Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”
and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
The aggregate market value of the voting
and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed using the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $166,389 based on a closing price
of $0.01 per share on such date. As of June 30, 2019, there were 150,000,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
PART I
We
urge you to read this entire Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the “Risk Factors” section and the financial statements
and related notes included herein. As used in this Annual Report, unless context otherwise requires, the words “we,”
“us”, “our,” “the Company,” “Inspyr Therapeutics, Inc.” and “Registrant”
refer to Inspyr Therapeutics, Inc., and our wholly owned subsidiary, Lewis & Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Also, any reference
to “common shares,” or “common stock,” refers to our $.0001 par value common stock. Also, any reference
to “preferred stock” or “preferred shares” refers to our $0.0001 par value Series A preferred stock, our
$0.0001 par value series B preferred stock, our $0.0001 par value Series C preferred stock, and our $.0.0001 par value Series
D preferred stock. All references to common stock, share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect the
1:30 reverse stock split that became effective on November 17, 2016 as if it had taken place as of the beginning of the earliest
period presented
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report includes “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These
statements relate to our business development plans, clinical trials, regulatory reviews, timing, strategies, expectations, anticipated
expense levels, business prospects and positioning with respect to the market for our proposed products, business outlook, technology
spending and various other matters (including contingent liabilities and obligations and changes in accounting policies, standards
and interpretations), express, our current intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies or predictions, as well as historical
information. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause
our actual results, performance or achievements, to be materially different from anticipated results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. When used in this report, statements that are not statements of current
or historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “plan,”
“intend,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “could,”
“anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue” or similar expressions or other variations or comparable
terminology are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions on which the forward-looking
statements contained herein are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate given the inherent
uncertainties as to the occurrence or nonoccurrence of future events. These statements are not guarantees of future performance
and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Our future operating results are dependent upon many factors
which are outside our control. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may
not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, our ability to:
|
●
|
Resume
our corporate operations that have been curtailed;
|
|
●
|
attract,
build and retain a senior management team;
|
|
●
|
manage
our business given continuing operating losses and negative cash flows;
|
|
●
|
obtain
sufficient capital or a strategic business arrangement to fund our operations and expansion plans;
|
|
●
|
build
the infrastructure necessary to support the growth of our business;
|
|
●
|
manage
competitive factors and developments beyond our control;
|
|
●
|
manage
scientific and medical developments which may be beyond our control;
|
|
●
|
manage
the governmental regulation of our business including state, federal and international laws;
|
|
●
|
maintain
and protect our intellectual property;
|
|
●
|
obtain
patents based on our current and/or future patent applications;
|
|
●
|
obtain
and maintain other rights to technology required or desirable to conduct or expand our business;
|
|
●
|
achieve
any potential strategic benefits of licensing transactions, collaborations, acquisitions, or in-licensing of new technologies,
if any;
|
|
●
|
successfully
integrate the business of with our wholly owned subsidiary, Lewis & Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and
|
|
●
|
manage
any other factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section, and elsewhere in this annual report.
|
All
forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these and other factors. We undertake
no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether to reflect events or circumstances after the date
initially filed or published, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise, except to the extent required by
federal securities laws. The risks discussed in this report should be considered in evaluating our business and future prospects.
Overview
We
are a clinical-stage, pre-revenue, pharmaceutical company primarily focused on the development of therapeutics for the treatment
of diseases. Through our acquisition of Lewis and Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., we currently are focusing on a pipeline of small
molecule adenosine receptor modulators.
The
adenosine receptor modulators include A
2B
antagonists, dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, and A
2A
agonists that have broad development applicability including indications within immuno-oncology and inflammation. Adenosine
is implicated in immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Adenosine receptor antagonists may boost the host immune response
against the tumor as a single-agent and in combination with other existing immuno-oncology agents leading to enhanced tumor killing
and inhibition of metastasis. Adenosine also has anti-inflammatory properties in the acute and chronic setting. Adenosine receptor
agonists may promote a decreased inflammatory response and can potentially treat a broad range of inflammatory and autoimmune
based diseases and conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, joint injury, Crohn’s disease, psoriasis) as well as improve
wound healing and decrease pain.
During
February 2018, due to a lack of capital, we curtailed our business operations. In the event that we are able to raise sufficient
capital, our major focus would be: (i) further characterization, in conjunction with Ridgeway Therapeutics, of anti-cancer activity
of the current pipeline of A
2B
antagonists and dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists leading to selection
of a clinical candidate for an Investigative New Drug or IND enabling studies, (ii) further characterization of the current pipeline
of A
2A
agonists leading to selection of a clinical candidate for an Investigative New Drug or IND enabling studies;
(iii) licensing and/or partnering the A
2B
antagonists, dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, and/or A
2A
agonists for further development, (iv) through our newly acquired adenosine receptor chemistry technology platform, continue
to produce next generation adenosine receptor modulators, (v) pursue licensing and/or partnering of mipsagargin, (vi) conduct
a clinical study of mipsagargin in patients with advanced HCC, (vii) explore collaborations utilizing mipsagargin in new, non-clinical
solid tumor models with leading researchers in the oncology field and (viii) plan to obtain licenses or options to acquire licenses
to patent filings from other individuals and organizations that we anticipate could be useful in advancing our research, development
and commercialization initiatives and our strategic business interests.
Our
ability to execute our business plan is dependent on the amount and timing of capital, if any, that we are able to raise. During
July 2018, we were able to raise approximately $500,000 through the sale of debt securities and we raised $25,000 in December
2018 through the sale of notes. We are currently using such funds to attempt to become current in our SEC reporting requirements,
pay outstanding invoices to our independent registered accounting firm, and other outstanding obligations directly related to
our SEC reporting requirements, the payment of which we believe to be vital to our future operations. Should we fail to further
raise sufficient funds to execute our business plan, our priority would be to maintain our intellectual property portfolio and
continue, to the best of our ability, our public company reporting requirements.
While
we believe that the data from our nonclinical studies appear promising, the outcome of our ongoing or future studies may ultimately
be unsuccessful.
Pre-Revenue
We
are a pre-revenue, early stage company that has not achieved profitability, and has no product revenues. Additionally, we have
no approved products for sale.
Going
Concern
Our
auditors’ report on our December 31, 2018 financial statements expressed an opinion that our capital resources as of the
date of their Audit Report were not sufficient to sustain operations or complete our planned activities for the upcoming year
unless we raised additional funds. During February of 2018, we curtailed our operations due to our lack of cash. Notwithstanding
our recent financings in July 2018, whereby we raised $500,000, and December 2018 whereby we raised $25,000, our current cash
level raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern past the third quarter of 2019. If we do not obtain
additional funds by such time, we may no longer be able to continue as a going concern and will cease operation which means that
our shareholders will lose their entire investment.
Recent
Developments
|
●
|
On
August 3, 2018, we entered into an agreement with Ridgeway Therapeutics, Inc. to develop A
2B
antagonists, dual
A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, initially as anti-cancer agents.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
July 5, 2018, we completed the private placement of $515,000 of non-interest bearing senior convertible debentures.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between
October 2, 2017 and October 23, 2017, we announced three (3) separate collaborations for preclinical studies of our proprietary
adenosine receptor modulator based compounds. The collaborations are with the University of Virginia School of
Medicine, NYU Winthrop Hospital, and the National Institutes of Health.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
September 12, 2017, we completed (i) the private placement of approximately $320,000 non-interest bearing senior convertible
debentures and (ii) the exchange of approximately $2.5 million in stated value Series A and Series B Preferred stock for non-interest
bearing senior convertible debentures.
|
|
●
|
On
July 31, 2017, we completed a share exchange agreement whereby we acquired 100% of the capital stock of Lewis & Clark
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in exchange for 7,122,172 shares of our common stock (50% of our issued and outstanding common stock,
including common shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock). We have subsequently determined that the goodwill
assigned to the as Lewis & Clark acquisition had become fully impaired as of December 31, 2017.
|
|
●
|
On
April 24, 2017, April 18, 2017 and March 17, 2017, we completed the private placement of an aggregate of approximately $290,000
of our securities.
|
Product
Development of Mipsagargin
Mipsagargin
is a prodrug targeting the tumor vasculature that has therapeutic potential in a wide range of malignancies. We have currently
curtailed our development of mipsagargin. We cannot predict if or when we will recommence development of mipsagargin.
Product
Development of Adenosine Receptor Modulators
Adenosine
is an extracellular signaling molecule that regulates multiple aspects of tissue function and specifically plays a role in immunity
and inflammation. High levels of adenosine in the tumor microenvironment inhibits immune response mediated through the A
2A
and A
2B
receptors. Adenosine also plays a role in non-malignant conditions where it is rapidly increased in response
to inflammation, hypoxia, ischemia, or trauma. Adenosine released in this setting has been shown to have a protective effect and
limits excessive inflammatory damage to tissues.
The
adenosine receptor antagonists have broad applicability as a potential immuno-oncology (IO) therapeutic agent in multiple tumor
types both as a single agent and in combination with other IO agents, in addition to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. We are
actively seeking licensing opportunities and/or partners to further development our A
2B
and dual A
2A
/A
2B
receptor antagonists. Our current product development plan for adenosine receptor antagonists contemplates the following
major initiatives, subject to the Company receiving sufficient funds:
|
●
|
Continue
development of anti-cancer agents with partner company, Ridgeway Therapeutics, Inc.
|
|
●
|
Further
characterization of existing agents toward IND enabling studies and support ongoing licensing/partnership activities.
|
|
●
|
Conduct
IND enabling studies.
|
|
●
|
Conduct
clinical studies with one or more of the adenosine receptor antagonists.
|
|
●
|
Continue
generating additional adenosine receptor antagonists to expand our portfolio.
|
The
adenosine receptor agonists have applicability in a broad range of non-oncology conditions including inflammatory and autoimmune
diseases and conditions. We are actively seeking licensing opportunities and/or partners to further development our A
2A
receptor agonists. Our current product development plan for adenosine receptor agonists contemplates the following major initiatives
subject to the Company receiving sufficient funds:
|
●
|
License
and/or partner to companies with development expertise in the intended indication.
|
|
●
|
Further
characterize existing agents to support licensing/partnership activities.
|
|
●
|
Continue
generating additional adenosine receptor agonists to expand our portfolio.
|
Our
Technology
We
have what we believe to be a robust intellectual property portfolio covering proprietary A
2A
agonists (LNC-001, see
below), A
2B
antagonists (LNC-002, see below), and dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists (LNC-003, see below).
We also have a substantial catalog of synthesized compounds, specifically A
2A
agonists and A
2B
antagonists
that require further characterization and testing for potential clinical candidates. We believe that our proprietary dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists have great potential and should be further explored.
Patents
and Proprietary Rights
Our
success will likely depend upon our ability to preserve our proprietary technologies and operate without infringing the proprietary
rights of other parties. However, we may rely on certain proprietary technologies and know-how that are not patentable or that
we determine to keep as trade secrets. We protect our proprietary information, in part, using confidentiality agreements with
our employees, consultants, significant scientific collaborators, and sponsored researchers that generally provide that all inventions
conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us shall be our exclusive property.
The
intellectual property underlying our technology is covered by certain patents and patent applications previously owned by Lewis
and Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (LNC) and now fully owned by the Company. All of the LNC intellectual property has been assigned
to LNC, a fully owned subsidiary of the Company.
FILE
NUMBER
|
|
FIELD
|
|
APPLICATION
NO.
|
|
FILING
DATE
|
|
ISSUE
DATE
|
|
PATENT NO.
|
|
LNC-001-AU
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
2013296420
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
Mar
22, 2018
|
|
2013296420
|
|
LNC-001-BR
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
BR112015022499
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-CA
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
2880040
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-EA
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
201590205
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
Jun
30, 2017
|
|
027174
|
|
LNC-001-EP
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
138259858
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-IL
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
236986
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
Sep
30, 2017
|
|
236986
|
|
LNC-001-IN
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
538DELNP2015
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-JP
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
2015525562
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-KR
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
1020157004901
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-MX
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
MXa2015001370
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-NZ
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
703992
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
Jan
15, 2019
|
|
703992
|
|
LNC-001-US
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
13956111
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
Jun
30, 2015
|
|
9067963
|
|
LNC-001-US-CNT1
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
14752861
|
|
Jun
27, 2015
|
|
Nov
21, 2017
|
|
9822141
|
|
LNC-001-US-CNT2
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
15818661
|
|
Nov
20, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-001-ZA
|
|
A
2A
AGONISTS
|
|
201501350
|
|
Jul
31, 2013
|
|
Dec
21, 2016
|
|
2015/01350
|
|
LNC-002-AU
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
2016246068
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-BR
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
BR1120170213869
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-CN
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
2016800268351
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-EA
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
201792156
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-EP
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
167774363
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-IL
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
254902
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-IN
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
201727039305
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-JP
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
2018504080
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-KR
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
1020177031978
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-MX
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
MXa2017012783
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-NZ
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
736705
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-SG
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
11201707753X
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
LNC-002-US
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
15094903
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
Feb
14, 2017
|
|
9593118
|
|
LNC-002-ZA
|
|
A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
201707248
|
|
Apr
8, 2016
|
|
Oct
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
LNC-003-P2
|
|
DUAL A
2A
-A
2B
ANTAGONISTS
|
|
62791910
|
|
Jan
14, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
When
appropriate, we will continue to seek patent protection for inventions in our core technologies and in ancillary technologies
that support our core technologies or which we otherwise believe will provide us with a competitive advantage. We will accomplish
this by filing and maintaining patent applications for discoveries we make, either alone or in collaboration with scientific collaborators
and strategic partners. Typically, we plan to file patent applications in the United States and, for LNC-003, in the Patent Cooperation
Treaty (PCT). In addition, we plan to obtain licenses or options to acquire licenses to patent filings from other individuals
and organizations that we anticipate could be useful in advancing our research, development and commercialization initiatives
and our strategic business interest.
Development
Strategy
While
we curtailed our operations in February 2018 due to our cash position, in the event that we are able to raise sufficient capital
to execute our clinical and pre-clinical development strategy, we anticipate that under the planning and direction of key
personnel, we expect to outsource all our nonclinical development and manufacturing, and the majority of our clinical development
activities to contract research organizations (CROs) and contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs). Our contract CROs and CMOs
are required to comply with federal, state and United States Food and Drug Administration or FDA regulations including Good Manufacturing
Practices (cGMP), Good Clinical Practices (GCP), and Good Lab Practices (GLP).
In
the event that we are able to raise sufficient capital, we intend to conduct further characterization and testing of our A
2B
antagonists to select a candidate for pre-clinical and clinical trials in an oncology indication. This oncology work is
expected to be run in conjunction with and oversight from Ridgeway Therapeutics, Inc. for the selection of an anti-cancer agent.
Ridgeway Therapeutics, Inc. is currently delinquent in their quarterly payments. We expect them to fulfill their obligations once
they have funding.
In-licensing
or Acquisition Strategy.
In
addition to the development of our current product candidates, we have initiated an in-licensing or acquisition strategy to further
expand our product pipeline. Our in-licensing strategy consists of evaluating early clinical or late preclinical stage opportunities
in therapeutic areas that can benefit from our current product candidates or core expertise in drug development. We believe that
this element of our corporate strategy could diversify some of the risks inherent in focusing on limited therapeutic areas and
could increase our probability of commercial success.
Commercialization
Strategy
In
the event that we are able to raise sufficient capital to continue our operations, we intend to (i) license or sell the underlying
technology of our therapeutics to third parties during or after our clinical trials, (ii) seek a corporate partner for further
development, or (iii) continue developing our drug candidates ourselves. It is expected that such third parties would then continue
to develop, market, sell, and distribute any resulting products. As part of our overall strategic plan, we are exploring our options
and actively seeking to engage in a collaborative, strategic and/or licensing arrangement with another pharmaceutical company.
If we enter into any such transaction, we may be required to give up certain rights to our technology and control over its future
development.
Intellectual
Property
We
regard the protection of patents and other intellectual property rights that we own or license as critical to our business and
competitive position. To protect our intellectual property, we rely on patent, trade secret, and copyright law, as well as confidentiality,
nondisclosure, assignment of invention and other contractual arrangements with our officers, directors, employees, consultants,
investigators, clinical trial sites, contractors, collaborators and other third parties to whom we disclose confidential information.
Our policy is to pursue patent applications on inventions and discoveries that we believe are commercially important to the development
and growth of our business. We solely own or have exclusive licenses to our patents and patent applications.
Our
pipeline currently includes a substantial catalog of synthesized compounds, specifically A
2A
agonists and A
2B
antagonists that require further characterization and testing for potential clinical candidates. Our proprietary dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists have great potential and need to be further explored.
Our
intellectual property estate, shown above, has eight (8) issued patents in six (6) different jurisdictions and twenty-one (21)
currently pending applications. With appropriate funding and upon further research into our dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, we intend to file a regular US and a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications to enable worldwide protection
of these antagonists.
When
appropriate and funding permitting, we plan to continue to seek patent protection for inventions in our core technologies and
in ancillary technologies that support our core technologies or which we otherwise believe would provide us with a competitive
advantage. We expect to be able to accomplish this by filing and maintaining patent applications for discoveries we make, either
alone or in collaboration with scientific collaborators and strategic partners. Typically, we plan to file patent applications
in the United States as well as foreign countries, where applicable. In addition, we may obtain licenses or options to acquire
licenses to patent filings from other individuals and organizations that we anticipate could be useful in advancing our research,
development and commercialization initiatives and our strategic business interest.
Manufacturing
and Supply
We
do not plan to develop company-owned or company-operated manufacturing facilities. We outsource all drug manufacturing to contract
manufacturers that are required to operate in compliance with cGMP. We may also seek to refine the current manufacturing process
in order to achieve improvements in efficiency, costs, purity and the like as well as address different drug formulations to achieve
improvements in stability and/or drug delivery.
Governmental
Regulations
FDA
Approval Process
Prior
to commencement of clinical studies involving humans, preclinical testing of new pharmaceutical products is generally conducted
on animals in the laboratory to evaluate the potential efficacy and safety of the product candidate. The results of these studies
are submitted to the FDA as part of an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, which must become effective before clinical
testing in humans can begin. Typically, human clinical evaluation involves a time-consuming and costly three-phase process. In
Phase I, clinical trials are conducted with a small number of people to assess safety, tolerability and to evaluate the pattern
of drug distribution within the body. In Phase II, clinical trials are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with a specific
disease in order to determine preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and expanded evidence of safety. (In some cases, an initial
trial is conducted in diseased patients to assess both preliminary efficacy and preliminary safety, in which case it is referred
to as a Phase I/II trial.) In Phase III, large-scale, multi-center, comparative trials are conducted with patients afflicted with
a target disease in order to provide enough data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety required by the FDA. The FDA closely monitors
the progress of each of the three phases of clinical testing and may, at its discretion, re-evaluate, alter, suspend, or terminate
the testing based upon the data which have been accumulated to that point and its assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the
patient. All adverse events must be reported to the FDA. Monitoring of all aspects of the study to minimize risks is a continuing
process.
The
results of the preclinical and clinical testing on non-biologic drugs and certain diagnostic drugs are submitted to the FDA in
the form of a New Drug Application (NDA) for approval prior to commencement of commercial sales. In responding to an NDA submission,
the FDA may grant marketing approval, may request additional information, may deny the application if it determines that the application
does not provide an adequate basis for approval, and may also refuse to review an application that has been submitted if it determines
that the application does not provide an adequate basis for filing and review. There can be no assurance that approvals would
be granted on a timely basis, if at all, for any of our proposed products.
Orphan
Drugs
Under
the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is
generally defined as a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. Orphan drug designation
must be requested before submitting an NDA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the generic identity of the drug and
its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten
the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process. The first NDA applicant to receive FDA approval for a particular
active ingredient to treat a particular disease with FDA orphan drug designation is entitled to a seven-year exclusive marketing
period in the United States for that product, for that indication. During the seven-year exclusivity period, the FDA may not approve
any other applications to market the same drug for the same orphan indication, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing
of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a
major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving a different drug for the same
disease or condition, or the same drug for a different disease or condition. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation
are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the NDA application user fee.
European
and Other Regulatory Approval
Whether
or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product by comparable regulatory authorities in Europe and other countries
is necessary prior to commencement of marketing the product in such countries. The regulatory authorities in each country may
impose their own requirements and may refuse to grant an approval, or may require additional data before granting it, even though
the relevant product has been approved by the FDA or another authority. As with the FDA, the regulatory authorities in the European
Union (EU), and other developed countries have lengthy approval processes for pharmaceutical products. The process for gaining
approval in particular countries varies, but generally follows a similar sequence to that described for FDA approval. In Europe,
the European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products provides a mechanism for EU-member states to exchange information on
all aspects of product licensing. The EU has established a European agency for the evaluation of medical products, with both a
centralized community procedure and a decentralized procedure, the latter being based on the principle of licensing within one
member country followed by mutual recognition by the other member countries.
Reimbursement
and Health Care Cost Control
Reimbursement
for the costs of treatments and products such as ours from government health administration authorities, private health insurers
and others, both in the United States and abroad, is a key element in the success of new health care products. Significant uncertainty
often exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved health care products. The revenue and profitability of some health
care-related companies have been affected by the continuing efforts of governmental and third party payors to contain or reduce
the cost of health care through various means. Payors are increasingly attempting to limit both coverage and the levels of reimbursement
for new therapeutic products approved for marketing by the FDA, and are refusing, in some cases, to provide any coverage for uses
of approved products for disease indications for which the FDA has not granted marketing approval. In certain foreign markets,
pricing or profitability of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to government control.
In
the United States, there have been a number of federal and state proposals to implement government control over health care costs.
The U.S. Patient Protection and Affordance Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act were signed into law
in March 2010. A number of provisions of those laws require further rulemaking action by governmental agencies to implement. The
laws change access to health care products and services and create new fees for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.
Future rulemaking could increase rebates, reduce prices or the rate of price increases for health care products and services,
or require additional reporting and disclosure. The laws also include new authorization to the FDA to approve companies to market
biosimilar products within the United States, although to date FDA rulemaking under this legislation has been limited. We cannot
predict the timing or impact of any such future rulemaking on our business.
Other
Regulations
We
are also subject to various U.S. federal, state, local and international laws, regulations and recommendations relating to safe
working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances,
including radioactive compounds and infectious disease agents, used in connection with our business. Additionally, we are subject
to regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. We cannot accurately predict the extent of government regulation which might
result from future legislation or administrative action.
Employees
As of December 31, 2018 we employed no
full-time individuals. As of July 26, 2019, Mr. Cain, our newly appointed interim chief executive officer, is our only remaining
employee. In addition, we contract with a limited number of consultants to assist in activities related to our operations.
Corporate
History
We
were incorporated in the State of Delaware in November 2003 and our principal office is located in Westlake Village, California.
On November 17, 2016, we completed a 1:30 reverse stock split of our common stock. Since our inception, we have invested a substantial
portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of mipsagargin (G-202). As of February 2018, we have curtailed
our operations due to our cash position. In the event that we receive sufficient funding, we plan to focus our efforts on our
Adenosine Receptor Modulators. We have generated no revenues from the sale of our product candidates and have experienced substantial
net operating losses.
Where
to Find More Information
We
make our public filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on Form 8-K and all exhibits and amendments to these reports. These materials are available on the SEC’s web
site,
http://www.sec.gov
.
You
may also read and copy any materials you file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1–800–SEC–0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The
Internet site is located at http://www.sec.gov. Alternatively, you may obtain copies of these filings, including exhibits, by
writing or telephoning us at:
INSPYR
THERAPEUTICS
31200
Via Colinas Suite 200
Westlake
Village, CA 91362
Attn:
Chief Executive Officer
Tel:
(818) 597-7552
We
have described below a number of uncertainties and risks which, in addition to uncertainties and risks presented elsewhere in
this Annual Report, may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. The uncertainties and
risks enumerated below as well as those presented elsewhere in this Annual Report should be considered carefully in evaluating
us, our business and the value of our securities. The following important factors, among others, could cause our actual business,
financial condition and future results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Annual
Report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time.
Risks
Related to our Financial Position and Need to Raise Additional Capital
We
were forced to curtail our operations due to a lack of operating capital and we will not be able to continue as a going concern
if we do not obtain additional financing.
Since
our inception, we have funded our operations through the sale of our securities. Our cash and restricted cash balances at December
31, 2018 was $331,000. In February 2018 we were forced to curtail our operations. Despite raising $500,000 in gross proceeds through
the sale of convertible debentures in July 2018 and $25,000 in December 2018 through the sale of notes, our ability to continue
as a going concern is still wholly dependent upon obtaining sufficient capital to fund our operations. We have no committed sources
of additional capital and our access to capital funding is always uncertain. Accordingly, despite our ability to secure capital
in the past, we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure additional capital through financing transactions, including
issuance of debt, or through other means such as the licensing of our technology or grants. In the event that we are not able
to secure additional funding, we may be forced to curtail operations, delay or stop ongoing clinical trials, cease operations
altogether or file for bankruptcy.
Our
auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our
auditors’ report on our December 31, 2018 financial statements expressed an opinion that our capital resources as of the
date of their audit report were not sufficient to sustain operations or complete our planned activities for the upcoming year
unless we raised additional funds. Our current cash level raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern
past the third quarter of 2019. If we do not obtain additional funds by such time, we may no longer be able to continue as a going
concern and will cease operation which means that our shareholders will lose their entire investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Stage of Development and Business
If
we are unable to successfully build a new management team and secure additional members and employees, our business could be harmed.
On July 15, 2019, Christopher Lowe, our chief executive officer, president and principal accounting officer
resigned. In February 2018, Ronald Shazer, MD, resigned as our chief medical officer. Effective July 24, 2019, we appointed Michael
Cain as our interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We will need to continue to augment senior management
as well as additional personnel to execute our business plan and grow our business. Our success depends largely on the development
and execution of our business strategy by our senior management team. The recent transitions in our executive team may be disruptive
to our business, and if we are unable to manage an orderly transition, our business may be adversely affected. Additionally, since
our management team consists of only one individual, Mr. Cain, the loss of Mr. Cain would likely harm our ability to implement
our business strategy and respond to the rapidly changing market conditions in which we operate. There may be a limited number
of persons with the requisite skills to serve in these positions, and we cannot assure you that we would be able to identify or
employ such qualified personnel on acceptable terms, if at all. Additionally, we cannot assure you that management will succeed
in working together as a team. In the event that we are unsuccessful, our business and prospects could be harmed.
We
are an early-stage company, have no product revenues, are not profitable and may never be profitable.
From
inception through December 31, 2018, we have raised approximately $36.9 million through the sale of our securities and exercise
of outstanding warrants. During this same period, we have recorded an accumulated deficit of approximately $60 million. Our net
losses for the two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $12,000 and $11.1 million, respectively. Our
decrease in net losses is a result of our curtailment of operations beginning February 2018. None of our products in development
have received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration or FDA, or other regulatory authorities; we have no
sales and have never generated revenues nor do we expect to for the foreseeable future. We have currently curtailed our pre-clinical
and clinical trials related to mipsagargin and are currently focusing our efforts on the development of our adenosine receptor
modulators. We expect to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as we continue the research, pre-clinical
and clinical development of our product candidates as well as the possible in-licensing of additional clinical and pre-clinical
assets. Accordingly, we will need additional capital to fund our continuing operations and any expansion plans. Since we do not
generate any revenue, the most likely sources of such additional capital include the sale of our securities, a strategic licensing
collaboration transaction or joint venture involving the rights to one or more of our product candidates, or from grants. To the
extent that we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders are likely to experience dilution with
regard to their percentage ownership of the company, which may be significant. If we raise additional funds through collaborations
or licensing arrangements, we may be required to relinquish some or all the rights to our technologies, product candidates, or
grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we raise additional capital by incurring debt, we could incur significant
interest expense and become subject to covenants that could affect the manner in which we conduct our business, including securing
such debt obligations with our assets.
Our
product candidates are at various stages of early development and significant financial resources are required to develop commercially
viable products and obtain regulatory approval to market and sell such products. We will need to devote significantly more research
and development efforts, financial resources and personnel to develop commercially viable products and obtain regulatory approvals.
We may encounter hurdles and unexpected issues as we proceed in the development of our other product candidates. While initial
data from our research appear promising, the outcome of the pre-clinical and development work is uncertain and future trials may
ultimately be unsuccessful. If we fail to develop and successfully commercialize our product candidates, our business may be materially
harmed and could fail.
We
have a limited operating history as a company, and may not be able to effectively operate our business.
Our
limited staff and operating history means that there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding our ability to:
|
●
|
develop
and commercialize our technologies and proposed products;
|
|
●
|
obtain
regulatory approval to commence the marketing of our products;
|
|
●
|
identify,
hire and retain the needed personnel to implement our business plan;
|
|
●
|
achieve
market acceptance or insurance reimbursement for any of our proposed products, if successfully developed; or
|
|
●
|
respond
to competition.
|
No
assurances can be given as to exactly when, if at all, we will be able to fully develop, and take the necessary steps to derive
any revenues from our proposed product candidates.
Raising
capital may be difficult as a result of our history of losses and limited operating history in our current stage of development.
When
making investment decisions, investors typically look at a company’s management, earnings and historical performance in
evaluating the risks and operations of the business and the business’s future prospects. Our history of losses, new senior
management team and relatively limited operating history in our current stage of development makes such evaluation, as well as
any estimation of our future performance, substantially more difficult. As a result, investors may be unwilling to invest in us
or on terms or conditions which are acceptable. If we are unable to secure additional financing, we may need to materially scale
back our business plan and/or operations or cease operations altogether.
Risks
Related to Commercialization
The
market for our proposed products is rapidly changing and competitive.
The
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are subject to rapid and substantial technological change and innovation. Developments
by others may render our proposed products noncompetitive or obsolete, or we may be unable to keep pace with technological developments
and other market factors. Competition from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, universities, governmental entities and
others diversifying into the field is intense and is expected to increase.
As
a pre-revenue company, our resources are limited and we may experience challenges inherent in the early development of novel therapeutics.
Competitors have developed or are in the process of developing technologies that are, or in the future may be, the basis for competition.
Some of these technologies may have an entirely different approach or means of accomplishing similar therapeutic efforts compared
to our proposed products. Our competitors may develop therapies that are safer, more effective and less costly than our proposed
products and therefore, present a serious competitive threat to us.
The
acceptance of therapies that are alternatives to ours may limit market acceptance of our proposed products, even if commercialized.
Many of our targeted diseases and conditions can also be treated by other medications and treatments. These treatments may be
widely accepted in medical communities and have a longer history of use. The established use of other competing therapies may
limit the potential for our proposed products, even if commercialized.
Our
proposed products may not be accepted by the healthcare community.
Our
proposed products, if approved for marketing, may not achieve market acceptance by the healthcare community since hospitals, physicians,
patients or the medical community in general may decide not to utilize them. We are attempting to develop products that are likely
to be first approved for marketing as a treatment for late stage cancer where there is no truly effective standard of care. If
approved for use in late stage cancer, our proposed products might then be evaluated in earlier stages where they could represent
a substantial departure from established treatment methods and would most likely compete with a number of more conventional drugs
and therapies which are manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical companies. It is too early in the development cycle
of our proposed products for us to predict our major competitors. The degree of market acceptance of our products, if developed,
will depend on a number of factors, including but not limited to:
|
●
|
our
ability to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of our proposed products to the medical community;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to create products that are superior to alternative products;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to establish in the medical community the potential advantage of our treatments over alternative treatment methods;
and
|
|
●
|
the
reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors.
|
If
the healthcare community does not accept our products, our business could be materially harmed.
Our
potential competitors in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries have significantly greater resources than we have.
We
compete against numerous companies, many of which have substantially greater resources than we have. Several such competitors
have research programs and/or efforts to treat the same diseases we target. Companies such as Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Merck
& Co., Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Sanofi S.A., as well as others, have substantially greater financial, research, manufacturing
and marketing resources than we do. As a result, such competitors may find it easier to compete in our industry and bring competing
products to market.
Risks
Related to the Development and Manufacturing of Our Product Candidates
We
intend to rely exclusively upon third-party FDA-regulated manufacturers and suppliers for our proposed products.
We
currently have no internal manufacturing capability, and intend to rely exclusively on FDA-approved licensees, strategic partners
or third party contract manufacturers or suppliers for the foreseeable future. Because manufacturing facilities are subject to
regulatory oversight and inspection, the failure of any of our third-party FDA regulated manufactures or suppliers to comply with
regulatory requirements could result in material manufacturing delays and product shortages, which could delay or otherwise negatively
impact our clinical trials and product development plans. Should we be forced to manufacture our proposed products, we cannot
give any assurance that we would be able to develop internal manufacturing capabilities or secure third party suppliers for raw
materials. In the event that we seek third party suppliers or alternative manufacturers, they may require us to purchase a minimum
amount of materials or could require other unfavorable terms. Any such event could materially impact our business prospects and
could delay the development of our proposed products. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that the contract manufacturers or
suppliers that we select will be able to supply our products in a timely or cost effective manner or in accordance with applicable
regulatory requirements or our own specifications.
We
may not be able to establish or maintain the third-party relationships that are necessary to develop or potentially commercialize
our product candidates.
As
needed, we plan to rely heavily on third party collaborators, partners, licensees, clinical research organizations, clinical investigators,
vendors or other third parties to support our research and development efforts and to conduct clinical trials for our product
candidates. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully negotiate agreements for, or maintain relationships with,
these third parties on a commercially reasonable basis, if at all. Additionally, to commercialize our proposed products, we intend
to rely on third party licensees or the outright sale of our proposed products to pharmaceutical partner(s). If we fail to establish
or maintain such third-party relationships as anticipated, our business could be adversely effected.
We
are dependent upon third parties to develop our product candidates, and such parties are, to some extent, outside of our control.
We
depend upon independent contract research organizations, investigators and collaborators, such as universities and medical institutions,
to conduct our pre-clinical and clinical studies. These individuals and/or entities are not our employees and we cannot control
the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. These third parties may not assign as great a priority to
our programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs ourselves. If these third parties fail
to devote sufficient time and resources to our programs, or if their performance is substandard, the development of our drug candidates
and corresponding FDA approval could be delayed or fail entirely.
Our
therapeutic compounds may not be able to be manufactured profitably on a large enough scale to support commercialization.
To
date, our therapeutic compounds have only been manufactured at a scale which is adequate to supply our research activities and
early-stage clinical trials. There can be no assurance that the procedures currently used to manufacture our therapeutic compounds
will work at a scale which is adequate for commercial needs. In the event our therapeutic compounds cannot be manufactured in
sufficient quantities for commercialization, our future prospects could be significantly impacted and our financial prospects
would be materially harmed.
Risks
Relating to our Intellectual Property
Our
competitive position is dependent on our intellectual property and we may not be able to withstand challenges to our intellectual
property rights.
We
rely on our intellectual property, including our issued and applied for U.S. and foreign patents as well as our licenses, as the
foundation of our business. If our intellectual property rights are challenged, no assurances can be given that our patents or
licenses would survive claims alleging invalidity or infringement on other patents and/or licenses. In addition, disputes may
arise regarding inventorship of our intellectual property. It is possible that our intellectual property may be infringing upon
existing patents that we are not currently unaware of. As the number of participants in the marketplace grows, the possibility
of patent infringement claims against us increases. It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine how such disputes would be
resolved. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with patent litigation, there is
a risk that some of our confidential information could be required to be publicly disclosed. Any litigation claims against us
may cause us to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain upon our financial resources, divert the attention
of management or restrict our core business or result in the public disclosure of confidential information.
We
may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation or other proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property
rights and we may be unable to protect our rights to, or use of, our technology.
Some
or all of our patent applications may not issue as patents, or the claims of any issued patents may not afford meaningful protection
for our technologies or products. In addition, patents issued to us or our licensors, if any, may be challenged and subsequently
narrowed, invalidated or circumvented. Patent litigation is widespread in the biotechnology industry and could harm our business.
Litigation might be necessary to protect our patent position or to determine the scope and validity of third-party proprietary
rights. If we choose to go to court to stop someone else from using the inventions claimed in our patents, that individual or
company would have the right to ask the court to rule that such patents are invalid and/or should not be enforced against that
third party. These lawsuits are expensive and we may not have the required resources to pursue such litigation or to protect our
patent rights. In addition, there is a risk that the court might decide that these patents are not valid and that we do not have
the right to stop the other party from using the inventions. There is also the risk that, even if the validity of these patents
is upheld, the court could refuse to stop the other party on the ground that such other party’s activities do not infringe
on our rights contained in these patents.
Furthermore,
a third party may claim that we are using inventions covered by their patent rights and may go to court to stop us from engaging
in our normal operations and activities, including making or selling our product candidates. These lawsuits are costly and could
materially increase our operating expenses and divert the attention of managerial and technical personnel. There is a risk that
a court would decide that we are infringing the third party’s patents and would order us to stop the activities covered
by the patents. In addition, there is a risk that a court would order us to pay the other party damages for having violated the
other party’s patents. The biotechnology industry has produced a proliferation of patents, and it is not always clear to
industry participants, including us, which patents cover various types of products or methods of use. The coverage of patents
is subject to interpretation by the courts, and the interpretation is not always uniform.
Because
some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, patent applications in
the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until eighteen months after filing, and publications
in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications
for technology covered by our issued patents or our pending applications or that we were the first to invent the technology. Our
competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering technology similar to ours. Any such patent
application may have priority over our patent applications and could further require us to obtain rights to issued patents covering
such technologies.
If
another party has filed a United States patent application on inventions similar to ours, we may have to participate in an interference
or other proceeding in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or the PTO, or a court to determine priority of invention in the
United States. The costs of these proceedings could be substantial, and it is possible that such efforts would be unsuccessful,
resulting in a loss of our United States patent position with respect to such inventions.
Some
of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have
substantially greater resources. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the capital necessary to continue our operations.
Obtaining
and maintaining our patent protection depends upon compliance with various procedural, documentary, fee payment and other requirements
imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these
requirements.
The
PTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment
and other provisions during the patent process. There are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse
of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such
an event, competitors might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case.
We
may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property.
We
rely in part on trade secret protection in order to protect our proprietary trade secrets and unpatented know-how. However, trade
secrets are difficult to protect, and we cannot be certain that others do not develop the same or similar technologies on their
own. Additionally, research with regard to our technologies has been performed in countries outside of the United States, and
we also anticipate conducting joint ventures, collaborations and future clinical trials outside the US. The laws in some of these
countries may not provide protection for our trade secrets and intellectual property. We have taken steps, including entering
into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, service providers, and potential strategic partners to protect
our trade secrets and unpatented know-how. These agreements generally require that the other party keep confidential and not disclose
to third parties all confidential information developed by the party or made known to the party by us during the course of the
party’s relationship with us. We also typically obtain agreements from these parties which provide that inventions conceived
by the party in the course of rendering services to us are our property. However, these agreements may not be honored, including
in foreign countries in which we conduct research, and may not effectively assign intellectual property rights to us. Enforcing
a claim that a party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets or know-how is difficult, expensive and time consuming,
and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States may be less willing to protect trade secrets or
know-how. The failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive position.
We
may be subject to claims that our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former
employers.
As
is common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, we employ and hire individuals and/or entities who were previously
employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims
against us are currently pending, we may be subject to claims that these individuals, entities or that we have inadvertently or
otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. Litigation may be necessary
to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial
costs and be a distraction to management.
Risks
Relating to Marketing Approval and Government Regulations
Data
obtained from clinical trials are susceptible to varying interpretations and may not be sufficient to support approval of our
proposed products by the FDA.
The
design of our potential clinical trials will be based on many assumptions about the expected effect of our product candidates
and if those assumptions are incorrect, our potential clinical trials may not produce statistically significant results. Preliminary
results may not be confirmed on full analysis of the detailed results of early clinical trials. Data already obtained, or in the
future obtained, from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials do not necessarily predict the results that may be obtained from
later trials. Moreover, pre-clinical and clinical data are susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or
prevent regulatory approval. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant
setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after promising results in earlier trials. The failure to adequately demonstrate the
safety and effectiveness of a proposed formulation or product under development could delay or prevent regulatory clearance of
the potential drug. Our products may not prove to be safe and effective in clinical trials and may not meet all regulatory requirements
needed to receive regulatory approval. While data from our completed trials appear promising, the outcome of the current trials
is uncertain and these trials or future trials may ultimately be unsuccessful. Our clinical trials may among other things, not
demonstrate sufficient levels of safety and efficacy necessary to obtain the requisite regulatory approvals for our drugs, and
thus our proposed drugs may not be approved for marketing.
Our
proposed products may not receive FDA or other regulatory approvals.
The
FDA and comparable government agencies in foreign countries impose substantial regulations on the manufacture and marketing of
pharmaceutical products through expensive, lengthy and detailed laboratory, pre-clinical and clinical testing procedures, sampling
activities and other costly and time-consuming procedures. Satisfaction of these regulations typically takes several years or
more and varies substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the proposed product. Our proposed products are subject
to extensive regulation and/or acceptance by numerous governmental authorities in the United States, including the FDA, and authorities
in other countries. Most of our proposed products will require governmental approval before they can be commercialized. Our failure
to receive the regulatory approvals in the United States or foreign countries will materially impact our business.
Our
proposed products may not have favorable results in clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.
Encouraging
results from our studies to date should not be relied upon as evidence that our planned pre-clinical and clinical trials will
ultimately be successful or our products approved for marketing. Even though the results of our studies to date seem promising,
we will be required to demonstrate through further pre-clinical and clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective
for use in a diverse population before we can seek regulatory approvals for their commercial sale. There is typically an extremely
high rate of attrition from the failure of product candidates as they proceed through clinical trials. If any product candidate
fails to demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy in any clinical trial, then we could experience potentially significant delays
in, or be required to abandon, development of that product candidate. While initial data from our preliminary studies appear promising,
the outcome of any clinical trials is uncertain and such trials or future trials may ultimately be unsuccessful.
If
users of our proposed products are unable to obtain adequate reimbursement from third-party payors, market acceptance of our proposed
products may be limited and we may not achieve revenues or profits.
The
continuing efforts of governments, insurance companies, health maintenance organizations and other payers of healthcare costs
to contain or reduce costs of health care may affect our future revenues and profitability as well as the future revenues and
profitability of our potential customers, suppliers and collaborative partners in addition to the availability of capital. In
other words, our ability to commercialize our proposed products depends in large part on the extent to which appropriate reimbursement
levels for the cost of our proposed formulations, products and related treatments are obtained by the health care providers of
these products and treatments. At this time, we cannot predict the precise impact that recently adopted or future laws will have
on these reimbursement levels.
We
may be unable to comply with our reporting and other requirements under federal securities laws.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related new rules and regulations implemented by the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, require changes in the corporate governance practices and
financial reporting standards for public companies. These laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to internal control over financial reporting, would be expected to materially increase
the Company’s legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and more burdensome. Presently
we qualify as a non-accelerated filer. Accordingly, we are exempt from the requirements of Section 404(b) and our independent
registered public accounting firm is not required to audit the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls and
management’s assessment of the design and the operating effectiveness of such internal controls. In the event that we become
an accelerated filer, we will be required to expend substantial capital in connection with compliance.
We
do not have effective internal controls over our financial reporting.
Because
of our limited resources, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting may not be effective in
providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Effective internal controls over financial
reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are necessary for us to provide reliable financial and other reports and effectively
prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial or SEC reports or prevent fraud, investors may lose confidence in our SEC
reports, our operating results and the trading price of our common stock could suffer materially and we may become subject to
litigation.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses and will divert time
and attention away from revenue generating activities.
Changing
laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and related SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated
with accessing the public markets and public reporting. Our management team invests significant time and financial resources to
comply with both existing and evolving standards for public companies, which will lead to increased general and administrative
expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from developing our business to compliance activities which could have
an adverse effect on our business.
Risks
Relating to our Securities
Our
common stock price may be particularly volatile because of our stage of development and business.
The
market prices for the securities of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies in general, and early-stage drug development companies
in particular, such as ours, have been highly volatile and may continue to be highly volatile in the future. The following may
have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:
|
●
|
our
ability retain and augment our current management team and workforce, which currently consists of only one employee, our
interim chief executive officer;
|
|
●
|
the
development status of our drug candidates, particularly the results of our clinical trials;
|
|
●
|
market
conditions or trends related to the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, or the market in general;
|
|
●
|
announcements
of technological innovations, new commercial products, or other material events by our competitors or us;
|
|
●
|
disputes
or other developments concerning our proprietary rights;
|
|
●
|
changes
in, or failure to meet, securities analysts’ or investors’ expectations of our financial and developmental performance;
|
|
●
|
additions
or departures of key personnel;
|
|
●
|
loss
of any strategic relationship;
|
|
●
|
discussions
of our business, products, financial performance, prospects, or stock price by the financial and scientific press and online
investor communities such as chat rooms;
|
|
●
|
industry
developments, including, without limitation, changes in healthcare policies or practices or third-party reimbursement policies;
|
|
●
|
public
concern as to, and legislative action with respect to, testing or other research areas of biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical
companies, the pricing and availability of prescription drugs, or the safety of drugs;
|
|
●
|
regulatory
developments in the United States or foreign countries; and
|
|
●
|
economic,
political and other external factors.
|
Broad
market fluctuations may cause the market price of our common stock to decline substantially. Additionally, fluctuations in the
trading price or liquidity of our common stock may materially and adversely affect, among other things, the interest of investors
to purchase our common stock on the open market and, generally, our ability to raise capital.
Our
board of directors has broad discretion to issue additional securities, in the event that we have adequate authorized capital
to issue such securities.
We are authorized under our certificate of incorporation to issue up to 150,000,000 shares of common stock
and 30,000,000 “blank check” shares of preferred stock. Shares of our blank check preferred stock provide the board
of directors with broad authority to determine voting, dividend, conversion, and other rights. As of June 30, 2019, we have issued
and outstanding 150,000,000 shares of common stock and, accordingly, no additional shares of common stock reserved for future grants
under our equity compensation plans and for issuances upon the exercise or conversion of currently outstanding shares of preferred
stock, options, warrants and other convertible securities will be available until such time as we complete a reverse stock split
or authorize additional shares. As of June 30, 2019, we have issued 1,853 shares of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock, of
which 133.8125 are outstanding, 1,000 shares of Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock, of which 71 are outstanding, 290.43148
shares of Series C 0% Convertible Preferred Stock, that are all outstanding, and 5,000 shares of Series D 0% Convertible Preferred
Stock, all of which are outstanding. Accordingly, we are entitled to issue no additional shares of common stock, and 29,991,856
additional shares of “blank check” preferred stock. Our board may generally issue those common and preferred shares,
or convertible securities to purchase those shares, without further approval by our shareholders. Any additional preferred shares
we may issue could have such rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions as may be designated from time-to-time by our board,
including preferential dividend rights, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption rights and liquidation provisions.
It
is likely that we will issue a large amount of additional securities to raise capital in order to further our business plans.
It is also likely that we will issue a large amount of additional securities to directors, officers, employees and consultants
as compensatory grants in connection with their services, both in the form of stand-alone grants or under our various stock plans.
Any issuances could be made at a price that reflects a discount to, or a premium from, the then-current market price of our common
stock. These issuances would dilute the percentage ownership interest of our current shareholders, which would have the effect
of reducing your influence on matters on which our stockholders vote, and might dilute the net tangible book value per share of
our common stock.
We
currently do not have enough authorized shares of common stock for additional issuances. The shareholders have approved a reverse
stock split in amount not less than 1-for-2 and not more than 1-for-500 at the discretion of the Board until December 31, 2019.
The Board currently plans to effect a reverse stock split in order to authorize additional capital for its future sale of securities
stock issuances to service providers, warrant exercises, and conversions of outstanding preferred stock and convertible debentures.
Future
sales of our common stock could cause our stock price to fall.
Transactions
that result in a large amount of newly issued shares become readily tradable, or other events that cause current stockholders
to sell shares, could place downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. In addition, the lack of a robust trading
market may require a stockholder who desires to sell a large number of shares of common stock to sell the shares in increments
over time to mitigate any adverse impact of the sales on the market price of our stock. If our stockholders sell, or the market
perceives that our stockholders intend to sell for various reasons, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market,
including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, the market price of our common stock could fall.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related
securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate. We may become involved in securities class
action litigation that could divert management’s attention and harm our business.
As of June 30, 2019, we had 150,000,000
shares of common stock, 1,853 shares of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock issued and 133.8125 Series A 0% Convertible Preferred
Stock outstanding, 1,000 shares of Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock issued and 71 Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock
outstanding, 290.43148 shares of Series C 0% Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, and 5,000 shares of Series D 0%
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. We additionally have issued an aggregate of $3,364,813 of senior convertible
debentures and convertible notes that are convertible into common stock at any time, of which $2,676,967 is outstanding. Substantially
all of the common shares and common shares underlying the Series A 0% Convertible Preferred, Series B 0% Convertible Preferred,
and Series C 0% Convertible shares are available for public sale, subject in some cases to volume and other limitations or delivery
of a prospectus. As of June 30, 2019, we were obligated to reserve for issuance (i) 328,221 shares of our common stock issuable
upon the conversion of 133.8125 shares of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock including an additional number of common shares
we are contractually obligated to reserve pursuant to our December 2015 offering; (ii) 14,200,000 shares of our common stock issuable
upon the conversion of 71 shares of Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock including an additional number of common shares we
are contractually obligated to reserve pursuant to our December 2016 offering; (iii) 38,086,296 shares of our common stock issuable
upon the conversion of 290.43148 shares of Series C 0% Convertible Preferred Stock including an additional number of common shares
we are contractually obligated to reserve pursuant to our March 2017 offering, (iv) 1,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
the conversion of 5,000 shares of Series D 0% Convertible Preferred Stock, (v) 4,231,391 shares of our common stock issuable upon
exercise of outstanding warrants at a weighted average exercise price of $1.79 per share, including an additional number of common
shares we are contractually obligated to reserve pursuant to our December 2015 offering, December 2016 offering and March 2017
offering, (vi) 298,748 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options under our equity compensation
plans at a weighted average exercise price of $5.07 per share and (vii) 799,989,916 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion
of our outstanding convertible notes. Subject to applicable vesting requirements and holding periods, upon conversion or exercise
of the outstanding convertible notes, warrants and options, the underlying shares may be resold into the public market. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, none of the shares of common stock underlying these convertible securities may be converted or exercised given that
we have no shares of common stock available under our certificate of incorporation. We cannot predict if future issuances or sales
of our common stock, or the availability of our common stock for sale, would harm the market price of our common stock or our ability
to raise capital. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we currently do not have adequate authorized shares available for issuance pursuant
to our convertible securities as of June 30, 2019.
The
market for our common stock has been illiquid and our investors may be unable to sell their shares.
Our
common stock trades with limited volume on the pink sheets of the OTC Markets Group Inc. Accordingly, although a limited public
market for our common stock exists, it is still relatively illiquid compared to that of a seasoned issuer. Prior to making an
investment in our securities, you should consider the limited market for our common stock. No assurances can be given that the
trading volume of our common stock will increase or that a liquid public market for our securities will ever materialize.
We
have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We
have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur
if the market price of our common stock appreciates.
Provisions
of Delaware law and executive employment agreements may prevent or delay a change of control, which could depress the trading
price of our common stock.
We
are subject to the Delaware anti-takeover laws regulating corporate takeovers. These anti-takeover laws prevent Delaware corporations
from engaging in a merger or sale of more than 10% of its assets with any stockholder, including all affiliates and associates
of the stockholder, who owns 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock, for three years following the date
that the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s assets unless:
|
●
|
the
Board of Directors approved the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s assets;
|
|
●
|
after
the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s assets, the stockholder owned at
least 85% of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock, excluding shares owned by directors, officers and employee
stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the
plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
●
|
on
or after this date, the merger or sale is approved by the Board of Directors and the holders of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the stockholder.
|
A
Delaware corporation may opt out of the Delaware anti-takeover laws if its certificate of incorporation or bylaws so provides.
We have not opted out of the provisions of the anti-takeover laws. As such, these laws could prohibit or delay mergers or other
takeover or change of control transactions and may discourage attempts by other companies to acquire us.
In
addition, employment agreements with certain executive officers provide for the payment of severance and accelerated vesting of
options and restricted stock in the event of termination following a change of control. These provisions could have the effect
of discouraging potential takeover attempts even if it would be beneficial to shareholders.
Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could discourage a third-party from acquiring us.
Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as applicable, among other things (i) provide our board with the ability to alter the
bylaws without stockholder approval and (ii) provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled by a majority of directors
in office. These provisions, while designed to reduce vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal, and to discourage
certain tactics used in proxy fights, may negatively impact a third-party’s decision to acquire us even if it would be beneficial
to shareholders.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports or if they publish unfavorable research or reports, an active
market for our common stock may not develop and the price of our common stock could decline.
We
are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment
community that generate or influence sales volume. Even if we come to the attention of such persons, they may be reluctant to
follow or recommend an unproven company such as ours until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. Generally, the trading
market for a company’s securities depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish.
We currently have limited research coverage by securities and industry analysts. As a consequence, there may be periods of time
when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer with significant research coverage.
We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or if developed,
will be sustained, or that current trading levels could be sustained or not diminish. In addition, in the event any analysts downgrades
our securities, the price of our shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover us or fails to
publish regular reports on us, interest in the purchase of our securities could decrease, which could cause the price of our common
stock and its trading volume, if any, to decline.
Our
common stock may be considered a “penny stock,” and may be subject to additional sale and trading regulations that
may make it more difficult to sell.
Our
common stock may be considered a “penny stock.” The principal result or effect of being designated a penny stock is
that securities broker-dealers participating in sales of our common stock may be subject to the penny stock regulations set forth
in Rules 15g-2 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act. For example, Rule 15g-2 requires broker-dealers dealing in penny
stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and
dated written receipt of the document at least two business days before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s
account. Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions
in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the
investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably
determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has
sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide
the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above;
and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s
financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult
and time consuming for holders of our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them in
the market or otherwise.
We
currently have no available common stock available for new securities issuances, or for the conversion / exercise of outstanding
securities, which may restrict us from accessing additional capital through the sale of new securities or the exercise of outstanding
convertible securities.
Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes
us to issue up to 150,000,000 shares of common stock, all of which are issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2019. Accordingly,
we do not have sufficient authorized shares of common stock for additional issuances. While our shareholders have approved a reverse
stock split in amount not less than 1-for-2 and not more than 1-for-500 at the discretion of the Board until December 31, 2019,
no such additional reverse stock split has taken place. Notwithstanding, the Board currently plans to effect a reverse stock split
in order to authorize additional capital for its future stock issuances, warrant exercises, and conversions of outstanding preferred
stock and convertible debentures. Our failure to complete the reverse stock split may further subject us to penalties if we are
unable to satisfy conversions of our outstanding convertible debentures, or exercises of our outstanding warrants and options,
which may harm our financial position and business prospects.
If
our management team is not effective or if we fail to attract, hire or retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to design,
develop or commercialize our products successfully or manage our business.
While we have been able to secure an interim
chief executive officer, our anticipated growth and expansion may require the addition of new personnel and the development of
additional expertise by existing management. There is intense competition for qualified personnel in such areas. Accordingly, there
can be no assurances that we would be able to attract and retain the qualified personnel necessary for the successful development
of our business.
ITEM
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our
executive offices are located at 31200 Via Colinas, Suite 200, Westlake Village, CA 91362. At present our employee and consultants
work virtually from around the country. We currently pay no money for these facilities. We anticipate that in the event we raise
capital sufficient to fund our operations, we will establish permanent offices and relocate to another facility. There is no affiliation
between us or any of our principals or agents and our landlords or any of their principals or agents.
ITEM
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
On
March 16, 2016, Dr. Craig Dionne provided us his notice of termination as the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer. Dr. Dionne’s notice of termination alleges that such termination was for “Good Reason” as
a result of a purported material change in his authority, functions, duties and responsibilities as chief executive officer. In
the event that termination was for “Good Reason”, Dr. Dionne would be entitled to certain severance payments as well
as other benefits. His notice of termination, in additional to requesting such severance, also requests the payment of Dr. Dionne’s
annual and long term bonus for 2014 and 2015. On April 11, 2016, we received a letter from Dr. Dionne demanding approximately
$2.3 million as a result of the foregoing.
The
Company vigorously disputes that the termination of his employment was for “Good Reason,” as that term is defined
in his employment agreement and under applicable law. This matter is at the early stages. While no litigation is pending at this
time, there can be no assurance that this matter will be resolved in such a manner as to avoid litigation. Accordingly, the Company
is unable at this time to predict the outcome of this matter, and any views formed as to the viability of these claims or the
costs to the Company which could result may change from time to time as the matter proceeds through its course.
ITEM
4.
|
MINE
SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
Not
Applicable
PART
II
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Market
Information
Our
common shares are quoted on the pink sheets of the OCT Markets under the symbol NSPX. Although a market for our common stock exists,
it is relatively illiquid.
Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Holders
As of June 30, 2019, we had approximately 133 record holders of our common stock.
Dividend
Policy
We
have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not currently anticipate declaring or paying cash
dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to
finance the operation and expansion of our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at
the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements,
financial conditions, future prospects, contractual restrictions and covenants, applicable law and other factors that our board
of directors may deem relevant. If we do not pay dividends, a return on your investment will occur only if the market price of
our common stock appreciates.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2018 with respect to our compensation plans under which equity securities
may be issued.
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
to be Issued
upon Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
|
|
|
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Stock Plan, as amended (1)
|
|
|
63,068
|
|
|
$
|
18.34
|
|
|
|
131,264
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Executive Compensation Plan
|
|
|
49,086
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
150,914
|
|
Inducement Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
211,360
|
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
88,640
|
|
2017 Equity Compensation Plan
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
323,514
|
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
|
|
2,370,818
|
|
|
(1)
|
Our
2007 Stock Plan, as amended, provides for the issuance of up to 50,000 common shares during any calendar year. The plan provides
for the issuance of up to 200,000 common shares in the aggregate.
|
GenSpera
2007 Equity Compensation Plan
Our
2007 Equity Compensation Plan (“2007 Plan”) is administered by our board or any of its committees. The purposes of
the 2007 Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional
incentive to Employees, Directors and Consultants, and to promote the success of our business. The issuance of awards under our
2007 Plan is at the discretion of the administrator, which has the authority to determine the persons to whom any awards shall
be granted and the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any award. Under our 2007 Plan, we may grant stock options,
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares and other stock based
awards. Our 2007 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 50,000 shares of common stock for the foregoing awards per fiscal year
with an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. As of December 31, 2018, we have
granted awards under the 2007 Plan equal to approximately 180,699 shares of our common stock, and 111,963 shares have been cancelled
or forfeited. Accordingly, there are 131,264 shares of common stock available for future awards under the 2007 Plan. In the event
of a change in control, awards under the 2007 Plan will become fully vested unless such awards are assumed or substituted by the
successor corporation.
GenSpera
2009 Executive Compensation Plan
Our
2009 Executive Compensation Plan, as amended (“2009 Plan”) is administered by our Board or any of its committees.
The purpose of our 2009 Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and our stockholders by attracting, retaining and rewarding
persons performing services for us and to motivate such persons to contribute to our growth and profitability. The issuance of
awards under our 2009 Plan is at the discretion of the administrator, which has the authority to determine the persons to whom
any awards shall be granted and the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any award. Under our 2009 Plan, we may grant
stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares and
other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2018, our 2009 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of our common
stock for the foregoing awards, and we have granted awards under the plan equal to approximately 164,868 common shares, and 115,782
shares have been cancelled or forfeited. Accordingly, there are 150,914 shares of common stock available for future awards under
the 2009 Plan.
GenSpera
Inducement Award Stock Option Plan
Our
Inducement Award Stock Option Plan (“Inducement Plan”) is administered by our board or our compensation committee.
The Plan is intended to be used in connection with the recruiting and inducement of senior management and employees. The issuance
of wards under the Inducement Plan is at the discretion of the administrator which has the authority to determine the persons
to whom any awards shall be granted and the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any award. The Company did not seek
approval of the Plan by our stockholders. Pursuant to the Inducement Plan, the Company may grant stock options for up to a total
of 300,000 shares of common stock to new employees of the Company. As of December 31, 2018, 211,360 grants have been made pursuant
to the Plan. Accordingly, there are 88,640 shares of common stock available for future issuance under the Inducement Plan.
Inspyr
Therapeutics 2017 Equity Compensation Plan
Our
2017 Equity Compensation Plan (“2017 Plan”) is administered by our board or any of its committees. The purposes of
the 2017 Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional
incentive to Employees, Directors and Consultants, and to promote the success of our business. The issuance of awards under our
2017 Plan is at the discretion of the administrator, which has the authority to determine the persons to whom any awards shall
be granted and the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any award. Under our 2017 Plan, we may grant stock options,
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares and other stock based
awards. Our 2017 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock for the foregoing awards. As of December
31, 2018, we have granted no awards under the 2017 Plan, and no shares have been cancelled or forfeited. Accordingly, there are
2,000,000 shares of common stock available for future awards under the 2017 Plan. In the event of a change in control, awards
under the 2017 Plan will become fully vested unless such awards are assumed or substituted by the successor corporation.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
In
July of 2011, we adopted the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Plan”). The Deferred Plan is intended
to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The
Deferred Plan is intended to be an unfunded “top hat” plan which is maintained primarily to provide deferred compensation
benefits for a select group of our “management or highly compensated employees” within the meaning of Sections 201,
301, and 401 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and to therefore be exempt
from the provisions of Parts 2, 3, and 4 of Title I of ERISA. The Deferred Plan is intended to help build a supplemental source
of savings and retirement income through pre-tax deferrals of eligible compensation, which may include cash, option and stock
bonus awards, discretionary cash, option and stock awards and/or any other payments which may be designated by the Deferred Plan
administrator, as eligible, for deferral under the Deferred Plan from time to time. As administered, the Deferred Plan is used
to defer compensation of stock awards granted under our other equity compensation plans and does not by its terms approve any
grants or awards.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
The
following information is given with regard to unregistered securities sold since January 1, 2017. The following securities
were issued in private offerings pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in the Securities Act and the rules promulgated
thereunder in reliance on Section 4(2) thereof, relating to offers of securities by an issuer not involving any public offering.
|
●
|
In
January 2017, as an inducement to employment for two new employees, we granted two inducement options, each to purchase 47,955
shares of Common Stock (an aggregate of 95,910 shares). Both options have a term of seven (7) years, an exercise
price of $0.55 per share and vest as follows: (i) 25% of the options vest monthly over a one year period and (ii) 75% vest
monthly over the following thirty-six (36) months. The options were both issued pursuant to our Inducement Award
Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
February 2017, we issued an aggregate of 60,000 shares of Common Stock to shareholders pursuant to the conversion of 31.8
shares of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $0.53 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
February 28, 2017, we issued Dr. Richerson, our former chief operating officer, a warrant
to purchase 76,726 shares of Common Stock in connection with his release of claims and
separation agreement. The warrant has an exercise price of $0.75 per share and a term
of three and a half (3.5) years.
On
February 28, 2017, in connection with Dr. Richerson’s release of claims and separation agreement, we agreed to make
any vested portion of Dr. Richerson’s outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 64,155 shares of Common Stock,
exercisable at any time during their remaining term regardless of any termination provisions contained in the equity compensation
plans to which such awards were made as well as reduce the exercise price of such options to $0.75 per share.
|
|
●
|
In
March through April 2017, we offered and sold 290.43148 units, in a private placement to certain accredited investors for
gross proceeds of approximately $290,000. The Series C preferred stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share and the common
shares are issuable pursuant to conversion of the preferred stock at a conversion price of $0.75 per share, subject to a 9.99%
beneficial ownership limitation and subject to adjustment pursuant to stock splits and dividends, and subject to adjustment
pursuant to customary anti-dilution protection for subsequent equity sales for a period of 12 months from the date of issuance.
The warrants include (i) 387,251 Series M common stock purchase warrants with a price per share of $0.90 and a term of five
years from the date of issuance, (ii) 387,251 Series N common stock purchase warrants with a price per share of $0.75 and
a term of six months from the date of issuance and (iii) 387,251 Series O common stock purchase with a price per share of
$0.75 and a term of six months from the date of issuance. The common shares underlying the Series C preferred stock are subject
to adjustment in the in the event of stock splits and dividends, subsequent equity sales, pro rata distributions and fundamental
transactions. In the event that the shares underlying all of the warrants issued in the March through April 2017 Offering
are not subject to a registration statement at the time of exercise, the warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis after
6 months from the issuance date. The warrants also contain provisions providing for an adjustment in the underlying number
of shares and exercise price in the event of stock splits or dividends, fundamental transactions, and pro rata distributions.
The warrants also contain anti-dilution protection for a period of 12 months from the date of issuance.
|
|
●
|
In
April 2017, we issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares of Common Stock to shareholders pursuant to the conversion of 26.5 shares
of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $0.53 per share.
|
|
●
|
In
May 2017, we issued an aggregate of 20,000 shares of Common Stock to shareholders pursuant to the conversion of 10.6 shares
of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $0.53 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
June 2017, we issued an aggregate of 20,000 shares of Common Stock to shareholders pursuant to the conversion of 10.6 shares
of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $0.53 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
July 31, 2017, we completed a share exchange agreement whereby we acquired 100% of the capital stock of Lewis & Clark
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in exchange for 7,122,172 shares of our common stock (50% of our issued and outstanding common stock,
including common shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
September 12, 2017, we issued $320,000 in senior convertible debentures (“Debentures”) for (i) $250,000 in cash
and (ii) the cancellation of $70,000 of obligations. The Debentures are non-interest bearing, have a maturity date
of September 12, 2018 and are convertible into shares of common stock at any time at a conversion price equal to the lesser
of (i) $0.33 and (ii) 85% of the lesser of (a) the volume weighted average price on the trading day immediately preceding
a conversion and (b) the volume weighted average price on a conversion date. The Debentures also contain provisions providing
for an adjustment in the event of stock splits or dividends, and fundamental transactions. The Debentures also
contain anti-dilution protection in the event of subsequent equity sales at a price that is lower than the then applicable
conversion price until such time that the Debentures are no longer outstanding. The Debentures are further redeemable
for cash upon twenty (20) trading days’ notice provided that certain conditions are met. As a result of the
sale of our Series D 0% convertible preferred stock in January 2019, which are convertible into common stock at a conversion
price of $0.005 per share, the maximum conversion price of the Debentures was repriced to $0.01.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
September 12, 2017, we issued $2,504,812.50 in Debentures in exchange for the cancellation of (i) $1,615.812 in stated value
of Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock and (ii) $890,000 of in stated value of Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock. The
Debentures contain the same terms as described above.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between
September 14, 2017 and December 31, 2017, Debenture holders converted an aggregate of $122,369.95 into 2,144,340 shares of
common stock at per share conversion prices ranging from $0.212 to $.022.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between
January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2018, Debenture holders converted an aggregate of $40,760.80
into 1,445,000 shares of common stock at per share conversion prices ranging from $0.033
to $0.025.
|
|
●
|
Between
April 1, 2018 and June 30, 2018, Debenture holders converted an aggregate of $55,029.43 into 4,305,000 shares of common stock
at per share conversion prices ranging from $0.017 to $0.007
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between
July 1, 2018 and September 30, 2018, Debenture holders converted an aggregate of $28,087.83 into 4,750,000 shares of common
stock at per share conversion prices ranging from $0.007 to $0.005
|
|
●
|
In
July 2018, we issued an aggregate of $515,000 of senior convertible debentures (“Debentures”) for (i) $500,000
in cash and (ii) the cancellation of $15,000 in obligations. The Debentures are non-interest bearing, have a maturity
date of July 5, 2019 and are convertible into common stock at any time at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.33
and (ii) 85% of the lesser of (a) the volume weighted average price on the trading day immediately preceding a conversion
and (b) the volume weighted average price on the conversion date. The Debentures also contain provisions providing
for an adjustment in the event of stock splits or dividends, and fundamental transactions. The Debentures also
contain anti-dilution protection in the event of subsequent equity sales that is lower than the then applicable conversion
price until such time that the Debentures are no longer outstanding. The Debentures are further redeemable for
cash upon twenty (20) trading days’ notice provided that certain conditions are met. The Debentures are further
redeemable for cash upon twenty (20) trading days’ notice provided that certain conditions are met. As a
result of the sale of our Series D 0% convertible preferred stock in January 2019, which are convertible into common stock
at a conversion price of $0.005 per share, the maximum conversion price of the Debentures was repriced to $0.01.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between October 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018, Debenture holders converted an aggregate of $237,337.39
into 63,175,000 shares of common stock at per share conversion prices ranging from $0.0028 to $0.0047.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between January 1, 2019 and March 31, 2019, Debenture holders converted an aggregate of $204,220.53 into
65,436,071 shares of common stock at per share conversion prices ranging from $0.0021 to $0.0046.
|
Use
of Proceeds
On
May 23, 2014, our registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-194687) was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission for our initial public offering pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 4,163,961 units at a public offering price
of $0.80 per unit. The information contained in the registration statement was amended pursuant to a post-effective amendment
that was declared effective the By the Securities Exchange Commission on January 27, 2015. After giving effect to the reverse
stock split, the units are convertible into 138,807 shares of common stock at the public offering price of $24.00 per unit. There
has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our public offering as described in our final prospectus filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b).
ITEM
6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
We
are not required to provide the information as to selected financial data as we are considered a smaller reporting company.
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking
statements regarding our business development plans, pre-clinical and clinical studies, regulatory reviews, timing, strategies,
expectations, anticipated expenses levels, business prospects and positioning with respect to market, demographic and pricing
trends, business outlook, technology spending and various other matters (including contingent liabilities and obligations and
changes in accounting policies, standards and interpretations) and express our current intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies
or predictions. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions and currently available information and
are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements” and under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion should be
read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
Our
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is provided
in addition to the accompanying financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial
condition, and cash flows. MD&A is organized as follows:
|
●
|
Company
Overview - Discussion of our business plan and strategy in order to provide context for the remainder of MD&A.
|
|
●
|
Critical
Accounting Policies - Accounting policies that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated
in our reported financial results and forecasts.
|
|
●
|
Results
of Operations - Analysis of our financial results comparing the year ended December 31, 2018 to the year ended December 31,
2017.
|
|
●
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources - Liquidity discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity.
|
Company
Overview
Business
We
are a clinical-stage, pre-revenue, pharmaceutical company primarily focused on the development of therapeutics for the treatment
of diseases. Through our acquisition of Lewis and Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., we currently are focusing on a pipeline of small
molecule adenosine receptor modulators.
The
adenosine receptor modulators include A
2B
antagonists, dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, and A
2A
agonists that have broad development applicability including indications within immuno-oncology and inflammation. Adenosine
is implicated in immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Adenosine receptor antagonists may boost the host immune response
against the tumor as a single-agent and in combination with other existing immuno-oncology agents leading to enhanced tumor killing
and inhibition of metastasis. Adenosine also has anti-inflammatory properties in the acute and chronic setting. Adenosine receptor
agonists may promote a decreased inflammatory response and can potentially treat a broad range of inflammatory and autoimmune
based diseases and conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, joint injury, Crohn’s disease, psoriasis) as well as improve
wound healing and decrease pain.
During
February 2018, due to a lack of capital, we curtailed substantially all our business operations. In the event that we are able
to raise sufficient capital, our major focus would be to: (i) further characterization, in conjunction with Ridgeway Therapeutics,
of anti-cancer activity of the current pipeline of A
2B
antagonists and dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists
leading to selection of a clinical candidate for an Investigative New Drug or IND enabling studies, (ii) further characterization
of the current pipeline of A
2A
agonists leading to selection of a clinical candidate for an Investigative New Drug
or IND enabling studies; (iii) licensing and/or partnering the A
2B
antagonists, dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, and/or A
2A
agonists for further development, (iv) through our newly acquired adenosine receptor chemistry
technology platform, continue to produce next generation adenosine receptor modulators, (v) pursue licensing and/or partnering
of mipsagargin, (vi) conduct a clinical study of mipsagargin in patients with advanced HCC, and (vii) explore collaborations utilizing
mipsagargin in new, non-clinical solid tumor models with leading researchers in the oncology field.
Our
ability to execute our business plan is dependent on the amount and timing of cash, if any, that we are able to raise. During
February of 2018, we curtailed our operations due to our lack of cash. During July 2018, we were able to raise approximately $500,000
through the sale of debt securities and we raised $25,000 in December 2018 through the sale of notes. We are currently using such
funds to attempt to become current in our SEC reporting requirements, pay outstanding invoices to our independent registered accounting
firm, and other outstanding obligations, the payment of which we believe to be vital to our future operations. Should we fail
to further raise sufficient funds to execute our business plan, our priority would be to maintain our intellectual property portfolio
and continue, to the best of our ability, our public company reporting requirements.
While
we believe that the data from our nonclinical studies appear promising, the outcome of our ongoing or future studies may ultimately
be unsuccessful.
Our
ability to execute our business plan is dependent on the amount and timing of cash, if any, that we are able to raise. Should
we not raise sufficient funds to execute our business plan, our priority is the continued production of adenosine receptor modulator
products for any existing material transfer agreements and continuing business development discussions with potential development
partners.
Recent
Developments
|
●
|
On
July 5, 2018, we completed the private placement of approximately $515,000 non-interest bearing senior convertible debentures.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
August 3, 2018, we entered into an agreement with Ridgeway Therapeutics, Inc. to develop A
2B
antagonists, dual
A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, initially as anti-cancer agents.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Between
October 2, 2017 and October 23, 2017, we announced three (3) separate collaborations for preclinical studies of our proprietary
adenosine receptor modulator based compounds. The collaborations are with the University of Virginia School of
Medicine, NYU Winthrop Hospital, and the National Institutes of Health.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
September 12, 2017, we completed (i) the private placement of approximately $320,000 non-interest bearing senior convertible
debentures and (ii) the exchange of approximately $2.5 million in stated value Series A and Series B Preferred stock for non-interest
bearing senior convertible debentures.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
July 31, 2017, we completed a share exchange agreement whereby we acquired 100% of the
capital stock of Lewis & Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in exchange for 7,122,172 shares
of our common stock (50% of our issued and outstanding common stock, including common
shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock). We have subsequently determined
that the goodwill assigned to the as Lewis & Clark acquisition had become fully impaired
as of December 31, 2017.
|
|
●
|
On
April 24, 2017, April 18, 2017 and March 17, 2017, we completed the private placement of an aggregate of approximately $290,000
of our securities.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Effective
July 26, 2019, we appointed Michael Cain as our interim chief executive officer.
|
Product
Development of Adenosine Receptor Modulators
Adenosine
is an extracellular signaling molecule that regulates multiple aspects of tissue function and specifically plays a role in immunity
and inflammation. High levels of adenosine in the tumor microenvironment inhibits immune response mediated through the A
2A
and A
2B
receptors. Adenosine also plays a role in non-malignant conditions where it is rapidly increased in response
to inflammation, hypoxia, ischemia, or trauma. Adenosine released in this setting has been shown to have a protective effect and
limits excessive inflammatory damage to tissues.
The
adenosine receptor antagonists have broad applicability as a potential immuno-oncology (IO) therapeutic agent in multiple tumor
types both as a single agent and in combination with other IO agents, in addition to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. We are
actively seeking licensing opportunities and/or partners to further development our A
2B
and dual A
2A
/A
2B
receptor antagonists. Our current product development plan for adenosine receptor antagonists contemplates the following
major initiatives, subject to the Company receiving sufficient funds:
|
●
|
Continue
development of anti-cancer agents with partner company, Ridgeway Therapeutics, Inc.
|
|
●
|
Further
characterization of existing agents toward IND enabling studies and support ongoing licensing/partnership activities.
|
|
●
|
Conduct
IND enabling studies.
|
|
●
|
Conduct
clinical studies with one or more of the adenosine receptor antagonists.
|
|
●
|
Continue
generating additional adenosine receptor antagonists to expand our portfolio.
|
The
adenosine receptor agonists have applicability in a broad range of non-oncology conditions including inflammatory and autoimmune
diseases and conditions. We are actively seeking licensing opportunities and/or partners to further development our A
2A
receptor agonists. Our current product development plan for adenosine receptor agonists contemplates the following major initiatives
subject to the Company receiving sufficient funds:
|
●
|
License
and/or partner to companies with development expertise in the intended indication.
|
|
●
|
Further
characterize existing agents to support licensing/partnership activities.
|
|
●
|
Continue
generating additional adenosine receptor agonists to expand our portfolio.
|
Financial
To
date, we have devoted substantially all of our efforts and financial resources to the development of our proposed drug candidates.
mipsagargin is the only product candidate for which we have conducted clinical trials, and we have not received FDA approval to
market, distribute or sell any products. We have currently curtailed our research on mipsagargin. We are also working on developing
IND approved studies for our adenosine receptor technology platform. Since our inception in 2003, we have generated no revenue
from product sales and have funded our operations principally through the private and public sales of our equity securities. We
have never been profitable and as of December 31, 2018 we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $60 million. We expect to
continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of our product candidates
and advance them through clinical trials.
Our
cash and restricted cash balances at December 31, 2018 was approximately $331,000 representing 90.4% of total assets. In July
2018 we completed private placements of approximately $515,000 of our securities and we raised $25,000 in December 2018 through
the sale of notes. Based on our current expected level of operating expenditures and cash balance as of December 31, 2018, we
expect to be able to fund our operations into the third quarter of 2019. This period could be shortened if there are any significant
increases in spending that were not anticipated or other unforeseen events.
We
anticipate raising additional cash through the private or public sales of equity or debt securities, collaborative arrangements,
licensing agreements or a combination thereof, to continue to fund our operations and the development of our product candidates.
There is no assurance that any such collaborative arrangement will be entered into or that financing will be available to us when
needed in order to allow us to continue our operations, or if available, on terms acceptable to us. If we do not raise sufficient
funds in a timely manner, we may be forced to curtail operations, delay or stop our ongoing pre-clinical studies and potential
clinical trials, cease operations altogether, or file for bankruptcy. We currently do not have commitments for future funding
from any source.
Going
Concern
Our
auditors’ report on our December 31, 2018 financial statements expressed an opinion that our capital resources as of the
date of their Audit Report were not sufficient to sustain operations or complete our planned activities for the upcoming year
unless we raised additional funds. During February of 2018, we curtailed our operations due to our lack of cash. Notwithstanding
our recent financings, in July 2018 whereby we raised $500,000, and December 2018, whereby we raised $25,000, our current cash
level raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we do not obtain additional funds, we may
no longer be able to continue as a going concern and will cease operation which means that our shareholders will lose their entire
investment.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
have prepared our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which
requires management to make significant judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during
the reporting period. We base these significant judgments and estimates on historical experience and other applicable assumptions
we believe to be reasonable based upon information presently available. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional
information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included
in the financial statements as soon as they became known. Actual results could materially differ from our estimates under different
assumptions, judgments or conditions.
All
of our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 3, Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates,
to our financial statements, included elsewhere in this annual report. We have identified the following as our critical accounting
policies and estimates, which are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, are the most
pervasive and important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and could potentially result
in materially different results under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation
of our financial statements:
Use
of Estimates
- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying disclosures.
Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Equivalents
- Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less
when purchased. We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. We have not
experienced any losses in such accounts.
Restricted
Cash -
Restricted cash consists of funds held in trust for the Company. The use of these funds is restricted to: (i) the payment
of professional fees in connection with bringing the Company’s filings current, and (ii) the payment of vendors associated
with the issuance and trading of the Company’s securities, such as transfer agent fees and fees payable to the OTCQB and
FINRA.
Research
and Development Costs
- Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Our research and development expenses
consist primarily of expenditures for toxicology and other studies, manufacturing, clinical trials, compensation and consulting
costs.
Stock-based
Compensation
- The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an equity award based on the grant-date
fair value of the award. All grants under our stock-based compensation programs are accounted for at fair value and that cost
is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period).
Compensation
expense for options granted to non-employees is determined in accordance with the standard as the fair value of the consideration
received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. Compensation expense for awards
granted to non-employees is re-measured each period. Determining the appropriate fair value of the stock-based compensation requires
the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based payment and stock price volatility. The Company
uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing option model to value its stock option awards which incorporate the Company’s stock
price, volatility, U.S. risk-free rate, dividend rate, and estimated life.
Derivative
Liability -
The Company has financial instruments that are considered derivatives or contain embedded features subject to
derivative accounting. Embedded derivatives are valued separately from the host instrument and are recognized as derivative liabilities
in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company measures these instruments at their estimated fair value and recognizes changes
in their estimated fair value in results of operations during the period of change. The Company values its derivative liabilities
using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The resulting liability is valued at each reporting date and the change in the
liability is reflected as change in derivative liability in the statement of operations.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
- Our short-term financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and other liabilities,
consist primarily of instruments without extended maturities. We believe that the fair values of our current assets and current
liabilities approximate their reported carrying amounts.
Derivative
liabilities consist of certain of our preferred stock and warrants with anti-dilution provisions, and are valued using option
pricing models which incorporate the Company’s stock price, volatility, U.S. risk-free rate, dividend rate, and estimated
life.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
With
the exception of those discussed below, there have not been any recent changes in accounting pronouncements and Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) during the year ended December 31, 2018 that are of significance
or potential significance to the Company.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU)
model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer
than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense
recognition in the income statement.
The
new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered
into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients
available. The Company does not expect any impact from the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
(“ASU No. 2017-04”). ASU No. 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from
the goodwill impairment test. A public business entity that is a SEC filer should adopt the amendments of ASU No. 2017-04 for
its annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted
for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect
any impact from the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In
May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”,
which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under
the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of
the award changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. If an award is not probable of vesting at the time a change
is made, the new guidance clarifies that no new measurement date will be required if there is no change to the fair value, vesting
conditions, and classification. This ASU will be applied prospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In
July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260),
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Part 1 – Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Down Round Features and Part 2 – Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable
Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with Scope Exception
(“ASU No. 2017-11”). Part 1 of ASU No. 2017-11 addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments
with down round features. Down round features are provisions in certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that
result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates
cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round
features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of ASU No. 2017-11 addresses
the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending
content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting
requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable
noncontrolling interests. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this update are effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company has early adopted the guidance under
ASU 2017-11 for the year end December 31, 2017.
Result
of Operations
Year
Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Our
results of operations have varied significantly from year to year and quarter to quarter and may vary significantly in the future.
We did not have revenue during the years ending December 31, 2018 and 2017. We do not anticipate generating any revenues during
2019. Net loss for 2018 and 2017 were $12,000 and $11.1 million, respectively, resulting from the operational activities described
below.
Operating
Expenses
Operating
expense totaled $0.7 million and $5.9 million during 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increase in operating expenses
is the result of the following factors.
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Change in 2018
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Versus 2017
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(amount in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
1,695
|
|
|
$
|
(1,487
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
(1,149
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
(2,159
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Impairment of equipment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Total operating expense
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
5,851
|
|
|
$
|
(5,127
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)%
|
Research
and Development
Research
and development expenses totaled $0.2 million and $1.7 million for the years ended 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease of
$1.5 million, or 88%, in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to the curtailment of business operations in February 2018, due
to a lack of capital.
Our
research and development expenses consist primarily of expenditures related to toxicology and other studies, manufacturing, clinical
trials, compensation and consulting costs.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses totaled $0.5 million and $1.7 million during 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease of approximately
$1.2 million, or 69%, in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily the result of the curtailment of business operations in February
2018, due to a lack of capital.
Impairment
Expense
Due
to the curtailment of business activity in February 2018, we determined that the goodwill assigned to the Lewis & Clark, Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. acquisition had become fully impaired as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $2.2
million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company also determined that the office and lab equipment acquired pursuant
to the Lewis & Clark, Pharmaceuticals, Inc. acquisition had become fully impaired as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, we
recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. We had no impairment charges during the
year ended December 31, 2018.
Other
Income (Expense)
Other
income (expense) totaled approximately $0.7 million of income and $5.2 million of expense for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Change in 2018
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Versus 2017
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(amount in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
%
|
Gain on conversion of debt
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(5,234
|
)
|
|
|
4,684
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
(5,249
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)%
|
Loss
on change in fair value of derivative liability
There
was a gain on change in fair value of our derivative liability of approximately $1.1 million during the year ended December 31,
2018, with a loss of approximately $0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The change in the fair value of our derivative
liability was the result of our sale of convertible debentures in September 2017 and July 2018, where we issued convertible notes
with variable conversion rates. Refer to Note 7 in our Financial Statements for further discussion on our derivative liability.
Gain
on conversion of debt
There
was a gain on conversion of debentures of approximately $0.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, with a gain of approximately
$0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. Gain on conversion of debt results from the difference between the fair
value of common stock issued upon conversion and the carrying amount of the debt converted.
Interest
income (expense)
We
had $0.6 million net interest expense in 2018, compared to $5.2 million of expense in 2017. The decrease of $4.7 million was attributable
to derivative instruments with a value in excess of proceeds received in the 2017 period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
have incurred losses since our inception in 2003 as a result of significant expenditures for operations and research and development
and the lack of any approved products to generate revenue. We have an accumulated deficit of approximately $60 million as of December
31, 2018 and anticipate that we will continue to incur additional losses for the foreseeable future. Through December 31, 2018,
we have funded our operations through the private sale of our equity securities, convertible debt and exercise of options and
warrants, resulting in gross proceeds of $36.9 million. Cash and restricted cash at December 31, 2018 was $0.3 million.
Our
auditors’ report on our December 31, 2018 financial statements expressed an opinion that our capital resources as of the
date of their Audit Report were not sufficient to sustain operations or complete our planned activities for the upcoming year
unless we raised additional funds. In 2018, we completed financings resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $0.5 million.
Based on our current level of expected operating expenditures, we expect to be able to fund our operations into the third quarter
of 2019. This assumes that we spend minimally on general operations and only continue conducting our ongoing clinical trials,
and that we do not encounter any unexpected events or other circumstances that could shorten this time period. If we do not obtain
additional funds by such time, we may no longer be able to continue as a going concern and will cease operation which means that
our shareholders will lose their entire investment.
We
are actively seeking sources of financing to fund our continued operations and research and development programs. To raise additional
capital, we may sell shares of equity or debt securities, or enter into collaborative, strategic and/or licensing transactions.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any financing transaction in a timely manner or on acceptable terms
or otherwise. If we are not able to raise additional cash, we may be forced to further delay, curtail, or cease development of
our product candidates, or cease operations altogether.
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
Cash and restricted cash at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Cash and restricted cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Net
cash used in operating activities was $0.2 million and $1.1 million during 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease of $0.9 million
in cash used during 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily attributable to a decrease in our net loss (after adjusting for noncash
items) of approximately $2.5 million partially offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses of approximately $0.1 million and a decrease
in accounts payable of approximately $1.5 million.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash
provided by investing activities was $0 and $0.02 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively. The cash provided by investing activities
in 2017 was due to cash acquired in the acquisition of Lewis & Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
During
2018, we received net proceeds of $0.5 million from the sales of our securities and convertible debentures, compared to $0.5 million
during 2017 in net proceeds from the sales of our securities in a private placement. We are actively seeking sources of financing
to fund our continued operations and research and development programs.
ITEM
7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We
are not required to provide the information as to selected financial data as we are considered a smaller reporting company.
ITEM
8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The
information required by this Item is included in our Financial Statements and Supplementary Data listed in Item 15(a)(1) of Part
IV of this Annual Report.
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM
9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, which consists only of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer (who is also our Principal
Executive Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2018. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018 were ineffective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Inherent
Limitations Over Internal Controls
The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that:
(i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the Company’s assets;
(ii)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with GAAP, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the
Company’s management and directors; and
(iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management,
which consists only of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer (who is also our Principal Executive Officer),
does not expect that the Company’s internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods are subject to the risk that those internal controls may
become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The
Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013). Based on the Company’s assessment, management
has concluded, that due to limited resources and limited number of employees, its internal control over financial reporting was
ineffective as of December 31, 2018 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. To mitigate the current limited resources and employees, we rely heavily on direct
management oversight of transactions, along with the use of legal and accounting professionals. As we grow, we expect to increase
the number of employees, which would enable us to implement adequate segregation of duties within the internal control framework.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2018, which were
identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange
Act that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding
internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit smaller reporting companies to provide
only the management’s report in this annual report.
ITEM
9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Significant Employees
The names of our directors and executive
officers and their ages, positions, and biographies as of July 26, 2019, are set forth below. Our executive officers are appointed
by, and serve at the discretion of the Board. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors are elected, except
in the case of death, resignation, or removal. On February 28, 2017, Russell Richerson, PhD, resigned as chief operating officer.
On February 12, 2018, Dr. Shazer resigned as chief medical officer. On February 9, 2018, Drs. Grebow and Buller resigned as members
of the Board. On June 30, 2019, John Montgomery resigned as a member of the Board. On July 15, 2019, Christopher Lowe resigned
as chief executive officer and as a member of the Board. On July 26, 2019, we appointed Michael Cain as our interim chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, president, and as a member of the Board.
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Position Since
|
Executive
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
Cain*
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Director
|
|
35
|
|
7/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott
V. Ogilvie
|
|
Director
|
|
64
|
|
03/2008
|
Claire
Thom, Pharm.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
63
|
|
10/2016
|
*
Effective, July 26, 2019, we appointed Michael Cain as interim chief executive officer, chief financial officer, president, and
as a member of the Board.
Michael Cain¸
serves
as our interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, and as a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Cain
has over 15 years of experience in technology and consulting fields. Mr. Cain has served as the President and as a Board member
of Level 4 Services, Inc, a private information technology company since 2013. In evaluating Mr. Cain’s specific experience,
qualifications, attributes and skills in connection with his appointment to our Board, we took into account his management experience
in other organizations and business development background.
Christopher Lowe
,
served
as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and a member of the Board of Directors until his resignation
in July 2019. Mr. Lowe has over 15 years of senior management experience as President, Chief Business Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of various private and public life sciences, medical technology and technology companies. Mr. Lowe has served as a partner
of FLG Partners, LLC, a CFO consulting, services and board advisory firm since January 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Lowe was an independent
consultant to life science companies. From February 2014 to until May 2014, Mr. Lowe served as interim Chief Executive Officer
of Hansen Medical, Inc. (Nasdaq - HNSN). Mr. Lowe also served as Chief Financial Officer of Hansen Medical from June 2014 until
its sale to Auris Surgical Robotics, Inc. in July 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Lowe served as Vice President, Administration and
Chief Financial Officer of Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq – ANTH), a drug development company, from November 2007
through June 2013, and additionally served as its Chief Business Officer from January 2011 until June 2013. Mr. Lowe served
as Vice President, Finance and Administration of Asthmatx, Inc., a medical device company, from September 2005 to December 2005
and as its Chief Financial Officer from January 2006 to November 2007. Mr. Lowe served as a member of the board of directors of
Hansen Medical, Inc. (HNSN) from September 2006 until its sale in July 2016. Mr. Lowe also has served as a member of the board
of directors of Pacific Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a private company from 2010 until 2014 and Career Closet, Inc., a non-profit private
corporation from 2009 until 2014. Mr. Lowe holds a B.S. from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo and
an M.B.A. from Saint Mary’s University, Texas. In evaluating Mr. Lowe’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes
and skills in connection with his appointment to our board, we took into account his prior work with both public and private organizations,
including his experience in building biopharmaceutical organizations, his strong business development background and his past experience
and relationships in life sciences companies.
Scott
V. Ogilvie
has served as a director on our board since February 2008. Mr. Ogilvie is currently the President of AFIN International,
Inc., a private equity/business advisory firm, which he founded in 2006. Prior to December 31, 2009, he was CEO of Gulf Enterprises
International, Ltd, a company that brings strategic partners, expertise and investment capital to the Middle East and North Africa.
He held this position since August 2006. Mr. Ogilvie previously served as Chief Operating Officer of CIC Group, Inc., an investment
manager, a position he held from 2001 to 2007. He began his career as a corporate and securities lawyer with Hill, Farrer &
Burrill, and has extensive public and private corporate management and board experience in finance, real estate, and technology
companies. Mr. Ogilvie currently serves on the board of directors of Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ: CUR) and Research Solutions, Inc.
(OTCQB: RSSS). Mr. Ogilvie also served on the board of directors of Preferred Voice Inc. (OTCQB: PRFV), Innovative Card Technologies,
Inc. (OTCBB: INVC) and National Healthcare Exchange, Inc. (OTCBB: NHXS). In evaluating Mr. Ogilvie’s specific experience,
qualifications, attributes and skills in connection with his appointment to our board, we took into account his prior work in
both public and private organizations regarding corporate finance, securities and compliance and international business development.
Claire
Thom, Pharm.D.
joined our board in October 2016. Dr. Thom has two decades of experience in the pharmaceutical
industry, with responsibilities including drug development, new product planning, and marketing. Most recently, from July
2013 until June 2016, Dr. Thom was the Senior Vice President Global Therapeutic Head for Oncology at Astellas Pharma (TOKYO: ALPMY).
At Astellas, she developed and supervised the implementation of the company’s oncology strategy. In addition, she was
appointed to serve on the Board of Directors for Agensys, a fully-owned subsidiary of Astellas. Prior to her roles at Astellas,
Dr. Thom served as Senior Vice President of Portfolio Management, Drug Development Management and Strategic Business Operations
at Millennium Pharmaceuticals, the Takeda Oncology Company, (TOKYO: TKPYY) from August 2008 until January 2013. Prior to her assignment
at Millennium, she held several positions of increasing responsibility at Takeda to become the company’s Oncology Franchise
Leader. Earlier, she worked at G.D. Searle and began her career as a clinical pharmacist. Ms. Thom was awarded a Doctor of Pharmacy
and a Bachelor of Pharmacy, both with honors, from the University of Illinois. In evaluating Dr. Thom’s specific experience,
qualifications, attributes and skills in connection with her appointment to our board, we took into account her knowledge of scientific
matters affecting our business and her understanding of our industry.
Family
Relationships
There
are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen by the registrant to become
a director or executive officer.
Diversity
of Board of Directors
We
do not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, but the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee strives to nominate Directors with a variety of complementary skills so that, as a group, the
board of directors will possess the appropriate talent, skills, and expertise to oversee our businesses.
Code
of Ethics
We
have adopted a “Code of Ethics” that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of our code is attached to this Annual Report
as Exhibit 14.01.
Independent
Directors
For
purposes of determining independence, the Company has adopted the definition of independence as contained in NASDAQ Market Place
Rule 5605(a)(2). Pursuant to the definition, the Company has determined that Dr. and Thom and Mr. Ogilvie qualify as independent.
Committees
The
board of directors has established three standing committees: (1) an Audit Committee, (2) a Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, and (3) a Leadership Development and Compensation Committee. Each of the committees operates under a written charter
adopted by the board of directors. A copy of each respective committee’s charter can be viewed as Exhibits 99.01, 99.02
and 99.03 to this Annual Report.
The table below identifies the Board’s standing committees and committee membership as of June 30,
2019:
Director
|
|
Independent
|
|
Audit Committee
|
|
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
|
Leadership
Development
and
Compensation
Committee
|
Scott
Ogilvie
|
|
Yes
|
|
Chair
|
|
Chair
|
|
—
|
Claire
Thom, Pharm.D.
|
|
Yes
|
|
Member
|
|
—
|
|
Chair
|
Each
member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is considered
independent under the NASDAQ Market Place Rules.
Audit
Committee
The
main function of our Audit Committee, which was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, is to
oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal systems of control, independent auditor relationships and the
audits of our financial statements. This committee’s responsibilities include:
|
●
|
Selecting
and hiring our independent auditors.
|
|
●
|
Evaluating
the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent auditors.
|
|
●
|
Approving
the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
the design, implementation, adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and our critical accounting policies.
|
|
●
|
Overseeing
and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they
relate to financial statements or accounting matters.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
with management any earnings announcements and other public announcements regarding our results of operations.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
regulatory filings with management and our auditors.
|
|
●
|
Preparing
any report the SEC requires for inclusion in our annual proxy statement.
|
|
●
|
The
Audit Committee will review and approve all related party transactions.
|
Our
Audit Committee is currently comprised of Scott V. Ogilvie and Claire Thom, each of whom is a non-employee member of our board
of directors. Our board of directors has determined that each of the directors serving on our Audit Committee is independent within
the meaning of the rules of the SEC and rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of NASDAQ. Additionally, our board has determined
that Scott V. Ogilvie is an audit committee financial expert as defined under the rules of the SEC. A copy of the charter is contained
in Exhibit 99.01 to this Annual Report
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
Our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s purpose is to assist our board of directors in identifying individuals qualified
to become members of our board of directors consistent with criteria set by our board of directors and to develop our corporate
governance principles. This committee’s responsibilities include:
|
●
|
Evaluating
the composition, size, organization and governance of our board of directors and its committees, determining future requirements,
and making recommendations regarding future planning, the appointment of directors to our committees and selection of chairs
of these committees.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and recommending to our board of directors, director independence determinations made with respect to continuing and prospective
directors.
|
|
●
|
Establishing
a policy for considering stockholder nominees for election to our board of directors.
|
|
●
|
Recommending
ways to enhance communications and relations with our stockholders.
|
|
●
|
Evaluating
and recommending candidates for election to our board of directors.
|
|
●
|
Overseeing
our board of directors’ performance and self-evaluation process and developing continuing education programs for our
directors.
|
|
●
|
Evaluating
and recommending to the board of directors termination of service of individual members of the board of directors as appropriate,
in accordance with governance principles, for cause or for other proper reasons.
|
|
●
|
Making
regular written reports to the board of directors.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and reexamining the committee’s charter and making recommendations to the board of directors regarding any proposed
changes.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
annually the committee’s own performance against responsibilities outlined in its charter and as otherwise established
by the board of directors.
|
Our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Scott V. Ogilvie, a non-employee member of our board of
directors. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Ogilvie is independent as defined in rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace
Rules of NASDAQ. The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is contained in Exhibit 99.03 of this Annual
Report
Leadership
Development and Compensation Committee
The
purpose of our Leadership Development and Compensation Committee is to oversee our compensation programs. The committee may form
and delegate authority to subcommittees or, with respect to compensation for employees and consultants who are not executive officers
for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, to our officers, in either instance as the committee determines appropriate. The
committee’s responsibilities include:
|
●
|
Reviewing
and approving our general compensation strategy.
|
|
●
|
Establishing
annual and long-term performance goals for our CEO and other executive officers.
|
|
●
|
Conducting
and reviewing with the board of directors an annual evaluation of the performance of the CEO and other executive officers.
|
|
●
|
Evaluating
the competitiveness of the compensation of the CEO and the other executive officers.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and making recommendations to the board of directors regarding the salary, bonuses, equity awards, perquisites and other compensation
and benefit plans for the CEO.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and approving all salaries, bonuses, equity awards, perquisites and other compensation and benefit plans for our other executive
officers.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and approving the terms of any offer letters, employment agreements, termination agreements or arrangements, change-in-control
agreements, indemnification agreements and other material agreements between the company and our executive officers.
|
|
●
|
Acting
as the administering committee for our stock and bonus plans and for any equity or cash compensation arrangements that we
may adopt from time to time.
|
|
●
|
Providing
oversight for our overall compensation plans and benefit programs, monitoring trends in executive and overall compensation
and making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to improvements to such plans and programs or the adoption
of new plans and programs.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and approving compensation programs as well as salaries, fees, bonuses and equity awards for non-employee members of the board
of directors.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
plans for the development, retention and succession of our executive officers.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
executive education and development programs.
|
|
●
|
Monitoring
total equity usage for compensation and establishing appropriate equity dilution levels.
|
|
●
|
Reporting
regularly to the board of directors on the committee’s activities.
|
|
●
|
Reviewing
and discussing with management the required annual compensation discussion and analysis disclosure, if any, regarding named
executive officer compensation and, based on this review and discussions, making a recommendation to include in our annual
public filings.
|
|
●
|
Preparing
and approving any required committee report to be included in our annual public filings.
|
|
●
|
Performing
a review, at least annually, of the performance of the committee and its members and reporting to the board of directors on
the results of this review.
|
|
●
|
Investigating
any matter brought to its attention, with full access to all our books, records, facilities and employees and obtaining advice,
reports or opinions from internal or external counsel and expert advisors in order to help it perform its responsibilities.
|
Our
Leadership Development and Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Claire Thom, who is a non-employee member of our board
of directors. Dr. Thom is an “outside” director as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the “Code”), and a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange
Act. Our board of directors has determined that Dr. Thom is independent as defined in rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules
of NASDAQ. A copy of the charter is contained in Exhibit 99.02 to this Annual Report.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership
with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders also are required by SEC rules to furnish the Company
with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based
solely upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, and on written representations from the reporting persons,
the Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company’s directors and officers were
timely met during 2018.
Name of Reporting Person
|
|
Type of Report and Number Filed Late
|
|
No. of Transactions
Reported Late
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
ITEM
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Summary
Compensation
The
following table provides disclosure concerning all compensation paid for services to us in all capacities for our fiscal years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 provided by (i) each person serving as our principal executive officer, or PEO, or acting in
a similar capacity during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018; (ii) our most highly compensated executive officers other than
our PEO who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2018 and whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 (collectively
with the PEO referred to as the “named executive officers” in this Executive Compensation section); and (iii) our
Principal Financial Officer .
Name
& Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Christopher
Lowe,
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
22,917
|
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,917
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer And Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald
Shazer, M.D.,
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
29,167
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,167
|
|
Chief
Medical And Senior Vice President
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell
Richerson, PhD
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
54,114
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
50,786
|
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
104,900
|
|
(1)
|
Of
Mr. Lowe’s salary listed, none was actually paid and $22,917 was accrued in 2018 but remains unpaid. Effective July 15, 2019, Mr. Lowe resigned as chief executive officer and as a member of the Board.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Of
Mr. Shazer’s salary listed, none was actually paid and $29,167 was accrued in 2018 but remains unpaid.
|
(3)
|
On
February 28, 2017, Dr. Richerson resigned as Chief Operating Officer. In connection with Dr. Richerson’s
release of claims and separation agreement, all of his 64,155 outstanding vested options become exercisable at any time during
their remaining term regardless of any termination provisions in the equity compensation plans and the exercise price of all
such options were reduced to $0.75 per share.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Of
Mr. Lowe’s salary listed, $91,667 was actually paid and $183,333 was accrued as of December 31, 2017 but remains unpaid.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Of
Dr. Shazer’s salary listed, $121,676 was actually paid and $228,324 was accrued as of December 31, 2017 but remains
unpaid.
|
Outstanding
Executive Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2018
The
following table sets forth information concerning stock options held on December 31, 2018, the last day of our 2018 fiscal year,
for each named executive officer.
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Unexercised
Options (#)
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher
Lowe,
|
|
|
64,940
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
8/3/2023
|
Chief
Executive Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald
Shazer, M.D.
|
|
|
32,470
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
8/9/2023
|
Chief
Medical Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
Vices President (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell
Richerson, Ph.D
|
|
|
9,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
1/2/2019
|
Chief
Operating Officer (3)
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
1/2/2019
|
|
|
|
11,438
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
3/25/2020
|
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
3/25/2020
|
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
1/7/2021
|
|
|
|
20,049
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
1/7/2021
|
|
|
|
76,726
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
8/28/2020
|
|
(1)
|
On
August 2, 2016, Mr. Lowe was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Lowe resigned his employment with the Company effective July 15, 2019.
|
|
(2)
|
On
August 8, 2016, Dr. Shazer was appointed Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President. On February 8, 2018, Dr. Shazer Resigned.
|
|
(3)
|
On
February 28, 2017, Dr. Richerson resigned as Chief Operating Officer.
|
Employment
Agreements and Change in Control
Christopher
Lowe
In
connection with Mr. Lowe’s employment, we entered into: (i) an employment agreement; (ii) a confidential information and
invention assignment agreement; and (iii) an indemnification agreement.
Employment
Agreement
We employed Christopher Lowe as our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to a written contract that until such time that either the Company or Mr.
Lowe terminates the agreement. Mr. Lowe resigned his employment with the Company effective July 15, 2019. Mr. Lowe received a base
salary of $316,250, of which we deducted $41,250 during the first year and pay such amount to a third party as a placement fee
for Mr. Lowe’s employment. As a result, Mr. Lowe received a net base salary of $275,000 for his first year of employment.
Mr. Lowe’s base salary may be adjusted on a periodic basis at the sole discretion of the board of directors pursuant to the
Company’s review of the compensation of other senior executives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the Company
receives $25,000,000 in proceeds from one or more series of transactions (“Funding Requirement”), Mr. Lowe’s
base salary will be adjusted to no less than the 50
th
percentile of base compensation for a similar executive at a comparable
Company as determined by the compensation committee in consultation with a nationally recognized compensation consultant. Commencing
the year after the Funding Requirement is achieved, Mr. Lowe will also be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus based on achievement
of certain performance goals with a target cash bonus being no less than the 50
th
percentile of compensation for a similar
executive at a comparable Company as determined by the compensation committee. Also, commencing one year after the date of his
employment, Mr. Lowe was be eligible to receive an annual market based stock option grant at the discretion of the board. In addition,
as an inducement to Mr. Lowe’s employment, we issued him an inducement option to purchase 72,156 shares of common stock,
of which, Mr. Lowe received 64,940 options and we issued the balance of 7,216 options, in the form of a warrant, to a third party
as a placement fee for Mr. Lowes employment. The Inducement Option has an exercise price of $4.35 per share, a term of seven (7)
years, and vests as follows: (i) 25% vests monthly over a one-year period commencing on the date employment began and (ii) 75%
vests upon time and milestones to be mutually agreed upon by Mr. Lowe and the board (or a committee thereof). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if the Company receives gross proceeds of $10,000,000 in the initial 12 month period from the date Mr. Lowe’s
employment began (“Qualifying Financing”) and the securities are sold in such Qualifying Financing at a price per share
less than the exercise price of Mr. Lowe’s inducement option, then the number of shares underlying such inducement option
will be increased by such number of shares as required to make such inducement option equal to the same percentage of ownership
of the Company that it represented immediately prior to such Qualifying Financing. In addition, pursuant Mr. Lowe’s employment
agreement, upon the Funding Requirement being met, Mr. Lowe will be eligible to earn a funding bonus. Such Funding Bonus will be
a one-time payment equal to two percent (2%) of the net funding received by the Company to be paid (i) 25% in cash and (ii) 75%
in equity securities (to be mutually agreed upon by Mr. Lowe and the Company).
In the event that Mr. Lowe was terminated
without Cause or Mr. Lowe resigns with Good Reason, as each term is defined in the employment agreement, Mr. Lowe was eligible
to receive: the payment of his accrued but unpaid base salary, any unpaid or unreimbursed expenses and any accrued but unused
vacation through the date of termination. In the event that the Company terminates Mr. Lowe’s employment without Cause or
Mr. Lowe resigns Good Reason, as each term is defined in the employment agreement, and the Funding Requirement has been met and
Mr. Lowe has been employed for at least six (6) months, he will be eligible to receive the continued payment of his base salary
for (i) 6 months following the termination date if termination occurs within 12 months of the date his employment began, (ii) 12
months following the termination date if termination occurs within between 12 and 24 months of the date his employment began, or
(iii) 18 months following the termination date if termination occurs after 24 months after the date his employment began. Further,
if within 12 months following a Sale Event (as defined in Inspyr Therapeutics Inducement Award Stock Plan) Mr. Lowe’s
employment is (a) terminated by the Company for any reason (other than as a result of his death or disability or a with Cause
termination) or (b) terminated by Mr. Lowe with Good Reason, then Mr. Lowe will be eligible to receive, in lieu of such severance
benefits: (i) 18 months of base salary, (ii) acceleration of the vesting of 100% of Mr. Lowe’s then outstanding unvested
equity awards and (iii) payment of a pro rata portion of Mr. Lowe’s target annual bonus for the year in which the termination
of employment occurs.
Confidential
Information and Invention Assignment Agreement
The
confidential information and invention assignment agreement requires Mr. Lowe to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s
intellectual property as well as the assignment of any inventions made by Mr. Lowe during his employment. The agreement also limits
Mr. Lowe’s ability to solicit certain employees, consultants, and other personnel of the Company for a period of 24 months
following the end of his employment.
Indemnification
Agreement
The
indemnification agreement provides for the indemnification and defense of Mr. Lowe, in the event of litigation, to the fullest
extent permitted by law.
The
foregoing summaries of Mr. Lowe’s: (i) employment agreement; (ii) confidential information and inventions assignment agreement;
and (iii) indemnification agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements which have
been filed with the SEC as exhibits to our public filings.
Ronald
Shazer, M.D.
Employment
Agreement
We
employed Ronald Shazer, M.D. as our Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President pursuant to a written contract until his
resignation in February 2018. Pursuant to the written contract, Dr. Shazer received a base salary of $350,000, which may be adjusted
on a periodic basis at the sole discretion of the board of directors pursuant to the Company’s review of the compensation
of other senior executives. Dr. Shazer was also eligible, upon the Company achieving the Funding Requirement, to receive an annual
bonus of up to 30% of his base salary, in cash or securities at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors, based
on the Company’s and Dr. Shazer’s performance. Also, commencing a year after the date his employment began, Dr. Shazer
was eligible to receive an annual market based stock option grant at the discretion of the Board. In addition, as an inducement
to Dr. Shazer’s employment, we issued him an inducement option to purchase 32,470 shares of Common Stock on August 9, 2016.
The Inducement Option has an exercise price of $4.50 per share, a term of seven (7) years, and vests as follows: (i) 25% vests
monthly over a one-year period commencing on the date employment began and (ii) 75% vests upon time and milestones to be mutually
agreed upon by Dr. Shazer and the board (or a committee thereof).
Confidential
Information and Invention Assignment Agreement
The
confidential information and invention assignment agreement required Dr. Shazer to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s
intellectual property as well as the assignment of any inventions made by Dr. Shazer during his employment. The agreement also
limits Dr. Shazer’s ability to solicit certain employees, consultants, and other personnel of the Company for a period of
24 months following the end of his employment.
Indemnification
Agreement
The
indemnification agreement provides for the indemnification and defense of Dr. Shazer, in the event of litigation, to the fullest
extent permitted by law.
The
foregoing summaries of Dr. Shazer’s: (i) employment agreement; (ii) confidential information and inventions assignment agreement;
and (iii) indemnification agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements which have
been filed with the SEC as exhibits to our public filings.
Russell
Richerson
In
connection with Dr. Richerson’s employment, we have entered into: (i) an employment agreement; (ii) a proprietary information,
inventions and competition agreement; and (iii) an indemnification agreement.
Employment
Agreement
Dr.
Richerson was employed by the Company until February 28, 2017 when he resigned as Chief Operating Officer. During his employment
as our Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Richerson had a written contract that automatically extended for successive one year terms
on September 2, of each year. Such base salary was reviewed yearly with regard to possible increase. In addition, Dr. Richerson
was eligible to receive annual discretionary and long term incentive bonuses as determined by the board. Dr. Richerson was also
entitled to receive certain payments and acceleration of outstanding equity awards in the event his employment is terminated.
In the event that Dr. Richerson was terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to eighteen
(18) months of salary continuation (payable in monthly installments), eighteen (18) months of continued medical insurance coverage
for Dr. Richerson and his family at a cost no less favorable than the premium co-pay charged to active employees, the acceleration
of outstanding equity awards and any accrued obligations. In the event that Dr. Richerson is terminated as a result of his disability,
he will be entitled to twelve (12) months of salary continuation plus any accrued obligations. Any termination payments that may
become due to Dr. Richerson were contingent upon his execution of a timely separation agreement in a form acceptable to us, which
shall include a release of claims against us and his resignation from the board, if applicable. On February 28, 2017, Dr. Richerson
entered into a release of claims and separation agreement with the Company whereby Dr. Richerson (i) received a warrant to purchase
76,726 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.75, with a term of three and a half (3.5) years and (ii) received a modification
to his outstanding options whereby all vested portions were made exercisable at any time during their remaining terms and all
exercises prices were reduced to $0.75 per share.
Proprietary
Information, Inventions and Competition Agreement
The
proprietary information, inventions and competition agreement requires Dr. Richerson to maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s
intellectual property as well as the assignment of any inventions made by Dr. Richerson during his employment. The agreement also
limits Dr. Richerson’s ability to compete within certain fields of interest, as defined in the agreement, for a period of
18 months following end of his employment.
Indemnification
Agreement
The
indemnification agreement provides for the indemnification and defense of Dr. Richerson, in the event of litigation, to the fullest
extent permitted by law.
The
foregoing summaries of Mr. Richerson’s: (i) employment agreement; (ii) proprietary information, inventions and competition
agreement; and (iii) indemnification agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements
which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to our public filings.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change- in-Control
On
February 28, 2017, Dr. Richerson provided us with his resignation as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and Dr. Richerson
and the Company entered into a separation agreement and release of claims.
The
following table sets forth the payments that would be made to Christopher Lowe if his employment in accordance with his employment
agreement had been terminated by us without cause or by the employee with good reason, or upon a sale event on December 31, 2018,
as applicable.
Name
|
|
Terminated
without
cause / Resign
for Good
Reason
|
|
|
Terminated, within 12 months
of a
Sale Event
|
|
Christopher Lowe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary (1)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(2)
|
Bonus (1)
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
(2)
|
Health (1)
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
(2)
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald Shazer, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(2)
|
Bonus (1)
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
(2)
|
Health
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
(2)
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
0
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
0
|
(2)
|
(1)
|
Severance Provisions are not applicable to employee’s employment agreement until such time as he
has been employed for at least 6 months and the Company has raised $25 million in gross proceeds from capital raising transactions.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Severance
Provisions pursuant to a termination within 12 months of a Sale Event occurring are not applicable as of December 31, 2018,
as no Sale Event has occurred prior to such date.
|
Equity
Compensation Plans
For
information related to our equity compensation plans for which our officers and directors are issued securities from, please see
Equity Compensation Plan Information
contained in Item 5 of this Annual Report.
Director
Compensation
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Peter
E. Grebow(1)
|
|
|
5,444
|
(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott
Ogilvie
|
|
|
54,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claire
Thom
|
|
|
49,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
Buller
(2)
|
|
|
5,333
|
(4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
Montgomery(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
|
On
February 9, 2018 Mr. Grebow resigned as a member of the Board.
On
February 9, 2018 Mr. Buller resigned as a member of the Board.
On
June 30, 2018, Mr. Montgomery resigned as a member of the Board.
|
|
|
(4)
|
No
director fees were paid in 2018. All fees have been accrued at December 31, 2018.
|
Amended
Outside Director Compensation Plan
On
October 12, 2016, the Company’s board of directors, upon the recommendation of the Leadership Development and Compensation
Committee, amended the Company’s non-executive Board compensation policy. The terms of the amended policy are as follows:
Inducement/First
Year Gran
t. Upon joining the Board, a director receives an option to purchase 2,500 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The option vests on the first year anniversary of the first day of the month after the director’s service on the Board begins,
provided the director has continuously provided services to the Company during that time.
Annual
Grant.
Subject to the shareholder’s rights to elect any individual director, starting on the first year anniversary
of service, and each subsequent anniversary thereafter, each eligible director will be granted options to purchase 1,667 shares
of common stock or restricted stock units of equivalent value. The annual grants vest quarterly during the grant year provided
the director has continuously provided services to the Company during that time.
Committee
and Committee Chairperson Grant.
Each director will receive options to purchase an additional 167 shares of common stock,
or restricted stock units of equivalent value, for each committee on which he or she serves. Chairpersons of each committee will
receive options to purchase an additional 167 shares of common stock, or restricted stock units of equivalent value. The
committee grants vest quarterly during the grant year provided the director has continuously provided services to the Company
during that time.
Special
Committee Grants.
From time to time, individual directors may be requested by the Board to provide extraordinary services. These
services may include such items as the negotiation of key contracts, assistance with scientific issues, or such other items as
the Board deems necessary and in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. In such instances, the board
shall have the flexibility to issue special committee grants. The amount of such grants and terms will vary based
on the tasks of the special committee.
Exercise
Price and Term.
All options issued pursuant to the non-executive director compensation policy will have an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of our common stock at close of market on the grant date and will have a term of five years.
All restricted stock unit and option grants and issuance of shares are subject to satisfaction of all applicable state and federal
securities laws. The determination with regard to whether awards will be made in options or restricted stock units will be at
the sole discretion of the director.
Cash
Compensation.
Each director will also receive cash compensation equal to: (i) an annual cash retainer of $40,000, and (ii)
quarterly payments of $1,000 per committee for non-chairperson committee members. In addition, committee chairpersons receive
an additional: (a) $10,000 for chairing the audit committee, (b) $5,000 for chairing the leadership development and compensation
committee, and (c) $5,000 for chairing the nomination and corporate governance committee.
Expenses
.
The Company will reimburse directors for all reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at meetings
of the Board, in accordance with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy as is in effect from time to time. Moreover,
certain directors will be reimbursed for expenses related to education or the attendance at industry conferences, including travel,
lodging and meals, up to a maximum of $10,000 per calendar year.
Indemnification
.
The Company shall indemnify all directors to the fullest extent permitted by law if the director was or is or becomes a party
to or witness or other participant in, or is threatened to be made a party to or witness or other participant in, any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute resolution mechanism, or any hearing, inquiry or investigation
that indemnitee in good faith believes might lead to the institution of any such action, suit, proceeding or alternative dispute
resolution mechanism, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or other as a result of their service on the Board
as provided for in the Company’s bylaws and standard indemnification agreement.
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
Information
regarding shares authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans approved and not approved by stockholders required by
this Item are incorporated by reference from Item 5 of this Annual Report from the section entitled “
Equity Compensation
Plan Information
”
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth, as of June
30, 2019, information regarding beneficial ownership of our capital stock by:
|
●
|
each
person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of any class of our voting securities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our current directors and nominees;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our current named executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
all
current directors and named executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC. Beneficial ownership means that a person has or shares voting or investment
power of a security and includes any securities that person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days after the measurement
date. This table is based on information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders. Except as otherwise indicated,
we believe that each of the beneficial owners of the common stock listed below, based on the information such beneficial owner
has given to us, has sole investment and voting power with respect to such beneficial owner’s shares, except where community
property laws may apply.
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
Underlying
Convertible
Securities (2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percent of
Class (2)
|
|
Directors and named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Lowe
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
64,940
|
|
|
|
64,940
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ronald Shazer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32,470
|
|
|
|
32,470
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Russell B. Richerson, PhD
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
121,003
|
|
|
|
121,003
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bo Jesper Hansen, MD, PhD
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Scott Ogilvie
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter E. Grebow, PhD
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Claire Thom
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard Buller
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
232,816
|
|
|
|
232,816
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
5% Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd. (3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,666,550
|
|
|
|
16,666,550
|
|
|
|
9.99
|
%
|
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,666,550
|
|
|
|
16,666,550
|
|
|
|
9.99
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Except
as otherwise indicated, the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common
stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and to the information contained
in the footnotes to this table. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of the beneficial owner is 31200 Via Colinas #200, Westlake
Village, CA 91362.
|
(2)
|
Pursuant
to Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a shareholder has sole
or shared voting power or investment power, and also any shares which the shareholder has the right to acquire within 60 days,
including upon exercise of common shares purchase options or warrants. There were 150,000,000 shares of common stock issued
and outstanding as of April 30, 2019.
|
(3)
|
89
Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman Ky1-9007, Cayman Islands. Does not include 352,994,879 shares underlying warrants and
debentures convertible into common stock securities subject to exercise conditions based on percentage ownership limitations.
|
(4)
|
89
Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman Ky1-9007, Cayman Islands. Does not include 238,065,882 shares underlying warrants and
debentures convertible into common stock securities subject to exercise conditions based on percentage ownership limitations.
|
ITEM
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Information
regarding disclosure of an employment relationship or transaction involving an executive officer and any related compensation
solely resulting from that employment relationship or transaction is incorporated by reference from the section of this annual
report entitled “
Executive Compensation
.”
Information
regarding disclosure of compensation to a director is incorporated by reference from the section of this annual report entitled
“
Director Compensation
.”
Related
Party Transactions
|
●
|
We
have entered into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements
and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest
extent permitted by Delaware law. The indemnification agreements are substantially similar to those entered into with our
executive officers and as a more fully described in the section of this annual report entitled “Employment Agreements
and Change in Control.”
|
|
●
|
On
February 28, 2017, we issued Dr. Richerson, our former chief operating officer, a warrant
to purchase 76,726 shares of Common Stock in connection with his release of claims and
separation agreement. The warrant has an exercise price of $0.75 per share and a term
of three and a half (3.5) years.
On
February 28, 2017, in connection with Dr. Richerson’s release of claims and separation agreement, we also agreed
to make any vested portion of Dr. Richerson’s outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 64,155 shares of Common
Stock, exercisable at any time during their remaining term regardless of any termination provisions contained in the equity
compensation plans to which such awards were made as well as reduce the exercise price of such options to $0.75 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
March 3, 2017, we granted Scott V. Ogilvie, one of our outside directors, options to purchase 2,335 shares of common stock. The
options were granted pursuant to our amended director compensation plan as compensation for Mr. Ogilvie’s service on
our board and related committees. The options have an exercise price of $0.54 per share. The options
vest quarterly over the grant year.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
May 23, 2017, we granted Peter Grebow, one of our outside directors, options to purchase 2,335 shares of common stock. The
options were granted pursuant to our amended director compensation plan as compensation for Dr. Grebow’s service on
our board and related committees. The options have an exercise price of $0.41 per share. The options vest quarterly
over the grant year.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
July 31, 2017, we granted John Montgomery one of our outside directors, options to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock.
The options were granted pursuant to our amended director compensation plan as compensation for Mr. Montgomery joining the
board. The options have an exercise price of $0.348 per share. The options vest quarterly over the grant year.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
July 31, 2017, pursuant to our acquisition of 100% of the capital stock of Lewis & Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Montgomery
was granted 236,163 shares of common stock in exchange for his ownership in Lewis and Clark Pharmaceuticals. The
shares issued to Mr. Montgomery had an aggregate value of $82,657.05 on the date of issuance based on the closing price of
our common stock on July 31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
August 14, 2017, we granted Bo Jesper Hansen, one of our outside directors, options to purchase 1,667 shares of common stock.
The options were granted pursuant to our amended director compensation plan as compensation for Dr. Hansen’s service
on our board and related committees. The options have an exercise price of $0.35 per share. The options vest quarterly
over the grant year.
|
|
●
|
On
September 12, 2017, (i) we entered into an exchange agreement whereby we issued $2,504,812.50 in senior convertible debentures
in exchange for 1,614.8125 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 890 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
and (ii) we entered into securities purchase agreements to sell an aggregate of $320,000 of convertible debentures in cash and
the cancellation of obligations of the Company. Of these amounts, Sabby Healthcare Master Fund and Sabby Volatility Warrant Master
Fund, previously greater than 5% beneficial owner of our securities, exchanged an aggregate of $2,464,812.50 in stated value of
preferred shares for convertible debentures and purchased $250,000 in convertible debentures. Sabby has waived a default under
these debentures.
|
|
●
|
On July 3, 2018, we sold an aggregate
of $515,000 of senior convertible debentures to Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund and Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, previously
greater than 5% beneficial owners of our securities. Sabby has waived a default under these debentures.
|
ITEM
14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The
following table summarizes the approximate aggregate fees billed to us or expected to be billed to us by our independent auditors
for our 2018 and 2017 fiscal years:
Type of Fees
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
62,500
|
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
53,500
|
|
|
$
|
67,000
|
|
Pre-Approval
of Independent Auditor Services and Fees
Our
board of directors reviewed and pre-approved all audit and non-audit fees for services provided by independent registered accounting
firm and has determined that the provision of such services to us during fiscal 2018 is compatible with and did not impair independence.
It is the practice of the audit committee to consider and approve in advance all auditing and non-auditing services provided to
us by our independent auditors in accordance with the applicable requirements of the SEC. The firm we engaged during 2018 provided
no other services, other than those listed above.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1 – BACKGROUND
Inspyr
Therapeutics, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our company”, “our”, “Inspyr” or
the “Company”) was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware in November 2003, and has its principal office in
Westlake Village, California. We are an early-stage, pre-revenue, pharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development
of prodrug cancer therapeutics for the treatment of solid tumors, including brain, liver, prostate and other cancers. We plan
to develop a series of therapies based on our target-activated prodrug technology platform.
We
are a clinical-stage, pre-revenue, pharmaceutical company primarily focused on the development of therapeutics for the treatment
of diseases. Through our acquisition of Lewis and Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., we currently are focusing on a pipeline of small
molecule adenosine receptor modulators.
The
adenosine receptor modulators include A
2B
antagonists, dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, and A
2A
agonists that have broad development applicability including indications within immuno-oncology and inflammation. Adenosine
is implicated in immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Adenosine receptor antagonists may boost the host immune response
against the tumor as a single-agent and in combination with other existing immuno-oncology agents leading to enhanced tumor killing
and inhibition of metastasis. Adenosine also has anti-inflammatory properties in the acute and chronic setting. Adenosine receptor
agonists may promote a decreased inflammatory response and can potentially treat a broad range of inflammatory and autoimmune
based diseases and conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, joint injury, Crohn’s disease, psoriasis) as well as improve
wound healing and decrease pain.
During
February 2018, due to a lack of capital, we curtailed our business operations. In the event that we are able to raise sufficient
capital, our major focus would be to: (i) further characterization, in conjunction with Ridgeway Therapeutics, of anti-cancer
activity of the current pipeline of A
2B
antagonists and dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists leading to selection
of a clinical candidate for an Investigative New Drug or IND enabling studies, (ii) further characterization of the current pipeline
of A
2A
agonists leading to selection of a clinical candidate for an Investigative New Drug or IND enabling studies;
(iii) licensing and/or partnering the A
2B
antagonists, dual A
2A
/A
2B
antagonists, and/or A
2A
agonists for further development, (iv) through our newly acquired adenosine receptor chemistry technology platform, continue
to produce next generation adenosine receptor modulators, (v) pursue licensing and/or partnering of mipsagargin, (vi) conduct
a clinical study of mipsagargin in patients with advanced HCC, and (vii) explore collaborations utilizing mipsagargin in new,
non-clinical solid tumor models with leading researchers in the oncology field.
Our
ability to execute our business plan is dependent on the amount and timing of cash, if any, that we are able to raise. During
February of 2018, we curtailed our operations due to our lack of cash. During July 2018, we were able to raise approximately $500,000
through the sale of debt securities and we raised $25,000 in December 2018 through the sale of notes. We are currently using such
funds to attempt to become current in our SEC reporting requirements, pay outstanding invoices to our independent registered accounting
firm, and other outstanding obligations, the payment of which we believe to be vital to our future operations. Should we fail
to further raise sufficient funds to execute our business plan, our priority would be to maintain our intellectual property portfolio
and continue, to the best of our ability, our public company reporting requirements.
NOTE
2 – MANAGEMENT’S PLANS TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN
Basis
of Presentation
The
opinion of our independent registered accounting firm on our financial statements contains explanatory going concern language.
We have prepared our financial statements on the basis that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization
of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred losses since inception and have an
accumulated deficit of $60 million as of December 31, 2018. We anticipate incurring additional losses for the foreseeable future
until such time, if ever, that we can generate significant sales from our therapeutic product candidates which are currently in
development or we enter into cash flow positive business development transactions.
To
date, we have generated no sales or revenues, have incurred significant losses and expect to incur significant additional losses
as we advance mipsagargin through clinical studies. Consequently, our operations are subject to all the risks inherent in the
establishment of a pre-revenue business enterprise as well as those risks associated with a company engaged in the research and
development of pharmaceutical compounds.
Our
cash and restricted cash balances at December 31, 2018 was approximately $331,000, representing 90.4% of our total assets. Based
on our current expected level of operating expenditures, we expect to be able to fund our operations into the third quarter of
2019. We curtailed operations in February 2018. We will require additional cash to fund and continue our operations beyond that
point. This period could be shortened if there are any unanticipated increases in planned spending on development programs or
other unforeseen events. We anticipate raising additional funds through collaborative arrangements, licensing agreements, public
or private sales of debt or equity securities, or some combination thereof. There is no assurance that any such arrangement will
be entered into or that financing will be available when needed in order to allow us to continue our operations, or if available,
on terms favorable or acceptable to us. We raised approximately $500,000 in July 2018 and $25,000 in December 2018, which we expect
will enable us to bring our required annual and quarterly filings current, which will enable us to seek additional financing.
In
the event additional financing is not obtained, we may pursue cost cutting measures as well as explore the sale of selected assets
to generate additional funds. If we are required to significantly reduce operating expenses and delay, reduce the scope of, or
eliminate any of our development programs or clinical trials, these events could have a material adverse effect on: our business,
results of operations, and financial condition. These factors raise significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
Our
auditors’ report issued in connection with our December 31, 2018 financial statements expressed an opinion that our capital
resources as of the date of their audit report were not sufficient to sustain operations or complete our planned activities for
the upcoming year unless we raised additional funds. Accordingly, our current cash level raises substantial doubt about our ability
to continue as a going concern past the third quarter of 2019. If we do not obtain additional funds by such time, we may no longer
be able to continue as a going concern and will cease operation which means that our shareholders will lose their entire investment.
NOTE
3 – SUMMARY OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND USE OF ESTIMATES
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Significant estimates
include the fair value of derivative instruments, stock-based compensation, recognition of clinical trial costs and other accrued
liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of expenditures
for toxicology and other studies, manufacturing, clinical trials, compensation and consulting costs.
We
incurred research and development expenses of $0.2 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Cash
Equivalents
For
purposes of the statements of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity date of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed applicable government
mandate insurance limits. We have not experienced any losses in our accounts. We did not have any cash equivalents at December
31, 2018 or 2017.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted
cash consists of funds held in trust for the Company. The use of these funds is restricted to: (i) the payment of professional
fees in connection with bringing the Company’s filings current, and (ii) the payment of vendors associated with the issuance
and trading of the Company’s securities, such as transfer agent fees and fees payable to the OTCQB and FINRA.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash
and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such
investments may exceed applicable government mandated insurance limits. Cash and restricted cash was $0.3 million and $0.01 million
at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there was no cash over the federally insured limit.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets consist of licensed technology, patents, and patent applications (see Note 5). The assets associated with licensed technology
are recorded at cost and are being amortized on the straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of twelve to seventeen
years.
Office
and Lab Equipment
Equipment
is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on the straight line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets of three to seven years. Expenditures for repair and maintenance which do not materially extend the useful
lives of property and equipment are charged to expense. When property or equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost
and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts with the resulting gain or loss reflected in operations.
Management periodically reviews the carrying value of its equipment for impairment.
Due
to the suspension of business activity in February 2018, the Company determined that the office and lab equipment acquired pursuant
to the Lewis & Clark, Pharmaceuticals, Inc. acquisition had become fully impaired as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, we
recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Depreciation
expense was approximately $2,000 and $23,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Loss
per Share
Basic
loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss and net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Basic and diluted loss per share are the same, in that any potential common stock
equivalents would have the effect of being anti-dilutive in the computation of net loss per share.
The
following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computations of weighted average shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, as they would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Shares underlying options outstanding
|
|
|
323,514
|
|
|
|
356,280
|
|
Shares underlying warrants outstanding
|
|
|
2,512,930
|
|
|
|
3,045,740
|
|
Shares underlying convertible notes outstanding
|
|
|
828,337,812
|
|
|
|
135,122,128
|
|
Shares underlying convertible preferred stock outstanding
|
|
|
26,395,624
|
|
|
|
18,324,050
|
|
|
|
|
857,569,880
|
|
|
|
156,848,198
|
|
Derivative
Liability
The
Company has financial instruments that are considered derivatives or contain embedded features subject to derivative accounting.
Embedded derivatives are valued separately from the host instrument and are recognized as derivative liabilities in the Company’s
balance sheet. The Company measures these instruments at their estimated fair value and recognizes changes in their estimated
fair value in results of operations during the period of change. The Company values its derivative liabilities using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. The resulting liability is valued at each reporting date and the change in the liability is reflected
as change in derivative liability in the statement of operations.
Goodwill
Our
goodwill consists of the excess purchase price paid in business combinations over the fair value of assets acquired. Goodwill
is considered to have an indefinite life.
The
Company has decided to perform its annual goodwill and impairment assessment on December 31st of each year. The Company employs
the non-amortization approach to account for goodwill. Under the non-amortization approach, goodwill is not amortized into the
results of operations, but instead is reviewed annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the asset might be impaired, to assess whether the fair value exceeds the carrying value.
When
evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill, we first assess a range of qualitative factors, including but not limited to,
macroeconomic conditions, industry conditions, the competitive environment, changes in the market for the Company’s products and
services, regulatory and political developments, entity specific factors such as strategy and changes in key personnel, and the
overall financial performance for each of the Company’s reporting units. If, after completing this assessment, it is determined
that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we then proceed to a
two-step impairment testing methodology using the income approach (discounted cash flow method).
In
the first step of the two-step testing methodology, we compare the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, with
its fair value, as determined by its estimated discounted cash flows. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair
value, we then complete the second step of the impairment test to determine the amount of impairment to be recognized. In the
second step, we estimate an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting
unit to 100% of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). If the carrying
value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the difference
in that period.
When
required, we arrive at our estimates of fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology which includes estimates of future
cash flows to be generated by specifically identified assets, as well as selecting a discount rate to measure the present value
of those anticipated cash flows. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and includes making assumptions about
projected growth rates, industry-specific factors, working capital requirements, weighted average cost of capital, and current
and anticipated operating conditions. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows could produce different
results.
Due
to the suspension of business activity in February 2018, the Company determined that the goodwill assigned to the Lewis &
Clark, Pharmaceuticals, Inc. acquisition had become fully impaired as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of $2.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Our
short-term financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and other liabilities, consist primarily of instruments with
maturities of three months or less when acquired. We believe that the fair values of our current assets and current liabilities
approximate their reported carrying amounts.
The
derivative liability consists of our convertible notes with a variable conversion feature. The Company uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to value its derivative liability which incorporate the Company’s stock price, volatility, U.S. risk-free
interest rate, dividend rate, and estimated life.
Fair
Value Measurements
The
U.S. GAAP Valuation Hierarchy establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair
value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration,
for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions
used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy
is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The
Company has recorded a derivative liability for its convertible notes with a variable conversion feature as of December 31, 2018.
The tables below summarize the fair values of our financial liabilities as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value at
December 31,
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
2,134
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,134
|
|
The
reconciliation of the derivative liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,934
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Additions to derivative instruments
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
Reclassification on conversion
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,134
|
|
|
$
|
2,934
|
|
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations
in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion
or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities during the period in which the related temporary difference
becomes deductible.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We
measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant-date fair value of the awards.
All awards under our stock-based compensation programs are accounted for at fair value and that cost is recognized over the period
during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period).
Compensation
expense for options granted to non-employees is determined in accordance with the fair value of the consideration received or
the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is a more reliable measurement. Compensation expense for awards granted
to non-employees is re-measured on each accounting period.
Determining
the appropriate fair value of stock-based compensation requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected life
of the stock-based compensation and the volatility of our stock price. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value
our stock option awards which incorporates our stock price, volatility, U.S. risk-free interest rate, dividend rate, and estimated
life.
Effect
of ASU No. 2017-11 on Previously Issued Financial Statements
In
July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260),
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Part 1 – Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Down Round Features and Part 2 – Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable
Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with Scope Exception
(“ASU No. 2017-11”). Part 1 of ASU No. 2017-11 addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments
with down round features. Down round features are provisions in certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that
result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates
cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round
features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of ASU No. 2017-11 addresses
the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending
content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting
requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable
noncontrolling interests. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this update are effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company has early adopted the guidance under
ASU 2017-11 for the year end December 31, 2017.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
With
the exception of those discussed below, there have not been any recent changes in accounting pronouncements and Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) during the year ended December 31, 2018 that are of significance
or potential significance to the Company.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU)
model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer
than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense
recognition in the income statement.
The
new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered
into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients
available. The Company does not expect any impact from the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
(“ASU No. 2017-04”). ASU No. 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from
the goodwill impairment test. A public business entity that is a SEC filer should adopt the amendments of ASU No. 2017-04 for
its annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted
for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect
any impact from the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In
May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”,
which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under
the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of
the award changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. If an award is not probable of vesting at the time a change
is made, the new guidance clarifies that no new measurement date will be required if there is no change to the fair value, vesting
conditions, and classification. This ASU will be applied prospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
4 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
The
following table contains additional information for the periods reported (in thousands).
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Non-cash financial activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued on conversion of notes payable and derivative liability
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
Debentures converted to common stock
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Derivative liability extinguished upon conversion of notes payable
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Derivative liability issued
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
Net assets and liabilities recognized with the acquisition of Lewis and Clark Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
Accounts payable paid through issuance of debentures
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Debentures issued to retire preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
Preferred stock and warrants issued for fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
There
was no cash paid for interest and income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
NOTE
5 – INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We
solely own or have exclusive licenses to all of our patents and patent applications. Between 2008 and 2011, we entered into license
and assignment agreements with Johns Hopkins University (JHU), the University of Copenhagen (UC) and certain co-inventors (Assignee
Co-Founders), in which we paid $212,000 in cash and common stock. As a result of these payments and pursuant to the agreements,
we acquired worldwide, exclusive, fully paid up rights in know-how, pre-clinical data, development data and certain patent portfolios
that relate to, and form the basis of, our technology. Under these agreements, we are not required to make any other future payments,
including fees or other reimbursements, milestones, or royalties, to JHU, UC, or the Assignee Co-Founders.
Amortization
expense recorded during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was approximately $17,000 for both years. Amortization expense
is estimated to be approximately $17,000 for each one of the next two fiscal years.
NOTE
6 – ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
1,326
|
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
Accrued research and development
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,814
|
|
|
$
|
1,539
|
|
NOTE
7 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
We
account for equity-linked financial instruments, such as our convertible preferred stock, convertible debentures and our common
stock warrants as either equity instruments or derivative liabilities depending on the specific terms of the respective agreement.
Equity-linked financial instruments are accounted for as derivative liabilities, in accordance with ASC Topic 815 – Derivatives
and Hedging, if the instrument allows for cash settlement or issuance of a variable number of shares. We classify derivative liabilities
on the balance sheet at fair value, and changes in fair value during the periods presented in the statement of operations, which
is revalued at each balance sheet date subsequent to the initial issuance of the stock warrant.
In
September 2017, July 2018 and December 2018, we issued convertible debentures and notes which contain a variable conversion feature,
anti-dilution protection and other conversion price adjustment provisions. As a result, the Company assessed its outstanding equity-linked
financial instruments and concluded that the convertible notes are subject to derivative accounting. The fair value of the conversion
feature is classified as a liability in the financial statements, with the change in fair value during the periods presented recorded
in the statement of operations.
During
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recorded a gain of approximately $1.1 million and a loss of approximately $0.1
million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities during the periods. For purpose of determining
the fair market value of the derivative liability, the Company used Black Scholes option valuation model. The significant assumptions
used in the Black Scholes valuations of the derivatives at December 31, 2018 are as follows:
|
|
2018
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
204
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
8 months
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
As
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the derivative liability recognized in the financial statements was approximately $2.1 million
and $2.9 million, respectively.
NOTE
8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating
Leases
Inspyr
currently does not have any ongoing leases for office space. It has availability to office space on an as needed basis. Its employees
work on a remote basis.
Rent
expense for office space amounted to approximately $0 and $52,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Employment
Agreements
We
employ our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to a written employment agreement. The employment agreement contains severance provisions
and indemnification clauses. The indemnification agreement provides for the indemnification and defense of the executive officer,
in the event of litigation, to the fullest extent permitted by law.
On
February 28, 2017, Russell Richerson, PhD, resigned as chief operating officer of the Company, effective immediately. Dr. Richerson
entered into a separation release of claims agreement (“Separation Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company: (i)
issued Dr. Richerson a warrant to purchase 76,726 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share and a term
of three and a half (3.5) years, (ii) agreed to make the vested portion of any options held by Dr. Richerson, exercisable at any
time during their remaining term regardless of any termination provisions contained in the applicable equity compensation plans
pursuant to which such awards were made (collectively, the “Awards”) and (iii) agreed to reduce the exercise prices
of such Awards to $0.75 per share for the duration of their respective terms. In consideration of the foregoing, Dr. Richerson
agreed to release the Company from any and all claims, including any rights or obligations as contained in his prior employment
agreement, as amended.
Severance
provisions are not applicable to any other executive officer employment agreements until such time as they have each been employed
for at least 6 months and the Company has raised $25 million in gross proceeds from capital raising transactions. Severance provisions
pursuant to a termination within 12 months of a Sale Event occurring are not applicable as of December 31, 2018, as no Sale Event
has occurred prior to such date.
Legal
Matters
On
March 16, 2016, Dr. Craig Dionne provided us his notice of termination as the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer. Dr. Dionne’s notice of termination states that such termination was for “Good Reason” as
a result of a material change in his authority, functions, duties and responsibilities as chief executive officer. In the event
that termination was for “Good Reason”, Dr. Dionne would be entitled to certain severance payments as well as other
benefits. The notice of termination, in additional to requesting such severance, also requests the payment of Dr. Dionne’s
annual and long term bonus for 2014 and 2015. While the Company disputes that the termination was for “Good Reason,”
as well as the amount of the bonuses due Dr. Dionne, if any, at this time the Company is unable to predict the financial outcome
of this matter, and any views formed as to the viability of these claims or the financial liability which could result may change
from time to time as the matter proceeds through its course. The Company is uncertain whether any litigation may result from the
foregoing and the outcome of any such litigation is uncertain.
The
Company is subject at times to other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although
occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters should
not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
NOTE
9 – CAPITAL STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred
Stock
During
December 2018, we designated 5,000 shares of preferred stock as Series D 0% Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred
Stock”). Each share of Preferred Stock shall have a par value of $0.0001 per share and a stated value equal to $1.00 (the
“Stated Value”).
With
respect to a vote of stockholders to approve a reverse split of the Common Stock to occur no later than December 31, 2019, only,
each share of Series D Preferred Stock held by a Holder, as such, shall be entitled to the whole number of votes equal to 30,001
shares of Common Stock. On any matter presented to the stockholders of the Corporation for their action or consideration at any
meeting of stockholders of the Corporation (or by written consent of stockholders in lieu of meeting), each holder of outstanding
shares of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into
which the shares of Preferred Stock held by such holder are convertible as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled
to vote on such matter. Except as provided by law or by the other provisions of the certificate of incorporation, holders of the
Preferred Stock shall vote together with the holders of Common Stock as a single class.
Each
share of Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at any time and from time to time from and after the Original Issue Date at the
option of the Holder thereof, into that number of shares of Common Stock (subject to the limitations set forth in Section 6(d))
determined by dividing the Stated Value of such share of Preferred Stock by the Conversion Price. The Conversion Price is $0.005
per share.
In
December 2015, we issued 1,853 shares of our Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock, with a stated value of $1,000 per share
and the common shares are issuable pursuant to conversion of the preferred stock at a conversion price of $4.50 per share, subject
to a 9.99% beneficial ownership limitation and subject to adjustment pursuant to stock splits and dividends, and subject to adjustment
pursuant to anti-dilution protection for subsequent equity sales for a period of 18 months from the effective date of the registration
statement.
In
December 2016, we issued 1,000 shares of our Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock, with a stated value of $1,000 per share
and the common shares are issuable pursuant to conversion of the preferred stock at a conversion price of $0.75 per share, subject
to beneficial ownership limitations and subject to adjustment pursuant to stock splits and dividends, and subject to adjustment
pursuant to anti-dilution protection for subsequent equity sales and other conversion price adjustments.
In March and April, 2017, we sold 290.43148
shares of Series C 0% Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series C Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 and is immediately
convertible into 387,251 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations, at a
conversion price equal to $0.75, subject to adjustment. The Conversion Price is subject to certain reset adjustments including
the date of any future amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with respect to a reverse stock split. The
Series C Preferred Stock has anti-dilution protection until such the twelve (12) month anniversary of the issuance of the Series
C Preferred Stock.
On
September 12, 2017 we entered into an exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) with certain holders (the “Investors”)
of our Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Shares”) and Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series
B Shares”). Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, we issued to the investors approximately $2.5 million in principal
amount of senior convertible debentures in exchange for 1,614.8125 Series A Shares with a stated value of approximately $1.6 million
and 890 Series B Shares with a stated value of approximately $0.9 million (collectively, the “Exchange”). In connection
with the Exchange, such Series A Shares and Series B Shares have been cancelled and terminated.
During
2017, 79.5 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 39 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted into a total of 223,585
shares of common stock.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there
were outstanding 133.81245 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, 71 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and 290.43148 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock.
As a result of recent equity financings
and conversions of debentures, the conversion prices of our Series A Preferred Stock has been reduced to $0.53 per share at December
31, 2018, the conversion price of 200 shares of our Series C preferred stock has been reduced to $0.02 per share at December 31,
2018, and our Series B Preferred Stock and 90.43418 shares of our Series C preferred stock has been reduced to $0.01 per share
at December 31, 2018.
Equity
Financings
March
2017 Offering
In
March, 2017, we sold $200,000 of the Company’s securities consisting of 200 shares of Series C 0% Convertible Preferred
Stock and an aggregate of 800,019 common stock purchase warrants as described below. The Series C Preferred Stock has a stated
value of $1,000 and is immediately convertible into 266,673 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain beneficial
ownership limitations, at a conversion price equal to $0.75, subject to adjustment. The Conversion Price is subject to certain
reset adjustments including the date of any future amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with respect
to a reverse stock split. The Series C Preferred Stock has anti-dilution protection until the twelve month anniversary of the
issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock.
The
Investors also received an aggregate of approximately: (i) 266,673 Series M common stock purchase warrants (“Series M Warrants”),
(ii) 266,673 Series N common stock purchase warrants (“Series N Warrants”) and (iii) 266,673 Series O common stock
purchase warrants (“Series O Warrants”) (collectively, the “Warrants”). The Series M Warrants have an
exercise price of $0.90 per share, subject to adjustment, and a term of five (5) years from the date of issuance, the Series N
Warrants have an exercise price of $0.75 per share, subject to adjustment, and a term of six (6) months from the date of issuance
and the Series O warrants have an exercise price of $0.75, subject to adjustment, and a term of twelve (12) months from the date
of issuance. The Warrants are immediately exercisable and separately transferable from the Series C Preferred Stock. In the event
that the shares underlying the Warrants are not subject to a registration statement at the time of exercise, the Warrants may
be exercised on a cashless basis after 6 months from the issuance date. The Warrants also contain provisions providing for an
adjustment in the underlying number of shares and exercise price in the event of stock splits or dividends and fundamental transactions.
Additionally, the Warrants contain anti-dilution protection until the twelve (12) month anniversary of the issuance date.
April
2017 Offering
In April, 2017, we sold $90,431 of the
Company’s securities consisting of 90.43148 shares of Series C 0% Convertible Preferred Stock and an aggregate of 361,734
common stock purchase warrants as described below. The Series C Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 and is immediately
convertible into 120,578 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations, at a
conversion price equal to $0.75, subject to adjustment. The Conversion Price is subject to certain reset adjustments including
the date of any future amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation with respect to a reverse stock split. The
Series C Preferred Stock has anti-dilution protection until the twelve month anniversary of the issuance of the Series C Preferred
Stock.
The
Investors also received an aggregate of approximately: (i) 120,578 Series M common stock purchase warrants (“Series M Warrants”),
(ii) 120,578 Series N common stock purchase warrants (“Series N Warrants”) and (iii) 120,578 Series O common stock
purchase warrants (“Series O Warrants”) (collectively, the “Warrants”). The Series M Warrants have an
exercise price of $0.90 per share, subject to adjustment, and a term of five (5) years from the date of issuance, the Series N
Warrants have an exercise price of $0.75 per share, subject to adjustment, and a term of six (6) months from the date of issuance
and the Series O warrants have an exercise price of $0.75, subject to adjustment, and a term of twelve (12) months from the date
of issuance. The Warrants are immediately exercisable and separately transferable from the Series C Preferred Stock. In the event
that the shares underlying the Warrants are not subject to a registration statement at the time of exercise, the Warrants may
be exercised on a cashless basis after 6 months from the issuance date. The Warrants also contain provisions providing for an
adjustment in the underlying number of shares and exercise price in the event of stock splits or dividends and fundamental transactions.
Additionally, the Warrants contain anti-dilution protection until the twelve (12) month anniversary of the issuance date.
Conversion
and exercise price resets
As a result
of recent equity financings and conversions of debentures, the conversion prices of our Series A Preferred Stock has been reduced
to $0.53 per share at December 31, 2018, the conversion price of 200 shares of our Series C preferred stock has been reduced to
$0.02 per share at December 31, 2018, and our Series B Preferred Stock and 90.43148 shares of our Series C preferred stock has
been reduced to $0.01 per share at December 31, 2018. The exercise prices of the warrants issued in conjunction with the Series
B and Series C preferred stock have also been reduced to $0.02 and $0.01 per share, respectively, at December 31, 2018.
As a result
of the reductions of the conversion prices of our preferred stock and warrants, we have recorded deemed dividends of approximately
$196,000 and $2,204,000 during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Common
Stock
During
the year ended December 31, 2018, we issued a total of 73,675,000 shares of common stock, valued at $503,308, upon the conversion
of $361,255 principal amount of our convertible debentures.
During
2017, we issued a total of 223,585 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 79.5 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 39
shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
During
2017, we issued a total of 2,144,340 shares of common stock, valued at $155,153, upon the conversion of $122,370 principal amount
of our convertible debentures.
Effective
July 31, 2017 we issued 7,122,172 shares of common stock to acquire 100% of the capital stock of Lewis & Clark, Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., a Virginia Corporation, pursuant to the terms of a share exchange agreement dated July 31, 2017.
NOTE
10 – STOCK OPTIONS
Deferred
Compensation Plan
In
July of 2011, we adopted Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the Deferred Plan). The Deferred Plan is intended to comply with
the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Deferred Plan is intended
to be an unfunded “top hat” plan which is maintained primarily to provide deferred compensation benefits for a select
group of our “management or highly compensated employees” within the meaning of Sections 201, 301, and 401 of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and to therefore be exempt from the provisions of Parts 2,
3, and 4 of Title I of ERISA. The Deferred Plan is intended to help build a supplemental source of savings and retirement income
through pre-tax deferrals of eligible compensation, which may include cash, option and stock bonus awards, discretionary cash,
option and stock awards and/or any other payments which may be designated by the Deferred Plan administrator, as eligible, for
deferral under the Deferred Plan from time to time. As administered, the Deferred Plan is used to defer compensation of stock
awards granted under our other equity compensation plans and does not by its terms approve any grants or awards.
Inspyr’s
Compensation Plans
The
Company’s 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (2007 Plan), 2009 Executive Compensation Plan (2009 Plan), 2017 Equity Compensation
Plan (2017 Plan), and the Inducement Award Stock Option Plan (Inducement Plan) (together, the Plans) provide for the awarding
of stock grants, nonqualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock units, performance units or other stock-based awards
to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company. The purpose of the Plans is to advance the interests of Inspyr
and our stockholders by attracting, retaining and rewarding persons performing services for us and to motivate such persons to
contribute to our growth and profitability. Our Plans are administered by a committee of non-employee directors (the Committee).
The Committee determines: who shall be granted awards; the vesting periods; the exercise price; and any other terms deemed appropriate
for any award.
Our
2007 Plan is administered by our board or any of its committees. The purposes of the 2007 Plan are to attract and retain the best
available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to Employees, Directors and Consultants,
and to promote the success of our business. The issuance of awards under our 2007 Plan is at the discretion of the administrator,
which has the authority to determine the persons to whom any awards shall be granted and the terms, conditions and restrictions
applicable to any award. Under our 2007 Plan, we may grant stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock units, performance units, performance shares and other stock based awards. Our 2007 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to
50,000 shares of common stock for the foregoing awards per fiscal year with an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock available
for issuance under the 2007 Plan. As of December 31, 2018, we have granted awards under the 2007 Plan equal to approximately 180,699
shares of our common stock, and 111,963 shares have been cancelled or forfeited. Accordingly, there are 131,264 shares of common
stock available for future awards under the 2007 Plan. In the event of a change in control, awards under the 2007 Plan will become
fully vested unless such awards are assumed or substituted by the successor corporation.
Our
2009 Plan, as amended is administered by our Board or any of its committees. The purpose of our 2009 Plan is to advance the interests
of the Company and our stockholders by attracting, retaining and rewarding persons performing services for us and to motivate
such persons to contribute to our growth and profitability. The issuance of awards under our 2009 Plan is at the discretion of
the administrator, which has the authority to determine the persons to whom any awards shall be granted and the terms, conditions
and restrictions applicable to any award. Under our 2009 Plan, we may grant stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2018, our
2009 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 200,000 shares of our common stock for the foregoing awards, and we have granted awards
under the plan equal to approximately 164,868 common shares, and 115,782 shares have been cancelled or forfeited. Accordingly,
there are 150,914 shares of common stock available for future awards under the 2009 Plan.
Our
Inducement Plan is administered by our board or our compensation committee. The Plan is intended to be used in connection with
the recruiting and inducement of senior management and employees. The issuance of wards under the Inducement Plan is at the discretion
of the administrator which has the authority to determine the persons to whom any awards shall be granted and the terms, conditions
and restrictions applicable to any award. The Company did not seek approval of the Plan by our stockholders. Pursuant to the Inducement
Plan, the Company may grant stock options for up to a total of 300,000 shares of common stock to new employees of the Company.
As of December 31, 2018, 211,360 grants have been made pursuant to the Plan.
Our
2017 Plan is administered by our Board or any of its committees. The purpose of our 2017 Plan is to attract and retain the best
available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants,
and to promote the success of the Company’s business. The issuance of awards under our 2017 Plan is at the discretion of
the administrator, which has the authority to determine the persons to whom any awards shall be granted and the terms, conditions
and restrictions applicable to any award. Under our 2017 Plan, we may grant stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock units, performance units, performance shares and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2018, our
2017 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for the foregoing awards, and we have not granted
any awards under the plan. Accordingly, there are 2,000,000 shares of common stock available for future awards under the 2017
Plan.
The
Company has recorded aggregate stock-based compensation expense related to the issuance of stock option awards in the following
line items in the accompanying consolidated statement of losses (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2018, we accelerated the vesting of all unvested employee options. As of December 31, 2018, there
was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options.
The
following table summarizes stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
|
Number of
shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual term
(in years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
268,876
|
|
|
$
|
24.1504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
104,747
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(17,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
41.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
356,280
|
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(32,766
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
323,514
|
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
323,514
|
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
During
2017, the Company issued options to purchase 104,747 shares of common stock to employees, and non-employee directors under the
Plans. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted to employees and non-employee directors during 2017 was estimated
at $0.59 per share on the date of grant.
The
following table summarizes weighted-average assumptions using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model used on the date of the grants
issued for the year ended December 31, 2017:
|
|
2017
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
128.5
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
No
options were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
NOTE
11 – WARRANTS
On
February 28, 2017, Russell Richerson, PhD, resigned as chief operating officer of the Company, effective immediately. Dr. Richerson
entered into a separation release of claims agreement (“Separation Agreement”) pursuant to which we issued Dr. Richerson
a warrant to purchase 76,726 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share and a term of 3.5 years.
In
connection with the sale of our Series C Preferred Stock in March and April 2017, we issued an aggregate of: (i) 387,251 Series
M common stock purchase warrants (“Series M Warrants”), (ii) 387,251Series N common stock purchase warrants (“Series
N Warrants”) and (iii) 387,251 Series O common stock purchase warrants (“Series O Warrants”) (collectively,
the “Warrants”). The Series M Warrants have an exercise price of $0.90 per share, subject to adjustment, and a term
of five (5) years from the date of issuance, the Series N Warrants have an exercise price of $0.75 per share, subject to adjustment,
and a term of six (6) months from the date of issuance and the Series O warrants have an exercise price of $0.75, subject to adjustment,
and a term of twelve (12) months from the date of issuance. The Warrants are immediately exercisable and separately transferable
from the Series C Preferred Stock. In the event that the shares underlying the Warrants are not subject to a registration statement
at the time of exercise, the Warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis after 6 months from the issuance date. The Warrants
also contain provisions providing for an adjustment in the underlying number of shares and exercise price in the event of stock
splits or dividends and fundamental transactions. Additionally, the Warrants contain anti-dilution protection until the twelve
(12) month anniversary of the issuance date.
Transactions
involving our warrants are summarized as follows:
|
|
Number of
shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual term
(in years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
5,203,436
|
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,238,479
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,396,175
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
3,045,740
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(532,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
2,512,930
|
|
|
$
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
2,512,930
|
|
|
$
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
No
warrants were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
As a result of recent equity financings
and conversions of debentures, the exercise prices of the warrants issued in conjunction with our Series B and Series C preferred
stock have also been reduced to $0.02 and $0.01 per share, respectively, at December 31, 2018.
The
following table summarizes outstanding common stock purchase warrants as of December 31, 2018:
|
|
Number of
shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
Issued to consultants
|
|
|
102,213
|
|
|
$
|
7.09
|
|
|
February 2019 through August 2023
|
Issued pursuant to 2014 financings
|
|
|
96,412
|
|
|
$
|
34.50
|
|
|
June 2019
|
Issued pursuant to 2015 financings
|
|
|
460,384
|
|
|
$
|
8.40
|
|
|
July 2020 through December 2020
|
Issued pursuant to 2016 financings
|
|
|
1,466,670
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
December 2021
|
Issued pursuant to 2017 financings
|
|
|
387,251
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
March 2022 through April 2022
|
|
|
|
2,512,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
12 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES AND NOTES
On
December 13, 2018 we issued an aggregate of $25,000 in convertible promissory notes (“Notes”) for cash proceeds of
$25,000. The Notes will mature on the earlier of (i) June 30, 2019 or (ii) such time as we raise capital in exchange for the sale
of securities (“Maturity Date”) and bear interest at 10% per year, payable on the Maturity Date. Pursuant to the terms
of the Notes, the Notes may be converted into shares of common stock upon an Event of Default (as such term is defined in the
Notes) or upon the Maturity Date at the election of the holder at a price per share equal to 75% of the lowest trade price of
our common stock on the trading day immediately prior to the date such exchange is exercised by the holder.
On
July 3, 2018, we entered into securities purchase agreements (“Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional
investors (the “Investors”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, we sold an aggregate of $515,000 of senior
convertible debentures (“Debentures”) consisting of $500,000 in cash and the cancellation of $15,000 of obligations
of the Company (the “Offering”). Pursuant to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, we will issue $515,000
in principal amount of Debentures.
The Debentures (i) are non-interest bearing,
(ii) have a maturity date one (1) year from the date of issuance and (iii) are convertible into shares of our common stock at
the election of the Investor at any time, subject to a beneficial ownership limitation of 4.99% which may be increased to 9.99%
by the Investor upon 61 days’ notice. The Debentures will have a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.33 and (ii)
85% of the lesser of (a) the volume weighted average price on the trading day immediately preceding a conversion date and (b)
the volume weighted average price on a conversion date. The Debentures also contain provisions providing for an adjustment in
the event of stock splits or dividends, and fundamental transactions. The Investors will also have the right to participate in
subsequent rights offerings and pro rata distributions. Additionally, the Debentures contain anti-dilution protection in the event
of subsequent equity sales at a price that is lower than the then applicable conversion price until such time that the Debentures
are no longer outstanding. Additionally, the Company has the option to redeem some or all of the Debentures for cash upon notice
of twenty (20) trading days provided certain conditions are met by the Company as more fully described in the Debentures. The
maturity date of the debentures has been extended to September 30, 2019 (see Note 15).
Furthermore,
without the approval of the Investors holding at least 67% of the then outstanding principal amount of the Debentures, the Company
may not (i) amend its charter documents in any manner that adversely affects the rights of any Investor, (ii) repay or repurchase
or acquire shares of its Common Stock, (iii) repay, repurchase, or acquire certain indebtedness, or (iv) pay cash dividends or
distributions on any equity securities of the Company. The Company is also required under the Securities Purchase Agreement to
hold a shareholder meeting by January 3, 2019 in order to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company
such that there are sufficient shares of Common Stock available for issuance underlying the Debentures upon their conversion in
full. The Company is also obligated under the Securities Purchase Agreement to pay Investors, as partial liquidated damages, a
fee of 2.0% of each Investor’s initial principal amount of such Investor’s Debenture in cash upon our failure to have
current public information available beginning six (6) months after the issuance date of the Debentures.
The
Investors were additionally given a right of participation in future offerings for a period of up to eighteen (18) months from
the date on which the shares underlying the Debentures are registered. The Securities Purchase Agreement also prohibits us from
issuing any common stock, subject to certain exemptions, for a period of 60 days following the closing of the Offering, without
the written approval of the Investors owning at least 50.1% of the securities issued in the Offering. Additionally, until the
twelve month anniversary of the registration of the shares underlying the Debentures, we are prohibited from entering into any
agreement to effect any issuance of common stock in a variable rate transaction.
On
September 12, 2017 we entered into an exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) with certain holders (the “Investors”)
of our Series A 0% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Shares”) and Series B 0% Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series
B Shares”). Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, we issued to the investors approximately $2.5 million in principal
amount of senior convertible debentures (“Debentures”) in exchange for 1,614.8125 Series A Shares with a stated value
of approximately $1.6 million and 890 Series B Shares with a stated value of approximately $0.9 million.
On
September 12, 2017, we sold an aggregate of $320,000 of our Debentures. The sale consisted of $250,000 in cash and the cancellation
of $70,000 of obligations of the Company.
The Debentures to be issued to the Investors
(i) are non-interest bearing, (ii) have a maturity date of September 12, 2018 and (iii) are convertible into shares of common
stock (“Common Stock”) of the Company at the election of the Investor at any time, subject to a beneficial ownership
limitation of 4.99% which may be increased to 9.99% by the Investor upon 61 days’ notice. The Debentures will have a conversion
price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.33 and (ii) 85% of the lesser of (a) the volume weighted average price on the trading day
immediately preceding a conversion date and (b) the volume weighted average price on a conversion date. The maturity date of the
debentures has been extended to September 30, 2019 (see Note 15).
The
Debentures also contain provisions providing for an adjustment in the event of stock splits or dividends, and fundamental transactions.
The Investors will also have the right to participate in subsequent rights offerings and pro rata distributions. Additionally,
the Debentures contain anti-dilution protection in the event of subsequent equity sales at a price that is lower than the then
applicable conversion price until such time that the Debentures are no longer outstanding. Additionally, the Company has the option
to redeem some or all of the Debentures for cash upon notice of twenty (20) trading days provided certain conditions are met by
the Company as more fully described in the Debentures.
Furthermore,
without the approval of the Investors holding at least 67% of the then outstanding principal amount of the Debentures, the Company
may not (i) amend its charter documents in any manner that adversely affects the rights of any Investor, (ii) repay or repurchase
or acquire shares of its Common Stock, (iii) repay, repurchase, or acquire certain indebtedness, or (iv) pay cash dividends or
distributions on any equity securities of the Company.
The Company is also obligated pay Investors,
as partial liquidated damages, a fee of 2.0% of each Investor’s initial principal amount of such Investor’s Debenture
in cash upon our failure to have current public information available. This requirement has been waived by the Investors through
September 30, 2019 (see Note 15).
In connection with the Offering, the Investors
also entered in a registration rights agreement (“Registration Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the Registration Rights
Agreement, the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Commission”)
within 45 days from the date of the Registration Rights Agreement to register the resale of 100% of the shares of Common Stock
underlying the Debentures and to maintain the effectiveness thereunder. The Company also agreed to have the registration statement
declared effective within 75 days from the date of the Registration Rights Agreement and keep the registration statement continuously
effective until the earlier of (i) the date after which all of the securities to be registered thereunder have been sold, or (ii)
the date on which all the securities to be registered thereunder may be sold without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions and
without current public information pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We are also obligated to
pay the Investors, as partial liquidated damages, a fee of 1.5% of each Investor’s subscription amount per month in cash
upon the occurrence of certain events, including our failure to file and / or have the registration statement declared effective
within the time periods provided. This requirement has been waived by the Investors through September 30, 2019 (see Note 15).
The
Investors were additionally given a right of participation in future offerings for a period of up to eighteen months from the
date in which the shares underlying the Debentures are registered as contemplated in the Registration Rights Agreement. The Securities
Purchase Agreement also prohibits the Company from issuing any Common Stock, subject to certain exemptions, for a period of 60
days following the closing of the Offering, without the written approval of the Investors owning at least 50.1% of the securities
issued in the Offering. Additionally, until the twelve (12) month anniversary of such effectiveness of the registration statement
as contemplated in the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is prohibited from entering into any agreement to effect any
issuance of Common Stock in a variable rate transaction.
NOTE
13 – ACQUISITION
On
July 31, 2017, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of Lewis & Clark, Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Virginia Corporation (“L&C”),
pursuant to the terms of a share exchange agreement (“Agreement”) dated July 31, 2017 (“Closing Date”),
by and among, the Company, L&C, certain principals of L&C (the “Principals”) and all of the existing shareholders
of L&C (“Shareholders”). As consideration for the acquisition of L&C, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate
of 7,122,172 shares of the Company’s common stock (“Payment Shares”) to the Shareholders, accounting for, subsequent
to the closing of the transaction, the Shareholders owning 50% of the issue and outstanding capital stock of the Company (including
common shares issuable upon conversion of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock). The shares issued for the acquisition
of L&C have been valued at $2,492,760.
The
Principals have agreed to establish escrow accounts with respect to an aggregate of 973,251 of the Payment Shares pursuant to
a share escrow agreement (“Escrow Agreement”) in order to satisfy certain indemnification obligations to the extent
such may arise under the Agreement for the benefit of the Company, its shareholders, and its personnel. The Agreement contains
certain customary indemnification provisions with respect to the Company one on hand and L&C and the Principals, on the other
hand.
Additionally,
pursuant to the Agreement, all Shareholders that receive at least 5% of the Payment Shares (at least 356,109 shares) (including
any shares held in escrow) agree to vote such shares in accordance with the recommendation of the Company’s board of directors
(“Board”) with respect to any matter to be voted upon by shareholders of the Company for a period of eighteen (18)
months from the Closing Date.
Furthermore,
each Shareholder agrees that for a period of eighteen (18) months from the Closing Date, it will not sell or transfer any of the
Payment Shares it receives pursuant to the Agreement, except that if a Shareholder is employed by the Company, it may sell up
to five percent (5%) of Payment Shares it receives on each ninety (90) day period following the one (1) year anniversary of the
Closing Date.
The
allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair values is as follows
(in thousands):
Cash
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
353
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
Due
to the suspension of business activity in February 2018, the Company determined that the goodwill assigned to the Lewis &
Clark, Pharmaceuticals, Inc. acquisition had become fully impaired as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill
impairment charge of $2.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company also determined that the office and lab
equipment acquired pursuant to the Lewis & Clark, Pharmaceuticals, Inc. acquisition had become fully impaired as of December
31, 2017. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017.
Pro
forma results
The
following tables set forth the unaudited pro forma results of the Company as if the acquisition of L&C had taken place on
the first day of the periods presented. These combined results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may have been
achieved had the companies been combined as of January 1, 2017, the first day of the periods presented.
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
|
(13,842
|
)
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
The
amounts of revenue and loss of L&C since the acquisition date included in the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2017 are approximately $0 and ($2,813,000), respectively, including goodwill impairment of approximately
$2,159,000.
NOTE
14 — INCOME TAXES
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), a tax reform bill, was enacted. The Act, among other items,
reduces the current federal income tax rate to 21% from 35%. The rate reduction is effective January 1, 2018, and is permanent.
The
Act has caused the Company’s deferred income taxes to be revalued. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through income tax expense. Pursuant to the guidance within SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 118 (“SAB 118”), as of December 31, 2017, the Company recognized the provisional effects of the enactment of the
Act for which measurement could be reasonably estimated. Since the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its
deferred tax assets, the revaluation of the deferred tax assets did not have a material impact on any period presented. The ultimate
impact of the Act may differ from these estimates due to the Company’s continued analysis or further regulatory guidance
that may be issued as a result of the Act.
As
a result of the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate, the Company reduced the value of its net deferred tax asset
by approximately $6.1 million which was recorded as a corresponding reduction to the valuation allowance during the fourth quarter
of 2017.
The
Company had, subject to limitation, $40.3 million of net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2018, which will expire
at various dates through 2037. In addition, the Company has research and development tax credits of approximately $458,000 at
December 31, 2018 available to offset future taxable income, which will expire from 2028 through 2037. We have provided a 100%
valuation allowance for the deferred tax benefits resulting from the net operating loss carryover and our tax credits due to our
lack of earnings history. In addressing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets
is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences are deductible.
The valuation allowance increased by approximately $178,000 and $832,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryover
|
|
$
|
8,597
|
|
|
$
|
8,468
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
Other
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
11,339
|
|
|
|
11,161
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(11,339
|
)
|
|
|
(11,161
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The actual tax benefit differs from the
expected tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (computed by applying the U.S. Federal Corporate tax rate
of 34% to income before taxes) are as follows:
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefits
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
Non-deductible items
|
|
|
(1,418.0
|
)%
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,446.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
The
Company’s tax returns for the previous three years remain open for audit by the respective tax jurisdictions.
NOTE
15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
During
January 2019, we issued a total of 65,436,071 shares of common stock upon the conversion of $204,221 principal amount of our convertible
debentures.
During
January 2019, we issued 5,000 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock for proceeds of $5,000.
Effective July 5, 2019, Sabby Healthcare
Master Fund, Ltd and Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. waived certain events of default under debentures issued in our
July 2018 debenture offering and September 2017 debenture offering (collectively, the “Debenture Offerings”) and extended
the maturity date of such debentures until September 30, 2019 in exchange for the issuance of $154,000 in new debentures with substantially
the same terms as those issued in our Debenture Offerings.
On July 15, 2019, Christopher Lowe resigned as our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, president,
and as a member of the Board. On July 26, 2019, we appointed Michael Cain as our interim chief executive officer, chief financial
officer, president, and as a member of the Board.