NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, and other information included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BioScrip, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the year ended
December 31, 2017
(the “Annual Report”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The information furnished in these Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements reflects all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the
three months
ended
March 31, 2018
require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes and are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending
December 31, 2018
.
The Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Prior period financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Immaterial Error Correction
During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company determined that certain prior period balances contained errors, predominantly due to a failure to appropriately account for and resolve transactions specific to suspense and clearing accounts. Management evaluated the materiality of the errors quantitatively and qualitatively, and concluded that they were not material to the financial statements of any period presented, but has elected to correct them in the accompanying prior period consolidated financial statements.
The following tables set forth the effect these corrections had on the Company’s March 31, 2017 statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
|
|
Previously Reported
|
|
Corrections
|
|
Revised
|
Net revenue
|
$
|
217,810
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
217,810
|
|
Gross profit
|
65,584
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
64,874
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
71,212
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
71,015
|
|
Interest expense
|
12,744
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
12,659
|
|
Loss from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
(18,991
|
)
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
(19,419
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
(437
|
)
|
|
138
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(19,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
(290
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,718
|
)
|
Certain amounts disclosed in the accompanying notes to the financial statements have been revised to reflect the corrections.
NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are classified as cash equivalents. Restricted cash consists of cash balances held by financial institutions as collateral for letters of credit. These balances are reclassified to cash and cash equivalents when the underlying obligation is satisfied, or in accordance with the governing agreement. As of
March 31, 2018
, the Company had a restricted cash balance, in a money market account, of approximately $
5.0 million
to cash collateralize outstanding letters of credit.
Collectability of Accounts Receivable
The following table sets forth the aging of our net accounts receivable (net of allowance for contractual adjustments and implicit price concessions as of
March 31, 2018
, and net of allowance for contractual adjustments, prior to allowance for doubtful accounts, as of
March 31, 2017
), aged based on date of service and categorized based on the three primary overall types of accounts receivable characteristics (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
0 - 180 days
|
|
Over 180 days
|
|
Total
|
|
0 - 180 days
|
|
Over 180 days
|
|
Total
|
Government
|
|
$
|
18,367
|
|
|
$
|
1,604
|
|
|
$
|
19,971
|
|
|
$
|
20,602
|
|
|
$
|
10,082
|
|
|
$
|
30,684
|
|
Commercial
|
|
61,561
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
63,580
|
|
|
63,767
|
|
|
18,779
|
|
|
82,546
|
|
Patient
|
|
3,819
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
10,204
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
83,747
|
|
|
$
|
4,438
|
|
|
88,185
|
|
|
$
|
86,946
|
|
|
$
|
36,488
|
|
|
123,434
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,912
|
)
|
Net accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
88,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,522
|
|
Implementation of Topic 606 effectively eliminated the allowance for doubtful accounts as we provided implicit price concessions to payors, and patients with co-pays, deductibles, and co-insurance. Amounts presented reflect reductions from the amounts billed to reflect the estimated transaction price, net of estimated implicit price concessions and contractual adjustments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The FASB delayed the effective date to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company did not elect early adoption and applied the modified retrospective approach upon adoption which results in application of the new guidance only to contracts that are not completed at the adoption date and does not require adjustment of prior reporting periods. Assessment of the new guidance did not result in an opening retained earnings adjustment, but did result in the adjustment of accounts receivable as the allowance for doubtful accounts was eliminated upon implementation. Pursuant to the requirements of Topic 606, the transaction price to be recognized as revenue is estimated based upon the amount of cash ultimately expected to be collected. Therefore, amounts expected to be written off are reflected in the amount of revenue recognized upon fulfillment of the performance obligation. The new standard resulted in the recognition of amounts previously reported as bad debt expense as a reduction to revenue upon implementation; see Note 3 - Revenue.
In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-11—Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity (Topic 480), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features and II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. ASU 2017-11 eliminates the requirement that a down round feature precludes equity classification when assessing whether an instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. A freestanding equity-linked financial instrument no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. The effective date for ASU 2017-11 is for annual or any interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09—Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 modifies when a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. The new guidance requires modification accounting if the fair value, vesting condition or the classification of the award is not the same immediately before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award. The effective date for ASU 2017-09 is for annual or any interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18—Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The effective date for ASU 2016-18 is for annual or any interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15—Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 provides guidance for eight specific cash flow issues with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. The effective date for ASU 2016-15 is for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02—Leases (Topic 842), requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard may be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The Company is evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 — REVENUE
Adoption of ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers"
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not restated and continue to be reported in accordance with accounting standards in effect for those periods.
Infusion Revenues
The Company generates revenue principally through the provision of infusion services to provide clinical management services and the delivery of cost effective prescription medications. Prescription drugs are dispensed either through a pharmacy participating in the Company’s pharmacy network or a pharmacy owned by the Company. Fee-for-service agreements include pharmacy agreements, under which we dispense prescription medications through the Company’s pharmacy facilities.
The Company provides a variety of therapies to patients. For infusion-related therapies, the Company frequently provides multiple deliverables of drugs and related nursing services. After applying the criteria from Topic 606, the Company concluded that multiple performance obligations exist in its contracts with its customers. Revenue is allocated to each performance obligation based on relative standalone price, determined based on reimbursement rates established in the third party payor contracts. Drug revenue is recognized at the time the drug is shipped, and nursing revenue is recognized on the date of service.
Revenue Recognition
ASC 606 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 requires application of a five-step model to determine when to recognize revenue and at what amount. The revenue standard applies to all contracts with customers and revenues are to be recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the Company’s patients in an amount that reflects consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services.
The following table presents our revenues at amounts initially recognized for each associated payor class during the first quarter of 2018 (in millions). Sales and usage-based taxes are excluded from revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
140,541
|
|
Government
|
|
26,542
|
|
Patient
|
|
1,501
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
168,584
|
|
Absent implementation of Topic 606, the Company would have reported revenue of
$174.0 million
, gross profit of
$60.5 million
, bad debt expense of
$5.5 million
, and allowance for doubtful accounts of
$41.2 million
for the
three months ended March 31, 2018
.
Contract Assets and Liabilities
In accordance with Topic 606, contract assets are to be recognized when an entity has the right to receive consideration in exchange for goods or service that have been transferred to a customer when that right is conditional on something other than the passage of time. The Company does not recognize contract assets as the right to receive consideration is unconditional in accordance with the passage of time criteria. Also in accordance with Topic 606, contract liabilities are to be recognized when an entity is obligated to transfer goods or services for which revenue has already been received. The Company does not receive revenue prior to the transfer of goods or services and, therefore, will not recognize contract liabilities
Significant Judgments
The Company determines implicit price concessions based on historical collection experience using a portfolio approach. The Company determines the transaction price based on gross charges for services provided, reduced by contractual adjustments based on contractual agreements and historical experience. Pursuant to the requirements of Topic 606, the transaction price to be recognized as revenue is estimated based upon the amount of cash ultimately expected to be collected. Therefore, amounts expected to be written off are reflected in the amount of revenue recognized upon fulfillment of the performance obligation.
The Company elected a practical expedient to expense sales commissions when incurred as the amortization period associated therewith is generally one year or less and the total paid is representative of less than
1.0%
of total revenue. These costs are recorded in operating expenses.
The Company elected the practical expedient to continue to expense costs associated with obtaining and fulfilling its contracts. These costs are recorded in operating expenses.
NOTE 4 — LOSS PER SHARE
The Company presents basic and diluted loss per share for its common stock, par value
$0.0001
per share (“Common Stock”). Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders of the Company by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to stockholders and the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares comprised of options granted, unvested restricted stocks, stock appreciation rights, warrants and Series A and Series C Preferred Stock (as defined below). Potential Common Stock equivalents that have been issued by the Company related to outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock and warrants are determined using the treasury stock method, while potential common shares related to Series A and Series C Preferred Stock are determined using the “if converted” method.
The Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value
$0.0001
per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value
$0.0001
per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock” and, together with the Series A Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”), is considered a participating security, which means the security may participate in undistributed earnings with Common Stock. The holders of the Preferred Stock would be entitled to share in dividends, on an as-converted basis, if the holders of Common Stock were to receive dividends. The Company is required to use the two-class method when
computing loss per share when it has a security that qualifies as a participating security. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines loss per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In determining the amount of net earnings to allocate to common stockholders, earnings are allocated to both common and participating securities based on their respective weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share for the Company’s Common Stock is computed using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the if-converted method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
$
|
(12,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,419
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
(30
|
)
|
|
(299
|
)
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(13,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,718
|
)
|
Accrued dividends on preferred stock
|
(2,481
|
)
|
|
(2,214
|
)
|
Deemed dividend on preferred stock
|
(176
|
)
|
|
(174
|
)
|
Loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(15,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator - Basic and Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
127,772
|
|
|
118,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, basic and diluted
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
The loss attributable to common stockholders is used as the basis of determining whether the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, the computation of diluted shares for the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
excludes the effect of
18.8 million
and
19.4 million
shares, respectively, issued in connection with the PIPE Transaction and the Rights Offering, the 2017 Warrants (see Note 5 - Stockholders’ Deficit), stock options and restricted stock awards, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive to loss attributable to common stockholders.
NOTE 5 — STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Carrying Value of Series A Preferred Stock
As of
March 31, 2018
, the following values were accreted pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2016, among the Company and the signatories thereto and recorded as a reduction of additional paid in capital in Stockholders’ Deficit and a deemed dividend on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, dividends were accrued at
11.5%
from the date of issuance to
March 31, 2018
. The following table sets forth the activity recorded during the
three months ended March 31, 2018
related to the Series A Preferred Stock (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock carrying value at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
Accretion of discount related to issuance costs
|
13
|
|
Dividends recorded through March 31, 2018
1
|
83
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock carrying value March 31, 2018
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
1
Dividends recorded reflect the increase in the Liquidation Preference associated with unpaid dividends.
Carrying Value of Series C Preferred Stock
As of
March 31, 2018
, the following values were accreted pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2016, among the Company and the signatories thereto and recorded as a reduction of additional paid in capital in Stockholders’ Deficit and a deemed dividend on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, dividends were accrued at
11.5%
from the date of issuance to
March 31, 2018
. The following table sets forth the activity recorded during the
three months ended March 31, 2018
related to the Series C Preferred Stock (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock carrying value at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
79,252
|
|
Accretion of discount related to issuance costs
|
163
|
|
Dividends recorded through March 31, 2018
1
|
2,398
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock carrying value March 31, 2018
|
$
|
81,813
|
|
1
Dividends recorded reflect the increase in the Liquidation Preference associated with unpaid dividends.
As of
March 31, 2018
, the Liquidation Preference of the Series A Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock was
$3.0 million
and
$87.0 million
, respectively.
First Quarter 2017 Private Placement
On March 1, 2017, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “First Quarter Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Venor Capital Master Fund Ltd., Map 139 Segregated Portfolio of LMA SPC, Venor Special Situations Fund II LP and Trevithick LP (the “First Quarter Stockholders”). Pursuant to the First Quarter Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an aggregate of
3.3 million
shares of its common stock (the “First Quarter Shares”) for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately
$5.1 million
in a private placement transaction (the “First Quarter 2017 Private Placement”). The purchase price for each Share was
$1.5366
, which was negotiated between the Company and the First Quarter Stockholders based on the volume-weighted average price of the Company's common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on March 1, 2017.
Proceeds from the First Quarter 2017 Private Placement were used for working capital and general corporate purposes.
2017 Warrants
In connection with the Second Lien Note Facility (as defined below), the Company issued warrants (the “2017 Warrants”) to the purchasers of the Second Lien Notes (as defined below) pursuant to a Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of June 29, 2017 (the “Warrant Purchase Agreement”). The 2017 Warrants entitle the purchasers of the Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, representing at the time of any exercise of the 2017 Warrants an equivalent number of shares equal to
4.99%
of the Common Stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis, subject to the terms of the Warrant Agreement governing the 2017 Warrants, dated as of June 29, 2017 (the “Warrant Agreement”); provided, however, the 2017 Warrants may not be converted to the extent that, after giving effect to such conversion, the holders of the 2017 Warrants would beneficially own, in the aggregate, in excess of (i)
19.99%
of the shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 29, 2017 (the “Closing Date”) minus (ii) the shares of Common Stock that were sold pursuant to the Second Quarter 2017 Private Placement (as defined below) (the “Conversion Cap”). The Conversion Cap will not apply to the 2017 Warrants if the Company obtains the approval of its stockholders for the removal of the Conversion Cap, which the Company is required to take certain steps to attempt to obtain, subject to the terms of the Warrant Agreement.
The 2017 Warrants have a
10
year term and an initial exercise price of
$2.00
per share, and may be exercised by payment of the exercise price in cash or surrender of shares of Common Stock into which the 2017 Warrants are being converted in an aggregate amount sufficient to pay the exercise price. The exercise price and the number of shares that may be acquired upon exercise of the 2017 Warrants is subject to adjustment in certain situations, including price based anti-dilution protection whereby, subject to certain exceptions, if the Company later issues Common Stock or certain Common Stock Equivalents (as defined in the Warrant Agreement) at a price less than either the then-current market price per share or exercise price of the 2017 Warrants, then the exercise price will be decreased and the percentage of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the 2017 Warrants will remain the same, giving effect to such issuance. Additionally, the 2017 Warrants have standard anti-dilution protections if the Company effects a stock split, subdivision, reclassification or combination of its Common Stock or fixes a record date for the making of a dividend or distribution to stockholders of cash or certain assets. Upon the occurrence of certain business combinations the 2017 Warrants will be converted into the right to acquire shares of stock or other securities or property (including cash) of the successor entity. The 2017 Warrants are reflected as a liability in other non-current liabilities on the balance sheet and are adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period through an adjustment to earnings. The fair value of the 2017 Warrants, subsequent to a remeasurement adjustment of
$3.4 million
, is
$17.1 million
at
March 31, 2018
in the Statement of Operations.
Second Quarter 2017 Private Placement
On June 29, 2017, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Second Quarter Stock Purchase Agreement”) with a fund managed by Ares Management L.P. (“Ares” or the “Second Quarter Stock Purchaser”). Pursuant to the terms of the Second Quarter Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company issued and sold to the Second Quarter Stock Purchaser in a private placement (the “Second Quarter 2017 Private Placement”)
6,359,350
shares of Common Stock (the “Second Quarter Shares”) at a price of
$2.50
per share, for proceeds of approximately
$15.9 million
, net of
$0.2 million
in associated costs.
Second Quarter 2017 Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the 2017 Warrants and the Second Quarter 2017 Private Placement, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Second Quarter 2017 Registration Rights Agreement”) with the holders of the 2017 Warrants and the Second Quarter Stock Purchaser. Pursuant to the Second Quarter 2017 Registration Rights Agreement, subject to certain exceptions, the Company is required, upon the request of the Second Quarter Stock Purchaser and holders of the 2017 Warrants, to register the resale of the Second Quarter Shares and the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the 2017 Warrants. Pursuant to the terms of the Second Quarter 2017 Registration Rights Agreement, these registration rights will not become effective until twelve months after the Closing Date, and the costs incurred in connection with such registrations will be borne by the Company.
NOTE 6 — RESTRUCTURING, ACQUISITION, INTEGRATION, AND OTHER EXPENSES, NET
Restructuring, acquisition, integration and other expenses include non-operating costs associated with restructuring, acquisition, and integration initiatives such as employee severance costs, certain legal and professional fees, training costs, redundant wage costs, impacts recorded from the change in contingent consideration obligations, and other costs related to contract terminations and closed branches/offices.
Restructuring, acquisition, integration, and other expenses, net in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three months
ended
March 31, 2018
and
2017
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Restructuring and other expenses
|
$
|
1,879
|
|
|
$
|
3,206
|
|
Acquisition and integration expense
|
3
|
|
|
17
|
|
Total restructuring, acquisition, integration, and other expense, net
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
3,223
|
|
NOTE 7 — DEBT
As of
March 31, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, the Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2018
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
First Lien Note Facility, net of unamortized discount
|
198,481
|
|
|
198,324
|
|
Second Lien Note Facility, net of unamortized discount
|
87,038
|
|
|
85,694
|
|
2021 Notes, net of unamortized discount
|
197,547
|
|
|
197,363
|
|
Capital leases
|
1,689
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
Less: Deferred financing costs
|
(3,318
|
)
|
|
(3,656
|
)
|
Total Debt
|
481,437
|
|
|
480,588
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
(1,722
|
)
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
$
|
480,382
|
|
|
$
|
478,866
|
|
Debt Facilities
The Company was previously obligated under (i) a senior secured first-lien revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of
$75.0 million
(the “Revolving Credit Facility”), (ii) a senior secured first-lien term loan B in an aggregate principal amount of
$250.0 million
(the “Term Loan B Facility”) and (iii) a senior secured first-lien delayed draw term loan B in an aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million
(the “Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility” and, together with the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan B Facility, the “Senior Credit Facilities”) with SunTrust Bank (“SunTrust”), Jefferies Finance LLC and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., originally entered on July 31, 2013 and amended from time to time.
On January 6, 2017, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Priming Credit Agreement” and, together with the Senior Credit Facilities, the “Prior Credit Agreements”) with certain existing lenders under the Senior Credit Facilities and SunTrust, as administrative agent for itself and the lenders. The Priming Credit Agreement provided an aggregate borrowing commitment of
$25.0 million
, which was fully drawn at closing.
On June 29, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into (i) a first lien note purchase agreement (the “First Lien Note Facility”), among the Company, which is the issuer under the agreement, the financial institutions and note purchasers from time to time party to the agreement (the “First Lien Note Purchasers”), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in its capacity as collateral agent for itself and the First Lien Note Purchasers (the “First Lien Collateral Agent”), pursuant to which the Company issued first lien senior secured notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$200.0 million
(the “First Lien Notes”); and (ii) a second lien note purchase agreement (the “Second Lien Note Facility” and, together with the First Lien Note Facility, the “Notes Facilities”) among the Company, which is the issuer under the agreement, the financial institutions and note purchasers from time to time party to the agreement (the “Second Lien Note Purchasers”), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in its capacity as collateral agent for itself and the Second Lien Note Purchasers (the “Second Lien Collateral Agent” and, together with the First Lien Collateral Agent, the “Collateral Agent”), pursuant to which the Company (a) issued second lien senior secured notes in an aggregate initial principal amount of
$100.0 million
(the “Initial Second Lien Notes”) and (b) has the ability to draw upon the Second Lien Note Facility and issue second lien delayed draw senior secured notes in an aggregate initial principal amount of
$10.0 million
for a period of
18
months after the Closing Date, subject to certain terms and conditions (the “Second Lien Delayed Draw Notes” and, together with the Initial Second Lien Notes, the “Second Lien Notes”; the Second Lien Notes, together with the First Lien Notes, the “Notes”). Funds managed by Ares are acting as lead purchasers for the Notes Facilities.
The Company used the proceeds of the sale of the First Lien Notes and the Initial Second Lien Notes to repay in full all amounts outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreements and extinguished the liability. Each of the Prior Credit Agreements was terminated following such repayment. The Company used the remaining proceeds of
$15.9 million
, net of
$0.2 million
in issuance costs, from the Notes Facilities and the Second Quarter 2017 Private Placement for working capital and general corporate purposes.
The First Lien Notes accrue interest, payable monthly in arrears, at a floating rate or rates equal to, at the option of the Company, (i) the base rate (defined as the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus
0.5%
per annum, the Prime Rate as published by The Wall Street Journal and the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (subject to a
1.0%
floor) plus
1.0%
), or (ii) the one-month LIBOR rate (subject to a
1.0%
floor), plus a margin of
6.0%
if the base rate is selected or
7.0%
if the LIBOR Option is selected. The First Lien Notes mature on August 15, 2020, provided that if the Company’s existing
8.875%
Senior Notes due 2021 (the “2021 Notes”) are refinanced prior to August 15, 2020, then the scheduled maturity date of the First Lien Notes shall be June 30, 2022.
The First Lien Notes will amortize in equal quarterly installments equal to
0.625%
of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Note Facility, commencing on September 30, 2019, and on the last day of each third month thereafter, with the balance payable at maturity. The First Lien Notes are pre-payable at the Company’s option at specified premiums to the principal amount that will decline over the term of the First Lien Note Facility. If the First Lien Notes are prepaid prior to the second anniversary of the Closing Date, the Company will be required to pay a make-whole premium based on the present value (using a discount rate based on the specified treasury rate plus
50
basis points) of all remaining interest payments on the First Lien Notes being prepaid prior to the second anniversary of the Closing Date, plus
4.0%
of the principal amount of First Lien Notes being prepaid. On or after the second anniversary of the Closing Date, the prepayment premium is
4.0%
, which declines to
2.0%
on or after the third anniversary of the Closing Date, and declines to
0.0%
on or after the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date. At any time, the Company may pre-pay up to
$50.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes from internally generated cash without incurring any make-whole or prepayment premium. The occurrence of certain events of default may increase the applicable rate of interest by
2.0%
and could result in the acceleration of the Company’s obligations under the First Lien Note Facility prior to stated maturity and an obligation of the Company to pay the full amount of its obligations under the First Lien Note Facility.
The First Lien Note Facility contains customary events of default that include, among others, non-payment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency events, material
judgments, cross-defaults to material indebtedness and events constituting a change of control. In addition, the obligations under the First Lien Note Facility are guaranteed by joint and several guarantees from the Company’s subsidiaries.
In connection with the First Lien Note Facility, the Company, its subsidiaries and the First Lien Collateral Agent entered into a First Lien Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2017 (the “First Lien Guaranty and Security Agreement”). Pursuant to the First Lien Guaranty and Security Agreement, the obligations under the First Lien Notes are secured by first priority liens on, and security interests in, substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The Second Lien Notes accrue interest, payable monthly in arrears, at a floating rate or rates equal to, at the option of the Company, (i) one-month LIBOR (subject to a
1.25%
floor) plus
9.25%
per annum in cash, (ii) one-month LIBOR (subject to a
1.25%
floor) plus
11.25%
per annum, which amount will be capitalized on each interest payment date, or (iii) one-month LIBOR (subject to a
1.25%
floor) plus
10.25%
per annum, of which one-half LIBOR plus
4.625%
per annum will be payable in cash and one-half LIBOR plus
5.625%
per annum will be capitalized on each interest payment date, provided that, in each case, if any permitted refinancing indebtedness with which the 2021 Notes are refinanced requires or permits the payment of cash interest, all of the interest on the Second Lien Notes shall be paid in cash. The Second Lien Notes mature on August 15, 2020, provided that if the 2021 Notes are refinanced prior to August 15, 2020, then the scheduled maturity date of the Second Lien Notes shall be June 30, 2022.
In connection with the Second Lien Note Facility, the Company also issued the 2017 Warrants to the purchasers of the Second Lien Notes pursuant to the Warrant Purchase Agreement. The 2017 Warrants entitle the purchasers of the 2017 Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock, representing at the time of any exercise of the 2017 Warrants an equivalent number of shares equal to
4.99%
of the Common Stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis, subject to the terms of the Warrant Agreement. The 2017 Warrants, considered a derivative and subject to remeasurement at each reporting period, are reflected in other non-current liabilities in the unaudited consolidated balance sheet. The 2017 Warrants, subsequent to a remeasurement adjustment of
$(3.4) million
, are carried at a fair value of
$17.1 million
at
March 31, 2018
.
The Second Lien Notes are not subject to scheduled amortization installments. The Second Lien Notes are pre-payable at the Company’s option at specified premiums to the principal amount that will decline over the term of the Second Lien Note Facility. If the Second Lien Notes are prepaid prior to the third anniversary of the Closing Date, the Company will need to pay a make-whole premium based on the present value (using a discount rate based on the specified treasury rate plus
50
basis points) of all remaining interest payments on the Second Lien Notes being prepaid prior to the third anniversary of the Closing Date, plus
4.0%
of the principal amount of Second Lien Notes being prepaid. On or after the third anniversary of the Closing Date, the prepayment premium is
4.0%
, which declines to
2.0%
on or after the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date, and declines to
0.0%
on or after the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date. The occurrence of certain events of default may increase the applicable rate of interest by
2.0%
and could result in the acceleration of the Company’s obligations under the Second Lien Note Facility prior to stated maturity and an obligation of the Company to pay the full amount of its obligations under the Second Lien Note Facility.
The Second Lien Note Facility contains customary events of default that include, among others, non-payment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency events, material judgments, cross-defaults to material indebtedness and events constituting a change of control. In addition, the obligations under the Second Lien Note Facility are guaranteed by joint and several guarantees from the Company’s subsidiaries.
In connection with the Second Lien Note Facility, the Company, its subsidiaries and the Second Lien Collateral Agent entered into a Second Lien Guaranty and Security Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2017 (the “Second Lien Guaranty and Security Agreement”). Pursuant to the Second Lien Guaranty and Security Agreement, the obligations under the Second Lien Notes are secured by second priority liens on, and security interests in, substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidies.
In connection with the First Lien Note Facility and the Second Lien Note Facility, the Company, the First Lien Collateral Agent and the Second Lien Collateral Agent, entered into an intercreditor agreement containing customary provisions to, among other things, subordinate the lien priority of the liens granted under the Second Lien Note Facility to the liens granted under the First Lien Note Facility.
2021 Notes
On February 11, 2014, the Company issued
$200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes. The 2021 Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by all existing and future subsidiaries of the Company.
Interest on the 2021 Notes accrues at a fixed rate of
8.875%
per annum and is payable in cash semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year. The debt discount of
$5.0 million
at issuance is being amortized as interest expense through maturity
which will result in the accretion over time of the outstanding debt balance to the principal amount. The 2021 Notes are the Company’s senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of its other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of its existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
The 2021 Notes are guaranteed on a full, joint and several basis by each of the Company’s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that is a borrower under any of the Company’s credit facilities or that guarantees any of the Company’s debt or that of any of its restricted subsidiaries, in each case incurred under the Company’s credit facilities. As of
March 31, 2018
, the Company does not have any independent assets or operations, and as a result, its direct and indirect subsidiaries (other than minor subsidiaries), each being 100% owned by the Company, are fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally, providing guarantees on a senior unsecured basis to the 2021 Notes.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following details the carrying value and the fair value of our financial instruments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instrument
|
|
Carrying Value as of March 31, 2018
|
|
Markets for Identical Item (Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
First Lien Note Facility
|
|
$
|
198,481
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
202,713
|
|
Second Lien Note Facility
|
|
87,038
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
101,855
|
|
2017 Warrants
|
|
17,056
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17,056
|
|
|
—
|
|
2021 Notes
|
|
197,547
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
186,682
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
500,122
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
203,738
|
|
|
$
|
304,568
|
|
The fair value hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements is as follows:
Level 1
: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2
: Quoted prices, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3
: Inputs that are unobservable for the assets or liabilities.
Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable, and capital leases. The carrying value of these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value due to their short maturities.
NOTE 8 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to various legal, regulatory and governmental proceedings incidental to its business. Based on current knowledge, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending legal, regulatory and governmental matters, including the matters described herein, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or liquidity of the Company. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in pending legal, regulatory and governmental matters, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, and the indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could be material to the Company’s results of operations or cash flows for any particular reporting period.
With respect to all legal, regulatory and governmental proceedings, the Company considers the likelihood of a negative outcome. If the Company determines the likelihood of a negative outcome with respect to any such matter is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company records an accrual for the estimated loss for the expected outcome of the matter. If the likelihood of a negative outcome with respect to material matters is reasonably possible and the Company is able to determine an estimate of the possible loss or a range of loss, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, the Company discloses the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. However, the Company is unable to estimate a possible loss or range of loss in some instances based on the significant uncertainties involved in, and/or the preliminary nature of, certain legal, regulatory and governmental matters.
Breach of Contract Litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery
On November 3, 2015, Walgreen Co. and various affiliates (“Walgreens”) filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that the Company breached certain non-compete provisions contained in the Community Pharmacy and Mail Business Purchase Agreement dated as of February 1, 2012, by and among Walgreens and certain subsidiaries and the Company and certain subsidiaries. The complaint seeks both money damages and injunctive relief. On December 7, 2015, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case. Walgreens filed an answering brief on January 11, 2016, and the Defendants filed a reply on January 25, 2016. On March 11, 2016, the Court held oral argument on the Company’s motion to dismiss and granted the motion, holding that Walgreens’ breach of contract claims for money damages must be resolved in accordance with the 2012 Purchase Agreement’s alternative dispute resolution procedure. On March 15, 2016, Walgreens informed the Court that it would not be pursuing any claims for injunctive relief in the Court at that time, but instead would engage in the required alternative dispute resolution procedure. Walgreens requested that the Court keep the case open pending the results of that process. On March 16, 2016, the Court stayed the lawsuit and removed the trial from its calendar, but did not grant Walgreens any other relief or enjoin the Company from taking any action. On December 8, 2016, the parties submitted the dispute to an arbitrator. On December 28, 2016, the arbitrator rendered its decision, finding that the Company had not violated the non-compete, except for certain limited sales of oral oncology, HIV and transplant pharmaceuticals, constituting approximately
3 percent
of the total sales that Walgreens claimed were made in violation of the agreement. The arbitrator also concluded that Walgreens was not entitled to recover its lost profits or lost revenues as a result of any such sales. Despite that ruling, the arbitrator awarded Walgreens
$5.8 million
in damages, or approximately
20 percent
of the total amount requested. On January 13, 2017, the Company filed a motion to vacate the arbitration award. On February 10, 2017, Walgreens opposed the Company’s motion and filed a motion to confirm the arbitration award and for other relief. On July 19, 2017, the Court confirmed the arbitration award and denied Walgreens’ request for injunctive relief. Following that decision, the parties entered into a global settlement of all disputes related to the non-compete provisions and the lawsuit was dismissed. The Company paid the settlement amount in August 2017.
Derivative Lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery
On May 7, 2015, a derivative complaint was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Derivative Complaint”) by the Park Employees’ & Retirement Board Employees’ Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago (the “Derivative Plaintiff”). The Derivative Complaint names as defendants certain current and former directors of the Company, consisting of Richard M. Smith, Myron Holubiak, Charlotte Collins, Samuel Frieder, David Hubers, Richard Robbins, Stuart Samuels and Gordon Woodward (collectively, the “Director Defendants”), certain current and former officers of the Company, consisting of Kimberlee Seah, Hai Tran and Patricia Bogusz (collectively the “Officer Defendants”), Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., Kohlberg Management V, L.L.C., Kohlberg Investors V, L.P., Kohlberg Partners V, L.P., Kohlberg TE Investors V, L.P., KOCO Investors V, L.P., and Jefferies LLC. The Company is also named as a nominal defendant in the Derivative Complaint. The Derivative Complaint was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery as
Park Employees and Retirement Board Employees’ Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Richard M. Smith, Myron Z. Holubiak, Charlotte W. Collins, Samuel P. Frieder, David R. Huber, Richard L. Robbins, Stuart A. Samuels, Gordon H. Woodward, Kimberlee C. Seah, Hai V.Tran, Patricia Bogusz, Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., Kohlberg Management V, L.L.C., Kohlberg Investors V, L.P., Kohlberg Partners V, L.P., Kohlberg TE Investors V, L.P., KOCO Investors V, L.P., Jefferies LLC and BioScrip, Inc., C.A. No. 11000-VCG (Del. Ch. Ct., May 7, 2015).
The Derivative Complaint alleged generally that certain defendants breached their fiduciary duties with respect to the Company’s public disclosures, oversight of Company operations, secondary stock offerings and stock sales. The Derivative Complaint also contended that certain defendants aided and abetted those alleged breaches. The damages sought were not quantified but included, among other things, claims for money damages, restitution, disgorgement, equitable relief, reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses, and interest. The Derivative Complaint incorporated the same factual allegations from
In re BioScrip, Inc., Securities Litigation
. On April 18, 2017, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and on November 27, 2017 the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal. Additional demands and lawsuits related to the same facts and circumstances, however, could be pursued in the future. In that event, there is no assurance that any defenses will be successful or that insurance will be available or adequate to fund any settlement, judgment or litigation costs associated with this action. Certain of the defendants may also seek indemnification from the Company pursuant to certain indemnification agreements, for which there may be no insurance coverage.
While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Company believes that the final resolution of this action is not likely to have a material adverse effect on results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources.
On December 18, 2017, a commercial payor of the Company sent a letter that claimed an alleged breach of the Company’s obligation under its provider contracts. No legal proceeding has been filed. The Company is not able to estimate the amount of
any possible loss. The Company believes this claim is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against this claim if any such legal proceeding is commenced.
Government Regulation
Various federal and state laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry impact or may in the future impact the Company’s current and planned operations, including, without limitation, federal and state laws and regulations prohibiting kickbacks in connection with healthcare services prohibiting certain conduct deemed to be anti-competitive (antitrust laws) and restricting drug distribution. Other laws and regulations that may affect our business include, but are not limited to, consumer protection, insurance, licensure, and privacy. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain or maintain any of the regulatory approvals that may be required to operate its business, and the failure to do so could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
From time to time, the Company responds to investigatory subpoenas and requests for information from governmental agencies and private parties. The Company cannot predict with certainty what the outcome of any of the foregoing might be. While the Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all existing laws and regulations material to the operation of its business. Such laws and regulations are often uncertain in their application to our business practices as they evolve and are subject to rapid change. As controversies continue to arise in the healthcare industry, federal and state regulation and enforcement priorities in this area can be expected to increase, the impact of which cannot be predicted. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to scrutiny or challenge under one or more regulations or that any such challenge would not be successful. Any such challenge, whether or not successful, could have a material effect upon the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. A violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, for example, may result in criminal penalties, substantial civil monetary penalties, as well as suspension or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Moreover, the costs and expenses associated with defending these actions, even where successful, can be significant.
NOTE 9 — CONCENTRATION OF RISK
Customer and Credit Concentration Risk
The Company provides trade credit to its customers in the normal course of business. No commercial payors accounted for more than
10.0%
of revenue during the
three months ended March 31, 2018
. One commercial payor, United Healthcare, accounted for approximately
22.8%
of revenue during the
three months ended March 31, 2017
. In addition, Medicare accounted for approximately
8.4%
and
6.9%
of revenue during the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
, respectively.
NOTE 10 — INCOME TAXES
The Company’s federal and state income tax provision from continuing operations for the
three months
ended
March 31, 2018
and
2017
is summarized in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
State
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total current
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
—
|
|
|
495
|
|
State
|
31
|
|
|
124
|
|
Total deferred
|
31
|
|
|
619
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
The Company’s reconciliation of the statutory rate from continuing operations to the effective income tax rate for the
three months
ended
March 31, 2018
and
2017
is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Tax benefit at statutory rate
|
$
|
(2,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,445
|
)
|
State tax expense, net of federal taxes
|
48
|
|
|
36
|
|
Alternative minimum tax receivable
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Valuation allowance changes affecting income tax provision
|
3,419
|
|
|
6,976
|
|
Non-deductible transaction costs and other
|
(690
|
)
|
|
52
|
|
Income tax expense
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 or US Federal Tax Reform (the “Reform”). The enactment included broad tax changes that are applicable to Bioscrip, Inc. Most notably, the Reform has established the U.S. corporate tax rate decrease from a high of 35% to a flat 21% income tax rate effective January 1, 2018. As a result, the Company has revalued its ending net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017. At
March 31, 2018
, the Company had Federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards of approximately
$415.5 million
, of which
$12.2 million
, is subject to an annual limitation, which will begin expiring in 2026 and later. The Company also has a carryforward of approximately
$11.5 million
related to the interest expense limitation, which is not subject to an expiration period. The Company has post-apportioned state NOL carry forwards of approximately
$454.7 million
, the majority of which will begin expiring in 2018 and later.
NOTE 11 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
BioScrip Equity Incentive Plans
Under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”), the Company may issue, among other things, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock grants, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units to key employees and directors. While SARs are authorized under the 2008 Plan, they may also be issued outside of the plan. The 2008 Plan is administered by the Company’s Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), a standing committee of the Board of Directors.
On November 30, 2016, at a special meeting, the stockholders approved (i) an amendment to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of Common Stock that the Company is authorized to issue from
125 million
shares to
250 million
shares (the “Charter Amendment”); (ii) an amendment to the 2008 Plan to (a) increase the number of shares of Common Stock in the aggregate that may be subject to awards by
5,250,000
shares, from
9,355,000
to
14,605,000
shares and (b) increase the annual grant caps under the Company’s 2008 Plan from
500,000
Options,
500,000
Stock Appreciation Rights and
350,000
Stock Grants and Restricted Stock Units that are intended to comply with the requirements of
Section 162(m) of the Code to a cap of no more than a total of
3,000,000
Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Stock Grants and Restricted Stock Units that are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code combined; and (iii) if necessary, an adjournment of the Stockholders’ Meeting if there were insufficient votes in favor of the Charter Amendment.
As of
March 31, 2018
,
5,470,536
shares remain available for grant under the 2008 Plan.
Stock Options
The Company recognized compensation expense related to stock options of
$0.3 million
during both the
three months ended March 31, 2018
and
2017
, respectively.
Restricted Stock
The Company recognized
$0.2 million
of compensation expense related to restricted stock awards during both the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
, respectively.
Stock Appreciation Rights and Market Based Cash Awards
The Company recognized nominal amounts of compensation expense related to stock appreciation rights and market based cash awards during the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
, respectively.
The Company recognized nominal compensation expense related to market based cash awards during the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On May 7, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved the BioScrip, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The ESPP provides all eligible employees, as defined under the ESPP, the opportunity to purchase up to a maximum number of shares of Common Stock of the Company as determined by the Compensation Committee. Participants in the ESPP may acquire the Common Stock at a cost of
85%
of the lower of the fair market value on the first or last day of the quarterly offering period. The Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 to register
750,000
shares of Common Stock, par value
$0.0001
per share, for issuance under the ESPP.
As of
March 31, 2018
,
7,884
shares remained available for grant under the ESPP. Since inception, the ESPP’s third-party service provider has purchased
742,116
shares on the open market and delivered these shares to the Company’s employees pursuant to the ESPP. The Company incurred nominal expense during the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017
, respectively.