UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2022
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 000-54546
AMERI METRO, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | | 45-1877342 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2575 Eastern Blvd. Suite 102
York, Pennsylvania 17402
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip
code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code: 717-434-0668
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)
of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $0.000001 par value per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a
well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent
filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “non-accelerated filer”, “smaller
reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller
reporting company | ☒ |
| | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant
to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant
included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether
any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the
registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
☐ Yes ☒ No
State the aggregate market value of the voting
and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the
average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second
fiscal quarter.
$0
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s
classes of preferred stock and common stock as of the latest practicable date.
Class | | Outstanding at January 31, 2024 |
| | |
Preferred Stock, par value $0.000001 | | 1,800,000 shares |
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.000001 | | 1,684,000 shares |
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.000001 | | 4,289,637,844 shares |
Class C Common Stock, par value $0.000001 | | 191,051,320 shares |
Class D Common Stock, par value $0.000001 | | 114,000,000 shares |
AMERI METRO, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX
PART I
ITEMS 1, 1A, 1B, 2,
3 and 4
SEE NOTE 1
PART II
ITEMS 5, 6, 7, and 7A
SEE NOTE 1
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
AMERI METRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEE NOTE 1
AMERI METRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
SEE NOTE 1
AMERI METRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 2022 AND 2021
SEE NOTE 1
AMERI METRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SEE NOTE 1
AMERI METRO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
July 31, 2022 and 2021
NOTE 1 – LETTER FROM AMERI METRO, INC. CFO
April 16, 2024
To Whom this May Concern and for the Record:
Ameri Metro, Inc. (“ARMT”) Background:
ARMT filed its original S-1 on June 13, 2013.
ARMT is an infrastructure company specializing in highly technical toll roads, bridges, high-speed rails, and ports. Since 2013, ARMT
has solidified over 100 infrastructure contracts throughout the USA and the world. All these contracts will ultimately recognize well
more than $1,000,000,000 each averaging approximately $20,000,000,000 each. All contracts ultimately benefit State or Federal agencies.
ARMT has solidified funding of approximately $950,000,000,000 from large financial institutions. ARMT was formed to enhance the humanitarian
crisis everywhere and fund governments whereby the projects are otherwise not affordable without raising taxes.
Personal Background:
My name is Phillip M. (“Marty”) Hicks,
and I am the Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ameri Metro, Inc. My brief professional background is that I have
more than 40 years’ experience and have served throughout the USA as a forensic accountant, one of the most accredited forensic
accountants in America. I am a former Partner for Deloitte and a veteran professional Whistleblower for the Security Exchange Commission’s
(“SEC”) program since its inception in August of 2011. With respect to White Collar crimes, I have assisted various U.S. Attorney’s
offices and the local Federal Bureau of Investigation. I continue to work with former Federal agents. In this respect, I have extensive
regulatory experience and have assisted with more than 50 Federal indictments including but not limited to; Robert Bandfield, Gregg Mulholland,
Brian Sodi, Scott Key, Barry Honig and others.
Late Regulatory Filings:
We at Ameri Metro, Inc. are providing details resulting in our late
filing of the following:
|
● |
All 10-Q’s and the 10-K due since January 31, 2022 |
Even though we have adequate books and records for all periods
questioned in the opinion of management, we are unable to file financial statements nor footnotes for these periods due to the following:
|
1. |
A bogus lawsuit was filed before the financial periods in question by Andrew Lentz for more than $389,000,000. Mr. Lentz was a former consultant to a related entity of ARMT. Mr. Lentz was fully aware that this bogus lawsuit would cause significant damages to ARMT including, but not limited to, not being able to meet its financial reporting requirements. To date, his strategy has worked. |
|
2. |
Andrew Lentz boasted to many ARMT affiliates about “blowing the whistle” on ARMT to the SEC. In fact, the SEC indeed accepted the Lentz TCR (complaint) and acted upon it by opening an investigation and issuing questionnaires to all but a few ARMT Stock Class B shareholders. Only an insider such as Andrew Lentz was privy to that very private information. ARMT is currently supporting a lawsuit against Lentz and the SEC on behalf of our Class B shareholders for violations of personal privacy, fraud and extortion. In that regard, Lentz was not in a position to file a lawsuit of this magnitude, notably having filed personal bankruptcy three times, thus fraudulent. |
|
3. |
Even though Andrew Lentz clearly made materially false statements to a Federal agency (i.e. the SEC) causing serious damages to ARMT, the SEC has not pursued, to our knowledge, a criminal complaint against him via the Department of Justice. In fact, the SEC continues to pursue de-registration of ARMT regardless of merit. |
|
4. |
The SEC has not issued its final position on accounting for digital currencies. The proposed SEC position remains in direct conflict with GAAP standards and the AICPA’s proposals. We agree with the AICPA’s position because the SEC’s position opens the door to massive financial statement manipulations. |
If these matters remain outstanding and the SEC
continues its course of action against ARMT, we have no choice but to do the following or any combination thereof to protect our interests:
|
● |
File a complaint in Federal Court against the SEC and Andrew Lentz for numerous allegations involving damages of more than $1,000,000,000. |
|
● |
Immediately tokenize ARMT so that the company is no longer regulated by the SEC because the company will no longer have equity positions. |
|
● |
File our complaint against Andrew Lentz for consideration to the US Attorney’s office in Pennsylvania. |
We sincerely hope this clarifies our inability
to meet our regulatory filing requirements, several of which are directly a consequence of SEC negligence.
Very Truly, | |
| |
/s/ Phillip M. Hicks. | |
Phillip M. (“Marty”) Hicks, Co-CEO, CFO
Cc: Resnick & Louis
Ameri Metro, Inc. | 2575
Eastern Blvd, Suite 102, York PA 17402 | Ameri-Metro.com
ITEMS 9, 9A and 9C
SEE NOTE 1
PART III
ITEMS 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14
SEE NOTE 1
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
EXHIBITS
3.1 |
|
Articles
of Incorporation (filed with the Form 10 November 9, 2011) |
3.2 |
|
Amended
by-laws (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
3.3 |
|
Cert.
of Amendment Cert. of Incorporation of Ameri Metro |
5.1 |
|
Opinion of Counsel on legality of securities being registered* |
10.1 |
|
Master
Indenture Agreement of Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (filed with the Form 8-K January 18, 2013) |
10.2 |
|
Master
Indenture Agreement of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. (filed with the Form 8-K January 18, 2013) |
10.3 |
|
Master
Indenture Agreement of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. (filed with the Form 8-K January 18, 2013) |
10.4 |
|
TEMS
engagement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
10.5 |
|
Alabama
Indenture Agreement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
10.6 |
|
High
Speed Rail Indenture Agreement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
10.7 |
|
Damar
Agreement (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
10.8 |
|
Agreement
For Construction (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.9 |
|
Assignment
Agreement For Construction (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.10 |
|
Payment
Agreement to Penndel Land Co (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.11 |
|
Ameri
Metro Inc. / HSR Tech Inc. Licensing of Intellectual Property Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.12 |
|
HSR
Tech LOI Tech Use Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.13 |
|
Opportunity
License Agreement Entities (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.14 |
|
Master
Agreement for Construction Nonprofits (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.15 |
|
Master
Agreement for Construction Entities (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.16 |
|
Consulting
Agreement HSRFP Inc. (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.17 |
|
Consulting
Agreement HSRF Inc. (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.18 |
|
Company
Founder Emp. Agreement(filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.19 |
|
Directorship
Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.20 |
|
Letter
of Intent for Port Trajan property (filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 13, 2013) |
10.21 |
|
Port
De Ostia Inc. Agreement GTI (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.22 |
|
C-Bar
Marshall Rebar Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.23 |
|
Ameri
Metro & Jewell LOI (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.24 |
|
Master
Consulting Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.25 |
|
Master
Trustee Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.26 |
|
2015
Executive Incentive Compensation Program (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.27 |
|
Establishing
the Compensation Committee (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.28 |
|
Amendment
to Payment Agreement Penndel Land Co. (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.29 |
|
Amendment
to HSR Technologies Inc. Payment Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.30 |
|
Amendment
to Damar TruckDeck LLC Payment Agreement (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
10.31 |
|
TEMS
consent form letter (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
23.1 |
|
Consent of Counsel (included in Exhibit 5.1)* |
31.1 |
|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002* |
31.2 |
|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002* |
32.1 |
|
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002* |
32.2 |
|
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002* |
99.1 |
|
ProAdvisor
Valuation report, dated November 1, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1, filed on November 23,
2016, and incorporated herein by reference) |
99.2 |
|
ProAdvisor
consent letter (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registration statement on Form S-1, filed on November 23, 2016) |
99.3 |
|
June
12, 2012 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
99.4 |
|
Alabama
Legislative Act 506 (filed as part of the Form 8-K/A filed January 18, 2013) |
99.5 |
|
Form
of subscription agreement for sale of the shares (filed with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 13, 2013) |
99.6 |
|
Intended
use of Master Trust Indentures (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.7 |
|
Florida
Alabama TPO Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.8 |
|
Alabama
Toll Road Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.9 |
|
Appalachian
Region Commission Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.10 |
|
Atlantic
Energy & Utilities Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.11 |
|
High
Speed Rail Projects Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.12 |
|
Port
Freeport & Brazoria Fort Bend Rail District Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.13 |
|
High
Speed Rail & Ancillary Projects Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.14 |
|
Port
of Ostia Inc. @ KSJM International Airport Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.15 |
|
Portus
De Jewel Mexico Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.16 |
|
KSJM
International Airport Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.17 |
|
HSR
Freight Line Inc. / Phila. Port Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.18 |
|
HSR
Freight Line Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.19 |
|
HSR
Passenger Services Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.20 |
|
HSR
Technologies Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.21 |
|
Malibu
Homes Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.22 |
|
Platinum
Media Inc. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-Q filed December 30, 2019) |
99.23 |
|
Port
De Claudius Inc. & Port Trajan of Pa. Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.24 |
|
Panama
Canal – Alabama Port Partnership (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.25 |
|
Lord
Chauffeurs Inc. – Business Jet Center @ KSJM Airport Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.26 |
|
HSR
Freight Line Inc. & HSR Passenger Services Coast to Coast Rail Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November
6, 2019) |
99.27 |
|
New
York – Washington Rail Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.28 |
|
Ann
Charles International Cargo Airport Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.29 |
|
Texas
International Trade Corridor Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.30 |
|
Virginia
Crescent Line Rail Bond Indenture (filed as part of the Form 10-K/A filed November 6, 2019) |
99.31 |
|
Shah
Mathias transferred 102,600,000 Class B shares from his personal holdings, equally, to 20 related entities that Ameri Metro Inc.
holds a 25% interest in 19 of the related entities and a 10% interest in one of the related entities. (filed with the Form 8-K September
17,2020) |
99.32 |
|
2015
Equity Incentive Plan, the plan was funded with class B shares. According to the plan schedule. (filed with the form 8-K September
17, 2020) |
99.33 |
|
NorAsia
Consulting & Advisory Valuation Report (filed with the form 8-K September 4, 2020) |
99.34 |
|
Lord
Chauffeurs, LTD Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K September 4, 2020) |
99.35 |
|
Slater
& West, Inc. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.36 |
|
Port of Ostia, Inc. Amendment
to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.37 |
|
Port de Claudius, Inc.
Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.38 |
|
Platinum Media, Inc. Amendment
to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.39 |
|
Penn Insurance Services
LLC. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.40 |
|
Natural Resources LLC.
Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.41 |
|
Malibu Homes, Inc. Amendment
to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.42 |
|
KSJM International Airport,
Inc. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.43 |
|
HSR Technologies, Inc.
Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.44 |
|
HSR Passenger Services,
Inc. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.45 |
|
HSR Logistics, Inc. Amendment
to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.46 |
|
HSR Freight Line, Inc.
Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.47 |
|
Eastern Development &
Design, Inc. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.48 |
|
Cape Horn Abstracting Amendment
to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.49 |
|
Atlantic Energy & Utility
Products, Inc. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.50 |
|
Ann Charles International
Airport, Inc. Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.51 |
|
Ameri Cement Inc. Amendment
to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 14, 2020) |
99.52 |
|
Portus de Jewel Seaport
& Inland Port project Amendment to Opportunity License Agreement (filed with the form 8-K August 12, 2020) |
99.53 |
|
Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers
Corp. 25% non-controlling interest in SMBC (filed with the form 8-K August 12, 2020) |
99.54 |
|
HSR Technologies, Inc has
acquired intellectual property from NP&G Innovations, Inc. (filed with the form 8-K July 30, 2020) |
99.55 |
|
Platinum Media Inc. joint
venture agreement with Resurrection Media PlatJV, LLC. (filed with the form 8-K July 30, 2020) |
99.56 |
|
Platinum Media Inc. joint
venture agreement with Best of Times Productions. (filed with the form 8-K July 30, 2020) |
99.57 |
|
HSR Technologies, Inc.
acquired DAMAR TruckDeck bed liner intellectual property. (filed with the form 8-K July 30, 2020) |
99.58 |
|
HSR Technologies Inc. combat
COVID 19 exclusive right to use FDA Approved ozone equipment. (filed with the form 8-K July 22, 2020) |
99.59 |
|
HSR Logistics Inc. has
acquired an easement. (filed with the form 8-K July 22, 2020) |
99.60 |
|
Ann Charles International
Airport Inc. acquired Air Cyprus Aviation Limited, (filed with the form 8-K July 20, 2020) |
99.61 |
|
Norasia Valuation Report dated July 31, 2020* |
101.INS |
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
104 |
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: April 17, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Shah Matthias |
|
|
Shah Matthias |
|
|
Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: April 17, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Phillip M Hicks |
|
|
Phillip M Hicks |
|
|
Co-CEO and CFO |
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME |
|
OFFICE |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Debra Mathias |
|
|
|
|
Debra Mathias |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James Becker |
|
|
|
|
James Becker |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Shahjahan C. Mathias |
|
|
|
|
Shahjahan C. Mathias |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald E. (“Nick”) Williams, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Donald E. (“Nick”) Williams, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Suhail Matthias |
|
|
|
|
Suhail Matthias |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bryan Elicker |
|
|
|
|
Bryan Elicker |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert Choiniere |
|
|
|
|
Robert Choiniere |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Keith A. Doyle |
|
|
|
|
Keith A. Doyle |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James Kingsborough |
|
|
|
|
James Kingsborough |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John Thompson |
|
|
|
|
John Thompson |
|
Director |
|
April 17, 2024 |
14
N/A
N/A
9999
false
FY
0001534155
true
0001534155
2021-08-01
2022-07-31
0001534155
2022-01-31
0001534155
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2024-01-31
0001534155
us-gaap:CommonClassAMember
2024-01-31
0001534155
us-gaap:CommonClassBMember
2024-01-31
0001534155
us-gaap:CommonClassCMember
2024-01-31
0001534155
ck0001534155:CommonClassDMember
2024-01-31
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
Exhibit 5.1
April
17, 2024
Board
of Directors of Ameri Metro Inc
Mr. Shah Mathias, CEO
Topic:
Ameri Metro Inc.
Since management didn’t provide financials for the period ended October 31, 2022 we couldn’t perform a review for the financials.
Elkana
Amitai
Israel office +972-4-843-7373
| Mitzpe Netofa, Israel 1592500
New Hampshire office
+1-860-327-8708 | 500 Commercial Street, Suite 502 Manchester, NH 03101
Exhibit
31.1
OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT
I,
Shah Mathias, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2022 of Ameri Metro, Inc.
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
April 17, 2024 |
By: |
/s/
Shah Mathias |
|
|
Shah
Mathias |
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT
I, Phillip M Hicks, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2022 of Ameri Metro, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the small
business registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 17, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Phillip M Hicks |
|
|
Phillip M Hicks |
|
|
Co-CEO and CFO |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri
Metro, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
3. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Date: April 17, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Shah Mathias |
|
|
Shah Mathias |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri
Metro, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
3. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Date: April 17, 2024 |
By: |
/s/ Phillip M Hicks |
|
|
Phillip M Hicks |
|
|
Co-CEO and CFO |
Exhibit 99.61
Valuation
Report Prepared by Ameri Metro, Inc. Management assisted by NorAsia Consulting & Advisory to the Board of Directors.
August 31, 2020
The Valuation Report provides an estimated
and expected range of potential Fair Market Values for Ameri Metro, Inc.’s common stock.
August 31, 2020,
To the Board of Directors of
Ameri Metro, Inc.
2575 Eastern Blvd, Suite 102
York, PA 17402
Re: Management’s Fair Market
Value for its Common Stock as of August 31, 2020
This valuation was performed for corporate
planning purposes; the resulting conclusion of value should not be used for any other purpose or by any other party for any purpose.
Based on our analysis we have determined
a range of values for Ameri Metro, Inc.’s (“AM” or “the Company”) by utilizing standard valuation metrics:
B) Valuation per Share | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Net Asset Approach | |
| | |
| |
i) Basic | |
$ | 301.03 | | |
$ | 220.66 | |
ii) Diluted | |
$ | 299.78 | | |
$ | 220.66 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted Future Net Income | |
| | | |
| | |
i) Basic | |
$ | 238.20 | | |
$ | 174.61 | |
ii) Diluted | |
$ | 237.21 | | |
$ | 174.08 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted Future Cash Flows | |
| | | |
| | |
i) Basic | |
$ | 142.07 | | |
$ | 104.14 | |
ii) Diluted | |
$ | 141.48 | | |
$ | 103.82 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Market Value Approach | |
| | | |
| | |
i) Basic | |
$ | 2,955.79 | | |
$ | 2,166.70 | |
ii) Diluted | |
$ | 2,943.51 | | |
$ | 2,160.09 | |
The details for the calculations are
summarized in this report in various sections but the detailed calculations are summarized in the Excel file “Valuation Tables Ameri
Metro Final”.
The Company since July 2020 through
to August 2020 has completed 14 independent cash transactions for options to acquire Ameri Metro Inc. common stock with strike prices
from $3,000 to $4,100 per share. Total cash received for these transactions are $294,000. The July 2020 strike prices were in the $3,000
range and the August 2020 prices were last at $4,100 which could be a leading indicator for the true market value of Ameri Metro’s
stock once it has obtained appropriate liquidity in the market.
Ameri Metro, Inc does have a ticker
symbol under (ARMT) which is on the OTC Markets, however there is no volume and this would not be an indicator of value.
Ameri Metro financial model is determined
based on all existing projects that have been identified and closed by the Company’s management. Ameri Metro’s valuation has
not considered the financing and growth factor in financing on going volume of projects through Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers, which is
in the process of re-registering as a financial institution and will become part of the United States of America Federal Reserve System.
Based
on our analysis, we believe that once the Ameri Metro shares are listed on the NYSE and sponsored by the appropriate market makers
that their value could trade between $2,160 and $4,100 per share given the significant earnings expectations and projects
identified.
This report is limited to the information
provided by management and any information that was not provided or is incorrect is the responsibility of management. We are not responsible
for any information provided after August 31, 2020 that could materially increase or decrease the expected valuation per share.
Respectfully submitted,
Ameri Metro, Inc. Management Assisted
by NorAsia Consulting & Advisory
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
Introduction |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
Definition of Fair Market Value |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
Valuation Methodologies |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A) |
Going Concern Valuation |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) |
The Market Approach |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) |
The Asset-Based Approach |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii) |
The Income Approach |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Net Income |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Cash Flow |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
Determine if Stock is Closely Held & Impact on Valuation |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
5) |
The Nature of the Business and the History of the Enterprise from its Inception |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
6) |
The Economic Outlook in General and the Condition and Outlook in General and the Condition and Outlook of the Specific Industry in Particular |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
7) |
The Book Value of the Stock and the Financial Condition of the Business |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
8) |
The Earning Capacity of the Company |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
9) |
Enterprise Goodwill or Other Intangible Value |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
10) |
Sales of the Stock and the Size of the Block of Stock to be Valued |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
11) |
Valuation Calculations |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
A) |
The Income Approach |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) |
Projected Net Income |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii) |
Projected Cash Flow |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
B) |
The Market Approach |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
C) |
The Asset-Based Approach |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) |
Adjusted Book Values Method |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
12) |
Other Items |
58 |
|
|
|
|
Appendix A: Other Calculations to Support Share Price Valuation |
60 |
This valuation was performed for corporate
planning purposes; the resulting conclusion of value should not be used for any other purpose or by any other party for any purpose.
The projections in the attached are
prepared based on a calendar year December 31 since Ameri Metro, Inc. is expecting to close on equity financing in the fourth quarter
of 2020 to commence project funding and the licensing for Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers should be completed in mid-November and the Bond
Issuances would commence in the fourth quarter 2020 and early 2021.
2) | Definition of Fair Market Value for this Report: |
The
definition of “Fair Market Value” for this Report is in line with which a stock market analyst would observe “Fair
Market Value”, which is typically the liquid trading price of the stock however many analysts will apply discounted cash flow and
discounted net income models to assess the reality of the stocks pricing1.
Fair
Value for financial reporting purposes is defined by ASC 820, “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” This definition is similar
in many respects to “fair market value,” which is defined in IRS Revenue Ruling 59-602.
This analysis prepared by management
to present to Ameri Metro’s board of directors for the expected trading values of the company’s stock. The analysis is management’s
best estimate of the stock and is subject to significant interpretation, assumptions and expectations about the future that there can
be no guarantees that the realities can be met. Additionally, other third parties reviewing the same information could come to the same,
similar or very different conclusions than those provided in this report.
3) | Valuation Methodologies: |
| A) | Going Concern Valuation |
There are two fundamental bases on which a company may be
valued:
| 1. | As a going concern3,
and |
Ameri Metro, Inc. will be valued on a going concern basis,
as this is expected to be the highest value and best use to determine an expected share price for the Company.
1 | https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/08/discounted-cash-flow-valuation.asp |
2 | https://gbq.com/measuring-fair-value-for-financial-reporting-
purposes/#:~:text=Accounting%20Standards%20Codification%20(ASC)%20Topic,market%20value%2C%E2%80%9D%20which%20
is%20defined |
3 | https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/going_concern_value.asp |
The market approach is fundamental to
valuation as fair market value is determined by the markets. Management’s approach was to utilize gross projected net income and
gross projected cash flow and applying an industry market multiple for each business within Ameri Metro. The Company operates in a diverse
group of businesses from technology to entertainment to infrastructure, therefore using management’s best estimate we analyzed each
business independently.
ii) | The Asset-Based Approach |
The asset based approach, sometimes
referred to as the cost approach, is an asset-oriented approach rather than a market oriented approach. Each component of a business is
valued separately.
Utilizing projected net income and cash
flows are acceptable methods to determine the fair market value of share price and assets. Since estimating the future income of a business
is at times considered to be speculative, historic data is used as a starting point, if it is available in the correct format and is accurate,
in several of the acceptable methods under the premised
For Ameri Metro, Inc. some of their
businesses have historical data and some do not, however, the future cannot be ignored as share valuations are based on market expectations
and performance.
Projected Net Income: standard
valuation parameters allow for five years of projected net income with a terminal value discounting the net income values back to present
day using the internal rate of return (or IRR), WACC or a reasonable discount rate. Additionally, management can apply a reasonable growth
rate based on expected growth of each business, the economy and inflation measures.
Projected Cash Flow: standard
valuation parameters allow for five years of projected net income with a terminal value discounting the cash flow values back to present
day using the internal rate of return (or IRR), WACC or a reasonable discount rate. Additionally, management can apply a reasonable growth
rate based on expected growth of each business, the economy and inflation measures.
4) | Determine if Stock is Closely Held & Impact on Valuation: |
Based
on the July 31, 2019 Form 10-K the board of directors, officers and the founder of Ameri Metro own 67.15% of the outstanding shares4.
Based on this there are still 32.85% of shares held by projects and independent parties that negotiated transactions with the Company’s
management.
4 | See July 31, 2019 Form 10-K Page 170 Item 12 on www.sec.gov. |
The Company is expected to issue shares
to large financial institutions as direct sales and is expecting large purchases of these shares therefore based on this analysis the
Company is not closely held and is not expected to be closely held once it begins trading its shares. There should be no impact on the
valuation due to the shares held by insiders, directors and officers of the Company.
5) | The Nature of the Business and the History of the Enterprise from its Inception: |
The Company was incorporated in the
State of Delaware and merged with Ameri Metro 2010 on June 12, 2012. The Company, and its wholly owned subsidiary Global Transportation
and Infrastructure, Inc., plan to use Private Public Partnerships (“PPP”) for funding of infrastructure projects and transportation
projects. The Company is a conduit to provide general contracting services for infrastructure projects and transportation projects. As
a conduit we identify infrastructure projects for both private and public end users. The Company will bring together private and public
entities, the end users, including the affiliate entities to organize the revenue bond offering, which will be the private debt vehicle
to build the infrastructure project for the end user. The Company’s ultimate role is providing general contracting services and
construction management services for the private and public entities.
The Company initially intends to develop
a Midwest high-speed rail system for passengers and freight. Currently the Company is engaged in raising capital and entering into relationships
to further its planned activities. These initial planned activities are “ATFI Roadway” and “Port Trajan”, a northeast
freight corridor.
Since its incorporation, the Company
has developed its business plan, appointed officers and directors, engaged initial project consultants, and had meetings with certain
agencies and groups related to potential future projects. Presently, the Company has not physically started any of the projects disclosed
in our business plan section. However, as disclosed in the “Projects” section, the Company has entered into agreements
with related and non-related parties. The Company will start these projects once capital is raised. The Company’s business model
and proceeds raised from financings will allow the Company to begin the ATFI Roadway and Port Trajan project as well as other projects.
The Company Founder, Shah Mathias,
has organized and established three related non-profit corporations and is an independent consultant of a fourth non-profit (ATFI) for
the purpose of funding projects of the Company identified by Transportation Economics Management Systems (TEMS), TEMS, a transportation/rail/sea
vessel consulting firm working for and with the Company has completed preliminary studies on behalf of the end user both public and private.
The Company can introduce related and non-related entities to the four non-profit entities for the purpose of funding projects they have.
These are the 4 Non-Profit entities
with the ability to officiate Master Bond Indentures when sponsored by a state end user:
| 1. | Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. (ATFI) (A Non-Related Party) |
| 2. | Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. (HSRF)(A Related Party) |
| 3. | Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider, Inc. (HSFP)(A Related Party) |
| 4. | Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority
(GIF&DA)(A Related Party) |
These three non–profit related
entities will play a vital role in financing. The non-profits statutes provide a vehicle to issue bonds and help secure infrastructure
potential projects. The non-profit entities have the discretion to turn over the infrastructure of potential projects to the state, or
the governing body after it has successfully developed and paid for the potential projects.
With the funding raised from financings,
the Company will then be able to consult the end users, related and non-related entities, and non-profits (who will sponsor bond offerings
to fund the projects) and to contract with one or more of the largest construction firms in the United States who will carry out the actual
construction management on the large projects we plan on building. The Company does not have the work force, or expertise to perform the
actual physical work from start to finish. However, the Company anticipates engaging the largest construction management and construction
firms in the industry, such as AECOM, to meet the project’s needs. AECOM, as noted in its filings with the SEC, has over thirty
years of experience undertaking similar projects and produced $20 billion in revenue in 2018. They operate with a capacity of 87,000 employees,
and provide planning, consulting, architectural, and engineering design services to commercial and governmental clients across 7 continents.
AECOM also offers construction services, including building construction and energy, infrastructure and industrial construction. In addition,
they can provide program and facility management which entails maintenance, training, logistics, consulting, technical assistance, systems
integration, and information technology services.
The Company anticipates these firms
will want to be involved due to the scale of each project the Company has under contract, and those potential projects the Company can
engage in as a result of their relationship with the non-profit entities.
The Company also believes the economic
studies performed by TEMS will confirm that the cost of the projects will be supported by the usage and revenues generated by the project.
This will allow the Company, and the associated construction firms contracted with, to sustain profit. The types of projects the Company
is proposing to build have generally been successful in the United States over the last 200 years and will attempt to improve the way
passengers and freight are transported around the United States.
On December 1, 2010, the Company
formed its wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. (“GTI”). GTI was formed to provide
development and construction consulting services for Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. “ATFI” is a non-related, non-profit
company supported by the State of Alabama, to act as the exclusive entity, as set forth in House Joint Resolutions, H.J.R 459 and
H.J.R. 456, to finance the development of the 357 mile Alabama Toll Road (starting on the coastline of Alabama and running northward
to the boarder of Tennessee).
Pursuant to the executed agreement with
ATFI, “Assignment Agreement For Construction,” GTI will act as the consultant for such a toll road, including implementation
of the financing mechanism for the design, planning, engineering and related costs for its construction, and to engage in the construction
of freight transportation and related transportation projects by contracting with some of the largest construction firms in the industry.
ATFI is a non-related entity, and along with other related entity projects that are supported by the ATFI 357 mile toll road in Alabama,
the Company intends to act as the conduit to bring the ATFI toll roadway to completion. The ATFI toll roadway and other related potential
projects stemming from the ATFI toll roadway project, are at different stages, of a six-stage process supported by agreements and contracts.
The Company has a six stage process
for potential future project opportunities:
| 1. | Management’s Decision to take on a project |
| 2. | Enter into Letters of Intent, Agreements, Construction Contracts |
| 3. | Obtain State(s) sponsorship of the project through legislative actions (where applicable) |
| 4. | Engineering and Design Studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility Studies |
| 5. | Raise Capital through Bond Financing and/or Company stock offerings or other borrowings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor |
The Company’s current list of
potential project opportunities is contained in the Business Plan Section. The common thread with all these future opportunities is that
the Company has not yet started Stage 5 or Stage 6, but continues to spend time, effort, and resources to advance each project. Each project
requires the raising of capital, which we expect to be accomplished through one or more of the non-profit entities mentioned on the previous
page.
With the Alabama legislation Joint Resolution
HJR 459 and HJR 456 signed by the Governor, the ATFI project along with the ancillary projects are designed to support the sustainability
and to ensure the success of the ATFI project. The Company, pursuant to the construction agreements, is acting as Master General Contractor
for the building of the toll road. The Company will also build ancillary projects and related transportation systems, including but not
limited to rail and toll bridges, upon the successful issuance of the bond offering. The Company plans to improve port operations and
cargo facilities while building a 357 mile toll road from the coast of Alabama to the southern border of the State of Tennessee.
The contracts between ATFI and the Company
are in full force and effect under the House Joint Resolution HJR 459 and 456 unless new legislation is issued to rescind the current
HJR 459 and HJR 456. The related and non-related party contracts are in full force and effect in association with the projects.
The Company makes no guarantee we will
succeed in our business plan to help the United States by improving the infrastructure and changing the way cargo and the population travel,
but according to the United States Government it is a high priority to improve states’ infrastructure without taxing the American
public. The Company’s business model and ATFI legislative rights that are in place stand a reasonable chance of making a difference.
As Super Cargo ships increase in size, studies show that
the US ports do not have the sufficient water depth of fifty feet to berth these mega ships. The map below shows the Alabama Port which
ties to the ATFI toll road have the sufficient water depth of fifty feet. There are current studies taking place by US ports on how they
will solve the problem. The new challenge to US ports stems from the Panama Canal being widened and deepened to accommodate such ships.
Most US ports shown in the map below still lack the water depth to receive such ships substantiated by public reports found on the ASCE
American Society of Civil Engineers website under “Report Card For America’s Infrastructure”. The Panama Canal studies
below were completed by TEMS:
The
Company’s first project “Port Trajan” is directly connected to our current Alabama port potential project
“Port De Claudius, Inc.” through the new Alabama Toll Road (“ATFI”) connecting to Route 81 in Knoxville
Tennessee, which today is a major shipping corridor from Tennessee to Maine with South Central Pennsylvania (the location of Port
Trajan) becoming one of the current distribution locations for the north east. We believe that the ports of Mobile and Baltimore,
each with 50 feet of water depths, stand to be the ports used in making cargo movement to the north east corridor more efficient as
the size of cargo ships continues to increase. These ports, based on studies performed by TEMS, have the ability to be deepened and
the cost to do so will be offset by the economic impact they create according to studies performed to date by TEMS.
The Company’s funding plans include
stock offering and non-related and related parties officiating bond offerings to fund the projects identified.
The major elements of the infrastructure
for the projects as part of the Company’s planned activities are stated below:
Trade and Transportation Corridors
| ● | Development of container ports
for Class C, D and E ships |
| ● | Development of inland transportation
corridors including new greenfield highways and railroads |
| ● | Building of inland ports and
multimodal transportation centers |
| ● | Development of new urban centers
along the new infrastructure |
| ● | Development of ancillary facilities
including airport (express service), distribution centers, and logistics centers. |
High Speed Rail
| ● | Development of modern rail equipment
operating at speeds exceeding 250 mph |
| ● | Use rail to connect rural, small
urban and major metropolitan areas |
| ● | Track improvement, including
replacement and upgrades, additional sidings, signal and communications systems, and grade-crossing improvements |
| ● | Building of new greenfield routes |
| ● | Construction or improvement
of railroad grade crossings and passenger stations |
| ● | Acquiring new train equipment
including train sets and spares |
Transportation Infrastructure
Development of new road systems to
accommodate driverless cars and trucks, including electric cars and infrastructure to support the highway and rail systems that will be
used in Trade and Transportation Corridors and the High Speed Rail Systems.
Supporting Ancillary Development
| ● | Development or expansion of
a feeder bus system linking outlying areas to railroad stations |
| ● | Operation of a “hub-and-spoke”
passenger rail system providing service to and through one or more major hubs to locations throughout the United States |
| ● | Provision of multi-modal connections
to improve system access, hotels, retail, parking garages, sorting facilities / distribution facilities |
Supporting Transportation Systems
Ancillary development opportunities, airports, inland ports,
sea ports, toll roads and technology parks
As the US and World populations are
rapidly increasing, infrastructure is becoming inadequate and dilapidated as stated on the American Society of Civil Engineers website.
Government authorities are unable to keep up with preventative maintenance and replacement work because of the lack of funding. Studies
have consistently shown that the development of infrastructure promotes economic growth. However, the global financial crises have sent
governments into restructuring their budgets and reduced the possibility for funding new infrastructure development.
The Company’s management team
has recognized the need for a solution to limit the financial burden on governments and taxpayers alike. The Company plans to use Private
Public Partnerships to fund some or all of the capital requirements for the project opportunities. The Company’s use of proceeds
from the offering will potentially make it possible for the Company to fulfill its consulting agreements with ATFI and Related Parties
to begin immediately the feasibility studies and investment grade studies needed to officiate the bond offerings, specifically for the
“Port Trajan” project as detailed in the “project” section.
Once TEMS completes feasibility and
environmental studies, it will be the Company’s goal, through the financial markets to raise capital from bond offerings.
In
order to support the functionality of financial structure between the end user, whether public or private, and the non-profit,
whether related or non-related, Shah Mathias created the sixteen related entities listed below of which the Company owns 25% of each
via non-voting common shares, with the remaining 75% (and 100% voting control) owned by Mr. Mathias. The Company acting in its
Master Consulting role will be the conduit between one or more of the related entities who will secure by contract the project from
the end user and approach the non-profits for bond offering of the project. The construction management services will be performed
by one or more of the largest construction management firms in the United States by utilizing existing well-established construction
firms in or near the project location to perform the physical work on each project. The Company’s consulting staffing needs
are already in place and any additional needs can be met easily. Once a project is started, the consulting management team of the
Company would rely heavily on the work force of some of the largest construction management firms in the country. The seventeenth
related entity, HSRF Trust, was created to place the bond offering revenue in trust managed by agreements with ING (now Voya).
| 2. | HSR Passenger Services, Inc. |
| 5. | KSJM International Airport, Inc. |
| 7. | Port of De Claudius, Inc. |
| 8. | Atlantic Energy & Utility Products, Inc. |
| 12. | Penn Insurance Services LLC |
| 14. | Eastern Development & Design, Inc. |
| 17. | Ann Charles International Airport, Inc. |
| 18. | Dutch East India Logistics Co. |
| 19. | Natural Resources, LLC |
| 20. | Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers |
Presently, none of these related
entities recognized any revenue. These entities play a vital role in terms of becoming the entity that builds and owns the potential
project while the bond debt is being paid back. The ultimate beneficial owner of the project could be one of these entities or in the
case of State projects, the State would become the beneficial owner of the project built once the bond debt is retired. This business
model will control cost over runs and allow for more tightly managed projects during construction and then management of the operations
of the project until the debt is paid back.
In summary and for clear understanding
of the process:
The State who has a project to build
would be able to have the project built by sponsoring the bond offering on behalf of one of the related entities below. The related entities
would build and manage the project, assume the liability of the debt and then return the project back to the State upon retirement of
the bond debt. In the case of non-State projects, the related entity could be the beneficial owner of the project at the end of the bond
debt retirement.
1) HSR
Freight line, Inc. This company will handle all services related to the use of track time, train sets leases and freight forwarding
services. HSR Freight Line, Inc. intends to offer high speed rail, freight forwarding and parcel handling services to existing national
and global carriers. As opposed to independently developing a freight corridor, carriers will be able to lease train sets with their trade
logos and slogans in their own color schemes at various rates depending on the time frames, in addition to toll fees for track time. The
Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as
consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in
post construction operations revenue.
2) HSR
Passenger Services, Inc. This company will handle all ticketing, booking, reservations, food & beverage services, hotel booking
and car rental booking services. HSR Passenger Service Inc. will offer concession space at the travel plazas, technology parks and develop
motels, hotels, fast food restaurant establishments and convenience stores. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages:
Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface
– as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
3) HSR
Technologies, Inc. This company will handle all build to suit manufacturing facilities for train sets and centralized signalization
services along the rail road tracks and train stations. Within the technology parks HSR Technologies, Inc. will be a sole provider of
all fiber optics, telecommunication and all related technologies services including equipment maintenance.
A. Maintenance
for train engines, rail cars and rail track through a maintenance agreement with equipment lease holders.
B. Total
maintenance for all Industrial sites for assembly plants, train stations, train terminals, manufacturing plants, parts distribution centers,
rail roads, rail crossings, rail yards, cargo terminals, parking lot, parking garages, hotel, motels, food and beverage vending machines,
all retail shopping centers, office complexes and all on/off site improvements.
C. The
airline industry is congested throughout existing terminal space. The proposed KSJM International Airport in Alabama will offer services
to eliminate burden on existing terminal space for airline carriers. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified inspection stations
will service the airline industry. This company will also provide marine services, oil platforms and petro chemical industry services
due to proximity to the Gulf of Mexico.
The Company interfaces with the entity,
in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services
for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
4) HSR
Logistics, Inc. This company will handle coordination, delivery and movement of all machinery equipment, material goods and will operate
all warehousing facilities.
The Company interfaces with the entity
in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services
for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
5) KSJM
International Airport, Inc. This company formed to serve as a master airport facility. It will provide four types of airport terminals
and one international airline inspection service terminal operated by HSR Technologies Inc.:
| a) | Passenger Terminals, operated by HSR Passenger Services Inc. |
| b) | Air Cargo Terminals, operated by Port of Ostia, Inc. |
| c) | Corporate Jet Center Terminal |
| d) | International Airline, FAA inspections maintenance service
terminals, operated by KSJM International Airport, Inc. |
| e) | Domestic Airline FAA inspection maintenance service terminals,
operated by HSR Technologies Inc. |
The Company interfaces with the entity
in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services
for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
6) Port
of Ostia, Inc. This company will handle foreign and domestic Air Cargo, and while supporting ground services such as freight forwarding
services will be provided by HSR Freight Line, Inc. and air and ground logistics will be provided by HSR Logistics, Inc. The Company interfaces
with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction
services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations
revenue.
7) Port
of De Claudius, Inc. This company will handle foreign and domestic inbound / outbound sea container inland port operation and warehouse
distribution center. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage
2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest
shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
8) Atlantic
Energy & Utility Products, Inc. This company will provide electric, gas, water, sanitary sewer service, trash removal, cable TV,
Dish network and internet services.
Petroleum
products and services will also be provided during and after construction, along with fuel services on the toll road, all industrial
and technology parks, including the airport, inland ports and incoming and outgoing vessels. The Company interfaces with the entity
in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction
services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction
operations revenue.
9) Malibu
Homes, Inc. This company will provide residential home building services. The Company interfaces with the entity, in three separate
stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage
3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
10) Ameri
Cement, Inc. This company handles all cement needs for building (357 miles four lane) Alabama Toll Road “ATFl” and others
future projects. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2
interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder,
sharing in post construction operations revenue.
11) Lord
Chauffeurs LID. This company operates all passenger ground transportation car service for passengers such as limo and taxi, as well
as the corporate jet center. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a
fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling
interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
12) Penn
Insurance Services LLC. This company provides all insurance services to all entities and risk management services for all entities,
but not limited to the entities. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for
a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling
interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
13) Cape
Horn Abstracting. This company provides all-land title examination services for all entities to insure against any pre -closing and
post-closing claims of ownership or deed restriction. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface
- as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as
a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
14) Eastern
Development & Design, Inc. This company provides all civil engineering and architectural services with strong cost control measures
thereby reducing engineering and architectural cost over runs. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage
1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface
– as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
15) Slater
& West, Inc. This company provides contract administration services and handles all work force human resource matters,
including background checks, loss prevention services, vendor invoice verification against goods and services provided, and to clear
invoice for payment. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for a fee,
Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling
interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
16) Platinum
Media, Inc. Designed to provide all media related services. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage
1 interface - as consultant for a fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for a fee and Stage 3 interface
– as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
17) Ann
Charles International Airport, Inc. Designed to provide airport services and cargo break facilities in Port Freeport and the Brazoria
Fort Bend Rail District Project. The Company interfaces with the entity in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for
fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services for fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling
interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
18) Dutch
East India Logistics Co. Designed to provide international cargo services in Yuma Arizona. The Company interfaces with the entity
in three separate stages: Stage 1 interface - as consultant for fee, Stage 2 interface – as consultant for construction services
for fee and Stage 3 interface – as a 25% non-controlling interest shareholder, sharing in post construction operations revenue.
19) Natural
Resources, LLC This company provides oil, gas and mineral extraction services, timber harvesting, agricultural and related food production
services associated with the operation of large-scale development projects. The Company owns 25% non-controlling interest, sharing ownership
of the asset and operations revenue.
20) Susquehanna
Mortgage Bankers Corp. Established in 1994, the entity was fully licensed by the Pennsylvania Banking Commission and HUD, as a lender.
The entity is in the process of reactivating with the State of Pennsylvania to become a licensed Commercial & Residential lender,
an entity supervised by the state banking commission. It has applied for a Fintech Commercial & Residential lender with the U.S. Office
of Currency Control to become a licensed lender under the U.S. Federal Reserve system. SMBC is expected to have eight times borrowing
power from the Federal Reserve. The Company has a 25% non-controlling interest, sharing in entity assets and pre-tax profits.
21) HSRF
Trust. This company is a statutory trust administrator of private and public funds and will safeguard the bondholder’s interest. No
money moves to any parties without trust authorization.
The Company anticipates the following
will occur by a regional or local municipalities upon the adoption and implementation of Trade, Transportation and a High-Speed Rail Systems
as part of the Company’s projects. To date, the Company has not developed any rail systems.
The
Company will engage TEMS to provide feasibility and investment grade studies, engage some of the largest construction management
firms in the United States, and locate well-established construction contractors and manufacturers to provide cost estimates on
completing the projects. The Company in its Trade and Transportation corridors will use technology well known to US contractors,
however, because high-speed rail travel is already in-place in much of Europe and Asia, the Company anticipates working with
European companies to furnish the high-speed rail equipment, such as locomotives and passenger cars.
The Company will furnish project proposals
with supporting feasibility study, appraisals, and cost/benefit analysis prepared by TEMS. The Company will then provide those tools to
a related entity or related non-profit entity so they can present such project proposals to the municipalities (state or local) as a complete
and finished project. The local or regional municipality will then independently analyze and discuss the Company’s proposal.
The two related non-profit entities
created for Trade and Transportation and High Speed Rail projects are:
Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc.
In 2010, the Company entered into an
agreement with HSRF (one of the Company’s related non-profit companies) Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will be responsible for
the construction of projects while the non-profit will be responsible for financing the construction and operating various high speed
rail and related projects across the United States. HSRF is designed to focus on the building of train tracks and stations. Pursuant to
the agreement between the Company and HSRF, the Company will act as the agent and representative of HSRF to perform all required tasks
and actions to develop and construct such projects by utilizing a large well-established construction management firm. The Company anticipates
that having this agreement in place and by having HSRF already organized will expedite the process of commencing a project once the Company
raises funds. Material aspects of the agreement are presented below in the “Business Plan” section.
Hi Speed Rail Facilities Provider,
Inc.
In 2010, the Company entered into a
written agreement with HSRFP (one of the Company’s related non-profit companies). The Company will be responsible for the construction
of projects while the nonprofit will be responsible for financing construction and operating various high speed rail and related projects
across the United States. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company was appointed as the agent and representative of HSRFP to perform all
required tasks and actions to develop and construct such projects by utilizing a large well-established construction management firm.
HSRFP was organized to provide a vehicle to issue bonds and help secure infrastructure projects for the Company, focusing on facilities
ancillary to the high speed rail, such as rail yards, rail assembly plants maintenance facilities. The Company anticipates that having
this agreement in place and by having HSRF already organized will expedite the process of commencing a project once the Company raises
funds. Material aspects of the agreement are presented below in the “Business Plan” section.
ING Investment Management
Each
of the non-profits has entered into an investment management agreement with ING Investment Management (“ING”) whereby
ING will manage any funds raised in bond offerings and provide investment advisory services. This non-binding agreement would only
take effect upon the raising of revenue bonds, which to date has not occurred. ING would serve to invest, reinvest and supervise the
management of any such funds raised, for any project in the future, while such funds were held in an investment account and until
use for the intended funds are needed for project purposes. The Company and the non-profits have not commenced raising funds through
any bond offerings.
Supporting Information
The United States Census Bureau predicts
that the American population will reach 420 million by 2050, a trend that will overwhelm our nation’s transportation infrastructure
according to the information provided on their website.
Current estimates suggest that overall
freight demand will double over the next 40 years from 15 billion tons today to 30 billion tons. The number of trucks on the road is also
expected to double. Already under unsustainable strain, the nation’s freight transportation infrastructure and highways will face
even greater challenges as the total volume of freight increases.
Extensive infrastructure expansion,
such as new ports, trade corridors and high-speed rail (HSR), is critical to help mitigate problems associated with rising fuel costs,
crowded highways, and greenhouse gas emissions. Population growth and development in the U.S. have made our nation increasingly reliant
on rail and highway infrastructure to transport people and freight.
Clearly, a strong, efficient freight
transportation system is vital to the nation’s economy. Our nation’s already strained and outdated railways must be upgraded
to handle the projected increases in freight shipping to relieve congestion on our highways. We believe that new trade corridors are needed
to support the additions of new ports and infrastructure in marine shipping. New high speed rail routes will also increase connectivity
between US cities to support the emerging new economy.
Business Plan
The Company, as a consultant through
its Master Consulting role along with TEMS has collectively identified projects worth five hundred and six billion dollars. The Company
has therefore approached the related non-profits for master bond indentures for each project, to meet the need of the related and non-related
end users of each project.
The Company acting as a Master Consultant,
and Master General Contractor through agreements with the related and non-related non-profits, and the related entities will perform construction
management services and consulting services for a fee (see material aspects of agreements below). The related and non-related non-profits
provide a source of capital through bond indentures upon TEMS providing investment grade studies that will confirm the potential project
revenue and will support the debt on behalf of the beneficial owner of a given project.
The contractual agreements and material
aspects of the agreements are presented below:
Master Agreement For Construction
with the Four Non-profits
The
Company is in contractual, “Master Agreement For Construction”, agreements with High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High
Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc., Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. and Alabama Toll Facilities
Inc., all four are nonprofit entities referred to as the “Cartel” who could issue bonds on behalf of government,
civilian and commercial end user projects directly, or on behalf of the affiliate entities listed below.
The material aspects of the “Master
Agreement For Construction” are as follows:
1. | AMERI as the agent and representative of CARTEL shall perform
all required tasks and actions to develop and construct the Project as agent and representative of CARTEL without limitation by taking
such actions as necessary to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering and
related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project and related activities. The specifications, designs, construction standards,
subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements, hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by AMERI, subject
to approval by CARTEL, and as necessary offered for review and approval by appropriate governmental and regulatory agencies. |
2. | AMERI shall assure that the Project is constructed according
to specifications and requirements imposed by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). The work done by AMERI through itself, its contractors,
subcontractors, agents, employees and affiliated organizations, shall be subject to inspections as mandated by law to demonstrate compliance
with all applicable standards. AMERI shall be responsible for coordinating all construction of the Project including construction work
performed by subcontractors and others. AMERI shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall be responsible
to CARTEL for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its control. AMERI
shall contract with all subordinate parties in its own name and behalf and not in the name of or on behalf of CARTEL unless later agreed
upon by the parties. AMERI shall provide to CARTEL, on an on-going basis, a list of all subcontractors and others engaged by AMERI for
work on the project, together with correct and complete copies of all contracts and agreements with such parties. |
3. | The engagement of any subcontractor or subordinate parties
for work on the project shall not excuse AMERI from complying in all respects with this contract. AMERI shall have full responsibility
for every portion of the construction of the Project furnished or performed by any subcontractor or subordinate party and every act or
omission (whether willful, negligent or otherwise) of AMERI’s employees, subcontractors and their employees, and all other parties
engaged for work upon the Project. All construction, acts and omissions of any party participating in the construction of the Project
shall be deemed those of AMERI for the purposes of this agreement. AMERI shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the
Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry. AMERI shall
take all reasonable precautions to prevent injury, damages or loss to persons or property throughout the Project, including especially
issues of environmental protection. |
4. | The term of this Agreement shall continue until the completion
of the Project and thereafter unless and until terminated by mutual agreement of CARTEL and AMERI and it may continue into if not so
terminated. |
5. | The parties agree that the face amount of the contract between
them for CARTEL to complete the Projects shall be determined by the face amount of each Master Trust Indenture less unrelated construction
and land cost at cost plus forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) over the adjustment for the increase in inflation regardless of
the cost to AMERI to perform the required services hereunder. |
In no event will the profits
to AMERI from the projects be less than forty percent (40%), plus two percent (2%) over the adjustment for the increase in inflation.
Construction contract is based upon 97% of the face amount of each Master Trust Indenture over the course of the construction period.
Amounts payable by CARTEL shall be due fifteen (15) days from the date of the submission of invoices from AMERI to CARTEL, time being
of the essence. For any payments received after the fifteenth (15th) day, a late fee of five percent
(5%) of the unpaid amount if paid within ten (10) days thereafter; and any amounts paid after said ten-day period shall accrue late fees
at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum plus a collection fee of three percent (3%) and attorney’s fees of five percent
(5%) of the unpaid balance. A deposit of Ten Dollars ($10.00) shall be paid by CARTEL to AMERI upon the execution of this agreement; with
a subsequent payment of three percent (3%) of the face amount of the contract upon the bond funding for the initial phase of the project;
and a subsequent payment of an additional two percent (2%) of the face amount of the contract upon mobilization of the project. These
percentages shall apply to the first phase and to all subsequent phases of the project.
| 6. | The parties agree that this Agreement is not intended to create,
nor shall it create, a partnership between them or any business relationship other than that specifically created by the terms hereof.
Likewise, no partnership or other business relationship shall be created between CARTEL, AMERI and any subcontractors or subordinate
parties contracted to work on the Project. |
| 7. | The business and affairs of the Project shall be controlled
by AMERI without the requirement that the approval of CARTEL be obtained for any actions taken, subject only to the submission of such
reports and accountings being furnished by AMERI to CARTEL as the parties may agree from time to time. Detailed and complete records
of all aspects of the Project shall be kept by CARTEL and AMERI for their use and for inspection by any third parties, agencies, regulators
or others authorized by law or agreement to access them. |
| 8. | AMERI may conduct the business of the Project from such location
or locations as it may elect, whether in the State of Delaware, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or elsewhere. However, as stated below,
Pennsylvania law shall govern this agreement. |
| 9. | AMERI may act through such subagents and subcontractors, attorneys
and representatives as it deems necessary in its sole discretion; and to compensate such parties under such terms as it may agree. |
| 10. | The funding for the Project shall be raised through the issuance
of bonds through a marketing plan determined by AMERI, and all proceeds thereof shall be deposited in custodial accounts administered
by fiduciaries and according to such terms as CARTEL TRUST shall institute for the safekeeping and distribution according to sound business
practices. AMERI shall act as Sponsor for the CARTEL Direct Offering and Bond Issuer. |
The Company will provide consulting
services for a fee according to contractual agreements between all four nonprofit entities and affiliate entities listed below. The contractual
agreements and material aspects of the agreements are presented below:
The Company is in contractual,
“Consulting Agreement”, agreements with High Speed Rail Facilities Inc., High Speed Rail Facilities Provider Inc.,
Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority Inc., and Alabama Toll Facilities Inc. All four are nonprofit entities, which
have the capability to fund government, civilian, and commercial end user projects directly or on behalf of the affiliate entities listed
below. The material aspects of the “Consulting Agreement” are as follows:
| 1. | HSRF hereby appoints AMERI as its agent and representative to
perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct the Project as agent and representative of HSRF without limitation by
taking such actions as necessary to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering
and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project and related activities. |
| 2. | AMERI hereby accepts such appointment and agrees to perform
as agent and representative of HSRF as specified. |
| 3. | The term of this Agreement shall continue until the completion
of the Project and thereafter until terminated by mutual agreement of HSRF and AMERI, and it may continue into if not so terminated. |
| 4. | AMERI shall be compensated for arranging financing and developing
the sponsorship mechanism for the Project by a specific fee equal to one and one half percent (1.5%) of the face amount of the master
indenture. Additionally, services other than arranging financing that are performed by AMERI for HSRF financing shall be compensated
in accordance with separate agreements addressing other aspects of the Project. In addition to the payment of fees for its services AMERI
shall be entitled to prompt reimbursement of all costs and expenses advanced or incurred by it in furtherance of its duties hereunder.
All fees are deemed earned upon delivering of a bond indenture document, HSRF is responsible for additional financing fees to direct
or indirect financiers, a mortgage banker, or financing facilitator. |
| 5. | The parties agree that this Agreement is not intended to create,
nor shall it create, a partnership between them or any business relationship other than that specifically created by the terms hereof. |
| 6. | The business and affairs of the Project shall be controlled
by AMERI without the requirement that the approval of HSRF be obtained for any actions taken, subject only to the submission of such
reports and accountings being furnished by AMERI METRO to HSRF as the parties may agree from time to time. |
| 7. | AMERI may conduct the business of the Project from such location
or locations as it may elect, whether in the UNITED KINGDOM, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, or elsewhere. |
| 8. | AMERI may act through such subagents and subcontractors, attorneys
and representatives as it deem necessary in its sole discretion; and to compensate such parties under such terms as it may agree. |
| 9. | The funding for the Project shall be raised through the issuance
of bonds through a marketing plan determined by AMERI, and all proceeds thereof shall be deposited in custodial accounts administered
by fiduciaries and according to such terms as AMERI METRO shall institute for the safekeeping and distribution according to sound business
practices. AMERI shall act as Sponsor for the HSRF Direct offering and Bond Issuer, stock offering. |
| 10. | AMERI shall maintain current and complete records of all aspects
of its performance on behalf of HSRF and in furtherance of the Project, with such records being available to HSRF and to other parties
as legally required. Such records shall be examined and audited by independent auditors and accountants selected by AMERI, with such
statements of account being rendered as required by good accounting practices. |
| 11. | AMERI shall comply with all legal requirements of all applicable
agencies and jurisdictions for the project, including but not limited to labor and hiring practices, compensation of subcontractors and
workers, and taxes and insurance. In order to assure such compliance, AMERI may employ attorneys and advisors as it may in its sole discretion
determine, securing such legal advice and opinions as will reasonably protect the Project and the parties thereto. |
| 12. | AMERI shall maintain during and after the completion of the
Project all records of the Project, and they shall be available for inspection as required by law and the agreement of the parties. |
Additionally, the agreements between
the other related and non-related non-profits are the same.
The Company has been in joint
meetings with related entities and private, public municipalities and regional governmental agency end users concerning projects that
have had studies completed in differing stages. The Company and related entities met with and made presentations to these parties. The
scope of work associated with projects consist of development relating to sea ports, airports, rail corridors, toll roads, inland ports,
intermodal facilities, sewer, water and power grids, all being anticipated to be revenue producing projects. However for the Company to
proceed on any of these, a substantial amount of capital must be raised through officiating bond funding through one or more of the related
and non-related non-profits. The following is a result of meetings and negotiations over the last 6 years, bringing the Company to the
stage of raising capital to operate and fulfill its business objectives. The result of our activities over the years are the projects
listed below.
Brief Descriptions of Projects
Throughout all Projects, when
we refer to one or more of the largest construction firms in the United States we are identifying construction management firms such as
one of the largest firms in the country with 87,000 employees, seventeen billion in generated revenue for 2016 and 30 plus years of experience
providing all of the services each of our projects would require. For clarity and disclosure the Company has not engaged any firm at
this time, but it is our business model to do so upon completed studies prior to bond offering. The Company’s current executive
team along with consulting firms such as TEMS and fee based legal teams we have identified, working together with financial market underwriters
who have the experience to bring the potential project to a point of starting through bond offering, is reason for the Company to call
these “Projects” There are a number of large construction management, engineering, architectural firms that we will engage
to commence project build out. We will rely heavily on firms to perform, while we stay within our Master Construction and Master Consulting
role. The Company is making no guarantee construction firms or construction management firms will contract with the Company, but it is
our business model to utilize the well-established firms within the country to fulfill our business plan.
Project 1
Port Trajan – Is
directly affected by Alabama Toll Facilities, Inc. “ATFI”, which is responsible for building a new toll road. ATFI is a non-related,
non-profit company with a project supported by the State of Alabama legislation and signed by Governor Bob Riley, according to House Joint
Resolutions, H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456. The Company will be responsible for building the 357 mile toll road. Port Trajan is complimented
by the ATFI roadway, and are mutually dependent of one another. The new Alabama Toll Road, when built, will provide a faster way to reach
Interstate 81 in Knoxville, Tennessee. It will eventually connect to Port Trajan in Pennsylvania, which travels north to the state of
Maine.
As cargo ships increase in size
and the need for deeper water at US ports on the east coast increase (substantiated by TEMS studies) the Company’s projects, Port
De Claudius, Inc. (PDC) (project #6) and Port Ostia (project #7), support the movement of cargo from the Alabama coast line by utilizing
the ATFI roadway to the north east distribution center of Port Trajan.
The Company will build Port Trajan
immediately upon bond financing because the land under agreement is connected to the existing Norfolk and Southern intermodal port, which
is presently receiving cargo containers by rail. Also, the intermodal port is located in south central Pennsylvania, connecting a population
of 50 million people. The Company will generate immediate revenue from the Port Trajan build out, and permits are ready to be issued for
4.2 million square feet of warehousing. These are the reasons Port Trajan will be the first project in our current project list. The feasibility
and economic impact studies will be performed by TEMS. The state will sponsor the bonds, GIF&DA will officiate the bond offering,
the Company will act as the consultant to bring the entire project to a starting point, and the large construction management firm will
perform all management and construction related steps.
On January 9, 2013, the Company
signed a letter of intent with Jewel Real Estate 10-86 Master LLLP, a related party to purchase land to develop for future sale.
On January 13, 2013, the Company
entered into a letter of intent with Port De Claudius, Inc., a related party trading as Port Trajan. The Company is contracted to provide
services for the build out of the Port Trajan’s five terminals, along with the sale of real property together with development rights
for a fee.
The Company was unable to meet
the deposit requirements of the Jewel Real Estate 10- 86 Master LLLP related party contract, and so in November 2013 the deposit requirements
were amended to require a cash deposit of $1,000 to hold the purchase option open for the Company until a bond offering is acquired. Future
plans are to issue in excess of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to aid funding the land purchase. As of January 31, 2016, the $1,000
deposit requirement outlined above, has been deposited on this contract.
On August 8, 2016, the Company
entered into a material definitive agreement for construction (“Construction Agreement”) with Port De Claudius, Inc. (“PDC”).
Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the Company shall engage one or more firm to perform all tasks and actions required to develop
and construct the Port Trajan Pennsylvania commercial properties (the “Project”). Furthermore, to secure the first and future
phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering, and related soft and hard costs of the construction of the Project.
Pursuant to the Construction Agreement, the specifications, designs, construction standards, subcontractor agreements, insurance requirements,
hiring and employment policies and similar items shall be developed by the Company, subject to approval by PDC. The Company shall assure
that the Project is constructed according to specifications and requirements imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
(PADOT) and the Federal Highway Administration. The Company shall supervise all phases of the construction of the Project, and it shall
be responsible to the PDC for all acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, agents, consultants and other parties under its
control. The Company shall be responsible for assuring that the construction of the Project is performed in a good and workmanlike manner,
and in accordance with the highest standards of care for the industry.
On September 11, 2016, the Company
consolidated all memorandums of understanding, letters of intent, and agreements into one agreement called the “sales agreement”.
As a result of the September 11, 2016 consolidation, an agreement for the assignment of assets took place.
For Phase One (the “Sale
Agreement”) with Jewel’s Real Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the “Seller”), Global Infrastructure Finance & Development
Authority, Inc., division of Hi Speed Rail Facilities Inc. (the “Financier”), PDC, and HSRF Statutory Trust as Trustee (the
“Trustee”), as dictated by the Construction Agreement, the Sale Agreement that was thereafter amended on September 13, 2016,
an amendment was signed for the closing date of the transaction to October 14, 2016. Pursuant to the “Sale Agreement”, Jewel’s
Real Estate 10-86 Master LLLP (the “Seller/Assignor”) to the Company (Assignee) assigned together all rights, title and interest
in and to any contractual agreements to Port De Claudius, Inc. (PDC) on completion of Phase One.
The Project consists of two phases,
Phase One consists of land purchase and onsite /offsite improvement. A dry closing with no funds being disbursed was originally scheduled
for September 21, 2016. The dry closing was later changed by amendment to October 14, 2016, and the closing took place on that date. Phase
Two is to take place on or before December 1, 2018 and consists of vertical construction of buildings and apparatuses.
The estimated cost for
both Phases is Two Billion Dollars ($2,000,000,000) at cost plus forty percent (40%), and plus two percent (2%) for the increase in
inflation regardless of the cost to the Company to perform the required services. In no event will the profit to the Company from
the amount paid by PDC be less than Eight Hundred Million Dollars ($800,000,000). A mobilization fee of $2,729,514 shall be due and
payable by PDC to the Company upon the closing of Bond offering for Phase One. The cost of Phase One is $950,000,000 and the net
Phase One revenue to the Company shall be $66,719,514. We are identifying Port Trajan as the priority project that will provide the
capital to begin investment grade studies for other projects. Economic and environmental studies performed by TEMS will be paid for
by profits of the Company from Port Trajan. These funded studies will then lead to officiating a bond offering through one of the
related non-profits on behalf of one of the related entities in the Company’s role as consultant, awarding the work to a one
or more of the largest construction and construction management firms. There are currently no contractual agreements with any of
these firms. However, agreements could be put in depending upon the firm’s years of experience, work force, and proven
processes and systems. It is our opinion that large construction and construction management firms will welcome the opportunity to
be awarded these projects.
The changing character of marine
transportation means that with the opening of the Panama Canal, only three ports on the East Coast will be able to receive Class C, D,
and E container vessels that require 50 feet of water. Baltimore is one of the three East Coast Ports that can accommodate such ships,
and therefore has strong potential for developing a Trade and Transportation corridor that can provide inland distribution of containers(according
to TEMS completed studies). A key part of the development of the Baltimore Trade and Transportation Corridor is the Port Trajan Project,
which will be an important Inland Port for the Port of Baltimore.
Port Trajan Project
The Port Trajan project is a transportation
project located in the Antrim Township, Greencastle, Pennsylvania on the Interstate 81 corridor and the railroad. The railroad, or “Crescent
Corridor”, is an existing 2,500 mile network of rail and terminals. An intermodal facility is an existing active rail-truck facility
in this corridor and the State of Pennsylvania that provided forty six million dollars of the one hundred million dollars that developed
this facility. This intermodal facility is an existing facility, and Port Trajan will be enhancing this shipping corridor by fulfilling
its development objective. Port De Claudius, Inc. intends to develop 2,700 acres of land next to this corridor, which has been designated
the “Port Trajan Project”. Port De Claudius, Inc. an affiliate entity, anticipates that it will construct a distribution center
consisting of 5 terminals, and a rail line between the main rail tracks to the highway for the transition of shipping containers from
the rail line to waiting trucks. The distribution center will provide the facility for repackaging the shipments, to be transported to
the final destination by truck, by constructing over time, up to thirty million square feet of warehouse space on 2,700 acres. The 2,700
acres is part of the January 9, 2013 letter of intent with Jewel Real Estate 10-86 Master LLLP a related party. The permitting for 4.2
million square feet of warehousing to be built on part of the 2,700 acres is ready to be issued.
Port De Claudius, Inc.
anticipates that such project will be completed in phases, the first of which is the purchase of an initial 345 acres at $350,000
per acre. The purchase price will include all on-site horizontal improvements, off-site improvements will be acquired at an
additional $20,000,000. The land is currently owned by a related company and Port De Claudius, Inc. and has entered into a letter of
intent for its purchase with the Company.
Port De Claudius, Inc. trading as
Port Trajan has engaged with Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) to manage and act as port agent at Port Trajan. Inchcape Shipping Services
(ISS) is a global operation that directs traffic from sea and air cargo to and from the ports. They have been in business since 1875.
As part of the development of
the Port of Baltimore Trade and Transportation Corridor, the development of inland ports such as Port Trajan is critical. However, since
the Harrisburg- Hagerstown corridor is already a major logistics center for the Northeast USA, the development of Port Trajan can begin
immediately and even before the Baltimore Trade and Transport Corridor is developed.
A Master Trust Indenture through
Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., with the cooperation of HSRF Statutory Trust, as trustee relating to
Port De Claudius, Inc., trading as Port Trajan of Pa., can offer to raise $8,000,000,000 billion of revenue bonds. The Company plans to
act as Consultant awarding the general contractor scope of work to an existing, well established firm as the horizontal and vertical site
improvements general contractor for Port De Claudius, Inc.
The Company intends to assist to
begin bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete within
the ninety day period, an investment grade study that will make it possible through bond rating agencies, to officiate a bond offering
for this project. To date no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after any assignments
of any agreements involving the entity, is still in full force and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction”
and “Consulting Agreement” described above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify for purposes of this project,
Port De Claudius Inc. and Port of Ostia, Inc. are related entities for this project.
The Company will engage contractors
by paying the mobilization fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies,
bond rating agency fees and also pay for the performance bond to insure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
The Company will receive compensation
from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital investment into the project. The Company will
than realize revenue to sustain its continued growth and ability to get other projects started by using its revenue as initial capital
investment while always being reimbursed from the bond proceeds that follow other projects. As discussed earlier the sources of realized
revenue for the Company are as follows: Construction Management fees, Consulting Fees, and twenty five percent profit sharing from each
of the related entities who are responsible for contracting by agreement. The Company will oversee the well-established firm awarded
the contract while they perform all scopes of work on the related entity(s) behalf for each project they secure.
The Company is not in
the real estate development business, it is a Super General Contractor and consultant to related and non-related parties for a fee,
and partner with each related entity receiving twenty five percent profit sharing per project. In this project the Company will work
for Port De Claudius, Inc., an affiliate entity, and engage some or all of the other affiliate entities to act as project overseers
/managers for the project, putting out for bids and awarding local, well-established national and international firms to perform
each specific scope of work on the project, ensuring it is completed on time and within budget. This also includes all of the
following projects.
The Company’s (current) Six
Stage Process for Port Trajan:
| 1. | Managements Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts
Completed |
| 3. | To have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions
(where applicable) N/A |
| 4. | Engineer and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility
Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor
- TBD |
Footnotes:
| 1) | There are 4.2 million sq. ft. of warehouse space approved
to date with permits available today. |
Project 2
Alabama Toll Road-Mobile Trade
and Transportation Corridor (ATFI Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc.)
The Company’s current project
“Port Trajan” is directly connected to our current Alabama port project “Port De Claudius, Inc.” through the Alabama
Toll Road Inc. (ATFI) project, connecting to Interstate 81 in Knoxville Tennessee Interstate 81is a major shipping corridor from Tennessee
to Maine, and South Central Pennsylvania (location of Port Trajan) is now operating as one of the distribution locations for the northeast.
The port of Mobile and Baltimore with 50 foot water depths stand to be the ports used in making cargo movement to the northeast corridor
more efficient as the size of cargo ships continue to increase. These ports have the ability to be deepened and the cost to do so will
be offset by the economic impact they create, according to studies performed by TEMS.
As its first step, Alabama Toll
Facilities, Inc. (ATFI) was created and obtained status as a nonprofit corporation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code. As a nonprofit corporation, ATFI is allowed to officiate bond offerings in order to finance the cost of acquisition and construction
and equipping of the toll road project, Alabama Toll Road.
In 2007, the toll road project
was presented to the Alabama legislature which on June 7, 2007, adopted Act no. 2007-506 entitled “Expressing Support for the Alabama
Toll Road Project”. This Act stated that it recognized the need to utilize other financial resources to meet the needs of that highway
and other infrastructure items such as that offered by ATFI. The Act urged approval of the bonds offered by ATFI as special revenue bonds
with the project eventually vesting to the state upon retirement of the bonds. The Act further supports designating ATFI as the exclusive
entity for creation and development of the toll road project. ATFI has full approval by the state of Alabama to officiate the bond offering.
As a second step, on September
23, 2009, Penndel Land Company (“Penndel”), a company wholly owned by Mr. Shah Mathias, entered into an agreement with ATFI
by which Penndel was appointed as the agent and representative of ATFI to perform all required tasks and actions to develop and construct
the toll road. This agreement was established prior to the formation of the Company.
Thirdly, on December 1, 2010, the
Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Transportation & Infrastructure, Inc. (“GTI”) in the state of Delaware
to provide development and construction services for the Alabama highway project and to include securing financing for the design, planning,
engineering and related costs of construction.
In December 2010, Penndel assigned
its agreements with ATFI to GTI. As such the Company, through its subsidiary, GTI, has the development rights for such toll road. Under
the terms of the agreement, GTI will provide development and construction services. GTI will also act as an agent and representative of
ATFI who is sponsored by the state of Alabama according to House Joint Resolutions, H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456, to take actions necessary
to secure the first and future phases of the financing applicable to the design, planning, engineering and related soft and hard costs
of the construction of a toll road in the state of Alabama and related activities.
In 2010, the Company was developing
this project at the time of the merger with Yellowwood. The planned toll road is designated as a 357 mile 4-lane road designed to be built
from Orange Beach, Alabama to the Tennessee state line with the intent of connecting various rural sections of Alabama to Tennessee and
more urban areas.
Alabama Indenture Agreement- On
December 1, 2010, ATFI nonprofit entered into a Master Trust Indenture agreement with as HSRF Statutory trust as a Trustee, which has
agreed to serve as the trustee for the bond offering of up to $7,000,000,000 of ATFI Revenue Bonds once it determines to effect such an
offering. The Alabama Indenture indicates that the developer for the project will be GTI. In April 2012 the Alabama Indenture was amended
to reflect a Master Indenture of $20,000,000,000. The Master Agreement provides the basic terms and conditions of any bond issuance such
as use of an escrow agent, rights of bond holders, sale of bonds, etc.
The Company acquired from Penndel
Land Company (majority owned by Mr. Mathias) the contract rights to a construction agreement with ATFI, a non-profit company supported
by the State of Alabama to act as the exclusive entity as set forth in H.J.R 459 and H.J.R. 456, as project developer for such a toll
road and on which Mr. Mathias served as one of its four directors. Mr. Shah Mathias (the Founder, Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and
Business Development, and non-board member of the Company) was one of the directors of ATFI and has subsequently resigned from his position.
When the Company secures financing,
ATFI will effect a bond offering to purchase the land on which the toll road is to be located. The Company has envisioned long-range ideas
and plans to develop currently undeveloped areas through which the planned Alabama Toll Road will traverse. These plans through its affiliates,
include the development of an airport called Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM), sea shipping port called Port De Claudius,
Inc., air cargo port called Port of Ostia and a high-speed rail line.
The Company will build
seventeen hundred miles of railroad tracks in parallel with ATFI. The Company has plans, through its affiliates, to build four
tracks north and south bound, two tracks for passenger services and two tracks for freight. Volkmann Railroad Builders has been
engaged by the Company to construct and built the railroad. Volkmann is a thirty five year old company that has built railroads for
NASA, the mining industry, oil and gas exploration and freight carriers.
In support of H.J.R. 459 and H.J.R.456
the following ancillary projects are being planned by the Company.
| 1. | Design built inland port called Port De Claudius, Inc.; |
| 2. | Design built airport called Sarah Jewel Mathias International
Airport (KSJM); |
| 3. | Design built air cargo port called Port of Ostia; |
| 4. | Design built railroad and train stations; |
| 5. | Design built Fiber Optic Lines; |
| 6. | Design built All Utilities underground or overhead; |
| 7. | Design built Power Grids; |
| 8. | Design built Cell Phone Towers; |
| 9. | Design built Motels, Travel Plazas, Fast Food Establishments; |
| 10. | Design built Outdoor Advertisements, Signage; |
| 11. | Design built Natural Gas Pipelines & Distillate Pipelines; |
A recent preliminary analysis
by TEMS suggested that the toll road would become part of a Mobile Trade and Transportation Corridor because of the opening of the Panama
Canal, and because Mobile is one of the only two Gulf Ports that can facilitate the large container vessels that need 50 feet of water.
As a result, an evaluation should be made of extending the corridor north along the west side of the Appalachian Mountains, (potential
project- Appalachian Regional Commission) a region that is today served by West Coast Ports. To assist the Company in completing an investment
grade study for the corridor, the following research/review team has been assembled to assess the analysis by Transportation Economics
& Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS).
Mobile Intermodal Corridor, Research
Review Team
Team Member Affiliation
| ● | Dr. Mark Burton, PhD University of Tennessee |
| ● | Dr. David Clarke, PhD University of Tennessee |
| ● | Mr. Rick Tucker Port of Huntsville, AL |
| ● | Mr. Jimmy Lyons Port of Mobile, AL |
| ● | Dr. Craig Phillip, PhD Vanderbilt University |
| ● | Dr. Ted Grossardt, PhD University of Kentucky |
| ● | Mr. Kent Sowards, Marshall University |
| ● | Dr. Mike Hicks, PhD Ball State University |
| ● | Mr. Scott Hercik Appalachian Regional Commission |
The purpose of this investment
grade study by TEMS is to evaluate the potential for developing the Mobile Trade and Transport Corridor, as an adjunct to Port Mobile
to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between the Appalachians in the east, and the Mississippi in the west, and
stretching as far north as the markets of mid-America including Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. The area is largely served today by West
Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these inland markets, but are low cost due to the large ships
that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile
corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving these markets.
The reason for this is that the
Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth)
that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce
the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the
Port of Mobile.
Potential Port of Mobile Hinterland
with Post-Panamax Max Ships
Mobile Trade & Transport Corridor: Population
and Required Linkage
In carrying out its initial review,
TEMS has already shown there is a prima facia case for the investment. However, the review was based on an analysis using existing data
and models including the Panama Canal Route Choice model and the National Ports model. Both models need updating to 2015 to reflect the
post 2008 recession economy and the latest changes in the development of the Panama Canal, US Ports, and marine economics.
In addition, the preliminary study
made a number of assumptions about the institutional structures that would be adopted by the Port and Railroads. In the Business Plan
phase these assumptions need to be evaluated and as appropriate adjustments made to accommodate the findings of direct discussions with
the key stakeholders.
Finally, the upgraded market
analysis and institutional assumptions will be used to develop a more detailed implementation plan, financial and funding plan, and economic
cost benefit and impact plan. The financial and funding plan will develop the cash flows for the project, and the timing and sources of
funds needed to complete the project. The economic analysis will show the benefits to the communities in the Trade and Transport Corridor.
The analysis will produce both the Cost Benefit Analysis required by USDOT, as well as the economic impact for the region associated with
job creation, increased income, property development, and tax base enhancement. This can be used to develop community outreach in communities
along the Alabama Toll Road corridor and at local and state level, to explain the costs and benefits of developing the corridor.
For this Feasibility Study, TEMS
will refine the more aggregate level of analysis that was used for the preliminary study. This will include updating the trade and traffic
data that derives the forecasts, working to resolve institutional issues and ensuring the practicality of the proposed implementation
process.
The Company will introduce the
bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete, within the ninety-day period, an investment grade study that will make it possible, through bond rating agencies, to officiate a bond offering for this
project. To date no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after any assignments
of any agreements involving any related entity, is still in full force and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction”
and “Consulting Agreement” described above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify ATFI is a nonprofit non-related
party to the Company and Global Transportation Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
The Company will engage a large
construction firm as identified earlier. The Company through use of proceeds identified in Operating Capital Reserves will pay the mobilization
fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies, bond rating agency fees
and also pay for the performance bond to insure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
The Company will
receive compensation from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital investment into the
project. The Company will than realize revenue, to sustain its continued growth and ability to get other projects such as ATFI
started, by using its revenue as initial capital investment into projects, while always being reimbursed from the bond proceeds that
follow other projects. As discussed earlier the sources of realized revenue for the Company are as follows, Construction Management
fees, Consulting fees and twenty five percent profit sharing from each of the related entities who are responsible for contracting
by agreement with the Company to do the work on the related entity(s) behalf per projects they secure.
The Company’s (current) Six
Stage Process for Alabama Toll Road Facility Inc. (ATFI):
| 1. | Managements Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts
Completed |
| 3. | To have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions
(where applicable)Completed |
| 4. | Engineer and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility
Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor
Within 12 months of bond capital |
Project 3
Appalachian Regional Commission
(ARC) -The Company along with TEMS acting as consultant for the Company have had discussions with ARC to help them over the next five
years, advance current and emerging opportunities and to continue to close the gap between Appalachian communities and the nation on key
socioeconomic indicators. ARC’s mission is to innovate, partner, and invest to build community capacity and strengthen economic growth
in Appalachia.
The Appalachian Regional Commission
(ARC) is a regional economic development agency that represents a partnership of federal, state, and local government. Established by
an act of Congress in 1965, ARC is composed of the governors of the thirteen Appalachian states and a federal co-chair, who is appointed
by the President of the United States of America. Local participation is provided through multi-county local development districts. ARC
invests in activities that address the five goals identified in the Commission’s strategic plan:
Goal 1: Economic Opportunities
Invest in entrepreneurial and
business development strategies that strengthen Appalachia’s economy.
Goal 2: Ready Workforce
Increase the education, knowledge,
skills, and health of residents to work and succeed in Appalachia.
Goal 3: Critical Infrastructure
Invest in critical infrastructure—especially
broadband; transportation, including the Appalachian Development Highway System; and water/wastewater systems.
Goal 4: Natural and Cultural Assets
Strengthen Appalachia’s community
and economic development potential by leveraging the Region’s natural and cultural heritage assets.
Goal 5: Leadership and Community Capacity
Build the capacity and skills
of current and next-generation leaders and organizations to innovate, collaborate, and advance community and economic development.
Each year ARC provides
funding for several hundred investments in the Appalachian Region, in areas such as business development, education and job
training, telecommunications, infrastructure, community development, housing, and transportation. The Company has engaged in
discussion with ARC to provide $34,000,000,000 in funding through Master Bond Indentures to fund these projects that create
thousands of new jobs; improve local water and sewer systems; increase school readiness; expand access to health care; assist local
communities with strategic planning; and provide technical and managerial assistance to emerging businesses.
ARC investments in infrastructure
have helped reduce the Region’s isolation, spur economic activity, and improve public health and safety. In order to compete in
the global economy, Appalachia must continue to develop and improve the infrastructure necessary for economic development, including broadband
and telecommunications; basic infrastructure, such as water and wastewater systems; diversified energy; housing; and transportation, including
the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS). ARC will also support investments in multi-modal transportation systems that strengthen
connections to regional, national, and global markets.
ARC infrastructure investments
will address local community needs as well as strategic, innovative approaches to economic development. ARC will provide leadership in
helping communities develop long-term plans for effective development and deployment of the infrastructure needed to support economic
competitiveness and quality of life. To create the greatest impact, ARC will leverage resources and bring together government agencies
and the private sector to build the critical infrastructure needed to strengthen the Region’s economy, complete the Appalachian
Development Highway System and construct local access roads to strengthen links between transportation networks and economic development.
Most recently a preliminary analysis
by TEMS, of the Appalachian Development Highway System corridor suggested that because of the opening of the Panama Canal and because
Mobile is one of the only two Gulf Ports that can facilitate the large container vessels that need 50 feet of water, the ATFI toll road
would become part of a Mobile Trade and Transportation Corridor (Port Trajan) connecting to the Appalachian Development Highway System
corridor. As a result, an evaluation should be made of extending the corridor north along the west side of the Appalachian Mountains,
a region that is today served by West Coast Ports.
Investment in the Appalachian
Development Highway System has significantly reduced the Region’s isolation and opened up opportunities for economic growth. ARC
will complete the remaining portions and constructing local access roads will further connect the region to strategic regional, national,
and global economic opportunities. ARC will invest in intermodal transportation planning and infrastructure that builds on the
ADHS and maximizes the region’s access to domestic and international markets. In order to compete in a global economy, Appalachia
must have reliable access to domestic and international markets. Connecting the ADHS to rail, waterway, and aviation routes can help link
Appalachian businesses to regional, national, and international markets.
The Company in meeting with the
ARC board has made available to them through Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc., $34,000,000,000 in funding
to assist in meeting ARC strategic planning goals above.
A Master Trust Indenture through
Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. with cooperation of High Speed Rail Facility Inc. (HSRF) statutory trust,
as trustee relating to any project forth coming out of the thirteen state region, through revenue bonds can offer to raise $34,000,000,000
to ARC and the related states, through HSR Freight Line Inc. and HSR Passenger Services Inc., related entities, for the Appalachian Regional
Commission corridor projects.
The Company will introduce the
bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete, within the ninety-day
period, an investment grade study that will make it possible, through bond rating agencies, to officiate a bond offering for any project
ARC would like to undertake. To date no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after
any assignments of any agreements involving the entities, is still in full force and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement
For Construction” and “Master Consulting Agreement” described above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify
for purposes of this project, HSR Freight Line Inc. and HSR Passenger Services Inc. are the related entities & Global Infrastructure
Finance & Development Authority, Inc. a non-profit related to the Company.
The Company will engage a large
construction firm as identified earlier. The Company through use of proceeds identified in Operating Capital Reserves will pay the mobilization
fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies, bond rating agency fees
and also pay for the performance bond to insure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
The Company will receive compensation
from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital investment into the project. The Company will
than realize revenue, to sustain its continued growth and ability to get other potential projects started, by using its revenue as initial
capital investment into projects, while always being reimbursed from the bond proceeds that follow other projects. As discussed earlier
the sources of realized revenue for the Company are as follows: Master Construction Management fees, Master Consulting fees and twenty
five percent profit sharing from each of the related entities.
The Company’s (current)
Six Stage Process for Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC):
| 1. | Managements Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts
Being Negotiated |
| 3. | To have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions (where applicable)TBD |
| 4. | Engineer and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility
Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor TBD |
Project 4
Atlanta-Louisville-Birmingham-Jacksonville
– The Company has received support for expansion of high speed rail, through House Resolution 948 of the Georgia House of Representatives,
stating that nineteen members of this body express their support of high speed trains and encourage the creation of a high speed rail
transit authority for Fulton, Carroll, and Douglas counties. The resolution specifically names the related party High Speed Rail Facilities,
Inc. as the developer of high speed rail.
House Resolution 948 By: Representatives
Waites of the 60th, Roberts of the 155th, Alexander of the 66th, Bruce of the 61st, and Yates of the 73rd
A RESOLUTION
Encouraging the creation of
a high speed rail transit authority to operate in Fulton, Carroll, and Douglas counties; and for other purposes. WHEREAS, high speed trains
are more energy efficient than cars and planes, decrease our dependence on foreign oil, and reduce air pollution that causes global warming
and harms public health; and WHEREAS, at distances of less than 400 miles, high speed trains can deliver passengers downtown-to-downtown
almost as fast as airplanes at a fraction of the cost, and can do so in virtually all weather; and WHEREAS, with wide seats, fax machines,
places to plug in a laptop computer, and food service, high speed trains provide a convenient, productive alternative to cars and airplanes;
and WHEREAS, a high speed rail network would pull together regional economies and promote intraregional business growth; and WHEREAS,
Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc., is looking to expand the use of high speed trains to Fulton, Carroll, and Douglas counties with
the intention of expanding service throughout Georgia and into Alabama; and WHEREAS, the creation of a high speed rail transit authority
is necessary for the success of a high speed rail system in Georgia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES that
the members of this body express their support of high speed trains and encourage the creation of a high speed rail transit authority
for Fulton, Carroll, and Douglas counties. 15 LC 39 1039 H. R. 948 - 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Clerk of the House of Representatives is authorized and directed to make appropriate copies of this resolution available for distribution
to members of the public and the press.
The travel time is estimated at
four to five hours between Atlanta and Dallas, which would have the train average at least 163 miles per hour. It would travel between
Atlanta and Birmingham in about 90 minutes. That type of connectivity between Atlanta and Birmingham could have game-changing effects
on several industries. It would be possible to live in Alabama and enjoy its lower property values and cost of living while working in
Atlanta with its higher salaries.
The Company through
its consultant TEMS has estimated the cost of the project at $3,000,000,000 on behalf of Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. a non-profit
entity related to the Company. Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. has the legal right to develop this corridor as a high speed rail
connection between the cities. The aim would be to provide high speed frequent rail service that would provide improved mobility for
people and cargo and at the same time provide an operating profit. The project would be developed as either a freestanding
enterprise or a public-private partnership (PPP) with an array of public and private support for the project.
Feasibility studies completed by TEMS
for the corridor are noted below:
Georgia Department of Transportation:
High-Speed Rail Planning Services: Atlanta- Louisville-Birmingham-Jacksonville
TEMS provided the Operating Plans
and Costs along with the financial and economic analysis for three Georgia corridors, Atlanta-Birmingham, Atlanta-Louisville, and Atlanta-
Jacksonville. TEMS supported HNTB Corporation (HNTB) and Parsons Brinckerhoff, a global engineering and professional services organization
PB with the development of new alignments for both 110-mph and 220-mph steel wheel technology along with a Maglev corridor for the Birmingham-Louisville
corridor. TEMS estimated operating costs considering cost drivers such as train miles, passenger miles, and fixed costs.
Once the ridership, revenue and
capital costs were calculated, TEMS provided both the financial and economic analysis for each corridor and technology. TEMS completed
a sensitivity analysis using high and low estimates of ridership and capital costs.
SERVICES PROVIDED: Operating
Plans, Operating Costs, Financial and Economic Analysis
The purpose of this financial
and economic analysis by TEMS is to evaluate the potential for developing the Atlanta-Birmingham, Atlanta-Louisville, and Atlanta-Jacksonville
as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between Atlanta and the south eastern sea board
markets. The area is largely served today by West Coast Ports that rely on relatively expensive rail and truck shipments to these inland
markets, but are low cost due to the large ships that can access West Coast Ports. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access
of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving
these markets.
The reason for this is
that the Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships
(50 foot depth) that will be able to access the gulf and east coast with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged,
this will reduce the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from
West Coast Ports to the Port of Mobile. This potential project is supported by other potential projects the Company is currently
working on, specifically project no. 5 - Florida-Alabama TPO and project no. 6 - Port De Claudius, Inc. DBA Port Trajan, Atlanta
Metro Area and the south east it will also be connected to intermodal ports located outside of Atlanta Georgia serviced by Port De
Claudius, Inc. The Company continues to meet with economic development offices in both Morgan and Newton counties of Georgia, being
well received, supporting the Company’s business model of consulting the related entities and related non-profit entities to
pursue additional intermodal port projects similar to Port Trajan in their counties, respectfully.
A Master Trust
Indenture through Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. a nonprofit related party with cooperation of HSRF Statutory Trust, as trustee,
relating to, High Speed Rail and Ancillary Projects Revenue Bond through revenue bonds can offer to raise $20,000,000,000 through Hi
Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. direct issuer of revenue bonds. The Company, as horizontal and vertical site improvement developer for
High Speed Rail and Ancillary Projects.
The Company will introduce the
bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete, within the ninety-day
period, an investment grade study that will make it possible, through bond rating agencies, to officiate a bond offering for this project.
To date no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after any assignments of any agreements
involving any affiliate entities, is still in full force and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction”
and “Consulting Agreement” described above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify for purposes of this project,
Hi Speed Rail Facilities, Inc. a nonprofit entity related to the Company will work with the state of Georgia on this project.
The Company will engage a large
construction firm as mentioned earlier. The Company through use of proceeds identified in Operating Capital Reserves will pay the mobilization
fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies, bond rating agency fees,
and also pay for the performance bond to ensure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
The Company will receive compensation
from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital investment into the project. The Company will
then realize revenue, to sustain its continued growth and ability to get other potential projects started, by using its revenue as initial
capital investment into projects, while always being reimbursed from the bond proceeds that follow other projects. As discussed earlier,
the sources of realized revenue for the Company are as follows: Master Construction Management fees, Master Consulting fees and twenty
five percent profit sharing from each of the related entities.
The Company’s (current)
Six Stage Process for ATLANTA-LOUISVILLE-BIRMINGHAM-JACKSONVILLE
| 1. | Managements Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts
Being Negotiated |
| 3. | To have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions (where applicable)Completed |
| 4. | Engineer and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility
Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor TBD |
Project 5
Florida-Alabama
TPO – FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: FLORIDA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY–2002 REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE, TEMS
evaluated the potential for implementing a high-speed rail service to connect St. Petersburg with Orlando. The future extension of
the service to Miami (Phase II) was examined at a lesser level of detail. TEMS provided ridership and revenue projections, as well
as operating and maintenance estimates for four different technologies and nine route alternatives. TEMS also completed the
financial and economic analyses and assessment of the feasibility of the system. TEMS’ analysis served as the basis for the
evaluation of high-speed rail in Florida by the state legislature and the governor.
SERVICES PROVIDED: Ridership
and revenue forecasts, operations planning, financial and economic analysis.
The purpose of financial and economic
analyses and assessment of the feasibility of the system by TEMS was also to evaluate the potential for developing distribution delivery
systems as an adjunct to Port Mobile to serve as a major container port for a hinterland corridor between Mobile and the Florida market
markets. With the opening of the Panama Canal, and the access of large ships to the Gulf of Mexico, the Mobile corridor has the potential
to provide a less expensive and more effective way of serving the Florida markets.
The reason for this is that the
Port of Mobile is one of the very few ports on the gulf and the east coast of the US that can serve the very large ships (50 foot depth)
that will be able to access the gulf and east coasts with the opening of the Panama Canal. Once the Port is dredged, this will reduce
the Maritime costs to the Port of Mobile significantly (i.e., 50 percent) and shift the competitive balance from West Coast Ports to the
Port of Mobile. This project is supported by other potential projects the Company is currently working on, specifically project no. 6
- Port De Claudius, Inc. DBA Port Trajan, the Florida Market place will also be connected to and serviced by Port De Claudius, Inc. The
Company continues to meet with economic development offices in both Morgan and Newton counties of Georgia, being well received, supporting
the Company’s business model as the Company is consulting the related entities and related non-profit entities to pursue additional
intermodal port projects similar to Port Trajan in their counties respectfully.
The Master Trust
Indenture through Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. a nonprofit related to the Company, with
cooperation of HSRF Statutory Trust, as trustee relating to, HSR Passenger Services Inc. an affiliate entity of the Company,
relating to projects for Florida-Alabama TPO, through revenue bonds can offer to raise $1,500,000,000 through Global Infrastructure
Finance & Development Authority, Inc. direct issuer of revenue bonds. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Global
Transportation Infrastructure Inc. will act as Master General Contractor as horizontal and vertical site improvements developer for
HSR Passenger Services Inc. for Florida-Alabama TPO projects.
The Company will introduce the
bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete, within the ninety-day
period, an investment grade study that will make it possible, through bond rating agencies, to officiate a bond offering for this project.
To date no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after any assignments of any agreements
involving any affiliate entities, is still in full force and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction”
and “Master Consulting Agreement” described above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify for purposes of this
project, HSR Passenger Services Inc. a related entity of the Company while Global Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority,
Inc. a non-profit entity related to the Company will work with Florida-Alabama TPO on this project.
The Company will engage a large
construction firm as identified earlier. The Company through use of proceeds identified in Operating Capital Reserves will pay the mobilization
fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies, bond rating agency fees
and also pay for the performance bond to insure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
The Company will receive compensation
from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital investment into the project. The Company will
then realize revenue to sustain its continued growth and ability to get other potential projects started while always being reimbursed
from the bond proceeds that follow. As discussed earlier the sources of realized revenue for the Company are as follows, Master Construction
Management fees, Master Consulting fees and twenty five percent profit sharing from each of the related entities.
The Company’s (current) Six
Stage Process for Florida-Alabama TPO
| 1. | Managements Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts
Being Negotiated |
| 3. | To have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions
(where applicable) Completed |
| 4. | Engineer and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility
Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor
TBD |
Project 6
PORT DE CLAUDIUS,
INC. (GREATER YUMA PORT) AUTHORITY AND TRADE CORRIDOR – has the developmental rights for a new port (Claudius) in Yuma
County Arizona to establish a foreign trade zone within Yuma County Arizona, and developing business zones and the trade corridor
through the Mexico-Arizona border in coordination with the Federal Authorities and agencies.
The Portus De- Jewel Mexico (project
no. 8), will be a new premier gateway for international commerce. It is located approximately 600 miles south of Yuma Arizona Intermodal
Port (current project no. 6), along the Mexican coast line. The Portus De- Jewel Mexico port encompasses 176,000 acres of land and water
along 26 miles of waterfront. It will feature 40 passenger and 384 cargo terminals, including automobile, breakbulk, container, dry and
liquid bulk, multi-use, and warehouse facilities that handle billions of dollars’ worth of cargo each year.
The west coast ports today are
becoming obsolete as the cargo ships continue to increase in size and hauling capacities. Also the movement of cargo out of the ports
have become congested with population growth over the last 100 years. The Company has secured the rights to build through the Mexico-Arizona
border, in coordination with Federal Authorities, a rail system to move cargo from Portus De Jewel to Yuma Arizona Intermodal Port project.
Global Infrastructure Finance &
Development Authority, Inc. (“GIF&DA”), a nonprofit entity related to the Company, with the cooperation of HSRF Statutory
Trust, the trustee to Port De Claudius, Inc., a related entity of the Company, can raise $8,000,000,000 through the issuance of revenue
bonds. The Company will act as Master General Contractor as horizontal and vertical site improvements developer for the project.
The Company will introduce bond
offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete an investment grade
study that for officiating a bond offering for this project. To date, no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s
contractual role related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction” and “Master Consulting Agreement” as
described in the “Business Plan” section is still in full force and effect after assignments of agreements involving related
entities, if any.
The capital raised from the offering
will be used as the initial capital investment in the Yuma Arizona Intermodal Port project to engage a large construction firm as mentioned
earlier, pay the mobilization fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies,
bond rating agency fees and also pay for the performance bond to ensure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
Pursuant to the Master Consulting
Agreement, the Company will receive compensation from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital
investment into the project. Other sources of revenue include management fees from the Master Agreement for Construction and twenty-five
percent profit sharing from each of the related entities. With the revenue recognized by the Company, the Company will then be able to
sustain its continued growth and to commence other potential projects.
The Company’s (current) Six
Stage Process for Yuma Arizona Intermodal Port
| 1. | Managements Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts
Completed |
| 3. | To have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions
(where applicable)Completed |
| 4. | Engineer and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility
Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management of the physical construction as a general contractor
TBD |
Project 7
SARAH JEWEL MATHIAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
(KSJM) & PORT OF OSTIA - Pursuant to the
Master Constructing Agreement with KSJM International Airport, Inc., the Company will build a major new air cargo airport as part of the
Mobile Trade and Transportation Corridor thereby increasing the capacity for the Southeast USA. This project will be developed with a
major e-trade company like FedEx, Amazon or UPS. The e-trade market is expanding by 12-16 percent per year. It will follow the Alliance
freight cargo airport development in Fort Worth, Texas.
The Sarah Jewel Mathias International
Airport (KSJM) and Port of Ostia commercial airport will revolutionize logistics in the United States. The existing transportation and
distribution infrastructure in the south has been identified as insufficient to meet the anticipated demand over the next several decades
according to studies by TEMS. The Company, as consultant to Port De Claudius, Inc., Port Ostia , Inc. and KSJM International Airport,
Inc., , has developed a plan to meet the demands of the future and to combat the existing distribution shortfalls by creating the most
efficient multi-modal distribution system the world has ever seen.
The commercial airport will be
located in west-central Alabama approximately half way between the Gulf of Mexico and the Tennessee border. High speed rail, freight rail
and the Alabama Toll Road ATFI (current potential project no. 2) of the Company, will connect the commercial airport with the port in
the south and connect to high density population centers in the north, specifically Port Trajan.
The Company has engaged Armstrong
Consulting Inc. for the airport engineering and planning. Armstrong Consulting Inc. is an experienced airport planning and engineer design
company. It will engineer and design according to standards from FAA AC150/5300-13 airport design and FAR PART 77.
The Company has engaged Inchcape
Shipping Services (ISS) to manage and act as port agent at Port Claudius and Port Of Ostia. Inchscape Shipping Services Inc. has a world
of expertise and provides global strategic maritime, cargo and supply chain solutions to ship owners and operators who span all geographies,
market segments, vessels and asset types. They perform 65,885 local port calls across 1,533 ports in 112 countries.
The Company has approached a major
aircraft manufacturer to help launch air cargo operation at KSJM and Port of Ostia. A major aircraft manufacturer has indicated that the
Company should move forward with its business plan.
The airfield component of the
commercial airport has been envisioned to accommodate the next generation’s mega-sized aircraft. Many airports around the world
are finding it difficult to handle the largest aircraft that are currently in service, such as the Airbus A380. Most of the existing airports
around the world are constrained by physical barriers that inhibit their ability to expand to accommodate the massive size of the aircraft
that operate today. This will not be an issue at KSJM. The airport will have four parallel runways measuring 18,000 feet long and 250
feet wide as well as a crosswind runway measuring 12,000 feet long and 250 feet wide. Design criteria for the taxiway system, aircraft
parking areas and the runways have been planned to accommodate new large aircraft of today as well as the next generation aircraft of
tomorrow. Sarah Jewel Mathias International Airport (KSJM) and Port of Ostia commercial airport components:
| § | Four 18,000’ x 250’ Runways |
| § | 24/7 Air Traffic Tower - No Curfew |
| § | 1,600-acre Inland Rail Port |
| § | 2,300-acre Industrial Park |
| § | Design/Build-to-Suit (Expandable) |
| § | 1,800-acre Airport Business Park |
| § | Shipping & Receiving (Logistics) |
| § | State-of-the-Art Facilities |
| § | Customer Reception Center |
| § | Nearby Residential/Retail/Hotel |
| § | 24/7 U.S. Customs Port of Entry |
| § | Full-Service Fixed-Based Operator |
| § | Flight Testing Facilities |
Sarah Jewel Mathias International
Airport (KSJM) and Port of Ostia Development Plan
Global Infrastructure
Finance & Development Authority, Inc. (“GIF&DA”), a nonprofit entity related to the Company, with the
cooperation of HSRF Statutory Trust, the trustee of the KSJM International Airport, Inc., a related entity of the Company can raise
$15,000,000,000 through issuance of revenue bonds. The Company, as Master General Contractor, will act as horizontal and vertical
site improvements developer for KSJM International Airport, Inc. (KSJM) a related entity of the Company.
The Company, will introduce the
bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete, within the ninety-day
period, an investment grade study for officiating a bond offering for this project. To date, no money has exchanged hands related to this
transaction. The Company’s contractual role related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction” and “Master
Consulting Agreement” described above within the “Business Plan” is still in full force and effect, after assignments
of agreements involving affiliate entities, if any.
The capital raised from the offering
will be used as the initial capital investment in the KSJM International Airport project to engage a large construction firm as identified
earlier, pay the mobilization fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility studies and investment grade studies,
bond rating agency fees and also pay for the performance bond to insure the completion of the construction to protect the bond holders.
Pursuant to the Master Consulting
Agreement, the Company will receive compensation from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company for its initial capital
investment into the project. Other sources of revenue include management fees from the Master Agreement for Construction and twenty five
percent profit sharing from each of the related entities. With the revenue recognized by the Company, the Company will then be able to
sustain its continued growth and commence other potential projects.
The
Company’s (current) Six Stage Process for KSJM International Airport, Inc. (KSJM)
| 1. | Managements
Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter
into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts Completed |
| 3. | To
have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions (where applicable) N/A |
| 4. | Engineer
and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising
Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management
of the physical construction as a general contractor TBD |
Project
8
Portus
De-Jewel Mexico - The Portus De- Jewel Mexico is the new premier gateway for international commerce. It is located approximately
600 miles south of the potential Yuma Arizona Intermodal Port (project no. 6) along the Mexican coast line. The Portus De- Jewel Mexico
encompasses 176,000 acres of land and water along 26 miles of waterfront. It will feature 40 passenger and 384 cargo terminals, including
automobile, breakbulk, container, dry and liquid bulk, multi-use, and warehouse facilities that handle billions of dollars’ worth
of cargo each year.
The
Portus De-Jewel Mexico development plan consists of 64 shipping/receiving berths at lengths of 15,000 ft. each. The total number of ships
berthed at one time would be 320 mega ships. The water depth would be constant at fifty five feet, the needed depth of water for mega
cargo ships.
The
Company estimates that Portus De-Jewel Mexico domestic economic impact overflow to the United States of America would be:
1.1
million jobs
$89.2
billion trade value in trade corridors of Arizona and California
$223
billion in U.S. trade value
$5.1
billion in state tax revenue
$21.5
billion in federal tax revenue
Port
customers will contribute about $760 million in ancillary trade value to Arizona and California
Economic
Impact: The economic impact is approximately five hundred billion dollars per year to US domestic economy. Port customers will contribute
approximately $27,800,000,000 per year to the local economy as well as to US domestic economy within the Portus De-Jewel Mexico complex.
The Port contributes substantially to the economy, in part, through the following activities:
Port
Industries: Port industries are businesses involved in the moving and handling of maritime cargo.
Dollars:
For every dollar spent by port industries - another 97 cents is generated in indirect and induced sales in the region. Each dollar
of spending for port user goods and services produces about 79 cents of additional industry sales in the region.
Jobs:
Accounts for approximately 32,000 direct port industry jobs (85% of which are trucking and warehousing jobs).
Port
Users: The biggest contributors to the economy are the port users who use the Port to receive imports or ship exports. Export manufacturers
are major port users. Other port users include local manufacturers who process imported unfinished goods.
Port
Customers: Port customers are the retail and other non-cargo businesses in the Port. They are most important to communities near
the Port as a source of jobs, recreation and specialty consumer goods.
Jobs:
Direct jobs associated with port customers numbered about 6,400 or roughly half of the jobs actually located in the Port. For every
one of these port customer jobs, nearly 1.7 additional jobs are created elsewhere in the region.
Portus
De Jewel
Global
Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. (“GIF&DA”), a nonprofit entity related to the Company, with
the cooperation of HSRF Statutory Trust, the trustee of Portus De-Jewel Mexico, a division of Port of Ostia, Inc. and a related entity
of the Company can raise $40,000,000,000 through the issuance of revenue bonds. The Company as Master General Contractor will act as
horizontal and vertical site improvements developer for Portus De-Jewel Mexico.
The
Company will introduce bond offerings relating to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to
complete, within the ninety-day period, an investment grade study to officiate a bond offering for this project. To date, no money has
exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction”
and “Master Consulting Agreement” as described in the “Business Plan” section is still in full force and effect
after assignments of agreements involving any affiliate entities.
The
capital raised from the offering will be used as the initial capital investment in the Portus De-Jewel Mexico project to engage a large
construction firm as mentioned earlier, pay the mobilization fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility
studies and investment grade studies, bond rating agency fees and also pay for the performance bond to ensure the completion of the construction
to protect the bond holders.
Pursuant
to the Master Consulting Agreement, the Company will receive compensation from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company
for its initial capital investment into the project. Other sources of revenue include management fees from the Master Agreement for Construction
and twenty five percent profit sharing from each of the related entities. With the revenue recognized by the Company, the Company will
then be able to sustain its continued growth and to commence other potential projects. On June 29, 2019, the Company issued 20,000,000
shares of Class B common stock to acquire a 10% participating profits interest in this project.
The
Company’s (current) Six Stage Process for Portus De-Jewel Mexico
| 1. | Managements
Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter
into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts Completed |
| 3. | To
have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions (where applicable)TBD |
| 4. | Engineer
and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising
Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management
of the physical construction as a general contractor TBD |
Project
9
HSR
Technologies Inc. Manufacturing Site - In October 2014, HSR Technology, Inc. a related party and the equitable owner of four tax
parcels located within West Manchester Township, York, PA, filed a request for landowner curative amendment with the local township with
the intent of constructing facilities on the properties for the fabrication, assembly and welding of steel, aluminum and stainless steel
assemblies with no foundry or casting operations. The use will include the fabrication and assembly of composite rebar, composite rail,
bed liners and rail car assemblies received pre-prepared. The rail access is critical to the procurement of the land, as the products
manufactured on site will be directly related to the Company’s purpose of creating global economic development and promoting trade
by bringing people together through innovative ideas and advanced technology. HSR Technology, Inc. proposes the initial construction
of a transfer and storage building with a rail siding into the building. Manufacturing and assembly buildings would be added in stages,
eventually employing up to 2,800 workers.
HSR
Technologies, Inc. has chosen the properties in question for industrial development after an extensive search of York County properties.
The property has 449+/- acres which meets the development needs and also provides future expansion capabilities. Rail service is critical
to the HSR Technologies Inc. business model, which is based on rail use. The site in question has 3,600 linear feet of rail line traversing
it and provides ample areas for siding access. Access to major roadways is a critical component of any manufacturing use. The subject
properties have direct access to an arterial road, West College Avenue, a state road; a collector road, Hokes Mill Road, also a state
road; and three local roads, offering many potential points of access. Also, the site is within 2200 feet of PA Route 462 and the Route
30 bypass.
Global
Infrastructure Finance & Development Authority, Inc. (“GIF&DA”), a non-profit entity related to the Company, with
the cooperation of HSRF Statutory Trust, the trustee of HSR Technologies Inc., a related entity of the Company can raise $25,000,000,000
through the issuance of revenue bonds. The Company as Master General Contractor will act as horizontal and vertical site improvements
developer for HSR Technologies, Inc.
The
Company, will wait until ninety days after the Registration Statement is effective before introducing bond offerings relating to the
project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant, TEMS, to complete an investment grade study for officiating a
bond offering for this project. To date, no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role
related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction” and “Master Consulting Agreement” described above within
the “Business Plan” is still in full force and effect after assignments of agreements involving related entities, if any.
The
four manufacturing plants that will commence operations on this site after site build out are as follows:
HIGHWAY
COMPOSITE REBAR - The Company has the right to use the new rebar product that can be used in its development of highways and rail
route structures. Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) has been engaged to manufacture the composite rebar, through HSR Technologies
Inc. for the Company. HSR Technologies, Inc. would manufacture the rebar for use in projects like the Alabama Toll Road, and the Texas
Trade Corridor, and Yuma Trade Corridor for the Company.
MCT
is the original developer of the composite rebar technology. HSR Technologies Inc. will also sell the rebar to others for commercial
use. Marshalls Composite Technologies LLC (MCT) offers a plant set up and license agreement to manufacture the rebar and a contract for
their technology to manufacture composite Re-bar (C RB).
U.S.
Patent Numbers: 5,702,816; 5,763,042; 5,851,468; 5,876,553; 6,485,660 B1; and 6,493,914 B2
MCT
is the only USA composite C-Rebar company that is federally certified to meet all federal specs for use in any government
funded projects. Congress gave final approval of a $109-billion transportation funding bill. Included in the compromise legislation
is a provision that calls for the use of total life-cycle cost analysis as part of the contract-awarding process for new federal
projects. The result could be billions of dollars in new business for the composites industry. The fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)
composites industry has long advocated for the U.S. Congress to require the states to employ a life-cycle cost assessment when
issuing contracts for infrastructure construction.
As
a practical matter, such a provision will save money because new infrastructure construction would take into account both the cost of
installation and long-term upkeep, rather than awarding a contract solely on the basis of lowest initial cost. According to the new bill,
the engineering analysis used by the State Departments of Transportation for awarding construction contracts for highway bridge projects,
“shall be evaluated by the State ... on engineering and economic bases, taking into consideration acceptable designs for bridges
.... and ... using an analysis of life-cycle costs and duration of project construction.” This change paves the way for the use of
composites and other high-performance materials in major infrastructure projects.
“These
life-cycle cost analysis requirements should push the states toward the use of longer-life and lower-maintenance-cost designs, including
projects that employ non-rusting and light-weight components such as Composite C- REBAR, girders, and deck systems,” says the Senior
Director of Government Affairs at the American Composites Manufacturers Association, John Schweitzer. “There are over 600,000 highway
bridges in the U.S., making this a very large potential market for FRP composite products.” For more information about the benefits
of life Dee-cycle cost assessment read this white paper by transportation policy expert and three decade veteran of the Congressional
Research Service, John W. Fischer.
In
February 2011, the Company issued an offer letter to HSR Technologies Inc. for purchase of future rebar products for cash of $4,750,000.
The Company is also engaged in development of other transportation projects, specifically the development of a toll road in the State
of Alabama. The Company is in need of 400 million feet of Composite C- Rebar for the toll road project in the State of Alabama. HSR Technologies,
Inc. site will facilitate the manufacturing and distribution of Composite C- Rebar.
The
management team advised the affiliate entity per the consulting agreement that it is in the best interest of the Company and the affiliate
entity, to wait until ninety days after the S-1 Registration Statement becomes effective, before introduction of bond offerings relating
to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant TEMS to complete within the ninety day period an investment
grade study for officiating a bond offering for this project. The Company advised to do this to preserve the quiet period of the pending
S-1 Registration Statement. To date, no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role related
to both the “Master Agreement For Construction” and “Master Consulting Agreement” described above within the
“Business Plan” is still in full force and effect after assignments of agreements.
COMPOSITE
RAILROAD TIES - HSR Technologies, Inc. holds the patent for producing rail ties that will be used to build the railroad system in
projects like Port Trajan and the Mobile Trade Corridor, Texas and Yuma Trade corridors.
On
April 16, 2012 the Company entered into an agreement to purchase intellectual property from HSR Technologies, Inc. in exchange for $8,000,000
per country license. The Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to secure contract rights. HSR Technologies, Inc. will facilitate
the manufacturing and distribution of Composite Rail Road Ties. The Company will use over 40 million Composite Rail Road Ties for its
current projects. The Company also has the right to exploit the intellectual property in other world markets as well.
NPG
Innovations entered into an exclusive licensing agreement rights involving two US patents, to manufacture composite rail road ties for
HSR Technologies, Inc. and is the original inventors of green technology railroad ties.
US
Patent Number: 5,996,901; 7,931,210
The
management team advised the affiliate entity per the consulting agreement that it is in the best interest of the Company and the affiliate
entity, to wait until ninety days after the S-1 Registration Statement becomes effective, before introduction of bond offerings relating
to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant TEMS to complete within the ninety day period an investment
grade study that will make it possible through bond rating agencies to officiate a bond offering for this project. The Company advised
to do this to preserve the quiet period of the pending S-1 Registration Statement. To date no money has exchanged hands related to this
transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after any assignments of any agreements involving the entity, is still in full force
and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction” and “Master Consulting Agreement” described
above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify for purposes of this project, HSR Technologies, Inc. is a related entity.
RAILCAR/LOCOMOTIVE
PRODUCTION FACILITY – &NBSP: Hi Speed Rail Car Assembly Line: RELCO Locomotives Inc., per agreements with
HSR Technologies Inc. will manufacture train set parts to be assembled by HSR Technologies Inc. on the HSR
Technologies
Inc. manufacturing site. The manufacturing facility will be for the fabrication, assembly and welding of steel, aluminum and stainless
steel assemblies and the use will include the fabrication of rail car assemblies received pre-prepared.
HSR
Technologies, Inc. entered into an exclusive Technology use agreement with US Railcar for exclusive use of DMU rail technologies and
use of its know-how for manufacturing of train sets meeting the 49 CFR Part 238 compliant DMU in current revenue service, that meets
or exceeds new Federal Rail Administration (FRA) and American Public Transportation Association (APTA) structural safety specifications.
The
Company has agreed to purchase US Railcar rights from HSR Technologies for $25,000,000. The Company intends to use train sets in the
future rail projects when the projects are funded. The Company also has the right to exploit the sale of train sets in other world
markets as well.
RELCO
Locomotives Inc., has been engaged by HSR Technologies, to provide pre-prepared train set parts for assembly by HSR Technologies Inc.
RELCO Locomotives Inc. is a fifty year old company and has provided services for Union Pacific, CSX Transportation, Burlington Northern
Santa Fe, Kansas City Southern Railway, Canadian National and numerous others. The Company has engaged Volkmann Railroad Builders to
construct the design built railroad. Volkmann is a thirty five year old company that has built railroads for NASA, the mining industry,
oil and gas exploration and freight carriers.
The
management team advised the affiliate entity per the consulting agreement that it is in the best interest of the Company and the affiliate
entity, to wait until ninety days after the S-1 Registration Statement becomes effective, before introduction of bond offerings relating
to the project. The Company will also work with its transportation consultant TEMS to complete within the ninety day period an investment
grade study that will make it possible through bond rating agency’s to officiate a bond offering for this project. The Company
advised to do this to preserve the quiet period of the pending S-1 Registration Statement. To date no money has exchanged hands related
to this transaction. The Company’s contractual role, after any assignments of any agreements involving the entity, is still in
full force and effect, related to both the “Master Agreement For Construction” and “Master Consulting Agreement”
described above within the “Business Plan”. To clarify for purposes of this project, HSR Technologies, Inc. is the affiliate
entity.
DAMAR
TRUCKDECK: The Company entered into a contract on June 10, 2010 for the acquisition of the patents, rights, titles, and business
of Damar Corporation LLC, the Inventor/developer/manufacturer of Damar TruckDeck. The Damar TruckDeck is a flexible truck deck storage
and organization system with an integrated frame allowing the cargo deck to be used as a hauling surface. The system has many configurations
to fit a wide variety of uses (hunting, construction, moving, hauling, etc.) in various truck deck sizes. The Damar TruckDeck primarily
consists of lockable repositionable storage units.
The
advantages of the Damar TruckDeck system are as follows:
| 1. | Organize
gear in removable containers with the DAMAR Load-N-Go™ containers, easily converting a truck’s usage by quickly swapping containers. |
| 2. | Protect
items in lockable hatches. Lockable, repositionable hatches protect items in the Load-N-Go™ containers from theft and weather while
a rear hatch allows the full length of the bed to be used for securing longer materials. |
| 3. | Ability
to haul large items. The recessed CargoDeck surface is built to support and haul large materials and equipment, and by maintaining some
bed wall height there is no need to strap items down. |
| 4. | Can
be installed or removed in minutes by one person with no tools and no drilling. The Damar Corporation has entered into contracts for
sale of its Damar TruckDeck with Lowe’s, The Home Depot, Advanced Auto Parts, Sam’s Club, Costco and Meyer Distributing. |
The
intended use of these assets will equip the Company field construction vehicle fleets with the needed tool storage containment and hauling
capabilities. The Company will also capitalize on the opportunity of marketing these products to the United States consumer market through
existing relationships by Damar Corporation LLC and large big box retail chains.
The
Company shall receive all rights and title to the patents, the TruckDeck system, and all related assets for a purchase price of $750,000
payable as $500,000 cash and the remaining $250,000 payable in the form of 7,500 shares of the Company’s common Class “B”
stock. The cash portion is payable within 90 days of the successful completion of the registration statement for Company shares.
The
Company intends to engage with HSR Technologies Inc. to manufacture the Damar TruckDeck products at the HSR Technologies manufacturing
site.
To
date, no money has exchanged hands related to this transaction.
U.S.
Patent Number: 8,210,592
Concerning
all manufactured products on the HSR Technology Park:
The
capital raised from the offering will be used as the initial capital investment in the HSR Technology Park potential project to engage
a large construction firm as mentioned earlier, pay the mobilization fees to declare the contractors in the bond offering, pay for feasibility
studies and investment grade studies, bond rating agency fees and also pay for the performance bond to ensure the completion of the construction
to protect the bond holders.
Pursuant
to the Master Consulting Agreement, the Company will receive compensation from the bond proceeds at bond closing to reimburse the Company
for its initial capital investment into the project. Other sources of revenue include management fees from the Master Agreement for Construction
and twenty five percent profit sharing from each of the related entities. With the revenue recognized by the Company, the Company will
then be able to sustain its continued growth and to commence other potential projects.
The
Company’s (current) Six Stage Process for HSR Technologies Inc. Manufacturing Site
| 1. | Managements
Final Investment Decision to take on a project Completed |
| 2. | Enter
into Letter of Intents, Agreements, Construction Contracts Completed |
| 3. | To
have the State(s) sponsor the project by legislative actions (where applicable)N/A |
| 4. | Engineer
and design studies, Architectural Design, Feasibility Studies Started |
| 5. | Raising
Capital through Bond Financing or Company stock offerings |
| 6. | Management
of the physical construction as a general contractor TBD |
Entry
of the Company into the Market
The
Company anticipates that it can offer a comprehensive, innovative approach to resolving the nation’s transportation crisis, and
it proposes doing so without the necessity of the government increasing taxes at any level, or in any manner. In short, the Company suggests
replacing public financing with private funding.
The
Company’s innovative approach is to utilize the related and non-related non-profit entities to officiate bond offerings to finance
infrastructure projects being identified around the country and internationally. A government entity can sponsor the bond offering since
the bond proceeds benefit the public interest of their state, and the state is not burdened with the debt liability of the offering.
The Company can then consult with one of the related entities to raise the needed capital through sponsored bonds, on behalf of the state
citizenry. The reason we say we are “Pioneers” of Private Public Partnerships is that the finished debt free project will
be sold back to the government entity for one dollar upon bond retirement, as the operations of the project are then managed for a fee,
resulting in revenue profits going into the State treasury in future years.
Ameri Metro Capital Structure | |
26-May-20 | | |
31-Aug-20 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Class A Common Stock | |
| 1,600,000 | | |
| 1,684,000 | |
Class B Common Stock | |
| 2,926,768,899 | | |
| 3,889,637,844 | |
Class C Common Stock | |
| 66,000,000 | | |
| 145,045,680 | |
Class D Common Stock | |
| 48,000,000 | | |
| 114,000,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common Shares Outstanding - Basic | |
| 3,042,368,899 | | |
| 4,150,367,524 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred Shares | |
| 1,800,000 | | |
| 1,800,000 | |
Stock Options | |
| 10,890,000 | | |
| 10,890,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted | |
| 3,055,058,899 | | |
| 4,163,057,524 | |
For
further details on the Company’s management, equity compensation, outstanding shares and other details please see the July 31,
2019 Form 10-K filing on www.Sec.gov and the company’s website: https://ameri-metro.com/
| 6) | The
Economic Outlook in General and the Condition and Outlook in General and the Condition and Outlook of the Specific Industry in Particular: |
THE
DEMAND FOR TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE5
The
United States Census Bureau predicts that the American population will reach 420 million by 2050, a trend that will overwhelm our nation’s
transportation infrastructure.
Current
estimates suggest that overall freight demand will double over the next 40 years from 15 billion tons today to 30 billion tons. The number
of trucks on the road is also expected to double. Already under unsustainable strain, the nation’s freight transportation infrastructure
and highways will face even greater challenges as the total volume of freight increases.
Extensive
infrastructure expansion, such as new ports, trade corridors and high-speed rail (HSR), is critical if rail and road transportation is
to help mitigate problems associated with rising fuel costs, crowded highways, and greenhouse gas emissions. Population growth and development
in the U.S. have made our nation increasingly reliant on rail and highway infrastructure to transport people and freight.
| 5 | https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/bridging-global-infrastructure-gaps |
Clearly,
a strong, efficient freight transportation system is vital to the nation’s economy. Our already-strained and outdated railways
must be upgraded to handle the projected increases in freight shipping in relieve congestion on our highways. New trade corridors are
needed to support the changes in marine shipping that will need new ports and infrastructure. Equally, new high speed rail routes are
needed to increase connectivity between US cities and support the emerging new economy, and reduce auto emissions6.
The
US government even recognizes that there is a need to rebuild America but Congress has strong emotions and can’t agree on a solution.
This is where the private sector must step in and Ameri Metro has the perfect platform to privatize and build the infrastructure needs
of America7.
Interest
rates are at all-time lows and with inflation in check, the need to create employment due to the nationwide lock downs, the projects
created by Ameri Metro will be very favorable to the US economic recovery.
The
requirement for infrastructure is strongly tied to GDP and population growth. Internationally and in the USA infrastructure has been
in a spending deficit for years where the USA is at a $2 Trillion deficit. In a good, moderate or weak economy the demand for infrastructure
development is critical to global success and creating efficient markets.
The
Mckinsey Global Institutes discussion paper on “Bridging Infrastructure GAPs Has the World Made Progress?” - October 2017
report claims that there is a $5.5 trillion spending gap globally between now and 2035, with regional variations.
The
world’s infrastructure investment has fallen short of investment needs, but the size of the gap varies considerably among geographies.
In
exhibit 5 on page 5 the global GAP from 2017 to 2035 for the United States of America was a half a trillion dollars based on 2020 and
requests from congress constituents this gap has increased to $2.0 trillion.
| 7) | The
Book Value of the Stock and the Financial Condition of the Business |
The
Adjusted Book Value of the Company is $915,834,515,374 which is based on all of the assets and liabilities acquired from inception of
the Company since 2012. Management has reviewed all of the 8-K filings and annual Form 10-Ks to ensure that all of the assets have been
appropriately captured. The adjusted book value is based on the Market Value of the Company’s shares compared to the management’s
Target Value.
| 8) | The
Earning Capacity of the Company |
The
Company has no historical earnings but with recent acquisition of profitable companies, such as Marfin Investment Group which has historically
generated approximately $85.0 million in profits from its $1.0B in annual revenues these acquisitions will provide historical and proven
earnings to Ameri Metro.
| 6 | https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/reimagining-infrastructure-in-the-
united-states-how-to-build-better |
| 7 | https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/infrastructure-productivity |
Based
on management’s projections the Company is expected to have very strong earnings potential of up to $366,586,946,127 in the aggregate
from 2020 to 2028. Projected net income for 2021 is approximately $2.1B.
| 9) | Enterprise
Goodwill or Other Intangible Value |
In
addition to the value of the physical assets of the Company, it is necessary to determine whether any goodwill or the intangible assets
exists.
The
Company has various patents, trademarks and key vendor contracts, such as with Inchcape Shipping Services to manage all of the port operations
for Ameri Metro, Inc. Management at this time does not have the appropriate information to assign a value to these intangibles identified.
If
any quantifiable goodwill is being generated by Ameri Metro, Inc., it will be calculated by using an income or market approach, and deriving
a value in excess of the net intangible assets.
Management’s
projected net income and projected cash flows (income valuation approaches) are not above the net asset valuation, below:
A) Gross Valuation | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Net Asset Approach | |
$ | 1,314,335,677,680 | | |
$ | 1,314,335,677,680 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted Future Net Income | |
$ | 724,691,664,503 | | |
$ | 724,691,664,503 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted Future Cash Flows | |
$ | 432,229,438,556 | | |
$ | 432,229,438,556 | |
This
would indicate that based on the income approach there currently is no enterprise goodwill or other intangible value.
Management’s
market approach is above the net asset valuation approach, however, this is mostly due to projected not realized earnings and cash flows
therefore indicating on an expectation basis Ameri Metro is expected to have significant enterprise goodwill.
A) Gross Valuation | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Net Asset Approach | |
$ | 1,314,335,677,680 | | |
$ | 1,314,335,677,680 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Market Value Approach | |
$ | 8,992,590,468,031 | | |
$ | 8,992,590,468,031 | |
| 10) | Sales
of the Stock and the Size of the Block of Stock to be Valued: |
Shareholders
have been selling options to acquire shares in the public company Ameri Metro, Inc. (Ticker Symbol: ARMT) which are summarized below.
Date | |
Security | |
Option Cost | | |
Strike Price | | |
Number
of Shares | | |
Expected
Capital to Selling
Shareholdres | |
8/26/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
$ | 2,500 | | |
$ | 4,100 | | |
| 1,250 | | |
$ | 5,122,500 | |
8/26/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 5,000 | | |
| 4,100 | | |
| 2,500 | | |
$ | 10,245,000 | |
8/26/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 2,500 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 1,250 | | |
$ | 4,747,500 | |
8/26/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 5,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 2,500 | | |
$ | 9,495,000 | |
8/11/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 5,000 | | |
$ | 18,990,000 | |
8/10/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 5,000 | | |
$ | 18,990,000 | |
8/10/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 5,000 | | |
$ | 18,990,000 | |
7/27/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 25,000 | | |
$ | 94,950,000 | |
8/6/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 30,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 15,000 | | |
$ | 56,970,000 | |
8/9/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 11,500 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 5,750 | | |
$ | 21,838,500 | |
8/4/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 2,500 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 1,250 | | |
$ | 4,747,500 | |
8/10/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
| 5,000 | | |
| 3,800 | | |
| 2,500 | | |
$ | 9,495,000 | |
7/17/2020 | |
Stock Option | |
$ | 150,000 | | |
$ | 3,000 | | |
| 65,000 | | |
$ | 194,850,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
$ | 294,000 | | |
| | | |
| 137,000 | | |
$ | 469,431,000 | |
The
selling shareholders have collected $294,000 and if the options are exercised will issue 137,000 ARMT shares, and shareholders will receive
approximately $469.431 million in proceeds from these options. Whether this is a large of enough block of stock to be considered relevant
to the valuation of Ameri Metro, Inc stock is a matter of opinion.
However,
it is noteworthy that the independent sale of the options to third parties have strike prices starting at $3,000 per share and hit as
high as $4,100 in late August 2020.
The
current market valuations for shares of Microsoft, Tesla, Amazon, and Apple suggest that this could be a leading indicator of how the
market will price in the substantial assets, self-funding ability and strategic relationships that Ameri Metro maintains.
Microsoft
trades at 33 times forward earnings8, Tesla9 has no earnings with decreasing quarterly over quarterly revenues,
yet trades at 333 times forward earnings; Apple trades at 31.85 times forward earnings10; and Amazon trades at 114.94 times
forward earnings.
Management
is not implying the Company is Microsoft, Apple, Tesla, etc., but notes that these are very large organizations, as will Ameri Metro
be. Ameri Metro has already obtained many large projects that will generate billions of dollars in annual revenues and has merged in
various companies that generate or will create substantial profits and wealth for shareholders.
Given
these factors, it is plausible that Ameri Metro would trade at 15.25 to 20.78 times forward earnings which would yield a stock price
of $2,160 to $4,100 per share.
Ameri
Metro is a unique investment opportunity in a starved market for US infrastructure. Investors such has Warren Buffet have always followed
hard asset companies in railway, infrastructure due their significant asset base and consistent cash flows. Ameri Metro shares could
be a darling on the markets once it commences trading.
| 8 | https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MSFT/key-statistics/ |
| 9 | https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA/key-statistics?p=TSLA |
| 10 | https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAPL/key-statistics?p=AAPL |
| 11) | Valuation
Calculations: |
Ameri
Metro Inc.
As
of August 31, 2020
Valuation
based on Discounted Projected Net Income
Entity/Project | |
Discounted
Net Income | | |
Net
Income | | |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2023 | | |
2024 | | |
2025 | | |
2026 | | |
2027 | | |
Perpetual
Net Income | |
a) Air Cypress Aviation Limited | |
| | | |
$ | 675,000,867 | | |
| | | |
$ | (24,349,661 | ) | |
$ | 16,689,902 | | |
$ | 59,689,902 | | |
$ | 103,868,268 | | |
$ | 146,908,340 | | |
$ | 177,024,550 | | |
$ | 195,169,566 | | |
$ | 204,928,044 | |
Discounted NI (Loss) | |
$ | 1,097,296,838 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 258 | % | |
| 74 | % | |
| 41 | % | |
| 21 | % | |
| 10 | % | |
| 5 | % |
b) Marfin Investment Group | |
| | | |
$ | 686,768,800 | | |
| | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | |
Discounted NI | |
$ | 1,144,445,872 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Management Fee | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted NI | |
$ | 129,575,640 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Penn Insurance
Services | |
| | | |
$ | 38,854,824,883 | | |
$ | 182,160,000 | | |
$ | 676,594,286 | | |
$ | 1,319,358,857 | | |
$ | 2,154,952,800 | | |
$ | 3,241,224,926 | | |
$ | 4,653,378,689 | | |
$ | 6,489,178,582 | | |
$ | 8,875,718,442 | | |
$ | 11,262,258,302 | |
Discounted Net Income | |
$ | 119,607,677,252 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit (Loss) | |
| | | |
$ | 122,500,000 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 18,750,000 | | |
$ | 21,250,000 | | |
$ | 20,000,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | |
Discounted NI (Loss) | |
$ | 192,328,820 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
c) Resurrection Media JV | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit (Loss) | |
| | | |
$ | 505,263,459 | | |
$ | (3,167,625 | ) | |
$ | 7,962,012 | | |
$ | 43,428,188 | | |
$ | 62,819,697 | | |
$ | 78,844,238 | | |
$ | 78,844,238 | | |
$ | 78,844,238 | | |
$ | 78,844,238 | | |
$ | 78,844,238 | |
Discounted NI (Loss) | |
$ | 991,419,488 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Port de Claudius | |
| | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Management Fee | |
| | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted NI | |
$ | 86,383,759.85 | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Port De Ostia,
Inc. | |
| | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Management Fee | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted NI | |
$ | 129,575,640 | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Slater &
West | |
| | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers | |
| | | |
$ | 74,192,497,960 | | |
$ | 493,350,000 | | |
$ | 1,377,042,857 | | |
$ | 1,919,727,857 | | |
$ | 2,754,790,500 | | |
$ | 4,099,516,221 | | |
$ | 6,365,948,231 | | |
$ | 10,348,886,986 | | |
$ | 17,599,861,653 | | |
$ | 29,233,373,655 | |
Discounted NI | |
$ | 294,128,165,904 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Master Consulting
and Bond Indenture Agreement | |
$ | 222,197,393,794 | | |
$ | 251,150,090,158 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Alabama | |
$ | 15,118,309,919 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Texas/SH36A | |
$ | 10,984,800,692 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Michigan Coast-to-Coast Rail | |
$ | 676,331,801 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
New York-Washington HSRI | |
$ | 40,225,380,114 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Yuma Port + Rail | |
$ | 17,982,578,968 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted Net Income | |
$ | 724,691,664,503 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Income | |
| | | |
$ | 366,586,946,127 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ameri
Metro Inc.
As
of August 31, 2020
Valuation
based on Discounted Projected Cash Flows
Entity/Project | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | | |
Cash
Flow | | |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2023 | | |
2024 | | |
2025 | | |
2026 | | |
2027 | | |
Perpetual
Cash Flow | |
a)
Air Cypress Aviation Limited | |
| | | |
$ | 879,928,911 | | |
| | | |
$ | (24,349,661 | ) | |
$ | 16,689,902 | | |
$ | 59,689,902 | | |
$ | 103,868,268 | | |
$ | 146,908,340 | | |
$ | 177,024,550 | | |
$ | 195,169,566 | | |
$ | 204,928,044 | |
Discounted
NI (Loss) NI | |
$ | 1,097,296,838 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 258 | % | |
| 74 | % | |
| 41 | % | |
| 21 | % | |
| 10 | % | |
| 5 | % |
b)
Marfin Investment Group | |
| | | |
$ | 686,768,800 | | |
| | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | | |
$ | 85,846,100 | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 1,144,445,872 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
KSJM
Int’l Airport | |
| | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Management
Fee | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 129,575,640 | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Penn
Insurance Services | |
| | | |
$ | 38,854,824,883 | | |
$ | 182,160,000 | | |
$ | 676,594,286 | | |
$ | 1,319,358,857 | | |
$ | 2,154,952,800 | | |
$ | 3,241,224,926 | | |
$ | 4,653,378,689 | | |
$ | 6,489,178,582 | | |
$ | 8,875,718,442 | | |
$ | 11,262,258,302 | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 119,607,677,252 | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross
Profit (Loss) | |
| | | |
$ | 122,500,000 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 18,750,000 | | |
$ | 21,250,000 | | |
$ | 20,000,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | | |
$ | 12,500,000 | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 192,328,820 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
c)
Resurrection Media JV | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross
Profit (Loss) | |
| | | |
$ | 480,854,811 | | |
$ | (3,167,625 | ) | |
$ | (7,208,612 | ) | |
$ | 39,487,563 | | |
$ | 39,432,451 | | |
$ | 82,462,207 | | |
$ | 82,462,207 | | |
$ | 82,462,207 | | |
$ | 82,462,207 | | |
$ | 82,462,207 | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 999,026,344 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Port
de Claudius | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Management
Fee | |
| | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 86,383,760 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Port
De Ostia, Inc. | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Management
Fee | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 129,575,640 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Susquehanna
Mortgage Bankers | |
| | | |
$ | 74,192,497,960 | | |
$ | 493,350,000 | | |
$ | 1,377,042,857 | | |
$ | 1,919,727,857 | | |
$ | 2,754,790,500 | | |
$ | 4,099,516,221 | | |
$ | 6,365,948,231 | | |
$ | 10,348,886,986 | | |
$ | 17,599,861,653 | | |
$ | 29,233,373,655 | |
| |
$ | 1,658,333,102 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Master
Consulting and Bond Indenture Agreement | |
$ | 222,197,393,794 | | |
$ | 251,150,090,158 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Alabama | |
$ | 15,118,309,919 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Texas/SH36A | |
$ | 10,984,800,692 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Michigan
Coast-to-Coast Rail | |
$ | 676,331,801 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
New
York-Washington HSRl | |
$ | 40,225,380,114 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Yuma
Port + Rail | |
$ | 17,982,578,968 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Discounted
Cash Flow | |
$ | 432,229,438,556 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash
Flow | |
| | | |
$ | 366,767,465,523 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ameri
Metro Inc.
As
of August 31, 2020
Valuation
based on Market Multiples
Entity/Project | |
Projected
Net
Income | | |
Projected
Cash Flows | | |
Industry | |
Industry
Multiple | | |
Market
Value based
on Projected Net Income | | |
Market
Value based
on Projected Cash Flows | |
Ameri
Cement | |
| | | |
| | | |
Cement
Contractors | |
| 8.9 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Ann
Charles Int’l Airport | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
a)
Air Cypress Aviation Limited | |
$ | 675,000,867 | | |
$ | 879,928,911 | | |
Airline
/ Airline Operators & Services | |
| 8.14 | | |
$ | 5,494,507,055 | | |
$ | 7,162,621,336 | |
b)
Marfin Investment Group | |
$ | 686,768,800 | | |
$ | 686,768,800 | | |
Conglomerate | |
| 15.6 | | |
$ | 10,713,593,280 | | |
$ | 10,713,593,280 | |
KSJM
Int’l Airport | |
| | | |
| | | |
Airline
/ Airline Operators & Services | |
| 8.16 | | |
| - | | |
| | |
Management
Fee | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | |
Penn
Insurance Services | |
$ | 38,854,824,883 | | |
$ | 38,854,824,883 | | |
Insurance | |
| 20.14 | | |
$ | 782,536,173,146 | | |
$ | 782,536,173,146 | |
b)
Best of Times JV | |
$ | 122,500,000 | | |
$ | 122,500,000 | | |
Entertainment
Production | |
| 19.03 | | |
$ | 2,331,175,000.00 | | |
$ | 2,331,175,000 | |
c)
Resurrection Media JV | |
$ | 505,263,459 | | |
$ | 480,854,811 | | |
Entertainment
Production | |
| 19.03 | | |
$ | 9,615,163,625 | | |
$ | 9,150,667,055 | |
Port
de Claudius | |
| | | |
| | | |
Port
Operations | |
| 4 | | |
| - | | |
| | |
Management
Fee | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
| |
| | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | | |
$ | 100,000,000 | |
Port
De Ostia, Inc. | |
| | | |
| | | |
Port
Operations | |
| 4 | | |
| - | | |
| | |
Management
Fee | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
| |
| | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | | |
$ | 150,000,000 | |
Susquehanna
Mortgage Bankers | |
$ | 74,192,497,960 | | |
$ | 74,192,497,960 | | |
Mortgage
Bank | |
| 20.56 | | |
$ | 1,525,397,758,055 | | |
$ | 1,525,397,758,055 | |
Master
Consulting and Bond Indenture Agreement | |
$ | 251,150,090,158 | | |
$ | 251,150,090,158 | | |
Construction
& Engineering | |
| 8.22 | | |
$ | 2,064,453,741,101 | | |
$ | 2,064,453,741,101 | |
Alabama | |
$ | 40,773,536,294 | | |
$ | 40,773,536,294 | | |
Port
Operations / High Speed Rail | |
| 18.05 | | |
$ | 735,984,409,630 | | |
$ | 735,984,409,630 | |
Texas
/ SH36A | |
$ | 42,170,754,695 | | |
$ | 42,170,754,695 | | |
Port
Operations / High Speed Rail | |
| 18.05 | | |
$ | 761,204,958,402 | | |
$ | 761,204,958,402 | |
Michigan
Coast to Coast Rail | |
$ | 2,941,937,739 | | |
$ | 2,941,937,739 | | |
High
Speed Rail | |
| 18.05 | | |
$ | 53,103,569,302 | | |
$ | 53,103,569,302 | |
New
York Washington HSRI | |
$ | 144,506,330,169 | | |
$ | 144,506,330,169 | | |
High
Speed Rail | |
| 18.05 | | |
$ | 2,608,417,512,079 | | |
$ | 2,608,417,512,079 | |
Yuma
Port + Rail | |
$ | 23,984,760,068 | | |
$ | 23,984,760,068 | | |
Port
Operations / High Speed Rail | |
| 18.05 | | |
$ | 432,937,907,357 | | |
$ | 432,937,907,357 | |
Total | |
$ | 620,964,265,092 | | |
$ | 621,144,784,488 | | |
| |
| | | |
$ | 8,992,590,468,031 | | |
$ | 8,992,590,468,031 | |
Target
Valuation | |
$ | 9,470,682,586,900 | | |
$ | 12,905,478,324,400 | | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expected
Market Mulltiples | |
| 15.25 | | |
| 20.78 | | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| C) | The
Asset-Based Approach |
The
book value calculations were provided by Ameri Metro’s third party calculations and approved by management.
| i) | Adjusted
Book Values Method |
Ameri
Metro Inc.
As
of August 31, 2020
Book
Value
| |
100% from Entity/Project Financials 7/31/20** | | |
Ameri Metro Share | |
Entity/Project | |
Net Ordinary Income | | |
Book Value*** | | |
Net Ordinary Income | | |
Book Value | |
Ameri Cement | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 15,506,899,970 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 3,876,724,993 | |
Ann Charles Int’l Airport | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 535,814,080,496 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 133,953,520,124 | |
Atlantic Energy & Utility Products | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 31,006,899,991 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 7,751,724,998 | |
Cape Horn Abstracting | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 15,506,899,896 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 3,876,724,974 | |
Dutch East India Logistics Co* | |
$ | 2,504,080,710 | | |
$ | 414,056,462,050 | | |
$ | 250,408,071 | | |
$ | 41,405,646,205 | |
Eastern Development & Design | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 119,623,499,970 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 29,905,874,993 | |
HSR Freight Line | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 143,610,450,570 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 35,902,612,643 | |
HSR Logistics | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 132,230,065,710 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 33,057,516,427 | |
HSR Passenger Services | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 87,436,567,770 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 21,859,141,943 | |
HSR Technologies | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 31,467,625,970 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 7,866,906,493 | |
KSJM Int’l Airport | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 69,756,899,970 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 17,439,224,993 | |
Lord Chauffeurs | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 23,249,999,980 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 5,812,499,995 | |
Malibu Homes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 69,756,899,980 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 17,439,224,995 | |
Natural Resources | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 5,424,999,990 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 1,356,249,998 | |
Penn Insurance Services | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 864,571,012,170 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 216,142,753,043 | |
Platinum Media | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 23,249,830,170 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 5,812,457,543 | |
Port de Claudius | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 188,611,030,180 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 47,152,757,545 | |
Port Ostia | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 129,988,751,380 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 32,497,187,845 | |
Portus de Jewel* | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 123,999,999,970 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 12,399,999,997 | |
Slater & West | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 11,883,206,560 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 2,970,801,640 | |
Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers | |
$ | 263,222,724 | | |
$ | 2,543,424,505,189 | | |
$ | 65,805,681 | | |
$ | 635,856,126,297 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Totals at 7.31.20 | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 316,213,752 | | |
$ | 1,314,335,677,680 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Adjusted Book Value | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 915,834,515,374 | |
| * | 10%
non-controlling Ownership by Ameri Metro; all others 25% non-controlling Ownership by Ameri Metro. |
| ** | Numbers
prepared by Feight CPA |
| *** | Total
Assets minus Total Liabilities |
The
Company’s management does not have the future cash flows or net income for the following entities. Obviously if the information
was available this would be able to increase the projected net income; projected net cash flow and market values, which would increase
the expected share values.
| 2) | Ann
Charles International Airport, Inc. |
| 4) | Dutch
East India Logistics Co. |
| 5) | Eastern
Development & Design, Inc. |
| a) | Land
Easement – Port Trajan |
| 8) | HSR
Passenger Services, Inc. |
| b) | NK
Shacolas Holdings Ltd |
| b) | Damar
Truck Deck Patent |
| 12) | Natural
Resources, Inc. |
| 14) | Port
De Claudius, Inc. |
| 17) | Slater
& West Slater & West, Inc. |
For
Air Cypress Aviation Limited management has projected net income for 2020 to 2025. For 2026, 2027 and the terminal value these items
were extrapolated from the 2020 and 2025 numbers. Projected cash flow information was re-worked based on projected net income and the
valuation provided by management.
For
Best of Times JV management was provided revenues, budget and number of films produced from 2020 to 2025. Management used movie production
standards to determine profitability and extrapolated these numbers to 2026, 2027 and the terminal value.
Marfin
Investment Group11 management obtained the information from public information in 2017 and extrapolated the information to create the
projected cash flows and projected net income. Marfin’s management represented that the revenues were relatively consistent at
approximately $1.0B and profitability was reasonably steady at approximately
$85.0MM.
| 11 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marfin_Investment_Group |
Appendix
A: Other Calculations to Support Share Price Valuation:
The
calculations below are the expected cash flows and net income for Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers and Penn Insurance. Susquehanna will be
the funding arm of Ameri Metro receiving fees from servicing, originating / underwriting, lender’s fee and credit enhancement.
Penn Insurance Services will act as the surety to Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers.
Susquehanna
Mortgage Bankers and Penn Insurance Services Net Income and Cash Flow Approach Valuations
| |
Year | | |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2023 | | |
2024 | | |
2025 | | |
2026 | | |
2027 | | |
Terminal
Value | |
Total Bond Indenture
Raise by Year | |
| | | |
| 25,300,000,000 | | |
| 68,671,428,571 | | |
| 89,272,857,143 | | |
| 116,054,714,286 | | |
| 150,871,128,571 | | |
| 196,132,467,143 | | |
| 254,972,207,286 | | |
| 331,463,869,471 | | |
| 331,463,869,471 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Susquehanna Mortgage Bankers
Fees | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Consulting Fee | |
| 1.50 | % | |
$ | 379,500,000 | | |
$ | 1,030,071,429 | | |
$ | 1,339,092,857 | | |
$ | 1,740,820,714 | | |
$ | 2,263,066,929 | | |
$ | 2,941,987,007 | | |
$ | 3,824,583,109 | | |
$ | 4,971,958,042 | | |
$ | 4,971,958,042 | |
Additional - Servicing Fee | |
| 0.13 | % | |
$ | 31,625,000 | | |
$ | 117,464,286 | | |
$ | 260,680,357 | | |
$ | 554,838,036 | | |
$ | 1,153,196,589 | | |
$ | 2,362,969,852 | | |
$ | 4,799,489,379 | | |
$ | 9,694,593,335 | | |
$ | 19,389,186,670 | |
Servicing Fee | |
| 0.50 | % | |
$ | 126,500,000 | | |
$ | 469,857,143 | | |
$ | 1,042,721,429 | | |
$ | 2,219,352,143 | | |
$ | 4,612,786,357 | | |
$ | 9,451,879,407 | | |
$ | 19,197,957,515 | | |
$ | 38,778,373,341 | | |
$ | 77,556,746,682 | |
Origination /Underwriting Fee | |
| 1.50 | % | |
$ | 379,500,000 | | |
$ | 1,030,071,429 | | |
$ | 1,339,092,857 | | |
$ | 1,740,820,714 | | |
$ | 2,263,066,929 | | |
$ | 2,941,987,007 | | |
$ | 3,824,583,109 | | |
$ | 4,971,958,042 | | |
$ | 4,971,958,042 | |
Lender Fee | |
| 1.50 | % | |
$ | 379,500,000 | | |
$ | 1,030,071,429 | | |
$ | 1,339,092,857 | | |
$ | 1,740,820,714 | | |
$ | 2,263,066,929 | | |
$ | 2,941,987,007 | | |
$ | 3,824,583,109 | | |
$ | 4,971,958,042 | | |
$ | 4,971,958,042 | |
Credit Enhancement Fee | |
| 3.00 | % | |
$ | 759,000,000 | | |
$ | 2,060,142,857 | | |
$ | 2,678,185,714 | | |
$ | 3,481,641,429 | | |
$ | 4,526,133,857 | | |
$ | 5,883,974,014 | | |
$ | 7,649,166,219 | | |
$ | 9,943,916,084 | | |
$ | 9,943,916,084 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Fee Income | |
| | | |
$ | 2,055,625,000 | | |
$ | 5,737,678,571 | | |
$ | 7,998,866,071 | | |
$ | 11,478,293,750 | | |
$ | 17,081,317,589 | | |
$ | 26,524,784,295 | | |
$ | 43,120,362,440 | | |
$ | 73,332,756,887 | | |
$ | 121,805,723,563 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Income | |
| | | |
$ | 493,350,000 | | |
$ | 1,377,042,857 | | |
$ | 1,919,727,857 | | |
$ | 2,754,790,500 | | |
$ | 4,099,516,221 | | |
$ | 6,365,948,231 | | |
$ | 10,348,886,986 | | |
$ | 17,599,861,653 | | |
$ | 29,233,373,655 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Penn Insurance Sevices | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Financial Guarantee Fee | |
| 3.00 | % | |
$ | 759,000,000 | | |
$ | 2,819,142,857 | | |
$ | 5,497,328,571 | | |
$ | 8,978,970,000 | | |
$ | 13,505,103,857 | | |
$ | 19,389,077,871 | | |
$ | 27,038,244,090 | | |
$ | 36,982,160,174 | | |
$ | 46,926,076,258 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Income | |
| | | |
$ | 182,160,000 | | |
$ | 676,594,286 | | |
$ | 1,319,358,857 | | |
$ | 2,154,952,800 | | |
$ | 3,241,224,926 | | |
$ | 4,653,378,689 | | |
$ | 6,489,178,582 | | |
$ | 8,875,718,442 | | |
$ | 11,262,258,302 | |
The
calculations below are the expected cash flows and net income 1.5% for consulting; cost plus 40% on the construction of all the projects,
subject to a 2% inflation adjustment starting in 2021. The rates of return are confirmed in Ameri Metro’s Master Consulting and
Bond Indenture Agreements.
Master
Consulting Agreement and Master Indenture Agreement Net Income and Cash Flow Approach Valuations
| |
| | |
| | |
2020 | | |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2023 | | |
2024 | | |
2025 | | |
2026 | | |
2027 | | |
Total |
|
Total Bond Indenture
Raise by Year | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 25,300,000,000 | | |
| 68,671,428,571 | | |
| 89,272,857,143 | | |
| 116,054,714,286 | | |
| 150,871,128,571 | | |
| 196,132,467,143 | | |
| 254,972,207,286 | | |
| 331,463,869,471 | | |
|
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Consulting Fee | |
| 1.50 | % | |
| | | |
| 379,500,000 | | |
| 1,030,071,429 | | |
| 1,339,092,857 | | |
| 1,740,820,714 | | |
| 2,263,066,929 | | |
| 2,941,987,007 | | |
| 3,824,583,109 | | |
| 4,971,958,042 | | |
18,491,080,087 |
|
Project Gross Profit | |
| 40 | % | |
| | | |
| 10,120,000,000 | | |
| 27,468,571,429 | | |
| 35,709,142,857 | | |
| 46,421,885,714 | | |
| 60,348,451,429 | | |
| 78,452,986,857 | | |
| 101,988,882,914 | | |
| 132,585,547,789 | | |
493,095,468,989 |
|
Inflation Adjustment | |
| 2 | % | |
| | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,785,457,143 | | |
| 2,321,094,286 | | |
| 3,017,422,571 | | |
| 3,922,649,343 | | |
| 5,099,444,146 | | |
| 6,629,277,389 | | |
22,775,344,878 |
|
Total Revenues | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 10,499,500,000 | | |
| 28,498,642,857 | | |
| 38,833,692,857 | | |
| 50,483,800,714 | | |
| 65,628,940,929 | | |
| 85,317,623,207 | | |
| 110,912,910,169 | | |
| 144,186,783,220 | | |
534,361,893,954 |
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Expenses as a percentage of
revenues: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Operating | |
| 20 | % | |
| | | |
| 2,099,900,000 | | |
| 5,699,728,571 | | |
| 7,766,738,571 | | |
| 10,096,760,143 | | |
| 13,125,788,186 | | |
| 17,063,524,641 | | |
| 22,182,582,034 | | |
| 28,837,356,644 | | |
106,872,378,791 |
|
Salaries | |
| 25 | % | |
| | | |
| 2,624,875,000 | | |
| 7,124,660,714 | | |
| 9,708,423,214 | | |
| 12,620,950,179 | | |
| 16,407,235,232 | | |
| 21,329,405,802 | | |
| 27,728,227,542 | | |
| 36,046,695,805 | | |
133,590,473,488 |
|
Gen
and Admin | |
| 8 | % | |
| | | |
| 839,960,000 | | |
| 2,279,891,429 | | |
| 3,106,695,429 | | |
| 4,038,704,057 | | |
| 5,250,315,274 | | |
| 6,825,409,857 | | |
| 8,873,032,814 | | |
| 11,534,942,658 | | |
42,748,951,516 |
|
Total Expenses | |
| 53 | % | |
| | | |
| 5,564,735,000 | | |
| 15,104,280,714 | | |
| 20,581,857,214 | | |
| 26,756,414,379 | | |
| 34,783,338,692 | | |
| 45,218,340,300 | | |
| 58,783,842,390 | | |
| 76,418,995,107 | | |
283,211,803,795 |
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Income from Operations Before
Provision for Taxes | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 4,934,765,000 | | |
| 13,394,362,143 | | |
| 18,251,835,643 | | |
| 23,727,386,336 | | |
| 30,845,602,236 | | |
| 40,099,282,907 | | |
| 52,129,067,780 | | |
| 67,767,788,113 | | |
251,150,090,158 |
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
|
|
|
Provision for Taxes | |
| 0 | % | |
| | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
- |
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
|
|
|
Net Income | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 4,934,765,000 | | |
| 13,394,362,143 | | |
| 18,251,835,643 | | |
| 23,727,386,336 | | |
| 30,845,602,236 | | |
| 40,099,282,907 | | |
| 52,129,067,780 | | |
| 67,767,788,113 | | |
251,150,090,158 |
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
|
|
|
Present Value of Net Income | |
| | | |
$ | 222,197,393,794 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
The calculations below are the future cash flows
and net income from 1) Alabama 2) Michigan Coast to Coast Rail 3) Texas / SH36A 4) New York – Washington HSRI 5) Yuma Port &
Rail this after the seven year build out of these projects under the Master Consulting & Master Bond Indenture Agreements. The cash
flows; net income and operations commence operations in 2028 or sooner.
Terminal
Value - Based on Project Operation Period
| |
| | |
- - - Operation Period
- - - | | |
| |
Project | |
Discounted CF | | |
2028 | | |
2029 | | |
2030 | | |
2031 | | |
2032 | | |
2033 | | |
2034 | | |
2035 | | |
2036 | | |
2037 | | |
2038 | | |
IRR** | |
Alabama | |
| | | |
$ | 788,707,446 | | |
$ | 842,402,874 | | |
$ | 897,930,636 | | |
$ | 955,342,547 | | |
$ | 1,014,691,762 | | |
$ | 1,076,032,809 | | |
$ | 1,139,421,621 | | |
$ | 1,204,915,573 | | |
$ | 1,272,573,514 | | |
$ | 1,342,455,806 | | |
$ | 1,414,624,360 | | |
| 6.70 | % |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 6,412,969,835 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Texas/SH36A | |
| | | |
$ | 716,142,076 | | |
$ | 805,157,734 | | |
$ | 897,447,563 | | |
$ | 993,106,921 | | |
$ | 1,092,233,674 | | |
$ | 1,194,928,255 | | |
$ | 1,301,293,725 | | |
$ | 1,411,435,843 | | |
$ | 1,525,463,129 | | |
$ | 1,643,486,931 | | |
$ | 1,765,621,500 | | |
| 9.50 | % |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 4,948,700,621 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Michigan Coast-to-Coast Rail | |
| | | |
$ | 90,313,342 | | |
$ | 92,239,830 | | |
$ | 94,207,253 | | |
$ | 96,216,476 | | |
$ | 98,268,385 | | |
$ | 100,363,884 | | |
$ | 102,503,896 | | |
$ | 104,689,363 | | |
$ | 106,921,247 | | |
$ | 109,200,530 | | |
$ | 111,528,216 | | |
| 9.90 | % |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 410,786,996 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
New York-Washington HSRI | |
| | | |
$ | 3,687,636,662 | | |
$ | 3,825,908,186 | | |
$ | 3,968,235,516 | | |
$ | 4,114,725,576 | | |
$ | 4,265,487,944 | | |
$ | 4,420,634,917 | | |
$ | 4,580,281,574 | | |
$ | 4,744,545,843 | | |
$ | 4,913,548,570 | | |
$ | 5,087,413,588 | | |
$ | 5,266,267,787 | | |
| 8.49 | % |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 21,255,356,652 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Yuma Port +
Rail | |
| | | |
$ | 721,966,918 | | |
$ | 738,508,645 | | |
$ | 755,423,254 | | |
$ | 772,719,044 | | |
$ | 790,404,497 | | |
$ | 808,488,280 | | |
$ | 826,979,252 | | |
$ | 845,886,468 | | |
$ | 865,219,181 | | |
$ | 884,986,848 | | |
$ | 905,199,134 | | |
| 3.38 | % |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 7,424,230,783 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | |
- - - Extended Operation
Period - - - | | |
|
|
Project | |
| | |
2039 | | |
2040 | | |
2041 | | |
2042 | | |
2043 | | |
2044 | | |
2045 | | |
2046 | | |
2047 | | |
2048 | | |
2049 | | |
2050 | | |
2051 | | |
2052 | | |
IRR** |
|
Alabama* | |
| | | |
$ | 1,489,142,675 | | |
$ | 1,566,075,872 | | |
$ | 1,645,490,740 | | |
$ | 1,727,455,772 | | |
$ | 1,812,041,210 | | |
$ | 1,899,319,082 | | |
$ | 1,989,363,253 | | |
$ | 2,082,249,463 | | |
$ | 2,178,055,377 | | |
$ | 2,276,860,627 | | |
$ | 2,378,746,865 | | |
$ | 2,483,797,808 | | |
$ | 2,592,099,290 | | |
$ | 2,703,739,312 | | |
6.70 |
% |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 8,705,340,084 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Texas/SH36A | |
| | | |
$ | 1,891,984,057 | | |
$ | 2,022,694,868 | | |
$ | 2,157,877,318 | | |
$ | 2,297,657,988 | | |
$ | 2,442,166,733 | | |
$ | 2,591,536,765 | | |
$ | 2,745,904,732 | | |
$ | 2,905,410,803 | | |
$ | 3,070,198,755 | | |
$ | 3,240,416,060 | | |
$ | 3,416,213,978 | | |
$ | 2,951,406,165 | | |
$ | 3,785,176,177 | | |
$ | 3,978,662,748 | | |
9.50 |
% |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 6,036,100,071 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Michigan Coast-to-Coast Rail | |
| | | |
$ | 113,905,330 | | |
$ | 116,332,917 | | |
$ | 118,812,045 | | |
$ | 121,343,805 | | |
$ | 123,929,310 | | |
$ | 126,569,699 | | |
$ | 129,266,131 | | |
$ | 132,019,792 | | |
$ | 134,831,894 | | |
$ | 137,703,671 | | |
$ | 140,636,387 | | |
$ | 143,631,331 | | |
$ | 146,689,817 | | |
$ | 149,813,190 | | |
9.90 |
% |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 265,544,805 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
New York-Washington HSRI | |
| | | |
$ | 5,450,241,188 | | |
$ | 5,639,467,019 | | |
$ | 5,834,081,786 | | |
$ | 6,034,225,357 | | |
$ | 6,240,041,039 | | |
$ | 6,451,675,657 | | |
$ | 6,669,279,644 | | |
$ | 6,893,007,120 | | |
$ | 7,123,015,983 | | |
$ | 7,359,467,998 | | |
$ | 7,602,528,887 | | |
$ | 7,852,368,424 | | |
$ | 8,109,160,531 | | |
$ | 8,373,083,375 | | |
8.49 |
% |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 18,970,023,463 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Yuma Port +
Rail | |
| | | |
$ | 925,865,916 | | |
$ | 946,997,290 | | |
$ | 968,603,573 | | |
$ | 990,695,308 | | |
$ | 1,013,283,272 | | |
$ | 1,036,378,475 | | |
$ | 1,059,992,174 | | |
$ | 1,084,135,868 | | |
$ | 1,108,821,314 | | |
$ | 1,134,060,524 | | |
$ | 1,159,865,773 | | |
$ | 1,186,249,608 | | |
$ | 1,213,224,850 | | |
$ | 1,240,804,602 | | |
3.38 |
% |
Discounted Cash Flow | |
$ | 10,558,348,186 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
Total DCF | |
$ | 84,987,401,494 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
|
v3.24.1.u1
Document And Entity Information - USD ($)
|
12 Months Ended |
|
|
Jul. 31, 2022 |
Jan. 31, 2024 |
Jan. 31, 2022 |
Document Information Line Items |
|
|
|
Entity Registrant Name |
AMERI METRO, INC.
|
|
|
Document Type |
10-K
|
|
|
Current Fiscal Year End Date |
--07-31
|
|
|
Entity Public Float |
|
|
$ 0
|
Amendment Flag |
false
|
|
|
Entity Central Index Key |
0001534155
|
|
|
Entity Current Reporting Status |
Yes
|
|
|
Entity Voluntary Filers |
No
|
|
|
Entity Filer Category |
Non-accelerated Filer
|
|
|
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer |
No
|
|
|
Document Period End Date |
Jul. 31, 2022
|
|
|
Document Fiscal Year Focus |
2022
|
|
|
Document Fiscal Period Focus |
FY
|
|
|
Entity Small Business |
true
|
|
|
Entity Emerging Growth Company |
false
|
|
|
Entity Shell Company |
false
|
|
|
ICFR Auditor Attestation Flag |
false
|
|
|
Document Annual Report |
true
|
|
|
Document Transition Report |
false
|
|
|
Entity File Number |
000-54546
|
|
|
Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code |
DE
|
|
|
Entity Tax Identification Number |
45-1877342
|
|
|
Entity Address, Address Line One |
2575 Eastern Blvd
|
|
|
Entity Address, Address Line Two |
Suite 102
|
|
|
Entity Address, City or Town |
York
|
|
|
Entity Address, State or Province |
PA
|
|
|
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code |
17402
|
|
|
City Area Code |
717
|
|
|
Local Phone Number |
434-0668
|
|
|
Title of 12(g) Security |
Common Stock, $0.000001 par value per share
|
|
|
Entity Interactive Data Current |
Yes
|
|
|
Document Financial Statement Error Correction [Flag] |
false
|
|
|
Auditor Name |
N/A
|
|
|
Auditor Location |
N/A
|
|
|
Auditor Firm ID |
9999
|
|
|
No Trading Symbol Flag |
true
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
Document Information Line Items |
|
|
|
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding |
|
1,800,000
|
|
Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
Document Information Line Items |
|
|
|
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding |
|
1,684,000
|
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
|
|
Document Information Line Items |
|
|
|
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding |
|
4,289,637,844
|
|
Class C Common Stock |
|
|
|
Document Information Line Items |
|
|
|
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding |
|
191,051,320
|
|
Class D Common Stock |
|
|
|
Document Information Line Items |
|
|
|
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding |
|
114,000,000
|
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AmendmentFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionPCAOB issued Audit Firm Identifier
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 10-K -Number 249 -Section 310
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Number 249 -Section 220 -Subsection f
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 40-F -Number 249 -Section 240 -Subsection f
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AuditorFirmId |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:nonemptySequenceNumberItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 10-K -Number 249 -Section 310
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Number 249 -Section 220 -Subsection f
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 40-F -Number 249 -Section 240 -Subsection f
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AuditorLocation |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:internationalNameItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 10-K -Number 249 -Section 310
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Number 249 -Section 220 -Subsection f
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 40-F -Number 249 -Section 240 -Subsection f
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AuditorName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:internationalNameItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionEnd date of current fiscal year in the format --MM-DD.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_CurrentFiscalYearEndDate |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:gMonthDayItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true only for a form used as an annual report.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 10-K -Number 249 -Section 310
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Number 249 -Section 220 -Subsection f
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 40-F -Number 249 -Section 240 -Subsection f
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentAnnualReport |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicates whether any of the financial statement period in the filing include a restatement due to error correction.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-K -Number 229 -Section 402 -Subsection w
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 10-K -Number 249 -Section 310
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Number 249 -Section 220 -Subsection f
Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 40-F -Number 249 -Section 240 -Subsection f
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentFinStmtErrorCorrectionFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionFiscal period values are FY, Q1, Q2, and Q3. 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarter 10-Q or 10-QT statements have value Q1, Q2, and Q3 respectively, with 10-K, 10-KT or other fiscal year statements having FY.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentFiscalPeriodFocus |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:fiscalPeriodItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThis is focus fiscal year of the document report in YYYY format. For a 2006 annual report, which may also provide financial information from prior periods, fiscal 2006 should be given as the fiscal year focus. Example: 2006.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentFiscalYearFocus |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:gYearItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionFor the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:dateItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true only for a form used as a transition report.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 20-F -Number 240 -Section 13 -Subsection a-1
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentTransitionReport |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentType |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:submissionTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionAddress Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1 |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionAddress Line 2 such as Street or Suite number
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine2 |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- Definition
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCode for the postal or zip code
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionName of the state or province.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressStateOrProvince |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:stateOrProvinceItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionA unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate number of shares or other units outstanding of each of registrant's classes of capital or common stock or other ownership interests, if and as stated on cover of related periodic report. Where multiple classes or units exist define each class/interest by adding class of stock items such as Common Class A [Member], Common Class B [Member] or Partnership Interest [Member] onto the Instrument [Domain] of the Entity Listings, Instrument.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCommonStockSharesOutstanding |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:sharesItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
instant |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate 'Yes' or 'No' whether registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. This information should be based on the registrant's current or most recent filing containing the related disclosure.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCurrentReportingStatus |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:yesNoItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCommission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityFileNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:fileNumberItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate whether the registrant is one of the following: Large Accelerated Filer, Accelerated Filer, Non-accelerated Filer. Definitions of these categories are stated in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. This information should be based on the registrant's current or most recent filing containing the related disclosure.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityFilerCategory |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:filerCategoryItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTwo-character EDGAR code representing the state or country of incorporation.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:edgarStateCountryItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-T -Number 232 -Section 405
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityInteractiveDataCurrent |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:yesNoItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityPublicFloat |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:monetaryItemType |
Balance Type: |
credit |
Period Type: |
instant |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityRegistrantName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityShellCompany |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicates that the company is a Smaller Reporting Company (SRC).
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntitySmallBusiness |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe Tax Identification Number (TIN), also known as an Employer Identification Number (EIN), is a unique 9-digit value assigned by the IRS.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityTaxIdentificationNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:employerIdItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate 'Yes' or 'No' if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityVoluntaryFilers |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:yesNoItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate 'Yes' or 'No' if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Is used on Form Type: 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, 20-F, 6-K, 10-K/A, 10-Q/A, 20-F/A, 6-K/A, N-CSR, N-Q, N-1A.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230 -Section 405
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityWellKnownSeasonedIssuer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:yesNoItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 10-K -Number 249 -Section 310
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 20-F -Number 249 -Section 220 -Subsection f
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form 40-F -Number 249 -Section 240 -Subsection f
+ Details
Name: |
dei_IcfrAuditorAttestationFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionLocal phone number for entity.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_LocalPhoneNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true only for a security having no trading symbol.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_NoTradingSymbolFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:trueItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTitle of a 12(g) registered security.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection g
+ Details
Name: |
dei_Security12gTitle |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:securityTitleItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=us-gaap_PreferredStockMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=us-gaap_CommonClassAMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=us-gaap_CommonClassBMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=us-gaap_CommonClassCMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=ck0001534155_CommonClassDMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
Ameri Metro (CE) (USOTC:ARMT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Ameri Metro (CE) (USOTC:ARMT)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024