ENCANTO HAS NET PRESENT VALUE OF $1.13 BILLION AND IRR OF 18.9% BACKED BY A
20-YEAR OFFTAKE AGREEMENT WITH INDIA'S NACOF
TSXV: EPO
VANCOUVER, June 12, 2017 /CNW/ - Encanto Potash Corp.
("Encanto" or the "Company") (TSXV: EPO), which has signed an
agreement to supply India with
potash over 20 years, would have the capacity to produce and export
3.4 million tonnes of potash annually, according to a recently
completed Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") by Amec Foster
Wheeler.
The estimated 20 per cent increase in production potential,
based on adoption of greater plant capacity, can be maintained for
more than 48 years, according to the PEA prepared by Amec Foster
Wheeler. The study also concludes the project has a net
present value of $1.13 billion CDN,
with an internal rate of return of 18.9% after taxes using a 10%
discount rate. The PEA highlights are shown in Table 1. Readers are
cautioned that the PEA is preliminary in nature, and is based on an
economic evaluation of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources.
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability, and there is no certainty that the
preliminary economic assessment will be realized.
Encanto, in partnership with the Muskowekwan First Nation
("MFN"), is developing Canada's
first potash mine on a First Nation reserve in south-east
Saskatchewan. Encanto recently
signed a contract with NACOF, the Government of India subsidized Farmers' Co-Operative, to
supply five million tonnes of potash annually for 20 years.
"We are confident that we will continue to succeed in building
Encanto into a global industrial company, and deliver to the First
Nations in Canada and to
India a food security contract
through long-term supply," said Encanto President and CEO
Stavros Daskos.
"With almost two years of efforts and the strategic alignment in
India with Mr. Vinay Maloo, founder and chairman of the Enso
Group, we signed a 20-year agreement to supply 100 million tonnes
of potash in India with
NACOF. With the leadership of Muskowekwan First Nation Chief
Reginald Bellerose, we then quickly
secured the Mineral Title with the MFN and the support of the
Ministry of Indigenous Affairs Government of Canada."
MFN Chief Reginald Bellerose
added: "I believe we are making First Nations history. This recent
study makes it clear the Encanto potash mine, thanks to the rich
potash resources beneath the MFN, has the capacity to meet this
long-term supply contract with India's NACOF. This represents one of the
largest developments on First Nations land and will allow the
Muskowekwan people to be active participants in the economy. I also
believe this partnership, endorsed by the Muskowekwan, is a model
for the future development of Canadian First Nation natural
resources."
Encanto next steps will be to secure the additional capacity,
above the 3.4 million tonnes estimated mine capacity, to supply the
5 million tonnes of potash established under the NACOF contract. To
do so, Encanto has formed a trading company that is now in
negotiations to supply potash to India, which if successful, would create a
positive revenue stream while the company continues to seek further
investment to build the $3.7-billion
(CDN) mine and plant.
Said Encanto CEO Daskos: "The next steps concurrent to
structuring project financing, are now focused on negotiating a
long-term supply agreement or merger with an existing producer
where a ramp up schedule for 5 million tonnes per year can be
reached with NACOF. This will trigger potash exports before opening
on‑site mining operations at MFN, allowing immediate revenues for
Encanto. These discussions are currently taking place with the
continued intervention of Mr. Maloo, who is also working to secure
these quantities with cash as guarantees for supply as we work out
pricing."
FURTHER DETAILS OF PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT BY AMEC
FOSTER WHEELER
Following the signature of the offtake agreement to supply
NACOF, a Government of India
subsidized Farmers' Co-Operative, with 5 million tonnes (Mt) of
potash annually for a guaranteed term of 20 years, Encanto has
updated its 2013 prefeasibility ("PFS") study mine plan that was
originally designed for 2.8 Mt of annual output by completing a PEA
based on 3.4 Mt of annual output. The PEA does not invalidate the
2013 PFS or the Mineral Reserves for the Project, it is simply an
alternative development option at a different plant
capacity. Under its operating agreement with Muskowekwan First
Nation, Encanto is now contractually obligated to deliver potash
within 36 months from its December 30,
2016 offtake agreement with NACOF.
The PEA indicates that the Project has significant positive
economics and that the mineralization is of sufficient size as well
as grade to support primary and secondary mining for over 48 years
with a Muriate of Potash production rate of 3.4 Mt per
annum. Although the Mineral Resources are sufficient to
support a production rate of 5 Mt of potash annually, the most
efficient production model for the MFN property would be to produce
at a rate of 3.4 Mt annually.
KEY FACTS
- Pre-tax net present value ("NPV") of $1.13 billion ($0.86
billion after taxes), and an internal rate of return ("IRR")
of 18.9% (17.9% after taxes)
- The economic model is based on financing of 80% of the capital
cost of the project at a 20 year amortization to match the 20 year
offtake agreement with NACOF.
Table 1: PEA Highlights
Assumed Muriate of
Potash ("MOP") Price (FOB Vancouver)
|
$319/t standard
grade, $344/t granular grade
|
Discount
Rate
|
10%
|
Inflation
Rate
|
2%
|
Operating Costs
("OPEX") at full capacity
(includes
utilities, labour, maintenance, reagents, fuel, insurances and
municipal taxes)
|
$42.86/t of MOP
produced
|
Sustaining Capital
Cost
(includes brine
field and Tailing Management Area extensions)
|
$35.98/t of MOP
produced
|
Logistics Costs (rail
and port)
|
$50.05/t of MOP
produced
|
Taxes and
Royalties
(includes Potash
Production Tax, Crown Royalty and Saskatchewan Resource Surcharge,
average over the life of the project)
|
$41.95/t MOP
sold
|
Initial capital costs
("CAPEX") (includes contingency)
|
$3.73
billion
|
Deferred
CAPEX
|
$300
million
|
Annual Production
Rate
|
3.4 Mt of
MOP
|
Lifespan
of Project
|
48 years +
|
|
|
Table 1
Notes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Monetary units are in
Canadian dollars
|
2.
|
t equals
tonnes
|
3.
|
Muriate of Potash
(MOP) product is 98% KCl
|
4.
|
The basis for the PEA
unit cost estimates was the PFS unit cost estimate. These
unit costs were reviewed, and updated as applicable. The
updated unit costs are not considered a material change to the
equivalent unit costs from the PFS, and therefore the PFS inputs
remain current.
|
- Capital and operating cost estimates were generated with a
target accuracy of -30% to +50%, typical for this level of study.
The initial CAPEX estimate for the plant is $3.73 billion and includes estimates for water
supply, and power and gas tie-ins to a 3rd party owned
Cogeneration plant. The estimate includes a contingency of
$568 million.
- The operating costs were estimated at $42.86/t of MOP product at full production
capacity. This figure includes utilities, labour, maintenance,
reagents (including fuel), insurances, and municipal taxes. It does
not include Royalties, Potash Production Taxes, or
Federal/Provincial Income taxes which are estimated at $41.95/t of MOP product. The logistical costs
estimates of $50.05/t of MOP product
were provided by existing carriers and port facilities with
capacity to serve this Project. Sustaining capital costs were
estimated at $35.98/t of MOP product
at full production and include provisions for well field extension,
and reclamation.
As a result of these findings, Encanto plans to proceed to
undertake further, more detailed economic studies on the
Project. During which, Encanto will review the results of this
base-case PEA to identify areas where improvements to the economics
of the project can be realized as a result of the First Nations
component to the Project. Areas for review may include, but are not
limited to, taxes and royalties.
MINERAL RESOURCE BASIS FOR THE PEA
The Mineral Resource estimate used as the basis for the PEA was
provided by Saskatchewan based
North Rim Exploration Limited, Qualified Person Tabetha Stirrett,
P.Geo. The Mineral Resource is shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Solution Mining Mineral Resource
Summary
Measured
|
Member
|
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Weighted
Average
KCl Grade (%)
|
KCl
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Patience
Lake
|
175.85
|
31.08
|
54.65
|
Belle
Plaine
|
174.16
|
29.27
|
50.97
|
Total Excluding
Interbed
|
350.02
|
|
105.62
|
Weighted Avg.
Excluding Interbed
|
|
30.18
|
|
Indicated
|
Member
|
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Weighted
Average
KCl Grade (%)
|
KCl
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Patience
Lake
|
905.66
|
29.96
|
271.31
|
Belle
Plaine
|
769.82
|
29.63
|
228.12
|
Total Excluding
Interbed
|
1,675.48
|
|
499.43
|
Weighted Avg.
Excluding Interbed
|
|
29.81
|
|
Inferred
|
Member
|
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Weighted
Average
KCl Grade (%)
|
KCl
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Patience
Lake
|
958.82
|
29.29
|
280.80
|
Belle
Plaine
|
838.06
|
29.61
|
248.12
|
Total Excluding
Interbed
|
1,796.87
|
|
528.93
|
Weighted Avg.
Excluding Interbed
|
|
29.44
|
|
|
|
Table 2
Notes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Mt = Million
tonnes.
|
2.
|
Density = 2.08
t/m3.
|
3.
|
Tonnage is calculated
based on Area x Thickness x Density (2,080 kg/m3) and is
reported in-place.
|
4.
|
KCl Tonnage refers to
contained Tonnage times weighted average grade, and is reported
in-place.
|
5.
|
Should any part of
the Mineral Resource estimate be converted to Mineral Reserves, the
tonnes will be reduced based on a 41.6% extraction ratio and 20%
plant and cavern loss.
|
6.
|
Mineral Resources are
reported using a cut-off grade of 15% K2O.
|
7.
|
Measured Resource
Radius of Influence of 800 metres, Indicated Resource Radius of
Influence of 2000 metres, Inferred Resource Radius of Influence of
5000 metres
|
8.
|
Mineral Resources
have an effective date of May 24, 2017.
|
9.
|
Tables 4 and 5 are
not additive to Table 2.
|
10.
|
Mineral Resources
that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
PFS SUMMARY
The summary of the 2013 PFS financial model is shown in Table
3.
Table 3: Summary of PFS Financial
Model
Assumed Muriate of
Potash Price (FOB Vancouver)
|
$460/t standard
grade. $485/t granular grade
|
Discount
Rate
|
10%
|
Inflation
Rate
|
2%
|
OPEX at full
capacity
(includes
utilities, labour, maintenance, reagents, fuel,
insurances and
municipal taxes)
|
$54.32/t of MOP
produced
|
Sustaining Capital
Cost
(includes brine
field and Tailing Management Area extensions)
|
$32.21/t of MOP
produced
|
Logistics Costs (rail
and port)
|
$50.50/t of MOP
produced
|
Taxes and
Royalties
(includes Potash
Production Tax, Crown Royalty and Saskatchewan
Resource
Surcharge, average over the life of the project)
|
$64.76/t of MOP
sold
|
Initial
CAPEX
(includes
contingency)
|
$2.86
billion
|
Deferred
CAPEX
|
$130
million
|
Annual Production
Rate
|
2.8 Mt of
MOP
|
Lifespan of
Project
|
50 years +
|
|
|
Table 3
Notes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The NPV of the PFS
remains positive using the assumed potash price in the PEA,
therefore the Mineral Reserves remain current.
|
2.
|
t equals
tonnes
|
3.
|
Muriate of Potash
(MOP) product is 98% KCl
|
The NPV of the PFS remains positive using the assumed potash
price in the PEA, therefore the Mineral Reserves remain current.
PFS Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statements
Table 4 presents Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves as
determined in the 2013 PFS.
Table 4: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
for the 2013 PFS
Member
|
Tonnage (Mt)
|
KCl
Grade1 (%)
|
KCl Tonnes
(Mt)2
|
Patience
Lake
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Proven
|
75.86
|
24.58%
|
18.65
|
Probable
|
304.22
|
23.23%
|
70.67
|
Belle
Plaine
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Proven
|
59.79
|
26.06%
|
15.58
|
Probable
|
230.98
|
24.71%
|
57.07
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proven
Mineral Reserves
|
135.64
|
25.24%
|
34.23
|
Total Probable
Mineral Reserves
|
535.2
|
23.87%
|
127.74
|
Total Proven and
Probable
Mineral Reserves
|
670.84
|
24.14%
|
161.96
|
|
|
Table 4
Notes:
|
|
|
1.
|
The grade shown was
back-calculated from the Tonnage in-place and the KCl tonnes.
The KCl tonnage in the table is the recoverable KCl, and was
determined by estimating the production in the life of mine plan on
a cavern by cavern basis using the local grade and member thickness
from the resource model together with a curve relating the In-place
grade to a brine grade. Extraction of brine from the caverns
was assumed to be 90% of total cavern volume.
|
2.
|
Mineral Reserves are
based on production from the caverns in the life of mine plan,
which represent an extraction ratio of 41.6%. Modifying
Factors include tonnage reductions to account for unknown anomalies
(5% for Proven and 9% for Probable) and plant recovery of 94.5%
(including downstream losses). These Mineral Reserves are
based on 100% KCl and do not account for the K2O or KCl
grade of the product actually sold.
|
3.
|
Proven Radius of
Influence of 800 metres.
|
4.
|
Probable Radius of
Influence of 2000 metres.
|
5.
|
The Mineral Reserves
have an effective date of February 13, 2013. The NPV of the
PFS remains positive using the potash price assumed in the PEA,
therefore the Mineral Reserves remain current.
|
6.
|
The Mineral Reserves
in Table 4 are not additive to the Mineral Resources in Tables 2
and 5
|
The Mineral Reserve estimate for the 2013 PFS was provided by
Agapito Associates, Inc. of Grand Junction, qualified person Dr.
Michael P. Hardy, P.E.
The Mineral Reserves discussed above were obtained from a mine
plan covering the areas of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources
surrounding seven of the wells advanced for this
project. Mineral Resources outside the areas containing
Mineral Reserves are presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Mineral Resource Statement from the
2013 PFS
Indicated
|
Member
|
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Weighted
Average
KCl Grade
(%)
|
KCl
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Patience
Lake
|
217.92
|
26.74
|
58.28
|
Belle
Plaine
|
116.55
|
30.71
|
35.79
|
Total Excluding
Interbed
|
334.47
|
|
94.07
|
Weighted Avg.
Excluding Interbed
|
|
28.12
|
|
Inferred
|
Member
|
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Weighted
Average
KCl Grade
(%)
|
KCl
Tonnage
(Mt)
|
Patience
Lake
|
838.08
|
29.57
|
247.83
|
Belle
Plaine
|
776.68
|
29.48
|
229.00
|
Total Excluding
Interbed
|
1,614.76
|
|
476.83
|
Weighted Avg.
Excluding Interbed
|
|
29.53
|
|
|
|
Table 5
Notes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Mt = Million
tonnes
|
2.
|
Density = 2.08
t/m3.
|
3.
|
Tonnage is calculated
based on Area x Thickness x Density (2,080 kg/m3) and is
reported in-place.
|
4.
|
KCl Tonnage refers to
contained Tonnage times weighted average grade, and is reported
in-place.
|
5.
|
Should the any part
of the Mineral Resource estimate be converted to Mineral Reserves,
the tonnes will be reduced based on a 41.6% extraction ratio and
20% plant and cavern loss.
|
6.
|
Mineral Resources are
reporting using a cut-off grade of 15% K2O.
|
7.
|
Indicated Resource
Radius of Influence of 2000 metres, Inferred Resource Radius of
Influence of 5000 metres
|
8.
|
Mineral Resources
have an effective date of January 31, 2013.
|
9.
|
The Mineral Resources
in Table 5 are not additive to the Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves in Tables 2 and 4. Mineral Resources in Table 5 are
reported exclusive of the Mineral Resources converted to Mineral
Reserves in Table 4.
|
The Mineral Resources were provided by Saskatchewan based North Rim Exploration
Limited, qualified person Tabetha
Stirrett, P. Geo. Differences between the Mineral
Resource tabulation in Table 2 and the Mineral Resource tabulation
in Table 5 include the following:
- The majority of the Indicated and Measured Mineral Resources
for the project were converted to Mineral Reserves in the PFS and
Mineral Resources that remain after conversion were reported
separately, whereas the PEA is based on the total Measured and
Indicated Mineral Resource estimate.
- An area under the proposed mine plant site that had an 800 m
buffer was included in the resource estimates for both the
Indicated and Inferred confidence categories in the PEA; however,
for the purposes of the PFS this area was excluded for both the
Indicated and Inferred confidence categories.
- A small area of additional land tenure that hosts Mineral
Resources was included in the PEA; this area was not available to
the PFS study at the time that study was completed.
- Slight changes to the weighted average grades may occur due to
minor differences in the area/volumes reported between the two
studies.
Qualified Persons
The following Qualified Persons will contribute to the technical
report on the PEA that will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of
this news release: David
Myers, P.Eng. and Paul
O'Hara, P.Eng. (Amec Foster Wheeler Americas Ltd.):
Tabetha Stirrett, P.Geo. (North Rim
Exploration Limited); Michael Hardy, P.E. (Agapito Associates,
Inc.); and Jim Brebner, P.Eng
(Novopro Projects Inc.).
The independent Qualified Person for the Mineral Resource
estimates disclosed in this news release is Tabetha Stirrett, P.Geo. (North Rim Exploration
Limited). The independent Qualified Person for the Mineral
Reserve estimate disclosed in this news release is Michael Hardy,
P.E. (Agapito Associates, Inc.). The independent Qualified
Person for the information disclosed in this news release in
relation to the 2013 PFS is Jim
Brebner, P.Eng (Novopro Projects Inc.).
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
From the retrieval of the core at the drill site to the shipment
of the core to the North Rim Exploration Core Laboratory in
Saskatoon, it was under the care
and supervision of the Drilling Supervisor, Wellsite Geologist, or
North Rim's Core Supervisor. Following the core retrieval, the
core was wrapped in plastic, boxed and secured on site. Immediately
following the completion of coring, a hotshot courier from the
coring company delivered the locked core trailer to North Rim's
secure core facility in Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan.
All sampling activities were carried out at North Rim's core
laboratory facilities located at 2834 Millar Avenue in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Upon arrival at the
core laboratory, the core was cleaned thoroughly to identify the
potash beds, clay seams, and mineralogical changes within the
core. Selection of the correct assay intervals was conducted
by North Rim geologists. Geochemical assay sampling was separated
into two separate intervals: from the top of the Patience Lake
Member to the base of the Belle Plaine Member, and the entire
Esterhazy Member. Once the sample intervals were determined
the core was slabbed lengthwise into halves by laboratory
assistants. The cutting process was supervised at all times by
a North Rim geologist. As the samples were chosen they were
labeled. Each sample and its corresponding sample tag were placed
into a waterproof, plastic sample bag, put into bags and then into
sealed plastic pails for transportation to the lab. Shipping
sheets were completed and accompanied the samples to the
Saskatchewan Research Council Geoanalytical Laboratories ("SRC") at
125 – 15 Innovation Boulevard in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. SRC is
independent of Encanto and is ISO17025 accredited for selected
analytical techniques.
North Rim geologists delivered the samples to SRC for
analysis. When SRC received the core samples at the
laboratory, they signed, dated and returned the North Rim Packing
Slip to the North Rim employee who delivered them. After
confirming that the sample list matched the samples in the pails, a
Sample Receipt Report was emailed to a pre-determined distribution
list. There, the samples were crushed, split and analyzed
according to the parameters stated in SRC's Basic Potash Analysis
package (soluble inductively coupled plasma [ICP], % insolubles and
% moisture).
Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) measures were
strictly adhered to, including the use of standards, blanks and
duplicates throughout the analysis period. With each set of 40
samples, two potash standards, one quartz blank, and one sample
pulp replicate analysis was completed. After processing, the
entire group of samples, a split sample replicate was
completed. Assay results generated are reviewed and approved
by SRC prior to release. Upon completion of the assaying and QA/QC
procedures, the geochemical results were emailed to the Encanto
contact list in a password-protected zip file. According to
the SRC Customer Quality Control policy the sample preparation and
analytical procedures are of the highest quality and are NI
43-101-compliant.
ABOUT ENCANTO:
Encanto Potash Corp. is a TSX Venture
Exchange listed and traded Canadian resource company engaged in the
development of potash properties in the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada, the largest producing
potash region in the world. Through a joint venture agreement with
Muskowekwan Resources Ltd. on our flagship property, Encanto has a
project land package which totals approximately 61,000 largely
contiguous acres. A Pre-Feasibility Study dated February 28, 2013 titled "Encanto Potash Corp.
Technical Report Summarizing the Preliminary Feasibility Study for
the Muskowekwan First Nations Home Reserve Project in South Eastern
Saskatchewan, Canada" confirms the Proven and Probable KCI Reserves
totaling 162 Mt grading 28% KCl (average) which supports primary
and secondary mining for over 50 years at an assumed annual rate
extraction rate of 2.8 Mt of MOP. The PEA Technical Report that
will be filed summarizes an alternative development option that
supports primary and secondary mining of the Mineral Resources for
48 years at an annual extraction rate of 3.4 Mt of MOP.
For additional information about Encanto Potash Corp., please
visit the Company's website at www.encantopotash.com or review the
Company's documents filed on www.sedar.com.
Encanto Potash Corp.
3123 – 595 Burrard Street
Vancouver, BC V7X 1J1
Tel: (604) 609-6110
Forward-Looking Information
ALL MINERAL RESERVE AND MINERAL RESOURCES ESTIMATES REPORTED BY
THE CORPORATION WERE ESTIMATED IN ACCORDANCE THE 2014 EDITION OF
THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY ("CIM") DEFINITION
STANDARDS FOR MINERAL RESOURCES AND MINERAL RESERVES ("CIM
DEFINITION STANDARDS") INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO CANADIAN
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101 ("NI 43-101"). THESE STANDARDS DIFFER
SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE U.S. SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC").
MINERAL RESOURCES WHICH ARE NOT MINERAL RESERVES DO NOT HAVE
DEMONSTRATED ECONOMIC VIABILITY.
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS "FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION" WITHIN THE
MEANING OF CANADIAN SECURITIES LEGISLATION AND "FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE
UNITED STATES PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995. THIS INFORMATION AND THESE STATEMENTS, REFERRED TO HEREIN AS
"FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" ARE MADE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS
DOCUMENT. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS RELATE TO FUTURE EVENTS OR
FUTURE PERFORMANCE AND REFLECT CURRENT ESTIMATES, PREDICTIONS,
EXPECTATIONS OR BELIEFS REGARDING FUTURE EVENTS AND INCLUDE, BUT
ARE NOT LIMITED TO, STATEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO:
(I) THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT AND GRADE OF MINERAL RESOURCES;
(II) THE PEA REPRESENTING A VIABLE DEVELOPMENT OPTION FOR THE
PROJECT;
(III) ESTIMATES OF THE CAPITAL COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING MINE
FACILITIES AND BRINGING A MINE INTO PRODUCTION, OF SUSTAINING
CAPITAL AND THE DURATION OF FINANCING PAYBACK PERIODS;
(IV) THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF FUTURE PRODUCTION, BOTH PRODUCED
AND METAL RECOVERED;
(V) ESTIMATES OF OPERATING COSTS AND TOTAL COSTS, NET CASH FLOW,
NET PRESENT VALUE AND ECONOMIC RETURNS FROM AN OPERATING MINE;
AND
(VI) ACTUAL PRICES ACHIEVED IN THE OFFTAKE AGREEMENT MAY BE
DIFFERENT FROM THOSE USED IN THE PFS AND IN THE PEA.
ANY STATEMENTS THAT EXPRESS OR INVOLVE DISCUSSIONS WITH RESPECT
TO PREDICTIONS, EXPECTATIONS, BELIEFS, PLANS, PROJECTIONS,
OBJECTIVES OR FUTURE EVENTS OR PERFORMANCE (OFTEN, BUT NOT ALWAYS,
USING WORDS OR PHRASES SUCH AS "EXPECTS", "ANTICIPATES", "PLANS",
"PROJECTS", "ESTIMATES", "ENVISAGES", "ASSUMES", "INTENDS",
"STRATEGY", "GOALS", "OBJECTIVES" OR VARIATIONS THEREOF OR STATING
THAT CERTAIN ACTIONS, EVENTS OR RESULTS "MAY", "COULD", "WOULD",
"MIGHT" OR "WILL" BE TAKEN, OCCUR OR BE ACHIEVED, OR THE NEGATIVE
OF ANY OF THESE TERMS AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS) ARE NOT STATEMENTS
OF HISTORICAL FACT AND MAY BE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
ALL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE BASED ON ENCANTO'S OR ITS
CONSULTANTS' CURRENT BELIEFS AS WELL AS VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS MADE BY
THEM AND INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO THEM. THE MOST
SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS ARE SET FORTH ABOVE, BUT GENERALLY THESE
ASSUMPTIONS INCLUDE:
(I) THE PRESENCE OF AND CONTINUITY OF POTASH AT THE MUSKOWEKWAN
POTASH PROJECT AT ESTIMATED GRADES;
(II) THE GEOTECHNICAL AND METALLURGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ROCK
CONFORMING TO SAMPLED RESULTS; INCLUDING THE QUANTITIES OF WATER
AND THE QUALITY OF THE WATER THAT MUST BE DIVERTED OR TREATED
DURING MINING OPERATIONS;
(III) THE CAPACITIES AND DURABILITY OF VARIOUS MACHINERY AND
EQUIPMENT;
(IV) THE AVAILABILITY OF PERSONNEL, MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT AT
ESTIMATED PRICES AND WITHIN THE ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIMES;
(V) CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES;
(VI) METALS SALES PRICES AND EXCHANGE RATE ASSUMED;
(VII) APPROPRIATE DISCOUNT RATES APPLIED TO THE CASH FLOWS IN
THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;
(VIII) TAX RATES AND ROYALTY RATES APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED
MINING OPERATION;
(IX) THE AVAILABILITY OF ACCEPTABLE FINANCING UNDER ASSUMED
STRUCTURE AND COSTS; (X) ANTICIPATED MINING LOSSES AND
DILUTION;
(XI) METALLURGICAL PERFORMANCE;
(XII) REASONABLE CONTINGENCY REQUIREMENTS;
(XIII) SUCCESS IN REALIZING PROPOSED OPERATIONS;
(XIV) RECEIPT OF PERMITS AND OTHER REGULATORY APPROVALS ON
ACCEPTABLE TERMS; AND
(XV) THE FULFILLMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COMMITMENTS AND
ARRANGEMENTS WITH LOCAL COMMUNITIES.
ALTHOUGH MANAGEMENT CONSIDERS THESE ASSUMPTIONS TO BE REASONABLE
BASED ON INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO IT, THEY MAY PROVE TO
BE INCORRECT. MANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE MADE ASSUMING THE
CORRECTNESS OF OTHER FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS, SUCH AS STATEMENTS
OF NET PRESENT VALUE AND INTERNAL RATES OF RETURN, WHICH ARE BASED
ON MOST OF THE OTHER FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS
HEREIN.
THE COST INFORMATION IS ALSO PREPARED USING CURRENT VALUES, BUT
THE TIME FOR INCURRING THE COSTS WILL BE IN THE FUTURE AND IT IS
ASSUMED COSTS WILL REMAIN STABLE OVER THE RELEVANT PERIOD.
BY THEIR VERY NATURE, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE
INHERENT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, BOTH GENERAL AND SPECIFIC, AND
RISKS EXIST THAT ESTIMATES, FORECASTS, PROJECTIONS AND OTHER
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WILL NOT BE ACHIEVED OR THAT ASSUMPTIONS
DO NOT REFLECT FUTURE EXPERIENCE. WE CAUTION READERS NOT TO PLACE
UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A NUMBER OF
IMPORTANT FACTORS COULD CAUSE THE ACTUAL OUTCOMES TO DIFFER
MATERIALLY FROM THE BELIEFS, PLANS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTATIONS,
ANTICIPATIONS, ESTIMATES ASSUMPTIONS AND INTENTIONS EXPRESSED IN
SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE RISK FACTORS MAY BE
GENERALLY STATED AS THE RISK THAT THE ASSUMPTIONS AND ESTIMATES
EXPRESSED ABOVE DO NOT OCCUR AS FORECAST, BUT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDE,
WITHOUT LIMITATION: RISKS RELATING TO VARIATIONS IN THE MINERAL
CONTENT WITHIN THE MATERIAL IDENTIFIED AS MINERAL RESOURCES FROM
THAT PREDICTED; VARIATIONS IN RATES OF RECOVERY AND EXTRACTION; THE
GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ROCK MINED OR THROUGH WHICH
INFRASTRUCTURE IS BUILT DIFFERING FROM THAT PREDICTED, THE QUANTITY
OF WATER THAT WILL NEED TO BE DIVERTED OR TREATED DURING MINING
OPERATIONS BEING DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS EXPECTED TO BE ENCOUNTERED
DURING MINING OPERATIONS OR POST CLOSURE, OR THE RATE OF FLOW OF
THE WATER BEING DIFFERENT; DEVELOPMENTS IN WORLD METALS MARKETS;
RISKS RELATING TO FLUCTUATIONS IN THE CANADIAN DOLLAR RELATIVE TO
THE US DOLLAR; INCREASES IN THE ESTIMATED CAPITAL AND OPERATING
COSTS OR UNANTICIPATED COSTS; DIFFICULTIES ATTRACTING THE NECESSARY
WORK FORCE; INCREASES IN FINANCING COSTS OR ADVERSE CHANGES TO THE
TERMS OF AVAILABLE FINANCING, IF ANY; TAX RATES OR ROYALTIES BEING
GREATER THAN ASSUMED; CHANGES IN DEVELOPMENT OR MINING PLANS DUE TO
CHANGES IN LOGISTICAL, TECHNICAL OR OTHER FACTORS; CHANGES IN
PROJECT PARAMETERS AS PLANS CONTINUE TO BE REFINED; RISKS RELATING
TO RECEIPT OF REGULATORY APPROVALS; DELAYS IN STAKEHOLDER
NEGOTIATIONS; CHANGES IN REGULATIONS APPLYING TO THE DEVELOPMENT,
OPERATION, AND CLOSURE OF MINING OPERATIONS FROM WHAT CURRENTLY
EXISTS; THE EFFECTS OF COMPETITION IN THE MARKETS IN WHICH ENCANTO
OPERATES; OPERATIONAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE RISKS AND THE ADDITIONAL
RISKS DESCRIBED IN ENCANTO'S ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH
SEDAR IN CANADA (AVAILABLE AT
WWW.SEDAR.COM) FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 2016. ENCANTO CAUTIONS THAT THE FOREGOING LIST OF
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE.
WHEN RELYING ON OUR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO MAKE DECISIONS
WITH RESPECT TO ENCANTO, INVESTORS AND OTHERS SHOULD CAREFULLY
CONSIDER THE FOREGOING FACTORS AND OTHER UNCERTAINTIES AND
POTENTIAL EVENTS. ENCANTO DOES NOT UNDERTAKE TO UPDATE ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT, WHETHER WRITTEN OR ORAL, THAT MAY BE
MADE FROM TIME TO TIME BY ENCANTO OR ON OUR BEHALF, EXCEPT AS
REQUIRED BY LAW.
NEITHER TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES
PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX
VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR
ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
SOURCE Encanto Potash Corp.