UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN
PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. 1)
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
þ
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement.
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
|
o
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement.
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials.
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12.
|
VCG HOLDING CORP.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
VCG Holding Corp. common stock, par value $0.0001 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
11,153,193 shares of VCGs common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated solely for the purpose of determining the filing fee.
The maximum aggregate transaction value was determined based upon the
product of (i) 11,153,193 shares of VCGs common stock (based on the
number of shares outstanding on December 23, 2010), multiplied by
(ii) the merger consideration of $2.25 per share (the Total
Consideration). No consideration will be paid for any option because the exercise price of all outstanding options exceeds the per share merger consideration.
The filing fee, calculated in accordance with Section 14(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 0-11(c)(1) promulgated thereunder, was determined by multiplying the Total Consideration by the applicable fee at the time of payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
$25,094,684.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
$1,789.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Tel: (303) 934-2424
Fax: (303) 922-0746
|
|
PRELIMINARY
COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED FEBRUARY 3,
2011
SPECIAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
[ * ], 2011
[ * ], 2011
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of
shareholders of VCG Holding Corp., a Colorado corporation, to be
held on [ * ], 2011 at [ * ] Mountain time, at [ * ] Lakewood,
Colorado. The accompanying proxy statement provides information
regarding the matters to be acted on at the special meeting,
including any adjournment or postponement thereof.
At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote
upon a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger that
we entered into on November 9, 2010 with Family Dog, LLC, a
Colorado limited liability company, its wholly-owned subsidiary,
FD Acquisition Co., our Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, Troy Lowrie, and our President and Chief
Operating Officer, Micheal Ocello. If both (i) holders of
record of a majority of VCG Holding Corp.s outstanding
common stock, as of [ * ], and (ii) a majority of the votes
actually cast at the special meeting, vote to adopt and approve
the merger agreement, and the other conditions in the merger
agreement are satisfied or waived, FD Acquisition Co. will be
merged with and into VCG Holding Corp. and VCG Holding Corp.
will survive as a privately-held, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Family Dog, LLC. The votes cast by shares of VCG Holding
Corp.s common stock beneficially owned by
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello will not be taken into account
for purposes of determining whether the requisite shareholder
vote in clause (ii) has been received, which we refer to in
the accompanying proxy statement as the majority of the
minority shareholder approval or vote.
Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, if
the merger agreement is approved and the merger is consummated,
each share of VCG Holding Corp.s common stock (except for
shares held by us, Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello, certain of
their affiliates, and shareholders that are eligible to and
elect to invoke dissenters rights), will be cancelled and
converted into the right to receive $2.25 in cash, without
interest (and less applicable withholding taxes). In addition,
all outstanding options to purchase VCG Holding Corp.s
common stock will be cancelled at the effective time of the
merger without any consideration either because they are
unvested, or, in the case of vested options, the per share
exercise price of all outstanding options is greater than the
merger consideration of $2.25 per share. Based on the closing
sale price for VCG Holding Corp.s common stock on
July 21, 2010, the last trading day before public
announcement of the proposal that resulted in the merger
agreement, the merger consideration represented a 36.4% premium
over the price per share of VCG Holding Corp.s common
stock prior to the announcement of the execution of the merger
agreement.
On November 9, 2010, our board of directors, after
considering numerous factors, including the unanimous
determination and recommendation of a special committee
comprised entirely of independent directors, unanimously
determined (with Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the vote)
that the Agreement and Plan of Merger is advisable, fair to and
in the best interests of VCG Holding Corp. and our shareholders.
In arriving at their determination and recommendation, our board
of directors and the special committee of our board of directors
carefully considered a number of factors which are described in
the accompanying proxy statement.
Our board of directors
unanimously recommends (with Mr. Lowrie taking no part in
such recommendation) that you vote FOR the approval
of the Agreement and Plan of Merger.
When you consider the recommendation of our board of directors
to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, you should be aware
that some of our directors and executive officers have interests
in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the
interests of our shareholders generally.
The accompanying proxy statement provides you with detailed
information about the special meeting and the Agreement and Plan
of Merger. You are urged to read the entire document carefully.
You may also obtain more information about us from documents we
have previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Regardless
of the number of shares you own, your vote is very
important.
If you fail to vote on the Agreement and Plan of Merger, the
effect will be the same as if you had voted against the approval
of the Agreement and Plan of Merger for purposes of calculating
whether a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting have voted to approve
the Merger Proposal, but will be neutral with respect to
calculating whether a majority of the minority shareholders has
approved the Merger Proposal, as further described in the
accompanying proxy statement. Once you have read the
accompanying proxy statement, please vote on the proposals
submitted to our shareholders at the special meeting, whether or
not you plan to attend the meeting, by signing, dating and
mailing the enclosed proxy card or by voting your shares by
Internet at [ * ] using the instructions on your proxy card. If
you receive more than one proxy card because you own shares that
are registered in different names or through entities, please
vote all of your shares shown on all of your proxy cards. If
your shares are held in street name, your broker
will be unable to vote your shares without instructions from
you. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares,
following the procedures provided to you by your broker. Failure
to instruct your broker to vote your shares will have exactly
the same effect as if you failed to vote as described above.
Voting by proxy will not prevent you from voting your shares in
person in the manner described in the accompanying proxy
statement if you subsequently choose to attend the special
meeting in person.
On behalf of your board of directors, thank you for your
cooperation and support.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Sawicki
|
|
Tenicia Bradley
|
Chairman of the Special Committee
|
|
Secretary
|
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE
SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE MERGER,
OR PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERITS OF THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN
OF MERGER OR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THE ENCLOSED PROXY STATEMENT. ANY CONTRARY
REPRESENTATION IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The accompanying proxy statement is dated [ * ], 2011, and it
and the proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or
about [ * ], 2011.
IMPORTANT
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF
SHARES YOU OWN. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY MAIL YOUR
PROXY CARD OR VOTE VIA THE INTERNET AT YOUR EARLIEST
CONVENIENCE.
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON [ * ], 2011.
To the Shareholders of VCG Holding Corp.:
A special meeting of shareholders of VCG Holding Corp., a
Colorado corporation (VCG) will be held at [ * ]
Lakewood, Colorado, on [ * ], 2011 at [ * ], Mountain Time, for
the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt and approve
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 9,
2010, by and among VCG Holding Corp., Family Dog, LLC, FD
Acquisition Co., Troy Lowrie and Micheal Ocello.
2. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve any motion
to adjourn or postpone the special meeting to another time or
place if necessary to solicit additional proxies if there are
insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve
the foregoing proposal.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
The accompanying proxy statement further describes the matters
to be considered at the special meeting. A copy of the merger
agreement has been included as
Appendix A
to this
proxy statement.
Our board of directors unanimously recommends (with
Mr. Lowrie taking no part in such recommendation) that you
vote FOR proposals 1 and 2.
When you consider the recommendation of our board of directors
to approve the merger agreement, you should be aware that some
of our directors and executive officers have interests in the
merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests
of our unaffiliated shareholders.
Our board of directors has set [ * ], 2011 as the record date
for the special meeting. Only holders of record of shares of
VCGs common stock at the close of business on [ * ], 2011
will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting
and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The special meeting
will begin promptly at [ * ], Mountain Time.
Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote is very
important. The affirmative vote of both (i) the holders of
a majority of the outstanding shares of VCGs common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting, and (ii) a
majority of the votes actually cast at the special meeting is
required to adopt and approve the merger agreement. Any votes
cast by shares beneficially owned by either of
Messrs. Lowrie or Ocello will not be taken into account for
any purpose when determining whether the requisite vote set
forth in clause (ii) has been achieved (e.g. in calculating
votes cast in favor or total votes cast). The affirmative vote
of the votes actually cast at the special meeting is required to
adopt and approve any adjournment or postponement proposal.
Holders of our common stock who do not vote in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement are entitled to assert
dissenters rights under Article 113 of the Colorado
Business Corporation Act, subject to the provisions of such act.
Those asserting their dissenters rights will have the
right to obtain payment in cash of the fair value of their
shares if the merger is completed provided they submit a written
notice in compliance with Article 113 of the Colorado
Business Corporation Act of their intention to demand payment
for their shares prior to the vote on the merger agreement and
if they further comply with the Colorado law procedures
explained in the accompanying proxy statement. When a record
shareholder dissents with respect to the shares held by any one
or more beneficial shareholders, each such beneficial
shareholder must certify to VCG that the beneficial shareholder
and the record shareholder have asserted, or will timely assert,
dissenters rights as to all such shares as to which there
is no limitation on the ability to exercise dissenters
rights. See Dissenters Rights beginning on
page 71 of the accompanying proxy statement.
Article 113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act is
attached as
Appendix C
to the accompanying proxy
statement.
To ensure your representation at the special meeting, please
complete and return the enclosed proxy card or submit your proxy
by Internet at [ * ].
Please submit your proxy promptly
whether or not you expect to attend the special meeting.
Submitting a proxy now will not prevent you from being able to
vote at the special meeting by attending in person and casting a
vote. If you hold your shares in street name through
a bank, broker or other nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy
from such custodian in order to vote in person at the meeting.
You should not send in your certificates representing shares of
VCG common stock until you receive instructions to do so.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Tenicia Bradley
Secretary
Lakewood, Colorado
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
-i-
TABLE OF
CONTENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
-ii-
TABLE OF
CONTENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
-iii-
TABLE OF
CONTENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
APPENDICES
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix A Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
Appendix B Opinion of North Point Advisors,
LLC
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
Appendix C Article 113 of the Colorado
Business Corporation Act (Dissenters Rights)
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
Appendix D Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
Appendix E Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
-iv-
PRELIMINARY
COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED FEBRUARY 3,
2011
VCG
Holding Corp.
390 Union
Boulevard, Suite 540
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
PROXY
STATEMENT
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD [ * ], 2011
The board of directors of VCG Holding Corp., a Colorado
corporation, is soliciting proxies to be used at our special
meeting of shareholders to be held at [ * ] Mountain Time on [ *
], 2011 at [ * ] Lakewood, Colorado. This proxy statement
contains important information regarding VCGs special
meeting, the proposals on which you are being asked to vote,
information you may find useful in determining how to vote and
voting procedures. In this proxy statement, the terms
VCG, the Company, we,
our, and us refer to VCG Holding Corp.
and its subsidiaries.
VCGs board of directors is sending these proxy materials
on or about [ * ], 2011 to all shareholders who owned shares of
VCGs common stock at the close of business on [ * ], which
date is also referred to in this proxy statement as the
record date.
The special meeting is held for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt and approve
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 9,
2010, by and among VCG Holding Corp., Family Dog, LLC, FD
Acquisition Co., Troy Lowrie and Micheal Ocello.
2. To consider and vote on a proposal to approve any motion
to adjourn or postpone the special meeting to another time or
place if necessary to solicit additional proxies if there are
insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve
the foregoing proposal.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
SUMMARY
TERM SHEET
The following summary and the Questions and Answers About
the Special Meeting immediately following this summary are
intended only to highlight certain information contained
elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary and the
following questions and answers section may not contain all the
information that is important to you. To more fully understand
the proposed merger and the terms of the merger agreement, as
well as the other matters described below, you should carefully
read this entire proxy statement, all of its appendices, and the
documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement
before voting. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page __. Where appropriate, we have
set forth a page reference directing you to a more complete
description of the topics described in this summary. Capitalized
terms used but not defined in this summary are defined in the
sections referred to in each heading or as otherwise indicated
below.
The
Proposals (see page __)
You are being asked to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt
and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
November 9, 2010, by and among VCG, Family Dog, LLC, which
we refer to in this proxy statement as Family Dog,
FD Acquisition Co., Troy Lowrie and Micheal Ocello, as the same
may be amended from time to time. We refer to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger as the merger agreement and we refer
to the proposal to approve the merger and the merger agreement
as the Merger Proposal in this proxy statement. If
the shareholders approve the Merger Proposal and the other
conditions to the closing of the merger are satisfied or waived,
upon closing of the merger, FD Acquisition Co. will be merged
with and into VCG and VCG will continue as the surviving
corporation. VCGs current shareholders will no longer have
a
direct or indirect equity interest in VCG (unless they are
members of Family Dog, such as Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello)
and VCGs common stock will no longer be listed on the
NASDAQ Global Market, which we refer to as NASDAQ in
this proxy statement, as a result of the merger. Throughout this
proxy statement we refer to the VCG shareholders, other than
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello and certain of their affiliated
entities, as the non-Executive Group shareholders,
and to the VCG shareholders, other than VCGs officers and
directors and certain of their affiliated entities, as the
unaffiliated shareholders.
You are also being asked to consider and vote on a proposal to
approve any motion to adjourn or postpone the special meeting to
another time or place if necessary to solicit additional proxies
if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special
meeting to approve the Merger Proposal. We refer to this
proposal as the Adjournment Proposal in this proxy
statement.
The
Parties to the Merger Agreement (see page __)
VCG is in the business of acquiring, owning and operating
nightclubs, which provide premium quality live adult
entertainment, and restaurant and beverage services in an
up-scale environment.
Family Dog was formed solely for purposes of entering into the
merger agreement and consummating the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement. Family Dog is owned by
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello and certain accredited investors
(as that term is defined in Rule 501 promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended) who have a pre-existing
personal or business relationship with Mr. Lowrie or
Mr. Ocello and who have delivered to Family Dog executed
subscription agreements, investor questionnaires and an executed
counterpart signature page to the operating agreement of Family
Dog.
FD Acquisition Co. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Family Dog.
FD Acquisition Co. was formed solely for purposes of entering
into the merger agreement and consummating the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
Mr. Lowrie has been our Chairman of the Board since April
2002 and our Chief Executive Officer since November 2002.
Mr. Ocello has been our President and Chief Operating
Officer since April 2002.
Mr. Lowrie beneficially owns shares of VCGs common
stock both individually and through Lowrie Management LLLP, an
entity owned and controlled by Mr. Lowrie. Mr. Lowrie
is the President of Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., which is
the General Partner of Lowrie Management LLLP. Lowrie Investment
Management, Inc. has voting and dispositive power of the shares
of VCGs common stock owned by Lowrie Management LLLP. Mr.
Ocello beneficially owns shares of VCGs common stock both
individually and through LTD Investment Group, LLC, an entity
owned and controlled by Mr. Ocello. We sometimes refer to
Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello, Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc. and LTD Investment Group, LLC
collectively as the Executive Group in this proxy
statement.
If VCGs shareholders approve the Merger Proposal and the
other conditions to the merger are satisfied or waived, in
connection with the closing of the merger, Messrs. Lowrie
and Ocello will contribute all of their shares of VCGs
common stock, including shares held beneficially through Lowrie
Management LLLP, with respect to Mr. Lowrie, and LTD
Investment Group, LLC, with respect to Mr. Ocello, to
Family Dog in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog.
Requisite
Shareholder Vote (see page __)
On the record date, there were 16,292,071 shares of VCGs
common stock outstanding, of which the Executive Group
beneficially owns 5,138,878 shares or 31.5%. One-third of the
votes entitled to be cast on a matter, represented in person or
by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the special meeting. If a
quorum exists, approval of the Merger Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of both (i) the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of VCGs common stock entitled to
vote at the special meeting, and (ii) under the merger
agreement, a majority of the votes actually cast at the special
meeting. Any abstaining votes, broker non-votes and votes cast
by members of the Executive Group with regard to shares of VCG
common stock held by the
2
members of the Executive Group will not be taken into account
for any purpose when determining whether the requisite vote set
forth in clause (ii) has been achieved (e.g. in calculating
votes cast in favor or total votes cast). However, the shares of
VCGs common stock held by the members of the Executive
Group will be taken into account for purposes of the requisite
vote set forth in clause (i) and establishing a quorum.
Further, the members of the Executive Group intend to vote in
favor of the Merger Proposal. The vote required by clause (ii)
is sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as the
majority of the minority shareholder approval or
vote.
If a quorum exists, the Adjournment Proposal is approved if the
votes actually cast favoring the Adjournment Proposal exceed the
votes cast opposing the Adjournment Proposal.
What
Shareholders Will Receive in the Merger (see
page __)
At the effective time of the merger, each share of common stock
held by our shareholders (other than as provided for with
respect to shares currently held by the Executive Group) will be
cancelled and converted into the right to receive $2.25 in cash,
without interest and subject to applicable withholding of taxes.
We sometimes refer to this amount in this proxy statement as the
merger consideration.
Based on the closing sale price for VCG common stock on
July 21, 2010, the last trading day before public
announcement of the proposal that resulted in the merger
agreement, the merger consideration represented a 36.4% premium
over the price per share of VCGs common stock and prior to
the announcement of the merger agreement.
The aggregate value of the merger consideration to be received
by the non-Executive Group shareholders in the merger is
approximately $25.1 million.
What
Option Holders Will Receive in the Merger (see
page __)
At the effective time of the merger, each option to purchase
shares of VCG common stock that is outstanding and unexercised
will be cancelled and VCG will not be required to make any
payments to the holders of such options because the exercise
price per share of each such option, in all instances, exceeds
the merger consideration.
Treatment
of Debt in the Merger (see page __)
Before consummation of the merger, Mr. Lowrie will assign,
or cause to be assigned, to Family Dog all rights to any debt
owed by VCG to him or any of his affiliates (other than the debt
used to purchase certain real property from one of VCGs
subsidiaries, as further disclosed under Special Factors
Real Estate Transaction Involving Mr. Lowrie.)
in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog. VCG does not
currently owe any debt to any of the other members of the
Executive Group. In addition, certain other creditors of VCG may
elect to assign their rights to debt owed by VCG to them to
Family Dog in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog.
We refer in this proxy statement to the debt referenced in the
two preceding sentences as the converting debt. At
any time after the approval of the Merger Proposal by VCGs
shareholders but before consummation of the merger, Family Dog,
in its sole discretion, may request that VCG convert a portion
or all of the debt owed by VCG to Family Dog into shares of VCG
common stock. Any debt owed by VCG before consummation of the
merger that is not converted as described in this paragraph will
remain outstanding after the merger.
Recommendation
of the Special Committee, VCGs Board of Directors and
VCGs Executive Officers (see page __)
Certain of our officers and directors have interests in the
merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests
of VCGs shareholders generally. Accordingly, our board of
directors formed a special committee, which we refer to in this
proxy statement as the Special Committee, currently
comprised of George Sawicki and David Levine, each of whom is a
non-management independent director. The members of the Special
Committee have no material interest in the merger that differs
from the interests of VCGs unaffiliated shareholders. The
Special Committee was charged with reviewing, evaluating and, as
appropriate, negotiating
3
or rejecting the Merger Proposal or any alternative proposal in
each case as the Special Committee considered to be in the best
interests of VCG and its unaffiliated shareholders.
The Special Committee has unanimously determined that the merger
agreement and the merger are fair to and in the best interests
of VCG and its unaffiliated shareholders, and has recommended
that VCGs board of directors approve the merger agreement
and that VCGs shareholders approve the merger agreement
and the merger.
After considering many factors, including the unanimous
recommendation of the Special Committee, VCGs board of
directors (with Troy Lowrie taking no part in the recommendation
or vote) has unanimously:
|
|
|
|
|
determined that the merger and the merger agreement are fair to
and in the best interests of VCG and its unaffiliated
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
approved the merger and merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
recommended that VCGs shareholders approve the merger and
the merger agreement.
|
Before VCGs board of directors unanimously approved the
merger and the merger agreement, the Special Committee and
VCGs board of directors received an opinion from an
independent financial advisor to the effect that, based on and
subject to the various assumptions and qualifications set forth
therein, as of the date of such opinion, the merger
consideration to be received by VCGs unaffiliated
shareholders in the merger is fair to such shareholders from a
financial point of view.
Accordingly, the Special Committee and VCGs board of
directors (with Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the
recommendation) unanimously recommend that you vote
FOR
the Merger Proposal. Each of the Special
Committee and VCGs board of directors (with
Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the recommendation) also
unanimously recommend that you vote
FOR
the
Adjournment Proposal.
None of our executive officers, consisting of Messrs. Lowrie and
Ocello, has made a recommendation with respect to how your
should vote on the Merger Proposal.
Reasons
for the Recommendation of the Special Committee and VCGs
Board of Directors (see page __)
Each of the Special Committee and VCGs board of directors
believes that the merger is both procedurally and substantively
fair to VCGs unaffiliated shareholders. Their belief is
based upon their knowledge and analysis of VCG, as well as the
factors discussed later in this proxy statement in the section
entitled Special Factors Recommendation of the
Special Committee, VCGs Board of Directors and VCGs
Executive Officers; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the
Merger.
Financial
Advisor to the Special Committee and its Opinion Issued to the
Special Committee and VCGs Board of Directors (see
page __)
North Point Advisors LLC, sometimes referred to in this proxy
statement as North Point Advisors, served as
financial advisor to the Special Committee in connection with
the merger transaction.
Before approving the merger and the merger agreement, the
Special Committee and VCGs board of directors received an
opinion from North Point Advisors, to the effect that, based on
and subject to the various assumptions and qualifications set
forth therein, as of the date of such opinion, the merger
consideration to be received by VCGs non-Executive Group
shareholders in the merger is fair to such shareholders from a
financial point of view. The full text of North Point
Advisors opinion, which sets forth the procedures
followed, assumptions made, matters considered, limits of review
undertaken and other matters considered by North Point Advisors
in preparing its opinion, is attached as
Appendix B
to this proxy statement. We strongly recommend that shareholders
read carefully the full text of North Point Advisors
written opinion.
North Point Advisors opinion addresses only the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be
received by the non-Executive Group shareholders as of the date
of such opinion and does not address any other aspect of the
merger. North Point Advisors opinion is not intended to
be, and does not constitute, advice or a recommendation to
VCGs board of directors, the Special Committee, or any
shareholder as to how to act or vote with respect to the Merger
Proposal or related matters.
4
Interests
of VCGs Directors and Officers in the Merger (see
page __)
If VCGs shareholders approve the Merger Proposal and the
other conditions to the merger are satisfied or waived, in
connection with the closing of the merger, Messrs. Lowrie
and Ocello and the other members of the Executive Group will
contribute all of their shares of VCG common stock to Family Dog
(in addition to all debt owed by VCG to Mr. Lowries
entity, Lowrie Management LLLP), other than the debt used to
purchase certain real property from one of VCGs
subsidiaries, as further disclosed under Special Factors
Real Estate Transaction Involving Mr.
Lowrie.). The balance of the membership interests in
Family Dog will be held by accredited investors within the
meaning of Rule 501 promulgated under the Securities Act
who have a pre-existing business or personal relationship with
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello and any creditors of VCG who
elect to assign to Family Dog certain debt owed to them by VCG
in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog. As of the
date hereof, no creditor of VCG (other than Lowrie Management
LLLP) has elected to assign its rights to debt owed by VCG to it
and it is not currently anticipated that any other creditors
will. All shares of VCGs common stock held by Family Dog
will be cancelled for no consideration upon consummation of the
merger. All options exercisable into shares of VCGs common
stock held by Mr. Ocello will be cancelled for no
consideration upon consummation of the merger because the
exercise price of such options exceeds the per share merger
consideration.
If the merger is completed, Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello will
hold substantially similar positions with the surviving
corporation with substantially similar compensation, except that
Mr. Lowries annual salary will be reduced from
$700,000 to $200,000.
VCGs current executive officers and directors will be
indemnified in respect of their past service, and Family Dog
will maintain VCGs current directors and
officers liability insurance, subject to certain
conditions as set forth in the merger agreement.
Those of VCGs current directors and executive officers who
do not hold any shares of VCGs common stock will not
receive any consideration upon consummation of the merger.
In connection with the merger, it is expected that Mr. Lowrie
will use part of the debt owed to Lowrie Management LLLP by VCG
to purchase certain real property from one of VCGs
subsidiaries, as further disclosed under Special Factors
Real Estate Transaction Involving Mr. Lowrie.
Special
Committee Compensation (see page __)
Upon formation of the Special Committee, VCGs board of
directors (other than Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello) determined that
each member of the Special Committee would receive compensation
for service on the Special Committee equal to $2,500 in cash per
month, and that the Chairman of the Special Committee would
receive additional compensation in an amount equal to $1,000 in
cash per month.
Position
of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP,
Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello as to Fairness; Provisions for
Unaffiliated Shareholders (see pages __ and __)
Each of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP,
Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello believes that the merger is fair (both
substantively and procedurally) to VCGs unaffiliated
shareholders.
An unaffiliated representative was not retained to act solely on
behalf of VCGs unaffiliated shareholders for purposes of
negotiating the terms of the transaction or preparing a report
concerning the fairness of the transaction. VCGs board of
directors formed the Special Committee, consisting solely of
independent, non-employee directors, to, among other things,
evaluate whether the merger agreement and the merger were fair
(both substantively and procedurally) to and in the best
interests of VCG and its unaffiliated stockholders.
5
Certain
Effects of the Merger (see page __)
Upon consummation of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
Family Dog will own all of VCGs issued and outstanding
shares of common stock and VCGs current shareholders
(unless they are members of Family Dog) will no longer hold any
interest in VCG;
|
|
|
|
each share of VCGs common stock (other than shares owned
by Family Dog, held in treasury by VCG or owned by shareholders
who properly exercise their dissenters rights under
Colorado law) will be cancelled and converted automatically into
the right to receive the merger consideration; and
|
|
|
|
each option to purchase shares of VCG common stock that is
outstanding and unexercised will be cancelled and VCG will not
be required to make any payments to the holders of such options.
|
Further, after consummation of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
VCG, as the surviving corporation, will become a privately held
corporation;
|
|
|
|
VCGs common stock will cease to be quoted on
NASDAQ; and
|
|
|
|
there will be no public market for VCGs common stock.
|
Conditions
to the Merger (see page __)
Completion of the merger is subject to a number of closing
conditions, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
VCGs shareholders voting to adopt and approve the Merger
Proposal;
|
|
|
|
no event having occurred since the date of the merger agreement
which has had a Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined
under The Merger Agreement Representations and
Warranties);
|
|
|
|
|
|
holders of no greater than 10% of the shares of VCG common stock
held by non-Executive Group shareholders having exercised their
dissenters rights;
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCG having terminated all Company Stock Plans (as defined under
The Merger Agreement Treatment of Stock
Options) and its stock repurchase program; and
|
|
|
|
VCG having obtained all required permits, licenses and the
consents necessary for the consummation of the merger.
|
At any time before the merger, Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co.
may waive the closing conditions applicable to VCG and VCG may
waive the conditions applicable to Family Dog, FD Acquisition
Co., Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello. Under Colorado law,
the Merger Proposal must be approved by the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of VCGs common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting and this condition
cannot be waived by the parties. While circumstances may change,
the parties do not currently expect that any conditions will be
waived.
Restrictions
on Solicitation, Acquisition Proposals and Changes in
Recommendation (see page __)
Under the merger agreement, and during its term, VCG is
prohibited from initiating, soliciting, facilitating or
encouraging any inquiry or the making of any proposal that
constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to an
Acquisition Proposal (as defined under The Merger
Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition
Proposals and Changes in Recommendation). Further, VCG may
not participate in any substantive discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information or data with
respect to VCG, or otherwise cooperate with or take any other
action to facilitate, any proposal that constitutes, or would
reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal, or
requires VCG to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the
merger or any other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, under certain circumstances, VCG
may respond to a bona fide unsolicited Acquisition Proposal or
terminate the merger agreement and enter into an acquisition
agreement with respect to a Superior Acquisition (as defined
under The Merger Agreement Restrictions on
Solicitation,
6
Acquisition Proposals and Changes in Recommendation), so
long as VCG complies with certain terms of the merger agreement
described under The Merger Agreement
Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition Proposals and Changes
in Recommendation.
VCGs board of directors may not withdraw or modify its
recommendation that VCGs shareholders approve and adopt
the Merger Proposal or approve or recommend an Acquisition
Proposal unless it determines in good faith that the failure to
do so would present a substantial risk of being inconsistent
with the fulfillment of its fiduciary duties under applicable
law.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (see page __)
The merger agreement also grants the parties certain termination
rights. The merger agreement may be terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co. and
VCG;
|
|
|
|
by either Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co., on the one hand, or
VCG, on the other hand: (i) if the merger is not
consummated on or before the later of (A) June 30,
2011 and (B) four months after [ * ], the date on which the
Securities and Exchange Commission notified VCG that it has no
further comments to this proxy statement, unless the failure to
consummate the merger by such outside date is the result of a
breach of the merger agreement by the party seeking to terminate
the merger agreement, or (ii) if any governmental entity
issues an order, decree or ruling or takes any other action
permanently enjoining, restraining or otherwise prohibiting the
merger;
|
|
|
|
by Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co., if VCG breaches or fails
to perform in any material respect any of its covenants
contained in the merger agreement, which breach or failure to
perform results in the failure of certain of Family Dogs
and FD Acquisition Co.s closing conditions, and such
breach or failure to perform cannot be or has not been cured
within 30 days after the giving of written notice of such
breach;
|
|
|
|
by VCG, if any of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co.,
Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello breaches or fails to perform
in any material respect any of their covenants contained in the
merger agreement, which breach or failure to perform results in
the failure of certain of VCGs closing conditions, and
such breach or failure to perform cannot be or has not been
cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice of
such breach;
|
|
|
|
by Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co. (i) if VCGs
board of directors shall have approved or recommended a Superior
Acquisition Proposal by a third party, (ii) if there is a
change in Company Recommendation (as defined under The
Merger Agreement Filing of Proxy Statement and
Schedule 13E-3
and Holding of Shareholders Meeting), (iii) if
VCGs board of directors shall have failed to include in
this proxy statement such Company Recommendation, (iv) if
VCG enters into, or VCGs board of directors approves or
recommends, a Company Acquisition Agreement, or
(v) VCGs board of directors or the Special Committee
has publicly announced an intention to do any of the foregoing;
|
|
|
|
by VCG upon the receipt of a Superior Acquisition Proposal if
VCG complies with all of the provisions of the merger agreement
concerning Acquisition Proposals and pays to Family Dog a
termination fee; and
|
|
|
|
by Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co. or VCG if the Merger Proposal
does not receive the requisite shareholder vote at the special
meeting or any adjournment and reconvening thereof.
|
Termination
Fees (see page __)
The merger agreement provides for the payment of termination
fees in certain instances in the event that the merger agreement
is terminated.
7
Payable
by VCG
VCG will be required to pay Family Dog a termination fee in the
amount $1,000,000 in the event that:
|
|
|
|
|
an Acquisition Proposal is made to the non-Executive Group
shareholders and thereafter the merger agreement is terminated
by either Family Dog or VCG if the merger is not consummated on
or before the outside dates described under Summary Term
Sheet Termination of the Merger Agreement
above or VCGs shareholders do not approve the Merger
Proposal at the special meeting of VCGs shareholders or
any adjournment and reconvening thereof, and within
12 months after such termination, VCG enters into, or
publicly announces the intention to enter into, a definitive
agreement with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, or
consummates the transactions contemplated by such Acquisition
Proposal (provided, that the percentages set forth in the
defined term Acquisition Proposal (see The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and Changes in Recommendation) shall
be deemed to be 50%).
|
The termination fee payable by VCG is reduced to $600,000 in the
event that VCG terminates the merger agreement to enter into a
Company Acquisition Agreement involving a Superior Acquisition
Proposal from certain identified parties with which VCG or North
Point Advisors has been in contact to discuss a potential change
in control transaction involving VCG and such party.
Payable
by Family Dog
Family Dog will be required to pay VCG a termination fee in the
amount $1,000,000 in the event that VCG terminates the merger
agreement (i) if the merger is not consummated on or before
the outside dates described under Summary Term
Sheet Termination of the Merger Agreement
above, or (ii) if Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co. or either
of Troy Lowrie or Micheal Ocello breaches or fails to perform in
any material respect any of its covenants contained in the
merger agreement, which breach or failure to perform
(A) would give rise to the failure of certain of VCGs
closing conditions, and (B) cannot be or has not been cured
within 30 days after the giving of written notice of such
breach, and, in the case of each of clauses (i) and (ii),
as a result of Family Dog not being able to secure financing for
the merger, provided that at the time of such termination all of
the closing conditions applicable to all of the parties
obligations as well as Family Dogs and FD Acquisition
Co.s obligations have been satisfied and VCG is not in
material breach of the merger agreement.
Financing
of the Merger (see page __)
The total amount of funds necessary to consummate the merger is
anticipated to be approximately $25,000,000, and transaction
expenses of Family Dog are anticipated to be approximately
$600,000.
Family Dog intends to finance the merger (including fees,
expenses and transaction costs) in substantial part from the
proceeds of the private placement contemplated by the
subscription agreements received by Family Dog from various
accredited investors (as that term is defined in Rule 501
promulgated under the Securities Act) who have a pre-existing
personal or business relationship with Mr. Lowrie or
Mr. Ocello. Family Dog has not delivered subscription
documents to, and has not accepted subscriptions from, persons
other than accredited investors who have a personal or business
relationship with either Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello. The
total amount subscribed for by accredited investors is
$19,200,000. Family Dog expects to finance the remaining portion
of the merger consideration and the related transaction fees
from lines of credit and other committed funds provided by other
affiliates of Family Dog, Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello,
and from funds held by (or otherwise available to) VCG at the
time of the merger, including VCGs cash on hand. Family
Dog has received commitments pursuant to subscription agreements
from such accredited investors, in an amount that, together with
the financial resources described in the previous sentence, is
sufficient to finance the merger and the anticipated transaction
expenses. In light of the subscriptions received, and the other
available sources of funds, Family Dog is no longer accepting
new subscriptions from additional investors.
8
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger (see page __)
The merger will be recorded at its fair market value as a
purchase transaction for financial accounting
purposes.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences (see
page __)
In general, a shareholders receipt of cash in exchange for
shares of VCGs common stock in the merger will be a
taxable sale transaction for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Because tax consequences of the merger will depend on
each shareholders particular individual circumstances,
each shareholder should consult his, her or its tax advisor for
a full understanding of the applicable U.S. federal, state,
local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the merger.
Litigation
Related to the Merger (see page __)
There is ongoing litigation in Colorado state and federal courts
challenging the Merger Proposal. The two lawsuits were brought
as class actions on behalf of the named plaintiffs and other
similarly situated shareholders against Mr. Lowrie, various
entities affiliated with Mr. Lowrie and the current as well
as certain former members of VCGs board of directors. The
plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the merger
consideration of $2.25 per share payable to VCGs
non-Executive Group shareholders upon the closing of the merger,
if at all, is inadequate, that the directors breached fiduciary
duties and that Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest in
connection with the Merger Proposal. The plaintiffs seek, among
other relief, to prevent the merger from occurring, an order
requiring the directors to fulfill their fiduciary duties,
damages, and an award of fees. The merger agreement contains a
condition to closing that there be, among other things, no
pending or threatened lawsuits challenging the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, other than the lawsuit
filed in Colorado state court referred to above.
Dissenters
Rights (see page __)
VCGs shareholders are entitled to dissent from the merger
and obtain payment of the fair value of their shares of
VCGs common stock if and when the merger is effectuated. A
shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters rights must:
(i) cause VCG to receive before the vote is taken on the
merger at the special meeting, written notice of the
shareholders intention to demand payment for the
shareholders shares if the merger is effectuated, and
(ii) not vote the shares in favor of the merger agreement
and the merger.
THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 113 OF THE COLORADO BUSINESS
CORPORATION ACT GOVERNING DISSENTERS RIGHTS ARE COMPLEX
AND TECHNICAL IN NATURE. SHAREHOLDERS DESIRING TO EXERCISE
DISSENTERS RIGHTS MAY WISH TO CONSULT COUNSEL, BECAUSE THE
FAILURE TO COMPLY STRICTLY WITH THESE PROVISIONS WILL RESULT IN
THE LOSS OF THEIR DISSENTERS RIGHTS.
9
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGER
The following questions and answers are intended to address
briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the Merger
Proposal and the special meeting. These questions and answers
may not address all questions that may be important to you as
our shareholder. Please refer to the Summary Term
Sheet and the more detailed information contained
elsewhere in this proxy statement, and the documents
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, which you
should read carefully and in their entirety.
|
|
Q:
|
What happens if the merger is not
consummated?
|
|
|
A:
|
If the merger is not approved by our shareholders or if the
merger is not consummated for any other reason, you will not
receive any payment for your shares in connection with the
merger. Instead, we will remain a public company, you will
continue to hold our common stock and our common stock will
continue to be listed and traded on NASDAQ. In addition, if the
merger is not consummated, we expect that management will
operate our business in a manner similar to the manner in which
it is being operated today and that our shareholders will
continue to be subject to the same risks and opportunities as
they currently are. In that situation, if you want to sell your
common stock, you would need to sell that stock in the open
market or in a privately negotiated transaction in compliance
with applicable securities laws and the price you would receive
for that stock would be based on the prevailing market price or
the price negotiated in the private transaction, respectively.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Why am I receiving this proxy statement and
proxy card?
|
|
|
A:
|
You are receiving this proxy statement and proxy card because
you are a record or beneficial holder of VCGs common stock
and consequently you are being asked to consider and vote upon
important matters at a special meeting of VCGs
shareholders.
|
|
Q:
|
Where and when is the special meeting?
|
|
A:
|
The special meeting of our shareholders will be held on [ * ],
2011 at [ * ].
|
|
Q:
|
What matters will be considered and voted
on at the special meeting?
|
|
A:
|
At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote
on the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt and approve the Merger Proposal;
|
|
|
|
to approve the Adjournment Proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other business as may properly come before the
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
The merger agreement is attached as
Appendix A
to
this proxy statement. We strongly recommend that you carefully
read the merger agreement in its entirety. The terms of the
merger agreement are further described under The Merger
Agreement beginning on page __.
|
|
Q:
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special
meeting?
|
|
A:
|
All shareholders of record as of the close of business on [ * ],
2011 the record date for the special meeting, will be entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting. The votes
cast by members of the Executive Group with regard to shares of
our common stock held by the members of the Executive Group will
not be taken into account for purposes of determining whether
the majority of the minority vote required by the merger
agreement has been achieved, as further described below.
|
|
Q:
|
May I attend the special meeting?
|
|
A:
|
All shareholders of record as of the close of business on the
record date for the special meeting, may attend the special
meeting.
|
If your shares are held in street name by your
broker, bank or other nominee, and you plan to attend the
special meeting, you must present proof of your ownership of our
common stock, such as a bank or
10
brokerage account statement, to be admitted to the meeting. You
also must present at the meeting a proxy issued to you by the
holder of record of your shares.
|
|
Q:
|
How many shares must be present to hold the
special meeting (i.e., to create a quorum)?
|
|
|
A:
|
One-third of the votes entitled to be cast on a matter by our
shareholders, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a
quorum for the special meeting.
|
|
|
Q:
|
How do the Special Committee and our board
of directors recommend that I vote on the Merger Proposal and
the Adjournment Proposal?
|
|
|
A:
|
Each of the Special Committee and our board of directors (with
Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the vote) has unanimously
determined that the merger is fair to, and in the best interests
of, us and our unaffiliated shareholders, and the Special
Committee and our board of directors (with Mr. Lowrie
taking no part in such recommendation) recommend that you vote
FOR
the Merger Proposal and the Adjournment
Proposal.
|
|
|
Q:
|
How do our directors and executive officers
intend to vote?
|
|
|
A:
|
As of the record date, our directors and executive officers
(excluding Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello) are entitled to
vote, in the aggregate, shares of our common stock representing
approximately 1.6% of the outstanding shares, excluding options
to purchase shares of our common stock. In addition, Mr. Lowrie
and Mr. Ocello are entitled to vote (directly or indirectly)
shares of our common stock representing approximately 31.5% of
the outstanding shares. We believe that our directors and
executive officers, including Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello,
intend to vote all of their shares of our common stock
FOR
the approval of the Merger Proposal and
the Adjournment Proposal. However, as further described above
under Summary Term Sheet Requisite
Shareholder Vote, votes cast by members of the Executive
Group will not be taken into account for any purpose when
determining whether the majority of the minority vote has been
achieved. The reasons for their intended vote are discussed
under Special Factors Recommendation of the
Special Committee, VCGs Board of Directors and VCGs
Executive Officers; Reasons for Recommending Approval of the
Merger, Special Factors Purposes and
Reasons of Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello for the Merger and
Special Factors Purposes, Reasons and Plans
for VCG after the Merger.
|
|
|
Q:
|
How do I vote?
|
|
A:
|
Please indicate on your proxy card how you want to vote, and
sign and mail your proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as
soon as possible so that your shares will be represented and
voted at the special meeting. In addition, you may deliver your
proxy via the Internet at [ * ] or the voting instruction form
received from any broker, bank or other nominee that may hold
shares of our common stock on your behalf. If you sign your
proxy card and do not indicate how you want to vote, your shares
will be voted
FOR
the approval of the Merger
Proposal. Please remember that if you fail to vote on the Merger
Proposal, the effect will be the same as a vote against the
approval of the Merger Proposal for purposes of calculating
whether a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting have voted to approve
the Merger Proposal but will be neutral with respect to
calculating whether a majority of the minority has approved the
Merger Proposal.
|
|
Q:
|
If my shares are held in street
name by my broker, banker or other nominee will my broker,
banker or other nominee vote my shares for me?
|
|
A:
|
If your shares are held by your broker, banker or other nominee
(that is, in street name), you will need to obtain a
voting instruction form from the institution that holds your
shares and follow the instructions included on that form
regarding how to instruct your nominee to vote your shares or
obtain a proxy form from your nominee allowing you to vote your
shares at the special meeting in person or by proxy. If you do
not give instructions to your nominee, your nominee can vote
your shares with respect to discretionary items, but
not with respect to non-discretionary items.
Discretionary items are proposals considered routine under the
rules of the New York Stock Exchange (to the extent such rules
apply to your nominee) on which your broker may vote your shares
held in street name in the absence of your voting instructions.
On non-discretionary items for which your do not give your
broker instructions, your shares will be treated as broker
non-votes and will not be voted. Voting on the Merger
Proposal is not a routine matter and will not be treated as a
discretionary item.
|
11
|
|
|
As a result, for the Merger Proposal, your nominee will not vote
your shares of VCG common stock without specific instructions
from you. If you fail to give your broker specific instructions,
your shares will not be voted, which will have the effect of a
vote against the Merger Proposal for purposes of calculating
whether a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock
entitled to vote at the special meeting have voted to approve
the Merger Proposal but will be neutral with respect to
calculating whether a majority of the minority has approved the
Merger Proposal. Voting on the Adjournment Proposal is a routine
matter and we expect that it will be treated as a
discretionary item. Accordingly, we expect that your
broker, banker or other nominee will vote your shares with
respect to the Adjournment Proposal even if you do not instruct
your nominee how to vote.
|
|
|
Q:
|
What does it mean if I receive more than
one proxy card?
|
|
A:
|
It means that you have multiple accounts at the transfer agent
and/or
with
brokers, banks or other nominees. Please sign and return all
proxy cards that you receive or submit your vote via the
Internet at [ * ] to ensure that all your shares are
voted.
|
|
Q:
|
May I change my vote?
|
|
A:
|
Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the special meeting. You may do this in one of the
following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
|
entering a new vote over the Internet (at [ * ]) or by signing
and returning another signed proxy card at a later date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
notifying our Corporate Secretary (by you or your attorney
authorized in writing, or if the shareholder is a corporation,
under its corporate seal, by an officer or attorney of the
corporation) to our principal executive offices before the
special meeting, stating that you are revoking your
proxy; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
voting in person at the special meeting.
|
If your shares are held in an account at a broker or other
nominee, you must contact your broker or other nominee to change
your vote.
|
|
Q:
|
How are votes counted?
|
|
A:
|
For the Merger Proposal, you may vote
FOR
,
AGAINST
or
ABSTAIN
. To
approve the Merger Proposal, the affirmative vote of both
(i) the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
VCGs common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting,
and (ii) a majority of the votes actually cast at the
special meeting of VCGs shareholders is required. If you
abstain, it will have the same effect as if you voted against
the Merger Proposal with respect to the requisite shareholder
vote set forth in clause (i) above but it will be neutral
with respect to the requisite shareholder vote set forth in
clause (ii) above. In addition, if your shares are held in
the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank
or other nominee will not be entitled to vote your shares with
respect to the Merger Proposal in the absence of specific
instructions, which, if not given, will have the effect as if
you abstained as described above.
|
For the Adjournment Proposal, you may vote
FOR
,
AGAINST
or
ABSTAIN
. Abstentions will be neutral with
respect to the Adjournment Proposal, which requires that the
votes actually cast favoring the Adjournment Proposal exceed the
votes cast opposing the Adjournment Proposal.
If you sign your proxy card without indicating your vote, your
shares will be voted
FOR
the approval of the
Merger Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, and in accordance
with the recommendations of our board of directors on any other
matters properly brought before the special meeting for a vote.
Abstentions and broker non votes count for purposes of
determination whether a quorum exists.
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
What happens if I sell my shares before the
special meeting?
|
|
|
A:
|
The record date of the special meeting is earlier than the date
set for the special meeting and the date that the merger is
expected to be completed. If you transfer your shares of common
stock after the record date, but before the special meeting, you
will retain your right to vote at the special meeting, but will
have transferred the right to receive $2.25 per share in cash,
without interest (and less applicable withholding
|
12
|
|
|
taxes), to be received by our shareholders upon consummation of
the merger. In order to be entitled to receive $2.25 per share,
without interest (and less applicable withholding taxes), you
must hold your shares through the effective time of the merger.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Should I send in my stock certificates
now?
|
|
A:
|
No. If you hold certificates representing shares of our
common stock, you will be sent a letter of transmittal with
detailed written instructions for exchanging your common stock
certificates for the $2.25 consideration promptly after the
merger is consummated.
Please do not send in your
certificates now.
|
|
|
Q:
|
When can I expect to receive the merger
consideration for my shares?
|
|
|
A:
|
Once you have submitted your properly completed letter of
transmittal, our stock certificates and other required documents
to the paying agent, the paying agent will send you the merger
consideration payable with respect to your shares.
|
|
Q:
|
I do not know where my stock certificate
is. How will I get my cash?
|
|
A:
|
The materials the paying agent will send you after completion of
the merger will include the procedures that you must follow if
you cannot locate your stock certificate. This will include an
affidavit that you will need to sign attesting to the loss of
your certificate. You may also be required to provide a bond to
us in order to cover any potential loss.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Who is soliciting my vote and will pay for
it?
|
|
|
A:
|
The proxy solicitation is being made by our board of directors
and paid for by us. Our directors, officers and employees may
also solicit proxies by personal interview, mail,
e-mail,
telephone, facsimile or by other means of communication. These
persons will not be paid additional remuneration for their
efforts. We will also request brokers and other fiduciaries to
forward proxy solicitation material to the beneficial owners of
shares of our common stock that the brokers and fiduciaries hold
of record. We will reimburse them for their reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses.
|
|
Q:
|
What should I do now?
|
|
A:
|
We urge you to read this proxy statement carefully, including it
appendices, and to consider how the transaction affects you as a
shareholder. Then simply mark, sign, date and promptly mail the
enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.
Should you prefer, you may deliver your proxy via Internet at [
* ] or in accordance with the voting instruction form received
from any broker, bank or other nominee that may hold shares of
our common stock on your behalf. Please act as soon as possible
so that your shares of our common stock will be voted at the
special meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
When is the merger expected to be
completed?
|
|
A:
|
The merger will become effective upon the later of the date and
time of the filing of the articles of merger with the Secretary
of State of the State of Colorado or such later date and time as
may be specified in the statement of merger with the consent of
the parties to the merger agreement. The filing of the statement
of merger will occur on the second business day following
satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions of the merger
unless otherwise agreed to in writing by us and Family Dog. The
parties are working toward completing the merger as quickly as
possible and anticipate closing the merger in the first quarter
of 2011.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Does this special meeting replace our
annual meeting of shareholders?
|
|
|
A:
|
No. If the Merger Proposal is not approved by our
shareholders or if the merger is not consummated for any other
reason, our board of directors intends to timely call and hold
our next annual meeting of shareholders to elect directors and
to attend to such other matters as may properly come before the
annual meeting.
|
|
|
Q:
|
Who can help answer my questions?
|
|
|
A:
|
If you have any questions about the merger or if you need
additional copies of this proxy statement or the enclosed proxy
card, you should contact Tenicia Bradley at our corporate
headquarters at VCG Holding Corp., 390 Union Boulevard, Suite
540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228,
(303) 934-2424.
|
13
SPECIAL
FACTORS
Background
of the Merger
The
Proposal Initially Made in November 2009
On November 3, 2009, Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie Management
LLLP, on behalf of Family Dog, presented to VCGs board of
directors a proposal (the Proposal) to acquire all
of the outstanding shares of VCGs common stock (other than
shares owned by members of the Executive Group) in a cash merger
transaction. The consideration proposed in the Proposal was
$2.10 per share of VCGs common stock.
Following receipt of the Proposal, VCGs board of directors
established the Special Committee consisting solely of
independent directors to evaluate the Proposal. The members of
the Special Committee appointed in November 2009 were George
Sawicki (Chairman), Kenton Sieckman and Carolyn Romero. The
Special Committee discussed and concluded that it would be
advisable for it to retain independent legal counsel and an
independent financial advisor. The Special Committee then
retained independent legal counsel.
After retaining its independent legal counsel, the Special
Committee commenced a process to determine which investment bank
should serve as financial advisor to the Special Committee. The
Special Committee sought recommendations for investment banking
firms from its members, VCGs Chief Financial Officer,
VCGs outside legal counsel and the Special
Committees independent legal counsel. This process
resulted in a list of investment banking firms which were
contacted and invited to submit proposals. From the investment
banking firms contacted, eight proposals were received.
Thereafter, VCGs Chief Financial Officer, VCGs
outside legal counsel and the Special Committees
independent legal counsel reviewed the proposals received.
VCGs Chief Financial Officer and the Special
Committees independent legal counsel had discussions with
each of the firms that had submitted a proposal. In these
discussions, questions were asked about each firms
qualifications to serve as financial advisor to the Special
Committee and also about their industry experience and any
potential conflicts of interest that such firms might have. The
submitted terms for the proposed engagement were also discussed.
After the completion of the discussions, the Special Committee
met to discuss the findings.
At this meeting, the Special Committees independent legal
counsel reviewed the terms of the proposals received and the
discussions which had been conducted with the various investment
banking firms. After discussion, the Special Committee indicated
that North Point Advisors appeared to be the leading candidate
for the engagement. It was noted that North Point Advisors was a
leading investment banking firm in the retail, restaurant and
entertainment industries and had experience in a number of going
private transactions. Also, North Point Advisors was
independent, had no conflicts with any of the parties to the
merger agreement, and had never represented VCG or the any
member of the Executive Group.
It was also noted that, in the course of discussions, North
Point Advisors had been willing to structure its fee proposal so
that amounts would be payable in increments (one time retainer
fee, strategic analysis fee, fairness opinion fee, and
transaction fee) at various points throughout a potential
transaction process. That structure would permit VCG to control
its fee payment obligations in the event that a transaction did
not proceed or if the process would extend out over a long
period of time. The Special Committee also noted that the
overall level of fees proposed by North Point Advisors was
within the mid-range of the fees proposed by the other
investment banking firms as a group.
The Special Committee directed its independent legal counsel to
negotiate further the terms of North Point Advisors
proposal to serve as the Special Committees financial
advisor. The engagement letter negotiated provided for a $50,000
non-refundable retainer fee, a $100,000 strategic alternatives
analysis fee, a $250,000 fairness opinion fee and a transaction
fee measured by the consideration to be paid in the merger if
the merger were consummated. The retainer fee and the strategic
alternatives analysis fee would be credited against the
transaction fee payable to North Point Advisors if a transaction
was ultimately consummated. The fairness opinion fee, however,
would not be credited against the transaction fee.
14
The Special Committee and North Point Advisors subsequently
executed an engagement agreement on December 4, 2009.
On December 3, 2009, at the request of the Special
Committee, VCG, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Lowries
affiliated entities (Lowrie Management LLLP and Family Dog)
entered into a Confidentiality and Standstill Agreement (the
Standstill Agreement). Pursuant to the Standstill
Agreement, Mr. Lowrie and his affiliated entities agreed
that, unless otherwise agreed to by the Special Committee, they
would not, among other things, (i) acquire additional
securities of VCG, (ii) enter into any merger or business
combination involving VCG or make or participate in any proxy
solicitation related thereto, or (iii) advise, assist or
encourage any other persons in connection with any of the
foregoing. The term of the Standstill Agreement was until the
earliest of (i) 12 months from the date of the
Standstill Agreement, (ii) the date of execution of any
definitive agreement with respect to the Proposal, or
(iii) 180 days after written notice by
Mr. Lowries investor group of the cessation of
negotiations with respect to the Proposal.
On December 16, 2009, after consultation with its legal and
financial advisors, the Special Committee determined that the
terms of the Proposal were inadequate. The Special Committee
then directed North Point Advisors to contact any parties that
had either previously expressed an interest or might potentially
be interested in pursuing a transaction with VCG.
Following the Special Committees instructions, North Point
Advisors contacted nine potential strategic buyers and 26
potential financial buyers for VCG.
As a result of the marketing process conducted by North Point
Advisors, the Special Committee negotiated and approved a
non-binding letter of intent (the Ricks LOI)
with Ricks Cabaret International, Inc.
(Ricks) and Mr. Lowrie, which was
executed by VCG, Ricks, Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie
Management LLLP on February 16, 2010. Ricks is a
publicly traded company (NASDAQ symbol: RICK) which operates
upscale adult nightclubs serving primarily businessmen and
professionals in the United States. No other party contacted by
North Point Advisors submitted an acquisition proposal for VCG.
The Ricks LOI proposed that Ricks would acquire all
of the outstanding shares of common stock of VCG in a
stock-for-stock merger transaction. Pursuant to the Ricks
LOI, VCGs shareholders were to receive shares of
Ricks common stock in exchange for their shares of
VCGs common stock. The number of Ricks shares to be
received would be based on an exchange ratio that varied based
upon the then current trading price of Ricks stock.
VCGs shareholders, for example, would have received
Ricks stock valued at $2.20 for each share of VCGs
common stock if the average trading price of Ricks stock
(as of the time of closing) was between $8.00 and $10.00 per
share. If the average trading price of Ricks stock (as of
the time of closing) was above $19.95, then VCGs
shareholders would have received Ricks stock valued at
$3.80 for each share of VCGs common stock. Ricks
also would have had the right to terminate the transaction if
the average trading price of Ricks stock (as of the time
of closing) was less than $8.00 per share.
At the time of the February 16, 2010 announcement, the
average price of Ricks common stock under the Ricks
LOI would have been equal to $11.76 per share, and VCGs
shareholders would have received Ricks stock valued at
$2.66 per share of VCGs common stock.
In the course of negotiating the Ricks LOI, it became
apparent to the parties to it that VCG would be unable to obtain
certain unrelated third party consents necessary for the
transfer of certain assets in the contemplated transaction with
Ricks. VCG and Ricks were unable to negotiate a
mutually acceptable solution to this issue. As a result, on
April 1, 2010, VCG and Ricks announced that the
Ricks LOI had expired, in accordance with its terms, on
March 31, 2010, with no definitive acquisition agreement
being executed by the parties to the Ricks LOI. Prior to
this announcement, the closing price of Ricks common stock
on March 31, 2010 was $12.80 per share. Ricks stock
price declined subsequent to the announcement. On
February 1, 2011, the closing price of Ricks common
stock was $8.68.
Selected
Developments after Expiration of the Ricks LOI and before
the Reaffirmed Proposal
Following the expiration of the Ricks LOI and the
dissolution of the Special Committee in April 2010, VCGs
board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$1 million of VCG common stock. In June and
15
July 2010, VCG repurchased an aggregate of 551,155 shares
of its common stock under the repurchase program for an
aggregate of $930,082.87.
On July 16, 2010, our board of directors approved and one
of VCGs subsidiaries sold to an entity affiliated with
Ricks (i) the building in which VCG previously
operated Jaguars Gold Club Fort Worth located in
Fort Worth, Texas, and (ii) all assets associated with
the club, excluding cash. The purchase price paid at closing
consisted of $1,000,000 in cash and the transfer from the
purchaser to VCG of 467,497 shares of VCGs common
stock previously held by the purchaser.
These two events were taken into consideration by North Point
Advisors, VCGs board of directors and the Special
Committee when evaluating the reaffirmed Proposal, as discussed
below.
The
Reaffirmed Proposal Made in July 2010
On July 20, 2010, Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie Management
LLLP, on behalf of Family Dog, delivered to VCGs board of
directors a letter reaffirming Family Dogs willingness to
pursue the transactions contemplated by the Proposal on the
terms originally set forth therein. As before, the Proposal was
to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of VCG
(other than shares owned by the Executive Group) in a cash
merger transaction and the consideration proposed in the
Proposal was $2.10 per share.
On July 21, 2010, VCGs board of directors held a
telephonic meeting (without the presence of Messrs. Lowrie
and Ocello), with a representative of Brownstein Hyatt Farber
Schreck, LLP, VCGs outside counsel (BHFS),
also participating. After discussing the reaffirmed Proposal,
VCGs board of directors also discussed the advisability of
reconstituting the Special Committee consisting of independent
directors to evaluate the Proposal.
VCGs board of directors present at the telephonic meeting
unanimously resolved to reconstitute the Special Committee with
three of VCGs independent directors. The members of the
Special Committee appointed by VCGs board of directors in
July 2010 (with Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello taking no part in
the vote) were George Sawicki, Carolyn Romero and David Levine,
with Mr. Sawicki serving as chairman. Mr. Levine
joined VCGs board of directors in July 2010, succeeding
Kenton Sieckman, who had resigned from VCGs board of
directors as of June 30, 2010.
VCGs board of directors (other than Messrs. Lowrie
and Ocello) determined that each member of the Special Committee
would receive compensation for service on the Special Committee
equal to $2,500 in cash per month, and that the Chairman of the
Special Committee would receive additional compensation in an
amount equal to $1,000 in cash per month.
The resolutions adopted by VCGs board of directors (other
than Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello) delegated to the Special
Committee the exclusive power and authority to, among other
things, (i) consider, evaluate, investigate and negotiate
the terms and conditions of the Proposal, (ii) reject or
discontinue pursuing the Proposal if the Special Committee, upon
the review of the advice and recommendations of its legal,
financial and other advisors, determined that pursuing the
Proposal was not in the best interests of VCGs
shareholders, (iii) explore, consider and negotiate the
terms and conditions of any potential transactions other than
the Proposal, and (iv) make reports and recommendations to
the entire board of directors as to the Proposal or any other
alternative transaction or strategic alternative. The
resolutions also empowered the Special Committee to retain
legal, financial and other advisors to assist the Special
Committee in the fulfillment of its duties.
On July 22, 2010, VCG issued a press release and a Current
Report on
Form 8-K
announcing the receipt of the reaffirmed Proposal. The press
release also announced the reconstitution of the Special
Committee.
Following the July 21, 2010 board of directors meeting, the
Special Committee members met with representatives of several
law firms to consider which law firm should serve as counsel to
the Special Committee. The Special Committee members interviewed
potential counsel with respect to each firms experience in
mergers and acquisitions transactions, and its experience in
representing special committees in considering going private
acquisition proposals made by directors, officers or
shareholders. After the completion of the interview process, the
Special Committee determined to retain Faegre & Benson
LLP
16
(Faegre) as its legal counsel. The Special Committee
made its decision to retain Faegre based on a number of factors,
including the reputation and experience of Faegre in mergers and
acquisitions transactions, and its experience in representing
special committees in considering going private acquisition
proposals made by directors, officers or shareholders.
On July 30, 2010, the Special Committee held a telephonic
meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North Point Advisors
participated in this meeting. Faegre reviewed with the Special
Committee the terms of the reaffirmed Proposal and the power and
authority delegated to it by VCGs board of directors.
Faegre also reviewed with the Special Committee the legal duties
of members of the Special Committee in evaluating the Proposal
or any other strategic alternatives. Following the meeting,
Faegre sent the Special Committee members a memorandum
describing these matters in further detail.
During this meeting, the Special Committee discussed which
investment bank should serve as financial advisor to the Special
Committee. It was noted that the Special Committee had retained
North Point Advisors as financial advisor in connection with the
initial Proposal made in 2009 and also with respect to the
proposed 2010 merger transaction with Ricks. Due to this
prior engagement, the Special Committee noted that North Point
Advisors was very familiar with VCG and would be in a position
to quickly get up to speed with respect to the reaffirmed
Proposal. It was also noted that North Point Advisors was a
leading investment banking firm in the retail, restaurant and
entertainment industries and had experience in a number of going
private transactions.
Faegre noted that even though North Point Advisors prior
engagement letter had expired pursuant to its terms, under the
tail provisions of North Point Advisors
expired engagement letter, North Point Advisors would be
entitled (even if they were not re-engaged) to a full contingent
transaction fee if the Proposal was consummated within a certain
period of time. Faegre also noted that North Point Advisors was
willing to be re-engaged by the Special Committee without the
payment of any additional retainer amounts by re-instating the
prior North Point Advisors engagement letter with no changes in
terms (except for the extension of the term until
December 31, 2010). North Point Advisors engagement
letter also provided that the fee payable by VCG upon North
Point Advisors delivery of the fairness opinion was
separate from the contingent transaction fee. After discussion
and consideration of various factors, the Special Committee
agreed to retain North Point Advisors as the financial advisor
to the Special Committee. Subsequent to the meeting, an
extension of the North Point Advisors engagement letter was
executed on behalf of the Special Committee.
Next, the Special Committee discussed the existing Standstill
Agreement, which had been executed in 2009 after the Proposal
had initially been made. Faegre noted that the Standstill
Agreement was in effect and that its terms and restrictions had
not been amended or waived by the Special Committee. Faegre also
noted that in reaffirming the Proposal, Mr. Lowrie had
agreed to having the Special Committee reconstituted and to
condition the completion of the Proposal on the prior approval
of the Special Committee. In doing so and in agreeing to
negotiate with the Special Committee, Faegre indicated that
Mr. Lowrie was acting consistent with the Standstill
Agreement, which was designed to prevent Mr. Lowrie from
purchasing shares of VCGs common stock and also from
attempting to acquire VCG (or control of VCG) without
negotiating with and receiving approval from the Special
Committee and VCGs board of directors. After discussion,
the Special Committee agreed that it would consider the
reaffirmed Proposal. But the Special Committee instructed Faegre
to inform Mr. Lowries counsel, Kamlet Reichert, LLP*(
(Mr. Lowries Counsel), that the terms and
conditions of the Standstill Agreement continued in full force
and effect.
The Special Committee then discussed the terms of the reaffirmed
Proposal. The reaffirmed Proposal was for $2.10 per share of
VCGs common stock, which was the same price proposed by
Mr. Lowrie in 2009 (and which was previously rejected by
the Special Committee as inadequate). The Special Committee
discussed the extent to which VCGs current financial and
operating condition differed from the circumstances in effect at
the time that the initial $2.10 Proposal had been rejected.
After discussion, the Special Committee requested that North
Point Advisors refresh and update its prior financial analysis
for future presentation to the Special
(*Effective as of January 1, 2011, the attorneys of Kamlet
Reichert, LLP joined the firm of Lathrop & Gage LLP.
17
Committee. The Special Committee also instructed Faegre to
inform Mr. Lowries Counsel that the Special
Committees consideration of the reaffirmed Proposal would
take longer than the August 4, 2010 deadline stated in the
reaffirmed Proposal.
On August 4, 2010, Mr. Lowrie notified the Special
Committee that in order to allow sufficient time to consider and
review the reaffirmed Proposal, the expiration of the Proposal
had been extended to August 20, 2010.
On August 6, 2010, VCG issued a press release and a Current
Report on
Form 8-K
announcing the extension of the reaffirmed Proposal. The press
release also announced that the Special Committee had retained
Faegre as its legal counsel and North Point Advisors as its
financial advisor.
On August 6, 2010, the Special Committee held a telephonic
meeting. A representative of Faegre participated in this
meeting. Mr. McGraw and Mr. Grusin, who are outside
directors of VCG but not members of the Special Committee, also
participated in this meeting. Those present discussed the terms
of the reaffirmed Proposal and also discussed various aspects of
VCGs current financial and operating condition. It was
noted that certain aspects of VCGs condition had improved
somewhat since the time of the initial Proposal in 2009. Those
present then discussed the terms of the reaffirmed Proposal and
noted that the reaffirmed Proposal was for $2.10 per share of
VCGs common stock, which was the same price initially
proposed by Mr. Lowrie on behalf of Family Dog in November
2009 and rejected as inadequate at that time. After further
discussion, the Special Committee instructed Faegre to inform
Mr. Lowries Counsel that, while no decisions had yet been
made, it was likely that the $2.10 offer price eventually would
be found inadequate again. Following the meeting, Faegre
communicated to Mr. Lowries Counsel the Special
Committees instructions.
On August 11, 2010, the Special Committee held a meeting at
the Boulder, Colorado offices of Faegre. A representative of
Faegre participated in this meeting. At this meeting, the
Special Committee members discussed a wide range of potential
options for responding to the reaffirmed Proposal. In addition,
Faegre discussed with the Special Committee a number of
non-price transaction terms that might be requested from
Mr. Lowrie during the course of negotiations. Among the
topics discussed was the possibility of requiring that any
transaction be approved by a majority of VCGs
non-Executive Group shareholders (which requirement is often
referred to as a majority of the minority approval).
Also discussed was the possibility of engaging a second
investment banking firm (which firm, unlike North Point
Advisors, would not be compensated with a significant contingent
transaction fee) to deliver a fairness opinion. The consensus of
the Special Committee was that both of these measures would
enhance the process of considering the reaffirmed Proposal.
On August 17, 2010, the Special Committee held a telephonic
meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North Point Advisors
participated in this meeting. At this meeting, North Point
Advisors reviewed with the Special Committee its updated
valuation analysis of VCG and of the terms of the reaffirmed
Proposal. North Point Advisors reviewed a number of valuation
analyses, comparing the updated analyses with the prior versions
of the similar analyses that were performed in connection with
the initial Proposal, and indicated that it would likely be able
to conclude that the $2.10 price was fair from a financial point
of view. The presentation provided by North Point Advisors also
provided an analysis of several potential strategic alternatives
available to VCG, including: maintaining the status quo as a
public company, recapitalizing the company, negotiating the
proposed management buyout offer, conducting strategic
acquisitions, selling VCG to an unaffiliated third party, and
liquidating VCGs assets.
Following North Point Advisors presentation, there was a
general discussion among those present. The North Point Advisors
representatives then left the meeting. After further discussion,
the Special Committee instructed Faegre to inform Mr.
Lowries Counsel that the Special Committee had determined
that the $2.10 offer was inadequate and that the reaffirmed
Proposal had been rejected. The Special Committee also requested
North Point Advisors to begin to contact any parties that had
either previously expressed an interest or might potentially be
interested in pursuing a transaction with VCG. Following the
meeting, Faegre communicated the Special Committees
instructions to Mr. Lowries Counsel and North Point
Advisors.
18
On August 18, 2010, the Special Committee held a telephonic
meeting. A representative of Faegre participated in this
meeting. At this meeting, Faegre reported that Mr. Lowrie
had requested that the Special Committee provide additional
substantive feedback on the reaffirmed Proposal beyond the
conclusion that the $2.10 price was inadequate. After
discussion, the Special Committee instructed Faegre and North
Point Advisors to develop an expanded response to the terms of
the reaffirmed Proposal. The Special Committee instructed Faegre
to inform Mr. Lowries Counsel that the response would
include the views of the Special Committee on valuation, but
would also include the Committees view on other non-price
transaction terms such as termination fees, majority of the
minority shareholder approval and no shop provisions.
On August 20, 2010, VCG issued a press release and a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
announcing that the Special Committee had informed
Mr. Lowrie that it had determined, with input from its
advisors, that the terms of the Proposal were currently
inadequate. The press release also announced that the Special
Committee had directed North Point Advisors to begin to contact
any parties that had either previously expressed an interest or
might potentially be interested in pursuing a transaction with
VCG.
Following the August 20, 2010 Special Committee meeting,
Faegre and North Point Advisors developed a draft of the
substantive response to the reaffirmed Proposal. North Point
Advisors also began to contact potentially interested parties.
The Special Committee also asked North Point Advisors to perform
an additional valuation analysis related to the potential sale
value of VCGs individual club locations.
On August 27, 2010, the Special Committee held a telephonic
meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North Point Advisors
participated in this meeting. At this meeting, North Point
Advisors reported that so far no other party contacted by North
Point Advisors had expressed interest in exploring an
acquisition proposal for VCG. North Point Advisors also reported
on the additional valuation analysis that had been requested by
the Special Committee. That analysis indicated that a breakup or
liquidation of VCG (meaning sales of the individual clubs
operated by VCG followed by a distribution of the net proceeds)
was unlikely to result in proceeds to shareholders in excess of
the $2.10 price currently being offered. On September 1, 2010,
North Point Advisors distributed a written copy of this
additional analysis to the Special Committee and its counsel.
The Special Committee then discussed potential responses to the
reaffirmed Proposal. North Point Advisors indicated that it
would likely be able to conclude that the $2.10 price was fair
from a financial point of view, but recommended that the Special
Committee respond to Mr. Lowrie on both price and also on
other transaction terms.
On September 2, 2010, the Special Committee held a
telephonic meeting. A representative of Faegre participated in
this meeting. At this meeting, the Special Committee discussed
the draft substantive response which had been prepared by Faegre
and North Point Advisors, including a discussion of price as
well as other non-price transaction terms. The Special Committee
determined to continue these discussions at a meeting to be held
the next day.
On September 3, 2010, the Special Committee held a
telephonic meeting. A representative of Faegre participated in
this meeting. Mr. McGraw and Mr. Grusin, who are
outside directors of VCG but not members of the Special
Committee, also participated in this meeting.
At this meeting, Faegre reviewed with those present the main
points in the draft substantive response which had been prepared
by Faegre and North Point Advisors, including the majority
of the minority shareholder approval, that no financing
contingency should be included in the merger agreement, that a
reverse termination fee should be payable by Family Dog in the
event that the financing for the transaction could not be
obtained, and that VCG should be able to consider alternative
acquisition proposals. The group also discussed what the
response of the Special Committee should be regarding price.
After extensive discussion, the group decided not to make a
counter offer to the $2.10 price, but instead instructed Faegre
to communicate to Mr. Lowries Counsel and Mr. Lowrie
a number of data points regarding valuation and to encourage
Mr. Lowrie to respond with an increased price.
Following the September 3, 2010 meeting, Faegre
communicated the Special Committees instructions to Mr.
Lowries Counsel. In response, Mr. Lowries Counsel
requested that the Special Committee and Mr. Lowrie
19
have a direct meeting where both sides could discuss the
Proposal further in detail with each other. The Special
Committee agreed to this request.
On September 10, 2010, VCG announced that Ms. Romero
had notified VCGs board of directors of her intent to
resign from her position as director and as a member of the
Special Committee effective October 31, 2010.
Ms. Romero informed VCGs board of directors that her
resignation was not due to any disagreement with VCG or related
to the Proposal, but was attributable solely to personal reasons.
On September 22, 2010, the Special Committee met with
Mr. Lowrie at the Boulder, Colorado offices of Faegre.
Mr. McGraw, Mr. Grusin and representatives of Faegre
and Mr. Lowries Counsel also participated in this meeting.
At this meeting, Mr. Lowrie made a presentation regarding
his view of the benefits of the reaffirmed Proposal to VCG and
its non-Executive Group shareholders. Mr. Lowries
presentation included a discussion of VCGs shareholder
base and institutional ownership, current challenges facing
VCGs business, VCGs outstanding debt and VCGs
upcoming debt maturities. While the meeting did not include a
specific negotiation regarding price or terms, some of the board
members present did express varying views on the valuation of
VCG. There was also a detailed discussion of the Special
Committees insistence that any transaction would have to
be conditioned upon a majority of the minority
shareholder approval.
Following the September 22, 2010 meeting, Faegre and Mr.
Lowries Counsel further discussed the topics raised during
the September 22, 2010 meeting. Mr. Lowries Counsel
conveyed that Mr. Lowrie had instructed it to prepare a
draft merger agreement for review and comment by Faegre and the
Special Committee prior to further discussion of price.
On September 29, 2010, Mr. Lowries Counsel delivered
to Faegre an initial draft of a proposed merger agreement with
respect to the reaffirmed Proposal. Faegre distributed copies of
the draft to the members of the Special Committee. The price per
share was left blank in the draft merger agreement.
On October 5, 2010, the Special Committee held a brief
telephonic meeting. A representative of Faegre participated in
this meeting. At this meeting, the Special Committee discussed
again the advantages and disadvantages of engaging a second
investment banking firm (which firm, unlike North Point
Advisors, would not be compensated with a significant contingent
transaction fee) to deliver a fairness opinion. No decision on
this issue was made at that meeting.
On October 11, 2010, Faegre transmitted to Mr.
Lowries Counsel suggested revisions to the initial draft
of the proposed merger agreement. Faegres revisions did
not include a suggested price.
On October 15, 2010, Mr. Lowries Counsel delivered to
Faegre a revised draft of a proposed merger agreement with
respect to the reaffirmed Proposal. The revised draft included a
per share price that had been increased to $2.20, as well as a
provision for approval by a majority of the minority
shareholders. Faegre distributed copies of the draft to the
members of the Special Committee.
On October 17, 2010, the Special Committee held a
telephonic meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North Point
Advisors participated in this meeting. Mr. McGraw and
Mr. Grusin also participated. Faegre reported that, other
than price, there were no significant business issues remaining
regarding the revised draft merger agreement.
North Point Advisors then reported on the status of the
market check which it had commenced in late August.
North Point Advisors reported that it had made over 50 outgoing
calls to over 25 parties that might potentially be interested in
pursuing a transaction with VCG. North Point Advisors reported
that one party indicated that it might be interested in
acquiring one or two of VCGs clubs in selected markets,
but was not interested in an acquisition proposal for the entire
company. No other party contacted expressed any interest in
exploring an acquisition proposal for VCG.
At this meeting, North Point Advisors orally discussed with the
Special Committee its valuation analysis of VCG, which it had
updated to reflect the $2.20 increased offer price. At the
conclusion of its presentation, North Point Advisors indicated
that it would likely be able to conclude that the $2.20 price
was fair from a financial point of view.
20
Following North Point Advisors presentation, there was a
general discussion among those present regarding the increased
$2.20 price. There was not a consensus among the directors at
the meeting on whether the $2.20 price should be approved. After
further discussion, the Special Committee instructed Faegre to
make a counter offer to Mr. Lowrie of a $2.50 price.
Following the meeting, Faegre communicated the Special
Committees instructions to Mr. Lowries Counsel.
Following the October 17, 2010 meeting, there were a number
of discussions between Mr. Lowries Counsel and Faegre
regarding the $2.20 price. Mr. Lowries Counsel informed
Faegre on several occasions that the increased $2.20 price was
Mr. Lowries last and best offer. In
response, Faegre communicated that it was unlikely that the
Special Committee and VCGs board of directors would
unanimously approve the $2.20 price. Faegre also communicated
that if the $2.20 price were to be approved by the Special
Committee and VCGs board of directors, such approval would
likely not be unanimous. During this time period, Mr.
Lowries Counsel and Faegre discussed and explored a number
of alternatives that might facilitate an approval in connection
with a $2.20 price. Among the options discussed were having the
transaction approved by only a majority of the Special Committee
or VCGs board of directors; having the Special Committee
or VCGs board of directors submit the transaction to
VCGs shareholders without a board recommendation (as
permitted by Colorado corporate law); or having the Special
Committee or Board approve the transaction only after receipt of
a fairness opinion from a second investment banking firm other
than North Point Advisors. No agreement was reached on any of
these alternatives.
On October 27, 2010, the Special Committee held a
telephonic meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North Point
Advisors participated in this meeting. Faegre reported that
Mr. Lowrie had not raised his price beyond the $2.20
offered ten days previously. At this meeting, North Point
Advisors reviewed with the Special Committee its valuation
analysis of VCG, which had been updated to exclude certain
significant non-recurring charges from VCGs actual and
projected financial performance. At the conclusion of its
presentation, North Point Advisors again indicated that it would
likely be able to conclude that the $2.20 price was fair from a
financial point of view. No decisions were made at this meeting.
On October 29, 2010, the Special Committee held another
telephonic meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North Point
Advisors participated in this meeting. There was a general
discussion among those present regarding the $2.20 price. Again,
there was not a consensus among the directors at the meeting on
whether the $2.20 price should be approved. After further
discussion, the Special Committee instructed Faegre to make a
counter offer to Mr. Lowrie of a $2.30 price. In addition,
the Special Committee stated that any approval of the proposed
$2.30 price would be conditioned upon receipt of a fairness
opinion from a second investment banking firm other than North
Point Advisors. Following the meeting, Faegre communicated the
Special Committees instructions to Mr. Lowries
Counsel.
On October 31, 2010, Ms. Romeros previously
contemplated resignation from VCGs board of directors and
Special Committee became effective. Ms. Romero did not take
part in any discussions regarding the reaffirmed Proposal
following her resignation. On the same day, Mr. Ocello also
resigned from VCGs board of directors effective
immediately in order for VCG to comply with NASDAQ Marketplace
Listing Rule 5605(b)(1), which requires that listed
companies have a majority of board members be independent.
On November 1, 2010, there were numerous telephone
discussions regarding the Special Committees instructions
from the October 29, 2010 meeting. Mr. Lowries
Counsel reported that Mr. Lowrie was not willing to
increase his price above $2.20. In addition, Mr. Lowries
Counsel reported that Mr. Lowrie was concerned about the
additional expense and time delay that would be involved with
retaining a second investment banking firm to give a fairness
opinion.
On the morning of November 2, 2010, Mr. Lowries
Counsel informed Faegre that Mr. Lowrie was willing to
increase his price to $2.25 but only in the event that the
additional expense for VCG and time delay associated with a
second investment banking firm could be avoided.
On the afternoon of November 2, 2010, the Special Committee
held a telephonic meeting. A representative of Faegre
participated in this meeting. There was a general discussion
among those present regarding the $2.25 price and the revised
offer which had been received. After discussion, the Special
Committee indicated
21
that it would be willing to agree to the revised offer and
concluded that a fairness opinion from a second investment
banking firm other than North Point Advisors was not necessary
in light of the increase in price and the strength of North
Point Advisors fairness opinion. Mr. McGraw and
Mr. Grusin then joined the meeting. After further
discussion, the four members of VCGs board of directors
participating in the meeting indicated that they would be
willing to agree to the revised offer. Following the meeting,
Faegre communicated the Special Committees instructions to
Mr. Lowries Counsel.
During the period from November 3 through November 9, 2010,
representatives of Mr. Lowries Counsel and Faegre
exchanged and negotiated several subsequent drafts of the merger
agreement. BHFS received a draft of the agreement on
November 3, 2010 and provided comments to Faegre on
November 5, 2010 and November 9, 2010. The merger
agreement was then finalized.
On the morning of November 9, 2010, the Special Committee
held a telephonic meeting. Representatives of Faegre and North
Point Advisors participated in this meeting. Faegre made a
presentation to the Special Committee regarding the legal duties
of members of the Special Committee in evaluating the reaffirmed
Proposal. The Special Committee then received a presentation
from North Point Advisors including financial analyses of the
proposed transaction. The representatives from North Point
Advisors reviewed with the Special Committee the background of
the transaction, including the negotiations that led to
Mr. Lowries best and final offer.
North Point Advisors then delivered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that, based
upon and subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth
in its written opinion, the $2.25 per share merger consideration
to be received by VCGs non-Executive Group shareholders
was fair, from a financial point of view, to such shareholders.
With the benefit of the presentations and after discussion, the
Special Committee unanimously determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of VCG and its
unaffiliated shareholders, approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and recommended that
VCGs shareholders approve and adopt the merger agreement.
The Special Committee further recommended that VCGs board
of directors approve the proposed transaction, including the
merger agreement and the other transactions contemplated
thereby, and that VCGs board of directors recommend to
VCGs shareholders that they approve and adopt the merger
agreement.
Thereafter, on the afternoon of November 9, 2010,
VCGs board of directors met telephonically to receive and
deliberate upon the report of the Special Committee.
Representatives of Faegre, BHFS and North Point Advisors were
also present at the meeting. The Special Committee, together
with Faegre and North Point Advisors, reported to VCGs
board of directors on the process undertaken by the Special
Committee and the Special Committees review of the merger
agreement, and unanimously recommended to VCGs board of
directors that VCGs board of directors accept the offer of
$2.25 per share for VCGs common stock held by the
non-Executive Group shareholders and approve and adopt the
merger agreement and the other transactions contemplated thereby.
After the presentation of the report, and responses to questions
posed by various members of VCGs board of directors to the
Special Committee and its advisors, VCGs board of
directors (other than Mr. Lowrie) unanimously determined
that the merger, the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of VCG and its unaffiliated shareholders, approved the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and recommended that VCGs shareholders approve and
adopt the merger agreement.
The definitive merger agreement was then executed by the
parties. VCG thereafter announced the proposed transaction on
November 10, 2010.
Material
Developments after the Execution of the Merger
Agreement
On December 27, 2010, VCG received an unsolicited offer in
the form of a written letter of intent from a competitor for the
acquisition of one of VCGs clubs. VCGs board of
directors directed the Special Committee to evaluate the offer
and to commence discussions with the competitor in an attempt to
explore
22
whether mutually agreeable terms could be reached. These
discussions are ongoing and the parties have not yet reached any
agreement nor has VCG executed the letter of intent. Before VCG
may execute the letter of intent or a definitive agreement with
respect to the transaction, the Special Committee would first
have to determine that it is in the best interest of VCG and its
shareholders and recommend it for approval to VCGs board
of directors, and VCGs board of directors would then have
to approve the transaction. When evaluating the proposed
transaction, it is expected that the Special Committee will ask
its financial advisor to provide an analysis regarding whether
the proposed transaction would affect the fairness of the merger
consideration to be paid in connection with the merger.
Pursuant to Section 5.01(g) of the merger agreement, VCG
may not sell any assets without Family Dogs prior written
consent (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed). Therefore, VCG would have to obtain
such consent before executing the letter of intent and any
definitive agreement with respect to this transaction.
The
Special Committee and Special Committee Compensation
On July 21, 2010, VCGs board of directors (with
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello abstaining) unanimously resolved
to reconstitute the Special Committee composed of three of
VCGs independent, non-employee directors and delegated to
the Special Committee the exclusive power and authority to,
among other things, (i) consider, evaluate, investigate and
negotiate the terms and conditions of the Proposal,
(ii) reject or discontinue pursuing the Proposal if the
Special Committee, upon the review of the advice and
recommendations of its legal, financial and other advisors,
determines that pursuing the Proposal is not in the best
interests of VCGs shareholders, (iii) explore,
consider and negotiate the terms and conditions of any potential
transactions other than the Proposal, and (iv) make reports
and recommendations to the entire Board as to the Proposal or
any other alternative transaction or strategic alternative.
VCGs board of directors appointed George Sawicki
(Chairman), Carolyn Romero and David Levine to serve on the
Special Committee. See Special Factors
Background of the Merger for more information about the
formation and authority of the Special Committee.
VCGs board of directors (other than Messrs. Lowrie and
Ocello) determined that each member of the Special Committee
would receive compensation for service on the Special Committee
equal to $2,500 in cash per month, and that the Chairman of the
Special Committee would receive additional compensation in an
amount equal to $1,000 in cash per month. VCG paid
Ms. Romero a total of $15,000 in cash for her service on
the Special Committee for the period November 3, 2009
through April 30, 2010 and $10,000 for the period
July 20, 2010 to October 31, 2010, the date on which
her resignation became effective. Mr. Sieckman received a
total of $15,000 in cash for his service on the Special
Committee for the period November 3, 2009 through
April 30, 2010. Mr. Levine received a total of $20,000
in cash for his service on the Special Committee from
July 20, 2010 through the date of this Proxy Statement.
Mr. Sawicki received a total of $21,000 in cash for his
service as Chairman of the Special Committee for the period
November 3, 2009 through April 30, 2010 and $28,000
for the period July 20, 2010 through the date of this Proxy
Statement.
Recommendation
of the Special Committee, VCGs Board of Directors and
VCGs Executive Officers; Reasons for Recommending Approval
of the Merger
The
Special Committee
The Special Committee, on behalf of VCG as authorized by
VCGs board of directors, by unanimous vote at a meeting
held on November 9, 2010 and after a presentation by its
financial advisor, determined that the merger, the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of VCG and its
unaffiliated shareholders. The Special Committee approved the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and recommended that VCGs shareholders approve and
adopt the merger agreement. The Special Committee also
recommended that VCGs board of directors approve the
proposed transaction, including the merger, the merger agreement
and the other transactions contemplated thereby, and recommend
to VCGs shareholders that they approve and adopt the
merger agreement.
23
In the course of the Special Committee reaching the
determinations and making the recommendations described above,
the Special Committee considered the following factors as being
generally positive or favorable in coming to its determinations
and recommendations:
|
|
|
|
|
that the merger consideration will be paid in all cash,
resulting in immediate increased value and liquidity to
VCGs shareholders, without the risk to them of VCGs
current business plan that is currently constrained by a highly
leveraged capital structure (with various debt and maturities
coming due in the short term) and which continues to face
challenging conditions in the general economy and the
gentlemens club industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the merger consideration of $2.25 per share of VCGs
common stock represents a premium of approximately
(i) 36.4% over the closing price of VCGs common stock
on July 21, 2010, the last trading day before
Mr. Lowries reaffirmed Proposal was made public, and
(ii) 20.9% over the closing price of VCGs common
stock on November 9, 2010, the last trading day before it
was publicly announced that VCG had entered into the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that holders of VCGs common stock that do not vote in
favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and
that otherwise properly exercise their dissenters rights
will have the opportunity to demand the fair value of their
shares under Colorado law;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the negotiations with respect to the merger consideration that,
among other things, led to an increase in the Proposal from
$2.10 per share to $2.20, and finally to $2.25, and the Special
Committees determination that, following extensive
negotiations between the Special Committee and Mr. Lowrie,
$2.25 per share was the highest price that Mr. Lowrie would
agree to pay, with the Special Committee basing its belief on a
number of factors, including the duration and tenor of
negotiations, assertions made by Mr. Lowrie and his counsel
during the negotiation process and the experience of the Special
Committee and its advisors;
|
|
|
|
the fact that no alternative acquisition proposal for VCG had
been submitted to the Special Committee or any of its advisors
between July 22, 2010, the date that VCG announced
Mr. Lowries reaffirmed Proposal, and November 9,
2010, the date of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fact that North Point Advisors actively solicited any
parties (including Ricks) that had either previously
expressed an interest or that might potentially be interested in
pursuing a transaction with VCG during the period from
August 17, 2010 through November 9, 2010 (the date of
the merger agreement) and that no parties contacted expressed
any interest in pursuing a transaction with VCG;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee received from its financial advisor,
North Point Advisors, an opinion delivered orally at the Special
Committee meeting on November 9, 2010, and subsequently
confirmed in writing as of the same date, to the effect that
based upon and subject to the limitations and qualifications set
forth in the written opinion, as of the date of the opinion, the
merger consideration of $2.25 per share in cash to be received
by VCGs non-Executive Group shareholders in the merger was
fair, from a financial point of view, to VCGs
non-Executive Group shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the presentation provided by North Point Advisors to the Special
Committee on November 9, 2010 in support of the foregoing
opinion;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the efforts made by the Special Committee and its advisors to
negotiate vigorously and execute a merger agreement that the
Special Committee believed was favorable to VCGs
unaffiliated shareholders, as further described below;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the consideration and negotiation of the merger agreement
was conducted entirely under the oversight of the members of the
Special Committee, which consisted of three (or two after
October 31, 2010) of VCGs directors, each of
whom is an independent, non-employee director, and that no
limitations were placed on the Special Committees
authority;
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee was advised by independent legal
counsel and an independent financial advisor, each of whom was
selected by the Special Committee;
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that all of the members of the Special Committee (one
of which has an investment in VCGs common stock) were
unanimous in their determination to approve the merger agreement
and the merger, and that the merger agreement and the merger
were approved and adopted by all of VCGs directors (with
Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the deliberations or the
vote), four out of five (three out of four if excluding
Mr. Lowrie) who have investments in VCGs common stock
and none of which is participating with Mr. Lowrie or
Mr. Ocello in the transaction; in fact, under the
negotiated terms of the merger agreement, Family Dog may not
issue any equity securities to any person who was a member of
VCGs board of directors before consummation of the merger,
other than Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello, for a period of
six months after the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the negotiated terms and conditions of the merger agreement
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the merger is conditioned upon the approval and adoption of
the merger agreement by VCGs shareholders, including the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement by a majority of
the minority shareholders at the shareholders meeting;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the provisions in the merger agreement that provide that, prior
to VCGs shareholders adopting the merger agreement, if the
Special Committee receives a written Acquisition Proposal from a
third party that the Special Committee believes in good faith to
be credible and reasonably capable of making a superior
proposal, then the Special Committee may furnish information
with respect to VCG to the person making such Acquisition
Proposal and participate in discussions or negotiations with the
person making such Acquisition Proposal regarding such
Acquisition Proposal, as more fully described under The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and Changes in Recommendation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the provisions in the merger agreement that provide that, prior
to VCGs shareholders adopting the merger agreement, the
Special Committee may, if it determines in good faith, after
consultation with its outside legal and financial advisors, that
the failure to take such action could reasonably be determined
to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to VCGs
shareholders under applicable law, withdraw or modify its
recommendation in favor of the merger, cause VCG to terminate
the merger agreement or cause VCG to terminate the merger
agreement and concurrently enter into a definitive agreement
with respect to a Superior Acquisition Proposal, upon payment to
Family Dog, in the case of any such termination, of a
termination fee of $1 million, representing only
approximately 2.9% of the equity value of the transaction (or
$600,000, representing only approximately 1.7% of the equity
value of the transaction, if the Acquisition Proposal that
results in the action or event that forms the basis for such
termination is related to a party which North Point Advisors
contacted prior to the date of the merger agreement) as further
described under The Merger Agreement
Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition Proposals
and Changes in Recommendation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Special Committees belief, based upon information
provided by Mr. Lowrie, that the financing necessary to pay
the merger consideration to VCGs shareholders is likely to
be available to Family Dog;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger agreement does not contain a financing
condition to Family Dogs obligations to close the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
the agreements of Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello contained
in the merger agreement that, from the execution and delivery of
the merger agreement until the earlier of the termination of the
merger agreement and the effective time of the merger, each will
not, directly or indirectly, purchase or otherwise acquire any
shares of VCGs common stock.
|
In the course of the Special Committees reaching the
determinations and making the recommendations described above,
the Special Committee considered the following factors to be
generally negative or unfavorable in making its determinations
and recommendations:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that essentially all of VCGs unaffiliated
shareholders will have no ongoing equity participation in VCG
following the merger, and that essentially all of VCGs
shareholders will cease to participate in
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
VCGs future earnings or growth, if any, or to benefit from
increases, if any, in the value of VCGs common stock, and
will not participate in any potential future sale of VCG to a
third party or any potential recapitalization of VCG which could
include a dividend to shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that there are other strategic alternatives potentially
available to VCG, which strategic alternatives include
maintaining the status quo, pursuing acquisitions, pursuing
selected asset sales, or engaging in a stock or cash merger with
a strategic or financial party, and that each of these
alternatives could potentially result in increased value for
VCGs shareholders, though the probability of such
increased value or continued availability is uncertain;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that Mr. Lowrie and any other investors in Family Dog could
realize significant returns on their equity investment in Family
Dog following the merger;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger agreement obligates VCG to submit the
merger agreement for approval to its shareholders at the special
meeting of shareholders even if VCGs board of directors no
longer recommends that VCGs shareholders approve the
Merger Proposal unless VCG terminates the merger agreement and
pays the $1 million termination fee to Family Dog;
|
|
|
|
the participation in the merger by Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello and the fact that they have interests in the
transaction that differ from, or are in addition to, those of
VCGs unaffiliated shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the risks and costs to VCG if the merger does not close,
including paying the fees and expenses associated with the
transaction, the diversion of management and employee attention,
potential employee attrition and the potential effect on
business relationships;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger consideration consists of cash and will
therefore generally be taxable for U.S. federal income tax
purposes to VCGs shareholders who surrender shares of
VCGs common stock in the merger;
|
|
|
|
the fact that other competing transactions could trigger the
change of control provisions under VCGs debt agreements,
leases and other material agreements, and the impact of such
additional costs under such circumstances;
|
|
|
|
the fact that other competing transactions could trigger the
change of control provisions under the employment agreements of
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello, in which case it is
estimated that Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello could be
entitled to receive payments and benefits under the employment
agreements in the amount of approximately $2,610,000 and
$2,416,000 respectively;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not be completed in a timely
manner or at all;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the $2.25 cash merger consideration payable to VCGs
non-Executive Group shareholders could be deemed, under certain
circumstances, to be less than the stock consideration proposed
to be paid under the Ricks LOI (which expired, in
accordance with its terms, on March 31, 2010, with no
definitive acquisition agreement being executed by the parties);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello, as the
beneficial owners of approximately 31.5% of VCGs common
stock, may as a practical matter be able to exercise significant
control on the outcome of most matters submitted to a vote of
VCGs shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the potential impact Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello, as the
beneficial owners of approximately 31.5% of VCGs common
stock, could have on the interest of third parties in making
offers competitive with the Proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger agreement contains restrictions on the
conduct of VCGs business prior to the completion of the
merger, generally requiring VCG to conduct VCGs business
only in the ordinary course, which may delay or prevent VCG from
undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending
completion of the merger, and the length of time between signing
and closing when these restrictions are in place.
|
26
In the course of reaching the determinations and decisions, and
making the recommendations, described above, the Special
Committee considered the following factors relating to the
procedural safeguards that the Special Committee believes were
present to ensure the fairness of the merger and to permit the
Special Committee to represent the interests of VCGs
unaffiliated shareholders, each of which the Special Committee
believes supports its decision and provides assurance of the
fairness of the merger to VCGs unaffiliated shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is conditioned upon the approval and adoption of the
merger agreement by VCGs shareholders, including the
approval and adoption of the merger agreement by a majority of
the minority shareholders at the shareholders meeting;
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee consists solely of independent,
non-employee directors;
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee members were adequately compensated
for their services prior to commencing their consideration of
the Proposal and any potential strategic alternatives and that
their compensation for serving on the Special Committee was in
no way contingent on their approving the merger agreement and
taking the other actions described in this proxy statement;
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee retained and was advised by Faegre as
its independent legal counsel and North Point Advisors as its
independent financial advisor;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee received from its financial advisor,
North Point Advisors, an opinion delivered orally at the Special
Committee meeting on November 9, 2010, and subsequently
confirmed in writing as of the same date, to the effect that
based upon and subject to the limitations and qualifications set
forth in the written opinion, as of the date of the opinion, the
merger consideration of $2.25 per share in cash to be received
by VCGs non-Executive Group shareholders in the merger was
fair, from a financial point of view, to VCGs unaffiliated
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the provisions in the merger agreement that provide that, prior
to VCGs shareholders adopting the merger agreement, if the
Special Committee receives a written Acquisition Proposal from a
third party that the Special Committee believes in good faith to
be credible and reasonably capable of making a superior
proposal, then the Special Committee may furnish information
with respect to VCG to the person making such Acquisition
Proposal and participate in discussions or negotiations with the
person making such Acquisition Proposal regarding such
Acquisition Proposal, as more fully described under The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and Changes in Recommendation;
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee was involved in extensive
deliberations since its reconstitution on July 21, 2010 to
consider alternatives to enhance shareholder value, including
consideration of the reaffirmed Proposal from Mr. Lowrie,
and was provided with full access to VCGs management and
documentation in connection with the work conducted by its
advisors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee, with the assistance of its legal and
financial advisors, vigorously negotiated with Mr. Lowrie
and his representatives throughout the process;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Special Committee had ultimate authority to
decide whether to proceed with a transaction or any alternative
transaction, subject to VCGs board of directors
approval of a definitive transaction agreement;
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee, from its inception, was authorized
to consider all strategic alternatives with respect to VCG,
including a sale of VCGs assets;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Special Committee was aware that it had no
obligation to recommend any transaction, including any proposal
made by Mr. Lowrie; and
|
|
|
|
that the Special Committee made its evaluation of the merger
agreement and the merger based upon the factors discussed in
this proxy statement, independent of the other members of
VCGs board of directors, including Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello, and with knowledge of the interests of
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello in the merger.
|
27
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Special Committee addresses the material
factors considered by the Special Committee in its consideration
of the merger agreement. In view of the variety of factors
considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger
agreement and the merger, the Special Committee did not find it
practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching
its determination and recommendation. In addition, individual
Special Committee members may have given different weights to
factors. The Special Committee approved the merger agreement and
the merger and recommended approval and adoption of the merger
agreement based upon the totality of the information presented
to and considered by it. The Special Committee conducted
extensive discussions of, among other things, the factors
described above, including asking extensive questions of
VCGs management and the Special Committees financial
and legal advisors, and unanimously determined that the merger
is both procedurally and substantively fair to and in the best
interests of VCGs unaffiliated shareholders, and to
recommend to VCGs board of directors that it approve the
merger agreement and the merger.
VCGs
Board of Directors.
On November 9, 2010, VCGs board of directors met to
consider the reports and recommendations of the Special
Committee with respect to the merger agreement. The Special
Committee reported to VCGs board of directors on its
review of the proposed transaction and the merger agreement. On
the basis of the Special Committees recommendations and
the other factors described below, VCGs board of directors
expressly adopted the Special Committees unanimous
conclusion and analysis with respect to the fairness of the
transaction and unanimously (with Mr. Lowrie taking no part
in the vote or the recommendation) determined that the merger
agreement and the merger are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of VCGs unaffiliated shareholders, approved the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and recommended that VCGs shareholders approve and
adopt the merger agreement.
In the course of VCGs board of directors reaching the
determinations and making the recommendations described above,
VCGs board of directors considered (with Mr. Lowrie
taking no part in such considerations) the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the unanimous determinations and recommendations of the Special
Committee; and
|
|
|
|
the factors considered by the Special Committee, including the
generally positive and favorable factors as well as the
generally negative and unfavorable factors, and the factors
relating to procedural safeguards.
|
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by VCGs board of directors includes the
material factors considered by VCGs board of directors. In
view of the variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the merger, VCGs board of directors did not
find it practicable to, and did not quantify or otherwise,
assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in
reaching its determination and recommendation. In addition,
individual directors may have given different weights to
different factors. VCGs board of directors unanimously
approved (with Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the vote or the
recommendation) the merger agreement and the merger and
recommended approval and adoption of the merger agreement based
upon the totality of the information presented to and considered
by it.
Other than as described in this proxy statement, VCGs
board of directors is not aware of any firm offers by any other
person during the prior two years for a merger or consolidation
of VCG with another company, the sale or transfer of all or
substantially all of VCGs assets or a purchase of
VCGs securities that would enable such person to exercise
control of VCG.
VCGs board of directors (with Mr. Lowrie taking no
part in such recommendation) recommends that you vote
FOR
the approval and adoption of the merger
agreement.
VCGs
Executive Officers
None of VCGs executive officers, consisting of
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello, has made a recommendation with
respect to how VCGs shareholders should vote on the Merger
Proposal.
28
Opinion
of North Point Advisors
The Special Committee retained North Point Advisors to act as
its financial advisor, and, if requested, to render to the
Special Committee an opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to VCGs shareholders (other than
the members of the Executive Group) of the $2.25 per share in
cash to be paid in the merger. At the November 9, 2010
meeting of the Special Committee, North Point Advisors delivered
to the Special Committee its oral opinion, which opinion was
subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of the
date and based upon and subject to the qualifications and
conditions set forth in the written opinion, the consideration
of $2.25 in cash per share was fair, from a financial point of
view, to VCGs shareholders (other than the members of the
Executive Group).
The full text of the North Point Advisors written opinion dated
November 9, 2010, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by North Point
Advisors in rendering its opinion, is attached as
Appendix B to this proxy statement and is incorporated in
its entirety herein by reference. VCGs shareholders are
urged to, and should, carefully read the North Point Advisors
written opinion in its entirety. The North Point Advisors
opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of
view and as of the date of the opinion, to VCGs
shareholders (other than the members of the Executive Group) of
the $2.25 per share in cash to be paid in the merger. North
Point Advisors written opinion was directed to the Special
Committee and was not intended to be, and does not constitute, a
recommendation as to how any of VCGs shareholders should
vote with respect to the merger or any other matter.
In connection with rendering the opinion described above and
performing its related financial analyses, North Point Advisors:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed and analyzed the financial terms of a draft of the
merger agreement dated November 5, 2010;
|
|
|
|
reviewed and analyzed certain financial and other data with
respect to VCG which was publicly available;
|
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed and analyzed certain information, including financial
projections, relating to VCGs business, earnings, cash
flow, assets, liabilities and prospects that were publicly
available, as well as those VCG furnished to it;
|
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the current and historical reported prices and trading
activity of VCGs common stock and similar information for
certain other companies deemed by North Point Advisors to be
comparable to VCG;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of VCG with that of certain
other publicly-traded companies that North Point Advisors deemed
relevant; and
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain business combination transactions that North Point
Advisors deemed relevant.
|
In addition, North Point Advisors performed a discounted cash
flows analysis for VCG on a stand-alone basis. North Point
Advisors conducted such other analyses, examinations and
inquiries and considered such other financial, economic and
market criteria as it deemed necessary in arriving at its
opinion. North Point Advisors also conducted discussions with
members of senior management and representatives of VCG
concerning the financial condition, historical and current
operating results, business and prospects for VCG, as well as
its business and prospects on a stand-alone basis.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed by North Point Advisors in connection with the
preparation of its fairness opinion, which was reviewed with the
Special Committee at a meeting held on November 9, 2010 and
was formally delivered to the Special Committee at such meeting.
The preparation of analyses and a fairness opinion is a complex
analytic process involving various determinations as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the
application of those methods to the particular circumstances
and, therefore, this summary does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by North Point Advisors or
of its presentations to the Special Committee on
November 9, 2010.
This summary includes information presented in tabular format,
which tables must be read together with the text of each
analysis summary, and considered as a whole, in order to fully
understand the financial
29
analyses presented by North Point Advisors. The tables alone do
not constitute a complete summary of the financial analyses. The
order in which these analyses are presented below, and the
results of those analyses, should not be taken as any indication
of the relative importance or weight given to these analyses by
North Point Advisors or the Special Committee. Except as
otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the
extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data
as it existed on or before November 9, 2010, and is not
necessarily indicative of current market conditions.
Historical
Stock Trading Analysis
North Point Advisors reviewed the historical price range for
VCGs common stock at one month, six months and one year
prior to the November 10, 2010 public announcement of the
execution of the merger agreement. This analysis indicated that
the price per share of VCG common stock to be paid to VCGs
shareholders pursuant to the merger agreement represented a
36.4% premium over the price per share of VCG s common
stock on July 21, 2010, the last trading day before public
announcement of the proposal that resulted in the merger
agreement (or a 20.9% premium over the closing price per share
of VCG s common stock on November 9, 2010, the last
trading day before public announcement of the execution of the
merger agreement) and a 39.4% premium over the volume weighted
average share price for the 30 calendar days prior to the public
announcement of the execution of the merger agreement on
July 21, 2010. In addition, this analysis indicated that
the $2.25 price falls above the high end of the one month equity
value range and the six month equity value range, and at the
midpoint of the 12 month equity value range.
Comparable
Public Trading Multiple Analysis
North Point Advisors reviewed and compared certain financial
information and valuation multiples for VCG to corresponding
financial information and public market multiples for the
following publicly traded corporations in the entertainment
industry and also in the micro-cap restaurant industry (defined
as casual dining companies with a market capitalization between
$25 million and $200 million).
Entertainment Companies:
Bowl America Inc.;
Dover Motorsports Inc.;
Flanigans Enterprises Inc.;
Gaylord Entertainment Co.;
Ricks Cabaret International, Inc.; and
The Marcus Corporation.
Microcap Restaurants:
Ark Restaurants Corp.;
Benihana Inc.;
J. Alexanders Corp.;
Kona Grill Inc.;
McCormick & Schmicks; and
OCharleys Inc.
Although most of the selected companies are not directly
comparable to VCG, the companies included were chosen because
they are publicly traded companies with operations that for
purposes of analysis may be considered similar to VCGs
operations. North Point Advisors considered Ricks (as the
only other publicly traded operator of adult entertainment
gentlemens clubs) to be the single company most comparable
to VCG. North Point Advisors also considered the group of
microcap restaurants to be more comparable to VCG than the group
of entertainment companies. The operations of the microcap
restaurants were considered somewhat similar to VCGs
operations since both involve food sales, sales of alcoholic and
other beverages and operation of a number of different
locations. The microcap restaurants were also similar to VCG in
terms of overall revenues and the number of locations operated.
The entertainment companies (other than Ricks) were
considered to be a less comparable group because those companies
varied significantly in size and also in
30
terms of the type of entertainment and services offered, such
as stock car racing, movie theaters, bowling and lodging.
North Point Advisors calculated various financial multiples for
such comparable companies based on ratio of such companies
operating data (obtained from SEC filings and Capital IQ
estimates as of November 9, 2010) to the
(i) enterprise value of such companies, and (ii) the
equity value per share of such companies. North Point Advisors
reviewed the third quartile, average, median and first quartile
statistics for the comparable companies grouping to determine
appropriate high and low multiples for each statistic.
North Point Advisors then compared the range of the first to
third quartiles of such multiples with the multiples obtained
for VCG. VCGs multiples were calculated based on the ratio
of VCGs operating data (provided by VCGs management)
to an implied enterprise value of $64.0 million (based on
the $2.25 per share merger consideration) and then taking into
account VCGs net debt of $27.2 million as of
September 30, 2010.) With respect to the comparable
companies, North Point Advisors calculated:
|
|
|
|
|
enterprise value (which is the market value of common equity
plus the book value of debt, less cash) as a multiple of latest
12 months revenue;
|
|
|
|
enterprise value as a multiple of latest 12 months earnings
before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (also
referred to in this proxy statement as EBITDA);
|
|
|
|
equity value per share as a multiple of latest 12 month
earnings per share;
|
|
|
|
enterprise value as a multiple of estimated revenue for 2010;
|
|
|
|
enterprise value as a multiple of EBITDA for 2010; and
|
|
|
|
equity value per share as a multiple of estimated earnings per
share for 2010.
|
The results of these analyses are summarized in the table below.
Because North Point Advisors deemed the group of microcap
restaurants to be more comparable to VCG than the group of
entertainment companies, the table below only shows the data
derived from the microcap restaurant grouping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microcap Restaurant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value or per Share Equity Value as a
|
|
First to Third
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCG
|
Multiple of:
|
|
Quartile Range
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
Offer Multiple
|
|
M Revenue
|
|
0.3x 0.5x
|
|
|
0.4
|
x
|
|
|
0.4
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
M EBITDA
|
|
5.9x 6.7x
|
|
|
6.7
|
x
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
6.3
|
x
|
M EPS
|
|
13.1x 16.3x
|
|
|
14.7
|
x
|
|
|
14.7
|
x
|
|
|
22.7
|
x
|
10 Revenue
|
|
0.4x 0.5x
|
|
|
0.4
|
x
|
|
|
0.4
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
10 EBITDA
|
|
5.5x 6.2x
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
5.7
|
x
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
10 EPS
|
|
13.3x 13.3x
|
|
|
13.3
|
x
|
|
|
13.3
|
x
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Ratios are considered not material (designated by NM
in the table above) if they are negative or greater than 25.
Based on the first to third quartile range for these multiples,
the resulting implied enterprise value for VCG ranged from
$48.3 million to $67.9 million, and the resulting
implied equity value per share ranged from $1.30 to $2.50. North
Point Advisors compared this range of enterprise values to the
implied enterprise value of $64.0 million contemplated by
the merger agreement and compared this range of equity values
per share to the per share consideration to be paid pursuant to
the merger agreement of $2.25.
31
North Point Advisors also calculated the same various financial
multiples for Ricks, which North Point Advisors considered
the company most comparable to VCG. The results of the analyses
for Ricks are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Ricks Enterprise Value or Per Share Equity Value as a
multiple of:
|
|
Multiple
|
|
M Revenue
|
|
|
1.3
|
x
|
M EBITDA
|
|
|
5.6
|
x
|
M EPS
|
|
|
9.3
|
x
|
10 Revenue
|
|
|
1.3
|
x
|
10 EBITDA
|
|
|
5.4
|
x
|
10 EPS
|
|
|
9.6
|
x
|
Based on the above multiples for Ricks, the resulting
implied enterprise value for VCG ranged from $36.6 million
to $56.4 million, and the resulting implied equity value
per share ranged from $0.58 to $1.80. North Point Advisors
compared this range of enterprise values to the implied
enterprise value of $64.0 million contemplated by the
merger agreement and compared this range of equity values per
share to the per share consideration to be paid pursuant to the
merger agreement of $2.25.
Comparable
Precedent Transaction Analysis
North Point Advisors reviewed the terms of certain recent merger
and acquisition transactions reported in SEC filings, public
company disclosures, press releases, industry and popular press
reports, databases and other sources relating to the following
selected transactions (listed by target/acquiror) in the
following industries announced since 2004:
Restaurants
with Performance Issues:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Target
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
05/18/2010
|
|
CKE Restaurants Inc.
|
|
Apollo Management, L.P.
|
09/29/2008
|
|
Wendys International Inc.
|
|
Triarc Companies Inc.
|
09/23/2008
|
|
Buca, Inc.
|
|
Planet Hollywood International, Inc.
|
06/13/2008
|
|
Smokey Bones Restaurant
|
|
Sun Capital Partners
|
10/22/2007
|
|
Champps Entertainment
|
|
Fox & Hound Restaurant Group
|
08/15/2007
|
|
Cafe Express
|
|
Redstone Capital Partners
|
08/06/2007
|
|
Boston Market Corporation
|
|
Sun Capital Partners, Inc.
|
11/28/2006
|
|
Fresh Enterprises Inc. (Baja Fresh)
|
|
Caliber Capital Group, Inc.
|
11/17/2006
|
|
Joes Crab Shack (120 Restaurants)
|
|
J.H. Whitney & Co.
|
08/21/2006
|
|
Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.
|
|
Sun Capital Partners Inc
|
06/20/2006
|
|
Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc
|
|
Wellspring Capital Management
|
03/08/2006
|
|
Dave & Busters Inc
|
|
Wellspring Capital Management
|
10/18/2005
|
|
Garden Fresh Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Sun Capital Partners, Inc
|
04/13/2005
|
|
Quality Dining
|
|
Management / Fitzpatrick Group
|
10/21/2004
|
|
Chevys Mexican Restaurant
|
|
Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co
|
03/11/2004
|
|
Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp.
|
|
Centre Partners/Fairmont Capital/Management
|
32
Clubs/Entertainment
Related:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Target
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Pending
|
|
Cheyenne Saloon and Opera House
|
|
|
07/16/2010
|
|
Jaguar Gold Club, LLC
|
|
RCI Entertainment (Ft. Worth), Inc.
|
06/01/2010
|
|
Restaurant Associates, Inc.
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
09/30/2009
|
|
Cabaret North Inc.
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
07/24/2009
|
|
Villa One Trust in Newburyport
|
|
|
02/28/2009
|
|
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC
|
|
FPI MB Entertainment LLC
|
01/23/2009
|
|
GTA-Stonehenge, LLC, Wildewood Country Club,
|
|
WCWW Committee, LLC
|
09/05/2008
|
|
Scores Las Vegas
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
07/28/2008
|
|
Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
07/04/2008
|
|
Karu & Y Ultralounge
|
|
|
06/18/2008
|
|
RCI Entertainment (Northwest Highway), Inc.
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
05/27/2008
|
|
Private Escapes Destination Club
|
|
Ultimate Escapes, Inc.
|
05/18/2008
|
|
Claddagh Development Group, LLC
|
|
|
04/15/2008
|
|
Jaguars Gold Club
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
04/11/2008
|
|
The Executive Club
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
03/31/2008
|
|
Playmates Gentlemens Club
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
03/31/2008
|
|
Crazy Horse Too, Inc.
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
12/21/2007
|
|
La Boheme Gentlemens Cabaret
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
11/30/2007
|
|
Tootsies Cabaret
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
10/30/2007
|
|
Upscale Gentlemans Nightclub In The Southeast
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
10/29/2007
|
|
Platinum Plus
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
09/17/2007
|
|
Jaguar Gold Club, LLC
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
09/14/2007
|
|
Upscale Gentlemans Nightclub In The Northeast
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
08/24/2007
|
|
Indiana Downs, LLC
|
|
Oliver Racing LLC
|
04/23/2007
|
|
New Orleans Nights
|
|
Ricks Cabaret International Inc.
|
04/16/2007
|
|
Regale, Inc.
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
03/20/2007
|
|
MRC, LP
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
02/28/2007
|
|
An Adult Night Club in St. Louis
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
01/31/2007
|
|
RCC LP
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
01/19/2007
|
|
Kentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
|
|
VCG Holding Corp.
|
01/15/2007
|
|
Epicurean Enterprises, LLC
|
|
|
The companies in the group of restaurants with performance
issues were restaurant companies characterized by either
negative sales growth, negative comparable sales growth,
decreased profitability, or a combination of the three. Many of
these companies also had unclear prospects for growth in the
near and long term, often as a result of the negative trends.
Because many of these factors also apply to VCG, North Point
Advisors concluded that the transactions for this group were
more comparable to VCGs proposed transaction than were the
transactions from the club/entertainment related
group.
For each of the selected transactions, North Point Advisors
calculated and compared multiples for the target companies based
on the ratio of the enterprise value to the latest
12 months net sales and the enterprise value to the latest
12 months EBITDA. North Point Advisors reviewed the third
quartile and first quartile statistics for the precedent
transactions grouping to determine appropriate high and low
multiples for each statistic.
The results of these analyses are summarized in the table below.
Because North Point Advisors deemed the transactions from the
group of restaurants with performance issues to be more
comparable to VCG than
33
the group of club/entertainment related transactions, the table
below only shows that data derived from the restaurants with
performance issues grouping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First to Third
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of:
|
|
Quartile Range
|
|
Offer Multiple
|
|
M Net Sales
|
|
|
0.5x 0.8
|
x
|
|
|
1.2
|
x
|
M EBITDA
|
|
|
5.8x 7.3
|
x
|
|
|
6.7
|
x
|
Based on the first to third quartile range for these multiples,
the resulting implied enterprise value for VCG ranged from
$59.1 million to $73.7 million and the resulting
implied equity value per share ranged from $1.96 to $2.85. North
Point Advisors compared this range of enterprise values to the
implied enterprise value of $64.0 million contemplated by
the merger agreement and compared this range of equity values
per share to the per share consideration to be paid pursuant to
the merger agreement of $2.25.
Based on the first to third quartile range of such premiums paid
for these companies, the resulting implied equity value per
share ranged from $2.02 to $2.57. North Point Advisors compared
this range of equity values per share to the per share
consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement of
$2.25.
In addition, North Point Advisors indicated that the $2.25 price
per share of VCGs common stock to be paid to VCGs
shareholders pursuant to the merger represented a premium of
36.4% based on the $1.65 closing price per share on
July 21, 2010, the last trading day before public
announcement of the proposal that resulted in the merger
agreement.
Premiums
Paid Analysis
North Point Advisors analyzed the premium paid for acquired
public entities in the retail and consumer spaces since 2005
with deal values between $10 million and $1 billion,
relative to the targets stock prices one day, one week and
one month prior to the date that the transaction was announced.
North Point Advisors reviewed the third quartile, average,
median and first quartile statistics for the premiums paid on
comparable acquisitions to determine appropriate high and low
multiples for each statistic. The following table presents the
result of this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First to Third
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCG Offer
|
Premium Paid
|
|
Quartile Range
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
Premium
|
|
One Day
|
|
8.5% 32.9%
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
One Week
|
|
13.2% 35.3%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
One Month
|
|
16.1% 40.7%
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
North Point Advisors performed three different discounted cash
flow analyses on VCG. For these analyses, North Point Advisors
used VCGs management projections for 2010 and projections
developed by North Point Advisors and approved by management for
2011 through 2015 (referred to in this proxy statement as the
Management Case). North Point Advisors then also
developed a Downside Case using more conservative
assumptions than those contained in the Management Case and also
an Upside Case using more aggressive assumptions
than those contained in the Management Case. The financial
projections included in the Management Case, the Upside Case and
the Downside Case are set forth under Other Important
Information Regarding Us Projected Financial
Information.
North Point Advisors calculated implied prices per share of
VCGs common stock using illustrative terminal values in
the year 2015 based on multiples ranging from 5.0x EBITDA to
7.0x EBITDA. These illustrative terminal values were then
discounted to calculate implied indications of present values
using discount rates ranging from 15.0% to 20.0%. The various
ranges for discount rates were chosen based on analyses of
VCGs weighted average of cost of capital. Using the
Management Case, the resulting implied equity values per share
ranged from $0.87 to $2.01. Using the Downside Case, the
resulting implied equity values per share ranged from $0.13 to
$0.88. Using the Upside Case, the resulting implied equity
values per
34
share ranged from $1.63 to $3.15. North Point Advisors compared
this range of equity values per share to the per share
consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement of
$2.25.
Illustrative
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
North Point Advisors performed an illustrative leveraged buyout
analysis using financial information provided by VCGs
management and projections and financing assumptions based on
North Point Advisors estimates. Assuming the refinancing
of all of VCGs existing debt upon a transaction and
hypothetical required internal rates of return ranging from 20%
to 30% to a financial buyer, and hypothetical financial buyer
enterprise value to EBITDA exit multiples ranging from 5.0x to
7.0x, the foregoing analysis implied a current enterprise value
for VCG of $42.9 million to $50.5 million, or a price
per share range of $0.98 to $1.45. North Point Advisors noted
that the merger consideration of $2.25 per share was above this
range.
Breakup
Analysis
North Point Advisors performed an illustrative breakup analysis,
which was designed to show what proceeds could be distributed to
VCGs shareholders assuming that VCG (i) could sell
all of its clubs at the same EBITDA multiple that VCG paid when
such clubs were acquired, and (ii) all such proceeds could
be distributed to shareholders with no corporate taxes being
paid by VCG. Using such assumptions, North Point Advisors
applied such multiples to the 2010 estimated EBITDA for each
club and calculated that the maximum distributable amount would
be $1.93 per share.
Limitations
on North Point Advisors Analyses and Opinion
The summary of North Point Advisors analyses set forth
above does not contain a complete description of these analyses,
but does summarize the material analyses performed by North
Point Advisors in rendering its opinion. The above summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the written opinion of
North Point Advisors attached as
Appendix B
to this
proxy statement. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a
complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial
analysis or summary description. North Point Advisors believes
that its analyses and the summary set forth above must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses or of the summary, without considering the analyses as
a whole or all of the factors included in its analyses, would
create an incomplete view of the processes underlying the
analyses set forth in the North Point Advisors written opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, North Point Advisors considered the
results of all of its analyses and did not attribute any
particular weight to any factor or analysis. Instead, North
Point Advisors made its determination as to fairness on the
basis of its experience and financial judgment after considering
the results of all of its analyses. The fact that any specific
analysis has been referred to in the summary above is not meant
to indicate that this analysis was given greater weight than any
other analysis. No company or transaction used in the above
analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to VCG or the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
North Point Advisors performed its analyses solely for purposes
of providing its opinion to the Special Committee. In performing
its analyses, North Point Advisors made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business and
economic conditions and other matters. Certain of the analyses
performed by North Point Advisors are based upon projections of
future results furnished to North Point Advisors by VCGs
management, further discussed under Other Important
Information Regarding Us Projected Financial
Information, which are not necessarily indicative of
actual future results and may be significantly more or less
favorable than actual future results. These projections are
inherently subject to uncertainty because, among other things,
they are based upon numerous factors or events beyond the
control of the parties or their respective advisors. North Point
Advisors does not assume responsibility if future results are
materially different from projected results.
North Point Advisors has relied upon and assumed, without
assuming liability or responsibility for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished, or otherwise made
available, to it or discussed with or reviewed by it. North
Point Advisors has further relied upon the assurances of
VCGs management that the financial information provided
has been
35
prepared on a reasonable basis in accordance with industry
practice and that VCGs management is not aware of any
information or facts that would make any information provided to
North Point Advisors incomplete or misleading. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, for the purpose of its opinion,
North Point Advisors has assumed that with respect to financial
projections, estimates and other forward-looking information
reviewed by it, that such information has been reasonably
prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of VCGs management as to
the expected future results of VCGs operations and
financial condition to which such financial projections,
estimates and other forward-looking information relate. North
Point Advisors expresses no opinion as to any such financial
projections, estimates or forward-looking information or the
assumptions on which they were based. With VCGs consent,
North Point Advisors has relied on advice of the outside counsel
to the Special Committee and VCGs independent accountants,
and on the assumptions of VCGs management, as to all
accounting, legal, tax and financial reporting matters with
respect to VCG and the merger agreement.
North Point Advisors assumed that the merger would be completed
on the terms set forth in the merger agreement reviewed by North
Point Advisors, without amendments and with full satisfaction of
all covenants and conditions without any waiver. North Point
Advisors expressed no opinion regarding whether the necessary
approvals or other conditions to the consummation of the merger
will be obtained or satisfied.
North Point Advisors did not assume responsibility for
performing, and did not perform any appraisals or valuations of
specific assets or liabilities of VCG. North Point Advisors
expresses no opinion regarding the liquidation value (except to
the extent described above under Breakup Analysis)
or solvency of any entity. North Point Advisors did not
undertake any independent analysis of any outstanding, pending
or threatened litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted
claims or other contingent liabilities to which VCG, or any of
its respective affiliates, are a party or may be subject. At the
direction of the Special Committee, and with its consent, North
Point Advisors opinion made no assumption concerning, and
therefore did not consider, the potential effects of litigation,
claims, investigations, or possible assertions of claims, or the
outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters.
North Point Advisors opinion was necessarily based on the
information available to it and the facts and circumstances as
they existed and were subject to evaluation as of the date of
the opinion. Events occurring after the date of the opinion
could materially affect the assumptions used by North Point
Advisors in preparing its opinion. North Point Advisors
expresses no opinion as to the prices at which VCGs shares
of common stock have traded or may trade following announcement
of the transaction or at any time after the date of the opinion.
North Point Advisors has not undertaken and is not obligated to
affirm or revise its opinion or otherwise comment on any events
occurring after the date it was rendered.
North Point Advisors was not requested to opine as to, and the
opinion does not address, the basic business decision to proceed
with the merger or the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, the pre-signing process conducted by VCG, the merits
of the transaction compared to any alternative business strategy
or transaction that may be available to VCG, the Executive
Groups ability to fund the merger consideration, any other
terms contemplated by the merger agreement or the fairness of
the amount or nature of the compensation to the VCGs
officers, directors or employees, or any class of such persons,
relative to the compensation to be received by holders of
VCGs common stock. North Point Advisors did not express
any opinion as to whether any alternative transaction might
produce consideration for VCGs shareholders in excess of
the consideration.
North Point Advisors is regularly engaged as a financial advisor
in connection with mergers and acquisitions, underwritings and
secondary distributions of securities and private placements.
The Special Committee selected North Point Advisors to render
its fairness opinion in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement on the basis of its
experience and reputation in acting as a financial advisor in
connection with mergers and acquisitions.
North Point Advisors was engaged by the Special Committee as its
exclusive financial advisor in connection with evaluating the
going private transaction and VCGs strategic alternatives,
and to render an opinion addressing the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to VCGs non-Executive Group
shareholders of the $2.25 per share in cash to be paid in the
merger. As compensation for these services, VCG has paid to
36
North Point Advisors (i) a retainer fee of $50,000,
(ii) a strategic alternatives analysis fee of $100,000 and
(iii) an opinion fee of $250,000. In addition, if the sale
of VCG is closed, North Point Advisors is entitled to receive a
transaction fee equal to (A) 1.0% of the aggregate
consideration realized by VCG and its shareholders in connection
with such transaction, if such aggregate consideration is equal
to or less than the aggregate consideration as described in the
Proposal, or (B) 1.0% of the aggregate consideration
described in the Proposal plus 4.5% of the aggregate
consideration in excess thereof, if the aggregate consideration
is greater than the aggregate consideration described in the
Proposal. The retainer fee and the strategic alternatives
analysis fee, but not the opinion fee, will be applied as
credits against any transaction fee payable in connection with
the engagement. None of the retainer fee, strategic alternatives
analysis fee or the opinion fee are contingent upon the
consummation of the merger or the conclusions reached in the
opinion.
In the ordinary course of its business, North Point Advisors and
its affiliates may actively trade securities of VCG for its own
account or the account of its customers and, accordingly, may at
any time hold a long or short position in such securities. North
Point Advisors may also, in the future, provide investment
banking and financial advisory services to VCG, the Executive
Group or entities that are affiliated with VCG or the Executive
Group, for which it would expect to receive compensation.
North Point Advisors written opinion was one of many
factors taken into consideration by the Special Committee and
VCGs board of directors in making the determination to
approve the merger agreement and recommend that VCGs
shareholders vote in favor of the Merger Proposal.
Position
of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP,
Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello as to Fairness
Under the rules governing going-private
transactions, Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management
LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group,
LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello are required to express
their beliefs as to the substantive and procedural fairness of
the merger to VCGs unaffiliated shareholders. Family Dog,
FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment
Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello are making the statements included in this
subsection solely for the purposes of complying with the
requirements of
Rule 13e-3
and related rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 as amended. The views of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co.,
Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD
Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello as to
the fairness of the proposed merger should not be construed as a
recommendation to any of shareholders as to how such shareholder
should vote on the Merger Proposal.
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello believe that the terms and
conditions of the merger are substantively fair to VCG and its
unaffiliated shareholders, based on the following substantive
factors:
Current Market Price.
The price of $2.25 per
share to be paid in the merger represents a premium of
approximately 36.4% over the reported closing price for the
shares on July 21, 2010, the last trading day before the
public announcement of Mr. Lowries reaffirmed
Proposal, and 20.9% over the closing price of VCGs common
stock on November 9, 2010, the last trading day before it
was publicly announced that VCG had entered into the merger
agreement.
Cash Consideration.
The merger will provide
consideration to VCG s shareholders entirely in cash,
which will allow them to pursue other investment alternatives.
Premiums Represented.
The price of $2.25 per
share is within the range of the premiums paid over pre-proposal
market prices in other transactions considered by
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello.
Comparable Companies.
The ratio of the merger
consideration of $2.25 per share to VCG earnings is within the
range of the price-to-earnings ratios of other adult
entertainment providers.
Market Receptiveness to Adult Entertainment
Providers.
The public securities markets have not
been responsive to improvements by adult entertainment providers
and appear to be influenced by concerns over stock price
volatility and other factors not within a companys
control. After consummation of the merger, the
37
non-Executive Group shareholders (unless they are members of
Family Dog) will no longer own any VCGs common stock and,
therefore, the merger will eliminate this concern about future
price pressure on VCGs common stock.
Comparable Transactions.
Family Dog, FD
Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment
Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello reviewed similar precedent transactions in the
same or similar industry as well as the VCGs historical
financial performance, its financial results and historical
market prices of its shares and believe that the merger
consideration is fair based on that review.
Opinion of North Point Advisors.
Before the
Special Committee and VCGs board of directors approved the
merger, North Point Advisors, the Special Committees
financial advisor, delivered its opinion to the Special
Committee and VCGs board of directors, which was
subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of the date of its
opinion and based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth in its opinion, the merger consideration
of $2.25 per share in cash to be received by the holders of
VCGs common stock (other than the Executive Group) under
the merger agreement is fair from a financial point of view to
such holders.
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello believe that the terms and
conditions of the merger are procedurally fair to VCG and its
unaffiliated shareholders, based on the following procedural
factors:
Approval of Disinterested Shareholders.
The
merger agreement explicitly requires the affirmative vote of
both (i) the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of VCGs common stock entitled to vote at the
special meeting, and (ii) a majority of the votes actually
cast at the special meeting. Any votes cast by members of the
Executive Group with regard to shares of VCG common stock held
by the members of the Executive Group will not be taken into
account for any purpose when determining whether the requisite
majority of the minority shareholder vote set forth in
clause (ii) has been achieved (e.g., in calculating votes
cast in favor or total votes cast).
Opportunity for Third Party Bids.
The Special
Committee directed North Point Advisors to contact potential
financial and strategic buyers to determine their interest in
making a competing bid for VCG and publicly announced it was
doing so. No firm proposals resulted from this process.
Opportunity to Change Recommendation.
Although
the merger agreement requires VCG to stop seeking other
proposals, it permits a change in the recommendation of the
Special Committee and VCGs board of directors in response
to a bona fide unsolicited proposal if necessary to comply with
their fiduciary duties to shareholders.
The interests of our unaffiliated shareholders were represented
by the Special Committee comprised of independent, non-employee
directors, which had the exclusive authority to review, evaluate
and negotiate the terms and conditions of the merger agreement
on behalf of VCG, with the assistance of the Special
Committees financial and legal advisors. Accordingly,
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello did not engage a financial
advisor for the purpose of reviewing and evaluating the merits
of the proposed merger from the unaffiliated shareholders
viewpoint. Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management
LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group,
LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello believe that the merger
agreement and the merger are substantively and procedurally fair
to the unaffiliated shareholders on the basis of the factors
described above in this section under Position of Family
Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello as to fairness, as
well as the factors described under Special
Factors Recommendation of the Special Committee,
VCGs Board of Directors and VCGs Executive Officers;
Reasons for Recommending Approval of the Merger Agreement
and agree with the analyses and conclusions of the Special
Committee and VCGs board of directors, based upon the
reasonableness of those analyses and conclusions, which they
adopt, and their respective knowledge of VCG, as well as the
factors considered by, and the findings of, the Special
Committee and VCGs board of directors with respect to the
fairness of the merger to such unaffiliated shareholders. In
addition, Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management
LLLP, Lowrie Investment
38
Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie
and Mr. Ocello considered the fact that the Special
Committee received an opinion from North Point Advisors to the
effect that based upon and subject to the limitations and
qualifications set forth in the written opinion, as of the date
of the opinion, the merger consideration of $2.25 in cash per
share of VCGs common stock that is to be received by the
non-Executive Group shareholders in the merger is fair, from a
financial point of view, to such shareholders. See Special
Factors Recommendation of the Special Committee,
VCGs Board of Directors and Executive Officers; Reasons
for Recommending Approval of the Merger Agreement.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered and given weight by Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co.,
Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD
Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello in
connection with evaluating the fairness of the merger agreement
and the merger is not intended to be exhaustive but includes all
the material factors they considered. Family Dog, FD Acquisition
Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc.,
LTD Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello
did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or
otherwise attach relative weights to the foregoing factors in
reaching their position as to the fairness of the merger
agreement and the merger. Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie
Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD
Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello
believe that the foregoing factors provide a reasonable basis
for their belief that the merger is fair to VCG and its
unaffiliated shareholders.
Purposes
and Reasons of Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello for the
Merger
The primary purpose of the merger for Messrs. Lowrie and
Ocello is to benefit from VCGs future earnings and growth
after VCGs common stock ceases to be publicly traded
through their ownership of membership interests of Family Dog.
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello believe that structuring the
transaction in such a manner is preferable to other transaction
structures because it will enable the acquisition of all shares
of VCGs common stock at the same time and it represents an
opportunity for VCGs unaffiliated shareholders to
immediately receive a substantial premium for their shares based
upon the closing price for VCGs common stock on
July 21, 2010, the last trading day before public
announcement of the proposal that resulted in the merger
agreement. In addition, Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello believe
that, following the merger, VCG will have greater operating
flexibility, allowing management to concentrate on long-term
growth, reduce VCGs focus on the quarter-to-quarter
performance, as often emphasized by the public markets, and
pursue alternatives that VCG would not have as a public company,
such as the ability to pursue transactions without focusing on
the market reaction or risk profile of VCGs unaffiliated
shareholders with respect to such transactions.
Purposes
and Reasons for the Merger of Family Dog and FD Acquisition
Co.
If the proposed merger is completed, VCG will become a direct
subsidiary of Family Dog. For Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co.,
the purpose of the merger is to effectuate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
Purposes,
Reasons and Plans for VCG after the Merger
The purpose of the merger for VCG is to enable VCGs
shareholders (other than Family Dog (who at the time of the
consummation of the merger will hold all shares of VCGs
common stock currently beneficially owned by the Executive
Group) and shareholders who properly exercise their
dissenters rights under Colorado law) to immediately
realize the value of their investment in VCG through their
receipt of the per share merger consideration of $2.25 in cash,
representing a premium of approximately (i) 36.4% over the
closing price of our common stock on July 21, 2010, the
last trading day before Mr. Lowries reaffirmed
Proposal was made public, and (ii) 20.9% over the closing
price of VCGs common stock on November 9, 2010, the
last trading day before it was publicly announced that VCG had
entered into the merger agreement. For the reasons discussed
under Special Factors Recommendation of the
Special Committee and Board of Directors; Reasons for
Recommending Approval of the Merger Agreement, VCGs
board of directors unanimously determined (with Mr. Lowrie
taking no part in the vote or recommendation) that the merger
agreement and the merger are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of VCG and its unaffiliated shareholders.
39
It is expected that, upon consummation of the merger, VCGs
operations will be conducted substantially in the same manner as
they currently are being conducted except that VCGs common
stock will cease to be publicly traded and will no longer be
listed on any exchange or quotation system, including NASDAQ, so
price quotations will no longer be available. Further, VCG will
not be subject to many of the obligations and constraints, and
the related direct and indirect costs, associated with having
publicly traded equity securities, and VCG will cease to
continue to file periodic reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Following the merger, VCG will continue to evaluate and review
its business and operations and may develop new plans and
proposals or elect to pursue acquisitions or other opportunities
that it considers appropriate to maximize its value.
VCG has in the past and recently been approached by third
parties unaffiliated with the Executive Group indicating an
interest in potentially purchasing certain clubs owned and
operated by VCG. While VCG has not entered into any agreement or
letter of intent with respect to any such potential divestiture,
VCG and Family Dog will continue to evaluate such proposals
after the merger to the extent they become available and are on
favorable terms to VCG.
No additional or improved benefits to VCGs management have
been agreed to or promised in connection with the merger.
Except as disclosed in this proxy statement, none of Family Dog,
FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello has any
present plans or proposals that would result in an extraordinary
corporate transaction, such as a merger, liquidation, relocation
of operations, or sale or transfer of a material amount of
assets, involving VCG or its subsidiaries, or any material
changes in VCGs indebtedness or capitalization, business
or composition of its management or personnel.
Certain
Effects of the Merger
If the merger is consummated, FD Acquisition Co. will be merged
with and into VCG, and VCG will continue as the surviving
corporation. Following the consummation of the merger, all of
VCGs issued and outstanding common stock will be owned by
Family Dog. Upon consummation of the merger, each share of
VCGs common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior
to the effective time of the merger (other than shares held by
Family Dog, held in treasury by VCG or owned by shareholders who
properly exercise their dissenters rights under Colorado
law) will be cancelled and converted automatically into the
right to receive $2.25 in cash, without interest. At the
effective time of the merger, each option to purchase shares of
VCG common stock that is outstanding and unexercised will be
cancelled and VCG will not be required to make any payments to
the holders of such options because the exercise price per share
of each such option, in all instances, exceeds the merger
consideration. See The Merger Agreement
Treatment of Stock Options for a further description of
the treatment of stock options in the merger.
As part of, or in connection with, the merger: (i) the
members of the Executive Group will transfer all shares of
VCGs common stock they hold (a total of
5,138,878 shares) to Family Dog in exchange for membership
interests in Family Dog, (ii) Mr. Lowrie will, and
certain other creditors of VCG may elect to, assign to Family
Dog their rights to certain debt owed to each by VCG in exchange
for membership interests in Family Dog, and (iii) as
further described under The Merger Agreement
Contribution of VCG Common Stock to Family Dog and Conversion of
Debt Held by Family Dog, Family Dog may elect to cancel
the indebtedness of VCG transferred to it from such parties in
exchange for shares of VCGs common stock. As of the date
hereof, no creditor of VCG (other than Lowrie Management LLLP)
has elected to assign its rights to debt owed to VCG to it to
Family Dog in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog,
and it is not currently anticipated that any other creditors
will. In connection with the transfer of shares of VCG common
stock by the Executive Group to Family Dog, Mr. Lowrie will
transfer such common stock held by him individually to Lowrie
Management LLLP, which will then transfer the aggregate number
of shares of VCGs common stock held by it (including the
shares transferred in this way by Mr. Lowrie) to Family Dog
in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog.
40
Upon consummation of the merger and the transactions
contemplated above, Family Dog will own all of VCGs issued
and outstanding shares of common stock. A table detailing the
expected capitalization of VCG and Family Dog following the
merger is set forth under Special Factors
Arrangements with Respect to VCG and Family Dog Following the
Merger.
If the merger is consummated, VCGs non-Executive Group
shareholders (unless they are members of Family Dog) will have
no interest in VCGs net book value or net earnings after
the merger. The table below sets forth the direct and indirect
interests in VCGs book value and net earnings of the
members of the Executive group prior to and immediately
following the merger, based on VCGs net book value as of
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010 and net
income for the fiscal year ended December 31 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership Prior to the Merger (1)
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Name
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$(000)s
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$(000)s
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$(000)s
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie(2)
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
$
|
7,566
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
$
|
7,471
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Micheal Ocello(3)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership Prior to the Merger (4)
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Name
|
|
2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$(000)s
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$(000)s
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$(000)s
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie(5)
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
$
|
12,563
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
$
|
12,405
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
Micheal Ocello(6)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The percentage of VCGs common
stock beneficially owned by each person listed in the table
above is based on the number of shares of VCGs common
stock held by such person as of the date of this proxy statement
and the number of shares of VCGs common stock outstanding
as of the date of this proxy statement (16,292,071).
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The data presented in this row
includes 4,394,100 shares of VCGs common stock held by
Lowrie Management LLLP and 549,189 shares of VCGs common
stock held by Mr. Lowrie individually. Mr. Lowrie is
the President of Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., which is
the General Partner of Lowrie Management LLLP. Lowrie Investment
Management, Inc. has voting and dispositive power of the shares
owned by Lowrie Management LLP.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The data presented in this row
includes 158,000 shares of VCGs common stock held by LTD
Investment Group, LLC and 37,589 shares of VCGs common
stock held by Micheal Ocello individually. Mr. Ocello is the
Managing Member of LTD Investment Group, LLC and has voting and
dispositive power of the shares owned by LTD Investment Group,
LLC.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The percentage ownership
beneficially owned by each person listed in the table above is
based on the number of membership units of Family Dog expected
to be held by such person and the total number of membership
units of Family Dog expected to be outstanding at the closing of
the merger. The percentage ownership assumes that no creditor of
VCG, other than Lowrie Management LLLP, will assign any debt to
Family Dog in exchange for membership units of Family Dog.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Following the consummation of the
merger, Mr. Lowrie will have an indirect interest in
VCGs net book value and earnings as a result of this
ownership of membership interests in Family Dog.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Following the consummation of the
merger, Mr. Ocello will have an indirect interest in
VCGs net book value and earnings as a result of his
ownership of membership interests in Family Dog.
|
A primary benefit of the merger to VCGs shareholders
(other than members of the Executive Group) will be the right of
such shareholders to receive a cash payment of $2.25, without
interest, for each share of VCGs common stock held by such
shareholders as described above, an approximately 36.4% premium
over the reported closing price for the shares on July 21,
2010, the last trading day before the public announcement of
Mr. Lowries reaffirmed Proposal, and an approximately
20.9% premium over the closing price of VCGs common stock
on November 9, 2010, the last trading day prior to the
public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement.
Additionally, such shareholders will avoid the risk of any
possible decrease in our future earnings, growth or value, and
the risks related to our additional leverage, following the
merger.
The primary detriments of the merger to such shareholders
include the lack of interest of such shareholders in VCGs
potential future earnings, growth or value (unless they are
members of Family Dog). Additionally, the receipt of cash in
exchange for shares of VCGs common stock pursuant to the
merger
41
agreement will generally be a taxable sale transaction for
U.S. federal income tax purposes to those of VCGs
shareholders who surrender shares of VCGs common stock in
the merger.
In connection with the merger, the members of the Executive
Group will receive benefits and be subject to obligations that
are different from, or in addition to, the benefits of
VCGs shareholders generally. These benefits and detriments
arise from (i) the right to a continued ownership interest
in VCG following the consummation of the merger, and
(ii) continued employment with VCG.
The primary benefits of the merger to the members of the
Executive Group and the members of Family Dog, based on their
ownership of membership interests in Family Dog, include their
respective interests in VCGs potential future earnings and
growth which, if VCG successfully executes its business
strategies, could be substantial. Additionally, following the
merger, VCG will be a private company, and as such will be
relieved of the burdens imposed on companies with publicly
traded equity, including the requirements and restrictions on
trading that VCGs directors, officers and beneficial
owners of more than 10% of VCGs common stock face as a
result of the provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Additionally, following the merger, Mr. Lowrie will retain
his position as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Ocello will
retain his position as President and Chief Operating Officer of
VCG as the surviving corporation.
The primary detriments of the merger to the members of the
Executive Group and the members of Family Dog include the fact
that all of the risk of any possible decrease in the surviving
corporations earnings, growth or value, and all of the
risks related to VCGs current and future indebtedness,
after the merger will be borne by Family Dog. Additionally, the
investment in Family Dog and VCG, as the surviving corporation,
will not be liquid, with no public trading market for such
securities, and the equity securities of Family Dog will be
subject to restrictions on transfer.
VCGs common stock is currently registered under the
Exchange Act and is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol VCGH. As a result of the merger, VCG, as the
surviving corporation, will become a privately held corporation,
and there will be no public market for VCGs common stock.
After the merger, VCGs common stock will cease to be
quoted on NASDAQ, and price quotations with respect to sales of
shares of VCGs common stock in the public market will no
longer be available.
Conduct
of Our Business if the Merger is Not Completed
If the merger is not approved by VCGs shareholders or if
the merger is not consummated for any other reason, shareholders
will not receive any payment for their shares in connection with
the merger. Instead, VCG will remain a public company and its
common stock will continue to be listed and traded on NASDAQ. In
addition, if the merger is not consummated, VCG expects that,
management will operate VCGs business in a manner similar
to the manner in which it is being operated today and that our
shareholders will continue to be subject to the same risks and
opportunities as they currently are.
From time to time, VCGs board of directors will evaluate
and review, among other things, VCGs business operations,
properties, dividend policy and capitalization and make such
changes as are deemed appropriate and continue to seek to
identify strategic alternatives to enhance shareholders
value. If the merger agreement is not approved by VCGs
shareholders or if the merger is not consummated for any other
reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction
that is found acceptable will be offered, or that VCGs
business, prospects, results of operations or stock price will
not be adversely impacted or that VCGs management team
will remain intact. In addition, if the merger is not
consummated, it is anticipated that Mr. Lowrie will
continue to hold a significant interest in VCG and might be able
to effectively control whether an alternative change in control
transaction could be approved by VCGs shareholders.
Interests
of Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello
In connection with, the merger: (i) the members of the
Executive Group will transfer all of their respective shares of
common stock of VCG (a total of 5,138,878 shares) to Family
Dog in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog,
(ii) Mr. Lowrie will cause Lowrie Management LLLP to
assign to Family Dog the rights to certain debt owed to it by
VCG in exchange for membership interests in Family
42
Dog; and (iii) as further described under The Merger
Agreement Contribution of VCG Common Stock to Family
Dog and Conversion of Debt Held by Family Dog, Family Dog
may elect to cancel the indebtedness of VCG transferred to it
from such parties in exchange for shares of VCGs common
stock. As of the date hereof, no creditor of VCG (other than
Lowrie Management LLLP) has elected to assign its rights to debt
owned by VCG to it to Family Dog in exchange for membership
interests in Family Dog, and it is not currently anticipated
that any other creditors will. In connection with the transfer
of shares of VCG common stock by the Executive Group to Family
Dog, Mr. Lowrie will transfer such common stock held by him
individually to Lowrie Management LLLP, which will then transfer
the aggregate number of shares of VCGs common stock held
by it (including the shares transferred in this way by
Mr. Lowrie) to Family Dog in exchange for membership
interests in Family Dog.
Additional information about Messrs. Lowries and
Ocellos interests in the merger in their capacities as
officers and, in the case of Mr. Lowrie, a director, of VCG
is set forth under Special Factors Interests
of VCGs Directors and Officers in the Merger.
Interests
of VCGs Directors and Officers in the Merger
Pursuant to the merger agreement, (i) the members of the
board of directors of the surviving corporation will be the same
as the sole director of FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie,
immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, and
(ii) the officers of the surviving corporation will be the
same as the officers of FD Acquisition Co., Messrs. Lowrie
and Ocello, immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.
Other than Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello, it is not currently
anticipated that any of VCGs current directors or
executive officers will serve as a director, manager or
executive officer of either Family Dog or VCG after consummation
of the merger.
Each of VCGs current directors are named parties to
certain litigation relating to the current proposed merger. The
litigation is currently pending and a resolution of this
litigation is not a condition to the closing of the merger. See
The Merger Agreement Litigation Related to the
Merger.
Directors McGraw, Grusin, Sawicki and Levine hold no stock
options to purchase shares of VCGs common stock.
Mr. Ocello currently holds 10,000 vested options to
purchase shares of VCGs common stock. Each option to
purchase shares of VCG common stock that is outstanding,
unexercised, and vested at the effective time of the merger will
be cancelled and the holders of such options will be entitled to
receive an amount (without interest), in cash, equal to the
product of the number of shares subject to each such option
multiplied by the excess, if any, of the merger consideration
over the exercise price per share of each such option, less
applicable withholding taxes. The exercise prices of all
outstanding stock options are substantially above $2.25.
Accordingly, at the closing of the merger, such stock options
will be cancelled without any payment.
Mr. Grusin beneficially owns approximately $410,000
aggregate principal amount of VCGs outstanding debt.
Mr. McGraw beneficially owns $50,000 aggregate principal
amount of the VCGs outstanding debt. The debt held by
Messrs. Grusin and McGraw will remain outstanding after
consummation of the merger under their respective terms and
conditions.
Mr. Lowrie beneficially owns through Lowrie Management LLLP
$5,700,000 aggregate principal amount of VCGs outstanding
debt. Before or contemporaneously with the completion of the
merger, Mr. Lowrie will cause Lowrie Management LLLP to
assign to Family Dog all rights to approximately $3,000,000 of
the debt owed by VCG to Lowrie Management LLLP in exchange for
membership interests in Family Dog. Mr. Lowrie intends to
use the remaining $2,700,000 of the debt owed by VCG to Lowrie
Management LLLP to purchase certain real property from one of
VCGs subsidiaries, as further disclosed under
Special Factors Real Estate Transaction
Involving Mr. Lowrie.
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello will contribute to Family
Dog all shares of VCGs common stock they beneficially own
immediately before the effective time of the merger in exchange
for equity ownership interests in Family Dog. At the effective
time of the merger, any such shares held by Family Dog will be
cancelled without any cash payment or other consideration.
43
Each of Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello is a party to an
employment agreement that would provide such executive officer
benefits in the amount of approximately $2,610,000 and
$2,416,000, respectively, upon a change of control. Each of the
employment agreements will be terminated immediately prior to
the merger and no change of control or other payments, except
for unpaid salaries, bonuses and health benefits or similar
arrangements, will be due and payable from VCG after the merger
under the employment agreements.
In addition, Mr. Lowrie will retain his position as Chief
Executive Officer and Mr. Ocello will retain his position
as President and Chief Operating Officer of the surviving
corporation following the merger.
Real
Estate Transaction Involving Mr. Lowrie
Mr. Lowrie beneficially owns through Lowrie Management LLLP
$5,700,000 aggregate principal amount of VCGs outstanding
debt. Before or contemporaneously with the completion of the
merger, Mr. Lowrie will cause Lowrie Management LLLP to
assign to Family Dog all rights to approximately $3,000,000 of
the debt owed by VCG to Lowrie Management LLLP in exchange for
membership interests in Family Dog. At the closing of the merger
or soon thereafter, Mr. Lowrie intends to use the remaining
$2,700,000 of the debt owed by VCG to Lowrie Management LLLP to
purchase from VCGH Real Estate Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of VCG, the real property on which two of the
VCGs nightclubs are located. The real property consists of
the land and buildings on and in which
PTs
®
Showclub in Indianapolis, Indiana and
PTs
®
Brooklyn in Brooklyn, Illinois are located. Lowrie Management
LLLP will purchase the land and building associated with
PTs
®
Showclub in Indianapolis, Indiana for $2,200,000 and the land
and building associated with
PTs
®
Brooklyn in Brooklyn, Illinois for $500,000. The purchase price
for the Indianapolis, Indiana property was based on an appraisal
received from an appraisal firm. The purchase price for the
Brooklyn, Illinois property was calculated based on a 12% return
on the current rent payable under the lease terms. Lowrie
Management LLLP will pay for the real estate by canceling
certain promissory notes issued by VCG with an outstanding
principal balance of $2,700,000. Lowrie Management LLLP will
then assume the leases that are currently in place for both
premises, with the same terms and conditions going forward after
the closing of the acquisition of the two properties. In the
event that the merger is not consummated, Mr. Lowrie may
not purchase the two properties from VCGH Real Estate Holdings,
Inc., in which event the debt owed by VCG to Lowrie Management
LLLP will remain outstanding under its current terms and
conditions.
Provisions
for Unaffiliated Shareholders
No provision has been made to grant our unaffiliated
shareholders access to the corporate files of VCG or the other
parties to the merger agreement, or to obtain counsel or
appraisal services at the expense of VCG or such other parties.
Further, an unaffiliated representative was not retained to act
solely on behalf of VCGs unaffiliated shareholders for
purposes of negotiating the terms of the transaction or
preparing a report concerning the fairness of the transaction.
VCGs board of directors formed the Special Committee,
consisting solely of independent, non-employee directors, to
review and consider the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger. The Special Committee
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger, are advisable, fair (both substantively and
procedurally) to and in the best interests of VCG and its
unaffiliated shareholders, and recommended that VCGs board
of directors approve and declare the advisability of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, and recommend that VCGs
shareholders approve the Merger Proposal.
Indemnification
and Insurance
From and after the effective time of the merger, Family Dog
will, and will cause the surviving corporation to, indemnify and
hold harmless to the fullest extent permitted under applicable
law each of VCGs present and former directors and officers
(who are referred to in this proxy statement as an
indemnified party) against any costs, expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees), judgments, fines,
losses, claims, damages, liabilities and amounts paid in
settlement in connection with any claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation arising out of, pertaining to any
facts or events existing or occurring at or prior to the
effective time of the merger, including the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and any
44
acts or omissions in connection with such persons serving as an
officer or director of VCG. If any such claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation occurs, Family Dog or the surviving
corporation will advance to each indemnified party the expenses
it incurs in defending against any such event to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law. No indemnification or
advancement, however, shall be made if it is ultimately
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction (which
determination has become final and is not subject to appeal)
that the advancement or indemnification of the indemnified party
is prohibited by applicable law.
For a period of six years from the effective time of the merger,
the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the surviving
corporation will contain provisions no less favorable with
respect to director and officer exculpation, indemnification and
advancement of expenses than are set forth in VCGs current
articles of incorporation and bylaws.
Family Dog or the surviving corporation will maintain or
purchase tail policies to VCGs current directors and
officers liability insurance, which tail policies
(i) will be effective for a period of six years after the
effective time of the merger with respect to claims arising from
acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the
merger with respect to those persons who are currently covered
by our directors and officers liability insurance,
and (ii) will contain terms with respect to coverage and
amount no less favorable, in the aggregate, than those of such
policy or policies as in effect on the date of the original
merger agreement. If the tail policies described in the
immediately preceding sentence cannot be obtained or can only be
obtained by paying aggregate premiums in excess of 150% of the
aggregate annual amount currently paid by us for such coverage,
the surviving corporation will only be required to provide as
much coverage as can be obtained by paying aggregate premiums
equal to 150% of the aggregate annual amount currently paid by
VCG for such coverage.
Arrangements
with Respect to VCG and Family Dog Following the
Merger
In connection with the merger, VCG will become a privately held
company. Following the consummation of the merger, all of the
issued and outstanding shares of VCGs common stock will be
held by Family Dog. Membership interests of Family Dog will be
held by members of the Executive Group and accredited investors
(as that term is defined in Rule 501 promulgated under the
Securities Act) who have a pre-existing personal or business
relationship with Messrs. Lowrie or Ocello. Five of these
accredited investors are current shareholders of VCG.
The table below sets forth the expected capitalization of VCG
and Family Dog following the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Units
|
|
Class B Units
|
|
Total Units
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Lowrie Management LLLP
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
%
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Converting debt held by certain creditors (excluding converting
debt beneficially owned by Mr. Lowrie(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Accredited investors in the private placement offering, as
described herein(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Certain creditors of VCG have been offered the opportunity to
assign their rights to certain debt owed by VCG to them to
Family Dog in exchange for membership interests in Family Dog.
As of the date hereof, no creditor of VCG (other than Lowrie
Management LLLP) has elected to assign its rights to debt owed
by VCG to it and it is not currently anticipated that any other
creditors will.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The calculation assumes the sale of $19,200,000 of Class B Units
of Family Dog to accredited investors who have a pre-existing
personal or business relationship with Messrs. Lowrie or Ocello.
|
45
Financing
of the Merger
The total amount of funds necessary to consummate the merger is
anticipated to be approximately $25,000,000, and transaction
expenses of Family Dog are anticipated to be approximately
$600,000.
Family Dog intends to finance the merger (including fees,
expenses and transaction costs) in substantial part from the
proceeds of the private placement contemplated by the
subscription agreements received by Family Dog from various
accredited investors (as that term is defined in Rule 501
promulgated under the Securities Act) who have a pre-existing
personal or business relationship with Mr. Lowrie or
Mr. Ocello. Family Dog has not delivered subscription
documents to, and has not accepted subscriptions from, persons
other than accredited investors who have a personal or business
relationship with either Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello. The
total amount subscribed for by accredited investors is
$19,200,000. Family Dog expects to finance the remaining portion
of the merger consideration and the related transaction fees
from lines of credit and other committed funds provided by other
affiliates of Family Dog, Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello,
and from funds held by (or otherwise available to) VCG at the
time of the merger, including VCGs cash on hand. Family
Dog has received commitments pursuant to subscription agreements
from such accredited investors in an amount that, together with
the financial resources described in the previous sentence, is
sufficient to finance the merger and the anticipated transaction
expenses. If the financing sources described in the preceding
sentence turn out to be unavailable, Family Dog intends to raise
any funds necessary by incurring debt from current lenders of
either VCG or Lowrie Management LLLP. In light of the
subscriptions received, and the other available sources of
funds, Family Dog is no longer accepting new subscriptions from
additional investors.
Lowrie Management LLLP has available to it a line of credit of
up to $2,000,000, all of which is currently available, pursuant
to the terms of a Business Loan Agreement, dated August 28,
2009, entered into with Citywide Banks, which agreement we
sometimes refer to herein as the Citywide Loan
Agreement. Lowrie Management LLLP issued a Promissory
Note, dated August 28, 2008, to Citywide Banks as evidence
of this indebtedness, which promissory note we sometimes refer
to herein as the Citywide Note. All amounts advanced
to Lowrie Management LLLP pursuant to the Citywide Loan
Agreement and the Citywide Note are secured by (i) a first
Deed of Trust on the property where the
PTs
®
Showclub in Denver, Colorado conducts its business and
(ii) a first Deed of Trust on the property where The
Penthouse
Club
®
in Denver, Colorado conducts its business. Both properties are
owned by Lowrie Management LLLP and leased to VCG. In addition,
Mr. Lowrie is personally guaranteeing the repayment of all
amounts advanced pursuant to the Citywide Loan Agreement and the
Citywide Note. Pursuant to the terms of the Citywide Loan
Agreement and the Citywide Note, all amounts advanced to Lowrie
Management LLLP accrue interest at variable interest rate equal
to 0.500 percentage points over the prime rate as published
in the Wall Street Journal, but, in no event, will the interest
rate be less than 6.0% per year. As of the date hereof, the
effective interest rate is 6%. The maturity date of the loan is
September 16, 2011.
Estimated
Fees and Expenses
Whether or not the merger is consummated and except as otherwise
provided in this proxy statement, each party to the merger
agreement will bear its respective fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the merger. Estimated fees and expenses to be
incurred by VCG in connection with the merger are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Legal Fees and Expenses
|
|
$
|
816,000
|
|
Financial Advisory Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
973,000
|
|
Special Committee Fees
|
|
|
121,000
|
|
Printing, Proxy and Meeting Costs
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Paying Agent
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,942,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Regulatory
Approvals
The merger agreement provides that it is a condition to the
obligations of Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co. to consummate
the merger that all foreign or domestic governmental consents,
orders and approvals required for the consummation of the
merger, the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
and transfer of any licenses related to the operations of
VCGs business as currently conducted or presently planned
to be conducted, including VCGs licenses and permits under
liquor laws and sexually oriented business laws, have been
obtained and be in effect at the effective time of the merger.
Further, the merger agreement provides that VCG shall use all
reasonable efforts to obtain all third party consents to the
merger required under any liquor, sexually oriented business and
amusement licenses and permits, as well as a city business
license for one of VCGs clubs.
The following discussion summarizes the material regulatory
requirements that VCG believes relate to the merger, although
the parties to the merger agreement may determine that
additional consents from or notifications to governmental
agencies are necessary or appropriate.
Liquor
Licenses
The adult entertainment industry is subject to extensive state
and local government regulation relating to the sale of
alcoholic beverages. Alcoholic beverage control regulations
require each of VCGs nightclubs to apply for and obtain
from state authorities a license to sell alcohol on the
premises. VCG currently has all of the liquor licenses required
to operate its business and these licenses will not be
terminated as a result of the merger. However, if VCG does not
consummate the merger and instead consummates an alternative
transaction, the party making the proposal for an alternative
transaction would be required to obtain new liquor licenses in
many of the states in which VCG operates to the extent it does
not already have such licenses.
Sexually
Oriented Business Licenses and Entertainment
Licenses
The adult entertainment industry is subject to extensive
municipal licensing requirements related to the operation of
businesses that provide live, nude or semi-nude entertainment.
Most of the localities that VCG operates in requires us to have
a Sexually Orientated Business, Amusement, or an Adult Cabaret
license. VCG currently holds all of the licenses required to
operate the businesses, and no new applications will need to be
approved in order to continue our operations as a result of the
merger.
If we do not consummate the merger and instead consummate an
alternative transaction, the party or parties making the
alternative transaction would be required to complete the
application process to obtain new licenses in every jurisdiction
where VCG operates. However, due to recent zoning changes in
Texas, we do not believe that a party or parties making such
alternative transaction would be granted the necessary licenses
to maintain VCGs current operations in Texas unless
Mr. Lowrie was part of the group making the alternative
transaction.
Other
Regulatory Approvals
In addition to those regulatory approvals described above, VCG
must obtain approvals, make filings and provide notices required
under the federal securities laws and file a statement of merger
with the Colorado Secretary of State upon the consummation of
the merger.
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger
The merger will be accounted for as a purchase
transaction for financial accounting purposes. Under this
method, the acquisition of VCGs common stock is recorded
at its fair market value where fair market value is
defined as the total amount paid for the transaction. The
acquisition related costs of the acquirer are expensed in the
periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are
received, unless costs directly relate to the issuance of debt
or equity securities.
47
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that
should be generally applicable to holders of shares of VCG
common stock upon the exchange of shares of VCG common stock for
cash pursuant to the merger. This summary is based on the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), Treasury regulations, administrative rulings
and court decisions, all as in effect as of the date hereof and
all of which are subject to differing interpretations
and/or
change at any time (possibly with retroactive effect). Any such
change could affect the accuracy of the statements and
conclusions set forth in this summary. This summary does not
address all U.S. federal income tax consequences that may
be relevant to particular shareholders in light of their
particular individual circumstances or to shareholders who are
subject to special rules, such as (i) holders of shares of
VCG common stock received in connection with the exercise of
employee stock options or otherwise as compensation,
(ii) holders that validly exercise their dissenters
rights under Colorado law, and (iii) holders subject to
special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law (such
as insurance companies, banks, tax-exempt entities, financial
institutions, broker-dealers, partnerships, S corporations
or other pass-through entities, mutual funds, traders in
securities who elect the
mark-to-market
method of accounting, tax-deferred or other retirement plans or
accounts, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax,
U.S. persons that have a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar, certain former citizens or residents of the
United States or holders that hold shares of VCG common stock as
part of a hedge, straddle, integration, constructive sale or
conversion transaction). In addition, except as specifically
described below, this summary does not discuss any consequences
to those of VCGs current shareholders who will
beneficially or constructively own an equity interest in Family
Dog or VCG after the merger, to holders of options to purchase
shares of VCG common stock, any aspect of state, local or
foreign tax law that may be applicable to any holder of shares
of VCG common stock, or any U.S. federal tax considerations
other than U.S. federal income tax considerations. This
summary assumes that holders own shares of VCG common stock as
capital assets.
The following summary is limited to the U.S. federal income
tax consequences relevant to a beneficial owner of shares of VCG
common stock that is (i) a citizen or resident of the United
States, (ii) a domestic corporation (or any other entity or
arrangement treated as a corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes), (iii) any estate, the income of which is
subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source, or
(iv) any trust if (a) a court within the United States is
able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of
the trust and (b) one or more U.S. persons have the
authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
If a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as
a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds
shares of VCG common stock, the tax treatment of a holder that
is a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the
status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.
Such holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the
tax consequences of accepting the cash in exchange for their
shares of VCG common stock pursuant to the merger.
We have not sought and will not seek any opinion of counsel or
any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the
merger transaction or the matters discussed herein. We urge
holders of shares of VCG common stock to consult their own tax
advisors with respect to the specific tax consequences to them
in connection with the merger in light of their own particular
circumstances, including the tax consequences under state,
local, foreign and other tax laws.
48
Characterization
of the Merger
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, FD Acquisition Co.
should be disregarded as a transitory entity, and the merger of
FD Acquisition Co. with and into VCG, with VCG surviving, should
be treated as a taxable sale of stock to holders of our common
stock and should not be treated as a taxable transaction to VCG,
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC, Troy
Lowrie and Micheal Ocello. As further discussed below, we intend
to take the position that, as a result of the merger, holders of
our common stock should be treated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes as if they (i) sold a portion of their stock
to Family Dog for cash, and (ii) had a portion of their
stock redeemed by VCG for cash.
Due to the lack of legislative, judicial or other interpretive
authority on this matter, it is unclear how the allocation of
proceeds between the deemed sale and deemed redemption portions
of the transaction should be determined. We intend to take the
position that (i) the portion of our common stock that is
converted, by reason of the merger, into the cash proceeds
provided directly or indirectly by Family Dog is being sold for
cash, and (ii) the portion of our common stock that is
converted, by reason of the merger, into the cash proceeds
provided directly or indirectly by VCG is being redeemed for
cash by VCG. There can be no assurance, however, that the
Internal Revenue Service will agree with such allocation.
Payments
with Respect to Shares of VCG Common Stock
The exchange of shares of VCG common stock for cash pursuant to
the merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, and a holder of our shares of common stock
who receives cash for shares of VCG common stock pursuant to the
merger will generally recognize gain or loss, if any, equal to
the difference between the amount of cash received and the
holders adjusted tax basis in the shares of VCG common
stock. Gain or loss must be determined separately for each block
of shares (i.e., shares acquired at the same cost in a single
transaction). Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss,
and will be long-term capital gain or loss if such holders
holding period for the shares of VCG common stock is more than
one year at the time of the exchange of such holders
shares of VCG common stock for cash. Long-term capital gains
recognized by an individual holder generally are subject to tax
at a lower rate than short-term capital gains or ordinary
income. There are limitations on the deductibility of capital
losses. Holders of our common stock should consult their tax
advisors regarding the determination and allocation of their tax
basis in their stock surrendered in the merger.
Backup
Withholding Tax and Information Reporting
Payments made with respect to shares of VCG common stock
exchanged for cash in the merger may be subject to information
reporting, and such payments will be subject to
U.S. federal backup withholding tax unless the holder
(i) furnishes an accurate tax identification number or
otherwise complies with applicable U.S. information
reporting or certification requirements (typically, by
completing and signing an IRS
Form W-9),
or (ii) is a corporation or other exempt recipient and,
when required, demonstrates such fact. Backup withholding is not
an additional tax and any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules may be refunded or credited against a
holders U.S. federal income tax liability, if any,
provided that such holder furnishes the required information to
the Internal Revenue Service in a timely manner.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger are
also discussed under Special Factors Certain
Effects of the Merger.
Litigation
Related to the Merger
On July 30, 2010, a complaint was filed in Colorado state
court, First Judicial District, Jefferson County District Court,
challenging the reaffirmed Proposal to acquire 100% of the
shares of VCGs common stock received from Family Dog and
Lowrie Management LLLP. VCG received a copy of the complaint on
August 13, 2010. The complaint was filed by David Cohen,
Timothy Cunningham, Gene Harris, Dean R. Jakubczak and William
C. Steppacher, Jr. derivatively on behalf of VCG and as a
class action on behalf of themselves and other similarly
situated shareholders against Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello,
Martin A. Grusin,
49
Robert J. Mcgraw, Jr., Carolyn Romero, George
Sawicki, David Levine, Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., Lowrie Management LLLP, and VCG (as
a nominal defendant). The plaintiffs complaint has since
been amended twice.
The second amended complaint was filed by the plaintiffs on
January 15, 2011 and was accepted by the court as of
January 24, 2011. In the second amended complaint, the
plaintiffs challenge the merger agreement and the proposed
merger, but they drop their derivative claim and purport only to
bring a class action on behalf of themselves and all similarly
situated shareholders. In the second amended complaint, the
plaintiffs allege, among other things, that: the merger
consideration of $2.25 per share payable to VCGs
non-Executive Group shareholders upon the closing of the merger,
if at all, is inadequate; Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest
with respect to the merger; the individual defendants have
breached their fiduciary duties under Colorado law in connection
with the Proposal; and the proxy statement filed by VCG with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2010 contains
certain omissions and misleading statements. The second amended
complaint seeks, among other relief, certification of the
plaintiffs as class representatives, an injunction directing the
members of VCGs board of directors to comply with their
fiduciary duties and enjoining them from consummating the
merger, an accounting of alleged damages suffered by the
plaintiffs and the class, an award of the costs and
disbursements of maintaining the action including reasonable
attorneys and experts fees, and such other relief
the court deems just and proper.
VCG believes that the allegations in the second amended
complaint are baseless and intends to mount a vigorous defense.
Resolution of the state action is not a condition to closing of
the merger.
On January 28, 2011, VCG moved to stay the state court
proceedings pending the resolution of the parallel federal
lawsuit described below on the grounds that the two actions are
substantially the same, arise out of the same operative facts,
seek the same relief, and trying both actions would be a waste
of both judicial and corporate resources. The court has not yet
ruled on this motion.
On January 7, 2011, VCG was served with a complaint filed
by Andrew Doyle in federal court in the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado. In the complaint, the
plaintiff purports to bring a class action lawsuit on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated against
Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello, Martin A. Grusin, Robert J.
McGraw, Jr., Carolyn Romero, George Sawicki, Kenton
Sieckman, David Levine, Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., Lowrie Management LLLP, and VCG.
Like the second amended state-law complaint, the federal
complaint challenges the merger agreement and the proposed
merger. The allegations in the federal complaint and the relief
sought are substantially the same as those in the state action;
in addition to the allegation set forth in the second amended
complaint, the federal complaint also alleges violations of
federal securities laws and regulations based on the allegations
described above related to the proxy statement filed by VCG with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2010.
On January 28, 2011, VCG filed its answer to the federal
complaint denying the material allegations therein and denying
that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment on any of his claims
or any relief whatsoever. VCGs answer also asserts certain
defenses. As with the second amended state law complaint, VCG
believes that the allegations in the federal complaint are
baseless and intends to mount a vigorous defense. The merger
agreement contains a condition to closing that there be, among
other things, no pending or threatened lawsuits challenging the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, other than
the lawsuit filed in Colorado state court referred to above.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements in this proxy statement, the documents
attached hereto and the documents incorporated by reference in
this proxy statement are forward-looking statements. These
include statements as to such things as our financial condition,
results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and
business, as well as forward-looking statements relating to the
merger. Such forward-looking statements are based on current
expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our
business and the proposed merger, the accurate prediction of
which may be difficult and involve assessment of events beyond
our control. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date hereof and, unless required by law, we undertake no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future
50
events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements can be
identified by forward-looking language, including words such as
believes, anticipates,
expects, estimates, intends,
may, plans, projects,
will, continues, predicts
and similar expressions, or negative of these words. These
statements by their nature involve substantial risks and
uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially
depending on a variety of factors, many of which are not within
our control. The following risks related to our business, among
others, could cause or contribute to actual results differing
materially from those described in the forward-looking
statements:
|
|
|
|
|
the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that
could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may be in
the future instituted against us and others following
announcement of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to complete the merger due to the failure to
obtain shareholder approval or satisfy other conditions to the
closing of the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
failure of any party to the merger agreement to abide by the
terms of that agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
risks that the merger, including the uncertainty surrounding the
closing of the merger, disrupts our current plans and
operations, including as a result of undue distraction of
management and personnel retention problems, and the potential
difficulties in employee retention;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to
the merger, including the impact of any termination fees we may
incur, which may be substantial;
|
|
|
|
|
|
costs and liabilities, or diversion of managements
attention, associated with any litigation related to the merger
and the current proposal to acquire us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may in
the future instituted against us and others following
announcement of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our limited operating history making our future operating
results difficult to predict;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of, and costs associated with, potential
sources of financing;
|
|
|
|
|
|
disruptions in the credit markets, economic conditions generally
and in the geographical markets in which we may participate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to manage growth;
|
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties associated with integrating acquired businesses
into our operations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
geographic market concentration;
|
|
|
|
|
|
legislation and government regulations affecting us and our
industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
competition within our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to promote our brands;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to protect our brands;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the loss of senior management and key personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
potential conflicts of interest between us and Troy Lowrie, our
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Micheal
Ocello, our President and Chief Operating Officer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with licensing requirements applicable to
our business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
liability from unsanctioned, unlawful conduct at our nightclubs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the negative perception of our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the failure of our business strategy to generate sufficient
revenues;
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
liability from uninsured risks or risks not covered by insurance
proceeds;
|
|
|
|
|
|
claims for indemnification from the officers and directors,
including, but not limited, in connection with any ongoing
litigation related to the merger and the current proposal to
acquire us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
deterrence of a change of control because of our ability to
issue securities or from the severance payment terms of certain
employment agreements with senior management;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to meet the NASDAQ continued listing requirements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with securities laws when issuing
securities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our common stock being a penny stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our intention not to pay dividends on our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our future issuance of common stock depressing the sale price of
our common stock or diluting existing shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the limited trading market for, and volatile price of, our
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to comply with rules and regulations applicable to
public companies.
|
IMPORTANT
INFORMATION REGARDING THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION
VCG
We are in the business of acquiring, owning and operating
nightclubs, which provide premium quality live adult
entertainment, and restaurant and beverage services in an
up-scale environment. As of September 30, 2010, we, through
our subsidiaries, own and operate nineteen nightclubs in
Indiana, Illinois, Colorado, Texas, North Carolina, Minnesota,
Kentucky, Maine, Florida, and California. We operate in one
reportable segment.
VCG was incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado in
1998, but did not begin its operations until April 2002. Our
principal executive offices are located at 390 Union Blvd.,
Suite 540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228. The telephone number
of our principal executive offices is
(303) 934-2424
and our website address is
www.vcgh.com.
Information
contained on our website does not constitute a part of this
proxy statement.
Family
Dog
Family Dog is a Colorado limited liability company formed solely
for purposes of entering into the merger agreement and
consummating the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. Family Dog has not conducted any activities to date
other than activities incidental to its formation and in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., a Colorado corporation
wholly-owned by Mr. Lowrie, will initially serve as the
manager of Family Dog. Mr. Lowrie serves as the President
of Lowrie Investment Management, Inc. Mr. Lowrie serves as
the President, Secretary and Treasurer of Family Dog. The
material occupations, positions, offices or employment during
the past five years of Mr. Lowrie are set forth below.
Family Dogs business address is 390 Union Blvd.,
Suite 540, Lakewood, CO 80228 and its telephone number is
(303) 934-2424.
FD
Acquisition Co.
FD Acquisition Co. is a Colorado corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Family Dog. FD Acquisition Co. was formed solely
for purposes of entering into the merger agreement and
consummating the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. FD Acquisition Co. has not conducted any activities
to
52
date other than activities incidental to its formation and in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
Mr. Lowrie is FD Acquisition Co.s sole director and
serves as FD Acquisition Co.s President, Secretary and
Treasurer. The material occupations, positions, offices or
employment during the past five years of Mr. Lowrie are set
forth below.
FD Acquisition Co.s business address is 390 Union Blvd.,
Suite 540, Lakewood, CO 80228 and its telephone number is
(303) 934-2424.
Troy
Lowrie
Mr. Lowrie has been our Chairman of the Board since April
2002 and Chief Executive Officer since November 2002. Further
details about Mr. Lowries professional background are
set forth under Other Important Information Regarding
Us Our Directors and Executive Officers.
Mr. Lowrie is a U.S. citizen.
The business address for Mr. Lowrie is 390 Union Blvd.,
Suite 540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228 and his business
telephone number is
(303) 934-2424.
Micheal
Ocello
Mr. Ocello has been our President and Chief Operating
Officer since April 2002. Further details about
Mr. Ocellos professional background are set forth
Other Important Information Regarding Us Our
Directors and Executive Officers. Mr. Ocello is a
U.S. citizen.
The business address for Mr. Ocello is 6161 Clifton Oaks
Place, St. Louis, Missouri 63129 and his business telephone
number is
(618) 271-9420.
Executive
Group
Mr. Lowrie beneficially owns shares of VCGs common
stock through Lowrie Management LLLP, an entity owned and
controlled by Mr. Lowrie. Mr. Ocello beneficially owns
shares of VCGs common stock through LTD Investment Group,
LLC, an entity owned and controlled by Mr. Ocello. We
sometimes refer to Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello, Lowrie
Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc. and LTD
Investment Group, LLC collectively as the Executive
Group in this proxy statement.
Legal
Proceedings
During the past five years, none of Family Dog, FD Acquisition
Co., Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., Lowrie Management LLLP,
LTD Investment Group LLC, Unique Entertainment Consultants,
Inc., Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello has been
(i) convicted in a criminal proceeding, or (ii) party
to any judicial or administrative proceeding that resulted in a
judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future
violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or
state securities laws or a finding of any violation of federal
or state securities laws.
THE
SPECIAL MEETING
Date,
Time and Place
This proxy statement is being furnished to VCGs
shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies on
behalf of VCGs board of directors for use at the special
meeting of shareholders to be held on [ * ], 2011.
Purpose
At the special meeting, you will be asked to:
1. To adopt and approve the Merger Proposal;
2. To approve the Adjournment Proposal; and
53
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
VCGs
Board of Directors Recommendation
Acting on the recommendation of the Special Committee and based
on its own evaluation of the Merger Proposal, VCGs board
of directors (with Mr. Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer, taking no part in the vote) has
determined that the merger agreement and the merger is fair to,
and in the best interests of, VCG and VCGs unaffiliated
shareholders. Consequently, VCGs board of directors (with
Mr. Lowrie taking no part in the recommendation) has
adopted and approved the merger agreement and the merger, and
recommends that shareholders vote
FOR
approval of the Merger Proposal. The reasons for their
recommendation are discussed under Special
Factors Recommendation of the Special Committee,
VCGs Board of Directors and VCGs Executive Officers;
Reasons for Recommending Approval of the Merger. None of
our executive officers, consisting of Messrs. Lowrie and
Ocello, has made a recommendation with respect to how VCGs
shareholders should vote on the Merger Proposal.
Record
Date, Outstanding Shares, Voting Rights and Quorum
VCGs board of directors has fixed the close of business on
[ * ], 2011 as the record date to determine the shareholders
entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the special
meeting. As of the close of business on the record date, VCG has
outstanding 16,292,071 shares of common stock held of
record by approximately [ * ] registered holders.
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello beneficially own an
aggregate of 5,138,878 shares, or 31.5%, of VCGs
common stock. Each outstanding share of common stock on the
record date is entitled to one vote on all matters coming before
the special meeting. The presence, either in person or by proxy,
of one-third of the issued and outstanding shares of common
stock entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the
special meeting. Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello intend to attend
the special meeting and the shares of VCGs common stock
beneficially owned by them will be counted towards the quorum.
Shares held in street name that are present at the meeting will
be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been
achieved at the special meeting.
Vote
Required, Calculation of Vote, Abstentions and Broker
Non-Votes
If a quorum exists, approval of the Merger Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of both (i) the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of VCGs common stock entitled to
vote at the special meeting, or [ * ] shares, and
(ii) a majority of the votes actually cast at the special
meeting of VCGs shareholders. Any abstaining votes, broker
non-votes and votes cast by members of the Executive Group with
regard to shares of VCG common stock held by the members of the
Executive Group will not be taken into account for any purpose
when determining whether the requisite vote set forth in
clause (ii) has been achieved (e.g. in calculating votes
cast in favor or total votes cast).
If a quorum exists, the Adjournment Proposal is approved if the
votes actually cast favoring the Adjournment Proposal exceed the
votes cast opposing the Adjournment Proposal.
At the special meeting, the results of shareholder voting will
be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the
special meeting. All shares of common stock represented at the
special meeting by properly executed or submitted proxies
received prior to or at the special meeting, unless previously
revoked, will be voted at the special meeting in accordance with
the instructions on the proxies. Unless contrary instructions
are indicated, proxies will be voted
FOR
the
approval of the Merger Proposal and
FOR
the
approval of the Adjournment Proposal.
Other than the Merger Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal, VCG
does not know of any matters that are to come before the special
meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the
special meeting for action, the persons named in the enclosed
proxy will have discretion to vote on such matters in accordance
with their best judgment.
54
Properly authenticated proxies voted abstain at the
special meeting will be counted for purposes of determining
whether a quorum has been achieved at the special meeting.
Abstentions will have same effect as if voted against the Merger
Proposal with respect to the requisite shareholder vote set
forth in clause (i) above but will be neutral with respect
to the requisite shareholder vote set forth in clause (ii)
above. Abstentions will be neutral with respect to the
Adjournment Proposal, which requires that the votes actually
cast favoring the Adjournment Proposal exceed the votes cast
opposing the Adjournment Proposal.
In addition, if your shares are held in the name of a broker,
bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee will
not be entitled to vote your shares on the Merger Proposal in
the absence of specific instructions, which, if not given, will
have the effect as if you abstained as described above. Your
broker, bank or other nominee will be entitled to vote your
shares on the Adjournment Proposal even in the absence of
specific instructions on how to vote.
Shares that are not represented at the special meeting will have
same effect as if voted against the Merger Proposal with respect
to the requisite shareholder vote set forth in clause (i)
above but will be neutral with respect to the requisite
shareholder vote set forth in clause (ii) above.
Revocation
of Proxies
Giving a proxy does not preclude a shareholders right to
vote in person if the shareholder giving the proxy so desires. A
shareholder has the unconditional right to revoke his, her, or
its proxy at any time prior to voting at the special meeting and
may do so in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by sending a notice of revocation to the secretary of VCG;
|
|
|
|
by sending a completed proxy card bearing a later date than your
original proxy card;
|
|
|
|
by submitting a later dated proxy via the Internet in the same
manner that you submitted your earlier proxy via the Internet
and following the instructions; or
|
|
|
|
by attending the special meeting and voting in person.
|
Your attendance at the special meeting alone will not revoke any
proxy. If you choose to change your vote, you must take the
described action, and the applicable notice must be received, no
later than the beginning of the special meeting.
If your shares are held in an account at a broker, banker or
other nominee, you should contact your broker, banker or other
nominee to change your vote.
Solicitation
of Proxies and Expenses
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of VCGs board of
directors. The cost of preparing, assembling, and mailing this
proxy statement, the Notice of Special Meeting and the enclosed
proxy will be borne by VCG. VCG is requesting that banks,
brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries forward
copies of the proxy materials to their principals and request
authority for the execution of proxies. VCG may reimburse these
persons for their expenses in so doing. The directors, officers
and employees of VCG and its subsidiaries may also solicit by
telephone, facsimile, electric mail or in person. Such
directors, officers, and employees will not be additionally
compensated for this solicitation, but may be reimbursed for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.
VCG has not authorized any person to provide any information or
make any representation not contained in this proxy statement.
You should not rely on any such information or representation as
having been authorized.
Surrender
of Stock Certificates
If the Merger Proposal is approved and the merger is
consummated, holders of common stock will be sent instructions
regarding the surrender of their certificates representing
shares of VCGs common stock. Shareholders should not send
their stock certificates until they receive these instructions.
For more information on the surrender of stock certificates
please see the section entitled The Merger
Agreement Procedure for Payment for the Shares of
VCGs Common Stock in the proxy statement.
55
Adjournment
of the Special Meeting
VCG does not currently intend to propose adjournment at the
special meeting if there are sufficient votes to approve the
Merger Proposal. If there are insufficient votes to approve the
Merger Proposal, the special meeting may be adjourned or
postponed to another time or place if the votes actually cast
favoring the Adjournment Proposal exceed the votes cast opposing
the Adjournment Proposal at the special meeting. If the special
meeting is adjourned to a date more than 60 days later than
the date of the original special meeting, VCGs board of
directors is required to fix a new record date.
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
This section describes the material terms of the merger
agreement. The description in this section and elsewhere in this
proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as
Appendix A
and incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement. Further, as discussed under The Merger
Agreement Representations and Warranties, you
should not rely on the representations and warranties contained
in the merger agreement as statements of factual information. We
encourage you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety before deciding to approve the Merger Proposal.
The
Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and
in accordance with Colorado law, FD Acquisition Co. will merge
with and into VCG, and VCG will survive the merger as a
wholly-owned, privately-held subsidiary of Family Dog.
As the surviving corporation, VCG will continue to exist
following the merger. Upon consummation of the merger,
VCGs articles of incorporation, as in effect immediately
before the merger, will become the articles of incorporation of
the surviving corporation until thereafter amended in accordance
with their terms and applicable law. VCGs bylaws, as in
effect immediately prior to the merger, will be the bylaws of
the surviving corporation until thereafter amended in accordance
with their terms and applicable law. FD Acquisition Co.s
sole director, Mr. Lowrie, will serve as the initial
director of the surviving corporation and FD Acquisition
Co.s sole officer, Mr. Lowrie, will be the initial
officer of the surviving corporation. It is contemplated that
Mr. Ocello will serve as an officer of the surviving
corporation after consummation of the merger.
Closing;
Effective Time of the Merger
The closing of the merger will take place on the second business
day following the satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by
law, waiver by the party or parties entitled to the benefits
thereof) of all of the conditions set forth in the merger
agreement (see summary under The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Merger), or on
such other time and date as will be agreed in writing between
Family Dog and VCG.
The merger will be effective in accordance with applicable law
as the statement of merger is duly filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Colorado, or at such later time as FD
Acquisition Co. and VCG will agree and specify in the statement
of merger.
Merger
Consideration and Treatment of Common Stock
Upon completion of the merger, each share of VCG common stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time
of the merger, other than shares held by Family Dog, by
shareholders who properly exercise dissenters rights under
Colorado law and in treasury by VCG, will be automatically
cancelled and converted into the right to receive $2.25 in cash,
without interest (less applicable withholding taxes). It is
contemplated that, before the effective time of the merger, the
members of the Executive Group will contribute all of the shares
of VCGs common stock held by them to Family Dog.
Each share of VCG common stock that is issued and held in the
treasury of VCG or issued and outstanding and owned by Family
Dog, including any shares issued to Family Dog in exchange for
Family
56
Dogs agreement to issue membership interests in Family Dog
in exchange for converting and cancelling VCGs debt as
described under The Merger Agreement
Contribution of VCG Common Stock to Family Dog and Conversion of
Debt Held by Family Dog, will automatically be cancelled
and retired and will cease to exist, and no consideration will
be delivered or deliverable.
Each share of VCG common stock issued and outstanding and owned
by a shareholders who properly exercised dissenters rights
under Colorado law, will be paid in accordance with Colorado
law, unless that dissenting shareholder loses its ability to
exercise its rights as a dissenting shareholder under Colorado
law, in which case the dissenting shareholder will receive the
merger consideration.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of FD Acquisition
Co.s capital stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger, will be converted
into one fully paid and non-assessable share of common stock of
the surviving corporation.
Contribution
of VCG Common Stock to Family Dog and Conversion of Debt Held by
Family Dog
Before completion of the merger, it is contemplated that each
member of the Executive Group will contribute to Family Dog all
of the shares of VCG common stock held by such member in
exchange for membership interests in Family Dog.
Further, before completion of the merger, it is contemplated
that Mr. Lowrie will cause Lowrie Management LLLP to assign to
Family Dog all rights to any debt owed by VCG to Lowrie
Management LLLP (other than the debt used to purchase certain
real property from one of VCGs subsidiaries, as further
disclosed under Special Factors Real Estate
Transaction Involving Mr. Lowrie.) in exchange for
membership interests in Family Dog (VCG does not currently owe
any debt to either Mr. Ocello or Family Dog). In addition,
certain other creditors of VCG may elect to assign their rights
to debt owed by VCG to them to Family Dog in exchange for
membership interests in Family Dog. As of the date hereof, no
other creditor has elected to assign its rights to debt owed by
VCG to it to Family Dog in exchange for membership interests in
Family Dog and it is not currently anticipated that any other
creditors will. At any time after the approval of the Merger
Proposal by VCGs shareholders in the manner described
elsewhere in this proxy statement, but before closing of the
merger, and in exchange for Family Dogs agreement to
cancel VCGs obligations with respect to this converting
debt, at Family Dogs election, VCG will issue to Family
Dog a number of shares of VCG common stock, equal to:
(i) the aggregate outstanding principal balance and all
unpaid accrued interest on the converting debt, divided by
(ii) the per share merger consideration.
Treatment
of Stock Options
Each option to purchase shares of VCGs common stock that
is outstanding and unvested at the effective time of the merger
will be terminated in compliance with the terms of VCGs
2002 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan, 2003 Stock Option and
Stock Bonus Plan and 2004 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights
Plan (collectively referred to in this proxy statement as the
Company Stock Plans), respectively, and the holders
of such options will be entitled to no merger consideration.
Each option to purchase shares of VCGs common stock that
is outstanding, unexercised, and vested at the effective time of
the merger will be cancelled and the holders of such options
will be entitled to receive an amount (without interest), in
cash, equal to the product of the number of shares subject to
each such option multiplied by the excess, if any, of the merger
consideration over the exercise price per share of each such
option, less applicable withholding taxes.
However, the exercise prices of all options outstanding exceed
the merger consideration. Accordingly, VCG will not be required
to make any payments for options upon consummation of the merger.
The Company Stock Plans will be terminated at the effective time
of the merger.
57
Adjustments
to the Merger Consideration
The merger consideration is generally fixed and will not change
based on the price per share of VCGs common stock, as
reported on NASDAQ. However, the merger consideration will be
appropriately adjusted to reflect fully the effect of any stock
split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, distribution,
recapitalization, redenomination, recapitalization,
split-up,
combination, exchange of shares, subdivision, or other similar
transaction with respect to VCGs common stock prior to the
effective time of the merger, if any.
Procedure
for Payment for the Shares of VCGs Common Stock
Before the effective time of the merger, FD Acquisition Co. will
designate a party reasonably acceptable to VCG to act as the
paying agent for the payment of the merger consideration upon
surrender of stock certificates representing shares of
VCGs common stock. Promptly following the effective time
of the merger, Family Dog will cause the surviving corporation
to deposit or cause to be deposited with the paying agent, for
the benefit of VCGs shareholders, cash in an amount
sufficient to pay the merger consideration payable to holders of
VCGs common stock. All of the fees and expense of the
paying agent will be borne by the surviving corporation.
Promptly after the effective time of the merger, but no later
than five days after the effective time of the merger, Family
Dog and the surviving corporation will cause the paying agent to
mail to each holder of record of VCGs common stock
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger a letter
of transmittal and instructions for use in effecting the
surrender of certificates of VCGs common stock and
receiving payment therefor. YOU SHOULD NOT SEND IN YOUR STOCK
CERTIFICATES UNTIL YOU RECEIVE A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL AND
INSTRUCTIONS. DO NOT SEND CERTIFICATES WITH THE ENCLOSED PROXY
CARD, AND DO NOT SEND YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATE TO THE PAYING AGENT
WITHOUT A PROPERLY COMPLETED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.
Upon the surrender to the paying agent of a duly executed letter
of transmittal, the certificate(s) representing shares of
VCGs common stock, and any other items specified by the
letter of transmittal, the surrendering shareholder will be
paid, in exchange for each share of common stock represented by
the certificate, cash in an amount, subject to any applicable
withholding taxes, equal to the product of the number of shares
represented by the letter of transmittal multiplied by the
merger consideration, and the surrendered certificate(s) will be
cancelled.
In the event of a transfer of ownership of shares of common
stock that is not registered in VCGs transfer records,
payment may be made to a person other than the person in whose
name the surrendered stock certificate is registered, if such
stock certificate is properly endorsed or otherwise in proper
form for transfer and the person requesting such payment shall
pay any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the
payment to a person other than the registered holder of such
stock certificate or establish to the satisfaction of the
surviving corporation or the paying agent that such tax has been
paid or is not applicable.
The paying agent may invest the funds received to pay the merger
consideration only in certain types of investments, as further
described in the merger agreement, and as directed by Family Dog
and the surviving corporation. Any interest and other income
resulting from such investments will be paid to the surviving
corporation.
The surviving corporation is entitled to require that the paying
agent deliver to the surviving corporation any portion of the
funds that remain unclaimed by the former shareholders of VCG
one year after the effective time of the merger. After that
date, subject to abandoned property, escheat, or other similar
laws, holders of stock certificates who have not previously
complied with the instructions to exchange their certificates
will be entitled to look only to the surviving corporation for
payment of their claim for merger consideration.
Until surrendered as contemplated by the merger agreement, each
stock certificate will be deemed at any time after the effective
time of the merger to represent only the right to receive upon
such surrender the amount of cash, without interest, into which
the shares of VCG common stock previously represented by such
stock certificate have been converted pursuant to the terms of
the merger agreement. No interest will be paid or accrue on the
cash payable upon surrender of any stock certificate.
58
In the event that your stock certificate has been lost, stolen
or destroyed, you must make an affidavit to that fact and
deliver such affidavit and an indemnity, in a form satisfactory
to Family Dog, against any claim that may be made against Family
Dog, the surviving corporation or the paying agent with respect
to the stock certificate alleged to have been lost, stolen or
destroyed. The affidavit and indemnity shall be delivered to the
paying agent or, following the first anniversary of the
effective time of the merger, the surviving corporation, who
shall pay in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
certificate the merger consideration.
Dissenters
Rights
Shareholders dissenters rights are further described
under Dissenters Rights.
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by VCG to Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co. and
representations and warranties made by Family Dog, FD
Acquisition Co., Troy Lowrie and Micheal Ocello to VCG. The
assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were
made solely for purposes of the merger agreement and may be
subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by
the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the
merger agreement.
Further, the representations and warranties described below and
included in the merger agreement were made by the parties to
each other as of specific dates. Regardless, some of those
representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete
as of any particular date because they are subject to a
contractual standard of materiality that may be different from
that generally applicable to public disclosures to shareholders
or used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties
to the merger agreement rather than establishing matters of fact.
The merger agreement is described in this proxy statement and
included as Appendix A only to provide public disclosure
regarding its terms and conditions as required by U.S. federal
securities laws, and not to provide any other factual
information regarding the parties or their respective
businesses. VCG will provide additional disclosure in its public
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to the
extent that it is aware of the existence of any material facts
that are required to be disclosed under U.S. federal securities
laws and that might otherwise contradict the representations and
warranties in the merger agreement and will update such
disclosure as required by U.S. federal securities laws.
For the foregoing reasons, you should not rely on the
representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement
as statements of factual information.
The representations and warranties of VCG relate to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate matters, including due organization of VCG and its
subsidiaries, corporate power and authority, possession of all
governmental franchises, licenses, permits, authorizations, and
approvals necessary to own, lease or otherwise hold its
properties and assets and to conduct business, good standing,
and qualification to do business;
|
|
|
|
VCGs capitalization;
|
|
|
|
the authorization, execution, delivery, performance and
enforceability of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the shareholder vote required to approve the Merger Proposal;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, or defaults
under, or loss of material benefits under, or creation of any
pledges, liens, chargers, mortgages, encumbrances or security
interests under, VCGs or its subsidiaries
organizational documents, certain contracts, applicable law or
judgments, orders or decrees as a result of the execution and
delivery of the merger agreement or the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
required consents, approvals, and filings in connection with the
execution, delivery, and performance of the merger agreement and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
the possession of required permits and compliance with permits
and applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the filing or furnishing of all forms, reports, statements,
certifications and other documents required to be filed or
furnished by VCG with the Securities and Exchange Commission
since January 1, 2009; the accuracy of the information
contained in those filings and the compliance of those filings
with applicable requirements of the Securities Act, and the
Exchange Act; and, with respect to financial statements
contained therein, preparation in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, also referred to in this proxy
statement as GAAP;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed material liabilities;
|
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed brokers fees;
|
|
|
|
|
|
receipt by the Special Committee and VCGs board of
directors of an opinion from North Point Advisors as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger
consideration to our non-Executive Group shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Point Advisors authorization to permit VCG to
include its opinion in the proxy statement.
|
Many of VCGs representations and warranties are qualified
by a Company Material Adverse Effect standard. The
merger agreement defines Company Material Adverse
Effect as any event, development, change or circumstance
arising after the date of the merger agreement that, either
individually or in the aggregate, has caused or would reasonably
be expected to cause a material adverse effect on the financial
condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or
business of VCG and its subsidiaries taken as a whole.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following, alone or in
combination, will not be deemed to constitute a Company Material
Adverse Effect for purposes of the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in or interpretations of applicable law (including the
rules and regulations of NASDAQ) or GAAP;
|
|
|
|
changes generally affecting the economy or the financial or
securities markets;
|
|
|
|
any natural disaster or act of God;
|
|
|
|
any act of terrorism or outbreak or escalation of hostilities or
armed conflict;
|
|
|
|
any event, development, change or circumstance resulting from
the public announcement of the merger agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
changes in the market price or trading volume of VCGs
common stock, or the failure of VCG to meet its
projections; or
|
|
|
|
the taking of any action expressly provided for in the merger
agreement or consented to in writing by Family Dog or FD
Acquisition Co.
|
The representations and warranties of Family Dog and FD
Acquisition Co. relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate matters, including due organization, and corporate
power and authority;
|
|
|
|
that since the date of its incorporation, FD Acquisition Co. has
not carried on any business or conducted any operations other
than activities related to its organization and the negotiation
and the execution of the merger agreement, the performance of
its obligations under the merger agreement, and matters
ancillary to the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
FD Acquisition Co.s capitalization;
|
|
|
|
the authorization, approval, execution, delivery, consummation,
performance, and enforceability of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, or defaults
under, or loss of material benefits under, or creation of any
pledges, liens, chargers, mortgages, encumbrances or security
interests under, the organizational documents, certain
contracts, applicable law or judgments, orders or decrees as a
result
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
of the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed required consents and approvals in
connection with the execution, delivery and performance of the
merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of liability for brokers fees; and
|
|
|
|
the existence or absence of any voting trust, proxy or similar
instrument with respect to the voting of any of the shares of
VCG common stock held by the Executive Group.
|
The representations and warranties of each of Mr. Lowrie
and Mr. Ocello relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the enforceability of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, or defaults
under, or loss of material benefits under, or creation of any
pledges, liens, chargers, mortgages, encumbrances or security
interests under certain contracts, applicable law or judgments,
orders or decrees as a result of the execution and delivery of
the merger agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed required consents and approvals in
connection with the execution, delivery and performance of the
merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
ownership of VCG securities;
|
|
|
|
the authority to vote or direct the vote of the shares of
VCGs common stock held by the Executive Group;
|
|
|
|
the absence of the denial, revocation or suspension of any
permit under a liquor law or sexually-oriented business law;
|
|
|
|
their lack of knowledge of any material inaccuracies with
respect to VCGs representations and warranties in the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
their familiarity with the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and agreement to be bound by such terms and
conditions; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of any agreement, plan or intention as of the date
of the merger agreement for any Public Shareholder (as defined
in the merger agreement) to acquire any security securities in
Family Dog or VCG after completion of the merger.
|
Restriction
on Issuance of Securities to Certain Individuals after the
Merger
The merger agreement provides that if two specified individuals
vote in favor of the Merger Proposal at the special meeting of
VCGs shareholders, then prior to the sixth month
anniversary of the closing, Family Dog will not issue any debt
or equity securities to such individuals (other than existing
debt owed by VCG to such individuals as of the date of the
merger agreement, including any extensions of such debt). The
specified individuals are current shareholders of VCG; one is a
sibling and the other is a business associate of
Mr. Lowries. This provision in the merger agreement
reflects the Special Committees belief that these two
individuals should be excluded from the majority of the minority
vote if they become investors in Family Dog at or immediately
after closing. Further, Family Dog may not issue any equity
securities to any person who was a member of VCGs board of
directors prior to the consummation of the merger, other than to
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello, during the six months after the
consummation of the merger.
Conduct
of Business Prior to Closing
VCG and its subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on their
conduct and operations until the merger is completed. VCG has
agreed, and agreed to cause each of its subsidiaries, to conduct
its business in the usual,
61
regular and ordinary course in substantially the same manner as
previously conducted or proposed to be conducted and use
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its current
business organization, to keep available the services of their
respective current officers and employees, and keep its
relationships with their respective customers, suppliers,
licensors, licensees, distributors and others having business
dealings with them, except as otherwise expressly permitted or
contemplated by the merger agreement, required by law or with
Family Dogs prior written consent (such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed). Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the merger agreement provides that any action
taken or failure to act by or at the express direction of either
of Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello that would otherwise
constitute a breach of the foregoing shall not be deemed to
constitute such breach.
In addition, VCG has agreed, except as expressly permitted or
contemplated by the merger agreement, required by law or with
the prior written consent of Family Dog, from the date of the
merger agreement until the consummation of the merger, to not,
and will cause each of its subsidiaries to not, do any of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other
distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock, other
than dividends and distributions by a subsidiary to VCG or
another of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
other than in the case of a direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiary, split, combine, recapitalize, subdivide or
reclassify any of its capital stock or issue or authorize the
issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in
substitution for shares of its capital stock;
|
|
|
|
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital
stock of VCG or any subsidiary or any other securities or any
rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares or other
securities;
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver, sell or grant (i) any shares of its capital
stock, (ii) any debentures, bonds, notes or other
indebtedness having the right to or any other voting securities,
(iii) any securities convertible into or exchangeable for,
or any options, warrants or rights to acquire, any such shares,
voting debt, voting securities or convertible or exchangeable
securities, or (iv) any phantom stock,
phantom stock rights, stock appreciation rights or
stock-based performance units, other than the issuance of common
stock upon the exercise of stock options outstanding on the date
of the merger agreement and in accordance with their present
terms;
|
|
|
|
repurchase any equity securities of VCG (including pursuant to
the stock repurchase program);
|
|
|
|
amend or propose any change to organizational documents;
|
|
|
|
amend or propose any change to the voting powers, full or
limited, or no voting powers,
and/or
the
designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional
or other special rights,
and/or
the
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof as provided
by Colorado law, of the preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any other person or acquire assets or
equity securities of any other person;
|
|
|
|
sell, lease, license, subject to a lien, encumber or otherwise
surrender, relinquish or dispose of any assets, property or
rights (including capital stock of a VCG subsidiary) except
(i) pursuant to existing contracts or commitments, or
(ii) in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, (i) make any loans, advances or capital
contributions to, or investments in, any other person, or
(ii) create, incur, guarantee or assume any indebtedness
for borrowed money or issue debt securities; provided that the
loans or advances to employees permitted under the merger
agreement will not exceed $10,000 in any individual case;
|
|
|
|
make any capital expenditure other than in the ordinary course
of business;
|
|
|
|
grant any increase in the compensation or benefits of directors,
officers, employees, consultants, representatives or agents of
VCG or any subsidiary other than as required by any plan or
arrangement in effect on the date of the merger agreement and
payments or increases for non-executive officer employees in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
hire, or terminate the employment or contractual relationship
of, any officer or employee of VCG or any subsidiary, as the
case may be, other than hirings or terminations in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice or that,
individually and in the aggregate, would not result in
(i) a material increase in the number of persons providing
services to VCG or any subsidiary in all such capacities, or
(ii) in the case of hirings, a material increase in the
aggregate payroll and other benefits costs to VCG or such VCG
subsidiary (such increase to be determined, in the case of a
hiring to replace an employee or other service provider in a
pre-existing position based solely on the costs in excess of the
costs associated with the replaced service provider), and
(iii) in the case of terminations, material liability to
VCG or any subsidiary in excess of the costs savings, if any,
directly derived from such terminations;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any action, suit, claim, litigation,
proceeding, arbitration, investigation, audit or controversy
involving claims, liabilities or obligations material to VCG and
its subsidiaries taken as a whole, or enter into any consent,
decree, injunction or similar restraint or form of equitable
relief in settlement of any material proceeding;
|
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of VCG
or any subsidiary; or
|
|
|
|
authorize, commit, or agree to take any of the foregoing actions.
|
Except as otherwise (i) expressly permitted or contemplated
by the merger agreement, (ii) required by law, or
(iii) with the prior written consent of VCG, acting through
the Special Committee (such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed), with respect to the foregoing
covenants, (A) neither Mr. Lowrie nor Mr. Ocello
will cause VCG or any of its subsidiaries to take or refrain
from taking any action that would constitute a breach of the
foregoing, and (B) Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co.,
Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello or any or their respective
affiliates may not enter into, modify or terminate any contract
with VCG or any of its subsidiaries.
From the date of the merger agreement until the completion of
the merger, each of VCG, Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co.,
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello shall use commercially
reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions
and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary under
applicable laws required for the consummation of the merger, and
to effect all necessary filings, consents, waivers,
authorizations, permits and approvals from governmental entities
and other third parties required for the consummation of the
merger.
Filing of
Proxy Statement and
Schedule 13E-3
and Holding of Shareholders Meeting
The merger agreement requires VCG to, as soon as reasonably
practicable following the date of the merger agreement, and in
any event within 10 business days after such date, prepare this
proxy statement and, subject to certain provisions, use
reasonable best efforts to clear comments, if any, received from
the Securities and Exchange Commission. The parties shall
jointly prepare and file
Schedule 13E-3
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and use commercially
reasonable efforts to have it cleared by the Securities and
Exchange Commission as promptly as reasonably practicable after
filing.
The merger agreement provides that this proxy statement shall
include VCGs board of directors recommendation that
VCGs shareholders approve and adopt the merger agreement
and the merger at the special meeting of VCGs shareholders
(this recommendation is referred to in this proxy statement as
the Company Recommendation) and no change in Company
Recommendation may be made except as permitted under the merger
agreement.
The merger agreement also requires VCG to call a meeting of
shareholders for the purpose of obtaining shareholder approval
of the Merger Proposal, to be held as soon as reasonably
practicable after the date of the merger agreement. In
connection with the shareholders meeting, VCG shall use
its commercially reasonable efforts to solicit proxies in favor
of the adoption and approval of the Merger Proposal and shall
take all other action necessary to secure such approval, as
further described elsewhere in this proxy statement.
63
VCG may adjourn or postpone the special meeting of shareholders
to the extent necessary to ensure that any necessary supplement
or amendment to this proxy statement is provided to VCGs
public shareholders in advance of a vote on the Merger Proposal
or, if as of the time for which VCG shareholders meeting
is originally scheduled (as set forth in this proxy statement)
there are insufficient shares of VCG common stock represented
(either in person or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary
to conduct the business of the special meeting of shareholders.
Termination
of VCG Stock Plans and Repurchase Program
VCG is required to terminate all Company Stock Plans as of the
effective time of the merger, and the provisions in any other
benefit plan providing for the issuance, transfer or grant of
any capital stock of VCG or any interest in respect of any
capital stock of VCG will be deleted as of the effective time of
the merger. VCG will ensure that, following the effective time
of the merger, no holder of a VCG stock option or any
participant in any Company Stock Plans will have any right
thereunder to acquire any capital stock of VCG or the surviving
corporation. VCG terminated its stock repurchase program before
execution of the merger agreement, as required by the terms of
the merger agreement.
The treatment of stock options in the merger is described under
The Merger Agreement Treatment of Stock
Options.
Indemnification
and Insurance
From and after the effective time of the merger and subject to
the limitations set forth in the merger agreement, Family Dog
will, and will cause the surviving corporation to, to the
fullest extent permitted under applicable law, indemnify and
hold harmless each present and former director and officer of
VCG, against any costs or expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims,
damages, liabilities and amounts paid in settlement in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, arising out of or pertaining to any facts or
events existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time
of the merger. The foregoing obligation to indemnify does not
apply to any claims, actions, suits, proceedings or
investigations for which VCG is prohibited from providing
indemnification under Colorado law or VCGs organizational
documents.
From and after the effective time of the merger, Family Dog
will, and will cause the surviving corporation to, advance
expenses (including the costs and expenses of any investigation
or preparation incurred in connection therewith) to an
indemnified party, as incurred, to the fullest extent permitted
under applicable law.
The merger agreement also provides that Family Dog will, or will
cause the surviving corporation to, obtain or maintain in effect
six-year tail policies to VCGs current
directors and officers liability insurance on terms
with respect to coverage and amount no less favorable, in the
aggregate, than those of such policy or policies as in effect as
of the date of the merger agreement. If such tail
policies cannot be maintained or obtained or can only be
maintained or obtained by paying aggregate premiums in excess of
150% of the aggregate annual amount currently paid by VCG for
such coverage, then the surviving corporation will only be
required to purchase as much insurance coverage as can be
maintained or obtained by paying aggregate premiums equal to
150% of the aggregate annual amount currently paid by VCG for
such coverage.
Successors and assigns of Family Dog or the surviving
corporation shall assume all of the indemnification and
insurance obligations of Family Dog or the surviving corporation
set forth in the merger agreement if Family Dog or the surviving
corporation or any of their respective successors or assigns
(i) consolidate with or merge with or into any other
corporation or entity and will not be the continuing or
Surviving Corporation or entity, or (ii) transfer all or
substantially all of its properties or assets to any person.
All provisions relating to exculpation, advancement of expenses
and indemnification for acts or omissions occurring prior to the
effective time of the merger existing in favor of each present
and former director and officer of VCG as provided in the
organizational and governance documents of VCG or any of its
subsidiaries, or under any applicable agreements or documents,
shall remain in full force and effect, and Family Dog and the
surviving corporation shall continue to honor such provisions,
for a period of the lesser of: (i) the
64
remaining term of any such applicable agreement or document, or
(ii) six years commencing at the effective time of the
merger, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
Other
Agreements
The merger agreement contains certain other covenants and
agreements, including agreements relating to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
cooperating with respect to public announcements; and
|
|
|
|
VCGs allowing access and agreeing to furnish to Family Dog
certain information and the confidentiality of such information.
|
Agreement
to Take Further Action and to Use Reasonable Best Efforts;
Consents and Governmental Approvals
The parties to the merger agreement have agreed to use their
reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and
cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, in the
most expeditious manner reasonably practicable, the merger and
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including
(i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or no actions,
waivers, consents and approvals from governmental entities and
the making of all necessary registrations and filings (including
filings with governmental entities, if any) and the taking of
all reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval
or waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any
governmental entity, including under applicable liquor laws and
sexually oriented business laws, (ii) the obtaining of all
necessary consents, approvals or waivers from third parties,
(iii) making all necessary filings, and thereafter making
any other required submissions, with respect to the merger
agreement and the merger required under the Hart-Scott Rodino
Act and any related governmental request thereunder and under
any other applicable law, (iv) the defending of any
lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or
administrative, challenging the merger agreement, the merger or
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including seeking to have any stay or temporary
restraining order entered by any court or other governmental
entity vacated or reversed, and (v) the execution and
delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate
the merger and to fully carry out the purposes of the merger
agreement.
The parties to the merger agreement are required to cooperate
with each other in connection with the making of all such
filings, including providing copies of all such documents to the
non-filing party and its advisors prior to filing and, if
requested, to accept all reasonable additions, deletions or
changes suggested in connection therewith. Further, the parties
to the merger agreement are required to use their respective
reasonable best efforts to furnish to each other all information
required for any application or other filing to be made pursuant
to the rules and regulations of any applicable law in connection
with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time
of the merger, VCG shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain
all third party consents to the merger required under any
liquor, sexually oriented business and amusement licenses and
permits, as well as a city business license for one of
VCGs clubs.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in the merger agreement
shall require any party to agree to any substantial limitation
on its operations or to dispose of any significant asset or
collection of assets.
Notification
The merger agreement requires that the parties give prompt
notice to the other parties upon the discovery of any fact or
circumstance that, or the occurrence or non-occurrence of any
event the occurrence or non-occurrence of which, would
reasonably likely to cause or result in any of the closing
conditions in the merger agreement not being satisfied.
65
Transfer
Taxes
The surviving corporation will pay all stock transfer, real
estate transfer, documentary, stamp, recording and other similar
taxes (including interest, penalties and additions to any such
taxes) incurred in connection with the merger.
Restrictions
on Solicitation, Acquisition Proposals and Changes in
Recommendation
VCG has agreed not to, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries
not to directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, solicit, facilitate or encourage any inquiry or the
making of any proposal that constitutes or would reasonably be
expected to lead to an Acquisition Proposal (as defined
below); or
|
|
|
|
participate in any substantive discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information or data with
respect to VCG, or otherwise cooperate with or take any other
action to facilitate, any proposal that constitutes, or would
reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal, or
requires VCG to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the
merger or any other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, before shareholder approval of
the Merger Proposal, VCG may, in response to a bona fide written
Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of, and
subject to compliance with the terms of the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish information or data with respect to VCG and each of its
subsidiaries to the person making such Acquisition Proposal
pursuant to and in accordance with a confidentiality agreement
(each in a form approved by the Special Committee, provided that
such agreement shall not prohibit VCG from complying with the
terms of the merger agreement concerning Acquisition Proposals)
if such information or data has previously been provided to
Family Dog or is provided to Family Dog before or concurrently
with the time it is provided to such person; and
|
|
|
|
participate in discussions or negotiations with such person
regarding such Acquisition Proposal, provided, in each case,
that the Special Committee determines in good faith, by
resolution duly adopted after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and North Point Advisors that such Acquisition
Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to
a Superior Acquisition Proposal (as defined below).
|
VCG will provide Family Dog with a written summary of the
material terms and conditions of each Acquisition Proposal
received as promptly as practicable after the receipt by VCG of
any Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry with respect to, or that
would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition
Proposal. VCG will keep Family Dog informed on a reasonably
current basis of the status of any such Acquisition Proposal,
including any changes to the price or other material terms and
conditions thereof.
Neither VCGs board of directors nor any committee thereof
(including the Special Committee) may, directly or indirectly,
withdraw or modify (or publicly propose to withdraw or modify)
in any manner adverse to Family Dog the recommendation of
VCGs board of directors that VCGs shareholders
approve and adopt the Merger Proposal or approve or recommend
(or publicly propose to approve or recommend) an Acquisition
Proposal unless it determines in good faith, by resolution duly
adopted after consultation with its outside legal counsel and
North Point Advisors, that the failure to do so would present a
substantial risk of being inconsistent with the fulfillment of
its fiduciary duties under applicable law. Notwithstanding any
such withdrawal or modification, the merger agreement shall be
submitted to VCGs shareholders at the special meeting of
shareholders for the purpose of adopting the merger agreement
and approving the merger, unless the merger agreement is
terminated and VCG pays a termination fee to Family Dog, as
further described under The Merger Agreement
Expenses and Termination Fees.
If at any time before the shareholders have approved the Merger
Proposal and the merger in the manner required in the merger
agreement, VCG receives an Acquisition Proposal that the Special
Committee (or VCGs board of directors) concludes in good
faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel and
North
66
Point Advisors constitutes a Superior Acquisition Proposal, then
VCGs board of directors
and/or
the
Special Committee may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause VCG to terminate the merger agreement pursuant to Section
8.01(f) of the merger agreement if VCG pays to Family Dog a
termination fee concurrently with such termination; or
|
|
|
|
cause VCG to enter into a Company Acquisition Agreement (as
defined below) and concurrently terminate the merger agreement
pursuant to Section 8.01(f) of the merger agreement if VCG
pays to Family Dog a termination fee concurrently with such
termination.
|
However, in both instances, VCG may not terminate the merger
agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(f) of the merger
agreement unless (i) the Special Committee first has
provided prior written notice to Family Dog that the Special
Committee is prepared to terminate the merger agreement in
response to a Superior Acquisition Proposal, which notice shall
attach the most current version of any written agreement
relating to the transaction that constitutes such Superior
Acquisition Proposal, and (ii) Family Dog does not make,
within five business days after the receipt of such notice, a
proposal that the Special Committee determines in good faith,
after consultation with its outside legal counsel and North
Point Advisors, is at least as favorable to the non-Executive
Group shareholders as such Superior Acquisition Proposal.
Nothing in the non-solicitation provisions of the merger
agreement prevents VCG from complying with the Exchange Act,
including
Rules 14d-9
and
14e-2
promulgated thereunder, in respect of any Acquisition Proposal
or otherwise making any disclosure to VCGs shareholders if
the Special Committee or board of directors determines in good
faith, by resolution duly adopted after consultation with its
outside counsel, that the failure to make such disclosure
(i) would breach its fiduciary duties to the shareholders
of VCG under applicable law, or (ii) would be inconsistent
with its obligations under applicable securities laws and
regulations (including the rules and regulations of NASDAQ).
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello
and their respective affiliates (other than VCG and its
subsidiaries) may not take any action with the purpose of
discouraging or preventing any person from making an Acquisition
Proposal or, once made, from continuing to pursue such
Acquisition Proposal but this obligation shall not prevent them
from enforcing their rights under the merger agreement or any
other agreement that Mr. Lowrie, Mr. Ocello or their
respective affiliates have entered into, or any rights arising
out of their ownership of VCG common stock.
For purposes of the merger agreement, Acquisition
Proposal means any proposal relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
a tender or exchange offer, merger, consolidation, business
combination, share exchange, reorganization, recapitalization,
liquidation, dissolution, or similar transaction involving VCG
with any person other than Family Dog or any affiliate of Family
Dog (a Third Party) pursuant to which such Third
Party would acquire more than 20% of the outstanding capital
stock of VCG;
|
|
|
|
VCGs acquisition of any Third Party in a transaction in
which the shareholders of the Third Party immediately prior to
consummation of such transaction will own more than 20% of
VCGs outstanding capital stock immediately following such
transaction, including the issuance by VCG of more than 20% of
its outstanding capital stock as consideration for assets or
securities of a Third Party; or
|
|
|
|
any direct or indirect acquisition by any Third Party of 20% or
more of the outstanding capital stock of VCG or of 20% or more
of the consolidated assets of VCG and its subsidiaries, taken as
a whole, in a single transaction or a series of related
transactions.
|
For purposes of the merger agreement, Company Acquisition
Agreement means, with respect to any Acquisition Proposal,
any written term sheet, letter of intent, memorandum of
understanding, merger agreement or other agreement, arrangement
or understanding which is approved by the Special Committee or
VCGs board of directors and duly authorized and executed
by VCG.
For purposes of the merger agreement, Superior Acquisition
Proposal means any bona fide written proposal or offer
made by a Third Party in respect of an Acquisition Proposal,
which the Special Committee determines in good faith, by
resolution duly adopted after consultation with its outside
counsel and North
67
Point Advisors, would result in a transaction that if
consummated would be more favorable from a financial point of
view to the public shareholders than the Merger Proposal
(including any proposal by Family Dog to amend the terms of the
merger agreement), and is reasonably capable of being
consummated on the terms so proposed taking into account all
financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of such proposal.
Voting
Agreement; Transfer or Acquisition of Shares; Waiver of
Dissenters Rights
Each of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello have agreed from the execution and delivery of
the merger agreement until the earlier of the termination of the
merger agreement and the effective time of the merger agreement,
that:
|
|
|
|
|
at the special meeting of shareholders or any other meeting of
VCGs shareholders, however called, and in any action by
written consent of VCGs shareholders, that each such
person will vote, or cause to be voted, all of the shares of
common stock then owned beneficially or of record by such
persons and their respective affiliates (other than VCG and its
subsidiaries), as of the record date for such meeting or
consent, in favor of the adoption of the Merger Proposal and any
actions required in furtherance thereof;
|
|
|
|
except as otherwise contemplated by the merger agreement,
neither any of such persons nor any of their respective
affiliates will directly or indirectly (i) sell, assign,
transfer, tender, pledge, encumber or otherwise dispose of any
of the shares of VCGs common stock held by such person to
a third party, (ii) deposit any of such shares of common
stock into a voting trust or enter into a voting agreement or
arrangement with respect to such shares of common stock or grant
any proxy or power of attorney with respect thereto,
(iii) enter into any contract, option or other arrangement
or undertaking with respect to the direct or indirect transfer
of any such shares of common stock to a third party,
(iv) enter into any hedging transactions, borrowed or
loaned shares, swaps or other derivative security, contract or
instruction in any way related to the price of the common stock,
or (v) take any action that would make any representation
or warranty of either of Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello
untrue or incorrect or have the effect of preventing, materially
delaying or materially impairing either of them from performing
his obligations under the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
except as otherwise contemplated by the merger agreement, none
of such persons nor any of their respective affiliates (which,
shall include any person with whom any such person is part of a
group as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act) shall or shall permit any of its representatives
or agents on its behalf to (i) in any manner acquire, agree
to acquire or make any proposal to acquire, directly or
indirectly, alone or in concert with any other person, any
securities or property of VCG or any of its subsidiaries, or any
rights or options to acquire any such securities or property
(including, but not limited to, beneficial ownership of such
securities or property as defined in
Rule 13d-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act), (ii) except at the
specific written request of the Special Committee, propose to
enter into, directly or indirectly, any merger or business
combination involving VCG or any of its subsidiaries, or to
purchase, directly or indirectly, a material portion of the
assets of VCG, (iii) make, or participate in, directly or
indirectly, any solicitation of proxies
(as those terms are used in the proxy rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission) to vote, or seek to advise or influence
any person with respect to the voting of any securities of VCG
in respect of or related to the matters set forth in
clauses (i) and (ii) above, (iv) enter into any
contract, arrangement or understanding with any person or
group (as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act) with respect to any securities of VCG or any of
its subsidiaries, including but not limited to any joint
venture, loan or option agreement, put or call, guarantee of
loans, guarantee of profits or division of losses or profits,
(v) disclose any intention, plan or arrangement
inconsistent with the foregoing, or (vi) advise, assist or
encourage any other persons in connection with any of the
foregoing.
|
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello have waived, to the full extent of the law, and
agreed not to assert, any dissenters rights pursuant to
Colorado law or any similar rights in connection with the merger
with respect to any and all shares of VCG common stock they
beneficially own.
68
Shareholder
Litigation
VCG has agreed to give Family Dog the opportunity to participate
in the defense or settlement of, and keep Family Dog reasonably
informed regarding, any shareholder litigation against VCG
and/or
its
directors relating to the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement. VCG has further agreed not to settle or offer
to settle any litigation commenced prior to or after the date of
the merger agreement against VCG or any of its directors or
executive officers by any shareholder of VCG relating to the
merger agreement, the merger, any other transaction contemplated
thereby or otherwise, without the prior written consent of
Family Dog, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Resignations
Prior to the consummation of the merger, VCG will deliver to
Family Dog written resignations of each of the directors then
serving on VCGs board of directors and each officer of VCG.
Financing
Family Dog is obligated under the merger agreement to use good
faith efforts to secure the financing necessary and required to
consummate the transaction contemplated by the merger agreement.
While consummation of the merger is not expressly conditioned on
Family Dog obtaining financing, failure of Family Dog to obtain
financing gives VCG, under certain circumstances, the right to
terminate the merger agreement and, if that were to occur, may
obligate Family Dog to pay a termination fee to VCG, as further
described as further described below under The Merger
Agreement Termination Rights and The
Merger Agreement Expenses and Termination
Fees. The financing of Family Dog is further described
under Special Factors Financing of the
Merger.
Conditions
to the Merger
The parties to the merger agreement will consummate the merger
only if the conditions set forth in the merger agreement are
satisfied or waived, where permissible.
Conditions
to all of the Parties Obligations
The conditions to each partys obligation include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by the requisite shareholder
vote;
|
|
|
|
the absences of any temporary restraining order, preliminary or
permanent injunction or other order issued by any court of
competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition
preventing the consummation of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of any waiting period under the
Hart-Scott Rodino Act.
|
Conditions
to Family Dogs and FD Acquisition Co.s
Obligations
The conditions to Family Dogs and FD Acquisition
Co.s obligation include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of VCG in the merger
agreement that are qualified as to materiality shall be true and
correct and those not so qualified shall be true and correct in
all material respects, as though made on the closing date,
except to the extent such representations and warranties
expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case such
representations and warranties qualified as to materiality shall
be true and correct, and those not so qualified shall be true
and correct in all material respects, on and as of such earlier
date) and except to the extent that the failure of such
representations and warranties to be true and correct do not
have a Company Material Adverse Effect (Section 7.02(a) of
the merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
Family Dog shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of
VCG by a duly authorized officer of VCG regarding VCGs
representations and warranties (Section 7.02(a) of the merger
agreement);
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
VCG shall have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement at or prior to the closing date, and Family Dog shall
have received a certificate signed on behalf of VCG by a duly
authorized officer of VCG to such effect (Section 7.02(b) of the
merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
there shall have been no event since the date of the merger
agreement which has had a Company Material Adverse Effect
(Section 7.02(c) of the merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
|
|
holders of no greater than 10% of the shares of VCG common stock
held by non-Executive Group shareholders may have exercised
their dissenters rights and delivered a payment demand to
VCG (excluding such holders who have failed to perfect,
withdrawn or otherwise lost such right to deliver a payment
demand) prior to the closing (Section 7.02(d) of the merger
agreement);
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCG shall have terminated all Company Stock Plans and its stock
repurchase program and, after giving effect to the cancellation
and conversion of options as described elsewhere in this proxy
statement, all VCG stock options shall have been cancelled or
terminated (Section 7.02(e) of the merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
FD Acquisition Co. shall have obtained all necessary approvals
from all of VCGs creditors (other than members of the
Executive Group) to consummate the merger and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
those creditors converting the debt owed by VCG to such
creditors into equity of Family Dog shall have executed all
documents reasonably necessary to effectuate the assignment of
their converting debt to Family Dog;
|
|
|
|
all foreign or domestic governmental consents, orders and
approvals required for the consummation of the merger, the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and transfer
of any licenses related to the operations of the business of VCG
as currently conducted or presently planned to be conducted,
including VCGs permits under liquor laws and
sexually-oriented business laws, to the extent set forth in VCG
disclosure letter, shall have been obtained and shall be in
effect at the effective time of the merger agreement; before
asserting a failure of this closing condition, the party doing
so shall have used all commercially reasonable efforts to obtain
such consents, orders and approvals; and
|
|
|
|
except with respect to the ongoing litigation challenging the
merger (filed on July 30, 2010 in the District Court for
Jefferson County, Colorado as Case No. 10-CV-3624), there shall
not be pending or threatened any suit, action or proceeding by
any governmental entity or any other third party (including any
VCG shareholder or any person asserting to be a VCG shareholder
other than the members of the Executive Group),
(i) challenging, or seeking to restrain or prohibit the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or seeking to
obtain damages from VCG (including any of it officers or
directors), Family Dog or FD Acquisition Co. with regard to the
merger or the merger agreement, (ii) seeking to prohibit or
limit the ownership or operation by VCG or to compel VCG or any
of its subsidiaries to dispose of or hold separate any material
portion of the business or assets of VCG as a result of the
merger, (iii) seeking to impose ownership of any shares of
VCGs common stock, including the right to vote the common
stock, on any matters properly presented to VCGs
shareholders, or (iv) seeking to prohibit Family Dog from
effectively controlling in any material respect the business or
operations of VCG and its subsidiaries.
|
Conditions
to VCGs Obligations
The conditions to VCGs obligation include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of each of Family Dog, FD
Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello in the
merger agreement that are qualified as to materiality shall be
true and correct and those not so qualified shall be true and
correct in all material respects, as though made on the closing
date, except to the extent such representations and warranties
expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case such
representations and warranties qualified as to materiality shall
be true and correct, and those not so qualified shall be true
and correct in all material respects, on and as of such earlier
date)
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
and except to the extent that the failure of such
representations and warranties to be true and correct do not
have a material adverse effect on either Family Dog or FD
Acquisition Co. (Section 7.03(a) of the merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCG shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of Family
Dog by a manager, FD Acquisition Co. by an officer and by each
of Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello regarding their
representations and warranties (Section 7.03(a) of the merger
agreement); and.
|
|
|
|
each of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello shall each have performed in all material
respects all obligations required to be performed by such person
under the merger agreement at or prior to the closing date, and
VCG shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of each
such person to such effect (Section 7.03(b) of the merger
agreement).
|
Termination
Rights
The merger agreement also grants the parties certain termination
rights. The merger agreement may be terminated at any time
before the effective time of the merger, whether before or after
shareholder approval has been obtained:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co. and
VCG (as agreed to by the Special Committee);
|
|
|
|
by either Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co., on the one hand, or
VCG (acting at the direction of the Special Committee and
approved by VCGs board of directors), on the other hand:
(i)if the merger is not consummated on or before the later of
(A) June 30, 2011, and (B) four months after
[ * ], the date on which the Securities and Exchange
Commission notified that it has no further comments to this
proxy statement, unless the failure to consummate the merger by
such outside date is the result of a breach of the merger
agreement by the party seeking to terminate the merger
agreement; or (ii) if any governmental entity issues an
order, decree or ruling or takes any other action permanently
enjoining, restraining or otherwise prohibiting the merger and
such order, decree, ruling or other action shall have become
final and non-appealable;
|
|
|
|
by Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co., if VCG breaches or fails
to perform in any material respect any of its covenants
contained in the merger agreement, which breach or failure to
perform (i) would give rise to the failure of a condition
set forth in Section 7.02(a) through Section 7.02(e)
of the merger agreement (as described above under The
Merger Agreement Conditions to the
Merger Conditions to Family Dogs and FD
Acquisition Co.s Obligations), and (ii) cannot
be or has not been cured within 30 days after the giving of
written notice to VCG of such breach;
|
|
|
|
by VCG (acting at the direction of the Special Committee and
approved by VCGs board of directors), if Family Dog, FD
Acquisition Co. or either of Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello
breaches or fails to perform in any material respect any of its
covenants contained in the merger agreement, which breach or
failure to perform (i) would give rise to the failure of a
condition set forth in Section 7.03(a) or Section 7.03(b)
of the merger agreement (as described above under The
Merger Agreement Conditions to the
Merger Conditions to VCGs Obligations
), and (ii) cannot be or has not been cured
within 30 days after the giving of written notice to Family
Dog or FD Acquisition Co. of such breach;
|
|
|
|
by Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co., (i) if VCGs
board of directors (acting through the Special Committee) shall
have approved or recommended a Superior Acquisition Proposal
(see The Merger Agreement Restrictions on
Solicitation, Acquisition Proposals and Change in
Recommendation) by a third party, (ii) if there is a
change in the Company Recommendation (see The Merger
Agreement Filing of Proxy Statement and
Schedule 13E-3
and Holding of Shareholders Meeting), (iii) if
VCGs board of directors (acting through the Special
Committee) shall have failed to include in this proxy statement
such Company Recommendation (including the recommendation that
VCGs shareholders vote in favor of the merger),
(iv) if VCG enters into, or VCGs board of directors
(acting by itself or through the Special Committee) approves or
recommends, a Company Acquisition Agreement (see The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Recommendation), or (v) if VCGs board
of directors or the Special Committee has publicly announced an
intention to do any of the foregoing;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by VCG (acting at the direction of the Special Committee and
approved by VCGs board of directors), pursuant to
Section 6.08(d) of the merger agreement (concerning a
Superior Acquisition Proposal as discussed under The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and Change in Recommendation), if
VCG has complied with all of the provisions of the merger
agreement concerning Acquisition Proposals and pays to Family
Dog a termination fee (as further described below under The
Merger Agreement Expenses and Termination
Fees); or
|
|
|
|
by either Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co., on the one hand, or
VCG (acting at the direction of the Special Committee and
approved by VCGs board of directors), on the other hand,
if at the special meeting of VCGs shareholders the
requisite shareholder vote is not obtained in favor of the
Merger Proposal as required by Colorado law or the merger
agreement.
|
Effect of
Termination
In the event of termination of the merger agreement, the merger
becomes void and of no effect, without any liability or
obligation on the part of the parties, other than (i) the
representations and warranties regarding brokers fees and
related matters set forth in Section 3.07 and 4.01(g) of
the merger agreement, (ii) the obligation of Family Dog and
FD Acquisition Co. to keep confidential any information received
under the merger agreement under the last sentence of
Section 6.02 of the merger agreement,
(iii) Section 8.02 of the merger agreement providing
for the effects of termination of the merger agreement and the
survival of certain obligations after termination, and
(iv) Article IX of the merger agreement containing
general provisions governing the merger agreement, which
provisions described in clauses (i) through (iv) shall
survive such termination, and except to the extent that such
termination results from the willful breach by a party of any
representation, warranty or covenant set forth in the merger
agreement. The merger agreement also provides that VCG shall not
be deemed to have breached any representation, warranty or
covenant set forth in the merger agreement to the extent that
such breach is a result of the direction of either of
Mr. Lowrie or Mr. Ocello.
Expenses
and Termination Fees
Except as otherwise provided below, all fees and expenses
incurred in connection with the merger agreement, the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will
be paid by the party incurring such fees or expenses, whether or
not the merger is consummated.
The merger agreement provides for the payment of termination
fees in certain instances in the event that the merger agreement
is terminated.
VCG
Termination Fees
VCG will be required to pay Family Dog a termination fee in the
amount $1,000,000 in the event that:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by VCG upon entering into a
Company Acquisition Agreement (see The Merger
Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition
Proposals and Change in Recommendation) constituting a
Superior Acquisition Proposal (see The Merger
Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition
Proposals and Change in Recommendation);
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Family Dog and FD
Acquisition Co. (i) if VCGs board of directors
(acting through the Special Committee) shall have approved or
recommended a Superior Acquisition Proposal (see The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and Change in Recommendation) made
by a third party, (ii) if there is a change in the Company
Recommendation (see The Merger Agreement
Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition Proposals and Change
in Recommendation), (iii) if VCGs board of
directors (acting through the Special Committee) shall have
failed to include in this proxy statement such Company
Recommendation (including the recommendation that VCGs
shareholders vote in favor of the merger), (iv) if VCG
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
enters into, or VCGs board of directors (acting by itself
or through the Special Committee) approves or recommends, a
Company Acquisition Agreement (see The Merger
Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation, Acquisition
Proposals and Change in Recommendation), or (v) if
VCGs board of directors or the Special Committee has
publicly announced an intention to do any of the
foregoing; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) an Acquisition Proposal is made to the non-Executive
Group shareholders generally or has otherwise become publicly
known, disclosed or proposed, and in each case has not been
withdrawn, and thereafter the merger agreement is terminated by
either Family Dog or VCG if the merger is not consummated on or
before the outside dates described under The Merger
Agreement Termination Rights above or
VCGs shareholders do not approve the merger agreement and
merger at the special meeting of VCGs shareholders, and
(ii) within 12 months after such termination, VCG
enters into, or publicly announces the intention to enter into,
a definitive agreement with respect to any Acquisition Proposal,
or consummates the transactions contemplated by such Acquisition
Proposal (provided, that the percentages set forth in the
defined term Acquisition Proposal (see The
Merger Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation,
Acquisition Proposals and Change in Recommendation) shall
be deemed to be 50%).
|
The termination fee payable by VCG is reduced to $600,000 in the
event that VCG terminates the merger agreement to enter into a
Company Acquisition Agreement involving a Superior Acquisition
Proposal from certain identified parties with which VCG or North
Point Advisors has been in contact to discuss a potential change
in control transaction involving VCG and such party.
Family
Dog Termination Fees
Family Dog will be required to pay VCG a termination fee in the
amount $1,000,000 in the event that VCG terminates the merger
agreement (i) if the merger is not consummated on or before
the outside dates described under The Merger
Agreement Termination Rights above or
(ii) if Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co. or either of Troy
Lowrie or Micheal Ocello breaches or fails to perform in any
material respect any of its covenants contained in the merger
agreement, which breach or failure to perform (A) would
give rise to the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 7.03(a) or Section 7.03(b) of the merger
agreement (as described above under The Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Merger Conditions to
VCGs Obligations), and (B) cannot be or has not
been cured within 30 days after the giving of written
notice to Family Dog or FD Acquisition Co. of such breach, and
in the case of each of clauses (i) and (ii), as a result of
Family Dog not being able to secure financing for the merger
(provided that at the time of such termination all of the
closing conditions applicable to all of the parties obligations
and Family Dogs and FD Acquisition Co.s obligations,
described under The Merger Agreement
Conditions to the Merger above, have been satisfied and
VCG is not in material breach of the merger agreement).
Amendment,
Extension and Waiver
The merger agreement may be amended by the parties at any time
before or after receipt of shareholder approval except that
(i) any amendment to the amendment provision of the merger
provision requires the approval of the Special Committee, or
VCGs board of directors in the case of a deadlock on the
Special Committee, and (ii) after receipt of shareholder
approval, the parties may not amend the merger agreement without
shareholder approval of such amendment if the amendment by law
requires shareholder approval.
At any time before the effective time of the merger, the parties
to the merger agreement may (a) extend the time for the
performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other
parties, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations
and warranties contained in the merger agreement or in any
document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement, or
(c) waive compliance with any of the agreements or
conditions contained in the merger agreement (other than the
condition that the Merger Proposal be approved by VCGs
shareholders). Any such extension or waiver by VCG requires the
approval of the Special Committee.
73
DISSENTERS
RIGHTS
The following is a summary of dissenters rights available
to VCGs shareholders, which summary is not intended to be
a complete statement of applicable Colorado law and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to Article 113 of the Colorado
Business Corporation Act, which is set forth in its entirety as
Appendix C
and incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement.
THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 113 ARE COMPLEX AND TECHNICAL IN
NATURE. SHAREHOLDERS DESIRING TO EXERCISE DISSENTERS
RIGHTS MAY WISH TO CONSULT COUNSEL BECAUSE THE FAILURE TO COMPLY
STRICTLY WITH THESE PROVISIONS WILL RESULT IN THE LOSS OF THEIR
DISSENTERS RIGHTS.
Right to
Dissent
VCGs shareholders are entitled to dissent from the merger
and obtain payment of the fair value of their shares if and when
the merger is effectuated. Fair value, with respect
to a dissenters shares, means the value of the shares
immediately before the effective time of the merger, excluding
any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the merger
except to the extent that exclusion would be inequitable. Under
Article 113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, a
shareholder entitled to dissent and obtain payment for his, her
or its shares may not also challenge the corporate action
creating the right to dissent unless the action is unlawful or
fraudulent with respect to the shareholder or VCG.
Under
Section 7-113-103(1)
of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, a record shareholder
may assert dissenters rights as to fewer than all shares
registered in the record shareholders name only if the
record shareholder dissents with respect to all shares
beneficially owned by any one person and causes VCG to receive
written notice which states such dissent and the name, address
and federal taxpayer identification number, if any, of each
person on whose behalf the record shareholder asserts
dissenters rights.
Section 7-113-103(2)
of the Colorado Business Corporation Act provides that a
beneficial shareholder may assert dissenters rights as to
the shares held on the beneficial shareholders behalf only
if (i) the beneficial shareholder causes VCG to receive the
record shareholders written consent to the dissent not
later than the time the beneficial shareholder asserts
dissenters rights, and (ii) the beneficial
shareholder dissents with respect to all shares beneficially
owned by the beneficial shareholder.
VCG will require that, when a record shareholder dissents with
respect to the shares held by any one or more beneficial
shareholders, each such beneficial shareholder must certify to
VCG that the beneficial shareholder and the record shareholder
have asserted, or will timely assert, dissenters rights as
to all such shares as to which there is no limitation on the
ability to exercise dissenters rights.
Procedure
for Exercise of Dissenters Rights
The notice accompanying this proxy statement states that
VCGs shareholders are entitled to assert dissenters
rights under Article 113 of the Colorado Business
Corporation Act. A shareholder who wishes to assert
dissenters rights shall: (i) cause VCG to receive
before the vote is taken on the Merger Proposal at the special
meeting, written notice of the shareholders intention to
demand payment for the shareholders shares if the merger
is effectuated, and (ii) not vote the shares in favor of
the Merger Proposal. A shareholder who does not satisfy the
foregoing requirements will not be entitled to demand payment
for his, her or its shares under Article 113 of the
Colorado Business Corporation Act.
Dissenters
Notice
If the merger is approved at the special meeting, VCG will send
written notice to dissenters who are entitled to demand payment
for their shares. The notice required by VCG will be given no
later than 10 days after the effective time of the merger
and will: (i) state that the merger was authorized and
state the effective time or proposed effective date of the
merger, (ii) set forth an address at which VCG will receive
payment demands and the address of a place where certificates
must be deposited, (iii) inform holders of un-certificated
shares to what extent transfer of the shares will be restricted
after the payment demand is received, (iv) supply
74
a form for demanding payment, which form will request a
dissenter to state an address to which payment is to be made,
(v) set the date by which VCG must receive the payment
demand and certificates for shares, which date will not be less
than 30 days after the date the notice is given,
(vi) state that if a record shareholder dissents with
respect to the shares held by any one or more beneficial
shareholders, each such beneficial shareholder must certify to
VCG that the beneficial shareholder and the record shareholder
or record shareholders of all shares owned beneficially by the
beneficial shareholder have asserted, or will timely assert,
dissenters rights as to all such shares as to which there
is no limitation of the ability to exercise dissenters
rights, and (vii) be accompanied by a copy of
Article 113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act.
Procedure
to Demand Payment
A shareholder who is given a dissenters notice to assert
dissenters rights and who wishes to assets
dissenters rights will, in accordance with the terms of
the dissenters notice, (i) cause VCG to receive a
payment demand (which may be a demand form supplied by VCG and
duly completed or other acceptable writing), and
(ii) deposit the shareholders stock certificates. A
shareholder who demands payment in accordance with the foregoing
retains all rights of a shareholder, except the right to
transfer the shares, until the effective time of the merger, and
has only the right to receive payment for the shares after the
effective time. A demand for payment and deposit of certificates
is irrevocable except as set forth under Dissenters
Rights If Dissenter is Dissatisfied with
Offer, and if the effective time of the merger does not
occur within 60 days after the date set by VCG by which it
must receive the payment demand, VCG will return the deposited
certificates and release the transfer restrictions imposed. If
the effective time of the merger occurs more than 60 days
after the date set by VCG by which it must receive the payment
demand, then VCG will send a new dissenters notice. A
shareholder who does not demand payment and deposit his, her or
its VCG share certificates as required by the date or dates set
forth in the dissenters notice will not be entitled to
demand payment for his, her or its shares of VCG common stock
under Article 113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act,
in which case, pursuant to the merger agreement, he, she or it
will receive cash consideration for each of his, her or its
shares equal to the per share price received by non-dissenting
shareholders.
Payment
At the effective time of the merger or upon receipt of a payment
demand, whichever is later, VCG will pay each dissenter who
complied with the notice requirements referenced in the
preceding paragraph, VCGs estimate of the fair value of
the dissenters shares plus accrued interest. Payment shall
be accompanied by an audited balance sheet as of the end of
VCGs most recent fiscal year or, if not available, the
balance sheet as of the end of a fiscal year ending not more
than 16 months before the date of payment, an audited
income statement for that year, an audited statement of changes
in shareholders equity for that year and an audited
statement of cash flow for that year, as well as the latest
available financial statements, if any, for the interim period,
which interim financial statements need not be audited. Payment
will also be accompanied by a statement of the estimate by VCG
of the fair value of the shares and an explanation of how the
interest was calculated, along with a statement of the
dissenters right to demand payment and a copy of
Article 113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act. With
respect to a dissenter who acquired beneficial ownership of his,
her or its shares after VCGs first announcement of the
terms of the Merger Proposal on November 10, 2010, or who
does not certify that his, her or its shares were acquired
before that date, VCG may, in lieu of making the payment
described above, offer to make such payment if the dissenter
agrees to accept it in full satisfaction of the demand.
If
Dissenter is Dissatisfied with Offer
If a dissenter disagrees with VCGs payment or offer, such
dissenter may give notice to VCG in writing of the
dissenters estimate of the fair value of the
dissenters shares and of the amount of interest due and
may demand payment of such estimate, less any payment made prior
thereto, or reject VCGs offer and demand payment of the
fair value of the shares and interest due if: (i) the
dissenter believes that the amount paid or offered is less than
the fair value of the shares or that the interest due was
incorrectly calculated, (ii) VCG fails to make payment
within 60 days after the date set by VCG by which it must
receive the payment
75
demand, or (iii) VCG does not return deposited certificates
or release the transfer restrictions imposed on un-certificated
shares if the effective time of the merger does not occur within
60 days after the date set by VCG by which it must receive
the payment demand from shareholders asserting dissenters
rights. A dissenter waives the right to demand payment under
this paragraph unless he, she or it causes VCG to receive the
notice referenced in this paragraph within 30 days after
VCG makes or offers payment for the shares of the dissenter, in
which event, such dissenter will receive all cash for his, her
or its shares in an amount equal to the amount paid or offered
by VCG.
Judicial
Appraisal of Shares
If a demand for payment made by a dissenter as set forth above
is unresolved, VCG may, within 60 days after receiving the
payment demand, commence a proceeding and petition a court to
determine the fair value of the shares and accrued interest. If
VCG does not commence the proceeding within the 60 day
period, it shall pay to each dissenter whose demand remains
unresolved the amount demanded. VCG must commence any proceeding
described above in the First Judicial District, Jefferson County
District Court. VCG must make all dissenters whose demands
remain unresolved parties to the proceeding as in an action
against their shares, and all parties shall be served with a
copy of the petition. Jurisdiction in which the proceeding is
commenced is plenary and exclusive. One or more persons may be
appointed by the court as appraisers to receive evidence and
recommend a decision on the question of fair value. The
appraisers will have the power described in the court order
appointing them. The parties to the proceeding will be entitled
to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil
proceedings. Each dissenter made a party to the proceeding will
be entitled to judgment for the amount, if any, by which the
court finds the fair value of the dissenters shares, plus
interest, to exceed the amount paid by VCG, or for the fair
value, plus interest, of a dissenters shares for which VCG
elected to withhold payment.
Court and
Counsel Fees
The court in an appraisal proceeding shall determine all costs
of the proceeding, including the reasonable compensation and
expenses of appraisers appointed by the court. The court will
assess the costs against VCG; except that the court may assess
costs against all or some of the dissenters, in the amount the
court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds that the
dissenters acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith
in demanding payment. The court may also assess the fees and
expenses of counsel and experts for the respective parties, in
amounts the court finds equitable: (i) against VCG and in
favor of the dissenters if the court finds that VCG did not
substantially comply with its obligations under the
dissenters rights statute, or (ii) against either VCG
or one or more dissenters, in favor of any other party, if the
court finds that the party against whom the fees and expenses
are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith
with respect to the rights provided by Article 113 of the
Colorado Business Corporation Act. If the court finds that the
services of counsel for any dissenter were of substantial
benefit to the other dissenters similarly situated, and that the
fees for those services should not be assessed against VCG, the
court may award to such counsel reasonable fees to be paid out
of the amount awarded to the dissenters who were benefited.
Any written notice required to be sent to VCG by a shareholder
electing to exercise his or her dissenters rights under
Article 113 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act should
be sent to Corporate Secretary at the headquarters of VCG
Holding Corp., 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540, Lakewood,
Colorado 80228.
76
OTHER
MATTERS
Other
Matters for Action at the Special Meeting
VCGs board of directors does not know of any other matters
to be presented for action at the special meeting other than as
described in this proxy statement. If any other business should
properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the
accompanying form of proxy intend to vote thereon in accordance
with their best judgment unless they are directed to do
otherwise.
Future
Shareholder Proposals
If the merger is consummated, there will be no public
shareholders of VCG and no public participation in any future
meeting of shareholders of VCG. However, if the merger is not
consummated, VCGs current shareholders will continue to be
entitled to attend and participate in VCGs shareholder
meetings.
Under Exchange Act
Rule 14a-8(e),
for a proposal to be included with a companys annual
meeting proxy statement, the proposals must be received at the
companys principal executive offices not less than
120 calendar days before the date of the companys
proxy statements released to shareholders in connection with the
previous years annual meeting. However,
Rule 14a-8(e)
also provides that if a company did not hold an annual meeting
the previous year, or if the date of the current years
annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from
the date of the previous years meeting, then the deadline
is a reasonable time before the company begins to print and send
its proxy materials.
VCG held its 2010 annual meeting of shareholders on
June 10, 2010 and VCGs proxy statement for the 2010
annual meeting of shareholders was dated April 30, 2010.
Accordingly, VCG must receive a proposal to be included with
VCGs proxy statement for the 2011 annual meeting on or
before December 31, 2010.
Notice of a shareholder proposal submitted outside the processes
of Exchange Act
Rule 14a-8
is considered untimely if a company does not have notice of such
proposal at least 45 days before the date on which the
company first sent its proxy materials for the prior years
annual meeting of shareholders under Exchange Act
Rule 14a-4(c)(1).
However,
Rule 14a-4(c)(1)
also provides that if during the prior year the company did not
hold an annual meeting, or if the date of the meeting has
changed more than 30 days from the prior year, then notice
must be received a reasonable time before the registrant sends
its proxy materials for the current year.
VCG sent its proxy materials for the 2010 annual meeting of
shareholders on or about May 5, 2010. Accordingly, VCG must
receive notice of a shareholder proposal submitted outside the
processes of Exchange Act
Rule 14a-8
for the 2011 annual meeting on or before March 21, 2011 for
it to be considered timely.
Householding
of Special Meeting Materials
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules that
permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy
delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two
or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a
single proxy statement addressed to those shareholders. This
process, which is commonly referred to as
householding, potentially provides extra convenience
for shareholders and cost savings for us.
If you are now receiving multiple copies of our proxy materials
and would like to have only one copy of these documents
delivered to your household in the future, please call, email or
write to us at
(303) 934-2424,
tbradley@vcgh.com
, or VCG Holding Corp., 390 Union Blvd.,
Suite 540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228, Attention: Corporate
Secretary.
77
OTHER
IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING US
Our
Directors and Executive Officers
Biographical
Information about Our Directors and Executive
Officers
The merger agreement provides that upon consummation of the
merger, FD Acquisition Co.s sole director and officer,
Mr. Lowrie, will become the initial director and officer of
the surviving corporation. It is also contemplated that
Mr. Ocello will become an officer of the surviving
corporation after consummation of the merger.
The following table sets forth information about VCGs
directors and certain of its executive officers as of the date
of this proxy statement and provides their respective ages and
positions with VCG. All of our directors and executive officers
are citizens of the United States, and can be reached at VCG
Holding Corp., 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540, Lakewood,
Colorado 80228.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions
|
|
Expires
|
|
Troy Lowrie(4),(6)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Micheal Ocello(7)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
Robert McGraw, Jr.(2),(3),(5)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Martin Grusin(6)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2012
|
|
George Sawicki(1),(2),(3),(5)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2011
|
|
David Levine(1),(2),(3),(5)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Governance and Nominating Committee
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the Compensation Committee
|
|
(4)
|
|
Member of the Executive Committee
|
|
(5)
|
|
Independent Board member
|
|
(6)
|
|
Non-independent Board member who is currently not serving on any
committee
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Ocello is an advisor to VCGs board of directors
|
Troy Lowrie.
Mr. Lowrie has been the
Chairman of the Board since April 2002 and Chief Executive
Officer since November 2002. Mr. Lowrie is President of
Lowrie Investment Management Inc., which is the sole manager of
Family Dog and also the general partner of Lowrie Management
LLLP, a Colorado limited liability limited partnership, which
formerly owned and operated adult entertainment nightclubs and
is now an investment entity. Mr. Lowrie was the owner and
President of International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
(IEC), a company engaged in the business of managing
adult entertainment nightclubs, from 1982 to October 2003, when
it was acquired by VCG. Mr. Lowrie is also the President,
Secretary and Treasurer of Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co.
Mr. Lowries leadership skills and experience in the
adult nightclub industry, among other factors, led VCGs
board of directors to conclude that he should serve as a
director.
Micheal Ocello.
Mr. Ocello has been the
President and Chief Operating Officer of VCG since April 2002.
He served as a director of VCG between since April 2002 and
October 2010. Mr. Ocello is the owner and President of
Unique Entertainment Consultants, Inc., of St. Louis,
Missouri, a management company that has specialized in the
management of nightclubs since 1995. The principal address and
phone number for Unique Entertainment Consultants, Inc., of
St. Louis, Missouri is 6161 Clifton Oaks Pl. and
(618) 271-9420.
Mr. Ocello has been affiliated with IEC in a managerial
capacity since 1982. He is currently the President of IEC.
Mr. Ocello is also the managing member of LTD Investment
Group, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company used by
Mr. Ocello for investment purposes. LTD Investment Group,
LLC currently owns 158,000 shares of our common stock, all
of which will be contributed to Family Dog in connection with
the
78
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. He is
President of the Association of Club Executives (ACE National,
the national trade association for the adult nightclub
industry), a private company, President of the Illinois Club
Owners Association, a private company, and past Vice Chairman
and current Board member of Missouris Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Board, a private company. Mr. Ocello
has served as a commissioned police officer for the Village of
Brooklyn, Illinois since early 2009.
Robert McGraw, Jr.
Mr. McGraw has
been a director of VCG since November 2002. A Certified Public
Accountant since 1982, Mr. McGraw is President of McGraw
and McGraw CPA, PC of Westminster, Colorado. The principal
address and phone number for McGraw and McGraw CPA, PC is 7260
Osceloa Street and
303-427-6641.
Mr. McGraws firm specializes in accounting for
restaurants, lounges, and small businesses. The practice
consists of income tax preparation, financial statement
preparation, and small business consulting. Mr. McGraw is
currently licensed in the State of Colorado and is a member of
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and
Colorado Society of Certified Public Accountants.
Mr. McGraw served on VCGs Audit Committee for half
the 2009 year and still serves on VCGs Compensation
and Governance and Nominating Committee, and is an independent
member of VCGs board of directors. Mr. McGraws
accounting and financial experience, among other factors, led
VCGs board of directors to conclude that he should serve
as a director. Mr. McGraw is a U.S. citizen.
Martin Grusin.
Mr. Grusin has been a
director of VCG since July 2005. Mr. Grusin has practiced
law as an attorney for his firm the Law Office of Martin
Grusin, P.C. since 1973. The principal address and phone
number for Martin Grusin, P.C. is 780 Ridge Lake
Blvd., Ste #202 Memphis, TN 38120 and
(901) 682-3450.
Mr. Grusin serves on no committees because of his
involvement in merger and acquisition activity for VCG and its
subsidiaries. Mr. Grusin is not considered to be an
independent member of VCGs board of directors.
Mr. Grusins legal, merger and acquisition experience,
as well as experience as a director of other public companies,
among other factors, led VCGs board of directors to
conclude that he should serve as a director. Mr. Grusin is
a U.S. citizen.
George Sawicki.
Mr. Sawicki has been a
director of VCG since June 2008. Mr. Sawicki is a sole
practitioner of law but he has served as in-house counsel for
Zed, formerly 9 Squared, a mobile media solutions company from
2007 through 2010. The principal address and phone number for
Zed is 1999 Broadway, Suite 1250, Denver, CO 80202 and
(720) 889-0016
Mr. Sawicki has previously served as in-house counsel for
Playboy Enterprises, Inc., an adult entertainment company from
2006 through 2007, and New Frontier Media, Inc., a producer and
distributor of adult themed and general motion picture
entertainment from 2003 through 2006. The principal address and
phone number for Playboy Enterprises, Inc. is
680 N. Lake Shore Dr #1500, Chicago, IL 60611 and
(312) 751-8000
and the principal address and phone number for New Frontier
Media, Inc. is 7007 Winchester Circle, Suite 200, Boulder,
CO 80301 and
(303) 444-0900.
Mr. Sawicki has worked as legal counsel with the areas of
corporate governance, patent,
e-commerce,
entertainment and marketing organizations, managing complex
transactions, and legal compliance consulting. Mr. Sawicki
serves on the Audit, Compensation (Chair), and Governance and
Nominating Committee (Chair) and is an independent member of
VCGs board of directors. Mr. Sawickis
experience as legal counsel for the adult industry, among other
factors, led VCGs board of directors to conclude that he
should serve as a director. Mr. Sawicki is a
U.S. citizen.
David Levine.
Mr. Levine has been a
director since July 2010. Mr. Levine is a business
consultant but has served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of ResortQuest International, a former NYSE-listed
company that provided vacation rental, property management, and
real estate services. The principal address and phone number for
ResortQuest International is 546 Mary Esther Cut-Off NW,
Suite 3, Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548 and
(800) 862-4853.
During his tenure
(1998-2002),
ResortQuest became the industrys leading brand name,
operating 32 integrated companies in 51 resort locations
throughout North America and Hawaii. Prior to launching
ResortQuest, Mr. Levine served as President and Chief
Operating Officer
(1994-1998)
of Equity Inns, Inc., a former NYSE-listed REIT that specialized
in lodging-related acquisitions. Mr. Levine is the Chair of
and the Financial Expert on VCGs Audit Committee and
serves on VCGs Compensation and Governance and Nominating
Committees. He is an independent member of VCGs board of
directors. Mr. Levine is a U.S. citizen.
79
Director
and Officer Involvement in Certain Legal or Material
Proceedings
There are no material proceedings to which any director,
executive officer or affiliate of VCG, any owner of record or
beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of
voting securities of VCG, or any associate of any such director,
executive officer, affiliate or security holder is a party
adverse to VCG or has a material interest adverse to VCG or any
of its subsidiaries.
To the best of our knowledge, none of the following events have
occurred during the past ten years that are material to an
evaluation of the ability or integrity of any director or
executive officer of VCG:
|
|
|
|
|
any bankruptcy petition filed by or against, or any appointment
of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for, the business
or property of such person, or any partnership in which such
person was a general partner or any corporation of which such
person was an executive officer either, in each case, at the
time of the filing for bankruptcy or within two years prior to
that time;
|
|
|
|
any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a
pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and
other minor offenses);
|
|
|
|
being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of
competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining
such person from, or otherwise limiting, the following
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker,
commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor
broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person
regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an
associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment
adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an
affiliated person, director or employee of any investment
company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance
company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in
connection with such activity;
|
|
|
|
engaging in any type of business practice; or
|
|
|
|
engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale
of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation
of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or
state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for
more than 60 days the right of such person to act as a
futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity
trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage
transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of
any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter,
broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person,
director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings
and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or
continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such
activity;
|
|
|
|
being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil
action, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state
securities or federal commodities law, and the judgment in such
civil action or finding by the Securities and Exchange
Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not
been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;
|
|
|
|
being the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state
judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree or finding,
not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an
alleged violation of any federal or state securities or
commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting
financial instructions or insurance companies, including, but
not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of
disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or
permanent
cease-and-desist
order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation
prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any
business entity; or
|
|
|
|
being the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any
self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)
(26) of the Exchange Act), any
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a) (29) of
the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange,
association, entity or organization that has disciplinary
authority over its members or person associated with a member.
|
Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
financial information for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The information as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 is derived from our consolidated
financial statements from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, which is included as
Appendix D
to this proxy statement and incorporated
herein by reference, which have been audited by Causey
Demgen & Moore Inc., as independent registered public
accountants. The information as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 is derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements from our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, which is
included as
Appendix E
to this proxy statement and
incorporated herein by reference, and include, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal,
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the
information. The information as of December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements,
which are not incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement.
The selected consolidated financial information should be read
in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements, including the related
notes, incorporated by reference into this proxy statement from
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and from our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.
Discontinued
Operations
On July 16, 2010, VCG completed the sale of substantially
all of the assets of Golden Productions JGC Fort Worth,
LLC, consisting of the club Jaguars Gold Club in
Ft. Worth, Texas. The results of operations for this club
has been reclassified as discontinued operations in the
statements of income for the periods presented during which VCG
owned the club, September 2007 to July 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
Statements of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
41,693,906
|
|
|
$
|
40,212,312
|
|
|
$
|
53,201,904
|
|
|
$
|
55,563,227
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
38,743,730
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
16,114,581
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
15,854,153
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1,190,845
|
|
|
$
|
2,345,551
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
1,102,368
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
(28,799,586
|
)(4)
|
|
$
|
5,503,795
|
|
|
$
|
1,520,363
|
|
|
$
|
718,360
|
|
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per common share
attributable to VCG stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.63
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Fully diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per
common share attributable to VCG stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,979,127
|
|
|
|
17,552,034
|
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
17,925,132
|
|
|
|
16,623,213
|
|
|
|
9,128,985
|
|
|
|
8,477,571
|
|
Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,979,127
|
|
|
|
17,552,034
|
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
18,146,949
|
|
|
|
17,012,983
|
|
|
|
9,338,570
|
|
|
|
8,477,571
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (At End of Period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
66,987,662
|
|
|
$
|
71,549,088
|
|
|
$
|
71,151,173
|
|
|
$
|
75,626,040
|
|
|
$
|
103,719,255
|
|
|
$
|
35,079,698
|
|
|
$
|
27,859,065
|
|
Current portion of notes and other obligations
|
|
$
|
6,961,320
|
|
|
$
|
1,068,830
|
|
|
$
|
3,867,344
|
|
|
$
|
3,636,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,343,029
|
|
|
$
|
2,761,197
|
|
|
$
|
5,369,291
|
|
Long-term notes and other obligations, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
19,076,474
|
|
|
$
|
29,745,808
|
|
|
$
|
26,880,039
|
|
|
$
|
32,840,320
|
|
|
$
|
21,505,497
|
|
|
$
|
17,230,560
|
|
|
$
|
9,273,082
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Fiscal year 2006 reflects the acquisitions of two adult
nightclubs in Colorado.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Fiscal year 2007 reflects the sale of the membership interests
in Epicurean Enterprises, LLC, which operated a nightclub in
Arizona, and the acquisitions of 11 adult nightclubs in
Minnesota (1), Illinois (4), Colorado (1), Maine (1), Florida
(1) North Carolina (1), Kentucky (1), and Texas (1).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 reflects the acquisitions of one adult
nightclub in California and one in Texas.
|
81
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 includes non-cash impairment charges for
goodwill, licenses, trade names and other intangible assets for
a total amount of approximately $46.0 million. In addition,
VCG recognized a non-cash impairment of real estate of
approximately $1.9 million.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Fiscal year 2009 includes non-cash impairment charges for
goodwill, licenses, trade names and other intangible assets for
a total amount of approximately $2.0 million. In addition,
VCG recognized a non-cash impairment of real estate of
approximately $268,000.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The nine-months ended September 30, 2009 includes a
non-cash impairment of real estate of approximately $268,000.
|
Projected
Financial Information
VCG does not, as a matter of course, make public forecasts or
projections as to future performance or financial data and is
especially wary of making projections for any earnings period
due to the inherent unpredictability of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, in connection with the
transaction review process, VCGs management provided
certain projections to North Point Advisors, which projections
were based on managements estimate of VCGs future
financial performance as of the date they were provided. We have
included below the material portions of these projections to
give our shareholders access to certain nonpublic information
prepared for purposes of considering and evaluating the merger.
The inclusion of this information should not be regarded as an
indication that VCG, VCGs management or board of
directors, or North Point Advisors considered, or now consider,
this information to be predictive of actual future results, and
such data should not be relied upon as such. Neither VCG nor any
of its affiliates or representatives has made or makes any
representations to any person regarding the ultimate performance
of VCG compared to the information contained in the projections,
and none of them intends to provide any update or revision
thereof.
The projections described below were prepared by our management
and were not prepared with a view towards public disclosure or
compliance with generally accepted accounting principles or with
published guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission
or the guidelines established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants regarding forecasts or projections.
The projections were prepared on a basis consistent with the
general accounting principles used in our historical financial
statements, except as otherwise noted in the footnotes to the
tables below, our independent public accounting firm, Causey
Demgen & Moore Inc., has neither examined nor compiled
the projections and, accordingly, Causey Demgen &
Moore Inc. does not express an opinion or any other form of
assurance with respect thereto. The Causey Demgen &
Moore Inc. report included in documents that are incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement relates to our historical
financial information. It does not extend to these projections
and should not be read to do so. Our internal financial
forecasts (upon which the projections were based in part) are,
in general, prepared solely for internal use and capital
budgeting and other management decisions and are subjective in
many respects and thus susceptible to interpretation and
periodic revision based on actual experience and business
developments. The projections also reflect numerous assumptions
made by our management with respect to industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, all of which are difficult to predict and many of
which are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you
that the projected results will be realized or that actual
results will not be significantly higher or lower than
projected. In addition, the projections do not consider the
effect of the merger or how VCGs business may be operated
following the merger.
Readers of this proxy statement are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on the specific portions of the financial projections
set forth below. No one has made or makes any representation to
any shareholder or anyone else regarding the information
included in these projections.
For the foregoing reasons, as well as the bases and assumptions
on which the financial projections were compiled, the inclusion
of specific portions of the financial projections in this proxy
statement should not be regarded as an indication that such
projections will be an accurate prediction of future events, and
they should not be relied on as such. We do not intend to update
or otherwise revise the following financial projections to
82
reflect circumstances existing after the date when made or to
reflect the occurrence of future events, even if any or all of
the assumptions are shown to be in error.
These projections are forward-looking statements and are based
on expectations and assumptions at the time they were prepared
by management. No assurance can be given that the assumptions
used in preparing these projections will reflect actual future
conditions. The projections described below involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to
differ materially from such expectations. Estimates and
assumptions are inherently subject to factors such as industry
performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and
financial conditions, all of which are difficult to predict and
beyond the control of VCGs management, as well as other
factors described above under the caption Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information beginning
on page __, which factors may cause the financial
projections and underlying assumptions to be inaccurate. You may
also refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Set forth below is a summary of certain projected financial data
(in millions) for VCG prepared by VCGs management and
provided to North Point Advisors. We sometimes refer to these
projections elsewhere in this proxy statement as the
Management Case. Based on the Management Case, North
Point Advisors then also developed an Upside Case
using more aggressive assumptions and a Downside
Case using more conservative assumptions. All figures in
the tables below have been adjusted to reflect the sale of the
Fort Worth, Texas club, which transaction occurred in July
2010.
Management
Case ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Est.
|
|
|
2011 Est.
|
|
|
2012 Est.
|
|
|
2013 Est.
|
|
|
2014 Est.
|
|
|
2015 Est.
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
54.6
|
|
|
$
|
55.4
|
|
|
$
|
57.1
|
|
|
$
|
58.8
|
|
|
$
|
60.6
|
|
|
$
|
62.4
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
Upside
Case ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Est.
|
|
|
2012 Est.
|
|
|
2013 Est.
|
|
|
2014 Est.
|
|
|
2015 Est.
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
60.1
|
|
|
$
|
66.1
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
$
|
80.0
|
|
|
$
|
88.0
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
Downside
Case ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Est.
|
|
|
2012 Est.
|
|
|
2013 Est.
|
|
|
2014 Est.
|
|
|
2015 Est.
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
51.9
|
|
|
$
|
49.3
|
|
|
$
|
46.8
|
|
|
$
|
44.5
|
|
|
$
|
42.3
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
EBITDA is normally a presentation of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. For
purposes of these projections, EBITDA does not include certain
historical costs, such as asset impairment charges, potential
company sale expenses, and certain one-time legal expenses.
EBITDA is a
non-U.S.
GAAP calculation that is frequently used by our investors to
measure operating results. EBITDA data are included because we
understand that such information is considered by investors as
an additional basis on evaluating our ability to pay interest,
repay debt, and make capital expenditures. Management cautions
that this EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
calculations reported by other companies. Because it is
non-U.S.
GAAP, EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to
operating or net income in measuring our results.
|
In preparing the Management Case estimates, management made the
following material assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Same store sales for existing clubs of negative 1.5% for fiscal
2010, then positive 3.0% annually for subsequent years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open or acquire no new clubs in the projected period.
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative costs remain constant at
approximately $3.4 million per year due to no new club
growth.
|
In preparing the Upside Case estimates, North Point Advisors
made the following material assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Same store sales for existing clubs of positive 10.0% for all
projected years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open or acquire no new clubs in the projected period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No clubs closed or sold in the projected period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA increases 10.0% annually for all projected years.
|
In preparing the Downside Case estimates, North Point Advisors
made the following material assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Same store sales for existing clubs of negative 5.0% for all
projected years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open or acquire no new clubs in the projected period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No clubs closed or sold in the projected period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA declines 5.0% annually for all projected years.
|
Price
Range of Common Stock, Dividend Information and Stock
Purchases
Price
Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market. As of [
* ], VCG had approximately [ * ] shareholders of
record. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock,
as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol
VCGH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.90
|
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.70
|
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.03
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.62
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter (thru December 21, 2010)
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
On November 9, 2010, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the execution of the agreement and merger
proposal, the high and low reported sales prices of our common
stock were $1.87 and $1.85, respectively. On December 22,
2010, the most recent practicable date before the printing of
this proxy statement, the high and low reported sales prices of
our common stock were $2.22 and $2.19, respectively. You are
urged to obtain a current market price quotation for our common
stock.
Dividends
VCG has never paid any cash dividends on shares of its common
stock.
84
Stock Repurchases by VCG and Stock Purchases by Family
Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Management LLLP, Lowrie
Investment Management, Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC, Mr.
Lowrie and Mr. Ocello
On July 26, 2007, VCGs board of directors adopted a
stock repurchase program, pursuant to which VCG may repurchase
up to the lesser of (i) 1,600,000 shares of its common
stock, or (ii) an aggregate of $10,000,000 of common stock.
On September 29, 2008, VCGs board of directors
authorized VCGs Executive Committee to repurchase, in its
discretion, up to an aggregate of $1,000,000 of common stock
pursuant to the repurchase program. On January 9, 2009,
VCGs board of directors authorized VCGs Executive
Committee to repurchase, in its discretion, up to an additional
aggregate of $1,000,000 of common stock pursuant to the
repurchase program. Further, on April 30, 2010, VCGs
board of directors authorized VCGs Executive Committee to
repurchase, in its discretion, up to an additional aggregate of
$1,000,000 of common stock pursuant to the repurchase program
(for a total amount of $3,000,000 of authorized purchases under
the repurchase program). On July 21, 2010 and in connection
with entering into negotiations regarding the merger agreement,
VCGs board of directors terminated the repurchase program.
The following table provides additional information about
VCGs purchases under the repurchase program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or Approximate
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of Shares that May
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Prices Paid
|
|
|
Average Price Paid per
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Programs(1)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
August 1 to 31, 2007
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.15 6.83
|
|
|
$
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
1,560,000 shares or $
|
9,742,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares repurchased in 2007
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
1,560,000 shares or $
|
9,742,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1 to 31, 2008
|
|
|
225,045
|
|
|
$
|
2.20 2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
225,045
|
|
|
1,334,955 shares or $
|
9,154,616
|
|
November 1 to 30, 2008
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.47 2.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
|
1,285,955 shares or $
|
9,061,668
|
|
December 1 to 31, 2008
|
|
|
52,979
|
|
|
$
|
1.32 1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
52,979
|
|
|
1,232,976 shares or $
|
8,989,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased in 2008
|
|
|
327,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
327,024
|
|
|
1,232,976 shares or $
|
8,989,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
33,400
|
|
|
$
|
1.50 1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
33,400
|
|
|
1,199,576 shares or $
|
8,932,556
|
|
February 1 to 28, 2009
|
|
|
116,257
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.56 1.70
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
116,257
|
(2)
|
|
1,083,319 shares or $
|
8,737,111
|
|
March 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
43,368
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
1.50 1.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
43,368
|
(3)
|
|
1,039,951 shares or $
|
8,668,806
|
|
June 1 to 30, 2009
|
|
|
57,501
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
2.12 2.27
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
57,501
|
(4)
|
|
982,450 shares or $
|
8,541,492
|
|
July 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
27,457
|
|
|
$
|
2.17 2.20
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
27,457
|
|
|
954,993 shares or $
|
8,480,641
|
|
August 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
66,149
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
2.17 2.30
|
|
|
$
|
2.23
|
|
|
|
66,149
|
(5)
|
|
888,844 shares or $
|
8,333,023
|
|
September 1 to 30, 2009
|
|
|
55,369
|
|
|
$
|
2.04 2.18
|
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
|
55,369
|
|
|
833,475 shares or $
|
8,212,329
|
|
October 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
44,681
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
1.86 2.15
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
44,681
|
(6)
|
|
788,794 shares or $
|
8,120,913
|
|
November 1 to 30, 2009
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
1.83 1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
788,321 shares or $
|
8,120,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased in 2009
|
|
|
444,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
444,655
|
|
|
788,321 shares or $
|
8,120,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 to 30, 2010
|
|
|
505,519
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
1.56 1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
505,519
|
(7)
|
|
282,802 shares or $
|
7,260,689
|
|
July 1 to 31, 2010
|
|
|
45,636
|
|
|
$
|
1.60 1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
45,636
|
|
|
237,166 shares or $
|
7,184,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased in 2010
|
|
|
551,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
551,155
|
|
|
237,166 shares or $
|
7,184,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock repurchased
|
|
|
1,362,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
1,362,834
|
|
|
237,166 shares or $
|
7,184,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless noted, VCG made all repurchases in the open market.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Of these repurchases, VCG purchased 20,957 shares of common
stock in the open market and 95,300 shares of common stock
in a block transaction.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Of these repurchases, VCG purchased 10,268 shares of common
stock in the open market and 33,100 shares of common stock
in a block transaction.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Of these repurchases, VCG purchased 51,647 shares of common
stock in the open market and 5,854 shares of common stock
in a private transaction.
|
85
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Of these repurchases, VCG purchased 61,149 shares of common
stock in the open market and 5,000 shares of common stock
in a private transaction.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Of these repurchases, VCG purchased 36,981 shares of common
stock in the open market and 7,700 shares of common stock
in a private transaction.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Of these repurchases, VCG purchased 35,799 shares of common
stock in the open market, 225,120 shares of common stock in
a private transaction and 244,600 shares of common stock in
a block transaction.
|
The following table sets forth information regarding purchases
of our common stock by Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie Management LLLP
during the last two years, showing for each quarter since
January 1, 2009 the number of shares of our common stock
purchased, the range of prices paid and the average price paid.
The table does not contain information for quarters in which no
purchases were made. Purchases by Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie
Management LLLP were made in open market transactions. None of
Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie Investment Management,
Inc., LTD Investment Group, LLC and Mr. Ocello acquired any
shares of our common stock during this period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Total # of
|
|
Range of Prices
|
|
Paid per Share
|
Period/Person
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Paid ($)
|
|
($)
|
|
January 1 March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
7,000
|
|
1.79 1.79
|
|
1.79
|
Lowrie Management LLLP
|
|
50,600
|
|
1.61 1.64
|
|
1.63
|
April 1 June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
Lowrie Management LLLP
|
|
57,200*
|
|
0.00* 2.29
|
|
1.00*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The amount reflects a transaction on April 29, 2009 whereby
Lowrie Management LLLP received 25,800 shares of common
stock as a gift from an affiliate. If the transaction on
April 29, 2009 were omitted from the table above, the total
number of shares purchased would be 31,400, the range of prices
paid would be $2.15 2.29, and the average price
paid per share would be $2.22.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
holding of our common stock by each person who, as of
February 1, 2011, is known to VCG to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of VCGs
86
common stock and by each director and named executive officer
and by all directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
|
Ownership(2)
|
|
Percent of Class(2)
|
|
Troy Lowrie(3)
|
|
|
4,943,289
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
Micheal Ocello(4)
|
|
|
195,589
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Robert McGraw(5)
|
|
|
68,235
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Martin Grusin(6)
|
|
|
86,319
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
George Sawicki
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David Levine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons)
|
|
|
5,304,650
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loeb Arbitrage Management LP (LAM), Loeb Arbitrage
Fund (LAF), Loeb Arbitrage Offshore Partners, Ltd.
(LAOP), Loeb Marathon Fund LP (LMF),
Loeb Marathon Offshore Partners, Ltd. (LMOP)(7)
|
|
|
1,491,556
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Whitebox Advisors, LLC (WA), Whitebox Combined
Advisors, LLC (WCA), Whitebox Combined Partners,
L.P.(WCP), Whitebox Multi-Strategy Fund, L.P.
(WMSFLP), Whitebox Multi-Strategy Fund, Ltd.
(WMSFLTD), Whitebox Intermarket Advisors, LLC
(WIA), Whitebox Intermarket Partners, L.P.
(WIP), Whitebox Intermarket Fund, L.P.
(WIFLP), Whitebox Intermarket Fund, Ltd.
(WIFLTD), HFR RVA Combined Master Trust
(HFR)(8)
|
|
|
1,380,498
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated, all shareholders listed above have
an address in care of our principal executive offices, which are
located at 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540, Lakewood,
Colorado 80228.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Unless otherwise noted, all shares of common stock listed above
are owned and registered in the name of each person listed as
beneficial owner and such person has sole voting and dispositive
power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially
owned by each of them. Percentage of ownership for each
shareholder is based on 16,292,071 shares of common stock
outstanding as of February 2, 2011. Pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding which are subject to
options, warrants, rights, or conversion privileges exercisable
within 60 days of the record date are deemed outstanding
for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage
beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage
beneficially owned by each other person listed.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes (i) 4,394,100 shares of common stock owned by
Lowrie Management LLLP, and (ii) 549,189 shares of
common stock owned by Mr. Lowrie. Mr. Lowrie is the
President of Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., the General
Partner of Lowrie Management LLLP. Mr. Lowrie disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Lowrie Management
LLLP, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
Mr. Lowrie has pledged 2,325,900 shares of stock as
collateral to secure VCGs obligations under two promissory
notes.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes (i) 158,000 shares of common stock owned by
LTD Investment Group, LLC, of which Mr. Ocello is the
managing member, and (ii) 37,589 shares of common
stock owned by Mr. Ocello. This does not include any
options held by Mr. Ocello. He has 30,000 options
outstanding (at an exercise price of $10.00), of which 10,000
options are vested.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes (i) 65,735 shares of common stock owned by
Mr. McGraw, and (ii) 2,000 shares of common stock
held by Mrs. Marjorie McGraw, Mr. McGraws wife.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes (i) 10,000 shares of common stock
beneficially owned by ACM Management, LLC, of which
Mr. Grusin is the Chief Manager and shares voting power
with other members, (ii) 66,319 shares of
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
common stock owned by Mr. Grusin, and
(iii) 10,000 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Grusins wife, Ms. Gayle Powelson.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 9, 2010. According to this
filing, LAM has shared voting and dispositve power over 105,517
shares of VCGs common stock, LAF has sole voting and
dispositve power over 826,439 shares of VCGs common stock,
LAOP has sole voting and dispositve power over 323,221 shares of
VCGs common stock, LMF has sole voting and dispositve
power over 170,074 shares of VCGs common stock, and LMOP
has sole voting and dispositve power over 66,305 shares of
VCGs common stock. According to this filing, the address
of the business office of all of the filing persons is 61
Broadway, 24th Floor, New York, NY 10006.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Based solely on an Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2010.
According to this filing, WA has shared voting and dispositve
power over 1,380,498 shares of VCGs common stock, each of
WCA, WCP, WMSFLP and WMSFLTD has shared voting and dispositve
power over 1,106,276 shares of VCGs common stock, and each
of WIA, WIP, WIFLP and WIFLTD has shared voting and dispositve
power over 210,719 shares of VCGs common stock and HFR RVA
is the beneficial owner of 63,503 shares of VCGs common
stock (the voting and dispositive power over these shares was
not reported in the filing). According to this filing, the
address of the business office of WA, WCA, WMSFLP, WIA, and
WIFLP is 3033 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 300, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55416. The address of the business office of WCP,
WMSFLTD, WIP, and WIFLTD is Trident Chambers,
P.O. Box 146, Waterfront Drive, Wickhams Cay, Road
Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. The address of the
business office of HFR is HFR RVA Combined Master Trust, 65
Front Street, Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda. According to a Form 13F
filed by WA on October 15, 2010, WA has sole investment power
over 1,180,263 shares of VCGs common stock, sole voting ,
sole voting power over 1,125,966 shares of VCGs common
stock and no voting power over 54,297 shares of VCGs
common stock.
|
Security
Ownership of Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co.
Family Dog and FD Acquisition Co. do not currently own any
shares of VCGs common stock and expressly disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock beneficially
owned by Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello. It is contemplated that
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello will contribute or will cause to
be contributed to Family Dog all shares of VCG common stock
beneficially owned by them before the effective time of the
merger. See The Merger Agreement Contribution
of VCG Common Stock to Family Dog and Conversion of Debt Held by
Family Dog.
88
Ratio of
Earnings to Fixed Charges
The following table contains VCGs ratio of earnings to
fixed charges for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1)
|
|
$
|
1,701,945
|
|
|
$
|
3,536,706
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,674
|
|
|
$
|
(39,247,508
|
)
|
Fixed charges
|
|
|
3,563,387
|
|
|
|
4,052,429
|
|
|
|
5,308,359
|
|
|
|
5,598,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings (loss) available for fixed charges
|
|
|
5,265,332
|
|
|
|
7,589,135
|
|
|
|
6,692,033
|
|
|
|
(33,648,977
|
)
|
Fixed Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,121,326
|
|
|
|
2,681,766
|
|
|
|
3,456,616
|
|
|
|
3,761,151
|
|
Estimate of interest in rental expense(2)
|
|
|
1,442,061
|
|
|
|
1,370,663
|
|
|
|
1,851,743
|
|
|
|
1,837,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Charges
|
|
$
|
3,563,387
|
|
|
$
|
4,052,429
|
|
|
$
|
5,308,359
|
|
|
$
|
5,598,531
|
|
Ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
(6.01
|
)
(3)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
does not include gain (loss) on discontinued operations and
non-controlling interests.
|
|
(2)
|
|
One third of rental expense was considered representative of the
interest factor.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The earnings for the year ended December 31, 2008 were
inadequate to cover total fixed charges due to impairment
charges of $48,006,551. The coverage deficiency for total fixed
charges was $39,247,508 at December 31, 2008.
|
Book
Value Per Share
Our net book value per share as of September 30, 2010 was
$1.51.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our Securities and Exchange Commission filings are
available to the public from the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov
,
which contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may also read
and copy any document we file at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Public Reference Room in Washington D.C.
located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of any
document we file at prescribed rates by writing to the Public
Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission at
that address. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission
at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room.
Information about us, including our Securities and Exchange
Commission filings, is also available on our website at
http://www.vcgh.com
.
Because the merger is a going private transaction,
we, Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello have filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Transaction Statement on
Schedule 13E-3
with respect to the proposed merger. The
Schedule 13E-3,
including any amendments and exhibits filed or incorporated by
reference as a part of it, is available for inspection as set
forth above. The
89
Schedule 13E-3
will be amended to report promptly any material changes in the
information set forth in the most recent
Schedule 13E-3
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Securities and Exchange Commission allows us to
incorporate by reference into this proxy statement
information in other documents we file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, which means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to those documents. Any
information referenced this way is considered to be part of this
proxy statement. Some documents or information, such as that
called for by Item 2.02 of
Form 8-K,
are deemed furnished and not filed in accordance with Securities
and Exchange Commission rules. None of those documents and none
of that information are incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement. The following documents previously filed by us
with the Securities and Exchange Commission are incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement and are deemed to be a part
hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
and amendments thereto filed March 15, 2010, April 1,
2010, April 30, 2010, May 14, 2010, June 11,
2010, June 15, 2010, July 2, 2010, July 9, 2010,
July 19, 2010, July 22, 2010, August 6, 2010,
August 9, 2010, August 13, 2010, August 17, 2010,
August 20, 2010, September 19, 2010, November 3,
2010, November 10, 2010, November 12, 2010 and
November 24, 2010
|
Specifically, the information set forth in the following
sections of VCGs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement and deemed to be a part
hereof.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1:
Business;
|
|
|
|
Item 7:
Managements Discussions and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations; and
|
|
|
|
Item 9:
Changes in and Disagreements with
Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
|
Also, the financial information set forth in Part I of
VCGs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 is
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement and deemed to
be a part hereof.
To the extent that any of the periodic reports incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement, such as annual and quarterly
reports, contain references to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to
forward-looking statement, we note that these safe harbor
provisions do not apply to any forward-looking statements we
make in connection with the going private transaction described
in this proxy statement.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated by reference
in this proxy statement shall be deemed to be modified or
superseded for all purposes to the extent that a statement
contained in this proxy statement modifies or replaces the
statement. Any statement so modified or superseded shall not be
deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute part
of this proxy statement.
We will provide a copy of any document incorporated by reference
in this proxy statement and any exhibit specifically
incorporated by reference in those documents, without charge, by
written or oral request directed to us at the following address
and telephone number: VCG Holding Corp., 390 Union Blvd.,
Suite 540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228, Attention: Corporate
Secretary,
(303) 934-2424.
Further, the reports and opinion of North Point Advisors will be
made available for inspection and copying at our principal
executive offices at the address listed in the preceding
sentence during our regular business hours by any interested
holder of our common stock.
90
Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules,
attached to this proxy statement as
Appendix D
and
Appendix E
, respectively, are the following filings
made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission: Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010. These
documents contain important information regarding VCG that you
should review in connection with considering the proposals
contained in this proxy statement.
Should you want more information regarding us, please refer to
the annual, quarterly and current reports, as applicable, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The information concerning VCG contained or incorporated by
reference in this document has been provided by us and the
information concerning Family Dog, FD Acquisition Co., Lowrie
Management LLLP, Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., LTD
Investment Group, LLC, Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello
contained in this document has been provided by Family Dog.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement to vote your
shares at the special meeting. We have not authorized anyone to
provide you with information that is different from what is
contained in this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated
February 3, 2011. You should not assume that the
information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of
any date other than that date, and neither the mailing of the
proxy statement to shareholders nor the issuance of the merger
consideration pursuant to the merger shall create any
implication to the contrary.
91
APPENDIX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 9, 2010
BY AND AMONG
FAMILY DOG, LLC
FD ACQUISITION CO.,
TROY LOWRIE,
MICHEAL OCELLO
AND
VCG HOLDING CORP.
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE I. THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section
1.01.
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section
1.02.
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section
1.03.
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section
1.04.
|
|
Effects of the Merger
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
Section
1.05.
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section
1.06.
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section
1.07.
|
|
Officers
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
ARTICLE II. EFFECT ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF PARENT AND PURCHASER;
EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section
2.01.
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section
2.02.
|
|
Company Stock Options
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section
2.03.
|
|
Converting Debt
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Section
2.04.
|
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Section
2.05.
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
ARTICLE III. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section
3.01.
|
|
Organization; Standing and Power
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Section
3.02.
|
|
Capital Structure
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section
3.03.
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Section
3.04.
|
|
No Conflicts; Consents
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Section
3.05.
|
|
Permits; Compliance
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section
3.06.
|
|
SEC Documents; Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Section
3.07.
|
|
Brokers; Schedule of Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Section
3.08.
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
ARTICLE IV. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT, PURCHASER
AND THE EXECUTIVES
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Section
4.01.
|
|
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Purchaser
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Section
4.02.
|
|
Representations and Warranties of Executives
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
ARTICLE V. COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Section
5.01.
|
|
Conduct of Business
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Section
5.02.
|
|
Other Actions
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
ARTICLE VI. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section
6.01.
|
|
Preparation of Proxy Statement; Schedule 13E-3; Shareholders
Meeting
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Section
6.02.
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section
6.03.
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts; Notification
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Section
6.04.
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
Section
6.05.
|
|
Indemnification
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Section
6.06.
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section
6.07.
|
|
Transfer Taxes
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section
6.08.
|
|
Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Section
6.09.
|
|
Third Party Consents
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section
6.10.
|
|
Voting Agreement; Transfer or Acquisition of Shares; Waiver of
Appraisal Rights
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Section
6.11.
|
|
Shareholder Litigation
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Section
6.12.
|
|
Resignations
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section
6.13.
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section
7.01.
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section
7.02.
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Purchaser
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
Section
7.03.
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Company
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
ARTICLE VIII. TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section
8.01.
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section
8.02.
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Section
8.03.
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Section
8.04.
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Section
8.05.
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Section
8.06.
|
|
Procedure for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
ARTICLE IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Section
9.01.
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Section
9.02.
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Section
9.03.
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
Section
9.04.
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.05.
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.06.
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.07.
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.08.
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.09.
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.10.
|
|
Enforcement
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
Section
9.11.
|
|
Selection of Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
A-3
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Section
|
|
A-1
|
|
Section 2.05(e)(iv)
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
Section 6.08(h)(i)
|
Affiliate
|
|
Section 9.03
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Board
|
|
Recitals
|
Board of Directors
|
|
Recitals
|
Certificate
|
|
Section 2.01(c)
|
Change in the Company Recommendation
|
|
Section 6.08(c)
|
Closing
|
|
Section 1.02
|
Closing Date
|
|
Section 1.02
|
Common Stock
|
|
Recitals
|
Company
|
|
Preamble
|
Company Acquisition Agreement
|
|
Section 6.08(h)(ii)
|
Company Disclosure Letter
|
|
Section 3.01
|
Company Material Adverse Effect
|
|
Section 3.01
|
Company Recommendation
|
|
Section 3.03(b)(iii)
|
Company Requisite Vote
|
|
Section 3.03(a)(i)
|
Company SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.06
|
Company Stock Options
|
|
Section 3.02
|
Company Stock Plans
|
|
Section 3.02
|
Company Subsidiary
|
|
Section 3.01
|
Company Termination Fee
|
|
Section 8.03(b)
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
Section 6.02
|
Consent
|
|
Section 3.04(b)
|
Contract
|
|
Section 3.04(a)(ii)
|
Company Subsidiary
|
|
Section 3.01
|
Converting Debt
|
|
Section 6.13
|
CRS
|
|
Section 1.01
|
Dissenting Shareholder
|
|
Section 2.04(a)
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
Section 2.04(a)(iii)
|
Effective Time
|
|
Section 1.03
|
Event
|
|
Section 3.01
|
Exchange Act
|
|
Section 3.04(b)(i)(C)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
Section 2.05(a)
|
Executives
|
|
Preamble
|
Executive Group
|
|
Recitals
|
Executive Group Shares
|
|
Section 4.02(d)
|
Executives Knowledge
|
|
Article III
|
Financial Advisor
|
|
Recitals
|
GAAP
|
|
Section 3.01(a)
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
Section 3.04(b)
|
HSR Act
|
|
Section 3.04(b)(vi)
|
Indemnified Parties
|
|
Section 6.05(a)
|
Judgment
|
|
Section 3.04(a)(iii)
|
Law
|
|
Section 3.04(a)(iii)
|
Liens
|
|
Section 3.04(a)
|
Liquor Laws
|
|
Section 3.05(c)(i)
|
A-4
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Lowrie
|
|
Preamble
|
Lowrie Management
|
|
Recitals
|
LTD
|
|
Recitals
|
Merger
|
|
Section 1.01
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
Section 2.01(c)
|
Ocello
|
|
Preamble
|
Outside Date
|
|
Section 8.01(b)(i)
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent Proposal
|
|
Recitals
|
Parent Termination Fee
|
|
Section 8.03(c)
|
Paying Agent
|
|
Section 2.05(a)
|
Per Share Merger Consideration
|
|
Section 2.01(c)
|
Permits
|
|
Section 3.05(c)(ii)
|
Person
|
|
Section 9.03
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 3.02
|
Prime-1
|
|
Section 2.05(e)(iv)
|
Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 3.04(b)(i)(B)
|
Public Shareholders
|
|
Recitals
|
Purchaser
|
|
Preamble
|
Purchaser Common Stock
|
|
Section 4.01(c)
|
Purchaser Disclosure Letter
|
|
Section 4.02(i)
|
Representative
|
|
Section 9.03
|
Restricted Action
|
|
Section 6.08(a)
|
Ricks LOI
|
|
Recitals
|
Schedule 13E-3
|
|
Section 3.04(b)(i)(A)
|
SEC
|
|
Section 3.04(b)
|
Securities Act
|
|
Section 3.06
|
SOB Authorities
|
|
Section 3.05(c)(iii)
|
SOB Laws
|
|
Section 3.05(c)(iv)
|
Special Committee
|
|
Section 9.03
|
Special Meeting of Shareholders
|
|
Section 3.03(a)
|
Special Requisite Vote
|
|
Section 3.03(a)(ii)
|
Statement of Merger
|
|
Section 1.03
|
Stock Repurchase Program
|
|
Section 5.01(c)
|
Subsidiary
|
|
Section 9.03
|
Superior Acquisition Proposal
|
|
Section 6.08(h)(iii)
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
Section 1.01
|
Third Party
|
|
Section 6.08(h)(i)(A)
|
Transfer
|
|
Section 6.10(b)(i)
|
Transfer Taxes
|
|
Section 6.07
|
Voting Agreement Termination
|
|
Section 6.10(a)
|
Voting Company Debt
|
|
Section 5.01(b)(ii)
|
A-5
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
This Agreement and Plan of Merger (this
Agreement
) is made and entered into as of
November 9, 2010, by and among Family Dog, LLC, a Colorado
limited liability company (
Parent
), FD
Acquisition Co., a Colorado corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent (
Purchaser
), Troy
Lowrie, an individual (
Lowrie
), Micheal
Ocello, an individual (
Ocello
, and, together
with Lowrie, the
Executives
), and VCG Holding
Corp., a Colorado corporation (the
Company
).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2009, Parent presented to the board
of directors of the Company (the
Board of
Directors
or the
Board
) a proposal
to acquire, subject to certain conditions, all of the
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in a cash
merger transaction (the
Parent Proposal
);
WHEREAS, in connection with the Parent Proposal, the Board
established the Special Committee (as defined below) to evaluate
the Parent Proposal and possible transactions with other
interested, unrelated third parties involving a sale of the
Company;
WHEREAS, the Special Committee determined on December 16,
2009, after consultation with its advisors, that the terms of
the Parent Proposal were currently inadequate and directed its
financial advisor, North Point Advisors LLC (the
Financial Advisor
), to contact any parties
that had either previously expressed an interest or might
potentially be interested in pursuing a transaction with the
Company;
WHEREAS, as a result of conducting an investigation of the
interest of other parties, the Special Committee negotiated and
approved a letter of intent with Ricks Cabaret
International, Inc. (the
Ricks LOI
),
which was executed on February 16, 2010, and provided for
Ricks Cabaret International, Inc. to acquire all of the
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in a
stock-for-stock transaction;
WHEREAS, the Ricks LOI subsequently expired on
March 31, 2010, with no definitive transaction document
being executed by the parties to the Ricks LOI;
WHEREAS, on July 22, 2010, Parent reaffirmed that it
remained willing to pursue the transactions contemplated by the
Parent Proposal on the terms originally set forth therein;
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2010, after consultation with its
advisors, the Special Committee again determined that the terms
of the Parent Proposal were currently inadequate;
WHEREAS, Purchaser now desires to acquire the entire equity
interest in the Company and to provide for the payment of $2.25
per share in cash for all shares of the issued and outstanding
common stock, par value $.0001 per share, of the Company (the
Common Stock
) other than the shares held by
the Executives, LTD Investment Group, LLC
(
LTD
) and Lowrie Management, LLLP
(
Lowrie Management
, and together with the
Executives and LTD, the
Executive Group
),
which shares are set forth on
Schedule A
attached
hereto, and the Special Committee and the Board have determined
to accept Purchasers proposal as reflected in this
Agreement;
WHEREAS, immediately prior to the execution of this Agreement by
the parties hereto, as described on
Schedule A
,
Purchaser, Parent and the Executive Group beneficially and of
record own 5,138,878 shares of the Common Stock,
constituting approximately 31.54% of the issued and outstanding
shares of the Common Stock and together with their affiliates
are holders of certain debt of the Company in the outstanding
principal amount of $6,453,136;
WHEREAS, each member of the Executive Group shall contribute to
Parent, prior to the Effective Time (as defined below), all of
the shares of the Common Stock owned by such person in exchange
for membership interests in Parent;
WHEREAS, the Special Committee and the Board have received the
opinion of the Financial Advisor, dated as of the date of this
Agreement, to the effect that, based on and subject to the
various assumptions and qualifications set forth therein, as of
the date of such opinion, the Per Share Merger Consideration (as
defined
A-6
below) to be received by the Public Shareholders (as defined
below) pursuant to the Merger (as defined below) is fair from a
financial perspective to such holders;
WHEREAS, based in part on the fairness opinion of the Financial
Advisor, the Special Committee has approved this Agreement,
determined and declared that this Agreement, the Merger and the
transactions contemplated hereby are fair to, advisable and in
the best interests of, the Companys shareholders (other
than the Executive Group, the
Public
Shareholders
) and has unanimously recommended approval
of the Merger and adoption of this Agreement by the Board of
Directors and the shareholders of the Company;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors having received and reviewed the
recommendation of the Special Committee and the opinion of the
Financial Advisor, has approved this Agreement, determined and
declared that this Agreement, the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby are fair to, advisable and in the best
interests of, the Public Shareholders and has unanimously
recommended approval of the Merger and adoption of this
Agreement by the shareholders of the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, having unanimously approved
this Agreement and adopted the Merger as set forth herein, has
determined to submit the Merger and this Agreement to the
shareholders of the Company for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Parent, Purchaser, each Executive and the Company
hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I.
THE MERGER
Section
1.01.
The
Merger.
At the Effective Time (as defined below)
and in accordance with this Agreement and
Section 7-90-203
and any other applicable provision of the Colorado Revised
Statutes (the
CRS
), Purchaser shall be merged
with and into the Company, the separate existence of Purchaser
shall cease, and the Company as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Parent shall continue as the surviving corporation under the
corporate name it possesses immediately prior to the Effective
Time (the
Merger
). The Company after the
Merger sometimes is referred to hereinafter as the surviving
corporation (the
Surviving Corporation
).
Section
1.02.
Closing.
The
closing (the
Closing
) of the Merger shall
take place at the offices of Kamlet Reichert, LLP, 950
Seventeenth Street, Suite 2400, Denver, Colorado 80202 at
10:00 a.m. (local time) on the second (2nd) business day
following the satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by Law,
waiver by the party or parties entitled to the benefits thereof)
of all of the conditions set forth in Article VII (other
than conditions that are by their nature to be satisfied or
waived at the Closing), or at such other place, time and date as
shall be agreed in writing between Parent and the Company. The
date on which the Closing occurs is referred to in this
Agreement as the
Closing Date
.
Section
1.03.
Effective
Time.
Prior to the Closing, the Company shall
prepare, and on the Closing Date shall cause to be filed with
the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, a
statement of merger (the
Statement of Merger
)
executed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the CRS
and shall make all other filings required under the CRS to
effect the Merger. The Merger shall become effective at such
time as the Statement of Merger is duly filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of Colorado, or at such later time as
Purchaser and the Company shall agree and specify in the
Statement of Merger (the time the Merger becomes effective in
accordance with the CRS being the
Effective
Time
).
Section
1.04.
Effects
of the Merger.
At the Effective Time, the effects
of the Merger shall be as provided in the applicable provisions
of this Agreement and as set forth in
Section 7-90-204
and any other applicable provision of the CRS. Without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, and subject thereto, at the
Effective Time all the rights and property of the Company and
Purchaser shall vest in the Surviving Corporation, and all debts
and liabilities of the Company and Purchaser shall become the
debts and liabilities of the Surviving Corporation.
A-7
Section
1.05.
Articles
of Incorporation and Bylaws
.
(a) At the Effective Time, the articles of incorporation of
the Company, as amended to date and as in effect immediately
prior to the Effective Time, shall be the articles of
incorporation of the Surviving Corporation, until thereafter
changed or amended as provided therein or by applicable Law.
(b) At the Effective Time, the bylaws of the Company, as in
effect immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall be the
bylaws of the Surviving Corporation, until thereafter changed or
amended as provided therein or by applicable Law.
Section
1.06.
Directors.
The
director of Purchaser immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be the director of the Surviving Corporation at the
Effective Time, until the earlier of his resignation or removal
or until his respective successors are duly elected and
qualified, as the case may be.
Section
1.07.
Officers.
The
officer of Purchaser immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be the officer of the Surviving Corporation at the
Effective Time, until the earlier of his resignation or removal
or until his respective successors are duly elected or appointed
and qualified, as the case may be.
ARTICLE II.
EFFECT ON
THE CAPITAL STOCK OF PARENT AND PURCHASER; EXCHANGE OF
CERTIFICATES
Section
2.01.
Effect
on Capital Stock.
At the Effective Time, by
virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of
Purchaser, the Company, the Surviving Corporation or the holder
of any of the following securities:
(a)
Capital Stock of Purchaser.
Each
issued and outstanding share of capital stock of Purchaser shall
be converted into and become one (1) fully paid and
non-assessable share of common stock, par value $.0001 per
share, of the Surviving Corporation.
(b)
Cancellation of Treasury and Purchaser-Owned Common
Stock.
Each share of Common Stock that is issued
and held in the treasury of the Company or issued and
outstanding and owned by Parent, including any shares issued
pursuant to Section 2.03 hereof, shall automatically be
canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no
consideration shall be delivered or deliverable in exchange
therefor.
(c)
Conversion of Common Stock.
Each
issued and outstanding share of Common Stock (other than shares
to be canceled pursuant to Section 2.01(b) hereof and,
subject to Section 2.04 hereof, any Dissenting Shares (as
defined below)) shall be converted into the right to receive
from the Surviving Corporation, and Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to pay pursuant to this Agreement, $2.25
per share in cash, without interest (the
Per Share
Merger Consideration
). The aggregate cash amount
payable upon the conversion of shares of Common Stock pursuant
to this Section 2.01(c) is referred to collectively as the
Merger Consideration
. At the Effective Time,
all such shares of Common Stock shall no longer be outstanding
and shall automatically be canceled and retired and shall cease
to exist, and each holder of a certificate that immediately
prior to the Effective Time represented any such shares of
Common Stock (each, a
Certificate
) shall
cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right
to receive the Per Share Merger Consideration with respect to
such shares, without interest, upon surrender of such
Certificate in accordance with Section 2.05.
Section
2.02.
Company
Stock Options.
Following the Effective Time,
Company Stock Options (as defined below) shall be treated in the
manner set forth in Section 6.04.
Section
2.03.
Converting
Debt.
Prior to the Closing (as defined below),
the Executive Group will assign their rights to any debt of the
Company held by them to Parent in exchange for membership
interests in Parent. In addition, certain other lenders of the
Company may elect to assign their rights to debt of the Company
held by them to Parent in exchange for membership interests in
Parent (such debt, together with the debt of the Executive Group
assigned pursuant to this Section 2.03, the
Converting Debt
). At any time after the
approval of this Agreement and the Merger by the Company
Requisite Vote and Special Requisite Vote, but prior to the
Closing Date, and in exchange for Parents agreement to
cancel the Companys obligations
A-8
with respect to the Converting Debt, at the election of Parent
in its sole discretion, the Company shall issue to Parent that
number of shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share of
the Company, equal to: (a) the aggregate outstanding
principal balance and all unpaid accrued interest on the
Converting Debt, divided by (b) the Per Share Merger
Consideration.
Section
2.04.
Dissenting
Shares
.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the
contrary, and solely to the extent available under the CRS,
shares of Common Stock that are outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time and that are held by a Company shareholder (a
Dissenting Shareholder
) who has
(i) neither voted in favor of the Merger nor executed a
writing consenting to the Merger, (ii) caused the Company
to receive, before any vote is taken at any meeting where a
notice of dissenters rights has been given to such a
shareholder, written notice of such holders intention to
demand payment for such holders shares of Common Stock in
accordance with
Section 7-113-202
of the CRS, and (iii) otherwise properly perfected and not
withdrawn or lost his, her or its rights in accordance with
Article 113 of Title 7 of the CRS (such shares being
referred to collectively as the
Dissenting
Shares
until such time as such shareholder fails to
perfect, withdraws or otherwise loses such shareholders
dissenters rights) shall not be converted into, or
represent the right to receive, the Per Share Merger
Consideration. Each Dissenting Shareholder shall be entitled to
receive payment for such shares held by it in accordance with
Section 7-113-206
of the CRS;
provided
,
however
, that if a
Dissenting Shareholder fails to perfect, withdraws or loses such
Dissenting Shareholders right to demand payment pursuant
to, or if a court of competent jurisdiction determines that such
Dissenting Shareholder is not entitled to the relief provided by
Article 113 of Title 7 of the CRS, such Dissenting
Shares held by such Dissenting Shareholder shall thereupon be
deemed to have been converted into, and represent the right to
receive, the Per Share Merger Consideration, without any
interest thereon, in the manner provided in this
Article II. Except as otherwise provided by
Article 113 of Title 7 of the CRS, the demand for
payment and deposit of certificates is irrevocable.
(b) The Company shall provide Parent with prompt notice
after receipt by the Company of any notices of intent to demand
payment or any demands for payment received by the Company from
Company shareholders seeking to become or who become Dissenting
Shareholders, withdrawals of any such notices of intent to
demand, and any other instruments served pursuant to
Article 113 of Title 7 of the CRS and received by the
Company with respect to dissenters rights. The Company
shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in all
negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands for
payment under the CRS. The Company shall not, except with the
prior written consent of Parent, unless otherwise required by
the CRS, make any payments with respect to any demands for
payment or offer to settle or settle any such demands or approve
any withdrawal or treatment of any such demands.
Section
2.05.
Exchange
of Certificates
.
(a)
Paying Agent.
Prior to the Effective
Time, Purchaser shall designate JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or
another party reasonably acceptable to the Company to act as
paying agent (the
Paying Agent
) for the
payment of the Merger Consideration upon surrender of
Certificates. Promptly following the Effective Time, Parent
shall cause the Surviving Corporation to provide to the Paying
Agent cash in an amount sufficient to pay the Merger
Consideration pursuant to Section 2.01(c) (such cash being
hereinafter referred to as the
Exchange
Fund
). All of the fees and expenses of the Paying
Agent shall be borne by the Surviving Corporation.
(b)
Exchange Procedure.
Parent and the
Surviving Corporation shall cause the Paying Agent to mail
promptly after the Effective Time (but, in any event, within
five (5) days after the Effective Time) to each holder of
record of Certificates, (i) a form of letter of transmittal
(which shall be in customary form agreed to by the Company and
Parent and shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and
risk of loss and title to Certificates shall pass, only upon
delivery of Certificates to the Paying Agent and shall be in
such form and have such other provisions as the Surviving
Corporation may reasonably specify), and (ii) instructions
for use in effecting the surrender of Certificates in exchange
for the Per Share Merger Consideration. Upon surrender of a
Certificate for cancellation to the Paying Agent, together with
such
A-9
letter of transmittal, duly completed and validly executed, and
such other documents as may reasonably be required by the Paying
Agent, the holder of such Certificate shall be entitled to
receive in exchange therefor the amount of cash into which the
shares of Common Stock theretofore represented by such
Certificate shall have been converted pursuant to
Section 2.01(c), without any interest thereon and less any
withholding of taxes, and the Certificate so surrendered shall
forthwith be canceled. Parent and the Surviving Corporation
shall enter into a paying agency agreement with the Paying Agent
in a form reasonably acceptable to the Company and which shall
provide that the Paying Agent shall promptly following any such
surrender of Certificates dispatch by mail payment of such
amount to such holder. In the event of a transfer of ownership
of Common Stock that is not registered in the transfer records
of the Company, payment may be made to a person (as defined
below) other than the person in whose name the Certificate so
surrendered is registered, if such Certificate shall be properly
endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the
person requesting such payment shall pay any transfer or other
taxes required by reason of the payment to a person other than
the registered holder of such Certificate or establish to the
satisfaction of the Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent
that such tax has been paid or is not applicable. Until
surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.05, each
Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time
to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender the
amount of cash, without interest, into which the shares of
Common Stock theretofore represented by such Certificate have
been converted pursuant to Section 2.01(c). No interest
shall be paid or shall accrue on the cash payable upon surrender
of any Certificate.
(c)
No Further Ownership Rights in Common
Stock.
The Merger Consideration paid upon
surrender of a Certificate in accordance with the terms of this
Article II shall be deemed to have been paid in full
satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of Common
Stock formerly represented by such Certificate, and after the
Effective Time there shall be no further registration of
transfers on the stock transfer books of the Surviving
Corporation of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective
Time, any Certificates are presented to the Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent for any reason, they shall be
canceled and exchanged for the amount of cash into which the
shares of Common Stock theretofore represented by such
Certificates shall have been converted as provided in this
Article II.
(d)
No Liability.
None of Purchaser, the
Company or the Paying Agent shall be liable to any person in
respect of any cash from the Exchange Fund that is required
under applicable Law to be delivered to a public official
pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar Law.
(e)
Investment of Exchange Fund; Return of Exchange
Fund.
Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall
direct the Paying Agent to invest any cash included in the
Exchange Fund only in any combination of (i) readily
marketable direct obligations issued or unconditionally
guaranteed by the Government of the United States or issued by
any agency thereof and backed by the full faith and credit of
the United States, (ii) insured certificates of deposit of,
or time deposits with, any commercial bank that is a member of
the Federal Reserve System and which issues (or the parent of
which issues) commercial paper rated as described in clause
(iv), (iii) on deposit with any commercial bank which is
organized under the Laws of the United States or any State
thereof and has combined capital and surplus of at least
$5 billion, (iv) commercial paper in an aggregate
amount of no more than $1 million per issuer outstanding at
any time, issued by any corporation organized under the Laws of
any State of the United States, rated at least
Prime-1
(or the then equivalent grade) by
Moodys Investors Services, Inc. or
A-1
(or the then equivalent grade) by Standard & Poors,
Inc., or (v) money market funds rated at least AAM or AAM-G
by Standard & Poors, Inc., as directed by Parent and
the Surviving Corporation, on a daily basis. Any interest and
other income resulting from such investments shall be paid to
the Surviving Corporation. The Surviving Corporation shall not
be entitled to the return of any amount in the possession of the
Paying Agent relating to the transactions described in this
Agreement until the date that is one (1) year after the
Effective Time. Thereafter, each holder of a Certificate
representing a share of Common Stock may surrender such
Certificate to the Surviving Corporation and (subject to
applicable abandoned property, escheat and similar Laws) receive
in exchange therefor any Per Share Merger Consideration that may
be payable upon surrender of such certificates pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement, without any interest
A-10
thereon and less any withholding for taxes, but shall have no
greater rights against the Surviving Corporation than may be
accorded to general creditors of the Surviving Corporation. If
for any reason the Exchange Fund is inadequate to pay the Merger
Consideration required to be paid pursuant to
Section 2.01(c), Parent shall promptly deposit or cause to
be deposited additional cash with the Paying Agent in an amount
sufficient to make all payments of Merger Consideration in
accordance with this Agreement. Except as contemplated by this
Article II, the Exchange Fund will not be used for any
other purpose.
(f)
Withholding Rights.
The Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent, as applicable, shall be
entitled to deduct and withhold, as required by applicable Law,
any applicable taxes from the consideration otherwise payable to
any holder of Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement, provided
that all amounts so deducted or withheld are timely remitted to
the applicable Governmental Entity.
(g)
Lost, Stolen or Destroyed
Certificates.
In the event any Certificate shall
have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the holder of such lost,
stolen or destroyed Certificate shall execute an affidavit of
that fact upon request. The holder of any such lost, stolen or
destroyed Certificate shall also deliver an indemnity, in a form
satisfactory to Parent, against any claim that may be made
against Parent, the Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent
with respect to the Certificate alleged to have been lost,
stolen or destroyed. The affidavit and any indemnity which may
be required hereunder shall be delivered to the Paying Agent or,
following the first anniversary of the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation, who shall pay in exchange for such lost,
stolen or destroyed certificate the Merger Consideration
deliverable in respect thereof as determined in accordance with
this Article II.
(h)
Adjustment to Prevent Dilution.
In
the event that following the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time the Company changes the number of shares of
Common Stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into or
exercisable for shares of Common Stock, as the case may be,
issued and outstanding by way of a reclassification, stock split
(including a reverse stock split), stock dividend or
distribution, combination, recapitalization, subdivision or
other similar transaction, the amount of Merger Consideration
payable with respect to a share of Common Stock shall be
adjusted appropriately to provide to holders of shares of Common
Stock the same economic effect contemplated by this Agreement
prior to such change.
(i)
Applicability to Certain Dissenting
Shares.
The provisions of this Section 2.05
shall also apply to Dissenting Shares that lose their status as
such, except that the obligations of the Paying Agent under this
Section 2.05 shall commence on the date of loss of such
status.
ARTICLE III.
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
The Company represents and warrants to Parent and Purchaser as
follows, except as disclosed in the Company SEC Documents (as
defined below) filed prior to the date hereof, and subject to
any facts that either Executive is actually aware or reasonably
should be aware in the performance of his duties for the Company
(referred to herein as
Executives
Knowledge
):
Section
3.01.
Organization;
Standing and Power.
Each of the Company and each
Company Subsidiary (as defined below) is duly organized and
validly existing under the Laws of the jurisdiction in which it
is organized and has full corporate power and authority and
possesses all governmental franchises, licenses, permits,
authorizations and approvals necessary to enable it to own,
lease or otherwise hold its properties and assets and to conduct
its businesses as presently conducted, other than such
franchises, licenses, permits, authorizations and approvals the
lack of which, individually or in the aggregate, would
constitute a Company Material Adverse Effect. For purposes of
this Agreement, a
Company Material Adverse
Effect
) means any event, development, change or
circumstance (any such item, an
Event
)
arising after the date of this Agreement that, either
individually or in the aggregate, has caused or would reasonably
be expected to cause a material adverse effect on the financial
condition, assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or
business of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries taken as a
whole, except in each case for any Effect resulting from,
A-11
arising out of or relating to any of the following, either alone
or in combination: (a) any change in or interpretations of
generally accepted accounting principles
(
GAAP
) or applicable Law (including the rules
and regulations of the Nasdaq stock market), (b) changes
generally affecting the economy, financial or securities
markets, (c) any natural disaster or act of God,
(d) any act of terrorism or outbreak or escalation of
hostilities or armed conflict, (e) the public announcement
of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, (f) changes in the share price or
trading volume of the Companys Common Stock or the failure
of the Company to meet its projections, or (g) the taking
of any action expressly provided for in this Agreement or
consented to in writing by Parent or Purchaser. Each of the
Company and each Company Subsidiary is duly qualified to do
business in each jurisdiction where the nature of its business
or its ownership or leasing of its properties make such
qualification necessary, except for failures to so qualify that
have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. Section 3.01 of the
letter, dated as of the date of this Agreement, from the Company
to Purchaser (the
Company Disclosure Letter
)
sets forth the name of each Company Subsidiary, its authorized
and outstanding capital stock and state of incorporation or
organization. For purposes of this Agreement,
Company
Subsidiary
means an entity (i) of which the
Company or any other Company Subsidiary is a general partner (in
the case of a partnership), or (ii) a majority of the total
voting power entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any
contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers or
trustees thereof is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly,
by the Company or by any one or more Company Subsidiaries.
Section
3.02.
Capital
Structure.
The authorized capital stock of the
Company consists of 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock and
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per
share (the
Preferred Stock
). As of the date
of this Agreement, 16,292,071 shares of Common Stock were
issued and outstanding and no shares were held in treasury or by
any Company Subsidiary. As of the date of this Agreement,
1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock have been designated as
Class A Preferred Stock, of which no shares were issued and
outstanding. Except as set forth above, no other shares of
capital stock are issued or outstanding as of the date of this
Agreement. All issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
and have no preemptive rights. As of the date of this Agreement,
there are no outstanding subscriptions, options, warrants,
rights or other arrangements or commitments obligating the
Company to issue any shares of its capital stock other than
stock options to acquire up to 231,500 shares of Common
Stock (the
Company Stock Options
) granted on
or prior to the date of this Agreement pursuant to the 2002
Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan, the 2003 Stock Option and
Stock Bonus Plan, and the 2004 Stock Option and Appreciation
Rights Plan (each as amended, collectively, the
Company
Stock Plans
). Other than as contemplated above in this
Section 3.02, there are not now, and at the Effective Time
there will not be, any outstanding bonds, debentures, notes or
other indebtedness or other securities of the Company having the
right to vote (or securities convertible into, or exchangeable
for, securities having the right to vote) on any matters on
which shareholders of the Company may vote. Except as set forth
in this Section 3.02, there are not outstanding securities,
options, warrants, calls, rights, commitments, agreements,
arrangements or undertakings of any kind to which the Company or
any Company Subsidiary is a party or by which any of them is
bound obligating the Company or any Company Subsidiary to issue,
deliver or sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold,
additional shares of capital stock or other equity or voting
securities of the Company or any Company Subsidiary or
obligating the Company or any Company Subsidiary to issue,
grant, extend or enter into any such security, option, warrant,
call, right, commitment, agreement or undertaking.
Section
3.03.
Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability
.
(a) The Company has all requisite corporate power and
authority to execute and deliver this Agreement. Subject to the
approval and adoption of this Agreement and the Merger by the
affirmative vote, at a special meeting of the Companys
shareholders duly called for the purpose in accordance with the
CRS (the
Special Meeting of Shareholders
), of
(i) a majority of the votes entitled to be cast thereon in
accordance with 7-111-103(5) of the CRS (the
Company
Requisite Vote
) and (ii) a majority of the votes
actually cast at the Special Meeting of Shareholders (the
Special Requisite Vote
), the Company has all
requisite corporate power and authority to consummate the Merger
and the transactions contemplated hereby;
provided
that,
for purposes of this Section 3.03(a), any abstaining votes,
broker
A-12
non-votes and votes cast by the Executive Group with regard to
Shares held by the Executive Group shall not be taken into
account for any purpose with regard to the Special Requisite
Vote (e.g. in calculating votes cast in favor or total votes
cast). The execution and delivery by the Company of this
Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the
transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by
all necessary corporate action on the part of the Company,
subject in the case of the consummation by the Company of the
transactions contemplated hereby to the Special Requisite Vote
and the Company Requisite Vote. The Company has duly executed
and delivered this Agreement, and this Agreement constitutes its
legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it in
accordance with its terms, subject to the effect of any
applicable bankruptcy, moratorium, insolvency, fraudulent
transfer, reorganization or other similar Law affecting the
enforceability of creditors rights generally and to the
effect of general principles of equity which may limit the
availability of remedies (whether in a proceeding at Law or in
equity). The Company Requisite Vote and the Special Requisite
Vote are the only votes of the holders of any class or series of
capital stock of the Company necessary to adopt this Agreement
and approve the transactions contemplated hereby, including the
Merger. No other vote or consent of the shareholders of the
Company is required by Law, the articles of incorporation or
bylaws of the Company or otherwise in order for the Company to
adopt this Agreement or to approve the transactions contemplated
hereby, including the Merger.
(b) The Board of Directors, at a meeting duly called and
held, acting on the recommendation of the Special Committee,
duly adopted resolutions (i) approving and declaring
advisable this Agreement, the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby, (ii) determining that the terms of
this Agreement and the Merger are fair to and in the best
interests of the Company and the Public Shareholders, and
(iii) recommending that the Companys shareholders
approve and adopt this Agreement and the Merger at the Special
Meeting (the
Company Recommendation
). No
state takeover statute or similar statute or regulation applies
to restrict or prevent the Companys ability to consummate
the Merger in accordance with this Agreement or any of the other
transactions contemplated hereby.
Section
3.04.
No
Conflicts; Consents
.
(a) Except as set forth on Section 3.04(a) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, the execution and delivery by the
Company of this Agreement does not, and the consummation of the
Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby and compliance
with the terms hereof will not, conflict with, or result in any
violation of or default (with or without notice or lapse of
time, or both) under, or result in, or give rise to, a right of
termination, cancellation or acceleration of any obligation or
to loss of a material benefit under, or result in the creation
of any pledges, liens, charges, mortgages, encumbrances and
security interests of any kind or nature whatsoever
(collectively,
Liens
) upon any of the
properties or assets of the Company or any Company Subsidiary
under, any provision of (i) the Companys articles of
incorporation, bylaws or the comparable governance or
organizational documents of any Company Subsidiary,
(ii) any contract, lease, license, indenture, note, bond,
agreement, permit, concession, franchise or other instrument (a
Contract
) to which the Company or any Company
Subsidiary is a party or by which any of their respective
properties or assets is bound, or (iii) subject to the
filings and other matters referred to in Section 3.04(b),
any judgment, order or decree (
Judgment
) or
statute, law (including common law), ordinance, rule or
regulation promulgated by any Governmental Entity (as defined
below) (
Law
) applicable to the Company or any
Company Subsidiary or their respective properties or assets.
(b) Except as set forth on Section 3.04(b) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, no consent, approval, license,
permit, order, authorization or waiver
(
Consent
) of, or registration, declaration or
filing with, or permit from, any Federal, state, local or
foreign government or any court of competent jurisdiction,
administrative agency or commission or other governmental
authority or instrumentality, domestic or foreign (a
Governmental Entity
) is required to be
obtained or made by or with respect to the Company or any
Company Subsidiary in connection with the execution, delivery
and performance of this Agreement or the consummation of the
Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby, other than
(i) the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the
SEC
) of (A) a Transaction Statement
on
Schedule 13E-3
(as amended or supplemented from time to time, the
Schedule 13E-3
),
(B) a proxy statement relating to the approval and adoption
of this Agreement and the Merger by the Company
A-13
Requisite Vote and the Special Requisite Vote (as amended or
supplemented from time to time, the
Proxy
Statement
), and (C) such other filings as may be
required under applicable securities Laws in connection with
this Agreement, the Merger and the transactions contemplated
hereby, including as required under Sections 13 and 16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act
), (ii) the filing of the
Statement of Merger with the office of the Secretary of State of
the State of Colorado and appropriate documents with the
relevant authorities of the other jurisdictions in which the
Company is qualified to do business, (iii) compliance with
and such filings as may be required under applicable
environmental Laws, (iv) such filings as may be required in
connection with the taxes described in Section 6.07,
(v) filings under any applicable state takeover Law or
state securities or blue sky Laws, (vi) filings
in connection with the premerger notification requirement of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the
HSR
Act
), if applicable to the transactions contemplated
hereby, (vii) such filings required under the delisting or
other requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market, and
(viii) such other items that, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect.
Section
3.05.
Permits;
Compliance
.
(a) The Company and each Company Subsidiary are in
possession of all Permits necessary to own, lease and operate
its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted, including Permits required under applicable Liquor
Laws, except where failure to be in possession of such Permits
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect. The Company and each Company Subsidiary are, and
have been, in compliance with the terms and conditions of such
Permits, except where failure to so comply would not reasonably
be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) The Company and each Company Subsidiary are, and at all
times have been, in compliance with all applicable Laws
(including any Liquor Law, or SOB Law), except for such
violations that would not reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) For purposes of this Agreement,
(i)
Liquor Laws
means any Laws governing
or relating to the sale of liquor,
(ii)
Permits
means all franchises,
grants, authorizations, licenses, permits, consents,
certificates and approvals of any Governmental Entity,
(iii)
SOB Authorities
means those
federal state, local or other governmental, regulatory and
administrative authorities, agencies, boards and officials
responsible for of involved in the regulation of sexually
oriented businesses or similar activities, and
(iv)
SOB Laws
means all Laws governing
or relating to sexually oriented businesses or similar
activities.
Section
3.06.
SEC
Documents; Undisclosed Liabilities.
The Company
has filed or furnished all reports, schedules, forms, statements
and other documents (including all exhibits, supplements and
amendments thereto) required to be filed or furnished by the
Company with the SEC since January 1, 2009 (such documents,
together with all exhibits and schedules thereto and all
information incorporated therein by reference and any documents
filed or furnished during such periods by the Company to the SEC
on Current Reports of
Form 8-K,
the
Company SEC Documents
). As of its
respective date, each Company SEC Document complied as to form
in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange
Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act
), as the case may be, and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including, in each case, the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder, and did not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make
the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. The consolidated financial
statements of the Company included in the Company SEC Documents
comply as to form in all material respects with applicable
accounting requirements and the published rules and regulations
of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP (except, in the case of unaudited
statements, as permitted by
Form 10-Q
of the SEC) applied on a consistent basis during the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto) and
fairly present the consolidated financial position of the
Company and the Company Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and
the consolidated results of their operations and cash flows for
the periods then ended (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal
A-14
year-end audit adjustments). Except as set forth in the Company
SEC Documents filed and publicly available prior to the date
hereof or Section 3.06 of the Company Disclosure Letter,
neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has any material
liabilities or obligations of any nature (whether accrued,
absolute, contingent or otherwise) that are not set forth on a
consolidated balance sheet of the Company or such Company
Subsidiary or in the notes thereto.
Section
3.07.
Brokers;
Schedule of Fees and Expenses.
No broker,
investment banker, financial advisor or other person, other than
the Financial Advisor, the fees of which will be paid by the
Company prior to the Closing of the Merger, is entitled to any
brokers, finders, financial advisors or other
similar fee or commission in connection with this Agreement, the
Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby based upon
arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company. The Company
has furnished to Purchaser a true and complete copy of all
agreements between the Company and the Financial Advisor
relating to the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section
3.08.
Opinion
of Financial Advisor.
The Special Committee and
the Board have received the opinion of the Financial Advisor,
dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of such
date, the Per Share Merger Consideration to be paid to the
Public Shareholders is fair from a financial point of view, a
signed copy of which opinion has been delivered to Parent and
Purchaser. The Company hereby represents and warrants that it
has been authorized by the Financial Advisor to permit the
inclusion of such Financial Advisor opinion and references
thereto in the Proxy Statement, subject to the terms of the
engagement letter, dated August 4, 2010, between the
Company and the Financial Advisor, a copy of which has been
provided to Parent and Purchaser.
ARTICLE IV.
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT, PURCHASER AND THE EXECUTIVES
Section
4.01.
Representations
and Warranties of Parent and Purchaser.
Parent
and Purchaser represent and warrant to the Company as follows:
(a) Each of Parent and Purchaser is duly organized and
validly existing under the Laws of the jurisdiction in which it
is organized and has full limited liability company or corporate
power and authority, as applicable, to conduct its businesses as
presently conducted.
(b) Since the date of its incorporation, Purchaser has not
carried on any business or conducted any operations other than
activities related to its organization and the negotiation and
the execution of this Agreement, the performance of its
obligations hereunder and matters ancillary thereto.
(c) The authorized capital stock of Purchaser consists of
1,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share
(
Purchaser Common Stock
), all of which are
owned by Parent.
(d) Each of Parent and Purchaser has all requisite limited
liability company or corporate power and authority, as
applicable, to execute and deliver this Agreement and to
consummate the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.
The execution and delivery by each of Parent and Purchaser of
this Agreement and the consummation by each of them of the
transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by
all necessary limited liability company or corporate action, as
applicable, on the part of Parent and Purchaser. Parent, as the
sole shareholder of Purchaser, has approved this Agreement and
the Merger. Each of Parent and Purchaser has duly executed and
delivered this Agreement, and this Agreement constitutes a
legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against each of
them in accordance with its terms.
(e) The execution and delivery by Parent and Purchaser of
this Agreement does not, and consummation of the Merger and the
transactions contemplated hereby and compliance with the terms
hereof and thereof will not, conflict with, or result in any
violation of or default (with or without notice or lapse of
time, or both) under, or give rise to a right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration of any obligation or to loss of a
material benefit under, or result in the creation of any Liens
upon any of the properties or assets of Parent or Purchaser
under, any provision of (i) Parents articles of
organization or operating
A-15
agreement or Purchasers articles of incorporation or
bylaws, (ii) any Contract to which Parent or Purchaser is a
party or by which any of their respective properties or assets
are bound, or (iii) subject to the filings and other
matters referred to in Section 4.01(f), any Judgment or Law
applicable to Parent or Purchaser or their respective properties
or assets.
(f) No Consent of, or registration, declaration or filing
with, any Governmental Entity is required to be obtained or made
by or with respect to Parent or Purchaser in connection with the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, other than
(i) the filing with the SEC of (A) the
Schedule 13E-3,
(B) the Proxy Statement, and (C) such other filings as
may be required under applicable securities Laws in connection
with this Agreement, the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby, including as required under
Sections 13 and 16 of the Exchange Act, (ii) the
filing of the Statement of Merger with the office of the
Secretary of State of the State of Colorado,
(iii) compliance with and such filings as may be required
under applicable environmental Laws, (iv) such filings as
may be required in connection with the taxes described in
Section 6.07, (v) filings under any applicable state
takeover Law or state securities or blue sky Laws,
(vi) filings in connection with the premerger notification
requirement of the HSR Act, if applicable to the transactions
contemplated hereby, and (vii) any matters, filings,
Permits or consents as may be required under applicable Liquor
Laws and SOB Laws.
(g) No broker, investment banker, financial advisor or
other person is entitled to any brokers, finders,
financial advisors or other similar fee or commission in
connection with the Merger and the transactions contemplated
hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Parent or
Purchaser.
(h) Except with respect to the Confidentiality Agreement
(as defined below) and Section 6.10, the Executive Group
Shares are not subject to any voting trust, proxy or similar
instrument with respect to the voting thereof.
Section
4.02.
Representations
and Warranties of Executives.
Each Executive, in
his individual capacity, severally and not jointly, represents
and warrants to the Company as follows:
(a) This Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding
obligation of such Executive enforceable against such Executive
in accordance with its terms, except to the extent that
enforceability thereof may be limited by applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, moratorium, reorganization or
other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors
rights generally and by principles of equity regarding the
availability of remedies (regardless of whether such
enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at
Law).
(b) Except with respect to any agreement between Executive
and the Company or a Company Subsidiary, the execution and
delivery by such Executive of this Agreement does not, and
consummation of the Merger and the transactions contemplated
hereby and compliance with the terms hereof will not, conflict
with, or result in any violation of or default (with or without
notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right
of termination, cancellation or acceleration of any obligation
or to loss of a material benefit under, or result in the
creation of any Liens upon any of the properties or assets of
such Executive under, any provision of (i) any Contract to
which such Executive is a party or by which any of his
properties or assets is bound, or (ii) subject to the
filings and other matters referred to in Section 4.02(c),
any Judgment or Law applicable to such Executive or his
properties or assets.
(c) No Consent of, or registration, declaration or filing
with, any Governmental Entity is required to be obtained or made
by or with respect to such Executive in connection with the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, other than
(i) filings as may be required under applicable securities
Laws in connection with this Agreement, the Merger and the
transactions contemplated hereby, including as required under
Sections 13 and 16 of the Exchange Act, and
(ii) compliance with and such filings as may be required
under applicable environmental Laws.
(d) As of the date hereof, such Executive is the beneficial
owner of the shares of Common Stock as are accurately and
completely set forth (including as to the form of ownership)
opposite such Executives
A-16
name on Schedule A, and Executive does not beneficially own
any other securities of the Company (such shares of Common Stock
and any other voting or equity interests of the Company
hereafter acquired by such Executive, any other member of the
Executive Group prior to the Voting Agreement Termination (as
defined below) in accordance with Section 6.10 being
referred to herein collectively as the
Executive Group
Shares
).
(e) Such Executive (or Lowrie Management or LTD), has the
full and sole power (together with the other Executive) to vote
or direct the voting of the Executive Group Shares set forth
opposite such Executives name on Schedule A.
(f) Such Executive has never been denied a Permit under a
Liquor Law or SOB Law or related finding of suitability by any
SOB Authority or Governmental Entity, or had any Permit granted
under any Liquor Law or SOB Law revoked or suspended.
(g) As of the date hereof, to Executives Knowledge,
none of the Companys representations and warranties set
forth in Article III of this Agreement are inaccurate or
incorrect in any material respect.
(h) Such Executive is familiar with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement that are applicable to such
Executive and agrees to be bound by such terms and conditions.
(i) Neither Parent nor Purchaser has any present
agreements, plans or intentions, as of the date of this
Agreement, directly or indirectly, with any Public Shareholder
for any Public Shareholder to acquire any equity securities
following the Closing in Parent or the Company. If any of the
parties identified in Section 4.02(i) of Purchasers
letter of even date hereof (the
Purchaser Disclosure
Letter
) vote in favor of the Merger at the Special
Meeting of the Shareholders, then prior to the sixth month
anniversary of the Closing, Parent shall not issue any debt or
equity securities to such person (other than existing debt of
the Company as of the date hereof, including any extensions of
such debt). Prior to the sixth month anniversary of the Closing,
Parent shall not issue any equity securities to any person who
was a member of the Companys Board of Directors prior to
the Closing, other than the Executive Group.
ARTICLE V.
COVENANTS
RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
Section
5.01.
Conduct
of Business.
Except as otherwise
(a) expressly permitted or contemplated by this Agreement,
(b) required by Law, or (c) with Parents prior
written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed), from the date of this Agreement to the
Effective Time, the Company shall, and shall cause each Company
Subsidiary to, conduct its business in the usual, regular and
ordinary course in substantially the same manner as previously
conducted or proposed to be conducted and use commercially
reasonable efforts to preserve intact its current business
organization, keep available the services of its current
officers and employees and keep its relationships with
customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees, distributors and
others having business dealings with them;
provided
,
however
, that any action taken or failure to act by or at
the express direction of either Executive that would otherwise
constitute a breach of this Section 5.01 shall not be
deemed to constitute such a breach. In addition, and without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as otherwise
(i) expressly permitted or contemplated by this Agreement,
(ii) required by Law, or (iii) with Parents
prior written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed), from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, the Company shall not, and
shall not permit any Company Subsidiary to, do any of the
following:
(a) (i) declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or
make any other distributions in respect of, any of its capital
stock, other than dividends and distributions by a Company
Subsidiary to Company or another Company Subsidiary,
(ii) other than in the case of a direct or indirect wholly
owned Company Subsidiary, split, combine, recapitalize,
subdivide or reclassify any of its capital stock or issue or
authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect of, in
lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock, or
(iii) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of
capital stock of the Company
A-17
or any Company Subsidiary or any other securities thereof or any
rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares or other
securities;
(b) issue, deliver, sell or grant (i) any shares of
its capital stock, including, without limitation, any shares of
the Preferred Stock, (ii) any debentures, bonds, notes or
other indebtedness having the right to vote (
Voting
Company Debt
) or any other voting securities,
(iii) any securities convertible into or exchangeable for,
or any options, warrants or rights to acquire, any such shares,
Voting Company Debt, voting securities or convertible or
exchangeable securities, or (iv) any phantom
stock, phantom stock rights, stock appreciation
rights or stock-based performance units, other than the issuance
of Common Stock upon the exercise of Company Stock Options
outstanding on the date of this Agreement and in accordance with
their present terms;
(c) repurchase any equity securities of the Company
(including pursuant to the Stock Repurchase Program dated
July 26, 2007 (the
Stock Repurchase
Program
)) or otherwise;
(d) amend or propose any change to its or any Company
Subsidiarys articles of incorporation, bylaws or other
comparable governance or organizational documents;
(e) amend or propose any change to the voting powers, full
or limited, or no voting powers,
and/or
the
designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional
or other special rights,
and/or
the
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof as provided
by Colorado Law, of the Preferred Stock;
(f) merge or consolidate with any other person or acquire
assets or equity securities of any other person;
(g) sell, lease, license, subject to a Lien, encumber or
otherwise surrender, relinquish or dispose of any assets,
property or rights (including capital stock of a Company
Subsidiary) except (i) pursuant to existing Contracts or
commitments, or (ii) in the ordinary course, consistent
with past practice;
(h) other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, (i) make any loans, advances
or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other person
or (ii) create, incur, guarantee or assume any indebtedness
for borrowed money or issue debt securities;
provided
that the loans or advances to employees permitted under this
Section 5.01(h) shall not exceed $10,000 in any individual
case;
(i) make any capital expenditure other than in the ordinary
course of business;
(j) grant any increase in the compensation or benefits of
directors, officers, employees, consultants, representatives or
agents of the Company or any Company Subsidiary other than as
required by any plan or arrangement in effect on the date hereof
and payments or increases for non-executive officer employees in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(k) hire or terminate the employment or contractual
relationship of any officer or employee of the Company or any
Company Subsidiary, as the case may be, other than hirings or
terminations in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice or that, individually and in the aggregate, would
not result in (i) a material increase in the number of
persons providing services to the Company or any Company
Subsidiary in all such capacities or (ii) in the case of
hirings, a material increase in the aggregate payroll and other
benefits costs to the Company or such Company Subsidiary (such
increase to be determined, in the case of a hiring to replace an
employee or other service provider in a pre-existing position
based solely on the costs in excess of the costs associated with
the replaced service provider), and (iii) in the case of
terminations, material liability to the Company or any Company
Subsidiary in excess of the costs savings, if any, directly
derived from such terminations;
(l) settle or compromise any action, suit, claim,
litigation, proceeding, arbitration, investigation, audit or
controversy involving claims, liabilities or obligations
material to the Company and the Company Subsidiaries taken as a
whole, or enter into any consent, decree, injunction or similar
restraint or form of equitable relief in settlement of any
material proceeding;
(m) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization of the Company or any Company Subsidiary; or
A-18
(n) authorize any of, or commit or agree to take any of,
the foregoing actions;
Except as otherwise (i) expressly permitted or contemplated
by this Agreement, (ii) required by Law, or (iii) with
the prior written consent of the Company, acting through the
Special Committee (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed), (A) neither Executive will cause
the Company or any Company Subsidiary to take or refrain from
taking an action that would constitute a breach of this
Section 5.01 absent the foregoing provision, and
(B) neither Parent, Purchaser or either Executive nor any
of their respective affiliates, will enter into, modify or
terminate any Contract with the Company or any Company
Subsidiary.
Section
5.02.
Other
Actions.
From the date hereof through the Closing
Date, the Company, Purchaser, Parent and the Executives shall
use commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary under applicable Laws required for the consummation of
the Merger, and to effect all necessary filings, consents,
waivers, authorizations, Permits and approvals from Governmental
Entities and other third parties required for the consummation
of the Merger.
ARTICLE VI.
ADDITIONAL
AGREEMENTS
Section
6.01.
Preparation
of Proxy Statement;
Schedule 13E-3;
Shareholders Meeting
.
(a) In cooperation with and subject to the review and
approval of the Special Committee or the Board, as promptly as
reasonably practicable following the date of this Agreement, the
Company shall prepare the Proxy Statement, and the parties shall
jointly prepare the
Schedule 13E-3;
provided
that the Company shall use its best efforts to
complete the Proxy Statement within 10 business days of the
execution of this Agreement. Parent, Purchaser and the Company
shall cooperate with each other in connection with the
preparation of the foregoing documents. The Company (acting
through or in cooperation with the Special Committee) will use
commercially reasonable efforts to have the Proxy Statement, and
the parties will use commercially reasonable efforts to have the
Schedule 13E-3,
cleared by the SEC as promptly as reasonably practicable after
such filing.
(b) The Company (acting through or in cooperation with the
Special Committee) will use commercially reasonable efforts to
cause the Proxy Statement to be mailed to the Companys
shareholders as promptly as reasonably practicable after the
Proxy Statement is cleared by the SEC. The Company shall as
promptly as reasonably practicable notify Parent of the receipt
of any oral or written comments from the SEC relating to the
Proxy Statement. The Company (acting through or in cooperation
with the Special Committee) shall cooperate and provide Parent
with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the draft
of the Proxy Statement (including each amendment or supplement
thereto), and the parties hereto shall cooperate and provide
each other with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment
on the draft
Schedule 13E-3
(including each amendment or supplement thereto) and all
responses to requests for additional information by and replies
to comments of the SEC, prior to filing such with or sending
such to the SEC, and the parties hereto will provide each other
with copies of all such filings made and correspondence with the
SEC. The Company (acting through or in cooperation with the
Special Committee), Parent and Purchaser will cause each of
(i) the Proxy Statement and any amendment or supplement
thereto, and (ii) the
Schedule 13E-3
and any amendment or supplement thereto, when filed, to comply
as to form in all material respects with the applicable
requirements of the Exchange Act. Each of the Company (acting
through or in cooperation with the Special Committee), Parent,
Purchaser and each Executive agrees that none of the information
supplied by it for inclusion in the Proxy Statement or any
amendment or supplement thereto or in the
Schedule 13E-3
or any amendment or supplement thereto will, (i) in the
case of the Proxy Statement, at the time the Proxy Statement or
any amendment or supplement thereto is first mailed to the
Companys shareholders, at the time of any amendment or
supplement thereto, and at the time of the Company Shareholders
Meeting, and (ii) in the case of the
Schedule 13E-3,
at the time it is first filed with the SEC and at the time of
any amendment thereto, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in
order to
A-19
make the statements made therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. If at
any time prior to the Effective Time, any information should be
discovered by any party which should be set forth in an
amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement or the
Schedule 13E-3
so that the Proxy Statement or the
Schedule 13E-3
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, the
party which discovers such information shall promptly notify the
other parties hereto and, to the extent required by applicable
Law, an appropriate amendment or supplement describing such
information shall be promptly filed by the Company (subject to
Parents review and comment) with the SEC and disseminated
by the Company to the shareholders of the Company.
(c) The Company (acting through or in cooperation with the
Special Committee) shall, as soon as reasonably practicable
following the date hereof, take all action necessary in
accordance with the CRS and the Companys articles of
incorporation and bylaws to duly call, give notice of, convene
and hold the Special Meeting of Shareholders for the purpose of
seeking the approval by the holders of Common Stock of this
Agreement and the Merger. The Proxy Statement shall include the
Company Recommendation, and no Change in the Company
Recommendation (as defined below) shall be made except as
permitted under Section 6.08(c). Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the Company agrees that its
obligations pursuant to the first sentence of this
Section 6.01(c) shall not be affected by a Change in the
Company Recommendation unless, prior to the Special Meeting of
Shareholders, this Agreement is terminated pursuant to
Article VIII and the Company Termination Fee (as defined
below) concurrently paid to Parent. Subject to the terms of this
Agreement, the Company shall use its commercially reasonable
efforts to solicit from its Public Shareholders proxies in favor
of the adoption and approval of this Agreement and the approval
of the Merger and shall take all other action necessary or
advisable to secure the Company Requisite Vote. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the
Company may adjourn or postpone the Special Meeting of
Shareholders to the extent necessary to ensure that any
necessary supplement or amendment to the Proxy Statement is
provided to the Companys Public Shareholders in advance of
a vote on the Merger and this Agreement or, if as of the time
for which the Company Shareholders Meeting is originally
scheduled (as set forth in the Proxy Statement) there are
insufficient shares of Company Common Stock represented (either
in person or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to
conduct the business of the Special Meeting of Shareholders. The
Company shall ensure that the Special Meeting of Shareholders is
called, noticed, convened, held and conducted, and that all
proxies solicited by the Company in connection with the Special
Meeting of Shareholders are solicited, in compliance with the
CRS, the Companys articles of incorporation and bylaws,
and all other applicable legal requirements.
Section
6.02.
Access
to Information; Confidentiality.
The Company
shall, and shall cause each Company Subsidiary to, afford to
Parent, and to Parents officers, employees, accountants,
counsel, financial advisors and other representatives,
reasonable access during normal business hours during the period
prior to the Effective Time to all their respective properties,
books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records and, during
such period, the Company shall, and shall cause each Company
Subsidiary to, furnish promptly to Parent (a) a copy of
each report, schedule, registration statement and other document
filed by it during such period pursuant to the requirements of
federal or state securities Laws, and (b) all other
information concerning its business, properties and personnel as
Parent may reasonably request. Any information furnished
pursuant to this Section 6.02 shall be subject to the terms
of the Standstill and Confidentiality Agreement between the
Company, Lowrie, Lowrie Management, LLLP and Parent, dated as of
December 3, 2009 (the
Confidentiality
Agreement
), and Purchaser agrees to be bound by and
subject to the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement to the
same extent as Lowrie, Lowrie Management, LLLP and Parent.
Section
6.03.
Reasonable
Best Efforts; Notification
.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in this Agreement, each of the parties hereto shall use its
reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and
cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, in the
most expeditious manner reasonably practicable, the
A-20
Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby, including
(i) the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions,
waivers, consents and approvals from Governmental Entities and
the making of all necessary registrations and filings (including
filings with Governmental Entities, if any) and the taking of
all reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval
or waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any
Governmental Entity, including under applicable Liquor Laws and
SOB Laws, (ii) the obtaining of all necessary consents,
approvals or waivers from third parties, (iii) making all
necessary filings, and thereafter making any other required
submissions, with respect to this Agreement and the Merger
required under the HSR Act and any related governmental request
thereunder and under any other applicable Law, (iv) the
defending of any lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether
judicial or administrative, challenging this Agreement, the
Merger or the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby, including seeking to have any stay or temporary
restraining order entered by any court or other Governmental
Entity vacated or reversed, and (v) the execution and
delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate
the transactions contemplated hereby and to fully carry out the
purposes of this Agreement. The Company (acting through or in
cooperation with the Special Committee), Parent, Purchaser and
each Executive shall cooperate with each other in connection
with the making of all such filings, including providing copies
of all such documents to the non-filing party and its advisors
prior to filing and, if requested, to accept all reasonable
additions, deletions or changes suggested in connection
therewith. The Company (acting through or in cooperation with
the Special Committee), Parent, Purchaser and the Executives
shall use their respective reasonable best efforts to furnish to
each other all information required for any application or other
filing to be made pursuant to the rules and regulations of any
applicable Law (including all information required to be
included in the Proxy Statement and the
Schedule 13E-3)
in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this
Agreement shall be deemed to require any party to agree to any
substantial limitation on its operations or to dispose of any
significant asset or collection of assets.
(b) The Company (acting through or in cooperation with the
Special Committee) shall give prompt notice to Parent and
Purchaser, and Parent and Purchaser shall give prompt notice to
the Company, of the discovery of any fact or circumstance that,
or the occurrence or non-occurrence of any event the occurrence
or non-occurrence of which, would reasonably likely to cause or
result in any of the conditions set forth in Article VII
not being satisfied;
provided
,
however
, that no
such notification shall affect the representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements of the parties or the conditions to the
obligations of the parties under this Agreement.
Section
6.04.
Stock
Options.
(a) As soon as reasonably practicable following the date of
this Agreement, the Board of Directors (or, if appropriate, any
committee thereof with responsibility for the administration of
the Company Stock Plans) shall adopt such resolutions or take
such other actions to provide that, unless required by the
applicable Company Stock Plan, each unvested Company Stock
Option outstanding at the Effective Time is terminated and each
vested and, if required by the applicable Company Stock Plan,
unvested Company Stock Option outstanding at the Effective Time
shall be converted into the right to receive from the Surviving
Corporation an amount equal to (i) the excess, if any, of
(A) the Per Share Merger Consideration
over
(B) the exercise price per share of Common Stock subject to
such Company Stock Option,
multiplied
by (ii) the
number of shares of Common Stock for which such Company Stock
Option shall not theretofore have been exercised.
(b) All amounts payable pursuant to this Section 6.04
shall be subject to any required withholding of taxes required
by applicable Law and shall be paid without interest. The
Company shall provide all appropriate notices as shall be
necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary contained in this Agreement, payment as to a
particular holder shall, at Purchasers request, be
withheld in respect of any Company Stock Option until all
necessary notices are given and consents are obtained from such
holder.
(c) The Company Stock Plans shall terminate as of the
Effective Time, and the provisions in any other benefit plan
providing for the issuance, transfer or grant of any capital
stock of the Company or any
A-21
interest in respect of any capital stock of the Company shall be
deleted as of the Effective Time, and the Company shall ensure
that following the Effective Time no holder of a Company Stock
Option or any participant in any Company Stock Plans shall have
any right thereunder to acquire any capital stock of the Company
or the Surviving Corporation.
(d) As of the date hereof, the Company has terminated the
Stock Repurchase Program.
Section
6.05.
Indemnification
.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall, and
shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, to the fullest extent
permitted under applicable Law, indemnify and hold harmless each
present and former director and officer of the Company
(collectively, the
Indemnified Parties
)
against any costs or expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims,
damages, liabilities and amounts paid in settlement in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, arising out of or pertaining to any facts or
events existing or occurring at or prior to the Effective Time
(including the Merger);
provided
,
however
, that
the foregoing obligation to indemnify the Indemnified Parties
shall not apply to any claims, actions, suits, proceedings or
investigations for which the Company is prohibited from
providing indemnification under the CRS or the Companys
articles of incorporation or bylaws. From and after the
Effective Time, Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to, advance expenses (including the costs and
expenses of any investigation or preparation incurred in
connection therewith) to an Indemnified Party, as incurred, to
the fullest extent permitted under applicable Law. In the event
of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation
arising after the Effective Time, (i) the Indemnified
Parties shall promptly notify Parent, Purchaser or the Surviving
Corporation thereof,
provided
,
however
, that
failure to provide such notice shall relieve Parent, Purchaser
or the Surviving Corporation of its indemnification obligation
only to the extent that Parent, Purchaser or the Surviving
Corporation, as the case may be, is actually prejudiced thereby,
(ii) none of Parent, Purchaser or the Surviving Corporation
shall be obligated to pay for more than one (1) firm of
counsel for all Indemnified Parties, except to the extent that
(A) an Indemnified Party has been advised by counsel that
there are conflicting interests between it and any other
Indemnified Party, or (B) local counsel, in addition to
such other counsel, is required to effectively defend against
such action or proceeding, and (iii) none of Parent,
Purchaser or the Surviving Corporation shall be liable for any
settlement effected without its written consent, which shall not
be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. None of
Parent, Purchaser or the Surviving Corporation shall have any
obligation hereunder to any Indemnified Party when and if a
court of competent jurisdiction shall ultimately determine (and
such determination shall have become final and not subject to
appeal) that the indemnification of such Indemnified Party in
the manner contemplated hereby is prohibited by applicable Law.
(b) Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation
to obtain or maintain in effect tail policies to the
Companys current directors and officers
liability insurance, which tail policies (i) shall be
effective for a period of six years after the Effective Time
with respect to claims arising from acts or omissions occurring
prior to the Effective Time with respect to those persons who
are currently covered by the Companys directors and
officers liability insurance and (ii) shall contain
terms with respect to coverage and amount no less favorable, in
the aggregate, than those of such policy or policies as in
effect on the date hereof. Notwithstanding the immediately
preceding sentence, if the tail polices described in the
immediately preceding sentence cannot be maintained or obtained
or can only be maintained or obtained by paying aggregate
premiums in excess of 150% of the aggregate annual amount
currently paid by the Company for such coverage, the Surviving
Corporation shall only be required to provide as much coverage
as can be maintained or obtained by paying aggregate premiums
equal to 150% of the aggregate annual amount currently paid by
the Company for such coverage. The current policies of
directors and officers liability insurance
maintained by the Company with respect to claims arising from or
related to facts or events that occurred at or before the
Effective Time until the expiration of such insurance policies
pursuant to the terms thereof.
A-22
(c) If Parent or the Surviving Corporation or any of their
respective successors or assigns (i) shall consolidate with
or merge with or into any other corporation or entity and shall
not be the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such
consolidation or merger, or (ii) shall transfer all or
substantially all of its properties or assets to any person,
then, and in each such case, proper provision shall be made so
that the successors and assigns of Parent or the Surviving
Corporation shall assume all of the obligations of Parent and
the Surviving Corporation set forth in this Section 6.05.
(d) The parties hereto intend that the provisions of this
Section 6.05 be for the benefit of, and will be enforceable
by, each Indemnified Party and are in addition to, and not in
substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or
contribution that any such Indemnified Person may have by
contract or otherwise.
(e) The rights of the Indemnified Parties under this
Section 6.05 shall be in addition to any rights such
Indemnified Parties may have under the organizational and
governance documents of the Company or any Company Subsidiary,
or under any applicable agreements or other documents or Laws.
Parent, Purchaser and the Surviving Corporation hereby agree
that all provisions relating to exculpation, advancement of
expenses and indemnification for acts or omissions occurring
prior to the Effective Time existing in favor of an Indemnified
Party as provided in the organizational and governance documents
of the Company or any Company Subsidiary, or under any
applicable agreements or documents, shall remain in full force
and effect, and Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall
continue to honor such provisions, for a period of the lesser
of: (i) the remaining term of any such applicable agreement
or document, or (ii) six (6) years commencing at the
Effective Time to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law.
Section
6.06.
Public
Announcements.
Parent, Purchaser and the Company
(acting through the Special Committee) shall consult with each
other before issuing, and provide each other the opportunity to
review and comment upon, any press release or other public
statements with respect to the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby and shall not issue any such press release
or make any such public statement prior to such consultation,
except (i) with respect to the announcement of any Change
in the Company Recommendation, or (ii) as may be required
by applicable Law, court process or by obligations pursuant to
any listing agreement with any national securities exchange or
the Nasdaq Global Market.
Section
6.07.
Transfer
Taxes.
All stock transfer, real estate transfer,
documentary, stamp, recording and other similar taxes (including
interest, penalties and additions to any such taxes)
(
Transfer Taxes
) incurred in connection with
the Merger shall be paid by, and Parent shall cause such
Transfer Taxes to be paid by, the Surviving Corporation, and the
Company shall cooperate with Parent and Purchaser in preparing,
executing and filing any tax returns with respect to such
Transfer Taxes.
Section
6.08.
Acquisition
Proposals.
(a) The Company shall not, nor shall it authorize or permit
any Company Subsidiary, nor shall it authorize any of its or the
Company Subsidiaries respective officers, directors,
employees or agents to (and shall use all reasonable efforts to
cause such persons not to), directly or indirectly
(1) initiate, solicit or facilitate or encourage any
inquiry or the making of any proposal that constitutes or would
reasonably be expected to lead to a Acquisition Proposal, or
(2) participate in any substantive discussions or
negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any information
or data with respect to the Company, or otherwise cooperate with
or take any other action to facilitate, any proposal that
constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any
Acquisition Proposal (as defined below), or requires the Company
to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the Merger or any
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement (each, a
Restricted Action
). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, prior to the Company Requisite Vote, the Company may,
in response to a
bona fide
written Acquisition Proposal
that did not result from a breach of this Section 6.08(a)
and subject to compliance with Section 6.08(c):
(i) furnish information or data with respect to the Company
and each Company Subsidiary to the person making such
Acquisition Proposal pursuant to and in accordance with a
confidentiality agreement (each in a form approved by the
Special Committee, provided that such agreement shall not
prohibit the Company from complying with the terms of
Section 6.08);
provided
that all such
A-23
information provided to such person has previously been provided
to Parent or is provided to Parent prior to or concurrently with
the time it is provided to such person; and
(ii) participate in discussions or negotiations with such
person regarding such Acquisition Proposal,
provided
, in
each case, that the Special Committee determines in good faith,
by resolution duly adopted after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and the Financial Advisor that such Acquisition
Proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to
a Superior Acquisition Proposal.
(b) The Company shall provide Parent with a written summary
of the material terms and conditions of each Acquisition
Proposal received as promptly as practicable after the receipt
by the Company of any Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry with
respect to, or that would reasonably be expected to lead to, any
Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall keep Parent informed on
a reasonably current basis of the status of any such Acquisition
Proposal, including any changes to the price or other material
terms and conditions thereof. For purposes of the foregoing, an
Acquisition Proposal or inquiry will be deemed to be received by
the Company only if and when the Board or Special Committee
receives notice of same.
(c) Neither the Board of Directors nor any committee
thereof (including the Special Committee) shall, directly or
indirectly, withdraw or modify (or publicly propose to withdraw
or modify) in any manner adverse to Parent the Company
Recommendation or approve or recommend (or publicly propose to
approve or recommend) an Acquisition Proposal (collectively, a
Change in the Company Recommendation
) unless
it determines in good faith, by resolution duly adopted after
consultation with its outside legal counsel and the Financial
Advisor, that the failure to do so would present a substantial
risk of being inconsistent with the fulfillment of its fiduciary
duties under applicable Law. Notwithstanding any Change in the
Company Recommendation, this Agreement shall be submitted to the
shareholders of the Company at the Special Meeting of
Shareholders for the purpose of adopting this Agreement and
approving the Merger, unless the Agreement is terminated
pursuant to Article VIII and the Company Termination Fee is
concurrently paid to Parent.
(d) At any time prior to the Company Requisite Vote and the
Special Requisite Vote, if the Company receives an Acquisition
Proposal that the Special Committee (or the Board of Directors)
concludes in good faith after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and the Financial Advisor constitutes a Superior
Acquisition Proposal (as defined below), then the Board of
Directors
and/or
the
Special Committee may (i) cause the Company to terminate
this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(f), or
(ii) cause the Company to enter into a Company Acquisition
Agreement and concurrently terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.01(f);
provided
, that the Company shall
not terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 8.01(f)
unless concurrently with such termination the Company pays to
Parent the Company Termination Fee as contemplated by
Section 8.03(b)(ii);
provided
,
further
, that,
the Board of Directors
and/or
the
Special Committee may not terminate this agreement pursuant to
Section 8.01(f) unless (A) the Special Committee shall
have first provided prior written notice to Parent that it is
prepared to take such action in response to a Superior
Acquisition Proposal, which notice shall attach the most current
version of any written agreement relating to the transaction
that constitutes such Superior Acquisition Proposal, and
(B) Parent does not make, within five (5) business
days after the receipt of such notice, a proposal that the
Special Committee determines in good faith, after consultation
with its outside legal counsel and the Financial Advisor, is at
least as favorable to the Public Shareholders as such Superior
Acquisition Proposal. The Company agrees that, during the five
(5) business day period prior to taking an action
contemplated by clauses (i) or (ii) above, the Company
(as directed by the Special Committee) shall negotiate in good
faith with Parent regarding any revisions to the terms of the
transaction contemplated by this Agreement proposed by Parent.
Notwithstanding any Change in the Company Recommendation, this
Agreement shall be submitted to the shareholders of the Company
at the Special Meeting of Shareholders for the purpose of
adopting this Agreement and approving the Merger,
provided
,
however
, that this Agreement shall not
be required to be submitted to the shareholders of the Company
at the Special Meeting of Shareholders if this Agreement has
been terminated pursuant to Article VIII and concurrently
with such termination the Company has paid to Parent the Company
Termination Fee as contemplated by Section 8.03(b)(ii).
A-24
(e) Nothing contained in this Section 6.08 shall
prohibit the Company from complying with the Exchange Act,
including
Rules 14d-9
and
14e-2
thereunder, in respect of any Acquisition Proposal or otherwise
making any disclosure to the shareholders of the Company if the
Special Committee or Board of Directors determines in good
faith, by resolution duly adopted after consultation with its
outside counsel, that the failure to make such disclosure
(i) would breach its fiduciary duties to the shareholders
of the Company under applicable Law or (ii) would be
inconsistent with its obligations under applicable securities
Laws and regulations (including the rules and regulations of the
Nasdaq stock market).
(f) Neither Parent, Purchaser, the Executives nor any of
their respective affiliates (other than the Company and the
Company Subsidiaries) shall take any action with the purpose of
discouraging or preventing any person from making an Acquisition
Proposal or, once made, from continuing to pursue such
Acquisition Proposal;
provided
, that the foregoing shall
not prevent Parent, Purchaser or the Executives from enforcing
their rights hereunder or any other agreement that Executive or
their respective affiliates have entered into, or any rights
arising out of their ownership of Common Stock in the Company.
(g) Nothing contained in this Section 6.08 shall
prohibit the Company from responding to any unsolicited proposal
or inquiry solely by advising the person making such proposal or
inquiry of the terms of this Section 6.08.
(h) For purposes of this Agreement:
(i)
Acquisition Proposal
means any
proposal or offer in respect of (A) a tender or exchange
offer, merger, consolidation, business combination, share
exchange, reorganization, recapitalization, liquidation,
dissolution, or similar transaction involving the Company with
any person other than Parent or any affiliate thereof (a
Third Party
) pursuant to which such Third
Party would acquire more than twenty percent (20%) of the
outstanding capital stock of the Company, (B) the
Companys acquisition of any Third Party in a transaction
in which the shareholders of the Third Party immediately prior
to consummation of such transaction will own more than twenty
percent (20%) of the Companys outstanding capital stock
immediately following such transaction, including the issuance
by the Company of more than twenty percent (20%) of its
outstanding capital stock as consideration for assets or
securities of a Third Party, or (C) any direct or indirect
acquisition by any Third Party of twenty percent (20%) or more
of the outstanding capital stock of the Company or of twenty
percent (20%) or more of the consolidated assets of the Company
and the Company Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a single
transaction or a series of related transactions.
(ii)
Company Acquisition Agreement
means, with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, any written
term sheet, letter of intent, memorandum of understanding,
merger agreement or other agreement, arrangement or
understanding which is approved by the Special Committee or the
Board of Directors and duly authorized and executed by the
Company.
(iii)
Superior Acquisition Proposal
means any bona fide written proposal or offer made by a Third
Party in respect of an Acquisition Proposal, which the Special
Committee determines in good faith, by resolution duly adopted
after consultation with its outside counsel and the Financial
Advisor, would result in a transaction that if consummated would
be more favorable from a financial point of view to the Public
Shareholders than the Merger (including any proposal by Parent
to amend the terms of this Agreement), and is reasonably capable
of being consummated on the terms so proposed taking into
account all financial, regulatory, legal and other aspects of
such proposal.
Section
6.09.
Third
Party Consents.
Between the date hereof and the
Effective Time, the Company shall use all reasonable efforts to
obtain the third party consents set forth in Section 6.09
of the Company Disclosure Letter.
Section
6.10.
Voting
Agreement; Transfer or Acquisition of Shares; Waiver of
Appraisal Rights
.
(a) Each of Parent, Purchaser and the Executives hereby
covenants and agrees that until the earlier of the termination
of this Agreement in accordance with its terms and the Effective
Time (the
Voting
A-25
Agreement Termination
), at the Special Meeting of
Shareholders or any other meeting of the shareholders of the
Company, however called, and in any action by written consent of
the shareholders of the Company, that each such person will
vote, or cause to be voted, all of the shares of Common Stock
then owned beneficially or of record by such persons and their
respective affiliates, as of the record date for such meeting or
consent, in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and the
approval of the Merger and any actions required in furtherance
thereof, as this Agreement may be modified or amended from time
to time. For purposes of this Section 6.10, the Company and
the Company Subsidiaries shall not be deemed to be affiliates of
Parent, Purchaser or either of the Executives.
(b) Each of Parent, Purchaser and the Executives hereby
covenants and agrees from the execution and delivery of this
Agreement until the Voting Agreement Termination that, except as
otherwise contemplated by this Agreement, neither any of such
persons nor any of their respective affiliates will directly or
indirectly (i) sell, assign, transfer, tender, pledge,
encumber or otherwise dispose of (collectively,
Transfer
) any of the shares of Common Stock
held by such person to a third party, (ii) deposit any of
such shares of Common Stock into a voting trust or enter into a
voting agreement or arrangement with respect to such shares of
Common Stock or grant any proxy or power of attorney with
respect thereto that is inconsistent with this
Section 6.10, (iii) enter into any Contract, option or
other arrangement or undertaking with respect to the direct or
indirect Transfer of any such shares of Common Stock to a third
party, (iv) enter into any hedging transactions, borrowed
or loaned shares, swaps or other derivative security, Contract
or instruction in any way related to the price of the Common
Stock, or (v) take any action that would make any
representation or warranty of either of the Executives contained
in Section 4.02 untrue or incorrect or have the effect of
preventing, materially delaying or materially impairing either
of the Executives from performing his obligations under this
Section 6.10.
(c) Each of Parent, Purchaser and the Executives covenants
and agrees from the execution and delivery of this Agreement
until the Voting Agreement Termination that, except as otherwise
contemplated by this Agreement, none of such persons nor any of
their respective affiliates (which, for the purposes of this
Section 6.10(c), shall include any person with whom any
such person is part of a group as defined in
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) shall or shall permit
any of its representatives or agents on its behalf to
(i) in any manner acquire, agree to acquire or make any
proposal to acquire, directly or indirectly, alone or in concert
with any other person, any securities or property of the Company
or any Company Subsidiary, or any rights or options to acquire
any such securities or property (including, but not limited to,
beneficial ownership of such securities or property as defined
in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), (ii) except at the specific
written request of the Special Committee, propose to enter into,
directly or indirectly, any merger or business combination
involving the Company or any Company Subsidiary, or to purchase,
directly or indirectly, a material portion of the assets of the
Company, (iii) make, or participate in, directly or
indirectly, any solicitation of proxies
(as those terms are used in the proxy rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission) to vote, or seek to advise or influence
any person with respect to the voting of any securities of the
Company in respect of or related to the matters set forth in
clauses (i) and (ii) above, (iv) enter into any
contract, arrangement or understanding with any person or
group (as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act) with respect to any securities of the Company or
any Company Subsidiary, including but not limited to any joint
venture, loan or option agreement, put or call, guarantee of
loans, guarantee of profits or division of losses or profits,
(v) disclose any intention, plan or arrangement
inconsistent with the foregoing, or (vi) advise, assist or
encourage any other persons in connection with any of the
foregoing.
(d) Each of Parent, Purchaser and the Executives hereby
waives, to the full extent of the Law, and agrees not to assert,
any dissenters rights pursuant to the CRS or any similar
rights in connection with the Merger with respect to any and all
Executive Group Shares.
Section
6.11.
Shareholder
Litigation.
The Company shall give Parent the
opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of, and
keep Parent reasonably informed regarding any shareholder
litigation against the Company
and/or
its
directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, whether commenced prior to or after the execution and
delivery of this Agreement. The Company agrees that it shall not
settle or offer to settle any litigation commenced prior to or
after the date hereof against the Company or
A-26
any of its directors or executive officers by any shareholder of
the Company relating to this Agreement, the Merger, any other
transaction contemplated hereby or otherwise, without the prior
written consent of Parent, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
Section
6.12.
Resignations.
Prior
to the Closing, the Company shall deliver to Purchaser written
resignations, which shall provide in each instance that such
resignations shall automatically become effective immediately
prior to the Effective Time, of each of the directors then
serving on the Companys Board of Directors and each
officer of the Company (other than the Executives).
Section
6.13.
Financing.
Parent
shall use good faith efforts to secure the financing necessary
and required to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Section 6.13 of the Purchaser Disclosure Letter
describes the anticipated financing sources.
ARTICLE VII.
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
Section
7.01.
Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Merger.
The respective obligation of each party
to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver on
or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions:
(a)
Company Shareholder Approval.
This
Agreement and the Merger shall have been approved by the Company
Requisite Vote and the Special Requisite Vote by the
shareholders of the Company at the Special Meeting of the
Shareholders, in compliance with and as required under the CRS.
(b)
No Injunctions or Restraints.
No
temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction
or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or
other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation
of the Merger shall be in effect;
provided
,
however
, that prior to asserting this condition the party
doing so shall have used all reasonable best efforts to prevent
the entry of any such injunction or other order and to appeal as
promptly as possible any such injunction or other order that may
be entered.
(c)
HSR Act.
The waiting period
applicable to the consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act,
if any, shall have expired or been terminated.
Section
7.02.
Conditions
to Obligations of Parent and Purchaser.
The
obligations of Parent and Purchaser to effect the Merger are
further subject to the following conditions:
(a)
Representations and Warranties.
The
representations and warranties of the Company in this Agreement
that are qualified as to materiality shall be true and correct
and those not so qualified shall be true and correct in all
material respects, as though made on the Closing Date, except to
the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate
to an earlier date (in which case such representations and
warranties qualified as to materiality shall be true and
correct, and those not so qualified shall be true and correct in
all material respects, on and as of such earlier date) and
except to the extent that the failure of such representations
and warranties to be true and correct do not have a Company
Material Adverse Effect. Purchaser shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of the Company by a duly authorized
officer of the Company to such effect.
(b)
Performance of Obligations of the
Company.
The Company shall have performed in all
material respects all obligations required to be performed by it
under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and
Purchaser shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of
the Company by a duly authorized officer of the Company to such
effect.
(c)
Material Adverse Effect.
There shall
have been no event since the date of this Agreement which has
had a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(d)
Dissenters Rights.
Holders of
no greater than ten percent (10%) of the Public Shareholders of
the Company shall have exercised their dissenters rights
and delivered a payment demand to the
A-27
Company pursuant to
Section 7-113-101
et seq
. of the CRS (excluding such holders who have
failed to perfect, withdrawn or otherwise lost such right to
deliver a payment demand) prior to the Closing.
(e)
Company Stock Plans and Stock Repurchase
Program.
The Company shall have terminated all
Company Stock Plans and the Stock Repurchase Program and, after
giving effect to Section 6.04, all Company Stock Options
shall have been cancelled or terminated.
(f)
Debt.
Purchaser shall have obtained
all necessary approvals from holders of any and all debt of the
Company (other than debt held by any member of the Executive
Group) to consummate the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby. In addition to the foregoing, the holders
of Converting Debt shall have executed all documents reasonably
necessary to effectuate the assignment of their Converting Debt
to Parent.
(g)
Consents.
All foreign or domestic
governmental consents, orders and approvals required for the
consummation of the Merger, the transactions contemplated
hereby, and transfer of any licenses related to the operations
of the business of the Company as currently conducted or
presently planned to be conducted, including the Companys
Permits under Liquor Laws and SOB Laws, to the extent set forth
on Section 3.04 of the Company Disclosure Letter, shall
have been obtained and shall be in effect at the Effective Time;
provided
,
however
, that prior to asserting this
condition the party doing so shall have used all commercially
reasonable efforts to obtain such consents, orders and approvals.
(h)
No Litigation.
Except with respect to
that certain matter filed on July 30, 2010 in the District
Court for Jefferson County, Colorado as Case
No. 10-CV-3624,
there shall not be pending or threatened any suit, action or
proceeding by any Governmental Entity or any other Third Party
(including any Company shareholder or any person asserting to be
a Company shareholder other than the Executive Group),
(i) challenging, or seeking to restrain or prohibit the
transactions contemplated hereby or seeking to obtain damages
from the Company (including any of it officers or directors),
Purchaser or Parent with regard to the Merger or this Agreement,
(ii) seeking to prohibit or limit the ownership or
operation by the Company or to compel the Company or any Company
Subsidiary to dispose of or hold separate any material portion
of the business or assets of the Company as a result of the
Merger, (iii) seeking to impose ownership of any shares of
Common Stock, including the right to vote the Common Stock, on
any matters properly presented to the shareholders of the
Company, or (iv) seeking to prohibit Parent from
effectively controlling in any material respect the business or
operations of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries.
Section
7.03.
Conditions
to Obligations of the Company.
The obligation of
the Company to effect the Merger is further subject to the
following conditions:
(a)
Representations and Warranties.
The
representations and warranties of each of Parent, Purchaser and
each Executive in this Agreement that are qualified as to
materiality shall be true and correct and those not so qualified
shall be true and correct in all material respects, as though
made on the Closing Date, except to the extent such
representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier
date (in which case such representations and warranties
qualified as to materiality shall be true and correct, and those
not so qualified shall be true and correct in all material
respects, on and as of such earlier date) and except to the
extent that the failure of such representations and warranties
to be true and correct do not have a material adverse effect on
either Parent or Purchaser. The Company shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of Parent by a manager of Parent to
such effect, Purchaser by an officer of Purchaser to such effect
and by each Executive to such effect.
(b)
Performance of Obligations of Parent, Purchaser and
the Executives.
Each of Parent, Purchaser and
each Executive shall each have performed in all material
respects all obligations required to be performed by such person
under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and the
Company shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of
each such person to such effect.
A-28
ARTICLE VIII.
TERMINATION,
AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Section
8.01.
Termination.
This
Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective
Time, whether before or after satisfaction of the condition set
forth in Section 7.01(a):
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent, Purchaser and the
Company (as agreed to by the Special Committee);
(b) by either Parent and Purchaser, on the one hand, or the
Company (acting at the direction of the Special Committee and
approved by the Board), on the other hand:
(i) if the Merger is not consummated on or before the later
of (A) June 30, 2011 and (B) four (4) months
after the Proxy Statement is cleared by the SEC (the
Outside Date
), unless the failure to
consummate the Merger by the Outside Date is the result of a
breach of this Agreement by the party seeking to terminate this
Agreement; or
(ii) if any Governmental Entity issues an order, decree or
ruling or takes any other action permanently enjoining,
restraining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger and such order,
decree, ruling or other action shall have become final and
nonappealable;
(c) by Parent and Purchaser, if the Company breaches or
fails to perform in any material respect any of its covenants
contained in this Agreement, which breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a condition set forth
in Section 7.02(a) through Section 7.02(e), and
(ii) cannot be or has not been cured within thirty
(30) days after the giving of written notice to the Company
of such breach;
(d) by the Company (acting at the direction of the Special
Committee and approved by the Board), if Parent, Purchaser or
either Executive breaches or fails to perform in any material
respect any of its covenants contained in this Agreement, which
breach or failure to perform (i) would give rise to the
failure of a condition set forth in Section 7.03(a) or
Section 7.03(b), and (ii) cannot be or has not been
cured within thirty (30) days after the giving of written
notice to Parent or Purchaser of such breach;
(e) by Parent and Purchaser, (i) if the Board (acting
through the Special Committee) shall have approved or
recommended a Superior Acquisition Proposal by a third party,
(ii) if there is a Change in the Company Recommendation,
(iii) if the Board (acting through the Special Committee)
shall have failed to include in the Company Proxy Statement such
Company Recommendation (including the recommendation that the
shareholders of the Company vote in favor of the Merger),
(iv) if the Company enters into, or the Board (acting by
itself or through the Special Committee) approves or recommends,
a Company Acquisition Agreement, or (v) the Board or the
Special Committee has publicly announced an intention to do any
of the foregoing;
(f) by the Company (acting at the direction of the Special
Committee and approved by the Board), pursuant to
Section 6.08(d), if the Company has complied with all the
provisions of Section 6.08 and pays to Parent the Company
Termination Fee as contemplated by such section; or
(g) by either Parent and Purchaser, on the one hand, or the
Company (acting at the direction of the Special Committee and
approved by the Board), on the other hand, if at the Special
Meeting of Shareholders the Company Requisite Vote or Special
Requisite Vote is not obtained in favor of this Agreement and
the Merger as required by the CRS or this Agreement.
Section
8.02.
Effect
of Termination.
In the event of termination of
this Agreement by either the Company, on the one hand, or Parent
or Purchaser, on the other hand, as provided in
Section 8.01, this Agreement shall forthwith become void
and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the
part of Purchaser, Parent, either Executive or the Company other
than Section 3.07, Section 4.01(g), the last sentence
of Section 6.02, this Section 8.02, Section 8.03
and Article IX, which provisions shall survive such
termination, and except to the extent that such termination
results from the willful breach by a party of any
representation, warranty or covenant set forth in this
Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any
breach of any representation, warranty or covenant of the
Company set forth in this Agreement is a
A-29
result of the direction of either Executive, the Company shall
not be deemed to have breached such representation, warranty or
covenant for any purpose under this Agreement (including in
determining whether any condition has been satisfied hereunder).
Section
8.03.
Fees
and Expenses
.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Section 8.03,
all fees and expenses incurred in connection with this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such fees or
expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated.
(b) The Company shall pay to Parent an amount equal to
$1,000,000 (the
Company Termination Fee
) in
the event that:
(i) this Agreement is terminated by the Company pursuant to
Section 8.01(f) or by Parent and Purchaser pursuant to
Section 8.01(e); or
(ii) (A) an Acquisition Proposal shall have been made
to the Public Shareholders generally or has otherwise become
publicly known, disclosed or proposed, and in each case has not
been withdrawn, and thereafter this Agreement is terminated by
either Parent or the Company pursuant to Section 8.01(b)(i)
or Section 8.01(g), and (B) within twelve
(12) months after such termination, the Company enters
into, or publicly announces the intention to enter into, a
definitive agreement with respect to any Acquisition Proposal,
or consummates the transactions contemplated by such Acquisition
Proposal;
provided
, that for purposes of this
Section 8.03(b)(ii), the percentages set forth in the
defined term Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to
be 50%.
In each case, the Company shall pay Parent the Company
Termination Fee by wire transfer of immediately available funds
on the second (2nd) business day following (y) in the case
of a payment required by Section 8.03(b)(i), the date of
termination of this Agreement, and (z) in the case of a
payment required by Section 8.03(b)(ii), the closing date
of any definitive agreement with regard to the Acquisition
Proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the
Company Termination Fee becomes payable by the Company in
connection with a termination under Section 8.01(f) in
order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an
Acquisition Proposal with any party set forth on
Section 8.03(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter, then the
Company Termination Fee shall be reduced to $600,000.
(c) Parent shall pay the Company an amount equal to
$1,000,000 (the
Parent Termination Fee
), in
the event that this Agreement is terminated by the Company
pursuant to Section 8.01(b)(i) or Section 8.01(d), in
each circumstance, as a result of Parent not being able to
secure financing for the Merger (provided that at the time of
such termination all of the conditions set forth in
Sections 7.01 and Section 7.02 shall have been
satisfied and the Company shall not be in material breach of
this Agreement). In such case, Parent shall pay the Company the
Parent Termination Fee by wire transfer of immediately available
funds on the second (2nd) business day after such termination by
the Company or by cancellation of indebtedness owed by the
Company to the Executives.
(d) Each of the parties hereto acknowledges that the
agreements contained in this Section 8.03 are an integral
part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that
neither the Company Termination Fee nor the Parent Termination
Fee is a penalty, but rather are liquidated damages in a
reasonable amount that will compensate Parent or the Company in
the circumstances in which such termination fee is payable for
the efforts and resources expended and opportunities foregone
while negotiating this Agreement and in reliance on this
Agreement and on the expectation of the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby, which amount would otherwise
be impossible to calculate with precision.
Section
8.04.
Amendment.
This
Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto at any time
before or after receipt of the Company Requisite Vote and the
Special Requisite Vote;
provided
,
however
, that
any amendment pursuant to this Section 8.04 shall require
the approval of the Special Committee, or in the case of a
deadlock on the Special Committee by the Board;
provided
,
further
,
however
, that after receipt of the
Company Requisite Vote and the Special Requisite Vote, there
shall be made no amendment that by Law
A-30
requires further approval by the shareholders of the Company
without the further approval of such shareholders. This
Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing
signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto.
Section
8.05.
Extension;
Waiver.
At any time prior to the Effective Time,
the parties hereto may (a) extend the time for the
performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other
parties, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations
and warranties contained in this Agreement or in any document
delivered pursuant to this Agreement, or (c) waive
compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained in
this Agreement (other than the condition set forth in 7.01(a),
which shall not be waived by any party);
provided
,
however
, that any extension or waiver by the Company
pursuant to this Section 8.05 shall require the approval of
the Special Committee. Any agreement on the part of a party to
any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in
an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party. The
failure of any party to this Agreement to assert any of its
rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a
waiver of such rights.
Section
8.06.
Procedure
for Termination, Amendment, Extension or
Waiver.
A termination of this Agreement pursuant
to Section 8.01, an amendment of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.04 or an extension or waiver pursuant to
Section 8.05 shall, in order to be effective, require
(a) in the case of Parent, action by its manager,
(b) in the case of Purchaser, action by its Board of
Directors, and (c) in the case of the Company, action by
the Special Committee.
ARTICLE IX.
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section
9.01.
Nonsurvival
of Representations and Warranties.
None of the
representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive
the Effective Time. This Section 9.01 shall not limit any
covenant or agreement of the parties that by its terms
contemplates performance after the Effective Time.
Section
9.02.
Notices.
All
notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications
under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given upon receipt by the parties at the following addresses (or
at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
(a) if to Parent or Purchaser, to:
Family Dog, LLC,
6729 Bear Point Trail
Golden, CO 80403
Facsimile:
(303) 278-4000
Attention: Mr. Troy Lowrie
with a copy to:
Kamlet Reichert, LLP
950 Seventeenth Street
Suite 2400
Denver, CO 80202
Facsimile:
(303) 825-1185
Attention: E. Lee Reichert, Esq.
(b) if to Lowrie, to:
Troy Lowrie
6729 Bear Point Trail
Golden, CO 80403
Facsimile:
(303) 278-4000
A-31
(c) if to Ocello, to:
Micheal Ocello
6161 Clifton Oaks Place
St. Louis, MO 63129
Facsimile:
(618) 271-8384
(d) if to the Company, to:
VCG Holding Corp.
390 Union Boulevard
Suite 540
Lakewood, CO 80228
Facsimile:
(303) 278-4000
Attention: Board of Directors
with a copy to:
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
410 Seventeenth Street
Suite 2200
Denver, CO
80202-4432
Facsimile:
(303) 223-1111
Attention: Adam J. Agron, Esq.
and
Faegre & Benson LLP
1900 Fifteenth Street
Boulder, CO 80302
Facsimile:
(303) 447-7800
Attention: James H. Carroll, Esq.
Section
9.03.
Definitions
.
For purposes of this Agreement:
An
affiliate
of any person means another
person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such first person.
A
person
means any individual, firm,
corporation, partnership, company, limited liability company,
trust, joint venture, association, Governmental Entity or other
entity.
A
representative
means, with respect to any
person, an officer, director, employee, auditor, investment
banker, financial advisor, counsel, agent and other
representative of such person.
The
Special Committee
means the Special
Committee of the Board formed to, among other things, negotiate
the terms of the Merger, if in existence at the relevant time;
provided
that if such committee is not in existence at
the relevant time or if there is a deadlock on the Special
Committee, an action of the Special Committee may be
taken by resolution of a majority of the members of the Board
who (a) have no direct or indirect interest in Parent,
whether as an investor or otherwise, (b) are not
representatives of any Person who has any such interest in
Parent, and (c) are not otherwise affiliated with, and are
independent from, Parent and each Executive.
A
subsidiary
of any person means another
person, an amount of the voting securities, other voting
ownership or voting partnership interests of which is sufficient
to elect at least a majority of its Board of Directors or other
governing body (or, if there are no such voting interests, fifty
percent (50%) or more of the equity interests of which is owned
directly or indirectly by such first person).
A-32
Section
9.04.
Interpretation.
When
a reference is made in this Agreement to a Section or Schedule,
such reference shall be to a Section of, or a Schedule to, this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and
headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes
only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms. Any agreement or instrument defined or referred to herein
or in any agreement or instrument that is referred to herein
means such agreement or instrument as from time to time amended,
modified or supplemented. References to a person are also to its
permitted successors and assigns.
Section
9.05.
Severability.
If
any term or other provision of this Agreement is determined by
any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or
incapable of being enforced by any rule or Law, or public
policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement
shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as
the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated
hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any
party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision
is invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, illegal or
incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate
in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the
original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an
acceptable manner to the end that transactions contemplated
hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.
Section
9.06.
Counterparts.
This
Agreement may be executed in one or more separate counterparts,
all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other
parties. Counterpart signatures transmitted by facsimile or by
electronic transmission (
i.e.,
by
e-mail)
shall be acceptable for this Agreement, and each other agreement
or instrument entered into in connection herewith or therewith
or contemplated hereby or thereby, and any amendments hereto or
thereto. No party hereto or to any such agreement or instrument
shall raise the use of a facsimile machine or other form of
electronic transmission to deliver a signature, or the fact that
any signature or agreement or instrument was transmitted or
communicated through the use of a facsimile machine or other
form of electronic transmission, as a defense to the formation
or enforceability of a contract and each such party forever
waives any such defense.
Section
9.07.
Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries.
This
Agreement, taken together with the Company Disclosure Letter and
the Confidentiality Agreement, (a) constitute the entire
agreement, and supersede all prior agreements and
understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with
respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and
(b) except for the provisions of Section 6.05, are not
intended to confer upon any person other than the parties any
rights or remedies.
Section
9.08.
Governing
Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the Laws of the State of Colorado,
regardless of the Laws that might otherwise govern under
applicable principles of conflicts of Laws thereof.
Section
9.09.
Assignment.
Neither
this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
under this Agreement shall be assigned, in whole or in part, by
operation of Law or otherwise by any of the parties without the
prior written consent of the other parties, except that
Purchaser may assign, in its sole discretion, any or all of its
rights, interests and obligations under this Agreement to any
company directly or indirectly wholly owned by Parent, but no
such assignment shall relieve the assigning party of any of its
obligations under this Agreement. Any purported assignment
without such consent shall be void. Subject to the preceding
sentences, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the
benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties and their
respective successors and assigns.
Section
9.10.
Enforcement.
(a) Subject to Section 9.10(b), the parties agree that
irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance
with their specific terms or were otherwise breached and it is
therefore accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled
to an
A-33
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, this being in addition to any other remedy to which
they are entitled at Law or in equity.
(b) For the avoidance of doubt, if Section 8.03(b) or
(c) become operative, the Company Termination Fee or Parent
Termination Fee, as the case may be, paid in accordance
Section 8.03(b) or (c), as applicable, shall be the sole
and exclusive remedy available against the party paying such fee.
Section
9.11.
Selection
of Jurisdiction.
Each of the parties to this
Agreement (a) consents to submit itself to the personal
jurisdiction of any state or federal court sitting in the City
and County of Denver, Colorado in any action or proceeding
arising out of or relating to this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (b) agrees
that all claims in respect of such action or proceeding may be
heard and determined in any such court, (c) agrees that it
will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by
motion or other request for leave from any such court, and
(d) agrees not to bring any action or proceeding arising
out of or relating to this Agreement or any of the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement in any other court. Each of the
parties hereto waives any defense of inconvenient forum to the
maintenance of any action or proceeding so brought and waives
any bond, surety or other security that might be required of any
other party with respect thereto. Any party hereto may make
service on another party by sending or delivering a copy of the
process to the party to be served at the address and in the
manner provided for the giving of notices in Section 9.02.
Nothing in this Section, however, shall affect the right of any
party to serve legal process in any other manner permitted by
Law.
[SIGNATURE
PAGE(S) FOLLOW]
A-34
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
, Parent, Purchaser and the Company
have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above
written.
Troy Lowrie, individually
Micheal Ocello, individually
FAMILY DOG, LLC
Name: Troy Lowrie
FD ACQUISITION CO.
Name: Troy Lowrie
VCG HOLDING CORP.
Name: George Sawicki
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chair, Special Committee
|
[
Signature Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger
]
SCHEDULE A
Executive
Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
Shares Held in Own Name
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
|
549,189
|
|
|
|
4,943,289
|
|
Lowrie Management, LLLP
|
|
|
4,394,100
|
|
|
|
4,394,100
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
37,589
|
|
|
|
195,589
|
|
LTD Investment Group, LLC
|
|
|
158,000
|
|
|
|
158,000
|
|
SCHEDULE A-1
APPENDIX B
November 9,
2010
Special Committee of the Board of Directors
VCG Holding Corp.
390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Gentlemen:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common stock (the
Common Stock) other than the Executive Group (as
defined below) of VCG Holding Corp., a Colorado corporation (the
Company), of the Per Share Merger Consideration (as
defined below) provided in that certain Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of November 9, 2010 (the
Agreement), to be entered into by and among Family
Dog, LLC (Parent), FD Acquisition Co., Troy Lowrie
(Lowrie), Michael Ocello (Ocello) and
the Company.
The Agreement provides, among other things, that the Company is
to be acquired by Parent through a merger (the
Merger), and that the issued and outstanding shares
of Common Stock not owned directly or indirectly by Lowrie,
Ocello and Lowrie Management, LLLP (collectively, the
Executive Group) be converted into the right to
receive $2.25 per share in cash, without interest (the Per
Share Merger Consideration). The terms and conditions of
the Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement.
In connection with our review of the Merger, and in arriving at
our opinion, we have: (i) reviewed and analyzed the terms
of the Agreement; (ii) reviewed and analyzed certain
financial and other data with respect to the Company, which was
publicly available, (iii) reviewed and analyzed certain
information, including financial statements and financial
forecasts, relating to the business, earnings, cash flow,
assets, liabilities, projected operations and prospects of the
Company, that were publicly available, as well as those that
were furnished to us by the Company; (iv) conducted
discussions with members of senior management and
representatives of the Company concerning the matters described
in clauses (ii) and (iii) above, as well as its
business and prospects on a stand alone basis; (v) reviewed
the current and historical reported prices and trading activity
of certain other publicly-traded companies deemed by us to be
comparable to the Company; and (vi) reviewed the terms, to
the extent publicly available, of certain business combination
transactions that we deemed relevant. In addition, we have
conducted such other analyses, examinations and inquiries and
considered such other financial, economic and market criteria as
we have deemed necessary in arriving at our opinion. We believe
such areas of investigation are sufficient and reasonable as a
basis for rendering this opinion. In conducting our review and
analysis, and as a basis for arriving at our opinion, we have
utilized generally accepted valuation and analytical techniques,
methodologies, procedures and considerations reasonably deemed
relevant and customary under the circumstances.
In arriving at our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed,
without assuming liability or responsibility for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished, or otherwise made
available, to us or discussed with or reviewed by us. We have
further relied upon the assurances of the management of the
Company that the financial information provided has been
prepared by the Company on a reasonable basis in accordance with
industry practice, and that the Company is not aware of any
information or facts that would make incomplete or misleading
any information provided to us by it. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, for the purpose of this opinion, we
have assumed, without independent verification, that with
respect to financial forecasts, estimates and other
forward-looking information reviewed by us, that such
information has been reasonably prepared based upon assumptions
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the management of the Company as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of the Company. We
express no opinion as to any such financial forecasts,
estimates, judgments or forward-looking information or the
assumptions upon which they were based. Although we have not
independently verified the accuracy and completeness of the
information we considered, we advise you that nothing has come
to our attention during the course of this engagement that has
caused us to believe that it was unreasonable for us to utilize
and rely on the information
B-1
we have reviewed. We are not legal, tax or regulatory advisors.
We are financial advisors only and we have relied, with your
consent and without independent verification, on the advice of
the outside counsel and the independent registered public
accountants to the Company, and on the assumptions of the
management of the Company, as to all accounting, legal, tax and
financial reporting matters with respect to the Company and the
Agreement.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed that the executed
Agreement will be in all material respects identical to the last
draft of such document reviewed by us. We have relied upon and
assumed, without independent verification, that (i) the
representations and warranties of all parties to the Agreement
and all other related documents and instruments that are
referred to therein are true and correct, (ii) each party
to such documents and instruments will fully and timely perform
all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by
such party in accordance with the provisions thereof,
(iii) the Merger will be consummated pursuant to the terms
of the Agreement, and (iv) all conditions to the
consummation of the Merger will be satisfied without waiver by
any party of any conditions or obligations thereunder.
Additionally, we have assumed that all the necessary regulatory
approvals and consents required for the Merger will be obtained
in a manner that will not adversely affect the parties or the
contemplated benefits of the Merger.
In arriving at our opinion, we have not performed any appraisals
or valuations of any specific assets or liabilities (fixed,
contingent or other), and have not been furnished or provided
with any such appraisals or valuations, nor have we evaluated
the solvency of the Company under any state or federal law
relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. The
analyses performed by us in connection with this opinion were
going concern analyses. We express no opinion regarding the
liquidation value of the Company or any other entity. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, we have undertaken no
independent analysis of any pending or threatened litigation,
regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other
contingent liabilities, to which the Company or any of its
affiliates is a party or may be subject, and our opinion makes
no assumption concerning, and therefore does not consider, the
possible assertion of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of
any such matters.
This opinion is necessarily based upon the information available
to us and facts and circumstances as they exist and are subject
to evaluation on the date hereof; events occurring after the
date hereof could materially affect this opinion and the
assumptions used in preparing this opinion. We have not
undertaken to reaffirm or revise this opinion or otherwise
comment upon any events occurring after the date hereof and do
not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this
opinion.
We have been engaged by the Special Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company to render an opinion with respect to
the Per Share Merger Consideration in connection with the Merger
and we will receive (i) a strategic alternatives analysis
fee, and (ii) an opinion fee, neither of which is
contingent upon the consummation of the Merger or the
conclusions reached in the opinion. We received a nonrefundable
retainer fee upon our engagement. If the Merger is consummated,
we will also receive a transaction fee measured by the
consideration received by the holders of Common Stock, against
which the retainer and strategic alternatives analysis fees will
be credited. The Company has also agreed to indemnify us against
certain liabilities and reimburse us for certain expenses in
connection with our services.
In the ordinary course of our business, we may, in the future,
provide investment banking and financial advisory services to
the Parent or entities that are affiliated with the Company,
Parent, Lowrie or Ocello, for which we would expect to receive
compensation. We are not currently engaged to provide any such
services.
This opinion is provided to the Special Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company in connection with its consideration
of the Merger and is not intended to be and does not constitute
a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company. It is
understood that this opinion will be relied upon by the Special
Committee of the Board of Directors in connection with the
Merger. This opinion may not be disclosed, referred to,
published or otherwise used (in whole or in part), nor may any
public references to us be made, without our prior written
consent, which consent is hereby given to the inclusion of this
opinion in any solicitation/recommendation statement
disseminated to shareholders of the Company. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company may disclose our advice, analyses,
opinions and other materials in its possession in response to
any subpoena, court order or other legal demand or requirements
of law, or otherwise in
B-2
connection with any litigation, dispute or other claim, provided
that prompt notice thereof is given to us. This opinion has been
approved for issuance by the Opinion Committee of North Point
Advisors LLC.
This opinion addresses solely the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to holders of the Common Stock other than the
Executive Group of the proposed Per Share Merger Consideration
determined as provided in the Agreement and does not address any
other terms or agreement relating to the Merger or any other
terms of the Agreement. We were not requested to opine as to,
and this opinion does not address, the basic business decision
to proceed with or effect the Merger, the merits of the Merger
relative to any alternative transaction or business strategy
that may be available to the Company, or any other terms
contemplated by the Agreement or the fairness of the amount or
nature of compensation to the Executive Group or the
Companys officers, directors or employees, or any class of
such persons, relative to the compensation to be received by
holders of the Common Stock other than the Executive Group.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing and based upon such
other factors as we consider relevant, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Per Share Merger Consideration,
determined as provided in the Agreement, is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of the Common Stock
other than the Executive Group.
Very truly yours,
NORTH POINT ADVISORS LLC
B-3
APPENDIX C
ARTICLE 113
OF THE COLORADO BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
PART 1
RIGHT OF
DISSENT
PAYMENT
FOR SHARES
7-113-101.
Definitions.
For purposes of this article:
(1) Beneficial shareholder means the beneficial
owner of shares held in a voting trust or by a nominee as the
record shareholder.
(2) Corporation means the issuer of the shares
held by a dissenter before the corporate action, or the
surviving or acquiring domestic or foreign corporation, by
merger or share exchange of that issuer.
(3) Dissenter means a shareholder who is
entitled to dissent from corporate action under
section 7-113-102
and who exercises that right at the time and in the manner
required by part 2 of this article.
(4) Fair value, with respect to a
dissenters shares, means the value of the shares
immediately before the effective date of the corporate action to
which the dissenter objects, excluding any appreciation or
depreciation in anticipation of the corporate action except to
the extent that exclusion would be inequitable.
(5) Interest means interest from the effective
date of the corporate action until the date of payment, at the
average rate currently paid by the corporation on its principal
bank loans or, if none, at the legal rate as specified in
section 5-12-101,
C.R.S.
(6) Record shareholder means the person in
whose name shares are registered in the records of a corporation
or the beneficial owner of shares that are registered in the
name of a nominee to the extent such owner is recognized by the
corporation as the shareholder as provided in
section 7-107-204.
(7) Shareholder means either a record
shareholder or a beneficial shareholder.
7-113-102.
Right to dissent.
(1) A shareholder, whether or not entitled to vote, is
entitled to dissent and obtain payment of the fair value of the
shareholders shares in the event of any of the following
corporate actions:
(a) Consummation of a plan of merger to which the
corporation is a party if:
(I) Approval by the shareholders of that corporation is
required for the merger by
section 7-111-103
or 7-111-104 or by the articles of incorporation; or
(II) The corporation is a subsidiary that is merged with
its parent corporation under
section 7-111-104;
(b) Consummation of a plan of share exchange to which the
corporation is a party as the corporation whose shares will be
acquired;
(c) Consummation of a sale, lease, exchange, or other
disposition of all, or substantially all, of the property of the
corporation for which a shareholder vote is required under
section 7-112-102
(1);
(d) Consummation of a sale, lease, exchange, or other
disposition of all, or substantially all, of the property of an
entity controlled by the corporation if the shareholders of the
corporation were entitled to vote upon the consent of the
corporation to the disposition pursuant to
section 7-112-102
(2); and
C-1
(e) Consummation of a conversion in which the corporation
is the converting entity as provided in
section 7-90-206
(2).
(1.3) A shareholder is not entitled to dissent and obtain
payment, under subsection (1) of this section, of the fair
value of the shares of any class or series of shares that either
were listed on a national securities exchange registered under
the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or were held of record by more than two thousand
shareholders, at the time of:
(a) The record date fixed under
section 7-107-107
to determine the shareholders entitled to receive notice of the
shareholders meeting at which the corporate action is
submitted to a vote;
(b) The record date fixed under
section 7-107-104
to determine shareholders entitled to sign writings consenting
to the corporate action; or
(c) The effective date of the corporate action if the
corporate action is authorized other than by a vote of
shareholders.
(1.8) The limitation set forth in subsection (1.3) of this
section shall not apply if the shareholder will receive for the
shareholders shares, pursuant to the corporate action,
anything except:
(a) Shares of the corporation surviving the consummation of
the plan of merger or share exchange;
(b) Shares of any other corporation which, at the effective
date of the plan of merger or share exchange, either will be
listed on a national securities exchange registered under the
federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or will be held of record by more than two thousand shareholders;
(c) Cash in lieu of fractional shares; or
(d) Any combination of the foregoing described shares or
cash in lieu of fractional shares.
(2) (Deleted by amendment, L. 96, p. 1321, § 30,
effective June 1, 1996.)
(2.5) A shareholder, whether or not entitled to vote, is
entitled to dissent and obtain payment of the fair value of the
shareholders shares in the event of a reverse split that
reduces the number of shares owned by the shareholder to a
fraction of a share or to scrip if the fractional share or scrip
so created is to be acquired for cash or the scrip is to be
voided under
section 7-106-104.
(3) A shareholder is entitled to dissent and obtain payment
of the fair value of the shareholders shares in the event
of any corporate action to the extent provided by the bylaws or
a resolution of the board of directors.
(4) A shareholder entitled to dissent and obtain payment
for the shareholders shares under this article may not
challenge the corporate action creating such entitlement unless
the action is unlawful or fraudulent with respect to the
shareholder or the corporation.
7-113-103.
Dissent by nominees and beneficial owners.
(1) A record shareholder may assert dissenters rights
as to fewer than all the shares registered in the record
shareholders name only if the record shareholder dissents
with respect to all shares beneficially owned by any one person
and causes the corporation to receive written notice which
states such dissent and the name, address, and federal taxpayer
identification number, if any, of each person on whose behalf
the record shareholder asserts dissenters rights. The
rights of a record shareholder under this subsection (1)
are determined as if the shares as to which the record
shareholder dissents and the other shares of the record
shareholder were registered in the names of different
shareholders.
(2) A beneficial shareholder may assert dissenters
rights as to the shares held on the beneficial
shareholders behalf only if:
(a) The beneficial shareholder causes the corporation to
receive the record shareholders written consent to the
dissent not later than the time the beneficial shareholder
asserts dissenters rights; and
C-2
(b) The beneficial shareholder dissents with respect to all
shares beneficially owned by the beneficial shareholder.
(3) The corporation may require that, when a record
shareholder dissents with respect to the shares held by any one
or more beneficial shareholders, each such beneficial
shareholder must certify to the corporation that the beneficial
shareholder and the record shareholder or record shareholders of
all shares owned beneficially by the beneficial shareholder have
asserted, or will timely assert, dissenters rights as to
all such shares as to which there is no limitation on the
ability to exercise dissenters rights. Any such
requirement shall be stated in the dissenters notice given
pursuant to
section 7-113-203.
PART 2
PROCEDURE
FOR EXERCISE
OF
DISSENTERS RIGHTS
7-113-201.
Notice of dissenters rights.
(1) If a proposed corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
is submitted to a vote at a shareholders meeting, the
notice of the meeting shall be given to all shareholders,
whether or not entitled to vote. The notice shall state that
shareholders are or may be entitled to assert dissenters
rights under this article and shall be accompanied by a copy of
this article and the materials, if any, that, under
articles 101 to 117 of this title, are required to be given
to shareholders entitled to vote on the proposed action at the
meeting. Failure to give notice as provided by this
subsection (1) shall not affect any action taken at the
shareholders meeting for which the notice was to have been
given, but any shareholder who was entitled to dissent but who
was not given such notice shall not be precluded from demanding
payment for the shareholders shares under this article by
reason of the shareholders failure to comply with the
provisions of
section 7-113-202
(1).
(2) If a proposed corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
is authorized without a meeting of shareholders pursuant to
section 7-107-104,
any written or oral solicitation of a shareholder to execute a
writing consenting to such action contemplated in
section 7-107-104
shall be accompanied or preceded by a written notice stating
that shareholders are or may be entitled to assert
dissenters rights under this article, by a copy of this
article, and by the materials, if any, that, under
articles 101 to 117 of this title, would have been required
to be given to shareholders entitled to vote on the proposed
action if the proposed action were submitted to a vote at a
shareholders meeting. Failure to give notice as provided
by this subsection (2) shall not affect any action taken
pursuant to
section 7-107-104
for which the notice was to have been given, but any shareholder
who was entitled to dissent but who was not given such notice
shall not be precluded from demanding payment for the
shareholders shares under this article by reason of the
shareholders failure to comply with the provisions of
section 7-113-202
(2).
7-113-202.
Notice of intent to demand payment.
(1) If a proposed corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
is submitted to a vote at a shareholders meeting and if
notice of dissenters rights has been given to such
shareholder in connection with the action pursuant to
section 7-113-201
(1), a shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters rights
shall:
(a) Cause the corporation to receive, before the vote is
taken, written notice of the shareholders intention to
demand payment for the shareholders shares if the proposed
corporate action is effectuated; and
(b) Not vote the shares in favor of the proposed corporate
action.
(2) If a proposed corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
is authorized without a meeting of shareholders pursuant to
section 7-107-104
and if notice of dissenters rights has been
C-3
given to such shareholder in connection with the action pursuant
to
section 7-113-201
(2), a shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters rights
shall not execute a writing consenting to the proposed corporate
action.
(3) A shareholder who does not satisfy the requirements of
subsection (1) or (2) of this section is not entitled
to demand payment for the shareholders shares under this
article.
7-113-203.
Dissenters notice.
(1) If a proposed corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
is authorized, the corporation shall give a written
dissenters notice to all shareholders who are entitled to
demand payment for their shares under this article.
(2) The dissenters notice required by
subsection (1) of this section shall be given no later than
ten days after the effective date of the corporate action
creating dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
and shall:
(a) State that the corporate action was authorized and
state the effective date or proposed effective date of the
corporate action;
(b) State an address at which the corporation will receive
payment demands and the address of a place where certificates
for certificated shares must be deposited;
(c) Inform holders of uncertificated shares to what extent
transfer of the shares will be restricted after the payment
demand is received;
(d) Supply a form for demanding payment, which form shall
request a dissenter to state an address to which payment is to
be made;
(e) Set the date by which the corporation must receive the
payment demand and certificates for certificated shares, which
date shall not be less than thirty days after the date the
notice required by subsection (1) of this section is given;
(f) State the requirement contemplated in
section 7-113-103
(3), if such requirement is imposed; and
(g) Be accompanied by a copy of this article.
7-113-204.
Procedure to demand payment.
(1) A shareholder who is given a dissenters notice
pursuant to
section 7-113-203
and who wishes to assert dissenters rights shall, in
accordance with the terms of the dissenters notice:
(a) Cause the corporation to receive a payment demand,
which may be the payment demand form contemplated in
section 7-113-203
(2) (d), duly completed, or may be stated in another
writing; and
(b) Deposit the shareholders certificates for
certificated shares.
(2) A shareholder who demands payment in accordance with
subsection (1) of this section retains all rights of a
shareholder, except the right to transfer the shares, until the
effective date of the proposed corporate action giving rise to
the shareholders exercise of dissenters rights and
has only the right to receive payment for the shares after the
effective date of such corporate action.
(3) Except as provided in
section 7-113-207
or 7-113-209 (1) (b), the demand for payment and deposit of
certificates are irrevocable.
(4) A shareholder who does not demand payment and deposit
the shareholders share certificates as required by the
date or dates set in the dissenters notice is not entitled
to payment for the shares under this article.
C-4
7-113-205.
Uncertificated shares.
(1) Upon receipt of a demand for payment under
section 7-113-204
from a shareholder holding uncertificated shares, and in lieu of
the deposit of certificates representing the shares, the
corporation may restrict the transfer thereof.
(2) In all other respects, the provisions of
section 7-113-204
shall be applicable to shareholders who own uncertificated
shares.
7-113-206.
Payment.
(1) Except as provided in
section 7-113-208,
upon the effective date of the corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
or upon receipt of a payment demand pursuant to
section 7-113-204,
whichever is later, the corporation shall pay each dissenter who
complied with
section 7-113-204,
at the address stated in the payment demand, or if no such
address is stated in the payment demand, at the address shown on
the corporations current record of shareholders for the
record shareholder holding the dissenters shares, the
amount the corporation estimates to be the fair value of the
dissenters shares, plus accrued interest.
(2) The payment made pursuant to subsection (1) of
this section shall be accompanied by:
(a) The corporations balance sheet as of the end of
its most recent fiscal year or, if that is not available, the
corporations balance sheet as of the end of a fiscal year
ending not more than sixteen months before the date of payment,
an income statement for that year, and, if the corporation
customarily provides such statements to shareholders, a
statement of changes in shareholders equity for that year
and a statement of cash flow for that year, which balance sheet
and statements shall have been audited if the corporation
customarily provides audited financial statements to
shareholders, as well as the latest available financial
statements, if any, for the interim or full-year period, which
financial statements need not be audited;
(b) A statement of the corporations estimate of the
fair value of the shares;
(c) An explanation of how the interest was calculated;
(d) A statement of the dissenters right to demand
payment under
section 7-113-209; and
(e) A copy of this article.
7-113-207.
Failure to take action.
(1) If the effective date of the corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
does not occur within sixty days after the date set by the
corporation by which the corporation must receive the payment
demand as provided in
section 7-113-203,
the corporation shall return the deposited certificates and
release the transfer restrictions imposed on uncertificated
shares.
(2) If the effective date of the corporate action creating
dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
occurs more than sixty days after the date set by the
corporation by which the corporation must receive the payment
demand as provided in
section 7-113-203,
then the corporation shall send a new dissenters notice,
as provided in
section 7-113-203,
and the provisions of
sections 7-113-204
to 7-113-209 shall again be applicable.
7-113-208.
Special provisions relating to shares acquired after
announcement of proposed corporate action.
(1) The corporation may, in or with the dissenters
notice given pursuant to
section 7-113-203,
state the date of the first announcement to news media or to
shareholders of the terms of the proposed corporate action
creating dissenters rights under
section 7-113-102
and state that the dissenter shall certify in writing, in or
with the dissenters payment demand under
section 7-113-204,
whether or not the dissenter (or the person on whose behalf
dissenters rights are asserted) acquired beneficial
ownership of the shares before that date. With respect to any
dissenter who does not so certify in writing, in or with the
payment demand, that the dissenter or the person on whose behalf
the dissenter asserts dissenters rights acquired
beneficial ownership of the
C-5
shares before such date, the corporation may, in lieu of making
the payment provided in
section 7-113-206,
offer to make such payment if the dissenter agrees to accept it
in full satisfaction of the demand.
(2) An offer to make payment under subsection (1) of
this section shall include or be accompanied by the information
required by
section 7-113-206
(2).
7-113-209.
Procedure if dissenter is dissatisfied with payment or
offer.
(1) A dissenter may give notice to the corporation in
writing of the dissenters estimate of the fair value of
the dissenters shares and of the amount of interest due
and may demand payment of such estimate, less any payment made
under
section 7-113-206,
or reject the corporations offer under
section 7-113-208
and demand payment of the fair value of the shares and interest
due, if:
(a) The dissenter believes that the amount paid under
section 7-113-206
or offered under
section 7-113-208
is less than the fair value of the shares or that the interest
due was incorrectly calculated;
(b) The corporation fails to make payment under
section 7-113-206
within sixty days after the date set by the corporation by which
the corporation must receive the payment demand; or
(c) The corporation does not return the deposited
certificates or release the transfer restrictions imposed on
uncertificated shares as required by
section 7-113-207
(1).
(2) A dissenter waives the right to demand payment under
this section unless the dissenter causes the corporation to
receive the notice required by subsection (1) of this
section within thirty days after the corporation made or offered
payment for the dissenters shares.
PART 3
JUDICIAL
APPRAISAL OF SHARES
7-113-301.
Court action.
(1) If a demand for payment under
section 7-113-209
remains unresolved, the corporation may, within sixty days after
receiving the payment demand, commence a proceeding and petition
the court to determine the fair value of the shares and accrued
interest. If the corporation does not commence the proceeding
within the
sixty-day
period, it shall pay to each dissenter whose demand remains
unresolved the amount demanded.
(2) The corporation shall commence the proceeding described
in subsection (1) of this section in the district court for
the county in this state in which the street address of the
corporations principal office is located, or, if the
corporation has no principal office in this state, in the
district court for the county in which the street address of its
registered agent is located, or, if the corporation has no
registered agent, in the district court for the city and county
of Denver. If the corporation is a foreign corporation without a
registered agent, it shall commence the proceeding in the county
in which the domestic corporation merged into, or whose shares
were acquired by, the foreign corporation would have commenced
the action if that corporation were subject to the first
sentence of this subsection (2).
(3) The corporation shall make all dissenters, whether or
not residents of this state, whose demands remain unresolved
parties to the proceeding commenced under subsection (2) of
this section as in an action against their shares, and all
parties shall be served with a copy of the petition. Service on
each dissenter shall be by registered or certified mail, to the
address stated in such dissenters payment demand, or if no
such address is stated in the payment demand, at the address
shown on the corporations current record of shareholders
for the record shareholder holding the dissenters shares,
or as provided by law.
(4) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding
is commenced under subsection (2) of this section is
plenary and exclusive. The court may appoint one or more persons
as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on
the question of fair value. The appraisers have the powers
described in the order
C-6
appointing them, or in any amendment to such order. The parties
to the proceeding are entitled to the same discovery rights as
parties in other civil proceedings.
(5) Each dissenter made a party to the proceeding commenced
under subsection (2) of this section is entitled to
judgment for the amount, if any, by which the court finds the
fair value of the dissenters shares, plus interest,
exceeds the amount paid by the corporation, or for the fair
value, plus interest, of the dissenters shares for which
the corporation elected to withhold payment under
section 7-113-208.
7-113-302.
Court costs and counsel fees.
(1) The court in an appraisal proceeding commenced under
section 7-113-301
shall determine all costs of the proceeding, including the
reasonable compensation and expenses of appraisers appointed by
the court. The court shall assess the costs against the
corporation; except that the court may assess costs against all
or some of the dissenters, in amounts the court finds equitable,
to the extent the court finds the dissenters acted arbitrarily,
vexatiously, or not in good faith in demanding payment under
section 7-113-209.
(2) The court may also assess the fees and expenses of
counsel and experts for the respective parties, in amounts the
court finds equitable:
(a) Against the corporation and in favor of any dissenters
if the court finds the corporation did not substantially comply
with part 2 of this article; or
(b) Against either the corporation or one or more
dissenters, in favor of any other party, if the court finds that
the party against whom the fees and expenses are assessed acted
arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to
the rights provided by this article.
(3) If the court finds that the services of counsel for any
dissenter were of substantial benefit to other dissenters
similarly situated, and that the fees for those services should
not be assessed against the corporation, the court may award to
said counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts
awarded to the dissenters who were benefited.
C-7
APPENDIX D
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One):
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number:
001-32208
VCG HOLDING CORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Colorado
|
|
84-1157022
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540, Lakewood, CO
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
80228
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(303) 934-2424
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class:
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
|
|
Common Stock, $.0001 par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 229.405) of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter
period) Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment of this
Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting company
þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of
the second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2009, was $25,955,857
(computed by reference to the average sale price as reported on
the NASDAQ Global Market). As of March 12, 2010, there were
17,310,723 shares of the registrants Common Stock,
par value of $.0001 per share, outstanding.
D-1
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
D-2
PART I
Forward-Looking
Statement Disclaimer
In this report, references to VCG Holding Corp,
VCG, the Company, we,
us, and our refer to VCG Holding Corp.
and its subsidiaries.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains certain forward-looking statements and, for this
purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements
of historical fact are intended to be forward-looking
statements with the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Without limiting the foregoing,
words such as may, will,
expect, believe, anticipate,
intend, estimate, continue,
or comparable terminology, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature
involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of
which are not within our control. These factors include, but are
not limited, to, costs and liabilities associated with the
proposed going private transaction and associated litigation and
the proposed merger transaction, our inability to retain
employees and members of management due to uncertainty about our
future direction due to the proposed merger transaction, costs
and liabilities associated with our inability to successfully
close the proposed merger transaction or any other similar
transaction, the possibility that we may be prohibited from
closing the proposed merger transaction or forced to rescind it
if it has been consummated and pay damages as a result of
litigation, diversion of managements attention caused by
the proposed merger transaction and associated litigation, our
limited operating history making our future operating results
difficult to predict, the availability of, and costs associated
with, potential sources of financing, disruptions in the credit
markets, economic conditions generally and in the geographical
markets in which we may participate, our inability to manage
growth, difficulties associated with integrating acquired
businesses into our operations, geographic market concentration,
legislation and government regulations affecting us and our
industry, competition within our industry, our failure to
promote our brands, our failure to protect our brands, the loss
of senior management and key personnel, potential conflicts of
interest between us and Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), our failure to
comply with licensing requirements applicable to our business,
liability from unsanctioned, unlawful conduct at our nightclubs,
the negative perception of our industry, the failure of our
business strategy to generate sufficient revenues, liability
from uninsured risks or risks not covered by insurance proceeds,
claims for indemnification from officers and Directors,
deterrence of a change of control because of our ability to
issue securities or from the severance payment terms of certain
employment agreements with senior management, our failure to
meet the NASDAQ continued listing requirements, the failure of
securities analysts to cover our common stock, our failure to
comply with securities laws when issuing securities, our common
stock being a penny stock, our intention not to pay dividends on
our common stock, our future issuance of common stock depressing
the sale price of our common stock or diluting existing
stockholders, the limited trading market for, and volatile price
of, our common stock, and our inability to comply with rules and
regulations applicable to public companies.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made
and are based on certain assumptions and expectations which may
or may not be valid or actually occur and which involve various
risks and uncertainties.
Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not
undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update
any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences,
developments, unanticipated events or circumstances after the
date of such statement.
General
Information
Our Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Colorado in 1998, but did not begin its operations until April
2002. The Company, through its subsidiaries, owns 20 adult
nightclubs that offer quality live adult entertainment,
restaurant and bar operations. Our nightclubs are located in
Colorado, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,
Minnesota, North Carolina, Maine, and Texas.
1
D-3
We believe maximum profitability and sustained growth in the
industry is obtained by owning and operating upscale adult
nightclubs. Our current strategy is to acquire upscale adult
nightclubs in areas that are not market saturated and where the
public is open to these types of establishments. Another part of
our growth strategy is to achieve nightclub
clustering. Adult nightclubs tend to group together
in their respective markets. We believe that clustering our
nightclubs leads to improved brand recognition, as well as some
improvement in economies of scale as costs of marketing are
spread over more nightclubs. Clustering also provides the
Company with the ability to disperse management expertise to
more locations under their responsibility.
Business
We operate the following nightclubs:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Club
|
|
Date Acquired
|
|
Club Type
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Indianapolis, Indiana
|
|
2002
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Brooklyn in Brooklyn, Illinois
|
|
2002
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
All Nude in Denver, Colorado
|
|
2004
|
|
C
|
The Penthouse
Club
®
in Glendale, Colorado
|
|
2004
|
|
A
|
Diamond
Cabaret
®
in Denver, Colorado
|
|
2004
|
|
A
|
PTs
®
Appaloosa in Colorado Springs, Colorado
|
|
October 2006
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Denver, Colorado
|
|
December 2006
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, Kentucky
|
|
January 2007
|
|
B
|
Roxys in Brooklyn, Illinois
|
|
February 2007
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Centreville, Illinois
|
|
February 2007
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Sports Cabaret in Sauget, Illinois
|
|
March 2007
|
|
B
|
The Penthouse
Club
®
in Sauget, Illinois
|
|
March 2007
|
|
A
|
The Mens
Club
®
in Raleigh, North Carolina
|
|
April 2007
|
|
A
|
Schieks Palace Royale in Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
|
May 2007
|
|
A
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Portland, Maine
|
|
September 2007
|
|
B
|
Jaguars Gold Club in Ft. Worth, Texas
(Golden)
|
|
September 2007
|
|
C
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Hialeah, Florida
|
|
October 2007
|
|
B
|
La Boheme Gentlemens Club in Denver, Colorado
|
|
December 2007
|
|
B
|
Jaguars Gold Club in Dallas, Texas (Manana)
|
|
April 2008
|
|
C
|
Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club in Anaheim, California
|
|
July 2008
|
|
C
|
The Company classifies its clubs into three tiers called A, B,
and C clubs. Type A club characteristics include
larger facilities with a variety of entertainment and
performers. A clubs include a restaurant with an
onsite chef preparer. Furthermore, A type clubs
offer high-label cigars, VIP facilities, and specialty suites.
Type B clubs have smaller facilities. Food service
is limited or not provided, but the facility serves alcohol.
These clubs are a topless format. Type C clubs do
not provide alcoholic beverages, except for Texas locations that
follow the Bring Your Own Bottle
(B.Y.O.B) format. These clubs are
all-nude.
The Company owns International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
(IEC), which provides management services to our
clubs. IEC was originally formed in 1980. At the time of
acquisition in October 2003, IEC was owned by Troy Lowrie, our
Chairman of the Board and CEO.
The
day-to-day
management of our clubs is conducted through IEC. IEC provides
the clubs with management and supervisory personnel to oversee
operations, hires and contracts all operating personnel,
establishes club policies and procedures, handles compliance
monitoring, purchasing, accounting and other administrative
services, and prepares financial and operating reports, and
income tax returns. IEC charges the
2
D-4
clubs a management fee based on the Companys common
expenses that are incurred in maintaining these functions.
In June 2002, the Company formed VCG Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
(VCG-RE), a wholly owned subsidiary that currently
owns the land and buildings of two of our nightclubs. On
July 31, 2009, VCG-RE sold another piece of the real
property located in Phoenix, Arizona to Black Canyon Highway
LLC, a Texas limited liability company. As of December 31,
2009, VCG-RE owns both the real property on which
PTs
®
Showclub in Indianapolis, IN and
PTs
®
Brooklyn in Brooklyn, IL are located.
The Company has one reportable segment. Our clubs are
distinguished by the following features:
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
Our club facilities are
within ready access to the principal business, tourist
and/or
commercial districts in the metropolitan areas in which they are
located. The facilities have state of the art sound systems,
lighting and professional stage design. Our clubs maintain an
upscale level of décor and furnishings to create a
professional appearance. Three of our clubs offer VIP rooms. Our
VIP rooms are open to individuals who purchase annual
memberships. They offer a higher level of service and are
elegantly appointed and spacious.
|
|
|
|
Professional
On-Site
Management
Our clubs are managed by persons
who are experienced in the restaurant
and/or
hospitality industry. The managers for the clubs are responsible
for maintaining a quality and professionally run club. At a
higher level, our Area Directors oversee the management of
several clubs within a specified geographical area. The Company
currently has 12 Area Directors who have collectively 18 to
26 years of experience in the industry.
|
|
|
|
Food and Beverage Operations
Many of
our clubs offer a first-class bar and food service. Five of our
clubs offer a full service restaurant that provides customers
with exceptional food, service and luxury. At most locations, we
provide a selective variety of food including, but not limited
to, hot and cold appetizers, pizza, and other limited food
choices. Some of our club operations do not have liquor
licenses. Those of our clubs that carry B.Y.O.B. permits sell
non-alcoholic beverages. Experienced chef and bar managers are
responsible for training, supervising, staffing, and operating
the food and beverage operations at each club.
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
Our clubs provide a high
standard of attractive, talented, and courteous female and male
performers and servers. We maintain the highest standards for
appearance, attitude, demeanor, dress, and personality. The
entertainment encourages repeat visits and increases the average
length of a patrons stay. Performers who work at our clubs
are experienced entertainers.
|
Working
Capital
We have historically reported negative working capital, where
current liabilities exceed current assets. This is consistent
with other businesses in our industry who report a working
capital deficit, which increases net cash provided by operating
activities. This is because we receive immediate cash payment
for sales, while inventories, accrued expenses, and other
current liabilities normally carry longer payment terms.
Advertising
and Promotion
Our ability to attract patrons to a nightclub for the first time
is critical to a nightclubs success. Promotions,
advertising, and special offers are the typical means to market
a nightclub. We use a variety of highly targeted methods to
reach our customers including local radio, billboard trucks,
internet, newspaper and magazine ads, and professional sporting
events.
We extensively utilize a marketing program developed by IEC. Our
nightclubs are marketed as a safe and upscale environment for
adult entertainment. The marketing strategy is to attract new
customers, increase the frequency of visits by existing
customers, and establish a higher level of name recognition. The
target market is the business-convention traveler, local
professionals, and business people. In addition, IEC conducts
various promotional activities throughout the year to keep the
nightclubs names before the public. In order to be good
3
D-5
corporate citizens, the nightclubs actively sponsor and
participate in local charitable events and make contributions to
local charities.
Compliance
Policies and Controls
IEC has developed comprehensive policies aimed at ensuring that
the operation of each nightclub is conducted in conformance with
local, state, and federal laws and they are designed to assure
our clients a quality and enjoyable experience. We have a
no tolerance policy on illegal drug use in or around
the facilities. We continually monitor the actions of
entertainers, employees, and customers to ensure that proper
behavior standards are met.
We believe that operational and accounting controls are
essential to the successful operation of a cash intensive
nightclub and bar business. IEC has also developed and
implemented internal operating and accounting controls to track
cash, credit card transactions, and food and beverage inventory.
We have installed an Aloha point of sale system, including
restaurant fraud tracking software, in all our clubs. These
controls also help to maintain the accuracy of our operating and
accounting records. IEC has developed other special software
programs to capture operating information and generate reports
for efficient management and control of the nightclubs. We
review all revenue information on a daily basis by club.
Patents,
Trademarks, Licenses and Royalty Agreements
Under the terms of a 2005 Licensing Agreement and in
consideration of royalty payments to General Media
Communications, Inc., Penthouse granted us a five-year
non-exclusive license, renewable in five years, for the use of
the registered trademarks Penthouse, Pet of
the Month, Pet of the Year, Three-Key
Logo and One-Key Logo in our nightclub
operations in Denver, Colorado and St. Louis, Illinois. The
royalty payments are based on a percentage of revenue. We also
have permission to use the name Jaguars Gold
Club for our nightclubs located in Dallas and
Ft. Worth, Texas without a fee.
The Diamond
Cabaret
®
name and
PTs
®
name and logo are trademarks registered with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have an indefinite
license from Club Licensing, LLC, which is controlled and
majority-owned by Troy Lowrie, who is a significant stockholder
and our Chairman of the Board and CEO, to use the
PTs
®
trademark for a fee. Roxys is a service mark registered
with the state of Illinois also owned by Club Licensing, LLC.
The fee was established in 2006 and approved by the independent
members of our Board of Directors (Board). The
licensing fee amount has not changed for several years. The
Mens
Club
®
has a annually renewable license from the Texas Richmond
Corporation.
Some of our nightclubs operate under owned trade names as
opposed to licensed registered trademarks. The Company has three
nightclubs that own trade names, which are used to market the
nightclubs, set forth in the table below.
|
|
|
Club Ownership
|
|
Trade Name
|
|
Classic Affairs, Inc.
|
|
Schieks Palace Royale
|
VCG-IS, LLC
|
|
Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club
|
Stout Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
|
|
La Boheme Gentlemens Cabaret
|
The Company does not pay royalties for the use of the owned
trade names on its own products and services. The trade names
are valuable in the operation of the nightclubs and their
dealings with customers. We have valued the three trade names
using the income approach. The income approach is
based on the premise that free cash flow is a more valid
criterion for measuring value than book or
accounting profits. The after-tax nightclub free cash flows were
discounted back to their net present value at an appropriate
intangible rate of return to estimate the fair value of the
trade names. All trade names have indefinite lives based on
managements expectations that we will continue using the
trade names in the future.
Our nightclubs hold several licenses (including liquor, dance,
and cabaret licenses) that are essential to the operation of our
business. Dance or cabaret licenses are not salable, yet they
can be transferred if a
4
D-6
nightclub is transferred with approval. We estimated the fair
value of cabaret licenses by using a variation of the income
approach called the excess earnings method. This approach
measures the present worth and anticipated future benefits of
the license. The appropriate expenses were deducted from the
sales attributable to the licenses and economic rents were
charged for the use of other contributory assets. Economic rents
are charges in the form of an expense to account for the
assets reliance on other tangible and intangible assets in
order to generate sales. The nightclub after-tax cash flows
attributable to the assets were discounted back to their net
present value at an appropriate intangible asset rate of return
and summed to indicate a value for the licenses. All licenses
have indefinite lives based on managements expectations
that we will continue using the licenses in the future.
Seasonality
We do not consider our business to be seasonal; however, severe
winter weather can limit customers from visiting our nightclubs.
Customers
The business of the Company taken as a whole, or any individual
club, is not dependent upon any single customer or a few
customers.
Competition
The adult nightclub entertainment business is highly competitive
with respect to price, location and quality of the facility,
entertainment, service, and food and beverages. Due to the
highly fragmented nature of the adult nightclub industry, exact
industry details are sparse about the actual number of operating
nightclubs in the United States. However, various sources state
that there are approximately 3,000 to 4,000 adult nightclubs in
the United States with no clear industry leader. We have many
competitors in the metropolitan areas in which we are located
and/or
intend to expand. Our current nightclubs compete with locally
owned nightclub owners. Three of our locations compete with
nightclubs owned by Ricks Cabaret International, Inc.
(Ricks). Changes in customer preferences, economic
conditions, demographic trends, and the location, number of, and
quality of competing nightclubs could adversely affect our
business, as could a shortage of experienced local management
and hourly employees. We believe that our nightclubs enjoy a
high level of repeat business and customer loyalty due to our
upscale restaurant atmosphere, food quality, premium
entertainment, perceived price-value relationship, and efficient
service. Although we believe that we are well positioned to
compete successfully, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to maintain our high level of name recognition and prestige
within the marketplace.
Government
Regulations
Our business is regulated by zoning, local and state liquor
licensing, and local ordinances. Also, we are subject to state
and federal time, place, and manner free speech restrictions. In
the states in which we currently operate, state liquor licenses
renew annually and are considered to be a privileged
license that could be subject to suspension or revocation. The
adult entertainment provided by our nightclubs has elements of
free speech and expression and therefore, has some protection
under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
However, the protection is limited to expression, and not
conduct. In addition to various regulatory requirements
affecting the sale of alcoholic beverages in many cities where
we operate, the location of a topless cabaret is subject to
restriction by city ordinance. These ordinances affect the
locations in which sexually oriented businesses may be operated
by typically requiring minimum distances to schools, churches,
and other sexually oriented businesses and containing
restrictions based on the percentage of residences within the
immediate vicinity of the sexually oriented business. The
granting of a sexually oriented business permit is not subject
to discretion; such a business permit must be granted if the
proposed operation satisfies the requirements of the applicable
ordinance.
5
D-7
In all states where we operate, management believes that we
comply with applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances
governing the sale of alcohol and the operation of sexually
oriented businesses. While our nightclubs are generally well
established in their respective markets, there can be no
assurance that local, state,
and/or
federal licensing and other regulations will permit our
nightclubs to remain in operation or be profitable in the future.
Employees
and Independent Contractors
As of March 11, 2010, we had approximately
925 employees, of which 135 were full-time management
employees including corporate and administrative operations, and
approximately 790 who were engaged in entertainment, food, and
beverage service, including bartenders and waitresses. None of
our employees are represented by a union nor have we ever
suffered a work stoppage. Our entertainers in Minneapolis,
Minnesota act as commissioned employees. As of March 11,
2010, we had independent contractor relationships with
approximately 2,000 entertainers in other states, who are
self-employed and perform at our locations on a non-exclusive
basis. Independent contractors/entertainers pay a fee to the
nightclub to perform.
Potential
Sale of the Company
As previously reported on the Companys Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on November 4, 2009, November 19,
2009, November 25, 2009, December 7, 2009 and
December 17, 2009), on November 3, 2009, the Company
received a non-binding letter of intent (the
Proposal) from the Companys Chairman and CEO,
Troy Lowrie, Lowrie Management, LLLP, an entity controlled by
Mr. Lowrie, and certain other unidentified investors
(collectively, the Lowrie Investors), to acquire all
of the outstanding common stock of the Company for $2.10 per
share in cash (the Going Private Transaction). The
Proposal contemplated that the Company would no longer be a
public reporting or trading company following the closing of the
Going Private Transaction. In response to the Proposal, the
Board formed a Special Committee consisting solely of directors
who are independent under the NASDAQ Global Market
(NASDAQ) independence rules to review and evaluate
the Proposal. The Special Committee was formed in order to
properly and fairly represent the best interests of the
Companys shareholders in a full and diligent evaluation of
the Proposal and any alternatives thereto in order to maximize
shareholder value. The members of the Special Committee are
George Sawicki, Kenton Sieckman and Carolyn Romero. The Special
Committee retained a financial advisor and independent legal
counsel to assist the Special Committee in its evaluation of the
Proposal and alternatives thereto. On December 16, 2009,
the Special Committee informed the Lowrie Investors that it had
determined, with input from its advisors, that the terms of the
Proposal were currently inadequate, and the Special Committee
directed its financial advisors to contact any parties that had
either previously expressed an interest or might potentially be
interested in pursuing a transaction with the Company.
In connection with the Proposal, the Company has been served
with three complaints (the Complaints) filed by
various plaintiffs, alleging that they bring purported
derivative and class action lawsuits against the Company and
each of the individual members of the Board on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated and derivatively on
behalf of the Company, which previously have been reported in
the Companys Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(filed with the SEC on November 19, 2009, November 24,
2009 and December 7, 2009). The Complaints allege, among
other things, that the consideration in the Proposal is
inadequate, that Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest with
respect to the Proposal and that in connection with the
Boards evaluation of the Proposal, the individual
defendants have breached their fiduciary duties under Colorado
law. The Complaints seek, among other things, certification of
the individual plaintiffs as a class representative, either an
injunction enjoining the defendants from consummating or closing
the Going Private Transaction, or if the Going Private
Transaction is consummated, rescission of the Going Private
Transaction, an injunction directing the Board members to comply
with their fiduciary duties, an award of damages in an amount to
be determined at trial, an accounting to the Plaintiffs and the
class for alleged damages suffered or to be suffered based on
the conduct described in the Complaint, an award of reasonable
attorneys and experts fees, and such other relief
the court deems just and proper. As of the date hereof, the
Company believes that
6
D-8
the allegations set forth in the Complaints are baseless and the
Company intends to vigorously defend itself in the lawsuits.
As reported on the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010, the Company,
Ricks, Mr. Lowrie, and Lowrie Management, LLLP
(collectively with Mr. Lowrie, Lowrie), entered
into a non-binding (except as to certain provisions, including
exclusivity and confidentiality) letter of intent (the
Letter of Intent). Pursuant to the Letter of Intent,
Ricks agreed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
common stock of the Company and the Company will merge with and
into Ricks or a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ricks
(the Merger). In the event the Merger is
consummated, the Company will become a subsidiary of Ricks
and the Companys shareholders will become shareholders of
Ricks. The parties intend that the Merger will be
structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Pursuant to the Letter of Intent, the Companys
shareholders will receive shares of common stock of Ricks
in exchange for their shares of the Companys common stock
based on an exchange ratio that values each share of the
Companys common stock between $2.20 and $3.80 per share.
The applicable exchange ratio will be determined based on the
weighted average closing price of Ricks common stock on
NASDAQ for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second
trading day prior to the closing of the Merger. In the event the
price per share of Ricks common stock as determined by
this formula is below $8.00, Ricks may terminate the
Merger agreement, subject to the payment to the Company of a
termination fee to be negotiated by the parties in connection
with the preparation of the Merger agreement. As of
February 16, 2010 (assuming the Merger were to close on
such date and the weighted average closing price per share of
Ricks common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days
ending on February 11, 2010 was equal to the closing price
of Ricks common stock on February 11, 2010 of $11.76
per share), the value of each share of the Companys common
stock under this formula would be $2.66 per share.
Contemporaneously with the closing of the Merger, Ricks
has agreed to acquire 5,770,197 shares of the
Companys common stock held by Lowrie and its affiliates
(the Lowrie Common Stock) for cash in an amount
equal to the lesser of $2.44 per share or the per share value of
the common stock received by the Companys shareholders in
the Merger. At Lowries election, Lowrie may receive
Ricks common stock, at the same exchange ratio received by
the Companys shareholders in the Merger, for up to 30% of
the Lowrie Common Stock. In addition, Mr. Lowrie will
(i) refinance (at a lower interest rate) and continue to
carry a $5.7 million note from the Company (as acquired by
Ricks), (ii) continue to personally guarantee certain
Company obligations in exchange for a to-be-determined fair
market value cash payment for such guarantees, (iii) sell
to Ricks the outstanding capital stock of Club Licensing,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lowrie Management, LLLP that
owns the trademarks Diamond Cabaret and
PTs, (the Trademarks), and
(iv) enter into a three-year consulting agreement with
Ricks (collectively, the Lowrie Transactions).
In exchange for the Lowrie Transactions, Lowrie will receive the
following: (a) a to-be-determined amount equal to the fair
market value of the restructuring of the $5.7 million note
and continued personal guarantees (currently estimated to be
$2 million); (b) a to-be-determined amount equal to
the fair market value of the Trademarks (currently estimated to
be $5 million); and (c) payment of $1.0 million
over three years and a monthly expense allowance equal to $1,500
under the consulting agreement. Assuming Lowrie elects to be
paid solely in cash at a price of $2.44 per share of the
Companys common stock and the fair market value of the
Lowrie Transactions is as set forth above (totaling
$7.0 million), Lowrie will receive aggregate payments of
approximately $26.8 million (which amount includes the
restructuring of the existing $5.7 million note held by
Mr. Lowrie and excludes payments under the consulting
agreement) in connection with the Merger, of which approximately
$16.8 million will be payable in cash at the closing of the
Merger and $10.0 million will be payable pursuant to a
four-year promissory note from Ricks bearing interest at
8.0% per annum.
The Letter of Intent provided for a binding exclusivity period
through March 12, 2010, which the parties have extended to
March 31, 2010, during which time the Company has agreed,
on behalf of itself and its representatives, to negotiate
exclusively with Ricks and has further agreed not to
solicit any offer or engage in any negotiations other than with
Ricks for the merger, sale of the business or assets of
the Company or tender or exchange offer for the Companys
common stock. In the event the Company receives an unsolicited
offer
7
D-9
that is superior to the terms of the Merger (a Superior
Proposal) and Ricks does not amend its offer within
five business days of the date on which it receives notice of
such Superior Proposal to be superior to the Superior Proposal,
then the Company may terminate the Letter of Intent. If the
Company terminates the Letter of Intent due to its receipt of a
Superior Proposal, it has agreed to reimburse Ricks for
its
out-of-pocket
expenses and fees incurred in evaluating and negotiating the
Merger in an amount not to exceed $250,000 in the aggregate. If
a definitive Merger agreement is not entered into by
March 31, 2010, the Letter of Intent will automatically
terminate, unless further extended by the parties.
The Merger agreement is expected to contain customary
representations and warranties including the absence of a
material adverse change in the business of Ricks and the
Company prior to closing and other customary closing conditions,
including but not limited to, the receipt of material consents,
the approval of the Merger by the shareholders of Ricks
and the Company and the effectiveness of a registration
statement containing a joint proxy statement/prospectus filed
with the SEC on
Form S-4
to be filed by Ricks, which, among other things, registers
the shares of common stock to be issued to the Companys
shareholders in the Merger. There can be no assurance that the
Company, Ricks and Lowrie will enter into a definitive
Merger agreement, that the entry into a definitive Merger
agreement, if any, will result in the closing of any transaction
or that the terms of any definitive Merger documents will
reflect the terms of the proposed Merger as outlined in the
Letter of Intent. See the discussion under the heading,
Risk Factors.
Available
Information
The Companys website is www.vcgh.com. The Companys
periodic reports and all amendments to those reports required to
be filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are
available free of charge through its website. The Company will
continue to post its periodic reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and its current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those documents to our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports are filed with, or
furnished to, the SEC. Material contained on the Companys
website is not incorporated by reference into this Report on
Form 10-K.
8
D-10
Our business prospects are subject to various risks and
uncertainties that impact our business. You should carefully
consider the following discussion of risks, and the other
information provided in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The risks described below are not the only ones we face.
Additional risks that are presently unknown to us or that we
currently deem immaterial may also impact our business.
The
process of negotiating and consummating the proposed merger
transaction or any other transaction, as well as the failure to
successfully consummate such a transaction, could adversely
affect our business.
The process of analyzing, negotiating, documenting, and
consummating (in each case, as necessary) the proposed merger or
any other transaction resulting from the processes conducted by
the legal and financial advisors to the Special Committee of our
Board could cause disruptions in our business, which could have
an adverse effect on our financial results. Among other things,
uncertainty as to whether the proposed merger or any alternative
transaction will be completed may cause current and prospective
employees and members of management to become uncertain about
their future roles with the Company if the transaction is
completed. This uncertainty could adversely affect our ability
to retain employees, members of management, and our
relationships with customers and vendors. In addition, despite
the fact that a Special Committee has been formed to manage and
oversee any transaction and the Special Committee is being
advised by outside professionals, the attention of management
and other resources may be directed toward a potential
transaction and diverted from
day-to-day
operations. Further, the costs associated with these processes
are expected to be considerable, regardless of whether any
transaction is approved or consummated. There is no assurance
that the proposed merger or any other transaction will occur. If
the proposed merger or any other transaction is not completed,
the share price of our common stock may change to the extent
that the current market price of our common stock reflects an
assumption that a transaction will be completed. Finally, a
failed transaction may result in negative publicity
and/or
a
negative impression of us in the investment community. All of
the foregoing could materially adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We are
subject to litigation related to the proposed going private
transaction, which could affect our ability to consummate a
transaction, force us to rescind a transaction if it is
consummated before the conclusion of the litigation or otherwise
adversely affect our business or stock price.
As previously disclosed in Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and Item 3 of this Annual Report, four complaints have been
filed relating to the original going private transaction. The
defendants in these lawsuits include varying combinations of the
Company, the members of the Companys Board, and Troy
Lowrie, the Companys Chairman and CEO. Among other things,
the complaints seek to enjoin the Company, its directors, and
certain of its officers from consummating the proposed going
private transaction. The going private transaction offer made by
Troy Lowrie was deemed inadequate by the Special Committee of
the Board on December 16, 2009. On February 16, 2010,
the Company signed a letter of intent to merge operations with
Ricks Cabaret International, Inc. as a wholly-owned
subsidiary. Additional lawsuits pertaining to the proposed
merger transaction could be filed in the future or the existing
lawsuits could affect the proposed merger transaction.
If successful, the results of any lawsuits could be that the
Company could be prohibited from consummating a proposed
transaction, or, if it has been consummated, the Company could
be forced to rescind it. The Company could also be required to
pay damages to the plaintiffs. Any conclusion of these lawsuits
or any other in a manner adverse to the Company could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business, results
of operations, financial condition, and cash flow. In addition,
the cost to the Company of defending these or any other
lawsuits, even if resolved in the Companys favor, could be
substantial. Such lawsuits could also substantially divert the
attention of the Companys management and other resources.
9
D-11
We
have had limited operations which makes our future operating
results difficult to predict.
Our Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Colorado in 1998, but did not begin its operations until April
2002. The Company through its subsidiaries currently owns (in
total or in partnerships) and operates 20 adult nightclubs that
offer quality live adult entertainment, restaurant, and bar
operations.
We have a limited operating history and face the risk and
uncertainties of other early-stage companies. Because of our
limited operating history, we may not be able to correctly
estimate our future operating expenses, which could lead to cash
shortfalls. Our budgeted expense levels are based in part on our
expectations concerning future revenues. We may be unable to
adjust our operations in a timely manner to compensate for any
unexpected shortfall in revenues. Accordingly, a significant
shortfall in demand for our services would decrease our revenues
and could have an immediate and material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, and financial condition. To the
extent that expenses precede or are not rapidly followed by
increased revenue, our business, results of operations, and
financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
Our
inability to obtain capital, use internally generated cash, or
use our securities or debt to finance future expansion efforts
could impair the growth and expansion of our
business.
Reliance on internally generated cash or debt to finance our
operations or complete business expansion efforts could
substantially limit our operational and financial flexibility.
The extent to which we will be able or willing to issue
securities to consummate expansions will depend on the market
value of our securities from time to time and the willingness of
potential investors, sellers, or business partners to accept it
as full or partial payment. Using securities for this purpose
also may result in significant dilution to our then existing
stockholders. To the extent that we are unable to use securities
to make future expansions, our ability to grow through
expansions may be limited by the extent to which we are able to
raise capital for this purpose through debt or equity
financings. Raising external capital in the form of debt could
require periodic interest payments that could hinder our
financial flexibility in the future. No assurance can be given
that we will be able to obtain the necessary capital to finance
a successful expansion program or our other cash needs. If we
are unable to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, we
may be required to reduce the scope of any expansion. In
addition to requiring funding for expansions, we may need
additional funds to implement our internal growth and operating
strategies or to finance other aspects of our operations. Our
failure to (a) obtain additional capital on acceptable
terms, (b) use internally generated cash or debt to
complete expansions because it significantly limits our
operational or financial flexibility, or (c) use securities
to make future expansions may hinder our ability to actively
pursue any expansion program we may decide to implement. In
addition, if we are unable to obtain necessary capital going
forward, our ability to continue as a going concern would be
negatively impacted.
Our
business has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by
disruptions in the credit markets, including reduced access to
credit and higher costs of obtaining credit.
Widening credit spreads, as well as significant declines in the
availability of credit, have adversely affected our ability to
borrow on a secured and unsecured basis and may continue to do
so. Disruptions in the credit markets may make it harder and
more expensive to obtain funding for our businesses. We often
rely on access to the secured and unsecured credit markets to
finance acquisitions of additional nightclubs. Additional
nightclub acquisitions are also financed by promissory notes
carried by the sellers and debt financed by company investors
and related parties. If our available funding is limited or we
are forced to fund our operations at a higher cost, these
conditions may require us to curtail our business activities and
increase our cost of funding, both of which could reduce our
profitability and prevent or hamper our growth through
acquisitions.
10
D-12
Our
business has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by
conditions in the U.S. financial markets and economic conditions
generally.
Our business is materially affected by conditions in the
U.S. financial markets and economic conditions generally.
In the past 24 months, these conditions have changed
suddenly and negatively. The ongoing financial crisis and the
loss of confidence in the stock market has increased our cost of
funding and limited our access to some of our traditional
sources of liquidity, including both secured and unsecured
borrowings. Increases in funding costs and limitations on our
access to liquidity could have a negative impact on our earnings
and our ability to acquire additional nightclubs. In addition,
the deteriorating general economic conditions in the United
States has caused a drop in consumer spending in general, and
discretionary spending in particular. This has caused a decline
in the number of patrons at our nightclubs and the amount of
money spent by them. Further, our nightclubs located in
geographical areas suffering from proportionally worse economic
conditions when compared to the United States in general have
experienced larger declines in operating revenues. Overall, the
economic environment during our 2009 fiscal year has been
slightly adverse for our business compared to the previous year
and there can be no assurance that these conditions will improve
in the near term. Until they do, we expect our results of
operations to be slightly adversely affected.
Our nightclubs were acquired with a purchase price based on
historical EBITDA. This results in each nightclub carrying a
substantial amount of intangible value, mostly allocated to
licenses and goodwill. Generally accepted accounting principles
require an annual impairment review of these indefinite lived
assets. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, the
annual impairment review resulted in an impairment loss of
approximately $1.8 million, compared to the impairment loss
of approximately $46 million in 2008. If difficult market
and economic conditions continue over 2010
and/or
we
experience a decrease in revenue at one or more nightclubs, we
could incur an additional decline in fair value of one or more
of our nightclubs. This could result in another future
impairment charge of up to the total value of the indefinite
lived intangible assets.
Our
acquisitions may result in disruptions in our business and
diversion of managements attention.
We have made, and may continue to make, acquisitions of
complementary nightclubs, restaurants, or related operations.
Any acquisitions will require the integration of the operations,
products, and personnel of the acquired businesses and the
training and motivation of these individuals. Such acquisitions
may disrupt our operations and divert managements
attention from
day-to-day
operations, which could impair our relationships with current
employees, customers, and partners. We may also incur debt or
issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisitions.
These issuances could be substantially dilutive to our
stockholders. In addition, our profitability may suffer because
of acquisition-related costs or amortization, or impairment
costs for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. If
management is unable to fully integrate acquired business,
products, or persons with existing operations, we may not
receive the benefits of the acquisitions, and our revenues and
stock trading price may decrease.
Our
business is subject to risks associated with geographic market
concentration.
One part of our growth strategy is nightclub
clustering. Adult nightclubs tend to group together
in their respective markets. We believe that clustering leads to
improved brand recognition as well as some improvement in
economics of scale as costs of marketing are spread over more
nightclubs. Clustering also provides the Company with the
ability to disperse management expertise to more locations under
their responsibility. We are subject to risks associated with
geographic market concentration in areas in which we own and
operate multiple nightclubs, such as adverse changes in the
local economy, the local regulatory environment, and our local
reputation. If we are unable to successfully diminish the impact
of these risks, our profitability and growth prospects may be
materially and adversely affected.
11
D-13
Our
business operations are subject to regulatory uncertainties
which may affect our ability to acquire additional nightclubs,
remain in operation or be profitable.
Our business is regulated by constantly changing zoning, local
and state liquor licensing, local ordinances, and state and
federal time, place and manner free speech restrictions. In
states in which we currently operate, liquor licenses renew
annually and are considered to be privileged
licenses that could be subject to suspension or revocation. The
adult entertainment provided by our nightclubs has elements of
free speech and expression and, therefore, has some protection
under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
However, the protection is limited to the expression of our
entertainers and not their conduct.
In all states where we operate, management believes that we
comply with applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances
governing the sale of alcohol and the operation of sexually
oriented businesses. However, changes in these laws,
regulations, and ordinances may increase our cost of compliance
therewith, or cause us to be unable to renew them, thereby
reducing our profitability or preventing our nightclubs to
remain in operation. There can be no assurance that local, state
and/or
federal licensing, and other regulations will permit our
nightclubs to remain in operation or profitable in the future.
Further, if we are involved in costly administrative or legal
proceedings to renew our licenses or defend against claims
involving non-protected free speech, it may result in negative
publicity and decreased profitability.
Beginning January 1, 2008, our two Texas nightclubs became
subject to a new state law requiring each nightclub to collect a
five dollar surcharge for every nightclub visitor. We have filed
a tax protest suit against this patron tax, and the
suit has been stayed by agreement until the Texas Supreme Court
resolves the underlying case. This trend is spreading to other
states to enact similar surcharges or admission fee taxes.
Currently, the Company is not passing this surcharge on to our
customers and we are absorbing this expense. Our profitability
could be negatively impacted if this surcharge continues in
Texas and spreads to other states in which the Company operates.
There
is substantial competition in the nightclub entertainment
industry, which may affect our ability to operate profitably or
acquire additional nightclubs.
Our ability to increase or sustain revenues is impacted by our
ability to compete effectively with our competitors, both for
nightclub acquisitions and patrons. Our ability to compete
depends on many factors, many of which are outside of our
control. These factors include the quality and appeal of our
competitors nightclubs relative to our offerings, the
strength of our competitors brands, the effectiveness of
our competitors sales, marketing efforts and the
attractiveness of their product offerings, and general consumer
behaviors and preferences regarding how they choose to spend
their discretionary income. Further, our competitors may have
significantly greater financial and management resources than
our Company. In addition, the industry is especially sensitive
to ever-changing and unpredictable competitive trends and
competition for general entertainment dollars which cannot be
easily predicted and which are beyond our control. If we are
unable to compete effectively in the market, we may be unable to
attract patrons to our existing nightclubs or complete
acquisitions of new nightclubs, which may prevent us from
sustaining or increasing our revenues or growing our business.
If we
are unable to effectively promote our brands and establish a
leading position in the marketplace, our business may
fail.
We believe that we may attract more patrons to our nightclubs
and distinguish ourselves from our competition by increasing the
awareness of our brands and that the importance of brand
recognition will increase over time. In order to gain brand
recognition, we believe that we must increase our marketing and
advertising budgets to create and maintain brand name loyalty
through the promotion and development of our affiliation with
the
PTs
®
,
Diamond
Cabaret
®
,
and
Penthouse
®
names. We do not know whether these efforts will lead to greater
brand recognition. If we are unable to effectively promote our
brand and establish a leading position in the marketplace, we
may be unable to attract patrons or new nightclubs for
acquisitions, which may prevent us from sustaining or increasing
our revenues or growing our business.
12
D-14
Our
failure to protect our brands may undermine our competitive
position and litigation to protect our brands or defend against
third-party allegations of infringement may be
costly.
We believe that it is important for our business to achieve
brand recognition. We rely primarily on trademarks and trade
names to achieve this. Third parties may infringe or
misappropriate our trademarks, trade names, and other
intellectual property rights, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
operating results. In addition, policing unauthorized use of our
trademarks, trade names, and other intellectual property can be
difficult and expensive. Litigation may be necessary to enforce
our intellectual property rights or determine the validity and
scope of the proprietary rights of others. We cannot give
assurance that the outcome of such potential litigation will be
in our favor. Such litigation may be costly and may divert
management attention as well as expend our other resources away
from our business. An adverse determination in any such
litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and may
harm our business, prospects, and reputation.
Our
business is dependent upon management and employees for
continuing operations and expansion.
Our success will depend, to a significant extent, on the efforts
and abilities of Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board and CEO,
Micheal Ocello, a Director and our President and Chief Operating
Officer and Courtney Cowgill, our Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer. The loss of the services of Messrs. Lowrie
and/or
Ocello or our inability to recruit and train additional key
personnel in a timely fashion could have a material and
continuing adverse effect on our business and future prospects.
A loss of one or more of our current officers or key personnel
could severely and negatively impact our operations.
Messrs. Lowrie and Ocello have limited experience managing
a public company subject to the SECs periodic reporting
obligations.
Hiring qualified management is difficult due to the limited
number of qualified professionals in the industry in which we
operate. We have in the past experienced difficulty in
recruiting qualified personnel and there can be no assurance
that we will be successful in attracting and retaining
additional members of management if our business continues to
grow. Failure to attract and retain personnel, particularly
management personnel, would continue to materially harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board and CEO, may have
potential conflicts of interest with the Company, which may
adversely affect our business. He beneficially owns a
significant number of shares of our common stock, which will
have an impact on all major decisions on which our stockholders
may vote and which may discourage an acquisition of our Company.
We have engaged in several transactions with Lowrie Management
LLLP, which is controlled and majority owned by Troy Lowrie, who
is a significant stockholder, and our Chairman of the Board and
CEO. Additionally, Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie Management LLLP is
one of several parties that have submitted a proposal to the
Companys Board to acquire all of the Companys common
stock in a going private transaction. Further, in the proposed
merger transaction as currently proposed, Mr. Lowrie will
receive different consideration than the Companys other
shareholders, due in part to his continued guaranty of certain
Company obligations, the sale of certain trademarks owned by
Mr. Lowries affiliates, the refinancing of his
promissory note with the Company, and his consulting agreement
with Ricks Cabaret International, Inc. The Special
Committee of the Board rejected the proposed going private
transaction as inadequate on December 16, 2009. Conflicts
of interest may arise between Mr. Lowries duties to
our Company and his duties to Lowrie Management LLLP, or his
interest as an owner of Lowrie Management LLLP or as a potential
acquirer of the Companys common stock in the proposed
going private transaction. Because Mr. Lowrie is a Director
and the CEO of our Company, he has a duty of loyalty and care to
us under Colorado law when there are any potential conflicts of
interest between our Company and Lowrie Management LLLP. We
cannot give you assurance that when conflicts of interest arise,
Mr. Lowrie will act completely in our interests or that
conflicts of interest will be resolved in our favor. In
addition, Mr. Lowrie could violate his legal duties by
diverting business opportunities from us to others. If we cannot
resolve any conflicts of interest between Mr. Lowrie and
us, we would have to rely on legal proceedings which could
disrupt our business.
13
D-15
Several
of our landlords and lenders have required
Mr. Lowries continued management role with our
Company in order to avoid a default or acceleration of our
obligations under certain of our leases or loan
agreements.
As of March 12, 2010, Mr. Lowrie owns approximately
28% of our issued and outstanding common stock. In addition, he
is our Chairman of the Board and CEO. The interests of
Mr. Lowrie may differ from the interests of other
stockholders. Because of his significant ownership of our common
stock, Mr. Lowrie will have the ability to significantly
influence virtually all corporate actions requiring stockholder
approval, including the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
election of our Directors;
|
|
|
|
amendment of our organizational documents;
|
|
|
|
the potential merger or going private transactions or the sale
of our assets or other corporate transaction; and
|
|
|
|
Control of the outcome of any other matter submitted to the
stockholders for vote.
|
Mr. Lowries beneficial stock ownership may discourage
potential investors from investing in shares of our common stock
due to the lack of influence they could have on our business
decisions, which in turn could reduce our stock price.
We
must comply with all licenses and permits relating to the sale
of alcohol.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from the sale of
alcoholic beverages. States in which we operate may have laws
which may limit the availability of a permit to sell alcoholic
beverages or which may provide for suspension or revocation of a
permit to sell alcoholic beverages in certain circumstances. The
temporary or permanent suspension or revocations of any such
permits would have a material adverse effect on the revenues,
financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.
In all states where we operate, management believes that we
comply with applicable city, county, state, or other local laws
governing the sale of alcohol.
Activities
or conduct at our nightclubs may cause us to lose necessary
business licenses, expose us to liability, or result in adverse
publicity, which may increase our costs, divert
managements attention from our business, and cause our
stockholders to lose confidence in us, thereby lowering our
profitability and our stock price.
We are subject to risks associated with activities or conduct at
our nightclubs that are illegal or violate the terms of
necessary business licenses. Our nightclubs operate under
licenses for sexually oriented businesses and some protection
under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. While
we believe that the activities at our nightclubs comply with the
terms of such licenses, and that the element of our business
that constitutes an expression of free speech under the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is protected, activities
and conduct at our nightclubs may be found to violate the terms
of such licenses or be unprotected under the
U.S. Constitution. This protection is limited to the
expression and not the conduct of an entertainer. An issuing
authority may suspend or terminate a license for a nightclub
found to have violated the license terms. Illegal activities or
conduct at any of our nightclubs may result in negative
publicity or litigation. Such consequences may increase our cost
of doing business, divert managements attention from our
business, and make an investment in our securities unattractive
to current and potential investors, thereby lowering our
profitability and our stock price.
IEC has developed comprehensive policies aimed at ensuring that
the operation of each nightclub is conducted in conformance with
local, state and federal laws. We have a no
tolerance policy on illegal drug use in or around the
facilities. We continually monitor the actions of entertainers,
waitresses, and customers to ensure that proper behavior
standards are met. However, such policies, no matter how well
designed and enforced, can provide only reasonable, but not
absolute, assurance that the policies objectives are being
14
D-16
achieved. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems and policies, there can be no assurance that our
policies will prevent deliberate acts by persons attempting to
violate or circumvent them. Notwithstanding the foregoing
limitations, management believes that our policies are
reasonably effective in achieving their purposes.
Our
industry is viewed negatively by many for moral, religious,
womens rights, and other reasons, therefore, the market
for our securities is smaller than for other securities and an
investor may find it hard to sell our securities.
We operate in an industry that is viewed negatively by many.
People may object to sexually oriented entertainment for moral,
religious, womens rights, or other reasons. As a result,
we are exposed to risks associated with societal attitudes
towards our business, both locally and nationally. Local
attitudes may disproportionally affect our nightclubs in areas
in which we are operating while national attitudes may affect
our business generally or our stock price specifically. Because
of the negative perception of our industry, the market for our
securities is smaller than for securities without such negative
perception. Therefore, an investor in our securities may be
unable to sell our securities at an acceptable time and price,
or at all.
Our
business plan and proposed strategy has not been independently
evaluated.
We have not obtained any independent evaluation of our business
plan and proposed business strategy. There can be no assurance
that our nightclubs or proposed strategy will generate
sufficient revenues to maintain profitability.
We may
be subject to uninsured risks which, if realized, could expose
us to money damages, which we may be unable to
pay.
We maintain insurance in amounts we consider adequate for
personal injury and property damage to which our nightclubs may
be subject. We also currently have personal injury liquor
liability coverage in place. However, there can be no assurance
that we will not be exposed to potential liabilities for money
damages in excess of the coverage provided by insurance,
including, but not limited to, liabilities which may be imposed
pursuant to state dram shop statutes or common law
theories of liability. In general, dram shop
statutes provide that a person injured by an intoxicated person
has the right to recover damages from an establishment that
wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such person if it was
apparent to the server that the individual being sold, served,
or provided with an alcoholic beverage was obviously intoxicated
to the extent that he presented a clear danger to himself and
others. If our insurance coverage is not sufficient to pay for
any money damages that we may be found liable for, we will have
to pay such excess damages using the funds needed for operation
of our business, if available, thereby increasing our costs and
reducing our profitability.
Our
Directors and Officers have limited liability and are entitled
to indemnification that could encourage derivative lawsuits and
require us to direct funds away from our business.
Our Articles of Incorporation provide that our Directors shall
not be liable to the Company or our stockholders for monetary
damages for breaches of fiduciary duties as a Director to the
fullest extent permitted by Colorado law.
Further, we are obligated to indemnify and advance expenses to
our Directors and Executive Officers in certain circumstances.
Our Articles of Incorporation provide that the Company shall
indemnify and advance expenses to a Director or Officer in
connection with a proceeding to the fullest extent permitted or
required by and in accordance with Colorado law. We have also
entered into separate, but substantively identical,
indemnification agreements with all of our Directors and named
executive officers. The indemnification agreements provide that
the Company will indemnify each Director and Executive Officer
against claims arising out of events or occurrences related to
such individuals service on the Companys Board or as
an Executive Officer, as applicable, (i) when such
indemnification is expressly required to be made by law, or
(ii) after a determination has been made that such
indemnification is permissible. Pursuant to these
15
D-17
arrangements, we may be required to advance costs incurred by an
Officer or Director and to pay judgments, fines, and expenses
incurred by an Officer or Director, including reasonable
attorneys fees, as a result of actions or proceedings in
which our Officers and Directors may become involved by reason
of being or having been an Officer or Director of our Company.
Funds paid in satisfaction of judgments, fines, and expenses may
be funds we need for the operation of our business, thereby
affecting our ability to maintain profitability.
These provisions in the Companys Articles of Incorporation
and the stand-alone indemnification agreements may have the
effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation
against Directors and Executive Officers, and may discourage or
deter stockholders or management from bringing a lawsuit against
Directors and Executive Officers even though such an action, if
successful, might otherwise have benefited our stockholders. We
also note that our Directors and Troy Lowrie, the Companys
Chairman of the Board and CEO, are currently defendants in one
or more lawsuits in connection with the proposed going private
transaction, as further discussed in another risk factor and
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company may be required to advance expenses to and indemnify
the Directors and Mr. Lowrie from expenses involved in
defending against such lawsuits. Any amount we are required to
pay or advance to a Director or Executive Officer pursuant to
these provisions will be diverted from the Companys
operating capital and will have an adverse effect on the
Companys cash flow and results of operation. While the
Company has obtained directors and officers
insurance to protect against this occurrence, there can be no
assurance that our directors and officers insurance
will cover a claim made for indemnification or be sufficient to
cover the entire amount claimed for indemnification.
We have been informed that the Securities and Exchange
Commission has the opinion that indemnification of liabilities
to Executive Officers or Directors under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act) to be against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and therefore
are unenforceable.
We
could use the issuance of additional shares of our authorized
stock to deter a change in control.
As of March 12, 2010, we have 17,310,723 shares of
common stock outstanding, out of a total of
50,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, and zero
shares of Series A preferred stock, out of a total of
1,000,000 shares authorized for future issuance under our
Articles of Incorporation. This does not include 224 shares
of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2002 Stock
Option and Stock Bonus Plan, 2,708 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under our 2003 Stock Option and Stock
Bonus Plan, and 906,667 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under our 2004 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights
Plan. In addition, our Board is authorized to issue blank
check preferred stock, with designations, rights, and
preferences as they may determine. Accordingly, our Board may,
without stockholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock
with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights
that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of
the holders of our common stock. This type of preferred stock
could also be issued to discourage, delay, or prevent a change
in our control. The ability to issue blank check
preferred stock is a traditional anti-takeover measure. These
provisions in our charter documents make it difficult for a
majority stockholder to gain control of the Board and of our
Company. The issuance of additional shares would make it more
difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if its doing so
would be beneficial to our stockholders.
We
have employment agreements with Troy Lowrie and Micheal Ocello
that contain features that may discourage a change of
control.
On December 4, 2008, we entered into five-year employment
agreements with Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board and CEO,
and Micheal Ocello, one of our Directors and our President and
Chief Operating Officer. Pursuant to the terms of the employment
agreements, if we terminate either of them other than for
cause, death, or disability
(as such terms are defined therein), or either of them
terminates his employment for good reason (as such
term is defined therein, which term includes termination of the
officer following a change of control), we must pay the officer
a severance payment equal to three times the sum of
16
D-18
the officers base salary in effect upon termination plus
an amount equal to the highest bonus the officer received in the
three years before termination, if any.
Further, the employment agreements provide that if such an
officers employment is terminated for any reason, we must,
at the officers election, promptly pay all outstanding
debt owed to the officer and his family or issue to the officer,
with his approval, the number of shares of our common stock
determined by dividing (a) the outstanding principal and
interest owed to the officer (b) 50% of the last sale price
of our common stock on the date of termination.
Finally, Mr. Lowries employment agreement provides
that if Mr. Lowries employment is terminated for any
reason, we must also take all necessary steps to remove
Mr. Lowrie as a guarantor of any of our (or our
affiliates) obligations to any third party. In the event
that we are not successful in doing so, we must pay to
Mr. Lowrie a cash amount equal to five percent per year of
the aggregate amount he is continuously guaranteeing until such
time when Mr. Lowrie no longer guarantees the obligations.
A change of control may trigger the payments set forth above and
the resulting costs may prevent or deter a potential acquirer
from buying the Company. Even if doing so could be beneficial to
our stockholders.
We
must meet the NASDAQ Global Market continued listing
requirements or we risk delisting, which may decrease our stock
price and make it harder for our stockholders to trade our
stock.
Our common stock is currently listed for trading on the NASDAQ
Global Market. We must continue to satisfy NASDAQs
continued listing requirements or risk delisting of our
securities. That would likely have an adverse effect on the
price of our common stock and our business. There can be no
assurance that the Company will meet the continued listing
requirements for the NASDAQ Global Market, or that the
Companys common stock will not be delisted from the NASDAQ
Global Market in the future. If our common stock is delisted
from NASDAQ, it may trade on the
over-the-counter
market, which may be a less liquid market. In such case, our
stockholders ability to trade, or obtain quotations of the
market value of, shares of our common stock would be severely
limited because of lower trading volumes and transaction delays.
These factors could contribute to lower prices and larger
spreads in the bid and ask prices for our securities.
In the
event the
make-up
of
our Board or Audit Committee were not, or are not in the future,
in compliance with the SEC and NASDAQ independence requirements,
we face a number of risks that could materially and adversely
affect our stockholders and our business.
The SEC rules and the NASDAQ Stock Markets continued
listing requirements require, among other things, that a
majority of the members of our Board are independent and that
our Audit Committee consists entirely of independent directors.
We know that we currently comply with the SEC and NASDAQ
requirements regarding director independence. However, in the
event that we do not remain in compliance with these
requirements, our Executive Officers could establish policies
and enter into transactions without the requisite independent
review and approval. This could present the potential for a
conflict of interest between us and our stockholders generally
and our Executive Officers, stockholders, or Directors.
Further, our failure to comply with these requirements may limit
the quality of the decisions that are made by our Board and
Audit Committee, such that the risk of material misstatements or
omissions caused by errors or fraud with respect to our
financial statements or other disclosures that may occur and not
be detected in a timely manner or at all; or the payment of
inappropriate levels of compensation to our executive officers.
In the event there are deficiencies or weaknesses in our
internal controls, we may misreport our financial results or
lose significant amounts due to misstatements caused by errors
or fraud. Finally, if the composition of our Board or Audit
Committee fails to meet NASDAQs independence requirements
in the future and we fail to regain compliance with
NASDAQs continued listing requirements, the Companys
common stock will be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market, as
further described in the previous risk factor.
17
D-19
Securities
analysts may not initiate coverage or continue to cover our
common stock, and this may have a negative impact on our common
stocks market price.
The trading market for our common stock depends, in part, on the
research and reports that securities analysts publish about us
and our business. We do not have any control over these
analysts. Currently, one analyst firm covers us but there is no
guarantee that this securities analyst will continue to cover
our common stock in the future. If securities analysts do not
cover our common stock, the lack of research coverage may
adversely affect its market price. If we are covered by
securities analysts, and our stock is downgraded, our stock
price would likely decline. If the analyst ceases to cover us or
fails to publish regular reports on us, we could lose visibility
in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or
trading volume to decline.
In the
past, we have raised substantial amounts of capital in private
placements, and if we fail to comply with the applicable
securities laws, ensuing rescission rights or lawsuits would
severely damage our financial position.
Our 2004 private placement consisted of securities that were not
registered under the Securities Act, as amended (the
Securities Act), or under any state blue
sky law as a result of exemptions from such registration
requirements. Such exemptions are highly technical in nature and
if we inadvertently failed to comply with any of such exemptive
provisions, investors could have the right to rescind their
purchase of our securities and sue for damages. If any investors
were to successfully seek such rescission or prevail in any such
suit, we could face severe financial demands that could have
significant, adverse affects on our financial position. Future
financings may involve sales of our common stock at prices below
prevailing market prices, as well as the issuance of warrants or
convertible securities at a discount to market price.
The
application of the penny stock rules could adversely
affect the market price of our common stock and increase the
transaction costs to sell those shares.
The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define a
penny stock as an equity security that has a market
price of less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less
than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. Because
the last reported trade of our company stock on the NASDAQ
Global Market was at a price below $5.00 per share, our common
stock is currently considered a penny stock. The SECs
penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction
in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver
a standardized risk disclosure document that provides
information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock
market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with
current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the
compensation of the broker-dealer and the salesperson in the
transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market
value of each penny stock held in the customers account.
In addition, the penny stock rules generally require that before
a transaction in a penny stock occurs, the broker-dealer must
make a special written determination that the penny stock is a
suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the
purchasers agreement to the transaction. If applicable in
the future, these rules may restrict the ability of
brokers-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect the
ability of investors to sell their shares, until our common
stock no longer is considered a penny stock.
Because
we do not intend to pay any dividends on our common stock,
purchases of our common stock may not be suited for investors
seeking dividend income.
Since our inception, we have not paid any dividends on our
common stock and we do not anticipate paying any dividends on
our common stock in the foreseeable future. The Board has
elected not to pay dividends in the future. We expect that
future earnings applicable to the common stockholders, if any,
will be used for working capital and to finance growth.
18
D-20
Future
sales of our common stock may depress our stock price. A
significant amount of common stock is subject to issuance upon
exercise of securities to purchase common stock. The exercise
and sale of these financial instruments could depress the market
price of our common stock.
A significant amount of our common stock may be eligible for
sale under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act at
different times in the future and its sale could depress the
market price of our common stock. Provided that all applicable
Rule 144 conditions are satisfied, we believe that
stockholders holding 17,310,723 shares of our issued and
outstanding shares of common stock are currently eligible to
sell their shares. The Company issued no stock in 2009.
We also have issued stock options convertible into an aggregate
of 262,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of between $6 and $13 per share. None of the options are
currently vested or exercisable but they vest and become
exercisable between April 2010 and June 2015. All option
exercise prices substantially exceed the market price of our
common stock on March 12, 2010.
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result
of sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or as a result of the perception that these sales
could occur. In addition, these factors could make it more
difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of
common stock. As of March 12, 2010, we have 50,000,000
authorized shares of which 17,310,723 shares of common
stock are issued and outstanding.
Ownership
could be diluted by future issuances of our stock, options,
warrants or other securities.
Ownership in the Company may be diluted by future issuances of
capital stock or the exercise of outstanding or to be issued
options, warrants or convertible notes to purchase capital
stock. In particular, we may sell securities in the future in
order to finance operations, expansions, or particular projects
or expenditures.
There
is a limited public trading market for our common
stock.
Our stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under
the trading symbol VCGH. There is a limited public
trading market for our common stock. Without an active trading
market, there can be no assurance of any liquidity or resale
value of our common stock, and stockholders may be required to
hold shares of our common stock for an indefinite period of time.
Our
stock price has been volatile and may fluctuate in the
future.
The trading price of our securities may fluctuate significantly.
This price may be influenced by many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our performance and prospects;
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our securities;
|
|
|
|
sales by selling stockholders of shares issued or issuable in
connection with our private placements;
|
|
|
|
investor perception of us and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by the
analyst;
|
|
|
|
general financial and other market conditions; and
|
|
|
|
Domestic and international economic conditions.
|
Public stock markets have experienced and are currently
experiencing substantial price and trading volume volatility.
These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market
price of our securities. Further, if the proposed merger
transaction or any alternative transaction is not completed, the
share price of our common stock may change, to the extent that
the current market price of our common stock reflects an
assumption that a transaction will be completed. Fluctuations in
our stock price may have made our stock
19
D-21
attractive to momentum, hedge, or day-trading investors who
often shift funds into and out of stocks rapidly, exacerbating
price fluctuations in either direction particularly when viewed
on a quarterly basis.
Other
Risk Factors May Adversely Affect Our Financial
Performance.
Other risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in the forward-looking
statements by affecting, among many things, pricing, consumer
spending, and consumer confidence, include, without limitation,
changes in economic conditions and financial and credit markets,
credit availability, increased fuel costs and availability for
our employees, customers and suppliers, health epidemics or
pandemics or the prospects of these events (such as reports on
avian flu), consumer perceptions of food safety, changes in
consumer tastes and behaviors, governmental monetary policies,
changes in demographic trends, terrorist acts, energy shortages
and rolling blackouts, and weather (including, major hurricanes
and regional snow storms) and other acts of God.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
Our corporate office is located at 390 Union Boulevard,
Suite 540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228. This office space is
used by IEC, our wholly-owned subsidiary. We occupy
approximately 5,500 square feet under a lease with an
unrelated third party that expires in February 2017. Additional
administrative offices are located inside various nightclub
locations or rented on a
month-to-month
basis without a formal lease.
Each of our adult entertainment nightclubs is held in separately
owned subsidiary corporations, limited liability companies, or
limited partnerships. We currently lease the real estate for a
majority of our company-owned adult entertainment nightclubs
under operating leases with remaining terms ranging from five
years to just over 50 years. These leases generally contain
options which permit us to extend the lease term at an agreed
rent or at prevailing market rates.
We own the real property on which we operate four company-owned
adult entertainment nightclubs located in Texas (2), Illinois
(1) and Indiana (1).
The table contains specifics about our leased and owned adult
nightclub locations:
|
|
|
|
Name/Club Ownership
|
|
|
Lease Information
|
PTs
®
Brooklyn
Platinum of Illinois, Inc.
Acq. Date: 5/1/2002
Location: Brooklyn, IL
Sq. Ft.: 9,000
Building owned by VCG: Yes
|
|
|
An Illinois corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
Indy Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
Acq. Date: 6/30/02
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Sq. Ft.: 9,200
Building owned by VCG: Yes
|
|
|
An Indiana corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. VCG
Real Estate leases a portion of the building that is not used by
the nightclub operation to an unaffiliated third party.
|
|
|
|
|
20
D-22
|
|
|
|
Name/Club Ownership
|
|
|
Lease Information
|
PTs
®
All Nude
VCG Restaurants Denver, Inc.
Acq. Date: 6/30/04
Location: Denver, CO
Sq. Ft.: 8,000
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party currently
for $14,500 per month. The regular lease term expired in January
2010 but the Company exercised a five year extension option and
the lease now will expire in January 2015. The base rent for
each subsequent lease year during the option period commencing
February 2010 and every February 1st will increase or decrease
by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) for the month of February immediately
preceding the adjustment date, and the CPI for the month of
February for the year preceding the adjustment date.
|
|
|
|
|
The Penthouse
Club
®
Glendale Restaurant Concepts, LP
Acq. Date: 6/30/04
Location: Glendale, CO
Sq. Ft.: 9,600
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Colorado limited partnership and 98% owned subsidiary of VCG,
including the 1% general partnership interest. The building is
leased from Lowrie Management LLLP, controlled by our Chairman
of the Board and CEO, Troy Lowrie, currently for $13,500 per
month. The lease term expires September 2014 and has three
options to extend that expire September 2029. The base rent
adjusts every five years. The rent from years one to five was
$12,000 per month, years six to ten is $13,500 per month, years
eleven to fifteen (option 1) is $15,000 per month, years sixteen
to twenty (option 2) is $16,500 per month, and years twenty one
to twenty five (option 3) is $18,000 per month.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub Appaloosa
VCG CO Springs, Inc.
Acq. Date: 10/2/06
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Sq. Ft.: 9,500
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party for $10,000
per month. The lease term expires October 2016 and has two
options to extend that expire October 2026. The base rent
adjusts every five years. The rent from years one to five is
$10,000 per month, years six to ten is $10,500 per month, years
eleven to fifteen (option 1) is $12,000 per month, and years
sixteen to twenty (option 2) is $13,500 per month.
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond
Cabaret
®
Glenarm Restaurant, LLC
Acq. Date: 10/8/04
Location: Denver, CO
Sq. Ft.: 36,000
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Colorado limited liability company and 90% owned subsidiary of
VCG. The building is leased from an unaffiliated third party for
$45,000 per month. The lease term expires October 2014 and has
three options to extend that expire October 2029. The base rent
adjusts every five years. The rent from years one to five was
$40,000 per month, years six to ten is $45,000 per month, years
eleven to fifteen (option 1) is $50,000 per month, years sixteen
to twenty (option 2) is $55,000 per month, and years twenty one
to twenty five (option 3) is $60,000.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Show Club
Denver Restaurant Concepts, LP
Acq. Date: 12/28/06
Location: Denver, CO
Sq. Ft.: 20,720
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Colorado limited partnership and 98% owned subsidiary of VCG.
The building is leased from Lowrie Management LLLP, controlled
by our Chairman of the Board and CEO, Troy Lowrie, currently for
$17,500 per month. This square footage includes nightclub,
office and storage space. The lease term expires December 2015
and has three options to extend that expire December 2029. The
base rent adjusts every five years. The rent from years one to
five was $15,000 per month, years six to ten is $17,500 per
month, years eleven to fifteen (option 1) is $20,000 per month,
years sixteen to twenty (option 2) is $22,500 per month, and
years twenty one to twenty five (option 3) is $25,000.
|
|
|
|
|
21
D-23
|
|
|
|
Name/Club Ownership
|
|
|
Lease Information
|
Roxys
RCC LP
Acq. Date: 1/18/07
Location: Brooklyn, IL
Sq. Ft.: 4,400
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
An Illinois limited partnership and 88% subsidiary of VCG.
The building is leased from an unaffiliated third party for
$5,000 per month. The lease term expires January 2017 and has
two options to extend that expire January 2027. The base rent
never changes, but the rent amount fluctuates monthly based on
sales.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
Kentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
Acq. Date: 1/2/07
Location: Louisville, KY
Sq. Ft.: 23,000
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Kentucky corporation and 100% owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from Lowrie Management LLLP, controlled by
our Chairman of the Board and CEO, Troy Lowrie, currently for
$7,500 per month. The lease term expires December 2016 and has
three five year options to extend that expire December 2031. The
base rent adjusts every five years. The rent from years one to
five is $7,500 per month, years six to ten is $8,750 per month,
years eleven to fifteen (option 1) is $10,000 per month, years
sixteen to twenty (option 2) is $11,250 per month, and years
twenty one to twenty five (option 3) is $12,000.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
Cardinal Management LP
Acq. Date: 2/5/07
Location: Centreville, IL
Sq. Ft.: 5,700
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
An Illinois limited partnership and 83% owned subsidiary of VCG.
The building is leased from an unaffiliated third party for
$5,000 per month. The lease term expires January 2017 and has
two options to extend that expire January 2027. The base rent
never changes, but the rent amount fluctuates monthly based on
sales.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Sports Cabaret
MRC LP
Acq. Date: 2/9/07
Location: Sauget, IL
Sq. Ft.: 9,700
Building Owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
An Illinois limited partnership and 100% owned subsidiary of
VCG. The building is leased from an unaffiliated third party for
$20,000 per month. The lease term expires February 2017 and has
two options to extend that expire February 2027. The base rent
never changes but the rent amount fluctuates monthly based on
sales.
|
|
|
|
|
The Penthouse
Club
®
IRC LP
Acq. Date: 2/7/07
Location: Sauget, IL
Sq. Ft.: 19,300
Building Owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
An Illinois limited partnership and a 90% owned subsidiary of
VCG. The building is leased from an unaffiliated third party for
$25,000 per month. The lease term expires March 2017 and has two
options to extend that expire March 2027. The base rent never
changes but the rent amount fluctuates monthly based on sales.
|
|
|
|
|
The Mens
Club
®
Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
Acq. Date: 4/16/07
Location: Raleigh, NC
Sq. Ft.: 21,200
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A North Carolina corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG.
The building is leased from an unaffiliated third party
currently for $6,000 per month. This lease has options to renew
for ten consecutive renewal terms of five years each that expire
January 2062. The base rent adjusts every five years by $250
after January 2017 with a maximum of $8,250 per month. The
Company also has a separate lease for the parking premises
currently for $20,250 per month. This lease expires January 2012
and has ten consecutive renewal terms of five years each that
expire on January 2062. The base rent adjusts on every renewal
term by $500 with a maximum of $45,750.
|
|
|
|
|
22
D-24
|
|
|
|
Name/Club Ownership
|
|
|
Lease Information
|
Schieks Palace Royale
Classic Affairs, Inc.
Acq. Date: 5/30/07
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Sq. Ft.: 11,600
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Minnesota corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party currently
for $25,000 per month. The building lease term expires June 2012
and has three five year options to extend that expire June 2027.
The base rent adjusts every five years. The rent from one to
five years is $25,000 per month, years six to ten (option 1) is
$27,750 per month, years eleven to fifteen (option 2) is $30,000
per month, and years sixteen to twenty (option 3) is $33,000 per
month.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
Kenkev II, Inc.
Acq. Date: 9/14/07
Location: Portland, ME
Sq. Ft.: 13,000
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Maine corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party currently
for $14,750 per month. The lease term expires September 2032 and
has two options to extend that expire September 2042. The base
rent adjusts every year by 3% after the first year of the lease.
|
|
|
|
|
Jaguars Gold Club
Golden Productions JGC
Fort Worth LLC
Acq. Date: 9/17/07
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Sq. Ft.: 10,000
Building owned by VCG: Yes
|
|
|
A Texas limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of
VCG. The building is owned by the nightclub but the land is
leased from an unaffiliated third party currently for $20,000
per month. The lease term expires September 2012 and has four
five year options to extend that expire September 2032. The base
rent adjusts every option period by 10% over the prior
terms rental obligation.
|
|
|
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
Kenja II, Inc.
Acq. Date: 10/29/07
Location: Miami, FL
Sq. Ft.: 7,600
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party currently
for $10,609 per month. The lease term expires October 2032 and
has two options to extend that expire October 2042. The base
rent adjusts every year by 3% after the first year of the lease.
|
|
|
|
|
La Boheme Gentlemens Club
Stout Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
Acq. Date: 12/21/07
Location: Denver, CO
Sq. Ft.: 6,200
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A Colorado corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party currently
for $17,000 per month. The lease term expires June 2016. The
base rent adjusts every three years. The rent from years one to
four is $17,000 per month, five to seven years is $20,000 per
month, and eight to nine years is $21,000 per month.
|
|
|
|
|
Jaguars Gold Club
Manana Entertainment, Inc.
Acq. Date: 4/14/08
Location: Dallas, TX
Sq. Ft.: 12,500
Building owned by VCG: Yes
|
|
|
A Texas limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of
VCG. The building is owned by the nightclub but the land is
leased from an unaffiliated third party for $25,000 per month.
The lease term expires April 2013 and has four five year options
to extend that expire April 2033. The base rent adjusts every
option period by 10% over the prior terms rental
obligation.
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club
VCG-IS, LLC
Acq. Date: 7/28/08
Location: Anaheim, CA
Sq. Ft.: 8,100
Building owned by VCG: No
|
|
|
A California corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of VCG. The
building is leased from an unaffiliated third party currently
for $8,000 per month. The lease term expires August 2010 and has
four five year options to extend that expire August 2025. The
base rent adjusts by $500 every five years with a maximum of
$9,500 per month.
|
|
|
|
|
23
D-25
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Other than as set forth below, we are not aware of any pending
legal proceedings against the Company, individually or in the
aggregate, that would have a material adverse affect on our
business, results of operations, or financial condition.
Thee
Dollhouse Productions Litigation
On or around July 24, 2007, VCG Holding Corp. was named in
a lawsuit filed in District Court, 191 Judicial District, of
Dallas County, Texas. This lawsuit arose out of a VCG
acquisition of certain assets belonging to Regale, Inc.
(Regale) by Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
(RRC), a wholly owned subsidiary of VCG, in Raleigh,
N.C. The lawsuit alleges that VCG tortiously interfered with a
contract between Michael Joseph Peter and Regale and
misappropriated Mr. Peters purported trade secrets.
On March 30, 2009, the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina entered an Order granting
Summary Judgment to VCG and dismissed Mr. Peters
claims in their entirety. The Court found that as a matter of
law, VCG did not tortiously interfere with Mr. Peters
contract with Regale and further found that VCG did not
misappropriate trade secrets. Mr. Peters did not appeal
that ruling and as such, the federal proceedings have concluded.
Ancillary to this litigation, Thee Dollhouse filed a claim in
arbitration on June 2008 against Regale as a result of this
transaction, asserting that Regale, by selling its assets to
RRC, breached a contract between Thee Dollhouse and Regale. In
addition, an assertion was made that one of Regales
principals tortiously interfered with the contract between
Regale and Thee Dollhouse. Regale filed a Motion to Stay
Arbitration which was granted in part and denied in part, with
the Court staying arbitration as to Regales principal and
denying the stay as to Regale. As a result, the arbitration as
to Regale is proceeding. VCG is indemnifying and holding Regale
harmless from this claim pursuant to their contract. The
arbitration was originally scheduled for late October 2009,
however due to illness of one of the principals of the claimant,
the arbitration has been adjourned to April 26, 2010. The
Company has not accrued any funds for the settlement of this
litigation, as the outcome of this dispute cannot be predicted.
The Companys or a successor entitys, indemnification
obligation to Regale will continue even if any of the proposed
sale transactions or an alternative transactions is consummated.
Zajkowski,
et. al. vs VCG and Classic Affairs Litigation
In December 2007, a former employee of VCGs subsidiary
Classic Affairs, Eric Zajkowski, filed a lawsuit in Hennepin
County District Court, Minneapolis, Minnesota against VCG
following his termination from employment alleging that, in
connection with his employment, he was subject to certain
employment practices which violated Minnesota law. The initial
action and subsequent pleading asserted that the matter was
filed as a purported class action. Subsequent to the filing of
Zajkowskis Complaint, Zajkowski moved to amend his
Complaint to name additional Plaintiffs and later, to name
Classic Affairs as a party defendant. VCG and Classic Affairs
have answered this complaint denying all liability. Classic
Affairs has also filed a Counter-Complaint against
Mr. Zajkowski based upon matters relating to his
termination from employment with Classic Affairs.
In December 2008 and early January 2009, the parties filed
cross-motions for Summary Judgment and Zajkowski filed a Motion
for Class Certification. Following the motions, the Court
issued a series of rulings on those Motions. In these rulings,
the Court has dismissed VCG as a party Defendant
having determined that VCG is not directly liable to Zajkowski
or the other Plaintiffs on their claims. The Court granted
Summary Judgment to Zajkowski as to one issue, but did not
determine the scope or extent, if any, of the alleged damages,
ruling this issue, like the others, are questions for a jury,
and the Court dismissed two other claims asserted by Zajkowski.
In all other respects, the Court has denied the parties
respective Summary Judgment motions.
On July 21, 2009, the Court denied Zajkowskis and the
other Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification.
Zajkowski appealed that decision to the Minnesota Court of
Appeals and on September 22, 2009, the Court of
24
D-26
Appeals denied Plaintiffs request for discretionary review.
Plaintiffs have indicated that they do not intend to seek leave
to appeal from the Minnesota Supreme Court. The parties have
held mediation in November 2009 and the case was resolved. The
settlement terms, including the amounts, are confidential. The
lawsuit has now been dismissed, with prejudice. All related
costs have been accrued or paid as of December 31, 2009.
Texas
Patron Tax Litigation
Beginning January 1, 2008, VCGs Texas clubs became
subject to a new state law requiring the Company to collect a
five dollar surcharge for every club visitor. A lawsuit was
filed by the Texas Entertainment Association, an organization in
which the Company is a member, alleging that the fee is an
unconstitutional tax. On March 28, 2008, the Judge of the
District Court of Travis County, Texas ruled that the new state
law violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
and, therefore, the District Courts order enjoined the
state from collecting or assessing the tax. The State of Texas
has appealed the District Courts ruling. When cities or
the State of Texas give notice of appeal, the State supersedes
and suspends the judgment, including the injunction. Therefore,
the judgment of the Travis County District Court cannot be
enforced until the appeals are completed.
The Company has filed a lawsuit to demand repayment of the paid
taxes. On June 5, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Third
District (Austin) affirmed the District Courts judgment
that the Sexually Oriented Business Fee violated the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The State of Texas
appealed the Court of Appeals ruling to the Texas Supreme Court.
On August 26, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court ordered both
sides to submit briefs on the merits. The States brief was
filed on September 25, 2009 and the Texas Entertainment
Associations brief was filed on October 15, 2009. On
February 12, 2010 the Texas Supreme Court granted the
States Petition for Review and set oral arguments for
March 25, 2010.
The Company has expensed approximately $290,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and $203,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2008 for the Texas Patron Tax. The Company
accrued, but did not pay the fourth quarter estimated tax
liability of $71,000. The Company has paid, under protest,
approximately $422,000 to the State of Texas for the two year
period.
Department
of Labor and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Reviews
United
States Department of Labor (DOL) Audit (PTs
Showclub)
In October 2008,
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, KY was required to conduct a self-audit
of employee payroll by the DOL. After an extensive self-audit,
it was determined that (a) the club incorrectly paid
certain employees for hours worked and minimum wage amounts and
(b) the club incorrectly charged certain minimum wage
employees for their uniforms. As a result, the DOL required that
the club issue back pay and refund uniform expenses to qualified
employees at a total cost of $14,439.
In March 2009, VCG was placed under a similar nationwide DOL
audit for all nightclub locations and its corporate office. All
locations completed the self-audit in August 2009 and are
currently working with the DOL to determine what, if any,
violations may have occurred. This case is still in the
investigatory state and no final determination can be made at
this time of an unfavorable outcome or any potential liability.
After discussion with outside legal counsel on this case, the
Company has accrued $200,000 as of December 31, 2009 for
potential wage/hour violations. A summary meeting has
tentatively been scheduled with the DOL and counsel on
March 15, 2010 to finalize the liability. The Company
believes it has corrected all processes that resulted in the
potential violations.
Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Reviews
On June 30, 2009,
PTs
®
Showclub in Portland, Maine was served a subpoena by ICE
requesting documents to conduct an I-9 audit. ICE requested all
original I-9s for both current and past employees from
September 14, 2007 (club acquisition date) to June 30,
2009. ICE conducted the audit to ensure proper use of the I-9
form to confirm that the club verified employees right to
work in the United States. The club complied
25
D-27
with the subpoena submitting all requested documents by
July 16, 2009. As of March 12, 2010, ICE is still
reviewing the requested documents. This matter is still in its
investigatory stage and no determination of potential violations
or liability has been made. No amounts have been accrued related
to this audit. While ICE initially discussed taking this audit
to all clubs, no formal actions have been taken by ICE to begin
that process. This audit is still isolated to Maine.
Internal
Revenue Service
The IRS audited
PTs
®
Showclub in Denver for the years 2006, 2007, and 2008 to
determine tip reporting compliance. Every business with
customary tipping must report annually on Form 8027 the
total sales from food and beverage operations, charge sales,
total tips reported, and charge tips reported. The audit was
based upon this Form to determine compliance with the amended
Section 3121(q) of the Internal Revenue Code. The audit was
conducted by an examining agent in Denver in August and
September 2009. The audit focused on the data reported on
Form 8027 and related underlying documentation. It included
the agent examining information contained in the daily sales
packages generated by the club.
The audit resulted in a determination that cash tips for that
club were under-reported in the three years examined. The tax
assessed as a result of this under-reporting was $61,500.
Penalties and interest were not assessed. The IRS auditor
indicated that all other clubs would be audited and recommended
that a Point of Sale (POS) system should be
installed in every club to ensure compliance with IRS
regulations. Upon completion of this audit, the Company began an
intensive self-audit for the three year period using the same
procedures followed by the IRS agent. This resulted in an
initial accrual of $386,000 in estimated taxes to cover the
estimated liability as of September 30, 2009. Subsequent
discussions with the IRS agent removed 2006 from the audit
period, replacing that year with 2009. The Company has submitted
workpapers prepared for the self-assessment to the IRS agent for
the periods 2007, 2008, and 2009. The agent has tentatively
indicated that these workpapers and test period could be used to
determine the ultimate tip reporting rate by club. As a result
of the completion of the self-assessment process for the three
years under examination, the Company has reduced the estimated
liability by $179,000 to approximately $207,000 as of
December 31, 2009.
Litigation
Associated with the Proposed Going Private
Transaction
In connection with the Proposal concerning the proposed Going
Private Transaction, the Company has been served with three
complaints filed by various plaintiffs, alleging that they bring
purported derivative and class action lawsuits against the
Company and each of the individual members of the Board on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and
derivatively on behalf of the Company, which previously have
been reported in the Companys Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(filed with the SEC on November 19, 2009, November 24,
2009 and December 7, 2009).
On November 13, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint filed by David Cohen in the District Court in
Jefferson County, Colorado. In the complaint, Mr. Cohen
alleges that he brings the purported class action lawsuit
against the Company and each of the individual members of the
Board on behalf of the Companys stockholders. The
complaint alleges, among other things, that Troy Lowrie, the
Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer, has conflicts of interest with respect to the Proposal
and that in connection with the Boards evaluation of the
Proposal, the individual defendants have breached their
fiduciary duties under Colorado law. The complaint seeks, among
other things, certification of Mr. Cohen as class
representative, either an injunction enjoining the defendants
from consummating or closing the Going Private Transaction, or
if the Going Private Transaction is consummated, rescission of
the Going Private Transaction, an award of damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and an award of reasonable
attorneys and experts fees.
On November 20, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint filed by Gene Harris and William C.
Steppacher, Jr. in the District Court in Jefferson County,
Colorado. In the complaint, the plaintiffs purport to bring a
derivative and class action lawsuit against the Company and each
of the individual members of the
26
D-28
Board on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
and derivatively on behalf of the Company. The complaint
alleges, among other things, that Mr. Lowrie has conflicts
of interest with respect to the Proposal and that the individual
defendants have breached their fiduciary duties under Colorado
law in connection with the Proposal. The complaint seeks, among
other things, certification of the plaintiffs as class
representatives, an injunction directing the Board members to
comply with their fiduciary duties, an accounting to the
plaintiffs and the class for alleged damages suffered or to be
suffered based on the conduct described in the complaint, an
award of the costs and disbursements of maintaining the action,
including reasonable attorneys and experts fees, and
such other relief the court deems just and proper.
On December 3, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint filed by David J. Sutton and Sandra Sutton in the
District Court in Jefferson County, Colorado. In the complaint,
the plaintiffs purport to bring a class action lawsuit against
the Company and each of the individual members of the Board on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The
complaint alleges, among other things, that Mr. Lowrie has
conflicts of interest with respect to the Proposal and that the
individual defendants have breached their fiduciary duties under
Colorado law in connection with the Proposal. The complaint
seeks, among other things, certification of the plaintiffs as
class representatives, an injunction directing the Board to
comply with their fiduciary duties and enjoining the Board from
consummating the Proposal, imposition of a constructive trust in
favor of the plaintiffs and the class upon any benefits
improperly received by the defendants, an award of the costs and
disbursements of maintaining the action, including reasonable
attorneys and experts fees, and such other relief
the court deems just and proper.
The plaintiffs in the three lawsuits have moved to consolidate
all three of the lawsuits (the Class Action and
Derivative Suits) into one suit together with a fourth
lawsuit arising out of the Proposal for the proposed Going
Private Transaction, in which the Company was not named as a
defendant, filed on December 11, 2009 by Brandon Ostry in
the District Court in Jefferson County, Colorado against
Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie Management, LLLP. The Company
provided additional details on the Ostry lawsuit in its Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 17, 2009. The court has
indicated that it will consider the consolidation motion if and
when the plaintiffs move for class certification. As of the date
hereof, the plaintiffs have not yet moved for class
certification.
As of the date hereof, the Company believes that the allegations
made in each of the Class Action and Derivative Suits are
baseless and the Company intends to vigorously defend itself.
The Company has not accrued any reserves for damages or for the
settlement of these lawsuits as the outcome of the disputes
cannot be predicted. Further, the uncertainty over the potential
outcome of the Class Action and Derivative Suits has
increased in light of subsequent events. As described elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
on December 16, 2009, the Special Committee of the
Companys Board rejected the Proposal concerning the
proposed Going Private Transaction as then-currently inadequate
and, as previously disclosed in the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010, on
February 17, 2010, the Company entered into the Letter of
Intent with Ricks concerning the proposed Merger.
Currently, the Class Action and Derivative Suits only
pertain to the Proposal for the proposed Going Private
Transaction and not the proposed Merger. However, it is possible
that the plaintiffs in the Class Action and Derivative
Suits will attempt to amend their complaints to make claims
related to the proposed Merger or that these plaintiffs or
others persons may file one or more new lawsuits related
to it.
Pursuant to the terms of the Companys Articles of
Incorporation and stand-alone indemnification agreement the
Company has entered into with its Directors and executive
officers, the Company may be required to advance expenses to and
indemnify the Directors and Mr. Lowrie from expenses
involved in defending against the lawsuits described above. The
Company has discussed the risks and costs associated with such
indemnification under the heading Risk Factors.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes
the outcome of any of these proceedings will not have a material
effect on the consolidated operations of the Company.
27
D-29
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes
the outcome of any of these proceedings will not have a material
effect on the consolidated operations of the Company.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Remove
and Reserved)
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
For Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
The Companys common stock, $0.0001 par value per
share, is currently traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol VCGH. The market for our common stock is
limited and volatile.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid
prices for our common stock for each quarterly period indicated,
as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
13.90
|
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
June 30
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
6.70
|
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
September 30
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
4.03
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
December 31
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.62
|
|
|
$
|
3.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
The high and low bid prices per share as reported on the NASDAQ
Global Market on March 11, 2010, were $2.88 and $2.73,
respectively.
Holders
As of March 12, 2010, there were approximately 2,232
stockholders of record of our common stock, excluding shares
held by objecting beneficial owners.
Dividends
The Company has never declared or paid any dividends on our
common stock. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our
common stock. We plan to retain our future earnings, if any, to
finance our operations and for expansion of our business. The
decision whether to pay cash dividends on our common stock will
be made by our Board, in its discretion, and will depend on our
financial condition, operating results, capital requirements,
and other factors that our Board consider relevant.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
Transfer Online, Inc., 512 SE Salmon Street, Portland, OR 97214.
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
During 2009, the Company repurchased an aggregate of
444,655 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase
price of $869,393. As a result, as of December 31, 2009, up
to 787,721 shares of common
28
D-30
stock or shares of common stock with an aggregate purchase price
of approximately $8,046,000 (whichever is less) remain available
for repurchase under the Companys repurchase program.
The following table provides additional information about the
Companys purchases under the repurchase program during the
fourth quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of Shares
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that may yet be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
or Programs(1)
|
|
|
the Plans or Programs
|
|
|
October 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
44,681
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
44,681
|
|
|
788,194 shares or $
|
8,046,913
|
|
November 1 to 30, 2009
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
787,721 shares or $
|
8,046,033
|
|
December 1 to 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787,721 shares or $
|
8,046,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
45,154
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
45,154
|
(2)
|
|
787,721 shares or $
|
8,046,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless noted, the Company made all repurchases in the open
market.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Of these repurchases, the Company purchased 37,454 shares
of common stock in the open market and 7,700 shares of
common stock in a private transaction.
|
On November 3, 2009, the Companys Board terminated
the stock repurchase program approved on July 26, 2007, to
allow the Company to evaluate the proposed going private
transaction by Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board and CEO,
among other parties.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth certain of the Companys
historical financial data. The selected historical consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been derived
from the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein. The
selected historical consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 and for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 have been derived from
the Companys audited financial statements for such years,
which are not included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The selected historical consolidated financial data set forth
are not necessarily indicative of the results of future
operations and should be read in conjunction with the discussion
under the heading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
and the historical consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included herein. The historical results are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any
future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
55,040,034
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
57,692,671
|
(3),(4)
|
|
$
|
39,616,731
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
16,114,581
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
15,854,153
|
|
Net income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
5,075,311
|
|
|
$
|
(37,440,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,442,076
|
|
|
$
|
236,833
|
|
|
$
|
(1,271,251
|
)
|
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.71
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
17,925,132
|
|
|
|
16,623,213
|
|
|
|
9,128,985
|
|
|
|
8,477,571
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
71,151,173
|
|
|
$
|
75,626,043
|
|
|
$
|
103,719,255
|
|
|
$
|
35,079,698
|
|
|
$
|
27,859,065
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
28,482,530
|
|
|
$
|
28,386,742
|
|
|
$
|
53,987,842
|
|
|
$
|
12,795,623
|
|
|
$
|
3,043,588
|
|
Please read the following selected consolidated financial data
in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for a discussion of information that will enhance understanding
of this data.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Fiscal year 2006 reflects the acquisitions of two adult
nightclubs in Colorado.
|
29
D-31
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Fiscal year 2007 reflects the sale of Arizona and the
acquisitions of 11 adult nightclubs in Minnesota (1), Illinois
(4), Colorado (1), Maine (1), Florida (1) North Carolina
(1), Kentucky (1), and Texas (1).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 reflects the acquisitions of one adult
nightclub in California and one in Texas. See Note 4 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 includes non-cash impairment charges for
goodwill, licenses, trade names and other intangible assets for
a total amount of approximately $46.0 million. In addition
the Company recognized a non-cash impairment of real estate of
approximately $1.9 million. See Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Fiscal year 2009 includes non-cash impairment charges for
goodwill, licenses, trade names and other intangible assets for
a total amount of approximately $2.0 million. In addition
the Company recognized a non-cash impairment of real estate of
approximately $268,000. See Note 6 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Forward-Looking
Statement Disclaimer
In this report, references to VCG Holding Corp,
VCG, the Company, we,
us, and our refer to VCG Holding Corp.
and its subsidiaries.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains certain forward-looking statements and, for this
purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements
of historical fact are intended to be forward-looking
statements with the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Without limiting the foregoing,
words such as may, will,
expect, believe, anticipate,
intend, estimate, continue,
or comparable terminology, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature
involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of
which are not within our control. These factors include, but are
not limited, to, costs and liabilities associated with the
proposed going private transaction and associated litigation and
the proposed merger transaction, our inability to retain
employees and members of management due to uncertainty about our
future direction due to the proposed merger transaction, costs
and liabilities associated with our inability to successfully
close the proposed merger transaction or any other similar
transaction, the possibility that we may be prohibited from
closing the proposed merger transaction or forced to rescind it
if it has been consummated and pay damages as a result of
litigation, diversion of managements attention caused by
the proposed merger transaction and associated litigation, our
limited operating history making our future operating results
difficult to predict, the availability of, and costs associated
with, potential sources of financing, disruptions in the credit
markets, economic conditions generally and in the geographical
markets in which we may participate, our inability to manage
growth, difficulties associated with integrating acquired
businesses into our operations, geographic market concentration,
legislation and government regulations affecting us and our
industry, competition within our industry, our failure to
promote our brands, our failure to protect our brands, the loss
of senior management and key personnel, potential conflicts of
interest between us and Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), our failure to
comply with licensing requirements applicable to our business,
liability from unsanctioned, unlawful conduct at our nightclubs,
the negative perception of our industry, the failure of our
business strategy to generate sufficient revenues, liability
from uninsured risks or risks not covered by insurance proceeds,
claims for indemnification from officers and Directors,
deterrence of a change of control because of our ability to
issue securities or from the severance payment terms of certain
employment agreements with senior management, our failure to
meet the NASDAQ continued listing requirements, the failure of
securities analysts to cover our common stock, our failure to
comply with securities laws when issuing securities, our common
stock being a penny stock, our intention not to pay dividends on
our common stock, our future issuance of common stock depressing
the sale price of our common stock or diluting existing
stockholders, the limited trading market for, and volatile price
of, our common stock, and our inability to comply with rules and
regulations applicable to public companies.
30
D-32
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made
and are based on certain assumptions and expectations which may
or may not be valid or actually occur and which involve various
risks and uncertainties.
Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not
undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update
any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences,
developments, unanticipated events or circumstances after the
date of such statement.
Overview
The Company is in the business of acquiring, owning and
operating nightclubs, which provide premium quality live adult
entertainment, restaurant and beverage services in an up-scale
environment. As of December 31, 2009, the Company, through
its subsidiaries, owns and operates 20 nightclubs in Indiana,
Illinois, Colorado, Texas, North Carolina, Minnesota, Kentucky,
Maine, Florida, and California. The Company operates in one
reportable segment.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States (U.S. GAAP) requires us to
make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the
amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and
accompanying notes, Note 2. Summary of significant
accounting policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements
describes the significant accounting policies and methods used
in preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
accounting positions described below are significantly affected
by critical accounting estimates. Such accounting positions
require significant judgments, assumptions, and estimates to be
used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial
Statements, and actual results could differ materially from the
amounts reported based on variability in factors affecting these
estimates.
Our management has discussed the development and selection of
these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of
our Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed our
disclosures to it in this Managements Discussion and
Analysis.
Assignment
of Fair Values upon Acquisition of Licenses, Goodwill and Other
Intangibles
In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 805,
Business Combinations
(ASC 805), and ASC Topic 350,
Intangibles -
Goodwill and Other
(ASC 350), when the Company
acquires a nightclub, we assign fair values to all identifiable
assets and liabilities, including intangible assets such as
licenses, goodwill, identifiable trade names, and covenants not
to compete. We also determine the useful life for the
amortizable identifiable intangible assets acquired. These
determinations require significant judgment, estimates, and
projections. The remainder of the purchased cost of the acquired
nightclub that is not assigned to identifiable assets or
liabilities is then recorded as goodwill. As a result of our
acquisitions, each nightclub has recorded a significant amount
of intangibles, including licenses and goodwill. The Company has
not had an acquisition since July 2008.
The assumptions and estimates used in determining the current
value of a nightclub includes operating cash flows, market and
market share, sales volume, prices, and working capital changes.
Historical experience, project performance, and any other
available information is also used at the time that the fair
value of the nightclub is estimated.
In estimating the fair values of our nightclubs, we used a
combination of the income approach and the market-based
approach. The income approach is a valuation technique, which
involves discounting estimated future cash flows of each
nightclub to their present value to calculate fair value. The
discount rate used varies by nightclub and represents the
estimated weighted average cost of capital, which reflects the
overall level of inherent risk involved in our operations and
cash flows. To estimate future cash flows, we applied a multiple
to
31
D-33
EBITDA. The market-based approach uses a comparable public
company, and then compares specific parts of our operations such
as rent expense.
Testing
for Impairment of Intangible Assets
ASC Topic 350 requires an annual reassessment of the carrying
value of indefinite lived assets at the reporting unit or
nightclub level, or even more frequently, if certain
circumstances occur, for impairment of that value. The
evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair
value of the reporting units to the recorded value. If the
recorded value of a nightclub exceeds its current fair value,
then an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the
book value of the intangible assets exceeds the implied fair
value of the nightclubs intangible assets. Accordingly,
the fair value of a reporting unit is allocated to all of the
assets and liabilities of that nightclub, including any
unrecognized intangible assets and the excess becomes the
implied value of the goodwill. This is done in relation to the
nightclubs respective forecasted cash flows and other
relevant assumptions
In performing the Companys annual impairment assessment at
December 31, 2009 in accordance with ASC Topic 350, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge for licenses of
$1,574,000 and trade names of $167,000. In addition, the Company
evaluated its goodwill at December 31, 2009 and recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of approximately $17,000. The total
impairment charge was approximately $1,758,000.
The fair value of the licenses, trade names, and reporting units
was based on estimated discounted future net cash flows at the
club level. The impairment charge is a result of a continued
weak economy. We computed an estimate of our company-wide
weighted average cost of capital of 12.0%. The long-term growth
rate of 3% was estimated by using the Gordon Growth Model. These
processes are subjective and require significant estimates.
These estimates include judgments about future cash flows that
are dependent on internal forecasts, growth rates, company
specific risk premiums and estimates of weighted average cost of
capital used to discount future cash flows. Changes in these
assumptions and estimates could materially affect the results of
our reviews for impairment.
Impairment
of Real Estate
ASC Topic 360,
Property Plant and Equipment
requires a
fair market valuation of assets, including land and buildings,
in the event of triggering events including adverse changes in
the business climate or decline in market value. In December
2008, the Company ordered an appraisal of the land and building
owned in Phoenix, Arizona. The appraisal was performed by an
independent third party real estate appraiser who valued the
land and building at $2,600,000, resulting in an impairment of
approximately $1,886,000 at December 31, 2008. This
building was rented by the individual who purchased the
operations and ownership interest in our subsidiary Epicurean
Enterprises in January 2007. The lessee defaulted on the lease
in August 2008 and an impairment charge of $268,000 was recorded
at June 30, 2009. On July 31, 2009, the Company sold
the building and land for approximately $2,300,000. The Company
recognized a non-cash loss of approximately $69,000 upon the
sale. The Company does not have any real property held for sale
or vacant as of December 31, 2009.
Stock
Options
In 2007 and 2008, the Company issued stock option grants to key
employees and officers. The two officer grants vest one-third on
the 3
rd
,
5th and 7th anniversary of the grant date. Key employee grants
vest 20% on the
3
rd
anniversary and 40% each on the 5th and 7th anniversary of the
grant date. The options are cancelled upon termination of
employment and expire ten years from the date of grant. All
options were granted at an exercise price significantly above
the fair market value of the common stock covered by the option
on the grant date. All option exercise prices substantially
exceed fair market value on December 31, 2009 and
March 12, 2010.
32
D-34
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation by measuring
and recognizing as compensation expense the fair value of all
options as of the grant date. The determination of fair value
involves a number of significant estimates. We use the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of
option grants using assumptions which are described in
Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. These
include the expected volatility of our stock and employee
exercise behavior. These variables make estimation of fair value
of stock options difficult. A key assumption is the number of
options ultimately expected to vest. Since no options were
granted during 2009, the only estimate which affected the 2009
financial statements was the forfeiture assumption. Forfeitures
were estimated at the time of the grant in 2007 and 2008 of 16%
over the seven year option vesting period based upon limited
historical experience and were revised to 25% during 2009 based
upon actual forfeitures. This resulted in a reduction of
stock-based compensation expense of approximately $46,000 for
2009.
Any subsequent revisions to the forfeiture assumptions adjusts
the prior period compensation expense in the period of the
change on a cumulative basis for unvested options for which
compensation expense has already been recognized and in
subsequent periods for unvested options for which the expense
has not yet been recognized. Actual forfeitures could differ
materially as a result of voluntary employee actions and
involuntary actions which may result in significant changes in
our stock-based compensation expense amounts in the future. In
addition, the value, if any, an employee ultimately receives
from stock-based compensation awards will likely not correspond
to the expense amounts recorded by the Company.
Legal
and Other Contingencies
As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, legal proceedings are pending or threatened. The
outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought against us and
other loss contingencies are subject to significant uncertainty.
We accrue a charge against income when our management determines
that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a
liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information
available to us to determine whether an accrual should be
established or adjusted. Due to the inherent uncertain nature of
litigation, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of defense or
settlement may vary materially from estimates.
IRS
Tip Audit
The IRS audited
PTs
®
Showclub in Denver for the years 2006, 2007, and 2008 to
determine tip reporting compliance. Every business with
customary tipping must report annually on Form 8027 the
total sales from food and beverage operations, charge sales,
total tips reported, and charge tips reported. The audit
resulted in a determination that cash tips for that club were
under-reported in the three years examined. The tax assessed,
without penalties and interest, as a result of this
under-reporting was $61,500. The Company performed an intensive
self-audit for 2007, 2008 and 2009 using the same procedures
followed by the IRS agent. As a result of the completion of the
self-assessment process for the three years under examination,
the Company has accrued a tip liability of $207,000 as of
December 31, 2009. This estimate involves significant
judgment and the actual tax liability may differ materially.
DOL
Audit
In October 2008,
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, KY was required to conduct a self-audit
of employee payroll by the DOL. After an extensive self-audit,
the DOL required that the Club issue back pay and refund uniform
expenses to qualified employees at a total cost of $14,439.
In March 2009, VCG was placed under a similar nationwide DOL
audit for all nightclub locations and its corporate office. All
locations completed the self-audit in August 2009 and are
currently working with the DOL to determine what, if any,
violations may have occurred. This case is still in the
investigatory state and no final determination can be made at
this time of an unfavorable outcome or any potential liability.
The Company has accrued $200,000 as of December 31, 2009
for potential wage/hour violations; however this estimate
involves significant judgment and the actual liability may vary
materially from this estimate. A
33
D-35
summary meeting has tentatively been scheduled with the DOL and
counsel on March 15, 2010 to finalize the liability. The
Company believes it has corrected all processes that resulted in
the potential violations.
Self-Insured
Health Insurance
The Company is partially self-insured for group health
insurance. The accrual is regularly evaluated and adjusted for
claims incurred but not reported. Due to the inherent uncertain
nature of medical claims, the actual cost may materially differ
from the $200,000 accrued liability as of December 31, 2009.
Income
Taxes
We are subject to income in the United States. Tax law requires
items to be included in the tax return at different times than
when the same items are reflected in the consolidated financial
statements. Permanent differences result when either deductible
items for U.S. GAAP purposes are not deductible for tax purposes
or income recognized for U.S. GAAP purposes is not recognized
for tax. Temporary differences reverse over time, such as
depreciation, amortization, and net operating loss
carry-forwards. As of December 31, 2009, we have an
estimated tax net operating loss carry-forward of approximately
$2,608,000 which is classified as non-current deferred tax
asset. Significant judgment is used in determining the timing of
utilizing the net operating loss carry-forward, some of which
may be utilized in 2010. Based on the evaluation of all
available information, the Company recognizes future tax
benefits, such as net operating loss carry-forwards, to the
extent that realizing these benefits is considered more
likely than not to be sustained in accordance with FASB
guidance issues in accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized.
The timing differences create either deferred tax assets or
liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on temporary differences between the financial reporting
and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The tax rates used to
determine deferred tax assets or liabilities are enacted tax
rates in effect for the year and manner in which the differences
are expected to reverse. Our effective rates differ from the
statutory rate primarily due to 2009 permanent differences of
approximately $351,000 (tax affected) and tax credits of
approximately $582,000.
During the course of ordinary business, there are some
transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. We establish reserves for
tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether,
additional tax will be due. The reserves are established when we
believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and
may not be fully sustained on review by tax authorities. We
evaluate our ability to realize the tax benefits associated with
deferred tax assets by analyzing our future taxable income using
both historical and projected future operating results,
reversing the existing taxable temporary differences, taxable
income in prior carry-back years (if permitted) and the
availability of tax planning strategies. In the event that we
change our determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets
that can be realized, we will adjust our valuation allowance
with a corresponding impact to the provision for income taxes in
the period in which such determination is made.
As of December 31, 2009, the current portion of the
deferred income tax asset was determined to be $76,920
attributable to the companys partially self insured health
insurance reserve and $3,841,673 non-current deferred income tax
asset attributable to other temporary differences.
Results
of Operations
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2008
Revenues
Total revenue, net of sales taxes, decreased from approximately
$57,693,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to
approximately $55,040,000 for the year ended December 31,
2009. The decrease in revenue of approximately $2,653,000 or
4.6% was primarily due to the weak economy and a reduction in
business and convention travel. The high-end A clubs had a
decline in revenue of approximately $1,552,000 or 7.3%. These
clubs are the most susceptible to the economic recession because
of their business clientele.
34
D-36
Because of the weak economy the B format clubs also experienced
an overall decline in revenue of approximately $2,462,000 or
8.8%. The Jaguars Gold Club in Dallas, Texas and Imperial
Showgirls Gentlemens Club in Anaheim, California were
included in operations for all of 2009, but only for a part of
2008. These acquisitions generated approximately $1,720,000 of
additional income in 2009 that was not included in 2008 results.
Rental income received from unrelated third parties, included in
other income, totaled approximately $179,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and approximately $288,000 in 2008. This
was due to the Company not receiving rental income in 2009 on
the Arizona property which was sold in July 2009. Rental income
in 2008 was less than 0.5% of total income and decreased to
approximately 0.3% in 2009.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Cost of Goods sold includes the cost of the alcohol, food, and
merchandise we sell to customers. We track cost of goods sold as
a percentage of the attributable revenues. Costs of goods sold
decreased in 2009 to approximately $5,921,000 or 23.9% of
attributable revenue. This compares to approximately $6,980,000
in 2008, or approximately 24.3% of attributable revenue. The
decrease is a result of operating two additional all nude
nightclubs (C clubs) for the full year of 2009 as compared to
2008. The all nude clubs do not sell alcohol and have a lower
cost of goods sold percentage. In addition, the A and B clubs
better managed their inventories, reducing the cost of sales
percentage by more than the decrease in attributable revenue.
Salaries
and Wages
Salaries and wages increased by approximately $320,000 or 2.4%
in 2009, from $13,461,000 for the year ended December 31,
2008 to approximately $13,781,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This slight change can be attributable
to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in the federal and state minimum wages ranging from
$0.17 to $0.70 per hour from 2008 to 2009;
|
|
|
|
the estimated accrual of $200,000 for DOL minimum wage
violations for 2006 through 2008; offset in part by a reduction
in club employee headcount by approximately 85 tipped, minimum
wage personnel from December 31, 2008 headcounts.
|
In November 2007, the Companys Compensation Committee
hired an independent consulting firm to determine proper
compensation levels for our CEO and President. The studys
results were used to determine the compensation of our
President, Micheal Ocello, after he changed his status from
consultant to employee in October 2007. Mr. Ocellos
annual salary has remained consistent, without an increase for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Our CEO and principal stockholder, Troy Lowrie, elected to not
receive a salary from the Companys inception in 2002 until
March 2008. At that time, Mr. Lowrie elected to receive a
salary of approximately $300,000 annually, only 40% of the
salary recommended by the independent salary survey and approved
by the Board. In November 2008, Mr. Lowrie elected to
increase his salary to $700,000, the full amount approved by the
Board. Mr. Lowrie has been paid that salary, without an
increase, through 2009.
The percentage of salary to total revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was 25.0%. The same percentage for the
previous year was 23.3%, an increase of 1.7%. We expect the
ongoing percentage of salary to total revenue to continue to be
approximately 25% of total revenues.
Other
General and Administrative Expenses
Taxes and permits expenses increased by approximately $585,000
for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the same
period in 2008. This 20.2% increase was a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
increased payroll taxes of $616,000 or 37.9%. This increase
includes the estimated tip audit accrual of $207,000 plus the
additional FICA tax already paid on unreported tip from 2006 to
2008 of $61,500 and additional FICA tax paid on reported tips in
2009;
|
35
D-37
|
|
|
|
|
increases in taxes and permits of approximately $72,000 or
15.4%. This category contains club liquor, cabaret or sexually
oriented business (S.O.B.) licenses, sales tax, and
business and health inspection licenses. This category also
includes amounts expensed for the Texas Patron Tax, paid under
protest, in the amounts of approximately $290,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and $203,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Refer to Item 3 Legal Proceedings for
additional information; and
|
|
|
|
decreases in property taxes of approximately $103,000 or 12.9%.
Property tax valuations were protested in the five clubs located
in East St. Louis, resulting in a property tax savings of
approximately $30,000. The sale of the Arizona building in July
2009, with annual property taxes of approximately $60,000,
reduced the 2009 property tax expense by almost $30,000.
Assessed values of club properties were reduced in Texas, with a
savings of approximately $16,000.
|
Charge card and bank fees decreased by approximately $72,000 to
a total of approximately $797,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This is an 8.3% decrease over the same
period in 2008. This decrease is attributable to a change in
several cities to banks with lower service charges, closing of
many bank accounts with little or nominal activity, sharp
decrease in wiring funds to avoid wire fees and the use of
electronic funds transfers and online banking. Chargeback losses
are also down in 2009 by approximately $37,000 due to changes in
procedures in processing and fighting customer chargebacks.
Annual rent increased slightly in 2009, to approximately
$5,855,000 as of December 31, 2009 compared to $5,798,000
for the same period ending December 31, 2008. This increase
of approximately $57,000 or 1.0% is for scheduled rent increases
plus rents for full year on Manana Entertainment, Inc. and
VCG-IS, LLC, the two clubs acquired during 2008.
Legal fees increased by 33.1% to approximately $1,466,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008. This increase is due to litigation involving the
Classic Affairs nightclub (see Item 3 Legal Proceedings).
The lawsuit has now been dismissed, with prejudice. All related
costs have been accrued or paid as of December 31, 2009.
Other professional fees decreased by approximately $572,000 or
20.5% in 2009 to approximately $2,216,000 at December 31,
2009, from the previous amount of $2,788,000 in 2008. These fees
include charges for appraisals, broker commissions for renting
company real estate, lobbying fees, and environment assessments.
Other professional fees in 2009 included the following
approximate amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
audit and quarterly review fees of $210,000 (see Item 14
Principal Accountant Fees and Services in Part III);
|
|
|
|
tax return preparation fees of $214,000 to file 2008 tax
returns, amend all the Companys federal and state returns
filed in 2008 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007
and correct earlier years state tax returns;
|
|
|
|
consultant expenses to test internal controls and document
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of approximately
$99,000;
|
|
|
|
$102,000 in marketing consulting fee expenses paid by warrants
that expired in 2009; and
|
|
|
|
$290,000 of valuation and impairment calculation costs and
consulting fees for work related to the SEC comment letter and
subsequent amended SEC filings;
|
Approximately $954,000 in expenses were incurred by the Company
and the Special Committee in relation to the proposed going
private transaction and proposed merger with Ricks Cabaret
International, Inc. See Footnote 3 to the Financial Statements.
These costs represent expenses of the Special Committee, legal
costs billed by the legal counsel to the Special Committee,
legal costs incurred by the Company in relation to both the
proposed going private transaction and proposed merger, and
costs billed and accrued from the financial advisor to the
Special Committee.
Advertising and marketing expenses decreased by approximately
$116,000 or 3.9% over the year ended December 31, 2008.
This decrease is mostly attributable to more efficient methods
of advertising, including
36
D-38
using billboard trucks for mobile advertising versus leasing
fixed billboard signs. Advertising and marketing expenses were
approximately 5.1% of total revenues in 2009 and 2008. The
Companys senior management uses this metric to monitor and
control advertising expenses.
Insurance expenses decreased by approximately $57,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2009, a 3.3% decrease over the
prior year. This decrease is due to insurance premium savings
related to economies of scale and lower rates resulting from a
reduction in claims. Insurance premiums represented
approximately 3.0% of total revenues in 2009 and 2008. This
percentage is a metric that Company senior management uses to
monitor and control insurance expenses.
Utilities expenses slightly decreased in 2009 over the same
period in 2008. The decrease of approximately $72,000 or 6.5%
was a result of milder weather in 2009 versus the very cold
winter in the central and northeast United States in 2008.
Repair and maintenance expenses increased from approximately
$1,022,000 in 2008 to $1,242,000 in 2009. This increase of
$220,000 or 21.5% resulted from repairs and stepped up
maintenance on several nightclubs, including repairs to
heating/air conditioning systems in Minnesota, Kentucky,
Illinois and Colorado. Sprinkler systems were repaired and
updated in Raleigh and sewer and drains were repaired in Denver.
Electrical wiring and lighting systems were repaired in several
clubs as well.
General and administrative (G&A) expenses
include common office and nightclub expenses such as janitorial,
supplies, security, cast and employee relations, education and
training, travel and automobile, telephone, and internet
expenses. Total G&A expenses totaled $5,023,000 for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2009 compared to
$4,777,000 for the same time period in 2008. Janitorial expenses
were the largest item in the G&A category, totaling
approximately $870,000 for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009. This is an increase of approximately
$126,000 over the same time period in 2008. The primary reason
for this increase is that the two clubs acquired in 2008 were
included in a full years expenses in 2009. In addition,
upholstery and carpet cleaning are included in this account and
this has been done semi-annually in most clubs in 2009. Office
and nightclub supplies totaled $694,000 for the 12 months
ended December 31, 2009, an increase of approximately 9.5%
over the same time period for 2008. Automobile and travel also
increased by approximately $51,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Employee education and travel was higher for club personnel,
where classes on non-violent security training, club management
and classes on the new point of sales POS system were offered to
personnel in all clubs. G&A expenses for being a public
company included SEC filing fees, investor relations and
transfer agent charges totaled approximately $218,000 for the
fiscal year ending in 2009. Other unusual and previously
disclosed expenses are included in the G&A total, including
abandoned acquisition totaling approximately $52,000 in 2009.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $13,507 or
0.8%, during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
the same period in 2008. This small increase is a result of the
point of sale (POS) system being installed in
November and December 2009. Depreciation on other asset
additions earlier in 2009 were offset by the end of depreciation
expense on the Arizona building that was sold in July 2009.
Amortization of non-compete agreements entered into in
connection with nightclub acquisitions, is included in
depreciation and amortization in the statement of consolidated
operations. For the year ended December 31, 2008
amortization of non-competes was $20,761 and $17,035 for the
year ended December 31, 2009. All non-compete agreements
were included in the acquisition valuation analysis and adjusted
accordingly. These adjusted values are being amortized ratably
over the life of the agreement.
Interest
Expense
Total interest expense decreased by approximately $305,000 or
approximately 8.1%, during the year ended December 31,
2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in
interest expense was a result
37
D-39
of the Company paying down over approximately $4,700,000 in
total debt, during 2009, including one promissory note with an
annual interest rate of 12%.
Interest
Income
Interest income decreased by almost $16,000 or 68.4% for the
year ended December 31, 2009, when compared to the same
period in 2008. This is because the Company made a decision to
spend virtually all free cash on paying down debt or buying back
the Companys stock, and because of interest earned in 2008
on a federal tax refund.
Loss
on Sale of Assets
The Company recorded losses on the sale or write-off of assets
totaling approximately $75,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The previously disclosed loss on the
sale of the Arizona property totaled almost $69,000 of that
loss. The remaining $6,000 was the write-off of miscellaneous
small assets at the clubs.
Income
Taxes
For 2009, the current income tax benefit of approximately
$127,000 represents the net of a Federal benefit of
approximately $274,000 offset by state income tax expense of
$147,000. Since a tax net operating loss of $2,529,111 was
generated during 2009, there is no Federal income tax owed for
2009. The Federal benefit resulted from the amendment of 2007
tax returns during 2009 and the reconciliation of the 2008 book
provision to the tax returns. State income tax expense primarily
represents taxes payable for those states which do not allow
consolidated tax filings, as well as minimum taxes due in
various states.
Deferred tax expense in 2009 included approximately $466,000 of
deferred income taxes expense as compared to a deferred income
tax benefit of $11,831,550 for the prior year which was
substantially attributable to asset impairments of $48,006,241.
Our non-current portion of deferred income tax asset increased
by $1,017,181 during 2009 due to the tax net operating loss
generated. This was partially offset by the sale of the Arizona
land and building during 2009 which reduced our non-current
portion of deferred income tax asset by approximately $780,000.
Net income was $735,691 for the year ended December 31,
2009 as compared with a net loss of $30,710,794 for 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The amount of cash flow generated and the working capital needs
of the nightclub operations does not materially fluctuate and is
predictable. We expect to meet our liquidity needs for the next
year from existing cash balances and cash flows from operations.
We intend to use our cash flows for principal and interest
payments on debt, capital expenditures in certain clubs, and
repairs and maintenance in other clubs.
Working
Capital
At December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had cash of approximately $2,677,000 and $2,209,000
respectively. Our total current assets were approximately
$4,884,000 and $4,220,000 for the same time period. Current
liabilities totaled approximately $8,004,000 at
December 31, 2009 and $7,128,000 at December 31, 2008.
The Companys current liabilities exceed its current assets
resulting in a negative working capital of approximately
$3,120,000 at December 31, 2009 and $3,108,000 at
December 31, 2008. The working capital deficit decreased by
approximately $12,000 between the two years. Our requirement for
working capital is not significant since we receive payment for
food and beverage purchases in cash or credit cards at the time
of the sale. So we receive the cash revenue before we are
required to pay our suppliers for these purchases.
Of the current liabilities at December 31, 2009, none is
due to Lowrie Management LLLP. A total of approximately
$1,309,000 of current liabilities are guaranteed by
Mr. Lowrie and secured by his personal
38
D-40
assets. Of that, the Company paid $1,400,000 in full on
January 4, 2010. At December 31, 2009, the Company
still had $1,280,000 of available and unused funding on its
revolving line of credit with one bank and consolidated two
loans into one loan with the same bank. The proposed merger
transaction and current economic conditions have temporarily
suspended the process of negotiating a larger line of credit. We
have loans and a line of credit with our lead bank and have no
reason to believe that these will not be renewed, when they come
due in 2010 to 2014.
In 2009, we made payments on debt totaling approximately
$5,175,000, including payments of high-interest rate debt. The
Company renegotiated terms on many loans during the fourth
quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009, extending maturity
dates by 12 to 14 months or more. In all instances but one
loan, the interest rate and principal amounts did not change,
making the extension a modification of the loan, not an
extinguishment.
On August 17, 2009, the Company modified the terms of two
existing long-term debt obligations totaling $3,872,426 with
Citywide Banks. The promissory notes that were consolidated
included:
(i) a promissory note executed on May 16, 2006 with a
current outstanding principal balance of $1,770,286, bearing
interest at 8.5% per annum, with monthly principal and interest
payments of approximately $36,156 and with a maturity date of
May 16, 2010; and
(ii) a promissory note executed on June 30, 2008 with
a current outstanding principal balance of $2,102,140, bearing
interest at 6% per annum, with monthly principal and interest
payments of approximately $50,403 and with a maturity date of
June 30, 2013.
The consolidated replacement promissory note (the
Replacement Note) in the amount of $3,872,426 bears
interest at the rate of 7% per annum, with monthly principal and
interest payments of approximately $76,865 and with a maturity
date of August 15, 2014. The Replacement Note contains two
new covenants. The first new covenant requires acquisitions or
additional indebtedness of equal to, or in excess, of $1,000,000
be pre-approved by Citywide Banks. The second new covenant is a
financial ratio covenant. This covenant requires the quarterly
calculation of net cash flow to debt service in a ratio greater
than, or equal to, 1.2 to 1.0. Net cash flow is defined as
income attributable to the Company plus depreciation,
amortization, and interest expense. Net profit excludes any
intangible impairments and related tax effects. The Company is
currently in compliance with all debt covenants.
The Company also extended its revolving line of credit with
Citywide Banks. The original line of credit (the Original
Line of Credit) was executed on June 29, 2008, had a
maturity date of June 29, 2010, a maximum principal amount
of $4,000,000, and a variable interest rate calculated on the
Prime Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, subject to
change daily with a floor of six percent. The replacement line
of credit (the Replacement Line of Credit) has the
identical maximum principal amount and interest terms as stated
in the Original Line of Credit. Monthly payments vary based on
principal outstanding. The maturity date of the Replacement Line
of Credit is August 15, 2011. The following is a
description of material changes in the terms of the Replacement
Line of Credit compared to the Original Line of Credit:
(i) The Original Line of Credit and the Replacement Line of
Credit have the same collateral, but have been cross
collateralized with the collateral for the Replacement Note: the
Whole Life Insurance Policy on the life of Troy Lowrie, plus the
P&A Select Strategy Fund, LP and the P&A Multi-Sector
Fund II, LP, owned by Lowrie Management LLLP, and
(ii) The Original Line of Credit covenants required that
all advances on the Original Line of Credit be fully repaid for
one day every 180 days. That covenant was replaced with the
same new covenants as indicated for the Replacement Note above.
On September 22, 2009, the Company prepaid a promissory
note issued to Bryan S. Foster (Foster) in
connection with VCGs purchase of Manana Entertainment,
Inc. (Manana) from Foster in the following manner:
(a) a cash payment of $1,600,000 made by VCG and Manana to
Foster, and
39
D-41
(b) an offset of the amount owed by Black Canyon Highway
LLC, the purchaser of the Phoenix, Arizona property to VCG
totaling $263,544 against the balance owed by VCG and Manana to
Foster under the Foster note.
After the application of the offset and note payments, the
outstanding principal balance owed by Black Canyon to VCG at
December 31, 2009 under the Black Canyon note is $56,132.
The unpaid balance on the Black Canyon note will continue to
accrue interest at eight percent per annum. No other terms of
the Black Canyon note were changed.
As previously disclosed, in August 2009, the Company
renegotiated due dates on five promissory notes, totaling
$1,984,612 with original maturity dates from January to November
2010. In all instances, the loans were extended twelve months
from their original maturity dates into 2011. No other changes
were made to these notes. The Company has shown these promissory
notes as long-term debt on the balance sheet. Please see
Note 9 in the consolidated financial statements for
additional detail on the Companys debt. The Company is not
currently considering any immediate acquisitions because of the
proposed merger transaction.
Cash flows generated from operations was $7,081,000, and we had
a net increase in cash at the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009. We have been able to satisfy our needs
for working capital and capital expenditures through a
combination of cash flow from nightclub operations and debt. We
expect that operations will continue with the realization of
assets and payment of current liabilities in the ordinary course
of business.
While we can offer no assurances, we believe that our existing
cash and expected cash flow from operations will be sufficient
to fund our operations and necessary capital expenditures and to
service our debt obligations for the foreseeable future. If the
proposed merger does not occur and if we are unable to achieve
our planned revenues, costs and working capital objectives, we
believe that we have the ability to curtail stock repurchases
and capital expenditures and will reduce costs to levels that
will be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash requirement
needs in the upcoming year.
Capital
Resources
We had stockholders equity of $28,482,530 at
December 31, 2009 and $28,386,742 at December 31,
2008. The $95,789 increase in stockholders equity is
primarily a result of the stock buybacks that occurred and are
described elsewhere in this document. We had stockholders
equity of $28,482,530 at December 31, 2009 and $28,386,742 at
December 31, 2008. The stock buybacks described elsewhere in
this document resulted in an approximate reduction in stock and
additional paid-in capital of $625,000. This was offset by net
income attributable to VCG of $735,691 for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$7,081,000 in 2009 compared to approximately $11,752,000 in
2008. The major non-cash activities in 2009 were the impairment
of indefinite life intangible assets (licenses, goodwill and
trademarks) of $1,758,000; the non-cash impairment of the
Phoenix, Arizona land and building of $268,000 and the
provisions of depreciation of approximately $1,695,000;
non-compete amortization of approximately $17,000 and net
amortization of favorable lease rights and unfavorable lease
liabilities of approximately $212,000. The amortization of loan
fees included an additional approximately $37,000 related to the
extinguishment and replacement of a bank debt, with a new note
including an extended due date and modified interest rate.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses also increased by
approximately $576,000. There was also a decrease in the
deferred income tax benefit of $739,000 due to the income tax
effect of the sale of the Arizona property offset by the
impairment losses.
Net cash used by investing activities totaled approximately
$1,236,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
Company purchased approximately $1,454,000 of property and
equipment, mostly in club remodels and the POS system.
Net cash used by financing activities was approximately
$5,380,000 for 2009. During 2009, we paid approximately $79,000
in loan fees, compared to approximately $268,000 paid to lenders
in 2008. We received approximately $1,212,000 in proceeds from
new debt, and paid approximately $5,175,000 in debt in 2009. We
40
D-42
repurchased approximately $869,000 of common stock, which was
immediately cancelled according to Colorado state law.
The following table reconciles net income or (loss) to EBITDA by
quarter. EBITDA is normally a presentation of earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
EBITDA is a non-GAAP calculation that is frequently used by our
investors to measure operating results. EBITDA data is included
because the Company understands that such information is
considered by investors as an additional basis on evaluating our
ability to pay interest, repay debt, and make capital
expenditures. Management cautions that this EBITDA may not be
comparable to similarly titled calculations reported by other
companies. Because it is non-GAAP, EBITDA should not be
considered an alternative to operating or net income in
measuring company results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Income (loss) attributable to VCG
|
|
$
|
735,691
|
|
|
$
|
(30,710,794
|
)
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,695,277
|
|
|
|
1,678,043
|
|
Amortization of covenants
not-to-compete
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
20,761
|
|
Amortization of leasehold rights and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(212,342
|
)
|
|
|
(192,067
|
)
|
Amortization of loan fees
|
|
|
216,205
|
|
|
|
448,015
|
|
Amortization component 2 goodwill
|
|
|
157,077
|
|
|
|
144,896
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,456,616
|
|
|
|
3,761,151
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
339,000
|
|
|
|
(11,101,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA before non-cash impairment charges
|
|
|
6,404,559
|
|
|
|
35,951,605
|
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash impairment charges
|
|
|
2,026,000
|
|
|
|
48,006,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA excluding non-cash impairment charges
|
|
$
|
8,430,559
|
|
|
$
|
12,054,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (excluding non-cash impairment charges) decreased
$3,404,500 in fiscal year 2009, primarily because of the
reduction in income tax benefits from the impairment charges.
Another non-GAAP financial measurement used by the investment
community is free cash flow. The following table calculated free
cash flow for the Company for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008. We use free cash flow
calculations as one method of cash management to anticipate
available cash, but cautions investors that this free cash flow
calculation may not be comparable to similarly titled
calculations reported by other companies. Because this is
non-GAAP, free cash flow should not be considered as an
alternative to the consolidated statement of cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (excluding non-cash impairment charges)
|
|
$
|
8,430,559
|
|
|
$
|
12,054,636
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,456,616
|
|
|
|
3,761,151
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
476,717
|
|
|
|
428,614
|
|
Total income tax
|
|
|
339,000
|
|
|
|
(11,101,610
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,454,478
|
|
|
|
1,324,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
2,703,748
|
|
|
$
|
17,642,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
D-43
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The Company has long-term contractual obligations primarily in
the form of operating leases and debt obligations. The following
table summarizes our contractual obligations and their aggregate
maturities as well as future minimum rent payments. Future
interest payments related to variable interest rate debt were
estimated by using the interest rate in effect at
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
30,747,383
|
|
|
$
|
3,867,344
|
|
|
$
|
16,842,568
|
|
|
$
|
7,207,409
|
|
|
$
|
1,622,791
|
|
|
$
|
1,198,348
|
|
|
$
|
8,923
|
|
Interest payments
|
|
|
5,542,948
|
|
|
|
2,849,231
|
|
|
|
1,963,890
|
|
|
|
531,813
|
|
|
|
162,794
|
|
|
|
34,868
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
102,264,692
|
|
|
|
3,773,720
|
|
|
|
3,815,037
|
|
|
|
3,893,601
|
|
|
|
3,966,958
|
|
|
|
4,016,618
|
|
|
|
82,798,758
|
|
Potential
Sale of the Company
On November 3, 2009, the Company received a non-binding
letter of intent (the Proposal) from the
Companys Chairman and CEO, Troy Lowrie, Lowrie Management,
LLLP, an entity controlled by Mr. Lowrie, and certain other
unidentified investors (collectively, the Lowrie
Investors), to acquire all of the outstanding common stock
of the Company for $2.10 per share in cash (the Going
Private Transaction). The Proposal contemplated that the
Company would no longer be a public reporting or trading company
following the closing of the Going Private Transaction. In
response to the Proposal, the Board formed a Special Committee
to review and evaluate the Proposal and to recommend to the
Board whether or not to approve or decline the Proposal. On
December 16, 2009, the Special Committee informed the
Lowrie Investors that it had determined, with input from its
advisors, that the terms of the Proposal were currently
inadequate, and the Special Committee directed its financial
advisors to contact any parties that had either previously
expressed an interest or might potentially be interested in
pursuing a transaction with the Company.
On February 16, 2010, the Company, Ricks Cabaret
International, Inc. (Ricks), Mr. Lowrie,
and Lowrie Management, LLLP (collectively with Mr. Lowrie,
Lowrie), entered into a non-binding (except as to
certain provisions, including exclusivity and confidentiality)
letter of intent (the Letter of Intent). Pursuant to
the Letter of Intent, Ricks agreed to acquire all of the
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company and the
Company will merge with and into Ricks or a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Ricks (the Merger). In the event
the Merger is consummated, the Company will become a subsidiary
of Ricks and the Companys shareholders will become
shareholders of Ricks. The parties intend that the Merger
will be structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
42
D-44
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of VCG Holding Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
VCG Holding Corp. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009. We also
have audited VCG Holding Corp.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in
Internal Control
Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). VCG Holding
Corp.s management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting (Item 9A.). Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements and an
opinion on the companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of VCG Holding Corp. as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also in our opinion, VCG Holding Corp. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in
Internal Control Integrated
Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ Causey Demgen & Moore Inc.
Denver, Colorado
March 12, 2010
43
D-45
VCG
Holding Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,677,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,209,060
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,900
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
254,333
|
|
|
|
25,473
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
594,720
|
|
|
|
276,267
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
926,321
|
|
|
|
949,088
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
354,730
|
|
|
|
282,485
|
|
Current portion of deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
76,920
|
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
4,884,464
|
|
|
|
4,020,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
22,946,114
|
|
|
|
25,738,388
|
|
Licenses, net
|
|
|
34,834,018
|
|
|
|
36,413,189
|
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
2,279,045
|
|
|
|
2,453,122
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
452,000
|
|
|
|
619,000
|
|
Favorable lease rights, net
|
|
|
1,647,968
|
|
|
|
1,705,364
|
|
Non-compete agreements, net
|
|
|
23,898
|
|
|
|
40,933
|
|
Non-current portion of deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
3,841,673
|
|
|
|
4,068,593
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
241,993
|
|
|
|
567,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
71,151,173
|
|
|
$
|
75,626,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable trade
|
|
$
|
1,750,940
|
|
|
$
|
847,493
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,930,049
|
|
|
|
2,257,116
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
67,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capitalized lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
3,805,277
|
|
|
|
2,602,000
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, related party
|
|
|
62,067
|
|
|
|
1,024,000
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
110,010
|
|
|
|
109,455
|
|
Current portion of unfavorable lease rights
|
|
|
277,920
|
|
|
|
278,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
8,004,180
|
|
|
|
7,128,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
1,628,301
|
|
|
|
845,136
|
|
Unfavorable lease rights, net of current portion
|
|
|
6,156,123
|
|
|
|
6,425,626
|
|
Capital lease, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,111
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
19,751,021
|
|
|
|
25,916,111
|
|
Long-term debt, related party, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,129,018
|
|
|
|
6,915,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
34,664,463
|
|
|
|
40,111,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 9 and
12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized;17,310,723 (2009) and 17,755,378 (2008) shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
51,932,082
|
|
|
|
52,557,047
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(26,996,863
|
)
|
|
|
(27,732,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total VCG Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
24,936,950
|
|
|
|
24,826,268
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
|
|
|
3,545,580
|
|
|
|
3,560,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
28,482,530
|
|
|
|
28,386,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
|
$
|
71,151,173
|
|
|
$
|
75,626,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
44
D-46
VCG
Holding Corp.
For
the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of alcoholic beverages
|
|
$
|
22,877,141
|
|
|
$
|
26,242,303
|
|
Sales of food and merchandise
|
|
|
1,868,576
|
|
|
|
2,502,393
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
27,170,918
|
|
|
|
25,568,380
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,123,399
|
|
|
|
3,379,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
55,040,034
|
|
|
|
57,692,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
5,921,054
|
|
|
|
6,979,636
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
13,780,775
|
|
|
|
13,461,173
|
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes and permits
|
|
|
3,478,871
|
|
|
|
2,894,076
|
|
Charge card and bank fees
|
|
|
797,340
|
|
|
|
869,210
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
5,855,191
|
|
|
|
5,798,066
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
1,465,638
|
|
|
|
1,100,991
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
2,215,655
|
|
|
|
2,787,789
|
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
2,805,260
|
|
|
|
2,921,327
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
1,655,280
|
|
|
|
1,712,036
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
1,032,494
|
|
|
|
1,104,047
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
1,242,276
|
|
|
|
1,022,100
|
|
Advisory fees related to change in control proposals
|
|
|
953,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,023,061
|
|
|
|
4,777,060
|
|
Impairment of building and land
|
|
|
268,000
|
|
|
|
1,961,200
|
|
Impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
1,741,000
|
|
|
|
27,323,855
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
18,721,496
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,712,311
|
|
|
|
1,698,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
49,964,723
|
|
|
|
95,132,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Operations
|
|
|
5,075,311
|
|
|
|
(37,440,195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,746,503
|
)
|
|
|
(3,091,642
|
)
|
Interest expense, related party
|
|
|
(710,113
|
)
|
|
|
(669,509
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
7,382
|
|
|
|
23,381
|
|
(Loss) gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(74,669
|
)
|
|
|
(205,825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expenses
|
|
|
(3,523,903
|
)
|
|
|
(3,943,595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,551,408
|
|
|
|
(41,383,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) current
|
|
|
(126,896
|
)
|
|
|
729,940
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) deferred
|
|
|
465,896
|
|
|
|
(11,831,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes
|
|
|
339,000
|
|
|
|
(11,101,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
1,212,408
|
|
|
|
(30,282,180
|
)
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
476,717
|
|
|
|
428,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to VCG
|
|
$
|
735,691
|
|
|
$
|
(30,710,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to VCGs
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.71
|
)
|
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to
VCGs stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.69
|
)
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
17,925,132
|
|
Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
18,146,949
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
45
D-47
VCG
Holding Corp.
For
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Restated Balances, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
17,723,985
|
|
|
$
|
1,772
|
|
|
$
|
51,007,824
|
|
|
$
|
2,978,240
|
|
|
$
|
3,660,915
|
|
|
$
|
57,648,751
|
|
Issuance of common stock for services
|
|
|
184,417
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1,487,235
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,487,253
|
|
Issuance of common stock for loan fee
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
36,539
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,540
|
|
Exercise of warrants
|
|
|
167,000
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
459,250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
459,267
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(327,024
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(753,169
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(753,202
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
233,634
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
233,634
|
|
Amortization of warrants for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
122,745
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
122,745
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37,011
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37,011
|
)
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(30,710,794
|
)
|
|
|
428,614
|
|
|
|
(30,282,180
|
)
|
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(529,055
|
)
|
|
|
(529,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
17,755,378
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
52,557,047
|
|
|
|
(27,732,554
|
)
|
|
|
3,560,474
|
|
|
|
28,386,742
|
|
Amortization of warrants for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
102,288
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
102,288
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
142,095
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
142,095
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(444,655
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(869,348
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(869,392
|
)
|
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
735,691
|
|
|
|
476,717
|
|
|
|
1,212,408
|
|
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(491,611
|
)
|
|
|
(491,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
17,310,723
|
|
|
$
|
1,731
|
|
|
$
|
51,932,082
|
|
|
$
|
(26,996,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,545,580
|
|
|
$
|
28,482,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
46
D-48
VCG
Holding Corp.
For
the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to VCG
|
|
$
|
735,691
|
|
|
$
|
(30,710,794
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
18,721,496
|
|
Impairment of indefinite lived intangible assets
|
|
|
1,741,000
|
|
|
|
27,323,546
|
|
Impairment of building and land
|
|
|
268,000
|
|
|
|
1,961,200
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,695,277
|
|
|
|
1,678,043
|
|
Amortization of non-compete agreements
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
20,761
|
|
Amortization of leasehold rights and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(212,342
|
)
|
|
|
(192,067
|
)
|
Amortization of loan fees
|
|
|
216,205
|
|
|
|
448,015
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
244,383
|
|
|
|
421,379
|
|
Issuance of stock for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,422,253
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
465,896
|
|
|
|
(11,831,550
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
476,717
|
|
|
|
428,614
|
|
(Gain) Loss on disposition of assets
|
|
|
74,669
|
|
|
|
216,539
|
|
Accrued interest added to long-term debt
|
|
|
243,901
|
|
|
|
180,613
|
|
Write-off uncollectible deposits
|
|
|
7,151
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes and other receivables
|
|
|
(287,894
|
)
|
|
|
152,135
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
22,767
|
|
|
|
20,030
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(72,245
|
)
|
|
|
(6,480
|
)
|
Accounts payable trade and accrued expenses
|
|
|
576,380
|
|
|
|
693,896
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
67,917
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
(40,811
|
)
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
783,165
|
|
|
|
845,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
7,081,228
|
|
|
|
11,751,954
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,670,691
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,454,478
|
)
|
|
|
(1,324,252
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(19,444
|
)
|
|
|
(206,068
|
)
|
Purchase of assets held for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(127,952
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
238,241
|
|
|
|
243,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(1,235,681
|
)
|
|
|
(11,085,832
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
1,212,115
|
|
|
|
14,009,000
|
|
Payments on debt
|
|
|
(4,152,700
|
)
|
|
|
(13,345,601
|
)
|
Proceeds from related party debt
|
|
|
25,099
|
|
|
|
2,140,000
|
|
Payments on related party debt
|
|
|
(912,843
|
)
|
|
|
(949,900
|
)
|
Borrowing (payments) on revolving line of credit
|
|
|
(90,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,190,000
|
)
|
Loan fees paid
|
|
|
(78,724
|
)
|
|
|
(268,218
|
)
|
Payment on capital lease
|
|
|
(19,111
|
)
|
|
|
(9,343
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
459,250
|
|
Repurchase of stock
|
|
|
(869,392
|
)
|
|
|
(753,202
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(491,611
|
)
|
|
|
(529,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(5,380,167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,437,069
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
465,380
|
|
|
|
(770,947
|
)
|
Cash beginning of period
|
|
|
2,209,060
|
|
|
|
2,980,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash end of period
|
|
$
|
2,674,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,209,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid in cash
|
|
$
|
225,972
|
|
|
$
|
822,307
|
|
Interest paid in cash
|
|
$
|
3,067,195
|
|
|
$
|
3,108,962
|
|
Non-cash acquisition activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of notes payable for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(5,793,027
|
)
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2,095,105
|
)
|
Non-cash divestiture activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of note payable transferred to buyer
|
|
$
|
1,771,854
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Issuance of note receivable to buyer
|
|
$
|
322,963
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
47
D-49
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Description of Business
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Other Long Term Assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
Fair Value Disclosure
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
Subsequent Events
|
|
|
73
|
|
48
D-50
VCG
Holding Corp.
|
|
1)
|
Description
of Business
|
VCG Holding Corp. (the Company) is in the business
of acquiring, owning, and operating nightclubs, which provide
premium quality live adult entertainment, restaurant, and
beverage services in an up-scale environment. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company, through its subsidiaries,
owns and operates twenty nightclubs in Indiana, Illinois,
Colorado, Texas, North Carolina, Minnesota, Kentucky, Maine,
Florida, and California. The Company operates in one reportable
segment.
|
|
2)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries
and a consolidated variable interest entity. All inter-company
balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period and certain financial statement disclosures. As
discussed below, the Companys most significant estimates
include those made in connection with the valuation of property
and equipment, intangible assets, goodwill, and the accrual of
certain liabilities. Actual results could differ materially from
these estimates.
Cash
Substantially all of the Companys cash is held by one bank
located in Colorado. The Company does not believe that, as a
result of this concentration, it is subject to any financial
risk beyond the normal risk associated with commercial banking
relationships.
Asset
Held for Sale
Asset held for sale in 2008 consisted of an employee house,
purchased by the Company when the employee was transferred to a
new nightclub in a new state. The house was sold in 2009 for
$107,326.
Other
Receivables
Other receivables at December 31, 2009 consist of
approximately $151,000 deposit due from a cancelled acquisition,
$56,000 from the sale of the Arizona land and building, various
small receivable amounts due from property insurance damage
claims, credit card fees, and employee advances. The
December 31, 2008 balance includes small receivable amounts
for property taxes, credit card fees, and employee advances.
Income
Tax Receivable
Income tax receivable is the amount due from the IRS for
overpayment of estimated income tax deposits made during the
year shown. This amount is applied against the first estimated
tax deposit due in the next fiscal year.
49
D-51
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Inventories
Inventories include alcoholic beverages, food, and Company
merchandise. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or
market, where cost is determined by using
first-in,
first-out method.
Prepaid
Expenses
Prepaid expenses represent expenses paid prior to the receipt of
the related goods or services. The balance consists primarily of
prepaid rent, liquor and other license fees, prepaid memberships
and prepaid insurance premiums for the corporate office, and
various nightclubs.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated using
the straight-line method over the estimated life, listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Buildings
|
|
39
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
The shorter of useful life or lease term
|
Vehicles
|
|
5
|
Computers and software
|
|
5
|
Equipment
|
|
3 10
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
3 7
|
Signs
|
|
10
|
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred. When an asset is sold or otherwise disposed of, the
cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and the resulting gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations for the respective period.
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of such assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss
is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its
fair value (see Note 5).
Goodwill
The excess of the purchase over the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase business
combinations is classified as goodwill. In accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other
(ASC
350), the Company does not amortize goodwill, but performs
impairment tests of the carrying value at least annually. The
Company tests goodwill for impairment at the
nightclub or reporting unit level, which
is one level below the operating segment.
Intangible
Assets
Indefinite life intangible assets, which are stated at cost, are
composed of liquor and cabaret or sexually oriented business
licenses and trade names. Finite lived assets include
non-compete agreements, which are stated at cost less
accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed on the
straight-line method over term of the non-compete agreement.
Intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.
50
D-52
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Indefinite life intangible assets are tested annually and
individually for impairment in accordance with ASC 350, for
impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Favorable
Lease Rights and Unfavorable Lease Rights
Favorable lease rights and unfavorable lease liabilities
resulted from the fair value analysis of nightclub acquisitions.
A favorable lease right occurs when the acquired lease is below
market at the time of acquisition. An unfavorable lease right
occurs when the acquired lease payments are above market. The
balance is amortized ratably into rent expense over the expected
lease term, which includes expected renewals.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred revenue consists of the unearned portion of VIP room
memberships. VIP room memberships are amortized into revenues
ratably over the one-year life of membership from the date of
purchase.
Deferred
Rent
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 840,
Leases
(ASC
840), the Company expenses rent on a straight-line basis
over the expected lease term, which includes expected renewals.
Revenue
Recognition
The Companys revenues from nightclubs include funds
received from the sale of alcoholic beverages, food, and
merchandise, service and other revenues. The Company recognizes
sales revenue at
point-of-sale
upon receipt of cash, check, or charge card. Service revenues
include entertainer payments to perform at the Companys
nightclubs, customer admission fees, customer payments for tabs
and tip charges, dance dollar payments, and suite rental fees.
Service revenue is collected and recorded as revenue on a daily
basis when received and earned.
Other income is comprised of fees charged for usage of ATM
machines located in nightclubs, credit card charges, VIP
memberships, valet parking fees, various fees at nightclubs for
services and special events, and rental income from third party
tenants at certain nightclubs. Other Income also includes
non-club revenue of rent received from unrelated third parties
in Indianapolis and Phoenix.
Advertising
Cost
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in
selling, general, and administrative expense.
Stock-Based
Compensation
At December 31, 2009, the Company had stock options
outstanding, which are described in Note 11. The Company
recognizes stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718,
Compensation-Stock Compensation
(ASC
718)
,
which requires the Company to measure the
cost of services to be rendered based on the grant-date fair
value of the equity award. The compensation expense is
recognized over the period an employee is required to provide
service in exchange for the award, referred to as the requisite
service period.
51
D-53
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are recorded in accordance with the provisions of
FASB ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes
(ASC 740).
Pursuant to ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amounts expected to be realized.
ASC 740 clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a companys financial statements and
prescribed a recognition threshold and measurement attributes
for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As a
result, the Company has applied a more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. ASC 740 only
allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater
than 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the
various taxing authorities.
The company files tax returns in the U.S. Federal and
various state jurisdictions. The company is no longer subject to
U.S. Federal income tax examinations for years prior to
2006 and state and local income tax examinations by tax
authorities for years prior to 2005. Penalties, if any, related
to unrecognized tax liabilities are in other general and
administrative on the Statement of Operations. Interest expense,
if any, related to unrecognized tax liabilities are in interest
expense on the Statement of Operations.
Earnings
per Share
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260,
Earnings per Share
(ASC 260), basic earnings (loss) per share is
computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common
shares by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share
is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common
shares by the weighted average number of common and potential
common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common
shares, composed of the incremental common shares issuable upon
the exercise of stock options and warrants, are included in the
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation to
the extent such shares are dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
735,691
|
|
|
$
|
(30,710,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
17,925,132
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,817
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,541,376
|
|
|
|
18,146,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(1.69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has excluded 262,500 and 300,500 stock options from
its calculation of the effect of dilutive securities in 2009 and
2008, respectively, as they represent anti-dilutive stock
options.
The Company has also excluded 325,376 warrants from its
calculation of the effect of dilutive securities in 2009, as
they represent anti-dilutive warrants.
52
D-54
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain and significant prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts
payable approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of
these instruments. The carrying amount of the notes payable
approximates fair value as the individual borrowings bear
interest at rates that approximate market interest rates for
similar debt instruments.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification
tm
(the Codification) as the single source of
authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC
registrants. We have conformed the references in the notes to
our financial statements to the new Codification.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC
820), to provide additional guidance on estimating fair
value when the volume and level of transaction activity for an
asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to
normal market activity for the asset or liability. Additional
disclosures are required regarding fair value in interim and
annual reports. These provisions are effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC Topic 805,
Business Combinations
(ASC 805) authoritative
guidance to require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in a business combination that arise from contingencies be
recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably
determined. If the fair value of such assets or liabilities
cannot be reasonably determined, then they would generally be
recognized in accordance with certain other pre-existing
accounting standards. This guidance also amends the subsequent
accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination and certain other disclosure
requirements. This guidance became effective for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations
that are consummated on or after October 1, 2009.
Accordingly, the Company will record and disclose assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that
arises from contingencies under the revised standard for
transactions consummated, if any, after October 1, 2009.
In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 855,
Subsequent Events
(ASC 855), which provides guidance on events
that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the
issuance of the financial statements. ASC 855 distinguishes
between events requiring recognition in the financial statements
from those that may require disclosure in the financial
statements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual
periods after June 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption had no impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update
(ASU)
No. 2009-05,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure
Topic 820,
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
authoritative
guidance to provide clarification on measuring liabilities at
fair value when a quoted price in an active market is not
available. In these circumstances, a valuation technique should
be applied that uses either the quote of the liability when
traded as an asset, the quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation
technique consistent with existing fair value measurement
guidance, such as an income approach or a market approach. The
new guidance also clarifies that when estimating the fair value
of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a
separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the
53
D-55
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the
liability. This guidance was adopted effective July 1,
2009. The adoption had no impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-04,
Accounting for Various Topics Technical
Corrections to SEC Paragraphs.
This update provides
updates/corrections to various topics of the codification with
regards to the SECs position on various matters. There is
no new guidance, but it includes adjustments to the SECs
position on already issued updates. Some of the main topics
covered are as follows: 1) Requirements for using push down
accounting in an acquisition 2) appropriate balance sheet
presentation of unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, which
are issued to nonemployees as consideration for future services,
and 3) intangible assets arising from insurance contracts
acquired in a business combination. The corrections are
applicable for 2009 since the updates relate to already issued
guidance. The adoption had no impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Issued
but not yet effective accounting standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation
authoritative guidance to require an analysis to determine
whether a variable interest gives the entity a controlling
financial interest in a variable interest entity. This guidance
requires an ongoing reassessment and eliminates the quantitative
approach previously required for determining whether an entity
is the primary beneficiary. It requires an analysis to determine
whether a variable interest gives the entity a controlling
financial interest in a variable interest entity. This guidance
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2009. VCG is currently assessing the impact that this guidance
may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 860,
Transfers and
Servicing
authoritative guidance to improve information and
disclosures related to the transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and the continuing risk
exposures related to transferred financial assets. The concept
of a qualifying special-purpose entity is eliminated
and the requirements for derecognizing financial assets have
been modified. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not expect the
adoption of this new guidance will have a significant impact on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management has reviewed and continues to monitor the
pronouncements of the various financial and regulatory agencies
and is currently not aware of any other pronouncements that
could have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities
During 2007, the Company became the .01% General Partner of 4th
Street Limited Partnership LLLP (4th Street), a
limited liability limited partnership that owns a building in
Minneapolis, MN that is rented by the Minneapolis nightclub
operated by the Company. The land and building, which had a net
book value of approximately $2,844,000 and $2,896,000 at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, represent the
only assets held by 4th Street. The lease term is for
17 years. The majority of the 99.9% limited partner
interests are held by related parties, ranging from note holder,
to stockholders and Directors. Under the terms of the 4th Street
partnership agreement, profits and losses and cash flows are
allocated between the General and the Limited Partners based on
their respective ownership percentages.
The Company has considered the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation
(ASC 810) and has determined
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the Limited Partners have very limited rights with respect to
the management and control of 4th Street;
|
|
|
|
the Company is the General Partner; and therefore, has control
of the partnership;
|
|
|
|
the Company is the Primary Beneficiary;
|
54
D-56
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
the Company has determined that 4th Street is a variable
interest entity; and
|
|
|
|
therefore, the Company has consolidated 4th Streets assets
and included its equity as noncontrolling interest on the
consolidated balance sheet.
|
The Company has reviewed the provisions of FASB ASC Topic
360-20,
Real Estate Sales
(ASC
360-20)
as it relates to accounting for the noncontrolling interest
attributable to the Limited Partners and has determined that the
interest should not be accounted for using the financing method.
Inventories consist of beverages, food, tobacco products and
merchandise. All are valued at the lower of cost or market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
$
|
823,165
|
|
|
$
|
841,154
|
|
Tobacco and merchandise
|
|
|
103,156
|
|
|
|
107,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
926,321
|
|
|
$
|
949,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 14, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the common
stock of Manana Entertainment, Inc. (Manana) and the
building in which Manana operates Jaguars Gold Club of
Dallas for total cash consideration of $4,093,525 and a 12%
promissory note in the amount of $2,500,000. The total purchase
price of $6,593,525, including direct acquisition costs of
$307,914, was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities
as set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
3,166,440
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,259,581
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
3,501,000
|
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Unfavorable lease right
|
|
|
(1,390,000
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(705,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
6,901,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is not amortizable for tax purposes.
On July 28, 2008, the Company acquired the assets of VCG-IS
LLC (VCG-IS) for cash consideration of $4,005,000
and an 8% promissory note in the principal amount of $3,293,027.
VCG-IS operates Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club in
Anaheim, CA. The total purchase price of $7,293,027, including
direct
55
D-57
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
acquisition costs of $321,643, was allocated to the acquired
assets and liabilities as set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$
|
160,633
|
|
Deposits and other assets
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
380,037
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
276,000
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
6,546,000
|
|
Favorable lease right
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
7,619,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of goodwill amortizable over 15 years for
tax purposes is $380,000.
The following pro forma financial information includes the
consolidated results of operations as if the 2008 acquisitions
had occurred at January 1, 2008, but do not purport to be
indicative of the results that would have occurred has the
acquisitions been made as of that date or of results which may
occur in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
59,816,000
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(29,800,000
|
)
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.66
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.64
|
)
|
|
|
5)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
The Companys property and equipment consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
856,737
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
11,362,143
|
|
|
|
14,076,390
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,056,795
|
|
|
|
10,645,692
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
3,138,217
|
|
|
|
2,470,848
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
269,503
|
|
|
|
138,090
|
|
Signs
|
|
|
308,819
|
|
|
|
268,726
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,993,370
|
|
|
|
1,918,126
|
|
Assets to be placed in service
|
|
|
168,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,797,092
|
|
|
|
30,374,609
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,850,978
|
)
|
|
|
(4,636,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
22,946,114
|
|
|
$
|
25,738,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was approximately $1,695,000 and $1,678,000
for the years-ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The Companys land and building in Phoenix was rented by
the individual who purchased the operations and ownership
interest in our subsidiary Epicurean Enterprises in January
2007. The lessee defaulted on the
56
D-58
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
lease in August 2008. In December 2008, the Company ordered an
appraisal of the land and building owned in Phoenix, Arizona.
The appraisal was performed by an independent third party real
estate appraiser who valued the land and building at $2,600,000.
The Company recognized a noncash impairment loss of $1,861,200
on December 31, 2008. On July 31, 2009, the Company
sold the building and land in Phoenix to a third party for
approximately $2,300,000. The Company recognized a non-cash
impairment loss of $268,000 during the second quarter of 2009
and an additional $68,800 in selling expenses in the third
quarter 2009. The additional selling expenses were recorded as a
loss on the sale of the property.
|
|
6)
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The Companys definite lived intangible assets consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant not to compete
|
|
$
|
61,694
|
|
|
$
|
(37,796
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,898
|
|
|
$
|
61,694
|
|
|
$
|
(20,761
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,933
|
|
Favorable lease rights
|
|
|
1,820,000
|
|
|
|
(172,032
|
)
|
|
|
1,647,968
|
|
|
|
1,820,000
|
|
|
|
(114,636
|
)
|
|
|
1,705,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,881,694
|
|
|
$
|
(209,828
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,671,866
|
|
|
$
|
1,881,694
|
|
|
$
|
(135,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,746,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 totaled $74,431 and $98,609, respectively.
At December 31, 2009, definite lived intangible assets are
expected to be amortized over a period of one to 24 years
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
86,927
|
|
2011
|
|
|
76,755
|
|
2012
|
|
|
75,492
|
|
2013
|
|
|
72,292
|
|
2014
|
|
|
71,892
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,288,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,671,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
D-59
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A reconciliation of the activity affecting indefinite lived
intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
Trade Names
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
17,622,000
|
|
|
$
|
53,316,734
|
|
|
$
|
578,000
|
|
Club acquisitions in 2008
|
|
|
2,639,618
|
|
|
|
10,047,000
|
|
|
|
276,000
|
|
Acquisition purchase price adjustments
|
|
|
1,057,898
|
|
|
|
138,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component 2 amortization
|
|
|
(144,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 impairment charges
|
|
|
(18,721,496
|
)
|
|
|
(27,088,855
|
)
|
|
|
(235,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,453,122
|
|
|
|
36,413,189
|
|
|
|
619,000
|
|
Component 2 amortization
|
|
|
(157,077
|
)
|
|
|
(5,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2009 impairment charges
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,574,000
|
)
|
|
|
(167,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,279,045
|
|
|
$
|
34,834,018
|
|
|
$
|
452,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
recorded amortization of component 2 goodwill of $162,248, which
reduced the book basis of goodwill by $157,077 and reduced the
remaining book basis of licenses by $5,171. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded amortization
of component 2 goodwill of $144,896, which reduced book basis of
goodwill. No impairment on goodwill as taken prior to December
31, 2007. Total accumulated impairment charges are $18,736,496.
In performing the Companys annual impairment assessment at
December 31, 2009 in accordance with ASC Topic 350, the
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge for licenses of
$1,574,000 and trade names of $167,000. In addition, the Company
evaluated its goodwill at December 31, 2009 and recorded a
non-cash impairment charge of $17,000.
For 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge for
licenses of approximately $27,089,000 and trade names of
approximately $235,000. In addition, the Company evaluated its
goodwill at December 31, 2008 and recorded a non-cash
impairment charge of approximately $18,721,000. The total
impairment charge for 2008 was approximately $46,045,000.
The fair values of the licenses, trade names, and the reporting
units with the impaired goodwill were based on estimated
discounted future net cash flows. These impairment charges are a
result of a continued weak economy, which resulted in either
zero growth or a reduction of estimated future cash flows at the
club level.
|
|
7)
|
Other
Long-Term Assets
|
The Companys other long-term assets consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Loan fees, net
|
|
$
|
108,866
|
|
|
$
|
246,347
|
|
Deposits lease, utility, and taxes
|
|
|
133,127
|
|
|
|
120,834
|
|
Acquisition deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
241,993
|
|
|
$
|
567,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
D-60
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Companys accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
|
$
|
1,225,526
|
|
|
$
|
832,802
|
|
Sales taxes
|
|
|
282,007
|
|
|
|
297,449
|
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
319,773
|
|
|
|
375,277
|
|
Legal and professional charges
|
|
|
31,344
|
|
|
|
667,810
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
54,772
|
|
|
|
83,778
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
16,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,930,049
|
|
|
$
|
2,257,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
D-61
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Companys long-term debt consists of the following:
Related Party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Description of Related Party Debt
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Note payable to Lowrie Management LLLP, interest at 10%, due
monthly, principal due June 2012, collateralized by general
assets of Illinois Restaurant Concepts LP and Denver Restaurant
Concepts LP, plus the consent to the transfer of the adult
permit and liquor license for both clubs upon default.
|
|
$
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Note payable to Lowrie Management LLLP, interest at 8.5%,
monthly principal and interest payments of $112,841, due January
2013, collateralized by general assets of Illinois Restaurant
Concepts, LP and Denver Restaurant Concepts, LP and a security
interest in the general assets of VCG Holding Corp. and consent
to the transfer of the adult permit and liquor license for both
clubs. This loan was consolidated into the new 10% loan in June
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,754,394
|
|
Note payable to Lowrie Family Foundation, a corporation
controlled by the Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, interest at 10%, interest accrued monthly to
principal, but no payments, due February 2011, unsecured.
|
|
|
698,934
|
|
|
|
662,828
|
|
Note payable to Lowrie Management LLLP, interest at 10%, due
monthly, principal due April 2011, collateralized by the general
assets of Denver Restaurant Concepts LP, general assets of
Illinois Restaurant Concepts LP, and consent to the transfer of
the adult permit and liquor license upon default in the name of
Denver Restaurant Concepts LP and RCC LP. This loan was
consolidated into the new 10% loan in June 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335,805
|
|
Note payable to the President and Chief Operating Officer with
interest at 10%, due monthly, principal due February 2011,
unsecured.
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Note payable to a board member with interest at 10%, due
monthly, principal due November 2011, unsecured.
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Note payable to the mother of the Chairman with interest at 10%,
due monthly, principal due February 2011, unsecured.
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
Note payable to the mother of the Chairman, with interest at
10%, monthly principal and interest payments of $3,456.22, due
December 2010, unsecured.
|
|
|
36,741
|
|
|
|
72,571
|
|
Note payable to the mother of the Chairman, with interest at
10%, interest accrues monthly to principal, but no payments, due
December 2010, unsecured.
|
|
|
25,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to the sister of Chairman, with interest at 10%,
monthly interest payments of $3,167, due February 2010,
collateralized by the general assets of Illinois Restaurant
Concepts LP and Denver Restaurant Concepts LP and consent to the
transfer of the adult permit and liquor license for both clubs
upon default. In June 2009, the Company paid this loan in full.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Note payable to an affiliate of a current Board member with
interest at 10%, due February 2011, collateralized by a personal
guarantee from Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
410,084
|
|
|
|
413,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt due
|
|
|
7,191,085
|
|
|
|
7,939,098
|
|
Less current portion, related party
|
|
|
(62,067
|
)
|
|
|
(1,024,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, related party
|
|
$
|
7,129,018
|
|
|
$
|
6,915,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
D-62
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The rates on all related party transactions are equal to or less
than other unsecured or secured notes to unrelated parties.
Third
Party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Description of Debt
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Note payable to Sunshine Mortgage, interest at 14% fixed, due
monthly, periodic principal with balance due December 2011,
collateralized by one parcel of real property located in
Ft. Worth, TX, the common stock of Kenja II, Inc.,
238,000 shares of VCG stock, furniture, fixtures and
equipment of Kenja II, Inc. and a guarantee from Lowrie
Management LLLP.
|
|
$
|
4,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
|
Loan from Citywide Banks, interest at 7% fixed, monthly
principal and interest payments of $76,865 due August 15,
2014, collateralized with a life insurance policy on Troy Lowrie
and additional securities owned by Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
3,654,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, interest at 8% fixed, monthly principal and
interest payments, due July 2011, collateralized by assets of
VCG-IS, LLC.
|
|
|
2,915,386
|
|
|
|
3,186,835
|
|
Note payable to Amfirst Bank, variable interest rate calculated
at prime subject to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at
December 31, 2009, monthly principal and interest payments
of approximately $55,898, due November 14, 2014,
collateralized by UCC Security Agreement of RCC LP, IRC LP, MRC
LP , Platinum of Illinois, Inc., Cardinal Management LP,VCG CO
Springs, Inc., VCG Real Estate, Inc., Glendale Restaurant
Concepts LP, Glenarm Restaurant LLC, the Indiana building, and a
guarantee from Lowrie Management LLLP.
|
|
|
2,844,219
|
|
|
|
3,325,927
|
|
Line of credit from Citywide Banks, variable interest rate
calculated at prime subject to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at
December 31, 2009, due monthly, principal due
August 15, 2011, collateralized by Company shares of common
stock owned by Lowrie Management LLLP, a life insurance policy
on Troy Lowrie, and additional securities owned by
Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
2,720,000
|
|
|
|
2,810,000
|
|
Note payable, variable interest rate calculated at prime subject
to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at December 31, 2008, due
monthly, periodic principal payments with balance due June 2013,
collateralized by a P&A Select Strategy Fund and securities
owned by Lowrie Management LLLP. This loan was consolidated into
a new loan in August 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,375,138
|
|
Note payable to Citywide Banks, interest at 8.5%, monthly
principal and interest payments of $36,156 with a balloon
payment of $2,062,483 due May 16, 2010, collateralized by
securities owned by Lowrie Management LLLP. This note was
consolidated on August 15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,080,527
|
|
Note payable, interest at 12% fixed, monthly principal and
interest payments, with periodic principal payments, due May
2010, collateralized by assets of Manana Entertainment, Inc. The
Company paid this note in full in September 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928,410
|
|
61
D-63
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Description of Debt
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Note payable, interest at a rate equal to the lesser
of(i) twelve percent (12%) or (ii) the rate for ten
(10) year Treasury Bills plus four percent (4%). Monthly
principal and interest payments of $22,949 due September 2018,
collateralized by certain real and personal property of
Epicurean. The Company sold the AZ property in July 2009 and
transferred this debt to the new owner. VCG agreed to guaranty
the Buyers performance on the $1,772,000 mortgage note
payable. The Buyer and its sole member agreed to indemnify VCG
from any losses arising from its guaranty of the same mortgage
note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847,618
|
|
Notes payable to investors, interest at 11%, monthly interest
payments, principal due January 2010, collateralized by the
general assets of the Company and a guarantee by Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 10% and 11% fixed, monthly interest
payments, due November 2010, collateralized by the general
assets and cash flow of VCG and 100% stock in Manana
Entertainment, Inc.
|
|
|
1,336,529
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 10%, monthly interest payments,
principal due between November 2009 and March 2012, unsecured.
|
|
|
1,198,000
|
|
|
|
1,380,000
|
|
Various notes payable, interest at 11% fixed, monthly interest
payments, principal due July 2011, collateralized by the general
assets and cash flow of VCG and 100% stock in VCG-IS, LLC and a
guarantee from Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Note payable, interest at 12% fixed due monthly, periodic
principal payments with balance due July 2011, collateralized by
one parcel of real property located in Ft. Worth, TX and
the common stock of Kenja II, Inc., and a guarantee from Lowrie
Management LLLP.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Note payable, interest at 10% fixed, monthly principal and
interest payments, due October 2013, unsecured.
|
|
|
214,732
|
|
|
|
231,957
|
|
Note payable to investors, interest at 8.5%, monthly principal
and interest payments, due October 20, 2011, collateralized
by the general assets of the Company and guaranteed by
Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
208,295
|
|
|
|
308,993
|
|
Note payable to employee, interest at 10%, due October 2011,
unsecured.
|
|
|
186,122
|
|
|
|
168,480
|
|
Auto loans payable, interest at 0%, monthly principal payments,
due in May 2012 and October 2015, collateralized by the vehicles
purchased.
|
|
|
102,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, variable interest rate calculated at prime subject
to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at December 31, 2009, due
monthly, principal and interest due January 2011, unsecured.
|
|
|
75,833
|
|
|
|
145,833
|
|
Note payable, variable interest rate calculated at prime subject
to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at December 31, 2009,
principal and interest payments, due December 2009, unsecured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt due
|
|
|
23,556,298
|
|
|
|
28,518,111
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(3,805,277
|
)
|
|
|
(2,602,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
19,751,021
|
|
|
$
|
25,916,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In conjunction with the refinancing of the two Citywide notes
in August 2009, two covenants were added. The first new covenant
requires acquisitions or additional indebtedness of equal to or
in excess of $1,000,000 be
pre-approved
by Citywide Banks. The second new covenant is a financial ratio
covenant. This covenant
62
D-64
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
requires the quarterly calculation of net cash flow to debt
service in a ratio greater than or equal to 1.2 to 1.0. Net cash
flow is defined as income attributable to the Company plus
depreciation, amortization and interest expense. Net profit
excludes any intangible impairments and related tax effects. The
Company has been in compliance with all covenants for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
The table below shows the future maturities of the principal
amount of the related party and third party long-term debt as of
December 31, 2009, including the new note of $100,000
disclosed in the subsequent events footnote:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,867,344
|
|
2011
|
|
|
16,942,568
|
|
2012
|
|
|
7,207,409
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,622,791
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,198,348
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,847,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Company still had $1,280,000 of
available and unused funding on its revolving line of credit.
Management believes the carrying amount of our fixed rate debt
approximates the fair value at December 31, 2009.
A reconciliation of the Companys effective income tax rate
and the United States Federal statutory rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States federal statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Utilization of net operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Impairment of nondeductible goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is entitled to a tax credit for the social security
and medicare taxes paid by the Company on its employees
tip income. This tip tax credit is subject to carry back and
carry forward provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has unused tip tax
credits of $582,000 and $256,000, respectively, which expire in
2029.
63
D-65
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, total deferred tax assets,
liabilities, and valuation allowance are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Licenses, goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
$
|
1,195,738
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,697
|
|
Favorable/unfavorable leases, net
|
|
|
1,866,569
|
|
|
|
2,718,507
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(819,743
|
)
|
|
|
(26,868
|
)
|
Accrued cost
|
|
|
76,920
|
|
|
|
100,105
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,017,181
|
|
|
|
21,539
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
581,928
|
|
|
|
255,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
3,918,593
|
|
|
$
|
4,239,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a tax net operating loss carry forward of
approximately $2,608,000 as of December 31, 2009, which
expires in 2029. Because the Company anticipates being
profitable in the future and anticipates being able to utilize
its deferred tax assets, no valuation allowance was recorded at
December 31, 2009.
We have analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and
state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax
returns. We believe that our income tax filing positions and
deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any
adjustments that will result in a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
Interest and penalties paid in 2009 and 2008 totaled $14,469 and
$0, respectively.
The company files tax returns in the U.S. Federal and
various state jurisdictions. The company is no longer subject to
U.S. Federal income tax examinations for years prior to
2006 and state and local income tax examinations by tax
authorities for years prior to 2005.
Common
Stock
Holders of the Companys common stock are entitled to one
vote for each share held of record on all matters. Since the
Companys common stock does not have cumulative voting
rights, the holders of shares having more than 50% of the voting
power, if they choose to do so, may elect all Directors and the
holders of the remaining shares would not be able to elect any
Directors. In the event of a voluntary or involuntary
liquidation of our Company, all stockholders are entitled to a
prorated distribution of the Companys assets remaining
after payment of claims by creditors and liquidation preferences
of any preferred stock. Holders of the Companys common
stock have no conversion, redemption, or sinking fund rights.
All of the outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and
non-assessable.
Preferred
Stock
The Board, without further action by the stockholders, is
authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock in one or more series. The Board may, without stockholder
approval, determine the dividend rates, redemption prices,
preferences on liquidation or dissolution, conversion rights,
voting rights, and any other preferences. Because of its broad
discretion with respect to the creation and issuance of
preferred stock without stockholder approval, the Board could
adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common
stock and, by issuing shares of Preferred Stock with certain
voting, conversion
and/or
redemption rights, could delay, defer, or prevent an attempt to
obtain control of the Company. The Board has authorized the sale
of
64
D-66
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
1,000,000 shares of Class A Preferred. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, none of the Companys
Series A Preferred Stock was outstanding.
Stock
Option and Stock Bonus Plans
The Companys stockholders have approved (i) the 2002
Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan, (ii) the 2003 Stock
Option and Stock Bonus Plan, and (iii) the 2004 Stock
Option and Appreciation Rights Plan (collectively, the
Plans). Under each of the Plans, the Company may grant to
designated employees, officers, Directors, advisors, and
independent contractors incentive stock options, nonqualified
stock options, and stock. If options granted under the Plans
expire, or are terminated for any reason without being
exercised, or bonus shares are forfeited, the shares underlying
such option
and/or
bonus
shares will become available again for issuance under the
applicable Plan.
The Compensation Committee
and/or
the
Board determines which individuals will receive grants, the
type, size and terms of the grants, the time when the grants are
made, and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction
period, including the criteria for vesting and the acceleration
of vesting, and the total number of shares of common stock
available for grants.
The stock awards issued under the Plans as of December 31,
2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares to be
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
|
2002 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
699,776
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
2003 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
247,292
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
2004 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
93,333
|
|
|
|
906,667
|
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
|
644,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,950,000
|
|
|
|
1,040,401
|
|
|
|
909,599
|
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
|
647,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year-ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not
issue any stock.
The following is a summary of all stock option transactions
under the 2004 Stock Option Plan for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Granted above fair market value
|
|
|
167,000
|
|
|
|
11.95
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(54,500
|
)
|
|
|
11.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
300,500
|
|
|
$
|
10.37
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(38,000
|
)
|
|
|
11.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
$
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, the range of exercise prices for
outstanding options was $6.00 $13.00. The weighted
average remaining contractual term as of December 31, 2009
is 7.7 years for the outstanding options
65
D-67
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
under the Plans. There is no aggregate intrinsic value as of
December 31, 2009 because the fair market value of the
outstanding options is below the weighted average exercise price.
Employee stock options are subject to cancellation upon
termination of employment and expire ten years from the date of
grant. The options generally vest 20% on the third anniversary
and 40% each on the fifth and seventh anniversaries of the date
of grant. Options have historically been granted at an exercise
price significantly above the fair market value of the common
stock covered by the option on the grant date.
Valuation
and Assumptions
The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 718,
Stock Compensation
(ASC 718), upon its initial stock option
issuance in April 2007. A transition method was not required
since there were no outstanding stock options. The Company used
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to determine the fair
value of option grants, using the assumptions noted in the
following table. Expected volatility was calculated using the
Companys historical stock prices since it became public in
October 2003, averaged with a peer-groups historical
volatility for the one to two years prior to 2003 needed to
reflect the six year expected life. The expected option life was
determined using the simplified method and represents the period
of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Grant Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
Weighted average expected volatility
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Weighted average risk free rates
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
compensation cost charged against income was $142,095 and
$233,634, respectively. At December 31, 2009, there was
$800,125 of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options. The
assumption for forfeitures increased during 2009 from 16% to 25%
based upon the Companys actual forfeitures. This cost is
expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining weighted average vesting period of approximately six
years.
Stock
Warrants
The Company issued stock warrants in 2004 and
2006.
The warrants were exercisable at a range of
prices between $2.00 $4.00. Each warrant was
exercisable into one share of the Companys common stock,
subject to certain adjustments and was in certain circumstances
exercisable on a cashless basis. At December 31, 2008, the
Company had warrants representing an aggregate of 325,376
warrants outstanding after 167,000 warrants were exercised. In
2009 no warrants were exercised and all unexercised warrants
expired in November 2009. There are no warrants outstanding at
December 31, 2009. Amortization of warrants issued for
services totaled $102,288 and $122,745 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
66
D-68
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
12)
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company conducts a major part of its nightclub operations
from 16 leased facilities, including three under related party
leases, and two land leases. The buildings are under
non-cancellable operating leases that expire between January
2015 and January 2062. Most of the operating leases contain
provisions where the Company can, at the end of the initial
lease term, extend the lease term for between two and 12
additional five or ten-year periods, with fixed rent increases.
The land leases expire between April 2012 and September 2012,
but can be extended for four additional five-year terms and 12
additional five-year terms, respectively. In virtually all
cases, the Company expects that in the normal course of
business, the leases will be renewed for the maximum lease
option term. The Company also leases office space in Colorado
for the Companys headquarter location.
Total rent expense for all leased facilities for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was approximately $5,855,000, of which
$418,500 was paid to Lowrie Management LLLP. Rent expense for
the year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately
$5,798,000 of which $414,000 was paid to Lowrie Management LLLP.
Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2009 are
set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Related Party
|
|
|
Third Party
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
462,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,311,720
|
|
|
$
|
3,773,720
|
|
2011
|
|
|
462,000
|
|
|
|
3,353,037
|
|
|
|
3,815,037
|
|
2012
|
|
|
477,000
|
|
|
|
3,416,601
|
|
|
|
3,893,601
|
|
2013
|
|
|
477,000
|
|
|
|
3,489,958
|
|
|
|
3,966,958
|
|
2014
|
|
|
481,500
|
|
|
|
3,535,118
|
|
|
|
4,016,618
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
9,180,000
|
|
|
|
73,618,758
|
|
|
|
82,798,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
11,539,500
|
|
|
$
|
90,725,192
|
|
|
$
|
102,264,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys leases typically require that it pay real
estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs in addition to
the minimum rental payments included in the above table. Such
costs vary from year to year and totaled $856,000 for 2009 and
$805,000 for 2008.
Favorable lease rights represent the approximate fair market
value arising from lease rates that are below market rates as of
the date of a clubs acquisition. The amount is being
amortized into rent expense ratably over the remaining term of
the underlying lease. Unfavorable lease liability represents the
approximate fair market value arising from lease rates that are
above market rates as on the date of a clubs acquisition.
Unfavorable lease liabilities are being amortized into rent
expense ratably over the remaining term of the underlying lease.
The Company leased the Arizona building and land to the
purchaser of Epicurean Enterprises, LLC for $20,000 per month,
actually collecting $140,000 in 2008. The lessee defaulted on
the lease in August 2008 and the Company fully reserved as bad
debt the remaining rent payments due for 2008. The Company did
not receive rent from this lessee in 2009. The property was sold
in July 2009.
The Company subleases unused space in the buildings that also
house clubs in Indianapolis and Denver. These are operating
leases with a contract for the first year, and switching to a
month-to-month
basis thereafter. Rental income earned from the Indianapolis
facility totaled $71,475 in 2009 and $20,365 in 2008. This 2008
lessee vacated the Indianapolis facility in March 2009. Another
tenant moved in beginning April 2009 at the rate of $6,720 per
month, increasing to $9,100 per month after September 1,
2009. The new lease is for 12 months and
month-to-month
thereafter.
67
D-69
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Legal
Proceedings
Thee
Dollhouse Productions Litigation
On or around July 24, 2007, VCG Holding Corp. was named in
a lawsuit filed in District Court, 191 Judicial District, of
Dallas County, Texas. This lawsuit arose out of a VCG
acquisition of certain assets belonging to Regale, Inc.
(Regale) by Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
(RRC), a wholly owned subsidiary of VCG, in Raleigh,
N.C. The lawsuit alleges that VCG tortiously interfered with a
contract between Michael Joseph Peter and Regale and
misappropriated Mr. Peters purported trade secrets.
On March 30, 2009, the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina entered an Order granting
Summary Judgment to VCG and dismissed Mr. Peters
claims in their entirety. The Court found that as a matter of
law, VCG did not tortiously interfere with Mr. Peters
contract with Regale and further found that VCG did not
misappropriate trade secrets. Mr. Peters did not appeal
that ruling and as such, the federal proceedings have concluded.
Ancillary to this litigation, Thee Dollhouse filed a claim in
arbitration on June 2008 against Regale as a result of this
transaction, asserting that Regale, by selling its assets to
RRC, breached a contract between Thee Dollhouse and Regale. In
addition, an assertion was made that one of Regales
principals tortiously interfered with the contract between
Regale and Thee Dollhouse. Regale filed a Motion to Stay
Arbitration which was granted in part and denied in part, with
the Court staying arbitration as to Regales principal and
denying the stay as to Regale. As a result, the arbitration as
to Regale is proceeding. VCG is indemnifying and holding Regale
harmless from this claim pursuant to their contract. The
arbitration was originally scheduled for late October 2009,
however due to illness of one of the principals of the claimant,
the arbitration has been adjourned to April 26, 2010. The
Company has not accrued any funds for the settlement of this
litigation, as the outcome of this dispute cannot be predicted.
The Companys or a successor entitys, indemnification
obligation to Regale will continue even if any of the proposed
sale transactions or an alternative transactions is consummated.
Zajkowski,
et. al. vs VCG and Classic Affairs Litigation
In December 2007, a former employee of VCGs subsidiary
Classic Affairs, Eric Zajkowski, filed a lawsuit in Hennepin
County District Court, Minneapolis, Minnesota against VCG
following his termination from employment alleging that, in
connection with his employment, he was subject to certain
employment practices which violated Minnesota law. The initial
action and subsequent pleading asserted that the matter was
filed as a purported class action. Subsequent to the filing of
Zajkowskis Complaint, Zajkowski moved to amend his
Complaint to name additional Plaintiffs and later, to name
Classic Affairs as a party defendant. VCG and Classic Affairs
have answered this complaint denying all liability. Classic
Affairs has also filed a Counter-Complaint against
Mr. Zajkowski based upon matters relating to his
termination from employment with Classic Affairs.
In December 2008 and early January 2009, the parties filed
cross-motions for Summary Judgment and Zajkowski filed a Motion
for Class Certification. Following the motions, the Court
issued a series of rulings on those Motions. In these rulings,
the Court has dismissed VCG as a party Defendant
having determined that VCG is not directly liable to Zajkowski
or the other Plaintiffs on their claims. The Court granted
Summary Judgment to Zajkowski as to one issue, but did not
determine the scope or extent, if any, of the alleged damages,
ruling this issue, like the others, are questions for a jury,
and the Court dismissed two other claims asserted by Zajkowski.
In all other respects, the Court has denied the parties
respective Summary Judgment motions.
On July 21, 2009, the Court denied Zajkowskis and the
other Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification.
Zajkowski appealed that decision to the Minnesota Court of
Appeals and on September 22, 2009, the Court of
68
D-70
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Appeals denied Plaintiffs request for discretionary review.
Plaintiffs have indicated that they do not intend to seek leave
to appeal from the Minnesota Supreme Court. The parties have
held mediation in November 2009 and the case was resolved. The
settlement terms, including the amounts, are confidential. The
lawsuit has now been dismissed, with prejudice. All related
costs have been accrued or paid as of December 31, 2009.
Texas
Patron Tax Litigation
Beginning January 1, 2008, VCGs Texas clubs became
subject to a new state law requiring the Company to collect a
five dollar surcharge for every club visitor. A lawsuit was
filed by the Texas Entertainment Association, an organization in
which the Company is a member, alleging that the fee is an
unconstitutional tax. On March 28, 2008, the Judge of the
District Court of Travis County, Texas ruled that the new state
law violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
and, therefore, the District Courts order enjoined the
state from collecting or assessing the tax. The State of Texas
has appealed the District Courts ruling. When cities or
the State of Texas give notice of appeal, the State supersedes
and suspends the judgment, including the injunction. Therefore,
the judgment of the Travis County District Court cannot be
enforced until the appeals are completed.
The Company has filed a lawsuit to demand repayment of the paid
taxes. On June 5, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Third
District (Austin) affirmed the District Courts judgment
that the Sexually Oriented Business Fee violated the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The State of Texas
appealed the Court of Appeals ruling to the Texas Supreme Court.
On August 26, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court ordered both
sides to submit briefs on the merits. The States brief was
filed on September 25, 2009 and the Texas Entertainment
Associations brief was filed on October 15, 2009. On
February 12, 2010 the Texas Supreme Court granted the
States Petition for Review and set oral arguments for
March 25, 2010.
The Company has expensed approximately $290,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and $203,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2008 for the Texas Patron Tax. The Company
accrued, but did not pay the
fourth
quarter estimated tax liability of $71,000. The Company has
paid, under protest, approximately $422,000 with the State of
Texas for the two year period.
Department
of Labor and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Reviews
United
States Department of Labor (DOL) Audit (PTs
Showclub)
In October 2008,
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, KY was required to conduct a self-audit
of employee payroll by the DOL. After an extensive self-audit,
it was determined that (a) the club incorrectly paid
certain employees for hours worked and minimum wage amounts and
(b) the club incorrectly charged certain minimum wage
employees for their uniforms. As a result, the DOL required that
the club issue back pay and refund uniform expenses to qualified
employees at a total cost of $14,439.
In March 2009, VCG was placed under a similar nationwide DOL
audit for all nightclub locations and its corporate office. All
locations completed the self-audit in August 2009 and are
currently working with the DOL to determine what, if any,
violations may have occurred. This case is still in the
investigatory state and no final determination can be made at
this time of an unfavorable outcome or any potential liability.
After discussion with outside legal counsel on this case, the
Company has accrued $200,000 as of December 31, 2009 for
potential wage/hour violations. A summary meeting has
tentatively been scheduled with the DOL and counsel on
March 15, 2010 to finalize the liability. The Company
believes it has corrected all processes that resulted in the
potential violations.
69
D-71
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Reviews
On June 30, 2009,
PTs
®
Showclub in Portland, Maine was served a subpoena by ICE
requesting documents to conduct an I-9 audit. ICE requested all
original I-9s for both current and past employees from
September 14, 2007 (club acquisition date) to June 30,
2009. ICE conducted the audit to ensure proper use of the I-9
form to confirm that the club verified employees right to
work in the United States. The club complied with the subpoena
submitting all requested documents by July 16, 2009. As of
March 12, 2010, ICE is still reviewing the requested
documents. This matter is still in its investigatory stage and
no determination of potential violations or liability has been
made. No amounts have been accrued related to this audit. While
ICE initially discussed taking this audit to all clubs, no
formal actions have been taken by ICE to begin that process.
This audit is still isolated to Maine.
Internal
Revenue Service
The IRS audited
PTs
®
Showclub in Denver for the years 2006, 2007, and 2008 to
determine tip reporting compliance. Every business with
customary tipping must report annually on Form 8027 the
total sales from food and beverage operations, charge sales,
total tips reported, and charge tips reported. The audit was
based upon this Form to determine compliance with the amended
Section 3121(q) of the Internal Revenue Code. The audit was
conducted by an examining agent in Denver in August and
September 2009. The audit focused on the data reported on
Form 8027 and related underlying documentation. It included
the agent examining information contained in the daily sales
packages generated by the club.
The audit resulted in a determination that cash tips for that
club were under-reported in the three years examined. The tax
assessed as a result of this under-reporting was $61,500.
Penalties and interest were not assessed. The IRS auditor
indicated that all other clubs would be audited and recommended
that a Point of Sale (POS) system should be
installed in every club to ensure compliance with IRS
regulations. Upon completion of this audit, the Company began an
intensive self-audit for the three year period using the same
procedures followed by the IRS agent. This resulted in an
initial accrual of $394,000 in estimated taxes to cover the
estimated liability as of September 30, 2009. Subsequent
discussions with the IRS agent removed 2006 from the audit
period, replacing that year with 2009. The Company has submitted
workpapers prepared for the self-assessment to the IRS agent for
the periods 2007, 2008, and 2009. The agent has tentatively
indicated that these workpapers and test period could be used to
determine the ultimate tip reporting rate by club. As a result
of the completion of the self-assessment process for the three
years under examination, the Company has reduced the estimated
liability by $187,000 to approximately $207,000 as of
December 31, 2009.
Litigation
Associated with the Proposed Going Private
Transaction
In connection with the Proposal concerning the proposed Going
Private Transaction, the Company has been served with three
complaints filed by various plaintiffs, alleging that they bring
purported derivative and class action lawsuits against the
Company and each of the individual members of the Board on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and
derivatively on behalf of the Company, which previously have
been reported in the Companys Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(filed with the SEC on November 19, 2009, November 24,
2009 and December 7, 2009).
On November 13, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint filed by David Cohen in the District Court in
Jefferson County, Colorado. In the complaint, Mr. Cohen
alleges that he brings the purported class action lawsuit
against the Company and each of the individual members of the
Board on behalf of the Companys stockholders. The
complaint alleges, among other things, that Troy Lowrie, the
Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer, has conflicts of interest with respect to the Proposal
and that in connection with the Boards evaluation of the
Proposal, the individual defendants have breached their
70
D-72
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
fiduciary duties under Colorado law. The complaint seeks, among
other things, certification of Mr. Cohen as class
representative, either an injunction enjoining the defendants
from consummating or closing the Going Private Transaction, or
if the Going Private Transaction is consummated, rescission of
the Going Private Transaction, an award of damages in an amount
to be determined at trial and an award of reasonable
attorneys and experts fees.
On November 20, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint filed by Gene Harris and William C.
Steppacher, Jr. in the District Court in Jefferson County,
Colorado. In the complaint, the plaintiffs purport to bring a
derivative and class action lawsuit against the Company and each
of the individual members of the Board on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated and derivatively on behalf of
the Company. The complaint alleges, among other things, that
Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest with respect to the
Proposal and that the individual defendants have breached their
fiduciary duties under Colorado law in connection with the
Proposal. The complaint seeks, among other things, certification
of the plaintiffs as class representatives, an injunction
directing the Board members to comply with their fiduciary
duties, an accounting to the plaintiffs and the class for
alleged damages suffered or to be suffered based on the conduct
described in the complaint, an award of the costs and
disbursements of maintaining the action, including reasonable
attorneys and experts fees, and such other relief
the court deems just and proper.
On December 3, 2009, the Company was served with a
complaint filed by David J. Sutton and Sandra Sutton in the
District Court in Jefferson County, Colorado. In the complaint,
the plaintiffs purport to bring a class action lawsuit against
the Company and each of the individual members of the Board on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The
complaint alleges, among other things, that Mr. Lowrie has
conflicts of interest with respect to the Proposal and that the
individual defendants have breached their fiduciary duties under
Colorado law in connection with the Proposal. The complaint
seeks, among other things, certification of the plaintiffs as
class representatives, an injunction directing the Board to
comply with their fiduciary duties and enjoining the Board from
consummating the Proposal, imposition of a constructive trust in
favor of the plaintiffs and the class upon any benefits
improperly received by the defendants, an award of the costs and
disbursements of maintaining the action, including reasonable
attorneys and experts fees, and such other relief
the court deems just and proper.
The plaintiffs in the three lawsuits have moved to consolidate
all three of the lawsuits (the Class Action and
Derivative Suits) into one suit together with a fourth
lawsuit arising out of the Proposal for the proposed Going
Private Transaction, in which the Company was not named as a
defendant, filed on December 11, 2009 by Brandon Ostry in
the District Court in Jefferson County, Colorado against
Mr. Lowrie and Lowrie Management, LLLP. The Company
provided additional details on the Ostry lawsuit in its Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 17, 2009. The court has
indicated that it will consider the consolidation motion if and
when the plaintiffs move for class certification. As of the date
hereof, the plaintiffs have not yet moved for class
certification.
As of the date hereof, the Company believes that the allegations
made in each of the Class Action and Derivative Suits are
baseless and the Company intends to vigorously defend itself.
The Company has not accrued any reserves for damages or for the
settlement of these lawsuits as the outcome of the disputes
cannot be predicted. Further, the uncertainty over the potential
outcome of the Class Action and Derivative Suits has
increased in light of subsequent events. As described elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
on December 16, 2009, the Special Committee of the
Companys Board rejected the Proposal concerning the
proposed Going Private Transaction as then-currently inadequate
and, as previously disclosed in the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010, on
February 17, 2010, the Company entered into the Letter of
Intent with Ricks concerning the proposed Merger.
Currently, the Class Action and Derivative Suits only
pertain to the Proposal for the proposed Going Private
Transaction and not the proposed Merger. However, it is possible
that the plaintiffs in the Class Action and Derivative
Suits
71
D-73
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
will attempt to amend their complaints to make claims related to
the proposed Merger or that these plaintiffs or others persons
may file one or more new lawsuits related to it.
Pursuant to the terms of the Companys Articles of
Incorporation and stand-alone indemnification agreement the
Company has entered into with its Directors and executive
officers, the Company may be required to advance expenses to and
indemnify the Directors and Mr. Lowrie from expenses
involved in defending against the lawsuits described above. The
Company has discussed the risks and costs associated with such
indemnification under the heading Risk Factors.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes
the outcome of any of these proceedings will not have a material
effect on the consolidated operations of the Company.
|
|
13)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that
could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are
marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to
offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction
costs. We adopted ASC
820-10
on
January 1, 2008. This guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework to measure fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC
820-10
establishes a fair value hierarchy used to prioritize the
quality and reliability of the information used to determine
fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into
the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or
unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not
corroborated by market data.
The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other
receivables, and trade accounts payable approximate fair value
because of the immediate or short-term maturities of these
financial instruments. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
our total debt was approximately $30,747,000 and $36,457,000;
respectively. The total debt had a fair value of $29,748,000 and
$36,396,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008; respectively.
The fair value of the debt was estimated using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) and was computed using a
discounted cash flow model using estimated market rates,
adjusted for our credit risk as of December 31, 2009 and
2008.
Our disclosure of the estimated fair value of our financial
instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of ASC
825-10,
Financial Instruments
. The estimated fair value amounts
have been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is required to interpret market data in order to
develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts
we could realize in a current market exchange. The use of
different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may
have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The
fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent
information available to management as of December 31, 2009
and 2008.
72
D-74
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Long-term
debt
In January 2010, the Company entered into a 10% fixed note with
an individual in the amount of $100,000. The note is unsecured,
interest only, and due January 2011.
Potential
Sale of the Company
As previously reported on the Companys Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on November 4, 2009, November 19,
2009, November 25, 2009, December 7, 2009 and
December 17, 2009), on November 3, 2009, the Company
received a non-binding letter of intent (the
Proposal) from the Companys Chairman and CEO,
Troy Lowrie, Lowrie Management, LLLP, an entity controlled by
Mr. Lowrie, and certain other unidentified investors
(collectively, the Lowrie Investors), to acquire all
of the outstanding common stock of the Company for $2.10 per
share in cash (the Going Private Transaction). The
Proposal contemplated that the Company would no longer be a
public reporting or trading company following the closing of the
Going Private Transaction. In response to the Proposal, the
Board formed a Special Committee consisting solely of directors
who are independent under the NASDAQ Global Market
(NASDAQ) independence rules to review and evaluate
the Proposal. The Special Committee was formed in order to
properly and fairly represent the best interests of the
Companys stockholders in a full and diligent evaluation of
the Proposal and any alternatives thereto in order to maximize
stockholder value. The members of the Special Committee are
George Sawicki, Kenton Sieckman and Carolyn Romero CPA. The
Special Committee retained a financial advisor and independent
legal counsel to assist the Special Committee in its evaluation
of the Proposal and alternatives thereto. On December 16,
2009, the Special Committee informed the Lowrie Investors that
it had determined, with input from its advisors, that the terms
of the Proposal were currently inadequate, and the Special
Committee directed its financial advisors to contact any parties
that had either previously expressed an interest or might
potentially be interested in pursuing a transaction with the
Company.
In connection with the Proposal, the Company has been served
with three complaints (the Complaints) filed by
various plaintiffs, alleging that they bring purported
derivative and class action lawsuits against the Company and
each of the individual members of the Board on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated and derivatively on
behalf of the Company, which previously have been reported in
the Companys Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(filed with the SEC on November 19, 2009, November 24,
2009 and December 7, 2009). The Complaints allege, among
other things, that the consideration in the Proposal is
inadequate, that Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest with
respect to the Proposal and that in connection with the
Boards evaluation of the Proposal, the individual
defendants have breached their fiduciary duties under Colorado
law. The Complaints seek, among other things, certification of
the individual plaintiffs as a class representative, either an
injunction enjoining the defendants from consummating or closing
the Going Private Transaction, or if the Going Private
Transaction is consummated, rescission of the Going Private
Transaction, an injunction directing the Board members to comply
with their fiduciary duties, an award of damages in an amount to
be determined at trial, an accounting to the Plaintiffs and the
class for alleged damages suffered or to be suffered based on
the conduct described in the Complaint, an award of reasonable
attorneys and experts fees, and such other relief
the court deems just and proper. As of the date hereof, the
Company believes that the allegations set forth in the
Complaints are baseless and the Company intends to vigorously
defend itself in the lawsuits.
As reported on the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 17, 2010, the Company,
Ricks, Mr. Lowrie, and Lowrie Management, LLLP
(collectively with Mr. Lowrie, Lowrie), entered
into a non-binding (except as to certain provisions, including
exclusivity and confidentiality) letter of intent (the
Letter of Intent). Pursuant to the Letter of Intent,
Ricks agreed to acquire all of the outstanding
73
D-75
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
shares of common stock of the Company and the Company will merge
with and into Ricks or a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Ricks (the Merger). In the event the Merger is
consummated, the Company will become a subsidiary of Ricks
and the Companys stockholders will become stockholders of
Ricks. The parties intend that the Merger will be
structured to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Pursuant to the Letter of Intent, the Companys
stockholders will receive shares of common stock of Ricks
in exchange for their shares of the Companys common stock
based on an exchange ratio that values each share of the
Companys common stock between $2.20 and $3.80 per share.
The applicable exchange ratio will be determined based on the
weighted average closing price of Ricks common stock on
NASDAQ for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second
trading day prior to the closing of the Merger. In the event the
price per share of Ricks common stock as determined by
this formula is below $8.00, Ricks may terminate the
Merger agreement, subject to the payment to the Company of a
termination fee to be negotiated by the parties in connection
with the preparation of the Merger agreement. Assuming the
Merger were to close on March 11, 2010, the weighted
average closing price per share of Ricks common stock for
the 20 consecutive trading days ending on March 9, 2010
$13.95 per share, the value of each share of the Companys
common stock under this formula would be $2.85 per share.
Contemporaneously with the closing of the Merger, Ricks
has agreed to acquire 5,770,197 shares of the
Companys common stock held by Lowrie and its affiliates
(the Lowrie Common Stock) for cash in an amount
equal to the lesser of $2.44 per share or the per share value of
the common stock received by the Companys stockholders in
the Merger. At Lowries election, Lowrie may receive
Ricks common stock, at the same exchange ratio received by
the Companys stockholders in the Merger, for up to 30% of
the Lowrie Common Stock. In addition, Mr. Lowrie will
(i) refinance (at a lower interest rate) and continue to
carry a $5.7 million note from the Company (as acquired by
Ricks), (ii) continue to personally guarantee certain
Company obligations in exchange for a to-be-determined fair
market value cash payment for such guarantees, (iii) sell
to Ricks the outstanding capital stock of Club Licensing,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lowrie Management, LLLP that
owns the trademarks Diamond Cabaret and
PTs, (the Trademarks), and
(iv) enter into a three-year consulting agreement with
Ricks (collectively, the Lowrie Transactions).
In exchange for the Lowrie Transactions, Lowrie will receive the
following: (a) a to-be-determined amount equal to the fair
market value of the restructuring of the $5.7 million note
and continued personal guarantees (currently estimated to be
$2 million); (b) a to-be-determined amount equal to
the fair market value of the Trademarks (currently estimated to
be $5 million); and (c) payment of $1.0 million
over three years and a monthly expense allowance equal to $1,500
under the consulting agreement. Assuming Lowrie elects to be
paid solely in cash at a price of $2.44 per share of the
Companys common stock and the fair market value of the
Lowrie Transactions is as set forth above (totaling
$7.0 million), Lowrie will receive aggregate payments of
approximately $26.8 million (which amount includes the
restructuring of the existing $5.7 million note held by
Mr. Lowrie and excludes payments under the consulting
agreement) in connection with the Merger, of which approximately
$16.8 million will be payable in cash at the closing of the
Merger and $10.0 million will be payable pursuant to a
four-year promissory note from Ricks bearing interest at
8.0% per annum.
The Letter of Intent provided for a binding exclusivity period
through March 12, 2010, which the parties have extended to
March 31, 2010, during which time the Company has agreed,
on behalf of itself and its representatives, to negotiate
exclusively with Ricks and has further agreed not to
solicit any offer or engage in any negotiations other than with
Ricks for the merger, sale of the business or assets of
the Company or tender or exchange offer for the Companys
common stock. In the event the Company receives an unsolicited
offer that is superior to the terms of the Merger (a
Superior Proposal) and Ricks does not amend
its offer within five business days of the date on which it
receives notice of such Superior Proposal to be superior to the
Superior Proposal, then the Company may terminate the Letter of
Intent. If the Company terminates the Letter of Intent due to
its receipt of a Superior Proposal, it has agreed to reimburse
Ricks for its
out-of-pocket
74
D-76
VCG
Holding Corp.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
expenses and fees incurred in evaluating and negotiating the
Merger in an amount not to exceed $250,000 in the aggregate. If
a definitive Merger agreement is not entered into by
March 31, 2010, the Letter of Intent will automatically
terminate, unless further extended by the parties.
The Merger agreement is expected to contain customary
representations and warranties including the absence of a
material adverse change in the business of Ricks and the
Company prior to closing and other customary closing conditions,
including but not limited to, the receipt of material consents,
the approval of the Merger by the stockholders of Ricks
and the Company and the effectiveness of a registration
statement containing a joint proxy statement/prospectus filed
with the SEC on
Form S-4
to be filed by Ricks, which, among other things, registers
the shares of common stock to be issued to the Companys
stockholders in the Merger. There can be no assurance that the
Company, Ricks and Lowrie will enter into a definitive
Merger agreement, that the entry into a definitive Merger
agreement, if any, will result in the closing of any transaction
or that the terms of any definitive Merger documents will
reflect the terms of the proposed Merger as outlined in the
Letter of Intent. See the discussion under the heading,
Risk Factors.
75
D-77
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Effectiveness
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report (i) were appropriately
designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their
objectives and (ii) were effective and provided reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in
reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (Exchange Act) is (a) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and
(b) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
of
the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and
dispositions of our assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded, as
necessary, to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009
using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment
using those criteria, our management concluded that, as of
December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective. The effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009
has been audited by Causey Demgen & Moore Inc., our
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its
report, which appears under Item 8.
76
D-78
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting
occurred during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Background
of our Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information about our
Directors and Executive Officers presented as of March 11,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Troy Lowrie(4),(6)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Micheal Ocello(4),(6)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director, Chief Operating Officer, and President
|
Courtney Cowgill(7)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer
|
Robert McGraw, Jr.(2),(3),(5)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Carolyn Romero(1),(5)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
Martin Grusin(6)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Director
|
Kenton Sieckman(1),(2),(3),(5)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
George Sawicki(1),(2),(3),(5)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Governance and Nominating Committee
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the Compensation Committee
|
|
(4)
|
|
Member of the Executive Committee
|
|
(5)
|
|
Independent Board member
|
|
(6)
|
|
Non-independent Board member who is currently not serving on any
Committee
|
|
(7)
|
|
Advisor to the Executive Committee and Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer who joined the Company on June 19, 2008
|
The Companys Directors are elected to hold office for
three-year terms and until their respective successors have been
duly elected and qualified. At the April 2007 Board of Directors
Meeting, the Board voted to amend the Bylaws and to divide the
Directors into three classes, one of which includes three
Directors and two of which includes two Directors.
77
D-79
The following table shows the terms of each current Director:
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Term
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
2007 - 2010
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
2009 - 2012
|
Robert McGraw Jr.
|
|
2007 - 2010
|
Carolyn Romero
|
|
2009 - 2010
|
Martin Grusin
|
|
2009 - 2012
|
Kenton Sieckman
|
|
2008 - 2011
|
George Sawicki
|
|
2008 - 2011
|
Our Executive Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board until
their resignation, termination, or death. There are no family
relationships among any of our officers
and/or
Directors.
Provided below are descriptions and the backgrounds of our
Executive Officers and Directors and their principal occupations
for the past five years:
Troy Lowrie.
Mr. Lowrie has been the
Chairman of the Board since April 2002 and Chief Executive
Officer since November 2002. Mr. Lowrie is President of
Lowrie Investment Management Inc., the General Partner of Lowrie
Management LLLP, a Colorado limited liability limited
partnership, which formerly owned and operated adult
entertainment nightclubs and is now an investment entity.
Mr. Lowrie was the owner and President of International
Entertainment Consultants, Inc. (IEC), a company engaged in the
business of managing adult entertainment nightclubs, from 1982
to October 2003, when it was acquired by the Company.
Mr. Lowrie has served as President of Western Country
Clubs, Inc., a public company specializing in large country and
western bars with live music from 1992 to 1996 and President of
New Millennium Media, Inc., a public company which sells
rotating print advertising equipment and full movement video
billboards. Mr. Lowrie has a M.A. in Finance from the
University of Denver in Denver, Colorado and a B.A. in Business
from Fort Lewis College in Durango, Colorado.
Mr. Lowrie has not served on any other public company
board. Mr. Lowries leadership skills and experience
in the adult nightclub industry, among other factors, led the
Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.
Micheal Ocello.
Mr. Ocello has been a
Director, President, and Chief Operating Officer of the Company
since April 2002. Mr. Ocello is the owner and President of
Unique Entertainment Consultants, Inc., of St. Louis,
Missouri, a management company that has specialized in the
management of nightclubs since 1995. Mr. Ocello has been
affiliated with IEC in a managerial capacity since 1982. He is
currently the President of IEC. Over his career, Mr. Ocello
has been affiliated with more than 25 adult entertainment
nightclubs including all
PTs
®
Showclubs, Diamond
Cabaret
®
,
The Penthouse
Club
®
,
and Shotgun Willies located in Denver;
PTs
®
Showclub in Colorado Springs; The Penthouse
Club
®
,
The Platinum Club, Roxys and
PTs
®
Showclubs in St. Louis; Schieks Palace Royale in
Minneapolis; The Mens Club in Raleigh; Jaguars in Dallas
and Ft. Worth; Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club in
Anaheim, and the Olympic Garden in Las Vegas. He is President of
the Association of Club Executives (ACE National, the national
trade association for the adult nightclub industry), President
of the Illinois Club Owners Association, and past Vice Chairman
and current Board member of Missouris Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Board. He is a past Vice President and board
member of the Free Speech Coalition. Mr. Ocello attended
the University of Missouri, Kansas City from 1977 to 1978 and
the United States Military Academy at West Point from 1979 to
1981. Mr. Ocello was originally elected to the Mehlville
Board of Education in 2006 and was re-elected for an additional
three year term in 2009. Mr. Ocello has served as a
commissioned Police Officer for the Village of Brooklyn,
Illinois since early 2009. Mr. Ocello has not served on any
other public company board. Mr. Ocellos industry
experience and leadership roles in the adult entertainment
industry, among other factors, led the Board to conclude that he
should serve as a director.
Courtney Cowgill.
Ms. Cowgill has been
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, Corporate Secretary, and
Treasurer since June 2008. Ms. Cowgill served as Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of Oceanic Exploration Company,
a publically held oil and gas exploration company, from May 2003
to June 2008. She
78
D-80
has more than 30 years of accounting experience, including
three years experience as an auditor with the former Arthur
Young & Co. She has served in Chief Financial Officer,
Controller, and Internal Auditor Manager positions for the last
20 years. She served as the Executive Director of Program
Management for Tele-Communications, Inc./AT&T Broadband, a
telecommunications company, from 1996 to 2000, and was employed
by the University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado as an Adjunct
Faculty Member from 2001 to 2004. Ms. Cowgill holds a B.S.
in Accounting from Metropolitan State College in Denver,
Colorado and an M.S. in Telecommunications Engineering from the
University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado. Ms. Cowgill
served on the Board as the Independent Financial Expert for
Cotter Corp., a privately held uranium mining company.
Ms. Cowgill is currently serving as Board President for the
Colorado State Board of Accountancy. Ms. Cowgill is an
active licensed CPA, CMA, CIA, and CFE.
Robert McGraw, Jr.
Mr. McGraw has been a
Director of the Company since November 2002. A Certified Public
Accountant since 1982, Mr. McGraw is President of McGraw
and McGraw CPA PC of Westminster, Colorado.
Mr. McGraws firm specializes in accounting for
restaurants, lounges, and small businesses. The practice
consists of income tax preparation, financial statement
preparation, and small business consulting. Mr. McGraw has
a Bachelors Degree from Western State College in Gunnison,
Colorado. Mr. McGraw is currently licensed in the State of
Colorado and is a member of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants and Colorado Society of Certified Public
Accountants. Mr. McGraw was a Director of Iptimize, Inc., a
publically held broadband voice and data service provider.
Mr. McGraw served on the Audit Committee for half the
2009 year and still serves on the Compensation, Governance
and Nominating Committee and is an independent member of the
Board. Mr. McGraws accounting and financial
experience, among other factors, led the Board to conclude that
he should serve as a director.
Martin A. Grusin.
Mr. Grusin has been a
director of VCG since July 2005. Mr. Grusin has been
practicing law since 1973. In addition to the active practice of
law Mr. Grusin has served as: General Counsel and Director
of Aqua Glass Corporation, one of the largest suppliers of
bathing fixtures in the country; President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director of United American Bank in Memphis,
Tennessee; Director of Regions Bank of Memphis, Tennessee; an
Associate Professor at the University of Arkansas in
Fayetteville, Arkansas and the Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law
at the University of Memphis in Memphis, Tennessee; Director of
Davis Cartage Company, a provider of transportation and
warehousing services in Owasso, Michigan; Managing Director of
Stern Cardiovascular Center, P.A. in Memphis, Tennessee, one of
the largest cardiac medical services providers in the South; and
former Director of Iptimize, Inc., a publically held broadband
voice and data service provider. Mr. Grusin received a B.
S. degree from the University of Memphis, a Juris Doctorate
degree from the Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law at the
University of Memphis State (1972) and an LL.M. from the
University of Miami School of Law (1973). Mr. Grusin serves
on no committees because of his involvement in merger and
acquisition activity for the Company and its subsidiaries.
Mr. Grusin is an independent member of the Board.
Mr. Grusins legal, merger and acquisition experience,
as well as experience as a director of other public companies,
among other factors, led the Board to conclude that he should
serve as a director.
George Sawicki.
Mr. Sawicki has been a
Director of the Company since June 2008. Mr. Sawicki has
been in-house counsel for Zed, formerly 9 Squared, a mobile
media solutions company, since 2007. Mr. Sawicki has
previously served as in-house counsel for Playboy Enterprises,
Inc., an adult entertainment company, New Frontier Media, Inc.,
a producer and distributor of adult themed and general motion
picture entertainment, Storage Technology Corporation, a data
storage company, and Oracle Corporation, the worlds
largest enterprise software company. Mr. Sawicki has worked
as legal counsel with the areas of corporate governance, patent,
e-commerce,
entertainment, and marketing organizations, managing complex
transactions, and legal compliance consulting. Mr. Sawicki
has a B.A. in Chemistry from Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, New
York, a M.S. in Management Information Systems from Houston
Baptist University in Houston, Texas, and a Juris Doctor degree
from the University of Houston Law Center in Houston, Texas.
Mr. Sawicki serves on the Audit, Compensation, and
Governance and Nominating Committee (Chair) and is an
independent member of the Board. Mr. Sawickis
experience as legal counsel for the adult industry, among other
factors, led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a
director.
79
D-81
Kenton Sieckman.
Mr. Sieckman has been a
Director of the Company since June 2008. Mr. Sieckman has
been Vice President of World Technical Services at CA Wily
Technology, a provider of application management solutions,
since 2003. Previously Mr. Sieckman was employed in similar
positions at Oracle Corporation, the worlds largest
enterprise software company, and BEA Systems, Inc., an
application infrastructure software company. Mr. Sieckman
has also worked in the areas of sales and building a worldwide
technical services organization. Mr. Sieckman has a B.A. in
Mathematics and Computer Science from the University of Colorado
at Boulder, Colorado. Mr. Sieckman served as a Director of
USMedSys, Corp., a former distributor of medical supplies and a
non-public company. Mr. Sieckman serves on the Audit,
Compensation (Chair), and Governance and Nominating Committees
and is an independent member of the Board.
Mr. Sieckmans investment experience and service on
other public company boards, among other factors, led the Board
to conclude that he should serve as a director.
Carolyn Romero.
Ms. Romero has been a
Director of the Company since August 2009. She is a Certified
Public Accountant and Certified Valuation Analyst.
Ms. Romero has more than 30 years of financial
management experience, including 24 years in public
accounting. Ms. Romero was Manager of Financial Reporting
for Woodward Governor Company until March 2010. Ms. Romero
has been President of BPW/CO Enhancement Corp since 1999;
Treasurer of BPW/USA since 2003; Treasurer of Juan de Jesus
Vigil Family Foundation since 2004, Finance Chair of Colorado
Business Women since 2005; and Member of the City of Loveland
Retirement Board from
2008-2009.
Ms. Romero has not previously served on a public company
board. Ms. Romero serves on the Audit Committee (Chair), is
the financial expert and an independent member of the Board.
Ms. Romeros accounting and financial experience,
among other factors, led the Board to conclude that she should
serve as a director.
Audit
Committee
We have a separately-designated standing Audit Committee. During
our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, the members of the
audit committee were Kenton Sieckman (Chair until
December 31, 2009), George Sawicki, and Carolyn Romero
(Chair beginning January 1, 2010) and for a portion of
the year Robert McGraw Jr., each of whom was an
independent director, as defined by applicable
securities laws and NASDAQ listing standards. The Company has
determined that both Carolyn Romero and Robert McGraw, Jr.
qualify as audit committee financial experts.
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its
oversight of the integrity of the financial statements of the
Company, the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, the independence and qualifications of the
independent auditors, and the performance of the Companys
internal audit function and the independent auditors. The Audit
Committee, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
oversees the work and compensation of the independent auditor;
|
|
|
|
reviews the scope of the independent auditors audit
examination, including its engagement letter prior to the annual
audit, and reviews the audit fees agreed upon and any permitted
non-audit services to be provided by the independent
auditors; and
|
|
|
|
recommends to the Board the retention or replacement of the
independent auditors, which reports solely and directly to the
Audit Committee.
|
Compensation
Committee
The members of the Compensation Committee are Kenton Sieckman
(Chair), Robert McGraw, Jr., and George Sawicki. The
principal responsibilities and functions of the Compensation
Committee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to develop, review, evaluate and recommend to the Board for its
approval the Companys compensation and benefit policies,
including the review and approval of the Companys
incentive and equity-based compensation plans, or amendments to
such plans; and
|
80
D-82
|
|
|
|
|
to review and recommend to the Board for its approval
compensation of the Companys Executive Officers
including annual base salaries, annual incentive compensation,
long-term incentive compensation, retirement benefits, if any,
employment, severance, and
change-in-control
agreements.
|
In reviewing the Companys compensation and benefits
policies, the Compensation Committee may consider the
recruitment, development, promotion, retention, compensation of
executive and senior officers of the Company, trends in
management compensation, and any other factors that it deems
appropriate. Such process shall include, when appropriate,
review of the financial performance and third party
administration of plans. The Compensation Committee seeks the
advice of our Chief Executive Officer on such matters. Our Chief
Executive officer makes recommendations to the Compensation
Committee about the compensation levels for other executive
officers.
The Compensation Committee has the power to form and delegate
authority to subcommittees and may delegate authority to one or
more designated members of the Compensation Committee, but no
subcommittee or member will have any final decision making
authority on behalf of the Board or the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more officers
of the Company the authority to make grants and awards of stock
or options to any officer not subject to Section 16 of the
Securities Act or employee of the Company under the
Companys incentive compensation or other equity-based
plans as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and in
accordance with the terms of any such plan.
The Compensation Committee may engage consultants in determining
or recommending the amount of compensation paid to our Directors
and Executive Officers. For example, in November 2007, the
Compensation Committee retained an independent consulting firm
to determine proper compensation levels for our Chief Executive
Officer and President. The studys results were used to
determine the compensation of our President, Micheal Ocello,
after he changed his status from consultant to employee in
October 2007 and for our Chief Executive Officer, Troy Lowrie,
when he began to take a salary in March 2008. Compensation for
our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer, Courtney Cowgill, was determined after discussion
with financial recruiters and a study of chief financial officer
salaries in other public companies of similar size and
complexity.
The Compensation Committee reviews director and executive
officer compensation annually and suggests appropriate
adjustments for approval by the full Board.
Governance
and Nominating Committee
The members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are
George Sawicki (Chair), Robert McGraw, Jr., and Kenton
Sieckman. The Governance and Nominating Committee performs,
among others, the following functions:
|
|
|
|
|
assists the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become
Board members and Committee members;
|
|
|
|
recommends that the Board select the director nominees for
election at the next annual or special meeting of stockholders
at which directors are to be elected;
|
|
|
|
recommends individuals to fill any vacancies or newly created
directorships that occur on the Board or its Committees between
any annual or special meeting of stockholders at which directors
are to be elected;
|
|
|
|
makes recommendations to the Board as to determinations of
director independence;
|
|
|
|
evaluates the Board and Committee structure, performance and
composition;
|
|
|
|
reviews, evaluates, recommends changes, and oversees compliance
with the Companys corporate governance guidelines,
including the Companys Code of Ethics; and
|
|
|
|
performs other duties or responsibilities expressly delegated to
the Governance and Nominating Committee by the Board relating to
the nomination of Board or Committee members.
|
81
D-83
The Governance and Nominating Committee will evaluate new
director candidates based on their biographical information, a
description of their qualifications, thorough reviews of
biographical and other information, input from others including
members of our Board and Executive Officers, and personal
discussions with the candidate. In considering director
candidates, the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates a
variety of factors to develop a Board and Committees that are
diverse in nature and comprised of experienced and seasoned
advisors. Each director nominee is evaluated in the context of
the full Boards qualifications as a whole, with the
objective of establishing a Board that can best perpetuate our
success and represent stockholder interests through the exercise
of sound judgment. In the nomination of an existing director,
the Governance and Nominating Committee will review the Board
performance of such director and solicit feedback about the
director from other Board members.
Section 16
(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who
own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity
securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other
equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors, and
greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such
reports furnished to us and representations that other than as
described below, during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, our directors, officers, and 10% holders complied with all
filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act. Ms. Courtney Cowgill, our Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer had a delinquent
Form 4 filing on October 26, 2009 for one transaction
that took place four days before the filing.
Code
of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our directors,
executive officers, and all of our employees. Our Code of Ethics
codifies the business and ethical principles that govern all
aspects of our business. The Code of Ethics is designed to deter
wrongdoing and to promote:
|
|
|
|
|
honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of
actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and
professional relationships;
|
|
|
|
full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in
reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the SEC
and in other public communications made by us;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and
regulations;
|
|
|
|
prompt internal reporting of violations of the ethics code to an
appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and
|
|
|
|
accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics.
|
We will provide any person, without charge and upon request,
with a copy of our Code of Ethics. Requests should be directed
to us at 390 Union Blvd., Suite #540, Lakewood, Colorado
80228, Attention: Secretary. The Code of Ethics is also
available on our website at
www.vcgh.com
. The
information on our website is not incorporated into this proxy
statement.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Executive
Compensation
The following table sets forth summary information concerning
compensation awarded to, earned by, or accrued for services
rendered to the Company in all capacities by our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Operating
82
D-84
Officer/ President, and Chief Financial Officer (collectively,
the named executive officers) for fiscal years 2009
through 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Award(s)
|
|
|
Award(s)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
(a) ($)
|
|
|
(b) ($)
|
|
|
(c) ($)
|
|
|
(d) ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(f) ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,449
|
|
|
|
792,449
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
292,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,370
|
|
|
|
409,680
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,460
|
|
|
|
863,960
|
|
President/Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
75,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,341
|
|
|
|
878,844
|
|
Courtney Cowgill(e)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
26,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,763
|
|
|
|
231,263
|
|
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
92,807
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
163,421
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Salary amounts represent base salary and payment for vacation,
holidays, and sick days.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated, bonuses shown were paid in the
fiscal year in which services were provided.
|
|
(c)
|
|
On January 18, 2008, the Company issued 5,214 shares
of the Companys common stock to each member of the
Companys Board, including Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello, in consideration for Board services provided
from June 2007 to June 2008. The fair market value of each share
of common stock at the time of grant was $9.59, the closing
market price on the grant date. On October 2, 2008, the
Company issued 7,375 shares of the Companys common
stock to each member of the Companys Board, including
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello, in consideration for Board
services provided from June 2008 to December 2008. The fair
market value of each share of common stock at the time of grant
was $3.39, the closing market price on the grant date.
|
|
(d)
|
|
The amounts reported reflected the aggregate fair value of stock
option awards granted during the fiscal year pursuant to our
2004 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan. Ms. Cowgill
was awarded 25,000 stock options on June 19, 2008 with a
calculated fair value of approximately $2.41 calculated using
the
Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Ms. Cowgill joined the Company in June 2008.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Amounts in the All Other Compensation Column consist
of the following payments to or on behalf of the named executive
officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Life, Health
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Life
|
|
|
and Dental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Car
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($) (a)
|
|
|
($) (b)
|
|
|
($) (c)
|
|
|
($) (d)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
22,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,409
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
92,449
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
24,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,370
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
22,051
|
|
|
|
58,673
|
|
|
|
31,736
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
162,460
|
|
President/ Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
14,408
|
|
|
|
58,673
|
|
|
|
29,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,341
|
|
Courtney Cowgill
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,763
|
|
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,977
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certain executives and other employees receive monthly car
allowances.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Variable universal life insurance is provided to Mr. Ocello
and paid by the Company.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Life, health, and dental insurance is provided to all executives.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Mr. Lowrie and Mr. Ocello received cash compensation
for their services on the Companys Board.
|
83
D-85
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding
but unexercised options held by our named executive officers as
of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
30,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
10/12/2017
|
|
President/ Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Courtney Cowgill
|
|
|
25,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
6/19/2018
|
|
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On October 12, 2007, the Company granted to Mr. Ocello
options to purchase 30,000 shares of the Companys
common stock. The options vest in three equal installments on
the third, fifth, and seventh anniversaries of the date of grant.
|
|
(2)
|
|
On June 19, 2008, the Company granted to Ms. Cowgill
options to purchase 25,000 shares of the Companys
common stock. The options vest in three equal installments on
the third, fifth, and seventh anniversaries of the date of grant.
|
Employment
Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements
In November 2007, the Companys Compensation Committee
hired an independent consulting firm to determine proper
compensation levels for our Chief Executive Officer and
President. The studys results were used to determine the
compensation of our President, Micheal Ocello, after he changed
his status from consultant to employee in October 2007.
Our Chief Executive Officer and principal stockholder, Troy
Lowrie, decided to forego a salary from the Companys
inception in 2002 until March 2008. At that time,
Mr. Lowrie decided to receive the Board approved salary of
approximately $300,000 annually, only 40% of the salary
recommended by the independent salary study and approved by the
Board. In November 2008, Mr. Lowrie elected to increase his
annual salary to the full amount of $700,000, as recommended by
the independent salary study and approved earlier by the Board.
On December 4, 2008, the Company entered into five-year
employment agreements with Troy Lowrie, the Companys
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Micheal
Ocello, the Companys President, Chief Operating Officer
and a Director. The agreements with each of Mr. Lowrie and
Mr. Ocello expire on December 4, 2013, but each has an
automatic renewal for an additional five-year period unless
either party thereto provides written notice that the agreement
shall not be extended and renewed. In the event that the Company
does not renew the initial term of an officers employment
agreement, the Company is required to pay the officer severance
in an amount equal to three times the sum of the officers
base salary in effect upon termination of the employment
agreement plus an amount equal to the highest bonus the officer
received in the three years before termination, if any.
The employment agreements provide for an annual base salary
payable to each officer of $700,000, subject to review at least
every 24 months and potential upward adjustments as
determined by the Companys Board. In addition, bonuses, if
any, are payable at the discretion of the Companys Board.
Each officer is entitled to certain benefits such as health,
dental, disability, long term care, paid time off, use of a
leased automobile and other fringe benefits as well as
participation in the Companys incentive, savings,
retirement, profit sharing, perquisites and other programs, as
approved by the Companys Board.
Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements, if an
officers employment is terminated by reason of such
officers death or disability, the
Company will continue paying the officers base salary plus
an amount equal to the highest bonus the officer received in the
three years before termination, if any, for a
84
D-86
period of one year following such termination. In addition,
health insurance coverage for the officer and his family will
continue for three years following such termination. In the
event that an officers employment is terminated as a
result of the officers disability, the Company
will also pay certain amounts in respect of the officers
disability benefits and long-term care policy. If an
officers employment is terminated for cause or
without good reason, the Company will pay the
officer his base salary through the date of termination and will
have no further obligations to the officer. Each officer has the
right to terminate the employment agreement for good
reason within nine months following a change of
control of the Company.
If the Company terminates an officers employment other
than for cause, death, or
disability, or an officer terminates his employment
for good reason, the officer will be entitled to a
severance payment equal to three times the sum of the
officers base salary in effect upon termination plus an
amount equal to the highest bonus the officer received in the
three years before termination, if any. In addition, health
insurance and disability benefits will be paid by the Company
for three years (or until such earlier time that the officer
accepts other employment) following such termination of
employment and certain outstanding but unvested options held by
the officer at the time of termination, if any, will become
immediately vested and exercisable for a period of 180 days
following such termination.
The employment agreements provide that during the employment
period and for one year following the termination of the
employment agreement by the Company with cause or by
the officer without good reason, each officer may
not compete with the Company within a 25-mile radius of any
nightclub owned or operated by the Company or any of its
affiliates. The employment agreements also contain customary
confidentiality,
non-solicitation,
and non-disparagement covenants.
Further, the employment agreements provide that if an
officers employment is terminated for any reason, the
Company shall, at the officers election, promptly pay all
outstanding debt owed to the officer and his family or issue to
the officer, with his approval, the number of shares of the
Companys common stock determined by dividing (a) the
outstanding principal and interest owed to the officer by
(b) 50% of the last sale price of the Companys common
stock on the date of termination.
Finally, Mr. Lowries employment agreement provides
that if his employment is terminated for any reason, the Company
must also take all necessary steps to remove Mr. Lowrie as
a guarantor of any Company (or its affiliates) obligations to
any third party. In the event that the Company is not successful
in doing so, the Company must pay to Mr. Lowrie a cash
amount equal to 5% per year of the aggregate amount he is
continuously guaranteeing until such time as Mr. Lowrie no
longer guarantees the obligations.
85
D-87
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The following table presents the amount of compensation payable
to each of our named executive officers as if the triggering
termination event had occurred on the last day of our most
recently completed fiscal year, December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination w/out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause, Non-Renewal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Quit with
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
with Cause
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
Salary
|
|
$
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Board of Directors Compensation
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
61,227
|
|
|
|
61,227
|
|
|
|
61,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Benefits
|
|
|
199,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
2,100,000
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
President/ Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Board of Directors Compensation
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Benefits
|
|
|
61,227
|
|
|
|
61,227
|
|
|
|
61,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Benefits
|
|
|
126,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
Disability Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Care Insurance
|
|
|
159,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
|
40,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Club Memberships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
Disability and VUL Insurance
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Care Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
|
56,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Club Memberships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
D-88
Compensation
of our Directors
The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we
paid to our non employee directors in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Cash
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Robert McGraw Jr.(2)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
Carolyn Romero(3),(5)
|
|
|
34,792
|
|
|
|
34,792
|
|
Martin Grusin
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Kenton Sieckman(2),(3)
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
George Sawicki(2),(3)
|
|
|
69,500
|
|
|
|
69,500
|
|
Allan Rubin(4)
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,542
|
|
|
|
315,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Except for Mr. Rubin and Ms. Romero, all Board members
received $50,000 as compensation for their service on the Board
for their 2009/2010 term.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Messrs. McGraw, Sawicki, and Sieckman served as members of
the Audit Committee and received an additional $12,500 for the
2009/2010 term.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Messrs. Sawicki and Sieckman and Ms. Romero were each
compensated $2,500 per month from November to December 2009 for
their services as members of the Special Committee.
Mr. Sawicki, as Chairman, of the Special Committee was
compensated an additional amount of $1,000 each month.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Mr. Rubin resigned from the Board in August 2009 due to his
lack of independence. The amount reflects payments to
Mr. Rubin through his service on the Board.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Ms. Romero joined the board in August 2009. The amount
reflects payments made to Ms. Romero for her services on
Board and the Audit Committee, including $3,125 for her role as
an independent financial expert.
|
Indemnification
of Directors
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements to
indemnify its Directors and Executive Officers. Under these
agreements, the Company is obligated to indemnify its Directors
and Executive Officers against claims arising out of events or
occurrences related to such individuals service on the
Companys Board or as an Executive Officer, to the extent
permitted by Article 109 of the Colorado Business
Corporation Act. The Company believes that these agreements are
necessary in attracting and retaining qualified Directors and
Officers.
87
D-89
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Stockholders
beneficially owning more than 5% of the Companys common
stock
The following table shows, as of March 11, 2010 and to the
best of our knowledge, all persons we know to be
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common
stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie(2)
|
|
|
4,943,289
|
|
|
|
28.56
|
%
|
390 Union Blvd, Suite 540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakewood, CO 80228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowrie Management LLLP
|
|
|
4,394,100
|
|
|
|
25.38
|
%
|
390 Union Blvd, Suite 540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakewood, CO 80228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitebox Advisors, LLC, Whitebox Combined Advisors, LLC,
Whitebox Combined Partners, L.P., Whitebox Multi-Strategy Fund,
L.P., Whitebox Multi-Strategy Fund, Ltd., Whitebox Intermarket
Advisors, LLC, Whitebox Intermarket Partners, L.P., Whitebox
Intermarket Fund, L.P., Whitebox Intermarket Fund, Ltd., HFR RVA
Combined Master Trust.(3)
|
|
|
1,380,498
|
|
|
|
7.97
|
%
|
3033 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minneapolis, MN 55416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise noted, all shares of common stock listed above
are owned and registered in the name of each person listed as
beneficial owner and such person has sole voting and dispositive
power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially
owned by each of them. Pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding which are subject to
options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges exercisable
within 60 days of the record date are deemed outstanding
for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage
beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage
beneficially owned by each other person listed.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes (i) 4,394,100 shares of common stock owned by
Lowrie Management LLLP and (ii) 549,189 shares of
common stock owned by Mr. Lowrie over which Mr. Lowrie
has sole voting and dispositive power. Mr. Lowrie is the
President of Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., the General
Partner of Lowrie Management LLLP. Mr. Lowrie disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Lowrie Management
LLLP, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
(3)
|
|
As reported by Whitebox Advisors, LLC on Schedule 13G filed
with the SEC on February 8, 2010.
|
88
D-90
Security
Ownership of our Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 11,
2010 by: (i) each director; (ii) each current
executive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table; and
(iii) all directors and executive officers as a group.
Unless otherwise specified, the address of each person named is
390 Union Blvd., Suite #540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
|
of Class
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
|
4,943,289
|
(2)
|
|
|
28.56
|
%
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
195,589
|
(3)
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
Courtney Cowgill
|
|
|
4,300
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert McGraw, Jr.
|
|
|
67,735
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carolyn Romero
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Martin Grusin
|
|
|
86,319
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kenton Sieckman
|
|
|
47,868
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
George Sawicki
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Executive Officers and Directors (as a group of eight
persons)
|
|
|
5,356,318
|
|
|
|
30.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents less than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise noted, all shares of common stock listed above
are owned and registered in the name of each person listed as
beneficial owner and such person has sole voting and dispositive
power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially
owned by each of them. Pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding which are subject to
options, warrants, rights, or conversion privileges exercisable
within 60 days of the Record Date are deemed outstanding
for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage
beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage
beneficially owned by each other person listed.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes (i) 4,394,100 shares of common stock owned by
Lowrie Management LLLP and (ii) 549,189 shares of
common stock owned by Mr. Lowrie over which Mr. Lowrie
has sole voting and dispositive power. Mr. Lowrie is the
President of Lowrie Investment Management, Inc., the General
Partner of Lowrie Management LLLP. Mr. Lowrie disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Lowrie Management
LLLP, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
Mr. Lowrie has pledged 2,325,900 shares of stock as
collateral on two of the Companies current notes.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes (i) 158,000 shares of common stock owned by
LTD Investment Group, LLC, of which Mr. Ocello is the
Managing Member and (ii) 37,589 shares of common stock
owned by Mr. Ocello over which Mr. Ocello has sole
voting and dispositive power. This does not include
30,000 shares of common stock underlying options to
purchase stock that are currently not exercisable within
60 days of the Record Date. Mr. Ocello has not pledged
any of his stock as collateral.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes (i) 4,300 shares of common stock owned by
Ms. Cowgill over which Ms. Cowgill has sole voting and
dispositive power. This does not include 25,000 shares of
common stock underlying options to purchase stock that are
currently not exercisable within 60 days of the Record
Date. Ms. Cowgill has not pledged any of her stock as
collateral.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes (i) 10,000 shares beneficially owned by ACM
Management, LLC, of which Mr. Grusin does not have sole
voting power but is the Chief Manager,
(ii) 66,319 shares owned by Mr. Grusin over which
Mr. Grusin has sole voting and dispositive power, and
(iii) 10,000 shares held by Mr. Grusins
wife, Ms. Gayle Powelson. Mr. Grusin has not pledged
any of his stock as collateral.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes (i) 65,735 shares owned by Mr. McGraw
over which Mr. McGraw has sole voting and dispositive power
and (ii) 2,000 shares held by Mrs. Marjorie
McGraw, Mr. McGraws wife. Mr. McGraw has not
pledged any of his stock as collateral.
|
89
D-91
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes (i) 47,118 shares owned by Mr. Sieckman
over which Mr. Sieckman has sole voting and dispositive
power and (ii) 750 shares held by
Mr. Sieckmans son. Mr. Sieckman has not pledged
any of his stock as collateral.
|
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2009,
information about our common stock that may be issued upon
exercise of options under our equity incentive plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
262,500
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
644,391
|
(1)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
$
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
647,099
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Company adopted a 2002 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan,
which was approved by its stockholders on July 22, 2002,
and reserved 700,000 shares of common stock for issuance
under the plan. In addition, the Company adopted a 2004 Stock
Option and Appreciation Rights Plan, which was approved by its
stockholders on July 29, 2005, and reserved
1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the
plan. Shares of common stock may be issued either: (i) upon
the exercise of stock options granted under the plans; or
(ii) as stock bonuses granted under the plans. If there is
any change in the number of shares of common stock through the
declaration of stock dividends, or through a recapitalization
resulting in stock splits, or combinations or exchanges of such
shares, the number of shares of common stock available for
options and the number of such shares covered by outstanding
options, and the exercise price per share of the outstanding
options, shall be proportionately adjusted to reflect any
increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of common
stock; provided, however, that any fractional shares resulting
from such adjustment shall be eliminated.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The Company adopted a 2003 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan and
reserved 250,000 shares of common stock for issuance under
the plan. These shares have been registered under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to a registration statement on
Form S-8.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Company has issued 262,500 options to employees under the
2002 and 2004 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plans.
|
Equity
Incentive Plans
At December 31, 2009, we had the (i) 2002 Stock Option
and Bonus Plan (the 2002 Plan), (ii) 2003 Stock
Option and Stock Bonus Plan (the 2003 Plan), and
(iii) 2004 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan (the
2004 Plan). The 2002 Plan was adopted by the Board
as of April 23, 2002, and by our stockholders on
July 22, 2002; the 2003 Plan was adopted by the Board on
June 23, 2003; and the 2004 Plan was adopted by the Board
as of December 14, 2004, and by our stockholders on
July 29, 2005.
The 2002 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to
700,000 shares of common stock. The 2003 Plan authorizes
the issuance of up to 250,000 shares of common stock. The
2004 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares
of common stock. By encouraging stock ownership, we seek to
motivate plan participants by allowing them an opportunity to
benefit from any increased value of our Company which their
individual effort, initiative, and skill help produce. The plans
are administered by our Compensation Committee, but our
90
D-92
Board makes all final decisions with respect to compensation
matters. The material terms and provisions of the plans are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Under both the 2002 and the 2003 Plans, we may grant to our
designated employees, Officers, Directors, advisors and
consultants incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options
and stock. Under the 2004 Plan, we may grant to our designated
employees, Officers, Directors, advisors and consultants
incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and stock
appreciation rights. As applicable, stock grants and stock
appreciation rights may be made to employees, officers,
directors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries,
including any non-employee members of the Board. Incentive stock
options may be granted only to employees of the Company.
Nonqualified stock options may be granted to employees,
officers, directors and consultants.
|
|
|
|
If options granted under either plan expire or are terminated
for any reason without being exercised, or bonus shares are
forfeited, the shares underlying such option
and/or
bonus
shares will become available again for issuance under the
respective plan.
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee determines which individuals will
receive grants, the type, size and terms of the grants, the time
when the grants are made and the duration of any applicable
exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for
vesting and the acceleration of vesting, and the total number of
shares of common stock available for grants. The exercise price
of an option may be equal to, greater than, or less than the
fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of
grant; provided that:
|
(i) the exercise price of an incentive stock option must be
equal to or greater than the fair market value of a share of
common stock on the date of grant;
(ii) the exercise price of an incentive stock option
granted to an employee who owns more than 10% of the issued and
outstanding common stock must not be less than 110% of the fair
market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the
date of grant; and
(iii) pursuant to the terms of the 2002 and 2003 Plans the
exercise price of a non-qualified stock option must be at a
price not less than 85% of the fair market value of the
underlying shares of common stock on the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee determines the term of each option,
which may not exceed ten years from the date of grant, except
that the term of an incentive stock option granted to an
employee who owns more than 10% of the issued and outstanding
common stock may not exceed five years from the date of grant.
The Compensation Committee may accelerate or extend the
exercisability of any or all outstanding options at any time for
any reason.
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee determines the number of shares of
stock granted to a participant and may subject any grant to
performance requirements, vesting provisions, transfer
restrictions and other restrictions and conditions.
|
As of December 31, 2009, there were no options outstanding
under the 2002 and the 2003 Plan. As of December 31, 2009,
there were 262,500 options outstanding under 2004 Plan. There is
still a small amount of shares available to be optioned or
granted in the 2002 and 2003 Plans.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
Review,
Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related
Persons
Our Board reviews, approves or ratifies all related party
transactions. A related party is someone who is a
(i) director, director nominee or Executive Officer of the
Company, (ii) beneficial owner of more than 5% of our
common stock, or (iii) an immediate family member of any of
the foregoing persons. Our policy covers transactions, or a
series of transactions, in which a related party was or is to be
a participant involving an amount exceeding $120,000 and in
which a related party has or will have a direct or indirect
material interest.
91
D-93
Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing this policy
and may review and amend this policy from time to time. Any
member of the Audit Committee who has an interest in the
transaction under discussion will abstain from voting on the
approval of the related party transaction, but may, if so
requested by the Chair of the Audit Committee, participate in
some or all of the Committees discussions of the related
party transaction.
In determining whether to approve a related party transaction,
the Audit Committee will consider, among other things, the
following factors to the extent relevant to the related party
transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
whether the terms of the related party transaction are fair to
the Company and such terms would be on the same basis if the
transaction did not involve a related party;
|
|
|
|
whether there are business reasons for the Company to enter into
the related party transaction;
|
|
|
|
whether the related party transaction would impair the
independence of an independent Director;
|
|
|
|
whether the related party transaction would present an improper
conflict of interest for any Director or Executive Officer of
the Company, taking into account: (i) the size of the
transaction, (ii) the overall financial position of the
Director or Executive Officer, (iii) the direct or indirect
nature of the Directors or Executive Officers
interest in the transaction, and (iv) the ongoing nature of
any proposed relationship, and any other factors deemed
relevant; and
|
|
|
|
whether the related party transaction is material, taking into
account: (i) the importance of the interest to the related
party, (ii) the relationship of the related party to the
transaction and of related parties to each other, (iii) the
dollar amount involved, and (iv) the significance of the
transaction to the Companys investors in light of all of
the circumstances.
|
Prior to acquiring any properties owned by or affiliated with
management, an appraisal or valuation must be conducted by an
independent third party and a majority of the independent
directors are required to approve any such transaction. In
addition, management is required to present to the Company all
property acquisition opportunities of which management becomes
aware and have the right of first refusal with respect to any
such opportunity.
Lowrie Management LLLP has made a written agreement that we have
a first right of refusal to any nightclub property
proposed for acquisition by Lowrie Management LLLP. Lowrie
Management LLLP is controlled and majority owned by Troy Lowrie,
the Companys Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our Audit
Committee reviewed, approved, or ratified all material related
party transactions.
Guarantees
Troy Lowrie, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
personally
and/or
Lowrie Management LLLP (its relationship to us is described
earlier) guaranteed certain of our obligations in a number of
transactions during 2009 and 2008.
92
D-94
The following table lists the transactions involved and set
forth the principal amounts personally guaranteed or secured by
his assets as of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Description of Transactions
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Note payable to Sunshine Mortgage, interest at 14% fixed, due
monthly, periodic principal with balance due December 2011,
collateralized by one parcel of real property located in
Ft. Worth, TX, the common stock of Kenja II, Inc.,
238,000 shares of VCG stock, furniture, fixtures and
equipment of Kenja II, Inc. and a guarantee from Lowrie
Management LLLP.
|
|
$
|
4,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
|
Loan from Citywide Banks, interest at 7% fixed, monthly
principal and interest payments of $76,865, due August 15, 2014,
collateralized with a life insurance policy on Troy Lowrie and
additional securities owned by Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
3,654,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Amfirst Bank, variable interest rate calculated
at prime subject to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at December
31, 2009, monthly principal and interest payments of
approximately $55,898, due November 14, 2014, collateralized by
UCC Security Agreement of RCC LP, IRC LP, MRC LP , Platinum of
Illinois, Inc., Cardinal Management LP, VCG CO Springs, Inc.,
VCG Real Estate, Inc., Glendale Restaurant Concepts LP, Glenarm
Restaurant LLC, the Indiana building, and a guarantee from
Lowrie Management LLLP.
|
|
|
2,844,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit from Citywide Banks, variable interest rate
calculated at prime subject to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at
December 31, 2009, due monthly, principal due August 15, 2011,
collateralized by Company shares of common stock owned by Lowrie
Management LLLP, a life insurance policy on Troy Lowrie, and
additional securities owned by Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
2,720,000
|
|
|
|
2,810,000
|
|
Note payable, variable interest rate calculated at prime subject
to a 6% floor, actual rate of 6% at December 31, 2008, due
monthly, periodic principal payments with balance due June 2013,
collateralized by a P&A Select Strategy Fund and securities
owned by Lowrie Management LLLP. This loan was consolidated
into a new loan in August 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,375,138
|
|
Note payable Citywide Banks, interest at 8.5%, monthly principal
and interest payments of $36,156 with a balloon payment of
$2,062,483 due May 16, 2010, collateralized by securities owned
by Lowrie Management LLLP. This note was consolidated on August
15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,080,527
|
|
Notes payable to investors, interest at 11%, monthly interest
payments, due January 2010, collateralized by the general assets
of the Company and a guarantee by Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
Note payable, interest at 12% fixed due monthly, periodic
principal payments with balance due July 2011, collateralized by
one parcel of real property located in Ft. Worth, TX and
the common stock of Kenja II, Inc., and a guarantee from Lowrie
Management LLLP.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Various notes payable, interest at 11% fixed, monthly interest
payments, due July 2011, collateralized by the general assets
and cash flow of VCG and 100% stock in VCG-IS, LLC and a
guarantee from Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to an affiliate of a current Board member with
interest at 10%, due February 2011, collateralized by a personal
guarantee from Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
410,084
|
|
|
|
413,501
|
|
Note payable to investors, interest at 8.5%, monthly principal
and interest payments, due October 20, 2011, collateralized by
the general assets of the Company and guaranteed by Mr. Lowrie.
|
|
|
208,295
|
|
|
|
308,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt due
|
|
$
|
17,937,463
|
|
|
$
|
15,388,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
D-95
Trademarks
The Diamond
Cabaret
®
name and
PTs
®
name and logo are trademarks registered with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have an indefinite
license from Club Licensing LLC, which is wholly owned by Lowrie
Management LLLP, to use these trademarks for a fee. Lowrie
Management LLLPs relationship to us is described above.
The fee was established in 2006 and approved by the independent
members of our Board. Per the existing agreement, the Company
pays $500 per month per club for licensing fees on twelve clubs.
This totals $72,000 per year.
Long-Term
Debt
On April 9, 2008, the Company obtained a loan with the
principal amount of $1,250,000 from Lowrie Management LLLP, an
entity controlled and majority-owned by the Companys
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in exchange for a 10% fixed
rate promissory note, due April 9, 2011. This note accrued
interest and was collateralized by the general assets of IRC LP
and DRC LP and the transfer of both nightclubs adult
permits and liquor licenses upon default. For 2009, this note
accrued approximately $76,000 in interest and no principal was
paid. On June 30, 2009, the Company renegotiated the terms
of this loan and another existing loan payable to Lowrie
Management LLLP. The Company consolidated these two debt
obligations totaling $5,700,000. The above promissory note had
an outstanding principal balance of $1,400,000 and a note
executed on November 1, 2007 had an outstanding principal
balance of $4,300,000, bearing interest at 8.5% per annum, with
monthly principal and interest payments. On this note, the
Company paid approximately $224,000 in interest and $483,000 in
principal for 2009. For 2008, on the note in the amount of
$4,300,000 the Company paid approximately $448,000 in interest
and $906,000 in principal. On the note with the outstanding
balance of $1,400,000 the Company accrued approximately $86,000
for interest and made no principal payments.
The $5,700,000 principal amount was consolidated into a
replacement promissory note, bearing interest at 10% per annum,
with monthly interest payments. The entire principal amount and
any accrued but unpaid interest is due on June 30, 2012. No
other changes were made to collateral or terms, because the note
requires payment of only interest. The Company has paid
approximately $285,000 in interest and no principal amounts were
paid during 2009 and owes $5,700,000 as of December 31,
2009.
On September 1, 2008, the Company obtained a loan with the
principal amount of $400,000 from The Powelson Trust, an
affiliate of Martin Grusin, a current Board member, in exchange
for a 10% fixed rate promissory note. This accrues interest and
is collateralized by a personal guarantee from Troy Lowrie. All
accrued interest from September 2008 to September 2009 was
payable in September 2009; all other accrued interest is payable
on the maturity date of the note, as amended, on
February 1, 2011. The Company accrued approximately $42,000
for interest in 2009 and owes approximately $410,000 as of
December 31, 2009. For 2008, the Company accrued
approximately $13,500 for interest in 2009 and owed
approximately $414,000.
On October 15, 2008, the Company obtained a loan with the
principal amount of $100,000 from Micheal Ocello, the
Companys President and Chief Operating Officer, in
exchange for a 10% fixed rate promissory note. This note is
interest only, paid monthly, and unsecured. The maturity date of
the note, as amended, is February 1, 2011. The Company has
paid Mr. Ocello approximately $10,000 in interest during
2009 and 2008. The principal amount of $100,000 remained
unchanged from December 31, 2009 and 2008.
On December 29, 2008, the Company obtained two loans with
the principal amounts of approximately $73,000 and $170,000 from
Luella Lowrie, the mother of Troy Lowrie, in exchange for two
10% fixed rate promissory notes. The Company makes monthly
payments of principal and interest on one of the notes and
interest only on the other. These notes are unsecured. The
maturity dates are December 1, 2010 and February 1,
2011. For 2008, the Company paid approximately $26,000 in
interest and $36,000 in principal. The Company has paid
Mrs. Lowrie approximately $22,000 in interest and
approximately $36,000 in principal during 2009 and owes an
aggregate of approximately $207,000 on both loans as of
December 31, 2009.
94
D-96
On December 29, 2008, the Company renegotiated a loan with
the principal amount of $390,000 from Vali Lowrie-Reed, the
sister of Troy Lowrie, in exchange for a 10% fixed rate
promissory note. The note is interest only paid monthly and
secured by the general assets of IRC LP and DRC LP, and consent
to the transfer of the adult permit and liquor license upon
default in the name of DRC LP and IRC LP. The terms of the note
also required that the Company pay Ms. Lowrie-Reed an
initial fee of 2% of the principal amount, which was paid in the
amount of $8,000 in 2008. For 2008, the Company paid
approximately $16,000 in interest and $10,000 in principal. In
June 2009, the Company repaid this debt obligation and paid
approximately $15,000 in interest and approximately $380,000 as
of December 31, 2009.
On January 20, 2009, the Company entered into a note
payable to Luella Lowrie, the mother of Troy Lowrie, in the
amount of $25,000. The interest is accrued at 10%, principal due
December 1, 2010, and is unsecured. The Company accrued
approximately $2,000 in interest and made an interest payment of
approximately $2,000 during 2009 and owes approximately $25,000
as of December 31, 2009.
On February 2, 2009, the Company extended a current debt
obligation of $50,000 from Robert McGraw, Jr., a director
of the Company. The interest rate is at 10% due monthly,
principal due November 15, 2011, and is unsecured. The
Company has paid Mr. McGraw approximately $5,000 in
interest during 2009 and owes approximately $50,000 as of
December 31, 2009.
Other
Transactions
The building that houses The Penthouse
Club
®
located in Denver, Colorado is leased from Lowrie Management
LLLP; currently the rent is approximately $13,500 per month. The
aggregate lease payments due in 2010 is $162,000. The lease term
expires in September 2014 and has three options to extend that
expire September 2029. The base rent adjusts every five years.
The rent from years one to five was $12,000 per month, years six
to ten is $13,500 per month, years 11 to 15 (option 1) is
$15,000 per month, years 16 to 20 (option 2) is $16,500 per
month, and years 21 to 25 (option 3) is $18,000 per month.
The Company paid Lowrie Management LLLP an aggregate of
approximately $149,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009
and $144,000 for the same period in 2008.
The building that houses
PTs
®
Showclub located in Louisville, Kentucky is leased from Lowrie
Management LLLP; currently the rent is approximately $7,500 per
month. The aggregate lease payments due in 2010 are $90,000. The
lease term expires December 31, 2016 and has three
five-year options to extend that expire December 31, 2031.
The base rent adjusts every five years. The rent from years one
to five is $7,500 per month, years six to ten is $8,750 per
month, years 11 to 15 (option 1) is $10,000 per month,
years 16 to 20 (option 2) is $11,250 per month, and years
21 to 24 (option 3) is $12,000. The Company paid Lowrie
Management LLLP an aggregate of approximately $90,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The building that houses
PTs
®
Showclub located in Denver, Colorado is leased from Lowrie
Management LLLP; currently the rent is approximately $17,500 per
month. The aggregate lease payments due in 2010 are $210,000.
The lease term expires December 31, 2014 and has three
five-year options to extend that expire December 31, 2029.
The base rent adjusts every five years. The rent from years one
to five was $15,000 per month, years six to ten is $17,500 per
month, years 11 to 15 (option 1) is $20,000 per month,
years 16 to 20 (option 2) is $22,500 per month, and years
21 to 25 (option 3) is $25,000. The Company paid Lowrie
Management LLLP an aggregate of approximately $180,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Director
Independence
Our Board has determined that each of Robert McGraw, Jr.,
Kenton Sieckman, Carolyn Romero, and George Sawicki qualify as
an independent director under rules promulgated by the SEC and
The NASDAQ Stock
Market
®
listing standards rules and has determined that the majority of
our directors are independent. Accordingly, all members of each
board committee are independent in accordance with The NASDAQ
Stock
Market
®
listing standards.
95
D-97
The Companys Audit Committee consists of Carolyn Romero
(Chair), Kenton Sieckman, and George Sawicki all of whom meet
the NASDAQ independence definition set forth in
Rule 4200(a)(14).
The Company tracks payments to the firms of certain directors
for legal and advisory services rendered each year, to ensure
that payments do not exceed levels mandated by the SEC and The
NASDAQ Stock
Market
®
for independent board service.
During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
Mr. Grusin was paid approximately $4,500 to the Law Office
of Martin A. Grusin, P.C. for his legal and professional
services performed for the Company. Martin Grusin is a board
member but not considered to be a independent board member
because of fees paid to his wife, Gayle Powelson, from the
Company for consulting services. During 2009, Ms. Powelson
received an aggregate of approximately $123,000 for financial
consulting services. The aggregate amount of payments made to
Mr. Grusin and his wife in 2009 totaled $127,937.
During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we paid an
aggregate of approximately $215,000 to Rubin Schulman, P.L.C.
for legal and professional services performed for the Company.
Allan Rubin was a board member of the Company until August 2009
and the managing partner of Rubin Schulman P.L.C. The Company
did not consider him an independent member of the board.
The Board based the independence determinations primarily on the
Companys records regarding payments made to Board members,
plus a review of the responses of the Directors and Executive
Officers to questions regarding employment and transaction
history, affiliations, and family and other relationships and on
discussions with the directors.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The firm of Causey Demgen & Moore Inc.
(CDM) served as our independent registered public
accounting firm for our 2009 and 2008 fiscal years.
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed or to
be billed by CDM for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
194,118
|
|
|
$
|
172,000
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
45,350
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
12,237
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
254,330
|
|
|
$
|
189,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
fees
Fees for audit services consisted of the audit of our annual
financial statements and reports on internal controls required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and reviews of our quarterly
financial statements.
Audit-related
fees
Fees for audit-related services billed in 2009 related to the
2008 SEC Comment Letter and SOX implementation. Fees for
audit-related services billed in 2008 related to acquisition
audits and new pronouncement reviews.
Tax
Fees
Fees for taxes billed in 2009 and 2008 related to research and
discussions of the state net operating loss to determine
potential carry back opportunities.
96
D-98
Other
All other fees billed in 2009 and 2008 related to consulting
services regarding accounting matters.
Audit
Committees Pre-Approval Policies and
Procedures
The audit committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit
services to be performed by CDM, and has established policies
and procedures to ensure that the Company is in full compliance
with the requirements for pre-approval set forth in the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC rules regarding auditor
independence.
In accordance with these policies and procedures, management
submits for approval audit and non-audit services that
management may wish to have CDM perform. The audit committee
approves or rejects each of the services and approves a range of
fees. Services cannot commence until such approval has been
granted. During the course of the year, the chairman of the
audit committee has the authority to pre-approve requests for
services.
All of the fees set forth in the Principal Accountant Fees and
Services table above for the fiscal years of 2009 and 2008 were
pre-approved by the audit committee.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) We have filed the following documents as part of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
not applicable or not required, or because the required
information is included in the consolidated financial statements
or the notes thereto.
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended Designations, Preferences, Limitations and Relative
Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock(9)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws(28)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen common stock certificate, $.0001 par value(1)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Specimen preferred stock certificate $.0001 par value(1)
|
|
*4
|
.3
|
|
Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan(1)
|
|
*4
|
.4
|
|
2003 Stock Option and Stock Bonus Plan(3)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement(16)
|
97
D-99
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.01
|
|
Trademark License Agreement, dated June 30, 2002, between
VCG Holding Corp. and Lowrie Management LLLP(1)
|
|
10
|
.02
|
|
Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated June 30, 2002,
between VCG Holding Corp. and Lowrie Management LLLP(1)
|
|
*10
|
.03
|
|
Management Contract, dated May 2, 2002, between VCG Holding
Corp. and International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.(1)
|
|
10
|
.04
|
|
Lease Agreement for
213-215
Madison, Brooklyn, Illinois, dated May 1, 2002, by and
between RELMSS and VCG Holding Corp.(1)
|
|
10
|
.05
|
|
Agreement to Purchase/Sell Real Estate, dated March 5,
2003, between VCG Real Estate Holdings, Inc. and Sacred Grounds
Resources, L.L.C.(2)
|
|
10
|
.06
|
|
Limited Partnership Purchase Agreement, executed effective
June 30, 2004, by and among VCG Holding Corp., WCC
Acquisitions, Inc. and Lowrie Management LLLP(4)
|
|
10
|
.07
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated July 21,
2004, by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(4)
|
|
10
|
.08
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated October 1, 2004, by and between
Lowrie Management LLLP and Glendale Restaurant Concepts LP(5)
|
|
10
|
.09
|
|
Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Assets, dated
August 18, 2004, by and between CCCG, Inc. and Glenarm
Restaurant Concepts, LLC(6)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated August 31, 2004, by and between
Glenarm Associates, Inc. and Glenarm Restaurant LLC(6)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
First Amendment to Commercial Lease, dated February 1,
2005, by Hampden and Galena Limited and VCG Restaurants Denver,
Inc.(7)
|
|
*10
|
.12
|
|
2004 Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan(8)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Business and Assets,
dated August 2, 2006, by and between VCG Holding Corp. and
Consolidated Restaurants Limited, LLC(10)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Business Lease, dated October 2, 2006, by and between 5975
Terminal, LLC and VCG CO Springs, Inc.(11)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Limited Partnership Purchase Agreement, dated December 18,
2006, by and among Lowrie Management LLLP and W.C.C.
Acquisitions Inc., VCG Holding Corp. and Denver Restaurants
Concepts, LP(12)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated December 31,
2006, by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(12)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Lease, dated January 1, 2005, by and between Lowrie
Management LLLP and Denver Restaurant Concepts LP(12)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Sale of VCGs 100% Membership Interest in Epicurean
Enterprises, L.L.C., dated January 15, 2007, by and between
VCG Holding Corp and Cory James Anderson(13)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Lease, dated January 15, 2007, by and between VCG Real
Estate Holdings Inc. and Epicurean Enterprises LLC(13)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated January 2, 2007, by and among
Troy Lowrie, VCG Holding Corp and Kentucky Restaurants Concepts,
Inc.(14)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Agreement for Sale of Limited Partnership Interest Restaurant
Concepts of Kentucky Limited Partnership, dated January 2,
2007(14)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Lease, dated January 1, 2007, by and between Lowrie
Management LLLP and Kentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(14)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Limited Partnership Purchase Agreement, dated January 18,
2007, by and among Lowrie Management LLLP and Illinois
Acquisitions Inc., VCG Holding Corp and RCC, LP(15)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Consent to Sell Partnership Interest of RCC, LP, dated
January 31, 2007(15)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Consent to Transfer Partnership Interest into Common Stock,
dated January 31, 2007(15)
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Business Lease, dated February 1, 2007, by and between Jay
Dinkelmann, as Trustee of Chicago Title Land Trust #1080459
and RCC LP(15)
|
98
D-100
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Limited Partnership Purchase Agreement, dated February 5,
2007, by and among Lowrie Management LLLP, Illinois Acquisitions
Inc., VCG Holding Corp. and Cardinal Management LP(16)
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Business Lease, dated February 1, 2007, by and between Jay
Dinkelmann, as Trustee of Chicago Title Land Trust #879-51
and Cardinal Management LP dba PTs Centreville(16)
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Limited Partnership Purchase Agreement, dated February 9,
2007, by and among Lowrie Management LLLP and Illinois
Acquisitions Inc., VCG Holding Corp and MRC, LP(17)
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated March 31,
2007, by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(17)
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Business Lease, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Jay
Dinkelmann as Trustee of Chicago Title Land Trust #1083191
and MRC, LP.(17)
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Limited Partnership Purchase Agreement, dated February 7,
2007, by and among Lowrie Management LLLP, Illinois Acquisitions
Inc., VCG Holding Corp. and IRC, LP(18)
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Promissory Note, dated March 31, 2007, by VCG Holding Corp
in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(18)
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Consent to Sell Partnership Interest of IRC, LP, dated
February 21, 2007(18)
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Business Lease, dated March 1, 2007, by and between Regions
Bank, as Trustee of Trust #39007440 and Omni Warehouse, Inc. and
IRC, LP.(18)
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated June 1, 2006,
by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(20)
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Assets, dated
March 23, 2007, by and among Regale, Inc., VCG Holding
Corp. and Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(20)
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Agreement of Sublease, dated April 16, 2007, by and between
Regale, Inc. and Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(21)
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated April 16, 2007, by and between Big
Deck Parking, LLC and Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(21)
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, by and
between Robert W. Sabes and VCG Holding Corp.(22)
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Real Estate Purchase Agreement, dated April 25, 2007, by
and between JFS Desert Fountain Properties, LLC and VCG Holding
Corp.(22)
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Lease, dated May 31, 2007, by and between JFS Desert
Fountain Properties, LLC and Classic Affairs, Inc.(22)
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Lease, dated June 29, 2007, by and between 4th Street
Partnership, LLLP and Classic Affairs, Inc.(23)
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement re: Kenkev II, Inc. f/k/a Mark R. Dean,
Inc., dated September 14, 2007, between Ken-Kev Inc. and
VCG Holding Corp.(24)
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
Restrictive Covenant Covenant Not to Compete, dated
September 14, 2007, between Gregory Kenwood Gaines and VCG
Holding Corp.(24)
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
Consulting-License Agreement, dated September 14, 2007, by
and between Alliance Management Partners, LLC and VCG Holding
Corp. on behalf of Seller Equity holding(24)
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
Business Lease, dated September 14, 2007, by and between
K & R Properties, Inc. and KenKevII, Inc.(24)
|
|
10
|
.48
|
|
Guaranty of Lease, dated September 14, 2007, by VCG Holding
Corp. in favor of K & R Properties(24)
|
|
10
|
.49
|
|
Purchase of Membership Interest, dated September 17, 2007,
by and among VCG Holding Corp. and Golden Productions JGC
Fort Worth, LLC, d/b/a Jaguars Gold Club
Fort Worth, and Bryan S. Foster(25)
|
|
10
|
.50
|
|
Covenant not to compete, dated September 17, 2007, between
Bryan S. Foster and VCG Holding Corp.(25)
|
|
10
|
.51
|
|
Covenant not to compete, dated September 17, 2007, between
Richard Richardson and VCG Holding Corp.(25)
|
|
10
|
.52
|
|
Deed of Ground Lease, dated September 17, 2007, by and
between VCG Holding Corp. and Bryan S. Foster(25)
|
99
D-101
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.53
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, by and
among VCG Holding Corp. and Manana Entertainment, Inc. db/a
Jaguars Gold Club Dallas, and Bryan S. Foster(26)
|
|
10
|
.54
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete, made and effective as of the Effective
Date, as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement by and among
VCG Holding Corp. and Manana Entertainment, Inc. d/b/a
Jaguars Gold Club Dallas and Bryan S. Foster, between
Bryan S. (Niko) Foster and VCG Holding Corp.(26)
|
|
10
|
.55
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete, made and effective as of the Effective
Date, as defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement by and among
VCG Holding Corp. and Manana Entertainment, Inc. d/b/a
Jaguars Gold Club Dallas and Bryan S. Foster, between
Richard Richardson and VCG Holding Corp.(26)
|
|
10
|
.56
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement Re: Kenja II, Inc. f/k/a Mark R. Dean,
Inc., dated September 14, 2007, between Kenja II, Inc. and
VCG Holding Corp.(26)
|
|
10
|
.57
|
|
Restrictive Covenant Covenant Not to Compete, dated
October 29, 2007, between Gregory Kenwood Gaines and VCG
Holding Corp.(26)
|
|
10
|
.58
|
|
Bonus Agreement Related to Purchase Agreement, dated
September 14, 2007, between G. Kenwood Gaines and VCG
Holding Corp.(26)
|
|
10
|
.59
|
|
Ground Lease Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, between VCG
Holding Corp. and Bryan S. Foster(26)
|
|
10
|
.60
|
|
Business Lease Agreement, dated October 29, 2007, by and
between Third Properties, LLC and Kenja II, Inc.(26)
|
|
10
|
.61
|
|
Guaranty of Lease, dated October 29, 2007, by VCG Holding
Corp. in favor of Third Property, Inc.(26)
|
|
10
|
.62
|
|
Balloon Promissory Note dated December 4, 2007, in favor of
Sunshine Mortgage Investors, Inc.(27)
|
|
10
|
.63
|
|
Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets, dated
December 5, 2007, by and between 1443 Corp., Inc. and Stout
Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(29)
|
|
10
|
.64
|
|
Assignment Agreement, dated December 21, 2007, by and
between VVSM, Inc. and VCG Holding Corp.(29)
|
|
10
|
.65
|
|
Non-Competition Agreement, dated December 21, 2007, by and
between 1443 Corp., Inc., Lance Migliaccio, Gidget Sanders, Ted
R. Bullard and Stout Restaurant Concepts, Inc.(29)
|
|
10
|
.66
|
|
Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Assets, dated
December 21, 2007, by and between 1447, Inc. and Bradshaw
Hotel, Inc.(29)
|
|
10
|
.67
|
|
Assignment and Assumption of Building Lease, dated
December 19, 2007, by and between P.P.P., LLC, Lance C.
Migliaccio, Gidget Bridget Sanders, Anthony Scott Falcone, Frank
Henry Walley, IV, Ted R. Bullard and Stout Restaurant Concepts,
Inc.(29)
|
|
10
|
.68
|
|
Building Lease, dated July 7, 2001, by and between Dikeou
Realty and 2222, Inc., as amended(29)
|
|
10
|
.69
|
|
Consulting Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, by and
between Lance C. Migliaccio and VCG Holding Corp.(29)
|
|
10
|
.70
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2007,
by and between 1443 Corp., Inc., Lance C. Migliaccio, Gidget
Bridget Sanders, Anthony Scott Falcone, Frank Henry Walley, IV,
Ted R. Bullard and VCG Holding Corp.(29)
|
|
10
|
.71
|
|
Agreement of Merger, dated February 9, 2008 by and between
VCG Holding Corp. and Mega Club(30)
|
|
10
|
.72
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated
February 9,2008, by and between VCG Holding Corp and Mega
Club(30)
|
|
10
|
.73
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete, dated February 9, 2008, between
Mega Club and VCG Holding Corp.(30)
|
|
10
|
.74
|
|
Covenant not to Compete, dated February 9, 2008, between
Mega Club Employee and VCG Holding Corp.(30)
|
|
10
|
.75
|
|
Sales Agreement, dated February 9, 2008, between Mega Club
and VCG Holding Corp.(30)
|
|
10
|
.76
|
|
Ground Lease Agreement, dated February 9, 2008, between VCG
Holding Corp. and Mega Club(30)
|
|
10
|
.77
|
|
Agreement of Purchase of Assets, dated March 15, 2008, by
and between VCG Holding Corp. and Mega Club(31)
|
|
10
|
.78
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete, dated March 15, 2008, by and
between VCG Holding Corp. and Mega Club(31)
|
100
D-102
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.79
|
|
First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
April 15, 2008, by VCG Holding Corp. and Manana
Entertainment, Inc. and Bryan Foster(36)
|
|
10
|
.80
|
|
Promissory Note, dated April 14, 2008, by and between VCG
Holding Corp. and Bryan Foster(36)
|
|
10
|
.81
|
|
Security Agreement, dated April 14, 2008, by and between
VCG Holding Corp. and Bryan Foster(32)
|
|
10
|
.82
|
|
Leasehold Deed of Trust Security Agreement, dated
April 14, 2008(32)
|
|
10
|
.83
|
|
Amended Balloon Promissory Note, dated July 11, 2008, by
and between VCG Holding Corp. and Sunshine Mortgage Investors,
Inc.(33)
|
|
10
|
.84
|
|
Balloon Promissory Note, dated, July 14, 2008, by and
between VCG Holding Corp. and Richard Stanton(33)
|
|
10
|
.85
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 15, 2008, by and
between 2640 W. Woodland Inc., and Glenn Smith, and
VCG-IS, LLC, and VCG Holding Corp.(34)
|
|
10
|
.86
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete, dated July 28, 2008, by and
between Glenn Smith and VCG-IS, LLC(34)
|
|
10
|
.87
|
|
Promissory Note, dated July 28, 2008, by and between
VCG-IS, LLC and 2640 W. Woodland, Inc.(34)
|
|
10
|
.88
|
|
Security Agreement, dated July 28, 2008, by and between
VCG-IS, LLC and 2640 W. Woodland, Inc.(34)
|
|
10
|
.89
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated November 11,
2007, by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(35)
|
|
10
|
.90
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated July 17,
2008, by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Vali Lowrie Reed(35)
|
|
*10
|
.91
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 4, 2008, by and
between VCG Holding Corp. and Troy Lowrie(36)
|
|
*10
|
.92
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 4, 2008, by and
between VCG Holding Corp. and Micheal Ocello(36)
|
|
10
|
.93
|
|
Agreement of Merger, dated February 9, 2008 by and between
VCG Holding Corp. and TTNA, Inc.(37)
|
|
10
|
.94
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated
February 9,2008, by and between VCG Holding Corp and TTNA,
Inc.(37)
|
|
10
|
.95
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete, dated February 9, 2008, by and
between VCG Holding Corp and Duncan Burch(37)
|
|
10
|
.96
|
|
Covenant not to Compete, dated February 9, 2008, between
TTNA, Inc. Employee and VCG Holding Corp(37)
|
|
10
|
.97
|
|
Sales Agreement, dated February 9, 2008, between Duncan
Burch and VCG Holding Corp(37)
|
|
10
|
.98
|
|
Ground Lease Agreement, dated February 9, 2008, between VCG
Holding Corp. and Duncan Burch(37)
|
|
10
|
.99
|
|
Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated June 30,
2009, by VCG Holding Corp. in favor of Lowrie Management LLLP(38)
|
|
11
|
.00
|
|
Real Estate Purchase Agreement, dated July 31, 2009 , by
and between Black Canyon Highway LLC and VCG Real Estate
Holding(39)
|
|
11
|
.01
|
|
Promissory Note dated August 15, 2009, by VCG Holding Corp.
in favor of Citywide Banks(40)
|
|
11
|
.02
|
|
Promissory Note dated August 15, 2009, by VCG Holding Corp.
in favor of Citywide Banks(40)
|
|
11
|
.03
|
|
Business Lease Agreement, dated August 15, 2009 by and
between VCG Holding Corp and Lowrie Management LLLP and Citywide
Banks(40)
|
|
11
|
.04
|
|
Change in Terms Agreement, dated August 15, 2009 by and
between VCG Holding Corp and Citywide Banks(40)
|
|
11
|
.05
|
|
Business Lease Agreement, dated August 15, 2009 by and
between VCG Holding Corp and Lowrie Management LLLP and Citywide
Banks(40)
|
|
11
|
.06
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2009,
by and between VCG Holding Corp, Troy Lowrie, Micheal Ocello,
Courtney Cowgill, Martin Grusin, Robert McGraw, Jr., Kenton
Sieckman, George Sawicki and Carolyn Romero(41)
|
|
11
|
.07
|
|
Letter of Intent between Ricks Cabaret International,
Inc., VCG Holding Corp., Troy Lowrie and Lowrie Management
LLLP(42)
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of VCG Holding Corp.(44)
|
101
D-103
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Causey Demgen & Moore Inc.(44)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of VCG Holding Corp.
required by
Rule 13a-14(1)
or
Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(44)
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of VCG Holding Corp.
required by
Rule 13a-14(1)
or
Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(44)
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of VCG Holding Corp.
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63(43)
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of VCG Holding Corp.
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and Section 1350 of 18 U.S.C. 63(43)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on
Form SB-2
filed on September 10, 2002
|
|
(2)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on
Form SB-2
filed on April 21, 2003
|
|
(3)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-8
filed August 6, 2003
|
|
(4)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 29, 2004
|
|
(5)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 8, 2004
|
|
(6)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Amended Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on October 18, 2004
|
|
(7)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 9, 2005
|
|
(8)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 1, 2005
|
|
(9)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on November 14, 2005
|
|
(10)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on August 14, 2006
|
|
(11)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 5, 2006
|
|
(12)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 5, 2007
|
|
(13)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
on January 19, 2007
|
|
(14)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
on January 23, 2007
|
|
(15)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
on February 15, 2007
|
|
(16)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statement on
Form S-3
filed March 1, 2007
|
|
(17)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
on March 6, 2007
|
|
(18)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
on March 21, 2007
|
|
(19)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
on March 23, 2007
|
|
(20)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB
filed April 3, 2007
|
|
(21)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 20, 2007
|
|
(22)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 7, 2007
|
|
(23)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on July 12, 2007
|
|
(24)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 20, 2007
|
|
(25)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 21, 2007
|
|
(26)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on November 16, 2007
|
|
(27)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 10, 2007
|
|
(28)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 27, 2007
|
|
(29)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 28, 2007
|
102
D-104
|
|
|
(30)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 14, 2008 & Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 3, 2009
|
|
(31)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed March 20, 2008 & Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 3, 2009
|
|
(32)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed April 18, 2008
|
|
(33)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed July 21, 2008
|
|
(34)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 1, 2008
|
|
(35)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed August 11, 2008
|
|
(36)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed December 10, 2008
|
|
(37)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 3, 2009
|
|
(38)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 2, 2009
|
|
(39)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 5, 2009
|
|
(40)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed November 11, 2009
|
|
(41)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed December 17, 2009
|
|
(42)
|
|
Incorporated by reference from Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed February 16, 2010
|
|
(43)
|
|
Furnished herewith
|
|
(44)
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
*
|
|
Indicates a management contract or compensation plan or
arrangement
|
103
D-105
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, this 12th day of March, 2010.
VCG HOLDING CORP.
Troy Lowrie
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Troy Lowrie
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Micheal Ocello
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and President
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Courtney Cowgill
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Secretary and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
By:
/s/
Robert
McGraw, Jr.
|
|
|
Robert McGraw, Jr.
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn Romero
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Grusin
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
George Sawicki
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Kenton Sieckman
|
|
|
Director
|
104
D-106
Exhibit 21.1
VCG
Holding Corp.
List of
Subsidiaries
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of
|
Name
|
|
DBA
|
|
Organization
|
|
VCG Phoenix Corp. (inactive)
|
|
|
|
Arizona
|
VCG-IS, LLC
|
|
Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club
|
|
California
|
Bradshaw Hotel, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Colorado
|
Denver Restaurant Concepts LP
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Colorado
|
Glenarm Restaurant LLC
|
|
Diamond
Cabaret
®
|
|
Colorado
|
Glendale Restaurant Concepts LP
|
|
The
Penthouse
®
Club
|
|
Colorado
|
International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
|
|
IEC
|
|
Colorado
|
Stout Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
|
|
La Boheme Gentlemens Club
|
|
Colorado
|
VCG CO Springs, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Colorado
|
VCG Licensing, Inc. (inactive)
|
|
|
|
Colorado
|
VCGH Properties, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Colorado
|
VCG Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
|
|
VCG Real Estate
|
|
Colorado
|
VCG Restaurants Denver, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
All Nude
|
|
Colorado
|
Kenja II, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Florida
|
Kenja Venture, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Florida
|
Cardinal Management LP
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Illinois
|
IRC LP
|
|
The
Penthouse
®
Club
|
|
Illinois
|
MRC LP
|
|
PTs
®
Sports Cabaret
|
|
Illinois
|
Platinum of Illinois, Incorporated
|
|
PTs
®
Brooklyn
|
|
Illinois
|
RCC LP
|
|
Roxys
|
|
Illinois
|
Indy Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Indiana
|
Kentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Kentucky
|
Kenkev II, Inc.
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub
|
|
Maine
|
4th Street Partnership LP
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
Classic Affairs, Inc.
|
|
Schieks Palace Royal
|
|
Minnesota
|
Good Cheer, Inc.
|
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
Raleigh Restaurant Concepts, Inc.
|
|
The Mens
Club
®
|
|
North Carolina
|
VCG-FL, LLC (in process of being dissolved)
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island
|
Kenkev, Inc.
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
Golden Productions JGC Fort Worth, LLC
|
|
Jaguars Gold Club
|
|
Texas
|
Manana Entertainment, Inc.
|
|
Jaguars Gold Club
|
|
Texas
|
D-107
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT
OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
In connection with the foregoing Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be filed with the Washington, D.C. Office of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we hereby consent
to the inclusion of our report dated March 12, 2010 related
to the audit of the consolidated financial statements of VCG
Holdings Corp. as of and for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008.
/s/ Causey
Demgen & Moore Inc.
Denver, Colorado
March 12, 2010
D-108
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Troy Lowrie, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of VCG Holding Corp. for the fiscal period ended
December 31, 2009;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
controls over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 12, 2010
Troy Lowrie
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
D-109
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Courtney Cowgill, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of VCG Holding Corp. for the fiscal period ended
December 31, 2009;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 12, 2010
Courtney Cowgill
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
D-110
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
I, Troy Lowrie, Chief Executive Officer of VCG Holding Corp.
(the Company) hereby certify, on the date hereof,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that
(1) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 12, 2010
Troy Lowrie
Chief Executive Officer
D-111
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
I, Courtney Cowgill, Chief Financial Officer of VCG Holding
Corp. (the Company) hereby certify, on the date
hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that
(1) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
Dated: March 12, 2010
Courtney Cowgill
Chief Financial Officer
D-112
APPENDIX E
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended:
September 30,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For The Transition Period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-32208
VCG HOLDING CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Colorado
|
|
84-1157022
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
390 Union Blvd., Suite 540, Lakewood, Colorado 80228
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip code)
(303) 934-2424
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act): Yes
o
No
þ
As of November 11, 2010, there were 16,292,071 shares
of the registrants common stock, $.0001 par value,
outstanding.
E-1
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
E-2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,384,073
|
|
|
$
|
2,677,440
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
229,833
|
|
|
|
254,333
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
142,568
|
|
|
|
594,720
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
862,514
|
|
|
|
920,192
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
656,636
|
|
|
|
354,730
|
|
Current portion of deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
28,400
|
|
|
|
76,920
|
|
Assets of business held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
4,304,024
|
|
|
|
7,398,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
20,643,975
|
|
|
|
21,016,179
|
|
Non-compete agreements, net
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
452,000
|
|
|
|
452,000
|
|
Licenses, net
|
|
|
34,140,721
|
|
|
|
34,252,018
|
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
2,279,045
|
|
|
|
2,279,045
|
|
Favorable lease rights, net
|
|
|
1,594,067
|
|
|
|
1,647,968
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
214,840
|
|
|
|
241,993
|
|
Non-current portion of deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
3,348,490
|
|
|
|
3,841,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
66,987,662
|
|
|
$
|
71,151,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable trade
|
|
$
|
1,121,886
|
|
|
$
|
1,750,940
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,642,962
|
|
|
|
1,930,049
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
26,956
|
|
|
|
67,917
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
104,700
|
|
|
|
110,010
|
|
Current portion of unfavorable lease rights
|
|
|
217,272
|
|
|
|
217,116
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease
|
|
|
6,953,893
|
|
|
|
3,805,277
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, related party
|
|
|
7,427
|
|
|
|
62,067
|
|
Liabilities of business held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
13,075,096
|
|
|
|
9,431,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease, net of current portion
|
|
|
38,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
1,990,242
|
|
|
|
1,521,140
|
|
Unfavorable lease rights, net of current portion
|
|
|
4,672,938
|
|
|
|
4,835,931
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
11,941,524
|
|
|
|
19,751,021
|
|
Long-term debt, related party, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,096,619
|
|
|
|
7,129,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
25,739,654
|
|
|
|
33,237,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized;16,292,071 (2010) and 17,310,723
(2009) shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
50,312,458
|
|
|
|
51,932,082
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(25,690,527
|
)
|
|
|
(26,996,863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total VCG Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
24,623,560
|
|
|
|
24,936,950
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
|
|
|
3,549,352
|
|
|
|
3,545,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
28,172,912
|
|
|
|
28,482,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
|
$
|
66,987,662
|
|
|
$
|
71,151,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
E-3
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of alcoholic beverages
|
|
$
|
5,387,645
|
|
|
$
|
5,708,126
|
|
|
$
|
16,027,165
|
|
|
$
|
17,434,580
|
|
Sales of food and merchandise
|
|
|
489,197
|
|
|
|
447,336
|
|
|
|
1,509,420
|
|
|
|
1,370,706
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
7,723,924
|
|
|
|
6,448,750
|
|
|
|
21,822,139
|
|
|
|
19,146,956
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
783,420
|
|
|
|
804,461
|
|
|
|
2,335,182
|
|
|
|
2,260,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
14,384,186
|
|
|
|
13,408,673
|
|
|
|
41,693,906
|
|
|
|
40,212,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,505,342
|
|
|
|
1,438,489
|
|
|
|
4,540,244
|
|
|
|
4,410,656
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
3,985,303
|
|
|
|
3,489,669
|
|
|
|
11,779,614
|
|
|
|
10,299,234
|
|
Impairment of building and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,000
|
|
Contingent indemnification claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other general and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes, permits and licenses
|
|
|
740,395
|
|
|
|
1,152,838
|
|
|
|
2,345,866
|
|
|
|
2,699,480
|
|
Charge card and bank fees
|
|
|
189,909
|
|
|
|
188,352
|
|
|
|
537,311
|
|
|
|
593,736
|
|
Rent
|
|
|
1,480,475
|
|
|
|
1,385,492
|
|
|
|
4,369,882
|
|
|
|
4,153,523
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
307,160
|
|
|
|
188,651
|
|
|
|
1,236,619
|
|
|
|
869,171
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
553,969
|
|
|
|
704,737
|
|
|
|
1,945,703
|
|
|
|
2,062,041
|
|
Advisory fees related to change in control proposals
|
|
|
121,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
645,320
|
|
|
|
653,170
|
|
|
|
1,955,019
|
|
|
|
1,935,202
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
409,023
|
|
|
|
435,374
|
|
|
|
1,324,195
|
|
|
|
1,218,718
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
278,253
|
|
|
|
268,851
|
|
|
|
748,649
|
|
|
|
754,679
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
276,831
|
|
|
|
240,291
|
|
|
|
814,902
|
|
|
|
806,142
|
|
Other
|
|
|
868,197
|
|
|
|
882,048
|
|
|
|
2,742,326
|
|
|
|
2,676,090
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
427,449
|
|
|
|
393,918
|
|
|
|
1,264,971
|
|
|
|
1,194,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
11,789,255
|
|
|
|
11,421,880
|
|
|
|
37,877,067
|
|
|
|
33,941,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations
|
|
|
2,594,931
|
|
|
|
1,986,793
|
|
|
|
3,816,839
|
|
|
|
6,271,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(512,802
|
)
|
|
|
(695,441
|
)
|
|
|
(1,579,626
|
)
|
|
|
(2,151,699
|
)
|
Interest expense, related party
|
|
|
(181,126
|
)
|
|
|
(142,522
|
)
|
|
|
(541,700
|
)
|
|
|
(530,067
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
4,572
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
(68,784
|
)
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
(57,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income (Expenses)
|
|
|
(690,046
|
)
|
|
|
(902,247
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114,894
|
)
|
|
|
(2,734,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,904,885
|
|
|
|
1,084,546
|
|
|
|
1,701,945
|
|
|
|
3,536,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) current
|
|
|
(21,900
|
)
|
|
|
(92,189
|
)
|
|
|
100,100
|
|
|
|
81,054
|
|
Income tax expense deferred
|
|
|
399,348
|
|
|
|
417,435
|
|
|
|
411,000
|
|
|
|
1,110,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes
|
|
|
377,448
|
|
|
|
325,246
|
|
|
|
511,100
|
|
|
|
1,191,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
1,527,437
|
|
|
|
759,300
|
|
|
|
1,190,845
|
|
|
|
2,345,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
|
|
|
523,646
|
|
|
|
35,770
|
|
|
|
472,812
|
|
|
|
96,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit of Consolidated and Affiliated Companies
|
|
|
2,051,083
|
|
|
|
795,070
|
|
|
|
1,663,657
|
|
|
|
2,442,525
|
|
Less Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
(132,601
|
)
|
|
|
(162,843
|
)
|
|
|
(357,321
|
)
|
|
|
(394,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to VCG
|
|
$
|
1,918,482
|
|
|
$
|
632,227
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,336
|
|
|
$
|
2,047,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and fully diluted income per share attributable to
VCGs stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and fully diluted income per share attributable to
VCGs stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Net Income Attributable to VCG Stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Basic and fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,371,444
|
|
|
|
17,440,835
|
|
|
|
16,979,127
|
|
|
|
17,552,034
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
E-4
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
17,310,723
|
|
|
$
|
1,731
|
|
|
$
|
51,932,082
|
|
|
$
|
(26,996,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,545,580
|
|
|
|
28,482,530
|
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,262
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(551,155
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(935,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(935,243
|
)
|
Common stock received as consideration for club sale
|
|
|
(467,497
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(794,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(794,745
|
)
|
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306,336
|
|
|
|
357,321
|
|
|
|
1,663,657
|
|
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(353,549
|
)
|
|
|
(353,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
16,292,071
|
|
|
$
|
1,629
|
|
|
$
|
50,312,458
|
|
|
$
|
(25,690,527
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,549,352
|
|
|
$
|
28,172,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
E-5
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit of consolidated and affiliated companies
|
|
$
|
1,663,657
|
|
|
$
|
2,442,525
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile profit of consolidated and affiliated
companies to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of building and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,000
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,319,110
|
|
|
|
1,270,503
|
|
Amortization of non-compete agreements
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
12,776
|
|
Amortization of leasehold rights and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(141,790
|
)
|
|
|
(147,588
|
)
|
Amortization of loan fees
|
|
|
48,413
|
|
|
|
174,524
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
110,262
|
|
|
|
233,364
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
653,000
|
|
|
|
1,026,470
|
|
(Gain) Loss on disposition of assets
|
|
|
(817,060
|
)
|
|
|
57,364
|
|
Accrued interest added to long-term debt
|
|
|
125,913
|
|
|
|
132,230
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
2,763,612
|
|
|
|
(39,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
5,737,135
|
|
|
|
5,430,817
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from divestiture of a club
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(838,372
|
)
|
|
|
(602,111
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
|
18,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
252,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
|
|
|
183,368
|
|
|
|
(349,138
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1,160,147
|
|
Payments on debt
|
|
|
(5,018,611
|
)
|
|
|
(3,722,214
|
)
|
Proceeds from related party debt
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
25,099
|
|
Payments on related party debt
|
|
|
(343,048
|
)
|
|
|
(812,435
|
)
|
Borrowing (payments) on revolving line of credit
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
(390,000
|
)
|
Payment on capitalized leases
|
|
|
(3,419
|
)
|
|
|
(19,111
|
)
|
Loan fees paid
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(78,725
|
)
|
Repurchase of stock
|
|
|
(935,243
|
)
|
|
|
(777,097
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(353,549
|
)
|
|
|
(380,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(6,213,870
|
)
|
|
|
(4,994,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(293,367
|
)
|
|
|
87,062
|
|
Cash beginning of period
|
|
|
2,677,440
|
|
|
|
2,209,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash end of period
|
|
$
|
2,384,073
|
|
|
$
|
2,296,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash divestiture activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock received as partial consideration for the
Ft. Worth Club
|
|
$
|
794,745
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities transferred to buyer
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,771,854
|
|
Issuance of note receivable to buyer
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
322,963
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of vehicle through capital lease
|
|
$
|
49,577
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
E-6
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
General
In this report, references to VCG Holding Corp.,
VCG, the Company, its,
we, us, and our refer to VCG
Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries.
We are in the business of acquiring, owning and operating
nightclubs, which provide premium quality live adult
entertainment, restaurant, and beverage services in an up-scale
environment. As of September 30, 2010, the Company, through
its subsidiaries, owns and operates nineteen nightclubs in
Indiana, Illinois, Colorado, Texas, North Carolina, Minnesota,
Kentucky, Maine, Florida, and California. The Company operates
in one reportable segment.
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements have been prepared by the Company. In the opinion of
management, the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only
normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for fair
presentation of the condensed consolidated financial position as
of September 30, 2010, and the condensed consolidated
results of operations and condensed consolidated cash flows for
the periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
The December 31, 2009 balance sheet data was derived from
audited financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP).
The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included herein have been prepared in accordance with the rules
and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) for Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and accordingly do not include all footnote disclosures that
would normally be included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, the Company believes
that the disclosures presented are adequate to ensure that the
information presented is not misleading. The Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and other information
filed with the SEC.
The Company utilizes a December 31 fiscal year end, references
herein to fiscal 2009 relate to the year ended
December 31, 2009, and references to the first,
second, third, and fourth
quarter of a fiscal year relate to the quarters ended
March 31, June 30, September 30, and
December 31, respectively, of the related year.
Principles
of Consolidation
The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned and
majority-owned subsidiaries, and a consolidated variable
interest entity. All significant inter-company balances and
transactions are eliminated in the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities
During 2007, the Company became the 0.01% General Partner of
4th Street Limited Partnership LLLP
(4th Street), a limited liability limited
partnership that owns a building in Minneapolis, MN that is
rented by the Minneapolis nightclub operated by the Company. The
land and building, which had a net book value of approximately
$2,792,000 at September 30, 2010 and $2,844,000 at
December 31, 2009, represent the only assets held by
4th Street. The lease term is for 17 years. The
majority of the 99.99% limited partner interests
E-7
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
are held by related parties of the Company, including
stockholders, directors and holders of Company debt (in the form
of promissory notes). Under the terms of the 4th Street
partnership agreement, profits and losses and cash flows are
allocated between the General and the Limited Partners based on
their respective ownership percentages.
The Company has considered the provisions of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 810,
Consolidation
(ASC 810) and has determined
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the Limited Partners have very limited rights with respect to
the management and control of 4th Street;
|
|
|
|
the Company is the General Partner; and therefore, has control
of 4th Street;
|
|
|
|
the Company is the primary beneficiary;
|
|
|
|
the Company has determined that 4th Street is a variable
interest entity; and
|
|
|
|
therefore, the Company has consolidated 4th Streets
assets and included its equity as noncontrolling interest on the
condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2010
(unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited).
|
The Company has reviewed the provisions of FASB ASC Topic
360-20,
Real Estate Sales
as it relates to accounting for the
noncontrolling interest attributable to the Limited Partners and
has determined that the interest should not be accounted for
using the financing method.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and
certain financial statement disclosures. As discussed below, the
Companys most significant estimates include those made in
connection with the valuation of intangible assets and
determining the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Actual
results could differ materially from these estimates.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that
will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
Penalties, if any, related to unrecognized liabilities are in
other general and administrative on the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest expense, if any,
related to uncertain tax liabilities is recorded in interest
expense on the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Earnings
per Share
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260,
Earnings per Share,
basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income
attributable to shares of the Companys common stock (the
Common Stock) by the weighted average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share is computed by dividing net income
attributable to shares of Common Stock by the weighted average
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period
plus the incremental shares of Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options and warrants, to the extent that the
latter shares are dilutive.
E-8
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to VCG
|
|
$
|
1,918,482
|
|
|
$
|
632,227
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,336
|
|
|
$
|
2,047,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,371,444
|
|
|
|
17,440,835
|
|
|
|
16,979,127
|
|
|
|
17,552,034
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and dilutive weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,371,444
|
|
|
|
17,440,835
|
|
|
|
16,979,127
|
|
|
|
17,552,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has excluded options to purchase 231,500 and
280,500 shares of Common Stock from its calculation of the
effect of dilutive securities in the three and nine months ended
September 2010 and 2009, respectively, as they represent
anti-dilutive stock options. In 2009, the Company excluded
warrants exercisable into 325,376 shares of Common Stock
from its calculation of the effect of dilutive securities as
they represent anti-dilutive warrants. The exercise prices of
these stock options and warrants were substantially above the
market price of the Common Stock during each period.
Noncontrolling
Interest in Consolidated Partnerships
The change in the carrying amount for noncontrolling interests
in consolidated partnerships is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
3,550,261
|
|
|
$
|
3,528,389
|
|
|
$
|
3,545,580
|
|
|
$
|
3,560,474
|
|
Net Income attributable to Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
132,601
|
|
|
|
162,843
|
|
|
|
357,321
|
|
|
|
394,842
|
|
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(133,510
|
)
|
|
|
(116,197
|
)
|
|
|
(353,549
|
)
|
|
|
(380,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
3,549,352
|
|
|
$
|
3,575,035
|
|
|
$
|
3,549,352
|
|
|
$
|
3,575,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
Certain and significant prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
|
|
2.
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
|
In September 2010, the SEC issued Release
33-9142
which amended the SECs rules and forms to remove the
requirement for issuers that are neither accelerated filers nor
large accelerated filers to obtain an auditor attestation report
on internal control over financial reporting. Therefore, smaller
reporting companies such as VCG will not need their auditors to
test internal controls; however, management will still need to
do its assessment for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Although VCG obtained an audit opinion on the Companys
internal controls over financial reporting for the year ended
December 31, 2009, we do not plan on obtaining the opinion
for the year ended December 31, 2010 due to this change in
the requirement.
E-9
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements.
This update provides amendment to the
codification regarding the disclosures required for fair value
measurements. The key amendments include: (a) a requirement
to disclose transfer in and out of Level 1 and 2;
(b) activity in Level 3 should show information about
purchases, sales, settlements, etc. on a gross basis rather than
as net basis; and (c) additional disclosures about inputs
and valuation techniques. The new disclosure requirements are
effective for periods beginning after December 31, 2009,
except for the gross disclosures of purchases, etc. which is
effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2010.
The Company adopted this update on January 1, 2010, and it
did not have a significant impact on the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-02,
Consolidation (Topic 810) Accounting and
Reporting for Decreases in Ownership
of a
Subsidiary a Scope Clarification. This update
provides clarification about Topic 810 (previously Statement of
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
) and
clarifies that the de-recognition provisions of Topic 810 apply
to (a) a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business
or nonprofit activity, (b) a subsidiary that is a business
or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method
investee or joint venture, and (c) an exchange of a group
of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for
a noncontrolling interest in an entity. This update is effective
for the first reporting period beginning after December 15,
2009. The Company adopted this update effective January 1,
2010, and it did not have a significant impact on the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-17,
Consolidation (Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable
Interest Entities.
This update amends Topic 810 and is a
result of SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140
. This standard did not have a significant
impact on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements when it was adopted on January 1, 2010.
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On July 16, 2010, the Company completed the sale of
substantially all of the assets of Golden Productions JGC
Fort Worth, LLC, consisting of the club Jaguars Gold
Club in Ft. Worth, Texas (the Ft. Worth
Club), to RCI Entertainment (Fort Worth), Inc., a
Texas corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Ricks
Cabaret International, Inc. (Ricks). This sale
consisted of substantially all of the assets associated with the
Ft. Worth Club, excluding cash and the real property upon
which the Ft. Worth Club is located. In connection with the
sale, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement
with its landlord. The landlord then executed a new ground lease
agreement with Ricks. All applicable licenses and permits
required to operate the Ft. Worth Club were transferred to
Ricks at closing.
The purchase price paid at closing consisted of $1,000,000 in
cash and the transfer from Ricks to the Company of
467,497 shares of Common Stock held by Ricks. The
Common Stock was valued at the closing price on July 16,
2010 of $1.70 per share, for a total purchase price of
$1,794,745. The $1,000,000 in cash was used to prepay a portion
of the 14% note payable to Sunshine Mortgage and the
467,497 shares of Common Stock were cancelled. The Company
realized a pre-tax book gain of $816,035 in July 2010 upon the
closing of the sale.
Shortly after the Companys acquisition of the Ft. Worth
Club in September 2007, Ft. Worth enacted a smoking ban
that significantly reduced customer volume, sales and profits.
The Texas Patron Tax went into effect on January 1, 2008,
which increased the costs of operating the Ft. Worth Club.
The Company sold the Ft. Worth Club because it was not
meeting financial targets and the impact of selling it will
improve total Company financial performance going forward. In
accordance with authoritative accounting guidance for reporting
discontinued operations, the financial results of its
Ft. Worth Club are now presented as discontinued operations
for all periods in the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
E-10
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Operating results of discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
56,229
|
|
|
$
|
480,255
|
|
|
$
|
843,139
|
|
|
$
|
1,410,337
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
13,154
|
|
|
|
22,243
|
|
|
|
34,318
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
24,266
|
|
|
|
121,750
|
|
|
|
243,142
|
|
|
|
338,320
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
45,445
|
|
|
|
276,209
|
|
|
|
639,775
|
|
|
|
844,052
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
14,618
|
|
|
|
33,302
|
|
|
|
45,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
74,066
|
|
|
|
425,731
|
|
|
|
938,462
|
|
|
|
1,262,518
|
|
Gain on sale of business
|
|
|
816,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
798,198
|
|
|
|
54,524
|
|
|
|
720,712
|
|
|
|
147,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense current
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
Income tax expense deferred
|
|
|
268,652
|
|
|
|
12,854
|
|
|
|
242,000
|
|
|
|
44,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
274,552
|
|
|
|
18,754
|
|
|
|
247,900
|
|
|
|
50,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
523,646
|
|
|
$
|
35,770
|
|
|
$
|
472,812
|
|
|
$
|
96,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities of business held for sale consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
6,129
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,929,935
|
|
Non-compete agreement, net
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
Licenses, net
|
|
|
582,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of business held for sale
|
|
$
|
2,519,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable lease rights, net
|
|
$
|
1,380,996
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
107,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of business held for sale
|
|
$
|
1,488,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories consist of beverages, food, tobacco products and
merchandise. All are valued at the lower of cost or market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
$
|
766,106
|
|
|
$
|
820,534
|
|
Tobacco and merchandise
|
|
|
96,408
|
|
|
|
99,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Inventories
|
|
$
|
862,514
|
|
|
$
|
920,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-11
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
9,362,143
|
|
|
|
9,362,143
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,419,845
|
|
|
|
11,021,103
|
|
Software, computers, and equipment
|
|
|
3,360,128
|
|
|
|
3,082,474
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
340,494
|
|
|
|
269,503
|
|
Signs
|
|
|
311,239
|
|
|
|
308,819
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
2,019,721
|
|
|
|
1,911,270
|
|
Assets to be placed in service
|
|
|
182,851
|
|
|
|
168,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,496,421
|
|
|
|
26,623,557
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(6,852,446
|
)
|
|
|
(5,607,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
20,643,975
|
|
|
$
|
21,016,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense from continuing operations was $423,949 and
$389,918 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 the depreciation expense from continuing
operations was $1,253,471 and $1,182,377, respectively.
In May 2010, the Company entered into a capital lease for a
vehicle in the amount of $48,977. The accumulated amortization
of the vehicle amounted to $2,134 for the three month period and
$3,213 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010,
which is included.
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill and intangible
assets from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010,
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
Names
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,279,045
|
|
|
$
|
34,252,018
|
|
|
$
|
452,000
|
|
|
$
|
36,983,063
|
|
Amortization of component 2 goodwill for stock
purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
2,279,045
|
|
|
$
|
34,140,721
|
|
|
$
|
452,000
|
|
|
$
|
36,871,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no amortization of trade names or licenses, except for
the component 2 amortization described above, as they have been
determined to have indefinite lives. Amortization of non-compete
agreements from continuing operations was $3,500 and $4,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 the amortization of non-compete agreements from
continuing operations was $11,500 and $12,000, respectively.
The ongoing uncertainty in general and economic conditions may
impact the Companys business, as well as the market price
of the Common Stock. This could negatively impact the
Companys future operating performances, cash flow,
and/or
stock
price resulting in additional goodwill
and/or
intangible asset impairment charges being recorded in future
periods, which could materially impact the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. If revenue and net income are
flat or decline, there is a risk that the Company
E-12
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
may be forced to make an additional impairment adjustment to
intangible assets at the next impairment test date of
December 31, 2010. The valuation of goodwill and intangible
assets is subject to a high degree of judgment and complexity.
There was no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Long-Term
Debt with Related Parties
On September 29, 2010, the Company prepaid a loan from the
President and Chief Operating Officer in the amount of $100,000
with interest payable at 10%. The loan was not collateralized.
The maturity date was April 1, 2012.
Long-Term
Debt with Third Parties
On August 10, 2010, the Company finalized the extension of
its revolving line of credit with Citywide Banks. The maturity
date has been extended from August 15, 2011 until
August 15, 2012. All other terms remain unchanged. The
maximum available principal amount is $4,000,000 and borrowings
bear interest at a variable interest rate calculated based on
the Prime Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, subject
to change daily with a floor of 6%. The Company makes monthly
payments based on the principal amount outstanding. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company owes $2,900,000 under the
revolving line of credit. There are multiple borrowers under the
revolving line of credit, including the Company and Lowrie
Management LLLP (Lowrie LLLP), an entity controlled
and majority owned by the Companys Chairman of the Board
and Chief Operating Officer, Troy Lowrie. Mr. Lowrie is
guaranteeing the obligations under the revolving line of credit.
The revolving line of credit is collateralized with shares of
Common Stock owned by Lowrie LLLP, a whole life insurance policy
on the life of Troy Lowrie, plus the P&A Select Strategy
Fund, LP and the P&A Multi-Sector Fund II, LP, owned
by Lowrie LLLP.
The terms of the revolving line of credit requires the Company
to have a net cash
flow-to-debt
service ratio greater than or equal to 1.2 to 1.0, calculated
quarterly. The Company met the covenant as of September 30,
2010.
Future
Maturities of Debt
The following table shows required future maturities of related
party and third party long-term debt and the capital lease as of
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Calendar Years Ending December 31,
|
Remaining in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,249,620
|
|
|
$
|
9,788,797
|
|
|
$
|
10,766,552
|
|
|
$
|
3,005,276
|
|
|
$
|
1,218,626
|
|
|
$
|
8,924
|
|
|
$
|
26,037,795
|
|
Income tax expense was $377,448 and $325,246 for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
total income taxes in the quarter are based on estimates for
separately filed state tax liabilities in the amount of
$(21,900) and deferred tax expense of $399,348, primarily a
result of the sale of the Ft. Worth Club. Total income tax
expense was $511,100 and $1,191,155 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total income
tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
consists of $100,100 for estimated state tax expense and a
deferred income tax expense of $411,000. At September 30,
2010, the Companys net operating loss carryforward is
approximately $2,555,000 and the estimated tax credit
carryforward is approximately $1,070,000, both of which expire
beginning in 2029. The standard effective tax rate for federal
and state taxes is 39%, however, the Company analyzes the
E-13
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
effective rate based on projected income, net operating loss
carryforward and tax credits generated but not used to determine
the effective rate applied of 28.0% plus estimated state taxes
for separately filed states based on the statutory rate for each
jurisdiction.
Income tax expense for all periods presented for the
Ft. Worth Club has been reclassified to Discontinued
Operations (see Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements under Discontinued
Operations).
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon
the level of historical taxable income and projections for
future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax
assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely
than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these
deferred tax assets.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
|
Thee
Dollhouse Productions Litigation
On July 24, 2007, VCG Holding Corp. was named in a lawsuit
filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas. This
lawsuit arose out of a VCG acquisition of certain assets
belonging to Regale, Inc. (Regale) by Raleigh
Restaurant Concepts, Inc. (RRC), a wholly owned
subsidiary of VCG, in Raleigh, N.C. The lawsuit alleges that VCG
tortiously interfered with a contract between Michael Joseph
Peter and Regale and misappropriated Mr. Peters
purported trade secrets. On March 30, 2009, the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
entered an order granting summary judgment to VCG and dismissed
Mr. Peters claims in their entirety. The court found
that as a matter of law, VCG did not tortiously interfere with
Mr. Peters contract with Regale and further found
that VCG did not misappropriate trade secrets. Mr. Peters
did not appeal that ruling and as such, the federal proceedings
have concluded.
Ancillary to this litigation, Thee Dollhouse filed a claim in
arbitration in June 2008 against Regale as a result of this
transaction, asserting that Regale, by selling its assets to
RRC, breached a contract between Thee Dollhouse and Regale. In
addition, an assertion was made that one of Regales
principals tortiously interfered with the contract between
Regale and Thee Dollhouse. Regale filed a Motion to Stay
Arbitration which was granted in part and denied in part, with
the court staying arbitration as to Regales principal and
denying the stay as to Regale. As a result, the arbitration as
to Regale is proceeding. VCG is indemnifying and holding Regale
harmless from this claim pursuant to the terms of the asset
purchase agreement between Regale and RRC. The arbitration
hearing was conducted between April 26 and 29, 2010. On
June 28, 2010, the arbitration panel entered an award in
favor of Thee Dollhouse N.C., Inc. and against Regale, Inc.,
awarding Thee Dollhouse N.C., Inc. damages in the amount of
$2,102,476, plus costs of $32,390 for a total award of
$2,134,866, plus interest at the North Carolina statutory rate.
On July 14, 2010, Regale filed a petition in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
challenging the award. Dollhouse N.C. and Mr. Peter have
petitioned to confirm the arbitration award. All briefing has
been completed and the matters are now under submission with the
Court. It is presently unknown when the Court will rule. The
Company and Regale presently intend to vigorously pursue all
available appeals of this award. As of September 30, 2010,
the Company has accrued $2,135,000, which is reported in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as
Contingent Indemnification Claim. The Company is accruing
interest on this potential liability.
E-14
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Texas
Patron Tax Litigation
Beginning January 1, 2008, VCGs Texas clubs became
subject to a new state law requiring the Company to collect a
five dollar surcharge for every club visitor. A lawsuit was
filed by the Texas Entertainment Association, an organization in
which the Company is a member, alleging that the surcharge is an
unconstitutional tax. On March 28, 2008, the judge of the
District Court of Travis County, Texas ruled that the new state
law violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
and therefore, the District Courts order enjoined the
state from collecting or assessing the tax. The State of Texas
has appealed the District Courts ruling. Under Texas law,
when cities or the State of Texas give notice of appeal, the
State of Texas intervenes and suspends the judgment, including
the injunction. Therefore, the judgment of the District Court of
Travis County cannot be enforced until the appeals are completed.
The Company has filed a lawsuit to demand repayment of the paid
taxes. On June 5, 2009, the Texas Third Court of Appeals
(serving the Austin, Texas area) affirmed the District
Courts judgment that the Sexually Oriented Business Tax
violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The
State of Texas appealed the Court of Appeals ruling to the Texas
Supreme Court. On August 26, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court
ordered both sides to submit briefs on the merits. The
States brief was filed on September 25, 2009, and the
Texas Entertainment Associations brief was filed on
October 15, 2009. On February 12, 2010, the Texas
Supreme Court granted the States Petition for Review. Oral
arguments of the case were heard on March 25, 2010, and the
parties are currently awaiting a decision by the Texas Supreme
Court.
The Company paid the tax for 2008 and the first three quarters
of 2009 under protest and expensed the tax for such periods. For
each quarter since December 31, 2009, the Company accrued
the tax and filed the appropriate tax returns, but did not pay
the State of Texas. As of September 30, 2010, the Company
has approximately $271,000 in accrued but unpaid liabilities for
this tax. The Company has paid approximately $401,000, under
protest, to the State of Texas since the inception of this tax.
DOL
Audit (PTs Showclub)
In October 2008,
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, Kentucky was required to conduct a
self-audit of employee payroll by the Department of Labor
(DOL). After an extensive self-audit, it was
determined that (a) the club incorrectly paid certain
employees for hours worked and minimum wage amounts and
(b) the club incorrectly charged certain minimum wage
employees for their uniforms. As a result, the DOL required that
the club issue back pay and refund uniform expenses to qualified
employees at a total cost of $14,439.
In March 2009, VCG was placed under a similar nationwide DOL
audit for all nightclub locations and its corporate office. All
locations completed the self-audit in August 2009 and are
currently working with the DOL to determine what, if any,
violations may have occurred. A summary meeting was held with
the DOL and Company counsel on March 19, 2010. The DOL
presented its preliminary findings of violations. A meeting was
held on May 20, 2010 in which DOL and Company counsel
agreed to continue negotiations at a later date. The Company
believes it has corrected all processes that resulted in the
potential violations. This case is still in the investigatory
state and no final determination can be made at this time of the
outcome or any potential liability. After discussion with
Company counsel on this case, the Company accrued $200,000 as of
December 31, 2009, for potential wage/hour violations. This
accrual and any estimate of potential liability have not changed
as of September 30, 2010. The Company expected a resolution
of this audit by August 30, 2010, but with the DOL
administrative change in investigators, the settlement
negotiation has now been extended. The Company expects to have a
resolution by November 30, 2010.
Texas
Sales Tax Audit
The Texas Comptrollers Office is conducting a sales and
use tax audit of Manana Entertainment, Inc., the entity
operating Jaguars Gold Club in Dallas, Texas, for the time
period beginning with the clubs
E-15
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
acquisition in April 2008 and ending in November 2009. The audit
commenced in March 2010. The primary focus of the audit is the
taxability of revenue received by Manana Entertainment, Inc.
with respect to independent contractor entertainer fees, credit
card sales of dance dollars and use tax.
In July 2010, the Company received notice from the Texas
Comptrollers Office that the audit period would be
extended to include the period of October 1, 2006 to
April 1, 2008, which period pre-dates the Companys
ownership of the club. Under the purchase agreement under which
the Company acquired the club, the Company is fully indemnified
by the seller for any liability arising for the additional
period.
The audit is incomplete; however, the Company accrued
approximately $107,000 at March 31, 2010 of additional
sales taxes for the period from the clubs acquisition in
April 2008 through November 2009, an additional $4,000 at
June 30, 2010 and an additional $4,000 at
September 30, 2010. Management intends to vigorously defend
the sales tax returns that is has previously filed during the
audit period in the administrative review process.
Litigation
Associated with the Proposed Going Private
Transaction
On August 13, 2010, the Company received a complaint filed
in Colorado state court, First Judicial District, Jefferson
County District Court challenging the Proposal (as defined in
Note 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements). The complaint was filed by David Cohen,
Timothy Cunningham, Gene Harris, Dean R. Jakubczak and William
C. Steppacher, Jr. derivatively on behalf of the Company
and as a class action on behalf of themselves and other
similarly situated shareholders against Troy Lowrie, each of the
individual members of the Companys Board of Directors and
the Company (as a nominal defendant). In the complaint, the
plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the individual
Directors breached their fiduciary duties under Colorado law and
that Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest in connection
with the Proposal. The plaintiffs seek, among other relief,
certification of the lawsuit as a class action with the
plaintiffs as class representatives, an injunction preventing
the Companys Board of Directors from accepting the
Proposal, an order requiring the Directors to fulfill their
fiduciary duties, an accounting of alleged damages if the
Companys Board of Directors accepts the Proposal and an
award of the plaintiffs attorneys and experts
fees.
To the best of the Companys knowledge, as of the date
hereof, neither the Company nor any of the individual defendants
have been served with process. On October 19, 2010, the
court issued an Order re Failure to Prosecute, directing the
plaintiffs to show cause why the complaint should not be
dismissed for failure to prosecute and giving the plaintiffs
until November 19, 2010 to make such a showing, in the
absence of which the case will be dismissed without prejudice
and without further notice. The Company believes that the
allegations set forth in the complaint are baseless and intends
to mount a vigorous defense if and when process is served.
Johnson
Litigation
On October 27, 2010, a complaint was filed against the
Company in the United States District Court for the District of
Maine, Case
No. 2:10-cv-00442
in a lawsuit captioned Johnson et al. v. VCG Holding Corp..
The company has not been formally served with the lawsuit,
however, the company, via its attorneys, has agreed to accept
service of the Complaint.
The complaint was filed by two former employees of one of the
Companys subsidiaries, KenKev II, Inc. d/b/a
PTs
®
Showclub Portland, Maine who allege that the Company
misclassified them as tipped minimum wage employees while
employed by the Company as disk jockeys and, as a result, failed
to pay all wages due to them under applicable law. The action is
plead as a class action, pursuant to Section 216(b) of the
Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 216(b)), and seeks to
certify a class action on behalf of all similarly situated
E-16
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
employees who are employed by the Company nationwide. In
addition, the two named plaintiffs allege that the Company
failed to pay them all wages required to be paid to them under
Maine law.
The Company intends to deny all liability in this matter,
however, it is cautioned that this matter is in its earliest
stages and the Companys ultimate liability cannot be
predicted at this time. As such, the Company has not accrued
anything related to this action.
Louisville
Ordinance Litigation
In 2004, Kentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc. d/b/a
PTs
®
Showclub (KRC) filed suit in the Jefferson County
Circuit Court challenging a recently enacted adult regulatory
ordinance which would impose significant restrictions on adult
entertainment in Jefferson County, Kentucky. The suit challenged
the legality, under the Kentucky State Constitution, of certain
restrictions that Jefferson County was seeking to impose on
adult businesses, such as a substantial restriction on hours of
operation, a prohibition on the sale of alcohol by adult
entertainment establishments, and other similar restrictions,
which in the view of management would likely result in decreased
revenues. Initially a temporary injunction was issued
prohibiting enforcement of the ordinance during the litigation.
After substantial litigation, the Jefferson County Circuit Court
upheld the constitutionality of the ordinance, but granted a
stay on its implementation pending appeal. KRC along with other
co-appellants appealed the order to the Kentucky Court of Appeal
who affirmed the constitutionality of the ordinance. Thereafter,
KRC and others appealed the decision to the Kentucky Supreme
Court which held oral argument on the appeal in 2009. On
April 22, 2010 the Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed in part,
reversed in part and remanded the case to the lower court. The
Kentucky Supreme Courts ruling upheld the
constitutionality of a majority of the restrictions. KRC and
others have appealed the Kentucky Supreme Courts decision
to the United States Supreme Court.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company is
involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The Company believes that any
adverse or positive outcome of any of these proceedings will not
have a material effect on the consolidated operations of the
Company.
Guaranty
of Real Property Loan
On July 31, 2009, VCG Real Estate Holdings, Inc. (VCG
Real Estate) sold a piece of real property located in
Phoenix, Arizona to Black Canyon Highway LLC, a Texas limited
liability company (Black Canyon). The property was
transferred subject to a loan made by Sacred Ground Resources
LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (Sacred
Ground), to VCG Real Estate at the time of VCG Real
Estates acquisition of the property from Sacred Ground.
Black Canyon assumed VCG Real Estates obligations under
the Sacred Ground loan as a part of the sale of the real
property and the Company remains as a guarantor on the loan in
the event of default by Black Canyon. Black Canyon has agreed to
indemnify the Company from any losses arising from the guaranty.
As of September 30, 2010, the balance owed by Black Canyon
to Sacred Ground was approximately $1,635,000.
Capitalized
Leases
In May 2010, the Company entered into a capital lease for a
vehicle in the amount of $48,977. Accumulated amortization of
the vehicle amounted to $2,134 for the three month period and
$3,213 for the
E-17
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
nine month period ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
The current minimum annual commitment under the lease is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ending September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
11,450
|
|
2012
|
|
|
11,450
|
|
2013
|
|
|
11,450
|
|
2014
|
|
|
21,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
|
55,788
|
|
Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(9,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future minimum payments
|
|
|
46,158
|
|
Current portion of lease obligation
|
|
|
7,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation under capital lease
|
|
$
|
38,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Potential
Sale of Company
|
On July 20, 2010, the Company received a non-binding
proposal (the Proposal) from Parent (as defined
below) and Lowrie LLLP to acquire all of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock (other than the shares held by Parent, its
affiliates and certain other investors) for $2.10 per share in
cash (the Acquisition). The Proposal contemplated
that the Company would no longer be a public reporting or
trading company following the closing of the Acquisition. The
Companys Board of Directors formed the Special Committee
(as defined below) to evaluate the Proposal. On August 20,
2010, the Special Committee informed Mr. Lowrie that it had
determined, with input from its advisors, that the terms of the
Proposal were currently inadequate. In addition, the Special
Committee directed its financial advisors, North Point Advisors
LLC, to begin to contact any parties that had either previously
expressed an interest or might potentially be interested in
pursuing a transaction with the Company. These contacts did not
result in any superior proposal or alternative transactions.
The Company continued its negotiations with the investors behind
the Proposal.
As a result, on November 9, 2010, the Company entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) with Family Dog, LLC (Parent), FD
Acquisition Co. (Merger Sub), the Companys
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive, Troy Lowrie, and the
Companys President and Chief Operating Officer, Micheal
Ocello. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will
be merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing
as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Parent (the Merger). Parent and Merger
Sub are currently owned and controlled by Mr. Lowrie.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as of the effective time of
the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of the
Companys common stock, par value $0.0001 per share
(collectively, the Common Stock), except for any
shares of Common Stock held by Parent and Dissenting Shares (as
such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) will be converted
into the right to receive a cash payment in the amount of $2.25
per share, without interest (the Merger
Consideration).
The Companys Board of Directors (with Troy Lowrie
abstaining from voting) unanimously approved the Merger and the
Merger Agreement following the unanimous recommendation of a
special committee comprised entirely of independent members of
the Companys Board of Directors (the Special
Committee). Before the Companys Board of Directors
unanimously approved the Merger and the Merger Agreement, the
Special Committee and the Companys Board of Directors
received an opinion from an independent financial advisor to the
effect that, based on and subject to the various assumptions and
qualifications set forth therein,
E-18
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
as of the date of such opinion, the Merger Consideration to be
received by the Companys shareholders in the Merger is
fair to such shareholders from a financial perspective.
The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of
2011. Upon the closing of the Merger, the Companys Common
Stock will no longer be traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market and
the Company will cease reporting to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The terms of the Merger and the Merger Agreement are more fully
set forth in the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 10, 2010. The Company cautions investors
that no assurance can be given that the Merger will be
consummated.
|
|
11.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that
could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are
marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to
offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction
costs. We adopted
ASC 820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
on
January 1, 2008. This guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework to measure fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC 820-10
establishes a fair value hierarchy used to prioritize the
quality and reliability of the information used to determine
fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into
the following three categories:
Level 1:
Quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:
Observable market based inputs
or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are not
corroborated by market data.
The carrying value of cash, other receivables and accounts
payable at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these
instruments. As of September 30, 2010, our total debt was
approximately $26,038,000 and our fair value was approximately
$25,516,000. As of December 31, 2009, our total debt was
approximately $30,747,000 and our fair value was approximately
$29,748,000. The fair value of the debt was estimated using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and was
computed using a discounted cash flow model using estimated
market rates, adjusted for our credit risk as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Our disclosure of the estimated fair value of our financial
instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of
ASC 825-10,
Financial Instruments
. The estimated fair value amounts
have been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is required to interpret market data in order to
develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts
we could realize in a current market exchange. The use of
different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may
have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The
fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent
information available to management as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
On November 2, 2010, the Company extended the maturity
dates of four loans from third parties, in an aggregate
principal amount of approximately $350,000, all with the
original maturity date of November 15, 2010. In all
instances, the notes were transformed into demand notes. No
other changes were made to the terms of these promissory notes.
The Company has reported these promissory notes as current
portion of long-term debt in the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
E-19
VCG
HOLDING CORP.
Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On November 2, 2010, the Company prepaid two loans in full
from a third party in the amount of $200,000, evidenced by two
promissory notes bearing interest at 10%. These notes were
unsecured. The maturity dates were November 15, 2010.
On November 2, 2010, the Company prepaid a loan in full
from a third party in the amount of $100,000, evidenced by a
promissory note bearing interest at 11%. This note was secured
by the general assets of the Company and the cash flow and 100%
of the shares of common stock of Manana Entertainment, Inc. The
maturity date was November 15, 2010.
On November 6, 2010, the Company extended the maturity date
on a loan from a third party with a current balance of $150,000,
with the original maturity date of November 6, 2010. The
note was transformed into a demand note. No other changes were
made to the terms of the note. The Company reported this
promissory note as current portion of long-term debt in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 9, 2010, the Company entered into the Merger
Agreement, as more fully described in Note 10 of the Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Potential Sale of Company.
E-20
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The information set forth under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) presents significant factors affecting
our consolidated operating results, financial condition,
liquidity and capital resources that occurred during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The
MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere
in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
The MD&A in the Companys Annual Report
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and filed with the
SEC on March 12, 2010, should also be referred to when
reading this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information and
Statements
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains certain forward-looking statements and, for this
purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements
of historical fact are intended to be forward-looking
statements with the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Without limiting the foregoing,
words such as may, will,
expect, believe, anticipate,
intend, estimate, continue,
or comparable terminology, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature
involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of
which are not within our control. These factors include, but are
not limited to, costs and liabilities associated with the
litigation related to the Proposal and the Acquisition,
diversion of managements attention caused by the
litigation related to the Proposal, the occurrence of any event,
change or other circumstance that could give rise to the
termination of the Merger Agreement, the outcome of any legal
proceedings that have been or may be in the future instituted
against the Company and others following announcement of the
Merger Agreement, the inability to complete the Merger due to
the failure to obtain shareholder approval or satisfy other
conditions to the closing of the merger, failure of any party to
the Merger Agreement to abide by the terms of that agreement,
risks that the Merger, including the uncertainty surrounding the
closing of the Merger, will disrupt the current plans and
operations of the Company, including as a result of undue
distraction of management and personnel retention problems, the
amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the
merger, including the impact of any termination fees the Company
may incur, which may be substantial, our limited operating
history making our future operating results difficult to
predict, the availability of, and costs associated with,
potential sources of financing, disruptions in the credit
markets, economic conditions generally and in the geographical
markets in which we may participate, our inability to manage
growth, difficulties associated with integrating acquired
businesses into our operations, geographic market concentration,
legislation and government regulations affecting us and our
industry, competition within our industry, our failure to
promote our brands, our failure to protect our brands, the loss
of senior management and key personnel, potential conflicts of
interest between us and Troy Lowrie, our Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer, our failure to comply with
licensing requirements applicable to our business, liability
from unsanctioned, unlawful conduct at our nightclubs, the
negative perception of our industry, the failure of our business
strategy to generate sufficient revenues, liability from
uninsured risks or risks not covered by insurance proceeds,
claims for indemnification from officers and directors,
deterrence of a change of control because of our ability to
issue securities or from the severance payment terms of certain
employment agreements with senior management, our failure to
meet the NASDAQ continued listing requirements, the failure of
securities analysts to cover our common stock, our failure to
comply with securities laws when issuing securities, our common
stock being a penny stock, our intention not to pay dividends on
our common stock, our future issuance of common stock depressing
the sale price of our common stock or diluting existing
stockholders, the limited trading market for, and volatile price
of, our common stock, and our inability to comply with rules and
regulations applicable to public companies.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made
and are based on certain assumptions and expectations which may
or may not be valid or actually occur and which involve various
risks and uncertainties.
Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not
undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update
any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences,
developments, unanticipated events or circumstances after the
date of such statement.
E-21
General
Overview
It is our desire to provide all parties who may read this
MD&A with an understanding of the Companys past
performance, its financial condition and its prospects in the
future. Accordingly, we will discuss and provide our analysis of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of the business.
|
|
|
|
Critical accounting policies.
|
|
|
|
Recently issued pronouncements.
|
|
|
|
Results of operations.
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and capital resources.
|
Our Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Colorado in 1998, but did not begin its operations until April
2002. As of September 30, 2010, the Company, through its
subsidiaries, owns nineteen adult nightclubs that offer quality
live adult entertainment, and restaurant and bar operations. Our
clubs are located in Colorado, California, Florida, Illinois,
Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina, Maine and Texas.
We believe maximum profitability and sustained growth in the
industry is obtained by owning and operating upscale adult
clubs. Our current strategy is to acquire upscale adult clubs in
areas that are not market saturated and where the public is open
to these types of establishments. Another part of our growth
strategy is to achieve club clustering. Adult clubs
tend to group together in their respective markets. We believe
that clustering our clubs leads to improved brand recognition,
as well as improvement in economies of scale as costs of
marketing and management are spread over more clubs. Clustering
also provides the Company with the ability to disperse
management expertise to more locations under their
responsibility.
Overview
of Business
The Company classifies its clubs into three tiers called A, B,
and C clubs. Type A club characteristics include
larger facilities with a variety of entertainment and
performers. A clubs include a restaurant with an
onsite chef preparer. Furthermore, A clubs offer
high-label cigars, VIP facilities, and specialty suites. Type
B clubs have smaller facilities. Food service is
limited or not provided, but the facility serves alcohol. Both
Type A and Type B clubs are topless
format. Type C clubs do not provide alcoholic
beverages except for some locations that follow the Bring
Your Own Bottle (B.Y.O.B) format. These clubs
are all-nude format.
E-22
Since we began operations, we have acquired the following clubs:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Club
|
|
Date Acquired
|
|
Club Type
|
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Indianapolis, Indiana
|
|
2002
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Brooklyn in Brooklyn, Illinois
|
|
2002
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
All Nude in Denver, Colorado
|
|
2004
|
|
C
|
The Penthouse
Club
®
in Glendale, Colorado
|
|
2004
|
|
A
|
Diamond
Cabaret
®
in Denver, Colorado
|
|
2004
|
|
A
|
PTs
®
Appaloosa in Colorado Springs, Colorado
|
|
October 2006
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Denver, Colorado
|
|
December 2006
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, Kentucky
|
|
January 2007
|
|
B
|
Roxys in Brooklyn, Illinois
|
|
February 2007
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Centreville, Illinois
|
|
February 2007
|
|
B
|
PTs
®
Sports Cabaret in Sauget, Illinois
|
|
March 2007
|
|
B
|
The Penthouse
Club
®
in Sauget, Illinois
|
|
March 2007
|
|
A
|
The Mens
Club
®
in Raleigh, North Carolina
|
|
April 2007
|
|
A
|
Schieks Palace Royale in Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
|
May 2007
|
|
A
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Portland, Maine
|
|
September 2007
|
|
B
|
Jaguars Gold Club in Ft. Worth, Texas
(Ft. Worth Club)*
|
|
September 2007
|
|
C
|
PTs
®
Showclub in Hialeah, Florida
|
|
October 2007
|
|
B
|
LaBoheme Gentlemens Club in Denver, Colorado
|
|
December 2007
|
|
B
|
Jaguars Gold Club in Dallas, Texas (Manana)
|
|
April 2008
|
|
C
|
Imperial Showgirls Gentlemens Club in Anaheim, California
|
|
July 2008
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
- sold on July 16, 2010
|
The Company owns International Entertainment Consultants, Inc.
(IEC), which provides management services to our
clubs. IEC was originally formed in 1980. At the time of
acquisition in October 2003, IEC was owned by Troy Lowrie, our
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
The
day-to-day
management of our clubs is conducted through IEC. IEC provides
the clubs with management and supervisory personnel to oversee
operations, hires and contracts all operating personnel,
establishes club policies and procedures, handles compliance
monitoring, purchasing, accounting and other administrative
services, and prepares financial and operating reports and
income tax returns. IEC charges the clubs a management fee based
on the Companys common expenses that are incurred in
maintaining these functions.
In June 2002, the Company formed VCG Real Estate Holdings, Inc.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns the land and buildings
housing two of our clubs.
The Company has one reportable segment. Our clubs are
distinguished by the following features:
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
Our club facilities are
within ready access to the principal business, tourist
and/or
commercial districts in the metropolitan areas in which they are
located. The facilities have state of the art sound systems,
lighting and professional stage design. Our clubs maintain an
upscale level of décor and furnishings to create a
professional appearance. Three of our clubs offer VIP rooms. Our
VIP rooms are open to individuals who purchase annual
memberships. They offer a higher level of service and are
elegantly appointed and spacious.
|
|
|
|
Professional
On-Site
Management
Our clubs are managed by persons
who are experienced in the restaurant
and/or
hospitality industry. The managers of the clubs are responsible
for maintaining a quality and professionally run club. At a
higher level, our Area Directors oversee the management of
|
E-23
|
|
|
|
|
several clubs within a specified geographical area. The Company
currently has 12 Area Directors each of who has between 17 to
25 years of experience in the industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food and Beverage Operations
Five of
our clubs offer a first-class bar and food service. At most
locations, we provide a selective variety of food including, but
not limited to, hot and cold appetizers, pizza and other limited
food choices. Three of our club operations do not have liquor
licenses. One of our clubs holds a B.Y.O.B. permit and sells
non-alcoholic beverages. Experienced chef and bar managers are
responsible for training, supervising, staffing and operating
the food and beverage operations at each club.
|
|
|
|
Entertainment
Our clubs provide a high
standard of attractive, talented and courteous performers and
servers. We maintain the highest standards for appearance,
attitude, demeanor, dress and personality. The entertainment
encourages repeat visits and increases the average length of a
patrons stay. We prefer that performers at our clubs be
experienced entertainers.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
The following discussion and analysis of the results of
operations and financial condition are based on the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements that have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our significant
accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to
the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. However, certain
accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to
the understanding of our financial position and results of
operations and require the application of significant judgment
by us. Further, such accounting policies and estimates can be
materially affected by changes from period to period by economic
factors or conditions that are outside our control. As a result,
our accounting policies and estimates are subject to an inherent
degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we use our
judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in
the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are
based on our historical operations, future business plans,
projected financial results, terms of existing contracts,
observance of trends in the industry, information provided by
our customers and information available from other outside
sources, as may be appropriate. Actual results may differ from
these estimates. Those critical accounting policies are
discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Position and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies, which is a part of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2010, the SEC issued Release
33-9142
which amended the SECs rules and forms to remove the
requirement for issuers that are neither accelerated filers nor
large accelerated filers to obtain an auditor attestation report
on internal control over financial reporting. Therefore, smaller
reporting companies such as VCG will not need their auditors to
test internal controls; however, management will still need to
do its assessment for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Although VCG obtained an audit opinion on the Companys
internal controls over financial reporting for the year ended
December 31, 2009, we do not plan on obtaining the opinion
for the year ended December 31, 2010 due to this change in
the requirement.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.
This update provides amendment to the codification regarding
the disclosures required for fair value measurements. The key
amendments include: (a) a requirement to disclose transfer
in and out of Level 1 and 2; (b) activity in
Level 3 should show information about purchases, sales,
settlements, etc. on a gross basis rather than as net basis; and
(c) additional disclosures about inputs and valuation
techniques. The new disclosure requirements are effective for
periods beginning after December 31, 2009, except for the
gross disclosures of purchases, etc. which is effective for
periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company
adopted this update on January 1, 2010, and it did not have
a significant impact on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
E-24
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-02,
Consolidation (Topic 810) Accounting and
Reporting for Decreases in Ownership
of a
Subsidiary a Scope Clarification. This update
provides clarification about Topic 810 (previously Statement of
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
) and
clarifies that the de-recognition provisions of Topic 810 apply
to (a) a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business
or nonprofit activity, (b) a subsidiary that is a business
or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method
investee or joint venture, and (c) an exchange of a group
of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for
a noncontrolling interest in an entity. This update is effective
for the first reporting period beginning after December 15,
2009. The Company adopted this update effective January 1,
2010, and it did not have a significant impact on the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-17,
Consolidation (Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable
Interest Entities.
This update amends Topic 810 and is a
result of SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140
. This standard did not have a significant
impact on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements when it was adopted on January 1, 2010.
Results
of Operations Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009
The following sets forth a comparison of the components of the
results of our continuing operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of alcoholic beverages
|
|
$
|
5,387,645
|
|
|
$
|
5,708,126
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
16,027,165
|
|
|
$
|
17,434,580
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)%
|
Sales of food and merchandise
|
|
|
489,197
|
|
|
|
447,336
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,509,420
|
|
|
|
1,370,706
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
7,723,924
|
|
|
|
6,448,750
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
21,822,139
|
|
|
|
19,146,956
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
783,420
|
|
|
|
804,461
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
|
2,335,182
|
|
|
|
2,260,070
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
14,384,186
|
|
|
|
13,408,673
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
41,693,906
|
|
|
|
40,212,312
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,505,342
|
|
|
|
1,438,489
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,540,244
|
|
|
|
4,410,656
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
3,985,303
|
|
|
|
3,489,669
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
11,779,614
|
|
|
|
10,299,234
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Impairment of building and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,000
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Contingent indemnification claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,135,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Other general and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes, permits and licenses
|
|
|
740,395
|
|
|
|
1,152,838
|
|
|
|
(35.8
|
)%
|
|
|
2,345,866
|
|
|
|
2,699,480
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)%
|
Charge card and bank fees
|
|
|
189,909
|
|
|
|
188,352
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
537,311
|
|
|
|
593,736
|
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
Rent
|
|
|
1,480,475
|
|
|
|
1,385,492
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
4,369,882
|
|
|
|
4,153,523
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
307,160
|
|
|
|
188,651
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,236,619
|
|
|
|
869,171
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
553,969
|
|
|
|
704,737
|
|
|
|
(21.4
|
)%
|
|
|
1,945,703
|
|
|
|
2,062,041
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
Advisory fees related to change in control proposals
|
|
|
121,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
136,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
645,320
|
|
|
|
653,170
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
1,955,019
|
|
|
|
1,935,202
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
409,023
|
|
|
|
435,374
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)%
|
|
|
1,324,195
|
|
|
|
1,218,718
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Utilities
|
|
|
278,253
|
|
|
|
268,851
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
748,649
|
|
|
|
754,679
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
276,831
|
|
|
|
240,291
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
814,902
|
|
|
|
806,142
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
868,197
|
|
|
|
882,048
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
2,742,326
|
|
|
|
2,676,090
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
427,449
|
|
|
|
393,918
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,264,971
|
|
|
|
1,194,377
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
11,789,255
|
|
|
|
11,421,880
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
37,877,067
|
|
|
|
33,941,049
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations
|
|
|
2,594,931
|
|
|
|
1,986,793
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,816,839
|
|
|
|
6,271,263
|
|
|
|
(39.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Other Income (Expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(512,802
|
)
|
|
|
(695,441
|
)
|
|
|
(26.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1,579,626
|
)
|
|
|
(2,151,699
|
)
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)%
|
Interest expense, related party
|
|
|
(181,126
|
)
|
|
|
(142,522
|
)
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
(541,700
|
)
|
|
|
(530,067
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
4,572
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
(68,784
|
)
|
|
|
(103.9
|
)%
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
(57,363
|
)
|
|
|
(101.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income (Expenses)
|
|
|
(690,046
|
)
|
|
|
(902,247
|
)
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(2,114,894
|
)
|
|
|
(2,734,557
|
)
|
|
|
(22.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,904,885
|
|
|
|
1,084,546
|
|
|
|
75.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,701,945
|
|
|
|
3,536,706
|
|
|
|
(51.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) current
|
|
|
(21,900
|
)
|
|
|
(92,189
|
)
|
|
|
(76.2
|
)%
|
|
|
100,100
|
|
|
|
81,054
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
Income tax expense deferred
|
|
|
399,348
|
|
|
|
417,435
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
411,000
|
|
|
|
1,110,101
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes
|
|
|
377,448
|
|
|
|
325,246
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
511,100
|
|
|
|
1,191,155
|
|
|
|
(57.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
1,527,437
|
|
|
|
759,300
|
|
|
|
101.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,190,845
|
|
|
|
2,345,551
|
|
|
|
(49.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
|
|
|
523,646
|
|
|
|
35,770
|
|
|
|
1363.9
|
%
|
|
|
472,812
|
|
|
|
96,974
|
|
|
|
387.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit of Consolidated and Affiliated Companies
|
|
|
2,051,083
|
|
|
|
795,070
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,663,657
|
|
|
|
2,442,525
|
|
|
|
(31.9
|
)%
|
Less Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
(132,601
|
)
|
|
|
(162,843
|
)
|
|
|
(18.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(357,321
|
)
|
|
|
(394,842
|
)
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to VCG
|
|
$
|
1,918,482
|
|
|
$
|
632,227
|
|
|
|
203.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,306,336
|
|
|
$
|
2,047,683
|
|
|
|
(36.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
The Companys revenue from clubs is comprised of funds
received from the sale of alcoholic beverages, food and
merchandise, service revenue and other income. The Company
recognizes sales revenue at
point-of-sale
(POS) upon receipt of cash or charge card.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, sales of
alcoholic beverages decreased by approximately $320,000 or 5.6%
compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, service revenue decreased by
approximately $1,407,000 or 8.1% compared to the same period in
2009. Sales of alcoholic beverages are down due to the general
weakness in economic conditions but are beginning to show
recovery from the previous quarter.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, sales of
food and merchandise increased by approximately $42,000 or 9.4%
compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, sales of food and merchandise increased
by approximately $139,000 or 10.1% compared to the same period
in 2009. Prior to 2009, VCG had subleased the kitchen and
outsourced the food service to experienced chefs (food
vendors) at four of our five A type clubs (the
fifth club continues to run the kitchen and account for all food
costs). This arrangement provides better food service to
customers with no risk of loss to VCG. Since the installations
of the POS systems in our clubs between October 2009 and
February 2010, the food vendors elected to use our POS systems
to facilitate credit card processing, whereas before, the food
revenue and related costs were being handled separately by the
food vendors. VCG pays the food revenue, net of any out of
pocket costs to the vendor. The new arrangement still represents
a breakeven food operation for VCG; however, now food sales and
cost of sales are being recorded by VCG.
Service revenues include entertainer payments to perform at the
Companys clubs, customer admission fees, customer payments
for tabs, dance dollar payments and suite rental fees. Service
revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2010
increased by approximately $1,275,000 or 19.8% compared to the
third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, service revenue increased by
approximately $2,675,000 or 14.0% compared to the same period in
2009. The increase in service revenue for both the three months
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the
same periods in 2009 was due to increased promotions for
tableside back rubs (TLC) and table dances.
E-26
Other income consists of fees charged for usage of ATM machines
located in clubs, VIP memberships, valet parking fees, various
fees at the clubs for services, revenue from special events, and
non-club revenue of rent received from unrelated third parties
occupying a portion of our Indianapolis, Indiana building. For
the three months ended September 30, 2010, other income
decreased by approximately $21,000 or 2.6% compared to the third
quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30,
2010, other income increased by approximately $75,000 or 3.3%
compared to the same period in 2009. The increase for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 is due to increased usage
of ATM machines and increased third party rent received for the
Indianapolis, Indiana building.
Total revenue, net of sales taxes, for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $975,000 or
7.3% compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, total revenue, net of sales
taxes, increased by approximately $1,482,000 or 3.7% compared to
the same period in 2009. The increases for both periods are
mainly due to an increase in service revenue for such periods as
a result of the promotions described above.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company
had fifteen clubs reporting same club increases ranging from
1.3% to 38.7% compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company had
twelve clubs reporting same club increases ranging from 2.5% to
23.2% compared to the same period in 2009.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Costs of goods sold, comprised of food, alcohol and merchandise
expenses, are variable and generally fluctuate with sales. For
the three months ended September 30, 2010, cost of goods
sold as a percentage of related revenue was approximately
$1.5 million, or 25.6%, compared to approximately
$1.4 million, or 23.4%, in the third quarter of 2009. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cost of goods
sold as a percentage of the related revenue was approximately
$4.5 million, or 25.9%, compared to approximately
$4.4 million, or 23.5%, compared to the same period in
2009. This increase is due to the change in reporting of food
sales and related cost of goods sold as described above. The
outsourced food revenue is reduced by appropriate sales taxes,
credit card fees and other directly related charges. The cost of
food and preparation materials is reported under cost of goods
sold. The food sales, net of any costs paid by VCG, are paid out
to the food vendors and are recorded in cost of goods sold.
Other ancillary costs associated with running a restaurant, such
as wait-staff payroll, restaurant supplies and licenses, are
paid directly by the food vendors out of the net sales proceeds.
The following table is a comparison of our cost of goods sold
and its percentage relative to revenue for our A
clubs that have subleased restaurants and relative to all other
clubs that do not operate restaurants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
A Clubs
|
|
|
All Other Clubs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
A Clubs
|
|
|
All Other Clubs
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Sales of alcoholic beverages
|
|
$
|
5,387,645
|
|
|
$
|
2,088,488
|
|
|
$
|
3,299,157
|
|
|
$
|
5,708,126
|
|
|
$
|
2,224,218
|
|
|
$
|
3,483,908
|
|
Sales of food and merchandise
|
|
|
489,197
|
|
|
|
260,851
|
|
|
|
228,346
|
|
|
|
447,336
|
|
|
|
242,655
|
|
|
|
204,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,876,842
|
|
|
$
|
2,349,339
|
|
|
$
|
3,527,503
|
|
|
$
|
6,155,462
|
|
|
$
|
2,466,873
|
|
|
$
|
3,688,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
1,505,342
|
|
|
$
|
644,450
|
|
|
$
|
860,892
|
|
|
$
|
1,438,489
|
|
|
$
|
606,219
|
|
|
$
|
832,270
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
E-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
A Clubs
|
|
|
All Other Clubs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
A Clubs
|
|
|
All Other Clubs
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Sales of alcoholic beverages
|
|
$
|
16,027,165
|
|
|
$
|
6,136,339
|
|
|
$
|
9,890,826
|
|
|
$
|
17,434,580
|
|
|
$
|
6,803,878
|
|
|
$
|
10,630,702
|
|
Sales of food and merchandise
|
|
|
1,509,420
|
|
|
|
787,709
|
|
|
|
721,711
|
|
|
|
1,370,706
|
|
|
|
723,447
|
|
|
|
647,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,536,585
|
|
|
$
|
6,924,048
|
|
|
$
|
10,612,537
|
|
|
$
|
18,805,286
|
|
|
$
|
7,527,325
|
|
|
$
|
11,277,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
4,540,244
|
|
|
$
|
1,948,460
|
|
|
$
|
2,591,784
|
|
|
$
|
4,410,656
|
|
|
$
|
1,825,792
|
|
|
$
|
2,584,864
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
In the tables above you will notice when A club
restaurants cost of goods sold data is removed from the
total, the cost of goods percentage relative to revenues for all
other clubs drops to 24.4% of related revenue for the three
months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of cost of
sales to revenue percentage relative to revenues for all other
clubs is 1.8%, calculated by comparing 24.4% to 21.8% for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The year to date increase of cost of sales to
revenue percentage relative to revenues for all other clubs is
1.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, when
compared to the same period in 2009.
Salaries
and Wages
Salaries and wages include hourly wages, management salaries,
and bonuses. For the three months ended September 30, 2010,
salaries and wages increased by approximately $496,000 or 14.2%
compared to the third quarter in 2009. This increase was driven
by the additional commission paid to TLC employees, which
corresponds to an increase in service revenue. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, salaries and wages
increased by approximately $1,480,000 or 14.4% compared to the
same period in 2009. This increase is attributable to
commissions paid of approximately $593,000 to the TLC employees
with a corresponding increase in TLC revenue of approximately
$728,000, increased supervisor salaries, the fee structure used
to compensate entertainers in Minnesota and a severance payment
made to a departing executive officer.
The following is a comparison of salaries and wages for the
three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, showing the percentages of salaries and
wages expenses compared to total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
$
|
3,985,303
|
|
|
$
|
3,489,669
|
|
|
$
|
11,779,614
|
|
|
$
|
10,299,234
|
|
As a percentage of revenue
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
Other
General and Administrative Expenses
Taxes,
Permits, and Licenses
This category includes employment taxes, costs associated with
business licenses and permits, real and personal property taxes
and the Texas Patron Tax.
E-28
The following table shows the breakdown of the amounts paid for
taxes, permits and licenses for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Employment Taxes
|
|
$
|
471,200
|
|
|
$
|
922,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,439,824
|
|
|
$
|
1,932,382
|
|
Business License
|
|
|
69,248
|
|
|
|
65,722
|
|
|
|
320,170
|
|
|
|
179,341
|
|
Property Taxes
|
|
|
164,122
|
|
|
|
129,189
|
|
|
|
469,331
|
|
|
|
473,249
|
|
Texas Patron Tax Expense
|
|
|
35,825
|
|
|
|
35,358
|
|
|
|
116,541
|
|
|
|
114,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
740,395
|
|
|
$
|
1,152,838
|
|
|
$
|
2,345,866
|
|
|
$
|
2,699,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment taxes are based on wages plus reported tips.
Employment taxes decreased by approximately $451,000 or 48.9%
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, employment taxes decreased by
approximately $493,000 or 25.5% compared to the same period in
2009. The decrease for both periods results from an overly
conservative accrual at September 30, 2009 of $455,000 for
an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tip audit of the
calendar years 2006 through 2009 which had just commenced.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company paid $61,500 for
the first Denver club which had been audited. Based upon the
Companys self-audit, the accrual was reversed by $187,000
at December 31, 2009. Based upon IRS audit results, the
accrual was further reversed by $55,000 at March 31, 2010.
The final liability assessed by the IRS on the remaining clubs
was approximately $151,000 which was paid in June 2010. VCG
acted promptly upon the IRS auditors recommendation to
install a POS system in every club to ensure compliance with IRS
regulations.
Business licenses expense includes costs of maintaining liquor,
cabaret and other general business licenses. The business
licenses expense increased by approximately $4,000 or 5.4% for
the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the
third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, business license expense increased by
approximately $141,000 or 78.5% compared to the same period in
2009. This increase is attributable to the Texas Sales Tax Audit
of Manana further discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities. The audit is
still incomplete; however, the Company has accrued approximately
$115,000 during 2010, of which $4,000 was accrued in the third
quarter 2010.
The Company pays real and personal property taxes on all the
clubs the Company operates. Property taxes increased by
approximately $35,000 or 27.0% compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to the third quarter in
2009. The increase in the third quarter 2010 compared to the
third quarter 2009 resulted from a slight increase in the
property taxes on most of our clubs in 2010 and because in 2009
the Company renegotiated property taxes on two of our Illinois
resulting in a credit being issued in 2009 while no credits were
issued in 2010. Property taxes decreased by approximately $4,000
or 1.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009.
The Company continues to accrue the Texas Patron Tax and to file
quarterly returns, under protest, with the State of Texas as
discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements under Commitments and
Contingent Liabilities.
Charge
Card and Bank Fees
Credit card and bank fees include chargebacks to the Company.
The credit card and bank fees increased by approximately $2,000
or 0.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, credit card and bank fees decreased by
approximately $56,000 or 9.5% compared to the same period in
2009. The decrease is a result of decreased use of credit card
at most of our clubs and the Companys purchase of the ATM
machine located in our California club and no longer paying fees
to a third party for its maintenance.
E-29
Rent
Rent expense includes rent payments to landlords, deferred rent
recorded per
Accounting Codification
840-10
and
840-20
and the amortization of leasehold rights and liabilities.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, rent expense
increased by approximately $95,000 or 6.9% compared to the third
quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30,
2010 rent expense increased by approximately $216,000 or
5.2% compared to the same period in 2009. The increase for both
periods is attributable to normal rent increases, including rent
increases where rent is based on a percentage of sales.
Legal
Fees
Legal fees increased by approximately $118,000 or 62.8% for the
three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the
third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, legal fees increased by approximately
$367,000 or 42.3% compared to the same period in 2009. This
increase is primarily the result of the Thee Dollhouse vs.
Regale litigation, (see Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities), costs
related to the special investigation discussed under Item 4
Controls and Procedures in the section entitled
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and an
additional expense of approximately $75,000 for legal fees
relating to the Classic Affairs (the entity that operates
Schieks Palace Royale in Minneapolis, Minnesota) lawsuit
which was ultimately dismissed, with prejudice, in the fourth
quarter of 2009.
Other
Professional Fees
Other professional fees include charges for accounting, tax and
Sarbanes-Oxley Act consultants, appraisals and license
valuations, broker commissions for renting Company real estate,
lobbying fees, environmental assessments, and accounting costs
allocated to individual clubs by the Company. For the three
months ended September 30, 2010, other professional fees
decreased by approximately $151,000 or 21.4% compared to the
third quarter in 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 other professional fees decreased by
approximately $116,000 or 5.6% compared to the same period in
2009. These decreases are attributable to additional fees paid
to a consultant for valuations, using consultants to implement
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to assist
with the restatement of financial reports during 2009, as well
as the cost of tax consultants to amend prior years tax
returns during 2009, which professional fees were paid in 2009
and not in 2010.
Advisory
Fees Related to Change in Control Proposals
These costs represent the expenses of the Special Committee of
the Board of Directors (the Special Committee),
including costs billed by the Special Committees legal
counsel, legal costs incurred by the Company in relation to both
the proposed transaction and the proposed merger with
Ricks Cabaret International, Inc.
(Ricks), costs billed and accrued from the
financial advisor of the Special Committee, the compensation of
the Special Committee and other fees associated with the
proposed transaction and the proposed merger. Approximately
$393,000 in expenses was incurred in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 by the Company. This amount has been
offset by approximately $256,000, which was a reversal of an
accrued but unearned transaction fee in relation to the proposed
transaction and proposed merger.
Insurance
Insurance costs include the cost of workers compensation,
health, general liability, employee life, and long-term care
insurance. For the three months ended September 30, 2010,
insurance costs decreased by approximately $26,000 or 6.1%
compared to the third quarter in 2009. The decrease is a result
of an audit for workers compensation premiums that
resulted in a refund for a prior year. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, insurance costs increased by
approximately $105,000 or 8.7% compared to the same period in
2009. This increase is due to increased health insurance
premiums and premium increases for workers compensation
insurance due to the Companys increase in salaries and
wages.
E-30
Repairs
and Maintenance
Repairs and maintenance expense increased by approximately
$36,000 or 15.2% for the three months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, repairs and maintenance increased
by approximately $9,000 or 1.1% compared to the same period in
2009. The increases are a result of 2010 repairs such as
building exteriors being repainted, repairs to equipment,
repairs to fire systems and software maintenance.
Other
Expenses
Other general and administrative (G&A) expense
includes common office and nightclub expenses such as
janitorial, supplies, security, cast and employee relations,
education and training, travel and automobile, telephone and
internet expenses. For the three months ended September 30,
2010, other expenses decreased approximately $14,000 or 1.6%
compared to the third quarter 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, other expenses increased by
approximately $66,000 or 2.5% compared to the same period in
2009. This increase is attributable to an increase in employee
training for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and
Training for Interventions Procedures.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately
$33,000 or 8.5% for the three months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the third quarter in 2009. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by approximately $71,000 or 5.9% compared to
the same period in 2009. These increases are a result of the
installation of the POS systems at our clubs and other fixed
assets acquired, including two vehicles.
Interest
Expense
Total interest expense decreased by approximately $144,000 or
17.2% and approximately $560,000 or 20.9% for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to
the same periods in 2009. The interest expense decreased for
both periods due to repayment of debt during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 totaling $4,710,000, of which
$1,000,000 was prepaid on 14% debt in July 2010.
Income
Tax Expense Current
Current income tax benefit for the third quarter 2010 decreased
by approximately $70,000 compared to the same quarter in 2009.
The current portion of income tax expense of approximately
$100,000 represents the portion of income taxes that are
estimated to be payable for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to approximately $81,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. During 2010, the
Company is utilizing its net operating loss carryforward from
2009 for federal and consolidated state income taxes, so current
income tax expense is solely attributable to separately filed
state tax requirements. Income tax expense for all periods
presented for Golden Productions JGC Fort Worth, LLC has
been reclassified to Discontinued Operations (see Note 3 of
the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements under Discontinued Operations).
Income
Tax Expense Deferred
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
approximately $699,000 less than the same period in 2009,
primarily due to the deferred tax benefit of the contingent
indemnification claim in 2010, partially offset by the deferred
tax expense recognized on the sale of the Ft. Worth Club.
Income tax expense for all periods presented for Golden
Productions JGC Fort Worth, LLC has been reclassified to
Discontinued Operations (see Note 3 of the Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Discontinued Operations).
E-31
Net
Income and Earnings Per Share
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, net income
increased by approximately $1,286,000 or $0.08 per share of
Common Stock compared to the third quarter in 2009. This
increase is a result of the sale of the Fort Worth club
where the Company realized a pre-tax book gain of approximately
$816,000 (see Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements under Discontinued
Operations), and an increase in total revenue of
approximately $975,000 partially offset by an increase in
operating expenses of approximately $367,000. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, net income decreased by
approximately $741,000 or $0.04 per share of Common Stock
compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily
attributable to the accrual of a $2,135,000 contingent
indemnification claim related to the Thee Dollhouse Production
litigation (see Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements under Commitments and
Contingent Liabilities), the related legal fees in the
defense of this indemnification claim, the increase in salaries
and wages because of the fee structure used to compensate
commissioned employees and the accrual of an executive severance
package. These costs were partially offset by the increase in
total revenue of approximately $1,482,000.
The weighted average shares outstanding decreased by
approximately 1,069,000 shares or 6.1% and approximately
573,000 shares or 3.3% for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the
same periods in 2009. These decreases are due to the sale of the
Fort Worth club where, as part of the purchase price, the
Company received 467,497 shares of Common Stock (see
Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements under Discontinued Operations),
and the Companys repurchases of its Common Stock pursuant
to the Companys stock repurchase plan. This plan was
suspended by the Companys Board of Directors in the third
quarter 2010, due to the potential sale of the Company (see
Note 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements under Potential Sale of
Company).
Liquidity
The amount of cash flow generated and the working capital needs
of nightclub operations do not materially fluctuate and are
predictable. We expect to meet our liquidity needs for the next
year from existing cash balances and cash flows from operations.
We intend to use our cash flows for principal and interest
payments on debt, capital expenditures in certain clubs and
repairs and maintenance.
The Company has access to a revolving line of credit with
Citywide Banks and as of September 30, 2010 we had
$1,100,000 in borrowing availability under this line of credit.
In August 2010, the Company extended the maturity date of the
revolving line of credit from August 2011 to August 2012. All
other terms of the line of credit remained unchanged. The terms
of the revolving line of credit requires the Company to have a
net cash
flow-to-debt
service ratio greater than or equal to 1.2 to 1.0, calculated
quarterly. As of September 30, 2010, the Company fulfilled
the covenant requirement.
On July 16, 2010, the Company sold the building in which
the Ft. Worth Club is located and all assets associated
with the club as more fully described in Note 3 of the
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
under Discontinued Operations. The purchase price
paid at closing consisted of $1,000,000 in cash and
467,497 shares of Common Stock, held by the Purchaser. The
$1,000,000 in cash was used to prepay the 14% note payable
to Sunshine Mortgage and the 467,497 shares of Common Stock
were cancelled.
During the three months and nine months ended September 30,
2010, the Company continued to be focused on using free cash
flow to reduce debt and repurchase Common Stock. The Company is
in the process of negotiating extensions on long-term debt which
will be maturing during the coming year. As of
September 30, 2010 debt was approximately $26,038,000,
which is approximately $4,710,000 less than the total debt at
December 31, 2009.
E-32
Working
Capital
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
Company had cash of approximately $2,384,000 and $2,677,000,
respectively. Our total current assets were approximately
$4,304,000 at September 30, 2010 and $7,398,000 at
December 31, 2009. Current liabilities totaled
approximately $13,075,000 at September 30, 2010 and
$9,432,000 at December 31, 2009. The Companys current
liabilities exceed its current assets resulting in a negative
working capital of approximately $8,771,000 at
September 30, 2010 and $2,033,000 at December 31,
2009. The working capital deficit increased by approximately
$6,738,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
This increase is primarily attributable to the increase in the
current portion of long-term debt of approximately $3,094,000,
the accrual for the contingent indemnification claim of
$2,135,000 as discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities and the
reclassification of the Ft. Worth Clubs long-term
assets and long-term liabilities to current as business held for
sale as of December 31, 2009, which improved working
capital by approximately $1,032,000 as of December 31,
2009. Our requirement for working capital is not significant
since we receive payment for food and beverage purchases in cash
or credit cards at the time of the sale. We receive the cash
revenue before we are required to pay our suppliers for these
purchases.
We have been able to satisfy our needs for working capital and
capital expenditures through a combination of cash flow from
club operations and debt. While we can offer no assurances, we
believe that our existing cash, our expected cash flow from
operations and our ability to extend debt maturities will be
sufficient to fund our operations and necessary capital
expenditures and to service our debt obligations for the
foreseeable future. If we are unable to achieve our planned
revenues, costs and working capital objectives, we expect that
we will have the ability to curtail stock repurchases and
capital expenditures and reduce costs to levels that will be
sufficient to enable us to meet our cash requirements in the
upcoming year.
Capital
Resources
VCG stockholders equity was approximately $24,624,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately
$24,937,000 at December 31, 2009. The decrease of
approximately $1,620,000 in paid-in capital was a result of
repurchasing an aggregate of approximately $935,000 of Common
Stock, the receipt of 467,497 shares of Common Stock with
an approximate value of $795,000 as part of the purchase price
in the sale of the Ft. Worth Club (see Note 3 of the
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
under Discontinued Operations) and recording
quarterly stock option compensation expense of approximately
$110,000. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
totaled approximately $3,549,000 as of September 30, 2010
and approximately $3,546,000 as of December 31, 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities was approximately
$5,737,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
which represents an increase of $306,000 compared to the same
period in 2009. The major non-cash operating activities for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 were the provision of
depreciation of approximately $1,319,000, the gain on sale of
assets of approximately $817,000 and compounded and unpaid
interest on long-term debt of approximately $126,000. The
increase in operating assets and liabilities is primarily
attributable to the $2,135,000 accrual at June 30, 2010 for
the contingent indemnification claim which is reported in
Accrued expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled approximately
$183,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
which represents an increase of $532,000 over the $349,000 used
by investing activities for the same period in 2009. The
improvement is primarily attributable to an increase in proceeds
from asset sales of $750,000 in 2010 compared to 2009. Additions
to property and equipment for the first nine months of 2010
totaled approximately $838,000 and included $275,000 in
leasehold improvements, $247,000 in software mostly related to
installing a new POS system, $108,000 in furniture and fixtures,
$108,000 in new carpeting in clubs and various smaller asset
additions aggregating $100,000. Capital expenditures increased
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
the same period in 2009 by approximately $236,000 due primarily
to increased spending on carpeting, leasehold improvements and
furniture and fixtures in clubs being remodeled, along with
increased spending on software for the POS system in 2010.
E-33
Net cash used by financing activities was approximately
$6,214,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to approximately $4,995,000 for the same period in the
prior year. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company
paid down approximately $5,365,000 in debt and made $354,000 in
distributions to noncontrolling interests. We received $480,000
in proceeds from new debt during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. In addition, during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, we repurchased
1,018,652 shares of Common Stock for approximately
$935,000. The Company had a net decrease in cash of
approximately $293,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, which is attributable to the
Companys focus on paying down debt.
The following table reconciles net income to EBITDA for the
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. EBITDA is
normally a presentation of earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, and amortization. EBITDA is a
non-U.S. GAAP
calculation that is frequently used by our investors to measure
operating results. EBITDA data is included because the Company
understands that such information is considered by investors as
an additional basis on evaluating our ability to pay interest,
repay debt, and make capital expenditures. Management cautions
that this EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
calculations reported by other companies. Because it is
non-U.S. GAAP,
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to operating or
net income in measuring company results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net Income attributable to VCG stockholders
|
|
$
|
1,918,482
|
|
|
$
|
632,227
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,336
|
|
|
$
|
2,047,683
|
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
429,087
|
|
|
|
419,480
|
|
|
|
1,319,110
|
|
|
|
1,270,503
|
|
Amortization of non-compete agreements
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
12,776
|
|
Amortization of leasehold rights and liabilities, net
|
|
|
(38,764
|
)
|
|
|
(48,606
|
)
|
|
|
(141,790
|
)
|
|
|
(147,588
|
)
|
Amortization of loan fees
|
|
|
13,916
|
|
|
|
52,621
|
|
|
|
48,413
|
|
|
|
174,524
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
680,012
|
|
|
|
785,342
|
|
|
|
2,072,913
|
|
|
|
2,507,242
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
377,448
|
|
|
|
325,246
|
|
|
|
511,100
|
|
|
|
1,191,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA before non-cash impairment charges
|
|
$
|
3,383,681
|
|
|
$
|
2,170,569
|
|
|
$
|
5,128,100
|
|
|
$
|
7,056,295
|
|
Add back:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-cash impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluding non-cash impairment charges
|
|
$
|
3,383,681
|
|
|
$
|
2,170,569
|
|
|
$
|
5,128,100
|
|
|
$
|
7,324,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
14,384,186
|
|
|
$
|
13,408,673
|
|
|
$
|
41,693,906
|
|
|
$
|
40,212,312
|
|
EBITDA as a percentage of revenue
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
E-34
Another
non-U.S. GAAP
financial measurement used by the investment community is free
cash flow. The following table calculates free cash flow for the
Company for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
We use free cash flow calculations as one method of cash
management to anticipate available cash, but caution investors
that this free cash flow calculation may not be comparable to
similarly titled calculations reported by other companies.
Because this is a
non-U.S. GAAP
measure, free cash flow should not be considered as an
alternative to the consolidated statement of cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
3,383,681
|
|
|
$
|
2,170,569
|
|
|
$
|
5,128,100
|
|
|
$
|
7,324,295
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
680,012
|
|
|
|
785,342
|
|
|
|
2,072,913
|
|
|
|
2,507,242
|
|
Current income tax
|
|
|
(21,900
|
)
|
|
|
(92,189
|
)
|
|
|
100,100
|
|
|
|
81,054
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
293,839
|
|
|
|
121,941
|
|
|
|
838,372
|
|
|
|
602,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
2,431,730
|
|
|
$
|
1,355,475
|
|
|
$
|
2,116,715
|
|
|
$
|
4,133,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Principal Financial Officer (collectively, the
Certifying Officers) conducted evaluations regarding
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. As
defined under
Sections 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
of
the Exchange Act, the term disclosure controls and
procedures means controls and other procedures of an
issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or
furnishes under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules, regulations and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or furnishes under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
issuers management, including the Certifying Officers, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on
this evaluation, as of September 30, 2010, the Certifying
Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that material information is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported by our management
on a timely basis in order to comply with our disclosure
obligations under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As previously reported, as part of the Companys routine
monitoring and evaluation of its internal control over financial
reporting, the Company utilizes a third party consultant to test
the Companys internal controls and procedures. On
March 21, 2010, following its monitoring of the closing of
one of the Companys nightclubs, the consultant informed
the Companys Chief Financial Officer that it believed a
small amount of cash receipts from one of the nightclubs
cash registers was not being collected or recorded in accordance
with the clubs recently installed POS system and the
Companys policies and procedures. The Companys Audit
Committee immediately conducted an investigation of this matter
with the assistance of independent legal and forensic accounting
advisors. Management fully cooperated with this investigation.
The Audit Committee informed its independent registered public
accounting firm, Causey Demgen & Moore Inc. (the
Auditor), of the consultants findings and the
results of the Audit Committees investigation. Neither the
Companys management, Audit Committee, nor the Auditor
concluded that there was a material
E-35
weakness in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2010. However, the Company
concluded that the following significant deficiencies in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting existed
as of March 31, 2010: (i) failure to collect and
record certain cash receipts in accordance with the
Companys POS system and the Companys policies and
procedures; (ii) failure to record the expenditure of such
cash receipts in accordance with the Companys policies and
procedures; and (iii) failure of management to prevent
employees from engaging in such conduct after becoming aware of
it. The investigation is complete, and the Company believes it
has fully remediated the significant deficiencies by the
following: (a) changes in procedures to require more
documentation and reconciliation of cash receipts and inventory
and (b) instituting a policy to obtain a quarterly signed
attestation from all corporate employees, Area Directors and key
club personnel as to (1) whether or not the employee has
any knowledge of business activity that is not in accordance
with company policies and procedures, and (2) knowledge of
the Companys Whistleblower Policy and how to report
events. Further, the Board recently admonished the
Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Troy
Lowrie, for being involved with or aware of violations of the
Companys policy regarding cash receipts and disbursements,
not reporting the violations to the Board of Directors or Audit
Committee, and violating the Companys Code of Ethics.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
Litigation
Other than as set forth below, we are not aware of any pending
legal proceedings against the Company, individually or in the
aggregate, that would have a material adverse affect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition.
Thee
Dollhouse Productions Litigation
On July 24, 2007, VCG Holding Corp. was named in a lawsuit
filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas. This
lawsuit arose out of a VCG acquisition of certain assets
belonging to Regale, Inc. (Regale) by Raleigh
Restaurant Concepts, Inc. (RRC), a wholly owned
subsidiary of VCG, in Raleigh, N.C. The lawsuit alleges that VCG
tortiously interfered with a contract between Michael Joseph
Peter and Regale and misappropriated Mr. Peters
purported trade secrets. On March 30, 2009, the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
entered an order granting summary judgment to VCG and dismissed
Mr. Peters claims in their entirety. The court found
that as a matter of law, VCG did not tortiously interfere with
Mr. Peters contract with Regale and further found
that VCG did not misappropriate trade secrets. Mr. Peters
did not appeal that ruling and as such, the federal proceedings
have concluded.
Ancillary to this litigation, Thee Dollhouse filed a claim in
arbitration in June 2008 against Regale as a result of this
transaction, asserting that Regale, by selling its assets to
RRC, breached a contract between Thee Dollhouse and Regale. In
addition, an assertion was made that one of Regales
principals tortiously interfered with the contract between
Regale and Thee Dollhouse. Regale filed a Motion to Stay
Arbitration which was granted in part and denied in part, with
the court staying arbitration as to Regales principal and
denying the stay as to Regale. As a result, the arbitration as
to Regale is proceeding. VCG is indemnifying and holding Regale
harmless from this claim pursuant to the terms of the asset
purchase agreement between Regale and RRC. The arbitration
hearing was conducted between April 26 and 29, 2010. On
June 28, 2010, the arbitration panel entered an award in
favor of Thee Dollhouse N.C., Inc. and against Regale, Inc.,
awarding Thee Dollhouse N.C., Inc. damages in the amount of
$2,102,476, plus costs of $32,390 for a total award of
$2,134,866, plus interest at the North Carolina statutory rate.
On July 14, 2010, Regale filed a petition in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
challenging the award. Dollhouse N.C. and Mr. Peter have
petitioned to confirm the arbitration award. All briefing has
been completed and the matters are now under submission with the
Court. It is presently unknown when the Court will rule. The
Company and Regale presently intend to vigorously pursue all
available appeals of this award. As of September 30, 2010,
the Company has accrued $2,135,000, which is reported in the
Unaudited Condensed
E-36
Consolidated Statements of Income as Contingent Indemnification
Claim. The Company is accruing interest on this potential
liability.
Texas
Patron Tax Litigation
Beginning January 1, 2008, VCGs Texas clubs became
subject to a new state law requiring the Company to collect a
five dollar surcharge for every club visitor. A lawsuit was
filed by the Texas Entertainment Association, an organization in
which the Company is a member, alleging that the surcharge is an
unconstitutional tax. On March 28, 2008, the judge of the
District Court of Travis County, Texas ruled that the new state
law violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
and therefore, the District Courts order enjoined the
state from collecting or assessing the tax. The State of Texas
has appealed the District Courts ruling. Under Texas law,
when cities or the State of Texas give notice of appeal, the
State of Texas intervenes and suspends the judgment, including
the injunction. Therefore, the judgment of the District Court of
Travis County cannot be enforced until the appeals are completed.
The Company has filed a lawsuit to demand repayment of the paid
taxes. On June 5, 2009, the Texas Third Court of Appeals
(serving the Austin, Texas area) affirmed the District
Courts judgment that the Sexually Oriented Business Tax
violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The
State of Texas appealed the Court of Appeals ruling to the Texas
Supreme Court. On August 26, 2009, the Texas Supreme Court
ordered both sides to submit briefs on the merits. The
States brief was filed on September 25, 2009, and the
Texas Entertainment Associations brief was filed on
October 15, 2009. On February 12, 2010, the Texas
Supreme Court granted the States Petition for Review. Oral
arguments of the case were heard on March 25, 2010, and the
parties are currently awaiting a decision by the Texas Supreme
Court.
The Company paid the tax for 2008 and the first three quarters
of 2009 under protest and expensed the tax for such periods. For
each quarter since December 31, 2009, the Company accrued
the tax and filed the appropriate tax returns, but did not pay
the State of Texas. As of September 30, 2010, the Company
has approximately $271,000 in accrued but unpaid liabilities for
this tax. The Company has paid approximately $401,000, under
protest, to the State of Texas since the inception of this tax.
DOL
Audit (PTs Showclub)
In October 2008,
PTs
®
Showclub in Louisville, Kentucky was required to conduct a
self-audit of employee payroll by the Department of Labor
(DOL). After an extensive self-audit, it was
determined that (a) the club incorrectly paid certain
employees for hours worked and minimum wage amounts and
(b) the club incorrectly charged certain minimum wage
employees for their uniforms. As a result, the DOL required that
the club issue back pay and refund uniform expenses to qualified
employees at a total cost of $14,439.
In March 2009, VCG was placed under a similar nationwide DOL
audit for all nightclub locations and its corporate office. All
locations completed the self-audit in August 2009 and are
currently working with the DOL to determine what, if any,
violations may have occurred. A summary meeting was held with
the DOL and Company counsel on March 19, 2010. The DOL
presented its preliminary findings of violations. A meeting was
held on May 20, 2010 in which DOL and Company counsel
agreed to continue negotiations at a later date. The Company
believes it has corrected all processes that resulted in the
potential violations. This case is still in the investigatory
state and no final determination can be made at this time of the
outcome or any potential liability. After discussion with
Company counsel on this case, the Company accrued $200,000 as of
December 31, 2009, for potential wage/hour violations. This
accrual and any estimate of potential liability have not changed
as of September 30, 2010. The Company expected a resolution
of this audit by August 30, 2010, but with the DOL
administrative change in investigators, the settlement
negotiation has now been extended. The Company expects to have a
resolution by November 30, 2010.
Texas
Sales Tax Audit
The Texas Comptrollers Office is conducting a sales and
use tax audit of Manana Entertainment, Inc., the entity
operating Jaguars Gold Club in Dallas, Texas, for the time
period beginning with the clubs acquisition in April 2008
and ending in November 2009. The audit commenced in March 2010.
The primary
E-37
focus of the audit is the taxability of revenue received by
Manana Entertainment, Inc. with respect to independent
contractor entertainer fees, credit card sales of dance dollars
and use tax.
In July 2010, the Company received notice from the Texas
Comptrollers Office that the audit period would be
extended to include the period of October 1, 2006 to
April 1, 2008, which period pre-dates the Companys
ownership of the club. Under the purchase agreement under which
the Company acquired the club, the Company is fully indemnified
by the seller for any liability arising for the additional
period.
The audit is incomplete; however, the Company accrued
approximately $107,000 at March 31, 2010 of additional
sales taxes for the period from the clubs acquisition in
April 2008 through November 2009, an additional $4,000 at
June 30, 2010 and an additional $4,000 at
September 30, 2010. Management intends to vigorously defend
the sales tax returns that is has previously filed during the
audit period in the administrative review process.
Litigation
Associated with the Proposed Going Private
Transaction
On August 13, 2010, the Company received a complaint filed
in Colorado state court, First Judicial District, Jefferson
County District Court challenging the Proposal (as defined in
Note 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements). The complaint was filed by David Cohen,
Timothy Cunningham, Gene Harris, Dean R. Jakubczak and William
C. Steppacher, Jr. derivatively on behalf of the Company
and as a class action on behalf of themselves and other
similarly situated shareholders against Troy Lowrie, each of the
individual members of the Companys Board of Directors and
the Company (as a nominal defendant). In the complaint, the
plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the individual
Directors breached their fiduciary duties under Colorado law and
that Mr. Lowrie has conflicts of interest in connection
with the Proposal. The plaintiffs seek, among other relief,
certification of the lawsuit as a class action with the
plaintiffs as class representatives, an injunction preventing
the Companys Board of Directors from accepting the
Proposal, an order requiring the Directors to fulfill their
fiduciary duties, an accounting of alleged damages if the
Companys Board of Directors accepts the Proposal and an
award of the plaintiffs attorneys and experts
fees.
To the best of the Companys knowledge, as of the date
hereof, neither the Company nor any of the individual defendants
have been served with process. On October 19, 2010, the
court issued an Order re Failure to Prosecute, directing the
plaintiffs to show cause why the complaint should not be
dismissed for failure to prosecute and giving the plaintiffs
until November 19, 2010 to make such a showing, in the
absence of which the case will be dismissed without prejudice
and without further notice. The Company believes that the
allegations set forth in the complaint are baseless and intends
to mount a vigorous defense if and when process is served.
Johnson
Litigation
On October 27, 2010, a complaint was filed against the
Company in the United States District Court for the District of
Maine, Case
No. 2:10-cv-00442
in a lawsuit captioned Johnson et al. v. VCG Holding Corp..
The company has not been formally served with the lawsuit,
however, the company, via its attorneys, has agreed to accept
service of the Complaint.
The complaint was filed by two former employees of one of the
Companys subsidiaries, KenKev II, Inc. d/b/a
PTs
®
Showclub Portland, Maine who allege that the Company
misclassified them as tipped minimum wage employees while
employed by the Company as disk jockeys and, as a result, failed
to pay all wages due to them under applicable law. The action is
plead as a class action, pursuant to Section 216(b) of the
Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 216(b)), and seeks to
certify a class action on behalf of all similarly situated
employees who are employed by the Company nationwide. In
addition, the two named plaintiffs allege that the Company
failed to pay them all wages required to be paid to them under
Maine law.
The Company intends to deny all liability in this matter,
however, it is cautioned that this matter is in its earliest
stages and the Companys ultimate liability cannot be
predicted at this time. As such, the Company has not accrued
anything related to this action.
E-38
Louisville
Ordinance Litigation
In 2004, Kentucky Restaurant Concepts, Inc. d/b/a
PTs
®
Showclub (KRC) filed suit in the Jefferson County
Circuit Court challenging a recently enacted adult regulatory
ordinance which would impose significant restrictions on adult
entertainment in Jefferson County, Kentucky. The suit challenged
the legality, under the Kentucky State Constitution, of certain
restrictions that Jefferson County was seeking to impose on
adult businesses, such as a substantial restriction on hours of
operation, a prohibition on the sale of alcohol by adult
entertainment establishments, and other similar restrictions,
which in the view of management would likely result in decreased
revenues. Initially a temporary injunction was issued
prohibiting enforcement of the ordinance during the litigation.
After substantial litigation, the Jefferson County Circuit Court
upheld the constitutionality of the ordinance, but granted a
stay on its implementation pending appeal. KRC along with other
co-appellants appealed the order to the Kentucky Court of Appeal
who affirmed the constitutionality of the ordinance. Thereafter,
KRC and others appealed the decision to the Kentucky Supreme
Court which held oral argument on the appeal in 2009. On
April 22, 2010 the Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed in part,
reversed in part and remanded the case to the lower court. The
Kentucky Supreme Courts ruling upheld the
constitutionality of a majority of the restrictions. KRC and
others have appealed the Kentucky Supreme Courts decision
to the United States Supreme Court.
In addition to the matters described above, the Company is
involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The Company believes that any
adverse or positive outcome of any of these proceedings will not
have a material effect on the consolidated operations of the
Company.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report,
you should carefully consider the factors discussed in
Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently
deem to be immaterial, also may materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition
and/or
operating results. There are no material changes to the risk
factors included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
As previously announced, the Companys Board of Directors
adopted a stock repurchase program on July 26, 2007
pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to the lesser of
(a) 1,600,000 shares of its Common Stock or
(b) an aggregate of $10,000,000 of Common Stock (the
Repurchase Program). On September 29, 2008, the
Companys Board of Directors authorized the Companys
Executive Committee to repurchase, in its discretion, up to an
aggregate of $1,000,000 of Common Stock pursuant to the
Repurchase Program. On January 9, 2009, the Companys
Board of Directors authorized the Companys Executive
Committee to repurchase, in its discretion, up to an additional
aggregate of $1,000,000 of Common Stock pursuant to the
Repurchase Program. Further, on April 30, 2010 the
Companys Board of Directors authorized the Companys
Executive Committee to repurchase, in its discretion, up to an
additional aggregate of $1,000,000 of Common Stock pursuant to
the Repurchase Program (for a total amount of $3,000,000 of
authorized purchases under the Repurchase Program).
During the third quarter ended September 30, 2010, the
Company repurchased an aggregate of 45,636 shares of Common
Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $75,899 since the
inception of the Repurchase Program. As a result, as of
September 30, 2010, up to 240,439 shares of Common
Stock or shares of Common Stock with an aggregate purchase price
of approximately $7,118,232 (whichever is less) remain available
for repurchase under the Repurchase Program. The Companys
Executive Committee has the authority to purchase shares of
Common Stock with an aggregate purchase price of up to
approximately $118,232 pursuant to the Board of Directors
September 2008, January 2009 and April 2010 authorizations under
the Repurchase Program. Due to the potential sale of the Company
(see Note 10 of the Notes to
E-39
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Potential Sale of Company) on July 21, 2010,
the Companys Board of Directors terminated it 10b5-1 plan
and discontinued buying stock.
The following table provides additional information about the
Companys purchases under the Repurchase Program for the
third quarter ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar Value)
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
of Shares that may yet be
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased(1)
|
|
per Share
|
|
Programs(1)
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
July 1 to 31, 2010
|
|
|
45,636
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
45,636
|
|
240,439 shares or $7,118,232
|
Total
|
|
|
45,636
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
45,636
|
|
240,439 shares or $7,118,232
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless noted, the Company made all repurchases in the open
market.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed
and Reserved].
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
On November 2, 2010, the Company extended the maturity
dates of four loans from third parties, in an aggregate
principal amount of approximately $350,000, all with the
original maturity date of November 15, 2010. In all
instances, the notes were transformed into demand notes. No
other changes were made to the terms of these promissory notes.
The Company has reported these promissory notes as current
portion of long-term debt in the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 2, 2010, the Company prepaid two loans in full
from a third party in the amount of $200,000, evidenced by two
promissory notes bearing interest at 10%. These notes were
unsecured. The maturity dates were November 15, 2010.
On November 2, 2010, the Company prepaid a loan in full
from a third party in the amount of $100,000, evidenced by a
promissory note bearing interest at 11%. This note was secured
by the general assets of the Company and the cash flow and 100%
of the shares of common stock of Manana Entertainment, Inc. The
maturity date was November 15, 2010.
On November 6, 2010, the Company extended the maturity date
on a loan from a third party with a current balance of $150,000,
with the original maturity date of November 6, 2010. The
note was transformed into a demand note. No other changes were
made to the terms of the note. The Company reported this
promissory note as current portion of long-term debt in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 9, 2010, the Company entered into the Merger
Agreement, as more fully described in Note 10 of the Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under
Potential Sale of Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of VCG Holding Corp.(1)
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of VCG Holding
Corp.(1)
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications(1)
|
E-40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
VCG HOLDING CORP.
Troy Lowrie
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer (Authorized Officer, Principal Executive
Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 12, 2010
E-41
EXHIBIT 31.1
RULE 13a-14(a)
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
I, Troy Lowrie, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of VCG Holding Corp. (this Report);
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this Report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is
being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
d. Disclosed in this Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Troy Lowrie
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 12, 2010
E-42
EXHIBIT 31.2
RULE 13a-14(a)
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
I, Troy Lowrie, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of VCG Holding Corp. (this Report);
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this Report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is
being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this Report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this Report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Troy Lowrie
Acting Principal Financial Officer
Date: November 12, 2010
E-43
EXHIBIT 32.1
SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of VCG Holding Corp.
(the Company) on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Troy Lowrie, Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with reporting requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
Troy Lowrie
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Acting
Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 12, 2010
E-44
PRELIMINARY COPY
PROXY CARD
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF
VCG HOLDING CORP.
[ * ]
, 2011
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Troy Lowrie and Micheal Ocello and each or any of them,
proxies, with power of substitution, to vote all shares of the undersigned at VCG Holding Corp.s
Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held on [ * ], 2011 at [ * ]:00 [ * ].m. Denver time at [ *
], or at any adjournment thereof, upon the matters set forth in the proxy statement for such
meeting, and in their discretion, on such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
See reverse for voting instructions.
The board of directors recommends that you vote
FOR
the following proposals:
1.
|
|
PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 9, 2010, BY AND
AMONG VCG HOLDING CORP., FAMILY DOG, LLC, FD ACQUISITION CO., TROY LOWRIE AND MICHEAL OCELLO,
AS IT MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
FOR
|
|
o
AGAINST
|
|
o
ABSTAIN
|
2.
|
|
PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN THE MEETING, IF NECESSARY, TO PERMIT FURTHER SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IN
THE EVENT THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING TO ADOPT THE MERGER
AGREEMENT PROPOSAL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
FOR
|
|
o
AGAINST
|
|
o
ABSTAIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name(s) of Shareholder(s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature if held jointly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. Persons signing as executor,
administrator, trustee, etc. should so indicate. Please sign exactly as the shares are titled in
the record holders name.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED
SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2. AT
THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME
BEFORE THE MEETING. PLEASE MARK, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.
Voting Instructions
There are two ways to vote your proxy card.
BY INTERNET http://[ * ].com QUICK *** EASY *** IMMEDIATE
Your Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you
marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
|
|
Use the Internet to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, until [ * ] Denver time
on [ * ], 2011.
|
|
|
|
Please have your proxy card and the last four digits of your Social Security Number or Tax
Identification Number available. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and create an
electronic ballot.
|
BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope weve provided or
return it to Corporate Secretary, VCG Holding Corp., 390 Union Boulevard, Suite 540, Lakewood,
Colorado 80228.
If you vote by phone or Internet, please do not mail your proxy card
IMPORTANT
Your vote is important. Regardless of the number of shares of VCGs common stock that you own,
please sign, date and promptly mail the enclosed proxy in the accompanying postage-paid envelope.
Should you prefer, you may vote your proxy via the Internet. Please refer to the instructions on
your proxy card or voting form that accompanied this proxy statement.
Instructions for Street Name Shareholders
If you own shares of VCGs common stock in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, only such
nominee can vote your shares on your behalf and only upon receipt of your instructions. You should
sign, date and promptly mail your proxy card, or voting instruction form, when you receive it from
your broker, bank or nominee. Please do so for each separate account you maintain. Your broker,
bank or nominee also may provide for telephone or Internet voting. Please refer to the proxy card,
or voting instruction form, which you received with this proxy statement.
Please vote by proxy, telephone or via the Internet at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please call Tenicia Bradley at
our corporate headquarters at (303) 934-2424.
Vcg Holding Corp. (MM) (NASDAQ:VCGH)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Vcg Holding Corp. (MM) (NASDAQ:VCGH)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024