TIDMUSF TIDMUSFP
RNS Number : 2224M
US Solar Fund PLC
20 September 2021
NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, TO US PERSONS OR INTO OR WITHIN
THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA OR JAPAN, OR ANY OTHER
JURISDICTION WHERE, OR TO ANY OTHER PERSON TO WHOM, TO DO SO WOULD
BE UNLAWFUL. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
OR FORM PART OF ANY OFFER TO SELL OR ISSUE, OR ANY SOLICITATION OF
ANY OFFER TO PURCHASE, SUBSCRIBE FOR OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRE, ANY
INVESTMENTS IN ANY JURISDICTION.
20 September 2021
US SOLAR FUND PLC (USF, the "Company")
Dividend Declaration and Interim Results to 30 June 2021
US Solar Fund PLC (LSE: USF) is pleased to announce its interim
results for the period ended 30 June 2021 and declare an interim
dividend of 1.25 cents per ordinary share for the three month
period to 30 June 2021 ("Second 2021 Interim Dividend").
Highlights to 30 June 2021
-- One transaction closed during the period bringing the total
portfolio to 493MW(DC) of operating capacity across 42 projects in
four states, with a variety of investment grade offtakers S&P
rated A to BBB. Portfolio revenues are 100% contracted at fixed or
escalating prices for a weighted average of 14.9 years.
-- The operating portfolio performed well in the first half,
with generation within 0.9% of budget. Above-budget performance in
Oregon and Utah was offset by underperformance due to contractual
curtailment in California and utility outages and maintenance in
North Carolina.
-- Period end unaudited Net Asset Value (NAV) of $313.3 million
or $0.943 per ordinary share, a 2.8% decrease from the 31 December
2020 NAV per ordinary share of $0.970.
-- The NAV per share decrease was primarily due to a lower US
merchant electricity price forecasts, reflecting COVID uncertainty
at the time these forecasts were released during 2020 and early
2021. Since the period end, US merchant price forecasts have
trended upwards again due to a reduction in COVID-related sentiment
and an increasingly bullish outlook for carbon pricing to 2050.
USF's cashflows during the contracted period (weighted average PPA
term remaining of 14.9 years) are not impacted by changes in
merchant electricity price forecasts.
-- The impact of merchant electricity price forecasts was
partially offset by favourable reductions in discount rates
resulting from the portfolio's continued transition from
construction phase to full run-rate operations and the reduction in
leverage achieved through the refinancing of the Heelstone
portfolio.
-- The Company initiated a 12-month Placing Programme with an
Initial Issue targeting $105 million. The Initial Issue closed on 7
May significantly oversubscribed, raising gross proceeds of $132
million from existing and new investors. Approximately $92m of
these proceeds have been used to pay down or refinance existing
debt facilities associated with the Heelstone portfolio with the
remainder available for acquisitions (including Tranche Two of
Mount Signal 2 (MS2).
-- Total dividend of 2.5 cents per ordinary share declared
during the period. The Company remains on track to deliver its 2021
annual dividend target of 5.5 cents per ordinary share which is
expected to be covered from operating cashflows.
-- At 30 June 2021, the Investment Manager's pipeline included
2.2GW(DC) of high-quality assets (including Tranche Two of MS2),
with an aggregate value of approximately $2.2 billion and a
weighted-average PPA term of 15.2 years.
Key Metrics
30 June 2021 31 December 30 June 2020
2020
-------------------------------------
Net Asset Value (NAV) $313.3m $194.2m $192.9m
------------ ------------ ------------
NAV per share $0.943 $0.970 $0.964
------------ ------------ ------------
Ordinary shares issued 332.2m 200.2m 200.1m
------------ ------------ ------------
Share price based on closing
price of indicated date $1.015 $1.075 $0.940
------------ ------------ ------------
Premium (Discount) to NAV 7.6% 10.8% (2.5%)
------------ ------------ ------------
Market capitalisation based on
closing price of indicated date $337m $215m $188m
------------ ------------ ------------
Dividends paid $2.00m (half $4.00m (full $2.00m (half
year) year) year)
------------ ------------ ------------
Share price total return performance 4.93% 10.13% (4.67%)
------------ ------------ ------------
Ongoing charges 1.36% 1.48% 1.50%
------------ ------------ ------------
Gearing 39.3% 55.0% 62.5%
------------ ------------ ------------
Second 2021 Interim Dividend
The Company is pleased to declare a Second 2021 Interim Dividend
of 1.25 cents per Ordinary Share, as timetabled below:
Ex-Dividend 7 October 2021
Date:
Record Date: 8 October 2021
Pay Date: 29 October 2021
Any such dividend payment to Shareholders may take the form of
either dividend income or "qualifying
interest income" which may be designated as an interest
distribution for UK tax purposes and therefore
subject to the interest streaming regime applicable to
investment trusts. Of this dividend declared of 1.25
cents per Ordinary Share, 0.95 cents is declared as dividend
income with 0.30 cents treated as qualifying
interest income.
This quarterly dividend is in line with the Company's target
full year dividend of 5.5 cents per share. The
Company expects to declare modestly lower quarterly dividends
for the first and second quarters and slightly higher quarterly
dividends for the third and fourth quarters due to the cash flow
profile of the assets.
Highlights after Period-End
-- In August, the Investment Manager announced that John Martin
would be stepping down as CEO to take up a position as CEO of
Windlab Pty Ltd. Liam Thomas, previously CIO, was appointed as
NESM's new CEO.
-- In September, the Company also increased the size of the
undrawn $25 million RCF to a $40 million facility, which remains
undrawn, and extended the tenor for two years.
Gill Nott, Chair of US Solar Fund, commented:
"The last six months represent the first full period that our
solar power assets were fully operational, a significant milestone
in our development. To that end, we're pleased to declare our
second quarterly dividend, as part of our committed target of 5.5
cents per ordinary share per year.
Despite the headwinds of the pandemic, which are looking more
favorable as we enter our second half, we continue to make strong
progress towards future growth. We made our sixth acquisition and
completed an oversubscribed capital raise during the period, and
would like to thank our existing and new investors for their
ongoing support."
Liam Thomas, CEO of New Energy Solar Manager, added:
"The US solar market continues to offer attractive
opportunities. President Biden has clearly made the climate change
and decarbonisation one of his administration's core priorities,
with a series of executive orders, pressure on federal agencies to
speed up their clean energy transition, and most recently his
bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which allocates
over $60 billion to power infrastructure.
The White House has backed this up with plans to further extend
and expand of the successful investment and production tax credits.
We expect these will benefit the solar rollout, supporting the
administration's goal for solar to increase tenfold to 30% of US
power production by the end of this decade.
Our focus remains on delivering maximum value from the current
portfolio of projects and continuing to grow the fund with new
investments in solar and energy storage."
The Company's Interim Report and Financial Statements for the
period ending 30 June 2021 are available on the Company's website
at:
https://www.ussolarfund.co.uk/investor-centre/key-documents-and-disclosure
and can be found at
https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism .
The Company's NAV and Quarterly Update for 30 June 2021 was also
released on the Company's website today, and is available at
https://www.ussolarfund.co.uk/investor-centre/key-documents-and-disclosure
.
For further information, please contact:
US Solar Fund
Whitney V oûte +1 718 230 4329
Cenkos Securities plc
James King
Tunga Chigovanyika
Will Talkington +44 20 7397 8900
Jefferies International Limited
Stuart Klein
Gaudi le Roux
Neil Winward +44 20 7029 8000
KL Communications +44 20 3995 6673
Charles Gorman
Will Sanderson
Millie Steyn
About US Solar Fund plc
US Solar Fund plc, established in 2019, listed on the premium
segment of the London Stock Exchange in April 2019 and has a
current market capitalisation of approximately $340m. The Company's
investment objective is to provide investors with attractive and
sustainable dividends with an element of capital growth by owning
and operating solar power assets in North America and other OECD
countries in the America.
The solar power assets that the Company acquires or constructs
are expected to have an asset life of at least 30 years and
generate stable and uncorrelated cashflows by selling electricity
to creditworthy offtakers under long-term power purchase agreements
(or PPAs). The Company's portfolio currently consists of 42
operational solar projects with a total capacity of 493MW(DC) , all
located in the United States.
Further information on the Company can be found on its website
at http://www.ussolarfund.co.uk .
About the Investment Manager
USF is managed by New Energy Solar Manager Pty Limited, which
also manages Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)-listed New Energy
Solar ( www.newenergysolar.com.au ). Combined, US Solar Fund and
New Energy Solar have committed approximately US$1.3 billion to 57
projects totalling 1.2GW(DC) .
NESM is owned by E&P Funds, the funds management division of
E&P Financial Group, an ASX listed company (ASX: EP1) with over
A$20 billion of funds under advice.
INTERIM REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the period from 1 January 2021 to 30 June 2021
1. Highlights
Table 1: Highlights for the period
31 December
30 June 2021 2020 30 June 2020
FINANCIAL
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Net Asset Value (NAV) $313.3m $194.2m $192.9m
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
NAV per share $0.943 $0.970 $0.964
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Ordinary shares
outstanding 332.2m 2 0 0 . 2 m 200.1m
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Share price based on
closing price
of indicated date $1.015 $1.075 $0 . 9 4 0
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Premium (discount) to NAV 7.6% 10.8% (2.5%)
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Market capitalisation
based on
closing price of
indicated date $337m $215m $188m
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Dividends paid $2.00m (half $4.00m (full $2.00m (half
year) year) year)
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Dividend cover 4.61x (half Not reported Not reported
year)
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Shareholder total return 4.93% 10.13% (4.67%)
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Ongoing charges 1.36% 1.48% 1.50%
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Gearing 39.3% 55.0% 62.5%
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
O P ER A T I O NAL
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Projects in construction - - 7
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Projects fully operational 42 41 34
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Total capacity (ownership 493MW DC 443MW DC 443MW DC
stake)
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Total electricity 449.1GWh (half 374GWh (full 121.5GWh (half
generation year) year) year)
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Generation % of budget -0.9% 2.5% - 4 .4%
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Weighted average PPA term 14.9 years 15.1 years 15.3 years
remaining
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
Average offtaker credit BBB+ A- A-
rating
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
CO 2 emissions displaced
annually 633,000t 618,000t 618,000t
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
US homes powered 79,000 74,000 74,000
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
US cars removed from the
road 137,000 134,000 134,000
--------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------
2. Chair's Statement
I am pleased to present the 2021 Interim Report for US Solar
Fund plc for the period ended 30 June 2021. The period was marked
by a number of significant achievements for the Company. In
addition, the new Biden Administration has given a strong
indication of further support for the renewables sector and solar
development. The Board believes that the US solar market continues
to show very considerable scope for expansion and that USF remains
well positioned to invest into this growth. The Board and the
Investment Manager have continued to operate successfully and
efficiently across three continents, with virtual meetings held
regularly on both a formal and informal basis, including holding
the AGM online.
This last six-months marked the first period that the Company's
entire portfolio of solar power assets was fully operational. As a
result, the Company paid its first quarterly dividend in line with
the Company's target full year dividend of 5.5 cents per Ordinary
Share. Year to date, generation is 0.9% below budget, predominantly
due to unscheduled maintenance, intermittent grid outages and the
Mount Signal 2 (MS2) project in California experiencing almost a
full year's curtailment allowances for both the prior and current
year periods during the first six months of 2021. Dividend cash
cover remains strong at 4.61x for the six months ended 30 June
2021.
In March, USF completed its sixth acquisition, 25% of MS2,
bringing the portfolio to 42 fully operating projects in four
states totaling 493 MWDC. In May, the Company completed a capital
raising exercise with $132 million in gross proceeds, significantly
exceeding its $105 million target. On behalf of the Board, I would
like to thank existing shareholders for their support and welcome
many first-time holders to the register.
Throughout the period, USF shares have traded between $1.00 to
$1.09 on the London Stock Exchange. At 30 June 2021, the Company's
shares were trading at $1.015 per Ordinary Share. This represents a
7.6% premium to the NAV of $313.3 million or $0.943 per Ordinary
Share. Including dividends paid and reinvested during the period,
shareholder total return from inception to 30 June is 4.93%.
CAPITAL RAISING AND REFINANCING
We were delighted by the market response to the capital raising
in May of $132 million with strong support from existing and new
investors.
The main purpose of the capital raising was to refinance the
existing debt facilities associated with 177 MWDC portfolio of 22
projects acquired in 2020 (Heelstone Portfolio). Shortly after
completing the raise, the existing debt facility was repaid with
the proceeds of a new debt facility from a new lender and
approximately $92 million of equity from the capital raise
(Heelstone Refinancing). The refinance reduces the effective
interest rate for the Heelstone Portfolio from approximately 6.25%
to less than 3% per annum and brings fund gearing to approximately
40%, in-line with the long-term target of 50%. The Company is
evaluating its strong pipeline of assets for suitable investments,
including storage opportunities at existing sites, and the option
over a further 25% of MS2, to deploy the additional proceeds
raised.
PERFORMANCE
USF's unaudited NAV at 30 June 2021 was $313.3 million or $0.943
per Ordinary Share, a 2.8% decrease from the 31 December 2020 NAV
of $0.970 per Ordinary Share and a 2.2% decrease to June 2020 NAV
of $0.964 per share. The downward movement was primarily due to a
decrease in merchant electricity price forecasts during the period,
partially offset by reductions in discount rates.
USF's cash flows during the PPA term are fully contracted and
not impacted by changes in merchant electricity price forecasts.
However, these forecasts are used to estimate revenue received in
the post-PPA period, so they still have an impact on NAV.
Pleasingly, since 30 June 2021, we have seen an improvement in
merchant pricing forecasts reflecting a reduction in COVID-19
uncertainty and increasingly bullish carbon price assumptions
relating to net zero targets. We expect this outlook to be
reflected in the next valuation.
The impact of merchant electricity price forecasts was partially
offset by favourable reductions to discount rates as the portfolio
has transitioned from construction phase to full run-rate
operations and by a reduction in leverage resulting from the
refinancing of the Heelstone Portfolio.
Reductions in discount rates typically occur as a project
progresses from construction start to one full year of operations
due to lower risks associated with the project. As of June 30,
2021, the portfolio has reached run-rate operations with the
exception of our largest asset, Milford. We expect to recognise an
incremental reduction in discount rate as the asset reaches a full
year of operations during H2 2021.
PORTFOLIO
In March, the Company acquired a 25% interest in the 200 MWDC
MS2 project in California, with an option to acquire a further 25%
interest prior to March 2022. This sixth acquisition brings the
Company's operating portfolio to 42 solar power projects totaling
493 MWDC. All projects have investment grade PPAs for 100% of
electricity generated, and the weighted average remaining PPA of
portfolio is 14.9 years. The long-term contracted cash flows of
USF's portfolio partially mitigate the impact of power price
fluctuations on NAV as the merchant power price forecasts only
impact revenue after the PPA terms.
DIVID
The Company declared a dividend of 1.25 cents per Ordinary Share
in September 2021 for the quarter ending 30 June 2021, totaling 2.5
cents per Ordinary Share for the six-month period. The Company
confirms its target 5.5 cent annual dividend, fully covered by
operating cash flows.
It is worth noting that USF's highest power generation, and
therefore operating cash flows, are produced in the summer months.
Allowing for the time taken for electricity sales to be converted
to distributable cash flow at the Company level, the profile of
dividend payments throughout the year reflects this seasonality of
the Company's underlying cash flows.
OUTLOOK
The US utility-scale solar market continues to experience strong
growth. During the first quarter of 2021, the US utility scale
solar market installed 3.6GWDC of capacity, representing the
largest first quarter of installations to date. This momentum is
expected to continue throughout the year with 17.9GWDC of solar
expected to be installed over the course of 2021, a 25% increase on
the total capacity installed in 2020 (14.3GWDC). Installations have
been driven by the increase in decarbonisation targets from a
variety of offtakers, a renewed focus on clean energy deployment at
the federal level, and the continued expansion of state-level
renewable energy targets. This is reflected by a strong opportunity
pipeline offering numerous high-quality construction-ready and
operational solar opportunities, as well as the potential to
install energy storage at existing sites
In late March, the Biden Administration announced the American
Jobs Plan, which is focused on creating jobs and upgrading US
infrastructure. Approximately $60 billion has been allocated to
energy infrastructure with a focus on increasing renewable power
connection to the grid. A second and related package includes an
extension and expanded direct-pay (cash payment for up to 85% of
the tax credit) investment tax credit (ITC) and production tax
credit for clean energy generation and storage. These have not yet
passed through Congress, however, should any of the proposed
policies be endorsed, there would be a significant positive impact
on the US utility scale solar market.
In April, the parent of the Investment Manager became a
signatory to the United Nations sponsored Principles for
Responsible Investing
(UN PRI). We are also reviewing European sustainability and
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure frameworks
to see how they might best be applied to USF. USF complied with
pre-contractual disclosure requirements as part of our recent
equity raising to meet the European ESG disclosure obligations for
EU domiciled investors and prospective investors. Given the volume
of capital from the EU flowing into sustainable funds and the
advance of reporting frameworks there, we believe USF would be
well-served to be aligned with EU reporting frameworks and are
working to implement this.
While many countries globally have moved between reopening and
shutting down and vaccination levels in the US and UK increase, the
pandemic continues to impact many sectors. However, as we have
previously commented, the solar industry in the US has largely been
considered critical infrastructure, so COVID-19 continues to have
no material impact on USF's on-the-ground operations. Service staff
continue to travel to
sites to conduct work as needed and the Company continues to
operate efficiently and smoothly, despite international travel
restrictions. The pandemic has impacted supply chains for many
industries, including solar. Supply chain impacts for USF are
limited as the current portfolio is fully operational, and spare
parts inventories are maintained for sites based on our independent
engineers' recommendations at the time of acquisition.
Finally, during the reporting period, the Investment Manager
announced that CEO John Martin is stepping down and that Liam
Thomas, who is currently CIO, is replacing him. We thank John for
his contribution to USF's establishment and initial growth, and we
are pleased that Liam is taking over the role given his knowledge
of the US market, the portfolio, and his relationships with many
shareholders.
GILL NOTT
CHAIR
20 September 2021
3. Investment Manager's Report
SUMMARY OF THE PERIOD
During the reporting period, the Investment Manager closed its
sixth acquisition, a 25% stake in the 200 MWDC Mount Signal 2
project in California, bringing the portfolio to 42 assets across
four US states totaling 493MWDC. The portfolio performed close to
expectations with generation 0.9% below budget. This was largely
driven by curtailment at MS2, where two years of contractual
curtailment took place in the first six months of 2021. Budgeted
production assumes curtailment is spread evenly over each PPA
contract year (periods commence 1 June), so there is expected to be
minimal impact for the remainder of 2021.
All cash flows from USF's assets are contracted in the US with
investment-grade offtakers for a weighted average of 14.9 years.
This was the first six-month period when all assets were fully
operating, and USF commenced paying the full target dividend. USF's
Q1 2021 dividend was
1.25 cents and Q2 2021, which is announced with this report, is
1.25 cents, totaling 2.5 cents for the period. The payments are in
line with the Company's annual target dividend of 5.5 cents per
Ordinary Share.
On 13 April, USF announced it was initiating a 12-month Placing
Programme with an Initial Issue targeting $105 million. The Initial
Issue closed on 7 May significantly oversubscribed, raising gross
proceeds of $132 million from existing and new investors. Shortly
after the completion of the capital raise, USF used $92 million of
equity to successfully refinance, the existing debt facilities
associated with a 177 MWDC portfolio of 22 projects acquired in
2020 (the Heelstone Portfolio). This refinancing benefits USF by
lowering overall gearing to approximately 40% (below the long-term
target of 50%), reducing sensitivity to changes in key assumptions
including long-term power prices, and enhancing dividend
coverage.
COVID-19 had no material impact on USF during the reporting
period.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
In March 2021, USF announced the financial close of a 25%
interest (Tranche One) in MS2, a 200MWDC operating solar plant
located in the Imperial Valley of Southern California, USF has an
option to acquire a further 25% interest (Tranche Two) for $22
million subject to a
performance-based adjustment mechanism which can adjust the
price upwards or downwards by up to $1 million. USF may exercise
the Tranche Two option for up to 12 months from Tranche One
completion (by March 2022), with Tranche Two completion subject to
the same customary third-party consents as Tranche One.
This acquisition increases USF's total portfolio to 493MWDC of
fully operational assets diversified across four states. USF's
portfolio is fully operational with all production sold to a
variety of investment-grade offtakers (S&P rated: BBB to A).
The Investment Manager continues to work diligently to assess
prospective investment opportunities to add to the portfolio.
US SOLAR FUND STRUCTURE
The following diagram is provided to assist with understanding
the financial statements set out in this Interim Report.
USF invests in its US-based subsidiary, USF Holding Corp., via a
combination of debt and equity. USF is entitled to a Management
Services Agreement (MSA) fee for the provision of management
services to USF Holding Corp. USF Holding Corp. reimburses USF for
investment costs, and costs associated with providing capital and
advice to acquire underlying US Solar Assets. In addition, the
Company earns interest on an intercompany loan to USF Holding Corp.
Cash may also flow from USF Holding Corp. to USF as a dividend or
return of capital, which is distributed to USF Holding Corp. on a
periodic basis from the Company's underlying Solar Assets.
There are no restrictions on the movement of cash between USF
and its subsidiary. As of 30 June 2021, the Company and USF Holding
Corp. have available cash of $16.1 million and $10.4 million
respectively, for a total balance of $26.5 million which may be
used to meet the obligations of USF. At 30 June 2021 an undrawn $25
million revolving credit facility (RCF) was in place at USF Avon
LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of USF Holding Corp.), providing
further liquidity support. After the end of the reporting period
USF increased the size and tenor of the RCF to $40 million and two
years.
OPERATING ASSET UPDATE
Table 2: H1 2021 Operating Portfolio Performance by State
State Number of MW capacity % of total % of budget Actual MWh MWh weighted
plants MW MWh / Budget performance
MWh vs budget
North Carolina 28 168 34% 28% (7.6%) (2.1%)
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- -------------
Oregon 10 140 28% 27% 4.5% 1.2%
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- -------------
Utah 1 128 26% 31% 3.6% 1.1%
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- -------------
California 3 57 12% 14% (7.8%) (1.1%)
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- -------------
Total 42 493 100% 100% (0.9%) (0.9%)
---------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- -------------
Construction for all USF projects was completed by the end of
2020, and the period ending 30 June 2021 was the first six-month
period during which the portfolio was fully operating. Also during
the period, USF completed the acquisition of 25% of MS2, adding
50MWDC of capacity
to the portfolio from the start of the second quarter. The
portfolio performed well during the reporting period, with actual
production of
449GWh (including reimbursed curtailment) which was 0.9% below
the budgeted or forecast production of 453GWh. USF measures
"Actual" performance against "Budgeted" performance. "Actual"
production is the number of GWh generated and sold to the offtaker.
"Budget" (also called "Forecasted") is the P50 production forecast
for the plant before any adjustment for experienced weather
conditions. Budget production
is based on a production model and assumptions verified by an
independent engineer at the time of acquisition, taking into
account the location of the site, design of the plant and equipment
used, degradation of equipment over time, planned maintenance
outages, and unplanned maintenance and grid outages.
NORTH CAROLINA
In North Carolina, performance was 7.6% below budget, primarily
due to unscheduled maintenance and intermittent grid outages. A
utility outage at the 6.7 MWDC Tiburon project was experienced in
Q2 2021 which has since come back online. The 6.2MWDC Nitro site
also remained offline for several months over the period, as a
result of an equipment failure, with site remediation completed in
Q2 2021. There was also minor unscheduled maintenance at several
other sites due to offline site inverters and combiner boxes over
the reporting period, which have since been rectified.
OREGON
The Oregon portfolio, comprising 28% of portfolio capacity,
performed 4.5% above budget for the reporting period due to higher
than budgeted plane of array irradiance experienced, but did
experience some utility outages, cable repairs and substation
conductor issues. All outages
that were experienced over the quarter have been investigated
and restored. The cable repairs commenced in March and are expected
to be completed in Q3 2021. This work is covered by insurance and
the project receives business interruption proceeds until repairs
are complete.
UTAH
In Utah, the Company's largest single asset, Milford, which
comprises 26% of USF's portfolio capacity by MWDC, continues to
show strong performance at 3.6% above budget. Milford has been
performing well over the period due to the asset's stronger than
budgeted availability factor. As Milford commenced commercial
operations in Q4 2020, 30 June 2021 marks Milford's first full
half-year of operations.
CALIFORNIA
Performance in California was 7.8% below budget for the period,
largely driven by curtailment10 at MS2. Under MS2's PPA, the
offtaker has the right to curtail MS2 for economic reasons
throughout the contract year up to a cap, after which any further
curtailment is compensated.
The Investment Manager's budget and NAV assumes that the full
annual curtailment cap is spread evenly across all 12 months,
however, the offtaker exercised almost its entire contractual
curtailment allowance for both the prior and current contractual
years during the first six months of 2021, which had an outsized
impact on performance over the period. Therefore, no further
material economic impact is expected during
this contract year (ending 31 May 2022), and commensurate
outperformance against budget during the next half-year is expected
(subject to normal operations).
The two smaller assets in California performed above budget over
the reporting period.
FUNDS COMMITTED
Since inception, USF has invested $283 million into the
operating portfolio. USF has $38 million of investable cash
remaining, which is intended to be used to acquire Tranche Two of
MS2 or other accretive investment opportunities should they
arise.
CAPITAL RAISE
In May 2021, USF announced it had raised gross proceeds of $132
million in the Initial Issue of its 12-month Placing Programme
announced in April 2021.
REFINANCING AND DEBT PAYDOWN
Shortly after the completion of the capital raising and
consistent with the use of proceeds contemplated in the Company's
Prospectus dated
13 April 2021, USF announced the refinancing of the existing
debt facilities associated with the Heelstone Portfolio. The
refinancing transaction used approximately $92 million of the $132
million gross proceeds of the Initial Issue along with the proceeds
of a new debt facility provided
by Fifth Third Bank National Association to repay all of the
existing project level debt. The new debt facility has a tenor of
seven years but is fully amortised over approximately 17 years, to
match the duration of the underlying PPA. Once completed, $7.6
million of restricted cash was released from the legacy debt
providers and returned to USF.
The refinancing of these legacy loans reduces the effective
interest rate for the Heelstone Portfolio from approximately 6.25%
to less than 3% per annum. The base interest rate is fully hedged
with fixed interest rate swaps for the full duration of the
loan.
This refinancing will benefit USF by lowering overall gearing to
approximately 40% (below the long-term target of 50%), reducing
sensitivity to changes in key assumptions including long-term power
prices, and enhancing dividend coverage.
An additional $7 million of proceeds was used to pay down debt
on the Euryalus portfolio. The impact of these transactions is
recognised in the movement in fair value of the Company's
investment in its US subsidiaries and underlying Solar Assets. Note
13 to the Financial Statements shows the underlying movements on a
look through basis for each of USF's Solar Assets.
PIPELINE UPDATE
The pipeline has remained robust since the Company's IPO ranging
from US$1.9 billion to US$4.8 billion at any given quarter. As at
30 June 2021, the Investment Manager's pipeline included 2.2GWDC of
high-quality assets (including Tranche Two of MS2), with an
aggregate value of approximately $2.2 billion in cash equity value
and a weighted-average PPA term of 15.2 years.
Throughout the course of the reporting period, the Investment
Manager has screened over 7GWDC of projects, with a total cash
equity value of over $7 billion. The Investment Manager continues
to take a conservative approach to pricing. It also continues to
strictly adhere to a process that is consistent with the strategy
and return targets of the Company given the pipeline offers
numerous high-quality construction-ready and operational investment
opportunities, including the potential to install energy storage at
existing sites.
EVENTS AFTER THE PERIOD
In August, the Investment Manager announced that John Martin
would be stepping down as CEO to take up a position as CEO of
Windlab Pty Ltd, a global renewable energy development company.
Liam Thomas, previously CIO, was appointed as NESM's new CEO. Liam
joined NESM in March 2016 and has overseen the acquisition and
construction of utility-scale solar asset portfolios for USF and
New Energy Solar, the Australian-listed fund also managed by NESM.
Liam has 17 years of experience in the renewable energy,
infrastructure, and agribusiness sectors including roles with
Origin Energy, Aurizon, and Orica.
Subsequent to period end, USF reached agreement on all
commercial terms to increase the size of the undrawn $25 million
RCF to a $40 million facility, and extend the tenor for two years.
Documentation is expected to be settled and executed in September
2021.
On 20 September 2021, the Company announced a dividend of 1.25
cents per Ordinary Share for the period ending 30 June 2021,
bringing total dividends declared for the six-month period to 2.5
cents per Ordinary Share.
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19 has had limited impact on the Company to date. Since
the outbreak, USF has made changes to its work environment to
ensure the health and safety of its employees, contractors, and
stakeholders. The New York office is staffed on a limited basis
with most of the US team working remotely using existing systems.
The Sydney office has used staggered access arrangements to enable
staff to work from the office while adhering to social distancing
guidelines, except when lockdowns are in place.
The Investment Manager works with contractors and other
stakeholders to ensure that operational targets are met while also
meeting relevant COVID-19 requirements. Essential for economic
activity, the generation and provision of electricity in most of
the US has not been significantly disrupted by the pandemic. USF's
projects have continued to operate and service personnel have been
permitted to travel to sites to conduct work as needed. The
Investment Manager continues to assess the current and potential
impact of the COVID-19 measures implemented by the US federal and
state governments on the Company's investment strategy and
operations.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
As at 30 June 2021 the Company owned 42 utility-scale solar
projects, totaling 493MWDC. All assets in USF's portfolio have
achieved commercial operations and are generating revenue for the
Company. USF continues to assess new opportunities to add to the
Company investment portfolio.
Asset Capacity Location Acquisition Acquisition Energy Offtaker Offtaker Remaining COD
(MW(DC) Date 6F Credit PPA Length
) Rating (Years)
Milford 127.8 Utah One Aug 19 PacifiCorp S&P: A 24.4 Nov 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Southern
Mount Signal Mar 21 California
2 49.9 California Six 8 Edison S&P: BBB 18.9 Jan 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Portland
General
Suntex 15.3 Oregon Five Jun 20 Electric S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Jul 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Portland
General
West Hines 15.3 Oregon Five Jun 20 Electric S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Jun 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Portland
General
Alkali 15.1 Oregon Five Jun 20 Electric S&P: BBB+ 10.2 Jun 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Portland
General
Rock Garden 14.9 Oregon Five Jun 20 Electric S&P: BBB+ 10.2 Jun 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Chiloquin 14.0 Oregon Four Mar 20 PacifiCorp S&P: A 10.5 Jan 18
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Dairy 14.0 Oregon Four Mar 20 PacifiCorp S&P: A 10.3 Mar 18
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Tumbleweed 14.0 Oregon Four Mar 20 PacifiCorp S&P: A 10.5 Dec 17
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Lakeview 13.7 Oregon Four Mar 20 PacifiCorp S&P: A 10.3 Dec 17
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Turkey
Hill 13.2 Oregon Four Mar 20 PacifiCorp S&P: A 10.3 Dec 17
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Merrill 10.5 Oregon Four Mar 20 PacifiCorp S&P: A 10.3 Jan 18
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Lane II 7.5 Carolina Two Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 12.2 Jul 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Pilot Mountain 7.5 Carolina Two Dec 19 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 12.2 Sep 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Virginia
North Electric
Davis Lane 7.0 Carolina Four Mar 20 & Power S&P: BBB+ 11.5 Dec 17
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Virginia
North Electric
Gauss 7.0 Carolina Four Mar 20 & Power S&P: BBB+ 12.1 Oct 18
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North North Carolina
Jersey 7.0 Carolina Four Mar 20 Electric S&P: A- 6.5 Dec 17
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Sonne Two 7.0 Carolina Four Mar 20 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Red Oak 6.9 Carolina Four Mar 20 Progress S&P: BBB+ 10.5 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Virginia
North Electric
Schell 6.9 Carolina Four Mar 20 & Power S&P: BBB+ 10.5 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Siler 421 6.9 Carolina Four Mar 20 Progress S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Cotten 6.8 Carolina Four Mar 20 Progress S&P: BBB+ 10.4 Nov 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Tiburon 6.7 Carolina Four Mar 20 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Monroe North Duke Energy
Moore 6.6 Carolina Four Mar 20 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Four Oaks 6.5 Carolina Three Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 9.3 Oct 15
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Princeton 6.5 Carolina Three Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 9.3 Oct 15
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Tate 6.5 Carolina Two Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 12.2 Aug 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Freemont 6.4 Carolina Four Mar 20 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Mariposa 6.4 Carolina Four Mar 20 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 10.2 Sep 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North
S. Robeson 6.3 Carolina Three Jan 20 Progress Energy S&P: BBB+ 6.1 Jul 12
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Sarah 6.3 Carolina Three Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 9.0 Jun 15
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Nitro 6.2 Carolina Three Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 8.4 Jul 15
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Sedberry 6.2 Carolina Four Mar 20 Progress S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Willard 6.0 Carolina Two Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 12.2 Oct 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Benson 5.7 Carolina Two Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 12.2 Aug 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Eagle Solar 5.6 Carolina Two Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 12.2 Aug 20
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
San Diego Gas
Granger 3.9 California Four Mar 20 & Electric S&P: BBB+ 15.2 Sep 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Valley San Diego Gas
Center 3.0 California Four Mar 20 & Electric S&P: BBB+ 15.4 Dec 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
County North Duke Energy
Home 2.6 Carolina Four Mar 20 Carolinas S&P: BBB+ 10.1 Sep 16
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Progress North
1 2.5 Carolina Three Jan 20 Progress Energy S&P: BBB+ 10.8 Apr 12
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Progress North
2 2.5 Carolina Three Jan 20 Progress Energy S&P: BBB+ 6.5 Apr 13
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
North Duke Energy
Faison 2.3 Carolina Three Dec 19 Progress S&P: BBB+ 8.8 Jun 15
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
Grand Total 492.9 14.9
-------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- ----------- ------
ACQUISITIONS
As of 30 June 2021, the Company had closed six acquisitions.
Acquisitions One and Two completed in 2019, Acquisitions Three,
Four and Five were completed in 2020 and Acquisition Six in
2021.
In March 2021, the Company announced it had completed the
acquisition of the 25% interest in MS2 with an option to acquire a
further 25%. As of 30 June, the total operational portfolio
capacity of the portfolio reached 493MWDC as seen in Figure 4.
Table 4 shows USF's completed and committed acquisitions and
valuation change between 31 December 2020 to 30 June 2021.
Approximately US$92 million was invested over the period for the
Heelstone Portfolio (Acquisition Four) Debt refinancing, resulting
in an Acquisition Four valuation of $116.6 million as at the end of
the period. Similarly, approximately US$7 million was used to repay
debt on the Euryalus (Acquisition Five) portfolio, resulting in a
valuation of $35.2 million as at 30 June 2021. As of the end of the
period, the Fair Value of the portfolio acquisitions was $276
million.
Table 4: Portfolio Acquisition Valuation
(US$m) Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition US UK Cash Total
One Two Three Four Five Six Cash and WC
and WC
31 December
2020 30,043,545 42,575,753 36,070,109 38,278,633 29,890,984 - 18,465,252 (1,164,928) 194,159,348
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Additions
(at cost) 16,542 (5,023,308) 245,318 85,341,800 7,229,184 23,071,034 3,615,541 16,024,908 130,521,020
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------- ------------
Change in fair
value (incl.
distributions) 574,898 (1,104,037) (1,785,837) (7,025,200) (1,962,733) (74,079) - - (11,376,988)
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------- ------------
30 June 2021 30,634,986 36,448,409 34,529,589 116,595,232 35,157,435 22,996,955 22,080,793 14,859,980 313,303,380
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------- ------------
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
At 30 June 2021, the Company's shares were trading at $1.015 per
Ordinary Share. This represents a 7.6% premium to the NAV of $313.3
million or $0.943 per Ordinary Share. The NAV is defined as the
total assets less any liabilities.
The Company generated a loss after tax of $4,985,055 (0.017
dollars per Ordinary Share) during the period. Intercompany loan
interest income of $991,750, foreign exchange gains of $180,245 on
funds that were retained in GBP, and MSA fee income of $2,568,123
from management services provided to the Fund's wholly owned US
subsidiaries, were offset by a net loss from investments of
$6,880,876 and administrative and other expenses of $1,844,297. The
net fair value loss on investments arose from negative value
impacts from updated merchant curves across the Fund's operating
portfolio which offset positive value impacts due to the lower
discount rates.
The financial statements of the Company are presented on pages
44 to 47. The Fund's sensitivity to discount rates and power prices
is detailed below.
Table 5: Performance Summary
30 June 31 December 30 June
2021 2020 2020
Number of projects 42 41 41
------------- -------------------- -------------
Capacity of projects 493MWDC 443MWDC 443MWDC
------------- -------------------- -------------
NAV $313.3m $194.2m $192.9m
------------- -------------------- -------------
NAV per share $0.943 $0.970 $0.964
------------- -------------------- -------------
Ordinary shares issued 332m 200m 200m
------------- -------------------- -------------
Closing share price (USF) $1.015 $1.075 $0.940
------------- -------------------- -------------
Market capitalisation (based
on closing price) $337m $215m $188m
------------- -------------------- -------------
Dividends paid $2.00m $4.00m $2.00m
(half year) (full year) (half year)
------------- -------------------- -------------
Share price total return performance 4.93% 10.13% (4.67%)
------------- -------------------- -------------
Figure 6 details the 3.4 cents per Ordinary Share movement in
the "FV gain on solar investments" category shown in Figure 5.
Discount rates were generally revised downwards to reflect current
market rates, operational track-record, and capital structure,
resulting in an uplift in valuations. The rollforward uplift is a
result of bringing forward the valuation date to 30 June 2021,
thereby removing cash flows from prior periods and bringing forward
future cash flows. The adjustment to USF model reflects the updated
valuation method to align with third-party valuation methods. To
ensure alignment with these methods, the Investment Manager rounds
valuations to the closest $0.5m, which resulted in a decrease this
period. Net working capital adjusts for changes in project level
cash, assets, and liabilities. The change in merchant curve
reflects the update of forecast power prices to use the most recent
two power price forecasts from two market consultants. Further
details on the change in merchant curve can be found in the
Valuation section below.
ONGOING CHARGES
The ongoing charges ratio of the Company is 1.36% of the average
NAV for the period ended 30 June 2021. The ratio has been
calculated using the AIC recommended methodology. The estimated
total cost as laid out in the prospectus was 1.35% based on
proceeds of $250 million.
VALUATION
NET ASSET VALUE
The NAV for the period ending 30 June 2021 is $313.3
million.
The valuation of the Solar Assets produced by the Investment
Manager is based on valuations by an independent appraiser on a
semi-annual basis as at 30 June and 31 December. These valuations
form part of the NAV calculation of the Company, which is subject
to review/audit. Additionally, an unaudited NAV and NAV per
Ordinary Share is calculated in US dollars on a quarterly basis as
at 31 March and 30 September by the administrator, JTC (UK)
Limited, (Administrator) in conjunction with the Investment
Manager.
VALUATION METHODOLOGY
The Company has engaged an independent third-party appraiser to
value operational Solar Assets acquired by the Company and its
Project Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), every six months as at 30
June and 31 December.
At each quarter end, the Investment Manager provides the
relevant third-party or internal valuations of the Solar Assets,
together with the valuations of the other assets of the Company and
its Project SPVs, to the Company Secretary and Administrator of the
Company.
The Administrator, in conjunction with the Investment Manager,
calculates the NAV and the NAV per Ordinary Share as at the end of
each quarter of the Company's financial year, and submits the same
to the Board for its approval.
The valuation has been calculated in accordance with Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as applied to
PV electricity generation systems in the US.
Fair value for operational Solar Assets is derived from a
discounted cash flow (DCF) methodology. For Solar Assets that are
still under construction at the time of valuation, the purchase
price of the Solar Power Asset including construction and
acquisition costs is normally used as an appropriate estimate of
fair value, provided no significant changes to key underlying
economic considerations (such as major construction impediments or
natural disasters) have arisen.
Primary valuation methodology:
-- The equity fair values of USF's construction assets are based
on the equity purchase price plus transaction costs (no assets were
valued on this basis for 30 June 2021 as all assets were
operational at period end).
-- The equity fair values of USF's operational assets are based
on DCF modelling of pre-tax cash flows to equity as at 30 June
2021. This methodology more accurately reflects the valuation
impact of the discrete debt instruments that USF has in place when
compared to an unlevered valuation.
-- A post-tax valuation is conducted at the US Holding Corp.
level to cross-check the implied post-tax discount rate.
In a DCF analysis, the fair value of the Solar Power Asset is
the present value of the asset's expected future cash flows, based
on a range of operating assumptions for revenues and costs and an
appropriate discount rate range.
The Investment Manager has reviewed a range of sources in
determining the fair market valuation of the Solar Assets,
including but not limited to:
-- discount rates publicly disclosed by the Company's global peers;
-- discount rates applicable to comparable infrastructure asset classes; and
-- capital asset price model outputs and implied risk premium
over relevant risk-free rates.
A broad range of assumptions are used in valuation models. Where
possible, assumptions are based on observable long-term historical
market and technical data given the long-term life of the assets.
The Investment Manager also engages technical experts such as
long-term electricity price forecasters to provide long-term inputs
for use in its valuations.
Long-term electricity price forecasts are obtained every six
months from two leading independent power price forecasting firms
for each jurisdiction in which Solar Assets are located. The most
recent two electricity price forecasts from each firm are averaged
and provided to the independent valuer to project the prices at
which existing PPAs will be re-contracted. The averaging of curves
and providers is used to prevent the valuation of the portfolio
being unduly influenced by one forecaster's set of assumptions; to
mitigate potential forecaster errors in a particular period; and to
reduce the timing risk inherent in valuing the portfolio shortly
before curve updates are released. The independent valuer assesses
these forecast prices for reasonableness against their own internal
forecasts and others in the marketplace.
The Investment Manager has used its judgement in arriving at
appropriate discount rates which are consistent with the discount
rates derived by the independent valuer. The Investment Manager's
view of discount rates is based on its knowledge of the market,
considering
intelligence gained from its bidding activities, discussions
with financial advisers in the appropriate market, and publicly
available information on relevant transactions.
30 JUNE 2021 VALUATION
NESM has engaged independent valuer KPMG to calculate the fair
value of its operating renewable energy assets. KPMG is one of the
largest valuation firms in the US with significant experience in
estimating the fair value of solar and other renewable energy
assets. In line with USF policy, 41 of USF's operating assets were
externally valued at 30 June 2021 with MS2 held at cost given the
transaction closed during the half-year period.
Figure 7: Merchant Electricity Power Price Forecast (Excluding
Acquisition Six)
Figure 8: Movement In Portfolio Weighted Average Merchant
Pricing (Excluding Acquisition Six)
The Company's contracted cash flows during the PPA period are
not impacted by any changes in merchant electricity price
forecasts, however, these forecasts are used to estimate revenue
received in the post-PPA period. The merchant electricity price
forecasts used in the 30 June 2021 valuation declined approximately
10.1% across the portfolio compared with 31 December 2020,
reflecting COVID uncertainty at the time these forecasts were
released in 2020 and early 2021. This resulted in a reduction of
$0.05 per share or 5.1% of NAV, consistent with the NAV sensitivity
analysis published in our annual report.
The Company uses the average of the most recent two forecasts
(available at the valuation date) from two independent providers (a
total of four price forecasts). The most recent merchant
electricity price forecast released by one of these providers
(after the end of period) is, on average, 14.5% higher than the
forecast it will replace in the 31 December 2021 valuations; due to
a reduction in COVID-related sentiment and an increasingly bullish
outlook for carbon pricing to 2050. The other independent provider
will release an updated forecast prior to the 31 December 2021
valuation date.
The impact of merchant electricity price forecasts was partially
offset by a gain of $0.028 per share from favourable reductions to
discount rates reflecting the portfolio's continued transition from
construction phase to full run-rate operations, as well as the
reduction in leverage achieved through the refinancing of the
Heelstone portfolio. The weighted average pre-tax cost of equity
used for levered assets was
7.3% (December 2020: 8.3%), and the weighted average pre-tax
weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for unlevered assets was
6.5% (December 2020: 6.7%). The largest driver of the reduction in
pre-tax cost of equity was the Heelstone Debt Refinancing.
Reductions in discount rates typically occur as a project
progresses from construction start to one full year of operations.
As of June 30, 2021, the portfolio has reached run-rate operations
except for our largest asset, Milford. The Company expects an
incremental reduction in discount rate as the asset reaches a full
year of operations during H2 2021.
TAX EQUITY
At a federal level in the US, the Investment Tax Credit (ITC)
introduced in 2005 to give project owners tax credits for
installing designated renewable energy generation equipment, has
been highly successful in driving renewable energy adoption in the
US. In addition, certain solar PV assets are eligible for
accelerated depreciation, enhancing US tax effectiveness. At 30
June 2021, tax equity financing was in place for all projects in
the Company's portfolio except for Acquisition Three. US tax equity
structures customarily include a mechanism for the tax equity
investor to exit the structure after a time or return-based target
is met. As expected at the time of acquisition, US Bancorp fully
exited the Acquisition Three tax equity structure during the
period.
Table 6 below details the tax equity arrangements for the
Company's portfolio.
Table 6: Tax Equity Summary
Solar Asset T a x Equity Partner Funding Status
Acquisition Wells Fargo Fully funded and active
One
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Acquisition US Bancorp Fully funded and active
T wo
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Acquisition None (previously US Bancorp) Exited
Three
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Acquisition Hartford Insurance Company; Valley National Fully funded and active
Four Bank; and US Bancorp
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Acquisition US Bancorp Fully funded and active
Five
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Acquisition Wells Fargo Fully funded and active
Six
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
GEARING
On a look-through basis USF had outstanding debt of $202.5
million as at 30 June 2021, based on the face value of drawn debt.
This equates to 39.3% of Gross Asset Value (GAV) (calculated as NAV
plus outstanding debt).
Refer to Note 8 of the financial statements for further
information on USF's debt facilities.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
The Investment Manager and the Company use sensitivity analysis
to assess the impact of changes in key assumptions on the fair
value of the Company's investments. The sensitivities shown in
Figure 9 assume the relevant input is changed over the entire
useful life of each of the
underlying renewable energy assets, while all other variables
remain constant. All sensitivities have been calculated
independently of each other. The full sensitivity analysis,
including comments on key assumptions and sensitivities, is
included in Note 13 to the financial statements.
Figure 9: Sensitivity Analysis (Change in Cents Per Share)
SHARE CAPITAL
On 16 April 2019, the Company was admitted to the premium
listing segment of the Official List of the FCA and to trading on
the main market of the London Stock Exchange.
As at 31 December 2020, 200,192,361 Ordinary Shares were in
issue and no other classes of shares were in issue at that date. At
31 December 2019 there were 200,092,323 Ordinary Shares on
issue.
Between 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020, the Company issued
100,038 Ordinary Shares to the Investment Manager at a price of
$0.964 per Ordinary Share, representing the amount due in shares to
the Investment Manager for the period from 1 January 2020 to 30
June 2020, in accordance with the terms of the investment
management agreement between the Company and New Energy Solar
Manager Pty Limited.
No management shares were issued during the period. 132,000,000
shares issued under the capital raise were added to the 200,192,361
on issue as at 31 December 2020 for a total of 332,192,361 shares
on issue as at 30 June 2021.
INFORMATION ON THE INVESTMENT MANAGER
USF is managed by New Energy Solar Manager Pty Limited, which
also manages New Energy Solar (www.newenergysolar.com.au).
Combined, US Solar Fund and New Energy Solar have committed
approximately US$1.3 billion to 57 projects totalling 1.2GWDC.
The Investment Manager has been given responsibility, subject to
the overall supervision of the Board, for active discretionary
investment management of the Portfolio in accordance with the
Company's investment objective and policy. The Investment Manager
offers in-house deal origination, execution, and asset management
capabilities with experience in equity, tax equity, debt
structuring and arranging, and active asset management. The
Investment Manager's team currently consists of more than 20
investment and asset management professionals located in Sydney and
New York. The Investment Manager is a corporate authorised
representative of E&P Funds Management Pty Limited.
SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM
The senior members of the Investment Manager who are responsible
for the management of US Solar Fund are set out below. Further
information on the Investment Manager team is provided at
www.ussolarfund.co.uk.
LIAM THOMAS BAgribus (Curtin), MSc (Curtin), MBA (Melbourne)
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NESM
Liam joined the Investment Manager as Director - Investments in
March 2016 to lead transaction origination and execution
activities, and succeeded John Martin as CEO in August 2021. Liam
has over 16 years' experience in mergers and acquisitions,
corporate and business development, projects, and commercial
management in the energy, infrastructure, mining, and agribusiness
sectors. Prior to joining the Investment Manager, Liam was a senior
member of the International Development team at Origin Energy,
which focused on the investment and development strategy for
utility-scale solar, hydro, and geothermal projects in Latin
America and South-East Asia. Liam's previous roles have included
General Manager of Commercial Development at Aurizon, Commercial
Manager for the Northwest Infrastructure iron ore port joint
venture, and Project Manager at Orica, focusing on large-scale
mining-related infrastructure and manufacturing projects.
ADAM HAUGHTON BS (Materials Engineering) (UMD), MBA (UT
Austin)
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, NESM
Adam joined the Investment Manager as a Director in July 2018,
focusing on due diligence and transaction execution for new fund
investments, and succeeded Liam Thomas as CIO in August 2021.
Before joining the Investment Manager, Adam was a Vice President at
Greentech Capital Advisors, an investment bank focused on mergers
and acquisitions and capital raising transactions for companies
within the sustainable infrastructure industry. Prior to Greentech,
Adam worked in Bank of America Merrill Lynch's Global Industrials
Investment Banking Group where he advised on a range of public and
private mergers and acquisitions and capital market transactions.
Earlier in his career, Adam was a Development Engineer at SunEdison
where he was responsible for the development and design of utility-
scale and commercial and industrial solar installations in the
US.
WARWICK KENEALLY BEcon (ANU), BCom (ANU), CA
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, NESM
Prior to joining NESM, Warwick was the interim CFO of NESM's
parent, E&P Financial Group Limited. Warwick has worked in
chartered accounting firms specialising in turnaround and
restructuring. Warwick started his career with KPMG working in its
Canberra, Sydney, and London offices and has undertaken a range of
complex restructuring and insolvency engagements across Europe, UK,
and Australia, for a range of Australian, UK, European and US
banks.
Warwick has worked with companies and lenders to develop and
implement strategic business options, provide advice in relation to
continuous disclosure requirements, develop cash forecasting
training for national firms, and lectured on cash management.
SCOTT FRANCIS BS (Mechanical Engineering) (UR), MBA (UR)
HEAD OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, NESM
Scott joined the Investment Manager in July of 2021, focusing on
Asset Management and Operations across the portfolio of projects.
Scott brings over 15 years of energy industry experience and has
managed over 1,000 MWs of solar and 2,500 MWs of wind projects.
Most recently, Scott was Director of Asset Management at Apex Clean
Energy,
a leading developer and operator of US utility-scale solar and
wind power, where Scott led the Asset Management team. Scott and
his team provide comprehensive asset management in all aspects of
projects including performance, reporting, optimisation, revenue
assurance (PPA and Merchant), insurance, and contractual
performance obligations. Prior roles have included various
positions managing operations and business development for Dominion
Energy's (Fortune 500 Utility) renewable assets.
4. Environmental, Social and Governance
During the reporting period, the Company and Investment Manager
focused on acquiring and operating assets, and in doing so,
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors were taken into
account.
The Company invests in and sells energy generated by Solar
Assets to energy offtakers, directly contributing to renewable
energy infrastructure and renewable power generation. As of 30 June
2021, USF's portfolio comprised 42 operational solar plants which
are responsible for displacing more than an estimated 633,000
tonnes21 of CO2 emissions, equivalent to powering over 79,000 US
homes, or removing over 137,000 US cars from the road every
year.
Core to the Company's investment and environmental objectives is
the intention to build a long-term, sustainable business.
Accordingly, the Directors and the Investment Manager are committed
to managing USF in line with the core principles of good ESG
practices.
Investing in utility-scale solar to provide attractive
risk-adjusted returns for investors is, by its very nature, a
compelling investment for investors focused on sustainability and
ESG. It contributes positively and materially to the world's
growing awareness of and momentum to address the impact of human
activity on the environment and climate. Importantly, through
developing utility-scale solar projects and contracting the PPAs
with various offtakers, the Company directly contributes to the
share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.
In April 2021, the parent of the Investment Manager became a
signatory to the United Nations sponsored Principles for
Responsible Investing (UN PRI). This Company is also reviewing EU
sustainability and ESG disclosure frameworks to see how they might
best be applied to USF.
USF complied with pre-contractual disclosure requirements as
part of our recent equity raising to meet the EU ESG disclosure
obligations for EU-domiciled investors and prospective investors,
and is considering aligning with EU reporting frameworks in
2022.
ESG DUE DILIGENCE AND ACQUISITION
-- Environmental site assessments are completed for all assets
during due-diligence and obtain certification that all projects
comply with applicable local, state or federal law.
-- Physical climate-related risks are considered during the
diligence process and routinely throughout operations.
-- O&M contractors and facility managers must obtain and
maintain all permits required under applicable laws, including
environmental regulations for each facility, and operate them
accordingly.
-- EPC contracts require third parties to conduct themselves and
their processes to the highest standard of environmental control
and compliance with all applicable laws. Strict controls are
implemented to avoid any spill contamination, hazardous substances,
trade sanctions in supply chains, and waste containment, among
others.
-- Prior to construction or investment, each solar asset site
has, as part of the EPC contract, an agreed Health and Safety Plan
that explicitly outlines health, safety and security measures to be
employed and includes various state and federal laws to which all
contractors, subcontractors, and site visitors must adhere, as well
as injury reporting and investigation and corrective action
processes.
ESG PRINCIPLES AT WORK IN USF
Adherence to ESG principles requires USF to consider the broader
impact of its activities and to incorporate practices to further
the aim of these principles.
Environmental considerations incorporate the impact on both the
local environment, as well as global issues like climate change.
USF's primary activity is investing in Solar Assets which support
renewable energy development and provide a clean energy source to
communities . Further, USF's strategy of owning and operating solar
power portfolios directly contributes to the displacement of CO2
emissions and assists states in their transition to becoming low
carbon economies, helping to achieve their respective renewable
energy targets.
USF's positive environmental impact can be seen in USF's first
acquisition, the Milford Solar project in Utah. This project
generates over 277,500 megawatt hours of electricity annually. This
volume of electricity is equivalent to displacing approximately
235,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions, powering 31,000 US homes, or
removing 51,000 US cars from the road, every year.
The Company will often acquire plants that are not yet
operational, and as such require many contractors and employees to
construct each project. For example there were over 80 contractors
on site for the construction of the 128MWDC Milford solar plant.
The Company, through the engagement of its contractors, seeks to
create quality jobs in the communities in which it operates. Once
operational, the plants provide a smaller number of long-term
employment opportunities for members of the communities in which
the plants are located.
The Company is committed to making tangible contributions to the
prosperity and economic development of the regions in which it
operates. For example, the Company seeks to form open and strong
relationships with the landowners on which its assets are located,
as well as those near its assets. The Company also partners with
educational and research institutions to share insights and data to
further advance the solar industry.
These partnerships also help USF to continue to improve its
practices around land preservation, a key consideration for the
Company during an asset's construction phase and operational
life.
Governance considerations require a company to examine its
structure, leadership, shareholder rights and internal controls.
USF's Board of Directors is independent of the Investment Manager
and seeks to implement a system of rules and practices that
preserves the integrity and efficiency of its operations. The Board
has worked with the Investment Manager and Company Secretary to
maintain a framework of governance to meet the interests of
stakeholders including shareholders, customers, financiers,
government, suppliers and the community. The Company also considers
acquisition and asset management principles and practices as they
relate to dealing with anti-corruption and labour standards.
USF recognises that these governance considerations are critical
to building a successful, long-term business.
SITE-SPECIFIC ESG INITIATIVES DURING OWNERSHIP
As assets are onboarded and in-construction assets become
operational, site-specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are
implemented based on a list of potential measures for each asset.
The US is vast and contains many different ecological environments.
The initiatives used for each site depend on the local environment
as well as the size of the asset. As USF's solar assets range from
2MWDC to 128MWDC different measures are appropriate for different
size assets. The list below includes actual measures that have been
implemented at various USF sites (as noted in parentheses) and
options that are being considered at other sites:
ENVIRONMENTAL
-- Minimisation of water usage and monitoring consumption (all sites).
-- Planting of local/indigenous grasses, plants or wildflowers
(Milford, Benson, Eagle Solar, Lane II, Pilot Mountain, Tate,
Willard).
-- Implementation of sustainable drainage and flood control
measures (Benson, Eagle Solar, Lane II, Pilot Mountain, Tate,
Willard, Four Oaks).
SOCIAL
-- Attendance at local community and government meetings to
maintain community engagement and dialogue.
-- Ongoing relationship development with O&M providers,
construction contractors, and landowners to encourage local
community engagement and contribution (all sites).
-- Effective complaint reporting and handling (all sites).
-- Engagement with local education institutions to help develop
understanding of renewable energy (Alkali, Rock Garden, Suntex,
West Hines I).
-- Contributions to select local and regional charitable
organisations (Granger, Alkali, Rock Garden, Suntex, Pilot
Mountain).
-- On site, all injuries and incidents must be reported
immediately, and reporting is followed by a well-documented
investigation process, detailed report, and corrective action (all
sites).
GOVERNANCE
-- Periodic and regular review of safety statistics and site
visits with site service providers to ensure compliance with local
and regional laws and the Investment Manager's ESG practices (all
sites).
-- Annual review of contract compliance (including health and
safety plans) with site service providers (all sites).
-- Regular review of site permits and obligations to ensure safe
and effective operations within the regulatory guidelines (all
sites).
SUSTAINABILITY
USF was established to both capitalise on and contribute to the
world's increasing awareness of the impact of climate change and
the need to better manage the world's resources for present and
future generations. The Company is focused on sustainability,
primarily as an investor in the solar industry, but also in the way
the Company is managed.
ALIGNMENT WITH UNITED NATIONS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
(UNSDG)
In 2015, the United Nations (UN) developed 17 Sustainable
Development Goals (SDG) to enable individuals, organisations,
corporations, and governments to implement, record and measure
their approach to addressing global challenges including poverty,
inequality, and climate change.
The Company is aligned with the UNSDG and has selected two core
goals to which the Company can most measurably contribute.
Affordable and Clean Energy Decent Work and Economic Growth
Relevant 7.2 By 2030, increase substantially 8.8 Protect labour rights and
Target the share of renewable energy promote safe and secure working
in the global energy mix. environments for all workers, including
migrant workers, in particular
women migrants, and those in precarious
employment.
------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
Reporting Measurement of carbon impact Reporting on health and safety
of Solar Assets; development strategic initiatives, planning
of strategic plans for assets and incidents at assets under ownership.
at end of life (e.g. solar
panel recycling).
------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------
UNSDG 7. 2
The 42 solar power projects in USF's portfolio have a combined
capacity of 493MWDC. This power is generated without producing
emissions and importantly, also replaces fossil-fuel generated
power, thereby displacing CO2 emissions. As USF's 42 assets are all
operating, they will be responsible for displacing more than an
estimated 633,000 tonnes22 of CO2, every year, equivalent to
powering 79,000 US homes or removing 137,000 US cars from the road
each year.
As a sustainably run business, USF is conscious of its
obligations to carefully consider and plan for the future disposal
of solar panels. Given USF's solar plants are relatively new, with
only 8% of capacity (including all acquisitions) being operational
for greater than five years and the majority being operational
between two and five years, the business has not yet needed to
manage the disposal of large quantities of solar panels, due to the
assumed solar asset life of 35+ years per project. In any case, USF
works with its contractors to ensure that materials and panels are
disposed of or where appropriate recycled properly according to any
associated regulations.
During construction and operation, the solar panels employed in
USF's plants have proven to be robust and rates of damage and waste
have been very low. With respect to the bulk of the panels
installed at USF's solar power plants, USF intends to establish a
solar panel recycling system that can facilitate the recovery of
valuable secondary raw materials and promote high levels of reuse.
To this end, USF is investigating the recycling programs available
in the industry and the approaches of its development and
construction partners.
UNSDG 8.8
When an acquired project is yet to be constructed, an
Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) Agreement must be
agreed upon and signed before construction. This agreement contains
a comprehensive and systematic Health and Safety Plan that
explicitly outlines certain requirements according to each site
location and layout of the project. This plan incorporates health,
safety and security measures required by various state and federal
laws to which all contractors, subcontractors and site visitors
must adhere.
A site Health and Safety Committee is established for each
project location, comprised of field representatives and management
from the EPC contractor once construction commences. These
representatives must obtain appropriate construction safety
certification (known as "OSHA36") and are responsible for daily
safety briefings. The representatives also facilitate weekly
"toolbox" meetings, designed to address
potential safety concerns on-site, and ensure the implementation
of preventive safety measures. USF did not have any assets under
construction during the period.
Once a site is operational, and upon appointment of O&M
contractors, a Safety and Health Management Plan is implemented.
These plans provide personnel working at the site with a framework
for addressing safety and health in the workplace with the goal of
preventing any fatalities, injuries, illnesses and equipment
damage. The approach is based on the principle that nearly all
worksite fatalities, injuries and illnesses are preventable. USF
currently has 42 operating projects.
The Company and the Investment Manager are also focused on
injury reporting and investigation as they allow for review of
existing preventive measures, thereby reducing the likelihood of an
event occurring. All injuries and incidents must be reported
immediately on the project site, followed by an investigation
process, detailed report and corrective action.
Over the course of the period to 30 June 2021, there were no
recordable injuries or lost-time accident on site.
The Company and Investment Manager continue to monitor and
maintain health and safety management policies and take a
preventive and proactive approach when dealing with health and
safety hazards, rigorously implementing safety practices and
improving them where applicable.
5. Principal Risks and Uncertainties
The Board is responsible for financial reporting and controls,
including the approval of the Annual Report and Accounts, the
dividend policy, any significant changes in accounting policies or
practices, and treasury policies including a use of derivative
financial instruments.
The Company faces a broad range of risks that the Board and
Investment Manager aim to mitigate through internal controls and
other actions. These risks are regularly assessed on a periodic
basis to ensure that the business operates smoothly and that any
adverse effect on the Company's performance and share value is
mitigated. To the extent possible, the Board also maintains a risk
matrix that is reviewed annually under the risk management
framework in place to minimise the impact of these risks should
they occur. The risks that the Board and Investment Manager believe
to be the most relevant to the business can be organised into key
categories as set out below:
-- legal & regulatory risks;
-- financial & market risks; and
-- operational risks,
Principal risks for the period and their mitigants are
summarised in the tables below:
LEGAL & REGULATORY RISKS
Risk Impact on Company Mitigant
======================================
Changes in Regulation changes may adversely The Company and Investment Manager
laws affect the monitor changes in
or regulations business and performance legislation for relevant jurisdictions
governing of the Company. to enable rapid and effective
the The Company is sensitive response. This ensures that any upcoming
Company's to tax changes for changes in legislation are
operations example, including but not proactively accounted for when evaluating
or limited to income tax, potential investment
the Investment Investment Tax Credits and opportunities. The Company and Investment
Manager's tax restrictions on Manager also consult
operations renewables. An adverse change with tax and regulatory experts as
in tax legislation required.
may impact the Company's
overall returns.
Political Political risks often translate As the Company's assets are in the
risks to elevated political uncertainties US, the Investment Manager does not
and have detrimental effects consider separation from the EU to
on investment and currency cause significant risks to the US
markets. The separation of renewables market. Noting the success
the United Kingdom (UK) from of the Company's equity raise in April
the European Union (EU) may 2021, the impact on the Company's
impact the Company's ability ability to attract capital was minimal.
to raise additional funds. The Company and Investment Manager
The outcome from US Congress monitor changes in legislation for
decisions and changes in relevant jurisdictions to enable rapid
US administration, and the and effective response. The Company
impacts on renewable energy and Investment Manager also consult
credits, tax concessions with tax and legislation experts as
and support for the renewable required.
generation sector are uncertain. The policy objectives of the Biden
administration regarding net zero
carbon emission energy generation
has lowered the political risk associated
with investment in US renewable energy.
======================================
FINANCIAL & MARKET RISKS
Risk Impact on Company Mitigant
Long-term PPA terms are generally shorter The Company secures revenue by acquiring
power price than the expected useful assets that have long- term PPAs in
fluctuations life of Solar Assets so price place (with a minimum PPA term of
forecasts are used to estimate 10 years for each project or portfolio
the value of cash flows between acquisition and a target weighted
PPA expiry and the end of average PPA term of almost 15 years
the asset's useful life. for the Company's entire portfolio).
Lower wholesale electricity The Company continues to regularly
price forecasts will reduce monitor changes in expert energy price
the revenue that the Solar forecasts and ensures that they are
Assets are expected to generate appropriately factored into asset
after PPA expiry, thereby valuations. The Company averages forecast
impacting asset valuations. price curves from two reputable providers
over their most recent two periods
(i.e., four curves in total) to mitigate
the impact on asset values from any
one forecaster changing views. Additionally,
the Company is evaluating energy storage
as a means to reduce exposure to power
price and
re-contracting risk.
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Valuation The due diligence process The Company appoints an independent
of that the Investment reputable firm to undertake
ass ets Manager undertakes in evaluating valuations of its Solar Assets on
acquisitions at least an annual basis. Further,
of Solar Assets may not reveal the
all facts that may Company appoints reputable third parties
be relevant in connection with industry specific skills
with such investments. to assist in the due diligence process
This could lead to valuation including reviewing detailed
errors that affect financial model inputs.
the returns achieved by the
underlying assets or
results in inaccurate reporting
to investors and
other stakeholders.
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Access to The Company may not be able Debt and tax equity financing is in
capital from to source funding from suitable place for all projects in the Company's
tax equity tax equity partners and debt portfolio. The Company has appointed
pa rtners providers which may limit a reputable and experienced Investment
a nd debt the amount of capital the Manager with strong existing banking
providers Company is able to invest. and tax equity relationships. These
Additionally, existing relationships, in addition
the Company may be exposed to new relationships, developed with
to risks from its contractual experienced tax equity partners allow
relationships in relation for various avenues to appoint a partner
to tax equity financing with best suited for the project. The Company
any tax equity partner. also continues to monitor compliance
with tax equity financing provisions.
The Company successfully refinanced
its Acquisition Four (Heelstone Portfolio)
debt facility, using existing
banking relationships of the Investment
Manager, with proceeds from the April
2021 share placement.
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Unable to The Company may not be able The IPO proceeds are fully invested
source to source suitable and the recent capital raising
suitable Solar assets in future, which would proceeds are largely invested. The
Assets result in the remaining capital will be put
Company holding levels of toward growth options (either Tranche
cash which are higher T wo of MS2 or other
than optimal. This cash would opportunities). The Company has also
likely generate appointed an Investment
much lower levels of returns Manager with a dedicated team of experienced
than the assets in the investment and
Company, consequentially renewable energy professionals focused
adversely affecting the on sourcing, evaluating
level of returns to shareholders and transacting on new investments
and the market for the Company, to deploy all
value of the Company. available capital.
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Interest rate The Company has debt facilities The base interest rate for all amortising
risk with both fixed and floating debt is fully hedged for the term
interest rates. The Company of the relevant loan, and for one
is also exposed to interest or more subsequent refinancings.
rate risk though holding The FTB Facility has a floating interest
variable rate bank deposits. rate which is not hedged but is currently
As such, changes in interest undrawn. The interest rate risk on
rates may have a positive this instrument and on bank deposits
or negative impact directly is not significant given the re lati
on the Company's net income ve l y low balances and current low
and, consequently, the profits level of interest rates. The Company
of the Company. Changes in does not bear interest rate risk on
interest rates may also affect its loan to USF Holding Corp. as the
the discount rates used in loan rate is fixed for the duration
the valuation of the assets. of the loan facility. Changes in interest
rate that affect the discount rates
used in the valuation of the assets
will also tend to impact long-term
electricity price forecasts which
provides a partial hedge.
In the event of the Company investing
in new projects, the Company's standard
practice is to hedge the floating
rate risk on the actual and anticipated
debt amortisation profile at the time
of investment.
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
OPERATIONAL RISKS
Risk Impact on Company Mitigant
Operational The Company is potentially The Investment Management Agreement
fraud exposed to financial losses ( IMA ) provides USF with certain
from fraudulent activities protections through passing certain
related to receipts from responsibilities to the Investment
counterparties or wholesale Manager. The Investment Manager maintains
markets, and adheres to policies and processes
or payments made to construction to mitigate the risk of fraud. The
entities, maintenance providers E&P Financial Group Limited, of which
and capital investors. the Investment Manager is a member,
holds insurance which covers fraudulent
incidents.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Default of The Company may experience The Company has a fully operational
developer a financial loss portfolio, with no Solar Assets
or (realised or unrealised) currently under construction. Where
Engineering, from a developer or EPC the Company undertakes
Procurement, counterparty failing to perform construction activity in the future,
Construction their contractual it appoints experienced and
(EPC) contractor obligations including warranty reputable contractors with strong
obligations which track records and through existing
continue after construction relationships with the Investment
is completed. Manager. The Company will
periodically review the credit ratings
and other available financial
indicators of counterparties before
contracting and adjust risk
premiums accordingly.
Contractual protections in EPC contracts
(milestone-based
payments, performance security, liens
over assets purchased and
installed by the EPC contractor),
means the potential impact of EPC
contractor default during construction
is largely limited to the time
and cost of replacing the contractor
rather than any persistent loss.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Unfavourable The Company may be exposed The Company and Investment Manager
weather to a lower than conduct sensitivity analysis
conditions expected volume of revenue using a range of power generation
including generation produced forecasts when evaluating
climate by the Solar Assets. Additionally, acquisitions however isolated or localised
change or the Solar Assets conditions such as storms,
events may face damages due to extreme heavy snowfall, or smoke and dust
weather events may cause production
conditions arising from climate shortfalls outside the range of power
change. generation forecasts. Investing
in geographically diverse projects
mitigates the impact of localised,
unfavourable weather conditions.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Under- The underperformance of Solar The Company uses third-party independent
performance Assets may lead engineers to review
of solar to reductions in energy generated the assets and provide independent
power and thereby reports on performance before
plants relative a reduction in revenue that acquisition, to ensure that reasonable
to acquisition the asset would be generation assumptions
assumptions expected to produce. are utilised. The Company and Investment
Manager also conduct
sensitivity analyses on power generation
when evaluating the
acquisition target. The Company and
the Investment Manager also
seek to engage with reputable O&M
and EPC contractors and include
market-standard contractual protections
in the relevant contracts.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Pandemics Global health concerns often The Investment Manager has established
including translate to elevated systems and procedures
COVID-19 uncertainties in financial that allow remote monitoring of the
markets and have solar power assets and remote
detrimental effects on the work by staff. These systems have
global economy. The operated throughout COVID-19,
COVID-19 outbreak may impact included extended periods of lock-down
the Company's restrictions.
supply chain and service The Investment Manager manages costs
providers (such as by using fixed-time and
higher O&M costs, longer fixed-cost contracts for construction,
response times, and working closely with EPC
higher insurance costs) and contractors during the construction
also ability to raise of assets, and with O&M
additional funds. contractors and other key suppliers
once assets become operational.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Counterparty There is the potential for There have been no material changes
credit risk losses to be incurred due to the creditworthiness of any of
to defaults by PPA counterparties, the USF counterparties as a result
EPC contractors, derivative of COVID-19, and the Company and the
counterparties, and deposit Investment Manager diversifies credit
taking institutions. risk across multiple investment-grade
counterparties. No financial transactions
are permitted with counterparties
with a credit rating of less than
BBB- from Standard & Poor's or Baa3
from Moody's unless specifically approved
by the Board. The Investment Manager
will continue
to monitor credit market conditions,
including as they apply to PPA counterparties.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
LONGER TERM VIABILITY
The Board is responsible for financial reporting and controls,
including the approval of the Annual Report and Accounts, the
dividend policy, any significant changes in accounting policies or
practices, and treasury policies including the use of derivative
financial instruments. The Board of the Company is also required to
assess the long-term prospects of the Company according to the
Association of Investment Companies (AIC) Code. The Board has
assessed the prospects of the group over a five-year period. The
Board considers a five-year timeframe to be reasonable on the basis
that the Company is in the initial stage of operating assets. The
key risks facing the Company including, but not limited to, the
risks mentioned on pages 26 to 28 have been individually assessed
by the Board. The likelihood and impact of each risk on the Company
prior to and after specific risk mitigation controls have taken
place have been evaluated.
The Company owns a portfolio of Solar Assets in the US that are
fully constructed, operational and generating renewable
electricity. As a result, it benefits from predictable and reliable
long-term cash flows and is subject to a set of risks that can be
identified and assessed. Each Solar Asset is supported by a
detailed financial model at acquisition and incorporated into the
Company's valuation model for quarterly valuations, which are
independently reviewed every half-year. The Board believes the
diversification within the Company's portfolio of Solar Assets
helps to withstand and mitigate the emerging and principal risks
the Company is most likely to face. The Company's revenues from
investments provide substantial cover to the operating expenses of
the SPVs, USF Holding Corp., and the Company and any other costs
likely to be faced by any of them over
the viability assessment period. The Investment Manager also
prepares a rolling detailed monthly two-year cash flow forecast to
address and specifically consider the sustainability of the
dividends.
After assessing these risks, and reviewing the Company's
liquidity position, together with the Company's commitments,
available but undrawn credit facilities, and forecasts of future
performance under various scenarios, the Board has a reasonable
expectation that the Company is well positioned to continue to
operate and meet its liabilities over the short term and the
five-year outlook period. While the Board has no reason to believe
that the Company will not be viable beyond the specified outlook
period, it is aware that it is difficult to foresee the viability
of any business over a longer period given the inherent uncertainty
involved.
It is important to note that the risks associated with
investments within the infrastructure sector could result in a
material adverse effect on the Company's performance and value of
Ordinary Shares. When required, experts will be employed to gather
information, including tax advisers, legal advisers, and
environmental advisers.
SECTION 172
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 recognises that directors
are responsible for acting fairly as between members and in a way
that they consider, in good faith, is the most likely to promote
the success of the Company for the benefit of its Shareholders as a
whole. In doing so, they are also required to consider the broader
implications of their decisions and operations on other key
stakeholders and their impact on the wider community and the
environment. Key decisions are those that are either material to
the Company or are significant to any of the Company's key
stakeholders. The Company's engagement with key stakeholders and
the key decisions that were made or approved by the Directors
during the year are described below:
SHAREHOLDERS
The Company also relies on Shareholders for continued access to
capital to support further growth of the Company.
The Investment Manager liaises with Shareholders through
specified reporting of Company performance at set dates in the
calendar, as well as ad hoc reporting of major announcements.
In addition, Shareholders have the opportunity to meet the Board
at the Annual General Meeting (AGM). The Board also endevours to
respond to any written queries made by Shareholders during the
course of the period, or to meet with major Shareholders if so
requested.
In addition to the formal business of the AGM, representatives
of the Investment Manager and the Board are available to answer
specific questions a Shareholder may have.
LERS
The Company also relies on Lenders for continued access to
capital to support further growth of the Company, and to refinance
existing debt facilities at maturity, or prior to maturity where it
is accretive for Shareholders.
The Investment Manager liaises with Lenders through specified
reporting of project level performance at set dates in the
calendar, as well as ad hoc reporting of major announcements.
SERVICE PROVIDERS
Our service providers are fundamental to the quality of our
product and to ensuring that as a business we meet the high
standards of conduct that we set ourselves.
The Board meets at least annually to review the performance of
the key service providers.
The Board has regular contact with the two main service
providers: the Investment Manager and Administrator through
quarterly board meetings with the Chair and Audit Chair meeting
more regularly.
REGULATORS/GOVERNMENT
The Board regularly considers how it meets regulatory and
statutory obligations and follows voluntary and best-practice
guidance, including how any governance decisions it makes impact
its stakeholders both in the short and long term.
PPA OFFTAKERS
The Offtakers for the Company's projects provide the main source
of operating cash inflows to the Company. No Offtaker is a related
party of the Board or Investment Manager. The Company is focused on
ensuring assets operate in line with weather-adjusted expectations
to deliver power to their PPA Offtakers.
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
The local communities, within which the Company's projects are
based, provide local support as well as human resources to work on
the project sites. The Company works actively with landholders and
city councils, to resolve matters including egress and access,
erosion, and land management issues.
6. Board of Directors
The Directors are responsible for the determination of the
Company's investment objective and policy and its investment
strategy and have overall responsibility for the Company's
activities, including the review of investment activity and
performance and the supervision and control of the Investment
Manager. The Directors have delegated responsibility for managing
the assets comprising the portfolio to the Investment Manager.
Further information on the Board is provided at
www.ussolarfund.co.uk.
GILLIAN NOTT
NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIR
Mrs Nott spent the majority of her career working in the energy
sector, including positions with BP. In 1994 she became CEO of
ProShare, a not-for-profit organisation promoting financial
education, savings and investment, and employee share
ownership. She was a non-executive Director of the Financial
Services Authority from 1998 until 2004. Subsequently she has held
numerous board roles, including being a non-executive director of
Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society, a leading insurer, and deputy
chair of the Association of Investment Companies. Mrs Nott has
served as both a non-executive director and chair of a number of
venture capital trusts and investment trusts. She is currently
chair of JPMorgan Russian Securities plc,
Premier Miton Global Renewables Trust plc, PMGR Securities 2025
plc and Gresham House Renewable Energy Venture Capital Trust 1
plc.
JAMIE RICHARDS
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mr Richards is a Chartered Accountant and has 25 years'
experience in fund management, banking and corporate recovery with
a focus on the infrastructure and solar sector. Mr Richards
previously was a partner, executive committee member and head of
infrastructure at Foresight Group having joined in 2000. Between
2007 and 2018 he had overall responsibility from inception for the
group's infrastructure and solar business in the UK, Australia,
Italy and the
US. He oversaw, as a member of the investment committee, more
than 100 solar projects representing the group's approximately
GBP1.5 billion solar portfolio and led the IPO of Foresight Solar
Fund Limited. Prior to 2007, he led a number
of venture capital and private equity transactions in the
technology and cleantech sectors representing Foresight Group's
funds and was a non-executive director of several companies.
Previously, Mr Richards worked at PwC, Citibank and Macquarie, both
in London and Sydney. Mr Richards is also a non-executive director
of Smart Meter Systems plc and currently acts as alternative chair
of the investment committee of Community Owned Renewable Energy
LLP, an investment programme targeting UK solar farms for community
ownership.
RACHAEL NUTTER
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Ms Nutter has spent over 20 years in the energy sector and the
last 15 years in the renewable and clean energy sector. Ms Nutter
is Director for Nature Based Solutions (NBS) at ClimateCare, a
leading player in the carbon markets. Until August 2020 Ms Nutter
worked at Shell, most recently as general manager of NBS business
development. Prior to this, she led a global solar business
development team in Shell that originated and delivered investments
in solar projects and development platforms, having previously led
the development of the solar entry strategy for Shell. Ms Nutter
also had a role within Shell Ventures. Prior to rejoining Shell in
2012, she worked at CT Investment Partners, Carbon Trust and
PA Consulting Group, having started her career as a petroleum
engineer with Shell. Ms Nutter is a board member of the Energy
Technologies Institute, a UK public-private partnership to
accelerate the commercialisation of low carbon technologies.
THOMAS PLAGEMANN
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mr Plagemann has almost 30 years of experience originating and
executing financing and investments in energy and infrastructure
assets. Most recently, Mr Plagemann was the chief commercial
officer at Vivint Solar where he was responsible for developing
Vivint Solar's tax equity, capital markets, market expansion, and
fundraising efforts and leading the financing strategy beyond its
existing third-party financing structures. During his career, Mr
Plagemann has been involved with projects valued in excess of $29
billion and has completed transactions across the balance sheet
from debt to equity. Prior to joining Vivint Solar, he was Head of
Energy, U.S. Corporate & Investment Banking for Santander
Global Banking & Markets.
Prior to joining Santander, he was at First Solar as the Global
Head of Project Finance and Transaction Execution. Prior to First
Solar, Mr. Plagemann was responsible for AIG FP's principal
investment strategy in the renewable energy sector. Before joining
AIG, he was a managing director with GE Capital's energy investment
business, and he started his career as a banker in Deutsche Bank's
project finance group. Mr Plagemann received a BA from the
University of Minnesota and a master's degree in international
affairs with a specialisation in finance from Columbia
University.
7. Directors' Report
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY AND STATUS
US Solar Fund Plc was incorporated as a Public Company, limited
by shares, in England and Wales on 10 January 2019 with registered
number 11761009. The registered office of the Company is The
Scalpel, 18th Floor, 52 Lime Street, London EC3M 7AF. Its share
capital is denominated in US dollars (US$ or $) and currently
consists of Ordinary Shares. The Company's principal activity is to
invest in a diversified portfolio of Solar Power Assets located in
North America and other countries forming part of the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the
Americas.
DIRECTORS
All Directors are non-executive Directors.
The Company maintains GBP20 million of Directors' and Officers'
Liability Insurance cover for the benefit of the Directors, which
was in place throughout the period and which continues in effect at
the date of this report.
Details of the fees paid to Directors in the period are set out
below:
DIRECTOR ANNUAL FEE RECEIVED IN PERIODED 30 JUNE
2021
(GBP) (GBP)
Gillian Nott* 60,000 30,000
------------- ---------------------------------------
Jamie Richards** 50,000 25,000
------------- ---------------------------------------
Rachael Nutter 4 0, 000 20,000
------------- ---------------------------------------
Thomas Plagemann 4 0, 000 20,000
------------- ---------------------------------------
*This includes GBP20,000 per annum in respect
of serving as Chair of the Board.
**This includes GBP10,000 per annum in respect
of serving as Chair of the Audit committee.
------------- ---------------------------------------
*This includes GBP20,000 per annum in respect of serving as
Chair of the Board.
**This includes GBP10,000 per annum in respect of serving as
Chair of the Audit committee.
In accordance with FCA Listing Rules 9.8.6(R)(1), Directors'
interest in the shares of the Company (in respect of which
transactions are notifiable to the Company under FCA Disclosure and
Transparency Rule 3.1.2(R)) as at 30 June 2021 are shown below:
DIRECTOR NUMBER OF PERCENTAGE OF ISSUED
ORDINARY SHARES SHARE CAPITAL
Gillian Nott 66,000 0.02%
----------------- ---------------------
Jamie Richards 65,495 0.02%
----------------- ---------------------
Rachael Nutter 39,934 0.01%
----------------- ---------------------
Thomas Plagemann - 0.00%
----------------- ---------------------
SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDINGS
NUMBER OF ORDINARY PERCENTAGE
SHAREHOLDER SHARES OF ISSUED
SHARE
CAPITAL
Liontrust Investment
Management
LLP 35,838,636 10.79%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Sarasin & Partners LLP 33,082,699 9. 96%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Baillie Gifford & Co 30,760,000 9.26%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Newton Investment Management
Limited 26,519,653 7. 98%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
CCLA Investment Management 2 5 , 2 6 7 , 3 5 6 7. 61%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Cantor Fitzgerald Ireland Ltd 20,670,338 6. 2 2 %
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Fidelity Investments 18,214,980 5.48%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Gravis Advisory Ltd 15,505,965 4.67%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Aberdeen Asset Managers Ltd
(UK) 1 4 , 9 4 0, 000 4.50%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Privium Fund Management BV 12,130,000 3.65%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Hargreaves Lansdown Asset
Management 1 1 , 5 7 6 , 5 6 8 3.65%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Brooks Macdonald Asset
Management 11,413,706 3.48%
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
GOING CONCERN
The Board has reviewed a set of financial projections of the
cash flow and distribution profile of the Company prepared by the
Investment Manager. The Board has assessed the prospects of the
group over a five-year period given the long-term nature of the
underlying assets to support the viability statement and completed
a detailed assessment to support the going concern conclusion for
the 12 months following the signing of the Interim Report. After
assessing these risks, and reviewing the Company's liquidity
position, together with forecasts of the Company's future
performance under various scenarios, the Board has a reasonable
expectation that the Company will continue to meet its
obligations as they fall due for at least the next 12 months. As
such the Board concluded that it is appropriate to adopt the going
concern basis of preparation in preparing these financial
statements. For further details on going concern please see Note
2.
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS
The Company made no political contributions during the
period.
POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
On 20 September 2021, the Company announced a dividend of 1.25
cents per Ordinary Share for the period ending 30 June 2021. The
Company's events after the period ended are discussed in the
Investment Manager's Report on page 11.
Signed by order of the Board,
GILL NOTT
CHAIR
20 September 2021
8. Directors' Responsibility Statement
The Directors are responsible for preparing the half-yearly
report and financial statements in accordance with applicable
regulations. The Directors confirm that to the best of their
knowledge:
-- the condensed set of financial statements has been prepared
in accordance with IAS 34 "Interim Financial Reporting" and gives a
true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position
and profit of the Company;
-- the interim management report which includes the Chairman's
Statement, Report of the Investment Adviser and Statement of
Principal Risks and Uncertainties for the remaining six months of
the year to 30 June 2021 includes a fair review of the information
required by:
a. DTR 4.2.7R of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules,
being an indication of important events that have occurred during
the first six months of the financial year and their impact on the
Unaudited Condensed Interim Financial Statements; and a description
of the principal risks and uncertainties for the remaining six
months of the financial year; and
b. DTR 4.2.8R of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules,
being related party transactions that have taken place during the
first six months of the financial year and that have materially
affected the financial position or performance of the Company
during that period; and any changes in the related party
transactions described in the last annual report that could do
so.
Signed by order of the Board,
GILL NOTT
CHAIR
Date: 20 September 2021
9. Independent Review Report to US Solar Fund plc.
We have been engaged by the company to review the condensed set
of financial statements in the half-yearly financial report for the
six months ended 30 June 2021 which comprises the Condensed
Statement of Profit and Loss and Other Comprehensive Income, the
Condensed Statement of Financial Position, the Condensed Statement
of Changes in Equity, the Condensed Statement of Cash Flows and
related notes 1 to 17. We have read the other information contained
in the half-yearly financial report and considered whether it
contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies
with the information in the condensed set of financial
statements.
Directors' responsibilities
The half-yearly financial report is the responsibility of, and
has been approved by, the directors. The directors are responsible
for preparing the half-yearly financial report in accordance with
the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the United
Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
As disclosed in note 2, the annual financial statements of the
company will be prepared in accordance with United Kingdom adopted
International Financial Reporting Standards. The condensed set of
financial statements included in this half-yearly financial report
has been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom adopted
International Accounting Standard 34, "Interim Financial
Reporting".
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on
the condensed set of financial statements in the half-yearly
financial report based on our review.
Scope of review
We conducted our review in accordance with International
Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410 "Review of
Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor
of the Entity" issued by the Financial Reporting Council for use in
the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information
consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other
review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on
Auditing (UK) and consequently does not enable us to obtain
assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters
that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not
express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that
causes us to believe that the condensed set of financial statements
in the half-yearly financial report for the six months ended 30
June 2021 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance
with United Kingdom adopted International Accounting Standard 34
and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the United
Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the company in accordance with
International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410
"Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the
Independent Auditor of the Entity" issued by the Financial
Reporting Council. Our work has been undertaken so that we might
state to the company those matters we are required to state to it
in an independent review report and for no other purpose. To the
fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the company, for our review
work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have formed.
Deloitte LLP
Statutory Auditor
London, UK
20 September 2021
10. Condensed Statement of Profit and Loss and Other Comprehensive Income
FOR THE PERIODED 30 JUNE 2021
Six Months Ended 30 June Six Months Ended 30 June
2021 2020
Revenue C ap Total Revenue C ap Total
Notes US$ ital US$ US$ ital US$
US$ US$
-------------- ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Net(loss)/gain on investments
at fair value through profit
and loss 8 - (6,880,876) (6,880,876) - 1,719,385 1,719,385
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
MSA fee income 8 2,568,123 - 2,568,123 - - -
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Intercompany loan interest
income 8 991,750 - 991,750 - - -
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Interest income 4 - - - 224,699 - 224,699
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Total income 3,559,873 (6,880,876) (3,321,003) 224,699 1,719,385 1,944,084
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Expenditure
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Administrative and other
expenses 5 (1,844,297) - (1,844,297) (1,491,154) - (1,491,154)
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Operating (loss)/profit for
the period 1,715,576 (6,880,876) (5,165,300) (1,266,455) 1,719,385 452,930
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Gain on foreign exchange - 180,245 180,245 - (671) (671)
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
(Loss)/profit before taxation 1,715,576 (6,700,631) (4,985,055) (1,266,455) 1,718,714 452,259
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Taxation 6 - - - - - -
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
(Loss)/Profit and total
comprehensive income for
the period 1,715,576 (6,700,631) (4,985,055) (1,266,455) 1,718,714 452,259
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
Earnings per share (basic 0 . 5 9
and diluted) - cents/share 7 9 (2.340) (1 . 741) (0.633) 0.859 0.226
------ ----------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
All items dealt with in arriving at the result for the period
relate to continuing operations.
The Total column of this statement represents Company's profit
and loss account, prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") in conformity with the
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 which comprise standards and
interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board ("IASB"), and International Accounting Standards and
Interpretations approved by the International Financial Reporting
Interpretation Committee ("IFRIC") that remain in effect. The
return on ordinary activities after taxation is the total
comprehensive income and therefore no additional statement of other
comprehensive income is presented. The supplementary revenue and
capital columns are presented for information purposes in
accordance with the Statement of Recommended Practice issued by the
Association of Investment Companies.
11. Condensed Statement of Financial Position
30 June 2021 31 December
Notes US$ 2020
US$
Non-current assets
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Investment held at fair value 8 298,443,400 195,324,276
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
298,443,400 195,324,276
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Current assets
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Tra de and other receivables 9 207,846 45,587
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents 10 16,111,513 523,170
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
16,319,359 568,757
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
T o t a l assets 314,762,759 195,893,033
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Current liabilities
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Tra de and other payables 11 1,459,380 732,723
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Dividends payable 12 - 1,000,962
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
1,459,380 1,733,685
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Net current assets/(liabilities) 14,859,979 (1,164,928)
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Total net assets 313,303,379 194,159,348
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Shareholders equity
Share capital 3,321,924 2,001,924
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Share premium 128,147,240 184,786
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Capital reduction reserve 183,523,153 188,176,521
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Capital reserve (3,429,229) 3,271,402
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Retained earnings 1,740,291 524,715
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Total shareholders equity 313,303,379 194,159,348
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
Net asset value per share 14 0.943 0.970
------- ---------------------------- ------------------------
12. Condensed Statement of Changes in Equity
FOR THE PERIODED 30 JUNE 2021
Notes Share Share Premium Capital Capital Retained Total Equity
Capital US$ Reduction Reserve Earnings US$
US$ Reserve US$ US$
US$
Balance
at 1 January
2021 2,001,924 184,786 188,176,521 3,271,402 524,715 194,159,348
---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
Issue of
share capital 1,320,000 130,680,000 - - - 132,000,000
---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
Equity issue
costs - (2,717,547) - - - (2,717,547)
---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
Dividends - - (2,717,547) - (500,000) (5,153,368)
---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
Loss & total
comprehensive
income for
the period - - - (6,700,631) 1,715,576 (4,985,055)
---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
Balance
at 30 June
2021 3,321,924 128,147,240 183,523,153 (3,429,229) 1,740,291 313,303,379
---------- -------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -------------
FOR THE YEARED 31 DECEMBER 2020
Notes Share Share Capital Capital Retained Total Equity
Capital Premium Reduction Reserve Earnings US$
US$ US$ Reserve US$ US$
US$
Balance
at 1 January
2020 2,000,923 89,350 192,179,367 319,371 524,715 194,415,720
---------- --------- ------------ ---------- ------------ -------------
Dividends - - (2,000,923) - - (2,000,923)
---------- --------- ------------ ---------- ------------ -------------
Profit &
total comprehensive
income for
the year - - - 1,718,714 (1,266,455) 452,259
---------- --------- ------------ ---------- ------------ -------------
Balance
at 30 June
2020 2,000,923 89,350 190,178,444 2,038,085 (1,439,746) 192,867,056
---------- --------- ------------ ---------- ------------ -------------
FOR THE YEARED 31 DECEMBER 2020
Notes Share Share Premium Capital Capital Retained Total Equity
Capital US$ Reduction Reserve Earnings US$
US$ Reserve US$ US$
US$
Balance
at 1 January
2020 2,000,923 89,350 192,179,367 319,371 524,715 194,415,720
---------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
Issue of
share capital 1,001 95,436 - - - 96,437
---------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
Dividends - - (4,002,846) - (4,002,846)
---------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
Tax charge - - - (349,448) 349,448 -
---------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
Profit &
total comprehensive
income for
the year - - - 3,301,479 348,558 3,650,037
---------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
Balance
at 31 December
2020 2,001,924 184,786 188,176,521 3,271,402 524,715 194,159,348
---------- -------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------------
13. Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Notes 1 January 2021 1 January 2020
to 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2020
US$ US$
Cash flows from operating
activities
------ ----------------- -----------------
(Loss)/profit for the year/period (4,985,055) 452,259
------ ----------------- -----------------
Adjustments for:
------ ----------------- -----------------
Net loss/(gain) on investments
at fair value through profit
and loss 8 3,321,003 (1,719,385)
------ ----------------- -----------------
(Gains)/losses on foreign
exchange (180,245) 671
------ ----------------- -----------------
Operating cash flows before
movements in working capital (1,844,297) (1,266,455)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Increase i n trade and other
receivables (162,259) (36 , 241)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Increase in trade and other
payables 726,657 106,430
------ ----------------- -----------------
(Increase)/decrease in interest
receivable - 34,302
------ ----------------- -----------------
Net cash gene r ated/(utilised)
in operating activities (1,279,900) (1,161,964)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Cash flows used in investing
activities
------ ----------------- -----------------
MSA fee income received 2,568,123
------ ----------------- -----------------
Intercompany loan interest
received 991,750
------ ----------------- -----------------
Purchases of investments 8 (110,000,000) (47,051,332)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Net cash outflow from investing
activities (106,440,127) (47,051,332)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Cash flows used in financing
activities
------ ----------------- -----------------
Dividends paid (6,154,328) (2,000,923)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Proceeds from issue of Ordinary 132,000,000 -
Shares at a premium
------ ----------------- -----------------
Share issue costs (2,717,547) -
------ ----------------- -----------------
Net cash inflow/(outflow)
from financing activities 123,128,125 (2,000,923)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Net increase/(decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
for the period 15,408,098 (50,214,219)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Effect of foreign exchange
rate movements 180,245 (671)
------ ----------------- -----------------
Cash and cash equivalents
at the beginning of the
period 523,170 76,458,662
------ ----------------- -----------------
Cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the period 16,111,513 26,243,772
------ ----------------- -----------------
14. Notes to the Financial Statements
FOR THE PERIOD FROM 1 JANUARY 2021 TO 30 JUNE 2021
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
US Solar Fund Plc (the Company) was incorporated as a Public
Company, limited by shares, in England and Wales on 10 January 2019
with registered number 11761009. The registered office of the
Company is The Scalpel, 18th Floor, 52 Lime Street, London EC3M
7AF. Its share capital is denominated in US Dollars and currently
consists of Ordinary Shares. The Company's principal activity is to
invest in a diversified portfolio of Solar Power Assets located in
North America and other countries forming part of the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the
Americas.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION
The Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements have
been prepared using accounting policies consistent with
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") in conformity
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 which comprise
standards and interpretations issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"), and International Accounting
Standards and Interpretations approved by the International
Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee ("IFRIC") that remain
in effect as well as International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 34
'Interim Financial Reporting' and the Statement of Recommended
Practice "Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and
Venture Capital Trusts", issued by the Association of Investment
Companies, (the AIC SORP) in October, 2019. The financial
statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for
the investment portfolio at fair value through the profit or loss.
The accounting policies, critical judgements, key sources of
estimation uncertainty and methods of computation are the same as
those applied in the Company's annual financial statements and
should be read in conjunction with the Company's annual financial
statements as at 31 December 2020.
The information provided in respect of the year ended 31
December 2020 does not constitute statutory accounts as defined in
Section 434 of the Companies Act 2006. A copy of the statutory
accounts for that year has been delivered to the Registrar of
Companies. The auditor's report on those accounts was not
qualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis
and did not contain statements under Section 498(2) or (3) of the
Companies Act 2006.
In terms of the AIC SORP, the Company presents an Income
Statement which shows amounts split between those which are revenue
and capital in nature. The determination of the revenue or capital
nature of a transaction is determined by giving consideration to
the underlying elements of the transaction. Capital transactions
are considered to be those arising as a result of the appreciation
or depreciation in the value of assets, whether due to the
retranslation of assets held in foreign currency or fair value
movements on investments held at fair value through profit and
loss. Revenue transactions are all transactions, other than those
which have been identified as capital in nature.
FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCY
The currency of the primary economic environment in which the
Company operates (the functional currency) is US Dollar which is
also the presentation currency.
GOING CONCERN
In assessing the going concern basis of accounting the Directors
have had regard to the guidance issued by the Financial Reporting
Council. In addition, note 16 to the annual financial statements
includes the policies and processes for managing its capital, its
financial risk management, details of its financial instruments and
its exposure to credit risk and liquidity risk. As noted in the
Investment Manager's report on page 11, COVID-19 has had limited
impact on the Company to date. The Investment Manager has been
closely monitoring well-developed contingency plans in order to
mitigate potential impacts. With respect to the longer-term impact
of COVID-19, there is a high degree of uncertainty as to the
current and future economic impact of the pandemic, and
accordingly, the Company's Investment Manager is taking a cautious
approach.
The Company generated a loss after tax of $5.0 million which
included a fair value loss of $6.9 million and operating cash
inflows of $1.7 million for the period. As at 30 June 2021, the
company is in a net current asset position of $14.9 million and has
available cash of $16.1 million. As of the same date, the Company's
subsidiary, USF Holding Corp., has available cash of $10.4 million,
which is available to meet the obligations of the Company. The
Directors and the Investment Manager have so far been able to
ensure the operational and trading integrity of the Company, and
based on the aforementioned the Company appears to have sufficient
cash resources to continue its operations for a period of at least
12 months from the date of approval of the accounts. As such the
Directors believe that the Company will continue into the
foreseeable future and have adopted the going concern basis of
preparation in preparing these financial statements. In addition,
the Company (through a wholly owned US subsidiary) had access to a
$25 million revolving credit facility with Fifth Third Bank
National Association
("FTB Facility"). The FTB Facility provides liquidity for
capital expenditures, working capital and general corporate
purposes. At 30 June 2021 the facility was undrawn.
SEGMENTAL INFORMATION
The Board is of the opinion that the Company is engaged in a
single segment business, being the investment in Solar Power Assets
located in North America and other countries forming part of the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in
the Americas.
3. NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS
APPLICATION OF NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the
Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements are consistent
with those followed in the preparation of the Company's Annual
Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 December 2020. The
adoption of new standards, interpretations and amendments in the
current year has not had a material impact. The Company has not
early adopted any other standard, interpretation or amendment that
has been issued but is not yet effective at 30 June 2021.
NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS IN ISSUE BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE
-- IAS 1 (amended) - Amendments regarding classifications of
liabilities, and disclosure of accounting policies - effective from
1 January 2023
-- IAS 8 (amended) - Amendments regarding the definition of
accounting estimates - effective from 1 January 2023.
-- IAS 12 (amended) Amendments regarding deferred tax on leases
and decommissioning obligations - effective from 1 January
2023.
Adoption of the new or amended standards and relevant
interpretations in future periods is not expected to have a
material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
4. INTEREST INCOME
1 January 2021 1 January 2020
to 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2020
US$ US$
Bank interest(1) - 224,699
------------------ ----------------------
- 224,699
------------------------------------- ----------------------
5. ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER EXPENSES
1 January 2021 1 January 2020
to 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2020
US$ US$
Administrative fees 71,659 68,562
----------------- -----------------
Director & officer insurance 29,138 16,339
----------------- -----------------
Directors fees 132,395 125,760
----------------- -----------------
Fees payable to the Company's
auditor for the audit
of the Company's financial
statements 6 7, 210 46,218
----------------- -----------------
Fees payable to the Company's
auditor for non-audit
services(1) 45,643 22,680
----------------- -----------------
Investment Management
expenses 22,495 21,288
----------------- -----------------
Investment Management
fees 1,264,117 964,370
----------------- -----------------
Legal and professional
fees 38,357 78,885
----------------- -----------------
Regulatory fees 15,311 7, 641
----------------- -----------------
Sundry expenses 15 7, 972 139 , 411
----------------- -----------------
1,844,297 1,491,154
----------------- -----------------
(1) The non-audit services provided related to the review of the
initial financial statements as well as an agreed-upon procedures
engagement. The Company has no employees and therefore no employee
related costs have been incurred.
6. TA XATION
The Company is approved as an Investment Trust Company and is
subject to tax at the UK corporation tax rate of 19%. An Investment
Trust Company can claim a corporation tax deduction for dividends
designated as interest distributions that are derived from net
interest income. Therefore, no UK corporation tax charge has been
recognised by the Company for the period ended 30 June 2021.
1 January 2021 1 January 2020
to 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2020
US$ US$
Tax charge in profit or
loss:
----------------- -----------------
- UK corporation tax - -
----------------- -----------------
7. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the profit
or loss for the period attributable to ordinary equity holders of
the Company by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in
issue during the period. As there are no dilutive instruments
outstanding, basic and diluted earnings per share are
identical.
1 January 2021 1 January 2020
to 30 June 2021 to 30 June 2020
US$ US$
Net (loss)/profit attributable to ordinary
shareholders (4,985,055) 452,259
----------------- -----------------
Weighted average number of Ordinary
Shares for the period 286,263,594 200,092,323
----------------- -----------------
Earnings per share - Basic and diluted
(cents per share) 1.741 0.226
----------------- -----------------
8. INVESTMENT IN SUBS IDIARY
PLACE OF PERCENTAGE
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
USF Holding Corp. Delaware, US Delaware 100%
------------------ ------------------
LOANS: NET
OPENING EQUITY PRINCIPAL FAIR VALUE
EQUITY AND ACQUISITIONS ADVANCED DURING MOVEMENT DURING CLOSING BALANCE:
LOANS DURING THE PERIOD THE PERIOD THE PERIOD EQUITY AND LOANS
------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
US$ US$ US$ US$ US$
------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
USF Holding Corp.
Delaware, US 195,324,276 110,000,000 - (6,880,876) 298,443,400
------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
The net fair value movement comprises the following:
Total ($US)
Fair value gain on investments (4,019,534)
------------
Other income/expenditure 698,531
------------
Total fair value movement (3,321,003)
------------
MSA fee - transferred to revenue reserve (2,568,123)
------------
Intercompany loan interest -transferred to revenue reserve (991,750)
------------
Net fair value movement (6,880,876)
------------
On 28 June 2019, the Company entered into a Management Services
Agreement ("MSA") with its subsidiary USF Holding Corp. The Board
of the Company, with further assistance by delegation of its duties
to the Investment Manager, provides strategic management services
to USF Holding Corp relating to its current portfolio of US Solar
Assets and potential acquisitions. The fair value loss for the
period to 30 June 2021 includes an MSA fee of $1,792,322 (period to
30 June 2020: $1,435,679 included within the net fair value
movement).
The investment in subsidiaries comprises on a 'look-through'
basis the following:
Us Solar Fund Us Solar Fund
30 June 2021 31 December 2020
(US$) (US$)
Purchase price of underlying solar asset interests held (i) 491,429,988 434,066,094
----------------------- ----------------------
Cash or cash equivalents 15,531,738 14,250,138
----------------------- ----------------------
Fair value of 3rd party loan funding provided (ii) (202,472,429) (250,455,652)
----------------------- ----------------------
Fair value of interest rate swaps on 3rd party loan funding provided
(ii) (10,286,611) (3,202,369)
----------------------- ----------------------
Deferred tax asset 2,337,772 660,356
----------------------- ----------------------
Other net liabilities 1,902,942 5,709
----------------------- ----------------------
Investment balance 298,443,400 195,324,276
----------------------- ----------------------
(i) The balance recorded at 30 June 2021 relates to the
Company's purchase price of the Acquisition One, Acquisition Two,
Acquisition Three, Acquisition Four, Acquisition Five and
Acquisition Six portfolio solar asset plants.
(ii) Fair value of 3rd party loan funding provided and the fair
value of interest rate swaps at 30 June 2021 was $212,759,040
(December 2020:$253,658,021), comprised of the following:
Facility Drawn Drawn
Size Face Value Fair
Issuing Bank Loan Type H el d By US$(M) US$(M) Value
US$(M)
Fifth Third Bank, Revolving
National Association Credit USF Avon, LLC 25.00 - -
Facility
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
USF Bristol Class B Member,
LLC
Zions Bancorporation, (Acquisition One - Milford)
N.A. Term Loan (i) 24.06 24.06 23.91
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
USF Bristol Class B
Member, LLC
KeyBank National (Acquisition One -
Association Term Loan Milford) (i) 24.06 24.06 24.03
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
Heelstone Energy Holdings,
LLC
(Acquisition Four -
Fifth Third Bank, Heelstone)
National Association Term Loan (ii) 69.44 69.44 70.82
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
SC Oregon 2, LLC
Fifth Third Bank, (Acquisition Five
National Association Term Loan - Dorset) (iii) 34.34 34.34 33.54
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
NES Hercules Class B Member,
LLC
(Acquisition Six - MS2)
Multiple Lenders Term Loan (iv) 50.58 50.58 60.46
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
Multiple Lenders Revolving
Loan Facility NES Hercules Class B 2.13 - -
Member, LLC
(Acquisition Six - MS2)
(iv)
---------------- ---------------------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------
Total 229.61 202.48 212.76
------------- ---------------- ------------
(i) USF Bristol Class B Member, LLC as Acquisition One borrower,
is party to a financing agreement with Zions Bancorporation, N.A.
and KeyBank National Association, each as lenders. The facility is
a term loan with a mini-perm structure, which will be fully
amortised over a 25-year period. The initial tenure of the loan is
a seven-year period, after which the loan will be refinanced. The
term loan facility is hedged with fixed interest rate swaps for the
full duration of the amortisation period. As at 30 June 2021, the
drawn fair value of the loan includes mark-to-market revaluation of
associated interest rate swaps of $0.18 million.
(ii) In May 2021, the Live Oak Bank debt held by the projects in
Acquisition Four (Heelstone) was repaid and a new term loan was
entered into between Heelstone Energy Holdings LLC and Fifth Third
Bank, National Association. The new debt facility has a tenor of
seven years but is fully amortised over approximately 16 years to
match the duration of the underlying power purchase agreements. The
term loan is hedged with fixed interest rate swaps for the full
duration of the loan, with a mark-to-market valuation as at 30 June
2021 of $(1.38) million, included in the drawn fair value of the
loan.
(iii) SC Oregon 2, LLC, entered into a term loan agreement with
Fifth Third Bank, National Association in September 2020. The term
loan has a mini-perm structure and will be fully amortised over an
11-year period, with the initial tenure maturing in June 2026. In
June 2021, SC Oregon 2, LLC prepaid $7.14 million of the
outstanding principal balance. The term loan facility is hedged
with fixed interest rate swaps for the full duration of the loan,
with a mark-to-market revaluation as at 30 June 2021 of $0.80
million, included in the drawn fair value of the loan.
(iv) USF owns a 25% interest in the NES Hercules Class B Member,
LLC therefore only 25% of the facility sizes, drawn face values and
drawn fair values have been recorded.
NES Hercules Class B Member LLC, the Acquisition Six borrower,
holds a $202.3 million term loan facility with Santander Bank N.A.,
CoBank ACB, CIT Bank N.A., Société Générale, Canadian Imperial Bank
of Commerce - New York Branch, KeyBank National Association and
Seine Funding, LLC as lenders. As at 30 June 2021, the term loan
was fully drawn. The loan matures on 31 January 2028 and is secured
by the assets of NES Hercules Class B Member LLC with collateral
pledges of various material project documents. As at 30 June 2021,
the drawn fair value of the loan includes mark-to-market
revaluation of associated interest rate swaps of $(39.54)
million.
NES Hercules Class B Member LLC also has an $8.5 million
revolving loan facility. The purpose of this facility is to provide
short-term liquidity for the payment of Debt Service and O&M
Expense as required by the project. As at 30 June 2021, the
revolving loan was undrawn. The revolving loan matures on 31
January 2028.
In addition to the above, the following Letters of Credit have
been issued:
-- KeyBank National Association has provided a Letter of Credit
to USF Bristol Class B Member, LLC to the value of $19.8 million,
expiring in November 2026 concurrent with the mini-perm structure
and will be refinanced thereafter.
-- Zions Bancorporation, N.A. has provided a Letter of Credit to
USF Bristol Class B Member, LLC to the value of $2.3 million,
expiring in November 2026 concurrent with the mini-perm structure
and will be refinanced thereafter.
-- Fifth Third Bank, N.A. has provided a Letter of Credit to
Heelstone Energy Holdings, LLC to the value of $6.8 million,
expiring in May 2028 concurrent with the mini-perm structure and
will be refinanced thereafter.
-- Fifth Third Bank, N.A. has provided a Letter of Credit to SC
Oregon 2, LLC to the value of $4.5 million, expiring in June 2026
concurrent with the mini-perm structure and will be refinanced
thereafter.
-- CoBank, ACB has provided a Letter of Credit to NES Hercules
Class B Member LLC on behalf of Imperial Valley Solar 2, LLC. There
are currently two Letters of Credit issued under this facility - a
$17.0 million LC expiring in March 2022 and a $7.9 million LC
expiring in March 2025.
9. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
30 June 2021 31 December
US$ 2020
US$
Prepayments 134,681 25,020
-------------- ---------------
VAT receivable 73,165 20,567
-------------- ---------------
207,846 45,587
-------------- ---------------
10. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
30 June 2021 31 December
US$ 2020
US$
Cash at bank 16,111,513 523,170
------------ -----------
16,111,513 523,170
------------ -----------
11. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
30 June 2021 31 December
US$ 2020
US$
Creditors and operating accruals 529,133 194,705
------------ -----------
Investment management fee accrual 930,244 538,018
------------ -----------
1,459,377 732,723
------------ -----------
12. DIVIDS PAYABLE
During the period, the Company declared dividends totalling
$5,153,368 (30 June 2020: $2,000,923) of which $5,153,368 (30 June
2020:
$1,000,461) has been paid as at 30 June 2021. The Company
declared a dividend of 0.5 cents per share, totalling $1,000,962
for the period ending 31 December 2020 which was paid by the
Company on 12 April 2021. The Company declared a dividend of 1.25
cents per share, totalling
$4,152,405 for the period ending 31 March 2021. The dividend was
paid by the Company on 30 June 2021 and received by shareholders on
2 July 2021.
13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The following table analyses within the fair value hierarchy the
Company's assets measured at fair value at 30 June 2021. The fair
value hierarchy to be applied under IFRS13 is as follows:
-- Level 1: Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
-- Level 2: Valuation techniques for which the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly
or indirectly observable.
-- Level 3: Valuation techniques for which the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement is
unobservable.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
US$ US$ US$
Investment in subsidiary - - 298,443,400
--------- --------- ------------
The following table analyses within the fair value hierarchy the
Company's assets measured at fair value at 31 December 2020:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
US$ US$ US$
Investment in subsidiary - - 195,324,276
--------- --------- ------------
The investment at fair value through profit or loss is a Level 3
in the fair value hierarchy and the reconciliation in the movement
of this Level 3 investment is presented below. No transfers between
levels took place during the period.
30 June 2021 31 December
US$ 2020
US$
119 , 472
Opening balance 195,324,276 , 416
------------------------------------------- --------------------
Add: purchases during the year 110,000,000 72,551,332
------------------------------------------- --------------------
Less: MSA fee paid (2,568,123) (3,000,000)
------------------------------------------- --------------------
Less: Intercompany loan interest (991,750) -
------------------------------------------- --------------------
Total fair value movement through the
profit or loss (3,321,003) 6,300,528
------------------------------------------- --------------------
Closing balance 298,443,400 195,324,276
------------------------------------------- --------------------
The Company's policy is to recognise transfers into and
transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels as of the date of the
event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.
In accordance with the guidelines of the Company's valuation
policy, operating assets held for the whole of the half year ending
30 June 2021 have been valued by an external valuation expert.
Underlying investments in solar projects, which remained in
construction as at 30 June 2021 or were operating projects
purchased within 6 months of 30 June 2021, have been valued at
purchase price including acquisition costs as no significant
changes to key underlying economic considerations have arisen. The
Investment Manager and Directors believe that this represents a
reasonable approximation of the fair value of these investments as
at 30 June 2021. There has been no change in the valuation
methodology during the period. A summary of the movement during the
period is included in the table below:
US$ Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition Acquisition US cash Total
One Two Three Four Five Six and working
capital
balances
31 December
2020 30,043,545 42,575,753 36,070,109 38,278,633 29,890,984 - 18,465,252 195,324,276
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Additions
from
USF proceeds
(at cost) - - - 83,518,880(1) 7,223,687 12,700,000 6,557,433 110,000,000
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Additions
from/(to)
US holding
co's
(at cost) 16,542 (5,023,308) 245,317 1,822,919 5,498 10,371,034 (2,941,890) 4,496,112
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Change
in fair
value 1,616,344 1,817 (927,351) (5,111,866) 475,602 (74,079) - (4,019,534)
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Project
distributions
to US
holding
co's (1,041,445) (1,105,853) (858,486) (1,913,334) (2,438,336) - - (7,357,455)
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
30 June
2021 30,634,986 36,448,409 34,529,589 116,595,232 35,157,435 22,996,955 22,080,793 298,443,400
------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
(1) USF received a return of capital on Acquisition Two during
the period, following the receipt of tax equity funding.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Set out below are the initial indications of the key assumptions
the Directors believe would have a material impact upon the fair
value of the investments should they change. In the absence of an
operating business model for each underlying renewable energy
asset, the sensitivities have been conducted on the acquisition
models of these assets. The following sensitivities assume the
relevant input is changed over the entire useful life of each of
the underlying renewable energy assets, while all other variables
remain constant. All sensitivities have been calculated
independently of each other.
The Directors consider the changes in inputs to be within a
reasonable expected range based on their understanding of market
transactions. This is not intended to imply that the likelihood of
change or that possible changes in value would be restricted to
this range.
Change Capital Reduction Total Shareholders
In Input Reserve Equity
(US$M) (US$ Cents)
Discount rate +0.5% -13.44 -4.05
-0.5% +14.81 +4.46
----------- ------------------ -------------------
Electricity production P90 -33.16 -9.98
(ch a n g e from P10 +32.49 +9.78
P50)
----------- ------------------ -------------------
Merchant Period -10% - 1 7. 38 -5.23
Electricity Prices +10% +1 7. 38 +5.23
----------- ------------------ -------------------
Operating expenses +10% -14.26 -4.29
-10% +14.21 +4.28
----------- ------------------ -------------------
Operating life - 3 years -13.22 -3.98
+ 3 years +11.40 +3.43
----------- ------------------ -------------------
Tax rate +5% -5.70 -1.72
-5% +5.69 +1 . 71
----------- ------------------ -------------------
DISCOUNT RATE
The sensitivity demonstrates the impact of a change in the
discount rate applied to the pre-tax, equity cash flows from all of
the Company's renewable energy asset investments as at 30 June
2021. A range of + / - 0.5% has been considered to determine the
resultant impact on the Company's NAV per share and the fair value
of its solar asset investments.
As at 30 June 2021, the weighted average pre-tax cost of equity
used for levered assets was 7.3% (December 2020: 8.3%), and the
weighted average pre-tax weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
for unlevered assets was 6.5% (December 2020: 6.7%). The largest
driver of the reduction in pre-tax cost of equity was the Heelstone
Debt Refinancing.
ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION
The Company's solar asset investments are valued based upon a
forecast P50 solar energy generation profile (being a 50%
probability that this generation estimate will be met or exceeded).
A technical adviser has derived this generation estimate by taking
into account a range of irradiation datasets, satellite and
ground-based measurements, and site-specific loss factors including
module performance degradation, module mismatch and inverter
losses. These items are then considered in deriving the anticipated
production of the individual solar asset (MWh per annum) based upon
a 50% probability of exceedance.
The sensitivity estimates the impact on the fair value of Solar
Asset investments and NAV per share of a change of production
estimates to P90 (90% likely probability of exceedance) and a P10
generation estimate (10% probability of exceedance).
As P10 generation estimates were not independently obtained for
each solar asset on or about the time of the asset acquisition, the
Directors have determined a proxy P10 estimate for those assets by
assessing the relationship between the independently determined P50
and P90 generation estimates for each of the assets in the
Operating Portfolio (e.g. a one-year P90 generation estimate might
be 92.5% of a 1-year P50 generation estimate, implying that it is
7.5% lower than the P50 generation estimate).
In determining the proxy P10 generation estimate, the Directors
have assumed that the relationship between a P50 generation
estimate and a P10 generation estimate is the same as that between
a P50 generation estimate and a P90 generation estimate in absolute
terms. Therefore, a one-year P10 generation estimate by this
methodology would be 107.5% (i.e. 100% + 7.5%) of the asset's P50
generation estimate.
MERCHANT PERIOD ELECTRICITY PRICES
Each of the assets underlying the Company's Solar Asset
investments have long-term PPAs in place with creditworthy energy
purchasers and thus the PPA prices are not impacted by energy price
changes during this period. For the post-PPA period of each solar
asset, the Directors use long-term electricity price forecasts that
have been prepared by a market consultant in their determination of
the fair value of the Company's operating solar asset
investments.
The sensitivities show the impact of an increase/decrease in
power prices for each year of the power price curve for each plant
over the plant's remaining economic life after the conclusion of
the existing PPAs. A flat 10% increase/decrease in market
electricity prices from forecasted levels over the remaining asset
life of all plants have been used in the sensitivity analysis.
Although a 10% increase/decrease is not typical, this figure has
been used as merchant period prices are determined upon the
discretion of expert market consultants.
OPERATING EXPENSES
The operating costs of the assets underlying the Company's solar
asset investments include annual operations and maintenance
(O&M), asset management (AM), insurance expenses, land lease
expenses, major maintenance, and general administration expenses.
Most operating expenses for the Solar Power Assets are contracted
and as such there typically little variation in annual operating
costs. However, there may be cases where all operating costs are
recontracted at a 10% premium or discount.
The sensitivity above assumes a 10% increase/decrease in annual
operating costs for all underlying assets and the resultant impact
on the Company's fair value of investments and NAV per share.
OPERATING LIFE
The useful operating life of a solar asset is generally accepted
by independent valuers to be the lesser of the lease term for the
asset site and the independent engineer's assessment of the asset's
useful life. The Company's maximum useful life assumption is 35
years for newly constructed assets.
The sensitivity above assumes a three-year increase/decrease in
useful operating life of the Company's solar assets, and the
resultant impact on the Company's fair value of investments and NAV
per share.
TAX RATE
The United States imposes a tax on profits of US resident
corporations at a rate of 21%. The sensitivity above assumes the US
corporate tax rate increases/decreases by 5% (to 26% / 16%) and
shows the resultant impact on the Company's fair value of
investments and NAV per Ordinary Share.
14. NET ASSET VALUE PER ORDINARY SHARE
Basic NAV per share is calculated by dividing the Company's net
assets as shown in the statement of financial position that are
attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company by the
number of Ordinary Shares outstanding at the end of the period. As
there are no dilutive instruments outstanding, basic, and diluted
NAV per Ordinary Share are identical.
30 June 2021 31 December 2020
US$ US$
Net assets per Statement
of Financial Position 313,303,379 194,159,348
------------- -----------------
Ordinary Shares in issue
as at 30 June 332,192,361 200,192,361
------------- -----------------
NAV per Ordinary Share
- Basic and diluted 0.943 0.970
------------- -----------------
15. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
The Company and the Directors are not aware of any person who,
directly or indirectly, jointly or severally, exercises or could
exercise control over the Company. The Company does not have an
ultimate controlling party.
Details of related parties are set out below:
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
Directors are paid fees of GBP40,000 per annum. In addition to
this, Gillian Nott receives GBP20,000 per annum in respect of
serving as Chair of the Board and Jamie Richards receives GBP10,000
per annum in respect of serving as Chair of the Audit
committee.
Total Directors' fees of $132,395 were incurred in respect of
the period (30 June 2020: $125,760) with none being outstanding and
payable at the period end.
SUBSIDIARY
The Company previously issued loans totalling $43 million to its
subsidiary USF Holding Corp. The principal portions of the loans
are repayable in seven years from issuance. The loans bear interest
at rates of 5% and 4.1% respectively, payable semi-annually in
arrears.
INVESTMENT MANAGER
The Investment Manager is entitled to management fees under the
terms of the Investment Management Agreement. The Company shall pay
to the Investment Manager an annual fee (exclusive of value added
tax, which shall be added where applicable) payable quarterly in
arrears calculated at the rate of:
Assets Under Management Fee Based on NAV
< $500 m illio n 1.0% per annum
-----------------
$500 million to $1 billion 0.9% per annum
-----------------
> $1 billion 0.8% per annum
-----------------
Based on the NAV on the last Business Day of the relevant
quarter.
The Management Fee due in respect of each quarter shall be
invoiced by the Manager to the Company as at the final Business Day
of the relevant quarter, and shall be due and payable in the
following manner:
a) no later than 10 Business Days after the Payment Date, 90% of
the Management Fee shall be paid to the Manager in cash to such
bank account as the Manager may nominate for this purpose; and
b) 10 percent of the Management Fee shall be paid to the Manager
or an Associate (as directed by the Manager) in the form of
Ordinary Shares in accordance with the provisions stated in the
Investment Management Agreement.
For the avoidance of doubt, where there are C Shares in issue,
the advisory fee will be charged on the Net Asset Value
attributable to the Ordinary Shares and C Shares respectively.
A management fee of $1,264,117 was incurred during the period
(30 June 2020: $964,370), of which $930,244 remained payable at 30
June 2021 (30 June 2020: $525,301).
In addition to the management fee, the Manager shall also be
entitled to payment of the following:
a) a fee for any successful arrangement of debt payable at a
rate of 0.5% of the debt face value; and
b) a fee for any oversight of asset construction services
payable at market rates, negotiated on an arms' length basis and
subject to the approval of the Board.
No debt arrangement fees and no asset construction services fees
were paid during the period.
16. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
The Company had no contingencies and no other significant
capital commitments at the reporting date.
17. POST-BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
Subsequent to period end, USF reached agreement on all major
commercial terms to increase the size of the undrawn $25 million
RCF to a $40 million facility, and extend the tenor for two years.
Documentation is expected to be settled and executed in September
2021.
On 20 September 2021, the Company announced a dividend of 1.25
cents per Ordinary Share for the period ending 30 June 2021,
bringing total dividends declared for the six-month period to 2.5
cents per Ordinary Share.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
IR UKVARABUKAAR
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 20, 2021 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
Us Solar (LSE:USF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Us Solar (LSE:USF)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024