types of contracts under which we perform our services, see “Business - Contract Structure” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016.
Goodwill
We test our goodwill at least annually for possible impairment. We complete our annual testing of goodwill as of the last day of the first month of our fourth fiscal quarter each year to determine whether there is impairment. In addition to our annual test, we regularly evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that may indicate a potential impairment of goodwill. We did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges during the three months ended
March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016. We had goodwill of approximately $21.9 million as of March 31, 2017 as the result of our various acquisitions in 2015 and 2016.
We test our goodwill for impairment at the level of our reporting units, which are components of our operating segments. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This accounting guidance allows companies to perform a qualitative assessment on goodwill impairment to determine whether a quantitative assessment is necessary. The process of testing goodwill for impairment, pursuant to ASU 2011-08, now involves an optional qualitative assessment on goodwill impairment of our reporting units to determine whether a quantitative assessment is necessary. If a quantitative assessment is warranted, we then determine the fair value of the applicable reporting units. To estimate the fair value of our reporting units, we use both an income approach based on management’s estimates of future cash flows and other market data and a market approach based upon multiples of EBITDA earned by similar public companies.
Once the fair value is determined, we then compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is determined to be less than the carrying value, we perform an additional assessment to determine the extent of the impairment based on the implied fair value of goodwill compared with the carrying amount of the goodwill. In the event that the current implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized.
Inherent in such fair value determinations are significant judgments and estimates, including but not limited to assumptions about our future revenue, profitability and cash flows, our operational plans and our interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations. To the extent these assumptions are incorrect or economic conditions that would impact the future operations of our reporting units change, any goodwill may be deemed to be impaired, and an impairment charge could result in a material effect on our financial position or results of operation. Almost all of our goodwill is contained in our Energy Efficiency Services, with the remainder in our Public Finance Service Segments. At our measurement date, the estimated fair value of our Energy Efficiency Services reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. A reduction in estimated fair value of our Energy Efficiency Services reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in future periods.
Accounting for Claims Against the Company
We accrue an undiscounted liability related to claims against us for which the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We disclose the amount accrued and an estimate of any reasonably possible loss in excess of the amount accrued, if such disclosure is necessary for our financial statements not to be misleading. We do not accrue liabilities related to claims when the likelihood that a loss has been incurred is probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated, or when the liability is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. Losses related to recorded claims are included in general and administrative expenses.
Determining probability and estimating claim amounts is highly judgmental. Initial accruals and any subsequent changes in our estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Business Combinations
The acquisition method of accounting for business combinations requires us to use significant estimates and assumptions, including fair value estimates, as of the business combination date and to refine those estimates as necessary during the measurement period (defined as the period, not to exceed one year, in which we may adjust the provisional amounts recognized for a business combination) based upon new information about facts that existed on the business combination date.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, we recognize separately from goodwill the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interests in an acquiree, at the acquisition date fair value. We measure goodwill as of the acquisition date as the excess of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Costs that we incur to complete the business combination such as investment banking, legal and other professional fees are not considered part of consideration. We charge these acquisition costs to other general and administrative expense as they are incurred.
Should the initial accounting for a business combination be incomplete by the end of a reporting period that falls within the measurement period, we report provisional amounts in our financial statements. During the measurement period, we adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date and we record those adjustments to our financial statements. We recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, including the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.
On March 4, 2016, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, WES, acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of Genesys Engineering P.C. (“Genesys”), a New York based energy engineering company. For further discussion of our acquisitions, see Note 2 “—Business Combinations” of notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of our assets and liabilities, subject to a judgmental assessment of the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. Significant judgment is applied when assessing the need for valuation allowances. Areas of estimation include our consideration of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Should a change in circumstances lead to a change in judgment about the utilization of deferred tax assets in future years, we would adjust the related valuation allowances in the period that the change in circumstances occurs, along with a corresponding increase or charge to income.
During each fiscal year, management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. For fiscal year 2016, we ultimately determined that it was more-likely-than-not that the entire California net operating loss will not be utilized prior to expiration. Significant pieces of objective evidence evaluated included our history of utilization of California net operating losses in prior years for each of our subsidiaries, as well as our forecasted amount of net operating loss utilization for certain members of the combined group. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance in the amount of $72,000 at the end of fiscal year 2016 related to California net operating losses. There was no change to the valuation allowance as of March 31, 2017.
For acquired business entities, if we identify changes to acquired deferred tax asset valuation allowances or liabilities related to uncertain tax positions during the measurement period and they relate to new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date, those changes are considered a measurement period adjustment and we record the offset to goodwill. We record all other changes to deferred tax asset valuation allowances and liabilities related to uncertain tax positions in current period income tax expense.
We recognize the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions if it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information derived from our consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of contract revenue. Amounts may not add to the totals due to rounding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
April 1,
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Direct costs of contract revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
15.8
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
Subcontractor services and other direct costs
|
|
58.4
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
Total direct costs of contract revenue
|
|
74.2
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits
|
|
13.6
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
Facilities and facility related
|
|
1.6
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
0.7
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
1.3
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
Other
|
|
5.7
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expenses
|
|
23.0
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
2.9
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
—
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
0.1
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
0.1
|
|
(0.1)
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
2.9
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
(1.0)
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended April 1, 2016
Contract revenue
Our contract revenue was $68.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, with $50.1 million attributable to the Energy Efficiency Services segment, $14.4 million attributable to the Engineering Services segment, $3.2 million attributable to the Public Finance Services segment, and $0.6 million attributable to the Homeland Security Services segment. Consolidated contract revenue increased $34.4 million, or 101.5%, to $68.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $33.9 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Included in the increase in consolidated contract revenue and contract revenue in our Energy Efficiency Services segment was incremental contract revenue of $18.1 million attributable to our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Genesys that we completed on March 4, 2016. Excluding the incremental contract revenue from such acquisition, our consolidated contract revenue increased by $16.3 million primarily due to the ramp up of new contracts for energy efficiency services in California, Kansas, New York and Utah.
Contract revenue in our Energy Efficiency Services segment increased $31.1 million, or 164.0%, to $50.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $19.0 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Excluding incremental revenue from our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Genesys, revenue in our Energy Efficiency Services segment increased as a result of increased revenue generated from the ramp up of new contracts for energy efficiency services in California, Kansas, New York and Utah. Contract revenue for the Engineering Services segment increased $3.1 million, or 27.7%, to $14.4 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $11.3 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Contract revenue for the Engineering Services segment increased primarily due to greater demand for our city engineering services in California, our building and safety services, and our construction management services. Contract revenue for the Public Finance Services
segment increased $0.2 million, or 8.3%, to $ 3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $3.0 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Contract revenue for the Homeland Security Services segment decreased by $0.1 million, or 9.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $0.6 million as compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Revenue in the Homeland Security Services segment decreased due to slightly lower levels of activity in the traditional planning, training and exercise consulting services business.
Direct costs of contract revenue.
Direct costs of contract revenue were $50.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, with $40.6 million attributable to the Energy Efficiency Services segment, $8.3 million attributable to the Engineering Services segment, $1.4 million attributable to the Public Finance Services segment, and $0.4 million attributable to the Homeland Security Services segment. Included in direct costs of contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was direct costs of revenue of $19.5 million attributable to our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Genesys. Overall, direct costs increased by $30.4 million, or 150.1%, to $50.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from $20.3 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in direct costs within our Energy Efficiency Services of $28.3 million, or 230.2%, which includes $16.1 million contributed by Genesys. Excluding the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Genesys for the Energy Efficiency Services segment, direct costs for Energy Efficiency Services increased by $12.2 million, primarily due to higher use of subcontractor services and increases in salaries and wages. Direct costs for the Engineering Services increased $2.1 million, or 34.2%. Direct costs of contract revenue in our Public Finance Services and Homeland Security Services segments remained flat.
Direct costs increased as a result of increases in salaries and wages of $2.3 million and an increase in subcontractor services and other direct costs of $28.2 million. Within direct costs of contract revenue, salaries and wages decreased to 15.8% of contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from 25.2% for the three months ended April 1, 2016 and subcontractor services and other direct costs increased to 58.4% of contract revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from 34.6% of contract revenue for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Subcontractor services increased primarily because of increased demand for the energy efficiency, sustainability and renewable energy services of our subsidiary Willdan Energy Solutions, which generally utilizes a higher percentage of subcontractors than our other segments.
General and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased by $3.9 million, or 32.9%, to $15.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from $11.8 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. This was due primarily to increases of $3.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, in general and administrative expenses of the Energy Efficiency Services, Engineering Services and Public Finance Services segments. Homeland Security Services segment general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat. Unallocated corporate expenses increased by $0.2 million. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of contract revenue decreased to 23.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to 34.8% for the three months ended April 1, 2016.
Of the $3.9 million increase in general and administrative expenses, approximately $2.6 million relates to increases in salaries and wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits. The increase in employee related costs primarily resulted from increased headcount within our Energy Efficiency and Engineering Services segments. As noted under “Components of Revenue and Expenses—Direct Costs of Contract Revenue,” we include salaries and wages not spent directly generating revenue under existing contracts in general and administrative expenses. Other general and administrative expenses increased by $0.7 million. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $0.3 million. Facilities and facility related expenses remained relatively flat. Stock-based compensation expenses increased by $0.3 million.
Income from operations.
As a result of the above factors, our operating income was $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to operating income of $1.8 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. Income from operations as a percentage of contract revenue was 2.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to 5.4% in the prior year period. The decrease in operating margin was primarily due to new projects and programs that required additional resources and resulted in higher subcontractor costs, increased labor costs, and added focus on business development.
Total other income (expense), net.
Total other income, net was $4,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to total other expense, net of $49,000 for the three months ended April 1, 2016. This decrease in expense is primarily the result of lower interest expense during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.
Income tax (benefit) expense.
Income tax benefit was $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to an income tax expense of $0.7 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. The decrease of $1.4 million, or 194.7% is primarily due to tax deductions related to stock option exercises.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the difference between the tax benefit recorded and the expense that would be recorded by applying the federal statutory rate is primarily attributable to tax deductions related to stock option exercises which were significant in the three months ended March 31, 2017. In accordance with ASU 2016-09 (see Note 1 “—Basis of Presentation, Organization and Operations of the Company”), the income tax benefit related to stock option exercises has been included as a reduction of 55.5% to our effective tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The effective tax rate also varies from the federal statutory rate due to the impact of state income tax expense, an adjustment to the estimate of the deferred tax asset related to stock options from fiscal year 2016, and certain expenses that are non-deductible for tax purposes, including meals and entertainment, compensation expense related to incentive stock options, and employee gifts.
Net income.
As a result of the above factors, our net income was $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to net income of $1.1 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2017, we had $19.4 million of cash and cash equivalents. Our cash decreased by $3.2 million since December 30, 2016 primarily due to cash used in operations of $1.4 million and payments of $2.8 million for contingent consideration and on notes payable related to our acquisitions, offset by $1.3 million proceeds from stock option exercises. Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated from operations. We also have a revolving line of credit with BMO Harris Bank N.A. (“BMO”), which matures on January 20, 2020 and provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $35.0 million, including a $10.0 million standby letter of credit sub-facility. Subject to satisfying certain conditions described in the Credit Agreement, we may request that BMO increase the aggregate amount under the revolving line of credit by up to $25.0 million, for a total facility size of $60.0 million; however, BMO is not obligated to do so. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash generated by operating activities and available borrowings under our revolving line of credit will be sufficient to finance our operating activities for at least the next 12 months.
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows used in operating activities were $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $1.6 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. The cash flows used in operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2017 resulted primarily from increases in accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts as a result of milestone billing arrangements contained in certain contracts that do not allow us to bill until various stages of our work are complete, partially offset by net income, as adjusted for non-cash activity such as depreciation and amortization and deferred taxes and increases in accrued liabilities and accounts payable. The cash flows used in operating activities for the three months ended April 1, 2016 resulted primarily from increases in accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts and decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by net income, as adjusted for non-cash activity such as depreciation and amortization and deferred taxes, and an increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows used in investing activities were $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $9.1 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. The cash flows used in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2017 were primarily due to purchase of equipment
and leasehold equipment. We used cash for investing activities during the three months ended April 1, 2016 primarily for the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Genesys.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash flows used in financing activities were $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $0.9 million for the three months ended April 1, 2016. The cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were primarily attributable to payments of $2.8 million for contingent consideration and on notes payable related to our acquisitions, offset by $1.3 million in proceeds from stock option exercises. The cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended April 1, 2016 were primarily attributable to the payments on notes payable related to our acquisitions.
Outstanding indebtedness
BMO Credit Facility
. On January 20, 2017, we and each of our subsidiaries, as guarantors (the “Guarantors”), entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with BMO, as lender. The Credit Agreement amends and extends our prior credit agreement with BMO (the “Prior Credit Agreement”), which was set to mature on March 24, 2017. The Credit Agreement provides for a $35.0 million revolving line of credit, including a $10.0 million standby letter of credit sub-facility, and matures on January 20, 2020. Subject to satisfying certain conditions described in the Credit Agreement, we may request that BMO increase the aggregate amount under the revolving line of credit by up to $25.0 million, for a total facility size of $60.0 million; however, BMO is not obligated to do so. Unlike the Prior Credit Agreement, the revolving line of credit is no longer subject to a borrowing base limitation and the Credit Agreement no longer includes a delayed draw term loan facility.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to either, at our option, (i) the highest of the prime rate, the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1% (the “Base Rate”) or (ii) LIBOR, in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% with respect to Base Rate borrowings and 1.25% to 2.00% with respect to LIBOR borrowings. The applicable margin will be based upon our consolidated leverage ratio. We will also be required to pay a commitment fee for the unused portion of the revolving line of credit, which will range from 0.20% to 0.35% per annum, and fees on any letters of credit drawn under the facility, which will range from 0.94% to 1.50%, in each case, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio.
Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are guaranteed by all of our direct and indirect subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of our and the Guarantors’ assets.
The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and affirmative covenants, including certain notice and financial reporting requirements. The Credit Agreement also requires compliance with financial covenants that require us to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.
The Credit Agreement includes customary negative covenants, including (i) restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness by us or the Guarantors and the incurrence of additional liens on property, (ii) restrictions on permitted acquisitions, including that the total consideration payable for all permitted acquisitions (including potential future earn-out obligations) shall not exceed $20.0 million during the term of the Credit Agreement and the total consideration for any individual permitted acquisition shall not exceed $10.0 million without BMO’s consent, and (iii) limitations on asset sales, mergers and acquisitions. Further, the Credit Agreement limits the payment of future dividends and distributions and share repurchases by us; however, we are permitted to repurchase up to $8.0 million of shares of common stock under certain conditions, including that, at the time of any such repurchase, (a) we are able to meet the financial covenant requirements under the Credit Agreement after giving effect to the share repurchase, (b) we have at least $5.0 million of liquidity (unrestricted cash or undrawn availability under the revolving line of credit), and (c) no default exists or would arise under the Credit Agreement after giving effect to such repurchase. In addition, the Credit Agreement includes customary events of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the interest rate will be increased by 2.0%, BMO has the option to make any loans then outstanding under the Credit Agreement immediately due and payable, and BMO is no longer obligated to extend further credit to us under the Credit Agreement.
As of March 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement.
Insurance Premiums
. We have also financed, from time to time, insurance premiums by entering into unsecured notes payable with insurance companies. During our annual insurance renewals in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 30, 2016, we elected to finance our insurance premiums for the upcoming fiscal year.
The unpaid balance of the financed premiums totaled $400,000 and $599,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and December 30, 2016, respectively.
Contractual obligations
We had no material changes in commitments for long-term debt obligations, operating lease obligations or capital lease obligations as of March 31, 2017, as compared to those disclosed in our table of contractual obligations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016.
As noted in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016, and as further discussed in Note 2 “–Business Combinations” we are obligated to pay earn-out payments in connection with our acquisition of Abacus and substantially all of the assets of 360 Energy in January 2015. As of March 31, 2017, we are obligated to pay (i) up to $2.9 million in cash, payable in installments, if certain financial targets of our divisions made up of the assets acquired from, and former employees of, 360 Energy are met during fiscal years 2017 and 2018, and (ii) up to $0.2 million in cash, payable in installments, if certain financial targets of our division made up of the assets acquired from, and former employees of, Economists.com, LLC are met during fiscal years 2016 and 2017. As of March 31, 2017, we had contingent consideration payable of $3.1 million related to these acquisitions, which includes $167,000 of accretion (net of fair value adjustments) related to the contingent consideration.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than operating lease commitments, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities. In addition, our policy is not to enter into derivative instruments, futures or forward contracts. Finally, we do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries or any interests in, or relationships with, any special-purpose entities that are not included in the consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Statement of Cash Flows
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Clarification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which eliminates the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows, by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-15 provides for retrospective application for all periods presented. We do not believe the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which clarifies existing accounting literature relating to how and when revenue is recognized by an entity. ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, an entity will need to exercise a greater degree of judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35,
Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. In August 2015, the FASB issued Update 2015-14, which defers the implementation of ASU 2014-09 for one year from the initial effective date. ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied either retrospectively or using the cumulative effect transition method, with early adoption not permitted. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which further clarifies the current revenue recognition guidance. This update is intended to increase stakeholders’ awareness of the proposals and to expedite improvements to ASU 2014-09. We are continuing to evaluate the impact that the new standard will have on the contract portfolio. Our approach will include a detailed review of contracts and comparing historical accounting policies and practices to the new standard. Because the standard may impact our business processes, systems and controls, we will also develop a comprehensive change management plan to guide the implementation if, and as needed. We will adopt the requirements of the new standard effective December 30, 2017 and we have not yet selected a transition method. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-20 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We will adopt the requirements of the new standard effective December 30, 2017, and we have not yet selected a transition method.
Stock Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends the current stock compensation guidance. The amendments simplify the accounting for the taxes related to stock based compensation, including adjustments to how excess tax benefits and a company's payments for tax withholdings should be classified. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt ASU 2016-09 on a prospective basis in 2016.
Business Combinations
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), which specifies the definition of a business that affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. We do not believe the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The FASB issued this update to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of the adoption of this update on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Proposed Accounting Standards
A variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently being studied by standard-setting organizations and certain regulatory agencies. Because of the tentative and preliminary nature of such proposed standards, we have not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation of such proposed standards would have on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, to fair values or to future cash flows that may result from changes in the price of a financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes. Market risk is attributed to all market risk sensitive financial instruments, including long-term debt.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $19.4 million as of March 31, 2017. This amount represents cash on hand in business checking accounts with BMO.
We do not engage in trading activities and do not participate in foreign currency transactions or utilize derivative financial instruments.
We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowings under our revolving line of credit which bears interest at variable rates. At March 31, 2017, we had $1.5 million of borrowings outstanding under our $35.0 million revolving credit facility and $2.6 million in letters of credit were issued with $30.9 million available for borrowing after considering the credit agreement’s debt covenants. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to either, at our option, (i) the highest of the prime rate, the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or one-month LIBOR plus 1% (the “Base Rate”) or (ii) LIBOR, in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% with respect to Base Rate borrowings and 1.25% to 2.00% with respect to LIBOR borrowings, and mature on January 20, 2020. The applicable margin will be based upon our consolidated leverage ratio. We will also be required to pay a commitment fee for the unused portion of the revolving line of credit, which will range from 0.20% to 0.35% per annum, and fees on any letters of credit drawn under the facility, which will range from 0.94% to 1.50%, in each case, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. Our borrowings under the revolving line of credit bear interest at the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin ranging between 1.25% and 2.00%, currently set at the LIBOR rate plus 1.25%, or 2.4% as of March 31, 2017 and matures on January 20, 2020. We do not have any interest rate hedges or swaps. Based upon the amount of outstanding indebtedness, a one percentage point change in the assumed interest rate would change our annual interest expense by approximately $15,000 in 2017.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Thomas Brisbin, and our Chief Financial Officer, Stacy McLaughlin, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2017. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at a reasonable assurance level, as of March 31, 2017. No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to claims and lawsuits from time to time, including those alleging professional errors or omissions that arise in the ordinary course of business against firms, like ours, that operate in the engineering and consulting professions. We carry professional liability insurance, subject to certain deductibles and policy limits, for such claims as they arise and may from time to time establish reserves for litigation that is considered probable of a loss.
In accordance with accounting standards regarding loss contingencies, we accrue an undiscounted liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, and we disclose the amount accrued and an estimate of any reasonably possible loss in excess of the amount accrued, if such disclosure is necessary for our financial statements not to be misleading. We do not accrue liabilities when the likelihood
that the liability has been incurred is probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated, or when the liability is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote.
Because litigation outcomes are inherently unpredictable, our evaluation of legal proceedings often involves a series of complex assessments by management about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. If the assessments indicate that loss contingencies that could be material to any one of our financial statements are not probable, but are reasonably possible, or are probable, but cannot be estimated, then we disclose the nature of the loss contingencies, together with an estimate of the possible loss or a statement that such loss is not reasonably estimable. While the consequences of certain unresolved proceedings are not presently determinable, and a reasonable estimate of the probable and reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts accrued for such proceedings cannot be made, an adverse outcome from such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our earnings in any given reporting period. However, in the opinion of our management, after consulting with legal counsel, and taking into account insurance coverage, the ultimate liability related to current outstanding claims and lawsuits is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
City of Glendale v. Willdan Financial Services,
Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County
A complaint was filed against us on July 16, 2014 relating to a project performed by Willdan Financial Services to prepare a Cost of Services Analysis (a “COSA”) for the Department of Water and Power of the City of Glendale, California (the “City of Glendale”). The purpose of the COSA was to assist the City of Glendale in setting water rates for property owners. The lawsuit alleged that the City of Glendale suffered damages due to mistakes in the COSA, as follows: the City of Glendale received less revenue than anticipated in an amount exceeding $9,000,000; the City of Glendale was required to retain another consultant to prepare a new COSA at the cost of $130,000; and the City of Glendale incurred costs associated with noticing and conducting public hearings at a cost of $83,052. The City of Glendale sought monetary damages. We denied the allegations asserted in the lawsuit.
The City of Glendale and we have settled this suit within insurance policy limits. The City of Glendale agreed to voluntarily dismiss the suit with prejudice
and agreed to release any and all claims that it may have against us, whether known or unknown, pertaining to the subject matter of the suit. The settlement does not impose any restrictions on us.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
3.1
|
|
First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Willdan Group, Inc., including amendments thereto (1)
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Willdan Group, Inc. (2)
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate for shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock (1)
|
4.2
|
|
The Company agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of each instrument with respect to issues of long-term debt of Willdan Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, the authorized principal amount of which does not exceed 10% of the consolidated assets of Willdan Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2017, by and among Willdan Group, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and BMO Harris Bank N.A. (3)
|
10.2
|
|
Master Reaffirmation of and Amendment to Collateral Documents, dated as of January 20, 2017, by and among Willdan Group, Inc. and the other Debtors (as defined therein) and BMO Harris Bank N.A. (3)
|
31.1
|
*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
31.2
|
*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
32.1
|
*
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
101
|
|
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and April 1, 2016 and (iv) the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2006, as amended (File No. 333-136444).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Willdan Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2017.
|
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
WILLDAN GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Stacy B. McLaughlin
|
|
|
Stacy B. McLaughlin
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Date: May 5, 2017
|
Willdan (NASDAQ:WLDN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Willdan (NASDAQ:WLDN)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024