TIDMAST
RNS Number : 0997L
Ascent Resources PLC
17 April 2018
Ascent Resources plc / Epic: AST / Index: AIM / Sector: Oil and
Gas
17 April 2018
Ascent Resources plc
("Ascent" or the "Company")
Audited Final Results for the year ended 31 December 2017
Transformational Year
Ascent Resources plc (AIM: AST), the AIM quoted European oil and
gas exploration and production company, is pleased to announce its
audited full year results for the year ended 31 December 2017.
2017 Highlights
-- Profitable, cash generative and debt free
-- Producing from a high value gas asset
-- Potential to increase production through well recompletions using existing infrastructure
-- Cash reserves of over GBP1 million
The Company has today announced it will conduct a review of the
various strategic options available to the Company to maximise
value for shareholders.
This will include both, seeking to identify a partner to work
with the Company to maximise the opportunities to develop existing
assets and offers for the Company.
Colin Hutchinson, CEO of Ascent Resources plc, commented:
"This has been a transformational year for Ascent, as we have
moved from an exploration company to a production company. We look
forward to our continued success in the future."
Enquiries:
Ascent Resources plc
Clive Carver, Chairman
Colin Hutchinson, CEO 0207 251 4905
WH Ireland, Nominated Adviser
& Broker
James Joyce / Alex Bond 0207 220 1666
Yellow Jersey, Financial PR and
IR
Tim Thompson / Harriet Jackson
/ Henry Wilkinson 0203 735 8825
Chairman's Statement
Introduction
The year under review was transformational for your Company. The
details of the milestones achieved are set out in the Chief
Executive's Review. Their cumulative effect is to have moved the
Company onto a new level.
In comparison to many other similar sized companies we are, in
the absence of unforeseen technical issues at Petišovci,
self-funded in that we expect income from the gas being sold to INA
in Croatia to exceed our day to day operational and administrative
costs for the foreseeable future. We have also eliminated virtually
all debt from the business.
There are several initiatives underway at Petišovci, funded from
current operating cash flow, to advance our field development plan,
further details of which are contained in the Chief Executive's
Review. These are expected to improve the financial performance of
the Company at affordable costs.
Background
Your Board came together in 2012/13 at the time of rescue
funding. Our focus then was to move the Company from its perilous
financial state and become operationally cashflow positive.
Since 2013, assets other than Petišovci were sold or closed;
partnership agreements at Petišovci were renegotiated; costs were
cut; and, while we have been waiting for permits, alternative
sources of income, being principally the sale of our untreated gas
to Croatia, were put in place, which together with periodic
injections of new cash have kept the Company afloat.
The primary objective of becoming operationally cashflow
positive was achieved with the delivery of first export gas
production in November 2017.
Our next objective is to use the Slovenian base to create a
larger regional gas producer. This requires both the development of
the next phase ('Phase 2') of the project where we add further
wells and install our own processing facility and the acquisition
of stakes in other projects.
Constraints on planned growth
The development of Petišovci and the acquisition of stakes in
other regional gas projects require investment. While equipment,
including the long-awaited treatment plant can be largely debt
funded, acquiring an interest in other projects requires additional
equity.
With the net present value of the Petišovci project estimated to
be around 10 times the current market capitalisation of the Company
and the share price lagging behind analyst estimates, now is not
the time to dilute the underlying value in the Company's shares
based on the levels at which they presently trade.
Additionally, the Board is clear that diluting from such a low
level is not an option most shareholders wish to pursue. Equally,
we recognise doing nothing is unlikely to be in the interests of
shareholders generally.
Permits
There is no doubt that the painfully slow delivery of the
regulatory approvals required to properly develop Phase 1 of the
Petišovci project and to commence Phase 2 has unnerved existing and
prospective shareholders.
Perhaps it is inevitable in such circumstances that conspiracy
theories develop as to why the permits have not been delivered. Our
firm belief is that the delays are purely the result of the slow
operation of an inefficient state bureaucracy, where those
responsible for delivering the permits receive no praise or reward
for so doing but rather may become the targets of unrepresentative
but vocal action groups.
In such circumstances, without the active encouragement of the
Government at the highest levels, the officials responsible have no
incentive to move at other than the slowest pace. Since the
delivery of first export gas in November 2017, we believe the
commitment of the country's top politicians to end their reliance
on gas sourced principally from Russia has become much stronger, as
it can now be seen as a deliverable reality rather than just a
dream.
We continue to expect the delivery of the permits required to
develop Petišovci in due course.
IPPC permit
Investors have placed great store by the award of the IPPC
permit and its delay has clearly had an impact on the share price.
While the award of the IPPC permit will be a major political
endorsement for Ascent and the Petišovci project, the permits that
will make the greatest short-term impact are the permits to
re-enter and stimulate additional wells.
Permits are dealt with in greater detail in the Chief
Executive's Review.
The way forward
The planned further development of the Petišovci project and the
diversification into other regional projects is not an option
currently available to the Company without potentially significant
dilution for shareholders.
Doing nothing is not an attractive option, although in a
previous era it would have been the choice of boards less
interested in maximising shareholder value.
We have received several expressions of interest from industry
players interested in working with us to allow the development of
the Company as indicated above. These include farm-outs and general
strategic partnerships. These are at an early stage and time will
tell if any bear fruit.
Rather than wait for these or other options to materialise, we
have decided to take a proactive approach and initiate a Strategic
Review in conjunction with GMP FirstEnergy, an independent advisory
firm with extensive energy sector expertise. Our purpose in this is
to identify a partner to work with us to maximise opportunities to
develop our existing assets to their fullest potential and, as
appropriate, other assets in the region.
By so doing we expect to maximise the chances of a deal with a
long-term partner to the benefit of all Ascent shareholders.
Clive Carver
Non-executive Chairman
16 April 2018
Strategic Report
Section 414C of the Companies Act 2006 ('the Act') requires that
the Company inform its members as to how the Directors have
performed their duty to promote the success of the Company by way
of a Strategic Report which includes a fair review of the business,
an analysis of the development and performance of the business and
analysis of financial position and key performance indicators.
We have incorporated these requirements into the information set
out below, included in the Chief Executive's Review and the
Operations Report.
Company Overview
Ascent Resources plc ('Ascent' or 'the Company') is an
independent oil and gas exploration and production ('E&P')
company that was admitted to trading on AIM in November 2004 (AIM:
AST). Ascent has been involved in Slovenia for just over 10 years
where it operates the Petišovci Tight Gas Project. To date it has
invested around EUR50 million in this project, which is currently
its principal asset. This asset has significant oil and gas
reserves and resources and an established, local production
infrastructure with connections to local and export customers.
During 2017 the Company brought two wells into production and
started export production from the Petišovci field in Slovenia to
INA in Croatia. The Company is now focussed on developing the field
further to increase production and enhance its long-term
prospects.
Asset Overview
The Petišovci Tight Gas Project is in an area that has been
exploited since 1943. The project targets the significant gas
reserves and resources in the Badenian, Middle Miocene,
Petišovci-Globoki ('Pg') gas reservoirs which occur at depths of
2,000-3,500 m (6,562-11,484 ft). These Pg reservoirs are a series
of interbedded sands and shales with a stacked productive gas pay
of some 290 m (951 ft).
Using the results of an extensive 3D seismic survey conducted in
2009 by Ascent and its partners, the locations of two new wells
were determined. These wells, Pg-11A and Pg-10 were successfully
drilled, completed and stimulated between 2010 and 2012. During
2017 the Company brought both of these wells into production and
started exporting gas from Petišovci to INA in Croatia.
Cumulative gas production from the Pg gas field since 1988,
including fuel and flare use and accounting for the gas equivalent
of the historical condensate production, is 9.3 Bcfe (263.4 MMSm(3)
). This is 2% of the currently estimated gas initially in place
('GIIP') of 456 Bcf, (12.9 BSm(3) ), based on independent
third-party estimates.
Further details of the asset and current reserves and resources
can be found on pages 11 and 12 below.
Ascent operates the Petišovci project on behalf of the Joint
Venture between Ascent Slovenia Limited and Geoenergo. Ascent has a
75% working interest in the project and carries 100% of the costs.
Until Ascent has recovered its costs in full it will receive 90% of
the net revenues.
Our strategy
The Board firmly believes that the gas field at Petišovci is an
outstanding prospect and therefore to date has focussed all of its
resources on this project, directing our available funding towards
bringing Petišovci into production.
Ascent aims to maximise the production and sale of hydrocarbons
from the Petišovci Project for the benefit of all stakeholders. We
will achieve this by carefully managing producing wells,
successfully reworking existing wells and drilling further
wells.
The commencement of production during the year was a significant
milestone and we will now proceed with the second stage of our
development plan at Petišovci while seeking to acquire additional
onshore oil & gas opportunities in Central & Eastern
Europe. In order to identify the best structure through which to
achieve these objectives we have decided to implement the strategic
review as discussed in the Chairman's statement above.
Our markets
Dependency on imported gas is very high throughout the EU,
particularly in Slovenia. This, and the history of relatively
stable gas prices in Europe underpins our strategy of exploration,
development and production in this region.
Our wells are connected to existing processing facilities,
intra-field and international pipelines, ensuring low cost
connection and easy access to the market.
How we operate
The Company utilises a full range of advanced geophysical,
geological and other state-of-the-art technology to evaluate and
de-risk projects and to reap maximum benefit from its appraisal,
development and production activities. Our Petišovci project is
operated through a local entity in a joint venture. Wherever
possible we utilise local companies to provide services to the
project effectively and efficiently.
Our people
Ascent has a small management team, implementing a defined
development programme. This is supplemented, as the need requires,
with regional technical and operational expertise to ensure the
highest standards are delivered on our projects. As an important
local employer in our area of operation we take our environmental
and social responsibilities seriously and always strive to be a
good corporate citizen.
Chief Executive's Review
The past year was a hugely significant year for the Company and
the project as we moved from an exploration to production company
after ten years of operation in Slovenia. We have overcome
considerable legal, regulatory, technical and financial hurdles to
arrive at this point.
2017 Highlights
- Recompletion of Pg-10
- Recompletion of Pg-11A
- Refurbishment of existing infrastructure
- Start of production from Pg-10 in April 2017 and Pg-11A in September 2017
- Start of export production to Croatia in November 2017
- GBP1 million end of year cash balance, including GBP0.4million of restricted cash.
- Debt reduced from GBP8.7m to GBP49k (actual cash liability rather than accounting measure).
- GBP0.8 million (almost EUR1m in local currency) revenue from production
Recompletion of well Pg-10
In January 2017, we finalised the recompletion work on the first
of two wells, Pg-10, and perforated the production tubing at a
depth of 3,102 metres. The well was subsequently tested and a
maximum stabilised flow rate of 249,000 cubic metres (8.8MMscfd)
was achieved on a 12 mm choke.
Recompletion of well Pg-11A
The workover at Pg-11A started in April 2017 and was completed
in August 2017. A section of the production tubing was removed and
replaced and production well head equipment was installed. The
operation took longer than anticipated after a wireline tool became
stuck in the tubing during the final procedures to remove the
bottom hole plug.
Refurbishment of the existing processing facility (CPP)
The refurbishment of existing infrastructure was required to
produce gas for export. The main work involved installing a
replacement separator, sufficient for the increased pressures and
flow rates expected on the export line. This work was completed in
July 2017 and the replacement separator is capable of processing
240,000 cubic metres per day (8.5MMscfd).
Commencement of production
Production from Pg-10 started on 14 April 2017 and production
from Pg-11A on 15 September 2017.
Connection and certification of the export pipeline
The 8" export pipeline which runs from the land at MRS Lendava
owned by our 100% owned subsidiary, Trameta, to the field operated
by INA at Medjimurje in Croatia was pressure tested and certified
by the Slovenian authorities in November 2016.
The 6" production pipeline which runs from the CPP past MRS
Lendava was refurbished and recertified during the year. At the
same time, the surface infrastructure required to clean and
maintain the pipeline was installed at MRS Lendava. Following this,
the connection between the two lines was installed and tested and
an operational certificate issued by the Slovenian authorities.
Finally, in November 2017, the Croatian authorities issued an
operating permit for the export pipeline on the Croatian side. The
export pipeline can accommodate daily production of over 800,000
cubic metres per day (28 MMscfd).
Analysis of business performance
1. Operational performance
Production KPI's Apr-2017 May-2017 Jun-2017 Jul-2017 Aug-2017 Sep-2017
----------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total production
(000s M3) 246 475 532 244 499 528
Total production
(MCF) 8,689 16,765 18,783 8,616 17,639 18,653
Days producing 14 31 29 22 31 26
Average daily -
000s M3 17.6 15.3 18.3 11.1 16.1 20.3
Average daily -
MMscfd 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.7
Condensate production
(litres) 5,616 8,856 10,520 3,402 6,258 11,904
BOE - Gas 1,498 2,891 3,238 1,486 3,041 3,216
BOE - Condensate 35 56 66 21 39 75
Production KPI's Oct-2017 Nov-2017 Dec-2017 Jan-2018 Feb-2018 Mar-2018
----------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total production
(000s M3) - 1,716 1,975 2,235 1,788 1,243
Total production
(MCF) - 60,606 69,759 78,934 63,129 43,894
Days producing - 29 31 31 28 31
Average daily -
000s M3 - 59.2 63.7 72.1 63.8 40.1
Average daily -
MMscfd - 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.4
Condensate production
(litres) - 46,332 89,856 96,147 65,470 59,130
BOE - Gas - 10,449 12,027 13,609 10,884 7,568
BOE - Condensate - 291 565 605 412 372
In total 11.4 million cubic metres of gas and 2.2 thousand
barrels of condensate have been sold in the 12 months since the
commencement of production on 14 April 2017.
Between 14 April 2017 and 13 April 2018, the wells have been
producing for 308 out of 365 days (84%). Production was suspended
for 17 days in July and August 2017 as part of our customers'
seasonal maintenance programme. Production was suspended from both
wells for 34 days in total from the end of September to early
November 2017 while the export infrastructure was connected and
tested in anticipation of export production starting.
Production from well Pg-10 has been satisfactory and in line
with expectations. It has been in production for just over one year
and to date has produced 10.4 million cubic metres of gas. In
addition, the production has given us an increased understanding of
the 'F' sands and their long term productive capabilities.
Well Pg-11A was a more difficult well to recomplete and bringing
this well into stable production has been more challenging. During
the workover in 2017 a choke and a piece of tooling were left
downhole at the end of the operation. At the time it was expected
that the well would flow satisfactorily with the restriction in
place. However, the performance of the well since September has
been sub-optimal and so the operation to remove the tooling and the
choke was carried out in March 2018. The operation began on the 14
March 2018 and the well was put back into production on 28 March
2018, the tooling having been removed and the tubing opened
significantly, although part of a mandrel remains stuck at 2,200
metres.
As the water column has not yet been fully removed from the
well, the flow rates and pressure have not yet fully recovered.
Ascent's engineers are currently working to remove the water and
allow gas to flow more freely to the surface again.
2. Financial performance
The financial highlights for the period are the reporting of
revenues for the first time since 2013 and the significant
reduction of debt which has reduced to less than GBP40,000 during
the year.
-- Revenues for the period of GBP814,000 (2016: GBPNil) through
test production from April 2017 until the start of November 2017
and then commercial production thereafter;
o GBP276,000 was derived from gas sales in Slovenia.
o GBP489,000 was derived from gas sales in Croatia.
o GBP49,000 was derived from condensate and other sales.
-- Gross margin generated of GBP411,000 (2016: GBPNil) after
charges to transfer the margin on test phase production to
exploration and evaluation costs of GBP67,000 (2016: GBPNil) in
line with the Company's accounting policy.
-- Loss from operating activities during the period increased on
the comparable period in 2016 by GBP237,000 to GBP1,619,000 as a
result of the increase in activities and operational supports costs
required as the Pg-10 and Pg-11A wells were brought production.
-- Loss before tax reduced by GBP710,000 to GBP1,966,000 as a
result of the reduced finance costs on loan notes following their
early conversion to equity.
-- Borrowings have reduced by GBP6 million over the year and the
Company is now virtually debt free.
-- Raised GBP2,988,000, before costs of GBP161,888 in equity,
during February 2017 and a further GBP1,500,000 before costs of
GBP100,000 in equity during November 2017; both through heavily
subscribed offers on the PrimaryBid platform.
-- GBP4.5 million (2016: GBP0.7 million) of additions to
exploration and evaluation costs prior to the transfer of GBP24.1
million of assets into production, related to Pg10 and Pg11a and
their share of the exploration cost pool following determination of
commercial production in November 2017.
3. Share Price performance
The operational and financial successes noted above have not
translated to a positive movement in the share price. We believe
that the current share price significantly undervalues the
potential of the Petišovci project and discounts the significant
progress that has been made during 2017 to monetise the asset.
The Company has a high potential asset, located in a stable EU
country, which is producing sufficient gas and condensate to make
the Company profitable and cash generative in future periods. We
have strong partners in Slovenia and the wider region together with
a detailed understanding of the subsurface, and of the permitting
and regulatory system. The Company is well placed to grow within
Slovenia and the region and I am of the view this has not been
reflected in the share price during Q4 2017 and Q1 2018.
Future Field Development
The Board of Ascent has, for some time, recognised the high
potential of the Petišovci reservoirs and has focussed all of its
resources on bringing the first two 'new' wells (Pg-10 and Pg-11A)
into production. The next phase of the development plan is to
re-enter and bring into production all suitable existing wells. We
estimate that up to seven of the existing Pg wells and well D14 are
suitable candidates and we have begun the process required to
re-enter these.
As part of the process, we will conventionally perforate and
produce from a number of these wells; this will provide data on the
pre-stimulation performance of the reservoirs, while at the same
time generating revenue for the joint venture.
While the focus of the development plan is to produce the
significant quantities of gas in the Pg reservoirs, the Company is
also undertaking further studies of the Pontian Upper Miocene
('Pt') reservoirs where around 6 MMbls of oil has been produced in
the past. These studies will be looking to identify any untapped
potential in these reservoirs, either through additional drilling
or enhanced recovery techniques.
In addition to the further potential upside in the shallow oil
there exists the possibility of further hydrocarbons below the
discovered Pg reservoirs. The feasibility of drilling past 4,000
metres when carrying out future re-entries is another potential
upside being assessed by our technical experts.
IPPC Permit
We submitted our original application in June 2014; in November
of that year the Slovenian Environmental Agency ('ARSO') approved
the content of the application and initiated a public consultation
process. In July 2015, once all reasonable objections raised by the
general public had been addressed by the partners, to the
satisfaction of ARSO, the permit was provisionally awarded but was
immediately appealed. In November 2015 the Environment Minister
dismissed the appeal but a subsequent appeal was made to the
Administrative Court.
Ascent and its partners had followed the permitting process as
advised by the authorities and confirmed by our legal advisers. It
was therefore surprising and disappointing when the Administrative
Court ruled in May 2016 that Slovenia had not implemented EU
Directives appropriately and we were effectively returned to the
beginning of the process. We were obliged to follow rules which had
been implemented after we had submitted the original application
despite Slovenian law clearly stating the opposite. This was deeply
frustrating as was the lack of any possibility for timely redress.
We were advised that the quickest way through would be to follow
the revised process.
In November 2016 our revised application using the 'Preliminary
Screening' procedure was approved by ARSO but was again immediately
appealed. In March 2017 the appeal was again dismissed by the
Environment Minister and again a further appeal was made to the
Administrative Court. On this occasion, in November 2017, the Court
ruled in our favour and confirmed that the Preliminary Screening
process had been appropriately applied.
We have now submitted the baseline reports required by ARSO
before the permit can be finally awarded.
Principal risks and uncertainties
Permitting The single biggest issue when carrying out operations
risk in Slovenia over the past five years has been the
environmental permitting process. This is not unique
to Ascent and it is our opinion that inefficiencies
and uncertainties within the environmental permitting
process are a significant hurdle to economic growth
in Slovenia.
The process to obtain a permit for the construction
of a processing plant so that Slovenian gas can be
treated and sold in the Slovenian market has taken
significantly longer than should have been the case,
due to the misapplication of EU Law by the Slovenian
Government.
Permitting risk exists for any elements of the field
development plan which require an environmental permit;
mainly well stimulation and the installation of processing
equipment. This risk is mitigated by our detailed
understanding of the process and our continued lobbying
for a reform of the more inefficient elements of
the law.
Concession The date when the concession is due to be renewed
extension is now only four years away which means that before
risk any further significant investment in facilities
is made the Company and its partners will need to
have obtained an early extension of the concession.
The Company and its partners have, for over a year
now, been completing the documentation required to
seek an early extension of the concession which is
due to expire in 2022. While we are confident that
an extension will be granted as a matter of course
there is however no guarantee that this will be the
case.
This risk is mitigated by the goals of the partners
being well aligned; the fact that we have brought
the field into production safely and successfully
and we have started the preparatory work well in
advance of the concession end date. As a result of
which we believe that the extension should be awarded
in due course.
------------------------------------------------------------
Sub-surface The nature of the Petišovci Project is such
risk that a range of health and safety, drilling, production
and commercial risks are identified for the development
of the resource.
The Petišovci Pg reservoirs are over-pressured
and hot, relative to normal hydrostatic and thermal
gradients. The reservoir gas contains some carbon
dioxide and low levels of hydrogen sulphide and mercaptan
sulphur.
There is a risk that the Company is unable to effectively
exploit the proven reserves and resources from the
Petišovci field which may result in a lower
than anticipated return on investment. This risk
is mitigated by the experience of the expert technical
consultants and sub-contractors retained by the Company
and the knowledge acquired by the Company from production
to date.
------------------------------------------------------------
Legal risk Now that the Group is generating revenue from the
Slovenian asset it has received legal claims relating
to past activities. Based on legal advice received
we consider these to be spurious and without merit.
The Board will vigorously reject such opportunistic
approaches.
------------------------------------------------------------
Risks associated As a UK registered Company with operations in the
with the UK EU, there is a risk of a negative impact from the
withdrawal UK's departure from the European Union. This risk
from the European is mitigated as we operate through locally owned
Union subsidiaries selling gas produced in Slovenia to
Croatia, another EU member state.
------------------------------------------------------------
Outlook
2017 was a transformative year for the Company. In 2018 and
beyond we look forward to the continued development of the
Petišovci field. Wells Pg-10 and Pg-11A are intended to prove the
commerciality of the wider field and the significant reserves and
resources contained within.
While we anticipate receiving the IPPC permit to construct our
own processing facility in due course this is not a priority to the
Company as in the meantime we have refurbished and increased the
capacity of the existing infrastructure.
The Company is in a strong position; we have an onshore European
gas asset with significant potential to grow. The net present value
of this asset, as estimated by the Company and market analysts, is
many times the current market capitalisation. In addition, we have
further upside potential within the Petišovci concession and
opportunities within Slovenia and the wider region.
We are delighted to have moved from an exploration company to a
production company during the year. It has been the goal that we
have been working towards for many years and we now look forward to
building from this base and growing the Company into a significant
regional Oil & Gas producer.
Colin Hutchinson
Chief Executive Officer
Operations Review
Slovenia
Ascent Slovenia Ltd 75% (operator), Geoenergo d.o.o. 25%
(concession holder)
The Petišovci Tight Gas Project, in a 98 km2 area in north
eastern Slovenia, targets the development of tight gas reservoirs
known to be in Miocene clastic sediments.
Ascent first acquired an interest in the Petišovci project in
2007 and in 2009 an extensive 3D seismic survey was conducted
across the Petišovci concession area.
The structure has two sets of reservoirs, the shallower Upper
Miocene and the deeper Middle Miocene. The Middle Miocene Badenian
reservoirs, or Pg sands, are the focus of Ascent's development
objectives; however, the shallow reservoirs, which were extensively
developed during the 1960s, are not considered to be fully
depleted.
The north-east region of Slovenia has been an oil and gas
producing area since the early 1940s and contains much of the
infrastructure necessary for processing and exporting produced
hydrocarbons.
Two new appraisal wells, Pg-10 and Pg-11, drilled in 2010/2011
to a total vertical depth of 3,497 m and 3,500 m respectively,
confirmed gas in all six Middle Miocene Badenian reservoirs ('A' to
'F' Pg sands). Gas flowed for the first time from the shallowest
'A' sands and, in addition, gas and condensate were sampled from
the Lower Badenian 'L' to 'Q' sands. Pg-10 proved productive from
the 'F' sands and Pg--11A (Pg-11 was side-tracked for technical
reasons to Pg-11A) from the deeper 'L' to 'Q' sands. Both wells
were successfully fracture stimulated resulting in flow rates of 8
MMscfd from the 'F' sands and 2 MMscfd from the 'L, M and N' sands,
proving the commercial potential of both wells.
During 2017 both Pg-10 and Pg-11A have been brought into
production. In April 2017 test production commenced from Pg-10 with
the resulting gas sold to a local industrial customer. In November
2017 export production began. This followed the upgrade and
installation of infrastructure and the recommissioning of the
export pipeline which links the Petišovci field in Slovenia with
the Medjimurje field in Croatia which is operated by INA. Total
production for the year was 5,989,921 cubic metres of gas,
resulting in revenue of GBP814,000. The Company is entitled to 90%
of the proceeds of revenue from production until such time as back
costs have been recovered.
Back-in Rights
Netherlands
As part of the Sale and Purchase Agreement signed in 2013 with
Tulip Oil for the Company's former Dutch licences, Ascent has the
right to re-purchase a 10% interest in each of the Dutch licences
once Tulip has made a final investment decision with respect to the
commercial development of the Terschelling-Noord Field.
Summary of Group Net Oil and Gas Reserves
Net Reserves and Resources
Net Attributable Net Attributable Net Attributable
----------
Reserves Contingent Resources Prospective Resources
----------
(Bcfe) (Bcfe) (Bcfe)
--------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
P90 P50 P10 Low Best High Low Best High
---------- ------ ------ ----- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -------
Slovenia 41 88 173 42 76 140 - - -
------ ------ ----- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -------
These figures are based on RPS gas-in-place estimates with a
management assumption of a 50% recovery factor and Ascent's 75%
participation.
Tested and/or produced commercial sands are included as reserves
while untested and unproduced sands remain as resources. The
condensate content of gas is not included.
Remaining reserves have been adjusted to take account of
historic field production and estimates of process flare and fuel,
which to the end of 2017 were 9.3 Bcfe. Ascent's share of this
production and gas use is 7.0 Bcf.
Proven Reserves (P90) are those quantities of petroleum which
can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be commercially
recoverable, from known reservoirs and under current economic
conditions, operating methods and government regulations.
Proven + Probable Reserves (P50) includes those unproven
reserves which are more likely than not to be recoverable.
For the P90 (P50 and P10) Reserves there is at least a 90% (50%;
10%) probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal
or exceed the estimate.
Contingent Resources are those quantities of petroleum
estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from
known accumulations, but the applied project(s) are not yet
considered mature enough for commercial development due to one or
more contingencies. Contingent resources may include, for example,
projects for which there are currently no viable markets or where
commercial recovery is dependent on technology under development or
where evaluation of the accumulation is insufficient to clearly
assess commerciality.
Prospective Resources are those quantities of petroleum which
are estimated to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered
accumulations.
The range of estimates shown for each category of reserves or
resources is a measure of the uncertainty inherent in the
estimation of producible volumes and includes the current
perceptions of geological, operational and commercial risk.
Summary of Ascent Resources plc's Licence Interests as at 31
December 2017
Permit
Working Area
Interest Gross Net
(%) (km(2) (km(2)
Permit Subsidiary ) ) Status
Operations
Slovenia
Petišovci Ascent Slovenia
Concession Limited 75 98 73 Oil & gas exploitation
Back in rights
The Netherlands
M10a/M11 Ascent Resources Gas exploration
Terschelling-Noord Netherlands BV 110 59 and appraisal
Glossary
M Thousand* cf Cubic feet
MM Million* scf Standard cubic feet
B Billion* scfd Standard cubic feet
per day
km(2) Square kilometres Bcfe Billion cubic feet
equivalent
m(3) Cubic metres
* These are 'oilfield' units, as commonly used in the oil and
gas industry. Other units conform to the Système International
d'unités (SI) convention
Directors' Report
The Directors present their Directors' Report and Financial
Statements for the year ended 31 December 2017 ('the year').
Principal activities
The principal activities of the Group comprise gas and oil
exploration and production. The Company is registered in England
and Wales and is quoted on the AIM Market of the London Stock
Exchange.
The Group's corporate management is in London and its oil and
gas interests are in Slovenia. The Group operates its own
undertakings both through subsidiary companies and joint ventures.
The subsidiary undertakings affecting the Group's results and net
assets are listed in Note 11 to the Financial Statements.
Future developments
The Company has identified the European gas market as a
relatively stable and secure arena in which to compete. The
European market continues to be a net importer of gas whilst
diversity of supply is central to the energy security strategy of
most nations. The Petišovci field in Slovenia has the potential to
supply a significant proportion of the country's gas requirement
for many years.
Financial risk management
Details of the Group's financial instruments and its policies
with regard to financial risk management are given in Note 25 of
the Financial Statements.
Results and dividends
The loss for the year after taxation was GBP2.0 million (2016:
GBP2.7 million). The Directors do not recommend the payment of a
dividend (2016: Nil).
Post balance sheet events
In March 2018 the Company carried out an operation at Pg-11A to
remove a choke and some stuck tooling left downhole at the end of
the workover operation in August 2017. At the time it was expected
that the well would flow satisfactorily with the restriction in
place. However, the performance of the well since September has
been sub-optimal and so the operation to remove the tooling and the
choke was carried out. The tooling was removed, and the tubing
opened significantly, although part of a mandrel remains stuck at
2,200 metres. As the water column has not yet been fully removed
from the well, the flow rates and pressure have not yet fully
recovered. Ascent's engineers are currently working to remove the
water and allow gas to flow more freely to the surface again. The
results of the operation are not clear at the date of this
report.
Directors
The Directors of the Company that served during the year, and
subsequently, were as follows:
Colin Hutchinson
Clive Nathan Carver
Nigel Sandford Johnson Moore
William Cameron Davies
Relevant details of the Directors, which include committee
memberships, are set out on page 17.
Directors' interests
The beneficial and non-beneficial interests in the issued share
capital and CLNs of the Company were as follows:
Ordinary shares of 0.1p each. Convertible loan notes.
At 31 December At 31 December At 31 December At 31 December
2017 2016 2017 2016
Clive
Carver 3,304,231 - - 34,166
Nigel Moore 1,339,275 5,975 - 13,333
Cameron
Davies 1,340,800 7,500 - 13,333
Colin
Hutchinson 1,570,370 270,270 - 10,001
Directors' emoluments
Details of Directors' share options and remuneration are set out
in Note 4 to the Financial Statements, under the heading
'Directors' remuneration'.
Third party indemnity provision
The Company has provided liability insurance for its Directors.
The annual cost of the cover is not material to the Group. The
Company's Articles of Association allow it to provide an indemnity
for the benefit of its Directors which is a qualifying indemnity
provision for the purposes of the Companies Act 2006.
Share capital
Details of changes to share capital in the period are set out in
Note 18 to the Financial Statements.
As at 12 April 2018 the Company has been notified of the
following significant interests in its ordinary shares, being a
holding of 3% and above:
Number of
ordinary
shares %
Hargreaves Lansdown (Nominees) Limited
<15942> 254,610,943 11.22
Interactive Investor Services Nominees
Limited <SMKTNOMS> 211,185,736 9.31
Hargreaves Lansdown (Nominees) Limited
<HLNOM> 198,422,171 8.75
Barclays Direct Investing Nominees
Limited <Client1> 195,506,143 8.62
HSDL Nominees Limited 155,138,981 6.84
Hargreaves Lansdown (Nominees) Limited
<VRA> 149,326,807 6.58
Interactive Investor Services Nominees
Limited <SMKTISAS> 117,007,551 5.16
HSDL Nominees Limited <Maxi> 92,166,811 4.06
Share Nominees Ltd 91,488,407 4.03
Shareholder communications
The Company has a website, www.ascentresources.co.uk, for the
purposes of improving information flow to shareholders, as well as
potential investors.
Employees
The Company's Board composition provides the platform for sound
corporate governance and robust leadership in implementing the
Company's strategies to meet its stated goals and objectives.
The Group's employees and consultants play an integral part in
executing its strategy and the overall success and sustainability
of the organisation. The Group has a highly skilled and dedicated
team of employees and consultants and places great emphasis on
attracting and retaining quality staff. As an international oil and
gas company, we facilitate the development of leadership from the
communities in which we operate. There is a large pool of qualified
upstream oil and gas exploration and production professionals in
the areas in which we operate, and we are committed to building and
developing our teams from these talent pools.
The Group holds its employees and consultants at all levels to
high standards and expects the conduct of its employees to reflect
mutual respect, tolerance of cultural differences, adherence to the
corporate code of conduct and an ambition to excel in their various
disciplines.
Disclosure of information to auditors
In the case of each person who was a Director at the time this
report was approved:
-- so far as that Director was aware there was no relevant audit
information of which the Company's auditors were unaware; and
-- that Director had taken all steps that the Director ought to
have taken as a Director to make himself aware of any relevant
audit information and to establish that the Company's auditors were
aware of that information.
This information is given and should be interpreted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the Companies Act
2006.
Going Concern
The Financial Statements of the Group are prepared on a going
concern basis as detailed in Note 1 to the financial
statements.
Auditors
In accordance with Section 489 of the Companies Act 2006, a
resolution for the reappointment of BDO LLP as auditors of the
Company is to be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting.
Approved for issue by the Board of Directors
and signed on its behalf
Clive Carver
Chairman
16 April 2018
Board of Directors
Clive Carver
Non-executive Chairman
Clive Carver qualified as a chartered accountant with Coopers
& Lybrand in London in 1986. Since then he has focussed on the
corporate finance and corporate broking arena, including working
for Kleinwort Benson and Price Waterhouse Corporate Finance. He was
successively head of corporate finance at broking firms Seymour
Pierce, Williams de Broe and finnCap.
He is executive Chairman of Caspian Sunrise PLC and
non-Executive Chairman of Tax Systems PLC and appScatter PLC all of
which have their shares quoted on AIM.
Colin Hutchinson
Chief Executive Officer & Finance Director
Colin Hutchinson is a fellow of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in Ireland, he holds a law degree from the University
of Dundee and an MBA from Warwick Business School. Colin previously
served as the Company's Finance Director. After completing his
accountancy training with Deloitte, he gained significant
international experience while working in commercially orientated
finance roles with a mix of technology and energy companies. Prior
to joining Ascent, he was Group Financial Controller & Company
Secretary at Lochard Energy plc and Co-Founder & Finance
Director at Samba Communications Ltd.
Nigel Moore
Non-executive Director
Chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration
Committee
Nigel Moore is a Chartered Accountant and was a former partner
at Ernst & Young for thirty years until 2003. For the last ten
years at Ernst & Young he specialised in the oil and gas
sector, advising a wide range of client companies, providing
significant input to strategic options, new opportunities and
helping to deliver shareholder value. During the last 15 years
Nigel has been a member of a number of boards focussed on
extractive industries.
Cameron Davies
Non-executive Director
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and member of the Audit
Committee
Cameron Davies is an international energy sector specialist and
the former Chief Executive of Alkane Energy plc. He has a PhD in
Applied Geochemistry from Imperial College, is a Fellow of the
Geological Society of London and a member of the European Petroleum
Negotiators Group and the PESGB. He has an excellent track record
of exploration success and also growing profits in a quoted energy
company. His career successes include the discovery of the third
largest oilfield in Tunisia. In 1994 he founded Alkane Energy plc
and managed the business from original concept, through venture
capital funding and an IPO to become a profitable operator of c.
160 MW of gas to power generation plants. In Q4 2016 Alkane was
acquired for c.GBP61 million by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure
Partners when Cameron resigned as a director.
He is also non-Executive Chairman of Powerhouse Energy PLC.
Directors and Advisers
Directors Clive Carver
Colin Hutchinson
Nigel Moore
Cameron Davies
Secretary Colin Hutchinson
Registered Office 5 New Street Square
London EC4A 3TW
Nominated Adviser and Joint WH Ireland Corporate Brokers
Broker 24 Martin Lane
London EC4R 0DR
Auditors BDO LLP
55 Baker Street
London W1U 7EU
Solicitors Taylor Wessing LLP
5 New Street Square
London EC4A 3TW
Bankers Barclays Corporate Banking
1 Churchill Place
London E14 5HP
Share Registry Computershare Investors Services
PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS13 8AE
PR & IR Yellow Jersey PR Limited
33 Stockwell Green
London SW99HZ
Company's registered number 05239285
Corporate Responsibility
Ascent operates a Management System that embodies Environmental,
Health, Safety ('EHS') and Social Responsibility ('SR') principles.
This system defines objectives to be met by Ascent, its
subsidiaries, affiliates, associates and operated joint ventures
(hereinafter collectively referred to as Ascent) in the management
of EHS and SR.
The policy of the Board of Ascent is to be fully accountable for
the necessary practices, procedures and means being in place so as
to ensure that each EHS and SR objective is demonstrated in full
and that continuous improvement practices are operating to ensure
that the required practices, procedures and means are being
monitored, refined and optimised as necessary. The Board will
accordingly review and report regularly to external stakeholders as
to the achievement of the objectives of this policy.
In accordance with this policy, the Executive Directors of
Ascent are directly and collectively responsible to the Board for
demonstrating that the EHS and SR objectives are attained
throughout Ascent. The Executive Directors have adopted Management
System Guidelines as guidance for demonstrating this.
The objectives of the Environment, Health, Safety and Social
Responsibility Policy are:
-- Ascent shall manage all operations in a manner that protects
the environment and the health and safety of employees, third
parties and the community.
-- The Executive Director provides the vision, establishes the
framework, sets the objectives and provides the resources for
responsible management of Ascent's operations.
-- Leadership and visible commitment to continuous improvement
are critical elements of successful operations.
-- A process that measures performance relative to policy aims
and objectives is essential to improving performance. Sharing best
practices and learning from each other promotes improvement.
-- Effective business controls ensure the prevention, control
and mitigation of threats and hazards to business stewardship.
-- Risk identification, assessment and prioritisation can reduce
risk and mitigate hazards to employees, third parties, the
community and the environment. Management of risk is a continuous
process.
-- Safe, environmentally sound operations rely on well-trained,
motivated people. Careful selection, placement, training,
development and assessment of employees and clear communication and
understanding of responsibilities are critical to achieving
operating excellence.
-- The use of internationally recognised standards, procedures
and specifications for design, construction, commissioning,
modifications and decommissioning activities are essential for
achieving operating excellence.
-- Operations within recognised and prudent parameters are
essential to achieving clear operating excellence. This requires
operating, inspection and maintenance procedures and information on
the processes, facilities and materials handled, together with
systems to ensure that such procedures have been properly
communicated and understood.
-- Adhering to established safe work practices, evaluating and
managing change and providing up-to-date procedures to manage
safety and health risks contribute to a safe workplace for
employees and third parties.
-- The minimisation of environmental risks and liabilities are
integral parts of Ascent's operations.
-- Third parties who provide materials and services (personnel
and equipment) or operate facilities on Ascent's behalf have an
impact on EHS and SR excellence. It is essential that third-party
services are provided in a manner consistent with Ascent's EHS and
SR Policy and Management System Guidelines.
-- Compliance with regulatory requirements and company
guidelines must be periodically measured and verified as part of
the continuous improvement process.
-- Preparedness and planning for emergencies are essential to
ensuring that all necessary actions are taken if an incident
occurs, to protect employees, third parties, the public, the
environment, the assets and brand of Ascent.
-- Effective reporting, incident investigation, communication
and lessons learned are essential to attaining and improving
performance.
-- Open and honest communication with the communities,
authorities and stakeholders with which Ascent operates builds
confidence and trust in the integrity of Ascent.
During 2017, the Group was Operator of one project which was
closely managed for maintaining the EHS and SR policy aims.
There have been no breaches of any applicable Acts recorded
against the Group during the reporting period.
Statement of Directors' Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Directors'
Report, the Strategic Report and the Financial Statements in
accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors
have elected to prepare the Group and Company financial statements
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
('IFRSs') as adopted by the European Union. Under company law the
Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are
satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of
affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or loss of the
Group for that period. The Directors are also required to prepare
financial statements in accordance with the rules of the London
Stock Exchange for companies trading securities on the AIM
Market.
In preparing these financial statements the Directors are
required to:
-- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
-- make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
-- state whether they have been prepared in accordance with
IFRSs as adopted by the European Union, subject to any material
departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
and
-- prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company's
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the
financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure that
the financial statements comply with the requirements of the
Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the
assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the Annual Report and
the Financial Statements are made available on a website. Financial
statements are published on the Company's website
(www.ascentresources.co.uk) in accordance with legislation in the
United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of
financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other
jurisdictions. A copy of the Annual Report will be available on the
firm's website later today. The Annual Report will be sent to
shareholders in due course. The maintenance and integrity of the
Company's website is the responsibility of the Directors. The
Directors' responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of
the Financial Statements contained therein.
Independent auditor's report to the members of Ascent Resources
plc
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of Ascent Resources plc
(the 'parent company') and its subsidiaries (the 'group') for the
year ended 31 December 2017 which comprise the consolidated income
statement and statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated
and company statement of changes in equity, the consolidated and
company statement of financial position, the consolidated and
company cash flow statement, and notes to the financial statements,
including a summary of significant accounting policies.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the
preparation of the financial statements is applicable law and
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by
the European Union and, as regards the parent company financial
statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the
Companies Act 2006.
In our opinion:
-- the financial statements give a true and fair view of the
state of the group's and of the parent company's affairs as at 31
December 2017 and of the group's loss for the year then ended;
-- the group financial statements have been properly prepared in
accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union;
-- the parent company financial statements have been properly
prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union
and as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies
Act 2006; and
-- the financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements section of our report. We are independent of the group
and the parent company in accordance with the ethical requirements
that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the
UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed
entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities
in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the parent company's members, as a
body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to
the parent company's members those matters we are required to state
to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the
fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the parent company and the
parent company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this
report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Conclusions relating to going concern
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in
relation to which the ISAs (UK) require us to report to you
where:
-- the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting
in the preparation of the financial statements is not appropriate;
or
-- the directors have not disclosed in the financial statements
any identified material uncertainties that may cast significant
doubt about the group's or the parent company's ability to continue
to adopt the going concern basis of accounting for a period of at
least twelve months from the date when the financial statements are
authorised for issue.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional
judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial
statements of the current period and include the most significant
assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to
fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect
on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the
audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These
matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we
do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Matter Our Response
Classification of the Petišovci
asset and carrying value of
the exploration, evaluation
costs and PP&E
Classification
Classification
We considered management's
The group determined that judgement that particular
particular assets in the Petišovci assets, namely the Pg10/Pg11a
field had reached commercial wells and associated infrastructure,
feasibility with commercial met the criteria for transfer
production during the year. to PP&E under the group's
As such, GBP24.1m was transferred accounting policies and IFRS.
from exploration and evaluation This included assessment of
costs to property, plant and the reserves per the independent
equipment ("PP&E") in 2017 Competent Person's assessment
as detailed in notes 9 and of gas reserves, together
10. The assessment that certain with review of production
assets had reached commercial data and the margins generated
feasibility and commercial from the wells following supply
production represents a judgement under the INA contract.
by management, together with
the cost to be transferred We reviewed the breakdown
from the exploration cost of the costs transferred to
pool to PP&E. production assets, agreeing
costs to historic accounting
Judgement was also required records and considered the
in determining an appropriate appropriateness of the classification.
depreciation policy to apply In respect of costs not specifically
to the producing assets, which attributed to the wells and
involved significant estimates infrastructure, such as the
and judgement including the original acquisition cost
selection of inputs to the for the field, we assessed
depletion method, gas reserves the methodology used for allocating
included in the calculations such costs between exploration
and the extent to which future and evaluation assets and
capital expenditure to access PP&E and confirmed key inputs
the relevant reserves are to supporting evidence.
included in the calculation.
Carrying values of exploration,
evaluation and producing assets
The group's exploration and
evaluation assets associated We assessed the depreciation
with the remaining Petišovci policy and considered whether
license area represent material it is in line with IFRS and
assets on the group's statement with industry practice. We
of financial position. As agreed the inputs to the calculations.
at 31 December 2017, the group's This included confirming the
exploration and evaluation consistency of the reserves
assets totalled GBP18.6m (2016: with the Pg10/11a field plan
GBP37.5m) as detailed in note and impairment model, confirming
10. that the estimated capital
expenditure is consistent
Management were required to with those models and agreeing
perform an impairment indicator production data to customer
review to assess whether there statements.
were any indicators of impairment
for these assets and whether Carrying values of exploration,
impairment is appropriate. evaluation and producing assets
Following this assessment,
the Board concluded that no We reviewed and challenged
impairment was required. For management's impairment assessment
further details see note 1. for exploration and evaluation
costs which was carried out
Additionally, management are in accordance with IFRS 6
required to assess the producing in order to determine whether
assets for indicators of impairment there were any indicators
at each reporting date and of impairment. In doing so
have performed an impairment we confirmed that the licences
review using the discounted remain valid, made inquiries
cash flows for the producing of management regarding the
asset cash generating unit future planned exploration
accordingly. As detailed in and considered the group's
note 1, the assessment of internal plans and budgets.
any impairment to the carrying
value of the producing asset We reviewed and challenged
requires significant estimation management's discounted cash
by management. The key estimates flow forecast models for both
and judgements include oil the exploration and evaluation
price, reserves, decline rates, assets and producing assets
and discount rate. separately, which form part
of their impairment review.
Given the inherent judgement In doing so, we considered
involved in determining whether the appropriateness of the
particular assets should be cash generating units used
transferred to PP&E and subsequent for the impairment reviews.
depreciation policy, the costs
to be transferred and the We have reviewed the key assumptions
assessment of the carrying in the models, challenging
value of the exploration and the appropriateness of estimates
evaluation assets and PP&E, with reference to empirical
we considered this area to data and external evidence
be a key audit matter. where available for inputs
such as gas prices, reserves,
production rates and capital
expenditure. We sensitised
the key inputs such as discount
rate and short and longer-term
gas prices to assess the impact
on headroom.
We agreed the reserves used
in the models to the most
recent Competent Person's
report and assessed the objectivity,
competence and independence
of these experts.
We have considered management's
assessment that the IPPC permit
will be approved, which forms
a judgement within the impairment
reviews. In doing so, we have
reviewed Board minutes, legal
documents and correspondence
regarding the permitting process.
We assessed the disclosures
included in the financial
statements in notes 1, 9 and
10.
-----------------------------------------
Our findings:
We found management's judgements regarding the classification
of the Petišovci assets and the depreciation policy
to be appropriate. We found management's conclusion that
there is no impairment required for the exploration and
evaluation costs or PP&E to be supportable and the estimates
to be balanced and well considered.
Matter Our Response
-----------------------------------------
Revenue recognition and cut-off
During the year the group We reviewed the revenue recognition
generated GBP0.8m of revenue policy disclosed in the financial
from the sale of hydrocarbons statements as per note 1,
from the Petišovci field. considering its compliance
In accordance with the group's with IFRS and industry standards
accounting policy revenue as well as the customer contracts
on test production is recorded and Joint Operating Agreement.
at nil margin with a reduction
in cost of sales and exploration We considered the consistency
and evaluation assets. Once of the accounting for revenue
commercial production has and costs of production with
been established revenue and the judgements as to when
costs are recorded in the commercial production was
income statement. achieved set out above.
Management were required to We reviewed the accounting
exercise judgement in determining treatment of gas produced
the extent to which revenues and costs associated with
represented test production the production during the
versus commercial levels of pre-production phase and commercial
production, considering factors production phase, to ensure
such as the volumes produced that the treatment is consistent
and profitability of such with the group's accounting
production. In addition, management policy.
were required to determine
an appropriate revenue recognition We agreed a sample of sales
policy with the commencement transactions in the year to
of sales. These factors were supporting documentation.
considered to increase the
risk associated with revenue We performed cut off procedures
recognition for our audit. on revenue around the year
end to satisfy ourselves that
Additionally, recognition revenue is recognised in the
of revenue carries an implicit correct period and that corresponding
fraud risk and we considered costs of sales are appropriately
the risk to be around the accounted for.
manipulation of cut-off around
year end and, as such, cut-off
was an area of key focus for
our audit.
-----------------------------------------
Our findings:
We found the revenue recognition policy to be appropriate
and found that revenue had been recorded in the appropriate
period.
Our application of materiality
Group materiality Basis for materiality
FY 2017 GBP650,000 Materiality based
on 1.5% of group assets.
------------------ --------------------------
FY 2016 GBP800,000 Materiality based
on 2% of group assets.
------------------ --------------------------
We consider total assets to be the financial metric of the most
interest to shareholders and other users of the financial
statements, given the group's status as an oil and gas exploration
and development company with commercial production only commencing
in November 2017, and therefore consider this to be an appropriate
basis for materiality. We had previously used a slightly higher
percentage of total assets but having considered market trends the
materiality benchmark was revised downwards.
Materiality in respect of the audit of the parent company was
set at GBP585,000 (2016: GBP720,000) using a benchmark of 1.5%
(2016: 2%) of total assets, limited to 90% of group
materiality.
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and
performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of
misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which
misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic
decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the
financial statements. Importantly, misstatements below these levels
will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take
account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the
particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their
effect on the financial statements as a whole.
Performance materiality is the application of materiality at the
individual account or balance level set at an amount to reduce to
an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of
uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for
the financial statements as a whole. Performance materiality was
set at 75% (2016: 75%) of the above materiality levels.
We agreed with the audit committee that we would report to the
committee all individual audit differences identified during the
course of our audit in excess of GBP30,000 (2016: GBP40,000). We
also agreed to report differences below these thresholds that, in
our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
There were no misstatements identified during the course of our
audit that were individually, or in aggregate, considered to be
material in terms of their absolute monetary value or on
qualitative grounds.
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our group audit focused on the group's significant components
which comprised Ascent Resources Plc and Ascent Slovenia Limited.
Whilst materiality for the financial statements as a whole was
GBP650,000, each significant component of the Group was audited to
a lower level of performance materiality of GBP430,000. Both of the
components were audited by BDO LLP.
The remaining components of the Group were considered
non-significant and such components were subject to analytical
review procedures together with substantive testing on group audit
risk areas applicable to that component, carried out by the group
audit team.
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The
other information comprises the information included in the annual
report, other than the financial statements and our auditor's
report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not
cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise
explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of
assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our
responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so,
consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent
with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the
audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we
identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material
misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a
material misstatement in the financial statements or a material
misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we
have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement
of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We
have nothing to report in this regard.
Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act
2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of
the audit:
-- the information given in the strategic report and the
directors' report for the financial year for which the financial
statements are prepared is consistent with the financial
statements; and
-- the strategic report and the directors' report have been
prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the group and
the parent company and its environment obtained in the course of
the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the
strategic report or the directors' report.
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in
relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to
you if, in our opinion:
-- adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent
company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received
from branches not visited by us; or
-- the parent company financial statements are not in agreement
with the accounting records and returns; or
-- certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
-- we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the directors' responsibilities
statement set out on page 21, the directors are responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied
that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control
as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation
of financial statements that are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are
responsible for assessing the group's and the parent company's
ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis
of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the
group or the parent company or to cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these financial statements.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of
the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting
Council's website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This
description forms part of our auditor's report.
Ryan Ferguson (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
16 April 2018
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
Consolidated Income Statement & Statement of Other
Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
Notes GBP '000s GBP '000s
Revenue 2 814 -
Cost of sales 2 (403) -
------------ ------------
Gross profit 411 -
Administrative expenses (2,030) (1,382)
------------ ------------
Loss from operating activities 3 (1,619) (1,382)
Finance income 5 - 159
Finance cost 5 (347) (1,453)
------------ ------------
Net finance costs (347) (1,294)
Loss before taxation (1,966) (2,676)
Income tax expense 6 - -
------------ ------------
Loss for the year (1,966) (2,676)
Loss for the year attributable
to equity holders of the parent (1,966) (2,676)
Loss per share
Basic & fully diluted loss
per share (Pence) 8 (0.10) (0.49)
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Loss for the year (1,966) (2,676)
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation
differences for foreign operations 898 2,997
Total comprehensive (loss)
/ income for the year (1,068) 321
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Share Share Merger Equity Share based Translation Retained Total
capital premium Reserve reserve payment reserve earnings
reserve
GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s
Balance at 1
January 2016 1,878 56,693 - 1,572 483 (2,805) (37,147) 20,674
Comprehensive
income
Loss for the
year - - - - - - (2,676) (2,676)
Other
comprehensive
income
Currency
translation
differences - - - - - 2,997 - 2,997
Total
comprehensive
income - - - - - 2,997 (2,676) 321
Transactions
with owners
Acquisition of
Trameta - - - - 1,103 - - 1,103
Extinguishment
of convertible
loan notes - - - (1,572) - - 1,572 -
Extension of
convertible
loan
notes - - - 2,787 - - - 2,787
Issue of new
convertible
loan
notes - - - 360 - - - 360
Conversion of
loan notes 749 2,996 - - - - - 3,745
Issue of shares
during the
year net of
costs 1,105 3,584 - - - - - 4,689
Share-based
payments and
expiry
of options - - - - 94 - 94 188
Balance at 31
December 2016 3,732 63,273 - 3,147 1,680 192 (38,157) 33,867
---------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------
Balance at 1
January 2017 3,732 63,273 - 3,147 1,680 192 (38,157) 33,867
Comprehensive -
income
Loss for the
year - - - - - - (1,966) (1,966)
Other
comprehensive
income
Currency
translation
differences - - - - - 898 - 898
Total
comprehensive
income - - - - - 898 (1,996) (1,068)
Transactions
with owners
Conversion of
loan notes 1,803 4,564 - (3,131) - - 3,131 6,367
Issue of shares
during the
year net of
costs 516 3,810 - - - - - 4,326
Shares issued
under Trameta
acquisition 50 - 300 - (350) - - -
Share-based
payments - - - - 239 - - 239
Balance at 31
December 2017 6,101 71,647 300 16 1,569 1,090 (36,992) 43,731
---------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Company Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Share Share premium Merger Equity Share based Retained Total parent
capital Reserve reserve payment earnings equity
reserve
GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s
Balance at 1
January 2016 1,878 56,693 - 1,572 483 (38,762) 21,864
Comprehensive
income
Profit and
total
comprehensive
income for the
year - - - - - 1,774 1,774
Transactions
with owners
Acquisition of
Trameta - - - - 1,103 - 1,103
Extinguishment
of convertible
loan notes - - - (1,572) - 1,572 -
Extension of
convertible
loan
notes - - - 2,787 - - 2,787
Issue of new
convertible
loan
notes - - - 360 - - 360
Conversion of
loan notes 749 2,996 - - - - 3,745
Issue of shares
during the
year net of
costs 1,105 3,584 - - - - 4,689
Share-based
payments - - - - 94 94 188
Balance at 31
December 2016 3,732 63,273 - 3,147 1,680 (35,322) 36,510
---------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ---------- -------------
Balance at 1
January 2017 3,732 63,273 - 3,147 1,680 (35,322) 36,510
Comprehensive
income
Profit and
total
comprehensive
income for the
year - - - - - 1,349 1,349
Transactions
with owners
Conversion of
loan notes 1,803 4,564 - (3,131) - 3,131 6,367
Issue of shares
during the
year net of
costs 516 3,810 - - - - 4,326
Shares issued
under
acquisition
Trameta 50 - 300 - (350) - -
Share-based
payments - - - - 239 - 239
Balance at 31
December 2017 6,101 71,647 300 16 1,569 (30,842) 48,791
---------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ---------- -------------
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 31 December 2017
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
Assets Notes GBP '000s GBP '000s
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 9 23,902 4
Exploration and evaluation costs 10 18,587 37,541
Prepaid abandonment fund 12 279 -
------------ ------------
Total non-current assets 42,768 37,545
Current assets
Inventory 2 -
Trade and other receivables 12 763 32
Cash and cash equivalents 721 3,153
Restricted cash 24 355 -
------------ ------------
Total current assets 1,841 3,185
Total assets 44,609 40,730
============ ============
Equity and liabilities
Attributable to the equity holders
of the Parent Company
Share capital 18 6,101 3,732
Share premium account 71,647 63,273
Merger Reserve 300 -
Equity reserve 16 3,147
Share-based payment reserve 1,569 1,680
Translation reserves 1,090 192
Retained earnings (36,992) (38,157)
------------ ------------
Total equity 43,731 33,867
------------ ------------
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 14 36 6,162
Provisions 15 266 447
Total non-current liabilities 302 6,609
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 16 576 254
Total current liabilities 576 254
Total liabilities 878 6,863
------------ ------------
Total equity and liabilities 44,609 40,730
============ ============
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
These financial statements were approved and authorised for
issue by the Board of Directors on 16 April 2018 and signed on its
behalf by:
Clive Carver,
Chairman
16 April 2018
Company Statement of Financial Position
As at 31 December 2017
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
Notes GBP '000s GBP '000s
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 2 2
Investment in subsidiaries and
joint ventures 11 15,443 15,443
Intercompany receivables 21 32,447 24,239
------------ ------------
Total non-current assets 47,892 39,684
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 13 55 10
Cash and cash equivalents 700 3,143
Restricted cash 24 355 -
------------ ------------
Total current assets 1,110 3,153
Total assets 49,001 42,837
============ ============
Equity
Share capital 18 6,101 3,732
Share premium 71,647 63,273
Merger Reserve 300 -
Equity reserve 16 3,147
Share-based payment reserve 1,569 1,680
Retained loss (30,842) (35,322)
Total equity 48,791 36,510
------------ ------------
Non-Current liabilities
Borrowings 14 36 6,162
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 36 6,162
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 17 174 165
Total current liabilities 174 165
Total liabilities 210 6,327
Total equity and liabilities 49,001 42,837
============ ============
The Company profit for the year was GBP1.3 million (2016: GBP1.8
million).
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
These financial statements were approved and authorised for
issue by the Board of Directors on 16 April 2018 and signed on its
behalf by:
Clive Carver
Chairman
16 April 2018
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Cash flows from operations
Loss after tax for the year (1,966) (2,676)
Adjustments for:
Depreciation charge 239 -
Change in inventory (2) -
Change in receivables (731) 29
Change in payables 121 (252)
Share- based payment charge 239 188
Exchange differences 29 1
Finance income - (159)
Finance cost 347 1,453
Transfer to restricted cash * (355) -
Net cash used in operating activities (2,079) (1,416)
------------- -------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received - 1
Payments for fixed assets (45) (1)
Payments for investing in exploration (4,343) (677)
Prepayment towards abandonment (279) -
fund
Net cash used in investing activities (4,667) (677)
------------- -------------
Cash flows from financing activities
Interest paid and other finance
fees (12) (73)
Proceeds from loans - 1,400
Repayment of loan - (800)
Issue of ordinary shares 4,500 4,999
Share issue costs (174) (311)
Net cash generated from financing
activities 4,314 5,215
------------- -------------
Net (decrease)/increase in cash
and cash equivalents for the
year (2,432) 3,122
Effect of foreign exchange differences - (1)
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of the year 3,153 32
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of the year 721 3,153
------------- -------------
* Restricted cash related to monies held on deposit by Ascent as
collateral against a bank guarantee in favour of INA to cover any
potential future penalties under the gas sales agreement.
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Company Cash Flow Statement
For the year ended 31 December 2017
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Cash flows from operations
Profit after tax for the year 1,349 1,774
Adjustments for
Change in receivables (45) 34
Change in payables 9 (251)
Increase in share-based payments
reserve 239 188
Foreign exchange (1,294) (3,921)
Finance income - (154)
Finance cost 337 1,441
Transfer to restricted cash * (355) -
Net cash generated from / (used
in) operating activities 240 (889)
============= =============
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for fixed assets - (1)
Advances to subsidiaries (7,008) (1,211)
Net cash flows used in investing
activities (7,008) (1,212)
------------- -------------
Cash flows from financing activities
Interest paid (2) (73)
Proceeds from loans - 1,400
Repayment of loan - (800)
Cash proceeds from issue of shares 4,500 4,999
Share issue costs (174) (311)
Net cash generated from financing
activities 4,324 5,215
------------- -------------
Net (decrease)/ increase in cash
and cash equivalents (2,444) 3,114
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of the year 3,143 28
Effects of foreign exchange differences 1 1
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of the year 700 3,143
============= =============
* Restricted cash related to monies held on deposit by Ascent as
collateral against a bank guarantee in favour of INA to cover any
potential future penalties under the gas sales agreement.
The Notes on pages 35 to 58 are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
Notes to the accounts
1 Accounting policies
Reporting entity
Ascent Resources plc ('the Company' or 'Ascent') is a company
domiciled and incorporated in England. The address of the Company's
registered office is 5 New Street Square, London EC4A 3TW. The
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended
31 December 2017 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries
(together referred to as the 'Group') and the Group's interest in
associates and joint ventures. The Parent Company financial
statements present information about the Company as a separate
entity and not about its Group.
The Company is admitted to AIM, a market of the London Stock
Exchange.
The consolidated financial statements of the Group for the year
ended 31 December 2017 are available from the Company's website at
www.ascentresources.co.uk.
Statement of compliance
The Group's and Company's financial statements for the year
ended 31 December 2017 were approved and authorised for issue by
the Board of Directors on 16 April 2018 and the Statements of
Financial Position were signed on behalf of the Board by Clive
Carver.
Both the Parent Company financial statements and the Group
financial statements give a true and fair view and have been
prepared and approved by the Directors in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU
('IFRSs').
Basis of preparation
In publishing the Parent Company financial statements here
together with the Group financial statements, the Company is taking
advantage of the exemption in section 408 of the Companies Act 2006
not to present its individual income statement and related notes
that form a part of these approved financial statements. The
Company profit for the year was GBP1,349,000 (2016: profit of
GBP1,774,000)
Measurement Convention
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical
cost convention. The financial statements are presented in sterling
and have been rounded to the nearest thousand (GBP'000s) except
where otherwise indicated.
The principal accounting policies set out below have been
consistently applied to all periods presented.
Going Concern
The Financial Statements of the Group are prepared on a going
concern basis. Following the commencement of export production, in
the absence of any unexpected issues with the two producing wells,
the Directors consider the Company has sufficient cash to fund its
current obligations for the next 12 months.
New and amended Standards effective for 31 December 2017
year-end adopted by the Group:
i. The following new standards and amendments to standards are
mandatory for the first time for the Group for the financial year
beginning 1 January 2017. The adoption of these standards and
amendments has had no material effect on the Group's financial
statements.
Standard Description Effective
date
IFRS 11 Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests 1 January
in Joint Operation 2017
----------------------------------------- ----------
IAS 16 and Clarification of Acceptable Methods 1 January
IAS 38 of Depreciation and Amortisation 2017
----------------------------------------- ----------
IAS 12 Recognition of deferred tax assets 1 January
for unrealised losses 2017
----------------------------------------- ----------
ii. Standards, amendments and interpretations, which are
effective for reporting periods beginning after the date of these
financial statements which have not been adopted early:
Standard Description Effective
date
IFRS 9 Financial instruments 1 January
2018
---------------------------------------- ----------
IFRS15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers 1 January
2018
---------------------------------------- ----------
IFRS 16 Leases 1 January
2019
---------------------------------------- ----------
IFRS 2 * Share based payment transactions 1 January
2018
---------------------------------------- ----------
IFRIC 22 * Foreign currency transactions and 1 January
advance consideration 2018
---------------------------------------- ----------
IFRIC 23 * Uncertainty over income tax treatments 1 January
2019
---------------------------------------- ----------
IAS 28* Amendments to IAS 28: Long term 1 January
interests in Associates and Joint 2019
Ventures
---------------------------------------- ----------
Annual improvements to IFRSs (2015-2017 1 January
cycle)* 2019
---------------------------------------- ----------
* not yet adopted by the European Union
IFRS 15 is intended to introduce a single framework for revenue
recognition and clarify principles of revenue recognition. This
standard modifies the determination of when to recognise revenue
and how much revenue to recognise. The core principle is that an
entity recognises revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods
and services to the customer of an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. The Company has only one
customer as all production is sold by our joint venture partner;
the concession holder. There will be no changes to the existing
policy as disclosed below as a result of IFRS 15 based on analysis
of the contract. Revenue will be recognised in the period that
hydrocarbons are delivered to the ultimate customer and the
obligation under the joint venture for the concession holder to
remit proceeds to the joint venture partners is created.
IFRS 9 replaces the incurred loss model of IAS 39 with a model
based on expected credit losses or losses on loans. The standard
requires entities to use an expected credit loss model for
impairment of financial assets. Under the new standard, the loss
allowance for a financial instrument will be calculated at an
amount equal to 12 month expected credit losses or lifetime
expected credit losses if there has been a significant increase in
credit risk of the financial instrument.
The Company has a loan to the 100% owned subsidiary that is the
license holder of the assets in Slovenia. Management are still
undertaking a full assessment but do not expect there to be any
material impact as in line with the work the Company completed to
test whether the producing and the intangible assets should be
impaired, it has determined that there currently is no reason to
expect a loss from this loan.
IFRS 16 introduces a single lease accounting model. This
standard requires lessees to account for all leases under a single
on-balance sheet model. Under the new standard, a lessee is
required to recognise all lease assets and liabilities on the
balance sheet; recognise amortisation of leased assets and interest
on lease liabilities over the lease term; and separately present
the principal amount of cash paid and interest in the cash flow
statement. The Group is assessing the impact of IFRS 16 including
the impact on service contracts which contain leases.
The Group does not expect the other standards to have a material
impact on the financial statements.
Critical accounting estimates and assumptions and critical
judgements in applying the Group's accounting policies
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with IFRSs requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, income, expenses and related
disclosures. The estimates and underlying assumptions are based on
practical experience and various other factors that are believed to
be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making the judgements about carrying values of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an
ongoing basis. Changes in accounting estimates may be necessary if
there are changes in the circumstances on which the estimate was
based or as a result of new information. Such changes are recorded
in the period in which the estimate is revised.
The application of the Group's accounting policies may require
management to make judgements, apart from those involving
estimates, which can have a significant effect on the amounts
amortised in the financial statements. Management judgement is
particularly required when assessing the substance of transactions
that have a complicated structure or legal form.
Exploration and evaluation assets - exploration and evaluation
costs are initially classified and held as intangible fixed assets
rather than being expensed. The carrying value of intangible
exploration and evaluation assets are then determined. Management
considers these assets for indicators of impairment under IFRS 6 at
least annually based on an estimation of the recoverability of the
cost pool from future development and production of the related oil
and gas reserves which requires judgement. This assessment includes
assessment of the underlying financial models for the Petišovci
field and requires estimates of gas reserves, production, gas
prices, operating and capital costs associated with the field and
discount rates (see Note 10). The forecasts are based on the
approval of the IPPC permit and other environmental permits which
the Board anticipate being issued having considered all facts and
circumstances.
(a) Decommissioning provision - the provision for
decommissioning is estimated by reference to operators and internal
specialist staff and requires estimates regarding the cost of
decommissioning, inflation, discount rates and the timing of works
which requires judgement (see Note 15); The carrying value of the
provision is GBP266,000.
(b) Commercial reserves - Commercial reserves are proven and
probable oil and gas reserves calculated on an entitlement basis
and are integral to the assessment of the carrying value of the
exploration, evaluation and production assets. Estimates of
commercial reserves include estimates of the amount of oil and gas
in place, assumptions about reservoir performance over the life of
the field and assumptions about commercial factors which, in turn,
will be affected by the future oil and gas price.
(c) Transfer of exploration assets to property, plant and
equipment - during the year we have transferred the costs
associated with areas of the Petišovci asset that were determined
to have achieved commercial feasibility with commercial production
from exploration costs to PPE. This judgment was based on
assessment of the gas reserves, levels of production and associated
profitability and the commencement of export production at Pg10 and
Pg11a. Judgment was required in establishing the costs to be
transferred from the exploration cost pool. Costs transferred
comprised direct costs associated with the wells and
infrastructure, together with an apportionment of the wider
unallocated cost pool based on the ratio of estimated future
production from the two wells relative to the field as a whole. The
carrying amount of exploration assets is GBP18,587,000 at 31
December 2017 and during the year GBP24,092,000 was transferred
from exploration to property plant and equipment. This is included
in Notes 9 and 10.
(d) Carrying value of property, plant and equipment (developed
oil and gas assets) - developed oil and gas assets are tested for
impairment at each reporting date. The impairment test was based on
a discounted cash flow model and key inputs requiring judgment and
estimate included gas prices, production and reserves, future costs
and discount rates. Gas prices in the near term are forecast based
on market prices less deductions under the INA contract, before
reverting to market prices with reference to the forward curve once
the IPPC permit is approved and gas sales take place into the
Slovenian market. The forecasts include future well workovers to
access the reserves included in the model. The impairment test
demonstrates significant headroom.
(e) Depreciation of property, plant and equipment - during the
year we have begun to depreciate the assets associated with current
production. The depreciation on a unit of production basis requires
judgment and estimation in terms of the applicable reserves over
which the assets are depreciated and the extent to which future
capital expenditure is included in the depreciable cost when such
expenditure is required to extract the reserve base. The
calculations have been based on actual production, estimates of P50
reserves and best estimate resources the estimated future workover
costs on the producing wells to extract this reserve. During the
year GBP24,092,000 was transferred from exploration to property
plant and equipment the depreciation charge for the year was
GBP239,000. This is included in Notes 9 and 10 below.
(f) Deferred tax - judgment has been required in assessing the
extent to which a deferred tax asset is recorded, or not recorded,
in respect of the Slovenian operations. Noting the history of
taxable losses and the initial phases of production, together with
assessment of budgets and forecasts of tax in 2018 the Board have
concluded that no deferred tax asset is yet applicable. This is
included at Note 7.
(g) In relation to 2016, the accounting treatment of the Trameta
acquisition which, as it possessed land and pipeline rights, but no
employees or active business processes was accounted for as an
asset acquisition. Estimates were required in determining the fair
value of consideration (see Note 10). The fair value of the Trameta
consideration was GBP1,103,000 as disclosed in Note 11 below.
Consideration for the transaction was 75 million ordinary shares
which vest in four tranches on the one-year anniversary of various
conditions being met. An option over a further 7.5 million ordinary
shares at an exercise price of 2pence is valid for three years from
November 2017 when the second condition was met. When the
conditions are met and the shares vest, merger relief is applied
and the share value in excess of nominal value is taken to a merger
reserve.
(h) In relation to 2016, New CLNs and modification to existing
CLNs - the Group entered into a series of significant modifications
to the maturity on its CLNs and subscribed to a new convertible
loan note. These transactions required judgment in terms of the
appropriate accounting treatment. In addition, judgment and
estimation was required in determining the fair value of liability
and equity components of the loan notes (see Note 14).
Basis of consolidation
Where the Company has control over an investee, it is classified
as a subsidiary. The Company controls an investee if all three of
the following elements are present: power over the investee,
exposure to variable returns from the investee, and the ability of
the investor to use its power to affect those variable returns.
Control is reassessed whenever facts and circumstances indicate
that there may be a change in any of these elements of control.
The consolidated financial statements present the results of the
Company and its subsidiaries as if they formed a single entity.
Inter-company transactions and balances between Group companies are
therefore eliminated in full.
The results of undertakings acquired or disposed of are
consolidated from or to the date when control passes to or from the
Group. The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during
the period are included in the Consolidated Income Statement from
the date that control commences until the date that control
ceases.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the results of
subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies they use into line
with those used by the Group.
Business combinations
On acquisition, the assets, liabilities and contingent
liabilities of subsidiaries are measured at their fair values at
the date of acquisition. Any excess of cost of acquisition over net
fair values of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent
liabilities acquired is recognised as goodwill. Any deficiency of
the cost of acquisition below the net fair values of the
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities
acquired (i.e. discount on acquisition) is credited to profit and
loss in the period of acquisition.
Joint arrangements
The Group is party to a joint arrangement when there is a
contractual arrangement that confers joint control over the
relevant activities of the arrangement to the Group and at least
one other party. Joint control is assessed under the same
principles as control over subsidiaries.
The Group classifies its interests in joint arrangements as
either joint ventures, where the Group has rights to only the net
assets of the joint arrangement, or joint operations where the
Group has both the rights to assets and obligations for the
liabilities of the joint arrangement.
All of the Group's joint arrangements are classified as joint
operations. The Group accounts for its interests in joint
operations by recognising its assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses in accordance with its contractually conferred rights and
obligations.
The Group has one joint arrangement as disclosed on page 11; the
Petišovci joint venture in Slovenia in which Ascent Slovenia
Limited (a 100% subsidiary of Ascent Resources plc) has a 75%
working interest.
Oil and Gas Exploration Assets
All licence/project acquisitions, exploration and appraisal
costs incurred or acquired on the acquisition of a subsidiary, are
accumulated in respect of each identifiable project area. These
costs, which are classified as intangible fixed assets are only
carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be
recovered through the successful development of the area or where
activities in the area have not yet reached a stage which permits
reasonable assessment of the existence of economically recoverable
reserves.
Pre-licence/project costs are written off immediately. Other
costs are also written off unless commercial reserves have been
established or the determination process has not been completed.
Thus, accumulated cost in relation to an abandoned area are written
off in full to the statement of comprehensive income in the year in
which the decision to abandon the area is made.
Transfer of exploration assets to property, plant and
equipment
Assets, including licences or areas of licences, are transferred
from exploration and evaluation cost pools to property, plant and
equipment when the existence of commercially feasible reserves have
been determined and the Group concludes that the assets can
generate commercial production. This assessment considers factors
including the extent to which reserves have been established, the
production levels and margins associated with such production. The
costs transferred comprise direct costs associated with the
relevant wells and infrastructure, together with an allocation of
the wider unallocated exploration costs in the cost pool such as
original acquisition costs for the field. The producing assets
start to be depreciated following transfer.
Depreciation of property plant and equipment
The cost of production wells is depreciated on a unit of
production basis. The depreciation charge is calculated based on
total costs incurred to date plus anticipated future workover
expenditure required to extract the associated gas reserves. This
depreciable asset base is charged to the income statement based on
production in the period over their expected lifetime P50
production extractable from the wells per the field plan.
The infrastructure associated with export production is to be
depreciated on a straight-line basis over a two-year period as this
is the anticipated period over which this infrastructure will be
used.
Impairment of oil and gas exploration assets
Exploration/appraisal assets are reviewed regularly for
indicators of impairment following the guidance in IFRS 6
'Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources' and tested
for impairment where such indicators exist.
In accordance with IFRS 6 the Group considers the following
facts and circumstances in their assessment of whether the Group's
oil and gas exploration assets may be impaired:
-- whether the period for which the Group has the right to
explore in a specific area has expired during the period or will
expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;
-- whether substantive expenditure on further exploration for
and evaluation of mineral resources in a specific area is neither
budgeted nor planned;
-- whether exploration for and evaluation of oil and gas
reserves in a specific area have not led to the discovery of
commercially viable quantities of oil and gas and the Group has
decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area;
and
-- whether sufficient data exists to indicate that although a
development in a specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying
amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is unlikely to be
recovered in full from successful development or by sale.
If any such facts or circumstances are noted, the Group, as a
next step, perform an impairment test in accordance with the
provisions of IAS 36. In such circumstances the aggregate carrying
value of the oil and gas exploration and assets is compared against
the expected recoverable amount of the cash generating unit. The
recoverable amount is the higher of value in use and the fair value
less costs to sell.
The Group has identified one cash generating unit, the wider
Petišovci project (excluding Pg10 and Pg11a and associated
infrastructure transferred to PPE) in Slovenia. Any impairment
arising is recognised in the Income Statement for the year.
Where there has been a charge for impairment in an earlier
period that charge will be reversed in a later period where there
has been a change in circumstances to the extent that the
discounted future net cash flows are higher than the net book value
at the time. In reversing impairment losses, the carrying amount of
the asset will be increased to the lower of its original carrying
values or the carrying value that would have been determined (net
of depletion) had no impairment loss been recognised in prior
periods.
Impairment of development and production assets and other
property, plant and equipment
At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying
amounts of its PP&E to determine whether there is any
indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If
any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is
estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss
(if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are
independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable
amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The
recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell
and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future
cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax
discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time
value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the
estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit)
is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying
amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its
recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense
immediately.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying
amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the
revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the
increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that
would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised
for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of
an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately.
Decommissioning costs
Where a material obligation for the removal of wells and
production facilities and site restoration at the end of the field
life exists, a provision for decommissioning is recognised. The
amount recognised is the net present value of estimated future
expenditure determined in accordance with local conditions and
requirements. An asset of an amount equivalent to the provision is
also added to oil and gas exploration assets and depreciated on a
unit of production basis once production begins. Changes in
estimates are recognised prospectively, with corresponding
adjustments to the provision and the associated asset.
Foreign currency
The Group's strategy is focussed on developing oil and gas
projects across Europe funded by shareholder equity and other
financial assets which are principally denominated in sterling. The
functional currency of the Company is sterling.
Transactions in foreign currency are translated to the
respective functional currency of the Group entity at the rates of
exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each
reporting date, monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated to the
functional currency at the rates prevailing on the reporting date.
Exchange gains and losses on short-term foreign currency borrowings
and deposits are included with net interest payable.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
to sterling at foreign exchange rates ruling at the balance sheet
date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are
translated to sterling at the average rate ruling during the
period. Foreign exchange differences arising on retranslation are
recognised directly in a separate component of equity. Foreign
exchange differences arising on inter-company loans considered to
be permanent as equity are recorded in equity. The exchange rate
from euro to sterling at 31 December 2017 was GBP1: EUR1.1262
(2016: GBP1: EUR1.1722).
On disposal of a foreign operation, the cumulative exchange
differences recognised in the foreign exchange reserve relating to
that operation up to the date of disposal are transferred to the
consolidated income statement as part of the profit or loss on
disposal.
Exchange differences on all other transactions, except
inter-company foreign currency loans, are taken to operating
loss.
Taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable
and any deferred tax.
The tax currently payable is based on the estimated taxable
profit for the period. Taxable profit differs from net profit as
reported in the income statement because it excludes items of
income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and
it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The
Group's liability for current tax is calculated using the expected
tax rate applicable to annual earnings.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding tax bases
used in the computation of taxable profit. It is accounted for
using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities
are recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred
tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that
taxable profits will be available against which deductible
temporary differences can be utilised. The carrying amount of
deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced
to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable
profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be
recovered.
Equity-settled share-based payments
The cost of providing share-based payments to employees is
charged to the income statement over the vesting period of the
related share options or share allocations. The cost is based on
the fair values of the options and shares allocated determined
using the binomial method. The value of the charge is adjusted to
reflect expected and actual levels of vesting. Charges are not
adjusted for market related conditions which are not achieved.
Where equity instruments are granted to persons other than
directors or employees the Consolidated Income Statement is charged
with the fair value of any goods or services received.
Grants of options in relation to acquiring exploration assets in
licence areas are treated as additions to Slovenian exploration
costs at Group level and increases in investments at Company
level.
Provisions
A provision is recognised in the Statement of Financial Position
when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a
result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of
economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the
effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the
expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current
market assessments of the time value of money and the risks
specific to the liability.
Convertible loan notes
Upon issue of a new convertible loan, where the convertible
option is at a fixed rate, the net proceeds received from the issue
of CLNs are split between a liability element and an equity
component at the date of issue. The fair value of the liability
component is estimated using the prevailing market interest rate
for similar non-convertible debt. The difference between the
proceeds of issue of the CLNs and the fair value assigned to the
liability component, representing the embedded option to convert
the liability into equity of the Group, is included in equity and
is not re-measured.
Subsequent to the initial recognition the liability component is
measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
When there are amendments to the contractual loan note terms
these terms are assessed to determine whether the amendment
represents an inducement to the loan note holders to convert. If
this is considered to be the case the estimate of fair value
adjusted as appropriate and any loss arising is recorded in the
income statement.
Where there are amendments to the contractual loan note terms
that are considered to represent a significant modification to the
loan note, without representing an inducement to convert, the Group
treats the transaction as an extinguishment of the existing
convertible loan note and replaces the instrument with a new
convertible loan note. The fair value of the liability component is
estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for similar
non-convertible debt. The fair value of the conversion right is
recorded as an increase in equity. The previous equity reserve is
reclassified to retained loss. Any gain or loss arising on the
extinguishment of the instrument is recorded in the income
statement, unless the transaction is with a counterparty considered
to be acting in their capacity as a shareholder whereby the gain or
loss is recorded in equity.
Where the loan note is converted into ordinary shares by the
loan note holder; the unaccreted portion of the loan notes is
transferred from the equity reserve to the liability; the full
liability is then converted into share capital and share premium
based on the conversion price on the note.
Non-derivative financial instruments
Non-derivative financial instruments comprise of investments in
equity and debt securities, trade and other receivables, cash and
cash equivalents, loans and borrowings and trade and other
payables.
Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the
statement of financial position when the Group becomes a party to
the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Trade and other receivables are measured at initial recognition
at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using
the effective interest method. A provision is established when
there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to
collect all amounts due. The amount of any provision is recognised
in the income statement.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash held by the Group and
short-term bank deposits with an original maturity of three months
or less.
Trade and other payables are initially measured at fair value
and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest rate method.
Financial liabilities and equity instruments issued by the Group
are classified in accordance with the substance of the contractual
arrangements entered into and the definitions of a financial
liability and an equity instrument. Where a financial liability is
extinguished and replaced by a convertible loan note and the
counterparty is acting in their capacity as a debt holder, the
liability is derecognised and replaced with a new convertible loan
note (see above). Any gain or loss arising on the extinguishment is
recorded in the income statement.
Equity
Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the
proceeds received, net of any direct issue costs.
Investments and loans
Shares and loans in subsidiary undertakings are shown at cost.
Provisions are made for any permanent diminution in value when the
fair value of the assets is assessed as less than the carrying
amount of the asset. Inter-company loans are repayable on demand
but are included as non-current as the realisation is not expected
in the short term.
Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the
internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker.
The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief
Executive Officer ('CEO').
Revenue recognition
Revenue is derived from the production of hydrocarbons under the
Petišovci, which Ascent Slovenia Limited holds a 75% working
interest. Under the terms of the Joint Venture agreement, and in
accordance with Slovenian law, the concession holder retains the
rights to all hydrocarbons produced. The concession holder enters
into sales agreements with customers and transfers the relevant
portion of hydrocarbon sales to Ascent Slovenia Limited for the
services it provides under the Joint Venture agreement.
Under the Joint Venture Agreement, the Group is entitled to 90%
of the revenues until back costs have been recovered and the Group
records revenue on the entitlement basis accordingly.
Ascent recognises revenue in the period the hydrocarbons are
delivered to the end customer and significant risks and rewards
transfer. Significant risk and reward on gas revenues transfer at
the border to Croatia under the contract and is recorded at this
point. Condensate, which is collected at a separating station and
transported via trucks to a customer in Hungary is recorded on
delivery according the terms of the contract.
Revenue earned during the period of test production is
recognised at nil gross margin. Any surplus of revenue over cost of
sales has been offset against capitalised exploration costs.
2 Segmental Analysis
The Group has two reportable segments, an operating segment and
a head office segment, as described below. The operations and day
to day running of the business are carried out on a local level and
therefore managed separately. The operating segment reports to the
UK head office which evaluates performance, decide how to allocate
resources and make other operating decisions such as the purchase
of material capital assets and services. Internal reports are
generated and submitted to the Group's CEO for review on a monthly
basis.
The operations of the Group as a whole are the exploration for,
development and production of oil and gas reserves.
The two geographic reporting segments are made up as
follows:
Slovenia - exploration, development and production
UK - head office
The costs of exploration and development works are carried out
under shared licences with joint ventures and subsidiaries which
are co-ordinated by the UK head office. Segment revenue, segment
expense and segment results include transfers between segments.
Those transfers are eliminated on consolidation.
Information regarding the current and prior year's results for
each reportable segment is included below.
A single customer accounted for 60% of total revenues for the
year and is disclosed within the Slovenia segment below.
2017 UK Slovenia Inter-company Total
GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s
Hydrocarbon sales - 814 - 814
Inter-company sales 1,601 (1,601) -
Total revenue 1,601 814 (1,601) 814
Cost of sales - (403) - (403)
Administrative expenses (excluding
depreciation) (1,148) (1,292) 649 (1,791)
Significant non-cash items
Depreciation - (239) (239)
Net finance costs (337) (1,282) 1,272 (347)
------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- -------------- ----------
Reportable segment (loss)/profit
before tax 116 (2,402) 320 (1,966)
Taxation - - - -
Reportable segment (loss)/profit
after taxation 116 (2,402) 320 (1,966)
------------------------------------ ---------- --------------
Reportable segment assets
Carrying value of exploration
assets - 37,541 - 37,541
Additions to exploration assets - 4,544 - 4,544
Decrease in decommissioning
asset - (199) - (199)
Transfers to plant and equipment - (24,092) - (24,092)
Effects of exchange rate movements 793 793
Total plant and equipment 3 23,899 - 23,902
Prepaid abandonment fund - 279 - 279
Total non-current assets 3 42,765 - 42,768
Other assets 33,501 786 (32,447) 1,841
Consolidated total assets 33,504 43,551 (32,447) 44,609
------------------------------------ ---------- --------------
Reportable segmental liabilities
Trade payables (92) (338) - (430)
External loan balances (36) - - (36)
Inter-group borrowings - (33,501) 33,501 -
Other liabilities (82) (330) - (412)
Consolidated total liabilities (210) (34,169) 33,501 (878)
Revenue was earned by the Slovenian segment through the joint
venture structure; sales were made to end customers in Slovenia
GBP294,000; Croatia GBP489,000 and Hungary GBP32,000.
2016 UK Slovenia Inter-company Total
GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s
Inter-company sales 160 - (160) -
Total revenue 160 - (160) -
Administrative expenses (870) (665) 153 (1,382)
Significant non-cash items
Net finance costs (1,296) (5) 7 (1,294)
------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- -------------- ----------
Reportable segment loss before
tax (2,006) (670) - (2,676)
Taxation - - - -
Reportable segment loss after
taxation (2,006) (670) - (2,676)
------------------------------------ ---------- --------------
Reportable segment assets
Carrying value of exploration
assets - 32,711 - 32,711
Additions to exploration assets - 1,779 - 1,779
Effects of exchange rate movements - 3,051 - 3,051
Total plant and equipment 2 2 - 4
Total non-current assets 2 37,543 - 37,545
Other assets 27,382 31 (24,228) 3,185
Consolidated total assets 27,384 37,574 (24,228) 40,730
------------------------------------ ---------- --------------
Reportable segmental liabilities
Trade payables (84) (64) - (148)
External loan balances (6,162) - - (6,162)
Inter-group borrowings - (27,382) 27,382 -
Other liabilities (81) (472) - (553)
Consolidated total liabilities (6,327) (27,918) 27,382 (6,863)
3 Operating loss is stated after charging:
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Employee costs (see Note 4) 797 560
Share based payment charge 235 188
Included within Admin Expenses
Audit Fees 73 60
Fees payable to the Company's auditor
other services - 2
------------- -------------
73 62
4 Employees and directors
a. Employees
The average number of persons employed by the Company and Group,
including Executive Directors, was:
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
Management and technical 9 6
============= =============
b. Directors and employee's remuneration
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Wages and salaries 687 439
Social security costs 64 81
Pension costs 44 37
Share-based payments 235 188
Taxable benefits 2 2
1,032 747
============= =============
c. Directors remuneration
2017 Salary/fees Bonus Pension Total
*
GBP GBP GBP GBP
Executive Directors
C Hutchinson 164,471 51,750 760 216,981
Non-executive Directors
C Carver 73,874 30,000 - 103,874
C Davies 37,192 15,000 - 52,192
N Moore 37,192 15,000 - 52,192
------------ -------- -------- --------
Total 312,729 111,750 760 425,239
2016 Salary/fees Bonus Pension Total
*
GBP GBP GBP GBP
Executive Directors
C Hutchinson 137,500 17,000 16 154,516
Non-executive Directors -
C Carver 60,000 - - 60,000
C Davies 30,000 - - 30,000
N Moore 30,000 - - 30,000
------------ -------- -------- --------
Total 257,500 17,000 16 274,516
The highest paid Director in the year ended 31 December 2017 was
Colin Hutchinson earning GBP216,981 (2016: C Hutchinson earning
GBP154,516). Colin Hutchinson is a member of the defined
contribution pension scheme which commenced in December 2016;
contributions during the year were GBP760 (2016: GBP16).
* Bonuses were payable on achieving first gas sales.
d. Directors' incentive share options
Opening Granted/ Closing Date Share Exercise Exercise
Price Period
2017 (Lapsed) Granted at Grant Price Start End
*
C Carver 1,328,443 - 1,328,443 30-Apr-13 16.4p 20p 30-Apr-16 30-Apr-23
C Carver 13,985,884 - 13,985,884 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
C Carver - 13,612,502 13,612,502 07-Nov-17 1.975p 1.975p 06-Nov-20 08-Nov-27
C Hutchinson 265,688 - 265,688 23-May-13 16.4p 20p 30-Apr-16 30-Apr-23
C Hutchinson 34,964,709 - 34,964,709 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
C Hutchinson - 34,031,255 34,031,255 07-Nov-17 1.975p 1.975p 06-Nov-20 08-Nov-27
N Moore 6,992,942 - 6,992,942 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
N Moore - 6,806,251 6,806,251 07-Nov-17 1.975p 1.975p 06-Nov-20 08-Nov-27
C Davies 6,992,942 - 6,992,942 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
C Davies - 6,806,251 6,806,251 07-Nov-17 1.975p 1.975p 06-Nov-20 08-Nov-27
2016
C Carver 1,328,443 - 1,328,443 30-Apr-13 16.4p 20p 30-Apr-16 30-Apr-23
C Carver - 13,985,884 13,985,884 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
C Hutchinson 265,688 - 265,688 30-Apr-13 16.4p 20p 30-Apr-16 30-Apr-23
C Hutchinson - 34,964,709 34,964,709 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
N Moore - 6,992,942 6,992,942 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
C Davies - 6,992,942 6,992,942 05-May-16 1.58p 1.58p 05-May-19 06-May-26
5 Finance income and costs recognised in the year
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Finance income
Foreign exchange movements realised - 6
Other income - 153
- 159
============= =============
Finance cost
Interest payable on borrowings - (51)
Accretion charge on convertible
loan notes (241) (1,380)
Foreign exchange movements realised (94) -
Loan fees - (16)
Bank Charges (12) (6)
(347) (1,453)
============= =============
Please refer to Note 14 for a description of financing activity
during the year.
6 Income tax expense
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Current tax expense - -
Deferred tax expense - -
Total tax expense for the year - -
============= =============
The difference between the total tax expense shown above and the
amount calculated by applying the standard rate of UK corporation
tax to the loss before tax is as follows:
Year ended Year ended
31-Dec-17 31-Dec-16
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Loss for the year (1,966) (2,676)
Income tax using the Company's
domestic tax rate at 19%
(2016: 20%) (374) (535)
Effects of:
Net increase in unrecognised
losses carried forward 273 666
Effect of tax rates in foreign
jurisdictions 40 20
Other non-taxable items (98) (195)
Other non-deductible expenses 159 44
Total tax expense for the - -
year
=========== ===========
7 Deferred tax - Group & Company
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Group
Total tax losses (37,080) (31,203)
Unrecorded deferred tax asset at
17% (2016: 17%) 6,304 5,305
---------- ----------
Company
Total tax losses (10,912) (10,322)
Unrecorded deferred tax asset at
17% (2016: 17%) 1,855 1,755
---------- ----------
No deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of the tax
losses carried forward. Refer to critical accounting estimates and
judgments
8 Loss per share
31 December 2017 31 December 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Result for the year
Total loss for the year attributable
to equity shareholders 1,966 2,676
Weighted average number of ordinary Number Number
shares
For basic earnings per share 1,877,070,907 544,270,848
Loss per share (Pence) (0.10) (0.49)
As the result for the year was a loss, no diluted EPS is
disclosed. At 31 December 2017, potentially dilutive instruments in
issue were 207,383,861 (2016: 973,469,828). Dilutive shares arise
from share options and CLNs issued by the Company and from the
deferred consideration on the Trameta transaction.
9 Property, Plant & Equipment - Group
Computer Developed Total
Equipment Oil & Gas
Assets
Cost
At 1 January 2016 - - -
Additions 4 - 4
At 31 December 2016 4 - 4
----------- ----------- -------
At 1 January 2017 4 - 4
Additions 2 43 45
Transfer from Exploration (Note
10) - 24,092 24,092
At 31 December 2017 6 24,135 24,141
----------- ----------- -------
Depreciation
At 1 January 2016 - - -
Charge for the year - - -
At 31 December 2016 - - -
----------- ----------- -------
At 1 January 2017 - - -
Charge for the year - (239) (239)
At 31 December 2017 - (239) (239)
----------- ----------- -------
Carrying value
At 31 December 2017 6 23,896 23,902
----------- ----------- -------
At 31 December 2016 4 - 4
----------- ----------- -------
At 1 January 2016 - - -
----------- ----------- -------
10 Exploration and evaluation assets - Group
Slovenia Total
Cost
At 1 January 2016 32,711 32,711
Additions 1,779 1,779
Effects of exchange rate movements 3,051 3,051
At 31 December 2016 37,541 37,541
--------- ---------
At 1 January 2017 37,541 37,541
Additions 4,544 4,544
Transfer to PPE (Note 9) (24,092) (24,092)
Adjustment to decommissioning asset (199) (199)
Effects of exchange rate movements 793 793
At 31 December 2017 18,587 18,587
--------- ---------
Carrying value
At 31 December 2017 18,587 18,587
--------- ---------
At 31 December 2016 37,541 37,541
--------- ---------
At 1 January 2016 32,711 32,711
--------- ---------
During the year the Company has brought Pg-10 and Pg-11A into
commercial production and has therefore transferred the related
costs from exploration assets to property, plant & equipment.
The total historic costs for Pg-10 and Pg-11A and the cost of the
infrastructure related to export gas production, together with an
apportionment of past exploration costs has been transferred from
exploration to property plant and equipment. The apportionment of
past historic costs was allocated to wells Pg-10 and Pg-11A based
on their expected contribution to total field production.
For the purposes of impairment testing the intangible oil and
gas assets are allocated to the Group's cash-generating unit, which
represent the lowest level within the Group at which the intangible
oil and gas assets are measured for internal management purposes,
which is not higher than the Group's operating segments as reported
in Note 2.
In the prior year, the Company accounted for the Trameta
transaction as the acquisition of land and pipeline rights.
relating to the exploration project. This fair value of
consideration was GBP1.1 million, see Note 23.
The amounts for intangible exploration assets represent costs
incurred on active exploration projects. Amounts capitalised are
assessed for impairment indicators under IFRS 6 at each period end
as detailed in the Group's accounting policy. In addition, the
Group routinely reviews the economic model and reasonably possible
sensitivities and considers whether there are indicators of
impairment. As at 31 December 2017 and 2016 the net present value
significantly exceeded the carrying value of the assets. The key
estimates associated with the economic model net present value are
detailed in Note 1. The outcome of ongoing exploration, and
therefore whether the carrying value of intangible exploration
assets will ultimately be recovered, is inherently uncertain.
11 Investment in subsidiaries - Company
GBP000s
At 1 January 2016 14,340
Acquisition of Trameta 1,103
At 31 December 2016 15,443
========
At 31 December 2017 15,443
========
Name of company Principal activity Country of incorporation % of share % of share
capital capital
held 2017 held 2016
Ascent Slovenia
Limited
Tower Gate Place
Tal-Qroqq Street
Msida MSD 1703 Oil and Gas
Malta exploration Malta 100% 100%
Ascent Resources
doo
Glavna ulica 7
9220 Lendava-Lendva Oil and Gas
Slovenia exploration Slovenia 100% 100%
Trameta doo
Glavna ulica 7
9220 Lendava-Lendva Infrastructure
Slovenia owner Slovenia 100% 100%
Ascent Resources
Netherlands BV
c/o Ascent Resources
plc
c/o Taylor Wessing
LLP
5 New Street Square Oil and Gas
London EC4A 3TW exploration Netherlands 100% 100%
All subsidiary companies are held directly by Ascent Resources
plc.
12 Trade and other receivables - Group
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Trade receivables 655 -
VAT recoverable 72 26
Prepaid abandonment fund 279 -
Prepayments & accrued income 36 6
1,042 32
Less non-current portion (279) -
---------- ----------
Current portion 763 32
========== ==========
13 Trade and other receivables - Company
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
VAT recoverable 19 4
Prepayments & accrued income 36 6
55 10
========== ==========
14 Borrowings - Group & Company
2017 2016
Group GBP '000s GBP '000s
Non-current
Convertible loan notes 36 6,162
36 6,162
---------- ----------
Company
Non-current
Convertible loan notes 36 6,162
36 6,162
---------- ----------
Convertible Loan Note 2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Liability brought forward 6,162 10,778
Interest expense 241 1,380
Modification to existing notes - de-recognition
Nov 2016 (iv) - (8,140)
Modification to existing notes - recognition
of amended note - Nov 2016 (iv) - 5,352
Fair value of new loan notes issued in November
2016 (iii) - 690
Converted notes (i) (6,367) (3,745)
Other movements - (153)
Liability at 31 December 36 6,162
---------- ----------
The only transactions relating to the convertible loan notes
during 2017 were various conversion request in which the loan notes
were converted to equity. The transactions during 2016 and the
background to the notes is also covered below:
(i) Conversions
There were a number of loan note conversions carried out during
the periods:
Loan notes converted including Shares issued
accrued interest*
2016 2017 2016 2017
GBP GBP No. No.
January - - - -
February - 2,652,107 - 265,210,704
March - 1,597,018 - 159,701,787
April 1,088,390 1,581,609 108,838,990 158,160,880
May 463,113 69,709 46,311,258 6,970,931
June 1,273,923 325 127,392,263 32,548
July - 3,117,137 - 311,713,705
August 845,053 - 84,505,321 -
September 563 - 56,312 -
October - - - -
November 73,455 - 7,345,491 -
December 357 - 35,702 -
3,744,853 9,017,906 374,485,337 901,790,555
* The amounts stated represent the loan note principal and accumulated
coupon interest rather than the amortised cost of the loan notes
under IFRS after the impact of discounting to fair value at
inception and subsequent accretion. The amortised cost of the
loan notes was GBP6,367,000 representing GBP9,017,906 less the
unamortised cost adjustment of GBP2,650,906. On conversion,
the amount recorded in equity at inception of GBP3,131,000 has
been transferred to retained earnings from the equity reserve.
(ii) Background
The balance at 31 December 2017 relates to the residual balance
of the 2013 convertible loan notes which are convertible at the
discretion of the holder into Ordinary shares at 100 Ordinary
shares per GBP1 principal of loan note.
The Group issued GBP5 million of 9 per cent 2013 CLNs during
2012 and 2013, convertible at any time at the discretion of the
holder, into Ordinary Shares at 200 Ordinary Shares per GBP1
principal of loan note, an effective conversion price of between
0.1p and 0.5p per Ordinary share depending on whether the balance
could be sold to independent third-party investors. The CLNs were
due to mature in January 2015.
On 5 February 2014, the Group agreed with Henderson to create a
new GBP5 million class of 9 per cent CLNs with a maturity date of
December 2014, convertible at any time at the discretion of the
holder, into Ordinary Shares at 100 Ordinary Shares per GBP1
principal of loan note, an effective conversion price of 1 pence
per Ordinary share. The first GBP2 million available under these
2014 CLNs was drawn immediately with the balance intended for sale
to independent third-party investors, with the intention that the
pricing of all the 2014 CLNs would be reset to the lowest price
paid by these new investors.
These convertible loan notes were subsequently subject to
various variations in terms and extensions through to 2016.
(iii) Issue of loan notes pursuant to the placing - 2016
On 27 October 2016 shareholders approved a placing which
included the issuance of GBP1,050,000 of new convertible loan notes
('The 2016 CLN's'), GBP50,000 of which were subscribed for by the
Directors of the Company. The notes were to be on identical terms
to the 2013 & 2014 CLNs.
On initial recognition, the liability and equity element of the
CLNs have been fair valued. The loans have been recognised at a
discount rate of 15% (equating to GBP690,000) and the interest
charge will accrete over the loan period.
The fair value attributable to the equity portion has been
recorded in equity (GBP360,000), representing the fair value of the
conversion option. The loan amount is convertible at any time into
ordinary shares of the Company, GBP1 million of which was converted
post period end.
(iv) Variation of loan note terms in 2016
In November 2016, prior to the notes falling due for repayment,
the holders of the CLNs agreed to extend the maturity to 19
November 2019 with no adjustment to the conversion price or any
other terms. The carrying value of the CLN liabilities at 19
November 2016 was GBP8,140,000. The CLNs were extinguished and
replaced with amended convertible loans. On initial recognition,
the liability and equity element of the CLNs have been fair valued.
The loans have been recognised at a discount rate of 15% (equating
to GBP5,352,000) and the interest charge will accrete over the loan
period.
The weighted average coupon interest rate of the convertible
loan is 0% as interest ceased to accrue on the convertible notes in
January 2015.
The fair value attributable to the equity portion was recorded
in equity (GBP2,788,000) representing the fair value of the
conversion option. The loan amount is convertible at any time into
ordinary shares of the Company.
The notes are not subject to a waiver of the provisions of Rule
9 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers. Accordingly, if
Henderson or any other holder of the 2013 and 2015 CLN's exercise
their right of conversion and they hold equal to or more than 30
per cent of the total voting rights of the Company, such holder
will be required to make a mandatory bid for the remaining ordinary
shares in the capital of the Company not held by them.
15 Provisions - Group
GBP000s
At 1 January 2016 386
Foreign exchange movement 61
At 31 December 2016 447
--------
At 1 January 2017 447
Adjustment to the decommissioning
provision (199)
Foreign exchange movement 18
At 31 December 2017 266
--------
The amount provided for decommissioning costs represents the
Group's share of site restoration costs for the Petišovci field in
Slovenia. The most recent estimate is that the year-end provision
will become payable after 2037. During the year the Company has
placed EUR300,000 (GBP279,000) on deposit as collateral against
this liability see Note 12.
16 Trade and other payables - Group
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Trade payables 430 147
Tax and social security payable 30 10
Other payables 19 -
Accruals and deferred income 97 97
576 254
========== ==========
17 Trade and other payables - Company
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Trade payables 92 84
Tax and social security payable 16 10
Accruals and deferred income 66 70
174 164
========== ==========
18 Called up share capital
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Authorised
10,000,000,000 ordinary shares
of 0.10p each 10,000 10,000
Allotted, called up and fully
paid
2,268,750,320 (2016: 157,306,901)
ordinary shares of 0.2pence
each (2016: 0.2p each) 6,101 3,732
Reconciliation of share capital movement 2017 2016
Number Number
At 1 January 1,084,074,224 157,306,900
-------------- --------------
Loan note conversions 901,790,555 374,485,337
Issue of Trameta consideration 25,000,000 -
shares
Placings 257,885,541 552,281,987
At 31 December 2,268,750,320 1,084,074,224
============== ==============
Shares issued during the year
There were a number of conversion requests processed during the
year; for the details see Note 14.
The Company also raised funds through placings during the
year:
-- On 13 February 2017, the Company raised GBP2,987,500
(GBP2,838,363 net of costs) via the Placing of 161,500,000 Ordinary
Shares with investors using the PrimaryBid.com platform.
-- On 27 October 2017, the Company raised GBP1,500,000
(GBP1,500,000 net of costs) via the Placing of 96,385,541 Ordinary
Shares with investors using the PrimaryBid.com platform.
Shares issued during the prior year
There were a number of conversion requests processed during the
prior year; for the details please see Note 14.
The Company also raised funds through placings during the prior
year:
-- On 12 April 2016, the Company raised GBP500,000 (GBP477,500
net of costs) via the Placing of 35,714,285 Ordinary Shares with
investors using the PrimaryBid.com platform.
-- On 7 June 2016, the Company raised GBP500,000 (GBP477,500 net
of costs) via the Placing of 83,333,333 Ordinary Shares with
investors using the PrimaryBid.com platform.
-- On 15 June 2016, the Company raised GBP500,000 (GBP500,000
net of costs) via the Placing of 83,333,333 Ordinary Shares to
Henderson Global Investors.
-- On 31 October 2016, the Company raised GBP2,627,500
(GBP2,402,434 net of costs) via the Placing of 262,750,000 Ordinary
Shares.
-- On 7 November 2016, the Company raised GBP871,510 (GBP871,510
net of costs) via the Placing of 87,151,027 Ordinary Shares to
Henderson Global Investors.
Reserve description and purpose
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve
within owners' equity:
-- Share capital: Amount subscribed for share capital at nominal value.
-- Merger reserve: Value of shares, in excess of nominal value,
issued with respect of the Trameta acquisition in 2016.
-- Equity reserve: Amount of proceeds on issue of convertible
debt relating to the equity component and contribution on
modification of the convertible loan notes, i.e. option to convert
the debt into share capital.
-- Share premium: Amounts subscribed for share capital in excess
of nominal value less costs of shares associated with share
issues.
-- Share-based payment reserve: Value of share options granted
and calculated with reference to a binomial pricing model. When
options lapse or are exercised, amounts are transferred from this
account to retained earnings.
-- Translation reserve: Exchange movements arising on the
retranslation of net assets of operation into the presentation
currency.
-- Accumulated losses: Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in consolidated income.
19 Operating lease arrangements
At the balance sheet date, the Group had no outstanding
commitments under non-cancellable operating leases (2016:
GBPnil).
20 Exploration expenditure commitments
In order to maintain an interest in the oil and gas permits in
which the Group is involved, the Group is committed to meet the
conditions under which the permits were granted and the obligations
of any joint operating agreements. The timing and the amount of
exploration expenditure commitments and obligations of the Group
are subject to the work programmes required as per the permit
commitments. This may vary significantly from the forecast
programmes based upon the results of the work performed. Drilling
results in any of the projects may also cause variations to the
forecast programmes and consequent expenditure. Such activity may
lead to accelerated or decreased expenditure. It is the Group's
policy to seek joint operating partners at an early stage to reduce
its commitments.
At 31 December 2017, the Group had exploration and expenditure
commitments of GBP Nil (2016 - Nil).
21 Related party transactions
a. Group companies - transactions
2017 2017 2016 2016
Cash Services Cash Services
Ascent Slovenia Limited 5,588 799 541 183
Ascent Resources doo 612 - 275 212
Trameta doo 9 - - -
6,210 799 816 395
------ --------- ----- ---------
Cash refers to funds advanced by the Company to subsidiaries.
Services relates to services provided by the Company to
subsidiaries.
b. Group companies - balances
2017 2017 2016 2016
Cash Services Cash Services
Ascent Slovenia Limited 23,450 4,104 16,690 3,175
Ascent Resources doo 3,078 1,806 2,369 1,735
Trameta doo 9 - - -
26,537 5,910 19,059 4,910
------- --------- ------- ---------
c. Directors
Key management are those persons having authority and
responsibility for planning, controlling and directing the
activities of the Group. In the opinion of the Board, the Group's
key management are the Directors of Ascent Resources plc.
Information regarding their compensation is given in Note 4.
2017
In February 2017, Colin Hutchinson subscribed for 270,270
Ordinary Shares as part of the PrimaryBid Placing described in Note
18.
In November 2017, Colin Hutchinson acquired 300,000 Ordinary
Shares at an average price of 1.743 pence per share in the
market.
The share-based payment charge for the period of GBP239,000
included an amount related to Directors of GBP211,000 (2016:
GBP133,502).
Clive Carver is a director of Darwin Strategic Limited, which is
the owner of PrimaryBid through which the Company raised GBP4.5
million in equity during 2017. Refer to Note 18 for further share
issues.
2016
In October 2016, the Directors subscribed for GBP50,000 of
convertible loan notes in connection with the Placing which raised
GBP4.5 million (GBP3.5 million equity and GBP1 million convertible
loan notes) before costs. Clive Carver, Cameron Davies and Nigel
Moore subscribed for GBP13,333 each with Colin Hutchinson
subscribing for GBP10,001.
Clive Carver is a director of Darwin Strategic Limited, which is
the owner of PrimaryBid through which the Company raised GBP1.0
million in equity during 2016. Refer to Note 18 for further share
issues.
22 Events subsequent to the reporting period
In March 2018 the Company carried out an operation at Pg-11A to
remove a choke and some stuck tooling left downhole at the end of
the workover operation in August 2017. At the time it was expected
that the well would flow satisfactorily with the restriction in
place. However, the performance of the well since September has
been sub-optimal and so the operation to remove the tooling and the
choke was carried out. The tooling was removed, and the tubing
opened significantly, although part of a mandrel remains stuck at
2,200 metres. The results of the operation are not clear at the
date of this report.
23 Share based payments
The Company has provided the Directors, certain employees and
institutional investors with share options and warrants
('options'). Options are exercisable at a price equal to the
closing market price of the Company's shares on the date of grant.
The exercisable period varies and can be up to seven years once
fully vested after which time the option lapses.
Details of the share options outstanding during the year are as
follows:
Shares Weighted
Average
price
(pence)
Outstanding at 1 January 2017 84,513,744 2.86
Granted during the year 68,062,510 1.98
Outstanding at 31 December 2017 152,576,254 2.38
Exercisable at 31 December 2017 13,185,738 9.76
Outstanding at 1 January 2016 5,935,738 26.32
Granted during the year 78,828,006 1.62
Expired during the year (250,000) 170.00
Outstanding at 31 December 2016 84,513,744 2.86
Exercisable at 31 December 2016 13,185,738 9.76
The value of the options is measured by the use of a binomial
pricing model. The inputs into the binomial model made in 2017 were
as follows:
Share price at grant date 1.32p - 1.975p
Exercise price 1.54p - 20p
Volatility 50%
Expected life 3-5 years
Risk free rate 0.5%
Expected dividend yield 0%
The value of the options is measured by the use of a binomial
pricing model. The inputs into the binomial model made in 2016 were
as follows:
Share price at grant date 1.32p - 1.54p
Exercise price 1.54p - 2.00p
Volatility 50%
Expected life 3-5 years
Risk free rate 0.5%
Expected dividend yield 0%
Expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical
volatility of the Group's share price over the previous 5 years.
The expected life is the expiry period of the options from the date
of issue.
Options outstanding at 31 December 2017 have an exercise price
in the range of 1.54p and 20.00p (31 December 2016: 1.58p and
20.00p) and a weighted average contractual life of 8.3 years (31
December 2016: 9.1 years).
Trameta acquisition
During the prior year, the Company acquired Trameta doo which
owned land and access rights over the export pipeline.
Consideration for the transaction was 75 million ordinary shares
which vest in four tranches on the one year anniversary of various
conditions being met. An option over a further 7.5 million ordinary
shares at an exercise price of 2pence is valid for three years from
November 2017 when the second condition was met.
The 75 million shares were valued using the Black-Scholes model
under the assumption that 100% of the shares will vest as
management expects all four of the vesting criteria to be
successfully achieved. The conditions have been met for the first
three tranches, being completion of the SPA, the certification of
the pipeline and the transmission of the first million cubic metres
of gas along the export pipeline.
The value of the options was measured by the use of a binomial
pricing model. The inputs into the binomial model in respect of the
Trameta consideration shares were as follows:
Share price at grant date 1.425p
Exercise price Nil
101% -
Volatility 130%
Expected life 1 -3 years
Risk free rate 1.75%
Expected dividend yield 0%
Expected volatility was determined by calculating the historical
volatility of the Group's share price over the previous comparable
periods. The expected life is the expiry period of the options from
the date of issue.
The value of the shares and options was GBP1.1 million which was
recognised as an addition to exploration and evaluation costs, see
Note 10.
24 Notes supporting the statement of cash flows
Group 2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Cash at bank and available on
demand 721 3,153
Cash held on deposit against 355 -
bank guarantee
1,076 3,153
========== ==========
Company 2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Cash at bank and available on
demand 699 3,143
Cash held on deposit against 355 -
bank guarantee
1,055 3,143
========== ==========
Included within cash and equivalents is GBP355,000 which is held
as EUR400,000 on deposit as a security against a bank guarantee
against a gas sales agreement. The Gas sales agreement lasts for a
minimum term of 12 months which expires in November 2018.
Significant non-cash transactions are as follows:
2017 2016
GBP '000s GBP '000s
Conversion of loan notes 6,367 3,745
Accretion charge on convertible loan
notes 241 1,380
Modification to existing notes - de-recognition
Nov 2016 - 8,140
Modification to existing notes - recognition
of amended note - Nov 2016 - 5,352
Fair value of new loan notes issued
in November 2016 - 690
25 Financial risk management
Group and Company
The Group's financial liabilities comprise CLNs, other loans and
trade payables. All liabilities are measured at amortised cost.
These are detailed in Notes 14, 15 and 16.
The Group has various financial assets, being trade receivables
and cash, which arise directly from its operations. All are
classified as loans and receivables. These are detailed in Notes
12, 13 and 24.
The main risks arising from the Group's financial instruments
are credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk (including interest
risk and currency risk). The risk management policies employed by
the Group to manage these risks are discussed below:
a. Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default
on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the
Group.
The Group does not have any receivables past due or
impaired.
The Group makes allowances for impairment of receivables where
there is an identified event which, based on previous experience,
is evidence of a reduction in the recoverability of cash flows.
The credit risk on cash is considered to be limited because the
counterparties are financial institutions with high and good credit
ratings assigned by international credit rating agencies in the
UK.
The carrying amount of financial assets, trade receivables and
cash held with financial institutions recorded in the financial
statements represents the exposure to credit risk for the
Group.
At Company level, there is the risk of impairment of
inter-company receivables if the full amount is not deemed as
recoverable from the relevant subsidiary company. These amounts are
written down when their deemed recoverable amount is deemed less
than the current carrying value.
b. Market risk
(i) Currency risk
Currency risk refers to the risk that fluctuations in foreign
currencies cause losses to the Company.
The Group's operations are predominantly in Slovenia. Foreign
exchange risk arises from translating the euro earnings, assets and
liabilities of the Ascent Resources doo and Ascent Slovenia Limited
into sterling. The Group manages exposures that arise from receipt
of monies in a non-functional currency by matching receipts and
payments in the same currency.
The Company often raises funds for future development through
the issue of new shares in sterling. These funds are predominantly
to pay for the Company's exploration costs abroad in Euros. As such
any sterling balances held are at risk of currency fluctuations and
may prove to be insufficient to meet the Company's planned euro
requirements if there is devaluation.
Foreign currency sensitivity analysis
The Group is mainly exposed to the currency of the European
Union (the euro).
The Group operates internationally and is exposed to currency
risk on sales, purchases, borrowings and cash and cash equivalents
that are denominated in a currency other than sterling. The
currencies giving rise to this are the euro and the United States
dollar.
Foreign exchange risk arises from transactions and recognised
assets and liabilities.
The Group does not use foreign exchange contracts to hedge its
currency risk.
Sensitivity analysis
The following table details the Group's sensitivity to a 10%
increase and decrease in sterling against the stated currencies.
10% is the sensitivity rate used when reporting foreign currency
risk internally to key management personnel and represents the
management's assessment of the reasonably possible change in
foreign exchange rates. The sensitivity analysis comprises cash and
cash equivalents held at the balance sheet date. A positive number
below indicates an increase in profit and other equity where
sterling weakens 10% against the relevant currency.
Euro currency change
Group Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
2017 2016
Profit or loss
10% strengthening of sterling 44 47
10% weakening of sterling (53) (58)
Equity
10% strengthening of sterling (2,489) (1,983)
10% weakening of sterling 3,040 2,424
Company
Profit or loss
10% strengthening of sterling (146) (13)
10% weakening of sterling 178 16
Equity
10% strengthening of sterling (2,948) (2,687)
10% weakening of sterling 3,604 3,288
(ii) Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk refers to the risk that fluctuations in
interest rates cause losses to the Company.
The Group and Company have no exposure to interest rate risk
except on cash and cash equivalent which carry variable interest
rates. The Group carries low units of cash and cash equivalents and
the Group and Companies monitor the variable interest risk
accordingly.
At 31 December 2017, the Group and Company has GBP loans valued
at GBP36,000 rates of 0% per annum.
At 31 December 2016, the Group and Company has GBP loans valued
at GBP6,162,000 rates of 0% per annum.
(iii) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk refers to the risk that the Company has
insufficient cash resources to meet working capital
requirements.
The Group and Company manages its liquidity requirements by
using both short- and long-term cash flow projections and raises
funds through debt or equity placings as required. Ultimate
responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board
of Directors, which has built an appropriate liquidity risk
management framework for the management of the Group's short-,
medium- and long-term funding and liquidity management
requirements.
The Group closely monitors and manages its liquidity risk. Cash
forecasts are regularly produced and sensitivities run for
different scenarios (see Note 1).
For further details on the Group's liquidity position, please
refer to the Going Concern paragraph in Note 1 of these
accounts.
Group Company
Maturity analysis of financial 2017 2016 2017 2016
liabilities
GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s GBP '000s
Less than six months -
loans and borrowings - - - -
Less than six months -
trade and other payables 576 254 174 165
Between six months and
a year - - - -
Over one year 36 -6,162 36 -6,162
c. Capital management
The Group manages its shares and CLN's as capital.
d. There are no externally imposed capital requirements.
e. Fair value of financial instruments
Set in the foregoing is a comparison of carrying amounts and
fair values of the Group's and the Company's financial
instruments:
Carrying Fair Value Carrying Fair Value
amount of financial of financial
instruments instruments
Year ended Year ended Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December 31 December 31 December
2017 2017 2016 2016
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
- unrestricted 721 721 3,153 3,153
Cash and cash equivalents
- restricted 355 355 - -
Trade receivables 655 655 - -
Prepaid abandonment fund
(refundable) 279 279 - -
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables 576 576 147 147
Convertible loans at
fixed rate 36 36 6,162 6,162
Capital Management - Year ended Year ended Year ended Year ended
Company 31 December 31 December 31 December 31 December
2017 2017 2016 2016
Carrying Fair Value Carrying Fair Value
of financial of financial
instruments instruments
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
- unrestricted 700 700 3,154 3,154
Cash and cash equivalents
- restricted 355 355 - -
Trade and other receivables - - - -
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables 174 174 84 84
Convertible loans at
fixed rate 36 36 6,162 6,162
Convertible loan at fixed rate
Fair value of convertible loans has been determined based on
tier 3 measurement techniques. The fair value is estimated at the
present value of future cash flows, discounted at estimated market
rates. Fair value is not significantly different from carrying
value.
Trade and other receivables/payables & inter-company
receivables
All trade and other receivables and payables have a remaining
life of less than one year. The ageing profile of the Group and
Company receivable and payables are shown in Notes 12, 13, 14, 16
and 17.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are all readily available and
therefore carrying value represents a close approximation to fair
value.
26 Commitments & contingencies
Now that the Group is generating revenue from the Slovenian
asset it has received legal claims relating to past activities.
Based on legal advice received we consider these to be spurious and
without merit. The Board will vigorously reject such opportunistic
approaches.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
FR EAFLKFLXPEAF
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
April 17, 2018 02:01 ET (06:01 GMT)
Ascent Resources (LSE:AST)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Ascent Resources (LSE:AST)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024