Supplemental Disclosures to the Proxy Statement in Connection with Litigation Relating to the Merger
Litigation Relating to the Merger
As previously
disclosed in the Proxy Statement, the following actions were commenced by purported stockholders of the Company between April 6, 2020 and April 20, 2020: (a) two putative class actions, (i) Post v. The Meet Group, Inc., et
al., No. 1:20-cv-00479-LPS (D. Del.) (the Post Complaint) and (ii) Paskowitz v. The Meet
Group, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-00481-LPS (D. Del.) (the Paskowitz Complaint), and (b) five individual
actions, (i) Wang v. The Meet Group, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-00475-LPS (D. Del.) (the Wang
Complaint), (ii) Bayer v. The Meet Group, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-02873-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (the Bayer
Complaint), (iii) Gurian v. The Meet Group, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-02855-AKH (S.D.N.Y.)
(the Gurian Complaint), (iv) Cole v. The Meet Group, Inc., et al., No. 1:20-cv-02987 (S.D.N.Y.) (the Cole Complaint), and
(v) Justus v. The Meet Group, Inc., et al., No
2:20-cv-04314-MCA-MAH (D.N.J.) (the Justus Complaint). Since then, the
following actions were commenced by purported stockholders of the Company: (a) one putative class action: Mowry v. The Meet Group, Inc. et al., No. 2:20-cv-02092-KSM (E.D. Pa.) (the Mowry Complaint); and (b) three individual actions: (i) Respler v. The Meet Group, Inc., et al., No. 3:20-cv-02841-JSC (N.D. Cal.) (the Respler Complaint); (ii) Miles v. The Meet Group, et al., No. 1:20-cv-03301 (S.D.N.Y.) (the Miles Complaint) and (iii) Lee v. The Meet Group, et al., No.
1:20-cv-03850 (S.D.N.Y.) (the Lee Complaint and, together with the Post Complaint, the Paskowitz Complaint, the Wang Complaint, the Bayer Complaint, the
Gurian Complaint, the Cole Complaint, the Justus Complaint, the Mowry Complaint, the Respler Complaint, and the Miles Complaint, the Complaints). Each complaint generally alleges certain deficiencies in the disclosures contained in the
Proxy Statement in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
While the Company believes that the disclosures set
forth in the Proxy Statement comply fully with applicable law, in order to moot plaintiffs disclosure claims in the Complaints, avoid nuisance and preclude any efforts to delay closing, and provide additional information to the Companys
stockholders, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Proxy Statement with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the Supplemental Disclosure). Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosure shall be deemed an admission
of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations in the Complaints that any additional disclosure was or is required. The Company
believes the Complaints are without merit.
Supplemental Disclosure to the Proxy Statement
The following Supplemental Disclosure should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Terms used below, unless
otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement.
Underlined text shows text being added to a referenced disclosure in the Proxy
Statement and a line through text shows text being deleted from a referenced disclosure in the Proxy Statement.
The disclosure under the heading
The Merger ProposalCertain Company Unaudited Prospective Financial InformationManagement Projections is hereby supplemented by adding the underlined information about stock-based compensation expense to footnote 3 of the
table on page 48 of the Proxy Statement. The table in its entirety, including the revised and supplemented footnote 3, is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ending December 31
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
2020E
|
|
|
2021E
|
|
|
2022E
|
|
|
2023E
|
|
|
2024E
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
% Growth
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
% Margin(2)
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
Adjusted EBIT(3)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
% Margin(4)
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Net Income(5)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
% Margin(6)
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
Selected Cash Flow Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
(Increase) / Decrease in NWC(7)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Effective Tax rate
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
Unlevered free cash flow(8)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|