CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title
of Each Class of Securities Offered |
Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price |
Amount
of
Registration Fee |
Notes
|
$3,885,000 |
$391.22 |
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2)
Registration Statement No. 333-199966
Pricing Supplement to the Prospectus
and Prospectus Supplement, each dated November 7, 2014, the Underlying
Supplement No. 1a-I dated November 7, 2014 and the Product
Supplement No. 4a-I dated November 7, 2014 — No. 1342
Medium-Term Notes, Series E
$3,885,000
Capped Buffered Enhanced Participation
Equity Notes due 2017
(Linked to the iShares®
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF)
The notes do not bear interest. The amount that you will be
paid on your notes on the stated maturity date (October 5, 2017, subject to adjustment) is based on the performance of the iShares®
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (which we refer to as the underlier) as measured from and including the trade date (September 30, 2015)
to and including the determination date (October 2, 2017, subject to adjustment). If the final underlier level on the determination
date is greater than the initial underlier level, the return on your notes will be positive, subject to the maximum settlement
amount of $1,319.50 for each $1,000 principal amount note. If the final underlier level declines by up to 10.00% from the
initial underlier level, you will receive the principal amount of your notes. If the final underlier level declines by more than
10.00% from the initial underlier level, the return on your notes will be negative. You could lose your entire investment
in the notes. Any payment on the notes is subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
To determine your payment at maturity, we will calculate the underlier
return, which is the percentage increase or decrease in the final underlier level from the initial underlier level. On the stated
maturity date, for each $1,000 principal amount note, you will receive an amount in cash equal to:
● |
if the underlier return is positive (the final underlier level is greater than the initial underlier level), the sum of (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product of (a) $1,000 times (b) 1.50 times (c) the underlier return, subject to the maximum settlement amount; |
● |
if the underlier return is zero or negative but not below -10.00% (the final underlier level is equal to or less than the initial underlier level but not by more than 10.00%), $1,000; or |
● |
if the underlier return is negative and is below -10.00% (the final underlier level is less than the initial underlier level by more than 10.00%), the sum of (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product of (a) $1,000 times (b) approximately 1.1111 times (c) the sum of the underlier return plus 10.00%. You will receive less than $1,000. |
Your investment in the notes involves certain risks,
including, among other things, our credit risk. See “Risk Factors” on page PS-9 of the accompanying product supplement
no. 4a-I, “Risk Factors” on page US-2 of the accompanying underlying supplement no. 1a-I and “Selected
Risk Factors” on page PS-12 of this pricing supplement.
The foregoing is only a brief summary of the terms of your
notes. You should read the additional disclosure provided herein so that you may better understand the terms and risks of your
investment.
The estimated value of the notes as determined by J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC, which we refer to as JPMS, when the terms of the notes were set, was $979.90 per $1,000 principal amount
note. See “Summary Information — JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes” on page PS-7 of this pricing
supplement for additional information about JPMS’s estimated value and “Summary Information — Secondary Market
Prices of the Notes” on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement for information about secondary market prices of the notes.
Original issue date (settlement date): October 7, 2015
Original issue price: 100.00% of the principal amount*
Underwriting commission/discount: 2.00% of the principal
amount*
Net proceeds to the issuer: 98.00% of the principal
amount
See “Summary Information — Supplemental Use of
Proceeds” on page PS-8 of this pricing supplement for information about the components of the original issue price of the
notes.
*JPMS, acting as agent for JPMorgan Chase & Co., will pay
all of the selling commissions of 2.00% of the principal amount it receives from us to an unaffiliated dealer. See “Plan
of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” on page PS-87 of the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I. The original issue
price is 98.00% for investors in certain fee-based advisory accounts; see “Supplemental plan of distribution” on page
PS-6 of this pricing supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this pricing
supplement, the accompanying product supplement, the accompanying underlying supplement, the accompanying prospectus supplement
or the accompanying prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The notes are not bank deposits, are not insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency and are not obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank.
Pricing Supplement dated September 30, 2015
The original issue price, fees and commissions and net proceeds
listed above relate to the notes we sell initially. We may decide to sell additional notes after the date of this pricing supplement,
at issue prices and with fees and commission and net proceeds that differ from the amounts set forth above. The return (whether
positive or negative) on your investment in notes will depend in part on the price you pay for your notes.
We may use this pricing supplement in the initial sale of the
notes. In addition, JPMS or any other affiliate of ours may use this pricing supplement in a market-making transaction in a note
after its initial sale. Unless JPMS or its agents inform the purchaser otherwise in the confirmation of sale, this pricing
supplement is being used in a market-making transaction.
SUMMARY INFORMATION
You may revoke your offer to purchase the notes at any time
prior to the time at which we accept such offer by notifying the applicable agent. We reserve the right to change the terms of,
or reject any offer to purchase, the notes prior to their issuance. In the event of any changes to the terms of the notes, we will
notify you and you will be asked to accept such changes in connection with your purchase. You may also choose to reject such changes,
in which case we may reject your offer to purchase.
You should read this pricing supplement together with the
prospectus, as supplemented by the prospectus supplement, each dated November 7, 2014 relating to our Series E medium-term notes
of which these notes are a part, and the more detailed information contained in product supplement no. 4a-I dated November 7, 2014
and underlying supplement no. 1a-I dated November 7, 2014. This pricing supplement, together with the documents listed below,
contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written
materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample
structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours. You should carefully consider, among other things,
the matters set forth in “Risk Factors” in the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I and “Risk Factors”
in the accompanying underlying supplement no. 1a-I, as the notes involve risks not associated with conventional debt securities.
We urge you to consult your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisers before you invest in the notes.
You may access these documents on the SEC website at www.sec.gov
as follows (or if such address has changed, by reviewing our filings for the relevant date on the SEC website):
Our Central Index Key, or CIK, on the SEC website is 19617.
As used in this pricing supplement, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Key Terms
Issuer: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Underlier: the iShares® MSCI Emerging Markets
ETF (Bloomberg symbol, “EEM UP Equity”). The accompanying product supplement refers to the underlier as the “Fund.”
Underlying index: the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, as maintained
by MSCI Inc. (“MSCI”).
Principal amount: each note will have a principal amount of
$1,000; $3,885,000 in the aggregate for all the offered notes; the aggregate principal amount of the offered notes may be increased
if the issuer, at its sole option, decides to sell an additional amount of the offered notes on a date subsequent to the date of
this pricing supplement
Purchase at amount other than principal amount: the amount
we will pay you at the stated maturity date for your notes will not be adjusted based on the price you pay for your notes, so if
you acquire notes at a premium to the principal amount and hold them to the stated maturity date, it could affect your investment
in a number of ways. The return on your investment in the notes will be lower than it would have been had you purchased the notes
at the principal amount. Also, the stated buffer level would not offer the same benefit to your investment as would be the case
if you had purchased the notes at the
principal amount. Additionally, the cap level would be triggered
at a lower percentage return than indicated below, relative to your initial investment. See “Selected Risk Factors —
If You Purchase Your Notes at a Premium to the Principal Amount, the Return on Your Investment Will Be Lower Than the Return on
Notes Purchased at the Principal Amount and the Impact of Certain Key Terms of the Notes Will Be Negatively Affected” on
page PS-13 of this pricing supplement.
Payment on the stated maturity date: for each $1,000 principal
amount note, we will pay you on the stated maturity date an amount in cash equal to:
● |
if the final underlier level is greater than or equal to the cap level, the maximum settlement amount; |
● |
if the final underlier level is greater than the initial underlier level but less than the cap level, the sum of (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product of (a) $1,000 times (b) the upside participation rate times (c) the underlier return; |
● |
if the final underlier level is equal to or less than the initial underlier level, but greater than or equal to the buffer level, $1,000; or |
● |
if the final underlier level is less than the buffer level, the sum of (i) $1,000 plus (ii) the product of (a) $1,000 times (b) the buffer rate times (c) the sum of the underlier return plus the buffer amount. You will receive less than $1,000. |
Initial underlier level: $32.78. The accompanying product
supplement refers to the initial underlier level as the “Initial Value.”
Final underlier level: the closing level of the underlier
on the determination date. In certain circumstances, the closing level of the underlier will be based on the alternative calculation
of the underlier described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Determination Date — Notes Linked
to a Single Underlying — Notes Linked to a Single Underlying (Other Than a Commodity Index)” on page PS-44 of the accompanying
product supplement or “The Underlyings — Funds — Discontinuation of a Fund; Alternate Calculation of Closing
Price and Trading Price” on page PS-75 of the accompanying product supplement. The accompanying product supplement refers
to the final underlier level as the “Final Value.”
Underlier return: the quotient of (i) the final underlier
level minus the initial underlier level divided by (ii) the initial underlier level, expressed as a percentage
Upside participation rate: 1.50
Cap level: 121.30% of the initial underlier level
Maximum settlement amount: $1,319.50
Buffer level: 90.00% of the initial underlier level
Buffer amount: 10.00%
Buffer rate: the quotient of the initial underlier
level divided by the buffer level, which equals approximately 1.1111
Trade date: September 30, 2015
Original issue date (settlement date): October 7, 2015
Determination date: October 2, 2017, subject to postponement
in the event of a market disruption event and as described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Determination
Date — Notes Linked to a Single Underlying — Notes Linked to a Single Underlying (Other Than a Commodity Index)”
on page PS-44 of the accompanying product supplement
Stated maturity date: October 5, 2017, subject to postponement
in the event of a market disruption event and as described under “General Terms of Notes — Postponement of a Payment
Date” on page PS-43 of the accompanying product supplement. The accompanying product supplement refers to the stated maturity
date as the “maturity date.”
No interest: The offered notes do not bear interest.
No listing: The offered notes will not be listed on any securities
exchange or interdealer quotation system.
No redemption: The offered notes will not be subject to redemption
right or price dependent redemption right.
Closing level: as described under “The Underlyings —
Funds — Price of One Share of a Fund” on page PS-70 of the accompanying product supplement. The accompanying product
supplement refers to the closing level as the “closing price.”
Share adjustment factor: the share adjustment factor is referenced
in determining the closing level of the underlier and is set initially at 1.0 on the trade date. The share adjustment factor is
subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events affecting the underlier. See “The Underlyings — Funds —
Price of One Share of a Fund” on page PS-70 of the accompanying product supplement and “The Underlyings — Funds
— Anti-Dilution Adjustments” on page PS-73 of the accompanying product supplement for further information.
Business day: as described under “General Terms of Notes
— Postponement of a Payment Date” on page PS-43 of the accompanying product supplement
Trading day: as described under “General Terms of Notes
— Postponement of a Determination Date — Additional Defined Terms” on page PS-47 of the accompanying product
supplement
Use of proceeds and hedging: as described under “Use
of Proceeds and Hedging” on page PS-42 of the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I, as supplemented by “—
Supplemental Use of Proceeds” below
Tax treatment: You should review carefully the section entitled
“Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I. The following discussion,
when read in combination with that section, constitutes the full opinion of our special tax counsel, Davis Polk & Wardwell
LLP, regarding the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and disposing of notes.
Based on current market conditions, in the opinion of our
special tax counsel it is reasonable to treat the notes as “open transactions” that are not debt instruments for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, as more fully described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences — Tax Consequences
to U.S. Holders — Notes Treated as Open Transactions That Are Not Debt Instruments” in the accompanying product supplement
no. 4a-I. Assuming this treatment is respected, subject to the possible application of the “constructive ownership”
rules, the gain or loss on your notes should be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if you hold your notes for more than
a year, whether or not you are an initial purchaser of notes at the issue price. The notes could be treated as “constructive
ownership transactions” within the meaning of Section 1260 of the Code, in which case any gain recognized in respect of the
notes that would otherwise be long-term capital gain and that was in excess of the “net underlying long-term capital
gain” (as defined in Section 1260) would be treated as ordinary income, and a notional interest charge would apply as if
that income had accrued for tax purposes at a constant yield over the notes’ term. Our special tax counsel has not expressed
an opinion with respect to whether the constructive ownership rules apply to the notes. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should consult
their tax advisers regarding the potential application of the constructive ownership rules.
The IRS or a court may not respect the treatment of the notes
described above, in which case the timing and character of any income or loss on the notes could be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting comments on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid
forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice focuses in particular on whether to require investors in these instruments
to accrue income over the term of their investment. It also asks for comments on a number of related topics, including the character
of income or loss with respect to these instruments; the relevance of factors such as the nature of the underlying property to
which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any, to which income (including any mandated accruals) realized by non-U.S. investors
should be subject to withholding tax; and whether these instruments are or should be subject to the constructive ownership regime
described above. While the notice requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates, any Treasury regulations
or other guidance promulgated after consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the tax
consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly with
retroactive effect. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in
the notes, including the potential application of the constructive ownership rules, possible alternative treatments and the issues
presented by this notice.
Withholding under legislation commonly referred
to as “FATCA” may (if the notes are recharacterized as debt instruments) apply to amounts treated as interest paid
with respect to the notes. Under a recent IRS notice, withholding under FATCA will not apply to payments of gross proceeds
(other than any amount treated as interest) of a taxable disposition, including redemption at maturity, of a note occurring before
January 1, 2019. You should consult your tax adviser regarding the potential application of FATCA to the notes.
Non-U.S. holders should also note that, notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I, recently promulgated Treasury regulations imposing a
withholding tax on certain “dividend equivalents” under certain “equity linked instruments” generally will
not apply to the notes.
ERISA: as described under “Benefit Plan Investor Considerations”
on page PS-99 of the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I
Supplemental plan of distribution: as described under “Plan
of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” on page PS-87 of the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I; we estimate that
our share of the total offering expenses will be approximately $10,000. We have agreed to sell to JPMS, and JPMS has agreed to
purchase from us, the aggregate principal amount of the notes specified on the front cover of this pricing supplement. JPMS proposes
initially to offer the notes to the public at the original issue price set forth on the cover page of this pricing supplement,
and to certain unaffiliated securities dealers at that price less a concession of 2.00% of the principal amount. The original issue
price for notes purchased by certain fee-based advisory accounts is 98.00% of the principal amount of the notes, which reduces
the selling commissions specified on the cover of this pricing supplement with respect to those notes to 0.00%.
We will deliver the notes against payment therefor in New York, New
York on October 7, 2015, which is the fifth scheduled business day following the date of this pricing supplement and of the pricing
of the notes. Under Rule 15c6-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, trades in the secondary market generally are
required to settle in three business days, unless the parties to any such trade expressly agree otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers
who wish to trade notes on any date prior to three business days before delivery will be required, by virtue of the fact that the
notes will initially settle in five business days (T + 5), to specify alternative settlement arrangements to prevent a failed settlement.
Conflicts of interest: JPMS has a “conflict of interest”
within the meaning of FINRA Rule 5121 in any offering of the notes in which it participates because we own, directly or indirectly,
all of the outstanding equity securities of JPMS and because the net proceeds received from the sale of the notes will be used,
in part, by JPMS or its affiliates in connection with hedging our obligations under the notes. The offering of the notes will comply
with the requirements of Rule 5121 of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) regarding a FINRA member
firm’s underwriting of securities of an affiliate. In accordance with FINRA Rule 5121, neither JPMS nor any other affiliated
agent of ours may make sales in the offering of the notes to any of its discretionary accounts without the specific written approval
of the customer.
Calculation agent: JPMS
CUSIP no.: 48125U5E8
ISIN no.: US48125U5E80
FDIC: the notes are not bank deposits and are not insured
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency, nor are they obligations of, or guaranteed by, a
bank.
Supplemental Terms of the Notes
For purposes of the notes offered by this pricing supplement, all
references to each of the following terms used in the accompanying product supplement will be deemed to refer to the corresponding
term used in this pricing supplement, as set forth in the table below:
Product Supplement Term |
Pricing Supplement Term |
Fund |
underlier |
Initial Value |
initial underlier level |
Final Value |
final underlier level |
closing price |
closing level |
pricing date |
trade date |
maturity date |
stated maturity date |
term sheet |
preliminary pricing supplement |
In addition, the following terms used in this pricing supplement
are not defined in the accompanying product supplement: underlier return, upside participation rate, maximum settlement amount,
cap level, buffer level, buffer amount and buffer rate. Accordingly, please refer to “Key Terms” on page PS-3 of this
pricing supplement for the definitions of these terms.
JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes
The estimated value of the notes when the terms of the notes are
set, which we refer to as JPMS’s estimated value of the notes, set forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal
to the sum of the values of the following hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income debt component with the same maturity as
the notes, valued using our internal funding rate for structured debt described below, and (2) the derivative or derivatives underlying
the economic terms of the notes. JPMS’s estimated value does not represent a minimum price at which JPMS would be willing
to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at any time. The internal funding rate used in the determination of JPMS’s
estimated value generally represents a discount from the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt. For additional information,
see “Selected Risk Factors — JPMS’s Estimated Value Is Not Determined by Reference to Credit Spreads for Our
Conventional Fixed-Rate Debt” on page PS-13 of this pricing supplement. The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying
the economic terms of the notes is derived from JPMS’s internal pricing models. These models are dependent on inputs such
as the traded market prices of comparable derivative instruments and on various other inputs, some of which are market-observable,
and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other factors, as well as assumptions about future market
events and/or environments. Accordingly, JPMS’s estimated value of the notes is determined when the terms of the notes are
set based on market conditions and other relevant factors and assumptions existing at that time. See “Selected Risk Factors
— JPMS’s Estimated Value Does Not Represent Future Values of the Notes and May Differ from Others’ Estimates”
on page PS-13 of this pricing supplement.
JPMS’s estimated value of the notes is lower than the original
issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are included in the original
issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to JPMS and the unaffiliated dealer, the projected profits,
if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated
cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. Because hedging our obligations entails risk and may be influenced by market forces
beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or less than expected, or it may result in a loss. We or one
or more of our affiliates will retain any profits realized in hedging our obligations under the notes. See “Selected Risk
Factors — JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes Is Lower Than the Original Issue Price of the Notes” on page PS-13
of this pricing supplement.
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes
For information about factors that will impact any secondary market
prices of the notes, see “Selected Risk Factors — Secondary Market Prices of the Notes Will Be Impacted by Many Economic
and Market Factors” on page PS-13 of this pricing supplement. In addition, we generally expect that some of the costs included
in the original issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by
JPMS in an amount that will decline to zero over the period from the date of this pricing supplement through December 27, 2015.
The length of any such initial period reflects the structure of the notes, whether our affiliates expect to earn a profit in connection
with our hedging activities, the estimated costs of hedging the notes and when these costs are incurred, as determined by JPMS.
See “Selected Risk Factors — The Value of the Notes as Published by JPMS (and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account
Statements) May Be Higher Than JPMS’s Then-Current Estimated Value of the Notes for a Limited Time Period” on page
PS-13 of this pricing supplement.
Supplemental Use of Proceeds
The notes are offered to meet investor demand for products that reflect
the risk-return profile and market exposure provided by the notes. See “Hypothetical Examples” on page PS-9 of this
pricing supplement for an illustration of the risk-return profile of the notes and “The Underlier” on page PS-18 of
this pricing supplement for a description of the market exposure provided by the notes.
The original issue price of the notes is equal to JPMS’s estimated
value of the notes plus the selling commissions paid to JPMS and the unaffiliated dealer, plus (minus) the projected profits (losses)
that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes, plus the estimated
cost of hedging our obligations under the notes.
Validity of the Notes
In the opinion of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as our special products
counsel, when the notes offered by this pricing supplement have been executed and issued by us and authenticated by the trustee
pursuant to the indenture, and delivered against payment as contemplated herein, such notes will be our valid and binding obligations,
enforceable in accordance with their terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’
rights generally, concepts of reasonableness and equitable principles of general applicability (including, without limitation,
concepts of good faith, fair dealing and the lack of bad faith), provided that such counsel expresses no opinion as to the
effect of fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer or similar provision of applicable law on the conclusions expressed above.
This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited to the federal laws of the United States of America, the laws of the
State of New York and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary
assumptions about the trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and its authentication of the notes
and the validity, binding nature and enforceability of the indenture with respect to the trustee, all as stated in the letter of
such counsel dated November 7, 2014, which was filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 by us on November
7, 2014.
HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLES
The following table and chart are provided for purposes of illustration
only. They should not be taken as an indication or prediction of future investment results and are intended merely to illustrate
the impact that the various hypothetical underlier levels on the determination date could have on the payment at maturity assuming
all other variables remain constant.
The examples below are based on a range of final underlier levels
that are entirely hypothetical; no one can predict what the underlier level will be on any day throughout the term of your notes,
and no one can predict what the final underlier level will be on the determination date. The underlier has been highly volatile
in the past — meaning that the underlier level has changed considerably in relatively short periods — and its performance
cannot be predicted for any future period.
The information in the following examples reflects hypothetical rates
of return on the offered notes assuming that they are purchased on the original issue date at the principal amount and held to
the stated maturity date. If you sell your notes in a secondary market prior to the stated maturity date, your return will depend
upon the market value of your notes at the time of sale, which may be affected by a number of factors that are not reflected in
the table below, such as interest rates, the volatility of the underlier and our creditworthiness. In addition, JPMS’s estimated
value is less than the original issue price. For more information on the JPMS’s estimated value, see “Summary Information
— JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes” on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement. The information in the table
also reflects the key terms and assumptions in the box below.
Key Terms and Assumptions |
Principal amount |
$1,000 |
Upside participation rate |
1.50 |
Cap level |
121.30% of the initial underlier level |
Maximum settlement amount |
$1,319.50 |
Buffer level |
90.00% of the initial underlier level |
Buffer rate |
approximately 1.1111 |
Buffer amount |
10.00% |
Neither a market disruption event nor a non-trading day occurs on
the originally scheduled determination date
During the term of the notes, the underlier is not delisted, liquidated
or otherwise terminated, the underlier and the underlying index have not been changed in any material respect and the underlier
has not been otherwise modified so that it does not, in the opinion of the calculation agent, fairly represent the price of the
underlier had those changes or modifications not been made
Notes purchased on original issue date at the principal amount and
held to the stated maturity date
|
For these reasons, the actual performance of the underlier over the
term of your notes, as well as the amount payable at maturity, if any, may bear little relation to the hypothetical examples shown
below or to the historical underlier levels shown elsewhere in this pricing supplement. For information about the historical levels
of the underlier during recent periods, see “The Underlier — Historical Closing Levels of the Underlier” below.
Before investing in the offered notes, you should consult publicly available information to determine the levels of the underlier
between the date of this pricing supplement and the date of your purchase of the offered notes.
Also, the hypothetical examples shown below do not take into account
the effects of applicable taxes. Because of the U.S. tax treatment applicable to your notes, tax liabilities could affect the after-tax
rate of return on your notes to a comparatively greater extent than the after-tax return on the underlier stocks.
The levels in the left column of the table below represent hypothetical
final underlier levels and are expressed as percentages of the initial underlier level. The amounts in the right column represent
the hypothetical payments at maturity, based on the corresponding hypothetical final underlier level (expressed as a percentage
of the initial underlier level), and are expressed as percentages of the principal amount of a note (rounded to the nearest one-thousandth
of a percent). Thus, a hypothetical payment at maturity of 100.000% means that the value of the cash payment that we would deliver
for each $1,000 of the outstanding principal amount of the offered notes on the stated maturity date would
equal 100.000% of the principal amount of a note, based on the corresponding
hypothetical final underlier level (expressed as a percentage of the initial underlier level) and the assumptions noted above.
Hypothetical Final Underlier Level
(as Percentage of Initial Underlier Level) |
Hypothetical Payment at Maturity
(as Percentage of Principal Amount) |
150.000% |
131.950% |
140.000% |
131.950% |
130.000% |
131.950% |
121.300% |
131.950% |
120.000% |
130.000% |
115.000% |
122.500% |
110.000% |
115.000% |
105.000% |
107.500% |
102.500% |
103.750% |
100.000% |
100.000% |
95.000% |
100.000% |
90.000% |
100.000% |
80.000% |
88.889% |
75.000% |
83.333% |
50.000% |
55.556% |
25.000% |
27.778% |
0.000% |
0.000% |
If, for example, the final underlier level were determined to be
25.000% of the initial underlier level, the payment that we would deliver on your notes at maturity would be approximately 27.778%
of the principal amount of your notes, as shown in the table above. As a result, if you purchased your notes on the original issue
date at the principal amount and held them to the stated maturity date, you would lose approximately 72.222% of your investment
(if you purchased your notes at a premium to principal amount you would lose a correspondingly higher percentage of your investment).
In addition, if the final underlier level were determined to be 150.000% of the initial underlier level, the payment that we would
deliver on your notes at maturity would be capped at the maximum settlement amount (expressed as a percentage of the principal
amount), or 131.950% of each $1,000 principal amount note, as shown in the table above. As a result, if you held your notes to
the stated maturity date, you would not benefit from any increase in the final underlier level over 121.300% of the initial underlier
level.
The following chart also shows a graphical illustration of the hypothetical
payments at maturity (expressed as a percentage of the principal amount of your notes) that we would pay on your notes on the stated
maturity date, if the final underlier level (expressed as a percentage of the initial underlier level) were any of the hypothetical
levels shown on the horizontal axis. The chart shows that any hypothetical final underlier level (expressed as a percentage of
the initial underlier level) of less than 90.000% (the section left of the 90.000% marker on the horizontal axis) would result
in a hypothetical payment at maturity of less than 100.000% of the principal amount of your notes (the section below the 100.000%
marker on the vertical axis) and, accordingly, in a loss of principal to the holder of the notes. The chart also shows that any
hypothetical final underlier level (expressed as a percentage of the initial underlier level) of greater than or equal to 121.300%
(the section right of the 121.300% marker on the horizontal axis) would result in a capped return on your investment.
The payments at maturity shown above are entirely hypothetical; they
are based on closing levels for the underlier that may not be achieved on the determination date and on assumptions that may prove
to be erroneous. The actual market value of your notes on the stated maturity date or at any other time, including any time you
may wish to sell your notes, may bear little relation to the hypothetical payments at maturity shown above, and these amounts should
not be viewed as an indication of the financial return on an investment in the offered notes. The hypothetical payments at maturity
on notes held to the stated maturity date in the examples above assume you purchased your notes at their principal amount and have
not been adjusted to reflect the actual price you pay for your notes. The return on your investment (whether positive or negative)
in your notes will be affected by the amount you pay for your notes. If you purchase your notes for a price other than the principal
amount, the return on your investment will differ from, and may be significantly lower than, the hypothetical returns suggested
by the above examples. Please read “Selected Risk Factors — Secondary Market Prices of the Notes Will Be Impacted by
Many Economic and Market Factors” on page PS-14 of this pricing supplement.
The hypothetical returns on the notes shown above apply only if
you hold the notes for their entire term. These hypotheticals do not reflect fees or expenses that would be associated with
any sale in the secondary market. If these fees and expenses were included, the hypothetical returns shown above would likely be
lower.
We cannot predict the actual final underlier level or what the market value of your notes will be on any particular day, nor can we predict the relationship between the underlier level and the market value of your notes at any time prior to the stated maturity date. The actual amount that you will receive, if any, at maturity and the rate of return on the offered notes will depend on the actual final underlier level determined by the calculation agent as described above. Moreover, the assumptions on which the hypothetical returns are based may turn out to be inaccurate. Consequently, the amount of cash to be paid in respect of your notes, if any, on the stated maturity date may be very different from the information reflected in the table and chart above. |
SELECTED RISK FACTORS
An investment in your notes is subject to the risks described below, as well as the risks described under “Risk Factors” in the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I and “Risk Factors” in the accompanying underlying supplement no. 1a-I. Your notes are a riskier investment than ordinary debt securities. Also, your notes are not equivalent to investing directly in the underlier stocks, i.e., the stocks underlying the underlier to which your notes are linked. You should carefully consider whether the offered notes are suited to your particular circumstances. |
You May Lose Some or All of Your Investment
in the Notes
The notes do not guarantee any return of principal. The return on
the notes at maturity is linked to the performance of the underlier and will depend on whether, and the extent to which, the underlier
return is positive or negative. Your investment will be exposed to loss on a leveraged basis if the final underlier level is less
than the initial underlier level by more than 10.00%. For every 1% that the final underlier level is less than the initial underlier
level by more than 10.00%, you will lose an amount equal to approximately 1.1111% of the principal amount of your notes. Accordingly,
you could lose some or all of your initial investment at maturity. Also, the market price of your notes prior to the stated maturity
date may be significantly lower than the purchase price you pay for your notes. Consequently, if you sell your notes before the
stated maturity date, you may receive far less than the amount of your investment in the notes.
Your Maximum Gain on the Notes Is Limited
to the Maximum Settlement Amount
If the final underlier level is greater than the initial underlier
level, for each $1,000 principal amount note, you will receive at maturity a payment that will not exceed the maximum settlement
amount, regardless of the appreciation in the underlier, which may be significant. Accordingly, the amount payable on your notes
may be significantly less than it would have been had you invested directly in the underlier. The maximum settlement amount is
$1,319.50.
The Notes Are Subject to the Credit Risk
of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The notes are subject to the credit risk of JPMorgan Chase &
Co., and our credit ratings and credit spreads may adversely affect the market value of the notes. Investors are dependent on JPMorgan
Chase & Co.’s ability to pay all amounts due on the notes. Any actual or potential change in our creditworthiness or
credit spreads, as determined by the market for taking our credit risk, is likely to adversely affect the value of the notes. If
we were to default on our payment obligations, you may not receive any amounts owed to you under the notes and you could lose your
entire investment.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
We and our affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with
the issuance of the notes, including acting as calculation agent and as an agent of the offering of the notes, hedging our obligations
under the notes and making the assumptions used to determine the pricing of the notes and JPMS’s estimated value. Also, the
distributor from which you purchase the notes may conduct hedging activities for us in connection with the notes. In performing
these duties, our economic interests, the economic interests of any distributor performing such duties and the economic interests
of the calculation agent and other affiliates of ours are potentially adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. In
addition, our business activities, and the business activities of any distributor from which you purchase the notes, including
hedging and trading activities, could cause our economic interests to be adverse to yours and could adversely affect any payment
on the notes and the value of the notes. It is possible that hedging or trading activities of ours or our affiliates in connection
with the notes could result in substantial returns for us or our affiliates while the value of the notes declines. If the distributor
from which you purchase notes is to conduct hedging activities for us in connection with the notes, that distributor may profit
in connection with such hedging activities and such profit, if any, will be in addition to the compensation that the distributor
receives for the sale of the notes to you. You should be aware that the potential to earn fees in connection with hedging activities
may create a further incentive for the distributor to sell the notes to you in addition to the compensation they would receive
for the sale of the notes. Please refer to “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest” on page PS-13
of the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I for additional information about these risks.
JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes
Is Lower Than the Original Issue Price of the Notes
JPMS’s estimated value is only an estimate using several factors.
The original issue price of the notes exceeds JPMS’s estimated value because costs associated with selling, structuring and
hedging the notes are included in the original issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions, the projected
profits, if any, that our affiliates expect to realize for assuming risks inherent in hedging our obligations under the notes and
the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. See “Summary Information — JPMS’s Estimated Value
of the Notes” on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement.
JPMS’s Estimated Value Does Not Represent
Future Values of the Notes and May Differ from Others’ Estimates
JPMS’s estimated value of the notes is determined by reference
to JPMS’s internal pricing models when the terms of the notes are set. This estimated value is based on market conditions
and other relevant factors existing at that time and JPMS’s assumptions about market parameters, which can include volatility,
dividend rates, interest rates and other factors. Different pricing models and assumptions could provide valuations for notes that
are greater than or less than JPMS’s estimated value. In addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future
may change, and any assumptions may prove to be incorrect. On future dates, the value of the notes could change significantly based
on, among other things, changes in market conditions, our creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors,
which may impact the price, if any, at which JPMS would be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions. See
“Summary Information — JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes” on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement.
JPMS’s Estimated Value Is Not Determined
by Reference to Credit Spreads for Our Conventional Fixed-Rate Debt
The internal funding rate used in the determination of JPMS’s
estimated value generally represents a discount from the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt. The discount is based
on, among other things, our view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational and ongoing liability
management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for our conventional fixed-rate debt. If JPMS were to use the interest
rate implied by our conventional fixed-rate credit spreads, we would expect the economic terms of the notes to be more favorable
to you. Consequently, our use of an internal funding rate would have an adverse effect on the terms of the notes and any secondary
market prices of the notes. See “Summary Information — JPMS’s Estimated Value of the Notes” on page PS-7
of this pricing supplement.
The Value of the Notes as Published by JPMS
(and Which May Be Reflected on Customer Account Statements) May Be Higher Than JPMS’s Then-Current Estimated Value of the
Notes for a Limited Time Period
We generally expect that some of the costs included in the original
issue price of the notes will be partially paid back to you in connection with any repurchases of your notes by JPMS in an amount
that will decline to zero over an initial predetermined period. These costs can include projected hedging profits, if any, and,
in some circumstances, estimated hedging costs and our secondary market credit spreads for structured debt issuances. See “Summary
Information — Secondary Market Prices of the Notes” on page PS-7 of this pricing supplement for additional information
relating to this initial period. Accordingly, the estimated value of your notes during this initial period may be lower than the
value of the notes as published by JPMS (and which may be shown on your customer account statements).
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes Will
Likely Be Lower Than the Original Issue Price of the Notes
Any secondary market prices of the notes will likely be lower than
the original issue price of the notes because, among other things, secondary market prices take into account our secondary market
credit spreads for structured debt issuances and, also, because secondary market prices (a) exclude selling commissions and (b)
may exclude projected hedging profits, if any, and estimated hedging costs that are included in the original issue price of the
notes. As a result, the price, if any, at which JPMS will be willing to buy notes from you in secondary market transactions, if
at all, is likely to be lower than the original issue price. Any sale by you prior to the maturity date could result in a substantial
loss to you. See the immediately following risk consideration for information about additional factors that will impact any secondary
market prices of the notes.
The notes are not designed to be short-term trading instruments.
Accordingly, you should be able and willing to hold your notes to maturity. See “— Lack of Liquidity” on page
PS-16 of this pricing supplement.
Secondary Market Prices of the Notes Will
Be Impacted by Many Economic and Market Factors
The secondary market price of the notes during their term will be
impacted by a number of economic and market factors, which may either offset or magnify each other, aside from the selling commissions,
projected hedging profits, if any, estimated hedging costs and the level of the underlier, including:
● |
any actual or potential change in our creditworthiness or credit spreads; |
● |
customary bid-ask spreads for similarly sized trades; |
● |
secondary market credit spreads for structured debt issuances; |
● |
the actual and expected volatility of the underlier; |
● |
the time to maturity of the notes; |
● |
the dividend rates on the underlier stocks; |
● |
interest and yield rates in the market generally; |
● |
the exchange rates and the volatility of the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which the underlier stocks are traded and the correlation between those rates and the closing levels of the underlier; |
● |
the occurrence of certain events to the underlier that may or may not require an adjustment to the share adjustment factor; and |
● |
a variety of other economic, financial, political, regulatory and judicial events. |
Additionally, independent pricing vendors and/or third party broker-dealers
may publish a price for the notes, which may also be reflected on customer account statements. This price may be different (higher
or lower) than the price of the notes, if any, at which JPMS may be willing to purchase your notes in the secondary market.
We May Sell an Additional Aggregate Principal
Amount of the Notes at a Different Issue Price
At our sole option, we may decide to sell an additional aggregate
principal amount of the notes subsequent to the date of this pricing supplement. The issue price of the notes in the subsequent
sale may differ substantially (higher or lower) from the original issue price you paid as provided on the cover of this pricing
supplement.
If You Purchase Your Notes at a Premium
to the Principal Amount, the Return on Your Investment Will Be Lower Than the Return on Notes Purchased at the Principal Amount
and the Impact of Certain Key Terms of the Notes Will Be Negatively Affected
The amount you will be paid for your notes on the stated maturity
date will not be adjusted based on the price you pay for the notes. If you purchase notes at a price that differs from the principal
amount of the notes, then the return on your investment in the notes held to the stated maturity date will differ from, and may
be substantially less than, the return on notes purchased at the principal amount. If you purchase your notes at a premium to the
principal amount and hold them to the stated maturity date the return on your investment in the notes will be lower than it would
have been had you purchased the notes at the principal amount. In addition, the impact of the buffer level and the cap level on
the return on your investment will depend upon the price you pay for your notes relative to the principal amount. For example,
if you purchase your notes at a premium to the principal amount, the cap level will permit only a lower percentage increase in
your investment in the notes than would have been the case for notes purchased at the principal amount. Similarly, the buffer level,
while still providing an increase in the return on the notes if the final underlier level is greater than or equal to the buffer
level but less than the cap level, will allow a greater percentage decrease in your investment in the notes than would have been
the case for notes purchased at the principal amount.
No Interest or Dividend Payments or Voting
Rights
As a holder of the notes, you will not receive interest payments.
As a result, even if the amount payable for your notes on the stated maturity date exceeds the principal amount of your notes,
the overall return you earn on your notes may be less than you would have earned by investing in a non-fund-linked debt security
of comparable maturity that bears interest at a prevailing market rate. In addition, as a holder of the notes, you will not have
voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends or other distributions or other rights that holders of the underlier stocks or
shares of the underlier would have.
The Notes Are Subject to Currency Exchange
Risk
Because the prices of the underlier stocks are converted into U.S.
dollars for purposes of calculating the net asset value of the underlier, holders of the notes will be exposed to currency exchange
rate risk with respect to each of the currencies in which the underlier stocks trade. Your net exposure will depend on the extent
to which those currencies strengthen or weaken against the U.S. dollar and the relative weight of the underlier stocks denominated
in each of those currencies. If, taking into account the relevant weighting, the U.S. dollar strengthens against those currencies,
the level of the underlier will be adversely affected and the payment at maturity, if any, may be reduced. Of particular importance
to potential currency exchange risk are:
● |
existing and expected rates of inflation; |
● |
existing and expected interest rate levels; |
● |
the balance of payments in the countries issuing those currencies and the United States and between each country and its major trading partners; |
● |
political, civil or military unrest in the countries issuing those currencies and the United States; and |
● |
the extent of government surpluses or deficits in the countries issuing those currencies and the United States. |
All of these factors are in turn sensitive to the monetary, fiscal
and trade policies pursued by the governments of the countries issuing those currencies and the United States and other countries
important to international trade and finance.
The Notes Are Subject to Risks Associated
with Securities Issued by Non-U.S. Companies
The underlier stocks have been issued by non-U.S. companies. Investments
in securities linked to the value of such non-U.S. equity securities involve risks associated with the securities markets in the
home countries of the issuers of those non-U.S. equity securities, including risks of volatility in those markets, governmental
intervention in those markets and cross shareholdings in companies in certain countries. Also, there is generally less publicly
available information about companies in some of these jurisdictions than there is about U.S. companies that are subject to the
reporting requirements of the SEC, and generally non-U.S. companies are subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting
standards and requirements and securities trading rules different from those applicable to U.S. reporting companies. The prices
of securities in foreign markets may be affected by political, economic, financial and social factors in those countries, or global
regions, including changes in government, economic and fiscal policies and currency exchange laws.
There Are Risks Associated With the
Underlier
Although the shares of the underlier are listed for trading on NYSE
Arca, Inc., which we refer to as NYSE Arca, and a number of similar products have been traded on NYSE Arca and other securities
exchanges for varying periods of time, there is no assurance that an active trading market will continue for the shares of the
underlier or that there will be liquidity in the trading market. The underlier is subject to management risk, which is the risk
that the investment strategies of the underlier’s investment adviser, the implementation of which is subject to a number
of constraints, may not produce the intended results. These constraints could adversely affect the market price of the shares of
the underlier and, consequently, the value of the notes.
The Performance and Market Value of the Underlier,
Particularly During Periods of Market Volatility, May Not Correlate with the Performance of the Underlying Index as well as the
Net Asset Value Per Share of the Underlier
The underlier does not fully replicate the underlying index and may
hold securities different from those included in the underlying index. In addition, the performance of the underlier will
reflect additional transaction costs and fees that are not included in the calculation of the underlying index. All of these
factors may lead to a lack of correlation between the performance of the underlier and the underlying index. In addition,
corporate actions with respect to the equity securities held by the underlier (such as mergers and spin-offs) may impact the variance
between the performances of the underlier and the underlying index. Finally, because the shares of the underlier are traded
on NYSE Arca and are subject to market supply and investor demand, the market value of one share of the underlier may differ from
the net asset value per share of the underlier.
During periods of market volatility, securities underlying the underlier
may be unavailable in the secondary market, market participants may be unable to calculate accurately the net asset value per share
of the underlier and the liquidity of the underlier may be adversely affected. This kind of market volatility may also disrupt
the ability of market participants to create and redeem shares in the underlier. Further, market volatility may adversely
affect, sometimes materially, the prices at which market participants are willing to buy and sell shares of the underlier.
As a result, under these circumstances, the market value of shares of the underlier may vary substantially from the net asset value
per share of the underlier. For all of the foregoing reasons, the performance of the underlier may not correlate with
the performance of the underlying index as well as the net asset value per share of the underlier, which could materially and adversely
affect the value of the notes in the secondary market and/or reduce your payment at maturity.
The Notes Are Subject to Risks Associated
with Emerging Markets
The underlier stocks have been issued by non-U.S. companies located
in emerging markets countries. Countries with emerging markets may have relatively unstable governments, may present the risks
of nationalization of businesses, restrictions on foreign ownership and prohibitions on the repatriation of assets, and may have
less protection of property rights than more developed countries. The economies of countries with emerging markets may be based
on only a few industries, may be highly vulnerable to changes in local or global trade conditions, and may suffer from extreme
and volatile debt burdens or inflation rates. Local securities markets may trade a small number of securities and may be unable
to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of holdings difficult or impossible
at times. Moreover, the economies in such countries may differ favorably or unfavorably from the economy in the United States in
such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resources and self-sufficiency. Any
of the foregoing could adversely affect the market value of shares of the underlier and the notes.
Lack of Liquidity
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. JPMS intends
to offer to purchase the notes in the secondary market but is not required to do so. Even if there is a secondary market, it may
not provide enough liquidity to allow you to trade or sell the notes easily. Because other dealers are not likely to make a secondary
market for the notes, the price at which you may be able to trade your notes is likely to depend on the price, if any, at which
JPMS is willing to buy the notes.
The Anti-Dilution Protection for the
Underlier Is Limited
The calculation agent will make adjustments to the share adjustment
factor for certain events affecting the shares of the underlier. However, the calculation agent will not make an adjustment in
response to all events that could affect the shares of the underlier. If an event occurs that does not require the calculation
agent to make an adjustment, the value of the notes may be materially and adversely affected.
The Tax Consequences of an Investment in
the Notes Are Uncertain
There is no direct legal authority as to the proper U.S. federal
income tax characterization of the notes, and we do not intend to request a ruling from the IRS. The IRS might not accept, and
a court might not uphold, the treatment of the notes described in “Key Terms — Tax treatment” in this pricing
supplement and in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I.
If the IRS were successful in asserting an alternative treatment for the notes, the timing and character of any income or loss
on the notes could differ materially and adversely from our description herein.
Even if the treatment of the notes is respected, the IRS may assert
that the notes constitute “constructive ownership transactions” within the meaning of Section 1260 of the Code, in
which case gain recognized in respect of the notes that would otherwise be long-term capital gain and that was in excess of the
“net underlying long-term capital gain” (as defined in Section 1260) would be treated as ordinary income, and a notional
interest charge would apply as if that income had accrued for tax purposes at a constant yield over the notes’ term. Our
special tax counsel has not expressed an opinion with respect to whether the constructive ownership rules apply to the notes.
In addition, in 2007 Treasury and the IRS released a notice requesting
comments on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of “prepaid forward contracts” and similar instruments. The notice
focuses in particular on whether to require investors in these instruments to accrue income over the term of their investment.
It also asks for comments on a number of related topics, including the character of income or loss with respect to these instruments;
the relevance of factors such as the nature of the underlying property to which the instruments are linked; the degree, if any,
to which income (including any mandated accruals) realized by non-U.S. investors should be subject to withholding tax; and whether
these instruments are or should be subject to the “constructive ownership” regime described above. While the notice
requests comments on appropriate transition rules and effective dates, any Treasury regulations or other guidance promulgated after
consideration of these issues could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences of an investment in the notes, possibly
with retroactive effect.
You should review carefully the section entitled “Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I and consult your tax adviser regarding
the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the notes, including the potential application of the constructive
ownership rules, possible alternative treatments and the issues presented by the notice described above.
THE UNDERLIER
The iShares® MSCI Emerging Markets ETF is an exchange-traded
fund of iShares, Inc., which is a registered investment company that consists of numerous separate investment portfolios. The iShares®
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before
fees and expenses, of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is a free-float adjusted average of the
U.S. dollar values of all of the equity securities constituting the MSCI indices for selected emerging markets countries. For additional
information about the iShares® MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, see “Fund Descriptions — The iShares®
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF” on page US-129 of the accompanying underlying supplement no. 1a-I.
Historical Closing Levels of the Underlier
The closing level of the underlier has fluctuated in the past and
may, in the future, experience significant fluctuations. Any historical upward or downward trend in the closing level of the underlier
during any period shown below is not an indication that the underlier is more or less likely to increase or decrease at any time
during the term of your notes.
You should not take the historical levels of the underlier as
an indication of the future performance of the underlier. We cannot give you any assurance that the future performance of the
underlier or the underlier stocks will result in a return of any of your initial investment on the stated maturity date. In light
of the increased volatility currently being experienced by the financial services sector and U.S. and global securities markets,
and recent market declines, it may be substantially more likely that you could lose all or a substantial portion of your investment
in the notes.
Neither we nor any of our affiliates make any representation to you
as to the performance of the underlier. The actual performance of the underlier over the term of the offered notes, as well as
the amount payable at maturity, may bear little relation to the historical levels shown below.
The graph below shows the closing levels of the underlier on each
day from January 4, 2010 through September 30, 2015. The closing level of the underlier on September 30, 2015 was $32.78. We obtained
the closing level listed above and the closing levels in the graph below from the Bloomberg Professional® service
(“Bloomberg”), without independent verification.
Historical Performance of iShares®
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Source: Bloomberg
We have not authorized anyone to provide any information other than
that contained or incorporated by reference in this pricing supplement, the accompanying underlying supplement no. 1a-I, the accompanying
product supplement no. 4a-I and the accompanying prospectus supplement and prospectus with respect to the notes offered by this
pricing supplement and with respect to JPMorgan Chase & Co. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as
to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This pricing supplement, together with the accompanying
underlying supplement no. 1a-I, the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I and the accompanying prospectus supplement and prospectus,
contains the terms of the notes and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral statements as well as any other written
materials including preliminary or indicative pricing terms, correspondence, trade ideas, structures for implementation, sample
structures, fact sheets, brochures or other educational materials of ours. The information in this pricing supplement, the accompanying
underlying supplement no. 1a-I, the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I and the accompanying prospectus supplement and prospectus
may be accurate only as of the dates of each of these documents, respectively. This pricing supplement, the accompanying underlying
supplement no. 1a-I, the accompanying product supplement no. 4a-I and the accompanying prospectus supplement and prospectus do
not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the notes in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation
is unlawful.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pricing Supplement
Page
Summary Information |
|
PS-3 |
Hypothetical Examples |
|
PS-9 |
Selected Risk Factors |
|
PS-12 |
The Underlier |
|
PS-18 |
|
|
|
Product Supplement No. 4a-I dated November 7, 2014 |
Description of Notes |
|
PS-1 |
Estimated Value and Secondary Market Prices of the Notes |
|
PS-7 |
Risk Factors |
|
PS-8 |
Use of Proceeds and Hedging |
|
PS-42 |
General Terms of Notes |
|
PS-43 |
The Underlyings |
|
PS-52 |
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences |
|
PS-77 |
Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest) |
|
PS-87 |
Notice to Investors |
|
PS-89 |
Benefit Plan Investor Considerations |
|
PS-99 |
Underlying Supplement No. 1a-I dated November 7, 2014 |
Supplemental Terms of Notes |
|
US-1 |
Risk Factors |
|
US-2 |
Equity Index Descriptions |
|
US-15 |
The Dow Jones Industrial AverageTM |
|
US-15 |
The EURO STOXX 50® Index |
|
US-17 |
The EURO STOXX® Banks Index |
|
US-22 |
The FTSE™ 100 Index |
|
US-27 |
The FTSE GEIS Indices |
|
US-29 |
The MSCI Indices |
|
US-37 |
The MSCI 25/50 Indices |
|
US-51 |
The NASDAQ-100 Index® |
|
US-56 |
The Nikkei 225 Index |
|
US-61 |
The Russell Indices |
|
US-65 |
The S&P 500® Index |
|
US-73 |
The S&P MidCap 400® Index |
|
US-78 |
The S&P Select Industry Indices |
|
US-83 |
The Select Sector Indices |
|
US-88 |
The TOPIX® Index |
|
US-91 |
Commodity Index Descriptions |
|
US-94 |
The Bloomberg Commodity Indices |
|
US-94 |
The S&P GSCI Indices |
|
US-107 |
Fund Descriptions |
|
US-117 |
The Financial Select Sector SPDR® Fund |
|
US-117 |
The iShares® 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF |
|
US-119 |
The iShares® U.S. Real Estate ETF |
|
US-122 |
The iShares® MSCI Brazil Capped ETF |
|
US-126 |
The iShares® MSCI Emerging Markets ETF |
|
US-129 |
The iShares® MSCI EAFE ETF |
|
US-132 |
The iShares® MSCI Mexico Capped ETF |
|
US-135 |
The iShares® Russell 2000 ETF |
|
US-138 |
The Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF |
|
US-141 |
The SPDR® Gold Trust |
|
US-146 |
The SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust |
|
US-149 |
The SPDR® S&P® Homebuilders ETF |
|
US-151 |
The SPDR® S&P® Metals & Mining ETF |
|
US-154 |
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® Fund |
|
US-157 |
The United States Oil Fund, LP |
|
US-160 |
The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF |
|
US-161 |
The Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF |
|
US-163 |
The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF |
|
US-165 |
The WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund |
|
US-172 |
Prospectus Supplement dated November 7, 2014 |
About This Prospectus Supplement |
|
S-1 |
Foreign Currency Risks |
|
S-2 |
Description of Notes |
|
S-4 |
Description of Warrants |
|
S-11 |
Description of Units |
|
S-14 |
United States Federal Taxation |
|
S-16 |
Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest) |
|
S-17 |
Prospectus dated November 7, 2014 |
Where You Can Find More Information |
|
1 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
2 |
Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
3 |
Use of Proceeds |
|
3 |
Important Factors That May Affect Future Results |
|
4 |
Description of Debt Securities |
|
6 |
Description of Warrants |
|
12 |
Description of Units |
|
15 |
Description of Purchase Contracts |
|
17 |
Forms of Securities |
|
18 |
Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest). |
|
24 |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
25 |
Legal Matters |
|
26 |
Benefit Plan Investor Considerations |
|
26 |
$3,885,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Capped Buffered Enhanced Participation
Equity Notes due 2017
(Linked to the iShares®
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF)
Medium-Term Notes, Series E
JP Morgan Chase (NYSE:JPM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2024 to Oct 2024
JP Morgan Chase (NYSE:JPM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2023 to Oct 2024