Table of
Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
|
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-51233
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
83-0423116
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
1521 WESTBRANCH DRIVE, SUITE 200
MCLEAN, VIRGINIA 22102
(Address of principal executive office)
(703) 287-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,
if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12
b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
x
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company
o
.
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes
o
No
x
.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of
shares of the issuers Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of August 3,
2009 was 22,080,133.
Table of Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments (Cost 6/30/09:
$30,328; Cost 3/31/09: $134,836)
|
|
$
|
26,961
|
|
$
|
94,740
|
|
Control investments (Cost 6/30/09: $144,908; Cost
3/31/09: $150,081)
|
|
149,509
|
|
166,163
|
|
Affiliate investments (Cost 6/30/09: $63,807; Cost
3/31/09: $64,028)
|
|
50,539
|
|
53,027
|
|
Total investments at fair value (Cost 6/30/09:
$239,043; Cost 3/31/09: $348,945)
|
|
227,009
|
|
313,930
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
84,577
|
|
7,236
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
952
|
|
1,500
|
|
Due from Custodian
|
|
1,416
|
|
2,706
|
|
Deferred financing fees
|
|
1,387
|
|
1,167
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
237
|
|
172
|
|
Other assets
|
|
212
|
|
132
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
315,790
|
|
$
|
326,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
Fee due to Administrator (Refer to Note 4)
|
|
173
|
|
179
|
|
Fee due to Adviser (Refer to Note 4)
|
|
238
|
|
187
|
|
Short -term loan
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit
|
|
46,940
|
|
110,265
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
159
|
|
127
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
112,860
|
|
112,041
|
|
NET ASSETS
|
|
$
|
202,930
|
|
$
|
214,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 22,080,133 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009
and March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
264,697
|
|
257,361
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation of investment portfolio
|
|
(12,034
|
)
|
(35,015
|
)
|
Net unrealized depreciation of derivative
|
|
(11
|
)
|
(53
|
)
|
Accumulated net investment loss
|
|
(49,744
|
)
|
(7,513
|
)
|
TOTAL NET ASSETS
|
|
$
|
202,930
|
|
$
|
214,802
|
|
NET ASSETS PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
9.19
|
|
$
|
9.73
|
|
THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3
Table of Contents
GLADSTONE
INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF
INVESTMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
Company (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (2)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CONTROL/NON-AFFILIATE INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Syndicated Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HMTBP Acquisition II Corp.
|
|
Service - aboveground
storage tanks
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.3%, Due
5/2014) (3)
|
|
$
|
3,828
|
|
$
|
3,657
|
|
Interstate
Fibernet, Inc.
|
|
Service - provider of voice
and data telecommunications services
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.6%, Due
7/2013) (3)
|
|
9,781
|
|
7,605
|
|
Survey Sampling, LLC
|
|
Service -
telecommunications-based sampling
|
|
Senior Term Debt (9.5%, Due
5/2011) (3)
|
|
2,422
|
|
2,404
|
|
Subtotal
- Syndicated Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,031
|
|
$
|
13,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-syndicated Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Greetings
Corporation
|
|
Manufacturing and design
greeting cards
|
|
Senior Notes (7.4%, Due
6/2016) (3)
|
|
$
|
3,043
|
|
$
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-Dry, LLC
|
|
Service - basement
waterproofer
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$380 available (10.5%, Due 10/2008) (5)
|
|
370
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (13.0%,
Due 5/2014) (5)
|
|
6,664
|
|
6,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (13.0%,
Due 5/2014) (5)
|
|
3,920
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
10,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,328
|
|
$
|
26,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTROL INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Stucki Holding Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing railroad
freight car products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.8%, Due
3/2012)
|
|
$
|
9,101
|
|
$
|
9,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (7.1%, Due
3/2012) (6)
|
|
9,900
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13%, Due 3/2014)
|
|
8,586
|
|
8,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
4,386
|
|
5,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
130
|
|
10,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,103
|
|
43,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acme Cryogenics, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing manifolds and pipes for industrial gasses
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (11.5%, Due 3/2013)
|
|
14,500
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
6,984
|
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,554
|
|
22,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASH Holdings Corp.
|
|
Retail and Service school buses and parts
|
|
Revolver, $1,500 available
(non-accrual, Due 3/2010) (5)
|
|
500
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (non-accrual, Due 1/2012) (5)
|
|
5,937
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,941
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cavert II Holdings Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing bailing wire
|
|
Senior Term Debt (8.3%, Due
10/2012)
|
|
4,875
|
|
4,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.0%,
Due 10/2012) (6)
|
|
2,700
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13.0%, Due 10/2014)
|
|
4,671
|
|
4,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
4,110
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
69
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
17,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase II Holdings Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing traffic doors
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$105 available (4.3%, Due 7/2010) (7)
|
|
3,395
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (8.8%, Due
3/2011)
|
|
8,525
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (12.0%,
Due 3/2011) (6)
|
|
7,640
|
|
7,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13.0%, Due 3/2013)
|
|
6,168
|
|
6,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
6,961
|
|
9,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
61
|
|
3,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,750
|
|
38,346
|
|
4
Table
of Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF
INVESTMENTS (Continued)
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
Company (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (2)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTROL INVESTMENTS
(Continued)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country Club Enterprises,
LLC
|
|
Service golf cart
distribution
|
|
Subordinated Term Debt
(14.0%, Due 11/2014)
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galaxy Tool Holding Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing aerospace
and plastics
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13.5%, Due 8/2013)
|
|
17,250
|
|
17,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
4,112
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,410
|
|
18,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
144,908
|
|
$
|
149,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATE INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danco Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing machining
and sheet metal work
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$2,100 available (9.3%, Due 10/2010) (5)
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (9.3%, Due
10/2012) (5)
|
|
4,312
|
|
4,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (11.5%,
Due 4/2013) (5)
|
|
9,067
|
|
8,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
2,500
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mathey
Investments, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing pipe-cutting
and pipe-fitting equipment
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$463 available (10.0%, Due 3/2011) (5) (7)
|
|
537
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.0%,
Due 3/2013) (5)
|
|
2,375
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (13.5%,
Due 3/2014) (5)(6)
|
|
7,227
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,916
|
|
10,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble Logistics, Inc.
|
|
Service aftermarket auto
parts delivery
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$0 available (4.3%, Due 12/2009) (5)
|
|
2,000
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (9.3%, Due
12/2011) (5)
|
|
6,227
|
|
4,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.5%,
Due 12/2011) (5) (6)
|
|
7,300
|
|
5,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,959
|
|
11,723
|
|
Quench Holdings Corp.
|
|
Service sales, installation
and service of water coolers
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (10.0%, Due 8/2013) (5)
|
|
8,000
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
2,950
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
7,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tread Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing storage and
transport equipment
|
|
Senior Term Debt (12.5%,
Due 5/2013) (5)
|
|
5,000
|
|
4,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
750
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
3
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
5,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,807
|
|
$
|
50,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
239,043
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
5
Table
of Contents
(1)
|
Certain of the listed securities are issued by affiliate(s) of
the indicated portfolio company.
|
(2)
|
Percentage represents the weighted average interest rates in effect at
June 30, 2009, and due date represents the contractual maturity date.
|
(3)
|
Security valued using internally-developed, risk-adjusted discounted
cash flow methodologies as of June 30, 2009.
|
(4)
|
Security is non-income producing.
|
(5)
|
Fair value based on opinions of value submitted by Standard &
Poors Securities Evaluations, Inc. at June 30, 2009.
|
(6)
|
Last Out Tranche of senior debt, meaning if the portfolio company is
liquidated, the holder of the Last Out Tranche is paid after the senior debt.
|
(7)
|
Terms of agreement were refinanced and revolver limit was reduced.
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6
Table
of Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF
INVESTMENTS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Company (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (2)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CONTROL/NON-AFFILIATE
INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Syndicated Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activant
Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Service - enterprise
software and services
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.4%, Due
5/2013) (7)
|
|
$
|
1,658
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Advanced Homecare
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Service - home health
nursing services
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.3%, Due
8/2014) (7)
|
|
2,947
|
|
2,019
|
|
Aeroflex, Inc.
|
|
Service - provider of
highly specialized electronic equipment
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.5%, Due
8/2014) (7)
|
|
1,892
|
|
1,083
|
|
Compsych Investments Corp.
|
|
Service - employee
assistance programs
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.8%, Due
2/2012) (7)
|
|
3,083
|
|
2,405
|
|
CRC Health Group, Inc.
|
|
Service - substance abuse
treatment
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.5%, Due
2/2012) (7)
|
|
7,772
|
|
5,026
|
|
Critical Homecare
Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Service - home therapy and
respiratory treatment
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.8%, Due
1/2012) (7)
|
|
4,359
|
|
3,632
|
|
Generac Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - standby power
products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.0%, Due
11/2013) (7)
|
|
6,799
|
|
3,820
|
|
Graham Packaging Holdings
Company
|
|
Manufacturing - plastic
containers
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.6%, Due
10/2011) (7)
|
|
3,348
|
|
2,813
|
|
HMTBP Acquisition II Corp.
|
|
Service - aboveground
storage tanks
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.5%, Due
5/2014) (3)
|
|
3,838
|
|
2,942
|
|
Huish Detergents, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing - household
cleaning products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.3%, Due
4/2014) (7)
|
|
1,966
|
|
1,690
|
|
Hyland Software, Inc.
|
|
Service - provider of
enterprise content management software
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.6%, Due
7/2013) (7)
|
|
3,912
|
|
2,990
|
|
Interstate
Fibernet, Inc.
|
|
Service - provider of voice
and data telecommunications services
|
|
Senior Term Debt (5.2%, Due
7/2013) (3)
|
|
9,804
|
|
6,698
|
|
KIK Custom
Products, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing - consumer
products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.8%, Due
5/2014) (7)
|
|
3,941
|
|
1,862
|
|
Kronos, Inc.
|
|
Service - workforce
management solutions
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.5%, Due
6/2014) (7)
|
|
1,899
|
|
1,291
|
|
Local TV Finance, LLC
|
|
Service - television
station operator
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.5%, Due
5/2013) (7)
|
|
985
|
|
359
|
|
LVI Services, Inc.
|
|
Service - asbestos and mold
remediation
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.5%, Due
11/2010) (7)
|
|
5,916
|
|
2,673
|
|
MedAssets, Inc.
|
|
Service - pharmaceuticals
and healthcare GPO
|
|
Senior Term Debt (5.1%, Due
10/2013) (7)
|
|
3,517
|
|
3,129
|
|
Network Solutions, LLC
|
|
Service - internet domain
solutions
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.2%, Due
3/2014) (7)
|
|
8,672
|
|
5,506
|
|
Open Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Service - software
outsourcing for financial institutions
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.3%, Due
1/2014) (7)
|
|
2,648
|
|
1,206
|
|
Ozburn-Hessey Holding Co.
LLC
|
|
Service third party
logistics
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.4%, Due
8/2012) (7)
|
|
7,523
|
|
5,975
|
|
Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC
|
|
Manufacturing - branded
food products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.2%, Due
4/2014) (7)
|
|
1,950
|
|
1,570
|
|
PTS Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - drug
delivery and packaging technologies
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.8%, Due
4/2014) (7)
|
|
6,877
|
|
4,264
|
|
QTC Acquisition, Inc.
|
|
Service - outsourced
disability evaluations
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.8%, Due
11/2012) (7)
|
|
1,763
|
|
1,356
|
|
Radio Systems Corporation
|
|
Service - design electronic
pet containment products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.3%, Due
9/2013) (7)
|
|
1,644
|
|
1,308
|
|
Rally Parts, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing - aftermarket
motorcycle parts and accessories
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.5%, Due
11/2013) (7)
|
|
2,458
|
|
1,073
|
|
SafeNet, Inc.
|
|
Service chip encryption
products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.2%, Due
4/2014) (7)
|
|
2,949
|
|
2,008
|
|
SGS
International, Inc.
|
|
Service - digital imaging
and graphics
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.0%, Due
12/2011) (7)
|
|
1,475
|
|
978
|
|
Survey Sampling, LLC
|
|
Service -
telecommunications-based sampling
|
|
Senior Term Debt (9.5%, Due
5/2011) (3)
|
|
2,596
|
|
2,441
|
|
Triad Laboratory Alliance,
LLC
|
|
Service - regional medical
laboratories
|
|
Senior Term Debt (4.5%, Due
12/2011) (7)
|
|
4,120
|
|
3,432
|
|
Wastequip, Inc.
|
|
Service - process and
transport waste materials
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.8%, Due
2/2013) (7)
|
|
2,893
|
|
1,530
|
|
WaveDivision Holdings, LLC
|
|
Service - cable
|
|
Senior Term Debt (3.5%, Due
6/2014) (7)
|
|
1,905
|
|
1,575
|
|
West Corporation
|
|
Service - business process
outsourcing
|
|
Senior Term Debt (2.9%, Due
10/2013) (7)
|
|
3,323
|
|
2,293
|
|
Subtotal - Senior Syndicated Loans
|
|
|
|
$
|
120,432
|
|
$
|
81,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Syndicated Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Greetings
Corporation
|
|
Manufacturing and design -
greeting cards
|
|
Senior Notes (7.4%, Due
6/2016) (3) (10)
|
|
$
|
3,043
|
|
$
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-Dry, LLC
|
|
Service - basement
waterproofer
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$300 available (10.5%, Due 10/2009) (5)
|
|
450
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.0%,
Due 5/2014) (5)
|
|
6,681
|
|
6,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.0%,
Due 5/2014) (5)
|
|
3,930
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,361
|
|
10,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,836
|
|
$
|
94,740
|
|
7
Table
of Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF
INVESTMENTS (Continued)
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Company (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (2)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTROL
INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Stucki Holding Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - railroad
freight car products
|
|
Senior Term Debt (5.0%, Due
3/2012)
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (7.2%, Due
3/2012) (6)
|
|
10,450
|
|
10,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13%, Due 3/2014)
|
|
8,586
|
|
8,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
4,387
|
|
5,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
130
|
|
14,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,799
|
|
49,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acme Cryogenics, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing - manifolds
and pipes for industrial gasses
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (11.5%, Due 3/2013)
|
|
14,500
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
6,984
|
|
6,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,554
|
|
21,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASH Holdings Corp.
|
|
Retail and Service - school
buses and parts
|
|
Revolver, $400 available
(non-accrual, Due 3/2010) (5)
|
|
1,600
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (non-accrual, Due 1/2012) (5)
|
|
5,937
|
|
2,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,041
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cavert II Holding Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - bailing
wire
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$3,000 available (8.0%, Due 10/2010) (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (8.3%, Due
10/2012)
|
|
5,687
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.0%,
Due 10/2012) (6)
|
|
2,950
|
|
2,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13.0%, Due 10/2014)
|
|
4,671
|
|
4,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
4,110
|
|
4,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
69
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,487
|
|
18,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase II Holdings Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - traffic
doors
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$1,105 available (4.5%, Due 7/2010)
|
|
3,395
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (8.8%, Due
3/2011)
|
|
8,800
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (12.0%,
Due 3/2011) (6)
|
|
7,680
|
|
7,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13.0%, Due 3/2013)
|
|
6,168
|
|
6,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
6,961
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
61
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,065
|
|
40,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country Club Enterprises,
LLC
|
|
Service - golf cart
distribution
|
|
Subordinated Term Debt
(14.0% Due 11/2014)
|
|
7,000
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
3,725
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,725
|
|
10,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galaxy Tool Holding Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - aerospace
and plastics
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (13.5%, Due 8/2013)
|
|
17,250
|
|
17,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
4,112
|
|
4,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
48
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,410
|
|
22,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,081
|
|
$
|
166,163
|
|
8
Table of Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULES OF
INVESTMENTS (Continued)
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Company (1)
|
|
Industry
|
|
Investment (2)
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFFILIATE
INVESTMENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danco Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - machining
and sheet metal work
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$2,600 available (9.3%, Due 10/2010) (5) (9)
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (9.3%, Due
10/2012) (5)
|
|
4,837
|
|
4,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (11.5%,
Due 4/2013) (5)
|
|
9,113
|
|
8,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
2,500
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,853
|
|
16,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mathey
Investments, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing -
pipe-cutting and pipe-fitting equipment
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$1,463 available (9.0%, Due 3/2011) (5) (9)
|
|
537
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (9.0%, Due
3/2013) (5)
|
|
2,375
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (12.0%,
Due 3/2014) (5)(6)
|
|
7,227
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
500
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
277
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,916
|
|
10,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble Logistics, Inc.
|
|
Service - aftermarket auto
parts delivery
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility,
$-0- available (6.5%, Due 12/2009) (5)
|
|
2,000
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (10.5%,
Due 12/2011) (5)
|
|
5,727
|
|
4,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt (12.5%,
Due 12/2011) (5)(6)
|
|
7,300
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (18.0%, Due 12/2011)
|
|
500
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (14.0%, Due 5/2009)
|
|
150
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4)
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,109
|
|
11,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quench Holdings Corp.
|
|
Service - sales,
installation and service of water coolers
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term
Debt (10.0%, Due 8/2013) (5)
|
|
8,000
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
2,950
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
8,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tread Corp.
|
|
Manufacturing - storage and
transport equipment
|
|
Senior Term Debt (12.5%,
Due 5/2013) (5)
|
|
5,000
|
|
4,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (4)
|
|
750
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants (4)
|
|
3
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
6,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,028
|
|
$
|
53,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
348,945
|
|
$
|
313,930
|
|
(1)
|
Certain of the listed securities are issued by affiliate(s) of
the indicated portfolio company.
|
(2)
|
Percentage represents the weighted average interest rates in effect at
March 31, 2009, and due date represents the contractual maturity date.
|
(3)
|
Security valued using internally-developed, risk-adjusted discounted
cash flow methodologies as of March 31, 2009.
|
(4)
|
Security is non-income producing.
|
(5)
|
Fair value based on opinions of value submitted by Standard &
Poors Securities Evaluations, Inc. at March 31, 2009.
|
(6)
|
Last Out Tranche of senior debt, meaning if the portfolio company is liquidated,
the holder of the Last Out Tranche is paid after the senior debt.
|
(7)
|
Security valued based on the sale price obtained at or subsequent to
March 31, 2009, since the security was sold.
|
(8)
|
Revolver was sold to third party subsequent to March 31, 2009.
|
(9)
|
Terms of agreement were refinanced and revolver limit was reduced.
|
(10)
|
The Company received non-cash assumption of $3,043 worth of senior
notes received from American Greetings Corporation for the Companys
agreement to the RPG bankruptcy settlement in which the Company received the
aforementioned notes and $909 in cash and recognized a loss on the settlement
of approximately $601.
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
9
Table of Contents
GLADSTONE
INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
investments
|
|
$
|
1,029
|
|
$
|
2,324
|
|
Control investments
|
|
2,777
|
|
2,569
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
1,278
|
|
1,111
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
5,084
|
|
6,028
|
|
Other income
|
|
85
|
|
10
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
5,169
|
|
6,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan servicing fee (Refer to Note 4)
|
|
1,068
|
|
1,254
|
|
Base management fee (Refer to Note 4)
|
|
313
|
|
426
|
|
Administration fee (Refer to Note 4)
|
|
173
|
|
235
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
702
|
|
1,102
|
|
Amortization of deferred finance costs
|
|
314
|
|
139
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
201
|
|
131
|
|
Stockholder related costs
|
|
82
|
|
100
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
57
|
|
53
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
51
|
|
47
|
|
Other
|
|
64
|
|
74
|
|
Expenses before credit from Adviser
|
|
3,025
|
|
3,561
|
|
Credits to base management fee (Refer to Note 4)
|
|
(301
|
)
|
(574
|
)
|
Total expenses net of credit to base management fee
|
|
2,724
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME
|
|
2,445
|
|
3,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED (LOSS) GAIN ON INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss on sale of Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
investments
|
|
(34,605
|
)
|
(1,718
|
)
|
Realized loss on termination of derivative
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation of
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments
|
|
36,728
|
|
4,465
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation of Control investments
|
|
(11,481
|
)
|
(4,867
|
)
|
Net unrealized depreciation of Affiliate investments
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
(5,415
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation of derivative
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
Net loss on investments
|
|
(11,635
|
)
|
(7,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
$
|
(9,190
|
)
|
$
|
(4,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares
|
|
22,080,133
|
|
19,943,346
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
10
Table of
Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
2,445
|
|
$
|
3,051
|
|
Realized loss on sale of investments
|
|
(34,605
|
)
|
(1,718
|
)
|
Realized loss on termination of derivative
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
portfolio
|
|
22,981
|
|
(5,817
|
)
|
Unrealized appreciation of derivative
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations
|
|
(9,190
|
)
|
(4,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
41,290
|
|
Shelf offering registration costs
|
|
(32
|
)
|
(637
|
)
|
Distributions to stockholders
|
|
(2,650
|
)
|
(4,858
|
)
|
Net (decrease) increase in net assets from capital
transactions
|
|
(2,682
|
)
|
35,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (decrease) increase in net assets
|
|
(11,872
|
)
|
31,311
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
214,802
|
|
206,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
202,930
|
|
$
|
237,756
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
11
Table of
Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) in net assets resulting from
operations
|
|
$
|
(9,190
|
)
|
$
|
(4,484
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (decrease) increase in
net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
(650
|
)
|
(8,978
|
)
|
Principal repayments of investments
|
|
6,725
|
|
3,493
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments
|
|
69,222
|
|
13,246
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of
investment portfolio
|
|
(22,981
|
)
|
5,817
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation of derivative
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
Net realized loss on sales of investments
|
|
34,605
|
|
1,718
|
|
Net realized loss on termination of derivative
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premiums and discounts
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Amortization of deferred finance costs
|
|
314
|
|
139
|
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
|
548
|
|
322
|
|
Decrease in due from custodian
|
|
1,290
|
|
1,504
|
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid assets
|
|
(65
|
)
|
333
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
(52
|
)
|
(79
|
)
|
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
(933
|
)
|
(331
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in administration fee payable to
Administrator (See Note 4)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
27
|
|
Increase in base management fee payable to Adviser
(See Note 4)
|
|
126
|
|
236
|
|
Decrease in loan servicing fee payable to Adviser
(See Note 4)
|
|
(75
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
32
|
|
11
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
143,921
|
|
12,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
|
(32
|
)
|
40,652
|
|
Borrowings from line of credit
|
|
24,200
|
|
52,750
|
|
Repayments of line of credit
|
|
(87,525
|
)
|
(68,300
|
)
|
Purchase of derivative
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred finance costs
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
Distributions paid
|
|
(2,650
|
)
|
(4,858
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
(66,580
|
)
|
20,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
77,341
|
|
33,220
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
7,236
|
|
9,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD
|
|
$
|
84,577
|
|
$
|
42,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PAID DURING PERIOD FOR
INTEREST
|
|
$
|
840
|
|
$
|
1,248
|
|
CASH PAID DURING PERIOD FOR TAXES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH ACTIVITIES
(1)
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On April 10, 2009, the Company made an investment disbursement to
Cavert II Holding Corp. for approximately $850 on their revolving line of
credit, and the proceeds were used to make the next four quarterly payments
due under normal amortization for both their senior term A and senior term B
loans in a non-cash transaction.
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
12
Table of
Contents
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Per Share Data (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
9.73
|
|
$
|
12.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from investment operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (2)
|
|
0.11
|
|
0.15
|
|
Realized loss on sale of investments (2)
|
|
(1.57
|
)
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments (2)
|
|
1.04
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Total from investment operations
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
(0.24
|
)
|
Total distributions (3)
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of shelf offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelf registration offering costs
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Effect on distribution of stock rights offering
after record date (4)
|
|
|
|
(1.21
|
)
|
Total effect of shelf offering
|
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
9.19
|
|
$
|
10.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
4.83
|
|
6.43
|
|
Total Return (5)
|
|
35.24
|
%
|
-29.57
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
22,080,133
|
|
22,080,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
202,930
|
|
$
|
237,756
|
|
Average net assets (6)
|
|
210,188
|
|
242,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit
|
|
$
|
46,940
|
|
$
|
129,285
|
|
Asset coverage ratio (7)
|
|
532
|
%
|
284
|
%
|
Asset coverage per unit (8)
|
|
$
|
5,323
|
|
$
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
(9) (10)
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
5.87
|
%
|
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets
(9) (11)
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
4.93
|
%
|
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets
(9)
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
5.03
|
%
|
(1)
|
|
Based on actual shares outstanding at the end of the corresponding
period.
|
(2)
|
|
Based on weighted average basic per share data.
|
(3)
|
|
Distributions are determined based on taxable income calculated in
accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from amounts determined
under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
|
(4)
|
|
The effect of distributions from the stock rights offering after the
record date represents the effect on net asset value of issuing additional
shares after the record date of a distribution.
|
(5)
|
|
Total return equals the change in the market value of the Companys
common stock from the beginning of the period, taking into account dividends
reinvested in accordance with the terms of our dividend reinvestment plan.
|
(6)
|
|
Calculated using the average of the balance of net assets at the end
of each month of the reporting period.
|
(7)
|
|
As a business development company, the Company is generally required
to maintain a ratio of at least 200% of total assets, less all liabilities
and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total borrowings.
|
(8)
|
|
Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of the
Companys total consolidated assets, less all liabilities and indebtedness
not represented by senior securities, to the aggregate amount of senior
securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in
terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness.
|
(9)
|
|
Amounts are annualized.
|
(10)
|
|
Ratio of expenses to average net assets is computed using expenses
before credits from the Adviser.
|
(11)
|
|
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets is computed using total
expenses net of credits to the management fee.
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
13
Table of Contents
GLADSTONE
INVESTMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA AND AS
OTHERWISE INDICATED)
JUNE 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE
1. ORGANIZATION
Gladstone Investment Corporation (the Company) was incorporated under
the General Corporation Laws of the State of Delaware on February 18, 2005
and completed an initial public offering on June 22, 2005. The Company is
a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to
be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). In addition, the Company has elected to
be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company (RIC) under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Companys
investment objectives are to achieve a high level of current income and capital
gains by investing in debt and equity securities of established private
businesses.
Gladstone Business Investment, LLC (Business Investment) a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was established on August 11, 2006
for the sole purpose of owning the Companys portfolio of investments in
connection with its line of credit. The financial statements of Business
Investment are consolidated with those of the Company.
The Company is externally managed by Gladstone Management Corporation
(the Adviser), an unconsolidated affiliate of the Company.
NOTE
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Unaudited
Interim Financial Statements
Interim financial
statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures
accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are
omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of
normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair statement of financial
statements for the interim periods have been included. The current periods
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately
may be achieved for the year. The interim financial statements and notes
thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on June 2,
2009.
The year-end
condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial
statements, but does not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments that
are both readily convertible to cash and have a maturity of three months or
less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Items classified as cash
equivalents include temporary investments in commercial paper, United States
Treasury securities and money-market funds. Cash and cash equivalents are
carried at cost which approximates fair value.
Investment
Valuation Policy
The Company
carries its investments at market value to the extent that market quotations
are readily available and reliable, and otherwise at fair value, as determined
in good faith by its Board of Directors.
In determining the fair value of the Companys investments, the Adviser
has established an investment valuation policy (the Policy). The Policy is approved by the Companys Board
of Directors and each quarter the Board of Directors reviews whether the
Adviser has applied the Policy consistently and votes whether or not to accept
the recommended valuation of the Companys investment portfolio.
The Company uses generally accepted valuation techniques to value its
portfolio unless the Company has specific information about the value of an
investment to determine otherwise. From time to time the Company may accept an
appraisal of a business in which the Company holds securities. These appraisals
are expensive and occur infrequently but provide a third-party valuation
opinion that may differ in results, techniques and scopes used to value the
Companys investments. When these
specific third-party appraisals are engaged or accepted, the Company uses such
appraisals to value the investment the Company has in that business if it is
determined that the appraisals are the best estimate of fair value.
The Policy, which
is summarized below, applies to publicly-traded securities, securities for
which a limited market exists, and securities for which no market exists.
14
Table of
Contents
Publicly-traded
securities:
The
Company determines the value of publicly-traded securities based on the closing
price for the security on the exchange or securities market on which it is
listed and primarily traded on the valuation date. To the extent that the Company owns
restricted securities that are not freely tradable, but for which a public
market otherwise exists, the Company will use the market value of that security
adjusted for any decrease in value resulting from the restrictive feature.
Securities
for which a limited market exists:
The Company values securities that are not traded on
an established secondary securities market, but for which a limited market for
the security exists, such as certain participations in, or assignments of,
syndicated loans, at the quoted price.
In valuing these assets, the Company assesses trading activity in an
asset class and evaluates variances in prices and other market insights to
determine if any available quote prices are reliable. If the Company concludes that quotes based on
active markets or trading activity may be relied upon, firm bid prices are
requested; however, if a firm bid price is unavailable, the Company bases the
value of the security upon the indicative bid price offered by the respective
originating syndication agents trading desk, or secondary desk, on or near the
valuation date. To the extent that the Company uses the indicative bid price as
a basis for valuing the security, the Adviser may take further steps to
consider additional information to validate that price in accordance with the
Policy.
In the event these limited markets become illiquid
such that market prices are no longer readily available, the Company will value
its syndicated loans using estimated net present values of the future cash
flows or discounted cash flows (DCF). The use of a DCF methodology follows
that prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff
Position No. 157-3,
Determining the
Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active
(FSP No. 157-3), which provides guidance on the use of a reporting
entitys own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount
rates when relevant observable inputs, such as quotes in active markets, are
not available. When relevant observable market data does not exist, the
alternative outlined in the FSP No. 157-3 is the use of valuing
investments based on DCF. For the
purposes of using DCF to provide fair value estimates, the Company considered
multiple inputs such as a risk-adjusted discount rate that incorporates
adjustments that market participants would make both for nonperformance and
liquidity risks. As such, the Company
developed a modified discount rate approach that incorporates risk premiums
including, among others, increased probability of default, or higher loss given
default, or increased liquidity risk.
The DCF valuations applied to the syndicated loans
provide an estimate of what the Company believes a market participant would pay
to purchase a syndicated loan in an active market, thereby establishing a fair
value. The Company will continue to
apply the DCF methodology in illiquid markets until quoted prices are available
or are deemed reliable based on trading activity. As of June 30, 2009, the portion of the
Companys investment portfolio that was valued using DCF was approximately
$16.2 million, or 7.2% of the fair value of its total portfolio of investments.
Securities
for which no market exists:
The valuation methodology for securities for which no
market exists falls into three categories: (1) portfolio investments
comprised solely of debt securities; (2) portfolio investments in
controlled companies comprised of a bundle of securities, which can include
debt or equity securities, or both; and (3) portfolio investments in
non-controlled companies comprised of a bundle of investments, which can
include debt or equity securities, or both.
(1)
Portfolio investments comprised
solely of debt securities:
Debt securities that are not publicly traded on an
established securities market, or for which a limited market does not exist (Non-Public
Debt Securities), and that are issued by portfolio companies where the Company
has no equity, or equity-like securities, are fair valued in accordance with
the terms of the Policy, which utilizes opinions of value submitted to the
Company by Standard & Poors Securities Evaluations, Inc. (SPSE).
The Company may also submit paid in kind (PIK) interest to SPSE for their
evaluation when it is determined that PIK interest is likely to be received.
(2)
Portfolio investments in controlled
companies comprised of a bundle of investments, which can include debt or
equity securities, or both:
The fair value of these investments is determined
based on the total enterprise value of the portfolio company, or issuer,
utilizing a liquidity waterfall approach under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair
Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). For the Companys Non-Public Debt Securities
and equity or equity-like securities (e.g. preferred equity, equity, or other
equity-like securities) that are purchased together as part of a package, where
the Company has control or could gain control through an option or warrant
security, both the debt and equity securities of the portfolio investment would
exit in the mergers and acquisition market as the principal market, generally
through a sale or recapitalization of the portfolio company. In accordance with
SFAS No. 157, the Company applies the in-use premise of value which
assumes the debt and equity securities are sold together. Under this liquidity
waterfall approach, the Company first calculates the total enterprise value of
the issuer by incorporating some or all of the following factors to determine
the total enterprise value of the issuer:
·
the issuers ability to make payments;
·
the earnings of the issuer;
·
recent sales to third parties of similar
securities;
·
the comparison to publicly traded
securities; and
15
Table of
Contents
·
DCF or other pertinent factors.
In gathering the sales to third parties of similar securities, the
Company may reference industry statistics and use outside experts. Once the
Company has estimated the total enterprise value of the issuer, the Company
will subtract the value of all the debt securities of the issuer; which are
valued at the contractual principal balance. Fair values of these debt
securities are discounted for any shortfall of total enterprise value over the
total debt outstanding for the issuer. Once the values for all outstanding
senior securities (which include the debt securities) have been subtracted from
the total enterprise value of the issuer, the remaining amount, if any, is used
to determine the value of the issuers equity or equity like securities. If, in the Advisers judgment, the liquidity
waterfall approach does not accurately reflect the value of the debt component,
the Adviser may recommend that the Company use a valuation by SPSE, or if that
is unavailable, a DCF valuation technique.
(3)
Portfolio investments in
non-controlled companies comprised of a bundle of investments, which can
include debt or equity securities, or both:
The Company values Non-Public Debt Securities that are
purchased together with equity or equity-like securities from the same
portfolio company, or issuer, for which the Company does not control or cannot
gain control as of the measurement date, using a hypothetical secondary market
as the Companys principal market. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the
Company determines its fair value of these debt securities of non-control
investments assuming the sale of an individual debt security using the
in-exchange premise of value (as defined in SFAS No. 157). As such, the
Company estimates the fair value of the debt component using estimates of value
provided by SPSE and its own assumptions in the absence of observable market
data, including synthetic credit ratings, estimated remaining life, current
market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the
measurement date. For equity or equity-like securities of investments for which
the Company does not control or cannot gain control as of the measurement date,
the Company values the equity portion based principally on the total enterprise
value of the issuer, which is calculated using a liquidity waterfall approach.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, such
estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values that would
have been obtained had a ready market for the securities existed, and the
differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market environment
and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the
gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than
the valuations currently assigned. There is no single standard for determining
fair value in good faith, as fair value depends upon circumstances of each
individual case. In general, fair value is the amount that the Company might
reasonably expect to receive upon the current sale of the security in an
arms-length transaction in the securitys principal market.
Refer to Note 3
for additional information regarding fair value measurements and the Companys
adoption of SFAS No. 157.
Interest
and Dividend Income Recognition
Interest income,
adjusted for amortization of premiums and acquisition costs and for the
accretion of discounts, is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that
such amounts are expected to be collected. Generally, when a loan becomes 90
days or more past due or if the Companys qualitative assessment indicates that
the debtor is unable to service its debt or other obligations, the Company will
place the loan on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on
that loan until the borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to pay
contractual amounts due. However, the
Company remains contractually entitled to this interest. At June 30, 2009, one Control investment
was on non-accrual with a fair value of approximately $2.0 million, or 0.9% of
the fair value of all loans held in the Companys portfolio at June 30,
2009. At March 31, 2009, one
Control investment was on non-accrual with a fair value of approximately $2.6
million, or 0.8% of the fair value of all loans held in the Companys portfolio
at March 31, 2009. Conditional
interest, or a success fee, is recorded upon full repayment of a loan
investment. To date, the Company has not recorded any conditional interest.
Dividend income on preferred equity securities is accrued to the extent that
such amounts are expected to be collected and that the Company has the option
to collect such amounts in cash. To date, the Company has not accrued any
dividend income.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009,
the FASB approved the
FASB Accounting
Standards Codification
(
Codification
)
as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (
U.S. GAAP
)
which was launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not
change current U.S. GAAP but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative
U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular
topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will
be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the
Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. The Codification is effective for the Company during its
interim period ending September 30, 2009 and is not expected to have an
impact on its financial condition or results of operations. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact to its financial reporting
process of providing Codification references in its public filings.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
(SFAS No. 166).
SFAS No. 166 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity
(QSPE) from SFAS No. 140,
Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities
(SFAS No. 140) and removes the exception from
applying FASB Interpretation
16
Table
of Contents
No. 46R.
This statement also clarifies the requirements for isolation and limitations on
portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.
SFAS No. 166 is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning April 1,
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard
on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events
(SFAS No. 165). The subsequent events project was initiated
in an effort to incorporate accounting guidance that originated as auditing
standards into the body of authoritative literature issued by the FASB. Moving the accounting requirements out of the
auditing literature and into the accounting literature is consistent with the
FASBs objective to codify all authoritative U.S. accounting guidance related
to a particular topic in one place. It
also provided an opportunity to consider international convergence issues. The FASB has established general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Although there is new terminology, the
standard is based on the same principles as those that previously existed in
the auditing standards. The new
standard, which includes a required disclosure of the date through which an
entity has evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009.
The Companys adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material
impact on the reporting of its subsequent events.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 115-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
(FSP No. 115-2), which was issued to make the guidance on
other-than-temporary impairment more operational and to improve the
presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and
equity securities in the financial statements.
FSP No. 115-2 requires significant additional disclosures for both
annual and interim periods, including the amortized cost basis of
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt, the methodology and key imports
used to measure the credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment, and a
roll forward of amounts recognized in earnings for securities by major security
type. FSP No. 115-2 amends SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities
(SFAS No. 115) and FSP No. 115-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and
Its Application to Certain Investments
, to require that entities
identify major security classes consistent with how the securities are managed
based on the nature and risks of the security, and also expands, for disclosure
purposes, the list of major security types identified in SFAS No. 115. FSP
No. 115-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Companys
adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the reporting
of its subsequent events.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly
(FSP No. 157-4), which provides
additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157
when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has
significantly decreased and also provides guidance on identifying circumstances
that indicate a transaction is not orderly.
FSP No. 157-4 amends SFAS No. 157 to require entities to
disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used
to measure fair value together with any changes in valuation techniques and
related inputs during the period. FSP No. 157-4
also requires reporting entities to define major categories
for both debt and equity securities to be
major security types as described in paragraph 19 of SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities
. This requires
entities to provide disclosures on a more disaggregated basis than previously
had been required under SFAS No. 157.
FSP No. 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Companys adoption of this pronouncement
did not have a material impact on the reporting of its subsequent events.
NOTE
3. INVESTMENTS
In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 and the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on April 1,
2008. In part, SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities
measured at fair value. The new standard provides a consistent definition of
fair value that focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous,
market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. The standard also establishes
the following three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the
measurement date.
·
Level 1
inputs to the valuation methodology
are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets;
·
Level 2
inputs to the valuation methodology
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level
2 inputs are in those markets for which there are few transactions, the prices
are not current, little public information exists or instances where prices
vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers; and
·
Level 3
inputs to the valuation methodology are
unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs
are those inputs that reflect the Companys own assumptions that market
participants would use to price the asset or liability based upon the best
available information.
As of June 30,
2009, all of the Companys assets were valued using Level 3 inputs.
17
Table of
Contents
The following
table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30,
2009, by caption on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
assets and liabilities for each of the three levels of hierarchy established by
SFAS No. 157:
|
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported in Condensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets and Liabilities
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
26,961
|
|
$
|
26,961
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,509
|
|
149,509
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,539
|
|
50,539
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
Changes
in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The following
table provides a roll-forward in the changes in fair value during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 for all investments for which the Company determines
fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors. When a determination is made
to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy,
the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to
the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 financial instruments
typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable
components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated
to external sources). Accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below
include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part
of the valuation methodology.
Fair value measurements using
unobservable data inputs (Level 3)
|
|
Non-Control/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Affiliate
|
|
Control
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Investments
|
|
Investments
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair value as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
94,740
|
|
$
|
166,163
|
|
$
|
53,027
|
|
$
|
313,930
|
|
Total realized/unrealized (losses) gains (a)
|
|
2,123
|
|
(11,481
|
)
|
(2,266
|
)
|
(11,624
|
)
|
New investments, repayments, and settlements, net
|
|
(69,902
|
)
|
(5,173
|
)
|
(222
|
)
|
(75,297
|
)
|
Transfers in (out) of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
26,961
|
|
$
|
149,509
|
|
$
|
50,539
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
(a) Realized/unrealized
gains and losses are reported on the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
Investments
At June 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009, the Company held investments in Non-Control/Non-Affiliates
of approximately $27.0 million and $94.7 million, respectively, at fair value.
These investments were comprised primarily of syndicated loan participations of
senior notes of private companies and also non-syndicated loan investments
where the Company does not have a significant ownership interest in the
portfolio company. Included in Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments, at both June 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, were common stock warrants of one
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate company, which carried a nominal fair value. At June 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, the Companys investments, at fair value, in Non-Control/Non-Affiliates
represented approximately 13% and 44%, respectively, of the Companys net
assets.
During April and
May 2009, the Company sold 29 of its 32 senior syndicated loans held at March 31,
2009 (collectively, the Syndicated Loan Sales) for an aggregate of
approximately $69.2 million in cash proceeds and recorded a realized loss of
approximately $34.6 million in connection with these sales. These loans were
sold to pay down all unpaid principal and interest owed to Deutsche Bank, A.G.
(Deutsche Bank) under the Companys prior credit agreement.
Control
and Affiliate Investments
At June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company had
investments of approximately $153.0 million and $157.0 million, respectively,
at fair value, in revolving credit facilities, senior debt and subordinated
debt of 12 portfolio companies. In addition, at June 30 and March 31,
2009, the Company had invested approximately $47.1 million and $62.2 million,
respectively, in preferred and common equity of those companies. At June 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, the Companys investments in Control investments, at fair value,
represented approximately 74% and 77%, respectively, of the Companys net
assets. Also, at both June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Companys
investments, at fair value, in Affiliate investments represented approximately
25% of the Companys net assets.
18
Table of
Contents
Control
and Affiliate Investment Activity
On April 9, 2009, A. Stucki Holding Corp. refinanced a portion of
its senior term debt by making principal repayments of approximately $2.0
million, which represented the next three quarterly payments due under normal
amortization on both their senior term A ($1.6 million) and senior term B
($412) loans. Normal amortization is
expected to resume on April 1, 2010.
On April 9, 2009, ASH Holdings Corp. made a repayment of
approximately $1.1 million on its revolving line of credit, which reduced the
outstanding balance to $500.
On April 10, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to reduce
the available credit limit on Mathey Investment, Inc.s revolving line of
credit from $2.0 million to $1.0 million.
This was a non-cash transaction.
On April 10, 2009, the Company made an investment disbursement to
Cavert II Holding Corp. (Cavert) for approximately $850 on its revolving line
of credit, and the proceeds were used to make the next four quarterly payments
due under normal amortization for both its senior term A and senior term B loans
in a non-cash transaction. Normal
amortization on both of these loans is expected to resume on July 1,
2010. Subsequently, on April 17,
2009, Cavert repaid the outstanding $850 in principal plus accrued interest on
its revolving line of credit. The revolving
line of credit was then sold to a third party, the Royal Bank of Canada, for a
nominal fee.
On April 13, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to reduce
the available credit limit on Chase II Holdings Corp.s revolving line of
credit from $4.5 million to $3.5 million.
This was a non-cash transaction.
Investment
Concentrations
Approximately
50.1% of the aggregate fair value of the Companys investment portfolio at June 30,
2009 was comprised of senior debt, approximately 29.1% was senior subordinated
debt, and approximately 20.8% was preferred and common equity securities. At June 30,
2009, the Company had investments in 17 portfolio companies with an aggregate
fair value of $227.0 million, of which A. Stucki Holding Corp., Chase II Holdings
Corp. and Acme Cryogenics, Inc. collectively comprised $103.8 million, or
45.7% of the Companys total investment portfolio, at fair value. The following table outlines the Companys
investments by type at June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Senior Term Debt
|
|
$
|
121,609
|
|
$
|
113,779
|
|
$
|
230,861
|
|
$
|
185,161
|
|
Senior Subordinated Term Debt
|
|
72,112
|
|
66,135
|
|
72,762
|
|
66,576
|
|
Preferred & Common Equity Securities
|
|
45,322
|
|
47,095
|
|
45,322
|
|
62,193
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
239,043
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
$
|
348,945
|
|
$
|
313,930
|
|
Investments at
fair value consisted of the following industry classifications at June 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Total
Investments
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Aerospace and Defense
|
|
$
|
18,851
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
9.3
|
%
|
$
|
22,436
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
10.4
|
%
|
Automobile
|
|
8,981
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
4.4
|
%
|
14,436
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
6.7
|
%
|
Beverage, Food and Tobacco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
0.7
|
%
|
Broadcasting and
Entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
Buildings and Real Estate
|
|
10,740
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
5.3
|
%
|
10,709
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
5.0
|
%
|
Cargo Transport
|
|
11,723
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
5.8
|
%
|
13,324
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
6.2
|
%
|
Chemicals, Plastics and
Rubber
|
|
22,241
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
11.0
|
%
|
21,420
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
10.0
|
%
|
Containers, Packaging and
Glass
|
|
17,899
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
8.8
|
%
|
21,446
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
10.0
|
%
|
Diversified/Conglomerate
Manufacturing
|
|
53,496
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
26.4
|
%
|
56,944
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
26.5
|
%
|
Diversified/Conglomerate
Service
|
|
3,657
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
1.8
|
%
|
23,585
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
11.0
|
%
|
Electronics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,594
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
Healthcare, Education and
Childcare
|
|
7,691
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
3.8
|
%
|
33,605
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
15.6
|
%
|
Machinery
|
|
53,216
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
26.2
|
%
|
63,907
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
29.8
|
%
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
5,950
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
6,171
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
Personal, Food, and
Miscellaneous Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
Printing and Publishing
|
|
2,555
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.3
|
%
|
3,158
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
1.5
|
%
|
Telecommunications
|
|
10,009
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
4.9
|
%
|
9,139
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
4.3
|
%
|
Total
Investments
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
313,930
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
The investments at
fair value were included in the following geographic regions of the United
States at June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Mid-Atlantic
|
|
$
|
89,813
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
44.3
|
%
|
$
|
119,622
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
55.7
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
85,157
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
42.0
|
%
|
105,945
|
|
33.7
|
%
|
49.3
|
%
|
Northeast
|
|
9,404
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
4.6
|
%
|
17,525
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
8.2
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
25,504
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
12.6
|
%
|
40,512
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
18.9
|
%
|
West
|
|
17,131
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
8.4
|
%
|
30,326
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
14.1
|
%
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
227,009
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
313,930
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
19
Table of Contents
The geographic
region indicates the location of the headquarters for the Companys portfolio
companies. A portfolio company may have a number of other business locations in
other geographic regions.
Investment
Principal Repayments
The following
table summarizes the contractual principal repayment and maturity of the
Companys investment portfolio by fiscal year, assuming no voluntary
prepayments:
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
For the
remaining nine months ending March 31:
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
For the fiscal
year ending March 31:
|
|
2011
|
|
27,041
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
54,260
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
14,941
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
74,229
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
15,308
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
Total contractual repayments
|
|
$
|
193,737
|
|
|
|
Investments in equity securities
|
|
45,322
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premiums on debt securities
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
Total investments held at
June 30, 2009:
|
|
$
|
239,043
|
|
NOTE
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Investment
Advisory and Management Agreement
The Company has entered into an investment advisory and management
agreement with the Adviser (the Advisory Agreement), which is controlled by
the Companys chairman and chief executive officer. In accordance with the
Advisory Agreement, the Company pays the Adviser fees as compensation for its
services, consisting of a base management fee and an incentive fee. On July 8,
2009, the Companys Board of Directors approved the renewal of its Advisory
Agreement with the Adviser through August 31, 2010.
The Company pays the Adviser an annual base management fee of 2% of its
average gross assets, which is defined as total assets less uninvested cash and
cash equivalents resulting from borrowings calculated as of the end of the two
most recently completed quarters. The following tables summarize the management
fees and associated credits reflected in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits to base management fee
from Adviser:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee reduction for the waiver of 2% fee on senior
syndicated loans to 0.5% (1)
|
|
(183
|
)
|
(424
|
)
|
Credit for fees received by Adviser from the
portfolio companies
|
|
(118
|
)
|
(150
|
)
|
Credit to base management fee from
Adviser
|
|
(301
|
)
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net base management fee
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
(1)
The
Adviser voluntarily waived the annual 2.0% base management fee to 0.5% for
senior syndicated loan participations to the extent that proceeds resulting
from borrowings were used to purchase such syndicated loan participation.
Overall, the base management fee due to
the Adviser cannot exceed 2% of total assets (as reduced by cash and cash
equivalents pledged to creditors) during any given fiscal year.
Amounts included in Fee due to Adviser in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of assets and liabilities
were as follows:
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
Unpaid base management fee
due to Adviser
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
Unpaid loan servicing fee
due to Adviser
|
|
226
|
|
301
|
|
Total Fee due to Adviser
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
20
Table
of Contents
From
inception through June 30, 2009, the Company has not recorded any
income-based incentive fee.
Loan
Servicing and Portfolio Company Fees
The Adviser also
services the loans held by Business Investment, in return for which it receives
a 2.0% annual fee based on the monthly aggregate outstanding balance of loans
pledged under the Companys line of credit. Since the Company owns these loans,
all loan servicing fees paid to the Adviser are treated as reductions against
the 2.0% base management fee under the Advisory Agreement. Effective April, 2006, the Advisers board of
directors voluntarily reduced the annual servicing fee rate on the senior
syndicated loans to 0.5%. For the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded loan servicing
fees due to the Adviser of $1,068 and $1,254, respectively, all of which were
deducted against the 2.0% base management fee in order to derive the Base
management fee line item in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations. Under the Advisory
Agreement, the Adviser has also provided and continues to provide managerial
assistance and other services to the Companys portfolio companies and may
receive fees for services other than managerial assistance.
Administration
Agreement
The Company has
entered into an administration agreement (the Administration Agreement) with
Gladstone Administration, LLC (the Administrator), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Adviser. Under the Administration
Agreement, the Company pays separately for administrative services. The
Administration Agreement provides for payments equal to the Companys allocable
portion of its Administrators overhead expenses in performing its obligations
under the Administration Agreement including, but not limited to, rent for
employees of the Administrator, and its allocable portion of the salaries and
benefits expenses of the Companys chief financial officer, chief compliance
officer, treasurer and their respective staffs. The Companys allocable portion
of expenses is derived by multiplying the Administrators total allocable
expenses by the percentage of the Companys average total assets (the total
assets at the beginning of each quarter) in comparison to the average total
assets of all companies managed by the Adviser under similar agreements. On July 8,
2009, the Companys Board of Directors approved the renewal of its
Administration Agreement with the Administrator through August 31, 2010.
The Company recorded fees to the Administrator on the condensed
consolidated statements of operations of $173 and $235 for three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. As of June 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, $173 and $179, respectively, was unpaid and
included in Fee due to Administrator in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of assets and liabilities.
NOTE
5. LINE OF CREDIT
On April 14,
2009, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Business Investment,
entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement providing for a
$50.0 million revolving line of credit (the Credit Facility) arranged by
Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) as administrative agent. Key
Equipment Finance Inc. also joined the Credit Facility as a committed lender. In connection with entering into the Credit
Facility, the Company borrowed $43.8 million under the Credit Facility to make
a final payment in satisfaction of all unpaid principal and interest owed to
Deutsche Bank under the prior credit agreement.
The Credit Facility may be expanded up to $125.0 million through the
addition of other committed lenders to the facility. The Credit Facility matures on April 14,
2010, and if the facility is not renewed or extended by this date, all unpaid
principal and interest will be due and payable within one year of the maturity
date. Advances under the Credit Facility
generally bear interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate (subject to a minimum rate of
2%), plus 5% per annum, with a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum on undrawn
amounts.
Interest is
payable monthly during the term of the Credit Facility. After April 14,
2010, if the Credit Facility is not renewed, all principal collections from the
Companys loans are required to be used to pay outstanding principal under the
Credit Facility. Available borrowings are subject to various constraints
imposed under the Credit Facility, based on the aggregate loan balance pledged
by Business Investment.
The Credit
Facility contains covenants that require Business Investment to maintain its
status as a separate entity; prohibit certain significant corporate
transactions (such as mergers, consolidations, liquidations or dissolutions);
and restrict material changes to the Companys credit and collection policies.
The facility also limits payments on distributions to the aggregate net
investment income for the prior twelve months preceding April 2010. As of June 30,
2009, Business Investment was in compliance with all of the facility
covenants. Additionally, during the
three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159), specifically for the Credit
Facility. SFAS No. 159 requires
that the Company apply a fair value methodology to the Credit Facility as of June 30,
2009, which is the period that this liability became eligible under SFAS No. 159. Due to the nature of this Credit Facility
being a short term agreement and the fact that interest is based on a variable
interest rate, the Credit Facility has been fair valued at its approximate cost
basis as of June 30, 2009.
In conjunction
with entering into the Credit Facility, the Company amended a performance
guaranty which remains substantially similar to the form under the previous
credit facility. The performance guaranty requires the Company to maintain a
minimum net worth of $169 million plus 50% of all equity and subordinated debt
raised after April 14, 2009, to maintain asset coverage with respect to senior
securities representing indebtedness of at least 200%, in accordance with Section 18
of the 1940 Act, and to
21
Table of
Contents
maintain its
status as a BDC under the 1940 Act and as a RIC under the Code. As of June 30,
2009, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under the performance
guaranty.
NOTE
6. INTEREST RATE CAP AGREEMENT
In May 2009, the Company cancelled its interest rate cap agreement
with Deutsche Bank and entered into an interest rate cap agreement with
BB&T that will effectively limit the interest rate on a portion of the
borrowings under the line of credit pursuant to the terms of the Credit
Facility. The interest rate cap has a notional amount of $45 million at a cost
of approximately $40. At June 30, 2009, the interest rate cap agreement
had a fair market value of approximately $29. The Company records changes in
the fair market value of the interest rate cap agreement monthly based on the
current market valuation at month end as unrealized depreciation or
appreciation on derivative on the Companys consolidated statement of
operations. The interest rate cap agreement expires in April 2010. The
agreement provides that the Companys floating interest rate or cost of funds
on a portion of the portfolios borrowings will be capped at 9% when the LIBOR
rate is in excess of 9%.
The use of a cap involves risks that are different from those
associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. Cap agreements may
be considered to be illiquid. Although the Company will not enter into any such
agreements unless it believes that the other party to the transaction is
creditworthy, the Company does bear the risk of loss of the amount expected to
be received under such agreements in the event of default or bankruptcy of the
agreement counterparty.
NOTE
7. SHORT -TERM LOAN
On June 30,
2009, the Company purchased $83.0 million of short -term United States Treasury
securities through Jefferies & Company, Inc. (Jefferies). The securities were purchased with $18.0
million in funds drawn on the Credit Facility and the proceeds from a $65.0
million short -term loan from Jefferies, with an effective annual interest rate
of approximately 2.5%. On July 2,
2009, when the securities matured, the Company repaid the $65.0 million loan
from Jefferies in full, and repaid all but $1.0 million of the amount drawn on
the Credit Facility for the transaction, which was retained for working capital
purposes.
NOTE
8. COMMON STOCK
As of both June 30,
2009 and March 31, 2009, 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value per share, were authorized and 22,080,133 shares of common stock were
outstanding.
NOTE
9. NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS PER SHARE RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
The following
table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net decrease in net
assets per share resulting from operations:
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2008
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net decrease in net
assets resulting from operations per share
|
|
$
|
(9,190
|
)
|
$
|
(4,484
|
)
|
Denominator for basic and diluted shares
|
|
22,080,133
|
|
19,943,346
|
|
Basic and diluted net decrease in net assets per
share resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
NOTE
10. DISTRIBUTIONS
The
following table lists the per common share distributions paid for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Record
Date
|
|
Payment
Date
|
|
Per Share
|
|
April 16,
2009
|
|
April 27,
2009
|
|
May 8, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
April 16,
2009
|
|
May 20,
2008
|
|
May 29,
2009
|
|
0.04
|
|
April 16,
2009
|
|
June 22,
2009
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Declaration
Date
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
Per Share
|
|
April 8,
2008
|
|
April 22,
2008
|
|
April 30,
2008
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
April 8,
2008
|
|
May 21,
2008
|
|
May 30,
2008
|
|
0.08
|
|
April 8,
2008
|
|
June 20,
2008
|
|
June 30,
2008
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
22
Table
of Contents
Aggregate distributions declared and paid for three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 were approximately $2.7 and $4.9 million, respectively, which
were declared based on estimates of net investment income, and some of the
distributions included a return of capital.
The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gains
distributions are determined annually in accordance with federal tax
regulations which may differ from GAAP. These differences primarily relate to
items recognized as income for financial statement purposes and realized gains
for tax purposes. As a result, net investment income and net realized gain
(loss) on investment transactions for a reporting period may differ
significantly from distributions during such period. Accordingly, the Company
may periodically make reclassifications among certain of its capital accounts
without impacting the net asset value of the Company.
Section 19(a) Disclosure
The Companys Board of Directors estimates the source of the
distributions at the time of their declaration as required by Section 19(a) of
the 1940 Act. On a monthly basis, if required under Section 19(a), the
Company posts a Section 19(a) notice through the Depository Trust
Companys Legal Notice System (LENS) and also sends to its registered
stockholders a written Section 19(a) notice along with the payment of
distributions for any payment which includes a distribution estimated to be
paid from any other source other than net investment income. The estimates of
the source of the distribution are interim estimates based on GAAP that are
subject to revision, and the exact character of the distributions for tax
purposes cannot be determined until the final books and records of the Company are
finalized for the calendar year. Following the calendar year end, after
definitive information has been determined by the Company, if the Company has
made distributions of taxable income (or return of capital), the Company will
deliver a Form 1099-DIV to its stockholders specifying such amount and the
tax characterization of such amount. Therefore, these estimates are made solely
in order to comply with the requirements of Section 19(a) of the 1940
Act and should not be relied upon for tax reporting or any other purposes and
could differ significantly from the actual character of distributions for tax
purposes.
The following GAAP estimates were made by the Board of Directors during
the quarter ended June 30, 2009:
Payment Date
|
|
Ordinary Income
|
|
Return of Capital
|
|
Total Distribution
|
|
May 8, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.043
|
|
$
|
(0.003
|
)
|
$
|
0.040
|
|
May 29, 2009
|
|
0.037
|
|
0.003
|
|
0.040
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
0.045
|
|
(0.005
|
)
|
0.040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because the Board of Directors declares distributions at the beginning
of a quarter, it is difficult to estimate how much of the Companys monthly
dividends and distributions, based on GAAP, will come from ordinary income,
capital gains and returns of capital. Subsequent to the quarter ended June 30,
2009, the following corrections were made to the above listed estimates for
that quarter:
Payment Date
|
|
Ordinary Income
|
|
Return of Capital
|
|
Total Distribution
|
|
May 8, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.051
|
|
$
|
(0.011
|
)
|
$
|
0.040
|
|
May 29, 2009
|
|
0.034
|
|
0.006
|
|
0.040
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
0.026
|
|
0.014
|
|
0.040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For distributions declared subsequent to quarter end, the following
estimates, based on GAAP, have been made pursuant to Section 19(a) of
the 1940 Act:
Payment Date
|
|
Ordinary Income
|
|
Return of Capital
|
|
Total Distribution
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.042
|
|
$
|
(0.002
|
)
|
$
|
0.040
|
|
August 31, 2009
|
|
0.039
|
|
0.001
|
|
0.040
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
0.039
|
|
0.001
|
|
0.040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At
June 30, 2009, the Company was not party to any signed term sheets for
potential investments.
In October 2008,
the Company executed a guaranty of a vehicle finance facility agreement between
Ford Motor Credit Company (FMC) and Auto Safety House, LLC (ASH), one of
its Control investments (the Finance Facility). The Finance Facility provides ASH with a line
of credit of up to $500 for component Ford parts used by ASH to build truck
bodies under a separate contract. Title
and ownership of the parts is retained by Ford. The guaranty of the Finance
Facility will expire upon termination of the separate parts supply contract
with Ford or upon our replacement as guarantor.
The Finance Facility is secured by all of the assets of Business
Investment. As of June 30, 2009,
the Company has not been required to make any payments on the guaranty of the
Finance Facility.
23
Table of
Contents
NOTE
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company
evaluated all events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2009
through the date of the filing of this Form 10Q on August 4, 2009.
Short
-Term Loan Repayment
On July 2,
2009, when the securities purchased through Jefferies matured, the Company
repaid the $65.0 million loan from Jefferies in full, and repaid all but $1.0
million of the amount drawn on the Credit Facility for the transaction, which
was retained for working capital purposes.
Please refer to Note 7, Short-Term Loan for more information.
Distributions
On July 8,
2009, the Companys Board of Directors declared the following monthly cash
distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
Per Share
|
|
July 8, 2009
|
|
July 23,
2009
|
|
July 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
0.040
|
|
July 8, 2009
|
|
August 21,
2009
|
|
August 31,
2009
|
|
0.040
|
|
July 8, 2009
|
|
September 22,
2009
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
0.040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renewal
of Advisory Agreement
On July 8,
2009, the Companys Board of Directors approved the renewal of the Advisory
Agreement and the Administration Agreement through August 31, 2010.
Registration
Statement
On July 21,
2009, the Company filed a registration statement (the Registration Statement)
with the SEC that, if declared effective by the SEC, will permit the Company to
issue, through one or more transactions, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million
in securities, consisting of common stock, preferred stock, subscription
rights, debt securities and warrants to purchase common stock, or a combination
of these securities.
Investment
Activity
On July 1,
2009, the Company extended approximately $0.1 million of revolver draws and
additional investments to existing portfolio companies. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company
received approximately $0.4 million from scheduled and unscheduled loan
repayments.
24
Table of
Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (dollar amounts in thousands, except per
share data or as otherwise indicated).
All statements contained herein, other than historical facts,
may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements may relate to,
among other things, future events or our future performance or financial
condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terminology such as may, might, believe, will, provided, anticipate,
future, could, growth, plan, intend, expect, should, would, if,
seek, possible, potential, likely or the negative of such terms or
comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We
caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, after the date of this Form 10-Q
.
The
following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report and our annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.
OVERVIEW
We were incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of
Delaware on February 18, 2005. We were primarily established for the
purpose of investing in subordinated loans, mezzanine debt, preferred stock and
warrants to purchase common stock of small and medium-sized companies in
connection with buyouts and other recapitalizations. We also invest in senior
secured loans, common stock and, to a much lesser extent, senior and
subordinated syndicated loans. Our investment objective is to generate both
current income and capital gains through these debt and equity instruments. We
operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company and have
elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In
addition, for tax purposes, we have elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company (RIC) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code).
Business
Environment
The current
economic conditions generally and the disruptions in the capital markets in
particular have decreased liquidity and increased our cost of debt and equity
capital, where available. The longer these conditions persist, the greater the
probability that these factors could continue to increase our cost and
significantly limit our access to debt and equity capital, and thus have an
adverse effect on our operations and financial results. Many of the companies
in which we have made or will make investments are also susceptible to the
economic downturn, which may affect the ability of one or more of our portfolio
companies to repay our loans or engage in a liquidity event, such as a sale,
recapitalization or initial public offering. The recession could also
disproportionately impact some of the industries in which we invest, causing us
to be more vulnerable to losses in our portfolio. Therefore, the fair market
value of our aggregate portfolio is likely to continue to decrease during these
periods.
The recession has
affected the availability of credit generally and, as a result, subsequent to
our fiscal year end, we sold 29 of the 32 senior syndicated loans that were
held in our portfolio of investments at March 31, 2009 to various
investors in the syndicated loan market (collectively, the Syndicated Loan
Sales) in order to repay amounts outstanding under our prior credit facility,
which matured in April 2009. These loans, in aggregate, had a cost value
of approximately $104.2 million, or 29.9% of the cost value of our total
investments, and an aggregate fair market value of approximately $69.8 million,
or 22.2% of the fair market value of our total investments, at March 31,
2009. These sales changed our asset composition in a manner that has affected
our ability to satisfy certain elements of the Codes rules for
maintenance of our RIC status. In order to maintain our status as a RIC, in
addition to other requirements, as of the close of each quarter of our taxable
year, we must meet the asset diversification test, which requires that at least
50% of the value of our assets consist of cash, cash items, U.S. government
securities or certain other qualified securities. During the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we fell below the required 50% asset diversification threshold.
Failure to meet
the asset diversification test alone will not result in our loss of RIC status.
In circumstances where the failure to
meet the quarterly 50% asset diversification threshold is the result of
fluctuations in the value of assets, including as a result of the sale of
assets, we will still be deemed under the Codes rules to satisfy the
asset diversification test and, therefore, maintain our RIC status, as long as
we have not made any new investments, including additional investments in our
portfolio companies (such as advances under outstanding lines of credit), since
the time that we fell below the 50% threshold. At June 30, 2009, the first
quarterly measurement date following the sales, we satisfied the 50% asset
diversification threshold through the purchase of short-term qualified
securities, which purchase was funded primarily through a short-term loan
agreement. Subsequent to the June 30th measurement date, these securities
matured and we repaid the short-term loan, at which time we again fell below
the 50% threshold. See Recent DevelopmentsShort-Term Loan for more information
regarding this transaction. As of the date of this filing, we remain below the
50% threshold. Thus, although we currently qualify as a RIC despite our
current, and potential future, inability to meet the 50% asset diversification
requirement, if we make any additional investments before regaining compliance
with the asset diversification test, our
25
Table
of Contents
RIC status will be
threatened. If we make a new or additional investment and fail to regain
compliance with the 50% threshold on the next quarterly measurement date
following such investment, we will be in non-compliance with the RIC rules and
will have thirty days to cure our failure of the asset diversification test
to avoid our loss of RIC status. Potential cures for failure of the asset
diversification test include raising additional equity or debt capital, or
changing the composition of our assets, which could include full or partial
divestitures of investments, such that we would once again exceed the 50%
threshold.
Until the
composition of our assets is above the required 50% asset diversification
threshold, we will continue to seek to deploy similar purchases of qualified
securities using short-term loans that would allow us to satisfy the asset
diversification test, thereby allowing us to make additional investments. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to enter into such a transaction
on reasonable terms, if at all. We also continue to explore a number of other
strategies, including changing the composition of our assets, which could
include full or partial divestitures of investments, and raising additional
equity or debt capital, such that we would once again exceed the 50% threshold.
Our ability to implement any of these strategies will be subject to market
conditions and a number of risks and uncertainties that are, in part, beyond
our control.
On April 14, 2009, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Gladstone
Business Investment, LLC (Business Investment), we entered into a second
amended and restated credit agreement providing for a $50.0 million revolving
line of credit (the Credit Facility) arranged by Branch Banking and Trust
Company (BB&T) as administrative agent. Key Equipment Finance Company
Inc. also joined the Credit Facility as a committed lender. Under the terms of the Credit Facility,
committed funding was reduced from $125.0 million under our prior facility to
$50.0 million. See Recent Developments section below for further
information. As of July 20, 2009, $28.2 million was outstanding under the
Credit Facility and $18.7 million was available for borrowing due to certain
limitations on our borrowing base. As a result of this limited availability
under our credit facility, and the restraints upon our investing activities
required in order to maintain RIC status under the Code as described above, we
are unsure when we will once again be in a position to make any new
investments. The Credit Facility also limits our distributions to stockholders
and, as a result, we recently decreased our monthly cash distribution rate by
50% as compared to the prior three month period. We do not know when market
conditions will stabilize, if adverse conditions will intensify or the full
extent to which the disruptions will continue to affect us. If market
instability persists or intensifies, we may experience increasing difficulty in
raising capital.
Challenges in the
current market are intensified for us by certain regulatory limitations under
the Code and the 1940 Act, as well as contractual restrictions under the
agreement governing the Credit Facility that further constrain our ability to
access the capital markets. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must
satisfy, among other requirements, an annual distribution requirement to pay
out at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our
stockholders on an annual basis. Because we are required to distribute our
income in this manner, and because the illiquidity of many of our investments
makes it difficult for us to finance new investments through the sale of
current investments, our ability to make new investments is highly dependent
upon external financing. Our external financing sources include the issuance of
equity securities, debt securities or other leverage such as borrowings under
our line of credit. Our ability to seek external debt financing, to the extent
that it is available under current market conditions, is further subject to the
asset coverage limitations of the 1940 Act, which require us to have at least a
200% asset coverage ratio, meaning generally that for every dollar of debt, we
must have two dollars of assets.
The recession may
also continue to decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans,
as well as the value of our equity investments, which has impacted and may
continue to impact our ability to borrow under the Credit Facility.
Additionally, the Credit Facility contains covenants regarding the maintenance
of certain minimum loan concentrations which are affected by the decrease in
value of our portfolio. Failure to meet these requirements would result in a
default which, if we are unable to obtain a waiver from our lenders, would
result in the acceleration of our repayment obligations under the Credit
Facility.
We expect that,
given these regulatory and contractual constraints in combination with current
market conditions, debt and equity capital may be costly or difficult for us to
access for some time. For so long as this is the case, our near-term strategy
depends on retaining capital and building the value of our existing portfolio
companies to increase the likelihood of maintaining potential future returns.
We will also, where prudent and possible, consider the sale of lower-yielding
investments. This has resulted, and may continue to result, in significantly
reduced investment activity, as our ability to make new investments under these
conditions is largely dependent on availability of proceeds from the sale or
exit of existing portfolio investments, which events may be beyond our control.
As capital constraints improve, we intend to continue our strategy of making
conservative investments in businesses that we believe will weather the current
economy and that are likely to produce attractive long-term returns for our
stockholders.
Use
of Internally-Developed Discount Cash Flow Methodologies
Given the
recession, the market for syndicated loans has become increasingly illiquid
with limited or no transactions for many of those securities which we hold. The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When
the Market for That Asset is Not Active
(FSP No. 157- 3),
provides guidance on the use of a discounted cash flow (DCF) methodology to
value investments in an illiquid market.
Under FSP No. 157-3, indications of an illiquid market include
cases where the volume and level of trading activity in the asset have declined
significantly, the available prices vary significantly over time or amongst
market participants, or the prices are not current. The marketplace for which
we obtain indicative bids for purposes of determining fair value for our
syndicated loan investments have shown these attributes of illiquidity. In
26
Table
of Contents
accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, our
valuation procedures specify the use of third-party indicative bid quotes for
valuing syndicated loans where there is a liquid public market for those loans
and market pricing quotes are readily available. However, due to continued
market illiquidity and the lack of transactions during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we determined that the current agent bank non-binding indicative bids for
our syndicated loans were unreliable and alternative procedures would need to
be implemented until liquidity returns to the marketplace. As of June 30, 2009, the portion of our
investment portfolio that was valued using DCF was approximately $16.2 million,
or 7.1% of the fair value of our total portfolio of investments.
Recent
Developments
New
Credit Facility with Branch Bank and Trust Company and Termination of Deutsche
Bank, A.G. Credit Facility
On April 14,
2009, we entered into the Credit Facility arranged by BB&T as
administrative agent. Key Equipment Finance Company Inc. also joined the Credit
Facility as a committed lender. In connection with our entry into the Credit
Facility, we borrowed $43.8 million under the Credit Facility to repay in full
all amounts outstanding under our prior credit agreement with Deutsche Bank,
A.G. (Deutsche Bank). The Credit
Facility may be expanded up to $125.0 million through the addition of other
committed lenders to the facility. The Credit Facility matures on April 14,
2010, and if the facility is not renewed or extended by this date, all unpaid
principal and interest will be due and payable within one year of maturity.
During the three
months ended June 30, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 159
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159), specifically for the
Credit Facility, which requires us to apply a fair value methodology to the
Credit Facility as of June 30, 2009, which is the period that this
liability became eligible under SFAS No. 159. Due to the nature of this
Credit Facility being a short term agreement and the fact that interest is
based on a variable interest rate, the Credit Facility has been fair valued at
its approximate cost basis as of June 30, 2009.
Interest
Rate Cap Agreement
During May 2009,
we cancelled our interest rate cap agreement with Deutsche Bank and entered
into a new interest rate cap agreement for a notional amount of $45.0 million
that will effectively limit the interest rate on a portion of the borrowings
under the Credit Facility. We incurred a premium fee of approximately $40 in
conjunction with this agreement.
Senior
Syndicated Loan Sales
As previously noted, during April and
May 2009, we finalized our sale of 29 of the 32 senior syndicated loans
that were held in our portfolio of investments at March 31, 2009 to
various investors in the syndicated loan market. The loans, in aggregate, had a cost value of
approximately $104.2 million, or 29.9% of the cost value of our total
investments, and an aggregate fair market value of approximately $69.8 million,
or 22.2% of the fair market value of our total investments, at March 31,
2009. As a result of these sales, we
received approximately $69.2 million in net cash proceeds and recorded a
realized loss of approximately $34.6 million.
Proprietary
Investments Term Debt Repayments and Revolver Reductions/Extinguishments
During April 2009,
we executed the following transactions with certain of our portfolio companies:
·
On April 9, 2009, A. Stucki Holding Corp.
refinanced a portion of its senior term debt by repaying approximately $2.0
million of principal repayments which represented the next three quarterly
payments due under normal amortization on both their senior term A ($1.6
million) and senior term B ($0.4 million) loans. Normal amortization is expected to resume on April 1,
2010.
·
On April 9, 2009, ASH Holdings Corp. made a
repayment of approximately $1.1 million on its revolving line of credit which
reduced the outstanding balance to $0.5 million.
·
On April 10, 2009, we entered into an agreement
to reduce the available credit limit on Mathey Investment, Inc.s
revolving line of credit from $2.0 million to $1.0 million. This was a non-cash transaction.
·
On April 10, 2009, we made an investment
disbursement to Cavert II Holding Corp. (Cavert) for approximately $0.85
million on its revolving line of credit, and the proceeds were used to make the
next four quarterly payments due under normal amortization for both their
senior term A and senior term B loans in a non-cash transaction. Normal amortization on both of these loans is
expected to resume on July 1, 2010.
Subsequently, on April 17, 2009, Cavert repaid the outstanding $.85
million in principal plus accrued interest on its revolving line of
credit. The revolving line of credit was
then sold to a third party, the Royal Bank of Canada, for a nominal fee.
·
On April 13, 2009, we entered into an agreement
to reduce the available credit limit on Chase II Holdings Corp.s revolving
line of credit from $4.5 million to $3.5 million. This was a non-cash transaction.
27
Table
of Contents
Short -Term
Loan
On June 30,
2009, we purchased $83.0 million of short -term United States Treasury
securities through Jefferies & Company, Inc. (Jefferies). The securities were purchased with $18.0
million in funds drawn on the Credit Facility and the proceeds from a $65.0
million short -term loan from Jefferies with an effective annual interest rate
of approximately 2.5%. On July 2,
2009, when the securities matured, we repaid the $65.0 million loan from
Jefferies in full, and repaid all but $1.0 million of the amount drawn on the
Credit Facility for the transaction, which was retained for working capital
purposes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30,
2009 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Investment Income
Investment income
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $5,169, as compared to $6,038
for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest income
from our investments in debt securities of private companies was $5,084 for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $6,004 for the comparable
prior year period. The level of interest income from investments is directly
related to the balance, at cost, of the interest-bearing investment portfolio
outstanding during the period multiplied by the weighted average yield. The
weighted average yield varies from period to period based on the current stated
interest rate on interest-bearing investments and the amounts of loans for
which interest is not accruing. Interest income from our investments decreased
$920, or 15.3%, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared
to the prior year period. This change was due to the decrease in the weighted
average yield of our portfolio, attributable mainly to a reduction in the
average LIBOR during the comparable time periods, which was approximately 0.37%
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to 2.7% in the prior
year period. Also contributing to the
change was a decrease in the average cost basis of our interest-bearing
investment portfolio during the period, which was approximately $241.7 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to approximately $299.8
million for the prior year period, due primarily to the Syndicated Loan Sales.
Interest income
from Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments was $1,029 for the three months
ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $2,324 for the prior year period. This
decrease was the result of an overall decrease in the number of
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments held at June 30, 2009 compared to
the prior year period, primarily due to the Syndicated Loan Sales. At June 30,
2009, we held investments in five different Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
investments, compared to 37 at June 30, 2008. This decrease was further
accentuated by drops in LIBOR between periods, due to the instability and
tightening of the credit markets.
Interest income
from Control investments was $2,777 for the three months ended June 30,
2009, as compared to $2,569 for the prior year period. The increase of $208 is
attributable to two additional Control investments, Galaxy Tool and Country
Club Enterprises, being held at June 30, 2009 compared to the prior year
period; however, this increase was partially offset by the reclassification of
Quench, a Control investment at June 30, 2008, as an Affiliate investment
for the current reporting year. This
reclassification took place in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Continuing decreases in LIBOR played a
minimal role in interest income from our proprietary deals during the current
quarter, as the majority of them include interest rate floors to protect
against such circumstances.
Interest income
from Affiliate investments was $1,278 for the three months ended June 30,
2009, as compared to $1,111 for the prior year period. The increase of $167 was
due mainly to the reclassification of Quench as an Affiliate investment, as
noted above.
The following
table lists the interest income from investments for the five largest portfolio
company investments during the respective periods:
Three months ended June 30, 2009
Company
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Chase II Holdings Corp.
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Galaxy Tools Holding Corp.
|
|
589
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
A. Stucki Holding Corp.
|
|
577
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Acme Cryogenics, Inc.
|
|
421
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Danco Acquisition Corp.
|
|
394
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
2,642
|
|
52.0
|
%
|
Other companies
|
|
2,442
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
5,084
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
28
Table
of Contents
Three months ended June 30, 2008
Company
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Chase II Holdings Corp.
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
A. Stucki Holding Corp.
|
|
669
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
Acme Cryogenics, Inc.
|
|
422
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Cavert II Holding Corp.
|
|
412
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Danco Acquisition Corp.
|
|
404
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
2,617
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
Other companies
|
|
3,387
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
6,004
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The weighted
average yield on our portfolio, excluding cash and cash equivalents, for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 was 9.84%, compared to 7.79% for the
prior year period. The weighted average
yield varies from period to period based on the current stated interest rate on
interest-bearing investments and the amounts of loans for which interest is not
accruing. The increase in the weighted
average yield for the current quarter results primarily from the Companys sale
of lower interest-bearing senior syndicated loans.
Interest income
from invested cash and cash equivalents was nominal for the three months ended June 30,
2009, compared to $24 for the prior year period. This decrease is a result of lower interest
rates offered by banks, as this income is derived mainly from interest earned
on overnight sweeps of cash held at financial institutions, in addition to us
using the proceeds from repayments on outstanding loans during the year to pay
down our line of credit.
Other income was
$85 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $10 for the
prior year period. The majority of this
increase was due to the full recognition of amendment fees related to the
Syndicated Loan Sales that were previously being amortized over the respective
lives of the loans.
Operating Expenses
Total operating
expenses, excluding any voluntary and irrevocable credits to the base
management fee, were $3,025 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as
compared to $3,561 for the prior year period, an overall decrease of $536, or
15.1%. The majority of this reduction
was due to a decrease in interest expense associated with the Credit Facility
as well as a decrease in the amount of fees to our Adviser.
Loan servicing
fees of $1,068 were incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as
compared to $1,254 for the prior year period. These fees were incurred in
connection with a loan servicing agreement between Business Investment and our
Adviser, which is based on the value of the aggregate outstanding portfolio.
These fees were directly credited against the amount of the base management fee
due to our Adviser. Our lower overall portfolio value, caused by the Syndicated
Loan Sales, attributed to the decrease in this fee.
The base
management fee for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $313, as
compared to $426 for the prior year period. The decrease is reflective of fewer
total assets held during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 when compared to
the prior year quarter. The base management fee is computed quarterly as
described under
Investment Advisory and
Management Agreement
in Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated
financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed
on June 2, 2009, and is summarized in the table below:
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits to base management fee
from Adviser:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee reduction for the waiver of 2% fee on senior
syndicated loans to 0.5% (1)
|
|
(183
|
)
|
(424
|
)
|
Credit for fees received by Adviser from the
portfolio companies
|
|
(118
|
)
|
(150
|
)
|
Credit to base management fee from
Adviser
|
|
(301
|
)
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net base management fee
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
(1)
Our Adviser voluntarily and irrevocably
waived the annual 2.0% base management fee to 0.5% for senior syndicated loan
participations to the extent that proceeds resulting from borrowings were used
to purchase such syndicated loan participations.
The administration
fee was $173 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $235
for the prior year period. The decrease in the current year period is due to a
decrease of administration staff and related expenses, as well as a decrease in
our total assets in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by
our Adviser under similar agreements.
The calculation of the
29
Table
of Contents
administrative fee
is described in detail above under
Investment
Advisory and Management Agreement
in Note 4 of the notes to the
consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
as filed on June 2, 2009.
Interest expense
was $702 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $1,102
for the prior year period, a decrease of $400, or 36.3%. The decline was a
direct result of decreased borrowings under the Credit Facility during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the prior year period. The weighted average balance outstanding on
our line of credit during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was
approximately $41.9 million, compared to $99.7 million in the comparable prior
year period.
Other operating
expenses (including deferred financing fees, professional fees, stockholder
related costs, insurance, directors fees and other direct expenses) increased
over the comparable prior year period, driven primarily by increases in
deferred financing fees related to the Credit Facility and professional fees,
such as audit and legal costs associated with
the filings of a shelf registration statement with the SEC and the
Syndicated Loan Sales, partially offset by slightly lower stockholder related
costs from proxy solicitation and annual report fees.
Realized and Unrealized (Loss) Gain
on Investments
Realized
Losses
During the three
months ended June 30, 2009, we exited 29 of the 32 senior syndicated loans
for aggregate proceeds of approximately $69.2 million in cash and recorded a
realized loss of approximately $34.6 million. For the three months ended June 30,
2008, we received approximately $13.2 million in cash proceeds and recognized a
net loss on the sale of nine syndicated loans in the aggregate amount of $1.7
million. The increase in realized losses is attributable to liquidity needs
from the senior syndicated loan sales associated with the repayment of amounts
outstanding under our prior credit facility with Deutsche Bank, which matured
in April 2009.
Unrealized
Gains and Losses
Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) of investments is the net change in the fair value
of our investment portfolio during the reporting period, including the reversal
of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains and
losses are actually realized. During the three months ended June 30, 2009,
we recorded net unrealized appreciation of investments in the aggregate amount
of $23.0 million, compared to $5.8 million for the prior year period. The unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
across our investments for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was as
follows:
Investment
Category
|
|
Net
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
|
|
$
|
36,728
|
*
|
Control
|
|
(11,481
|
)
|
Affiliate
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,981
|
|
*
Includes the reversal of approximately
$34.4 million of previously recorded unrealized depreciation related to the
Syndicated Loan Sales, which resulted in a $34.6 million of realized loss for
the current quarter.
We recorded
approximately $36.7 million of unrealized appreciation of our
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments for the quarter ended June 30, 3009,
due primarily to the reversal of $34.4 million of previously recorded
unrealized depreciation upon the completion of the Senior Syndicated Loan
Sales, as noted above, and appreciation in value in the aggregate amount of
approximately $2.3 million on our remaining Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
investments.
Our Control
investments experienced the most significant devaluation in our total
portfolio, particularly in our equity holdings, which depreciated in value by
an aggregate of approximately $11.9 million during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, mainly in A. Stucki and Galaxy Tools, as well as Country Club Enterprises,
whose fair value had previously approximated its cost basis. The debt portion of our Control investments
appreciated modestly, led by Auto Safety House.
Our Affiliate
investments also experienced unrealized depreciation during the current quarter,
most notably in the equity components of our investments, which experienced
depreciation in the aggregate of approximately $3.2 million, led by Danco and
Quench. This was partially offset by
unrealized appreciation in our debt positions of approximately $0.9 million,
primarily in Danco and Quench.
Over our entire
investment portfolio, we recorded an aggregate of approximately $38.1 million
of unrealized appreciation on our debt positions for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, while our equity holdings experienced an aggregate devaluation of
approximately $15.1 million. At June 30,
2009, the fair value of our investment portfolio was less than the cost basis
of our portfolio by approximately $12.0 million, as compared to $35.0 million
at March 31, 2009, representing net unrealized appreciation of $23.0
million for the quarter. We believe that
our investment portfolio was valued at a depreciated value due primarily to the
general instability of the loan markets.
Although our investment portfolio has depreciated, our entire portfolio
was fair valued at 95% of cost as of June 30, 2009.
30
Table
of Contents
The unrealized
depreciation of our investments does not have an impact on our current ability
to pay distributions to stockholders; however, it may be an indication of
future realized losses, which could ultimately reduce our income available for
distribution.
Derivatives
During May 2009,
we cancelled our prior interest rate cap agreements and recorded a realized
loss of $53. During the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we entered into a new interest rate cap agreement with BB&T for a
notional amount of $45.0 million that will effectively limit the interest rate
on a portion of the borrowings under the Credit Facility. We incurred a premium fee of approximately
$40 in conjunction with this agreement.
At June 30, 2009, its value had decreased by approximately $11.
We recorded net
unrealized appreciation of our interest rate cap agreement of $42 for the three
months ended June 30, 2009. For the
prior year period, the fair market value of our prior interest rate cap
agreements remained flat.
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting
from Operations
For the three
months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a net decrease in net assets
resulting from operations of $9.1 million as a result of the factors discussed
above. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a net
decrease in net assets resulting from operations of $4.5 million. Our net decrease in net assets resulting from
operations per basic and diluted weighted average common share for the quarters
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0.42 and $0.22, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating
Activities
Net cash provided
by operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was
approximately $143.9 million and consisted primarily of the proceeds received
from the syndicated loan sales and the net loss realized on those sales,
borrowings under the short -term loan, as discussed in Note 7, Short -Term
Loan Agreement, in the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements, and principal payments received from existing
investments. For the three months ended June 30,
2008, net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $13.0 million
and consisted primarily of the proceeds from the sale of existing portfolio
investments, and principal repayments, offset by the purchase of one new
Control investment.
At June 30,
2009, we had investments in equity of, loans to, or syndicated participations
in 17 private companies with a cost basis totaling approximately $239.0
million. At June 30, 2008, we had
investments in equity of, loans to, or syndicated participations in 47 private
companies with an aggregate cost basis of approximately $341.3 million. A summary of our investment activity for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Loan
Disbursements (1)
|
|
Principal
Repayments (2)
|
|
Proceeds
from
Sales (3)
|
|
Net Loss
on
Disposal (3)
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
(a)
|
$
|
7,575
|
(a)
|
$
|
69,222
|
|
$
|
(34,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Loan
Disbursements (1)
|
|
Principal
Repayments (2)
|
|
Proceeds from
Sales (3)
|
|
Net Loss on
Disposal (3)
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
8,978
|
|
$
|
3,493
|
|
$
|
13,246
|
|
$
|
(1,718
|
)
|
(a)
Includes an $850 non-cash transaction whereby a portfolio company,
Cavert Wire, drew $850 on its revolving line of credit and immediately used the
proceeds to pay down its senior term A and senior term B loans. No cash was disbursed in this transaction, as
it was simply a transfer of balance. The
$850 drawn on the credit line was subsequently paid off in full and sold to a
third party for a nominal fee.
(1) Loan Disbursements:
|
|
New Investments
|
|
Disbursements to Existing
|
|
Total
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Companies
|
|
Investments
|
|
Portfolio Companies
|
|
Disbursements
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
0
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
(a)
|
$
|
1,500
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Investments
|
|
Disbursements to Existing
|
|
Total
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Companies
|
|
Investments
|
|
Portfolio Companies
|
|
Disbursements
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
1
|
(b)
|
$
|
5,753
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
$
|
8,978
|
|
(a) See note (a) above
(b) Tread Corporation
31
Table
of Contents
(2) Principal
Repayments:
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Scheduled
Principal
Repayments
|
|
Unscheduled
Principal
Repayments (*)
|
|
Total
Principal
Repayments
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
$
|
5,571
|
(a)
|
$
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Scheduled Principal
Repayments
|
|
Unscheduled Principal
Repayments (*)
|
|
Total Principal
Repayments
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
$
|
977
|
|
$
|
3,493
|
|
(*) Includes principal
repayments due to excess cash flows, covenant trips, exits, refinancings, etc.
(a) Includes principal
payments received in connection with the refinancings of A. Stucki and Cavert.
Our last
investment in a new portfolio company was in November 2008. In light of current economic conditions,
limited borrowings available under the Credit Facility, constraints on our
ability to access the capital markets and the restraints upon our investing
activities required in order to maintain the RIC status, our near-term strategy
will be focused on retaining capital and building the value of our existing
portfolio companies. We will also, where
prudent and possible, consider the sale of lower-yielding investments. This strategy has resulted, and may continue
to result, in significantly reduced investment activity, as our ability to make
new investments under these conditions is largely dependent on availability of
proceeds from the sale or exit of existing portfolio investments, which events
may be beyond our control and our ability to satisfy the asset diversification
test under the Code. As our capital
constraints and asset diversification improve, we intend to continue our
strategy of making conservative investments in businesses that we believe will
weather the current economy and that are likely to produce attractive long-term
returns for our stockholders.
Short
-Term Loan Agreement
On June 30,
2009, we purchased $83.0 million of short -term United States Treasury
securities through Jefferies. The
securities were purchased with $18.0 million in funds drawn on the Credit
Facility and the proceeds from a $65.0 million short -term loan from Jefferies
with an effective annual interest rate of approximately 2.5%. On July 2, 2009, when the securities
matured, we repaid the $65.0 million loan from Jefferies in full, and repaid
all but $1.0 million of the amount drawn on the Credit Facility for the
transaction, which was retained for working capital purposes. If necessary,
we plan to use a similar form of loan
agreement in future quarters as a financing option in order to satisfy certain
quarterly asset diversification requirements and maintain our status as a RIC
under Subchapter M of the Code.
(3) Loan
Sales / Exits:
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Number of
Loans Sold
|
|
Proceeds
Received
|
|
Position
(Principal) Sold
|
|
Unamortized
Loan Costs (#)
|
|
Net Loss
on
Disposal
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
29
|
(a)
|
$
|
69,223
|
|
$
|
103,772
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
$
|
(34,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Number of
Loans Sold
|
|
Proceeds
Received
|
|
Position
(Principal) Sold
|
|
Unamortized
Loan Costs (#)
|
|
Net Loss on
Disposal
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
9
|
(b)
|
$
|
13,246
|
|
$
|
14,926
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
$
|
(1,718
|
)
|
(#) Includes balance of
premiums, discounts, acquisition costs, and deferred compensation unamortized
at time of exit.
(a) One syndicated loan
(Critical Homecare Solutions) was sold in two separate installments.
(b) Includes
the partial sale of three syndicated loans still held subsequent to June 30,
2008 (CRC Health Group, Graham Packaging and Pinnacle Foods). One syndicated loan (NPC International) was
sold in two separate installments.
As discussed elsewhere in this
report, during April 2009, we sold 29 of our 32 senior syndicated loans
held at March 31, 2009 for an aggregate of approximately $69.2 million in
cash proceeds and recorded a realized loss of approximately $34.6 million in
connection with these sales. These loans were sold to pay down all unpaid
principal and interest owing to Deutsche Bank under our prior credit facility.
Financing
Activities
Net cash used in
financing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was
approximately $66.6 million, which primarily consisted of net repayments made
on the line of credit, in connection with the termination of our prior credit
facility. During the three months ended June 30,
2008, net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $20.2
million, due mainly to the Rights Offering (as defined below), which accounted
for cash proceeds of $40.7 million. The
majority of the cash outflow consisted of net repayments made on the credit
facility.
32
Table
of Contents
Distributions
In order to qualify as a RIC and to avoid corporate level tax on the
income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of
the Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term
capital gains to our stockholders on an annual basis. In accordance with these
requirements, we declared and paid monthly cash distributions of $0.04 per
common share during each month of the quarter ended June 30, 2009. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, our
distribution payments of approximately $2.7 million exceeded our net investment
income by approximately $0.2 million. We declared these distributions based on
our estimates of net investment income for the fiscal year. Our investment pace
continued to be slower than expected in our third full year of operations and,
consequently, our net investment income was lower than our original estimates. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
we reduced our monthly distribution from $0.08 to $0.04.
Issuance of Equity
On July 21, 2009, we filed a registration statement (the Registration
Statement) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) that, if
declared effective by the SEC, will permit us to issue, through one or more
transactions, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million in securities, consisting of
common stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, debt securities and
warrants to purchase common stock, or a combination of these securities. To
date, we have incurred approximately $20 of costs in connection with the
Registration Statement.
We anticipate issuing equity securities to obtain additional capital in
the future. However, we cannot determine the terms of any future equity
issuances or whether we will be able to issue equity on terms favorable to us,
or at all. Additionally, when our common stock is trading below net asset
value, we will have regulatory constraints under the 1940 Act on our ability to
obtain additional capital in this manner. At June 30, 2009, our stock
closed trading at $4.83, representing a 47.4% discount to our net asset value
of $9.19 per share. Generally, the 1940 Act provides that we may not issue
stock for a price below net asset value per share, without first obtaining the
approval of our stockholders and our independent directors or through a rights
offering.
We raised additional capital within these regulatory constraints in April 2008
through an offering of transferable subscription rights to purchase additional
shares of common stock (the Rights Offering). Pursuant to the Rights
Offering, we sold 5,520,033 shares of our common stock at a subscription price
of $7.48 per share, which represented a purchase price equal to 93% of the weighted
average closing price of our stock in the last five trading days of the
subscription period. Net proceeds of the offering, after offering expenses
borne by us, were approximately $40.5 million and were used to repay
outstanding borrowings under our line of credit. Should our common stock
continue to trade below its net asset value per share, we may seek to conduct
similar offerings in the future in order to raise additional capital, although
there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to raise
capital.
Future Capital Resources
During our 2008 annual stockholders meeting, our stockholders approved
a proposal that allows us to issue long-term rights, including warrants to
purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share that will
not be less than the greater of the market value or net asset value of our
common stock at a time such rights may be issued. This proposal is in effect until our next
annual stockholders meeting, which is currently scheduled for August 13,
2009, when our stockholders will again be asked to vote in favor of renewing
this proposal for another year.
New Revolving Credit Facility
On April 14, 2009, we entered into the Credit Facility, which
provides for a $50.0 million revolving line of credit arranged by BB&T as
administrative agent, replacing Deutsche Bank who served as administrative
agent under our prior credit facility. Key Equipment Finance, Inc. also
joined the Credit Facility as a committed lender. In connection with our entry into the Credit
Facility, we borrowed $43.8 million under the Credit Facility to repay Deutsche
Bank in full all amounts outstanding under the prior credit agreement. The Credit Facility may be expanded up to
$125.0 million through the addition of other committed lenders to the
facility. The Credit Facility matures on
April 14, 2010 and, if the facility is not renewed or extended by this
date, all unpaid principal and interest will be due and payable within one year
of maturity. Advances under the Credit Facility
will generally bear interest at the 30 day LIBOR rate (subject to a minimum
rate of 2%), plus 5% per annum, with a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum on
undrawn amounts.
Interest is payable monthly during the term of the Credit
Facility. After April 14, 2010, if
the Credit Facility is not renewed, all collections of principal from our loans
are required to be used to pay outstanding principal under the Credit Facility.
Available borrowings are subject to various constraints imposed under the Credit
Facility, based on the aggregate loan balance pledged by Business Investment.
The Credit Facility contains covenants that require Business Investment
to maintain its status as a separate entity, prohibit certain significant
corporate transactions (such as mergers, consolidations, liquidations or
dissolutions) and restrict material changes to our credit and collection
policies. The Credit Facility also limits the borrower and industry
concentrations of loans that are eligible to secure advances as well as limits
on payments of distributions limited to the aggregate net investment income for
the prior twelve
33
Table
of Contents
months preceding April 2010. As of June 30, 2009, Business
Investment was in compliance with all of the facility covenants. Additionally,
during the three months ended June 30, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 159
specifically for the Credit Facility with BB&T. SFAS No. 159 requires
us to apply a fair value methodology to the Credit Facility as of June 30,
2009, which is the period that this liability became eligible under SFAS No. 159.
Due to the nature of this Credit Facility being a short term agreement and the
fact that interest is based on a variable interest rate, the Credit Facility
has been fair valued at its approximate cost basis as of June 30, 2009. As
of July 20, 2009, there was $28.2 million of borrowings outstanding on the
Credit Facility at an interest rate of approximately 7.0%, and the remaining
borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was approximately $18.7 million.
During May 2009, we cancelled our interest rate cap agreement with
Deutsche Bank and entered into a new interest rate cap agreement with BB&T
for a notional amount of $45 million that will effectively limit the interest
rate on a portion of the borrowings under the Credit Facility. We incurred a premium fee of approximately
$40 in conjunction with this agreement.
As of June 30, 2009, the interest rate cap agreement had
depreciated by approximately $11 and had a fair value of $29.
In conjunction with entering into the amended and restated Credit
Facility, we amended a performance guaranty which remains substantially similar
to the form under the previous credit facility. The performance guaranty
requires us to maintain a minimum net worth of $169 million plus 50% of all
equity and subordinated debt raised after April 14, 2009, to maintain asset
coverage with respect to senior securities representing indebtedness of at
least 200%, in accordance with Section 18 of the 1940 Act, and to maintain
our status as a BDC under the 1940 Act and as a RIC under the Code. As of June 30,
2009, we were in compliance with the covenants under the performance guaranty.
Our continued compliance with these covenants, however, depends on many
factors, some of which are beyond our control. In particular, depreciation in
the valuation of our assets, which valuation is subject to changing market
conditions that are presently very volatile, affects our ability to comply with
these covenants. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, net unrealized
appreciation on our investments was approximately $23.0 million, brought about
primarily by the reversal of $34.4 million of previously unrealized
depreciation on syndicated loans that were sold during the quarter, compared to
an unrealized depreciation of approximately $5.8 million during the prior year
period. Given the continued deterioration in the capital markets, net
unrealized depreciation in our portfolio may continue to threaten our ability
to comply with the covenants under the Credit Facility. Accordingly, there are
no assurances that we will continue to comply with these covenants. Failure to
comply with these covenants would result in a default which, if we were unable
to obtain a waiver from the lenders, could accelerate our repayment obligations
under the Credit Facility and thereby have a material adverse impact on our
liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay
distributions as more fully described below.
The Credit Facility matures on April 14, 2010, and, if the
facility is not renewed or extended by this date, all unpaid principal and
interest will be due and payable within one year of maturity and all
collections of principal from our loans will be required to be used to pay
outstanding principal under the Credit Facility. There can be no guarantee that
we will be able to renew, extend or replace the Credit Facility on terms that
are favorable to us, or at all. Our
ability to obtain replacement financing will be constrained by current economic
conditions affecting the credit markets, which have significantly deteriorated
over the last several months and may decline further. Consequently, any renewal, extension or
refinancing of the Credit Facility will likely result in significantly higher
interest rates and related charges and may impose significant restrictions on
the use of borrowed funds with regard to our ability to fund investments or
maintain distributions. For instance, in
connection with the recent establishment of the Credit Facility, the size of
the line was reduced from $125.0 million under our prior facility to $50.0 million
under the Credit Facility and Deutsche Bank, who was a committed lender our
prior credit facility elected not to participate in the new facility and
withdrew its commitment. If we are not
able to renew, extend or refinance the Credit Facility, this would likely have
a material adverse effect on our liquidity and ability to fund new investments
or pay distributions to our stockholders.
Our inability to pay distributions could result in us failing to qualify
as a RIC. Consequently, any income or
gains could become taxable at corporate rates. If we are unable to secure
replacement financing, we may be forced to sell certain assets on
disadvantageous terms, which may result in realized losses such as those
recently recorded in connection with the Syndicated Loan Sales, which resulted
in a realized loss of approximately $34.6 million during the quarter ended June 30,
2009. Such realized losses could
materially exceed the amount of any unrealized depreciation on these assets as
of our most recent balance sheet date, which would have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations. In
addition to selling assets, or as an alternative, we may issue equity in order
to repay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. Based on the recent trading prices of our
stock, such an equity offering may have a substantial dilutive impact on our
existing stockholders interest in our earnings and assets and voting interest
in us.
Contractual Obligations and
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We were not a party to any signed term sheets for potential investments
as of June 30, 2009. In October 2008,
the Company executed a guaranty of a vehicle finance facility agreement between
Ford Motor Credit Company (FMC) and Auto Safety House, LLC (ASH), one of
our Control investments (the Finance Facility). The Finance Facility provides ASH with a line
of credit of up to $500 for component Ford parts used by ASH to build truck
bodies under a separate contract. Title
and ownership of the parts is retained by Ford. The guaranty of the Finance
Facility will expire upon termination of the separate parts supply contract
with Ford or
34
Table
of Contents
upon our replacement as guarantor.
The Finance Facility is secured by all of the assets of Business
Investment. As of June 30, 2009, we
have not been required to make any payments on the guaranty of the Finance
Facility.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses
during the period reported. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates. We have identified our investment valuation process as our most
critical accounting policy.
Investment
Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our
condensed consolidated financial statements is the valuation of investments and
the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments
recorded.
General Valuation Policy:
We value our investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940
Act. As discussed more fully below, we
value securities for which market quotations are readily available and reliable
at their market value. We value all
other securities and assets at fair value as determined in good faith by our
Board of Directors.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, which, for
financial assets, is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, with early adoption permitted. We adopted SFAS No. 157 on April 1,
2008. In part, SFAS No. 157 defines fair value and establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about assets and liabilities
measured at fair value. The new standard provides a consistent definition of
fair value that focuses on exit price in the principal, or most advantageous,
market and prioritizes, within a measurement of fair value, the use of
market-based inputs over entity-specific inputs. The standard also establishes
the following three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the
transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the
measurement date.
·
Level 1
inputs to the valuation methodology are
quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets;
·
Level 2
inputs to the valuation methodology
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level
2 inputs are in those markets for which there are few transactions, the prices
are not current, little public information exists or instances where prices
vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers; and
·
Level 3
inputs to the valuation methodology are
unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs
are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions that market participants
would use to price the asset or liability based upon the best available
information.
See Note 3, Investments in our notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for additional information regarding fair value
measurements and our adoption of SFAS No. 157.
We use generally accepted valuation techniques to value our portfolio
unless we have specific information about the value of an investment to
determine otherwise. From time to time we may accept an appraisal of a business
in which we hold securities. These appraisals are expensive and occur
infrequently but provide a third-party valuation opinion that may differ in
results, techniques and scopes used to value our investments. When these specific third-party appraisals
are engaged or accepted, we would use such appraisals to value the investment
we have in that business if we determine that the appraisals are the best
estimate of fair value.
In determining the value of our investments, our Adviser has
established an investment valuation policy (the Policy). The Policy has been approved by our Board of
Directors, and each quarter the Board of Directors reviews whether our Adviser
has applied the Policy consistently, and votes whether or not to accept the
recommended valuation of our investment portfolio.
The Policy, which is summarized below, applies to the following
categories of securities:
·
Publicly-traded securities;
·
Securities for which a limited market
exists; and
·
Securities for which no market exists.
Valuation Methods:
Publicly-traded securities:
We determine the value of
publicly-traded securities based on the closing price for the security on the
exchange or securities market on which it is listed and primarily traded on the
valuation date. To the extent that we own restricted securities that are not
freely tradable, but for which a public market otherwise exists, we will use the
market value of that security adjusted for any decrease in value resulting from
the restrictive feature.
35
Table
of Contents
Securities for which a limited market
exists:
We value
securities that are not traded on an established secondary securities market,
but for which a limited market for the security exists, such as certain
participations in, or assignments of, syndicated loans, at the quoted bid
price. In valuing these assets, we
assess trading activity in an asset class, evaluate variances in prices and
other market insights to determine if any available quote prices are reliable. If we conclude that quotes based on active markets
or trading activity may be relied upon, firm bid prices are requested; however,
if a firm bid price is unavailable, we base the value of the security upon the
indicative bid price offered by the respective originating syndication agents
trading desk, or secondary desk, on or near the valuation date. To the extent that we use the indicative bid
price as a basis for valuing the security, our Adviser may take further steps
to consider additional information to validate that price in accordance with the
Policy.
In the event these limited markets become illiquid such that market
prices are no longer readily available, we will value our syndicated loans
using estimated net present values of the future cash flows or discounted cash
flows. The use of a DCF methodology follows that prescribed by FSP No. 157-3,
which provides guidance on the use of a reporting entitys own assumptions
about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates when relevant
observable inputs, such as quotes in active markets, are not available. When
relevant observable market data does not exist, the alternative outlined in the
FSP No. 157-3 is the use of valuing investments based on DCF. For the purposes of using DCF to provide fair
value estimates, we considered multiple inputs such as a risk-adjusted discount
rate that incorporates adjustments that market participants would make both for
nonperformance and liquidity risks. As
such, we developed a modified discount rate approach that incorporates risk
premiums including, among others, increased probability of default, or higher
loss given default, or increased liquidity risk.
The DCF valuations
applied to the syndicated loans provide an estimate of what we believe a market
participant would pay to purchase a syndicated loan in an active market,
thereby establishing a fair value. We
will continue to apply the DCF methodology in illiquid markets until quoted
prices are available or are deemed reliable based on trading activity.
Securities for which no market
exists:
The
valuation methodology for securities for which no market exists falls into
three categories: (1) portfolio investments comprised solely of debt
securities; (2) portfolio investments in controlled companies comprised of
a bundle of securities, which can include debt or equity securities, or both;
and (3) portfolio investments in non-controlled companies comprised of a
bundle of investments, which can include debt or equity securities, or both.
(1)
Portfolio investments
comprised solely of debt securities:
Debt securities that are not publicly traded on an
established securities market, or for which a limited market does not exist (Non-Public
Debt Securities), and that are issued by portfolio companies where we have no
equity, or equity-like securities, and are fair valued in accordance with the
terms of the policy, which utilizes opinions of value submitted to us by
Standard & Poors Securities Evaluations, Inc. (SPSE). We may
also submit paid in kind (PIK) interest to SPSE for their evaluation when it
is determined that PIK interest is likely to be received.
In the case of Non-Public Debt Securities, we have
engaged SPSE to submit opinions of value for our debt securities that are
issued by portfolio companies in which we own no equity, or equity-like securities. SPSEs opinions of value are based on the
valuations prepared by our portfolio management team as described below. We request that SPSE also evaluate and assign
values to success fees (conditional interest included in some loan securities)
when we determine that the probability of receiving a success fee on a given
loan is above 6-8%, a threshold of significance. SPSE will only evaluate the
debt portion of our investments for which we specifically request evaluation,
and may decline to make requested evaluations for any reason at its sole
discretion. Upon completing our collection of data with respect to the
investments (which may include the information described below under Credit
Information, the risk ratings of the loans described below under Loan
Grading and Risk Rating and the factors described hereunder), this valuation
data is forwarded to SPSE for review and analysis. SPSE makes its independent
assessment of the data that we have assembled and assesses its independent data
to form an opinion as to what they consider to be the market values for the
securities. With regard to its work, SPSE has issued the following paragraph:
SPSE provides evaluated price opinions which are
reflective of what SPSE believes the bid side of the market would be for each
loan after careful review and analysis of descriptive, market and credit
information. Each price reflects SPSEs best judgment based upon careful
examination of a variety of market factors. Because of fluctuation in the
market and in other factors beyond its control, SPSE cannot guarantee these
evaluations. The evaluations reflect the market prices, or estimates thereof,
on the date specified. The prices are based on comparable market prices for
similar securities. Market information has been obtained from reputable
secondary market sources. Although these sources are considered reliable, SPSE
cannot guarantee their accuracy.
SPSE opinions of value of our debt securities that are
issued by portfolio companies where we have no equity, or equity-like
securities are submitted to our Board of Directors along with our Advisers
supplemental assessment and recommendation regarding valuation of each of these
investments. Our Adviser generally accepts the opinion of value given by SPSE,
however, in certain limited circumstances, such as when our Adviser may learn
new information regarding an investment between the time of submission to SPSE
and the date of the assessment by our Board of Directors, our Advisers
conclusions as to value may differ from the opinion of value delivered by SPSE.
Our Board of Directors then reviews whether our Adviser has followed its
established procedures for determinations of fair value, and votes to accept or
reject the recommended valuation of our investment
36
Table
of Contents
portfolio. Our Adviser and our management recommended,
and our Board of Directors voted to accept, the opinions of value delivered by
SPSE on the loans in our portfolio as denoted on the Schedule of Investments
included in our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Because there is a delay between when we close an
investment and when the investment can be evaluated by SPSE, new loans are not
valued immediately by SPSE; rather, management makes its own determination
about the value of these investments in accordance with our valuation policy
using the methods described herein.
(2)
Portfolio investments in
controlled companies comprised of a bundle of investments, which can include
debt or equity securities, or both:
The fair value of these investments is determined
based on the total enterprise value of the portfolio company, or issuer,
utilizing a liquidity waterfall approach under Statement of Accounting
Standards (SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). For Non-Public Debt Securities and equity or
equity-like securities (e.g. preferred equity, equity, or other equity-like
securities) that are purchased together as part of a package, where we have
control or could gain control through an option or warrant security, both the
debt and equity securities of the portfolio investment would exit in the
mergers and acquisitions market as the principal market, generally through a
sale or recapitalization of the portfolio company. In accordance with SFAS No. 157,
we apply the in-use premise of value which assumes the debt and equity
securities are sold together. Under this liquidity waterfall approach, we
continue to use the enterprise value methodology utilizing a liquidity
waterfall approach to determine the fair value of these investments under SFAS No. 157
if we have the ability to initiate a sale of a portfolio company as of the
measurement date. Under this approach, we first calculate the total enterprise
value of the issuer by incorporating some or all of the following factors:
·
the issuers ability to make payments;
·
the earnings of the issuer;
·
recent sales to third parties of similar
securities;
·
the comparison to publicly traded
securities; and
·
DCF or other pertinent factors.
In gathering the sales to third parties of similar
securities, we may reference industry statistics and use outside experts. Once
we have estimated the total enterprise value of the issuer, we subtract the
value of all the debt securities of the issuer; which are valued at the
contractual principal balance. Fair values of these debt securities are
discounted for any shortfall of total enterprise value over the total debt
outstanding for the issuer. Once the values for all outstanding senior
securities (which include the debt securities) have been subtracted from the
total enterprise value of the issuer, the remaining amount, if any, is used to
determine the value of the issuers equity or equity like securities. If, in our Advisers judgment, the liquidity
waterfall approach does not accurately reflect the value of the debt component,
the Adviser may recommend that we use a valuation by SPSE, or if that is
unavailable, a DCF valuation technique.
(3)
Portfolio investments in
non-controlled companies comprised of a bundle of investments, which can
include debt or equity securities, or both:
We value Non-Public Debt Securities that are purchased
together with equity or equity-like securities from the same portfolio company,
or issuer, for which we do not control or cannot gain control as of the
measurement date, using a hypothetical secondary market as our principal
market. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, we determine the fair value of
these debt securities of non-control investments assuming the sale of an
individual debt security using the in-exchange premise of value (as defined in
SFAS No. 157). As such, we estimate the fair value of the debt component
using estimates of value provided by SPSE and our own assumptions in the
absence of observable market data, including synthetic credit ratings,
estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of
similar securities as of the measurement date. For equity or equity-like
securities of investments for which we do not control or cannot gain control as
of the measurement date, we value the equity portion based on the total
enterprise value of the issuer, which is calculated using a liquidity waterfall
approach as described above.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation
process, such estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the values
that would have been obtained had a ready market for the securities existed,
and the differences could be material. Additionally, changes in the market
environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments
may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be
different than the valuations currently assigned. There is no single standard
for determining fair value in good faith, as fair value depends upon
circumstances of each individual case. In general, fair value is the amount
that we might reasonably expect to receive upon the current sale of the
security in an arms-length transaction in the securitys principal market.
Valuation Considerations:
From time to time, depending on certain circumstances,
the Adviser may use the following valuation considerations, including but not
limited to:
·
the nature and
realizable value of the collateral;
·
the portfolio companys
earnings and cash flows and its ability to make payments on its obligations;
37
Table
of Contents
·
the markets in which
the portfolio company does business;
·
the comparison to
publicly traded companies; and
·
DCF and other relevant
factors.
Because such valuations, particularly valuations of private securities and
private companies, are not susceptible to precise determination, may fluctuate
over short periods of time, and may be based on estimates, our determinations
of fair value may differ from the values that might have actually resulted had
a readily available market for these securities been available.
Credit Information:
Our Adviser monitors a wide variety of key credit statistics that
provide information regarding our portfolio companies to help us assess credit
quality and portfolio performance. We and our Adviser participate in the
periodic board meetings of our portfolio companies in which we hold Control and
Affiliate investments and also require them to provide annual audited and
monthly unaudited financial statements. Using these statements or comparable
information and board discussions, our Adviser calculates and evaluates the
credit statistics.
Loan Grading and Risk Rating:
As part of our valuation procedures above, we risk rate all of our
investments in debt securities. For syndicated loans that have been rated by an
NRSRO (as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act), we use the NRSROs
risk rating for such security. For all other debt securities, we use a
proprietary risk rating system. Our risk rating system uses a scale of 0 to 10,
with 10 being the lowest probability of default. This system is used to
estimate the probability of default on debt securities and the probability of
loss if there is a default. These types of systems are referred to as risk
rating systems and are used by banks and rating agencies. The risk rating
system covers both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the business and the
securities we hold.
For the debt securities for which we do not use a third-party NRSRO
risk rating, we seek to have our risk rating system mirror the risk rating
systems of major risk rating organizations, such as those provided by an NRSRO.
While we seek to mirror the NRSRO systems, we cannot provide any assurance that
our risk rating system will provide the same risk rating as an NRSRO for these
securities. The following chart is an estimate of the relationship of our risk
rating system to the designations used by two NRSROs as they risk rate debt
securities of major companies. Because our system rates debt securities of
companies that are unrated by any NRSRO, there can be no assurance that the
correlation to the NRSRO set out below is accurate. We believe our risk rating
would be significantly higher than a typical NRSRO risk rating because the risk
rating of the typical NRSRO is designed for larger businesses. However, our
risk rating has been designed to risk rate the securities of smaller businesses
that are not rated by a typical NRSRO. Therefore, when we use our risk rating
on larger business securities, the risk rating is higher than a typical NRSRO
rating. The primary difference between our risk rating and the rating of a
typical NRSRO is that our risk rating uses more quantitative determinants and
includes qualitative determinants that we believe are not used in the NRSRO
rating. It is our understanding that most debt securities of medium-sized
companies do not exceed the grade of BBB on an NRSRO scale, so there would be
no debt securities in the middle market that would meet the definition of AAA,
AA or A. Therefore, our scale begins with the designation 10 as the best risk
rating which may be equivalent to a BBB from an NRSRO, however, no assurance
can be given that a 10 on our scale is equal to a BBB on an NRSRO scale.
Companys
System
|
|
First
NRSRO
|
|
Second
NRSRO
|
|
Gladstone
Investments Description(a)
|
>10
|
|
Baa2
|
|
BBB
|
|
Probability of Default (PD) during the next ten
years is 4% and the Expected Loss (EL) is 1% or less
|
10
|
|
Baa3
|
|
BBB-
|
|
PD is 5% and the EL is 1% to 2%
|
9
|
|
Ba1
|
|
BB+
|
|
PD is 10% and the EL is 2% to 3%
|
8
|
|
Ba2
|
|
BB
|
|
PD is 16% and the EL is 3% to 4%
|
7
|
|
Ba3
|
|
BB-
|
|
PD is 17.8% and the EL is 4% to 5%
|
6
|
|
B1
|
|
B+
|
|
PD is 22% and the EL is 5% to 6.5%
|
5
|
|
B2
|
|
B
|
|
PD is 25% and the EL is 6.5% to 8%
|
4
|
|
B3
|
|
B-
|
|
PD is 27% and the EL is 8% to 10%
|
3
|
|
Caa1
|
|
CCC+
|
|
PD is 30% and the EL is 10% to 13.3%
|
2
|
|
Caa2
|
|
CCC
|
|
PD is 35% and the EL is 13.3% to 16.7%
|
1
|
|
Caa3
|
|
CC
|
|
PD is 65% and the EL is 16.7% to 20%
|
0
|
|
N/A
|
|
D
|
|
PD is 85% or there is a payment of default and the
EL is greater than 20%
|
(a)
The default rates set
forth are for a ten year term debt security. If a debt security is less than
ten years, then the PD is adjusted to a lower percentage for the shorter
period, which may move the security higher on our risk rating scale
The above scale gives an indication of the probability of default and
the magnitude of the loss if there is a default. Our policy is to stop accruing
interest on an investment if we determine that interest is no longer
collectible. At June 30, 2009, one
investment was on non-accrual for approximately $2.0 million at fair value, or
0.9% of the aggregate fair value of our investment portfolio. Additionally, we do not risk rate our equity
securities.
38
Table
of Contents
The following table lists the risk ratings for all non-syndicated loans
in our portfolio at June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, representing
approximately 90% and 59%, respectively, of all loans in our portfolio at the
end of each period:
Rating
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
Highest
|
|
8.0
|
|
7.0
|
|
Average
|
|
5.6
|
|
5.5
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
5.3
|
|
5.1
|
|
Lowest
|
|
2.0
|
|
2.0
|
|
The following table lists the risk ratings for syndicated loans in our
portfolio that were not rated by an NRSRO at June 30, 2009 and March 31,
2009, representing approximately 3% and 12%, respectively, of all loans in our
portfolio at the end of each period:
Rating
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
Highest
|
|
8.0
|
|
9.0
|
|
Average
|
|
7.0
|
|
8.0
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
7.2
|
|
8.0
|
|
Lowest
|
|
6.0
|
|
7.0
|
|
For syndicated loans that are currently rated by an NRSRO, we risk rate
such loans in accordance with the risk rating systems of major risk rating
organizations, such as those provided by an NRSRO. The following table lists
the risk ratings for all syndicated loans in our portfolio that were rated by
an NRSRO at June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, representing
approximately 7% and 29%, respectively, of all loans in our portfolio at the
end of each period:
Rating
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
Highest
|
|
B+/B1
|
|
BB/Ba2
|
|
Average
|
|
B/B2
|
|
B/B2
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
B-/B3
|
|
B/B2
|
|
Lowest
|
|
CCC+/B2
|
|
CCC+/B3
|
|
Tax Status
Federal Income Taxes
We intend to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC under Subtitle
A, Chapter 1 of Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we are not subject to
federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains distributed
to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, we are required to distribute to
stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by
the Code. It is our policy to pay out as a distribution up to 100% of those
amounts.
In an effort to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on RICs, we
currently intend to distribute during each calendar year, an amount at least
equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98%
of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one-year period ending
on October 31 of the calendar year, and (3) any ordinary income and
net capital gains for preceding years that were not distributed during such
years.
Revenue
Recognition
Interest
and Dividend Income Recognition
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premiums and acquisition
costs and for the accretion of discounts, is recorded on the accrual basis to
the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. Generally, when a loan becomes 90 days or
more past due or if our qualitative assessment indicates that the debtor is
unable to service its debt or other obligations, we will place the loan on
non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on that loan until the
borrower has demonstrated the ability and intent to pay contractual amounts
due. However, we remain contractually
entitled to this interest. At June 30,
2009, one Control investment was on non-accrual with a fair value of
approximately $2.0 million, or 0.9% of the fair value of all loans held in our
portfolio at June 30, 2009. At March 31,
2009, one Control investment was on non-accrual with a fair value of
approximately $2.6 million, or 0.8% of the fair value of all loans held in our
portfolio at March 31, 2009. Conditional interest, or a success fee, is
recorded when earned upon full repayment of a loan investment. To date we have
not recorded any conditional interest. Dividend income on preferred equity
securities is accrued to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected and that we have the option to collect such amounts in cash. To date,
we have not accrued any dividend income.
Services
Provided to Portfolio Companies
As a business development company under the 1940 Act, we are required
to make available significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies.
We provide these services through our Adviser, who provides these services on
our behalf through its officers who are also our officers. Currently, neither
we nor our Adviser charges a fee for managerial assistance, however, if our
Adviser does
39
Table
of Contents
receive fees for such managerial assistance, our Adviser will credit
the managerial assistance fees to the base management fee due from us to our
Adviser.
Our Adviser receives fees for the other services it provides to our portfolio
companies. These other fees are typically non-recurring, are recognized as
revenue when earned and are generally paid directly to our Adviser by the
borrower or potential borrower upon the closing of the investment. The services
our Adviser provides to our portfolio companies vary by investment, but
generally include a broad array of services such as investment banking
services, arranging bank and equity financing, structuring financing from
multiple lenders and investors, reviewing existing credit facilities,
restructuring existing investments, raising equity and debt capital, turnaround
management, merger and acquisition services and recruiting new management
personnel. When our Adviser receives fees for these services, 50% of certain of
those fees are voluntarily credited against the base management fee that we pay
to our Adviser. Any services of this nature subsequent to the closing would
typically generate a separate fee at the time of completion.
Our Adviser also receives fees for monitoring and reviewing portfolio
company investments. These fees are recurring and are generally paid annually
or quarterly in advance to our Adviser throughout the life of the investment.
Fees of this nature are recorded as revenue by our Adviser when earned and are
not credited against the base management fee.
We may receive fees for the origination and closing services we provide
to portfolio companies through our Adviser. These fees are paid directly to us
and are recognized as revenue upon closing of the originated investment and are
reported as Fee income in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the
notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this report.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest
rates. We estimate that ultimately
approximately 20% of the loans in our portfolio will be made at fixed rates and
approximately 80% will be made at variable rates. As of June 30, 2009, our portfolio
consisted of the following breakdown in relation to all outstanding debt:
23
|
%
|
variable rates
|
|
46
|
%
|
variable rates with a floor
|
|
31
|
%
|
fixed rates
|
|
100
|
%
|
Total
|
|
There have been no material changes in the
quantitative and qualitative market risk disclosures for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC on June 2,
2009.
In May 2009, we cancelled our interest rate cap
agreement with Deutsche Bank and entered into an interest rate cap agreement
with BB&T that will effectively limit the interest rate on a portion of the
borrowings under the line of credit pursuant to the terms of the Credit
Facility. The interest rate cap has a notional amount of $45.0 million at a
cost of approximately $40. The Company records changes in the fair market value
of the interest rate cap agreement monthly based on the current market
valuation at month end as unrealized depreciation or appreciation on derivative
on the Companys consolidated statement of operations. The interest rate cap
agreement expires in April 2010. The agreement provides that the Companys
floating interest rate or cost of funds on a portion of the portfolios
borrowings will be capped at 9% when the LIBOR rate is in excess of 9%.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
As of June 30, 2009, we, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely
alerting management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of material information about us required to be included in periodic
Securities and Exchange Commission filings. However, in evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and
management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
40
Table of Contents
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Neither we, nor any of
our subsidiaries, are currently subject to any material legal proceeding, nor,
to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us or any
of our subsidiaries.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS.
Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they
occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
and the trading price of our common stock. For a discussion of these risks,
please refer to the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2009, filed by us with the SEC on June 2,
2009.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Not applicable.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF
SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION.
Not applicable.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
See the exhibit index.
41
Table
of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
GLADSTONE INVESTMENT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Mark Perrigo
|
|
|
Mark Perrigo
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: August 4, 2009
42
Table
of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit a.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-123699), filed
May 13, 2005.
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit b.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-123699), filed
June 21, 2005.
|
3.3
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00704), filed on July 10,
2007.
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-123699), filed
June 21, 2005.
|
10.1
|
|
Investment Advisory and Management Agreement between
the Company and Gladstone Management Corporation, dated June 22, 2005
and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K, filed on June 14, 2006 (renewed on
July 8, 2009).
|
10.2
|
|
Administration Agreement between the Company and
Gladstone Administration, LLC, dated June 22, 2005 and incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed June 14, 2006 (renewed on July 8, 2009).
|
10.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of April 14, 2009 by and among Gladstone Business Investment LLC as
Borrower, Gladstone Management Corporation as Servicer, the Committed Lenders
named therein, the CP Lenders named therein, the Managing Agents named
therein, and Branch Banking and Trust Company as Administrative Agent,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00704), filed April 14, 2009.
|
11
|
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the
notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained
in this report).
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
All other exhibits for which provision is made in the applicable
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under
the related instruction or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
43
Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2025 to Feb 2025
Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Feb 2025