- Significant increase in northern high-grade mineral resource
estimate at 800 mg/l lithium cut-off:
-
- Measured and indicated resource estimate of 1,682,000 tonnes
of lithium carbonate equivalent at an average grade of 926 mg/l
Lithium
- Significant increase of central and southern medium-grade
resource estimate at 400 mg/l Lithium cut-off:
-
- Measured and indicated resource estimate 5,304,000 tonnes of
lithium carbonate equivalent at an average grade of 636 mg/l
Lithium
- Average combined impurities for Magnesium/Lithium and
Sulphate/Lithium continue to be lowest in industry
-
- High grade resource with 800 mg/l cut off: Mg/Li=1.66 and
Sulfate/Li=0.49
- Potential for resource expansion continues to exist at
depth, and off strike on the eastern border of the 3Q Project under
the alluvial cones.
TORONTO, June 9, 2021
/CNW/ - Neo Lithium Corp. ("Neo Lithium" or the
"Company") (TSXV: NLC) (OTCQX: NTTHF) (FSE: NE2) is pleased
to announce an updated resource estimate for the Tres Quebradas
lithium brine project in Catamarca Province, Argentina ("3Q Project"). This updated
mineral resource estimate has been completed under the supervision
of Canadian-based Groundwater Insight, Inc., which is independent
of the Company.
Based on this updated mineral resource estimate, the 3Q Project
deposit continues to improve, confirming that it is one of the
largest and highest-grade lithium brine deposits in the world.
Since the completion of the previous mineral resource estimate
in July 2018, the Company has
continued drilling and has revised the statistical criteria to
define measured, indicated, and inferred resources. Using the new
drill holes (see news release dated May 27,
2021 for further information) and the revised statistical
criteria, the measured and indicated mineral resource categories
have increased by 125% at the 800 mg/l lithium cut-off, and by 33%
at 400 mg/l lithium cut-off, when compared to the July 2018 estimate. Similar average grades and
impurities were observed.
The updated lithium resource estimate is summarized in Tables 1
and 2, for the 800 and 400 mg/l cut-offs, respectively, with
comparison to the July 2018
results.
Table 1 - in situ Lithium Resource at
800 mg/L Lithium cut-off
|
Average
Concentration
|
Brine
Volume
|
Mass
Cumulated
|
Comparison
with 2018
Resource
|
|
Li
(mg/l)
|
(Millions
m³)
|
Li
(tonne)
|
Li2CO3
(tonne)
|
Li2CO3
(%)
|
Measured
|
928
|
188
|
175,000
|
930,000
|
281%
|
Indicated
|
923
|
153
|
141,000
|
752,000
|
50%
|
Total M &
I
|
926
|
341
|
316,000
|
1,682,000
|
125%
|
Inferred
|
918
|
33
|
31,000
|
163,000
|
-12%
|
Table 2 - in situ Lithium Resource at
400 mg/l Lithium cut-off
|
Average
Concentration
|
Brine
Volume
|
Mass
Cumulated
|
Comparison
with 2018
Resource
|
|
Li
(mg/l)
|
(Millions
m³)
|
Li
(tonne)
|
Li2CO3
(tonne)
|
Li2CO3
(%)
|
Measured
|
790
|
437
|
346,000
|
1,839,000
|
223%
|
Indicated
|
576
|
1,131
|
651,000
|
3,465,000
|
1%
|
Total M &
I
|
636
|
1,568
|
996,000
|
5,304,000
|
33%
|
Inferred
|
561
|
757
|
425,000
|
2,261,000
|
-22%
|
Note: The
tonnage values in Tables 1 and 2 are expressed as total contained
metals and have been rounded to the nearest thousand.
|
Average density for the brine is 1.217. The low magnesium
and sulfate content of the mineral resource is consistent with the
previous mineral resource estimate. Table 3 summarizes the
main impurities ratios for magnesium and sulfate.
Table 3 - 3Q Project Impurity Ratios at 800
mg/l Lithium Cut-off
Impurity
Ratio
|
Magnesium/Lithium
|
Sulfate/Lithium
|
|
|
Measured
|
1.66
|
0.49
|
|
Indicated
|
1.66
|
0.48
|
|
Total M &
I
|
1.66
|
0.49
|
|
Inferred
|
1.67
|
0.41
|
|
"These updated results confirm that 3Q Project is one of the
most significant lithium brine discoveries in recent history" said
Dr. Perez, President and CEO of Neo Lithium. "We continue to
add high quality resources to the 3Q Project and there is still
incremental value and growth at this world-class high-grade
resource."
Neo Lithium's wholly-owned 3Q Project is within an elongated
salar, 28 km in length that contains a high-grade resource in the
northern third of the salar, roughly defined by the 800 mg/l cut
off, and a medium-grade resource in the southern two thirds of the
salar, within the 400 mg/l cut off. The high-grade resource is
strategically important because it requires smaller evaporation
ponds to put the project into production. Since the pond size is
geometrically related to grade, increases in grade have a
significant impact in decreasing capital costs of pond
construction. Ponds can represent up to 50% of the capital cost of
an evaporative lithium brine project. Therefore, an important
design goal of the project is to minimize pond size.
"We are very pleased with these updated results, which highlight
further upside at the 3Q Project. However, this development does
not take away focus from our ongoing work toward the completion of
the Feasibility Study in Q3," said Gabriel Pindar, COO of Neo
Lithium. "These results emphasize the potential for further
expansion, even beyond what we originally thought."
Feasibility Study Update
The Company is working with Worley on the Feasibility Study for
the 3Q Project. The current larger mineral resource estimate is not
expected to negatively impact the new reserve estimation and mine
plan that will be delivered as part of the Feasibility Study. The
Company does not expect mineral extraction methods to change as a
result of the increased mineral resource estimates, as the grade
and location of the mineral resource remains substantially the
same. Accordingly, the "Preliminary Feasibility Study ("PFS")
- 3Q Project, NI 43-101 Technical Report Catamarca, Argentina" with an effective date of
May 7, 2019 and amended as of
May 8, 2019, and subsequently amended
April 1, 2021 is still relevant and
valid as a preliminary indication of the economic potential of the
3Q Project.
A new reserve estimate will be issued along with the Feasibility
Study, to be completed by Worley at the end of Q3 – beginning of Q4
2021. We have completed all base engineering work and issued
proposals to receive vendor budgetary quotes to start compiling the
Feasibility Study Capex estimate. At this stage we remain within
the parameters of the PFS Capex and we do not expect major changes
or deviations from it beyond the accuracy of the PFS
estimate.
Our expanded pilot ponds have been commissioned and are fully
operational. We will be reconfiguring the pilot plant to
reflect continuous operation as part of our operational testing
procedure. Both systems have provided valuable information in
support of the Feasibility Study and are serving as training
grounds for our team in Argentina.
We are proud to announce that we have now reached 20% of our future
permanent staff, in full compliance with our Environmental, Social
and Governance (ESG) goals, providing training and work
opportunities to local people, and thus strengthening the
relationship with our local community.
Resource Estimate Methodology
The mineral resource estimate was prepared in accordance with
best practice methods specific to brine resources. The approach
includes a reliance on drilling and sampling methods that yield
depth-specific chemistry and drainable porosity measurements of the
brine host rock.
The mineral resource calculation is based on four drilling and
sampling campaigns, which included the following:
- Completion of 10,523.65m of
drilling (6,145.75m of diamond drill
and 4,377.90m of rotary holes)
divided in 56 drill holes.
- The deepest hole was 647m.
- The rotary wells were completed with 8 or 10 inch PVC or iron
piping. They were pumped for over 48 hours to ensure the brine
flowed from the aquifer and that all remaining traces of drill mud
was removed. Outflow was typically sampled at six-hour intervals.
All samples were averaged (typically 6 to 10 samples were collected
in each well) and the sample concentration was attributed to the
gravel pack interval of the well.
- The diamond drill holes were cored with HQ triple tube.
- Of the 56 holes used for the mineral resource estimate, nine
reached the basement at depths ranging from 50m (in the western boundary of the salar) to
647m in the eastern border of the
salar. All others were terminated after reaching target depth or
due to drill limitations.
- The total thickness of the basin exceeds 650m on the eastern side, and brine saturated
sediments are present throughout the majority of the sequence; the
exception is relatively fresher-water zones where surface inflows
occur.
- A total of 230 brine samples plus 74 QA/QC samples were
collected from the drill holes during drilling and from completed
wells; and 45 surface samples were collected from the 3Q and Verde
lagunas. Repeat samples were averaged resulting in 184 unique
sample locations, that were used to calculate the resource
estimate.
- Brine samples were collected from the diamond drill holes
during drilling, using a standard packer technique (both single and
double packer) to obtain samples from discrete levels of the
formation. Fluorescein dye was used to ensure that the samples were
representative of the collection interval. Sampling intervals range
from 2m to 50m, depending on the hole.
- Brine was sampled (and bathymetry conducted) in Laguna 3Q and
Laguna Verde, located at the north and south ends of the salar,
respectively. Extensive sampling indicates that the brine
composition in these lagunas is essentially continuous with the
brine under the salar crust.
- Brine samples interpreted to reflect the influence of
freshwater inflows (Rio Salado, Rio
Nacimiento, and Rio 3Q) were removed from the data set prior to
interpolation. Similarly, volumes of the subsurface
associated with fresher water were also removed from the salar
volume for resource estimation.
The previous (2018) mineral resource estimate used a search
radius criteria technique to classify measured, indicated and
inferred resources. In the current estimate the approach was
revised to a borehole density method. Both methods are widely used
in both brine and hard rock resource estimation. The borehole
density method was considered more appropriate based on an
increasing body of site data, which continue to support spatially
predictable geology and brine trends.
Geology and Brine Model
Geology and brine models were assembled in the numerical
modeling software FEFLOW. Geology was interpreted from surface
mapping, diamond drilling core and rotary borehole logging. Eight
primary geological units were identified:
- Brine lakes: standing bodies of surface brine at the north and
south ends of the salar complex (Laguna 3Q and Laguna Verde,
respectively);
- Hyper-Porous Halite: karstic, near surface halite (typically
less than 50m depth);
- Upper Sediments: formed by sand, silt and conglomerates located
at surface or near surface;
- Porous Halite: formed by halite with moderate porosity that is
readily identified by visual methods;
- Massive Halite: this unit generally occurs as labelled, but
often contains interbedded layers of clay, volcaniclastics, and
halite with greater visible porosity. Consistent with this
observation, a range of tests have indicated potentially important
porosity in this unit.
- Lower Sediments: well rounded sand, silt and minor
conglomerates hosted below the Massive Halite (typically
300m to 500
m deep);
- Fanglomerates: sedimentary polymictic angular breccia with sand
matrix located below the Lower Sediments and above the Basement,
typically below 500 m depth; and
- Hydrostratigraphic Basement: Permian andesites and dacites;
generally considered to have negligible or low drainable
porosity.
Core samples were packed in Lexan tubing and shipped to
Daniel B. Stephens & Associates
Inc. ("DBS"), Inc., a laboratory in the U.S., to measure Relative
Brine Release Capacity (RBRC). This method of porosity
determination is designed to estimate Specific Yield, which is the
portion of the total porosity that can reasonably be expected to
drain through pumping. General porosity trends were consistent with
geology, with considerable variability also noted within geological
units.
RBRC was measured in 307 core samples (across all drilling
campaigns), to estimate the Specific Yield of each geological unit.
Pumping tests were also completed in the Hyper-Porous Halite, Upper
Sediments and Porous Halite.
A summary of the RBRC measurements and the percentage of the
resource in each unit is provided in Table 4.
Table 4 - RBRC Results and the Distribution of the
Resource between the Primary Geological Units
Hydrostratigraphic
Units
|
# of
Samples
|
Average
Specific
Yield
|
% of the
Resource
|
|
|
Brine
Lakes
|
|
|
1
|
|
Hyper-Porous
Halite*
|
66
|
14.74
|
11
|
|
Upper
Sediments*
|
14
|
9.12
|
22
|
|
Porous
Halite*
|
97
|
6.33
|
16
|
|
Massive
Halite
|
84
|
3.85
|
15
|
|
Lower
Sediments
|
12
|
5.18
|
11
|
|
Fanglomerate
|
33
|
11.23
|
24
|
|
Hydrological
Basement
|
1
|
1.73
|
0
|
|
*Units evaluated
with Pumping Tests
|
The Hyper-Porous Halite hosts 11% of the resource. A pumping
test was completed in this unit that included the use of
fluorescein dye, which enabled estimation of Effective Porosity, a
parameter that is closely related to Specific Yield. The test
provided an Effective Porosity value of 15%, which is consistent
with the average RBRC value for the unit.
The Lower Sediments and Fanglomerates host a combined 35% of the
total resource (almost entirely classified as inferred resource,
due to depth and lower borehole density). Only 13 boreholes
penetrate to these units, and only two completely penetrate the
units. Further exploration is required at depth along the entire
salar complex with the objective of converting these inferred
resources into the measured and indicated categories.
The brine data were interpolated directly within FEFLOW, to
minimize the potential for errors in transferring distributions
between software packages. Mass calculations were conducted within
FEFLOW, with consideration of the assigned drainable porosity and
the interpolated grade in each model cell.
Further Drilling and Blue Sky
The expansion of the resource estimate in the high-grade zone is
based on the discovery of high-grade brine at depth and to the east
(and outside) of the previous mineral resource estimate. As a
result, the company decided to continue the drilling campaign in
the high-grade mineral resource in the next season (starting
September 2021). This follow-up
drilling campaign will focus on the high-grade mineral resource at
depth. The deepest hole in the high-grade zone is currently
365 m, and it did not reach basement.
This is taken as an indication of further discovery potential at
depth and to the east of Laguna 3Q under a large flanking alluvial
fan. The upcoming drilling campaign will not delay the company's
work to initiate pond construction in the coming austral summer,
since it is located some distance from the construction sites.
Qualified Person
Neo Lithium requested Groundwater Insight, Inc. based in
Nova Scotia, Canada to supervise
the preparation of an independent lithium brine resource estimate
for the Company's 3Q Project brine deposit in Argentina. Dr. Mark
King, Ph.D., P. Geo., Hydrogeologist with Groundwater
Insight Inc., served as the Qualified Person (QP) for this work, as
such terms are defined by NI 43-101. The mineral resource estimate
was prepared by Engineer and Numerical Modeler Paul Martin (P.
Eng., Aqua Insight Inc.) using the FEFLOW software.
The current increase of total resources (taking into account
measured, indicated and inferred mineral resource categories) is
approximately 9%. Therefore, the company is of the view that
issuance of a new NI 43-101 Technical Report, to document the
resource, is not required at this time.
The final Technical Report (including a resource and reserve
estimate to be supervised by Groundwater Insight, Inc.) will be
prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and will be consistent with
the standards and guidelines set out by the Canadian Institute of
Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. The report is now in preparation
by Worley, and it will be issued as a Definitive Feasibility Study
at the end of Q3 or beginning of Q4 2021.
Dr. King has read and approved the contents of this news
release, concerning the preparation of the mineral resource
estimate. Waldo Perez, Ph.D. and
P.Geo., is the internal Qualified Person for the 3Q Project in
accordance with NI 43-101.
Brine Sample Collection (QA/QC)
The brine samples collected in the field were delivered by the
Company to Andesmar Transport Company ("Andesmar") in Catamarca
city, in the province of Catamarca. Andesmar delivered the samples
by truck to Alex Stewart Laboratories ("ASL"), an ISO
9001-2008-certified laboratory in Mendoza, Argentina.
ASL used the following analytical methodologies: ICP-OES
(inductively-coupled plasma-optical (atomic) emission spectrometry)
to quantify boron, barium, calcium, lithium, magnesium, manganese,
and potassium; an argentometric method to assay for chloride; a
gravimetric method to analyze for sulfate; a volumetric analysis
(acid/base titration) for the evaluation of alkalinity (as CaCO3);
a gravimetric method to determine density and total dissolved
solids; and, a laboratory pH meter to determine pH.
All analytical work is subject to systematic and rigorous
Quality Assurance-Quality Control procedures. A reference
("standard") sample was inserted into the sample stream at a
frequency of approximately 1 in 15 samples; a field blank was
inserted at a frequency of approximately 1 in 15 samples; and a
field duplicate sample was inserted at a frequency of approximately
1 in 15 samples.
About Neo Lithium Corp.
Neo Lithium Corp. has quickly become a prominent new name in
lithium brine development by virtue of its high quality 3Q Project
and experienced team. Neo Lithium is rapidly advancing its 100%
owned 3Q Project - a unique high-grade lithium brine lake and salar
complex in Latin America's
"Lithium Triangle".
The 3Q Project is located in the Catamarca Province, the largest
lithium producing area in Argentina covering approximately 35,000 ha
including a salar complex of approximately 16,000 ha.
Additional information regarding Neo Lithium Corp. is available
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under the Company's profile and at its
website at www.neolithium.ca, including various pictures of ongoing
work at the project.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this press release.
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements - Certain information set forth in this
news release may contain forward-looking statements. Such
statements include but are not limited to, statements concerning
the Sidecar Placement and the Brokered Offering, the intended use
of proceeds therefrom, the Closing Date and receipt of regulatory
approvals, including the approval of the TSXV. Generally,
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words
such as "plans", "expects" or "is expected", "scheduled",
"estimates" "intends", "anticipates", "believes", or variations of
such words and phrases, or statements that certain actions, events
or results "can", "may", "could", "would", "should", "might" or
"will", occur or be achieved, or the negative connotations thereof.
These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the control of the
Company, which could cause the actual results, performance or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from the
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such statements. These risks include, without limitation, failure
to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable
terms, political and regulatory risks associated with mining and
exploration activities, including environmental regulation, risks
and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill and
sample results and to mineral resource and reserve calculations,
risks related to the uncertainty of cost and time estimation and
the potential for unexpected delays, costs and expenses, risks
related to metal price fluctuations, the market for lithium
products, and other risks and uncertainties related to the
Company's prospects, properties and business detailed elsewhere in
the Company's disclosure record. Although the Company believes its
expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and has
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
actions, events or results to differ materially from those
described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors
that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended and undue reliance should not be placed on
forward-looking statements.
SOURCE Neo Lithium Corp.