UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
000-31635
(Commission file number)
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
|
|
95-4333817
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
130 Baytech Drive
|
|
|
San Jose, CA
|
|
95134
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code)
|
(408) 522-3100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
.
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding as of July 23, 2010 was
9,795,349 shares.
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,095
|
|
|
$
|
55,158
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
4,879
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
35,416
|
|
|
|
75,141
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
37,403
|
|
|
$
|
77,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
Restructuring liabilities, short-term
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
Restructuring liabilities, long-term
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,308
|
|
|
|
5,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par
value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; zero
and 300,000 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,092
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value;
50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,795,349
and 9,684,756 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Additional paid-in capital, common stock
|
|
|
317,101
|
|
|
|
309,755
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(285,017
|
)
|
|
|
(280,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
32,095
|
|
|
|
71,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
37,403
|
|
|
$
|
77,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Derived from the Companys audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
3,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,580
|
|
|
$
|
8,587
|
|
|
$
|
12,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues*
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
4,237
|
|
|
|
7,427
|
|
|
|
9,056
|
|
Research and development*
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
2,081
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
Sales and marketing*
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
General and administrative*
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
6,560
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
|
|
12,658
|
|
|
|
17,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(2,064
|
)
|
|
|
(4,071
|
)
|
|
|
(4,771
|
)
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(2,814
|
)
|
|
|
(1,970
|
)
|
|
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
|
(4,571
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,814
|
)
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
|
(4,550
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of
tax* (Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,640
|
|
|
$
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share from
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net income per share from
discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.86
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted
net loss per share
|
|
|
9,773,600
|
|
|
|
9,460,395
|
|
|
|
9,737,363
|
|
|
|
9,403,482
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Includes the following amounts related to stock-based compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,980
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
|
(4,550
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) continuing operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
Amortization of investments, net
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
Accrued compensation and other liabilities
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Proceeds on sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
14,315
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(14,091
|
)
|
|
|
(22,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(10,819
|
)
|
|
|
20,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of preferred stock
|
|
|
(36,238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Proceeds from common stock issuance
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock options, net
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(36,015
|
)
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,513
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(49,063
|
)
|
|
|
15,193
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
55,158
|
|
|
|
33,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,095
|
|
|
$
|
49,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
Endwave Corporation (Endwave or the Company) designs, manufactures and markets radio
frequency, or RF, products that enable the transmission, reception and processing of high frequency
RF signals. The Company currently has two key product lines:
|
|
|
The Companys transceiver modules which serve as the core RF sub-system in digital
microwave radios are produced for telecommunication network original equipment
manufacturers and system integrators located throughout the world, collectively referred
to as telecom OEMs.
|
|
|
|
The Companys semiconductor product line consists of a broad range of monolithic
microwave integrated circuits, or MMICs, including amplifiers, voltage controlled
oscillators, up and down converters, variable gain amplifiers, voltage variable
attenuators, fixed attenuators and filters. These types of devices find wide application
in numerous telecommunications, avionic, defense, homeland security, instrumentation and
consumer systems.
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Endwave have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they
do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The year-end condensed
consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, the information contained
herein reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. Operating
results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010 or any future periods. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.
On April 30, 2009, the Company sold its defense and security business to Microsemi Corporation
(Microsemi). The Companys financial statements have been presented to reflect the defense and
security business as a discontinued operation for all periods presented. See additional discussion
at Note 9, Discontinued Operations.
2. Investments
The following fair value amounts have been determined using available market information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
1,999
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,999
|
|
United States government agencies
|
|
|
16,966
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
16,966
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,410
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
United States government agency
|
|
|
8,759
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8,762
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,292
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the Company had $21.4 million of short-term investments with maturities of
less than one year and no long term investments.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had unrealized gains of $3,000 related to $14.1 million of
investments in debt securities and unrealized losses of $2,000 related to $7.3 million of
investments in debt securities. The securities were in an unrealized loss position for a period of
less than one year. The investments mature through 2011 and the Company believes that it has the
ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates. Realized gains and losses were
insignificant for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
The Company reviews its investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that have
indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary
include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, credit
quality and the Companys ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow
for any anticipated recovery in market value. If the Company believes the carrying value of an
investment is in excess of its fair value, and this difference is other-than-temporary, it is the
Companys policy to write down the investment to reduce its carrying value to fair value.
Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets of
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
$
|
54,097
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States government agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
United States government agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,966
|
|
|
|
8,762
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
$
|
54,097
|
|
|
$
|
25,761
|
|
|
$
|
11,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys financial assets and liabilities are valued using market prices on both active
markets (Level 1) and less active markets (Level 2). Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained
from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets.
Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from
7
readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments. As of June 30, 2010, the Company
did not have any assets or liabilities without observable market values that would require a high
level of judgment to determine fair value (Level 3).
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company did not have any significant transfers
of investments between Level 1 and Level 2.
The amounts reported as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued warranty, compensation and other liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term
maturities. The fair value for the Companys investments in marketable debt securities is estimated
based on quoted market prices. Based upon borrowing rates currently available to the Company for
capital leases with similar terms, the carrying value of its capital lease obligations approximates
fair value.
3. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or
market and consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
3,463
|
|
|
$
|
4,046
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
|
$
|
4,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second quarter of 2010 included a $1.5 million write-off of inventory associated with
excess material related to a rapid drop in sales of a legacy product for a major customers radio
platform.
4. Note Receivable
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company was issued a note receivable with one of its
customers, Allgon Microwave Corporation AB (Allgon) which failed to meet the terms of its
accounts receivable. The note was in the amount of $545,000, with payments of $25,000 due on a
weekly basis. The note was to be paid in full by the end of the first quarter of 2009.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, Allgon made the first five payments under the
note. However, during the fourth quarter of 2008, Allgon went in default on the note and filed for
bankruptcy protection. At the time of default, the note receivable balance was $420,000. Based on
Allgons bankruptcy liquidation and the related estimates of payments to Allgons creditors, the
Company reserved 100%, or $420,000, of the remaining balance of the note receivable.
Subsequent to Allgons default on the note receivable, the Company filed a complaint alleging
that Allgons parent company, Advantech Advanced Microwave Technologies Inc. of Montreal, Canada
(Advantech), had breached its contractual obligations with the Company and owes the Company
$994,500 including the note receivable, purchased inventory and authorized and accepted purchase
orders resulting in shippable finished goods. See additional discussion at Note 7, Commitments and
Contingencies.
5. Warranty
The warranty periods for the Companys products are between 12 and 30 months from date of
shipment. The Company provides for estimated warranty expense at the time of shipment. While the
Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring
and evaluating the quality of component suppliers, its warranty obligation is affected by product
failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure.
Should actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from the
estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty accrual and related costs may be required.
8
Changes in the Companys product warranty liability during the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
1,087
|
|
|
$
|
2,439
|
|
Warranties accrued
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Warranties settled or reversed
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
(1,049
|
)
|
Warranties transferred due to sale of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Restructuring
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company undertook certain restructuring activities to
reduce expenses. The components of the restructuring charge included severance, benefits, payroll
taxes and other costs associated with employee terminations. The net charge for these restructuring
activities was $1.2 million and all cash payments have been made. Of this amount, approximately
$182,000 has been included in the discontinued operations line item on the consolidated statements
of operations.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company undertook certain additional restructuring
activities to reduce expenses. The components of the restructuring charge included severance,
benefits, payroll taxes and other costs associated with employee terminations. The net charge for
these restructuring activities was $243,000 and all cash payments have been made. Of this amount,
approximately $39,000 has been included in the discontinued operations line item on the
consolidated statements of operations.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company undertook certain additional restructuring
activities, including the departure of a senior executive, to reduce expenses. The components of
the restructuring charge included severance, benefits, payroll taxes and other costs associated
with employee terminations. The net charge for these restructuring activities was $1.2 million. The
remaining restructuring liability of $858,000 at June 30, 2010 is expected to be substantially paid
by the end of the third quarter of 2012.
Changes in all of the Companys restructuring liabilities discussed are summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Accrual at December 31
|
|
$
|
1,208
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
Imputed interest
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge adjustment
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at June 30
|
|
$
|
858
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, $399,000 and $459,000 of accrued restructuring charges were included in
current liabilities and long-term liabilities, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance
sheet. At December 31, 2009, $570,000 and $638,000 of accrued restructuring charges were included
in current liabilities and long-term liabilities, respectively, on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet. The restructuring liability related to a senior executive was recorded at its fair
value based on an assumed interest rate of 5.0%, which represents the current market rate of
interest at which the Company could borrow, due to the long-term nature of the liability. The
Company will recognize interest expense associated with amortizing the $77,000 discount on this
liability over the 30 month term of the restructuring payout. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized interest expense of $11,000 and $24,000, respectively.
9
The Companys restructuring estimates will be reviewed and revised quarterly, if necessary,
and may result in an increase or decrease to restructuring charges. During the first quarter of
2010, the Company recorded a $14,000 positive adjustment as a result of lower benefit charges in connection with the first quarter
2009 restructuring plan than were originally anticipated.
7. Commitments and Contingencies
On October 31, 2008, the Company filed a complaint with the Canadian Superior Court in
Montreal, Quebec alleging that Advantech, the parent company of Allgon Microwave Corporation AB,
had breached its contractual obligations with Endwave and owes the Company $994,500 in a note
receivable, purchased inventory and authorized finished goods purchase orders. The Company cannot
predict the outcome of these proceedings. Other than the complaint against Advantech, the Company
is not currently a party to any material litigation
8. Stockholders Equity
Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement
The Company had 5,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock authorized as of June 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
In April 2006, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Oak Investment Partners XI,
Limited Partnership (Oak). Pursuant to the purchase agreement, Oak purchased 300,000 shares of
the Companys Series B preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, for $150 per preferred share,
or a total of $45.0 million. The preferred shares are convertible initially into 3,000,000 shares
of common stock, for an effective purchase price of $15 per common share equivalent. The Company
also issued Oak a warrant granting Oak the right to purchase an additional 90,000 shares of Series
B preferred stock at an exercise price of $150 per share. The warrant expired on April 24, 2009.
The Company received net proceeds of $43.1 million from the sale of the Series B preferred stock
and the warrant after the payment of legal fees and other expenses, including commissions.
On January 21, 2010, the Company repurchased all 300,000 outstanding shares of its preferred
stock held by Oak for $120 per share, or a total of $36.0 million in cash. The total cost of the
repurchase was $36.2 million, which included fees and expenses. The 300,000 outstanding shares
represented 3,000,000 shares of Endwave common stock on an as-converted basis. Such shares had
entitled Oak to a liquidation preference equal to its original investment of $45.0 million before
any proceeds from a liquidation or sale of the Company would have been paid to the holders of
Endwaves common stock. In connection with the share repurchase, Eric Stonestrom, Oaks designee to
Endwaves board of directors, resigned from the board of directors.
Since the Company repurchased the preferred stock for official retirement, the excess of the
stated value, $43.1 million, over the effective repurchase price of $36.2 million was credited to
additional paid-in capital.
Stock Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the
award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. All of the Companys stock
compensation is accounted for as an equity instrument.
10
The effect of recording stock-based compensation for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 was as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
Amounts capitalized into inventory during the three month period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Amounts previously capitalized into inventory and expensed
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
562
|
|
Tax effect on stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on net income (loss) per share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the compensation cost in connection with the purchase plan for the three months ended June
30, 2010, the Company recognized a benefit of $171,000 due to actual contributions being less than
expected contributions for the offering period, resulting in the recognition of compensation cost
only for those awards that actually vested.
The effect of recording stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 was as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
1,151
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
205
|
|
Amounts capitalized into inventory during the six month period
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Amounts previously capitalized into inventory and expensed
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
Tax effect on stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on net income (loss) per share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted options to purchase
25,500 and 50,300 shares of common stock, respectively, with an estimated total grant-date fair
value of $44,000 and $60,000, respectively. Of these amounts, the Company estimated that the
stock-based compensation expense of the awards not expected to vest was $7,000 and $5,000,
respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted 30,000 restricted stock units
with an estimated grant-date fair value of $95,000 or $3.15 per share. Of this amount, the Company
estimated that the stock-based compensation expense of the awards not expected to vest was $8,000.
The Company did not grant any restricted stock units during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted options to purchase
295,100 and 520,000 shares of common stock, respectively, with an estimated total grant-date fair
value of $447,000 or $1.51 per option and $538,000 or $1.04 per option, respectively. Of these
amounts, the Company estimated that the stock-based compensation expense of the awards not expected
to vest was $75,000 and $146,000, respectively.
11
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted 168,000 restricted stock units
with an estimated grant-date fair value of $451,000 or $2.68 per share. Of this amount, the
Company estimated that the stock-based compensation expense of the awards not expected to vest was
$49,000. The Company did not grant any restricted stock units during the six months ended June 30,
2009.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company fully accelerated the vesting of
165,600 options in connection with the closing of the Microsemi transaction described in Note 9 and
certain restructuring activities. The Company recorded additional stock-based compensation expense
of $66,000 relating to the incremental value of the fully vested modified awards.
As of June 30, 2010, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to all stock
options was $570,000, net of estimated forfeitures, and will be recognized over an estimated
weighted-average service period of 1.3 years. As of June 30, 2010, the unrecorded stock-based
compensation balance related to all restricted stock units was $321,000, net of estimated
forfeitures, and will be recognized over an estimated weighted-average service period of 1.5
years. As of June 30, the unrecorded stock-based compensation balance related to the employee
stock purchase plan was $167,000, net of estimated forfeitures, and will be recognized over an
estimate weighted-average service period of 0.5 years.
Valuation Assumptions
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model and the graded-vesting method with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.51% - 2.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.46% - 2.05
|
%
|
|
|
1.28% - 2.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.44% - 2.05
|
%
|
Expected life of options
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
3.0 years
|
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
|
4.5 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
The fair value of purchase rights under the employee stock purchase plan is determined using
the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.24% - 1.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.35% - 0.93
|
%
|
|
|
0.24% - 1.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.35% - 0.93
|
%
|
Expected life of options
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends
and has no present intention to pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the combination
of historical volatility of the Companys common stock and the expected future volatility over the
period commensurate with the expected life of the options and other factors. The risk-free interest
rates are taken from the Daily Federal Yield Curve Rates as of the grant dates as published by the
Federal Reserve and represent the yields on actively traded Treasury securities for terms equal to
the expected term of the options. The expected term calculation is based on the Companys observed
historical option exercise behavior and post-vesting cancellations of options by employees.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009 was $12,000 and $107,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $51,000 and $109,000, respectively.
12
Equity Incentive Program
The Companys equity incentive program is a broad-based, long-term retention program designed
to align stockholder and employee interests. Under the Companys equity incentive program, stock
options generally have a vesting period of four years, are exercisable for a period not to exceed
ten years from the date of issuance and are generally granted at prices not less than the fair
market value of the Companys common stock at the grant date. Under the Companys equity incentive
program, restricted stock units have a vesting period of two years.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the indicated periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,010,561
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
295,100
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(73,990
|
)
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
(52,727
|
)
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,178,944
|
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and exercisable and
expected to be exercisable at June
30, 2010
|
|
|
1,113,365
|
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
Options vested and exercisable at
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
536,680
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
$
|
439
|
|
The options outstanding and options vested and exercisable at June 30, 2010 were in the
following exercise price ranges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Vested and Exercisable
|
|
Options Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
$0.76 - $ 1.21
|
|
|
11,348
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
11,348
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
$1.81 - $ 1.81
|
|
|
279,613
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
155,974
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
$1.93 - $ 2.40
|
|
|
88,607
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
55,924
|
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
$2.53 - $ 2.53
|
|
|
465,058
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
|
|
|
269,319
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
$2.55 - $ 2.55
|
|
|
30,300
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
30,074
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
$2.65 - $ 2.65
|
|
|
261,825
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
9.59
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
$2.92 - $ 6.59
|
|
|
37,868
|
|
|
$
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
9,848
|
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
$9.90 - $13.23
|
|
|
4,325
|
|
|
$
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
4,118
|
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178,944
|
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
|
|
|
536,680
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the restricted stock unit activity for the indicated periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
168,000
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(6,200
|
)
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
161,800
|
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
At June 30, 2010, the Company had 148,371 restricted stock units vested and expected to vest
with a weighted average remaining contractual term of 1.03 years and an aggregate intrinsic value
of $455,000.
At June 30, 2010, the Company had 4,771,305 options and awards available for grant under its
equity incentive plans.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In October 2000, the Company established the Endwave Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
All employees who work a minimum of 20 hours per week and are customarily employed by the Company
(or an affiliate thereof) for at least five months per calendar year are eligible to participate.
Under this plan, employees may purchase shares of common stock through payroll deductions of up to
15% of their earnings with a limit of 3,000 shares per offering period under the plan. The price
paid for the Companys common stock purchased under the plan is equal to 85% of the lower of the
fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of commencement of participation by an
employee in an offering under the plan or the date of purchase.
For the compensation cost in connection with the purchase plan for the three months ended June
30, 2010, the Company recognized a benefit of $171,000 due to actual contributions being less than
expected contributions for the offering period, resulting in the recognition of compensation cost
only for those awards that actually vested. For the compensation cost in connection with the
purchase plan for the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized an expense of
$61,000. For the compensation cost in connection with the purchase plan for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, the Company recognized a benefit of $96,000, and for the six months ended June 30,
2009, we recognized an expense of $205,000.
During the second quarter of 2010, there were 36,603 shares issued under the purchase plan at
a weighted average price of $2.03 per share. During the second quarter of 2009, there were 103,075
shares issued under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $2.35 per share. At June 30,
2010, there were 327,229 shares available for purchase under the purchase plan.
9. Discontinued Operations
On April 30, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the Purchase
Agreement) with Microsemi, pursuant to which Microsemi purchased the Companys defense and
security business (the Business), including all of the outstanding capital stock of Endwave
Defense Systems, Incorporated (EDSI). As consideration, Microsemi assumed certain liabilities
associated exclusively with the Business, including the Companys building lease in Folsom,
California, and paid $28.0 million in cash. The Purchase Agreement contains standard
representations and warranties as to the Business that survives for two years following the
closing. In connection with the transaction, the Company entered into an indemnification agreement
pursuant to which the Company agreed to indemnify Microsemi for environmental, product liability
and intellectual property infringement claims related to the Companys operation of the Business
prior to the closing date, as well as for any other excluded liability, and Microsemi agreed to
indemnify the Company for any claims related to the operation of the Business following the closing
date and for any other assumed liability, subject in some cases to a customary deductible and
limitation on maximum damages.
Concurrently with the closing of the acquisition, the Company entered into a transition
services agreement and an employee transition services agreement with Microsemi pursuant to which
the Company agreed to provide to Microsemi for a limited period of time certain transitional
services, including human resources, information technology and product supply services.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized a $19.6 million gain on
sale of discontinued operations, net of tax, which included the following: $28.0 million of cash
received from Microsemi and $1.3 million of liabilities assumed by Microsemi reduced by $647,000 of
deal fees and $9.1 million of assets transferred to Microsemi.
14
The results of operations for the Business classified as discontinued operations are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
5,313
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation, net of tax
|
|
|
19,558
|
|
|
|
19,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
18,597
|
|
|
$
|
17,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed
by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
and potential common stock equivalents outstanding during the period, if dilutive. Potential common
stock equivalents include the convertible preferred stock which was repurchased in January 2010,
options to purchase common stock, restricted stock units and shares to be purchased in connection
with the Companys employee stock purchase plan.
As of June 30, 2009, 300,000 shares of preferred stock were outstanding, which were
convertible into 3,000,000 shares of common stock. On January 21, 2010, the Company repurchased
all 300,000 shares of its preferred stock held by Oak.
As the Company incurred net losses from continuing operations for all periods presented,
shares associated with common stock issuable upon the conversion of the preferred shares were not
included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Potential dilutive common shares of 1,340,744 as of June 30, 2010 and 2,433,395 as of June 30, 2009
from the assumed exercise of stock options and unvested restricted stock units were not included in
the net income (loss) per share calculations as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. As
a result, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for all periods
presented.
11. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) generally represents all changes in stockholders equity except
those resulting from investments or contributions by stockholders. The Companys unrealized gains
and losses on its available-for-sale securities and gains and losses resulting from foreign
exchange translations represent the only components of comprehensive loss excluded from the
reported net loss and are displayed in the statements of stockholders equity.
The components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,640
|
|
|
$
|
(4,097
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,980
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on investments
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,624
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,111
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
12. Segment Disclosures
The Company operates in a single business segment. Although the Company sells to customers in
various geographic regions throughout the world, the end customers may be located elsewhere. The
Companys total revenues by billing location for the periods ended June 30 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Finland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
Hungary
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Slovakia
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,323
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Finland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,891
|
|
|
|
77.1
|
%
|
Germany
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Hungary
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Slovakia
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Rest of the world
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,822
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, three customers each accounted for greater than 10%
of total revenues and combined they accounted for 91% of our total revenues. For the three months
ended June 30, 2009, two customers each accounted for greater than 10% of total revenues and
combined they accounted for 94% of our total revenues and no other customer accounted for more than
10% of our total revenues.
In the first half of 2010, three customers each accounted for greater than 10% of total
revenues and combined they accounted for 93% of our total revenues. In the first half of 2009, one
customer accounted for 85% of our total revenues and no other customer accounted for more than 10%
of our total revenues.
13. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) FASB issued new standards
for revenue recognition with multiple deliverables. These new standards impact the determination of
when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as
separate units of accounting. Additionally, these new standards modify the manner in which the
transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables by no longer
permitting the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration. These new standards are
required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2011; however, early adoption is permitted. The
Company does not expect these new standards to significantly impact its unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued new standards for the accounting for certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. These new standards amend the scope of pre-existing
software revenue guidance by removing from the guidance non-software components of tangible
products and certain software components of tangible products. These new standards are required to
be adopted in the first quarter of 2011; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company does
not expect these new standards to significantly impact its unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
16
In January 2010, the FASB issued new standards for fair value measurement and disclosures.
These new standards require disclosures for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2
fair value measurements and
the reasons for the transfers and activity. For Level 3 fair value measurements, purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements must be reported on a gross basis. Further, additional disclosures
are required by class of assets or liabilities, as well as inputs used to measure fair value and
valuation techniques. These standards are required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2010.
These standards did not have a material impact on the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued new standards which amend the subsequent event disclosure
requirements for SEC filers. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. These standards are effective upon issuance
and did not a material impact on the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements, related notes and Risk Factors section included elsewhere in
this report on Form 10-Q, as well as the information contained under Risk Factors, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, this discussion
contains forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties,
including statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the
future. All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available
to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking
statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In
the past, our operating results have fluctuated and are likely to continue to fluctuate in the
future.
The terms we, us, our and words of similar import below refer to Endwave Corporation.
Overview
We design, manufacture and market radio frequency, or RF, products that enable the
transmission, reception and processing of high frequency RF signals.
As a result of the divestiture of our Defense and Security RF module business in April 2009,
our products now consist of two key product lines:
|
|
|
Our transceiver modules which serve as the core RF sub-system in digital microwave
radios are produced for telecommunication network original equipment manufacturers and
system integrators located throughout the world, collectively referred to as telecom
OEMs.
|
|
|
|
|
Our semiconductor product line consists of a broad range of monolithic microwave
integrated circuits, or MMICs, including amplifiers, voltage controlled oscillators, up
and down converters, variable gain amplifiers, voltage variable attenuators, fixed
attenuators and filters. These types of devices find wide application in numerous
telecommunications, avionic, defense, homeland security, instrumentation and consumer
systems. Our semiconductor product line was formally introduced to the market in the
latter part of 2009 and has not yet become a significant source of revenue for us.
|
On April 30, 2009, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Microsemi Corporation
(Microsemi) pursuant to which Microsemi purchased our Defense and Security RF module business,
including all of the outstanding capital stock of our subsidiary, Endwave Defense Systems,
Incorporated. As consideration, Microsemi assumed certain liabilities associated exclusively with
the Defense and Security RF module business and paid $28.0 million in cash. Additionally, as part
of the sale, approximately 130 employees associated with the Defense and Security RF module
business transferred to Microsemi. Accordingly, we reclassified the results of our Defense and
Security RF module business as a discontinued operation in our consolidated statements of
operations for all
periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and all amounts set forth in this
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation reflect such
reclassification.
17
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. In many instances, we could have reasonably used different accounting estimates,
and in other instances changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from
period-to-period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by
our management. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and
actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows will be affected.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies involve our more significant
judgments, assumptions and estimates and, therefore, could potentially have a significant impact on
our consolidated financial statements: Revenue recognition; Allowance for doubtful accounts;
Warranty reserves; Inventory valuation; Stock-based compensation; Deferred taxes; Long-lived
assets; Goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life; Fair value measurement; and
Business combinations.
There have been no material changes in the matters for which we make critical accounting
estimates in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 24,
2010.
Results of Operations
Three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a percentage of total
revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
|
|
|
70.6
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
147.4
|
|
|
|
137.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(74.8
|
)
|
|
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
|
(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
(37.2
|
)
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)
|
|
|
(35.3
|
)
|
|
|
(47.7
|
)
|
|
|
(35.7
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)
|
|
|
(35.1
|
)
|
|
|
(47.7
|
)
|
|
|
(35.5
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)%
|
|
|
298.2
|
%
|
|
|
(47.7
|
)%
|
|
|
101.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
3,753
|
|
|
$
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
8,587
|
|
|
$
|
12,822
|
|
|
|
(33.0
|
)%
|
18
Total revenues primarily consist of product revenues for sales of our transceiver module
products.
During the second quarter of 2010, total revenues decreased by $1.8 million, or 32.7%,
compared to the second quarter of 2009. During first half of 2010, total revenues decreased by
$4.2 million, or 33.0%, compared to the same period in 2009. The demand for our products has
declined relative to prior periods as a key legacy product for a major customers radio platform
experienced a rapid drop in sales while sales of our new module designs supporting next-generation
radios were just beginning their production ramp. The increased revenues from the new module
designs did not offset the decline in revenues from the legacy product.
During the remainder of 2010, we expect revenues to be lower relative to the first half of
2010 in absolute dollar terms as revenues from our new module design and our semiconductor
product-lines are not expected to offset the decline in revenues from our legacy products.
Cost of product revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues
|
|
$
|
4,036
|
|
|
$
|
4,237
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
7,427
|
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
107.5
|
%
|
|
|
75.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
%
|
|
|
70.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues consists primarily of: costs of direct materials; equipment
depreciation; costs associated with procurement, production control, quality assurance and
manufacturing engineering; fees paid to our offshore manufacturing vendor; reserves for potential
excess or obsolete material; costs related to stock-based compensation; and accrued costs
associated with potential warranty returns offset by the benefit of usage of materials that were
previously written off.
During the second quarter of 2010, the cost of product revenues as a percentage of revenues
increased compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to the write-off of inventory
associated with excess material related to a rapid drop in sales of a legacy product for a major
customers radio platform. The cost of product revenues in both periods was favorably impacted by
the utilization of inventory that was previously written off, amounting to approximately $92,000
during the second quarter of 2010 and $46,000 during the second quarter of 2009.
During the first half of 2010, the cost of product revenues as a percentage of revenues
increased compared to the first half of 2009, primarily due to the write-off of inventory
associated with excess material related to a rapid drop in sales of a legacy product for a major
customers radio platform. The cost of product revenues in both periods was favorably impacted by
the utilization of inventory that was previously written off, amounting to approximately $102,000
during the first half of 2010 and $65,000 during the first half of 2009.
We continue to focus on reducing the cost of product revenues as a percentage of total
revenues through the introduction of new designs and technologies and further improvements to our
offshore manufacturing processes. In addition, our product costs are impacted by the mix and
volume of products sold and will continue to fluctuate as a result.
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and
development expenses
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
(17.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
3,011
|
|
|
|
(30.9
|
)%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for
research and development personnel, outside professional services, prototype materials, supplies
and labor, depreciation for related equipment, allocated facilities costs and expenses related to
stock-based compensation.
19
During the second quarter of 2010, research and development costs decreased in absolute
dollars compared to the second quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of
$173,000 in personnel related expenses and a decrease of $103,000 in stock-based compensation
expenses were partially offset by an increase of $64,000 in project related expenses.
During the first half of 2010, research and development costs decreased in absolute dollars
compared to the first half of 2009 primarily due to a decrease of $525,000 in personnel related
expenses, a decrease of $276,000 in project related expenses and a decrease of $136,000 in
stock-based compensation expenses.
During the remainder of 2010, we expect research and development expenses to be consistent
with the first half of 2010 in absolute dollar terms.
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,151
|
|
|
$
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for sales and marketing
personnel, professional fees, facilities costs, expenses related to stock-based compensation and
promotional activities.
During the second quarter of 2010, sales and marketing costs increased in absolute dollars
compared to the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to an increase in marketing and sales
commissions which were partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expenses.
Similarly, during the first half of 2010, sales and marketing costs increased in absolute
dollars compared to the first half of 2009 primarily due to an increase in travel, marketing and
sales commissions which were partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expenses.
During the remainder of 2010, we expect sales and marketing expenses to be consistent with the
first half of 2010 in absolute dollar terms.
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
|
$
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)%
|
Percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive,
finance, accounting, legal, information technology and human resources personnel, professional
fees, facilities costs, and expenses related to stock-based compensation.
During the second quarter of 2010, general and administrative costs were $882,000 compared to
$1.5 million in the second quarter of 2009. The decrease in general and administrative costs was
primarily due to a $220,000 decrease in personnel-related expenses, a $203,000 decrease in
stock-based compensation and a $101,000 decrease for professional fees.
During the first half of 2010, general and administrative costs were $2.0 million compared to
$3.2 million in the first half of 2009. The decrease in general and administrative costs was
primarily due to a $661,000 decrease in personnel-related expenses, a $378,000 decrease in
stock-based compensation and a $219,000 decrease for professional fees. The decrease in
personnel-related expenses is primarily due to the restructuring activities undertaken during
fiscal 2009.
20
During the remainder of 2010, we expect general and administrative expenses to be consistent
with the first half of 2009 in absolute dollar terms.
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
(101.1
|
)%
|
During the first quarter of 2009, we undertook certain restructuring activities to reduce
expenses. These terminations affected all areas of our operations. The components of the
restructuring charge included severance, benefits, payroll taxes and other costs associated with
employee terminations. The net charge for these restructuring activities in the first quarter of
2009 was $1.2 million. Of this amount, approximately $182,000 has been included in income from
discontinued operations. During the first quarter of 2010, we recorded a $14,000 positive
adjustment as a result of lower benefit charges in connection with our first quarter 2009
restructuring plan than were originally anticipated.
During the second quarter of 2009, we undertook certain additional restructuring activities to
reduce expenses. These terminations affected all areas of our operations. The components of the
restructuring charge included severance, benefits, payroll taxes and other costs associated with
the employee terminations. The net charge for these restructuring activities was $243,000 and all
cash payments have been made. Of this amount, approximately $39,000 has been included in the
discontinued operations line item on the consolidated statements of operations.
During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded $166,000 of restructuring expenses. A
restructuring charge of $258,000 for the second quarter 2009 restructuring plan was partially
offset by a $55,000 adjustment to the first quarter 2009 restructuring plan and $37,000 of
restructuring expense recorded in discontinued operations. During the third quarter of 2009, we
recorded a $15,000 positive adjustment as a result of lower benefit charges in connection with our
second quarter 2009 restructuring plan than were originally anticipated.
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and
other income
(expense), net
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
(107.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
(113.0
|
)%
|
Interest and other income, net consists primarily of interest income earned on our cash, cash
equivalents and investments, the amortization of the deferred gain from the sale of our Diamond
Springs, California location which ended in June 2009, gains and losses related to foreign currency
transactions and interest expense imputed for a long-term restructuring liability.
The decrease in interest and other income, net during both the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 was primarily the result of decreased interest earned on our investments and increased
interest expense for a long-term restructuring liability.
During the second quarter of 2010, we earned $25,000 of interest income which was offset by
interest expense for a long-term restructuring liability, banking charges and losses on foreign
currency transactions. During the second quarter of 2009, we earned $68,000 of interest income and
recognized $38,000 of other income from the amortization of the deferred gain from the sale of our
Diamond Springs, California location which were partially offset by banking charges and losses on
foreign currency transactions.
During the first half of 2010, we earned $46,000 of interest income which was offset by
interest expense for a long-term restructuring liability, banking charges and losses on foreign
currency transactions. During the first half of 2009, we earned $154,000 of interest income and
recognized $76,000 of other income from the amortization of
the deferred gain from the sale of our Diamond Springs, California location which were
partially offset by banking charges and losses on foreign currency transactions.
21
Our functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. Transactions in foreign currencies other than the
functional currency are remeasured into the functional currency at the time of the transaction.
Foreign currency transaction losses consist of the remeasurement gains and losses that arise from
exchange rate fluctuations related to our operations in Thailand. During the second quarter of
2010, we recorded a foreign currency transaction loss of $2,000 and during the second quarter of
2009 we recorded a foreign currency transaction gain of $2,000. During the first half of 2010 and
2009, we recorded foreign currency transaction losses of $5,000 and $3,000, respectively.
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit of $13,000 due to a
benefit from refundable research and development tax credits in the United States. During the
first half of 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit of $21,000 due to a benefit from refundable
research and development tax credits in the United States. No other income tax expense (benefit)
has been recorded because we have incurred operating losses that cannot be benefitted due to a full
valuation allowance.
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,597
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,530
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
On April 30, 2009, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Microsemi pursuant to
which Microsemi purchased our Defense and Security RF module business including all of the
outstanding capital stock of Endwave Defense Systems Incorporated. As consideration, Microsemi
assumed certain liabilities associated exclusively with the Defense and Security RF module business
and paid $28.0 million in cash.
We classified the results of the Defense and Security RF module business as a discontinued
operation in our consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. During the
second quarter of 2009, we recognized income from discontinued operations of $18.6 million net of
tax expense of $41,000 related to the sale of the Business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2010, we had $6.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, $21.4 million in
short-term investments, working capital of $30.7 million and no debt outstanding. The following
table sets forth selected condensed consolidated statement of cash flows data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,190
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(10,819
|
)
|
|
|
20,231
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(36,015
|
)
|
|
|
459
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments at
end of period
|
|
$
|
27,506
|
|
|
$
|
68,667
|
|
22
During both the first half of 2010 and the first half of 2009, operating activities used $2.2
million of cash. During the first half of 2010, our net loss, adjusted for depreciation and other
non-cash items, used $3.2 million of cash as compared to the first half of 2009 which used $3.1
million of cash. During the first half of 2010, the remaining provision of $996,000 of cash was
primarily due to an $818,000 decrease in accounts receivable and a $758,000 increase in accounts
payable which were partially offset by a $399,000 decrease in accrued compensation and other
liabilities and a $212,000 decrease in accrued warranty. During the first half of 2009, the
remaining provision of $942,000 of cash was primarily due to a $4.6 million decrease in inventory
and a $123,000 increase in accounts payable which were partially offset by a $1.8 million increase
in accounts receivable, an $898,000 increase in other assets, a $531,000 decrease in accrued
warranty and a $527,000 decrease in accrued compensation and other liabilities.
During the first half of 2010, investing activities used $10.8 million of cash as compared to
the first half of 2009 which provided $20.2 million of cash. The use of cash during the first half
of 2010 was due to a net increase in investments of $10.3 million and the purchase of $528,000 of
property and equipment. The source of cash during the first half of 2009 was due to the $28.0
million proceeds from sale of our defense and security business and a $600,000 decrease to
restricted cash, which were partially offset by a net increase in investments of $8.2 million and
the purchase of $178,000 of property and equipment.
Financing activities used $36.0 million of cash during the first half of 2010 primarily due to
the $36.2 million repurchase of our preferred stock which was partially offset by $152,000 of
proceeds from the exercise of stock options and $74,000 of cash from the proceeds of stock
issuance. Financing activities provided $459,000 of cash during the first half of 2009 primarily
due to $242,000 of cash from the proceeds of stock issuance and $226,000 of proceeds from the
exercise of stock options.
At June 30, 2010, we had a net unrealized gain of $1,000 related to $21.4 million of
investments in 26 debt securities. The investments all mature through 2011 and we believe that we
have the ability to hold these investments until their maturity dates. During the first half of
2010 and 2009, we recorded foreign currency transaction losses of $5,000 and $3,000, respectively.
In order to maintain and enhance our competitive position, we must be able to satisfy our
customers short lead-times and rapidly-changing needs. As a result of these challenges, we may
increase our raw materials and finished goods inventory so that they will be better-positioned to
meet their customers demand. We currently have inventory consigned to a customer location and may
increase this inventory in the future. Generally, if the consigned inventory is not withdrawn by
our customer within a certain period of time we have the ability to invoice the customer for the
consigned inventory. These potential increases in raw materials and finished goods may increase our
working capital needs in the future.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances will be sufficient to meet our
operating and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. With the exception of operating
leases discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this report, we
have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and we have not established or
invested in any variable interest entities. We have not guaranteed the debt or obligations of other
entities or entered into options on non-financial assets. The following table summarizes our future
cash obligations for operating leases and capital lease, excluding interest, as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Contractual Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, including interest
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,013
|
|
|
$
|
576
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) FASB issued new standards
for revenue recognition with multiple deliverables. These new standards impact the determination of
when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as
separate units of accounting. Additionally, these new standards modify the manner in which the
transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables by no longer
permitting the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration. These new standards are
required to be adopted in the first quarter of 2011; however, early adoption is permitted. We do
not expect these new standards to significantly impact our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued new standards for the accounting for certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. These new standards amend the scope of pre-existing
software revenue guidance by removing from the guidance non-software components of tangible
products and certain software components of tangible products. These new standards are required to
be adopted in the first quarter of 2011; however, early adoption is permitted. We do not expect
these new standards to significantly impact our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued new standards for fair value measurement and disclosures.
These new standards require disclosures for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2
fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers and activity. For Level 3 fair value
measurements, purchases, sales, issuances and settlements must be reported on a gross basis.
Further, additional disclosures are required by class of assets or liabilities, as well as inputs
used to measure fair value and valuation techniques. These standards are required to be adopted in
the first quarter of 2010. These standards did not have a material impact on our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued new standards that amend the subsequent event disclosure
requirements for SEC filers. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. These standards are effective upon issuance
and did not have a material impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no material changes in our reported market risks since our report on market
risks in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the heading
corresponding to that set forth above. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relates primarily to our investment portfolio. In order to reduce this interest rate risk, we
usually invest our cash primarily in investments with short maturities. As of June 30, 2010, our
investments in our portfolio were classified as cash equivalents and short-term investments. The
cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted primarily of United States treasury notes,
United States government agency notes, United States government money market funds, corporate bonds
and commercial paper. Since our investments consist of cash equivalents and short-term investments,
a change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our financial condition or results
of operations. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce interest income.
Currently, all sales to international customers are denominated in United States dollars and,
accordingly, we are not exposed to foreign currency rate risks in connection with these sales.
However, if the dollar were to strengthen relative to other currencies that could make our products
less competitive in foreign markets and thereby lead to a decrease in revenues attributable to
international customers.
We currently pay a number of expenses related to our Thai personnel and office in Thai Bhat.
During the first half of 2010, the total payments made in Thai Bhat were $391,000 and we recorded a
related foreign currency transaction loss of $5,000. During the first half of 2009, the total
payments made in Thai Bhat were $395,000 and we recorded a related foreign currency transaction
loss of $3,000.
24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) were effective as of the end of the period covered by
this report.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives and our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have
concluded that these controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. We
believe that a control system no matter how well designed and operated cannot provide absolute
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company
have been detected.
(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 31, 2008, we filed a complaint with the Canadian Superior Court in Montreal, Quebec
alleging that Advantech Advanced Microwave Technologies Inc., or Advantech, the parent company of
Allgon Microwave Corporation AB, or Allgon, had breached its contractual obligations with Endwave
and owes us $994,500 in a note receivable, purchased inventory and authorized and accepted purchase
orders resulting in shippable finished goods. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.
In a related action, we have filed a creditors claim for $994,500 against Allgon in the
composition of creditors proceedings now pending in a Stockholm, Sweden bankruptcy court.
Although a recovery under Swedish bankruptcy law is not assured, if it occurs any recovery will be
a set-off in the Montreal action against Allgons parent, Advantech.
The Company is not a party to any other material legal proceeding which is expected to have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations. From
time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.
These claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial
resources and diversion of management efforts.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should consider carefully the following risk factors as well as other information in this
report before investing in any of our securities. If any of the following risks actually occur, our
business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. This could cause
the market price of our common stock to decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
**
Indicates risk factor has been updated since our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
25
Risks Relating to Our Business
We have had a history of losses and may not be profitable in the future.**
We had a net loss from continuing operations of $2.8 million for the second quarter of 2010.
We also had a net loss from continuing operations of $10.6 million and $4.0 million for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There is no guarantee that we will achieve or
maintain profitability in the future.
We depend on the mobile communication industry for substantially all of our revenues. As this
industry is negatively impacted by the global economic downturn, our revenues and our profitability
could continue to suffer. In addition, consolidation in this industry could result in delays or
cancellations of orders for our products, adversely impacting our results of operations.
The global economic downturn has impacted the mobile communication industry. If the downturn
in the mobile communication industry persists, our revenues will continue to suffer and we may be
forced to write off excess inventories, uncollectible accounts receivable and abandoned or obsolete
equipment and attempt to reduce our operating expenses through additional restructuring activities.
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to reduce operating expenses to a level commensurate with
the lower revenues resulting from such a prolonged industry downturn.
The mobile communication industry has undergone significant consolidation in the past few
years. For example, during April 2007, Nokia and Siemens merged their mobile communication network
businesses. The acquisition of one of our major customers in this market, or one of the
communications service providers supplied by one of our major customers, could result in delays or
cancellations of orders for our products and, accordingly, delays or reductions in our anticipated
revenues and reduced profitability or increased net losses.
We depend on a small number of key customers in the mobile communication industry for a significant
portion of our revenues. If we lose any of our major customers or there is any material reduction
in orders for our products from any of these customers, our business, financial condition and
results of operations would be adversely affected.**
We depend, and expect to continue to depend, on a relatively small number of mobile
communication customers for a significant part of our revenues. The loss of any of our major
customers or any material reduction in orders from any such customers, would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For the three
months ended June 30, 2010, three customers each accounted for greater than 10% of total revenues
and combined they accounted for 91% of our total revenues. For the three months ended June 30,
2009, two customers each accounted for greater than 10% of total revenues and combined they
accounted for 94% of our total revenues. In the first half of 2010, three customers each accounted
for greater than 10% of total revenues and combined they accounted for 93% of our total revenues.
In the first half of 2009, one customer accounted for 85% of our total revenues and no other
customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues.
The current turmoil in the global economy could adversely impact our operations and financial
results.**
Over the past several years, global economic conditions have continued to remain weak and
uncertain. For example, credit continues to be severely restricted. This restriction in credit
has materially impacted our operations and financial results and we expect it to continue to do so.
Our customers often rely on credit markets to finance the build-out of their networks and systems.
With the current restriction in credit markets, capital may not be available to our customers or
may only be available at unfavorable terms. Without appropriate capital, our customers may have
difficulty funding their on-going operations and may reduce their orders for our products. This
could significantly impact our operations and financial results. Additionally, our vendors may
rely on credit markets to finance their operations. With the current restriction in credit
markets, capital may not be available to our vendors or may only be available at unfavorable terms.
Without appropriate capital, our vendors may have difficulty funding their on-going operations and
may not be able to fulfill requirements for their products. This could significantly impact our
operations and financial results through a reduction in our revenues.
26
Our semiconductor product line will require us to incur significant expenses and may not be
successful.**
Our new semiconductor product line will require us to incur expenses to design, test,
manufacture and market these new products including the purchase of inventory, supplies and capital
equipment. The future success of our semiconductor product line will depend on our ability to
develop these new products in a cost-effective and timely manner and to market them effectively.
The development of our products is complex, and from time to time we may experience delays in
completing the development and introduction of our new products or fail to efficiently manufacture
such products in the early production phase. The semiconductor product line may have little
immediate impact on our revenue because a new standard product may not generate meaningful revenue.
In the meantime, we will have incurred expenses to design, produce and market the products, and we
may not recover these expenses if demand for the product fails to reach forecasted levels which may
adversely affect our operating results.
Because of the shortages of some components and our dependence on single source suppliers and
custom components, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of components of sufficient
quality in a timely fashion, or we may be required to pay higher prices or to purchase components
of lesser quality.**
Many of our products are customized and must be qualified with our customers. This means that
we cannot change components in our products easily without the risks and delays associated with
requalification. Accordingly, while a number of the components we use in our products are made by
multiple suppliers, we may effectively have single source suppliers for some of these components.
Further, we have recently experienced extended lead times for many components.
In addition, we currently purchase a number of components, some from single source suppliers,
including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
semiconductor devices;
|
|
|
|
|
application-specific monolithic microwave integrated circuits;
|
|
|
|
|
voltage-controlled oscillators;
|
|
|
|
|
voltage regulators;
|
|
|
|
|
passive components;
|
|
|
|
|
unusual or low usage components;
|
|
|
|
|
surface mount components compliant with the EUs Restriction of Hazardous
Substances, or RoHS, Directive;
|
|
|
|
|
custom metal parts;
|
|
|
|
|
high-frequency circuit boards; and
|
|
|
|
|
custom connectors.
|
Any delay or interruption in the supply of these or other components could impair our ability
to manufacture and deliver our products, harm our reputation and cause a reduction in our revenues.
In addition, any increase in the cost of the components that we use in our products could make our
products less competitive and lower our margins. In the past, we suffered from shortages of and
quality issues with various components. These shortages and quality issues adversely impacted our
product revenues and could reappear in the future. Our single source suppliers could enter into
exclusive agreements with or be acquired by one of our competitors, increase their prices, refuse
to sell their products to us, discontinue products or go out of business. Even to the extent
alternative suppliers are available to us and their components are qualified with our customers on
a timely basis, identifying them and entering into
arrangements with them may be difficult and time consuming, and they may not meet our quality
standards. We may not be able to obtain sufficient quantities of required components on the same or
substantially the same terms.
27
Competitive conditions often require us to reduce prices and, as a result, we need to reduce our
costs in order to be profitable.**
Over the past year, we reduced the prices of many of our telecommunication products in order
to remain competitive and we expect market conditions will cause us to reduce our prices in the
future. In order to reduce our per-unit cost of product revenues, we must continue to design and
re-design products to require lower cost materials and improve our manufacturing efficiencies. The
combined effects of these actions may be insufficient to achieve the cost reductions needed to
maintain or increase our gross margins or achieve profitability.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations
and market downturns.
Our revenues, earnings and other operating results have fluctuated in the past and our
revenues, earnings and other operating results may fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations are
due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among
others, global economic conditions, overall growth in our target markets, the ability of our
customers to obtain adequate capital, U.S. export law changes, changes in customer order patterns,
customer consolidation, availability of components from our suppliers, the gain or loss of a
significant customer, changes in our product mix and market acceptance of our products and our
customers products. These factors are difficult to forecast, and these, as well as other factors,
could materially and adversely affect our quarterly or annual operating results.
Implementing our acquisition strategy could result in dilution to our stockholders and operating
difficulties leading to a decline in revenues and operating profit.
We intend to pursue acquisitions in our markets that we believe will be beneficial to our
business. The process of investigating, acquiring and integrating any business into our business
and operations is risky and may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The
areas in which we may face difficulties include:
|
|
|
diversion of our management from the operation of our core business;
|
|
|
|
|
assimilating the acquired operations and personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
integrating information technology and reporting systems;
|
|
|
|
|
retention of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
retention of acquired customers; and
|
|
|
|
|
implementation of controls, procedures and policies in the acquired business.
|
In addition to the factors set forth above, we may encounter other unforeseen problems with
acquisitions that we may not be able to overcome. Future acquisitions may require us to issue
shares of our stock or other securities that dilute our other stockholders, expend cash, incur
debt, assume liabilities, including contingent or unknown liabilities, or create additional
expenses related to write-offs or amortization of intangible assets with estimated useful lives,
any of which could materially adversely affect our operating results.
We rely on the semiconductor foundry operations of third-party semiconductor foundries to
manufacture the integrated circuits sold directly to our customers or contained in our products.
The loss of our relationship with any of these foundries without adequate notice would adversely
impact our ability to fill customer orders and could damage our customer relationships.
We utilize both industry standard semiconductor components and our own custom-designed
semiconductor devices. However, we do not own or operate a semiconductor fabrication facility, or
foundry, and rely on a limited number of third parties to produce our custom-designed components.
If any of our semiconductor suppliers is unable to deliver semiconductors to us in a timely
fashion, the resulting delay could severely impact our ability to fulfill customer orders and could
damage our relationships with our customers. In addition, the loss of our relationship with or our
access to any of the semiconductor foundries we currently use for the fabrication of custom
designed components and any resulting delay or reduction in the supply of semiconductor devices to
us, would severely impact our ability to fulfill customer orders and could damage our relationships
with our customers.
28
We may not be successful in forming alternative supply arrangements that provide us with a
sufficient supply of gallium arsenide devices. Gallium arsenide devices are used in a substantial
portion of the products we manufacture. Because there are a limited number of semiconductor
foundries that use the particular process technologies we select for our products and that have
sufficient capacity to meet our needs, using alternative or additional semiconductor foundries
would require an extensive qualification process that could prevent or delay product shipments and
revenues. We estimate that it may take up to six months to shift production of a given
semiconductor circuit design to a new foundry.
We rely heavily on a Thailand facility of HANA, a contract manufacturer, to produce our RF modules
and to package our microwave and millimeter wave integrated circuits. If HANA is unable to produce
these modules in sufficient quantities or with adequate quality, or it chooses to terminate our
manufacturing arrangement, we will be forced to find an alternative manufacturer and may not be
able to fulfill our production commitments to our customers, which could cause sales to be delayed
or lost and could harm our reputation.
We outsource the assembly and testing of our products to a Thailand facility of HANA, a
contract manufacturer. We plan to continue this arrangement as a key element of our operating
strategy. If HANA does not provide us with high quality products and services in a timely manner,
terminates its relationship with us, or is unable to produce our products due to financial
difficulties or political instability we may be unable to obtain a satisfactory replacement to
fulfill customer orders on a timely basis. In the event of an interruption of supply from HANA,
sales of our products could be delayed or lost and our reputation could be harmed. Our latest
manufacturing agreement with HANA expires in October 2010, but will renew automatically for
successive one-year periods unless either party notifies the other of its desire to terminate the
agreement at least one year prior to the expiration of the term. No such notification has been sent
to or received from HANA. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement without cause upon
365 days prior written notice to the other party, and either party may terminate the agreement if
the non-terminating party is in material breach and does not cure the breach within 30 days after
notice of the breach is given by the terminating party. There can be no guarantee that HANA will
not seek to terminate its agreement with us.
Our products may contain component, manufacturing or design defects or may not meet our customers
performance criteria, which could cause us to incur significant repair expenses, harm our customer
relationships and industry reputation, and reduce our revenues and profitability.
We have experienced manufacturing quality problems with our products in the past and may have
similar problems in the future. As a result of these problems, we have replaced components in some
products, or replaced the product, in accordance with our product warranties. Our product
warranties typically last twelve to thirty months. As a result of component, manufacturing or
design defects, we may be required to repair or replace a substantial number of products under our
product warranties, incurring significant expenses as a result. Further, our customers may discover
latent defects in our integrated circuits and module products that were not apparent when the
warranty period expired. These latent defects may cause us to incur significant repair or
replacement expenses beyond the normal warranty period. In addition, any component, manufacturing
or design defect could cause us to lose customers or revenues or damage our customer relationships
and industry reputation.
We may not be able to design our products as quickly as our customers require, which could cause us
to lose sales and may harm our reputation.
Existing and potential customers typically demand that we design products for them under
difficult time constraints. In the current market environment, the need to respond quickly is
particularly important. If we are
unable to commit the necessary resources to complete a project for a potential customer within
the requested timeframe, we may lose a potential sale. Our ability to design products within the
time constraints demanded by a customer will depend on the number of product design professionals
who are available to focus on that customers project and the availability of professionals with
the requisite level of expertise is limited. We have, in the past, expended significant resources
on research and design efforts on potential customer products that did not result in additional
revenue.
29
Each of our communication products is designed for a specific range of frequencies. Because
different national governments license different portions of the frequency spectrum for the mobile
communication market, and because communications service providers license specific frequencies as
they become available, in order to remain competitive we must adapt our products rapidly to use a
wide range of different frequencies. This may require the design of products at a number of
different frequencies simultaneously. This design process can be difficult and time consuming,
could increase our costs and could cause delays in the delivery of products to our customers, which
may harm our reputation and delay or cause us to lose revenues.
Our customers often have specific requirements that can be at the forefront of technological
development and therefore difficult and expensive to meet. If we are not able to devote sufficient
resources to these products, or we experience development difficulties or delays, we could lose
sales and damage our reputation with those customers.
We depend on our key personnel. Skilled personnel in our industry can be in short supply. If we are
unable to retain our current personnel or hire additional qualified personnel, our ability to
develop and successfully market our products would be harmed.
We believe that our future success depends upon our ability to attract, integrate and retain
highly skilled managerial, research and development, manufacturing and sales and marketing
personnel. Skilled personnel in our industry can be in short supply. As a result, our employees are
highly sought after by competing companies and our ability to attract skilled personnel is limited.
To attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be required to grant large stock option or other
stock-based incentive awards, which may harm our operating results or be dilutive to our other
stockholders. We may also be required to pay significant base salaries and cash bonuses, which
could harm our operating results.
Due to our relatively small number of employees and the limited number of individuals with the
skill set needed to work in our industry, we are particularly dependent on the continued employment
of our senior management team and other key personnel. If one or more members of our senior
management team or other key personnel were unable or unwilling to continue in their present
positions, these persons would be very difficult to replace, and our ability to conduct our
business successfully could be seriously harmed. We do not maintain key person life insurance
policies.
The length of our sales cycle requires us to invest substantial financial and technical resources
in a potential sale before we know whether the sale will occur. There is no guarantee that the sale
will ever occur and if we are unsuccessful in designing integrated circuits and module products for
a particular generation of a customers products, we may need to wait until the next generation of
that product to sell our products to that particular customer.
Our products are highly technical and the sales cycle can be long. Our sales efforts involve a
collaborative and iterative process with our customers to determine their specific requirements
either in order to design an appropriate solution or to transfer the product efficiently to our
offshore contract manufacturer. Depending on the product and market, the sales cycle can take
anywhere from 2 to 24 months, and we incur significant expenses as part of this process without any
assurance of resulting revenues. We generate revenues only if our product is selected for
incorporation into a customers system and that system is accepted in the marketplace. If our
product is not selected, or the customers development program is discontinued, we generally will
not have an opportunity to sell our product to that customer until that customer develops a new
generation of its system. There is no guarantee that our product will be selected for that new
generation system. The length of our product development and sales cycle makes us particularly
vulnerable to the loss of a significant customer or a significant reduction in orders by a customer
because we may be unable to quickly replace the lost or reduced sales.
30
We may not be able to manufacture and deliver our products as quickly as our customers require,
which could cause us to lose sales and would harm our reputation.
We may not be able to manufacture products and deliver them to our customers at the times and
in the volumes they require. Manufacturing delays and interruptions can occur for many reasons,
including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
the failure of a supplier to deliver needed components on a timely basis or with
acceptable quality;
|
|
|
|
|
lack of sufficient capacity;
|
|
|
|
|
poor manufacturing yields;
|
|
|
|
|
equipment failures;
|
|
|
|
|
manufacturing personnel shortages;
|
|
|
|
|
transportation disruptions;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in import/export regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
infrastructure failures at the facilities of our offshore contract manufacturer;
|
|
|
|
|
natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism; and
|
|
|
|
|
political instability.
|
Manufacturing our products is complex. The yield, or percentage of products manufactured that
conform to required specifications, can decrease for many reasons, including materials containing
impurities, equipment not functioning in accordance with requirements or human error. If our yield
is lower than we expect, we may not be able to deliver products on time. For example, in the past,
we have on occasion experienced poor yields on certain products that have prevented us from
delivering products on time and have resulted in lost sales. If we fail to manufacture and deliver
products in a timely fashion, our reputation may be harmed, we may jeopardize existing orders and
lose potential future sales, and we may be forced to pay penalties to our customers.
Although we do have long-term commitments from many of our customers, they are not for fixed
quantities of product. As a result, we must estimate customer demand, and errors in our estimates
could have negative effects on our cash, inventory levels, revenues and results of operations.**
We have been required historically to place firm orders for products and manufacturing
equipment with our suppliers up to six months prior to the anticipated delivery date and, on
occasion, prior to receiving an order for the product, based on our forecasts of customer demands.
Our sales process requires us to make multiple demand forecast assumptions, each of which may
introduce error into our estimates. If we overestimate customer demand, we may allocate resources
to manufacturing products that we may not be able to sell when we expect, if at all. As a result,
we would have additional usage of cash, excess inventory and overhead expense, which would harm our
financial results. On occasion, we have experienced adverse financial results due to excess
inventory and excess manufacturing capacity. The second quarter of 2010 included a $1.5 million
write-off of inventory associated with excess materials related to a rapid drop in sales of a
legacy product for a major customers radio platform.
Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand or if insufficient manufacturing capacity were
available, we would lose revenue opportunities, market share and damage our customer relationships.
On occasion, we have been unable to adequately respond to unexpected increases in customer purchase
orders and were unable to benefit from this increased demand. There is no guarantee that we will be
able to adequately respond to unexpected increases in
customer purchase orders in the future, in which case we may lose the revenues associated with
those additional purchase orders and our customer relationships and reputation may suffer.
31
Any failure to protect our intellectual property appropriately could reduce or eliminate any
competitive advantage we have.**
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We rely
primarily on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to protect our
proprietary technologies and processes. As of June 30, 2010, we had 42 United States patents
issued, many with associated foreign filings and patents. Our issued patents include those relating
to basic circuit and device designs, semiconductors, our multilithic microsystems technology and
system designs. Our issued United States patents expire between 2013 and 2028. We maintain a
vigorous technology development program that routinely generates potentially patentable
intellectual property. Our decision as to whether to seek formal patent protection is done on a
case by case basis and is based on the economic value of the intellectual property, the anticipated
strength of the resulting patent, the cost of pursuing the patent and an assessment of using a
patent as a strategy to protect the intellectual property.
To protect our intellectual property, we regularly enter into written confidentiality and
assignment of rights to inventions agreements with our employees, and confidentiality and
non-disclosure agreements with third parties, and generally control access to and distribution of
our documentation and other proprietary information. These measures may not be adequate in all
cases to safeguard the proprietary technology underlying our products. It may be possible for a
third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology without authorization,
develop similar technology independently or attempt to design around our patents. In addition,
effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited
outside of the United States, Europe and Japan. We may not be able to obtain any meaningful
intellectual property protection in other countries and territories. Additionally, we may, for a
variety of reasons, decide not to file for patent, copyright, or trademark protection outside of
the United States. Moreover we occasionally agree to incorporate a customers or suppliers
intellectual property into our designs, in which case we have obligations with respect to the
non-use and non-disclosure of that intellectual property. We also license technology from other
companies, including Northrop Grumman Corporation. There are no limitations on our rights to make,
use or sell products we may develop in the future using the chip technology licensed to us by
Northrop Grumman Corporation. Steps taken by us to prevent misappropriation or infringement of our
intellectual property or the intellectual property of our customers may not be successful.
Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect
our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others, including
our customers. Litigation of this type could result in substantial costs and diversion of our
resources.
We may receive in the future, notices of claims of infringement of other parties proprietary
rights. In addition, the invalidity of our patents may be asserted or prosecuted against us.
Furthermore, in a patent or trade secret action, we could be required to withdraw the product or
products as to which infringement was claimed from the market or redesign products offered for sale
or under development. We have also at times agreed to indemnification obligations in favor of our
customers and other third parties that could be triggered upon an allegation or finding of our
infringement of other parties proprietary rights. These indemnification obligations would be
triggered for reasons including our sale or supply to a customer or other third parties of a
product which was later discovered to infringe upon another partys proprietary rights.
Irrespective of the validity or successful assertion of such claims we would likely incur
significant costs and diversion of our resources with respect to the defense of such claims. To
address any potential claims or actions asserted against us, we may seek to obtain a license under
a third partys intellectual property rights. However, in such an instance, a license may not be
available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
With regard to our pending patent applications, it is possible that no patents may be issued
as a result of these or any future applications or the allowed patent claims may be of reduced
value and importance. If they are issued, any patent claims allowed may not be sufficiently broad
to protect our technology. Further, any existing or future patents may be challenged, invalidated
or circumvented thus reducing or eliminating their commercial value. The failure of any patents to
provide protection to our technology might make it easier for our competitors to offer similar
products and use similar manufacturing techniques.
32
We are exposed to fluctuations in the market values of our investment portfolio.
Although we have not experienced any material losses on our cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments, future declines in their market values could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and operating results. Although our portfolio has no direct investments
in auction rate or sub-prime mortgage securities, our overall investment portfolio is currently
and may in the future be concentrated in cash equivalents including money market funds. If any of
the issuers of the securities we hold default on their obligations, or their credit ratings are
negatively affected by liquidity, credit deterioration or losses, financial results, or other
factors, the value of our cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments could decline
and result in a material impairment.
Risks Relating to Our Industry
Our failure to compete effectively could reduce our revenues and margins.
Among merchant suppliers in the mobile communication market who provide integrated
transceivers to radio OEMs, we primarily compete with Compel Electronics SpA, Filtronic plc, and
Microelectronics Technology Inc. Additionally, there are mobile communication OEMs, such as
Ericsson and NEC Corporation, that use their own captive resources for the design and manufacture
of their transceiver modules, rather than using merchant suppliers like us. To the extent that
mobile communication OEMs presently, or may in the future, produce their own transceiver modules,
we lose the opportunity to provide our modules to them. However, as we launched our semiconductor
product line, we gain the opportunity to provide integrated circuits to all radio OEMs.
Our failure to comply with any applicable environmental regulations could result in a range of
consequences, including fines, suspension of production, excess inventory, sales limitations and
criminal and civil liabilities.
Due to environmental concerns, the need for lead-free solutions in electronic components and
systems is receiving increasing attention within the electronics industry as companies are moving
towards becoming compliant with the RoHS Directive. The RoHS Directive is European Union
legislation that restricts the use of a number of substances, including lead, after July 2006. We
believe that our products impacted by these regulations are compliant with the RoHS Directive and
that materials will continue to be available to meet these new regulations. However, it is possible
that unanticipated supply shortages or delays or excess non-compliant inventory may occur as a
result of these new regulations. Failure to comply with any applicable environmental regulations
could result in a range of consequences, including loss of sales, fines, suspension of production,
excess inventory and criminal and civil liabilities.
Government regulation of the communications industry could limit the growth of the markets that we
serve or could require costly alterations of our current or future products.
The markets that we serve are highly regulated. Communications service providers must obtain
regulatory approvals to operate broadband wireless access networks within specified licensed bands
of the frequency spectrum. Further, the Federal Communications Commission and foreign regulatory
agencies have adopted regulations that impose stringent RF emissions standards on the
communications industry.
Our failure to continue to develop new or improved semiconductor process technologies could impair
our competitive position.
Our future success depends in part upon our ability to continue to gain access to the current
semiconductor process technologies in order to adapt to emerging customer requirements and
competitive market conditions. If we fail to keep abreast of the new and improved semiconductor
process technologies as they emerge, we may lose market share which could adversely affect our
operating results.
33
The segment of the semiconductor industry in which we participate is intensely competitive, and our
inability to compete effectively would harm our business.
The markets for our products are extremely competitive, and are characterized by rapid
technological change and continuously evolving customer requirements. Many of our competitors have
significantly greater financial,
technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing resources than we do. As a result, our competitors
may develop new technologies, enhancements of existing products or new products that offer price or
performance features superior to ours. In addition, our competitors may be perceived by
prospective customers to offer financial and operational stability superior to ours.
We expect competition in our markets to intensify, as new competitors enter the RF, microwave
and millimeterwave component market, existing competitors merge or form alliances, and new
technologies emerge. If we are not able to compete effectively, our market share and revenue could
be adversely affected, and our business and results of operations could be harmed.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Stock
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated historically and is likely to fluctuate in the
future.**
The price of our common stock has fluctuated widely since our initial public offering in
October 2000. In the first half of 2010, the lowest daily sales price for our common stock was
$2.28 and the highest daily sales price for our common stock was $3.61. In 2009, the lowest daily
sales price for our common stock was $1.36 and the highest daily sales price for our common stock
was $3.43. The market price of our common stock can fluctuate significantly for many reasons,
including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
our financial performance or the performance of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
the purchase or sale of common stock, short-selling or transactions by
large stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
technological innovations or other significant trends or changes in the
markets we serve;
|
|
|
|
|
successes or failures at significant product evaluations or site
demonstrations;
|
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures involving us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
decisions by major customers not to purchase products from us or to pursue
alternative technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
decisions by investors to de-emphasize investment categories, groups or
strategies that include our company or industry;
|
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the industry, the financial markets and the economy as
a whole; and
|
|
|
|
|
the low trading volume of our common stock.
|
It is likely that our operating results in one or more future quarters may be below the
expectations of security analysts and investors. In that event, the trading price of our common
stock would likely decline. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations. These market fluctuations can be unrelated to the operating performance of particular
companies and the market prices for securities of technology companies have been especially
volatile. Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such
sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.
Additionally, future stock price volatility for our common stock could provoke the initiation of
securities litigation, which may divert substantial management resources and have an adverse effect
on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our existing insurance coverage may not
sufficiently cover all costs and claims that could arise out of any such securities litigation. We
anticipate that prices for our common stock will continue to be volatile.
34
We have a few stockholders that each own a large percentage of our outstanding capital stock and,
as a result of their significant ownership, are able to significantly affect the outcome of matters
requiring stockholder approval.**
As of May 14, 2010, our four largest stockholders together owned approximately 37% of our
outstanding common stock. Because most matters requiring approval of our stockholders require the
approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of our outstanding capital stock present in
person or by proxy at the annual meeting, the significant ownership interest of these shareholders
allows them to significantly affect the election of our directors and the outcome of corporate
actions requiring stockholder approval. This concentration of ownership may also delay, deter or
prevent a change in control and may make some transactions more difficult or impossible to complete
without their support, even if the transaction is favorable to our stockholders as a whole.
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and arrangements with executive officers could delay or
prevent a change in control.
We are subject to certain Delaware anti-takeover laws by virtue of our status as a Delaware
corporation. These laws prevent us from engaging in a merger or sale of more than 10% of our assets
with any stockholder, including all affiliates and associates of any stockholder, who owns 15% or
more of our outstanding voting stock, for three years following the date that the stockholder
acquired 15% or more of our voting stock, unless our board of directors approved the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested
stockholder, or upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock of the
corporation, or the business combination is approved by our board of directors and authorized by at
least 66 2/3% of our outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder. A
corporation may opt out of the Delaware anti-takeover laws in its charter documents; however we
have not chosen to do so. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include a number of
provisions that may deter or impede hostile takeovers or changes of control of management,
including a staggered board of directors, the elimination of the ability of our stockholders to act
by written consent, discretionary authority given to our board of directors as to the issuance of
preferred stock, and indemnification rights for our directors and executive officers. Additionally,
we have adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan, providing for the distribution of one preferred share
purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock that may lead to the delay or prevention
of a change in control that is not approved by our board of directors. We have a Senior Executive
Officer Severance Retention Plan, an Executive Officer Severance Plan and a Key Employee Severance
and Retention Plan that provide for severance payments and the acceleration of vesting of a
percentage of certain stock options granted to our executive officers and certain senior,
non-executive employees under specified conditions.
These plans may make us a less attractive acquisition target or may reduce the amount a
potential acquirer may otherwise be willing to pay for our company.
35
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
3.1(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation effective October 20, 2000.
|
|
|
|
3.2(3)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation effective June 28, 2002.
|
|
|
|
3.3(4)
|
|
Certificate of Designation for Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
|
|
|
|
3.4(5)
|
|
Certificate of Designation for Series B Preferred Stock.
|
|
|
|
3.5(6)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation effective July 26, 2007.
|
|
|
|
3.6(7)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws.
|
|
|
|
4.1(2)
|
|
Form of Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
|
|
4.2(4)
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005 between the Registrant and Computershare Trust Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
4.3(4)
|
|
Form of Rights Certificate
|
|
|
|
4.6(8)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2007, between the Registrant and ComputerShare
Trust Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
10.1(2)
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into by the Registrant with each of its directors and officers.
|
|
|
|
10.2(2)*
|
|
1992 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.3(2)*
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option under 1992 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.4(2)*
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option under 1992 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.5(9)*
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.6(10)*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.7(10)*
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.8(2)*
|
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.9(2)*
|
|
Form of 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Offering.
|
|
|
|
10.10(11)*
|
|
2000 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended.
|
|
|
|
10.11(2)*
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under the 2000 Non-Employee Director Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.12(12)*
|
|
Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors.
|
|
|
|
10.13(18)*
|
|
2010 Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
10.14(19)*
|
|
Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan.
|
|
|
|
10.15(2)
|
|
License Agreement by and between TRW Inc. and TRW Milliwave Inc. dated February 28, 2000.
|
|
|
|
10.16(14)
|
|
Purchase Agreement between Nokia and the Registrant dated January 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
10.17(14)
|
|
Frame Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and Siemens Mobile Communications Spa dated
January 16, 2006.
|
|
|
|
10.18(15)
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between Legacy Partners I San Jose, LLC and the Registrant dated May 24, 2006.
|
|
|
|
10.19(16)
|
|
Services Agreement by and between Hana Microelectronics Co., Ltd. and the Registrant dated October 15, 2006.
|
|
|
|
10.20(17)
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between 8812, a California limited partnership, and the Registrant dated May 20, 2008.
|
|
|
|
10.21(17)
|
|
Amended and Restated Supply Agreement by and between Northrop Grumman Space and Mission Systems Corp. and
the Registrant dated May 12, 2008.
|
36
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
10.22(13)
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of December 1, 2008, to Amended and Restated Supply Agreement by and between
Northrop Grumman Space and Mission Systems Corp. and the Registrant dated May 12, 2008.
|
|
|
|
10.23(13)
|
|
Amendment, dated as of February 13, 2009, to Amended and Restated Supply Agreement by and between
Northrop Grumman Space and Mission Systems Corp. and the Registrant dated May 12, 2008.
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
on August 14, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-41302) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 5, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
April 26, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
July 28, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 28, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Previously filed as an appendix to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed on June 13, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-144851) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 1, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
for the quarter year ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No. 333-144054) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(15)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(16)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(17)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter year ended June 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(18)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(19)
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter year ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*
|
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for a portion of this exhibit.
|
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Endwave Corporation has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 13, 2010
|
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John J. Mikulsky
|
|
|
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly
Authorized Officer and Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice President
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
38
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
39
Endwave (NASDAQ:ENWV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2025 to Feb 2025
Endwave (NASDAQ:ENWV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Feb 2025