Note
1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Eagle Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”),
EagleBank (the “Bank”), Eagle Commercial Ventures, LLC (“ECV”), Eagle Insurance Services, LLC, and Bethesda
Leasing, LLC, with all significant intercompany transactions eliminated. The investment in subsidiaries is recorded on the Company’s
books (Parent Only) on the basis of its equity in the net assets of the subsidiary. The accounting and reporting policies of the
Company conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and to general
practices in the banking industry. Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts previously reported to conform to the classification
made in 2018. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies.
Nature
of Operations
The
Company, through the Bank, conducts a full service community banking business, primarily in Northern Virginia, Suburban Maryland,
and Washington, D.C. The primary financial services offered by the Bank include real estate, commercial and consumer lending,
as well as traditional deposit and repurchase agreement products. The Bank is also active in the origination and sale of residential
mortgage loans, the origination of small business loans, and the origination, securitization and sale of multifamily FHA loans.
The guaranteed portion of small business loans, guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), is typically
sold to third party investors in a transaction apart from the loan’s origination. As of December 31, 2018, the Bank offers
its products and services through twenty banking offices, five lending centers and various electronic capabilities, including
remote deposit services and mobile banking services. Eagle Insurance Services, LLC, a subsidiary of the Bank, offers access to
insurance products and services through a referral program with a third party insurance broker. Eagle Commercial Ventures, LLC,
a direct subsidiary of the Company, had provided subordinated financing for the acquisition, development and construction of real
estate projects; these transactions involved higher levels of risk, together with commensurate higher returns. Refer to Higher
Risk Lending – Revenue Recognition below.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates and such
differences could be material to the financial statements.
Business
Combinations
Business
combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
805, “
Business Combinations
”. Under the acquisition method, identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date are measured at their fair values as of that date, and
are recognized separately from goodwill. Results of operations of the acquired entities are included in the consolidated statement
of income from the date of acquisition.
Cash
Flows
For
purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, and interest
bearing deposits with other banks which have an original maturity of three months or less.
Loans
Held for Sale
The
Company regularly engages in sales of residential mortgage loans held for sale and the guaranteed portion of SBA loans originated
by the Bank. The Company has elected to carry loans held for sale at fair value. Fair value is derived from secondary market quotations
for similar instruments. Gains and losses on sales of these loans are recorded as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
The
Company’s current practice is to sell residential mortgage loans held for sale on a servicing released basis, and, therefore,
it has no intangible asset recorded in the normal course of business for the value of such servicing as of December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017.
The
Company enters into commitments to originate residential mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior
to funding (i.e. interest rate lock commitments). Such interest rate lock commitments on mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary
market are considered to be derivatives. To protect against the price risk inherent in residential mortgage loan commitments,
the Company utilizes both “best efforts” and “mandatory delivery” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate
the risk of potential decreases in the values of loans that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.
Under a “best efforts” contract, the Company commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal
amount and quality to an investor and the investor commits to a price that it will purchase the loan from the Company if the loan
to the underlying borrower closes. The Company protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts
forward delivery commitments, whereby the investor commits to purchase a loan at a price representing a premium on the day the
borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer/investor has assumed the interest rate risk on the loan. As
a result, the Bank is not generally exposed to losses on loans sold utilizing best efforts, nor will it realize gains related
to rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The market values of interest rate lock commitments and best efforts
contracts are not readily ascertainable with precision because rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not actively
traded. Because of the high correlation between rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts, no gain or loss should occur
on the interest rate lock commitments. Under a “mandatory delivery” contract, the Company commits to deliver a certain
principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If the Company fails to
deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, it is obligated to pay the investor
a “pair-off” fee, based on then-current market prices, to compensate the investor for the shortfall. The Company manages
the interest rate risk on interest rate lock commitments by entering into forward sale contracts of mortgage-backed securities,
whereby the Company obtains the right to deliver securities to investors in the future at a specified price. Such contracts are
accounted for as derivatives and are recorded at fair value in derivative assets or liabilities, carried on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet within other assets or other liabilities with changes in fair value recorded in other income within the Consolidated Statements
of Operations. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment to the customer and closing and sale of the loan to an
investor generally ranges from 30 to 90 days under current market conditions. The gross gains on loan sales are recognized based
on new loan commitments with adjustment for price and pair-off activity. Commission expenses on loans held for sale are recognized
based on loans closed.
In
circumstances where the Company does not deliver the whole loan to an investor, but rather elects to retain the loan in its portfolio,
the loan is transferred from held for sale to loans at fair value at the date of transfer.
The
sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans on a servicing retained basis gives rise to an excess servicing asset, which is computed
on a loan by loan basis with the unamortized amount being included in intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This
excess servicing asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis (with adjustment for prepayments) as an offset to servicing
fees collected and is included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The
Company originates multifamily FHA loans through the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Multifamily Accelerated
Program (“MAP”). The Company securitizes these loans through the Government National Mortgage Association (”Ginnie
Mae”) MBS I program and sells the resulting securities in the open market to authorized dealers in the normal course of
business and generally retains the MSRs for a period of time before the MSRs are packaged into a portfolio and sold. When servicing
is retained on multifamily FHA loans securitized and sold, the Company computes an excess servicing asset on a loan by loan basis
with the unamortized amount being included in Intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unamortized multifamily FHA
MSRs totaled $282 thousand as of December 31, 2018 and $596 thousand as of December 31, 2017.
Noninterest
Income includes gains from the sale of the Ginnie Mae securities and net revenues earned on the servicing of multifamily FHA loans
underlying the Ginnie Mae securities. Revenue from servicing commercial multifamily FHA mortgages is recognized as earned based
on the specific contractual terms of the underlying servicing agreements, along with amortization of and changes in impairment
of mortgage servicing rights.
Investment
Securities
The
Company has no securities classified as trading, or as held-to-maturity. Securities available-for-sale are acquired as part of
the Company’s asset/liability management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, current market
conditions, loan demand, changes in prepayment risk and other factors. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value,
with unrealized gains or losses being reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), a separate component of shareholders’
equity, net of deferred income tax. Realized gains and losses, using the specific identification method, are included as a separate
component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Premiums
and discounts on investment securities are amortized/accreted to the earlier of call or maturity based on expected lives, which
lives are adjusted based on prepayment assumptions and call optionality. Declines in the fair value of individual available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are other-than-temporary in nature result in write-downs of the individual securities to their
fair value. Factors affecting the determination of whether other-than-temporary impairment has occurred include a downgrading
of the security by a rating agency, a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, or a change in management’s
intent and ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Management
systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. This analysis
requires management to consider various factors, which include the: (1) duration and magnitude of the decline in value; (2) financial
condition of the issuer or issuers; and (3) structure of the security.
The
entire amount of an impairment loss is recognized in earnings only when: (1) the Company intends to sell the security; or (2)
it is more likely than not that the Company will have to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3)
the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. In all other situations, only the portion
of the impairment loss representing the credit loss must be recognized in earnings, with the remaining portion being recognized
in shareholders’ equity as comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes.
Loans
Loans
are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized deferred costs and fees. Interest income on loans is accrued
at the contractual rate on the principal amount outstanding. It is the Company’s policy to discontinue the accrual of interest
when circumstances indicate that collection is doubtful. Deferred fees and costs are being amortized on the interest method over
the term of the loan.
Management
considers loans impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and
interest payments according to contractual terms. Loans are evaluated for impairment in accordance with the Company’s portfolio
monitoring and ongoing risk assessment procedures. Management considers the financial condition of the borrower, cash flow of
the borrower, payment status of the loan, and the value of the collateral, if any, securing the loan. Generally, impaired loans
do not include large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans such as residential real estate and consumer type loans which
are evaluated collectively for impairment and are generally placed on nonaccrual when the loan becomes 90 days past due as to
principal or interest. Loans specifically reviewed for impairment are not considered impaired during periods of “minimal
delay” in payment (90 days or less) provided eventual collection of all amounts due is expected. The impairment of a loan
is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or
the fair value of the collateral if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the collateral. In appropriate circumstances,
interest income on impaired loans may be recognized on a cash basis.
Higher
Risk Lending – Revenue Recognition
The
Company had occasionally made higher risk acquisition, development, and construction (“ADC”) loans that entailed higher
risks than ADC loans made following normal underwriting practices (“higher risk loan transactions”). These higher
risk loan transactions were made through the Company’s subsidiary, ECV. This activity was limited as to individual transaction
amount and total exposure amounts, based on capital levels, and was carefully monitored. The loans were carried on the balance
sheet at amounts outstanding. ECV recorded no additional interest on higher risk loan transactions during 2018, 2017, or 2016
(although normal interest income was recorded) and had no transactions outstanding as of December 31, 2018 compared to three higher
risk loan transactions outstanding as of December 31, 2017, amounting to $7.7 million.
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The
allowance for credit losses represents an amount, which in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable losses
on loans and other extensions of credit that may become uncollectible. The adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is determined
through careful and continuous review and evaluation of the loan portfolio and involves the balancing of a number of factors to
establish a prudent level of allowance. Among the factors considered in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
are lending risks associated with growth and entry into new markets, loss allocations for specific credits, the level of the allowance
to nonperforming loans, historical loss experience, economic conditions, portfolio trends and credit concentrations, changes in
the size and character of the loan portfolio, and management’s judgment with respect to current and expected economic conditions
and their impact on the existing loan portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values
if collateral dependent otherwise discounted cash flows. Loans or any portion thereof deemed uncollectible are charged against
the allowance, while recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management adjusts the level of the allowance through the provision
for credit losses, which is recorded as a current period operating expense. The allowance for credit losses consists of allocated
and unallocated components.
The
components of the allowance for credit losses represent an estimation done pursuant to ASC Topic 450,
“Contingencies,”
or ASC Topic 310,
“Receivables.”
Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified
significant conditions or circumstances related to a specific credit that management believes indicate the probability that a
loss may be incurred. For potential problem credits for which specific allowance amounts have not been determined, the Company
establishes allowances according to the application of credit risk factors. These factors are set by management and approved by
the appropriate Board committee to reflect its assessment of the relative level of risk inherent in each risk grade. A third component
of the allowance computation, termed a nonspecific or environmental factors allowance, is based upon management’s evaluation
of various environmental conditions that are not directly measured in the determination of either the specific allowance or formula
allowance. Such conditions include general economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends
(including trends in delinquencies and nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions), loan volumes and concentrations,
specific industry conditions within portfolio categories, recent loss experience in particular loan categories, duration of the
current business cycle, bank regulatory examination results, findings of outside review consultants, and management’s judgment
with respect to various other conditions including credit administration and management and the quality of risk identification
systems. Executive management reviews these environmental conditions quarterly, and documents the rationale for all changes.
Management
believes that the allowance for credit losses is adequate; however, determination of the allowance is inherently subjective and
requires significant estimates. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to
the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. Evaluation of the potential effects of these factors on
estimated losses involves a high degree of uncertainty, including the strength and timing of economic cycles and concerns over
the effects of a prolonged economic downturn in the current cycle. In addition, various banking agencies, as an integral part
of their examination process, and independent consultants engaged by the Bank, periodically review the Bank’s loan portfolio
and allowance for credit losses. Such review may result in recognition of additions to the allowance based on their judgments
of information available to them at the time of their examination. The review of the adequacy of the Allowance for Credit Losses
includes an assessment of the fair value adjustment for acquired loans in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Premises
and Equipment
Premises
and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization computed using the straight-line method for financial
reporting purposes. Premises and equipment are depreciated over the useful lives of the assets, which generally range from three
to seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, three to five years for computer software and hardware, and five to twenty
years for building improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the terms of the respective leases, which may include
renewal options where management has the positive intent to exercise such options, or the estimated useful lives of the improvements,
whichever is shorter. The costs of major renewals and betterments are capitalized, while the costs of ordinary maintenance and
repairs are expensed as incurred. These costs are included as a component of premises and equipment expenses on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Other
Real Estate Owned (OREO)
Assets
acquired through loan foreclosure are held for sale and are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired,
establishing a new cost basis. The new basis is supported by appraisals that are generally no more than twelve months old. Costs
after acquisition are generally expensed. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through noninterest
expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in market
conditions or appraised values.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent
purchased assets and MSRs that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other
legal rights. Intangible assets that have finite lives, such as core deposit intangibles, are amortized over their estimated useful
lives and subject to periodic impairment testing. Intangible assets (other than goodwill) are amortized to expense using accelerated
or straight-line methods over their respective estimated useful lives.
Goodwill
is subject to impairment testing at the reporting unit level, which must be conducted at least annually or upon the occurrence
of a triggering event. The Company performs impairment testing during the fourth quarter of each year or when events or changes
in circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired.
The
Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the goodwill impairment test is judgmental
and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Similarly, estimates and assumptions are used in determining
the fair value of other intangible assets. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flows, market
comparisons and recent transactions. These approaches use significant estimates and assumptions including projected future cash
flows, discount rates reflecting the market rate of return, projected growth rates and determination and evaluation of appropriate
market comparables. Based on the results of qualitative assessments of all reporting units, the Company concluded that no impairment
existed at December 31, 2018. However, future events could cause the Company to conclude that goodwill or other intangibles have
become impaired, which would result in recording an impairment loss. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse
impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Interest
Rate Swap Derivatives
As
required by ASC 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes
in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a
derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria
necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value
of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair
value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or
other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign
currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing
of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset
or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions
in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of
its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.
Customer
Repurchase Agreements
The
Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same securities. Under
these arrangements, the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement
that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase the assets. As a result, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The agreements
are entered into primarily as accommodations for large commercial deposit customers. The obligation to repurchase the securities
is reflected as a liability in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, while the securities underlying the securities
sold under agreements to repurchase remain in the respective assets accounts and are delivered to and held as collateral by third
party trustees.
Marketing
and Advertising
Marketing
and advertising costs are generally expensed as incurred.
Income
Taxes
The
Company employs the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as required by ASC Topic 740, “
Income Taxes
.”
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities (i.e. temporary timing differences) and are measured at the enacted
rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse. The Company utilizes statutory requirements for its income tax accounting,
and limits risks associated with potentially problematic tax positions that may incur challenge upon audit, where an adverse outcome
is more likely than not. Therefore, no provisions are necessary for either uncertain tax positions nor accompanying potential
tax penalties and interest for underpayments of income taxes in the Company’s tax reserves. In accordance with ASC Topic
740, the Company may establish a reserve against deferred tax assets in those cases where realization is less than certain, although
no such reserves exist at December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
Transfer
of Financial Assets
Transfers
of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets
is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free
of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the
Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
In certain cases, the recourse to the Bank to repurchase assets may exist but is deemed immaterial based on the specific facts
and circumstances.
Earnings
per Common Share
Basic
net income per common share is derived by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding during the period measured. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income
available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period measured including
the potential dilutive effects of common stock equivalents.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In
accordance with ASC Topic 718,
“Compensation,”
the Company records as compensation expense an amount equal
to the amortization (over the remaining service period) of the fair value of option and restricted stock awards computed at the
date of grant. Compensation expense on variable stock grants (i.e. performance based grants) is recorded based on the probability
of achievement of the goals underlying the performance grant. Refer to
Note 17
to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of stock-based compensation awards, activity and expense for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The Company records the discount from the fair market value of shares issued under its
Employee Share Purchase Plan as a component of Salaries and employee benefits expense in its Consolidated Statement of Income.
New
Authoritative Accounting Guidance
Accounting
Standards Adopted in 2018
ASU
2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).”
The amendments in ASU 2014-09 supersede the revenue
recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. The general principle of the
amendments require an entity to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that
reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance sets
forth a five step approach to be utilized for revenue recognition. The Company completed its overall assessment of revenue streams
and review of related contracts potentially affected by the ASU, including deposit related fees, interchange fees, and merchant
income. Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that ASU 2014-09 did not materially change the method in which the Company
currently recognizes revenue for these revenue streams. The Company also completed its evaluation of certain costs related to
these revenue streams to determine whether such costs should be presented as expenses or contra-revenue (i.e., gross vs. net).
Based on its evaluation, the Company did not identify revenue streams within the scope of ASC 606 that required a material change
in their presentation under the gross vs. net requirement of ASC 606. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 and its related amendments
on its required effective date of January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective approach. Since there was no net income
impact upon adoption of the new guidance, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary.
Consistent with the modified retrospective approach, the Company did not adjust prior period amounts.
The
majority of our revenue-generating transactions are not subject to ASC 606, including revenue generated from financial instruments,
such as our loans, letters of credit, derivatives and investment securities, as well as revenue related to our mortgage servicing
activities, as these activities are subject to other GAAP discussed elsewhere within our disclosures. Substantially all of the
Company’s revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Descriptions of our revenue-generating activities that are
within the scope of ASC 606, which are presented in our income statements as components of noninterest income are as follows:
|
●
|
Service
charges on deposit accounts - these represent general service fees for monthly account
maintenance and activity- or transaction-based fees and consist of transaction-based
revenue, time-based revenue (service period), item-based revenue or some other individual
attribute-based revenue. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation is completed
which is generally monthly for account maintenance services or when a transaction has
been completed (such as a wire transfer). Payment for such performance obligations are
generally received at the time the performance obligations are satisfied.
|
|
●
|
Other
Fees – generally, the Company receives compensation when a customer that it refers
opens an account with certain third-parties. This category includes credit card, investment
advisory, and interchange fees. The timing and amount of revenue recognition is not materially
impacted by the new standard.
|
|
●
|
Sale
of OREO – ASU 2014-09 prescribes derecognition requirements for the sale of OREO
that are less prescriptive than existing derecognition requirements. Previously, the
Company was required to assess 1) the adequacy of a buyer’s initial and continuing
investments and 2) the seller’s continuing involvement with the property. ASU 2014-09
requires an entity to assess whether it is “probable” that it will collect
the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for transferring the asset
to the customer. The new requirements could result in earlier revenue recognition; however,
such sales are infrequent and the impact of this change is not considered material to
our financial statements.
|
A
contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration (resulting
in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract liability balance is an entity’s
obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the
customer. The Company’s noninterest revenue streams are largely based on transactional activity, or standard month-end revenue
accruals based on fee schedules. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance
obligation and revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and
therefore, does not have contract balances material to our financial statements. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company
did not have any significant contract balances.
In
connection with the adoption of Topic 606, an entity is required to capitalize, and subsequently amortize into expense, certain
incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if these costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of
obtaining a contract are those costs that an entity incurs to obtain a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred
if the contract had not been obtained (for example, sales commission). The Company utilizes the practical expedient which allows
entities to immediately expense contract acquisition costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs
would have been amortized in one year or less. Upon adoption of Topic 606, the Company did not capitalize any contract acquisition
cost.
ASU
2016-01, “
Financial Instruments—(Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities.
” ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial
instruments by making targeted improvements to GAAP as follows: (1) require equity investments (except those accounted for under
the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes
in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable
fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions
for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (2) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without
readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates
that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; (3) eliminate the requirement to disclose
the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (4) eliminate
the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value
that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (5) require public
business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes;
(6) require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of
a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability
at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (7) require separate presentation of financial
assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables)
on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (8) clarify that an entity should evaluate the
need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s
other deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2016-01 was effective for us effective January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on
our Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to
Note 24
to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for the valuation of the loan portfolio using the exit price notion.
ASU
2016-15
“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”
is intended to reduce the diversity in practice around how certain
transactions are classified within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 became effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did
not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
ASU
2017-04, “
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.”
ASU
2017-04 eliminates step two from the goodwill impairment test which required entities to compute the implied fair value of goodwill.
Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a
reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill
allocated to that reporting unit. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 effective December 31, 2018. The new standard did not
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU
2017-12,
“Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.”
ASU
2017-12 amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in ASC 815 to improve the transparency and understandability
of information conveyed to financial statement users about an entity’s risk management activities to better align the entity’s
financial reporting for hedging relationships with those risk management activities and to reduce the complexity of and simplify
the application of hedge accounting. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-12 effective January 1, 2018. The new standard did not
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
ASU
2018-02, “
Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)- Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
” ASU 2018-02 allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) (“AOCI”) to retained earnings for the tax effects caused by the revaluation of deferred taxes resulting from
the newly enacted corporate tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The ASU is effective in years beginning after December
15, 2018, but permits early adoption in a period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We elected to early
adopt the ASU as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of the guidance resulted in a $674 thousand cumulative-effect adjustment, done
on a portfolio basis, to reclassify the income tax effects resulting from tax reform from AOCI to retained earnings. The adjustment
increased retained earnings and decreased AOCI in the first quarter of 2018.
Accounting
Standards Pending Adoption
ASU
2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 has, among other things, required lessees to recognize a lease liability,
which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset
that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does
not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where
necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”
ASU 2016-02 became effective for us on January 1, 2019 and initially required transition using a modified retrospective approach
for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842) – Targeted Improvements,” which, among other
things, provides an additional transition method that allows entities to not apply the guidance in ASU 2016-02 in the comparative
periods presented in the financial statements and instead recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained
earnings in the period of adoption. In December 2018, the FASB also issued ASU 2018-20, “Leases (Topic 842) - Narrow-Scope
Improvements for Lessors,” which provides for certain policy elections and changes lessor accounting for sales and similar
taxes and certain lessor costs. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, ASU 2018-11 and ASU 2018-20 on January 1, 2019, we expect to recognize
right-of-use assets between $36 million and $38 million and related lease liabilities between $36 million and $38 million. We
expect to elect to apply certain practical expedients provided under ASU 2016-02 whereby we will not reassess (i) whether any
expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii)
initial direct costs for any existing leases. We also do not expect to apply the recognition requirements of ASU 2016-02 to any
short-term leases (as defined by related accounting guidance). We expect to utilize the modified-retrospective transition approach prescribed by ASU 2018-11.
ASU
2016-13,
“Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326).”
This ASU significantly changes
how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair
value through net income. In issuing the standard, the FASB is responding to criticism that today’s guidance for determining
the allowance for credit losses delays recognition of expected future credit losses. The standard will replace today’s “incurred
loss” approach with an “expected loss” model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss
(“CECL”) model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2)
certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities,
loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities.
For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today,
except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. The ASU
also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure
requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses.
In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator,
disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2020; early adoption
is permitted for us beginning on January 1, 2019. Entities will apply any changes resulting from the application of the new standard’s
provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the
guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). We have substantially concluded our data gap analysis and have
contracted with a third party to develop a model to comply with CECL requirements. We have established a steering committee with
representation from various departments across the enterprise. The committee has agreed to a project plan and has regular meetings
to ensure adherence to our implementation timeline. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 to determine
the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 2 – Cash and Due from Banks
Regulation D of the
Federal Reserve Act requires that banks maintain noninterest reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank based principally on
the type and amount of their deposits. During 2018, the Bank maintained balances at the Federal Reserve sufficient to meet reserve
requirements, as well as significant excess reserves, on which interest is paid.
Additionally, the Bank
maintains interest-bearing balances with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and noninterest bearing balances with domestic correspondent
banks as compensation for services they provide to the Bank.
Note 3 – Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities
available-for-sale are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
U. S. agency securities
|
|
$
|
260,150
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
4,033
|
|
|
$
|
256,345
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
477,949
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
472,231
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
45,814
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
45,769
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
9,503
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9,576
|
|
Other equity investments
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
$
|
793,634
|
|
|
$
|
2,321
|
|
|
$
|
11,816
|
|
|
$
|
784,139
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
U. S. agency securities
|
|
$
|
198,115
|
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
|
$
|
195,984
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
322,067
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
317,836
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
60,976
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
62,057
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
13,010
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,173
|
|
Other equity investments
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
$
|
594,386
|
|
|
$
|
1,928
|
|
|
$
|
7,046
|
|
|
$
|
589,268
|
|
In addition, at December
31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company held $23.5 million and $36.3 million in equity securities, respectively, in a combination
of Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stocks, which are required to be held
for regulatory purposes and which are not marketable, and therefore are carried at cost.
The unrealized losses
that exist are generally the result of changes in market interest rates and interest spread relationships since original purchases.
The weighted average duration of debt securities, which comprise 99.9% of total investment securities, is relatively short at 3.6
years. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation
techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions
and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. The Company does not believe that the investment securities that were in an
unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2018 represent an other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intend to sell
the investments and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the securities before recovery of its amortized
cost basis, which may be at maturity.
Gross unrealized losses and fair value by
length of time that the individual available-for-sale securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December
31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
U. S. agency securities
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
72,679
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
|
$
|
144,636
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
217,315
|
|
|
$
|
4,033
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
61,199
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
225,995
|
|
|
|
6,766
|
|
|
|
287,194
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
17,041
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
21,340
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
139,671
|
|
|
$
|
1,116
|
|
|
$
|
387,672
|
|
|
$
|
10,700
|
|
|
$
|
527,343
|
|
|
$
|
11,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
U. S. agency securities
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
102,264
|
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
|
$
|
55,093
|
|
|
$
|
1,341
|
|
|
$
|
157,357
|
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
152,350
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
147,953
|
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
300,303
|
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
17,446
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,446
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
272,060
|
|
|
$
|
2,593
|
|
|
$
|
203,046
|
|
|
$
|
4,453
|
|
|
$
|
475,106
|
|
|
$
|
7,046
|
|
The amortized cost
and estimated fair value of investments available-for-sale at December 31, 2018 and 2017 by contractual maturity are shown in the
table below. Expected maturities for residential mortgage backed securities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers
may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
U. S. agency securities maturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
128,148
|
|
|
$
|
125,545
|
|
|
$
|
109,893
|
|
|
$
|
108,198
|
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
119,856
|
|
|
|
118,883
|
|
|
|
74,106
|
|
|
|
73,916
|
|
Five years through ten years
|
|
|
12,146
|
|
|
|
11,917
|
|
|
|
14,116
|
|
|
|
13,870
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
477,949
|
|
|
|
472,231
|
|
|
|
322,067
|
|
|
|
317,836
|
|
Municipal bonds maturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
8,097
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
5,171
|
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
15,025
|
|
|
|
15,081
|
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
19,879
|
|
Five years through ten years
|
|
|
21,626
|
|
|
|
21,385
|
|
|
|
35,432
|
|
|
|
35,846
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
Corporate bonds maturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one year through five years
|
|
|
8,003
|
|
|
|
8,076
|
|
|
|
11,510
|
|
|
|
11,673
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Other equity investments
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
$
|
793,634
|
|
|
$
|
784,139
|
|
|
$
|
594,386
|
|
|
$
|
589,268
|
|
In 2018, gross realized
gains on sales of investment securities were $391 thousand and gross realized losses on sales of investment securities were $294
thousand. In 2017, gross realized gains on sales of investment securities were $796 thousand and gross realized losses on sales
of investment securities were $254 thousand. In 2016, gross realized gains on sales of investment securities were $1.4 million
and gross realized losses on sales of investment securities were $188 thousand.
Proceeds from sales
and calls of investment securities for 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $36.3 million, $73.1 million, and $94.3 million, respectively.
The carrying value
of securities pledged as collateral for certain government deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and certain
lines of credit with correspondent banks at December 31, 2018 was $528.2 million, which is well in excess of required amounts in
order to operationally provide significant reserve amounts for new business. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there
were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and U.S. agency securities, which exceeded ten
percent of shareholders’ equity.
Note 4 - Loans and Allowance for Credit
Losses
The Bank makes loans
to customers primarily in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and surrounding communities. A substantial portion of the Bank’s
loan portfolio consists of loans to businesses secured by real estate and other business assets.
Loans, net of unamortized
net deferred fees, at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are summarized by type as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,553,112
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,375,939
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,256,900
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
3,047,094
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
887,814
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
755,444
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Real estate mortgage - residential
|
|
|
106,418
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
104,357
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
1,039,815
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
973,141
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)
|
|
|
57,797
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
58,691
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Home equity
|
|
|
86,603
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
93,264
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
6,991,447
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
6,411,528
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Less: allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
(69,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
6,921,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,346,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized net deferred
fees amounted to $26.5 million and $23.9 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, of which $60 thousand and $93 thousand at December
31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, represented net deferred costs on home equity loans.
Loans acquired from
Virginia Heritage Bank (“Virginia Heritage”) totaled $804 million at fair value, comprised of $801 million of loans
that were not considered impaired at the acquisition date and $3.0 million of loans that were determined to be impaired at the
time of acquisition. The impaired loans were accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 310-30
“Accounting for Certain
Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer”
(“ASC 310-30”). Loans acquired in the acquisition of Virginia
Heritage that were determined to be purchased credit impaired loans were all considered collateral dependent loans. Therefore,
estimated fair value calculations and projected cash flows included only return of principal and no interest income.
As of December 31,
2018 and 2017, the Bank serviced $111.1 million and $195.3 million, respectively, of multifamily FHA loans, SBA loans and other
loan participations, which are not reflected as loan balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Loan Origination/Risk Management
The Company’s
goal is to mitigate risks in the event of unforeseen threats to the loan portfolio as a result of economic downturn or other negative
influences. Plans for mitigating inherent risks in managing loan assets include carefully enforcing loan policies and procedures,
evaluating each borrower’s business plan during the underwriting process and throughout the loan term, identifying and monitoring
primary and alternative sources for loan repayment, and obtaining collateral to mitigate economic loss in the event of liquidation.
Specific loan reserves are established based upon credit and/or collateral risks on an individual loan basis. A risk rating system
is employed to proactively estimate loss exposure and provide a measuring system for setting general and specific reserve allocations.
The composition of
the Company’s loan portfolio is heavily weighted toward commercial real estate, both owner occupied and income producing.
At December 31, 2018, owner occupied commercial real estate and construction - C&I (owner occupied) represent approximately
14% of the loan portfolio while non-owner occupied commercial real estate and real estate construction represented approximately
61% of the loan portfolio. The combined owner occupied and commercial real estate loans represented approximately 75% of the loan
portfolio. Real estate also serves as collateral for loans made for other purposes, resulting in 85% of all loans being secured
by real estate. These loans are underwritten to mitigate lending risks typical of this type of loan such as declines in real estate
values, changes in borrower cash flow and general economic conditions. The Bank typically requires a maximum loan to value of 80%
and minimum cash flow debt service coverage of 1.15 to 1.0. Personal guarantees may be required, but may be limited. In making
real estate commercial mortgage loans, the Bank generally requires that interest rates adjust not less frequently than five years.
The Company is also an active traditional
commercial lender providing loans for a variety of purposes, including working capital, equipment and account receivable financing.
This loan category represents approximately 22% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2018 and was generally variable or adjustable
rate. Commercial loans meet reasonable underwriting standards, including appropriate collateral and cash flow necessary to support
debt service. Personal guarantees are generally required, but may be limited. SBA loans represent approximately 2% of the commercial
loan category. In originating SBA loans, the Company assumes the risk of non-payment on the unguaranteed portion of the credit.
The Company generally sells the guaranteed portion of the loan generating noninterest income from the gains on sale, as well as
servicing income on the portion participated. SBA loans are subject to the same cash flow analyses as other commercial loans. SBA
loans are subject to a maximum loan size established by the SBA as well as internal loan size guidelines.
Approximately 1% of
the loan portfolio at December 31, 2018 consists of home equity loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. These credits,
while making up a small portion of the loan portfolio, demand the same emphasis on underwriting and credit evaluation as other
types of loans advanced by the Bank.
Approximately 2% of
the loan portfolio consists of residential mortgage loans. The repricing duration of these loans was 22 months. These credits represent
first liens on residential property loans originated by the Bank. While the Bank’s general practice is to originate and sell
(servicing released) loans made by its Residential Lending department, from time to time certain loan characteristics do not meet
the requirements of third party investors and these loans are instead maintained in the Bank’s portfolio until they are resold
to another investor at a later date or mature.
Loans are secured primarily
by duly recorded first deeds of trust or mortgages. In some cases, the Bank may accept a recorded junior trust position. In general,
borrowers will have a proven ability to build, lease, manage and/or sell a commercial or residential project and demonstrate satisfactory
financial condition. Additionally, an equity contribution toward the project is customarily required.
Construction loans
require that the financial condition and experience of the general contractor and major subcontractors be satisfactory to the Bank.
Guaranteed, fixed price contracts are required whenever appropriate, along with payment and performance bonds or completion bonds
for larger scale projects.
Loans intended for
residential land acquisition, lot development and construction are made on the premise that the land: 1) is or will be developed
for building sites for residential structures, and; 2) will ultimately be utilized for construction or improvement of residential
zoned real properties, including the creation of housing. Residential development and construction loans will finance projects
such as single family subdivisions, planned unit developments, townhouses, and condominiums. Residential land acquisition, development
and construction loans generally are underwritten with a maximum term of 36 months, including extensions approved at origination.
Commercial land acquisition
and construction loans are secured by real property where loan funds will be used to acquire land and to construct or improve appropriately
zoned real property for the creation of income producing or owner user commercial properties. Borrowers are generally required
to put equity into each project at levels determined by the appropriate Loan Committee. Commercial land acquisition and construction
loans generally are underwritten with a maximum term of 24 months.
Substantially all construction
draw requests must be presented in writing on American Institute of Architects documents and certified either by the contractor,
the borrower and/or the borrower’s architect. Each draw request shall also include the borrower’s soft cost breakdown
certified by the borrower or their Chief Financial Officer. Prior to an advance, the Bank or its contractor inspects the project
to determine that the work has been completed, to justify the draw requisition.
Commercial permanent
loans are generally secured by improved real property which is generating income in the normal course of operation. Debt service
coverage, assuming stabilized occupancy, must be satisfactory to support a permanent loan. The debt service coverage ratio is ordinarily
at least 1.15 to 1.0. As part of the underwriting process, debt service coverage ratios are stress tested assuming a 200 basis
point increase in interest rates from their current levels.
Commercial permanent
loans generally are underwritten with a term not greater than 10 years or the remaining useful life of the property, whichever
is lower. The preferred term is between 5 to 7 years, with amortization to a maximum of 25 years.
The Company’s
loan portfolio includes ADC real estate loans including both investment and owner occupied projects. ADC loans amounted to $1.62
billion at December 31, 2018. A portion of the ADC portfolio, both speculative and non-speculative, includes loan funded interest
reserves at origination. ADC loans that provide for the use of interest reserves represent approximately 70% of the outstanding
ADC loan portfolio at December 31, 2018. The decision to establish a loan-funded interest reserve is made upon origination of the
ADC loan and is based upon a number of factors considered during underwriting of the credit including: (1) the feasibility of the
project; (2) the experience of the sponsor; (3) the creditworthiness of the borrower and guarantors; (4) borrower equity contribution;
and (5) the level of collateral protection. When appropriate, an interest reserve provides an effective means of addressing the
cash flow characteristics of a properly underwritten ADC loan. The Company does not significantly utilize interest reserves in
other loan products. The Company recognizes that one of the risks inherent in the use of interest reserves is the potential masking
of underlying problems with the project and/or the borrower’s ability to repay the loan. In order to mitigate this inherent
risk, the Company employs a series of reporting and monitoring mechanisms on all ADC loans, whether or not an interest reserve
is provided, including: (1) construction and development timelines which are monitored on an ongoing basis which track the progress
of a given project to the timeline projected at origination; (2) a construction loan administration department independent of the
lending function; (3) third party independent construction loan inspection reports; (4) monthly interest reserve monitoring reports
detailing the balance of the interest reserves approved at origination and the days of interest carry represented by the reserve
balances as compared to the then current anticipated time to completion and/or sale of speculative projects; and (5) quarterly
commercial real estate construction meetings among senior Company management, which includes monitoring of current and projected
real estate market conditions. If a project has not performed as expected, it is not the customary practice of the Company to increase
loan funded interest reserves.
The following tables
detail activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Allocation
of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.
|
|
|
|
|
Income Producing -
|
|
|
Owner Occupied -
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Construction -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
|
Home
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
13,102
|
|
|
$
|
25,376
|
|
|
$
|
5,934
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
18,492
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
64,758
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(3,491
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,160
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(4,985
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries
|
|
|
(3,151
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(3,474
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
8,660
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
15,857
|
|
|
$
|
28,034
|
|
|
$
|
6,242
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
18,175
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
69,944
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
4,803
|
|
|
$
|
2,465
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,918
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
11,054
|
|
|
|
25,569
|
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
17,125
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
61,026
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
15,857
|
|
|
$
|
28,034
|
|
|
$
|
6,242
|
|
|
$
|
965
|
|
|
$
|
18,175
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
69,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14,700
|
|
|
$
|
21,105
|
|
|
$
|
4,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,284
|
|
|
$
|
16,487
|
|
|
$
|
1,328
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
59,074
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(4,575
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(3,287
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
5,661
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
8,971
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
13,102
|
|
|
$
|
25,376
|
|
|
$
|
5,934
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
18,492
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
64,758
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
3,259
|
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
7,601
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
22,996
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
17,992
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
57,157
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
13,102
|
|
|
$
|
25,376
|
|
|
$
|
5,934
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
$
|
18,492
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
64,758
|
|
The
Company’s recorded investments in loans as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 related to each balance in the allowance
for loan losses by portfolio segment and disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Income
Producing - Commercial
|
|
Owner
Occupied - Commercial
|
|
Real
Estate
Mortgage
|
|
Construction
- Commercial and
|
|
Home
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
Residential
|
|
Residential
|
|
Equity
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Total
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
investment in loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
8,738
|
|
$
|
61,747
|
|
$
|
5,307
|
|
$
|
1,228
|
|
$
|
7,012
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
84,519
|
|
Collectively
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
1,544,374
|
|
|
3,195,153
|
|
|
882,507
|
|
|
105,190
|
|
|
1,090,600
|
|
|
86,116
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
6,906,928
|
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
1,553,112
|
|
$
|
3,256,900
|
|
$
|
887,814
|
|
$
|
106,418
|
|
$
|
1,097,612
|
|
$
|
86,603
|
|
$
|
2,988
|
|
$
|
6,991,447
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
investment in loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
8,726
|
|
$
|
10,192
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
$
|
478
|
|
$
|
4,709
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
$
|
30,191
|
|
Collectively
evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
1,367,213
|
|
|
3,036,902
|
|
|
749,943
|
|
|
103,879
|
|
|
1,027,123
|
|
|
92,770
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
6,381,337
|
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
1,375,939
|
|
$
|
3,047,094
|
|
$
|
755,444
|
|
$
|
104,357
|
|
$
|
1,031,832
|
|
$
|
93,264
|
|
$
|
3,598
|
|
$
|
6,411,528
|
|
At
December 31, 2018, nonperforming loans acquired from Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation (“Fidelity”) and Virginia
Heritage have a carrying value of $282 thousand and $202 thousand, respectively, and an unpaid principal balance of $332 thousand
and $995 thousand, respectively, and were evaluated separately in accordance with ASC Topic 310-30,
“Loans and Debt Securities
Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality
.” The various impaired loans were recorded at estimated fair value with any
excess being charged-off or treated as a non-accretable discount. Subsequent downward adjustments to the valuation of impaired
loans acquired will result in additional loan loss provisions and related allowance for credit losses.
Credit
Quality Indicators
The
Company uses several credit quality indicators to manage credit risk in an ongoing manner. The Company’s primary credit quality
indicators are to use an internal credit risk rating system that categorizes loans into pass, watch, special mention, or classified
categories. Credit risk ratings are applied individually to those classes of loans that have significant or unique credit characteristics
that benefit from a case-by-case evaluation. These are typically loans to businesses or individuals in the classes which comprise
the commercial portfolio segment. Groups of loans that are underwritten and structured using standardized criteria and characteristics,
such as statistical models (e.g., credit scoring or payment performance), are typically risk rated and monitored collectively.
These are typically loans to individuals in the classes which comprise the consumer portfolio segment.
The
following are the definitions of the Company’s credit quality indicators:
|
Pass:
|
Loans
in all classes that comprise the commercial and consumer portfolio segments that are
not adversely rated, are contractually current as to principal and interest, and are
otherwise in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management
believes that there is a low likelihood of loss related to those loans that are considered
pass.
|
Watch:
|
Loan
paying as agreed with generally acceptable asset quality; however the obligor’s
performance has not met expectations. Balance sheet and/or income statement has shown
deterioration to the point that the obligor could not sustain any further setbacks. Credit
is expected to be strengthened through improved obligor performance and/or additional
collateral within a reasonable period of time.
|
Special
Mention:
|
Loans in the classes that comprise the commercial portfolio segment that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s
close attention. If not addressed, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan.
The special mention credit quality indicator is not used for classes of loans that comprise the consumer portfolio segment. Management
believes that there is a moderate likelihood of some loss related to those loans that are considered special mention.
|
|
Classified:
|
Classified
(a) Substandard
- Loans inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying
capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have
a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They
are characterized by the distinct possibility that the company will sustain some loss
if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate
amount of substandard loans, does not have to exist in individual loans classified substandard.
|
Classified
(b) Doubtful
- Loans that have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified substandard, with the added characteristic
that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values,
highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably
specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the assets, its classification as an estimated
loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.
The
Company’s credit quality indicators are updated generally on a quarterly basis, but no less frequently than annually. The following
table presents by class and by credit quality indicator, the recorded investment in the Company’s loans and leases as of December
31, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
Watch and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,505,477
|
|
|
$
|
25,584
|
|
|
$
|
22,051
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,553,112
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,182,903
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
82,885
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,256,900
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
844,286
|
|
|
|
38,221
|
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
887,814
|
|
Real estate mortgage 3 residential
|
|
|
104,543
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
106,418
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
1,090,600
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,097,612
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
85,434
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
86,603
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,816,231
|
|
|
$
|
66,670
|
|
|
$
|
118,970
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,991,447
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,333,050
|
|
|
$
|
34,163
|
|
|
$
|
8,726
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,939
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,033,046
|
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
|
|
10,192
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,047,094
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
696,754
|
|
|
|
53,189
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
755,444
|
|
Real estate mortgage - residential
|
|
|
103,220
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
104,357
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
1,027,123
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,031,832
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
92,084
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
93,264
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,288,782
|
|
|
$
|
92,555
|
|
|
$
|
30,191
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,411,528
|
|
Nonaccrual
and Past Due Loans
Loans
are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were
due. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations
as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status regardless of
whether or not such loans are considered past due. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments
are received in excess of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually
due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
The
following table presents, by class of loan, information related to nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
7,115
|
|
|
$
|
3,493
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
Real estate mortgage - residential
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans (1)(2)
|
|
$
|
16,277
|
|
|
$
|
13,238
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes
troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) that were performing under their restructured
terms totaling $24.0 million at December 31, 2018, and $12.3 million at December 31,
2017.
|
|
(2)
|
Gross
interest income of $1.0 million and $939 thousand would have been recorded in 2018 and
2017, respectively, if nonaccrual loans shown above had been current and in accordance
with their original terms, while interest actually recorded on such loans were $265 thousand
and $101 thousand at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for a description of the Company’s policy for placing loans
on nonaccrual status.
|
The
following table presents, by class of loan, an aging analysis and the recorded investments in loans past due as of December 31,
2018 and 2017.
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recorded
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
90 Days or
|
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
More Past Due
|
|
|
Due Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
4,535
|
|
|
$
|
2,870
|
|
|
$
|
7,115
|
|
|
$
|
14,520
|
|
|
$
|
1,538,592
|
|
|
$
|
1,553,112
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,855
|
|
|
|
27,479
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
3,221,800
|
|
|
|
3,256,900
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
9,789
|
|
|
|
878,025
|
|
|
|
887,814
|
|
Real estate mortgage – residential
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
5,664
|
|
|
|
100,754
|
|
|
|
106,418
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
7,423
|
|
|
|
1,090,189
|
|
|
|
1,097,612
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
85,439
|
|
|
|
86,603
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,919
|
|
|
$
|
34,464
|
|
|
$
|
16,277
|
|
|
$
|
73,660
|
|
|
$
|
6,917,787
|
|
|
$
|
6,991,447
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
|
$
|
3,493
|
|
|
$
|
6,946
|
|
|
$
|
1,368,993
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,939
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
4,398
|
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
12,160
|
|
|
|
3,034,934
|
|
|
|
3,047,094
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
9,929
|
|
|
|
745,515
|
|
|
|
755,444
|
|
Real estate mortgage – residential
|
|
|
6,993
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
9,012
|
|
|
|
95,345
|
|
|
|
104,357
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
7,320
|
|
|
|
1,024,512
|
|
|
|
1,031,832
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
92,463
|
|
|
|
93,264
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,970
|
|
|
$
|
18,102
|
|
|
$
|
13,238
|
|
|
$
|
46,310
|
|
|
$
|
6,365,218
|
|
|
$
|
6,411,528
|
|
Impaired
Loans
Loans
are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all
amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest
payments. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature and on an individual loan basis for other
loans. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at
the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment
is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability
of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions
thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
The
following table presents, by class of loan, information related to impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
Unpaid
Contractual
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Average
Recorded Investment
|
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
With No
|
|
With
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Related
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Year
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Investment
|
|
Allowance
|
|
To
Date
|
|
To
Date
|
|
To
Date
|
|
To
Date
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
8,613
|
|
$
|
2,057
|
|
$
|
6,084
|
|
$
|
8,141
|
|
$
|
4,803
|
|
$
|
10,306
|
|
$
|
8,359
|
|
$
|
(126
|
)
|
$
|
190
|
|
Income producing
- commercial real estate
|
|
|
21,402
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
19,682
|
|
|
21,402
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
15,331
|
|
|
12,309
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
550
|
|
Owner occupied -
commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,731
|
|
|
4,361
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
5,731
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
196
|
|
Real estate mortgage
– residential
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Construction - commercial
and residential
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
68
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,774
|
|
$
|
13,166
|
|
$
|
27,136
|
|
$
|
40,302
|
|
$
|
8,918
|
|
$
|
36,463
|
|
$
|
27,836
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
$
|
1,006
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
5,644
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
$
|
5,525
|
|
$
|
3,259
|
|
$
|
5,764
|
|
$
|
5,765
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
Income producing
- commercial real estate
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
10,068
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
493
|
|
Owner occupied -
commercial real estate
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
6,743
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
73
|
|
Real estate mortgage
– residential
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
17
|
|
Construction - commercial
and residential
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
3,731
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,696
|
|
$
|
6,456
|
|
$
|
19,121
|
|
$
|
25,577
|
|
$
|
7,601
|
|
$
|
27,240
|
|
$
|
25,695
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
Modifications
A
modification of a loan constitutes a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes
a concession. The Company offers various types of concessions when modifying a loan. Commercial and industrial loans modified
in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting revolving credit lines to term loans.
Additional collateral, a co-borrower, or a guarantor is often requested. Commercial mortgage and construction loans modified in
a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for the remaining term of the loan, extending the maturity date at an interest
rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or substituting or adding a new borrower or guarantor.
Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only payment period. As of December 31, 2018, all
performing TDRs were categorized as interest-only modifications.
Loans
modified in a TDR for the Company may have the financial effect of increasing the specific allowance associated with the loan.
An allowance for impaired consumer and commercial loans that have been modified in a TDR is measured based on the present value
of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price,
or the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Management exercises
significant judgment in developing these estimates.
The
following table presents, by class, the recorded investment of loans modified in TDRs held by the Company during the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Income
Producing - Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Owner
Occupied - Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Construction
- Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured
accruing
|
|
|
9
|
|
$
|
1,026
|
|
$
|
19,636
|
|
$
|
3,363
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
Restructured
nonaccruing
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
544
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12
|
|
$
|
1,570
|
|
$
|
19,636
|
|
$
|
3,363
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
24,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured
and subsequently defaulted
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Number
of Contracts
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Income
Producing - Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Owner
Occupied - Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Construction
- Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Total
|
|
Troubled debt restructings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured
accruing
|
|
|
9
|
|
$
|
2,032
|
|
$
|
9,212
|
|
$
|
1,095
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
12,339
|
|
Restructured
nonaccruing
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
988
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14
|
|
$
|
2,899
|
|
$
|
9,333
|
|
$
|
1,095
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
13,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured
and subsequently defaulted
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
The
Company had twelve TDRs at December 31, 2018, totaling approximately $24.6 million, as compared to fourteen TDRs totaling approximately
$13.3 million at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2018, nine of these TDR loans, totaling approximately $24.0 million,
are performing under their modified terms, as compared to the same period in 2017, there were nine performing TDR loans totaling
approximately $12.3 million. During 2018, there were two performing TDRs totaling $460 thousand that defaulted on their modified
terms which were reclassified to nonperforming loans, as compared to the same period in 2017, there were five performing TDR loans
totaling approximately $988 thousand that defaulted on their modified terms and were reclassified to nonperforming loans. A default
is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more, or it has been placed on nonaccrual. During 2018 there
were four defaulted loans totaling approximately $1.4 million that were charged off during the year, as compared to the same period
in 2017, there was one defaulted loan totaling approximately $237 thousand that was charged off. There were two loan payoffs on
performing loans in 2018 totaling approximately $3.9 million that were modified during the year. During 2018, there was a pay
down of approximately $176 thousand on one nonperforming loan totaling approximately $183 thousand at December 31, 2017. During
2017, there was a pay down of approximately $4.8 million resulting from the sale of the underlying collateral on one nonperforming
loan totaling approximately $4.9 million at December 31, 2016. Commercial and consumer loans modified in a TDR are closely
monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the
Company evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation
of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. During 2018, there
were two loans modified in a TDR totaling approximately $12.8 million, as compared to the same period in 2017, there were four
loans totaling approximately $5.3 million modified in a TDR.
The
criteria used to determine if a loan should be considered for charge off relates to its ultimate collectability includes the following:
|
●
|
All
or a portion of the loan is deemed uncollectible;
|
|
●
|
Repayment
is dependent upon secondary sources, such as liquidation of collateral, other assets,
or judgment liens that may require an indefinite time period to collect.
|
Loans
may be identified for charge off in whole or in part based upon an impairment analysis consistent with ASC 310. If all or a portion
of a loan is deemed uncollectible, such amount shall be charged off in the month in which the loan or portion thereof is determined
to be uncollectible.
Loans
approved for non-accrual status, or charge off, are managed by the Chief Credit Officer or as dictated by the Directors Loan Committee
and/or Credit Review Committee. The Chief Credit Officer is expected to position the loan in the best possible posture for
recovery, including, among other actions, liquidating collateral, obtaining additional collateral, filing suit to obtain judgment
or restructuring of repayment terms. A review of charged off loans is made on a monthly basis to assess the possibility of
recovery from renewed collection efforts. All charged off loans that are deemed to have the possibility of recovery, whether partial
or full, shall be actively pursued. Charged off loans that are deemed uncollectible will be placed in an inactive file with documentation
supporting the suspension of further collection efforts.
In
the process of collecting problem loans the Bank may resort to the acquisition of collateral through foreclosure and repossession
actions, or may accept the transfer of assets in partial or full satisfaction of the debt. These actions may in turn result
in the necessity of carrying real property or chattels as an asset of the Company pending sale.
For
purchased loans acquired that are not deemed impaired at acquisition, credit marks representing the principal losses expected
over the life of the loans are a component of the initial fair value. Subsequent to the purchase date, the methods utilized to
estimate the required allowance for credit losses for these loans is similar to originated loans; however, the Company records
a provision for loan losses only when the required allowance exceeds any remaining credit mark. The differences between the initial
fair value and the unpaid principal balance at the date of acquisition are recorded in interest income over the life of the loans.
The
following table presents changes in the credit mark accretable yield, which includes income recognized from contractual interest
cash flows, for the dates indicated.
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
$
|
(2,459
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,444
|
)
|
Net reclassifications from nonaccretable yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
$
|
(1,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,459
|
)
|
Related
Party Loans
Certain
directors and executive officers have had loan transactions with the Company. Such loans were made in the ordinary course of the
Company’s lending business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable loans with third parties; and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability
or present other unfavorable features. All of such loans are performing and none of such loans are disclosed as nonaccrual, past
due, restructured or potential problem loans.
The
following table summarizes changes in amounts of loans outstanding, both direct and indirect, to those persons during 2018 and
2017.
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
$
|
238,236
|
|
|
$
|
137,816
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
55,657
|
|
|
|
138,565
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(126,009
|
)
|
|
|
(38,145
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
$
|
167,884
|
|
|
$
|
238,236
|
|
During 2018, we modified our analysis with
respect to insider related parties and as a result included additional relationships such as those involving extended family members
and trusts, resulting in an increase to the previously reported $60.9 million balance of related party loans at December 31, 2017.
Note
5 - Premises and Equipment
Premises
and equipment include the following at December 31:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
31,026
|
|
|
$
|
31,451
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
31,168
|
|
|
|
29,667
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(45,343
|
)
|
|
|
(40,127
|
)
|
Total premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
16,851
|
|
|
$
|
20,991
|
|
Total
depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, was $5.6 million, $5.4 million and
$5.0 million, respectively.
The Company leases banking and office space in 29 locations under non-cancelable lease arrangements accounted
for as operating leases. The initial lease periods range from five to ten years and provide for one or more five year renewal options.
The leases in some cases provide for scheduled annual rent escalations and require that the Bank (lessee) pay certain operating
expenses applicable to the leased space. Rent expense applicable to operating leases amounted to $8.3 million for the year 2018,
and $8.5 million for each of 2017 and 2016, as the company has completed some consolidation and “right-sizing” of its
banking offices network. The Company subleased three leased premises during 2018, and four leased premises during 2017 and 2016.
The Company recorded $574 thousand, $455 thousand, and $579 thousand of sublease income as a reduction of rent expense during 2018,
2017, and 2016, respectively.
At
December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases having an initial term in excess of one
year are as follows:
Years ending December 31:
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
|
2019
|
$
|
8,435
|
|
2020
|
|
7,700
|
|
2021
|
|
7,611
|
|
2022
|
|
7,108
|
|
2023
|
|
6,750
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
29,138
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
$
|
66,742
|
|
Note
6 – Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a separate line item, net of accumulated amortization and consist of
the following items:
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
FHA
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
MSR Sales
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (1)
|
|
$
|
104,168
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
104,168
|
|
Core deposit (2)
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,312
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Excess servicing (3)
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
578
|
|
Non-compete agreements (4)
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,048
|
|
|
$
|
838
|
|
|
$
|
(7,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(672
|
)
|
|
$
|
105,766
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (1)
|
|
$
|
104,168
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
104,168
|
|
Core deposit (2)
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,355
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
Excess servicing (3)
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
Non-compete agreements (4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,710
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
$
|
(5,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
107,212
|
|
The
aggregate amortization expense was $1.6 million, $1.5 million, and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and
2016, respectively.
|
(1)
|
The
Company recorded an initial amount of unidentified intangible (goodwill) incident to
the acquisition of Fidelity of approximately $360 thousand. Based on allowable adjustments
through August 31, 2009, the unidentified intangible (goodwill) amounted to approximately
$2.2 million. The Company recorded an initial amount of unidentified intangible (goodwill)
incident to the acquisition of Virginia Heritage of approximately $102 million.
|
|
(2)
|
In
connection with the Fidelity and Virginia Heritage acquisitions, the Company made an allocation of the purchase price to core
deposit intangibles which were $2.3 million and $4.6 million, respectively, based off of an independent evaluation and is included
in intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The initial amount recorded for the
Fidelity acquisition was $2.3 million. The amount of the core deposit intangible relating to the Fidelity acquisition was fully
amortized at December 31, 2018, as a component of other noninterest expense. The initial amount recorded for the Virginia Heritage
acquisition was $4.6 million. The amount of the core deposit intangible relating to the Virginia Heritage acquisition at December
31, 2018 was $758 thousand, which is being amortized over its remaining economic life through 2020 as a component of other noninterest
expense.
|
|
(3)
|
The
Company recognizes a servicing asset for the computed value of servicing fees on the sale of multifamily FHA loans and the sale
of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans. Assumptions related to loan terms and amortization is made to arrive at the initial recorded
values, which are included in other assets. During 2018, the Company sold a portion of its FHA mortgage servicing rights totaling
$672 thousand for a net loss of $71 thousand.
|
|
(4)
|
The
Company entered into a non-compete agreement for three years with its former Vice Chairman of the Bank. The amount of the non-compete intangible was $262 thousand as of December 31, 2018, which is being amortized
over its remaining term through 2020 as a component of professional fees.
|
The
future estimated annual amortization expense is presented below:
Years ending December 31:
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
|
2019
|
|
1,051
|
|
2020
|
|
155
|
|
2021
|
|
71
|
|
2022
|
|
71
|
|
2023
|
|
71
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
179
|
|
Total annual amortization
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
Note
7 – Other Real Estate Owned
The activity within OREO for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is presented in the table below. There
was one residential real estate loan totaling $487 thousand in the process of foreclosure as of December 31, 2018. For the year
ended December 31, 2018, there were no sales of OREO. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the proceeds on sales of OREO were
$2.1 million resulting from the sale of three foreclosed properties. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the loss on the sale
of OREO was $301 thousand.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
2,694
|
|
Real estate acquired from borrowers
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
Properties sold
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,445
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
Note
8 – Mortgage Banking Derivatives
As
part of its mortgage banking activities, the Bank enters into interest rate lock commitments, which are commitments to originate
loans where the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding and the customers have locked into that interest rate.
The Bank then locks in the loan and interest rate with an investor and commits to deliver the loan if settlement occurs (“best
efforts”) or commits to deliver the locked loan in a binding (“mandatory”) delivery program with an investor.
Certain loans under interest rate lock commitments are covered under forward sales contracts of mortgage backed securities (“MBS”).
Forward sales contracts of MBS are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest
rate lock commitments and commitments to deliver loans to investors are considered derivatives. The market value of interest rate
lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not readily ascertainable with precision because they are not actively traded
in stand-alone markets. The Bank determines the fair value of interest rate lock commitments and delivery contracts by measuring
the fair value of the underlying asset, which is impacted by current interest rates, taking into consideration the probability
that the interest rate lock commitments will close or will be funded.
Certain
additional risks arise from these forward delivery contracts in that the counterparties to the contracts may not be able to meet
the terms of the contracts. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to any MBS to fail to meet its obligation. Additional risks
inherent in mandatory delivery programs include the risk that, if the Bank does not close the loans subject to interest rate risk
lock commitments, it will still be obligated to deliver MBS to the counterparty under the forward sales agreement. Should this
be required, the Bank could incur significant costs in acquiring replacement loans or MBS and such costs could have an adverse
effect on mortgage banking operations.
The
fair value of the mortgage banking derivatives is recorded as a freestanding asset or liability with the change in value being
recognized in current earnings during the period of change.
At
December 31, 2018 the Bank had mortgage banking derivative financial instruments with a notional value of $49.6 million related
to its forward contracts. The fair value of these mortgage banking derivative instruments at December 31, 2018 was $229 thousand
included in other assets and $269 thousand included in other liabilities. At December 31, 2017 the Bank had mortgage banking derivative
financial instruments with a notional value of $37.1 million related to its forward contracts. The fair value of these mortgage
banking derivative instruments at December 31, 2017 was $43 thousand included in other assets and $10 thousand included in other
liabilities.
Included
in gain on sale of loans for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was a net gain of $57 thousand and a net gain of $279 thousand,
respectively, relating to mortgage banking derivative instruments. The amount included in gain on sale of loans for year ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 pertaining to its mortgage banking hedging activities was a net realized loss of $157 thousand and
a net realized loss of $809 thousand, respectively.
Note
9 – Interest Rate Swap Derivatives
The
Company uses interest rate swap agreements to assist in its interest rate risk management. The Company’s objective in using
interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to
interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company entered into forward starting interest rate swaps in April
2015 as part of its interest rate risk management strategy intended to mitigate the potential risk of rising interest rates on
the Bank’s cost of funds. The notional amounts of the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges do not represent
amounts exchanged by the counterparties, but rather, the notional amount is used to determine, along with other terms of the derivative,
the amounts to be exchanged between the counterparties. The interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and involve
the receipt of variable rate amounts from two counterparties in exchange for the Company making fixed rate payments beginning
in April 2016. The Company’s intent is to hedge its exposure to the variability in potential future interest rate conditions
on existing financial instruments.
As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had three forward starting designated cash flow hedge interest rate swap
transactions outstanding that had an aggregate notional amount of $250 million associated with the Company’s variable rate
deposits. The net unrealized gain before income tax on the swaps was $3.7 million at December 31, 2018 compared to a net unrealized
gain before income tax of $2.3 million at December 31, 2017. The unrealized gain at year end 2018 is due to the expectation of
short term rates remaining above the fixed strike rate of the swap for the remaining term of the interest rate swap.
For
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative are initially reported in other comprehensive
income (outside of earnings), net of tax, and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.
The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging
instrument with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged transactions.
Amounts
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to designated cash flow hedge derivatives will be reclassified to interest
income/expense as interest payments are made/received on the Company’s variable-rate assets/liabilities. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company reclassified income
of $560 thousand
related
to designated cash flow hedge derivatives from accumulated other comprehensive income to decrease interest expense. During the
year ended December 31, 2017, the Company reclassified $1.6 million related to derivatives from accumulated other comprehensive
income to interest expense. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates (based on existing interest rates) that $2.0
million will be reclassified as a decrease in interest expense.
The
Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the interest rate swap counterparty. The Company minimizes
this risk by entering into derivative contracts with only large, stable financial institutions, and the Company has not experienced,
and does not expect, any losses from counterparty nonperformance on the interest rate swaps. The Company monitors counterparty
risk in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 815,
“Derivatives and Hedging.”
In addition, the interest
rate swap agreements contain language outlining collateral-pledging requirements for each counterparty. Collateral must be posted
when the market value exceeds certain threshold limits.
The
designated cash flow hedge interest rate swap agreements detail: 1) that collateral be posted when the market value exceeds certain
threshold limits associated with the secured party’s exposure; 2) if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness (including
default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender), then the Company could also be declared in
default on its derivative obligations; 3) if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well capitalized institution then the
counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements.
As
of December 31, 2018, the aggregate fair value of all designated cash flow hedge derivative contracts with credit risk contingent
features (i.e., those containing collateral posting or termination provisions based on our capital status) that were in a net
asset position totaled $3.7 million. The aggregate fair value of all derivative contracts with credit risk contingent features
that were a net asset position totaled $2.3 million as of December 31, 2017. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds
with certain of its derivative counterparties. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company was not required to post collateral
with its derivative counterparties against its obligations under these agreements because these agreements were in a net asset
position. If the Company had breached any provisions under the agreements at December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017, it could
have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.
During
the third quarter of 2018, the Company entered into credit risk participation agreements (“RPAs”) with institutional
counterparties, under which the Company assumes its pro-rata share of the credit exposure associated with a borrower’s performance
related to interest rate derivative contracts. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or
liability exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers’ credit spread to that exposure. Total
expected exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from using observable
inputs, such as yield curves and volatilities. These derivatives are not designated as hedges, are not speculative, and have a
notional value of $27.5 million as of December 31. 2018. The changes in fair value for these contracts are recognized directly
in earnings.
The
table below identifies the balance sheet category and fair values of the Company’s designated cash flow hedge derivative
instruments and non-designated hedges as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Category
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Category
|
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
$
|
845
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
$
|
598
|
|
Other Assets
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
821
|
|
Other Assets
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
837
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
$
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
$
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Contracts
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
59
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
27,500
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
The table below presents
the pre-tax net gains (losses) of the Company’s cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Reclassified from AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Reclassified from AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
Pre-tax gain
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Pre-tax (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
Category
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
Category
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,594
|
)
|
The table below presents the pre-tax net
gains (losses ) of the Company’s designated cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest Income (Expense)
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense)
|
|
|
Interest Income (Expense)
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense)
|
|
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in which the
effects of cash flow hedges are recorded
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of cash flow hedging:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships in Subtopic 815-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Balance Sheet Offsetting
:
Our designated cash flow hedge interest rate swap derivatives are eligible for offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are
subject to master netting arrangements. Our derivative transactions with counterparties are generally executed under International
Swaps and Derivative Association (“ISDA”) master agreements which include “right of set-off” provisions.
In such cases there is generally a legally enforceable right to offset recognized amounts and there may be an intention to settle
such amounts on a net basis. The Company generally offsets such financial instruments for financial reporting purposes.
The following table presents the liabilities
subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2018
|
Offsetting of Derivative Assets
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
|
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Net Amounts of Assets presented in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Cash Collateral Posted
|
|
|
Net Amount
|
|
Counterparty 1
|
|
$
|
2,948
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,948
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,948
|
|
Counterparty 2
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
892
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
892
|
|
Counterparty 3
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
3,781
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,781
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,781
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
Offsetting of Derivative Assets
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
|
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Net Amounts of Assets presented in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Cash Collateral Posted
|
|
|
Net Amount
|
|
Counterparty 1
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
Counterparty 2
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,201
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,201
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,201
|
|
Note 10 – Deposits
The following table
provides information regarding the Bank’s deposit composition at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 as well as the average
rate being paid on interest bearing deposits at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
2,104,220
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,982,912
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,775,684
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest bearing transaction
|
|
|
593,107
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
420,417
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
289,122
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
2,949,559
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
2,621,146
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
2,902,560
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
Time, $100,000 or more
|
|
|
801,957
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
515,682
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
|
|
464,842
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
Other time
|
|
|
525,442
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
313,827
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
283,906
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,974,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,853,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,716,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining maturity of time deposits
at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
230,360
|
|
|
$
|
180,459
|
|
|
$
|
120,238
|
|
More than three months through six months
|
|
|
355,022
|
|
|
|
228,513
|
|
|
|
151,422
|
|
More than six months through twelve months
|
|
|
308,063
|
|
|
|
208,554
|
|
|
|
207,141
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
433,954
|
|
|
|
211,983
|
|
|
|
269,947
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,327,399
|
|
|
$
|
829,509
|
|
|
$
|
748,748
|
|
Interest expense on deposits for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Interest bearing transaction
|
|
$
|
3,348
|
|
|
$
|
1,537
|
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
Savings and money market
|
|
|
35,534
|
|
|
|
17,284
|
|
|
|
12,038
|
|
Time, $100,000 or more
|
|
|
17,138
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
6,487
|
|
Other time
|
|
|
4,190
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,210
|
|
|
$
|
27,286
|
|
|
$
|
19,248
|
|
Related Party Deposits
totaled $141.4 million and $179.1 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
During 2018, we modified our analysis with respect to insider related parties and as a result included additional
relationships such as those involving extended family members and trusts, resulting in an increase to the previously reported $84.3
million balance of related party deposits at December 31, 2017.
As of December 31,
2018 and December 31, 2017, time deposit accounts in excess of $250 thousand totaled $445.8 million and $279.7 million, respectively.
Note 11 – Affordable Housing Projects
Tax Credit Partnerships
Included in Other Assets,
the Company makes equity investments in various limited partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low
Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments
is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital, to facilitate the sale of affordable housing products offerings, and to assist
in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act. The primary activities of the limited partnerships include the
identification, development, and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. Generally,
these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity.
The Company is a limited
partner in each LIHTC limited partnership. Each limited partnership is managed by an unrelated third party general partner who
exercises significant control over the affairs of the limited partnership. The general partner has all the rights, powers and authority
granted or permitted to be granted to a general partner of a limited partnership. Duties entrusted to the general partner of each
limited partnership include, but are not limited to: investment in operating companies, company expenditures, investment of excess
funds, borrowing funds, employment of agents, disposition of fund property, prepayment and refinancing of liabilities, votes and
consents, contract authority, disbursement of funds, accounting methods, tax elections, bank accounts, insurance, litigation, cash
reserve, and use of working capital reserve funds. Except for limited rights granted to the limited partner(s) relating to the
approval of certain transactions, the limited partner(s) may not participate in the operation, management, or control of the limited
partnership’s business, transact any business in the limited partnership’s name or have any power to sign documents
for or otherwise bind the limited partnership. In addition, the general partner may only be removed by the limited partner(s) in
the event the general partner fails to comply with the terms of the agreement or is negligent in performing its duties.
The general partner
of each limited partnership has both the power to direct the activities which most significantly affect the performance of each
partnership and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the entities. Therefore,
the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any LIHTC partnership. The Company accounts for its affordable
housing tax credit investments using the proportional amortization method. The Company’s net affordable housing tax credit
investments were $28.2 million and related unfunded commitments were $15.0 million and as of December 31, 2018 and are included
in Other Assets and Other Liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
As of December 31, 2018, the expected payments
for unfunded affordable housing commitments were as follows:
Years ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
6,111
|
|
2020
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
2021
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
2022
|
|
|
155
|
|
2023
|
|
|
247
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
889
|
|
Total unfunded commitments
|
|
$
|
14,989
|
|
Note 12 – Borrowings
Information relating to short-term and long-term
borrowings is as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Year-End:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased
|
|
$
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
$
|
76,561
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
76,561
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
Federal Home Loan Bank – current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
401,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
401,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased
|
|
$
|
44,333
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
73,237
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
73,237
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
Federal Home Loan Bank – current portion
|
|
|
192,131
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
65,416
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
|
65,416
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
236,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Month-end Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased
|
|
$
|
72,141
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
$
|
85,614
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
85,614
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Federal Home Loan Bank – current portion
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
397,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Year-End:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Month-end Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company offers
its business customers a repurchase agreement sweep account in which it collateralizes these funds with U.S. agency and mortgage
backed securities segregated in its investment portfolio for this purpose. By entering into the agreement, the customer agrees
to have the Bank repurchase the designated securities on the business day following the initial transaction in consideration of
the payment of interest at the rate prevailing on the day of the transaction.
The Bank can purchase
up to $147.5 million in federal funds on an unsecured basis from its correspondents, against which there were no amounts outstanding
at December 31, 2018 and can borrow unsecured funds under one-way CDARS and ICS brokered deposits in the amount of $1.26 billion,
against which there was $62.3 million outstanding at December 31, 2018. The Bank also has a commitment at December 31, 2018 from
Promontory to place up to $700.0 million of brokered deposits from its IND program in amounts requested by the Bank, as compared
to an actual balance of $544.5 million at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018, the Bank was also eligible to make advances
from the FHLB up to $1.51 billion based on collateral at the FHLB, of which there was $55.0 million outstanding at December 31,
2018. The Bank may enter into repurchase agreements as well as obtain additional borrowing capabilities from the FHLB provided
adequate collateral exists to secure these lending relationships. The Bank also has a back-up borrowing facility through the Discount
Window at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“Federal Reserve Bank”). This facility, which amounts to approximately
$662.0 million, is collateralized with specific loan assets identified to the Federal Reserve Bank. It is anticipated that, except
for periodic testing, this facility would be utilized for contingency funding only.
On August 5, 2014,
the Company completed the sale of $70.0 million of its 5.75% subordinated notes, due September 1, 2024 (the “2024 Notes”).
The Notes were offered to the public at par. The 2024 Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes to the fullest extent
permitted under the Basel III Rule capital requirements. The net proceeds were approximately $68.8 million, which includes $1.2
million in deferred financing costs which is being amortized over the life of the 2024 Notes.
On July 26, 2016, the
Company completed the sale of $150.0 million of its 5.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes, due August 1, 2026 (the “2026
Notes”). The 2026 Notes were offered to the public at par and qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes to the fullest
extent permitted under the Basel III Rule capital requirements. The net proceeds were approximately $147.35 million, which includes
$2.6 million in deferred financing costs which is being amortized over the life of the 2026 Notes.
Note 13 – Warrants
On December 27, 2016,
378,495 net shares of common stock were issued upon the exercise in full of the warrant for 423,977 shares originally issued in
connection with the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock.
Note 14 – Income Taxes
The Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act (the “Tax Act”) enacted in December 2017 reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective
January 1, 2018. As a result of the Tax Act, we recorded a $14.6 million reduction in the value of our net deferred tax
asset, which was recorded as additional income tax expense during 2017. We had net deferred tax assets (deferred tax assets in
excess of deferred tax liabilities) of $33.0 million and $28.8 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively, which related primarily to our allowance for credit losses, and loan origination fees. Management believes it is
more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Federal and state income tax expense consists of the
following for the years ended December 31:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Current federal income tax expense
|
|
$
|
39,498
|
|
|
$
|
59,019
|
|
|
$
|
53,290
|
|
Current state income tax expense
|
|
|
15,931
|
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
Total current tax expense
|
|
|
55,429
|
|
|
|
66,530
|
|
|
|
67,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,634
|
)
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
|
|
(5,523
|
)
|
Deferred state income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(3,497
|
)
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
(5,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
51,932
|
|
|
$
|
85,504
|
|
|
$
|
61,395
|
|
Temporary timing differences
between the amounts reported in the financial statements and the tax bases of assets and liabilities result in deferred taxes.
The table below summarizes significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities utilizing federal corporate income
tax rates of 21% as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and 35% as of December 31, 2016:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
$
|
18,101
|
|
|
$
|
16,568
|
|
|
$
|
23,738
|
|
Deferred loan fees and costs
|
|
|
6,733
|
|
|
|
6,741
|
|
|
|
10,728
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
Other
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
34,920
|
|
|
|
29,950
|
|
|
|
49,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap derivatives
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Excess servicing
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
(1,260
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
|
|
(1,180
|
)
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
Net deferred income tax amount
|
|
$
|
33,327
|
|
|
$
|
28,770
|
|
|
$
|
48,220
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory federal
income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31 follows:
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
21.00
|
%
|
|
|
35.00
|
%
|
|
|
35.00
|
%
|
Increase (decrease) due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
Deferred tax adjustment related to Tax Act
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7.85
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tax exempt interest and dividend income
|
|
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.61
|
)
|
|
|
(0.98
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
Effective tax rates
|
|
|
25.43
|
%
|
|
|
46.04
|
%
|
|
|
38.59
|
%
|
The Company is currently
estimating that its effective tax rate for 2019 will be in the range of 25% to 26%. The net operating loss carry forward acquired
in conjunction with the Fidelity acquisition is subject to annual limits under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of $718
thousand and expires in 2027. The Company remains subject to examination for the years ending after December 31, 2014.
Note 15 – Net Income per Common
Share
The calculation of
net income per common share for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
152,276
|
|
|
$
|
100,232
|
|
|
$
|
97,707
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
34,306
|
|
|
|
34,139
|
|
|
|
33,587
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
4.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
152,276
|
|
|
$
|
100,232
|
|
|
$
|
97,707
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
34,306
|
|
|
|
34,139
|
|
|
|
33,587
|
|
Adjustment for common share equivalents
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Average common shares outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
34,443
|
|
|
|
34,321
|
|
|
|
34,181
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
4.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Note 16– Related Party Transactions
The Bank leases office
space from a limited liability company in which a trust for the benefit of an executive officer’s children has a 51% interest.
During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to lease office space for a second location with limited
liability companies in which an executive officer indirectly owns a majority interest. The Company leased additional space at this
location starting with the third quarter of 2017. The Company paid $2.2 million, $2.1 million, and $1.9 million excluding certain
pass-through expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
A director is a shareholder in the law firm which has provided, and continues to provide, legal services to
the Company and its subsidiaries. During 2018, the Company and its subsidiaries paid aggregate fees of $750 thousand to that firm.
Under the Director’s arrangement with his firm, he does not participate significantly in the profits or revenues resulting
from the provision of legal services to the Company and its subsidiaries.
The EagleBank Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit, seeks to improve the well being of our community by providing
financial support to local charitable organizations that help foster and strengthen vibrant, healthy, cultural and sustainable
communities. The Company paid $150 thousand, $145 thousand, and $139 thousand to the EagleBank Foundation for the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Certain directors and
executive officers have had loan transactions with the Company. Such loans were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially
the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with outsiders.
Please see further detail regarding Related Party Loans in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 17 – Stock-Based Compensation
The Company maintains
the 2016 Stock Plan (“2016 Plan”), the 2006 Stock Plan (“2006 Plan”) and the 2011 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (“2011 ESPP”).
In connection with
the acquisition of Virginia Heritage, the Company assumed the Virginia Heritage 2006 Stock Option Plan and the 2010 Long Term Incentive
Plan (the “Virginia Heritage Plans”).
No additional options
may be granted under the 2006 Plan or the Virginia Heritage Plans.
The Company adopted
the 2016 Plan upon approval by the shareholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting held on May 12, 2016. The 2016 Plan provides directors
and selected employees of the Bank, the Company and their affiliates with the opportunity to acquire shares of stock, through awards
of options, time vested restricted stock, performance-based restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. Under the 2016 Plan,
1,000,000 shares of common stock were initially reserved for issuance.
For awards that are
service based, compensation expense is being recognized over the service (vesting) period based on fair value, which for stock
option grants is computed using the Black-Scholes model. For restricted stock awards granted under the 2006 plan, fair value is
based on the average of the high and low stock price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. For restricted stock awards
granted under the 2016 plan, fair value is based on the Company’s closing price on the date of grant. For awards that are
performance-based, compensation expense is recorded based on the probability of achievement of the goals underlying the grant.
In February 2018, the
Company awarded 94,344 shares of time vested restricted stock to senior officers, directors, and certain employees. The shares
vest in three substantially equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
In February 2018, the
Company awarded senior officers a targeted number of 42,533 performance vested restricted stock units (PRSUs). The vesting of PRSUs
is 100% after three years with payouts based on threshold, target or maximum average performance targets over a three year period.
There are two performance metrics: 1) average annual earnings per share growth; and 2) average annual return on average assets.
Average annual return on average assets is measured against peer companies in the KBW Regional Banking Index. Average annual earnings
per share growth is measured compared to the Company’s budget.
The Company has unvested
restricted stock awards and PRSU grants of 272,679 shares at December 31, 2018. Unrecognized stock based compensation expense related
to restricted stock awards and PRSU grants totaled $8.5 million at December 31, 2018. At such date, the weighted-average period
over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 1.74 years.
The following tables
summarize the unvested restricted stock awards at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Perfomance Awards
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Unvested at beginning
|
|
|
62,338
|
|
|
$
|
50.45
|
|
|
|
33,226
|
|
|
$
|
42.60
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
42,533
|
|
|
|
60.45
|
|
|
|
36,523
|
|
|
|
57.49
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,913
|
)
|
|
|
50.28
|
|
|
|
(2,520
|
)
|
|
|
41.93
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,891
|
)
|
|
|
54.70
|
|
Unvested at end
|
|
|
98,958
|
|
|
$
|
54.76
|
|
|
|
62,338
|
|
|
$
|
50.45
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Time Vested Awards
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Unvested at beginning
|
|
|
164,043
|
|
|
$
|
53.57
|
|
|
|
262,966
|
|
|
$
|
33.60
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
94,344
|
|
|
|
60.45
|
|
|
|
91,097
|
|
|
|
62.70
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(7,132
|
)
|
|
|
56.48
|
|
|
|
(2,360
|
)
|
|
|
49.52
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(77,534
|
)
|
|
|
49.67
|
|
|
|
(187,660
|
)
|
|
|
30.07
|
|
Unvested at end
|
|
|
173,721
|
|
|
$
|
58.93
|
|
|
|
164,043
|
|
|
$
|
53.57
|
|
Below is a summary
of stock option activity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018
,
2017 and 2016. The information excludes restricted
stock units and awards.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
143,224
|
|
|
$
|
9.13
|
|
|
|
216,859
|
|
|
$
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
298,740
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
49.49
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(108,201
|
)
|
|
|
7.17
|
|
|
|
(72,535
|
)
|
|
|
8.19
|
|
|
|
(77,144
|
)
|
|
|
14.48
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
34.47
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
|
15.48
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
(6,637
|
)
|
|
|
12.87
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
34,123
|
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
143,224
|
|
|
$
|
9.13
|
|
|
|
216,859
|
|
|
$
|
8.80
|
|
The following summarizes
information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018. The information excludes restricted stock units and awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Outstanding:
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
$5.76
|
|
$10.72
|
|
|
22,024
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
$10.73
|
|
$11.40
|
|
|
5,089
|
|
|
|
11.17
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
$11.41
|
|
$24.86
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
$24.87
|
|
$49.91
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
|
|
47.91
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,123
|
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Exercisable:
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5.76
|
|
$10.72
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.73
|
|
$11.40
|
|
|
5,089
|
|
|
|
11.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
$11.41
|
|
$24.86
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
$24.87
|
|
$49.91
|
|
|
4,850
|
|
|
|
47.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,274
|
|
|
$
|
21.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the assumptions as shown in the table below used for grants during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016. There were no grants of stock options during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
24.23
|
%
|
Weighted-Average volatility
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
24.23
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
Weighted-average fair value (grant date)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
14.27
|
|
The total intrinsic
value of outstanding stock options was $1.2 million and $7.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018 and 2017. The total fair
value of stock options vested was $80 thousand, $71 thousand and $66 thousand, for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense related to stock options totaled $17 thousand at December 31, 2018. At such date, the weighted-average
period over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 1.54 years.
Cash proceeds, tax
benefits and intrinsic value related to total stock options exercised is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
$
|
776
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
955
|
|
Tax benefits realized from stock compensation
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
Approved by shareholders
in May 2011, the 2011 ESPP reserved 550,000 shares of common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends) for issuance to employees.
Whole shares are sold to participants in the plan at 85% of the lower of the stock price at the beginning or end of each quarterly
offering period. The 2011 ESPP is available to all eligible employees who have completed at least one year of continuous employment,
work at least 20 hours per week and at least five months a year. Participants may contribute a minimum of $10 per pay period to
a maximum of $6,250 per offering period or $25,000 annually (not to exceed more than 10% of compensation per pay period). At December
31, 2018, the 2011 ESPP had 387,805 shares reserved for issuance.
Included in salaries
and employee benefits in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Company recognized $6.5 million, $5.6 million
and $6.9 million in stock-based compensation expense for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is
recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards.
Note 18 – Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a qualified
401(k) Plan which covers all employees who have reached the age of 21 and have completed at least one month of service as defined
by the Plan. The Company makes contributions to the Plan based on a matching formula, which is reviewed annually. For the years
2018, 2017, and 2016, the Company recognized $894 thousand, $1.2 million, and $1.1 million in expense associated with this benefit,
respectively. These amounts are included in salaries and employee benefits in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 19 – Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan
The Bank has entered
into Supplemental Executive Retirement and Death Benefit Agreements (the “SERP Agreements”) with certain of the Bank’s
executive officers other than Mr. Paul, which upon the executive’s retirement, will provide for a stated monthly payment
for such executive’s lifetime subject to certain death benefits described below. The retirement benefit is computed as a
percentage of each executive’s projected average base salary over the five years preceding retirement, assuming retirement
at age 67. The SERP Agreements provide that (a) the benefits vest ratably over six years of service to the Bank, with the executive
receiving credit for years of service prior to entering into the SERP Agreement (b) death, disability and change-in-control shall
result in immediate vesting, and (c) the monthly amount will be reduced if retirement occurs earlier than age 67 for any reason
other than death, disability or change-in-control. The SERP Agreements further provide for a death benefit in the event the retired
executive dies prior to receiving 180 monthly installments, paid either in a lump sum payment or continued monthly installment
payments, such that the executive’s beneficiary has received payment(s) sufficient to equate to a cumulative 180 monthly
installments.
The SERP Agreements
are unfunded arrangements maintained primarily to provide supplemental retirement benefits and comply with Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code. The Bank financed the retirement benefits by purchasing fixed annuity contracts with four insurance carriers
in 2013 totaling $11.4 million that have been designed to provide a future source of funds for the lifetime retirement benefits
of the SERP Agreements. The primary impetus for utilizing fixed annuities is a substantial savings in compensation expenses for
the Bank as opposed to a traditional SERP Agreement. The annuity contracts accrued $81 thousand and $47 thousand of income for
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which were included in other noninterest income on the Consolidated Statement
of Operations. The cash surrender value of the annuity contracts was $12.4 million at December 31, 2018 and was included in other
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded benefit expense
accruals of $686 thousand and $410 thousand respectively for this post retirement benefit.
Upon death of a named
executive, the annuity contract related to such executive terminates. The Bank has purchased additional bank owned life insurance
contracts, which would effectively finance payments (up to a 15 year certain amount) to the executives’ named beneficiaries.
Note 20 – Financial Instruments
with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Various commitments
to extend credit are made in the normal course of banking business. Letters of credit are also issued for the benefit of customers.
These commitments are subject to loan underwriting standards and geographic boundaries consistent with the Company’s loans
outstanding.
Commitments to extend
credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments
are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Loan commitments outstanding
and lines and letters of credit at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Unfunded loan commitments
|
|
$
|
2,228,689
|
|
|
$
|
2,267,774
|
|
Unfunded lines of credit
|
|
|
90,283
|
|
|
|
96,477
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
83,162
|
|
|
|
68,723
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,402,134
|
|
|
$
|
2,432,974
|
|
Because most of the
Company’s business activity is with customers located in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, a geographic concentration
of credit risk exists within the loan portfolio, the performance of which will be influenced by the economy of the region.
The Bank maintains
a reserve for the potential repurchase of residential mortgage loans, which amounted to $45 thousand at December 31, 2018 and $73
thousand at December 31, 2017. These amounts are included in other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Changes in the balance of the reserve are a component of other expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The reserve is available to absorb losses on the repurchase of loans sold related to document and other fraud, early payment default
and early payoff. Through December 31, 2018, no reserve charges have occurred related to fraud.
The Company enters
into interest rate lock commitments, which are commitments to originate loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined
prior to funding and the customers have locked into that interest rate. The residential mortgage division either locks in the loan
and rate with an investor and commits to deliver the loan if settlement occurs under best efforts or commits to deliver the locked
loan in a binding mandatory delivery program with an investor. Certain loans under rate lock commitments are covered under forward
sales contracts of mortgage backed securities as a hedge of any interest rate risk. Forward sales contracts of mortgage backed
securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest rate lock commitments
and commitments to deliver loans to investors are considered derivatives. The market value of interest rate lock commitments and
best efforts contracts are not readily ascertainable with precision because they are not actively traded in stand-alone markets.
The Company determines the fair value of rate lock commitments and delivery contracts by measuring the fair value of the underlying
asset, which is impacted by current interest rates while taking into consideration the probability that the rate lock commitments
will close or will be funded. These transactions are further detailed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 21 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
The Company has various
financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments that may require future cash payments. Except for its
loan commitments, as shown in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the following table shows details on these fixed
and determinable obligations as of December 31, 2018 in the time period indicated.
|
|
Within One
|
|
|
One to
|
|
|
Three to
|
|
|
Over Five
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Deposits without a stated maturity (1)
|
|
$
|
5,646,886
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,646,886
|
|
Time deposits (1)
|
|
|
893,445
|
|
|
|
396,942
|
|
|
|
37,012
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,327,399
|
|
Borrowed funds (2)
|
|
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
250,413
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
8,435
|
|
|
|
15,311
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
|
|
66,742
|
|
Outside data processing (3)
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
8,091
|
|
|
|
7,630
|
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
24,061
|
|
George Mason sponsorship (4)
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
8,475
|
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
D.C. United (5)
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
Non-Compete agreement (6)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
LIHTC investments (7)
|
|
|
6,111
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
14,989
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,591,259
|
|
|
$
|
430,871
|
|
|
$
|
61,096
|
|
|
$
|
262,317
|
|
|
$
|
7,345,543
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes accrued interest payable at December 31, 2018.
|
|
(2)
|
Borrowed funds include customer repurchase agreements, and other short-term and long-term borrowings.
|
|
(3)
|
The Bank has outstanding obligations under its current core data processing contract that expire
in March 2025 and two other vendor arrangements that relate to network infrastructure and data center services, one expires in
July 2020 and the other expires in December 2019.
|
|
(4)
|
The Bank has the option of terminating the George Mason agreement at the end of contract years
10 and 15 (that is, effective June 30, 2025 or June 30, 2030). Should the Bank elect to exercise its right to terminate the George
Mason contract, contractual obligations would decrease $3.5 million and $3.6 million for the first option period (years 11-15)
and the second option period (16-20), respectively.
|
|
(5)
|
Marketing sponsorship agreement with D.C. United
|
|
(6)
|
Non-compete agreement with a retired Director.
|
|
(7)
|
Low Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”) expected payments for unfunded affordable
housing commitments.
|
In the normal course
of its business, the Company is involved in litigation arising from banking, financial, and other activities it conducts. Management,
after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will
have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, operating results or liquidity.
Note 22 – Regulatory Matters
The Company and Bank
are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts
and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting, and other factors.
Quantitative measures
established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and Bank to maintain amounts and ratios (set forth in
the table below) of Total capital, Tier 1 capital and CET1 (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined),
and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined), referred to as the Leverage Ratio. Management believes, as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, that the Company and Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and Bank
as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the table below:
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum Required For
|
|
Corrective Action
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Regulations *
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|
$
|
1,007,438
|
|
|
|
12.49
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,147,151
|
|
|
|
14.23
|
%
|
|
|
6.375
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|
|
1,297,427
|
|
|
|
16.08
|
%
|
|
|
1,217,140
|
|
|
|
15.10
|
%
|
|
|
9.875
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|
|
1,007,438
|
|
|
|
12.49
|
%
|
|
|
1,147,151
|
|
|
|
14.23
|
%
|
|
|
7.875
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
1,007,438
|
|
|
|
12.10
|
%
|
|
|
1,147,151
|
|
|
|
13.78
|
%
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|
$
|
845,123
|
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
969,250
|
|
|
|
12.91
|
%
|
|
|
5.750
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|
|
1,129,954
|
|
|
|
15.02
|
%
|
|
|
1,033,554
|
|
|
|
13.76
|
%
|
|
|
9.250
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|
|
845,123
|
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
|
|
969,250
|
|
|
|
12.91
|
%
|
|
|
7.250
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
845,123
|
|
|
|
11.45
|
%
|
|
|
969,250
|
|
|
|
13.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
*
Applies to Bank only
Bank and holding company
regulations, as well as Maryland law, impose certain restrictions on dividend payments by the Bank, as well as restricting extensions
of credit and transfers of assets between the Bank and the Company. At December 31, 2018, the Bank could pay dividends to the parent
to the extent of its earnings so long as it maintained required capital ratios.
Note 23 – Other Comprehensive
Income
The following table
presents the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
(4,279
|
)
|
|
$
|
(438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,841
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Total unrealized loss
|
|
|
(4,376
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(3,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
Total unrealized gain
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
$
|
(2,903
|
)
|
|
$
|
(378
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
(1,319
|
)
|
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
|
$
|
(840
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
Total unrealized loss
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
Total unrealized gain
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
1,106
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
(3,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,280
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
Total unrealized loss
|
|
|
(4,994
|
)
|
|
|
(1,998
|
)
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
(2,947
|
)
|
|
|
(2,018
|
)
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
Total unrealized gain
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
(1,116
|
)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
$
|
(5,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,572
|
)
|
The following table
presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Available For Sale
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
(3,131
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,381
|
|
|
$
|
(1,750
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
|
|
(3,841
|
)
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
(2,035
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
Net other comprehensive income during period
|
|
|
(3,913
|
)
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
(2,525
|
)
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
(7,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,769
|
|
|
$
|
(4,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
(426
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,381
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
Net other comprehensive income during period
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
(3,131
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,381
|
|
|
$
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
1,041
|
|
|
$
|
(850
|
)
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
|
|
|
(2,280
|
)
|
|
|
(934
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
Net other comprehensive income during period
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
(2,572
|
)
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
(1,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
(426
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,381
|
)
|
The following table
presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Details about Accumulated Other
|
|
Amount Reclassified from
|
|
|
Affected Line Item in
|
Comprehensive Income Components
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
the Statement Where
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
|
Net Income is Presented
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on sale of investment securities
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment securities
|
Interest income (expense) derivative deposits
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
Interest expense on deposits
|
Interest expense derivative borrowings
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
Interest expense on short-term borrowings
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
Tax expense
|
Total Reclassifications for the Period
|
|
$
|
490
|
|
|
$
|
(651
|
)
|
|
$
|
(642
|
)
|
|
Net Income
|
Note 24 – Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of an
asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction
occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability.
In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach
and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 820,
“Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures,”
establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy
is as follows:
|
Level 1
|
Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical
assets or liabilities; also includes certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government and agency securities actively traded in
over-the-counter markets.
|
|
Level 2
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated
by observable market data; also includes derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with observable
market inputs or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain
U.S. Government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans held
for sale.
|
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market
activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar
techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation;
also includes observable inputs for single dealer nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data. This category
generally includes certain private equity investments, retained interests from securitizations, and certain collateralized debt
obligations.
|
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair
Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents
the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
(Fair Value)
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. agency securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
256,345
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
256,345
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
472,231
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
472,231
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,769
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,769
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,576
|
|
|
|
9,576
|
|
Other equity investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
797,326
|
|
|
$
|
10,023
|
|
|
$
|
807,349
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. agency securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
195,984
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
195,984
|
|
Residential mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
317,836
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
317,836
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
62,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
62,057
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,673
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
13,173
|
|
Other equity investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,096
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,096
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
614,902
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
616,663
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Investment securities
available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available.
If quoted prices are not available, fair value is measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques
such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other
factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange such as the New York Stock
Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds.
Level 2 securities include U.S. agency debt securities, mortgage backed securities issued by Government Sponsored Entities (“GSE’s”)
and municipal bonds. Securities classified as Level 3 include securities in less liquid markets, the carrying amounts approximate
the fair value.
Loans held for sale
:
The Company has elected to carry loans held for sale at fair value. This election reduces certain timing differences in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations and better aligns with the management of the portfolio from a business perspective. Fair value is derived
from secondary market quotations for similar instruments. Gains and losses on sales of residential mortgage loans are recorded
as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Gains and losses on sales of multifamily FHA
securities are recorded as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As such, the Company
classifies loans subjected to fair value adjustments as Level 2 valuation.
The following table
summarizes the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance for loans held for sale measured
at fair value as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Principal Balance
|
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
19,254
|
|
|
$
|
18,797
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
FHA mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Principal Balance
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
25,096
|
|
|
$
|
24,674
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
FHA mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
No residential mortgage
loans held for sale were 90 or more days past due or on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
Interest rate swap
derivatives:
These derivative instruments consist of forward starting interest rate swap agreements, which are accounted for
as cash flow hedges under ASC 815. The Company’s derivative position is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and
is valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry and that use actively quoted or observable market
input values from external market data providers and/or non-binding broker-dealer quotations. The fair value of the derivatives
is determined using discounted cash flow models. These models’ key assumptions include the contractual terms of the respective
contract along with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, yield curves, nonperformance risk and volatility.
Derivative contracts are executed with a Credit Support Annex, which is a bilateral agreement that requires collateral postings
when the market value exceeds certain threshold limits. These agreements protect the interests of the Company and its counterparties
should either party suffer credit rating deterioration.
Credit Risk Participation
Agreements: The Company enters into credit risk participation agreements (“RPAs”) with institutional counterparties,
under which the Company assumes its pro-rata share of the credit exposure associated with a borrower’s performance related
to interest rate derivative contracts. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or liability
exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers’ credit spread to that exposure. Total expected exposure
incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from using observable inputs, such as yield
curves and volatilities. Accordingly, RPAs fall within Level 2.
The following is a
reconciliation of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level
3):
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
1,718
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
Realized gain included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Reclass from level 2
|
|
|
8,076
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,076
|
|
Principal redemption
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
9,794
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
10,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Realized loss included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
Principal redemption
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
1,718
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
1,832
|
|
Realized loss included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Principal redemption
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
1,718
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
Realized loss included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Principal redemption
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Securities classified
as Level 3 include securities in less liquid markets, the carrying amount approximate the fair value. The securities consist of
$9.8 million in corporate bonds and equity investments in the form of common stock of two local banking companies which are not
publicly traded, and for which the carrying amount approximates fair value.
Mortgage banking
derivatives:
The Company relies on a third-party pricing service to value its mortgage banking derivative financial assets
and liabilities, which the Company classifies as a Level 3 valuation. The external valuation model to estimate the fair value of
its interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale includes grouping the interest rate lock
commitments by interest rate and terms, applying an estimated pull-through rate based on historical experience, and then multiplying
by quoted investor prices determined to be reasonably applicable to the loan commitment groups based on interest rate, terms, and
rate lock expiration dates of the loan commitment groups. The Company also relies on an external valuation model to estimate the
fair value of its forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans (i.e., an estimate of what the Company would receive or
pay to terminate the forward delivery contract based on market prices for similar financial instruments), which includes matching
specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments against applicable investor pricing.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring
Basis
The Company measures
certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the following is a general description of the methods used to value such
assets.
Impaired loans
:
The Company considers a loan impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the original contractual terms of the note agreement, including both principal and interest. Management has determined that
nonaccrual loans and loans that have had their terms restructured in a troubled debt restructuring meet this impaired loan definition.
For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent
loans, which the Company classifies as a Level 3 valuation.
Other real estate
owned
: Other real estate owned is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair value is based upon independent
market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral, which the Company
classifies as a Level 3 valuation. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
(Fair Value)
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,338
|
|
|
$
|
3,338
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,937
|
|
|
|
18,937
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,131
|
|
|
|
5,131
|
|
Real estate mortgage - residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
32,778
|
|
|
$
|
32,778
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
(Fair Value)
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,266
|
|
|
$
|
2,266
|
|
Income producing - commercial real estate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
Real estate mortgage - residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
Construction - commercial and residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31,
2017
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
19,370
|
|
|
$
|
19,370
|
|
Loans
The Company does not
record loans at fair value on a recurring basis; however, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for
loan loss is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management
measures impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 310,
“Receivables.”
The fair value of impaired loans is estimated
using one of several methods, including the collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value,
and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring a specific allowance represent loans for which the fair value of
expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investment in such loans. At December 31, 2018, substantially all of the
Company’s impaired loans were evaluated based upon the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, impaired
loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy.
When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records
the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral
is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring
Level 3.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company discloses
fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value, whether or not such financial
instruments are recognized on the balance sheet. Fair value is the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in
a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation, and is best evidenced by quoted market
price, if one exists.
Quoted market prices, if available,
are shown as estimates of fair value. Because no quoted market prices exist for a portion of the Company’s financial instruments,
the fair value of such instruments has been derived based on management’s assumptions with respect to future economic conditions,
the amount and timing of future cash flows and estimated discount rates. Different assumptions could significantly affect these
estimates. Accordingly, the net realizable value could be materially different from the estimates presented below. In addition,
the estimates are only indicative of individual financial instrument values and should not be considered an indication of the fair
value of the Company taken as a whole.
The following methods
and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each category of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate
value:
Cash due from banks
and federal funds sold:
For cash and due from banks and federal funds sold the carrying amount approximates fair value.
Interest bearing
deposits with other banks:
For interest bearing deposits with other banks the carrying amount approximates fair value.
Investment securities:
For these instruments, fair values are based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is
measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows,
adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions.
Federal Reserve
and Federal Home Loan Bank stock:
The carrying amounts approximate the fair values at the reporting date.
Loans held for sale:
As the Company has elected the fair value option, the fair value of loans held for sale is the carrying value and is based on commitments
outstanding from investors as well as what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics
for residential mortgage loans held for sale since such loans are typically committed to be sold (servicing released) at a profit.
The fair value of multifamily FHA loans held for sale is the carrying value and is based on commitments outstanding from investors
as well as what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics for multifamily FHA loans
held for sale since such loans are typically committed to be securitized and sold (servicing retained) at a profit.
Loans:
The loan
portfolio is valued using an exit price notion. The present value of cash flows projection is established for each loan in the
portfolio projecting contractual payments, default adjusted payments, cash flows in the event of default (including deferred timing
of recoveries), and pre-payments. These expected cash flows are then discounted to present value using the note interest rate and
an established market rate which, if different from the note rate, allows the Bank to isolate the amount above or below par a potential
acquirer would pay to acquire the Bank’s portfolio.
Bank owned life
insurance:
The fair value of bank owned life insurance is the current cash surrender value, which is the carrying value.
Annuity investment:
The fair value of the annuity investments is the carrying amount at the reporting date.
Mortgage banking
derivatives:
The Company enters into interest rate lock commitments with prospective residential mortgage borrowers. These
commitments are carried at fair value based on the fair value of the underlying mortgage loans which are based on market data.
These commitments are classified as Level 3 in the fair value disclosures, as the valuations are based on market unobservable inputs.
The Company hedges the risk of the overall change in the fair value of loan commitments to borrowers by selling forward contracts
on securities of GSEs. These forward settling contracts are classified as Level 3, as valuations are based on market unobservable
inputs. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.
Credit Risk Participation
Agreements:
The Company enters into credit risk participation agreements (“RPAs”) with institutional counterparties,
under which the Company assumes its pro-rata share of the credit exposure associated with a borrower’s performance related
to interest rate derivative contracts. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or liability
exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers’ credit spread to that exposure. Total expected
exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from using observable inputs,
such as yield curves and volatilities. Accordingly, RPAs fall within Level 2.
Interest rate swap
derivatives:
These derivative instruments consist of forward starting interest rate swap agreements, which are accounted for
as cash flow hedges. The Company’s derivative position is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and is valued using
models generally accepted in the financial services industry and that use actively quoted or observable market input values from
external market data providers and/or non-binding broker-dealer quotations. The fair value of the derivatives is determined using
discounted cash flow models. These models’ key assumptions include the contractual terms of the respective contract along
with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, yield curves, nonperformance risk and volatility. Derivative contracts
are executed with a Credit Support Annex, which is a bilateral ratings-sensitive agreement that requires collateral postings when
the market value exceeds certain threshold limits. These agreements protect the interests of the Company and its counterparties
should either party suffer a credit rating deterioration.
Noninterest bearing
deposits:
The fair value of these deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, since generally accepted
accounting standards do not permit an assumption of core deposit value.
Interest bearing
deposits:
The fair value of interest bearing transaction, savings, and money market deposits with no defined maturity is the
amount payable on demand at the reporting date, since generally accepted accounting standards do not permit an assumption of core
deposit value.
Certificates of
deposit:
The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates
at which similar deposits with remaining maturities would be accepted.
Customer repurchase
agreements:
The carrying amount approximate the fair values at the reporting date.
Borrowings:
The carrying amount for variable rate borrowings approximate the fair values at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed rate
FHLB advances and the subordinated notes are estimated by computing the discounted value of contractual cash flows payable at current
interest rates for obligations with similar remaining terms. The fair value of variable rate FHLB advances is estimated to be carrying
value since these liabilities are based on a spread to a current pricing index.
Off-balance sheet
items:
Management has reviewed the unfunded portion of commitments to extend credit, as well as standby and other letters of
credit, and has determined that the fair value of such instruments is equal to the fee, if any, collected and unamortized for the
commitment made.
The estimated fair
values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
6,773
|
|
|
$
|
6,773
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,773
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
11,934
|
|
|
|
11,934
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,934
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with other banks
|
|
|
303,157
|
|
|
|
303,157
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
303,157
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
784,139
|
|
|
|
784,139
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
774,345
|
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
23,506
|
|
|
|
23,506
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,506
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans
(1)
|
|
|
6,921,503
|
|
|
|
6,921,048
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,921,048
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
73,441
|
|
|
|
73,441
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
73,441
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Annuity investment
|
|
|
12,417
|
|
|
|
12,417
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,417
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,104,220
|
|
|
|
2,104,220
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,104,220
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,542,666
|
|
|
|
3,542,666
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,542,666
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,327,399
|
|
|
|
1,325,209
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,325,209
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Customer repurchase agreements
|
|
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
217,196
|
|
|
|
218,006
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
218,006
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
7,445
|
|
|
$
|
7,445
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,445
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
15,767
|
|
|
|
15,767
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,767
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with other banks
|
|
|
167,261
|
|
|
|
167,261
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
167,261
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
589,268
|
|
|
|
589,268
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
587,550
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
36,324
|
|
|
|
36,324
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36,324
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
25,096
|
|
|
|
25,096
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,096
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans
(2)
|
|
|
6,346,770
|
|
|
|
6,381,213
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,381,213
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
60,947
|
|
|
|
60,947
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60,947
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Annuity investment
|
|
|
11,632
|
|
|
|
11,632
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,632
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,982,912
|
|
|
|
1,982,912
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,982,912
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,041,563
|
|
|
|
3,041,563
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,041,563
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
829,509
|
|
|
|
829,886
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
829,886
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Customer repurchase agreements
|
|
|
76,561
|
|
|
|
76,561
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,561
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
541,905
|
|
|
|
533,162
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
533,162
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage banking derivatives
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
(1)
|
Carrying
amount is net of unearned income and the allowance for credit losses. In accordance with the prospective adoption of ASU No. 2016-01,
the fair value of loans was measured using an exit price notion.
|
|
(2)
|
Carrying
amount is net of unearned income and the allowance for credit losses. The fair value of loans was measured using an entry price
notion.
|
Note
25 – Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)
The
following table reports quarterly results of operations (unaudited) for 2018, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
2018
|
|
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
105,581
|
|
|
$
|
102,360
|
|
|
$
|
96,296
|
|
|
$
|
89,049
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
23,869
|
|
|
|
21,069
|
|
|
|
18,086
|
|
|
|
13,269
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
81,712
|
|
|
|
81,291
|
|
|
|
78,210
|
|
|
|
75,780
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,441
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
79,112
|
|
|
|
78,850
|
|
|
|
76,560
|
|
|
|
73,811
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
6,089
|
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
5,304
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
31,687
|
|
|
|
31,614
|
|
|
|
32,289
|
|
|
|
31,121
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
53,514
|
|
|
|
52,876
|
|
|
|
49,824
|
|
|
|
47,994
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
13,197
|
|
|
|
13,928
|
|
|
|
12,528
|
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
40,317
|
|
|
|
38,948
|
|
|
|
37,296
|
|
|
|
35,715
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
40,317
|
|
|
$
|
38,948
|
|
|
$
|
37,296
|
|
|
$
|
35,715
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (1)
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
Diluted (1)
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
86,526
|
|
|
$
|
82,370
|
|
|
$
|
79,344
|
|
|
$
|
75,794
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
11,167
|
|
|
|
10,434
|
|
|
|
9,646
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
75,359
|
|
|
|
71,936
|
|
|
|
69,698
|
|
|
|
66,894
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
4,087
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
71,272
|
|
|
|
70,015
|
|
|
|
68,132
|
|
|
|
65,497
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
9,496
|
|
|
|
6,784
|
|
|
|
7,023
|
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
29,803
|
|
|
|
29,516
|
|
|
|
30,001
|
|
|
|
29,232
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
50,965
|
|
|
|
47,283
|
|
|
|
45,154
|
|
|
|
42,335
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
35,396
|
|
|
|
17,409
|
|
|
|
17,382
|
|
|
|
15,318
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
15,569
|
|
|
|
29,874
|
|
|
|
27,772
|
|
|
|
27,017
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
15,569
|
|
|
$
|
29,874
|
|
|
$
|
27,772
|
|
|
$
|
27,017
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (1)
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
Diluted (1)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
75,795
|
|
|
$
|
72,431
|
|
|
$
|
69,772
|
|
|
$
|
67,807
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
8,771
|
|
|
|
7,703
|
|
|
|
5,950
|
|
|
|
5,216
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
67,024
|
|
|
|
64,728
|
|
|
|
63,822
|
|
|
|
62,591
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
64,912
|
|
|
|
62,440
|
|
|
|
59,934
|
|
|
|
59,548
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
7,014
|
|
|
|
6,405
|
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
29,780
|
|
|
|
28,838
|
|
|
|
28,295
|
|
|
|
28,103
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
42,146
|
|
|
|
40,007
|
|
|
|
39,214
|
|
|
|
37,735
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
16,429
|
|
|
|
15,484
|
|
|
|
15,069
|
|
|
|
14,413
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
25,717
|
|
|
|
24,523
|
|
|
|
24,145
|
|
|
|
23,322
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
25,717
|
|
|
$
|
24,523
|
|
|
$
|
24,145
|
|
|
$
|
23,322
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (1)
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
Diluted (1)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
(1)
Earnings per common share are calculated on a quarterly basis and may not be additive to the year to date amount.
Note
26 – Parent Company Financial Information
Condensed
financial information for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (Parent Company only) is as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
72,783
|
|
|
$
|
77,883
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,249,704
|
|
|
|
1,088,670
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,214
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,330,801
|
|
|
$
|
1,171,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,564
|
|
|
$
|
4,625
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
217,296
|
|
|
|
216,905
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
221,860
|
|
|
|
221,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
528,380
|
|
|
|
520,304
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
584,494
|
|
|
|
431,544
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,275
|
)
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
1,108,941
|
|
|
|
950,438
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
1,330,801
|
|
|
$
|
1,171,968
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest and dividends
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
Gain on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Total Income
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
11,916
|
|
|
|
11,916
|
|
|
|
7,493
|
|
Legal and professional
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Directors compensation
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
$
|
14,687
|
|
|
$
|
13,632
|
|
|
$
|
8,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Income Tax (Benefit) and Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(14,009
|
)
|
|
|
(13,398
|
)
|
|
|
(8,586
|
)
|
Income Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(2,892
|
)
|
|
|
(4,689
|
)
|
|
|
(2,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(11,117
|
)
|
|
|
(8,709
|
)
|
|
|
(5,667
|
)
|
Equity in Undistributed Income of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
163,393
|
|
|
|
108,941
|
|
|
|
103,374
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
152,276
|
|
|
$
|
100,232
|
|
|
$
|
97,707
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
152,276
|
|
|
$
|
100,232
|
|
|
$
|
97,707
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
used in operating activities:
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary
|
|
|
(163,393
|
)
|
|
|
(108,941
|
)
|
|
|
(103,374
|
)
|
Net tax benefits from stock compensation
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(2,508
|
)
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(13,576
|
)
|
|
|
(9,426
|
)
|
|
|
(4,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Investment in subsidiary (net)
|
|
|
6,892
|
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
(124,636
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
6,892
|
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
(124,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance in long-term borrowings
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
147,586
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
149,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(5,100
|
)
|
|
|
(8,678
|
)
|
|
|
20,869
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
77,883
|
|
|
|
86,561
|
|
|
|
65,692
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
|
|
$
|
72,783
|
|
|
$
|
77,883
|
|
|
$
|
86,561
|
|