Table of Contents
File No. 024-12317
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on November 6, 2023
PART II - INFORMATION REQUIRED IN OFFERING CIRCULAR
Preliminary Offering
Circular dated November 6, 2023
An offering statement pursuant to Regulation A relating to these securities
has been filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Information contained in this Preliminary
Offering Circular is subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted before the
offering statement filed with the SEC is qualified. This Preliminary Offering Circular shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation
of an offer to buy nor may there be any sales of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful
before registration or qualification under the laws of any such state. We may elect to satisfy our obligation to deliver a Final Offering
Circular by sending you a notice within two business days after the completion of our sale to you that contains the URL where the Final
Offering Circular or the offering statement in which such Final Offering Circular was filed may be obtained.
OFFERING CIRCULAR
Aqua Power Systems Inc.
16,000,000 Units
Each Unit Consisting of 3 Shares of Common Stock
and 2 Warrants to Purchase One Share Each of
Common Stock
Exercisable at $0.25 Per Warrant
By this Offering Circular, Aqua Power Systems
Inc., a Nevada corporation, is offering for sale a maximum of 16,000,000 units of its securities (the “Units”) at a fixed
price of $___.0.45-0.75. per Unit (the price to be fixed by a post-qualification supplement), with each Unit consisting of 3 shares
of common stock (the “Common Stock”) and 2 warrants (each, a “Warrant”) to purchase one share each of Common
Stock (each, a “Warrant Share”) exercisable at $0.25 per Warrant, pursuant to Tier 1 of Regulation A of the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
A minimum purchase of $5,000 of the Units is required
in this offering; any additional purchase must be in an amount of at least $1,000. This offering is being conducted on a best-efforts
basis, which means that there is no minimum number of Units that must be sold by us for this offering to close; thus, we may receive no
or minimal proceeds from this offering. All proceeds from this offering will become immediately available to us and may be used as they
are accepted. Purchasers of the Units will not be entitled to a refund and could lose their entire investments.
Please see the “Risk Factors” section, beginning on page
4, for a discussion of the risks associated with a purchase of the Units.
We estimate that this offering will commence within two days of the
SEC’s qualification of the Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular forms a part; this offering will terminate at the
earliest of (a) the date on which the maximum offering has been sold, (b) the date which is one year from this offering being qualified
by the SEC or (c) the date on which this offering is earlier terminated by us, in our sole discretion. (See “Plan of Distribution”).
Title of |
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Offered |
|
of Shares |
|
Price to Public |
|
Commissions(1) |
|
Proceeds to Company(2) |
Units(3) |
|
16,000,000 |
|
$_____0.45-0.75 |
|
$-0- |
|
$_____7,200,000-20,000,000(4) |
(1) | | We do not intend
to offer and sell the Units through registered broker-dealers or utilize finders. However, should we determine to employ a registered
broker-dealer of finder, information as to any such broker-dealer or finder shall be disclosed in an amendment to this Offering Circular. |
(2) | | Does not account
for the payment of expenses of this offering estimated at $20,000. See “Plan of Distribution.” |
(3) | | Each Unit consists
of 3 Shares of Common Stock and 2 Warrants to purchase one Warrant Share exercisable at $0.25 per Warrant. |
(4) | | Does not include
up to $8,000,000 in additional proceeds from the exercise of all of the Warrants included in the Units. There is assurance that any of
the Warrants will be exercised. |
Our common stock is quoted in the over-the-counter
under the symbol “APSI” in the OTC Pink marketplace of OTC Link. On November 3, 2023, the closing price of our common
stock was $0.037675 per share.
Investing in the Units is speculative and involves substantial risks,
including the superior voting rights of our outstanding shares of Convertible Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred
Stock”), which preclude current and future owners of our common stock, including the Units, from influencing any corporate decision.
The Series B Preferred Stock has the following voting rights: each share of Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to 1,000 votes on all
matters.
Our directors, as the owners of all outstanding shares of the Series
B Preferred Stock, will, therefore, be able to control the management and affairs of our company, as well as matters requiring the approval
by our shareholders, including the election of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets,
and any other significant corporate transaction. (See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to a Purchase of the Units”).
THE SEC DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OF, OR GIVE ITS APPROVAL TO,
ANY SECURITIES OFFERED OR THE TERMS OF THE OFFERING, NOR DOES IT PASS UPON THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OFFERING CIRCULAR OR OTHER
SOLICITATION MATERIALS. THESE SECURITIES ARE OFFERED PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE SEC. HOWEVER, THE SEC HAS NOT
MADE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION THAT THE SECURITIES OFFERED ARE EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION.
The use of projections or forecasts in this offering is prohibited.
No person is permitted to make any oral or written predictions about the benefits you will receive from an investment in Units.
No sale may be made to you in this offering
if you do not satisfy the investor suitability standards described in this Offering Circular under “Plan of Distribution—State
Law Exemption and Offerings to Qualified Purchasers” (page 24). Before making any representation that you satisfy the established
investor suitability standards, we encourage you to review Rule 251(d)(2)(i)(C) of Regulation A. For general information on investing,
we encourage you to refer to www.investor.gov.
This Offering Circular follows the disclosure format of Form S-1, pursuant
to the General Instructions of Part II(a)(1)(ii) of Form 1-A.
The date of this Offering Circular is ______, 2023.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The information contained in this Offering Circular
includes some statements that are not historical and that are considered forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, statements regarding our development plans for our business; our strategies and business outlook; anticipated
development of our company; and various other matters (including contingent liabilities and obligations and changes in accounting policies,
standards and interpretations). These forward-looking statements express our expectations, hopes, beliefs and intentions regarding the
future. In addition, without limiting the foregoing, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of
future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words anticipates, believes,
continue, could, estimates, expects, intends, may, might, plans, possible, potential, predicts, projects, seeks, should, will, would and
similar expressions and variations, or comparable terminology, or the negatives of any of the foregoing, may identify forward-looking
statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.
The forward-looking statements contained in this
Offering Circular are based on current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments that are difficult to predict. We cannot
guarantee future performance, or that future developments affecting our company will be as currently anticipated. These forward-looking
statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual
results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements attributable to
us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties, along with others, are also
described below in the Risk Factors section. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions
prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. You should not
place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and should not make an investment decision based solely on these forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY
The following summary highlights material information
contained in this Offering Circular. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before purchasing our common
stock. Before making an investment decision, you should read this Offering Circular carefully, including the Risk Factors section and
the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms we, us and our refer and
relate to Aqua Power Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation, including its subsidiaries.
Our Company
The Company was originally incorporated in Nevada
on December 9, 2010, as NC Solar Inc. with the goal of developing solar energy collection farms on commercial and/or industrial buildings
located on distressed, blighted and/or underutilized commercial land in North Carolina and other southern states of the United States.
On June 6, 2014, management changed and, on August 12, 2014, the Company changed its name to Aqua Power Systems Inc.
On December 1, 2020, the Eighth Judicial District
Court of Nevada entered an order appointing Small Cap Compliance, LLC as custodian of the Company, authorizing and directing it to, among
other things, take any action reasonable, prudent and for the benefit of the Company, including reinstating the Company under Nevada law,
appointing officers and convening a meeting of stockholders. Small Cap Compliance, LLC was not a shareholder of the Company on the date
that it applied to serve as a custodian of the Company.
On December 7, 2020, Small Cap Compliance, LLC
filed the Certificate of Reinstatement for the Company, thereby reinstating the Company, appointed Stephen W. Carnes as the sole officer
and director of the Company, and amended the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to one million
shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
On March 3, 2021, the Eighth Judicial District
Court of Nevada entered an order approving Small Cap Compliance, LLC’s actions, without prejudice to the claims of interested parties
as to dilution of their interest, terminated Small Cap Compliance, LLC’s custodianship of the Company, and discharged Small Cap
Compliance as the custodian of the Company.
On April 27, 2022, Robert Morris and the board
of directors of APSI agreed in a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors In Lieu of Special Meeting that Mr. Morris would
become a director of APSI to help with acquisitions, effective May 1, 2022.
On December 28, 2022, pursuant to the closing and
completion of the acquisition, the Company acquired Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., an Indiana corporation (“Tradition”).
Tradition was incorporated under the laws of the state of Indiana on September 16, 2015. Tradition is headquartered in Angola, Indiana,
and provides freight transportation, brokerage, truck leasing and financing, warehousing and fulfillment services throughout the United
States, and manufactures and sells bolts and fasteners, and creates custom plates, cages, and embeds.
Upon the acquisition of Tradition, the business
of Tradition became the primary business of the Company. (See “Business”).
Offering Summary
Securities Offered |
16,000,000 Units, with each Unit consisting of 3 Shares of Common Stock and 2 Warrants to purchase one Warrant Share each at $0.25. |
|
|
Offering Price |
$_____0.45-0.75 per Unit. |
|
|
Shares of Common Stock
Outstanding Before
This Offering |
17,204,180 shares issued and outstanding as of the date hereof. |
|
|
Shares of Common Stock
Outstanding After
This Offering |
97,204,180 shares issued and outstanding, assuming (1) the sale of all of the Units hereunder and (2) the exercise of all Warrants included in the Units. |
|
|
Minimum Number of Shares
to Be Sold in This Offering |
None |
|
|
Disparate Voting Rights |
Our outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock possess superior voting rights, which preclude current and future owners of our Common Stock, including the Warrant Shares, from influencing any corporate decision. The Series B Preferred Stock has the following voting rights: each share of Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to 1,000 votes on all matters. Our Directors, Robert Morris, Joseph Davis and Stephen W. Carnes, own of all of the outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock and will, therefore, be able to control the management and affairs of our company, as well as matters requiring the approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and any other significant corporate transaction. (See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to a Purchase of the Offered Shares” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”). |
|
|
Investor Suitability Standards |
The Offered Shares may only be purchased by investors residing in a state in which this Offering Circular is duly qualified who have either (a) a minimum annual gross income of $70,000 and a minimum net worth of $70,000, exclusive of automobile, home and home furnishings, or (b) a minimum net worth of $250,000, exclusive of automobile, home and home furnishings. |
|
|
Market for our Common Stock |
Our common stock is quoted in the over-the-counter market under the symbol “APSI” in the OTC Pink marketplace of OTC Link. |
|
|
Termination of this Offering |
This offering will terminate at the earliest of (a) the date on which the maximum offering has been sold, (b) the date which is one year from this offering circular being qualified by the SEC and (c) the date on which this offering is earlier terminated by us, in our sole discretion. |
|
|
Use of Proceeds |
We will apply the proceeds
of this offering for repayment of indebtedness and for working capital. (See “Use
of Proceeds”). |
|
|
Risk Factors |
An investment in the Units involves a high degree of risk and should
not be purchased by investors who cannot afford the loss of their entire investments. You should carefully consider the information included
in the Risk Factors section of this Offering Circular, as well as the other information contained in this Offering Circular, prior to
making an investment decision regarding the Units |
|
|
Corporate Information |
Our principal executive offices are located at 2180 Park Avenue North, Unit 200, Winter Park, Florida 32789; our telephone number is 407-674-9444; our corporate website is located at www.aquapowersystemsinc.com. No information found on our company’s website is part of this Offering Circular. |
Continuing Reporting Requirements Under Regulation A
As a Tier 1 issuer under Regulation A, we will
be required to file with the SEC a Form 1-Z (Exit Report Under Regulation A) upon the termination of this offering. We will not be required
to file any other reports with the SEC following this offering.
However, during the pendency of this offering and
following this offering, we intend to file quarterly and annual financial reports and other supplemental reports with OTC Markets, which
will be available at www.otcmarkets.com.
All of our future periodic reports, whether filed
with OTC Markets or the SEC, will not be required to include the same information as analogous reports required to be filed by companies
whose securities are listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ, for example.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Units involves substantial risks. You should carefully
consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information contained in this Offering Circular, before purchasing any of
the Units. The occurrence of any of the following risks might cause you to lose a significant part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties
discussed below are not the only ones we face, but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are most significant to
our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition. Some statements in this Offering Circular, including statements in
the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. (See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”).
Risks Related to Our Company
We have incurred losses in prior periods,
and losses in the future could cause the quoted price of our common stock to decline or have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, our ability to pay our debts as they become due, and on our cash flows. We have incurred losses in prior periods. For
the six months ended June 30, 2023, we reported a net loss of $1,848,135 (unaudited) and, as of that date, we had an accumulated deficit
of $2,553,856 (unaudited). For the year ended December 31, 2022 (12/28/2022 through 12/31/2022), we incurred a net loss of $142,019 (unaudited)
and, as of that date, we had an accumulated deficit of $705,721 (unaudited). For the year ended March 31, 2022, we reported net income
of $554,911 (unaudited). Any losses in the future could cause the quoted price of our common stock to decline or have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, our ability to pay our debts as they become due, and on our cash flows.
Our financial statements are not independently
audited, which could result in errors and/or omissions in our financial statements if proper standards are not applied. We are
not required to have our financial statements audited by a firm that is certified by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).
As such, we do not have a third party reviewing the accounting. We may also not be up to date with all publications and releases released
by the PCAOB regarding accounting standards and treatments. This circumstance could mean that our unaudited financials may not properly
reflect up to date standards and treatments, resulting in misstated financial statements.
There is doubt about our ability to continue
as a viable business. We have not earned a profit from our operations during recent financial periods. There is no assurance that
we will ever earn a profit from our operations in future financial periods.
We do not have a successful operating history.
Historically, we have reported net losses from operations, which makes an investment in the Units speculative in nature. Because of this
lack of operating success, it is difficult to forecast our future operating results. Our performance and business prospects will suffer
if we are unable to overcome the following challenges, among others:
|
• | our dependence upon external sources for the financing of our operations, particularly given
that there are concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern; |
|
• | our ability to manage our expansion, growth and operating expenses; |
|
• | our ability to finance our business; |
|
• | our ability to compete and succeed in a highly competitive industry; and |
|
• | future geopolitical events and economic crisis. |
There are risks and uncertainties encountered
by under-capitalized companies. As an under-capitalized company, we are unable to offer assurance that we will be able to overcome
our lack of capital, among other challenges.
Natural disasters and other events beyond
our control could materially adversely affect us. Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption
to our operations, international commerce and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative effect on us. Our business operations
are subject to interruption by natural disasters, fire, power shortages, pandemics and other events beyond our control. Although we maintain
crisis management and disaster response plans, such events could make it difficult or impossible for us to deliver our services to our
customers and could decrease demand for our services. In the spring of 2020, large segments of the U.S. and global economies were impacted
by COVID-19, a significant portion of the U.S. population are subject to “stay at home” or similar requirements. The extent
of the impact of COVID-19 on our operational and financial performance will depend on certain developments, including the duration and
spread of the outbreak, impact on our customers and our sales cycles, impact on our customer, employee or industry events, and effect
on our vendors, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. At this point, the extent to which COVID-19 may impact our financial
condition or results of operations is uncertain. To date, the COVID-19 outbreak, has significantly impacted global markets, U.S. employment
numbers, as well as the business prospects of many small businesses (our potential clients). To the extent COVID-19 continues to wreak
havoc on the markets and limits investment capital or personally impacts any of our key employees, it may have significant impact on our
results and operations.
Risks Generally Related to the Company’s and Tradition’s
Business and Industry
Shareholders will not receive disclosure
or information regarding a prospective business. Management is not required to and will not provide shareholders with disclosure
or information regarding prospective business opportunities. Moreover, a prospective business opportunity may not result in a benefit
to shareholders or prove to be more favorable to shareholders than any other investment that may be made by shareholders and investors.
We likely will complete only the acquisition
of Tradition. Given our limited financial resources, which have mainly been provided by one of our officers and directors, Stephen
W. Carnes, our competition with similar companies that are looking for potential acquisitions and have more resources than us, and other
considerations, it is likely we will only complete only the acquisition of Tradition. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be
solely dependent upon the performance of Tradition. In this case, we will not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the
possible diversification of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business
transactions or asset acquisitions in different industries or different areas of a single industry so as to diversify risks and offset
losses.
Tradition’s business is subject to
economic, business and regulatory factors affecting the truckload industry that are largely beyond its control, any of which could have
a material adverse effect on its results of operations. The truckload industry is highly cyclical, and Tradition’s business
is dependent on a number of factors that may have a negative impact on its results of operations, many of which are beyond its control.
Tradition believes that some of the most significant of these factors are economic changes that affect supply and demand in transportation
markets that could have a material adverse effect, such as:
Economic conditions that decrease shipping demand
or increase the supply of available tractors and trailers can exert downward pressure on rates and equipment utilization, thereby decreasing
asset productivity. The risks associated with these factors are heightened when the U.S. economy is weakened. Some of the principal risks
during such times are as follows:
|
• |
Tradition may experience low overall freight levels, which may impair Tradition’s asset utilization; |
|
• |
certain of Tradition’s customers may face credit issues and cash flow problems that may lead to payment delays, increased credit risk, bankruptcies and other financial hardships that could result in even lower freight demand and may require us to increase Tradition’s allowance for doubtful accounts; |
|
• |
freight patterns may change as supply chains are redesigned, resulting in an imbalance between Tradition’s capacity and Tradition’s customers’ freight demand; |
|
• |
customers may solicit bids for freight from multiple trucking companies or select competitors that offer lower rates from among existing choices in an attempt to lower their costs, and Tradition might be forced to lower its rates or lose freight; and |
|
• |
Tradition may be forced to accept more loads from freight brokers, where freight rates are typically lower, or may be forced to incur more non-revenue miles to obtain loads. |
Tradition is also subject to cost increases outside
its control that could materially reduce its profitability if Tradition is unable to increase Tradition’s rates sufficiently. Such
cost increases include, but are not limited to, increases in fuel prices, driver and office employee wages, purchased transportation costs,
interest rates, taxes, tolls, license and registration fees, insurance, revenue equipment and related maintenance, tires and other components
and healthcare and other benefits for Tradition’s employees. Further, Tradition may not be able to appropriately adjust Tradition’s
costs to changing market demands. In order to maintain high variability in Tradition’s business model, it is necessary to adjust
staffing levels to changing market demands. In periods of rapid change, it is more difficult to match Tradition’s staffing level
to its business needs. Further, Tradition may not be able to appropriately adjust its costs to changing market demands.
In addition, events outside Tradition’s control,
such as deterioration of U.S. transportation infrastructure and reduced investment in such infrastructure, strikes or other work stoppages
at Tradition’s facilities or at customer, port, border or other shipping locations, pandemics, armed conflicts or terrorist attacks,
efforts to combat terrorism, military action against a foreign state or group located in a foreign state or heightened security requirements
could lead to wear, tear and damage to Tradition’s equipment, driver dissatisfaction, reduced economic demand and freight volumes,
reduced availability of credit, increased prices for fuel or temporary closing of the shipping locations or U.S. borders. Such events
or enhanced security measures in connection with such events could impair Tradition’s operating efficiency and productivity and
result in higher operating costs.
Regarding Tradition’s manufacturing
business, a downturn in the economy and other factors may affect customer spending, which could harm Tradition’s operating results.
In general, Tradition’s sales represent spending on discretionary items or consumption needs by its customers. This spending is
affected by many factors, including, among others:
|
• |
general business conditions, |
|
• |
interest rates, |
|
• |
inflation, |
|
• |
the availability of consumer credit, |
|
• |
taxation, |
|
• |
fuel prices and electrical power rates, |
|
• |
unemployment trends, |
|
• |
terrorist attacks and acts of war, and |
|
• |
other matters that influence consumer confidence and spending. |
A downturn or political conflict regionally, nationally,
or internationally could negatively impact sales.
Tradition operates in the highly competitive
and fragmented truckload carrier industry, and numerous competitive factors could impair its ability to improve its profitability and
materially adversely affect its results of operations. Numerous competitive factors could impair Tradition’s ability to
improve its profitability and materially adversely affect its results of operations, including:
|
• |
Tradition competes with many other truckload carriers of varying sizes and service offerings and, to a lesser extent, with (i) less-than-truckload carriers and (ii) other transportation and brokerage companies, several of which have access to more equipment and greater capital resources than Tradition does; |
|
• |
maintaining or expanding Tradition’s business or Tradition may be required to reduce its freight rates in order to maintain business and keep its equipment productive; |
|
• |
Tradition may increase the size of its fleet during periods of high freight demand during which its competitors also increase their capacity, and Tradition may experience losses in greater amounts than such competitors during subsequent cycles of softened freight demand if Tradition is required to dispose of assets at a loss to match reduced freight demand; |
|
• |
Tradition may have difficulty recruiting and retaining drivers because upgrades of its tractor fleet to match or exceed those of its competitors may not increase its cost savings or profitability; |
|
• |
some of Tradition’s larger customers are other transportation companies and/or also operate their own private trucking fleets, and they may decide to transport more of their own freight; |
|
• |
some shippers have reduced or may reduce the number of carriers they use by selecting preferred carriers as approved service providers or by engaging dedicated providers, and Tradition may not be selected; |
|
• |
consolidation in the trucking industry may create other large carriers with greater financial resources and other competitive advantages, and Tradition may have difficulty competing with them; |
|
• |
Tradition’s competitors may have better safety records than Tradition or a perception of better safety records; |
|
• |
competition from freight brokerage companies may materially adversely affect Tradition’s customer relationships and freight rates; |
|
• |
new digital entrants with cheaper sources of capital could inhibit Tradition’s ability to compete; |
|
• |
Tradition’s competitors may have better technology that may lead to increased operating efficiencies, reduced costs, a better ability to recruit drivers and more demand for their services; and |
|
• |
economies of scale that procurement aggregation providers may pass on to smaller carriers may improve such carriers’ ability to compete with Tradition. |
Regarding Tradition’s manufacturing
business, Tradition may not be able to compete effectively against its competitors, which could harm its business and operating results.
The industrial, construction, and maintenance supply industry, although consolidating, still remains a large, fragmented industry that
is highly competitive. Tradition believes that sales of industrial, construction, and maintenance industry supplies will become more concentrated
over the next few years, which may make the industry even more competitive. Tradition’s current or future competitors include companies
with similar or greater market presence, name recognition, and financial, marketing, and other resources, and Tradition believes they
will continue to challenge Tradition with their product selection, financial resources, and services. Increased competition or the adoption
by competitors of aggressive pricing strategies and sale methods could cause us to lose market share or to reduce Tradition’s prices
or increase its spending, thus eroding its margins.
Tradition may not be able to effectively
manage and implement its organic growth strategies. While Tradition currently believes it can grow its profits and cash flows
organically through further penetration of existing customers and by expanding its customer base, Tradition may not be able to effectively
and successfully implement such strategies and realize its stated goals. Tradition’s goals may be negatively affected by a failure
to further penetrate its existing customer base, cross-sell its service offerings, pursue new customer opportunities, manage the operations
and expenses of new or growing service offerings or otherwise achieve growth of its service offerings. Successful execution of Tradition’s
business strategies may not result in Tradition achieving its current business goals.
Tradition has several major customers, the
loss of one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on its business. A significant portion of Tradition’s
operating revenue is generated from a number of major customers, the loss of one or more of which could have a material adverse effect
on its business. For fiscal year 2021, Tradition’s largest customer accounted for approximately 13% of its operating revenue. Economic
and capital markets conditions may adversely affect Tradition’s customers and their ability to remain solvent. Tradition’s
customers’ financial difficulties can negatively impact its business and operating results and financial condition. Generally, Tradition
does not have contractual relationships with its customers that guarantee any minimum volumes, and its customer relationships may not
continue as presently in effect. Tradition generally does not have long-term contractual relationships with its customers, including its
dedicated customers, and certain of these contracts contain clauses that permit cancellation on a short-term basis without cause, and
accordingly any of its customers may not continue to utilize its services, renew its existing contracts or continue at the same volume
levels. Despite the existence of contract arrangements with Tradition’s customers, certain of its customers may nonetheless engage
in competitive bidding processes that could negatively impact its contractual relationship. In addition, certain of Tradition’s
major customers may increasingly use their own truckload and delivery fleets, which would reduce its freight volumes. A reduction in or
termination of Tradition’s services by one or more of its major customers could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s
business and operating results.
Tradition’s profitability may be materially
adversely impacted if its capital investments do not match customer demand for invested resources or if there is a decline in the availability
of funding sources for these investments. Tradition’s operations require significant investments. The amount and timing
of capital investments depend on various factors, including anticipated volume levels and the price and availability of assets. If anticipated
demand differs materially from actual usage, Tradition’s capital-intensive Freight Transportation segment may have too much or too
little capacity. Moreover, across Tradition’s reportable segments resource requirements vary with customer demand, which may be
subject to seasonal or general economic conditions. Tradition’s ability to properly select freight and adapt to changes in customer
transportation requirements is important to efficiently deploy resources and make capital investments in trucks, trailers, and containers
(with respect to Tradition’s Freight Transportation segment) or obtain qualified third-party capacity at a reasonable price (with
respect to Tradition’s Brokerage segment). Although Tradition’s business volume is not highly concentrated, its customers’
financial failures or loss of customer business may also affect it.
Tradition may not be able to successfully
implement its company growth strategy of diversifying its revenue base and expanding its capabilities. Tradition’s company
growth strategy entails selectively diversifying its revenue base, as Tradition has done with its service offerings, and venturing into
the manufacturing space. This strategy involves certain risks, and Tradition may not overcome these risks, in which case Tradition’s
business, financial position and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. In connection with Tradition’s company
growth strategy, Tradition has in the past made selective acquisitions, made new investments in technology and in office, service and
warehouse centers, increased sales and marketing efforts and hired new drivers and associates. Tradition expects to continue to pursue
its company growth strategy, and this exposes Tradition to certain risks, including:
|
• |
making significant capital expenditures, which could require substantial capital and cash flow that Tradition may not have or may not be able to obtain on satisfactory terms; |
|
• |
growth may strain Tradition’s management, capital resources, information systems and customer service; |
|
• |
hiring new managers, drivers and other associates, including in specialty equipment services, may increase training and compliance costs and may result in temporary inefficiencies until those associates become proficient in their jobs; |
|
• |
specialty transport of hazardous materials, which subjects Tradition to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations by governmental authorities and, in the event of an accidental release of these commodities, could result in significant loss of life and extensive property damage as well as environmental remediation obligations; and |
|
• |
expanding Tradition’s service offerings may require it to encounter new competitive challenges in markets in which Tradition has not previously operated or with which it is unfamiliar. |
Fluctuations in the price or availability
of fuel or surcharge collection may increase Tradition’s costs of operations, which could materially adversely affect its profitability.
Fuel is one of Tradition’s largest operating expenses. Diesel fuel prices fluctuate greatly due to factors beyond Tradition’s
control, such as supply and demand, political events, terrorist activities, armed conflicts, commodity futures trading, depreciation of
the dollar against other currencies, weather events and other natural disasters, which could increase in frequency and severity due to
climate change, as well as other man-made disasters, each of which may lead to an increase in the cost of fuel. Fuel prices also are affected
by the rising demand for fuel in developing countries, including China, and could be materially adversely affected by the use of crude
oil and oil reserves for purposes other than fuel production and by diminished drilling activity. Such events may lead not only to increases
in fuel prices, but also to fuel shortages and disruptions in the fuel supply chain. Because Tradition’s operations are dependent
upon diesel fuel, significant diesel fuel cost increases, shortages, rationings, or supply disruptions would materially adversely affect
Tradition’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Increases in fuel costs, to the extent not offset
by rate per mile increases or fuel surcharges, have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s operations and profitability. While
Tradition has fuel surcharge programs in place with a majority of Tradition’s customers, which historically have helped Tradition
offset the majority of the negative impact of rising fuel prices associated with loaded or billed miles, Tradition also incurs fuel costs
that cannot be recovered even with respect to customers with which Tradition maintains fuel surcharge programs, such as those associated
with non-revenue generating miles, the time when Tradition’s engines are idling and fuel for refrigeration units on Tradition’s
refrigerated trailers. Moreover, the terms of each customer’s fuel surcharge program vary, and certain customers have sought to
modify the terms of their fuel surcharge programs to minimize recoverability for fuel price increases. In addition, because Tradition’s
fuel surcharge recovery lags behind changes in fuel prices, Tradition’s fuel surcharge recovery may not capture the increased costs
Tradition pays for fuel, especially when prices are rising. This could lead to fluctuations in Tradition’s levels of reimbursement,
which have occurred in the past. During periods of low freight volumes, shippers can use their negotiating leverage to impose fuel surcharge
policies that provide a lower reimbursement of Tradition’s fuel costs. There is no assurance that Tradition’s fuel surcharge
program can be maintained indefinitely or will be sufficiently effective. Tradition’s results of operations would be negatively
affected to the extent Tradition cannot recover higher fuel costs or fail to improve Tradition’s fuel price protection through its
fuel surcharge program.
Regarding Tradition’s manufacturing
business, increases in energy costs and the cost of raw materials used in its products could impact its cost of goods and distribution
and occupancy expenses, which may result in lower operating margins. Costs of raw materials used in Tradition’s products
(e.g., steel) and energy costs have been rising during the last several years, which has resulted in increased production costs for Tradition’s
vendors. Those vendors typically look to pass their increased costs along to Tradition through price increases. The fuel costs of Tradition’s
distribution operation have risen as well. While Tradition typically tries to pass increased vendor prices and fuel costs through to its
customers or to modify Tradition’s activities to mitigate the impact, Tradition may not be successful. Failure to fully pass these
increased prices and costs through to Tradition’s customers or to modify its activities to mitigate the impact would have an adverse
effect on Tradition’s operating margins.
Difficulties attracting and retaining qualified
drivers, including through owner-operators, could materially adversely affect Tradition’s profitability and ability to maintain
or grow its fleet. Like many truckload carriers, from time to time Tradition may experience difficulty in attracting and retaining
sufficient numbers of qualified drivers, including through owner-operators, and driver shortages may recur in the future. Tradition’s
challenge with attracting and retaining qualified drivers stems from intense market competition and Tradition’s driver quality standards,
which subjects Tradition to increased payments for driver compensation and owner-operator contracted rates. Failure to recruit high-quality,
safe drivers that meet Tradition’s testing standards could diminish the safety of its fleet and could have a materially adverse
effect on its customer relationships and its business.
Tradition’s company drivers are generally
compensated on a per-mile basis, and the rate per-mile generally increases with the drivers’ length of service. Owner-operators
contracting with Tradition are generally compensated on a percentage of revenue basis. The compensation Tradition offers its drivers and
owner-operators is also subject to market conditions and labor supply. Tradition may in future periods increase company driver and owner-operator
compensation, which will be more likely to the extent that economic conditions improve and industry regulation exacerbates driver shortages
forcing driver compensation higher. The average trucking company will have a turnover rate of roughly 95% annually. Tradition’s
turnover rate, one-hundred and twenty-four percent (124%), in the last twelve (12) months, requires Tradition to continually recruit a
substantial number of company drivers in order to operate Tradition’s revenue-producing fleet equipment, including trucks and specialty
equipment. If Tradition is unable to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of high-quality company drivers, and contract
with suitable owner-operators, Tradition could be required to adjust its compensation packages, or operate with fewer trucks and face
difficulty meeting shipper demands, all of which could adversely affect Tradition’s profitability and ability to maintain its size
or grow.
Tradition’s use of owner-operators
to provide a portion of its truck fleet exposes it to different risks than it faces with its owned trucks. Tradition may contract
with more owner-operators and use more owner-operator trucks than some of its competitors. Tradition is therefore more dependent on owner-operator
trucks than some of its competitors. Failure to maintain owner-operator business and relationships and increased industry competition
for owner-operators could have a materially adverse effect on Tradition’s operating results.
During times of increased economic activity, Tradition
faces heightened competition for owner-operators from other carriers. To the extent Tradition’s turnover increases, Tradition may
be required to increase owner-operator compensation or take other measures to remain an attractive option for owner-operators. If Tradition
cannot attract sufficient owner-operators, or it becomes economically difficult for owner-operators to survive, Tradition may not be able
to maintain the percentage of Tradition’s fleet provided by owner-operators or maintain Tradition’s delivery schedules.
Tradition provides financing to certain qualified
owner-operators who qualify for financing in order to lease trucks from Tradition. If Tradition is unable to provide such financing in
the future, due to liquidity constraints or other restrictions, Tradition may experience a decrease in the number of owner-operators available
to fully operate its assets. Further, if owner-operators operating the trucks Tradition finance default under or otherwise terminate the
financing arrangement and Tradition is unable to find a replacement owner-operator, Tradition may incur losses on amounts owed to Tradition
with respect to the truck in addition to any losses Tradition may incur as a result of the idling of the truck.
Tradition’s lease contracts with owner-operators
are governed by federal and other leasing regulations, which impose specific requirements on us and owner-operators. It is possible that
Tradition could face lawsuits alleging the violation of leasing obligations or failure to follow the contractual terms, which could result
in liability.
Tradition utilizes owner-operators to complete
its services. These owner-operators are subject to similar regulation requirements, such as the electronic on-board recording and driver
Hours of Service (HOS) requirements that apply to larger carriers, which may have a more significant impact on their operations, causing
them to exit the transportation industry. Aside from when these third parties may use Tradition’s trailing equipment to fulfill
loads, Tradition does not own the revenue equipment or control the drivers delivering these loads. The inability to obtain reliable third-party
owner-operators could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s operating results and business growth.
Tradition depends on third-party service
providers, particularly in Tradition’s Brokerage segment, and service instability from these providers could increase Tradition’s
operating costs and reduce its ability to offer brokerage services, which could materially adversely affect its revenue, business, financial
condition, results of operations and customer relationships. Tradition’s Brokerage Services segment is dependent upon the
services of third-party carriers, including other truckload carriers. For this business, Tradition does not own or control the transportation
assets that deliver to Tradition’s customers’ freight and Tradition does not employ the providers directly involved in delivering
the freight. These third-party providers may seek other freight opportunities and/or require increased compensation in times of improved
freight demand or tight truckload capacity. If Tradition is unable to secure the services of these third parties or if Tradition becomes
subject to increases in the prices Tradition must pay to secure such services, its business, financial condition and results of operations
may be materially adversely affected, and Tradition may be unable to serve its customers on competitive terms. Tradition’s ability
to secure sufficient equipment or other transportation services may be affected by many risks beyond Tradition’s control, including
equipment shortages, increased equipment prices, new entrants with different business models, interruptions in service due to labor disputes,
driver shortage, changes in regulations impacting transportation and changes in transportation rates.
Difficulty in obtaining materials, equipment,
goods and services from Tradition’s vendors and suppliers could adversely affect Tradition’s Freight Transportation, Brokerage,
and Equipment Leasing segments. Tradition primarily uses Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.’s network
for fueling and on road repairs, and Tradition is dependent upon its suppliers for certain products and materials, including Tradition’s
tractors and trailers. If Tradition fails to maintain favorable relationships with its vendors and suppliers, or if its vendors and suppliers
are unable to provide the products and materials Tradition needs or undergo financial hardship, Tradition could experience difficulty
in obtaining needed goods and services because of production interruptions, limited material availability or other reasons, or Tradition
may not be able to obtain favorable pricing or other terms. As a result, Tradition’s business and operations could be adversely
affected.
Furthermore, a decrease in vendor output may have
a materially adverse effect on Tradition’s ability to purchase a quantity of new revenue equipment that is sufficient to sustain
Tradition’s desired growth rate and to maintain a late-model fleet. Tractor and trailer vendors may reduce their manufacturing output
in response to lower demand for their products in economic downturns or shortages of component parts. Currently, tractor and trailer manufacturers
are experiencing significant shortages of semiconductor chips and other component parts and supplies, including steel, forcing many manufacturers
to curtail or suspend their production, which has led to a lower supply of tractors and trailers, higher prices, and lengthened trade
cycles, which could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s business, financial condition, and results of operations, particularly
Tradition’s maintenance expense and driver retention.
If Tradition is unable to recruit, develop
and retain its key associates, its business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. Tradition
is highly dependent upon the services of certain key employees, including its team of executive officers and managers. The loss of any
of their services could negatively impact Tradition’s operations and future profitability. Inadequate succession planning or unexpected
departure of key executive officers could cause substantial disruption to Tradition’s business operations, deplete its institutional
knowledge base and erode its competitive advantage. Additionally, Tradition must continue to recruit, develop and retain skilled and experienced
managers if Tradition is to realize its goal of expanding its operations and continuing its growth. Failure to recruit, develop and retain
a core group of managers could have a materially adverse effect on Tradition’s business.
Developments in labor and employment law
and any unionizing efforts by employees could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s results of operations. Tradition
faces the risk that Congress, federal agencies or one or more states could approve legislation or regulations significantly affecting
its businesses and its relationship with its employees which would have substantially liberalized the procedures for union organization.
None of Tradition’s employees are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement, but any attempt by its employees to organize
a labor union could result in increased legal and other associated costs. Additionally, given the National Labor Relations Board’s
“speedy election” rule, Tradition’s ability to timely and effectively address any unionizing efforts would be difficult.
If Tradition entered into a collective bargaining agreement with its employees, the terms could materially adversely affect its costs,
efficiency and ability to generate acceptable returns on the affected operations.
Insurance and claims expenses could significantly
reduce Tradition’s earnings. Tradition’s future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which
could reduce its earnings. Estimating the number and severity of claims, as well as related judgment or settlement amounts is inherently
difficult.
Tradition believes its aggregate insurance limits
should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that the amount of one or more claims could exceed Tradition’s
aggregate coverage limits. If any claim were to exceed Tradition’s coverage, Tradition would bear the excess. Insurance carriers
have raised premiums for many businesses, including transportation companies. As a result, Tradition’s insurance and claims expense
could increase, or Tradition could raise its deductible when its policies are renewed or replaced. Tradition’s operating results
and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if (i) cost per claim, premiums, or the number of claims significantly
exceeds its estimates, (ii) Tradition experiences a claim in excess of its coverage limits, (iii) Tradition’s insurance carriers
fail to pay on its insurance claims or (iv) Tradition experiences a claim for which coverage is not provided.
Tradition operates in a highly regulated
industry, and increased direct and indirect costs of compliance with, or liability for violations of, existing or future regulations could
have a material adverse effect on its business. Tradition, its drivers, and its equipment are regulated by the DOT, the EPA, the
DHS and other agencies in states in which it operates. For further discussion of the laws and regulations applicable to Tradition, its
drivers, and its equipment, please see “Regulation”. Future laws and regulations may be more stringent, require changes in
Tradition’s operating practices, influence the demand for transportation services or require Tradition to incur significant additional
costs. Higher costs incurred by Tradition, or by Tradition’s suppliers who pass the costs onto Tradition through higher supplies
and materials pricing, or liabilities Tradition may incur related to its failure to comply with existing or future regulations could adversely
affect its results of operations.
If the independent contractors Tradition
contracts with are deemed by regulators or judicial process to be employees, its business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially adversely affected. Tax and other regulatory authorities, as well as independent contractors themselves, have
increasingly asserted that independent contractor drivers in the trucking industry are employees rather than independent contractors.
Companies that use lease-purchase independent contractor programs, such as Tradition, have been more susceptible to reclassification lawsuits.
If the independent contractors with whom Tradition contracts are determined to be employees, Tradition would incur additional exposure
under federal and state tax, workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, labor, employment and tort laws, including for prior
periods, as well as potential liability for employee benefits and tax withholdings, and Tradition’s business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. For further discussion of legislation regarding independent contractors,
please see “Regulation”.
Safety-related evaluations and rankings under
CSA could materially adversely affect Tradition’s profitability and operations, its ability to maintain or grow its fleet and its
customer relationships. Under the CSA program, fleets are evaluated and ranked against their peers based on certain safety-related
standards. As a result, Tradition’s fleet could be ranked poorly as compared to peer carriers, which could have an adverse effect
on its business, financial condition and results of operations. The occurrence of future deficiencies could affect driver recruitment
by causing high-quality drivers to seek employment with other carriers or limit the pool of available drivers or could cause Tradition’s
customers to direct their business away from Tradition and to carriers with higher fleet safety rankings, either of which would materially
adversely affect Tradition’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, future deficiencies could increase
Tradition’s insurance expenses. Further, Tradition may incur greater than expected expenses in its attempts to improve unfavorable
scores.
None of Tradition’s subsidiaries is currently
exceeding the established intervention thresholds in the seven CSA safety-related categories. If Tradition were to receive unfavorable
ratings, Tradition may be prioritized for an intervention action or roadside inspection, either of which could materially adversely affect
Tradition’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, customers may be less likely to assign loads to
Tradition. For further discussion of the CSA program, please see “Regulation”.
Receipt of an unfavorable DOT safety rating
could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s operations and profitability. Tradition currently has a satisfactory
DOT safety rating, which is the highest available rating under the current safety rating scale. If Tradition were to receive a conditional
or unsatisfactory DOT safety rating, it could materially adversely affect Tradition’s business, financial condition and results
of operations as customer contracts may require a satisfactory DOT safety rating, and a conditional or unsatisfactory rating could materially
adversely affect or restrict its operations. For further discussion of the DOT safety rating system, please see “Regulation.”
Changes in U.S. tax laws and regulations
may impact Tradition’s effective tax rate and may adversely affect its business, financial condition and operating results.
Significant reform of the U.S. tax laws, including significant changes related to federal tax rates, interest expense deductions, capital
expenditure deductions and the taxation of business entities, could adversely affect Tradition. Tradition benefits from certain tax provisions
relating to capital expenditure deductions. Reform could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s growth opportunities, business
and results of operations.
Changes to trade regulation, quotas, duties
or tariffs, caused by the changing U.S. and geopolitical environments or otherwise, may increase Tradition’s costs and materially
adversely affect its business. The imposition of additional tariffs or quotas or changes to certain trade agreements, including
tariffs applied to goods traded between the United States and China, could harm Tradition’s Warehouse Leasing and Equipment Leasing
service segments, and among other things, increase the costs of the materials used by Tradition’s suppliers to produce new revenue
equipment or increase the price of fuel. Such cost increases for Tradition’s revenue equipment suppliers would likely be passed
on to Tradition, and to the extent fuel prices increase, Tradition may not be able to fully recover such increases through rate increases
or its fuel surcharge program, either of which could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s business.
Tradition’s operations
are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could result in substantial fines or penalties. Tradition
is subject to various environmental laws and regulations dealing with the hauling and handling of hazardous materials, waste and other
oil, fuel storage tanks, air emissions from Tradition’s vehicles and facilities, engine idling and discharge and retention of storm
water. Tradition’s truck terminals often are located in industrial areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination
could occur. Tradition’s operations involve the risks of fuel spillage or seepage, environmental damage and hazardous waste disposal,
among others. Certain of Tradition’s facilities have waste oil or fuel storage tanks and fueling islands. If Tradition is involved
in a spill or other accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances Tradition transports, if soil
or groundwater contamination is found at Tradition’s facilities or results from its operations, or if Tradition is found to be
in violation of applicable environmental laws or regulations, Tradition could owe cleanup costs and incur related liabilities, including
substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on Tradition’s
business and operating results.
EPA regulations limiting exhaust emissions became
more restrictive in 2010. In 2010, an executive memorandum was signed directing the NHTSA and the EPA to develop new, stricter fuel efficiency
standards for heavy trucks. In 2011, the NHTSA and the EPA adopted final rules that established the first-ever fuel economy and greenhouse
gas standards for medium-and heavy-duty vehicles. These standards apply to model years 2014 to 2018, which are required to achieve an
approximate 20 percent reduction in fuel consumption by model year 2018, and equates to approximately four gallons of fuel for every 100
miles traveled. In June 2015, the EPA and NHTSA jointly proposed new stricter standards that would apply to trailers beginning with model
year 2018 and tractors beginning with model year 2021.
In October 2016, the EPA and NHTSA formally published
the Final Rule for Phase 2 of the GHG emissions and fuel efficiency standards for medium and heavy-duty engines and vehicles. On August
5, 2021, U.S. EPA announced an update to the Cleaner Trucks Initiative called the Clean Trucks Plan. The Clean Trucks Plan plans to reduce
GHG and other harmful air pollutants from heavy-duty trucks through a series of rulemakings over the next three years. Further, the EPA
is targeting 2027 for these new standards to take effect and is also working on enacting more stringent greenhouse gas emission standards
(beginning with model year 2030 vehicles) by the end of 2024. For further discussion of the laws and regulations applicable to Tradition,
its drivers, and its equipment, please see “Regulation”.
Tradition is subject to various claims and
lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, and increases in the amount or severity of these claims and lawsuits could adversely affect
us. Tradition is exposed to various claims and litigation related to commercial disputes, personal injury, property damage, environmental
liability and other matters. Developments in regulatory, legislative or judicial standards, material changes to litigation trends, or
a catastrophic accident or series of accidents, involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability
could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Tradition has significant ongoing capital
requirements that could affect its profitability if Tradition is unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing
on favorable terms. The truckload industry generally, and Tradition’s Equipment Leasing and Warehouse Leasing services segments,
are capital intensive and asset heavy. Tradition expects to pay for projected capital expenditures with cash flows from operations, proceeds
from equity sales or financing available under its existing debt instruments. Tradition’s total capital expenditures in its fiscal
year ended December 31, 2021 were $21,950,374. If Tradition were unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, Tradition would need
to seek alternative sources of capital, including financing, to meet its capital requirements. In the event that Tradition is unable to
generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms in the future, Tradition may have to limit its fleet size,
enter into less favorable financing arrangements or operate its revenue equipment for longer periods, any of which could have a materially
adverse effect on its profitability.
The seasonal pattern generally experienced
in the trucking industry may affect Tradition’s periodic results during traditionally slower shipping periods and winter months.
In the trucking industry, revenue generally follows a seasonal pattern which may affect Tradition’s operating results. Tradition
typically experiences a seasonal surge in sales during the fourth quarter of Tradition’s fiscal year as a result of holiday sales.
After the December holiday season and during the remaining winter months, Tradition’s freight volumes are typically lower because
some customers reduce shipment levels. Tradition’s operating expenses have historically been higher in the winter months because
of cold temperatures and other adverse winter weather conditions which result in decreased fuel efficiency, increased cold weather-related
maintenance costs of revenue equipment and increased insurance and claims costs. Revenue can also be affected by adverse weather conditions,
holidays and the number of business days during a given period because revenue is directly related to the available working days of shippers.
From time to time, Tradition may also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes,
blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could harm Tradition’s results of operations or make its
results of operations more volatile.
Tradition is increasingly dependent on data
networks and systems, including tracking and communications systems, and significant systems disruptions, including those caused by cybersecurity
breaches, could adversely affect Tradition’s business. Tradition’s policy of increasingly using technology to improve
productivity and reduce costs means that its business is reliant on the efficient, stable and uninterrupted operation of its data networks
and systems, including tracking and communications systems. Tradition’s computer systems are used in various aspects of its business,
including load planning and receiving, dispatch of drivers and third-party capacity providers, freight and container tracking, customer
billing and account monitoring, automation of tasks, producing financial and other reports and other general functions and purposes. Tradition
is currently dependent on two vendors, Transport Pro, for fleet and transportation management software, and Camelot Software, for warehouse
management systems. Tradition is in the process of converting its transportation management software from Transport Pro to TMW by Trimble
Transportation Enterprise Solutions, Inc. (“Trimble”) and will be dependent on Trimble, once the conversion process is complete.
If the stability or capability of such vendors is compromised, it could adversely affect Tradition’s revenue, customer service,
driver turnover rates and data preservation. Additionally, if any of Tradition’s critical information or communications systems
fail or become unavailable, Tradition could have to perform certain functions manually, which could temporarily affect the efficiency
and effectiveness of its operations.
Tradition’s operations and those of its technology
and communications service providers are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist
attacks, internet failures, computer viruses, malware, hacking and other events beyond Tradition’s control. More sophisticated and
frequent cyber-attacks within the United States in recent years have also increased security risks associated with information technology
systems. In the event of a cyber-attack, breach or other such event, Tradition’s business and operations could be adversely affected
in the event of a system failure, disruption or security breach that causes a delay, or interruption or impairment of Tradition’s
services and operations.
Tradition may not make acquisitions in the
future, which could impede growth, or if it does, Tradition may not be successful in integrating any acquired businesses, either of which
could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s business. Historically, a key component of Tradition’s growth
strategy has been to pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses and/or assets. As discussed in “Karr Transportation Asset Purchase”
and “EDSCO Purchase and Sale,” in “BUSINESS”. Tradition acquired assets in two separate deals in 2022. The EDSCO
Purchase and Sale is complimentary, but different to Tradition’s core business, and Tradition cannot assure that it will be successful
in integrating all of or portions of the aforementioned acquisitions. Further, Tradition may not be successful in identifying, negotiating
or consummating any future acquisitions. If Tradition succeeded in consummating future acquisitions, any acquisitions Tradition undertakes
could involve numerous risks that could have a materially adverse effect on Tradition’s business and operating results, including:
|
• |
difficulties in integrating the acquired company’s operations and in realizing anticipated economic, operational and other benefits in a timely manner that could result in substantial costs and delays or other operational, technical or financial problems; |
|
• |
challenges in achieving anticipated revenue, earnings or cash flows; |
|
• |
assumption of liabilities that may exceed Tradition’s estimates or what was disclosed to Tradition; |
|
• |
the diversion of Tradition’s management’s attention from other business concerns; |
|
• |
the potential loss of customers, key associates and drivers of the acquired company; |
|
• |
difficulties operating in markets in which Tradition has had no or only limited direct experience; |
|
• |
the incurrence of additional indebtedness; and |
|
• |
the issuance of additional shares of APSI’s common stock, which would dilute your ownership in APSI. |
Tradition’s existing and future indebtedness
could limit its flexibility in operating its business or adversely affect its business and our liquidity position. As of June
30, 2023, Tradition had the following indebtedness:
Notes payable to new primary bank bearing interest ranging from 4% to 5,75%: payable in various monthly installments through April 2032, secured by guarantees of certain shareholders and related entities, and secured by substantially all business assets. | |
$ | 13,160,552 | |
| |
| | |
Installment notes payable to various financial institutions bearing interest
ranging from 3.75% to 6.99%; payable in various monthly installments through October 2029, secured by guarantees of certain
shareholders and related entities, and collateralized by related equipment with a net book value of $10,031,281 at June 30,
2023. | |
| 12,185,327 | |
| |
| | |
Installment notes for acquisition of stock in Traditions; payable in 16 quarterly installments aggregating $1,603,786 including interest at 3%; secured by assignment and pledge of stock in Tradition Transportation Group. | |
| 24,092,038 | |
| |
| | |
Installment note for acquisition of Traditions; payable in full upon repayment of installment notes above for acquisition of Traditions; noninterest bearing and unsecured. | |
| 1,731,421 | |
| |
| | |
Installment notes payable to shareholder, bearing interest at 10%, principal and interest due June 2023. | |
| 244,940 | |
| |
| | |
Installment note for redemption of Tradition stock; payable in monthly installments of $34,167 beginning February 2023 through January 2028 unsecured. | |
| 2,050,000 | |
| |
| 53,464,278 | |
Less unamortized debt issuance costs | |
| (286,220 | ) |
Current maturities of long-term debt | |
| (9,105,783 | ) |
| |
$ | 44,072,275 | |
Tradition’s indebtedness may increase
from time to time in the future for various reasons, including fluctuations in operating results, capital expenditures and potential acquisitions.
Any indebtedness Tradition incurs and restrictive covenants contained in the agreements related thereto could:
|
• |
make it difficult for Tradition to satisfy its obligations, including making interest payments on its debt obligations; |
|
• |
limit its ability to obtain additional financing to operate its business; |
|
• |
require it to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow to payments on its debt, reducing its ability to use its cash flow to fund capital expenditures and working capital and other general operational requirements; |
|
• |
limit its flexibility to plan for and react to changes in its business; |
|
• |
place it at a competitive disadvantage relative to some of Tradition’s competitors that have less, or less restrictive, debt than Tradition; |
|
• |
limit its ability to pursue acquisitions; and |
|
• |
increase its vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including changes in interest rates or a downturn in Tradition’s business or the economy. |
The occurrence of any one of these events could
have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s business, financial condition and operating results or cause a significant decrease
in Tradition’s liquidity and impair Tradition’s ability to pay amounts due on Tradition’s indebtedness. Significant
repayment penalties may limit its flexibility.
Tradition and/or APSI may need to obtain
additional financing which may not be available or, if it is available, may result in a reduction in the percentage ownership of APSI’s
then-existing shareholders. Tradition and/or APSI may need to raise additional funds in order to:
|
• |
finance unanticipated working capital requirements or refinance existing indebtedness; |
|
• |
develop or enhance Tradition’s technological infrastructure and our existing products and services; |
|
• |
fund strategic relationships; |
|
• |
respond to competitive pressures; and |
|
• |
acquire complementary businesses, technologies, products or services. |
Additional financing may not be available on terms
favorable to Tradition and/or APSI, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, Tradition’s
ability to fund its expansion strategy, Tradition and/or APSI’s ability to take advantage of unanticipated opportunities or acquisitions,
Tradition’s ability to develop or enhance technology or services or otherwise respond to competitive pressures could be significantly
limited. Because there are companies similar to Tradition and APSI with more capital, if Tradition and APSI cannot obtain additional financing,
Tradition and APSI’s business opportunities will be severely limited and prevent Tradition’s and APSI’s growth. If APSI
raises additional funds by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of APSI’s then-existing shareholders
may be reduced, and holders of these securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of APSI’s then-existing
shareholders.
The requirements of APSI remaining a public
company may strain Tradition’s resources and distract Tradition’s management, which could make it difficult to manage Tradition’s
business. We are required to comply with various regulatory and reporting requirements, including those required by the SEC. Complying
with these reporting and other regulatory requirements are time-consuming and expensive and could have a negative effect on Tradition’s
business, results of operations and financial condition. We are required to comply with certain provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, as amended (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) including maintaining internal controls over financial reporting, and if
we fail to continue to comply, Tradition’s business could be harmed, and the price of our securities could decline.
Tradition could be negatively impacted by
the COVID-19 outbreak or other similar outbreaks. Covid-19 has had a considerable effect on Tradition’s industry and its
business. The first two weeks of the Covid-19 pandemic created uncertainty, which affected Tradition’s operations, but Tradition
adapted by cleaning work facilities more often, and making sure its drivers have the support and facilities to efficiently do their job.
Tradition’s operations, particularly in areas of increased COVID-19 infections, could be further disrupted. Negative financial results,
operational disruptions, driver and non-driver absences, uncertainties in the market, and a tightening of credit markets, caused by COVID-19,
including its variants, other similar outbreaks, or a recession, could have a material adverse effect on Tradition’s liquidity,
reduce credit options available to Tradition, make it more difficult to obtain amendments, extensions, and waivers, and adversely impact
Tradition’s ability to effectively meet its short- and long-term obligations. Furthermore, government vaccination, testing, and
mask mandates could increase Tradition’s turnover and make recruiting more difficult, particularly among its driver and maintenance
personnel.
The outbreak of COVID-19 has significantly increased
uncertainty in the economy. Risks related to a slowdown or recession are described in Tradition’s risk factor titled “Tradition’s
business is subject to economic, business and regulatory factors affecting the truckload industry that are largely beyond its control,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.”
Developments related to COVID-19 have been unpredictable
and the extent to which further developments could impact Tradition’s operations, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations,
and cash flows is highly uncertain. Such developments may include the duration of the virus, the distribution and availability of vaccines,
vaccine hesitancy, the severity of the disease and the actions that may be taken by various governmental authorities and other third parties
in response to the outbreak.
Risks Related to Securities Compliance and Regulation
We will not have reporting obligations under
Sections 14 or 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor will any shareholders have reporting requirements of Regulation 13D or 13G,
nor Regulation 14D. So long as our common shares are not registered under the Exchange Act, our directors and executive officers
and beneficial holders of 10% or more of our outstanding common shares will not be subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires executive officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class
of equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports
concerning their ownership of common shares and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Such information about our
directors, executive officers and beneficial holders will only be available through periodic reports we file with OTC Markets.
Our common stock is not registered under the Exchange
Act and we do not intend to register our common stock under the Exchange Act for the foreseeable future; provided, however, that we will
register our common stock under the Exchange Act if we have, after the last day of any fiscal year, more than either (1) 2,000 persons;
or (2) 500 shareholders of record who are not accredited investors, in accordance with Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.
Further, as long as our common stock is not registered
under the Exchange Act, we will not be subject to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, which, among other things, prohibits companies that
have securities registered under the Exchange Act from soliciting proxies or consents from shareholders without furnishing to shareholders
and filing with the SEC a proxy statement and form of proxy complying with the proxy rules.
The reporting required by Section 14(d) of the
Exchange Act provides information to the public about persons other than the company who is making the tender offer. A tender offer is
a broad solicitation by a company or a third party to purchase a substantial percentage of a company’s common stock for a limited
period of time. This offer is for a fixed price, usually at a premium over the current market price, and is customarily contingent on
shareholders tendering a fixed number of their shares.
In addition, as long as our common stock is not
registered under the Exchange Act, our company will not be subject to the reporting requirements of Regulation 13D and Regulation 13G,
which require the disclosure of any person who, after acquiring directly or indirectly the beneficial ownership of any equity securities
of a class, becomes, directly or indirectly, the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the class.
There may be deficiencies with our internal
controls that require improvements. Our company is not required to provide a report on the effectiveness of our internal controls
over financial reporting. We are in the process of evaluating whether our internal control procedures are effective and, therefore, there
is a greater likelihood of undiscovered errors in our internal controls or reported financial statements as compared to issuers that have
conducted such independent evaluations.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
As a non-listed company conducting an exempt
offering pursuant to Regulation A, we are not subject to a number of corporate governance requirements, including the requirements for
independent board members. As a non-listed company conducting an exempt offering pursuant to Regulation A, we are not subject
to a number of corporate governance requirements that an issuer conducting an offering on Form S-1 or listing on a national stock exchange
would be. Accordingly, we are not required to have (a) a board of directors of which a majority consists of independent directors under
the listing standards of a national stock exchange, (b) an audit committee composed entirely of independent directors and a written audit
committee charter meeting a national stock exchange’s requirements, (c) a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely
of independent directors and a written nominating/ corporate governance committee charter meeting a national stock exchange’s requirements,
(d) a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors and a written compensation committee charter meeting the requirements
of a national stock exchange, and (e) independent audits of our internal controls. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections
afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of a national stock exchange.
Our holding company structure makes us dependent
on our subsidiaries for our cash flow and could serve to subordinate the rights of our shareholders to the rights of creditors of our
subsidiaries, in the event of an insolvency or liquidation of any such subsidiary. Our company acts as a holding company and,
accordingly, substantially all of our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries will be separate and distinct
legal entities. As a result, substantially all of our cash flow will depend upon the earnings of our subsidiaries. In addition, we will
depend on the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries. No subsidiary will have any obligation to provide
our company with funds for our payment obligations. If there is an insolvency, liquidation or other reorganization of any of our subsidiaries,
our shareholders will have no right to proceed against their assets. Creditors of those subsidiaries will be entitled to payment in full
from the sale or other disposal of the assets of those subsidiaries before our company, as a shareholder, would be entitled to receive
any distribution from that sale or disposal.
Risks Related to a Purchase of the Units
The outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred
Stock preclude current and future owners of our common stock from influencing any corporate decision. Our outstanding shares of
Series B Preferred Stock possess superior voting rights, which preclude current and future owners of our Common Stock, including the Warrant
Shares, from influencing any corporate decision. The Series B Preferred Stock has the following voting rights: each share of Series B
Preferred Stock is entitled to 1,000 votes on all matters. Our Directors own all of the outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred Stock
and will, therefore, be able to control the management and affairs of our company, as well as matters requiring the approval by our shareholders,
including the election of directors, any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and any other significant
corporate transaction. (See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”).
We are authorized, in the sole discretion
of our Board of Directors, to issue shares of preferred stock that possess significant anti-dilution protection. In addition to
our designated shares of Series A Preferred Stock and our currently outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, our Board of Directors
is authorized to designate additional series of preferred stock that possess rights superior to those of our Common Stock. (See “Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”).
Series B Preferred Stock. The Series
B Preferred Stock has rights of conversion into our common stock, exercisable at any time, as follows:
Each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible,
at the option of the its holder, into 1,000 fully-paid and non-assessable shares of our Common Stock.
The effect of the rights of conversion of the Series
B Preferred Stock is that, upon the conversion, the then-holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, as a group, will be issued a number
of shares of common stock equal to 80% of the then-outstanding issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. (See “Dilution—Ownership
Dilution”).
There will be no market for the Warrants
included in the Units. There is currently no market for the Warrants and none is expected in the future. The Company does not
intend to take any action that would serve to create a market for the Warrants. Unless and until a holder of Warrants acquires Warrant
Shares upon exercise of Warrants, purchasers of Units in this offering should not expect to earn any profit on their investment in the
Warrants.
Holders of Warrants have no rights as a shareholder.
Unless and until a holder of Warrants acquires Warrant Shares upon exercise of Warrants, such holder will have no rights as a shareholder
of our company with respect to the Warrant Shares underlying such Warrants. Upon exercise of Warrants, a holder will be entitled to exercise
the rights of a common shareholder only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date.
There is no minimum offering and no person
has committed to purchase any of the Units. We have not established a minimum offering hereunder, which means that we will be
able to accept even a nominal amount of proceeds, even if such amount of proceeds is not sufficient to permit us to achieve any of our
business objectives. In this regard, there is no assurance that we will sell any of the Units or that we will sell enough of the Units
necessary to achieve any of our business objectives. Additionally, no person is committed to purchase any of the Units.
We may seek additional capital that may result
in shareholder dilution or that may have rights senior to those of our common stock. From time to time, we may seek to obtain
additional capital, either through equity, equity-linked or debt securities. The decision to obtain additional capital will depend on,
among other factors, our business plans, operating performance and condition of the capital markets. If we raise additional funds through
the issuance of equity, equity-linked or debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the rights
of our common stock, which could negatively affect the market price of our common stock or cause our shareholders to experience dilution.
You may never realize any economic benefit
from a purchase of Units. Because the market for our common stock is volatile, there is no assurance that you will ever realize
any economic benefit from your purchase of Units.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our
common stock. We intend to retain earnings, if any, to provide funds for the implementation of our business strategy. We do not
intend to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, there can be no assurance that holders of our common stock
will receive cash, stock or other dividends on their shares of our common stock, until we have funds which our Board of Directors determines
can be allocated to dividends.
Our shares of common stock are Penny Stock,
which may impair trading liquidity. Disclosure requirements pertaining to penny stocks may reduce the level of trading activity
in the market for our common stock and investors may find it difficult to sell their shares. Trades of our common stock will be subject
to Rule 15g-9 of the SEC, which rule imposes certain requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities subject to the rule to persons
other than established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by the rule, broker-dealers must make a special suitability
determination for purchasers of the securities and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to sale. The
SEC also has rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks generally are equity
securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the
NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in that security is provided by the exchange
or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules,
to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the
penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation
of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock
held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must
be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or
with the customer’s confirmation.
The market price for our common stock has
been, and may continue to be, highly volatile. The market for low-priced securities is generally less liquid and more volatile
than securities traded on national stock markets. Wide fluctuations in market prices are not uncommon. No assurance can be given that
the market for our common stock will continue. The price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors
such as the following, some of which are beyond our control:
|
• |
quarterly variations in our operating results; |
|
• |
operating results that vary from the expectations of investors; |
|
• |
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by investors; |
|
• |
reaction to our periodic filings, or presentations by executives at investor and industry conferences; |
|
• |
changes in our capital structure; |
|
• |
announcements of innovations or new services by us or our competitors; |
|
• |
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
|
• |
lack of success in the expansion of our business operations; |
|
• |
announcements by third parties of significant claims or proceedings against our company or adverse developments in pending proceedings; |
|
• |
additions or departures of key personnel; |
|
• |
asset impairment; |
|
• |
temporary or permanent inability to offer our products and services; and |
|
• |
rumors or public speculation about any of the above factors. |
The terms of this offering were determined
arbitrarily. The terms of this offering were determined arbitrarily by us. The offering price for the Units, including the exercise
price of the Warrants, does not necessarily bear any relationship to our company’s assets, book value, earnings or other established
criteria of valuation. Accordingly, the offering price of the Units, including the exercise price of the Warrants, should not be considered
as an indication of any intrinsic value of such securities. (See “Dilution”).
Our common stock is subject to price volatility
unrelated to our operations. The market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including
market perception of our ability to achieve our planned growth, quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, trading
volume in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our
company’s competitors or our company itself. In addition, the over-the-counter stock market is subject to extreme price and volume
fluctuations in general. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons
unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.
You will suffer dilution in the net tangible
book value of the Common Stock included in the Units and the Warrant Shares you purchase in this offering. If you acquire any
Units, you will suffer immediate dilution, due to the lower book value per share of our Common Stock included in the Units and the Warrant
Shares compared to the purchase price per share of the Common Stock included in the Units in this offering and the exercise price of the
Warrants. (See “Dilution”).
As an issuer of penny stock, the protection
provided by the federal securities laws relating to forward looking statements does not apply to us. Although federal securities
laws provide a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by a public company that files reports under the federal securities laws,
this safe harbor is not available to issuers of penny stocks. As a result, we will not have the benefit of this safe harbor protection
in the event of any legal action based upon a claim that the material provided by us contained a material misstatement of fact or was
misleading in any material respect because of our failure to include any statements necessary to make the statements not misleading. Such
an action could hurt our financial condition.
DILUTION
Ownership Dilution
The information under “Investment Dilution”
below does not take into account the potential conversion of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock into 750,000,000 shares
of our Common Stock.
The conversion of the outstanding shares of Series
B Preferred Stock into shares of our Common Stock would cause then-holders of our Common Stock, including the Common Stock included in
the Units and the Warrant Shares, to incur significant dilution in their ownership of our company. (See “Risk Factors—Risks
Related to a Purchase of the Units,” “Description of Securities” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”).
Investment Dilution
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to
purchasers of our Common Stock in this offering represents the difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of the Units
in this offering for the shares of Common Stock included in the Units and the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants included
in the Units, and the net tangible book value per share immediately after completion of this offering. In this offering, dilution is attributable
primarily to our negative net tangible book value per share.
If you purchase Units in this offering, your investment
in the shares of Common Stock included in the Units and the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants included in the Units (the
exercise of which is assumed in this section) will be diluted to the extent of the difference between your purchase price per share of
Common Stock and the net tangible book value of our Common Stock after this offering. Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2023,
was $(1,897,466) (unaudited), or $(0.11) per share. Net tangible book value per share is equal to total assets minus the sum of total
liabilities and intangible assets divided by the total number of shares outstanding.
The tables below illustrate the dilution (relative
to the Common Stock) to purchasers of Units in this offering, on a pro forma basis, assuming (A) 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of the Units are
sold, (B) all of the Warrants included in the Units are exercised and (C) a per Unit price of $0.60 (a per share price of $0.20), which
represents the midpoint of the offering price range herein.
Assuming the Sale
of 100% of the Units
Assumed offering price per share |
$0.20 |
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$(0.11) |
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering |
$0.27 |
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$0.16 |
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to purchasers of Units in this offering |
$0.04 |
Assuming the Sale
of 75% of the Units
Assumed offering price per share |
$0.20 |
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$(0.11) |
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering |
$0.25 |
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$0.14 |
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to purchasers of Units in this offering |
$0.06 |
Assuming the Sale
of 50% of the Units
Assumed offering price per share |
$0.20 |
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$(0.11) |
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering |
$0.23 |
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$0.12 |
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to purchasers of Units in this offering |
$0.08 |
Assuming the Sale
of 25% of the Units
Assumed offering price per share |
$0.20 |
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$(0.11) |
Increase in net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering |
$0.19 |
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2023 (unaudited) |
$0.08 |
Dilution in net tangible book value per share to purchasers of Units in this offering |
$0.12 |
USE OF PROCEEDS
The table below sets forth the estimated proceeds
we would derive from this offering, assuming (1) the sale of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the Units, (b) the exercise of all of the Warrants
included in the Units and (c) assuming the payment of no sales commissions or finder's fees. There is, of course, no guaranty that we
will be successful in selling any of the Units in this offering.
| |
Assumed Percentage of Units Sold in This Offering (assuming all Warrants are exercised) |
| |
25% | |
50% | |
75% | |
100% |
Shares of Common Stock sold | |
20,000,000 | |
40,000,000 | |
60,000,000 | |
80,000,000 |
Gross proceeds | |
$[3,800,000-5,000,000] | |
$[7,600,000-10,000,000] | |
$[11,400,000-15,000,000] | |
$[15,200,000-20,000,000] |
Offering expenses | |
20,000 | |
20,000 | |
20,000 | |
20,000 |
Net proceeds | |
$[3,780,000-4,980,000] | |
$[7,580,000-9,980,000] | |
$[11,380,000-14,980,000] | |
$[15,180,000-19,980,000] |
The table below sets forth the estimated proceeds
we would derive from this offering, assuming (1) the sale of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the Units, (b) the exercise of all of the Warrants
included in the Units and (c) assuming the payment of no sales commissions or finder's fees. There is, of course, no guaranty that we
will be successful in selling any of the Units in this offering.
|
|
Use of Proceeds for Assumed Percentage of Units Sold in This Offering |
|
|
(assuming all Warrants are exercised) |
|
|
25% |
|
50% |
|
75% |
|
100% |
Reduction of Indebtedness(1) |
|
$[1,890,000-2,490,000] |
|
$[3,790,000-4,990,000] |
|
$[5,690,000-7,490,000] |
|
$[7,590,000-9,990,000] |
Working Capital |
|
[1,890,000-2,490,000] |
|
$[3,790,000-4,990,000] |
|
$[5,690,000-7,490,000] |
|
$[7,590,000-9,990,000] |
Total Net Proceeds |
|
$ [3,780,000-4,980,000] |
|
$[7,580,000-9,980,000] |
|
$[11,380,000-14,980,000] |
|
$[15,180,000-19,980,000] |
____________-
(1) As of the date of this Offering
Circular, we have not determined which of our existing debt facilities will be reduced. This determination is to be made by our management
based on the amount of proceeds, that the timing thereof, derived from this offering and our future working capital position.
We reserve the right to change the foregoing use
of proceeds, should our management believe it to be in the best interest of our company. The allocations of the proceeds of this offering
presented above constitute the current estimates of our management and are based on our current plans, assumptions made with respect to
the industry in which we operate, general economic conditions and our future revenue and expenditure estimates.
Investors are cautioned that expenditures may vary
substantially from the estimates presented above. Investors must rely on the judgment of our management, who will have broad discretion
regarding the application of the proceeds of this offering. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend upon numerous
factors, including market conditions, cash generated by our operations (if any), business developments and the rate of our growth. We
may find it necessary or advisable to use portions of the proceeds of this offering for other purposes.
In the event we do not obtain the entire offering
amount hereunder, we may attempt to obtain additional funds through private offerings of our securities or by borrowing funds. Currently,
we do not have any committed sources of financing.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
In General
Our company is offering a maximum of 16,000,000
Units on a best-efforts basis, at a fixed price of $_____0.45-0.75 per Unit.
Each Unit consists 3 shares of Common Stock and
two (2) Warrants to purchase one share each of Common Stock exercisable at $0.25 per Warrant. Any funds derived from this offering will
be immediately available to us for our use. There will be no refunds. This offering will terminate at the earliest of (a) the date on
which the maximum offering has been sold, (b) the date which is one year from this offering being qualified by the SEC or (c) the date
on which this offering is earlier terminated by us, in our sole discretion.
There is no minimum number of Units that we are
required to sell in this offering. All funds derived by us from this offering will be immediately available for use by us, in accordance
with the uses set forth in the Use of Proceeds section of this Offering Circular. No funds will be placed in an escrow account during
the offering period and no funds will be returned, once an investor’s subscription agreement has been accepted by us.
We intend to sell the Units in this offering through
the efforts of our Chief Executive Officer, Robert Morris. Mr. Morris will not receive any compensation for offering or selling the Units.
We believe that Mr. Morris is exempt from registration as a broker-dealer under the provisions of Rule 3a4-1 promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In particular, Mr. Morris:
|
• |
is not subject to a statutory disqualification, as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the Securities Act; and |
|
• |
is not to be compensated in connection with his participation by the payment of commissions or other remuneration based either directly or indirectly on transactions in securities; and |
|
• |
is not an associated person of a broker or dealer; and |
|
• |
meets the conditions of the following: |
|
|
• |
primarily performs, and will perform at the end of this offering, substantial duties for us or on our behalf otherwise than in connection with transactions in securities; and |
|
|
• |
was not a broker or dealer, or an associated person of a broker or dealer, within the preceding 12 months; and |
|
|
• |
did not participate in selling an offering of securities for any issuer more than once every 12 months other than in reliance on paragraphs (a)(4)(i) or (iii) of Rule 3a4-1 under the Exchange Act. |
As of the date of this Offering Circular, we have
not entered into any agreements with selling agents for the sale of the Offered Shares. However, we reserve the right to engage FINRA-member
broker-dealers. In the event we engage FINRA-member broker-dealers, we expect to pay sales commissions of up to 8% of the gross offering
proceeds from their sales of the Offered Shares. In connection with our appointment of a selling broker-dealer, we intend to enter into
a standard selling agent agreement with the broker-dealer pursuant to which the broker-dealer would act as our non-exclusive sales agent
in consideration of our payment of commissions of up to 8% on the sale of Offered Shares effected by the broker-dealer.
Procedures for Subscribing
If you are interested in subscribing for Units
in this offering, please submit a request for information by e-mail to Mr. Morris at: gohealthkick@gmail.com; all relevant information
will be delivered to you by return e-mail.
Thereafter, should you decide to subscribe for
Units, you are required to follow the procedures described therein, which are:
|
• |
Electronically execute and deliver to us a subscription agreement; and |
|
• |
Deliver funds directly by check or by wire or electronic funds transfer via ACH to our specified bank account. |
Acceptance of Subscriptions. Upon
our acceptance of a subscription agreement, we will countersign the subscription agreement and issue the Units subscribed. Once you submit
the subscription agreement and it is accepted, you may not revoke or change your subscription or request your subscription funds. All
accepted subscription agreements are irrevocable.
This Offering Circular will be furnished to prospective
investors upon their request via electronic PDF format and will be available for viewing and download 24 hours per day, 7 days per week
on our company’s page on the SEC’s website: www.sec.gov.
An investor will become a shareholder of our company
and the Units will be issued as of the date of settlement. Settlement will not occur until an investor’s funds have cleared and
we accept the investor as a shareholder.
By executing the subscription agreement and paying
the total purchase price for the Units subscribed, each investor agrees to accept the terms of the subscription agreement and attests
that the investor meets certain minimum financial standards. (See “State Qualification and Investor Suitability Standards”
below).
An approved trustee must process and forward to
us subscriptions made through IRAs, Keogh plans and 401(k) plans. In the case of investments through IRAs, Keogh plans and 401(k) plans,
we will send the confirmation and notice of our acceptance to the trustee.
Minimum Purchase Requirements
You must initially purchase at least $5,000 of
the Units in this offering. If you have satisfied the minimum purchase requirement, any additional purchase must be in an amount of at
least $1,000.
State Law Exemption and Offerings to Qualified Purchasers
State Law Exemption. This Offering
Circular does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase anyUnits in any jurisdiction in which,
or to any person to whom, it would be unlawful to do so. An investment in the Units involves substantial risks and possible loss
by investors of their entire investments. (See “Risk Factors”).
The Units have not been qualified under the securities
laws of any state or jurisdiction. Currently, we plan to sell the Units in as many states as this offering is able to be qualified. In
the case of each state in which we sell the Units, we will qualify the Units for sale with the applicable state securities regulatory
body or we will sell the Units pursuant to an exemption from registration found in the applicable state’s securities, or Blue Sky,
law.
Certain of our offerees may be broker-dealers registered
with the SEC under the Exchange Act, who may be interested in reselling the Units to others. Any such broker-dealer will be required to
comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC and FINRA relating to underwriters.
Investor Suitability Standards. The
Units may only be purchased by investors residing in a state in which this Offering Circular is duly qualified who have either (a) a minimum
annual gross income of $70,000 and a minimum net worth of $70,000, exclusive of automobile, home and home furnishings, or (b) a minimum
net worth of $250,000, exclusive of automobile, home and home furnishings.
Issuance of the Units
Upon settlement, that is, at such time as an investor's
funds have cleared and we have accepted an investor's subscription agreement, we will issue such investor's purchased Units, which means
we will (1) issue the shares of Common Stock included in the purchased Units in book-entry form and (2) deliver to the investor a Warrant
included in the purchased Units.
Transferability of the Units
The Units, including the Common Stock, the Warrants
and the Warrant Shares underlying the Warrants that comprise the Units, will be generally freely transferable, subject to any restrictions
imposed by applicable securities laws or regulations.
Advertising, Sales and Other Promotional Materials
In addition to this Offering Circular, subject
to limitations imposed by applicable securities laws, we expect to use additional advertising, sales and other promotional materials in
connection with this offering. These materials may include information relating to this offering, articles and publications concerning
industries relevant to our business operations or public advertisements and audio-visual materials, in each case only as authorized by
us. In addition, the sales material may contain certain quotes from various publications without obtaining the consent of the author or
the publication for use of the quoted material in the sales material. Although these materials will not contain information in conflict
with the information provided by this Offering Circular and will be prepared with a view to presenting a balanced discussion of risk and
reward with respect to the Units, these materials will not give a complete understanding of our company, this offering or the Units and
are not to be considered part of this Offering Circular. This offering is made only by means of this Offering Circular and prospective
investors must read and rely on the information provided in this Offering Circular in connection with their decision to invest in the
Units.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of (a) 200,000,000
shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share; and (b) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share, of which
(1) 5,000,000 shares are designated Series A Preferred Stock and (2) 1,000,000 shares are designated Series B Preferred Stock.
As of the date of this Offering Circular, there
were (x) 17,204,180 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding held by five holders of record; (y) no shares of Series A Preferred
Stock were issued and outstanding; and (z) 750,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding held by three holders
of record.
Units
Each Unit offered hereunder consists 3 shares of
Common Stock and two (2) Warrants to purchase one share each of Common Stock exercisable at $0.25 per Warrant.
Common Stock
General. The holders of our common
stock currently have (a) equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available therefore, when, as and if declared by our Board
of Directors; (b) are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the affairs of our company; (c) do not have preemptive, subscriptive or conversion rights and there are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights applicable thereto; and (d) are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters
on which shareholders may vote. Our Bylaws provide that, at all meetings of the shareholders for the election of directors, a plurality
of the votes cast shall be sufficient to elect. On all other matters, except as otherwise required by Nevada law or our Articles of Incorporation,
as amended, a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders shall be necessary to authorize any corporate action to be taken
by vote of the shareholders.
Non-cumulative Voting. Holders of
shares of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares,
voting for the election of directors, can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in such event, the holders
of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors.
Pre-emptive Rights. As of the date
of this Offering Circular, no holder of any shares of our capital stock has pre-emptive or preferential rights to acquire or subscribe
for any unissued shares of any class of our capital stock not otherwise disclosed herein.
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
(the Series A Preferred Stock) is entitled to one hundred (100) votes per share on all matters.
Except as provided by law, the holders of shares
of Series A Preferred Stock vote together with the holders of shares of Common Stock as a single class.
In addition, so long as any shares of Series A
Preferred Stock remains outstanding, in addition to any other vote or consent of stockholders required by our certificate of incorporation,
the company will not, without first obtaining the approval (by written consent, as provided by law or otherwise) of the holders of a majority
of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a class: (i) Increase or decrease (other than by redemption
or conversion) the total number of authorized shares of Series A Preferred Stock; (ii) Effect an exchange reclassification, or cancellation
of all or a part of the Series A Preferred Stock, but excluding a stock split or reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock
or Preferred Stock; (iii) Effect an exchange, or create a right of exchange, of all or part of the shares of another class of shares into
shares of Series A Preferred Stock; or (iv) Alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of the shares of Series A Preferred
Stock so as to affect adversely the shares of such series, including the rights set forth in this Designation. For clarification, issuances
of additional authorized shares of Series A Preferred under the terms herein shall not require the authorization or approval of the existing
shareholders of Preferred Stock.
The Company is not required to pay dividends at
any specific rate on the Series A Preferred Stock. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, either
voluntarily or involuntarily, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution
of any assets of the Company to the holders of the junior stock by reason of their ownership of such stock, but not prior to any holders
of the Company’s senior securities, which holders shall have priority to the distribution of any assets of the Company, an amount
per share for each share of Series A Preferred Stock held by them equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for each share
of preferred stock. If upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the assets of the Company legally available for
distribution to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are insufficient to permit the payment to such holders of the full amounts
of their liquidation preference, subsequent to the payment to the senior securities then the entire remaining assets of the Company following
the payment to the senior securities legally available for distribution shall be distributed with equal priority and pro rata among holders
of the Series A Preferred Stock in proportion to the full amounts they would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to their liquidation
preference. The liquidation preference of Series A Preferred Stock shall be equal to the original issue price per share of Series A Preferred
Stock, as adjusted for any recapitalizations.
Holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall have
the right, exercisable at any time and from time to time (unless otherwise prohibited by law, rule or regulation), to convert any or all
of their shares of the Series A Preferred Stock into Common Stock at the conversion ratio of (1) one Preferred A share to (100) one hundred
common shares.
Holders of Series A Preferred Stock have no preemptive
or subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our Series A Preferred Stock.
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock
Each share of Convertible Series B Preferred Stock
(the Series B Preferred Stock) is entitled to one thousand (1,000) votes per share on all matters. Except as provided by law, the holders
of shares of Series B Preferred Stock vote together with the holders of shares of Common Stock as a single class.
The Series B Preferred Stock is not entitled to
receive any dividends in any amount during which such shares are outstanding.
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the Company, either voluntary or involuntary, after setting apart or paying in full the preferential amounts due to holders
of senior capital stock, if any, the holders of Series B Preferred Stock and parity capital stock, if any, shall be entitled to receive,
prior and in preference to any distribution of any of the assets or surplus funds of the Company to the holders of junior capital stock,
including Common Stock, an amount equal to $0.001 per share (the "Liquidation Preference"). If upon such liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company, the assets of the Company available for distribution to the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock and
parity capital stock, if any, shall be insufficient to permit in full the payment of the Liquidation Preference, then all such assets
of the Company shall be distributed ratably among the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock and parity capital stock, if any. Neither
the consolidation or merger of the Company nor the sale, lease or transfer by the Company of all or a part of its assets shall be deemed
a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
Each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be
convertible, at the option of the Holder, into 1,000 (One Thousand) fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Corporation's Common Stock.
The aforementioned 1 to 1,000 ratio will be adjusted by stock splits, dividends, and distributions, and that adjustment will apply to
reclassifications, consolidations, and mergers.
Holders of Series B Preferred Stock have no preemptive
or subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our Series B Preferred Stock.
Warrants
Each of the Warrants included in the Units entitles
its holder to purchase one Warrant Share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.25. The Warrants are exercisable for a period of two
years from their respective issuance dates, with the exercise price being adjustable in certain events, including stock dividends and
stock splits.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any dividends on
our common stock. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business. As a result, we do
not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Shareholder Meetings
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of shareholders
may be called only by our Board of Directors, the chairman of the board, or our president, or as otherwise provided under Nevada law.
Transfer Agent
We have retained the services of VStock Transfer
LLC, 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, New York 11598, as the transfer agent for our common stock. VStock Transfer’s website is located
at: www.vstockstocktransfer.com. No information found on VStock Transfer’s website is part of this Offering Circular.
BUSINESS
Organizational History of the Company
The Company was originally incorporated in Nevada
on December 9, 2010, as NC Solar Inc. with the goal of developing solar energy collection farms on commercial and/or industrial buildings
located on distressed, blighted and/or underutilized commercial land in North Carolina and other southern states of the United States.
On June 6, 2014, management changed and, on August 12, 2014, the Company changed its name to Aqua Power Systems Inc.
On December 1, 2020, the Eight Judicial District
Court of Nevada entered an order appointing Small Cap Compliance, LLC as custodian of the Company, authorizing and directing it to, among
other things, take any action reasonable, prudent and for the benefit of the Company, including reinstating the Company under Nevada law,
appointing officers and convening a meeting of stockholders. Small Cap Compliance, LLC was not a shareholder of the Company on the date
that it applied to serve as a custodian of the Company.
On December 7, 2020, Small Cap Compliance, LLC
filed the Certificate of Reinstatement for the Company, thereby reinstating the Company, appointed Stephen W. Carnes as the sole officer
and director of the Company, and amended the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to one million shares
of Series B Preferred Stock.
On March 3, 2021, the Eight Judicial District Court
of Nevada entered an order approving Small Cap Compliance, LLC's actions, without prejudice to the claims of interested parties as to
dilution of their interest, terminated Small Cap Compliance, LLC's custodianship of the Company, and discharged Small Cap Compliance as
the custodian of the Company.
On April 27, 2022, Robert Morris and the board
of directors of APSI agreed in a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors In Lieu of Special Meeting that Mr. Morris would
become a director of APSI to help with acquisitions, effective May 1, 2022.
Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal
Year.
On February 9, 2023, the Board of Directors of
Aqua Power Systems, Inc. approved a change in the Company's fiscal year end from March 31 to a calendar year end of December 31. The change
will not affect nor impact the Company's actual financial results; however, the change will affect the timing and form of the Company's
next scheduled financial report.
With this change, the financial reporting period
ending December 31, 2022, will now be the Company's fiscal year end rather than the end of a financial quarter. The Company will file
a Form 10-KT for the Company's annual report for the period ending December 31, 2022, rather than a quarterly Form 10-Q report. Form 10-KT
is a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") submitted in lieu of or in addition to a standard 10-K annual
report when a company changes the end of its fiscal year.
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. Purchase
On December 28, 2022, pursuant to the Closing (hereinafter
defined) and completion of the Acquisition (hereinafter defined), the Company acquired Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., an Indiana
Corporation ("Tradition") and Tradition thereafter became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
Tradition Transportation Company, L.L.C.
Tradition Transportation Company, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on January 22, 2016. Through this subsidiary,
Tradition operates its tractor and trailer fleets, which are discussed below.
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C.
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on September 17, 2016. Through this subsidiary
Tradition engages in equipment acquisition and disposition.
Tradition Logistics, L.L.C. Tradition
Logistics, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on January 1, 2016. This subsidiary operates six (6) warehouses
with four (4) in Indiana, specifically Angola, Indianapolis, Greenfield, and Greenwood; and two (2) located in Georgia, specifically Statesboro
and Savannah, and provides time-sensitive warehousing, logistics and freight management to all 48 continental states and, as needed, internationally
(into Mexico and Canada).
Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC. Freedom
Freight Solutions, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on May 3, 2018. This subsidiary identifies and qualifies
third party carriers, and connects the loads to the drivers.
Tradition Transportation Sales & Service,
Inc. Tradition Transportation Sales & Service, Inc. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on September 17,
2015. This subsidiary is principally engaged in providing mechanical repair and maintenance services for tractors and trailers that Tradition
utilizes. It operates with the primary focus of maintenance cost reduction, expediting redeployment of equipment, and to serve as a back-stop
to safety vehicle inspections.
Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC.
Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on January 21, 2022, for the transaction
with EDSCO Holding Company, LLC, as described above. This was formed as a small exploratory step into the supply of metal bolts, nuts,
and other industrial fasteners. This company will serve Tradition Transportation Sales & Service, Inc. as a vendor.
Overview of the Business of Tradition
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. was incorporated
under the laws of the state of Indiana on September 16, 2015. Tradition is headquartered in Angola, Indiana, and provides freight transportation,
brokerage, truck leasing and financing, warehousing and fulfillment services throughout the United States, and manufactures and sells
bolts and fasteners, and creates custom plates, cages, and embeds.
Acquisition of Tradition Transportation Group, Inc.
On December 28, 2022, APSI entered into a Stock
Purchase and Sale Agreement and a Contract Assignment agreement with Joseph Michael Davis ("Mr. Davis"). Due to the Contract
Assignment agreement, APSI assumed all of the obligations of Mr. Davis under a multiparty stock purchase agreement, promissory notes,
and assignment and pledge of stock agreements that Mr. Davis entered into on December 28, 2022. The Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement,
Contract Assignment agreement, agreements assumed by APSI are referred to as the "Acquisition."
On December 28, 2022, (the "Effective Date"),
APSI simultaneously entered into a series of agreements for the purchase of all of the issued and outstanding stock held by the shareholders
of Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., an Indiana corporation ("Tradition"). Those agreements are discussed below.
Stock Purchase Agreement. On December
28, 2022, APSI entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "SPA") with Mr. Davis to purchase 745,196 shares of common
stock (the "Shares") of Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., an Indiana corporation, for Twenty-Eight Million Five Hundred
Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-Eight and 76/100 Dollars ($28,548,458.76) in United States Dollars (the "Purchase Price"),
which is equal to Thirty-Eight and 31/100 Dollars ($38.31) per share. The Shares represent all of the issued and outstanding shares of
Tradition.
Mr. Davis is the Chief Operating Officer and a
director of Tradition.
Per the SPA, the Purchase Price was delivered and
was agreed to be delivered in the following proportions:
| (1) | A down payment of Two Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand United States Dollars ($225,000.00) in immediately available funds was delivered
to Mr. Davis (the "Down Payment"). |
| (2) | An amount equal to Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00) was offset against the Purchase Price on December
28, 2022 in full satisfaction of certain obligations of the Tradition Sellers (as defined below) to Tradition; |
| (3) | An aggregate amount equal to Twenty-Four Million Ninety-Two Thousand Thirty-Eight and 31/100 Dollars ($24,092,038.31) pursuant to
one or more secured promissory note(s) (the "Promissory Notes") providing for installments of not less than One Million Five
Hundred Five Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-Two and 39/100 Dollars ($1,505,752.39) commencing on the ninetieth (90th) day following the
date on which the registration by APSI of its securities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")
has been qualified or declared effective and continuing every ninetieth (90th) day thereafter until the Purchase Price and all accrued
but unpaid interest thereon has been paid in full; and |
| (4) | A final payment to be made to Mr. Davis in the amount of One Million Seven Hundred Thirty-One Thousand Four Hundred Twenty and 45/100
Dollars ($1,731,420.45). |
Mr. Carnes provided the funds for the Down Payment,
and APSI wrote a promissory note to him with the principal amount of the note being the price of the Down Payment, Two Hundred Twenty-Five
Thousand United States Dollars ($225,000.00).
Also, per the SPA, APSI and Mr. Davis agreed that
within 30 days of the date of the SPA, December 28, 2022, APSI shall file a registration statement (registered offering) with the SEC.
Subsequently, the first payment should be anticipated to be made within 90 days after the SEC qualifies the registration statement.
Multiparty Stock Purchase Agreement.
On December 28, 2022, Mr. Davis entered into the Multiparty Stock Purchase Agreement (the "MSPA") between Mr. Davis and Timothy
E. Evans, James L. Evans, and Bulwark Capital, L.L.C. (each a "Tradition Seller" and altogether the "Tradition Sellers").
Pursuant to the MSPA, Mr. Davis purchased 270,001 shares from Timothy E. Evans, a director, and the President and CEO of Tradition, 224,000
shares from James L. Evans a director, and the Vice President of Tradition, and 206,000 shares from Bulwark Capital, LLC, which is owned
by Joseph J. Montel, who is a director, and the Corporate Secretary and General Counsel of Tradition. The total amount of shares purchased
was 700,001 (the "T-Shares") for Twenty-Six Million Eight Hundred and Seventeen Thousand Thirty-Eight and 31/100 Dollars ($26,817,038.31)
(the "MSPA Purchase Price").
While APSI did not directly enter into the MSPA,
Mr. Davis legally assigned his rights in the MSPA to APSI, as later described in the Contract Assignment agreement.
The MSPA includes the following terms:
|
(1) | The MSPA Purchase Price to be delivered in the following proportions: |
| (a) | A down payment of Two Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand United States Dollars ($225,000.00) in immediately available funds delivered to
the Tradition Sellers. |
| (b) | An amount equal to Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00) shall be offset against the Purchase Price
on December 28, 2022, in full satisfaction of certain obligations of the Tradition Sellers to Tradition; and |
| (i) | This payment was offset against the purchase price for Tradition's redemption of 103,000 shares of Tradition, immediately before the
Closing. |
| (ii) | The aforementioned shares made up half of the 206,000 shares that Bulwark Capital, L.L.C. sold in the MSPA. |
| (c) | An aggregate amount equal to Twenty-Four Million Ninety-Two Thousand Thirty-Eight and 31/100 Dollars ($24,092,038.31) pursuant to
the Promissory Notes providing for installments of not less than One Million Five Hundred Five Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-Two and 39/100
Dollars ($1,505,752.39) commencing on the ninetieth (90th) day following the date on which the registration by APSI of its securities
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") has been qualified or declared effective and continuing
every ninetieth (90th) day thereafter until the Purchase Price and all accrued but unpaid interest thereon has been paid in full. |
| (2) | That
the only shareholder agreement between the shareholders of Tradition would be terminated; |
| | |
| (3) | That
APSI shall prepare and file a registration statement, no later than February 28, 2023; |
| | |
| (4) | That
the Tradition Sellers will enter into employment agreements with Tradition; |
| | |
| (5) | Tradition shall continue to maintain insurance that is similar to the insurance currently in place for the directors and officers
of Tradition for the next six years; |
| (6) | That until APSI has paid the MSPA Purchase Price and all accrued but unpaid interest thereon, in full, Mr. Davis and APSI shall not
cause Tradition to do the following: |
| (a) | (i) incur any indebtedness in excess of $1,000,000, (ii) enter into any transaction or series of transactions involving a payment
greater than $1,000,000, (iii) guarantee any indebtedness, or allow a lien to be placed against its assets other than in connection with
trade credit incurred in the ordinary course of business; |
| (b) | except for adding a director who is reasonably acceptable to the Tradition Sellers, increase or decrease the size of the board of
directors, or take any action to remove or replace any person serving as a director immediately prior to the closing; |
| (c) | hire, retain or engage for any position any immediate family member (as defined in Instruction 1(a)(iii) of 17 CFR §229.404(a))
of a director, officer or shareholder; |
| (d) | enter into or be a party to a transaction with any director, officer, employee, or any "associate" (as defined in Rule 12b-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act) of any such person; |
| (e) | hire, fire, or change the compensation of the executive officers, including approving any option grants; |
| (f) | change its principal business, enter new lines of business, or exit the current line of business; |
| (g) | sell, assign, license, pledge or encumber material technology or intellectual property, other than licenses granted in the ordinary
course of business; |
| (h) | enter into the sale of all or substantially all of the assets and property of Tradition, a merger, or a change of control; |
| (i) | authorize, adopt or otherwise effect, a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring, reorganization or similar
transaction involving Tradition; or |
| (j) | issue additional equity securities, debt securities, or warrants or options to purchase the same. |
The Tradition Sellers and Mr. Davis agreed that
the MSPA would be assignable to APSI. The MSPA also contained a form promissory note, a form assignment and pledge of stock agreement,
and a form contract assignment agreement as attachments.
Promissory Notes. The Promissory Notes were
entered into on December 28, 2022, between Mr. Davis and each Tradition Seller. The terms of the three promissory notes are below:
| (1) | Mr. Davis agreed to pay Timothy E. Evans Ten Million Two Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty-Eight and 31/100 U.S. Dollars
($10,268,738.31) together with interest thereon, for his 270,001 shares of Tradition; |
| (2) | Mr. Davis agreed to pay James L. Evans Eight Million Five Hundred Six Thousand Four Hundred Forty and No/100 U.S. Dollars ($8,506,440.00)
together with interest thereon, for his 224,000 shares of Tradition; |
| (3) | Mr. Davis agreed to pay Bulwark Capital, L.L.C. Five Million Three Hundred Sixteen Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty and No/100 U.S. Dollars
($5,316,860.00) together with interest thereon, for its 206,000 shares of Tradition; |
| (4) | The Tradition Sellers' consent to Mr. Davis' sale of the T-Shares to APSI is conditioned upon APSI's assumption of all of Mr. Davis'
obligations under the promissory notes; |
| (5) | The principal and interest shall be payable in sixteen (16) consecutive installments commencing on the ninetieth (90th) day following
the date on which the registration by APSI of its securities with the SEC has been qualified or declared effective and continuing every
ninetieth 90thday thereafter; |
| (6) | Mr. Davis shall be responsible for interest, which shall accrue daily on the outstanding principal amount of the promissory notes
(and on any past-due interest payment) at a rate of three percent (3.0%) per annum commencing on the date that the SEC declares the registration
of APSI's securities effective; and |
| (7) | In addition to exercising any rights each Tradition Seller has been granted by Mr. Davis under their respective assignment and pledge
of stock agreements, as described below, Mr. Davis authorizes the Tradition Sellers to seek any other legal means of collection if Mr.
Davis is in default of their respective promissory notes. |
Assignment and Pledge of Stock Agreements.
The assignment and pledge of stock agreements were entered into on December 28, 2022 by and between Mr. Davis and each of the Tradition
Sellers. These agreements secured the indebtedness, related to the Promissory Notes. Per these agreements, the Tradition Sellers have
a security interest in the T-Shares until their respective Promissory Notes are paid in full. Also, per this agreement, default occurs
if their respective Promissory Notes, assignment and pledge of stock agreements, or the MSPA are defaulted on, or if the T-Shares are
sold or transferred, without written consent of the respective Tradition Seller, to anyone other than APSI.
The contract assignment agreement is described
below.
Contract Assignment Agreement. Simultaneously
with the SPA, on December 28, 2022, APSI and Mr. Davis signed a "Contract Assignment" agreement that assigned Mr. Davis' rights
in the right, title and interest in, to and under the MSPA to APSI, provided that APSI expressly assume all of the obligations of Mr.
Davis under the MSPA, the Promissory Notes, and the assignment and pledge of stock agreements between Mr. Davis and each Tradition Seller.
The SPA and MSPA closed on December 28, 2022 (the
"Closing"). As a result of the Closing, Tradition became a wholly owned subsidiary of APSI.
The aforementioned agreements included customary
representations, warranties, and covenants by the respective parties and conditions.
Karr Transportation Asset Purchase
On July 27, 2022, Tradition's wholly owned subsidiaries,
Tradition Transportation, L.L.C. and Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. (together the "Purchaser"), both subsidiaries discussed
in more detail below, entered into an asset purchase agreement ("Karr Asset Purchase Agreement") with Karr Transportation, Inc.,
an Arkansas corporation, Beers Investment Group, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company, and its shareholders, Kelly Beers and Albert
Beers ("Karr Sellers"). As a result of this agreement, Tradition acquired the following:
| (1) | 25 tractors for $3,500,000. 1 is a Kenworth T680M made in 2014; 5 are Kenworth T680Ms made in 2020; 5 are Freightliner Cascadias made
in 2021; 8 are Freightliner Cascadias made in 2022; 4 are Kenworth T680s made in 2020; and 2 are Izuzu NPRs made in 2015 and 2019. |
| (2) | 35 Utility Reefer Trailers for $3,000,000. 15 are 3000Rs or similar and made in 2019; 5 are 3000Rs and made in 2021; and 15 are VS2RAs
and made in 2021. |
| | |
| (3) | The
ability to offer employment to 18 drivers for a placement fee of $5,000, if an offer is accepted. |
| (4) | The ability to offer employment to 1 mechanic for a placement fee of $5,000, if an offer is accepted. |
| (5) | The ability to offer employment to 7 operational employees for a placement fee of $5,000, if an offer is accepted. |
| (6) | All of the miscellaneous personal property used by Karr Sellers in connection with the Business, including, without limitation, furniture,
fixtures, equipment and other tangible personal property, as well as all books and records relating to the Assets, including, without
limitation, purchase information, warranty information, maintenance and repair information, operation history, title and registration,
and accounting information shall be transferred by Sellers to Purchaser for the sum of $1.00. |
Per the Karr Asset Purchase Agreement, the parties
entered into two separate agent agreements, one with Tradition Transportation Company, L.L.C. ("Trucking Agent Contract") and
one with Freedom Freight Solutions, L.L.C. ("Freedom Agent Contract") for the total consideration of $200,000. Both Agreements
provide a cap on commissions of $3,299,999, minus any payments for drivers, mechanics, or operating staff ("Cap").
The Trucking Agent Contract provides that the Karr
Sellers, having substantial experience in the freight motor carrier industry and having customers, who have freight shipping needs for
their cargo of general commodities, would refer their customers to Tradition Trucking Company, LLC for a commission of six percent (6%)
of line-haul revenues on Tradition Transportation Company, LLC assets. The aforementioned commission is subject to (a) Line Haul Revenue
being defined as the "Freight Charge" and/or "Pay Gross" within Tradition Transportation, L.L.C.'s software system,
and Line Haul does not include additional charges for fuel surcharge, accessorial charges, project management, detention, tarping, stop
offs, etc., and (b) revenues, excluding any amounts not paid within 90 days from the date of invoice, or amounts collected by Tradition
Transportation, L.L.C. with the assistance of an outside collection agency or an attorney.
The Freedom Agent Contract provides that the Karr
Sellers, having substantial experience in the freight motor carrier industry and having customers, who have transportation brokerage service
needs for their cargo of general commodities, would refer their customers to Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC for a commission of six percent
(6%) of the margin on revenues generated through Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC.
Finally, the Purchaser and Karr Sellers agreed
to enter into a mutually agreeable lease for use of the property commonly known as 4106 Highway 62 East, Mountain Home, Arkansas 72653,
at the rate of three thousand dollars ($3,000) per month for the office space and one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) per month
for the repair shop space. The term of the lease was six (6) months from the date of Closing, with Purchaser having the right to extend
the term under the same terms and costs for two (2) additional six (6) month periods. Intent is for current dispatch and operations offices,
two (2) additional offices occupied by accounting, and non-exclusive use of the break area, kitchen and restrooms; together with the three
(3) bay maintenance facility, office currently used, and up to ten (10) parking spaces for semi-trucks and trailers (additional to employee
and customer parking).
The Karr Asset Purchase Agreement has a term of
the lesser of a period ending upon payment of the Cap, and a period of 5 years. Otherwise, at the written option of the parties, the Karr
Asset Purchase agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice. The Karr Asset Purchase Agreement is qualified
by reference to the full text of the document attached as Exhibit 10.4 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
EDSCO Purchase and Sale
On January 31, 2022, Tradition's wholly owned subsidiary,
Anthem Anchor Bolts & Fasteners, LLC ("Anthem"), discussed in more detail below, and EDSCO Holding Company, LLC ("EDSCO")
entered into an asset purchase and sale agreement. In this agreement, Anthem acquired the following inventory and equipment of EDSCO Holding
Company, LLC for the purchase price of $447,918.52 (the "EDSCO Purchase Price"): a 2011 Chevy Truck, a Trailer, a Nissan forklift,
a Yale forklift, a Clark Forklift, a 250 Amp Mig Welder, a 2 1/2 Double head landis Threader, a 1 1/4 single head landis, a 1 1/4 rotary
bender, a 200 ton Bulldozer, a do all saw, a Tesker 236 threader, a Tesker 215 roll threader, a Tesker 210 roll threader, a Reed B 112
Roll threader, a Landis Lanurol roll threader, a Plasma table, a Landis cut threader, a Floor scale, an additional 250 amp mig welder,
various tools, a Bar Snapper, a Plasma Water Table, a Small bending unit, a Pallet Racking machine, and a Mult-function Printer (altogether
the "EDSCO Assets").
The EDSCO Purchase Price was paid by wire transfer
initiated on February 7, 2022 and EDSCO delivered to Anthem a bill of sale to transfer and vest in Anthem good and marketable title to
the EDSCO Assets, free and clear of all encumbrances. EDSCO had been operating at 300 East Railroad Street, Waterloo, DeKalb County, Indiana
46793 (the "EDSCO Location"). As part of the closing, the owner of the EDSCO Location provided Tradition until September 30,
2022, to relocate. The rent paid to the owner of the property was paid up-front.
Anthem was relocated to 210 South Progress Drive,
Kendallville, Indiana 46755, further discussed in "ITEM 3. PROPERTIES." Anthem, due to this acquisition, is a manufacturer of
bolts, nuts, and fasteners, and creates custom plates, cages, and embeds. The asset purchase and sale agreement between EDSCO Holding
Company, LLC and Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC is qualified by reference to the full text of the full document attached as Exhibit
10.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.
Industry Overview, Competition, and Market Opportunity
Trucking is the primary means of serving the North
American transportation market. Trucking continues to attract shippers due to the mode's cost advantages relative to air transportation
and flexibility relative to rail. Truckload growth is largely tied to U.S. economic activity such as GDP growth and industrial production
and moves in line with changes in sales, inventory and production within various sectors of the U.S. economy, including manufactured goods,
construction products and bulk commodities.
The U.S. truckload industry sector comprises the
use of dry van and specialty equipment. Both dry van and specialty equipment are used to transport goods over a long-haul and on a regional
basis. Dry van carriers represent an integral component of the transportation supply chain for most retail and manufactured goods in North
America. Specialty carriers employ equipment such as flat-bed trucks, temperature-controlled trailers, over-sized trailers and bulk transport,
dump, and waste equipment. These carriers can transport temperature-controlled products and bulk commodities such as specialty chemicals
and petrochemicals. Specialty equipment offering is characterized by higher equipment costs and more extensive driver training requirements
relative to dry van offerings, resulting in higher barriers to entry and creating opportunities for differentiated value propositions
for customers.
The American Trucking Associations ("ATA")
has published, on its website, https://www.trucking.org/economics-and-industry-data, the following information, regarding trends in the
truck freight industry in 2021:
| (1) | Trucks moved nearly 72.2% of the United States of America's freight by weight |
| (2) | Gross freight revenues from trucking amounted to $875.5 billion dollars, which represents 80.8% of the revenue generated by the freight
industry |
| (3) | Trucks transported 66.1% of the value of surface trade between the U.S. and Canada and 82.7% between the U.S. and Mexico in 2021 |
The ATA also published that, as of June 2022, 95.7%
of fleets operate ten or fewer trucks and 99.7% operate less than 100, and the number of for-hire carriers on file with the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration totaled 1,102,799, private carriers totaled 718,594, there were 153,191 carriers identified as both for-hire
and private carriers, and other interstate motor carriers totaled 37,718.
As seen above, the U.S. truckload industry is large
and fragmented, characterized by many small carriers. Some of Tradition's competitors include J.B. Hunt, Old Dominion Freight Line, Schneider,
ACME Truck Line Inc., Crete Carrier, C.H. Robinson, CRST, Knight Logistics, Swift, and Werner Enterprises.
Regulations and initiatives to improve the safety
of the U.S. trucking industry have impacted industry dynamics. Tradition believes the recent trend is for industry regulation to become
progressively more restrictive and complex, which constrains the overall supply of trucks and drivers in the industry. See "Regulation"
below for more information on the regulatory environment of the industry. Tradition believes smaller carriers will likely be challenged
to maintain the utilization required for acceptable profitability under this regulatory framework.
Because the trucking industry is very fragmented,
with most carriers operating ten or fewer trucks, and highly regulated, as described below in "Regulation," Tradition believes
that this industry primed for consolidation.
Tradition's Service Offerings
Freight transportation services, brokerage services,
equipment leasing services, and warehouse leasing are Tradition's main services offerings.
Due to the EDSCO Purchase and Sale described above,
Tradition has entered the manufacturing space and now manufactures bolts, nuts, and fasteners, and create custom plates, cages, and embeds.
Tradition's manufacturing business is described later in "Manufacturing" and includes information related to Tradition's customers,
competition, vendors, and the industry.
Freight Transportation Services.
Tradition's "Freight Transportation Services" consist of the outbound and inbound movement of freight and make up about 50%
of its total revenue, as of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. Tradition offers dry van, temperature-controlled, and flatbed specialized
transportation services across all 48 contiguous states. The description of Tradition's fleet and trailers is described in more detail
below in "Tractor and Trailer Fleets."
Brokerage Services. Tradition's "Brokerage
Services" make up about 35% of its total revenue, as of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. These services include freight management,
fulfillment, relabeling and repackaging, outbound logistics, supply chain management, warehouse management, inventory management, and
shipment and tracking notification.
Equipment Leasing Services. Tradition's
"Equipment Leasing Services" consist of the financing of owner-operator trucks and make up about 7% of its total revenue, as
of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. Tradition offers a variety of leasing options including long-term, short-term, subleasing
options. Customers can also purchase equipment from Tradition. Customers can lease or purchase late-model power units from Kenworth, Peterbilt,
and Freightliner. Tradition also offers leasing on state-of-the-art trailers from Wabash, and Great Dane. Tradition's leasing system's
state of the art financial management technology helps simplify the leasing process.
Warehouse Leasing Services. Tradition's
"Warehouse Leasing Services" make up about 8% of its total revenue, as of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. Tradition
has six (6) warehouses with four (4) in Indiana, specifically Angola, Indianapolis, Greenfield, and Greenwood; and two (2) located in
Georgia, specifically Statesboro and Savannah. The warehouses provide more than 1.8 million sq. ft. of warehouse compacity, specifically:
|
Angola Office |
|
135,500 sq. ft. |
|
Franklin (Indianapolis) Office |
|
156,960 sq. ft. |
|
|
Greenfield Fulfillment Center |
|
432,000 sq. ft. |
|
Greenwood Warehouse |
|
584,820 sq. ft |
|
|
Statesboro Warehouse |
|
205,934 sq. ft. |
|
Savannah Port Facility |
|
311,265 sq. ft. |
|
Services include warehousing and fulfillment, and
drayage, or the moving of freight from a container ship to a warehouse.
Tractor and Trailer Fleets
Tradition operates a fleet of approximately 162
company-owned tractors and approximately 303 trailers. Additionally, Tradition leases approximately 64 tractors and 248 trailers. Tradition's
tractor fleet includes technology including electronic logging devices ("ELDs"), electronic speed limiters, electronic roll
stability, and Samsara forward facing dash cams. Each of Tradition's company tractors is also equipped with onboard communication units
that offer real time freight positioning to its customers and instant communication between its drivers and Tradition.
Tractors and trailers represent Tradition's most
substantial capital investments. In general, Tradition expects to operate a tractor for approximately 3 years and 360,000 miles of operation,
and trailers for approximately 10 years of operation. Tradition depreciates or finances its equipment over their useful lives and down
to salvage values that Tradition expects to represent fair market value at the expected time of sale. Tradition's ongoing capital expenditures
are significant, and its annual depreciation expense is expected to be approximately equal to maintenance capital expenditures, net of
proceeds of dispositions, assuming a constant percentage of leased versus owned equipment and a constant trade cycle.
Tradition's company tractors have an average model
year of 2020 and its trailers have average model year of 2017, as of December 28, 2022.
Tradition's Competitive Strengths
Tradition's management and the diversification
of its business model are its primary strengths. Tradition's service offerings are based in assets and non-assets. Tradition manages its
customer portfolio through type of products and services by each customer and by percentage of business Tradition will do with each customer
based on annual sales and product types. Tradition is managed this way to allow it to balance its annual revenues, and have the ability
to grow and gain market share. Tradition's technology and management teams are guided through this process as Tradition reviews its operations
quarterly with its business development teams and operations management.
Tradition's competitive strengths provide it with
a strong foundation to continue to improve its profitability and stockholder value and are discussed in more detail below:
Complementary mix of services to afford flexibility
and stability throughout economic cycles
|
• |
Tradition's service offerings have unique characteristics and are subject to differing market forces, which Tradition believes allows it to respond effectively through economic cycles. |
|
|
|
|
• |
Tradition's Freight Transportation Services, Brokerage Services, Warehousing Leasing Services, and Equipment Leasing Services involve assets and non-assets. These services, along with Tradition's manufacturing business, complement and support one another, and create opportunities for cross selling. |
Technology
Tradition has integrated general and industry-specific technology
into its front and back-end office operations, allowing Tradition to run efficiently and effectively. Tradition is focused on continual
implementation of the digital initiatives that Tradition believes are re-engineering it to be a market leader in growth and profitability
over the next decade. Some examples of the technologies that Tradition uses are as follows:
| (1) | Samsara's "to-the-second" GPS tracking and smart geofencing provides best-in-class visibility to improve route performance. |
| (2) | SkyBlitz provides commercial telematics, focused on solutions for enterprise and local fleets, tank monitoring and petroleum logistics |
| (3) | Tradition is currently using Transport Pro as its TMS (Transportation Management Software); however, Tradition is in the middle of
converting to TMW by Trimble Transportation Enterprise Solutions, Inc. for its transportation management solutions. |
| (4) | Camelot Software, provides warehouse management systems. |
Diverse and resilient customer base
Tradition maintains a diverse customer base that fall within
a broad spectrum of geographies and end markets. Tradition's customers are described in more detail below.
Maintenance system designed to optimize life
cycle investment and minimize operating costs
Tradition's fleet represents its largest capital investment,
a visible representation of Tradition's brand for customers and drivers and a large portion of its controllable costs. Tradition selects,
maintains and disposes of its fleet based on rigorous analysis of its investments and operating costs.
Over the past several years, Tradition has developed a disciplined
and effective maintenance program designed to actively manage these assets based on the amount of miles a tractor is driven for preventive
maintenance and replacement of parts. Tradition's owned and lease-purchase units are serviced at approved vendors according to its Maintenance
Program Schedule: (1) A Service - Performed every 35,000 miles, (2) B Service - Performed every 17,500 miles, (3) C Service - Performed
every 250,000 miles, and (4) D Service - Performed every 150,000 miles. Tradition believes this approach, coupled with its approved vendors,
helps it effectively manage its maintenance cost per mile, keeps drivers on the road efficiently and creates an attractive asset and record
for resale.
Motivated management team focused on tactical
execution and leadership in the truckload market
Tradition's senior corporate staff has a combined 110 years
of industry knowledge and experience. Tradition's Chief Executive Officer, Timothy E. Evans, has over 30 years of experience in the transportation
and warehousing industry. Joseph Montel, Tradition's company Secretary and General Counsel has nearly 30 years of experience in transportation,
banking, corporate, securities, and real estate. James L. Evans, Tradition's Vice President, has been involved in the transportation,
logistics, and warehousing industry for more than 30 years. Joseph M. Davis, Tradition's Chief Operating Officer, has more than 20 years
of experience in the industry and has been on the operations side for most of that time. Tradition believes its leadership team is well-positioned
to execute its strategy and remains a key driver of its financial and operational success.
Customer Relationships
Tradition maintains a diverse customer base that
includes a large base of nearly 500 active customers, including Meijer Distribution, Inc. Therma-Tru Corp., Dunham's Distribution Center,
Bridgestone, and C.H. Robinson. Tradition's customers fall within a broad spectrum of geographies and end markets, including building
materials, transportation, automotive, manufacturing, grocery stores, containers and packaging, and food and drink. For the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2021, Tradition's largest customer accounted for approximately 13% of Tradition's revenue.
Tradition's Business Strategies
Tradition believes it possesses the ability to
scale, infrastructure and service offerings to compete effectively in its markets, its opportunity for further improvement is significant,
and its strategies are designed to enhance stockholder value.
Improve profitability and grow revenue.
| (1) | Improve asset productivity by using advanced technology to optimize dispatch miles in all cycles and actively upgrade freight mix
when volumes permit. |
| | |
| (2) | Control
non-essential costs and seek efficiencies throughout the enterprise. |
| (3) | Pursue driver training and safety initiatives as a core value. |
| (4) | Continue to leverage Tradition's service mix to manage through all market cycles. |
| (5) | Grow Tradition's revenue base organically and prudently with a focus on cross-selling its services with existing customers and pursuing
new customer opportunities. |
Strategic investments and growth strategies.
| (1) | Tradition currently invests and plans to continue investing in infrastructure as well as administrative/operational and driver recruitment
personnel to maintain growth. |
| (2) | Tradition has a goal of acquiring 200 plus tractors and 400 trailers in 2023 and 2024, through merger and acquisitions opportunities. |
| (3) | Tradition plans to open deployment centers in Indianapolis Indiana, Savannah Georgia, Nashville Tennessee, and Dallas Texas in 2023
and 2024. |
| (4) | Tradition looks to acquire a warehouse facility, in Indiana, in 2023 for warehouse operations only, and plans to relocate main operations
to a new location in Indiana with the acquisition or construction of new facility. |
| (5) | Tradition plans to explore strategic mergers and acquisitions opportunities in 2023 and 2024 for the additions of terminals in Dallas,
TX, the southeastern U.S. and the pacific coast to facilitate driver recruitment, reseating, and related opportunities. |
| (6) | Tradition plans to determine which marketing platforms provide the best return for its multiple services and products, and Tradition
plans to invest in the diversification of its marketing. Tradition currently invest in social media, websites, hub spot CRM platform,
trade shows and brochures as Tradition scales its sales force internally and nationally. |
| (7) | Tradition plans to invest in and grow its manufacturing business and launch U-bolt manufacturing to add more diversification to its
products. |
(8) Tradition
plans to invest in and grow its drayage business.
Owner Operators
In addition to the company drivers that Tradition
employs, it enters into contracts with independent contractors or owner operators, to many of whom Tradition leases tractors. Owner operators
may operate their own tractors and provide their services to Tradition under contractual arrangements. Except for generally providing
owner operators with the use of its trailers, owner operators are responsible for the ownership and operating expenses of their tractors,
and are compensated by Tradition primarily on a rate per mile basis. By operating safely and productively, independent contractors can
improve their own profitability and Tradition's. Tradition believes that the fleet of independent contractors it engages provides significant
advantages that primarily arise from the motivation of business ownership. Owner operators tend to produce more miles per tractor per
week. As of December 28, 2022, Tradition has approximately 132 owner operators.
Owner operators have access to medical, dental
and vision insurance, as well as safety and referral bonus programs.
Human Capital Resources
As of December 28, 2022, Tradition has two hundred
and fifteen (215) full-time employees. Sixty (60) of the full-time employees are its drivers, and one-hundred twenty-two (122) are office
personnel. Tradition also has one hundred and thirty two (132) owner operator drivers. None of Tradition's employees are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement.
To attract and retain the best-qualified talent,
Tradition offers competitive benefits, including, medical, dental and vision insurance, as well as life insurance and a 401k. Owner operators
have access to medical, dental and vision insurance, as well as safety and referral bonus programs.
In addition to Tradition's hiring criteria, its
tractors are equipped with electronic speed limiters, automatic transmissions, lane departure and collision warning systems, air disc
brakes and high performance wide brake drums, electronic roll stability and, more recently, forward-facing cameras.
Trademarks
Tradition has a word mark and a design mark on
"Tradition Transportation Company, LLC," which were registered on March 12, 2019.
Regulation
Transportation Regulations. Tradition's
operations are regulated and licensed by various government agencies, including the Department of Transportation ("DOT"), Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") and the Department of Homeland security ("DHS"). These and other federal and state agencies
also regulate Tradition's equipment, operations, drivers and third-party carriers.
The DOT, through the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration ("FMCSA"), imposes safety and fitness regulations on Tradition and its drivers, including rules that restrict
driver hours-of-service. Changes to such hours-of-service rules can negatively impact Tradition's productivity and affect its operations
and profitability by reducing the number of hours per day or week its drivers may operate and/or disrupt Tradition's network. However,
in August 2019, the FMCSA issued a proposal to make changes to its hours-of-service rules that would allow truck drivers more flexibility
with their 30-minute rest break and with dividing their time in the sleeper berth. It also would extend by two hours the duty time for
drivers encountering adverse weather, and extend the short haul exemption by lengthening the drivers' maximum on-duty period from 12 hours
to 14 hours. In June 2020 the FMCSA adopted a final rule substantially as proposed, which became effective in September 2020. Certain
industry groups have challenged these rules in court, and it remains unclear what, if anything, will come from such challenges. Any future
changes to hours-of-service rules could materially adversely affect Tradition's results of operations and profitability.
There are two methods of evaluating the safety
and fitness of carriers. The first method is the application of a safety rating that is based on an onsite investigation and affects a
carrier's ability to operate in interstate commerce. Tradition currently has a satisfactory DOT safety rating for Tradition's U.S. operations
under this method, which is the highest available rating under the current safety rating scale. If Tradition were to receive a conditional
or unsatisfactory DOT safety rating, it could materially adversely affect its business, as some customers and potential customers may
not want to utilize the services of a carrier with such a rating. In January 2016, the FMCSA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
outlining a revised safety rating measurement system, which would replace the current methodology. Under the proposed rule, the current
three safety ratings of "satisfactory," "conditional" and "unsatisfactory" would be replaced with a single
safety rating of "unfit," and a carrier would be deemed fit when no rating was assigned. Moreover, the proposed rules would
use roadside inspection data in addition to investigations and onsite reviews to determine a carrier's safety fitness on a monthly basis.
Under the current rules, a safety rating can only be given upon completion of a comprehensive onsite audit or review. Under the proposed
rules, a carrier would be evaluated each month and could be given an "unfit" rating if the data collected from roadside inspections,
investigations and onsite reviews did not meet certain standards. The proposed rule underwent a public comment period extending into May
2016 and several industry groups and lawmakers have expressed their disagreement with the proposed rule, arguing that it violates the
requirements of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (the "FAST Act"), and that the FMCSA must first finalize its
review of the Compliance, Safety, Accountability program ("CSA") scoring system, described in further detail below. Based on
this feedback and other concerns raised by industry stakeholders, in March 2017, the FMCSA withdrew the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
related to the new safety rating system. In its notice of withdrawal, the FMCSA noted that a new rulemaking related to a similar process
may be initiated in the future. Therefore, it is uncertain if, when or under what form any such rule could be implemented. The FMCSA has
also indicated that it is in the early phases of a new study on the causation of crashes. Although it remains unclear whether such study
will ultimately be completed, the results of such study could spur further proposed and/or final rules in regard to safety and fitness.
In addition to the safety rating system, the FMCSA
has adopted the CSA program as an additional safety enforcement and compliance model that evaluates and ranks fleets on certain safety-related
standards. The CSA program analyzes data from roadside inspections, moving violations, crash reports from the last two years and investigation
results. The data is organized into seven categories. Carriers are grouped by category with other carriers that have a similar number
of safety events (e.g., crashes, inspections or violations) and carriers are ranked and assigned a rating percentile to prioritize them
for interventions if they are above a certain threshold. Currently, these scores do not have a direct impact on a carrier's safety rating.
However, the occurrence of unfavorable scores in one or more categories may (i) affect driver recruiting and retention by causing high-quality
drivers to seek employment with other carriers, (ii) cause Tradition's customers to direct their business away from Tradition and to carriers
with higher fleet rankings, (iii) subject Tradition to an increase in compliance reviews and roadside inspections, (iv) cause Tradition
to incur greater than expected expenses in Tradition's attempts to improve unfavorable scores or (v) increase Tradition's insurance expenses,
any of which could adversely affect Tradition's results of operations and profitability.
Under the CSA, these scores were initially made
available to the public in five of the seven categories. However, pursuant to the FAST Act which was signed into law in December 2015,
the FMCSA was required to remove from public view the previously available CSA scores while it reviews the reliability of the scoring
system. During this period of review by the FMCSA, Tradition will continue to have access to its own scores and will still be subject
to intervention by the FMCSA when such scores are above the intervention thresholds. A study was conducted and delivered to the FMCSA
in June 2017 with several recommendations to make the CSA program more fair, accurate, and reliable. In late June 2018, the FMCSA provided
a report to Congress outlining the changes it may make to the CSA program in response to the study. Such changes include the testing and
possible adoption of a revised risk modeling theory, potential collection and dissemination of additional carrier data and revised measures
for intervention thresholds. The adoption of such changes is contingent on the results of the new modeling theory and additional public
feedback. Therefore, it is unclear if, when and to what extent such changes to the CSA program will occur. However, any changes that increase
the likelihood of Tradition receiving unfavorable scores could materially adversely affect Tradition's results of operations and profitability.
In May 2020 the FMCSA announced that effective
immediately it is making permanent a pilot program that will not count a crash in which a motor carrier was not at fault when calculating
the carrier's safety measurement profile, called the Crash Preventability Demonstration Program ("CPDP"). The CPDP will expand
the types of eligible crashes, modify the Safety Measurement System to exclude crashes with not preventable determinations from the prioritization
algorithm and note the not preventable determinations in the Pre-Employment Screening Program. Under the program, carriers with eligible
crashes that occurred on or after August 2019, may submit a Request for Data Review with the required police accident report and other
supporting documents, photos or videos through the FMCSA's DataQs website. If the FMCSA determines the crash was not preventable, it will
be listed on the Safety Measurement System but not included when calculating a carrier's Crash Indicator Behavior Analysis and Safety
Improvement Category measure in SMS. Additionally, the not preventable determinations will be noted on a driver's Pre-Employment Screening
Program report.
The final rule requiring the use of ELDs was published
in December 2015. This rule required drivers of commercial motor vehicles that are required to keep logs to be ELD-compliant by December
2017. Use of automatic onboard recording devices was permitted until December 2019, at which time use of ELDs became required. Tradition
was fully converted to ELDs by the December 2019 deadline. Tradition believes that more effective hours-of-service enforcement under this
rule may improve Tradition's competitive position by causing all carriers to adhere more closely to hours-of-service requirements.
In December 2016, the FMCSA issued a final rule
establishing a national clearinghouse for drug and alcohol testing results and requiring motor carriers and medical review officers to
provide records of violations by commercial drivers of FMCSA drug and alcohol testing requirements. Motor carriers are required to query
the clearinghouse to ensure drivers and driver applicants do not have violations of federal drug and alcohol testing regulations that
prohibit them from operating commercial motor vehicles. The final rule became effective in January 2017, with a compliance date in January
2020. In December 2019, however, the FMCSA announced a final rule extending by three years the date for state driver's licensing agencies
to comply with certain Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse requirements. The December 2016 commercial driver's license rule required states
to request information from the Clearinghouse about individuals prior to issuing, renewing, upgrading or transferring a CDL. This new
action will allow states' compliance with the requirement, which was set to begin January 2020, to be delayed until January 2023. That
being said, the FMCSA has indicated it will allow states the option to voluntarily query Clearinghouse information beginning January 2020.
The compliance date of January 2020 remained in place for all other requirements set forth in the Clearinghouse final rule; however, upon
implementation, the rule may reduce the number of available drivers in an already constrained driver market. Pursuant to a new rule finalized
by the FMCSA, effective November 2021, states are required to query the Clearinghouse when issuing, renewing, transferring, or upgrading
a commercial driver's license and must revoke a driver's commercial driving privileges if such driver is prohibited from driving a motor
vehicle for one or more drug or alcohol violations.
In September 2020, the Department of Health and
Human Services ("DHHS") announced proposed mandatory guidelines to allow employers to drug test truck drivers and other federal
workers for pre-employment and random testing using hair specimens. However, the proposal also requires a second sample using either urine
or an oral swab test if a hair test is positive, if a donor is unable to provide a sufficient amount of hair for faith-based or medical
reasons, or due to an insufficient amount or length of hair. The proposal specifically requires that the second test be done simultaneously
at the collection event or when directed by the medical review officer after review and verification of laboratory-reported results for
the hair specimen. DHHS indicated the two-test approach is intended to protect federal workers from issues that have been identified as
limitations of hair testing, and related legal deficiencies identified in two prior court cases. The ATA has voiced concerns with the
new guidelines, characterizing them as "weak" and "misguided," and specially taking issue with the second sample requirement,
which the ATA feels diminishes the value of hair testing. It is unclear if, and when, a final rule may be put in place. Any final rule
may reduce the number of available drivers. Tradition currently performs urine testing and will continue to monitor any developments in
this area to ensure compliance.
Other rules have been recently proposed or made
final by the FMCSA, including (i) a rule requiring the use of speed limiting devices on heavy duty tractors to restrict maximum speeds,
which was proposed in 2016, and (ii) a rule setting forth minimum driver-training standards for new drivers applying for commercial driver's
licenses for the first time and to experienced drivers upgrading their licenses or seeking a hazardous materials endorsement, which was
made final in December 2016, with a compliance date in February 2020. However, in May 2020, the FMCSA approved an interim rule delaying
implementation of the final rule by two years which extended the compliance date to February 2022. In July 2017, the DOT announced that
it would no longer pursue a speed limiter rule, but left open the possibility that it could resume such a pursuit in the future. In May
2021, however, the Cullum Owings Large Truck Safe Operating Speed Act was reintroduced into the U.S. House of Representatives and would
require commercial motor vehicles with a gross weight of more than 26,000 pounds to be equipped with a speed limiter that would limit
the vehicle's speed to no more than 65 M.P.H. The effect of these rules, to the extent they become effective, could result in a decrease
in fleet production and driver availability, either of which could materially adversely affect Tradition's business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ("IIJA"),
signed into law by President Biden in November 2021, created an apprenticeship program for drivers younger than 21 to eventually qualify
to drive commercial trucks in interstate commerce. The provision drew certain mechanics from the bills introduced in Congress in 2019
related to lowering the age requirements for interstate commercial driving. The FMCSA announced the establishment of this apprenticeship
program in January 2022 in an effort to help the industry's ongoing driver shortage. The program is open to 18 to 20-year-old drivers
who already hold intrastate commercial driver's licenses and sets a strict training regimen for participating drivers and carriers to
comply with. Motor carriers interested in participating must complete an application for participation and submit monthly data on an apprentice's
driver activity, safety outcomes, and additional supporting information. It remains unclear whether any regulatory changes will stem from
the apprenticeship program.
In December 2018, the FMCSA granted a petition
filed by the ATA and in doing so determined that federal law does preempt California's wage and hour laws, and interstate truck drivers
are not subject to such laws. The FMCSA's decision has been appealed by labor groups, and multiple lawsuits have been filed in federal
courts seeking to overturn the decision. In January 2021, the Ninth Circuit upheld the FMCSA's determination that federal law does preempt
California's meal and rest break laws, as applied to drivers of property-carrying commercial motor vehicles. Other current and future
state and local wage and hour laws, including laws related to employee meal breaks and rest periods, may also vary significantly from
federal law. Further, driver piece rate compensation, which is an industry standard, has been attacked as non-compliant with state minimum
wage laws and lawsuits have recently been filed and/or adjudicated against carriers demanding compensation for sleeper berth time, layovers,
rest breaks and pre-trip and post-trip inspections, the outcome of which could have major implications for the treatment of time that
drivers spend off-duty (whether in a truck's sleeper berth or otherwise) under applicable wage laws. Both of these issues adversely impact
Tradition and the industry as a whole, with respect to the practical application of the laws, thereby resulting in additional cost. As
a result, Tradition, along with other companies in Tradition's industry, are subject to an uneven patchwork of wage and hour laws throughout
the United States. In the past, certain legislators have proposed federal legislation to preempt state and local wage and hour laws; however,
passage of such legislation is uncertain. Tradition's fleet currently complies with all local laws.
Tax and other regulatory authorities, as well as
independent contractors themselves, have increasingly asserted that independent contractor drivers in the trucking industry are employees
rather than independent contractors. Federal legislation has been introduced in the past that would make it easier for tax and other authorities
to reclassify independent contractors as employees, including legislation to increase the recordkeeping requirements for those that engage
independent contractor drivers and to increase the penalties for companies who misclassify their employees and are found to have violated
employees' overtime and/or wage requirements. The most recent example being the Protecting the Rights to Organize ("PRO") Act,
which was passed by the House of Representatives and received by the Senate in March 2021 and remains with the Senate's Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions. The PRO Act proposes to apply the "ABC Test" for classifying workers under Federal Fair Labor
Standards Act claims. It is unknown whether any of the proposed legislation will become law or whether any industry-based exemptions from
any resulting law will be granted. Additionally, federal legislators have sought to abolish the current safe harbor allowing taxpayers
meeting certain criteria to treat individuals as independent contractors if they are following a long-standing, recognized practice, extend
the Fair Labor Standards Act to independent contractors and impose notice requirements based on employment or independent contractor status
and fines for failure to comply. Some states have put initiatives in place to increase their revenue from items such as unemployment,
workers' compensation and income taxes and a reclassification of independent contractors as employees would help states with this initiative.
Recently, courts in certain states have issued
decisions that could result in a greater likelihood that independent contractors would be judicially classified as employees in such states.
In September 2019, California enacted A.B. 5 ("AB5"), a new law that changed the landscape of the state's treatment of employees
and independent contractors. AB5 provides that the three-pronged "ABC Test" must be used to determine worker classification
in wage-order claims. Under the ABC Test, a worker is presumed to be an employee-and the burden to demonstrate their independent contractor
status is on the hiring company through satisfying all 3 of the following criteria:
| (1) | the
worker is free from control and direction in the performance of services; and |
| | |
| (2) | the worker is free from control and direction in the performance of services; and is performing work outside the usual course of the
business of the hiring company; and |
| | |
| (3) | the
worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. |
How AB5 will be enforced is still to be determined.
In January 2021, however, the California Supreme Court ruled that the ABC Test could apply retroactively to all cases not yet final as
of the date the original decision was rendered, April 30, 2018. While AB5 was set to go into effect in January 2020, a federal judge in
California issued a preliminary injunction barring the enforcement of AB5 on the trucking industry while the California Trucking Association
("CTA") moves forward with its suit seeking to invalidate AB5. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the reasoning behind
the injunction in April 2021, ruling that AB5 is not pre-empted by federal law, but granted a stay of the AB5 mandate in June 2021 (preventing
its application and temporarily continuing the injunction) while the CTA petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Supreme Court")
to review the decision. In November 2021, the Supreme Court requested that the U.S. solicitor general weigh in on the case. The injunction
was lifted on August 29, 2022. There is not yet much clarity on how AB5 will be enforced. Further, the matter is not settled, as the CTA
is pursuing the case from the beginning and has requested another injunction. It is also possible AB5 will spur similar legislation in
states other than California, which could adversely affect Tradition's results of operations and profitability.
Further, class actions and other lawsuits have
been filed against certain members of the trucking industry seeking to reclassify independent contractors as employees for a variety of
purposes, including workers' compensation and health care coverage. Taxing and other regulatory authorities and courts apply a variety
of standards in their determination of independent contractor status. If independent contractors Tradition contracts with are determined
to be employees, Tradition would incur additional exposure under federal and state tax, workers' compensation, unemployment benefits,
labor, employment and tort laws, including for prior periods, as well as potential liability for employee benefits and tax withholdings.
Environmental Regulations. From time
to time Tradition engages in the transportation of hazardous substances, most notably molten aluminum. Additionally, some of Tradition's
tractor terminals are located in areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination could occur. Tradition's operations
involve the risks of fuel spillage or seepage, environmental damage, and hazardous waste disposal, among others. Certain of Tradition's
facilities have wash facilities, waste oil or fuel storage tanks and fueling islands. If Tradition is involved in a spill or other accident
involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances Tradition transports, if soil or groundwater contamination
is found at Tradition's facilities or results from Tradition's operations, or if Tradition is found to be in violation of applicable laws
or regulations, Tradition could be subject to cleanup costs and liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal
liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on Tradition's business, financial condition and results of operations.
In August 2011, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (the "NHTSA") and the EPA adopted a new rule that established the first-ever fuel economy and greenhouse gas
standards for medium and heavy-duty vehicles, including the tractors Tradition employs (the "Phase 1 Standards"). The Phase
1 Standards apply to tractor model years 2014 to 2018 and require the achievement of an approximate 20 percent reduction in fuel consumption
by the 2018 model year, which equates to approximately four gallons of fuel for every 100 miles traveled. In addition, in February 2014,
President Obama announced that his administration would begin developing the next phase of tighter fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas
standards for medium-and heavy-duty tractors and trailers (the "Phase 2 Standards"). In October 2016, the EPA and NHTSA published
the final rule mandating that the Phase 2 Standards will apply to trailers beginning with model year 2018 and tractors beginning with
model year 2021. The Phase 2 Standards require nine percent and 25 percent reductions in emissions and fuel consumption for trailers and
tractors, respectively, by 2027. The final rule was effective in December 2016, but has since faced challenges and delays. In October
2017, the EPA announced a proposal to repeal the Phase 2 Standards as they relate to gliders (which mix refurbished older components,
including transmissions and pre-emission-rule engines, with a new frame, cab, steer axle, wheels, and other standard equipment). The outcome
of such proposal is still undetermined. Additionally, implementation of the Phase 2 Standards as they relate to trailers has been challenged
in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In November 2021, a panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia ruled in favor of the association challenging the standards and vacated all portions of the Phase 2 Standards that applied to
trailers, and consequently, the Phase 2 Standards will only require reductions in emissions and fuel consumption for tractors.
In January 2020, the EPA announced it is seeking
input on reducing emissions of nitrogen oxides and other pollutants from heavy-duty trucks. The EPA anticipates taking final action on
the new plan, commonly referred to as the "Cleaner Trucks Initiative." On August 5, 2021, U.S. EPA announced an update to the
Cleaner Trucks Initiative called the Clean Trucks Plan. The Clean Trucks Plan plans to reduce GHG and other harmful air pollutants from
heavy-duty trucks through a series of rulemakings over the next three years. Further, the EPA is targeting 2027 for these new standards
to take effect and is also working on enacting more stringent greenhouse gas emission standards (beginning with model year 2030 vehicles)
by the end of 2024.
The California Air Resources Board ("CARB")
also adopted emission control regulations that will be applicable to all heavy-duty tractors that pull 53-foot or longer box-type trailers
within the State of California. The tractors and trailers subject to these CARB regulations must be either EPA SmartWay certified or equipped
with low-rolling resistance tires and retrofitted with SmartWay-approved aerodynamic technologies. Enforcement of these CARB regulations
for 2011 model year equipment began in January 2010 and have been phased in over several years for older equipment. In addition, in February
2017 CARB proposed "California Phase 2" standards that would generally align with the federal Phase 2 Standards, with some minor
additional requirements, and as proposed would stay in place even if the federal Phase 2 Standards are affected. In February 2019, the
California Phase 2 standards became final. Thus, even though the trailer provisions of the Phase 2 Standards were removed, Tradition will
still need to ensure that Tradition's fleet that operates in California is compliant with the California Phase 2 standards, which may
result in increased equipment costs and could adversely affect Tradition's operating results and profitability. CARB has also recently
announced intentions to adopt regulations ensuring that 100% of tractors operating in California are operating with battery or fuel cell-electric
engines in the future. Whether these regulations will ultimately be adopted remains unclear. Tradition will continue monitoring its compliance
with the CARB regulations. Federal and state lawmakers also have proposed potential limits on carbon emissions under a variety of climate-change
proposals. Compliance with such regulations has increased the cost of Tradition's new tractors, may increase the cost of any new trailers
that will operate in California, and could impair equipment productivity and increase Tradition's operating expenses. These adverse effects,
combined with the uncertainty as to the reliability of the newly designed diesel engines and the residual values of these vehicles, could
materially increase Tradition's costs or otherwise materially adversely affect Tradition's business, financial condition and results of
operations. In June 2020 CARB also passed the Advanced Clean Trucks ("ACT") regulation, which became effective in March 2021
and generally requires original equipment manufacturers to begin shifting towards greater production of zero-emission heavy duty tractors
starting in 2024. Under ACT, by 2045, every new tractor sold in California will need to be zero-emission. While ACT does not apply to
those simply operating tractors in California, it could affect the cost and/or supply of traditional diesel tractors and may lead to similar
legislation in other states or at the federal level.
In order to reduce exhaust emissions, some states
and municipalities have begun to restrict the locations and amount of time where diesel-powered tractors may idle. These restrictions
could force Tradition to purchase on-board power units that do not require the engine to idle or to alter Tradition's drivers' behavior,
which could result in increased costs.
In addition to the foregoing laws and regulations,
Tradition's operations are subject to other federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, many of which are implemented
by the EPA and similar state agencies. Such laws and regulations generally govern the management and handling of hazardous materials,
discharge of pollutants into the air, surface water and other environmental media, and groundwater preservation and disposal of certain
various substances. Tradition does not believe that its compliance with these statutory and regulatory measures has had a material adverse
effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Food Safety Regulations. In April
2016, the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") published a final rule establishing requirements for shippers, loaders, carriers
by motor vehicle and rail vehicle and receivers engaged in the transportation of food, to use sanitary transportation practices to ensure
the safety of the food they transport as part of the Food Safety Modernization Act ("FSMA"). This rule sets forth requirements
related to (i) the design and maintenance of equipment used to transport food, (ii) the measures taken during food transportation to
ensure food safety, (iii) the training of carrier personnel in sanitary food transportation practices and (iv) maintenance and retention
of records of written procedures, agreements and training related to the foregoing items. These requirements took effect for larger carriers
such as Tradition in April 2017. The FSMA is applicable to Tradition not only as a carrier, but Tradition is also considered a shipper
when acting in the role of broker. Tradition believes it has been in compliance with the FSMA since the compliance date. However, if
Tradition is found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations related to the FSMA or if Tradition transports food or goods
that are contaminated or are found to cause illness and/or death, Tradition could be subject to substantial fines, lawsuits, penalties
and/or criminal and civil liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results
of operations.
As the FDA continues its efforts to modernize food
safety, it is likely additional food safety regulations will take effect in the future. In July 2020, the FDA released its "New Era
of Smarter Food Safety" blueprint, which creates a ten year roadmap to create a more digital, traceable and safer food system. This
blueprint builds on the work done under the FSMA, and while it is still unclear what, if any, changes to the current governing framework
may ultimately take effect, further regulation in this area could negatively affect Tradition's business by increasing its compliance
obligations and related expenses going forward.
Executive and Legislative Climate.
On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act ("IRA"). The IRA seeks to reduce the carbon
emissions in the U.S. by roughly 40% by 2030. It incentivizes the use of alternative forms of fuel, such as biodiesel and renewable fuel
mixtures, and provides a tax credit for battery electric or hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty vehicles. Electric trucks are still more expensive
than diesel trucks, and some states, like California and Texas have had issues with their power grids, which have affected electric vehicles.
Tradition will need to monitor the price of tractors and fuel to determine whether electric trucks will be practical for its use in the
near future.
President Biden also has indicated an intention
to make substantial changes to the current U.S. tax laws during his administration, including changes to the way capital gains are treated.
Any changes to U.S. tax laws may have an adverse impact on Tradition's business and profitability.
The United States Mexico Canada Agreement ("USMCA")
was entered into effect in July 2020. The USMCA is designed to modernize food and agriculture trade, advance rules of origin for automobiles
and trucks, and enhance intellectual property protections, among other matters, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
It is difficult to predict at this stage what could be the impact of the USMCA on the economy, including the transportation industry.
However, given the amount of North American trade that moves by truck, it could have a significant impact on supply and demand in the
transportation industry, and could adversely impact the amount, movement and patterns of freight Tradition transports.
The IIJA was signed into law by President Biden
in November 2021. The roughly $1.2 trillion bill contains an estimated $550 billion in new spending, which will impact transportation.
In particular, it dedicates more than $100 billion for surface transportation networks and roughly $66 billion for freight and passenger
rail operations. Among provisions in the law specific to trucking is the aforementioned apprenticeship program for drivers younger than
21 to eventually qualify to drive commercial trucks in interstate commerce. It remains unclear how the IIJA will be implemented into and
effect Tradition's industry. The IIJA may result in increased compliance and implementation related expenses, which could have a negative
impact on Tradition's operations.
Given COVID-19's considerable effect on Tradition's
industry, the FMCSA issued and/or extended various temporary responsive measures throughout the year. Although, to date, these measures
have largely been enacted in order to assist industry participants in operating under adverse circumstances, any further responsive measures
remain unclear and could have a negative impact on Tradition's operations.
In November 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor's
Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") published an emergency temporary standard (the "Emergency Rule")
requiring all employers with at least 100 employees to ensure that their employees are fully vaccinated or require any employees who remain
unvaccinated to produce a negative COVID-19 test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. The Emergency Rule has been
blocked by the Supreme Court. Effective January 2022, the U.S. is prohibiting unvaccinated foreigners from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border
and U.S.-Canada border. Furthermore, effective January 2022, Canada is prohibiting unvaccinated foreigners, including U.S. citizens, from
crossing their border. These border requirements, as well as any future vaccination, testing or mask mandates that are allowed to go into
effect, could, among other things, (i) cause Tradition's unvaccinated employees to go to smaller employers, if such employers are not
subject to future mandates, or leave Tradition or the trucking industry, especially Tradition's unvaccinated drivers, (ii) result in logistical
issues, increased expenses, and operational issues from arranging for weekly tests of Tradition's unvaccinated employees, especially its
unvaccinated drivers, (iii) result in increased costs for recruiting and retention of drivers, as well as the cost of weekly testing,
and (iv) result in decreased revenue if Tradition is unable to recruit and retain drivers. Any vaccination, testing or mask mandates that
are interpreted as applying to drivers would significantly reduce the pool of drivers available to Tradition and its industry, which would
further impact the extreme shortage of available drivers. Accordingly, any vaccination, testing or mask mandates, if allowed to go into
effect, could have a material adverse effect on Tradition's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Seasonality
In the trucking industry, revenue has historically
decreased as customers reduce shipments following the winter holiday season and as inclement weather impedes operations. At the same time,
operating expenses have generally increased, with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and weather, causing more physical
damage equipment repairs and insurance claims and costs. For the reasons stated, first quarter results historically have been lower than
results in each of the other three quarters of the year. Over the past several years, Tradition has seen increases in demand at varying
times, including surges between Thanksgiving and the year-end holiday season.
Manufacturing
As described above in “EDSCO Purchase and
Sale,” Tradition's wholly owned subsidiary, Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC, is a manufacturer of bolts, nuts, and fasteners,
and creates custom plates, cages, and embeds. Most of Tradition's customers are in the construction and manufacturing markets. The construction
market includes general, electrical, plumbing, sheet metal, and road contractors. Tradition is not reliant on any number of customers.
The manufacturing market includes both original equipment manufacturers and maintenance and repair operations. This business is highly
competitive. Competitors include both large distributors located primarily in large cities and smaller distributors located in cities
throughout the United States. Tradition believes that the principal competitive factors affecting the markets for its products are customer
service and convenience. Tradition is not reliant on any single vendor. This is not a seasonal business.
PROPERTIES
Properties Leased by Our Company
We maintain our principal executive office at 2180
North Park Ave, Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32789, which is leased to us by Obduro, LLC. Obduro, LLC is owned by our Chief Executive Officer,
President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director, Stephen W. Carnes. The monthly rent for this office space is $2,000.00 per month. The space
is a shared office space, which at the current time is suitable for the conduct of our business.
Properties Owned by Tradition
Tradition currently owns the following property:
959 Growth Parkway, Angola, Indiana 46703
Tradition acquired this property, otherwise known as the Angola
Maintenance Facility, on April 22, 2022 for $800,000. The Angola Maintenance Facility is comprised of approximately 2 acres of land and
11,250 square feet of maintenance facility and offices. The maintenance structure is a pole frame building constructed approximately 22
years ago. This property is primarily utilized by the Freight Transportation and Equipment Leasing segments of Tradition's business.
Properties Leased by Tradition
Tradition currently leases the following properties.
1175 Collins Road, Greenwood, Indiana 46143
Otherwise known as the Greenwood Warehouse. This property is
comprised of 584,820 square feet of warehouse and office space. The property is leased for a term of three years commencing on June 1,
2022 and expiring on June 30, 2025. The base monthly rent rate for the first year is $236,364.75, the second year is $245,819.34, and
the third year is $255,652.11. This property is primarily utilized by the Warehouse Leasing segment of Tradition's business.
210 South Progress Drive, Kendallville, Indiana
46755
This property is comprised of 41,843 of bolt and fastener manufacturing/industrial
manufacturing and warehouse space. The property is leased for a term of three years commencing on October 1, 2022 and expiring on September
30, 2025. The base monthly rent rate for the first year is $12,204.21, the second year is $13,075.94, and the third year is $13,947.67.
This property will primarily be used for the manufacturing of anchor bolts and special type fasteners.
300 Growth Parkway, Angola, Indiana 46703
Otherwise known as the Angola Office. This property is comprised
of 135,500 square feet of warehouse space and office areas. The initial lease for the Angola Office was entered into June 20, 2016. This
lease has been renewed and extended the term of the lease to expire April 30, 2024. The base monthly rent is $11,493.30. This property
is primarily utilized by the Fright Transportation, Warehouse Leasing, Equipment Leasing, and Brokerage Services segments of Tradition's
business.
3000 Tremont Road, Savannah, Chatham County,
Georgia 31405
Otherwise known as the Savannah Port Facility. This property
is comprised of approximately 25 acres and a 311,265 square feet building. This location is less than 4 miles from the port and will operate
customary warehousing, transloading (taking cargo from the shipping container and placing it into a trailer), drayage (moving the shipping
containers from the port to the warehouse for transloading), shipping container storage, and (once repair and maintenance completed, which
are in process) rail. The property is leased for a term of five years commencing on May 1, 2022 and expiring on April 30, 2027. The base
monthly rent rate for the first year is $155,633.00, the second year is $161,080.00, the third year is $166,717.00, the fourth year is
$172,553.00, and the fifth year is $178,592.00. This property is primarily utilized by the Fright Transportation, Warehouse Leasing, and
Brokerage Services segments of Tradition's business.
333 South Franklin Road, Indianapolis, Indiana
46219
Otherwise known as the Franklin Office. This property is comprised
of approximately 25 acres and 389,319 square feet of warehouse and office space, 8,609 square feet of truck terminal space, and approximately
10,467 of maintenance facility space. The property will be leased for a term of 84 months, the warehouse and office space commencing on
December 1, 2022, the truck terminal and maintenance space commencing prior to July 1, 2023, and expiring on July 31, 2028. The base monthly
rent rate for the first year is $126,528.68, the second year is $136,131.67, the third year is $144,639.90, the fourth year is $149,523.62,
the fifth year is $154,578.27, the sixth year is $159,809.84, and the seventh year is 165,224.51. This property is primarily utilized
by the Warehouse Leasing and Brokerage Services segments of Tradition's business.
6644 Old River Road North, Statesboro, Bulloch
County, Georgia
Otherwise known as the Statesboro Warehouse. This property
is comprised of approximately 146.84 acres and a 283,644 square feet building of warehouse space and offices. Tradition has leased 100,000
sq. ft. and is currently in discussions to increase the amount of space leased. The property is leased for a term of three years commencing
on April 1, 2022 and expiring on March 31, 2023. The base monthly rent rate is $81,515.54. This property is primarily utilized by the
Warehouse Leasing segments of Tradition's business.
6887 West 350 North, Greenfield, Indiana 46140
Otherwise known as the Greenfield Fulfillment Center. This
property is comprised of approximately 432,000 square feet of warehouse space and offices. The property is leased for a term of three
years. The lease commenced on June 10, 2021, and expires on April 30, 2023. Rent began to accrue on July 1, 2021. The base monthly rent
rate is $144,000.00. This property is primarily utilized by the Fright Transportation, Warehouse Leasing, and Brokerage Services segments
of Tradition's business.
Suite 1502, 110 East Wayne Street, Fort Wayne,
Indiana 46802
Otherwise known as the Freedom Office. This property is comprised
of 3,233 square feet of office space. The Freedom Office is an expansion of the freight brokerage activities presently being undertaken
at the Franklin Office. The property is leased for a term of three years. The initial lease term started on November 15, 2021. The was
extended. The extension commenced on May 16, 2022, and expires on May 15, 2023. The base monthly rent rate is $50,111.50. This property
is primarily utilized by the Fright Transportation, Warehouse Leasing, Equipment Leasing, and Brokerage Services segments of Tradition's
business.
Suite 1503, 110 East Wayne Street, Fort Wayne,
Indiana 46802
Otherwise known as FWAO. This property is comprised of 2,652
square feet of office space. The FWAO is used for relocated accounting and payroll personnel, driver recruitment personnel, and human
resources. The property is leased for a term of three years. The lease commenced on June 1, 2022, and expires on May 31, 2023. The fixed
price per month of the rent is $3,425.50. This property is primarily utilized by the Fright Transportation segment of Tradition's business.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Recent Legal Proceedings Involving Our Company
Aqua Power Systems Inc., a Nevada Corporation
– (Petition of SMALL CAP COMPLIANCE, LLC) (“Custodianship”). On October 19, 2020, Small Cap Compliance, LLC
filed its motion to serve as custodian of the Company; it was not a shareholder of the Company on the aforementioned date.
On December 1, 2020, the Eight Judicial District
Court of Nevada entered an order approving the appointment of Small Cap Compliance, LLC as custodian of the Company, authorizing and directing
it to, among other things, take any action reasonable, prudent and for the benefit of the Company, including reinstating the Company under
Nevada law, appointing officers and convening a meeting of stockholders. (Small Cap Compliance, LLC and the Company entered into a Custodian
Services Agreement on December 1, 2020, which set forth the duties of Small Cap Compliance, LLC)
On December 7, 2020, Small Cap Compliance, LLC
filed a Certificate of Reinstatement for the Company, thereby reinstating the Company, appointed Stephen W. Carnes as the sole officer
and director of the Company, and amended the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of one million shares
of Series B Preferred stock. The aforementioned were approved, and Stephen W. Carnes was elected as the sole director and the sole executive
officer, at a meeting of the shareholders on January 4, 2021.
On January 1, 2021, Small Cap Compliance, LLC filed
a Motion to Terminate Custodianship.
On March 3, 2021, the Eight Judicial District Court
of Nevada entered an order approving Small Cap Compliance, LLC’s actions, without prejudice to the claims of interested parties
as to dilution of their interest, terminated Small Cap Compliance, LLC’s custodianship of the Company, and discharged Small Cap
Compliance as custodian of the Company.
In re: AQUA POWER SYSTEMS INC., a Nevada
Corporation, (Application of Stephen W. Carnes) (“Receivership”). On January 28, 2021, Stephen W. Carnes filed an
application with the Eight District Court of Nevada to be appointed as the Receiver of the Company and requested that the Court Order
written proof of claim from all Claimants and Creditors of the Company as a reasonable and necessary step toward rehabilitating our insolvency.
On March 1, 2021, the Eighth Judicial District
Court of Nevada ordered that Stephen W. Carnes be appointed “Receiver” of the Company, with the authority to rehabilitate
the Company by, including but not limited to, collecting the debts and property due and belonging to the Company, to compromise and settle
with the debtors and creditors of the Company, to prosecute and defend lawsuits in the name of the Company, to do all other acts as might
be done by the Com, to do all other acts as may be reasonable and necessary to continue the business of the Company, and to appoint agents
for the exercise of these duties.
On March 1, 2021, the Eighth Judicial District
Court of Nevada ordered that all claimants and creditors of the Company had sixty (60) days, from March 1, 2021, to submit written proof
of claim to the receiver.
On May 3, 2021, Claimant Graham Taylor submitted
claims on behalf of himself, Heng Hong Investment, and Puriwanto Handoko.
On June 28, 2021, Receiver filed a motion to shorten
time and a motion to bar asserted claims and unasserted claims.
On August 5, 2021, the Eighth Judicial District
Court of Nevada ordered that all claimants and creditors of the Company are barred from participating in the distribution of assets of
the Company which arose on or before August 6, 2021 (Notice of entry of the Order). No appeal was filed by the claimants within the timeframe
for an appeal.
On October 4, 2021, filed a Motion to Terminate
the Receivership and a hearing was set for November 8, 2021, regarding the Company’s Motion to Terminate the Receivership. At the
hearing, on November 8, 2021, the Company’s Motion to Terminate the Receivership was granted.
On November 9, 2021, the Eighth Judicial District
Court of Nevada ordered the Receivership Terminated.
AQUA POWER SYSTEMS INC. v. SILVERTON SA,
INC. On May 4, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit for declaratory relief, seeking an order declaring void 6,330,138 shares of common
stock of the Company held by Silverton SA, Inc., which was administratively dissolved July 9, 2018, in book entry with the Company’s
transfer agent, which were not acquired by any consideration.
On August 23, 2021, the Company moved for an entry
of default for Silverton SA, Inc.’s failure to appear or serve any papers as required by law. On September 15, 2021, the Company
filed a Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgement for failure to appear, file any responsive pleading or paper in this action, or otherwise
assert any defense to this action as required by law.
On September 22, 2021, the Circuit Court of the
Ninth Judicial Circuit of Orange County, Florida ruled that the Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgement was granted and the Court
declared the 6,330,138 shares of common stock in the Company issued to [Silverton SA, Inc.] on or about October 7, 2015, held in Book
Entry, void and cancelled.
AQUA POWER SYSTEMS INC. v. PARAMOUNT TRADING
COMPANY INC. On May 4, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit for declaratory relief, seeking an order declaring void 2,690,000 shares
of common stock of the Company held by Paramount Trading Company (“PTC”), a defunct company, in book entry with the Company’s
transfer agent, which were not acquired by any consideration.
On August 23, 2021, the Company moved for an entry
of default for failure to appear or serve any papers as required by law. On September 15, 2021, the Company filed a Motion for Entry of
Default Final Judgement for failure to appear, file any responsive pleading or paper in this action, or otherwise assert any defense to
this action as required by law.
On September 24, 2021, the Circuit Court of the
Ninth Judicial Circuit of Orange County, Florida ruled that the Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgement was granted and the Court
declared the 2,690,000 shares of common stock in APSI issued to PTC, over two transactions, on or about October 1, 2015 and on or about
July 14, 2017, held in Book Entry, void and cancelled.
AQUA POWER SYSTEMS INC. v. TADASHI ISHIKAWA.
On November 5, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit for declaratory relief, seeking an order cancel 32,942,624 shares of common stock of
the Company held by Tadashi Ishikawa, as he had not provided consideration for his shares nor complied with his obligations to the Company,
in book entry with the Company’s transfer agent, which were not acquired by any consideration. This complaint was refiled on December
10, 2021 with a required general standing case management plan/order.
On March 7, 2022, the Company filed a Motion for
Default for failure to appear.
On April 27, 2022, the Clerk of Court entered a default for Tadashi Ishikawa’s failure to respond.
On April 28, 2022, the Company filed a Motion for
Entry of Default Judgement Final.
On May 19, 2022, the Circuit Court of the Ninth
Judicial Circuit of Orange County, Florida granted the Company’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Final against Tadashi Ishikawa
and declared that the 32,942,624 shares of common stock void and cancelled.
Tradition’s Recent Legal Proceedings
Tradition is involved in various litigation and
claims primarily arising in the normal course of business, which include claims for personal injury or property damage incurred in the
transportation of freight. Tradition retains insurance for liability, physical damage and cargo damage in amounts that management considers
to be adequate. Based on its knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, advice of outside counsel, management believes the resolution
of claims and pending litigation, will not have a materially adverse effect on APSI or Tradition.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statement
The following discussion
and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements and related notes, beginning on page F-1 of this Offering
Circular.
Our actual results may
differ materially from those anticipated in the following discussion, as a result of a variety of risks and uncertainties, including
those described under Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors. We assume no obligation to update any
of the forward-looking statements included herein.
Basis of the Following Discussion
Our acquisition of Tradition
on December 27, 2022, is reflected in the discussion and analysis below and is presented on a comparative basis to reflect the financial
statement presentation included herein (beginning on page F-1), which means:
| · | For
periods prior to the acquisition of Tradition, the Company is referred to as the Predecessor. |
| · | For
periods after the acquisition, the Company is referred to as the Successor. |
| · | Due
to the Tradition acquisition and the application of push-down accounting, different bases
of accounting have been used to prepare the Predecessor and Successor financial statements. |
| · | A
black line separates the Predecessor and Successor financial statement excerpts to highlight
the lack of comparability between these two periods. |
Results of Operations
The tables below are taken
from our Statement of Operations. The results shown in the “Predecessor” columns are the historical operating results of
Tradition, prior to its being acquired by our company.
The results shown in the
column under “Successor” for the six months ended June 30, 2023, are the first full-period operating results of our company
following the December 27, 2022, acquisition of Tradition.
The discussions below
that relate to the year ended December 31, 2022, of the Predecessor include the period from December 28, 2022, through December 31, 2022,
of the Successor (the “Successor 3-Day Period”). Management believes this presentation will assist in better understanding
our company’s historical operating results, including those of Tradition.
All of the information
presented in the tables below is unaudited.
Income/Loss From
Operations.
| |
PREDECESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | |
| |
Year
Ended December
31, 2021 | | |
January
1, 2022, to December
27, 2022 | | |
December
28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 | | |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2022 | | |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2023 | |
Revenue | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Freight Contracts | |
$ | 45,563,535 | | |
$ | 41,978,251 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 23,618,732 | | |
$ | 15,941,268 | |
Brokerage Service | |
| 30,336,204 | | |
| 43,876,910 | | |
| – | | |
| 24,843,500 | | |
| 17,940,651 | |
Equipment Leases | |
| 5,196,017 | | |
| 4,970,822 | | |
| – | | |
| 3,357,003 | | |
| 4,076,276 | |
Equipment Rental | |
| 1,738,552 | | |
| 1,514,530 | | |
| – | | |
| 834,959 | | |
| 575,294 | |
Warehouse Leases | |
| 7,762,131 | | |
| 18,189,060 | | |
| – | | |
| 6,859,924 | | |
| 4,873,083 | |
Fuel Surcharge | |
| 3,814,933 | | |
| 5,570,498 | | |
| – | | |
| 2,775,989 | | |
| 2,207,326 | |
Fastener | |
| – | | |
| 1,917,112 | | |
| – | | |
| 728,454 | | |
| 1,231,139 | |
Transactional Accessory
Income | |
| 1,046,143 | | |
| 476,413 | | |
| – | | |
| 241,963 | | |
| 466,490 | |
Total Revenue | |
| 95,457,515 | | |
| 118,493,595 | | |
| – | | |
| 63,260,524 | | |
| 47,311,528 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of Revenue | |
| 79,761,364 | | |
| 101,379,721 | | |
| – | | |
| 53,257,680 | | |
| 42,003,734 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit | |
| 15,696,151 | | |
| 17,113,874 | | |
| – | | |
| 10,002,844 | | |
| 5,307,795 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating Expenses | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
General & administrative expenses | |
| 8,647,360 | | |
| 10,129,391 | | |
| 127,179 | | |
| 3,430,720 | | |
| 5,493,139 | |
Depreciation expense | |
| 2,863,490 | | |
| 2,827,901 | | |
| – | | |
| 1,615,611 | | |
| 2,252,171 | |
Total Operating Expenses | |
| 11,510,850 | | |
| 12,957,292 | | |
| 127,179 | | |
| 5,046,330 | | |
| 7,745,310 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income (Loss) from Operations | |
| 4,185,301 | | |
| 4,156,582 | | |
| (127,179 | ) | |
| 4,956,514 | | |
| (2,437,515 | ) |
INCOME (LOSS)
FROM OPERATIONS: SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 AND 2022
Revenue.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023 (the “Interim Successor Period”), there occurred a significant reduction in revenues
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022 (the “Interim Predecessor Period”). For the Successor Period, total revenue
was $47,311,528 (unaudited) compared to total revenue of $63,260,524 (unaudited) for the Predecessor Period. This 25% reduction in total
revenue is primarily attributable to a reduction in freight contracts, brokerage services and warehouse leases.
Cost
of Revenue. For the Interim Successor Period, the cost of revenue was $42,003,734 (unaudited), or approximately 89% of total revenue.
For the Interim Predecessor Period, the cost of revenue was $53,257,680 (unaudited), or approximately 84% of total revenue. The higher
percentage of cost of revenues for the Interim Successor Period is primarily due to a three point increase in carrier pay, a one point
increase in fuel and fuel taxes, and three point increase in salaries and wages, a two point increase in insurance, and a three point
increase in equipment rental and lease costs.
Gross
Profit. For the Interim Successor Period, the gross profit was $5,307,795 (unaudited). For the Interim Predecessor Period, the gross
profit was $10,002,844 (unaudited).
Operating
Expenses. For the Interim Successor Period, operating expenses were $7,745,310 (unaudited), comprised of $5,493,139 (unaudited) in
general and administrative expenses and $2,252,171 (unaudited) in depreciation expense. For the Interim Predecessor Period, operating
expenses were $5,046,330 (unaudited), comprised of $3,430,720 (unaudited) in general and administrative expenses and $1,615,611 (unaudited)
in depreciation expense.
The
increase in general and administrative expenses from the Interim Predecessor Period to the Interim Successor Period is attributable primarily
to our increase in building rental costs as a result of a new warehouse additions in Greenwood, Indiana, Kendallville, Indiana, Savannah,
Georgia, Indianapolis, Indiana, and Stateboro, Georgia, in addition to standard lease escalations.
The
increase in depreciation expense from the Interim Predecessor Period to the Interim Successor Period is attributable primarily to the
additional machinery and equipment being depreciated as a result of the assets acquired in the EDESCO acquisition.
Income
(Loss) from Operations. For the Interim Predecessor Period, there was income from operations of $4,956,514 (unaudited), compared
to the Interim Successor Period when there was a loss from operations of $2,437,515 (unaudited). Higher costs of revenue and higher operating
expenses coupled with a reduction in total revenue resulted in a net loss from operations for the Interim Successor Period.
INCOME (LOSS)
FROM OPERATIONS: YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND 2021
Revenue.
For the year ended December 31, 2022 (including the Successor 3-Day Period) (“Predecessor FY 2022”), total revenue was $118,493,595
(unaudited) compared to total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“Predecessor FY 2021) of $95,457,515 (unaudited).
Cost
of Revenue. For Predecessor FY 2022, the cost of revenue was $101,379,721 (unaudited), or approximately 85.6% of total revenue. For
Predecessor FY 2021, the cost of revenue was $79,761,364 (unaudited), or approximately 83.6% of total revenue. The higher percentage
of cost of revenues for Predecessor FY 2022 is primarily due to a five point increase in carrier pay, a one point increase in fuel and
fuel taxes, and one point increase in salaries and wages, a one point increase in equipment rental and lease costs, while to cost of
diver wages decreased seven points as a percentage of revenue but stayed constant in terms of dollars.
Gross
Profit. For Predecessor FY 2022, the gross profit was $17,113,874 (unaudited). For Predecessor FY 2021, the gross profit was $15,696,151
(unaudited).
Operating
Expenses. For Predecessor FY 2022, operating expenses were $12,957,292 (unaudited), comprised of $10,129,391 (unaudited) in general
and administrative expenses and $2,827,901 (unaudited) in depreciation expense. For Predecessor FY 2021, operating expenses were $11,501,850
(unaudited), comprised of $8,647,360 (unaudited) in general and administrative expenses and $2,863,490 (unaudited) in depreciation expense.
The
increase in general and administrative expenses from Predecessor FY 2021 to Predecessor FY 2022 is attributable primarily to the higher
business activity associated with an increase in total revenue.
Income
(Loss) from Operations. For Predecessor FY 2022, there was income from operations of $4,156,582 (unaudited), compared to Predecessor
FY 2021 when there was income from operations of $4,185,301 (unaudited).
Other
Income (Expense).
| |
PREDECESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | |
| |
Year
Ended December
31, 2021 | | |
January
1, 2022, to December
27, 2022 | | |
December
28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 | | |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2022 | | |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2023 | |
Other Income (Expense) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| (941,273 | ) | |
| (1,065,573 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (348,179 | ) | |
| (958,621 | ) |
Gain (loss) on equipment sale/disposal | |
| 270,481 | | |
| 1,527,260 | | |
| – | | |
| 333,221 | | |
| 1,548,002 | |
Fuel rebates | |
| 612,010 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Other income | |
| 8,426 | | |
| 25,631 | | |
| | | |
| 100 | | |
| – | |
Other expenses | |
| – | | |
| (65,000 | ) | |
| (14,840 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Total Other Income (Expense) | |
| (50,356 | ) | |
| 422,317 | | |
| (14,840 | ) | |
| (14,857 | ) | |
| 589,381 | |
OTHER INCOME
(EXPENSE): SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 AND 2022
Other
Income (Expense). For the Interim Successor Period, total other income was $589,381 (unaudited), which was comprised of gain on equipment
sale/disposal of $1,548,002 (unaudited) that was offset by interest expense of $958,621 (unaudited). For the Interim Predecessor Period,
total other expense was $14,857 (unaudited), which was comprised of gain on equipment sale/disposal of $333,221 (unaudited) and other
income of $100 (unaudited) that was offset by interest expense of $348,179 (unaudited).
The
increase in gain on equipment sale/disposal from the Interim Predecessor Period to the Interim Successor Period is attributable primarily
to the standard practice of de-fleeting older assets.
The
significant increase in interest expense from the Interim Predecessor Period to the Interim Successor Period is attributable to our increased
debt level, which results in higher debt servicing cost. Our inability to pay down debt as rapidly as in the past is attributable primarily
to our increased cost (as a result of growth) and lower profitability.
OTHER INCOME
(EXPENSE): YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND 2021
Other
Income (Expense). For Predecessor FY 2022, total other income was $422,317 (unaudited), which was comprised of gain on equipment
sale/disposal of $1,527,260 (unaudited) and other income of $25,631 (unaudited) that was offset by interest expense of $1,065,573 (unaudited)
and other expenses of $65,000 (unaudited). For Predecessor FY 2021, total other expense was $50,356 (unaudited), which was comprised
of gain on equipment sale/disposal of $270,481 (unaudited), fuel rebates of $612,010 (unaudited) and other income of $8,426 (unaudited)
that was offset by interest expense of $941,273 (unaudited).
Net
Income (Loss).
| |
PREDECESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | |
| |
Year
Ended December
31, 2021 | | |
January
1, 2022, to December
27, 2022 | | |
December
28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 | | |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2022 | | |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2023 | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | |
| 4,134,945 | | |
| 4,578,899 | | |
| (142,019 | ) | |
| 4,941,656 | | |
| (1,848,135 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Provision for Income Taxes | |
| (1,148,000 | ) | |
| (1,272,000 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | |
$ | 2,986,945 | | |
$ | 3,306,899 | | |
$ | (142,019 | ) | |
$ | 4,941,656 | | |
$ | (1,848,135 | ) |
NET INCOME (LOSS):
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 AND 2022
Net
Income (Loss). The net loss for the Interim Successor Period was $1,848,135 (unaudited), which represents a significant deterioration
in operating results from the Interim Predecessor Period, when net income was $4,941,656 (unaudited). The deterioration in operating
results from the Interim Predecessor Period to the Interim Successor Period is attributable to reduced revenues against a relative increase
in cost of revenue and an increase in operating expenses. For the remainder of 2023, management expects that Successor operating results
will continue to reflect lower margins as a result of a slowdown in our growth and an increase in our debt, debt servicing costs, and
increase operating expenses. Management endeavors to negotiate more favorable terms with debtors as well as identify new resources to
assist with the restructuring of debt, which will in the long-run assist in mitigating losses and lead to profitability.
NET INCOME (LOSS):
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 AND 2021
Net Income (Loss). The net income
for Predecessor FY 2022 was $3,306,899 (unaudited), compared Predecessor FY 2021, when net income was $2,986,945 (unaudited).
Plan of Operation
We believe that the proceeds
of this offering will satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
With the proceeds of this
offering, we intend to improve our financial position through the repayment and/or restructuring of certain of our current third-party
loans. The capacity to cause such changes in our debt structure is expected to significantly improve our liquidity as it relates to cash
available for our operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
June
30, 2023. At June 30, 2023, the Successor had $218,779 (unaudited) in cash and a working capital deficit of $11,256,573 (unaudited),
compared to $487,560 (unaudited) in cash and a working capital deficit of $10,816,136 (unaudited) at December 31, 2022. We have sufficient
working capital to fund current operating expenses at least through the first quarter of 2024. To the extent we require additional funds
beyond the first quarter of 2024 and more than 12 months from the date hereof, we will need to obtain additional debt or equity-based
capital from third parties, including in this offering, to continue our operations. There is no assurance that we will be successful
in obtaining such additional capital.
As of June 30, 2023, Tradition
had the following indebtedness:
Installment notes payable to various financial
institutions bearing interest ranging from 3.75% to 6.99%; payable in various monthly installments through October 2029, secured
by guarantees of certain shareholders and related entities, and collateralized by related equipment with a net book value of $10,031,281
at June 30, 2023. | |
$ | 13,160,552 | |
Installment notes for acquisition of stock in Tradition;
payable in 16 quarterly installments aggregating $1,603,786 including interest at 3%; secured by assignment and pledge of stock in
Tradition Transportation Group. | |
| 12,185,327 | |
Installment notes for acquisition of stock in Tradition;
payable in 16 quarterly installments aggregating $1,603,786 including interest at 3%; secured by assignment and pledge of stock in
Tradition Transportation Group. | |
| 24,092,038 | |
Installment note for acquisition of Tradition; payable
in full upon repayment of installment notes above for acquisition of Tradition; non-interest bearing and unsecured. | |
| 1,731,421 | |
Installment notes payable to shareholder, bearing interest
at 10%, principal and interest due June 2023. | |
| 244,940 | |
Installment note for redemption
of Tradition stock; payable in monthly installments of $34,167 beginning February 2023 through January 2028 unsecured. | |
| 2,050,000 | |
| |
| 53,464,278 | |
Less unamortized debt issuance costs | |
| (286,220 | ) |
Current maturities of long-term
debt | |
| (9,105,783 | ) |
| |
$ | 44,072,275 | |
December
31, 2022. At December 31, 2022, the Successor had $487,560 (unaudited) in cash and a working capital deficit of $10,816,136 (unaudited),
compared to $68,185 (unaudited) in cash and working capital of $2,457,247 (unaudited) of the Predecessor at December 31, 2021.
Capital Expenditures
We
expect to make capital expenditures during the next 12 months, depending on availability of capital with which to do so. The amount of
any such expenditures cannot be predicted.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
There are no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations are based upon our audited financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We continually evaluate our estimates, including those related to income taxes, and the valuation of equity transactions. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Any future changes to these estimates and assumptions could cause a material change to our reported amounts of revenues, expenses,
assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the financial statements. Estimates are based on historical experience, management expectations for future performance, and
other assumptions as appropriate. Key areas affected by estimates include the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, which
is based on such factors as estimated future cash flows. We re-evaluate estimates on an ongoing basis; therefore, actual results may vary
from those estimates.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the fair values of these instruments due to their short-term nature. The carrying amount
for borrowings under the financing agreement approximates fair value because of the variable market interest rates charged for these borrowings.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND
CONTROL PERSONS
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information
concerning our company’s executive management.
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
|
Robert D. Morris |
|
47 |
|
Chief Executive Officer, Executive Director |
|
|
Joseph M. Davis |
|
42 |
|
President, Treasurer and Director |
|
|
Stephen W. Carnes |
|
59 |
|
Secretary and Director |
|
Our directors serve until a successor is elected
and qualified. Our officers are elected by the Board of Directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until their successor(s) is duly
elected and qualified, or until they are removed from office. There exist no family relationships among our officers and directors.
Certain information regarding the backgrounds of
each of our officers and directors is set forth below.
Robert D. Morris. Robert Morris was appointed
to the board of directors on April 27, 2022 and joined the board, effective, May 1, 2022. Mr. Morris is a graduate of Indiana University
(Bloomington) and has served as a State Representative in the Indiana House of Representatives since 2010. In the Indiana House of Representatives,
Mr. Morris serves on the following committees: Commerce, Small Business and Economic Development (Chairman), Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications,
Roads, and Transportation. In 1998, Mr. Morris created MFE, Inc., DBA Healthkick Nutrition Centers, a chain of health supplement centers,
based in Fort Wayne Indiana. Since its creation, Mr. Morris has overseen all aspects of operations for Healthkick Nutrition Centers.
Joseph M. Davis. Mr. Davis assumed the role
of director of Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., and Chief Operations Officer at Tradition Transportation Company, LLC, a subsidiary
of Tradition, in April 2019 following the merger between Tradition Transportation Group Inc. and Merica Logistics. Mr. Davis was a founder
of Merica Logistics and served as the CEO of the company from 2015-2019. Mr. Davis got his start in the transportation industry in 1999
by helping the Evans Equipment Company implement a TMS system.
Since then, Mr. Davis has held several different
positions within the industry including dispatch operations, load planning, accounting, and management. Mr. Davis served as the Operations
Manager at Bohren Logistics from 2010-2014 before moving into the role of Chief Operations Officer with Tradition.
Currently, Mr. Davis oversees all asset operations
with the goal of optimizing the process to generate maximum revenue for Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. while maintaining the highest
safety standards possible.
Stephen W. Carnes. Since December 2020,
Mr. Carnes, currently our Secretary, has served variously as our Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director.
Since January 2017, Mr. Carnes has owned a company, Obduro, LLC, in which he provides management consulting services to companies to facilitate
growth. Since July 2014, he has also owned Powcar Properties, LLC, where he acts as a landlord for rental properties. Since January 2023,
Mr. Carnes has served as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and a Director of Tocca Life Holdings, Inc. (trading
symbol: TLIF), a Winter Park, Florida-based operator of rock climbing facilities, and, since March 2023, he has served as CEO and Director
of GEMZ Corp. NV, a Winter Park, Florida-based conversion container manufacturing company (trading symbol: GMZP). Mr. Carnes earned a
B.S. degree in Business Administration from Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Key Employees
Timothy E. Evans. Timothy E. Evans is the
President and CEO, and a director of Tradition. Mr. Evans served as president of operations of the Evans Companies, from 2003 until 2014.
He was dispatch operations manager (2001 – 03), sales manager (1998 – 2001), and general manager of sales and service (1992
– 2004). Mr. Evans served as a director of the Evans Companies from 2009 until the Celadon transaction.
Mr. Evans has been involved in the transportation
and warehousing industry for nearly 30 years, devoting his efforts primarily to operations, maintenance and repair, equipment, and safety,
and estimating. He has held a Commercial Driver’s License for more than 20 years and is experienced in all aspects of truck operations.
The Evans Companies had been qualified as an associate dealer and service center for International-Navistar.
James L. Evans. James L. Evans is the Vice
President and a director of Tradition. Mr. Evans was president and CEO of the Evans Companies since June 2007. He has been a member of
the board of directors of the central operating company since 2009.
Prior to his selection as president and CEO, Mr.
Evans established warehousing and logistics as a division of the Evans Companies, overseeing expansion to nearly 300,000 square feet of
warehousing space. Mr. Evans previously served as president of logistics (1998 – present, having merged into the CEO role), and
as an agent of Great American Lines (1985 – 1998).
Mr. Evans has been involved in the transportation,
logistics, and warehousing industry for more than 30 years, expanding the warehousing and logistics divisions into significant contributors
to the overall growth and stability of the Evans Companies. He has held a Commercial Driver’s License for more than 20 years and
is experienced in all aspects of truck operations, including Evans Companies’ qualification as an associate dealer and service center
for International-Navistar.
Mr. Evans received his associate degree from Lincoln
Tech, Indianapolis, in 1983.
Joseph J. Montel. Joseph J. Montel is the
Corporate Secretary, General Counsel, and a director of Tradition. Mr. Montel has been an attorney since 1993, and is licensed in Indiana
and Ohio, with Georgia pending. Mr. Montel has nearly 30-years of experience in transportation, banking, corporate, securities, and real
estate. He also teaches Regulation of Financial Institutions as an Adjunct Professor at the Indiana University, Robert H. McKinney, School
of Law.
Ownership and management experience includes other
transportation and supply-chain corporations, financial services enterprises, including a national bank and bank holding company, complex
environmental development companies (federal, state, and local permitting), and construction firms. Multiple business platforms developed
by Mr. Montel have been copywritten and/or patented. Federal regulators consented to his appointment as President and CEO of a troubled
financial institution which he successfully resolved without FDIC intervention.
Joseph J. Montel has been the sole shareholder
of The Montel Law Firm, P.C., since 2002 (following his tenure at Krieg DeVault, LLP). The Montel Law Firm generally limits its representation
to matters relating to financial regulations and structures, cannabis and crypto-asset law and compliance, contracts, and general corporate.
Mr. Montel is a court approved expert witness, and has provided testimony in areas of banking and SBA lending.
Mr. Montel was appointed by the Governor to serve
on the Indiana Business Law Survey Commission, and has continuously served the Commission for more than 20 years. He received a federal
appointment to the US Small Business Administration Regulatory Fairness Board, Region V, and served three full 3-year terms (2004-2013).
Mr. Montel received his Bachelor of Arts from Purdue
University in 1990. He obtained his juris doctorate from the Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis in 1993, and was a
member of the Indiana International & Comparative Law Review.
Conflicts of Interest
At the present time, we do not foresee any direct
conflict between our officers and directors, their other business interests and their involvement in our company.
Corporate Governance and Director Independence
Our Board has not established any committees, including
an audit committee, a compensation committee or a nominating committee, or any committee performing a similar function. The functions
of those committees are being undertaken by our Board. Because we do not have any independent directors, our Board believes that the establishment
of committees of our Board would not provide any benefits to our company and could be considered more form than substance.
We do not have a policy regarding the consideration
of any director candidates that may be recommended by our stockholders, including the minimum qualifications for director candidates,
nor have our officers and directors established a process for identifying and evaluating director nominees. We have not adopted a policy
regarding the handling of any potential recommendation of director candidates by our stockholders, including the procedures to be followed.
Our officers and directors have not considered or adopted any of these policies as we have never received a recommendation from any shareholder
for any candidate to serve on our Board of Directors.
Given our relative size and lack of directors’
and officers’ insurance coverage, we do not anticipate that any of our shareholders will make such a recommendation in the near
future. While there have been no nominations of additional directors proposed, in the event such a proposal is made, all current members
of our Board will participate in the consideration of director nominees.
As with most small, early-stage companies until
such time as our company further develops our business, achieves a revenue base and has sufficient working capital to purchase directors’
and officers’ insurance, we do not have any immediate prospects to attract independent directors. When we are able to expand our
Board to include one or more independent directors, we intend to establish an audit committee of our Board of Directors. It is our intention
that one or more of these independent directors will also qualify as an audit committee financial expert. Our securities are not quoted
on an exchange that has requirements that a majority of our Board members be independent, and we are not currently otherwise subject to
any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors, nor
are we required to establish or maintain an audit committee or other committee of our Board.
None of our directors is not independent, within
the meaning of definitions established by the SEC or any self-regulatory organization. We are not currently subject to any law, rule or
regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include independent directors.
Shareholder Communications with Our Board of Directors
Our company welcomes comments and questions from
our shareholders. Shareholders should direct all communications to our Chief Executive Officer, Stephen W. Carnes, at our executive offices.
However, while we appreciate all comments from shareholders, we may not be able to respond individually to all communications. We attempt
to address shareholder questions and concerns in our press releases and documents filed with OTC Markets, so that all shareholders have
access to information about us at the same time. Mr. Carnes collects and evaluates all shareholder communications. All communications
addressed to our directors and executive officers will be reviewed by those parties, unless the communication is clearly frivolous.
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics
applicable to each of our officers and directors, a copy of which is included as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering
Circular forms a part.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In General
As of the date of this Offering Circular, there
are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to officers, directors or employees of our company, pursuant to any
presently existing plan provided by, or contributed to, our company.
Compensation Summary
The following table summarizes information concerning
the compensation awarded, paid to or earned by, our executive officers.
Name and Principal Position | |
| Year
Ended | | |
| Salary
($) | | |
| Bonus
($) | | |
| Stock
Awards ($) | | |
| Option
Awards ($) | | |
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen-
sation ($) | | |
| Non-qualified Deferred Compen-
sation Earnings ($) | | |
| All
Other Compen- sation ($) | | |
| Total
($) | |
Robert D. Morris | |
| 12/31/22 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
| 3/31/22 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Joseph M. Davis | |
| 12/31/22 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
President and Treasurer | |
| 3/31/22 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Stephen W. Carnes | |
| 12/31/22 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Secretary and Former Chief Executive Officer | |
| 3/31/22 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Outstanding Option Awards
The following table provides certain information
regarding unexercised options to purchase common stock, stock options that have not vested and equity-incentive plan awards outstanding
as of the date of this Offering Circular, for each named executive officer.
| |
| Option
Awards | | |
| Stock
Awards | | |
Name | |
| Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | |
| Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | |
| Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | | |
| Option
Exercise Price ($) | | |
| Option
Expiration Date | | |
| Number
of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | |
| Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | | |
| Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#) | | |
| Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested ($) | |
Robert D. Morris | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| N/A | | |
| N/A | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Joseph M. Davis | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| N/A | | |
| N/A | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Stephen W. Carnes | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| N/A | | |
| N/A | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Employment Agreements
Executive Officers. We have not entered
into employment agreements with any our executive officers.
Key Employees.
Timothy E. Evans. Tradition entered into
an employment agreement with Timothy E. Evans for his services as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Tradition. The initial
term of Executive’s employment under this Agreement shall be for a term of four (4) years, commencing on the Effective Date to be
automatically extended for successive one (1) year periods, unless either party provides written notice to the other party at least sixty
(60) days prior to the end of the then existing term that the party does not wish to extend the term of the agreement. As compensation
for Timothy E. Evans’ services, the Company agreed to an annual base salary of Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($300,000.00).
Timothy E. Evans is also entitled to certain employee and business expense benefits. Employment may be terminated by the mutual agreement
of Timothy E. Evans and Tradition, death, disability, with cause, without cause, and with and without good reason by Timothy E. Evans.
James L. Evans. Tradition entered into an
employment agreement with James L. Evans for his services as the Vice President of Tradition. The initial term of Executive’s employment
under this Agreement shall be for a term of four (4) years, commencing on the Effective Date to be automatically extended for successive
one (1) year periods, unless either party provides written notice to the other party at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the
then existing term that the party does not wish to extend the term of the agreement. As compensation for James L. Evans’ services,
the Company agreed to an annual base salary of Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($300,000.00). James L. Evans is also entitled
to certain employee and business expense benefits. Employment may be terminated by the mutual agreement of James L. Evans and Tradition,
death, disability, with cause, without cause, and with and without good reason by James L. Evans.
Joseph J. Montel. Tradition entered into
an employment agreement with Joseph J. Montel for his services as the General Counsel of Tradition. The initial term of Executive’s
employment under this Agreement shall be for a term of four (4) years, commencing on the Effective Date to be automatically extended for
successive one (1) year periods, unless either party provides written notice to the other party at least sixty (60) days prior to the
end of the then existing term that the party does not wish to extend the term of the agreement. As compensation for Joseph J. Montel’s
services, the Company agreed to an annual base salary of Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($300,000.00). Joseph J. Montel is
also entitled to certain employee and business expense benefits. Employment may be terminated by the mutual agreement of Joseph J. Montel
and Tradition, death, disability, with cause, without cause, and with and without good reason by Joseph J. Montel.
Outstanding Equity Awards
During the year ended December 31, 2022, our Board
of Directors made no equity awards and no such award is pending.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
We currently have no long-term incentive plans.
Director Compensation
Our directors are not compensated for their services
as directors of our company.
On April 27, 2022, Robert Morris and the our Board
of Directors agreed in a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors In Lieu of Special Meeting that Mr. Morris would become a
director on May 1, 2022, and would be paid $25,000 upon the signing of the aforementioned Unanimous Written Consent, April 27, 2022, and
if we should successfully complete a merger or business combination on or before December 31, 2022, Mr. Morris will receive a $25,000
bonus. Because such an acquisition closed as of December 28, 2022, Mr. Morris received the $25,000 bonus.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
The table below does not give effect to certain
events, as follows:
Series B Preferred Stock Conversion.
The table below does not give effect to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon conversion of the outstanding shares of Series
B Preferred Stock, which are owned by our officers and directors. At any time, these persons, as a group, have the right to convert each
share of Series B Preferred Stock into 1,000 shares of common stock, a total of up to 750,000,000 shares. (See “Risk Factors—Risks
Related to a Purchase of the Units” and “Dilution—Ownership Dilution”).
In light of the caveat stated in the foregoing
paragraphs, the following table sets forth, as of the date of this Offering Circular, information regarding beneficial ownership of our
common stock by the following: (a) each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by our company to be the beneficial owner of more
than five percent of any class of our voting securities; (b) each of our directors; (c) each of the named executive officers; and (d)
all directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, based on
voting or investment power with respect to the securities. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage
ownership of that person, shares of common stock underlying convertible instruments, if any, held by that person are deemed to be outstanding
if the convertible instrument is exercisable within 60 days of the date hereof.
|
|
Share Ownership Before This Offering |
|
|
Share Ownership After This Offering |
|
|
|
|
Name of Shareholder |
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
|
% Beneficially Owned(1) |
|
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
|
% Beneficially Owned(2) |
|
|
Effective Voting Power |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
Executive Officers and
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Morris |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Davis |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Carnes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Officers and directors, ass a group (3 persons) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
5% or Greater Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Thomas |
|
|
1,145,905 |
|
|
|
6.66% |
|
|
|
1,145,905 |
|
|
|
1.18% |
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock(3)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Morris(5) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
33.33% |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
33.33% |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Davis(5) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
33.33% |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
33.33% |
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Carnes(5) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
33.33% |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
33.33% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | | Based on 17,204,180
shares outstanding, before this offering. |
(2) | | Based on 97,204,180
shares outstanding, assuming (a) the sale of all of the Units and (b) the exercise of all of the Warrants included in the Units, after
this offering. |
(3) | | Each
share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to 1,000 votes per share
on all matters. (See Note 5). |
(4) | | At any time, each
share of Series B Preferred Stock may be converted into 1,000 shares of common stock, a total of up to 750,000,000 shares. (See “Description of Securities—Series B Preferred Stock”). |
(5) | | Due to the superior
voting rights of the Series B Preferred Stock, Robert Morris, Joseph Davis and Stephen W. Carnes will be able to control the management
and affairs of our company, as well as matters requiring the approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors, any merger,
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and any other significant corporate transaction. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the executive officer and director
compensation arrangements discussed in “Executive Compensation,” the following is a description of each transaction that has
occurred during our last three fiscal years, and each currently proposed transaction in which:
|
· |
we have been or are to be a participant; |
|
· |
the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and |
|
· |
any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of their immediate family or person sharing their household had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. |
Policies regarding Related Party Transactions
We do not yet have polices regarding related party
transactions.
Related Party Transactions
APSI maintains its principal executive office at
2180 North Park Ave, Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32789, which is leased to APSI by Obduro, LLC. Obduro, LLC is owned by our Secretary and
Director, Stephen W. Carnes. The monthly rent for this office space is $2,000.00 per month.
On February 14, 2022, Stephen W. Carnes provided
the funds for APSI to acquire a digital asset commonly referred to as “land” within the Sandbox metaverse. The purchase price
was 7.9 Ethereum (ETH). On December 28, 2022, Mr. Carnes purchased the metaverse property back from the Company for 7.9 Ethereum, which
was valued on the day of the Acquisition. The related party payable account was reduced accordingly.
On December 22, 2022, APSI issued a promissory
note to Stephen W. Carnes in exchange for $225,000.00, to be used for the down payment related to the Acquisition, if the SPA were to
be entered into, with interest payable on the unpaid principal at the rate of 10.00 percent per annum, calculated monthly not in advance,
beginning on December 22, 2022. As the Acquisition closed on December 28, 2022, the aforementioned funds were used for the aforementioned
down payment. The conformed copy of this promissory note is attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 10.32.
On April 27, 2022, Robert Morris and the our Board
of Directors agreed in a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors In Lieu of Special Meeting that Mr. Morris would become a
director on May 1, 2022, and would be paid $25,000 upon the signing of the aforementioned Unanimous Written Consent, April 27, 2022, and
if we should successfully complete a merger or business combination on or before December 31, 2022, Mr. Morris will receive a $25,000
bonus. Because such an acquisition closed as of December 28, 2022, Mr. Morris received the $25,000 bonus.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters with respect to the Units
offered by this Offering Circular will be passed upon by Newlan Law Firm, PLLC, Flower Mound, Texas. Newlan Law Firm, PLLC owns no securities
of our company.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed an offering statement on Form 1-A
with the SEC under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock offered by this Offering Circular. This Offering Circular, which
constitutes a part of the offering statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the offering statement or the exhibits
and schedules filed therewith. For further information with respect to us and our common stock, please see the offering statement and
the exhibits and schedules filed with the offering statement. Statements contained in this Offering Circular regarding the contents of
any contract or any other document that is filed as an exhibit to the offering statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement
is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the offering statement.
The offering statement, including its exhibits and schedules, may be inspected without charge at the public reference room maintained
by the SEC, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of the offering statement
may be obtained from such offices upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information about the public reference room. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains all information regarding companies
that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is www.sec.gov.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Page |
Unaudited Balance Sheets at December 31, 2021 (Predecessor), at December 27, 2022 (Predecessor), at December 31, 2022 (Successor), and at June 30, 2023 (Successor) |
|
F-1 |
Unaudited Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor), for the Period From January 1, 2022, to December 27, 2022 (Predecessor), for the Period From December 28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 (Successor), for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 (Predecessor), and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Successor) |
|
F-2 |
Unaudited Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor), for the Period From January 1, 2022, to December 27, 2022 (Predecessor), for the Period From December 28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 (Successor), and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Successor) |
|
F-3 |
Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 (Predecessor), for the Period From January 1, 2022, to December 27, 2022 (Predecessor), for the Period From December 28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 (Successor), for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 (Predecessor), and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 (Successor) |
|
F-4 |
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements |
|
F-5 |
Unaudited Balance Sheets
| |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | | |
December 27, | | |
Year
Ended December 31, | | |
June 30, | |
| |
2021 | | |
2022 | | |
2022 | | |
2023 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
ASSETS | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Current Assets | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 68,185 | | |
$ | 215,961 | | |
$ | 487,560 | | |
$ | 218,779 | |
Contract receivables, net | |
| 9,787,299 | | |
| 12,824,293 | | |
| 12,330,632 | | |
| 11,474,448 | |
Inventories | |
| – | | |
| 434,840 | | |
| 429,575 | | |
| 493,726 | |
Contract assets | |
| 3,704,216 | | |
| 1,547,517 | | |
| 4,220,119 | | |
| 1,759,017 | |
Pre-paid expenses and other current assets | |
| 951,191 | | |
| 2,150,510 | | |
| 2,115,740 | | |
| 2,034,745 | |
Total Current Assets | |
| 14,510,891 | | |
| 17,173,121 | | |
| 19,583,626 | | |
| 15,980,715 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Property & equipment, net | |
| 13,535,972 | | |
| 31,025,392 | | |
| 44,184,756 | | |
| 39,745,872 | |
Right-of-use assets under operating leases, net | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 30,229,338 | | |
| 25,895,221 | |
Other assets | |
| 1,019,211 | | |
| 1,759,984 | | |
| 873,690 | | |
| 3,365,344 | |
Goodwill | |
| 427,455 | | |
| 807,099 | | |
| 5,774,416 | | |
| 6,028,917 | |
Total Assets | |
$ | 29,493,529 | | |
$ | 50,765,596 | | |
$ | 100,645,826 | | |
$ | 91,016,069 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY) | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Current Liabilities | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash overdraft | |
$ | 22,873 | | |
$ | 151,212 | | |
$ | 185,195 | | |
$ | – | |
Line of Credit | |
| 3,238,737 | | |
| 5,540,864 | | |
| 8,256,525 | | |
| 7,790,557 | |
Long-term-debt, current portion | |
| 2,657,431 | | |
| 52,480 | | |
| 9,105,783 | | |
| 9,105,783 | |
Operating lease liabilities, current portion | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 6,974,517 | | |
| 6,974,517 | |
Finance lease liabilities, current portion | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 114,321 | | |
| 114,321 | |
Accounts Payable | |
| 4,420,114 | | |
| 4,450,462 | | |
| 4,754,971 | | |
| 3,871,449 | |
Accrued expenses | |
| 1,628,018 | | |
| (1,183,171 | ) | |
| 904,770 | | |
| (695,329 | ) |
Contract liabilities | |
| 86,471 | | |
| | | |
| 27,690 | | |
| – | |
Deposits | |
| – | | |
| (945,346 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Accrued expenses – related party | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 75,990 | | |
| 75,990 | |
Total Current Liabilities | |
| 12,053,644 | | |
| 8,066,501 | | |
| 30,399,762 | | |
| 27,237,288 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Long-term debt, net | |
| 8,861,925 | | |
| 30,814,236 | | |
| 43,827,335 | | |
| 43,827,335 | |
Operating lease liabilities | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 23,328,089 | | |
| 18,993,972 | |
Finance lease liabilities | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 285,031 | | |
| – | |
Deferred income taxes | |
| 2,106,000 | | |
| 2,106,000 | | |
| 2,610,000 | | |
| 2,610,000 | |
Note payable - related party | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 244,940 | | |
| 244,940 | |
Total Liabilities | |
| 23,021,569 | | |
| 40,986,737 | | |
| 100,695,157 | | |
| 92,913,535 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Undesignated Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 4,000,000 shares authorized, at December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2022, there were none issued and outstanding, respectively | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Preferred A Stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, at December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2022, there were none issued and outstanding, respectively | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Preferred B Stock $0.001 par value 1,000,000 shares authorized, at December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2022, there were 500,000 and 500,000 issued and outstanding, respectively | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 500 | | |
| 750 | |
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 17,204,180 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 1,720 | | |
| 1,720 | |
Common stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 745,196 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 | |
| 1,178,680 | | |
| 1,178,680 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Retained earnings | |
| 5,293,280 | | |
| 8,600,179 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 654,170 | | |
| 653,920 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (705,721 | ) | |
| (2,553,856 | ) |
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | |
| 6,471,960 | | |
| 9,778,859 | | |
| (49,331 | ) | |
| (1,897,466 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) | |
$ | 29,493,529 | | |
$ | 50,765,596 | | |
$ | 100,645,826 | | |
$ | 91,016,069 | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
Unaudited Statement of Operations
| |
PREDECESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | |
| |
Year
Ended December 31, 2021 | | |
January
1, 2022, to December 27, 2022 | | |
December 28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | |
Revenue | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Freight Contracts | |
$ | 45,563,535 | | |
$ | 41,978,251 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 23,618,732 | | |
$ | 15,941,268 | |
Brokerage Service | |
| 30,336,204 | | |
| 43,876,910 | | |
| – | | |
| 24,843,500 | | |
| 17,940,651 | |
Equipment Leases | |
| 5,196,017 | | |
| 4,970,822 | | |
| – | | |
| 3,357,003 | | |
| 4,076,276 | |
Equipment Rental | |
| 1,738,552 | | |
| 1,514,530 | | |
| – | | |
| 834,959 | | |
| 575,294 | |
Warehouse Leases | |
| 7,762,131 | | |
| 18,189,060 | | |
| – | | |
| 6,859,924 | | |
| 4,873,083 | |
Fuel Surcharge | |
| 3,814,933 | | |
| 5,570,498 | | |
| – | | |
| 2,775,989 | | |
| 2,207,326 | |
Fastener | |
| – | | |
| 1,917,112 | | |
| – | | |
| 728,454 | | |
| 1,231,139 | |
Transactional Accessory Income | |
| 1,046,143 | | |
| 476,413 | | |
| – | | |
| 241,963 | | |
| 466,490 | |
Total Revenue | |
| 95,457,515 | | |
| 118,493,595 | | |
| – | | |
| 63,260,524 | | |
| 47,311,528 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of Revenue | |
| 79,761,364 | | |
| 101,379,721 | | |
| – | | |
| 53,257,680 | | |
| 42,003,734 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit | |
| 15,696,151 | | |
| 17,113,874 | | |
| – | | |
| 10,002,844 | | |
| 5,307,795 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating Expenses | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
General & administrative expenses | |
| 8,647,360 | | |
| 10,129,391 | | |
| 127,179 | | |
| 3,430,720 | | |
| 5,493,139 | |
Depreciation expense | |
| 2,863,490 | | |
| 2,827,901 | | |
| – | | |
| 1,615,611 | | |
| 2,252,171 | |
Total Operating Expenses | |
| 11,510,850 | | |
| 12,957,292 | | |
| 127,179 | | |
| 5,046,330 | | |
| 7,745,310 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income (Loss) from Operations | |
| 4,185,301 | | |
| 4,156,582 | | |
| (127,179 | ) | |
| 4,956,514 | | |
| (2,437,515 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other Income (Expense) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| (941,273 | ) | |
| (1,065,573 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (348,179 | ) | |
| (958,621 | ) |
Gain (loss) on equipment sale/disposal | |
| 270,481 | | |
| 1,527,260 | | |
| – | | |
| 333,221 | | |
| 1,548,002 | |
Fuel rebates | |
| 612,010 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Other income | |
| 8,426 | | |
| 25,631 | | |
| – | | |
| 100 | | |
| – | |
Other expenses | |
| – | | |
| (65,000 | ) | |
| (14,840 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Total Other Income (Expense) | |
| (50,356 | ) | |
| 422,317 | | |
| (14,840 | ) | |
| (14,857 | ) | |
| 589,381 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | |
| 4,134,945 | | |
| 4,578,899 | | |
| (142,019 | ) | |
| 4,941,656 | | |
| (1,848,135 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Provision for Income Taxes | |
| (1,148,000 | ) | |
| (1,272,000 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | |
$ | 2,986,945 | | |
$ | 3,306,899 | | |
$ | (142,019 | ) | |
$ | 4,941,656 | | |
$ | (1,848,135 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Loss Per Share – Basic | |
$ | n/a | | |
$ | n/a | | |
$ | (0.00 | ) | |
$ | n/a | | |
$ | (0.11 | ) |
Net Loss Per Share –Diluted | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | | |
| (0.00 | ) | |
| n/a | | |
| (0.00 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – Basic | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | | |
| 17,204,180 | | |
| n/a | | |
| 17,204,180 | |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – Diluted | |
| n/a | | |
| n/a | | |
| 17,204,180 | | |
| n/a | | |
| 17,204,180 | |
See accompanying notes
to unaudited financial statements.
Unaudited Statement of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity (Deficit)
PREDECESSOR
| |
Series
A Preferred | | |
Series
B Preferred | | |
Common
Stock | | |
Additional Paid-In
Capital | | |
Retained Earnings | | |
Total Stockholders’
Equity/ (Deficit)
| |
| |
Shares | | |
Amount ($) | | |
Shares | | |
Amount ($) | | |
Shares | | |
Amount
($) | | |
($) | | |
($) | | |
($) | |
Balance
December 31, 2020 | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
| 1,178,680 | | |
– | | |
2,306,335 | | |
3,485,015 | |
Net income | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
| – | | |
– | | |
2,986,945 | | |
2,986,945 | |
Balance December 31,
2021 | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
| 1,178,680 | | |
– | | |
5,293,280 | | |
6,471,960 | |
Net income | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
| – | | |
– | | |
4,941,656 | | |
4,941,656 | |
Balance June 30, 2022 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
– | | |
| 1,178,680 | | |
– | | |
10,234,936 | | |
11,413,616 | |
Net loss | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
| – | | |
– | | |
(1,634,757 | ) | |
(1,634,757 | ) |
Balance
December 27, 2022 | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
| 1,178,680 | | |
– | | |
8,600,179 | | |
9,778,859 | |
SUCCESSOR
| |
Series
A Preferred | | |
Series
B Preferred | | |
Common
Stock | | |
Additional Paid-In
Capital | | |
Accumulated Deficit | | |
Total Stockholders’
Equity/
(Deficit)
| |
| |
Shares | | |
Amount
($) | | |
Shares | | |
Amount
($) | | |
Shares | | |
Amount
($) | | |
($) | | |
($) | | |
($) | |
Balance
December 27, 2022 | |
– | | |
– | | |
500,000 | | |
500 | | |
17,204,180 | | |
1,720 | | |
654,170 | | |
(563,702 | ) | |
92,688 | |
Net loss | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
(142,019 | ) | |
(142,019 | ) |
Balance December 31, 2022 | |
– | | |
– | | |
500,000 | | |
500 | | |
17,204,180 | | |
1,720 | | |
654,170 | | |
(705,721 | ) | |
(49,331 | ) |
Redemption of shares | |
– | | |
– | | |
(250,000 | ) | |
(250 | ) | |
– | | |
– | | |
250 | | |
– | | |
– | |
Issuance of shares for employment | |
– | | |
– | | |
500,000 | | |
500 | | |
– | | |
– | | |
(500 | ) | |
– | | |
– | |
Net loss | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
– | | |
(1,848,135 | ) | |
(1,848,135 | ) |
Balance
June 30, 2023 | |
– | | |
– | | |
750,000 | | |
750 | | |
17,204,180 | | |
1,720 | | |
653,920 | | |
(2,553,856 | ) | |
(1,897,466 | ) |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
Unaudited Statement of Cash Flows
| |
PREDECESSOR
| | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | | |
PREDECESSOR | | |
SUCCESSOR | |
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2021 | | |
January 1, 2022, to December 27, 2022 | | |
December 28, 2022, to December 31, 2022 | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 | | |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Profit (Loss) | |
$ | 2,986,945 | | |
$ | 3,306,899 | | |
$ | (142,019 | ) | |
$ | 4,941,656 | | |
$ | (1,848,135 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation | |
| 2,804,531 | | |
| 2,827,901 | | |
| – | | |
| 1,615,611 | | |
| 2,252,171 | |
Debt issuance costs | |
| 7,136 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Bad debt expense | |
| 80,950 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Deferred income taxes | |
| 1,118,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Loss on value of digital asset | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 14,840 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Contract receivables | |
| (3,195,254 | ) | |
| (3,036,994 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (5,678,049 | ) | |
| 856,184 | |
Contract assets | |
| (2,481,969 | ) | |
| 2,156,699 | | |
| – | | |
| 307,608 | | |
| 2,461,102 | |
Inventory | |
| – | | |
| (434,840 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (397,741 | ) | |
| (64,151 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | |
| (450,233 | ) | |
| (1,199,319 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (1,294,249 | ) | |
| 80,995 | |
Accounts payable | |
| 1,939,479 | | |
| 30,348 | | |
| – | | |
| 797,274 | | |
| (807,532 | ) |
Current maturities of long-term-debt | |
| – | | |
| (2,604,951 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (2,604,951 | ) | |
| – | |
Deposits | |
| – | | |
| (945,346 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (145,447 | ) | |
| – | |
Accrued expenses | |
| 989,037 | | |
| (2,811,189 | ) | |
| 43,000 | | |
| (543,709 | ) | |
| (1,676,089 | ) |
Contract liabilities | |
| (476,179 | ) | |
| (86,471 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (86,471 | ) | |
| (27,690 | ) |
Other assets | |
| – | | |
| (740,773 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (740,773 | ) | |
| (2,491,654 | ) |
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities: | |
| 3,322,443 | | |
| (3,538,036 | ) | |
| (84,179 | ) | |
| (3,829,241 | ) | |
| (1,264,799 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Loss (gain) on disposition of property & equipment | |
| (270,481 | ) | |
| 1,527,260 | | |
| – | | |
| 333,221 | | |
| 1,548,002 | |
Property & equipment | |
| (9,662 | ) | |
| (17,489,420 | ) | |
| – | | |
| (5,415,830 | ) | |
| 638,711 | |
Intangible assets | |
| 58,958 | | |
| (379,644 | ) | |
| – | | |
| 427,455 | | |
| (254,501 | ) |
Net cash acquired in acquisition | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 215,961 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Right-of-use assets | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 4,334,117 | |
Net Cash Provided By (Used in) Investing Activities | |
| (221,185 | ) | |
| (20,696,965 | | |
| 215,961 | | |
| (4,655,154 | ) | |
| 6,266,329 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Increase (decrease) in cash overdraft | |
| 22,873 | | |
| 128,339 | | |
| – | | |
| 14,632 | | |
| (185,195 | ) |
Increase (decrease) line of credit | |
| 97,799 | | |
| 2,302,127 | | |
| – | | |
| 1,452,988 | | |
| (465,968 | ) |
Changes in long-term debt | |
| (2,915,288 | ) | |
| 21,952,311 | | |
| – | | |
| 7,161,196 | | |
| – | |
Debt issuance costs | |
| (321,850 | ) | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Borrowings – related parties | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 225,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Financing lease liabilities | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (285,031 | ) |
Operating lease liabilities | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| (4,334,117 | ) |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | |
| (3,116,466 | ) | |
| 24,382,777 | | |
| 225,000 | | |
| 8,628,816 | | |
| (5,270,311 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash | |
| (15,208 | ) | |
| 147,776 | | |
| 356,782 | | |
| 144,421 | | |
| (268,781 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash at Beginning of Period | |
| 83,393 | | |
| 68,185 | | |
| 130,778 | | |
| 68,185 | | |
| 487,560 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash at End of Period | |
$ | 68,185 | | |
$ | 215,961 | | |
$ | 487,560 | | |
$ | 212,606 | | |
$ | 218,779 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for interest | |
| 949,680 | | |
| 1,065,573 | | |
| – | | |
| 348,179 | | |
| 958,621 | |
Cash paid for taxes | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Property & equipment acquired through long-term debt | |
| 1,606,227 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Equipment acquired through asset trade-in | |
| 612,000 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Long-term debt refinanced | |
| 10,912,763 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Acquisition of a company’s assets – liabilities financed with Seller Notes Payable | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 24,092,038 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Cancellation of shares | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 3,294 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Repayment of related party debt with intangible asset | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 10,115 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Issuance of Series B Preferred shares | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 250 | | |
| – | |
See accompanying notes
to unaudited financial statements.
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization and Business
Organizational History
Aqua Power Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
was originally incorporated in Nevada on December 9, 2010, as NC Solar Inc. with the goal of developing solar energy collection farms
on commercial and/or industrial buildings located on distressed, blighted and/or underutilized commercial land in North Carolina and other
southern states of the United States. On June 6, 2014, management changed and, on August 12, 2014, the Company changed its name to Aqua
Power Systems Inc.
On December 1, 2020, the Eight Judicial District
Court of Nevada entered an order appointing Small Cap Compliance, LLC as custodian of the Company, authorizing and directing it to, among
other things, take any action reasonable, prudent and for the benefit of the Company, including reinstating the Company under Nevada law,
appointing officers and convening a meeting of stockholders. Small Cap Compliance, LLC was not a shareholder of the Company on the date
that it applied to serve as a custodian of the Company.
On December 7, 2020, Small Cap Compliance, LLC
filed the Certificate of Reinstatement for the Company, thereby reinstating the Company, appointed Stephen W. Carnes as the sole officer
and director of the Company, and amended the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to one million
shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
On March 3, 2021, the Eight Judicial District
Court of Nevada entered an order approving Small Cap Compliance, LLC’s actions, without prejudice to the claims of interested parties
as to dilution of their interest, terminated Small Cap Compliance, LLC’s custodianship of the Company, and discharged Small Cap
Compliance as the custodian of the Company.
On April 27, 2022, Robert Morris and the board
of directors of APSI agreed in a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors In Lieu of Special Meeting that Mr. Morris would
become a director of APSI to help with acquisitions, effective May 1, 2022.
Acquisition of Tradition Transportation
On December 28, 2022, the Company acquired Tradition
Transportation Group, Inc., an Indiana corporation (“Tradition”), and Tradition thereafter became a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company, and the business of Tradition became the primary business of the Company. Tradition is headquartered in Angola, Indiana,
and provides freight transportation, brokerage, truck leasing and financing, warehousing and fulfillment services throughout the United
States, and manufactures and sells bolts and fasteners, and creates custom plates, cages, and embeds.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been
presented on a comparative basis. For periods prior to the acquisition of Tradition (see below), the Company is referred to as the Predecessor.
For periods after the acquisition, it is referred to as the Successor. Due to the acquisition and the application of push-down accounting,
different bases of accounting have been used to prepare the Predecessor and Successor financial statements. A black line separates the
Predecessor and Successor financial statements to highlight the lack of comparability between these two periods.
References to the Company include Tradition and
its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
Change in Fiscal Year
On February 9, 2023, the Company’s Board
of Directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from March 31 to a calendar year end of December 31. The change
will not affect nor impact the Company’s actual financial results. With this change, the financial reporting period ending December
31, 2022, became the Company’s fiscal year end rather than the end of a financial quarter.
Overview of the Business of Tradition
On December 28, 2022, the Company entered into
a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement and a Contract Assignment agreement with Joseph Michael Davis (“Mr. Davis”). Under the
Contract Assignment agreement, the Company assumed all of the obligations of Mr. Davis under a multiparty stock purchase agreement, promissory
notes, and assignment and pledge of stock agreements that Mr. Davis entered into on December 28, 2022. The Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement,
Contract Assignment agreement, agreements assumed by the Company are referred to herein as the “Acquisition.”
Karr Transportation
Asset Purchase
On July 27, 2022, Tradition’s
wholly owned subsidiaries, Tradition Transportation, L.L.C. and Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. (together the “Purchaser”),
both subsidiaries discussed in more detail below, entered into an asset purchase agreement (“Karr Asset Purchase Agreement”)
with Karr Transportation, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, Beers Investment Group, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company, and its shareholders,
Kelly Beers and Albert Beers (“Karr Sellers”). As a result of this agreement, Tradition acquired the following:
(1) |
|
25 tractors for $3,500,000. 1 is a Kenworth T680M made in 2014; 5 are Kenworth T680Ms made in 2020; 5 are Freightliner Cascadias made in 2021; 8 are Freightliner Cascadias made in 2022; 4 are Kenworth T680s made in 2020; and 2 are Izuzu NPRs made in 2015 and 2019. |
(2) |
|
35 Utility Reefer Trailers for $3,000,000. 15 are 3000Rs or similar and made in 2019; 5 are 3000Rs and made in 2021; and 15 are VS2RAs and made in 2021. |
(3) |
|
The ability to offer employment to 18 drivers for a placement fee of $5,000, if an offer is accepted. |
(4) |
|
The ability to offer employment to 1 mechanic for a placement fee of $5,000, if an offer is accepted. |
(5) |
|
The ability to offer employment to 7 operational employees for a placement fee of $5,000, if an offer is accepted. |
(6) |
|
All of the miscellaneous personal property used by Karr Sellers in connection with the Business, including, without limitation, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other tangible personal property, as well as all books and records relating to the Assets, including, without limitation, purchase information, warranty information, maintenance and repair information, operation history, title and registration, and accounting information shall be transferred by Sellers to Purchaser for the sum of $1.00. |
Per the Karr Asset Purchase Agreement,
the parties entered into two separate agent agreements, one with Tradition Transportation Company, L.L.C. (“Trucking Agent Contract”)
and one with Freedom Freight Solutions, L.L.C. (“Freedom Agent Contract”) for the total consideration of $200,000. Both Agreements
provide a cap on commissions of $3,299,999, minus any payments for drivers, mechanics, or operating staff (“Cap”).
The Trucking Agent Contract provides
that the Karr Sellers, having substantial experience in the freight motor carrier industry and having customers, who have freight shipping
needs for their cargo of general commodities, would refer their customers to Tradition Trucking Company, LLC for a commission of six percent
(6%) of line-haul revenues on Tradition Transportation Company, LLC assets. The aforementioned commission is subject to (a) Line Haul
Revenue being defined as the “Freight Charge” and/or “Pay Gross” within Tradition Transportation, L.L.C.’s
software system, and Line Haul does not include additional charges for fuel surcharge, accessorial charges, project management, detention,
tarping, stop offs, etc., and (b) revenues, excluding any amounts not paid within 90 days from the date of invoice, or amounts collected
by Tradition Transportation, L.L.C. with the assistance of an outside collection agency or an attorney.
The Freedom Agent Contract provides
that the Karr Sellers, having substantial experience in the freight motor carrier industry and having customers, who have transportation
brokerage service needs for their cargo of general commodities, would refer their customers to Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC for a commission
of six percent (6%) of the margin on revenues generated through Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC.
Finally, the Purchaser and Karr Sellers
agreed to enter into a mutually agreeable lease for use of the property commonly known as 4106 Highway 62 East, Mountain Home, Arkansas
72653, at the rate of three thousand dollars ($3,000) per month for the office space and one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) per
month for the repair shop space. The term of the lease was six (6) months from the date of Closing, with Purchaser having the right to
extend the term under the same terms and costs for two (2) additional six (6) month periods. Intent is for current dispatch and operations
offices, two (2) additional offices occupied by accounting, and non-exclusive use of the break area, kitchen and restrooms; together with
the three (3) bay maintenance facility, office currently used, and up to ten (10) parking spaces for semi-trucks and trailers (additional
to employee and customer parking).
The Karr Asset Purchase Agreement has
a term of the lesser of a period ending upon payment of the Cap, and a period of 5 years. Otherwise, at the written option of the parties,
the Karr Asset Purchase agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice.
EDSCO Purchase and Sale
On January 31, 2022, Tradition’s
wholly owned subsidiary, Anthem Anchor Bolts & Fasteners, LLC (“Anthem”), discussed in more detail below, and EDSCO Holding
Company, LLC (“EDSCO”) entered into an asset purchase and sale agreement. In this agreement, Anthem acquired the following
inventory and equipment of EDSCO Holding Company, LLC for the purchase price of $447,918.52 (the “EDSCO Purchase Price”):
a 2011 Chevy Truck, a Trailer, a Nissan forklift, a Yale forklift, a Clark Forklift, a 250 Amp Mig Welder, a 2 1/2 Double head landis
Threader, a 1 1/4 single head landis, a 1 1/4 rotary bender, a 200 ton Bulldozer, a do all saw, a Tesker 236 threader, a Tesker 215 roll
threader, a Tesker 210 roll threader, a Reed B 112 Roll threader, a Landis Lanurol roll threader, a Plasma table, a Landis cut threader,
a Floor scale, an additional 250 amp mig welder, various tools, a Bar Snapper, a Plasma Water Table, a Small bending unit, a Pallet Racking
machine, and a Mult-function Printer (altogether the “EDSCO Assets”).
The EDSCO Purchase Price was paid by
wire transfer initiated on February 7, 2022 and EDSCO delivered to Anthem a bill of sale to transfer and vest in Anthem good and marketable
title to the EDSCO Assets, free and clear of all encumbrances. EDSCO had been operating at 300 East Railroad Street, Waterloo, DeKalb
County, Indiana 46793 (the “EDSCO Location”). As part of the closing, the owner of the EDSCO Location provided Tradition until
September 30, 2022, to relocate. The rent paid to the owner of the property was paid up-front.
Anthem was relocated to 210 South Progress
Drive, Kendallville, Indiana 46755. Anthem, due to this acquisition, is a manufacturer of bolts, nuts, and fasteners, and creates custom
plates, cages, and embeds.
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries
Tradition Transportation
Company, L.L.C. Tradition Transportation Company, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on January 22, 2016.
Through this subsidiary, Tradition operates its tractor and trailer fleets, which are discussed below.
Tradition Leasing
Systems, L.L.C. Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on September 17, 2016. Through
this subsidiary Tradition engages in equipment acquisition and disposition.
Tradition Logistics,
L.L.C. Tradition Logistics, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on January 1, 2016. This subsidiary operates
six (6) warehouses with four (4) in Indiana, specifically Angola, Indianapolis, Greenfield, and Greenwood; and two (2) located in Georgia,
specifically Statesboro and Savannah, and provides time-sensitive warehousing, logistics and freight management to all 48 continental
states and, as needed, internationally (into Mexico and Canada).
Freedom Freight Solutions,
LLC. Freedom Freight Solutions, L.L.C. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on May 3, 2018. This subsidiary identifies
and qualifies third party carriers, and connects the loads to the drivers.
Tradition Transportation
Sales & Service, Inc. Tradition Transportation Sales & Service, Inc. was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company
on September 17, 2015. This subsidiary is principally engaged in providing mechanical repair and maintenance services for tractors and
trailers that Tradition utilizes. It operates with the primary focus of maintenance cost reduction, expediting redeployment of equipment,
and to serve as a back-stop to safety vehicle inspections.
Anthem Anchor Bolts
and Fasteners, LLC. Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC was organized as an Indiana Limited Liability Company on January 21, 2022,
for the transaction with EDSCO Holding Company, LLC, as described above. This was formed as a small exploratory step into the supply of
metal bolts, nuts, and other industrial fasteners. This company will serve Tradition Transportation Sales & Service, Inc. as a vendor.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Company’s financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices,
establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of
internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that (1) recorded transactions are valid; (2) valid transactions
are recorded; and (3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present
fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company accounts for cash and cash equivalents
under FASB ASC 305, “Cash and Cash Equivalents”, and considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Contract Assets and Liabilities
Contract assets represent revenues recognized
and performance obligations satisfied in advance of customer billing. Contract liabilities represent payments received from customer in
advance of the satisfaction of performance obligations under the contract. At June 30, 2023, the Company had contract assets of $1,759,017
and contact liabilities of $0.
Contract Receivables
Contract receivables consist of amounts billed
to customers in exchange for services provided. Delinquent receivables are written off based on credit evaluations and specific circumstances
of the customer. The Company had contract receivables of $11,474,448 at June 30, 2023. The Company evaluates its contract receivables
and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, based on an evaluation of historical losses, current economic conditions, and other
factors unique to the Company’s customer base. Management has not provided for an allowance for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2023.
Convertible Instruments
The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion
options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging Activities”.
Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate
conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain
criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument
are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies
both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value
reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered
a derivative instrument.
The Company accounts for convertible instruments
(when it has been determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) as follows: The
Company records when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments
based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the
effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt
to their stated date of redemption.
Deferred Income Taxes and Valuation Allowance
The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC
740 Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. The principal temporary differences relate to the depreciable lives and salvage
values of property and equipment, net operating loss carryforward, and amortization of organizational costs for tax purposes.
Tradition, Leasing, Logistics, Freight, Trucking,
and Anthem are wholly owned subsidiaries of Tradition and are not subject to federal and state income tax and their net taxable income
or loss are included in the tax returns of the Company.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America require management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Company and recognize a tax liability if the Company
has taken an uncertain position that more likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by various federal and state taxing
authorities. Management has analyzed the tax positions taken by the Company, and has concluded that as of June 30, 2023, and December
31, 2022, there are no uncertain positions taken or expected to be taken that would require recognition of a liability of disclosure in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company is subject to routine audits by taxing jurisdictions; however, there are
currently no audits for any tax periods in progress.
Tradition has filed its federal and state income
tax returns for periods through December 31, 2021. These income tax returns are generally open to examination by the relevant taxing authorities
for a period of three years from the later of the date the return was filed of its due date (including approved extensions).
Financial Instruments
“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,”
defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal
or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market
data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three
broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level
1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1: |
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: |
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
Level 3: |
Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based
upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2023, and December 31, 2022. The respective
carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these
instruments.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition
cost over the fair value of identifiable net assets less liabilities acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized and
is only tested when a triggering event occurs. If the estimated fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill is
considered to be impaired, and an impairment loss will be recognized to write goodwill down to its estimated fair value. Any subsequent
increase in the estimated fair value of goodwill is not recognized. The goodwill recorded on the balance sheet is related to the acquisition
of Tradition. The Company is currently in the process of conducting a valuation of the acquisition of Tradition, and the purchase price
allocation will be presented in subsequent filings.
Other Intangibles
Other intangibles represent exclusive distribution
contracts that were acquired with the acquisition of Tradition. These contracts are amortized over the specific contract period.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets such as property, equipment
and identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. When required impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset. The fair
value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals,
if required. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is
recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company
estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the recovery
of the assets. At June 30, 2023, and December 31, 2022, the Company did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.
Property and Equipment
The Company follows ASC 360, Property, Plant,
and Equipment, for its fixed assets. Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are recorded at
cost and depreciated to residual values over their estimated useful service lives using the straight-line method. Major repairs to property
and equipment are capitalized while minor repairs are expensed as
incurred. The ranges of estimated useful lives
are as follows:
|
Description |
|
Ranges of Useful Lives |
|
|
Tractors, trailers, and vehicles |
|
5 to 6 years |
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
5 years |
|
|
Warehouse equipment |
|
5 to 7 years |
|
|
Office furniture, equipment, and software |
|
3 to 7 years |
|
Related Parties
The Company follows ASC 850, “Related Party
Disclosures,” for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. The Company leases office
space from an entity that is controlled by a Director of the Company.
Revenue Recognition
Freight Contracts
The Company recognizes freight contract
revenue for financial reporting purposes over time, as performances obligations are satisfied, due to the continuous transfer of control
to the customer Freight contracts are generally accounted for as a single unit of account (a single performance obligation), and not segmented
between types of services. Progress toward completion of the Company’s freight contracts is measured by the percentage of miles
traveled to date and estimated total mileage for each freight contract This method is used because management considers miles incurred
to be the best available measure of progress on uncompleted freight contracts. Freight contracts have a typical contract duration of less
than one month.
Brokerage Services
Revenues from all brokerage services
are recognized upon delivery as the Company acts as an agent. Performance obligations are satisfied upon delivery by a third party. Brokerage
contracts have a typical contract duration of one month or less.
Equipment Lease Income
Equipment lease revenue is primarily
revenue generated from equipment leased to owner operators who haul loads for the Company. The Company recognizes equipment lease income
based on the terms of the lease agreement. The leases primarily result in lease income recognized ratably over the life of the lease agreement.
Equipment Rental Income
Equipment rental revenue is primarily
revenue generated from equipment rented to owner operators and customers as temporary replacement equipment or short-term rentals. The
Company recognizes equipment rental income based on the terms of the rental agreement.
Warehouse Lease Income
The Company recognizes warehouse lease
income based on the terms of the lease agreement. The leases primarily result in lease income recognized ratably over the life of the
lease agreement.
Fuel Surcharge Income
The Company recognizes fuel surcharge
income based on the terms of the agreements. These are additional fees that are charged to cover the fluctuating cost of fuel and is calculated
as a percentage of the base rate and is usually added to customers’ freight bill to cover the cost of operations.
Faster Income
This is income recognized by our Anthem
subsidiary to manufacture and supply metal bolts, nuts, and industrial fasters internals to the Company as well as to third-party customers.
Transaction Price and
Amounts Allocated to Performance Obligations
Generally, the transaction price in
a contract is known at contract inception and is allocated to the performance obligations based upon the stand-alone selling prices of
the promised services.
Stock-Based Compensation
FASB ASC 718 “Compensation - Stock Compensation,”
prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based payments award to employees, including employee stock options, restricted
stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights, may be classified as either equity or liabilities. The Company determines
if a present obligation to settle the share-based payment transaction in cash or other assets exists. A present obligation to settle in
cash or other assets exists if: (a) the option to settle by issuing equity instruments lacks commercial substance or (b) the present obligation
is implied because of an entity’s past practices or stated policies. If a present obligation exists, the transaction should be recognized
as a liability; otherwise, the transaction should be recognized as equity.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation
issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 505-50 “Equity - Based Payments to Non-Employees.”
Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable:
(a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined
at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date. As of June 30, 2023, the Company did not have any stock-based
transactions.
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing
net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income
(loss) per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of
incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and upon the conversion of notes. In periods in which a net
loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered anti-dilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation.
Forgiveness of Indebtedness
The Company follows the guidance of AS 470.10
related to debt forgiveness and extinguishment. Debts of the Company are considered extinguished when the statute of limitations in the
applicable jurisdiction expires or when terminated by judicial authority such as the granting of a declaratory judgment. Debts to related
parties or shareholders are treated as capital transactions when forgiven or extinguished and credited to additional paid in capital.
Debts to non-related parties are treated as other income when forgiven or extinguished.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
“Leases” Topic 842, which amends the guidance in former ASC Topic 840, Leases (“ASC 840"). The new standard increases
transparency and comparability most significantly by requiring the recognition by lessees of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and
lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases longer than 12 months. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the
objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For
lessees, leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition
in the income statement, over the expected term on a straight-line basis. Operating leases are recognized on the balance sheet as right-of-use
assets, current operating lease liabilities and non-current operating lease liabilities. We determine if an arrangement is a lease at
inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities on
our consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property and equipment, current liabilities, and long-term liabilities
on our consolidated balance sheets. When the Company initiates a lease, we will record the transaction in accordance with ASC 840.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported
and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles
and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position
or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain
standards are under consideration.
Note 3. Acquisition of Tradition
On December 28, 2022, the Company entered into
a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (“SPA”) to purchase 745,196 shares of common stock of Tradition for $28,548,459, which
is equal to $38.31 per share. The shares represent all issued and outstanding shares of Tradition.
Under the SPA, the purchased price was funded
as follows:
| 1. | Down
payment of $225,000. |
| | |
| 2. | An amount equal to $2,500,000 was offset against the purchase price in full satisfaction of certain obligations
of the Tradition sellers. Of this amount, $2,050,000 remains payable to a former stockholder of Tradition at December 31, 2031 (Note 6). |
| | |
| 3. | An aggregate amount equal to $24,092,038 of seller notes (Note 6), commencing on the ninetieth day following
the date on which the registration by APSI of its securities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has been qualified or declared
effective. |
| | |
| 4. | Final
payment shall be made to Seller in the amount of $1,731,421 after seller notes are paid in full (Note 7). |
| | |
| | Note: The Company is currently in the process of conducting a valuation
of the acquisition of Tradition, and the purchase price allocation will be presented in subsequent filings. |
The pre-valuation acquisition date fair values
of assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity are as follows:
Assets | |
| |
Cash | |
$ | 440,961 | |
Contract receivables, net | |
| 12,330,632 | |
Inventories | |
| 429,575 | |
Contract assets | |
| 4,220,119 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | |
| 2,115,740 | |
Property and equipment: net | |
| 44,184,756 | |
Right of use asset under operating leases | |
| 30,229,338 | |
Other assets | |
| 873,690 | |
Goodwill and other intangibles | |
| 5,774,416 | |
| |
$ | 100,599,227 | |
| |
| | |
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity | |
| | |
Cash overdraft | |
$ | 185,195 | |
Line of credit | |
| 8,256,525 | |
Accounts payable | |
| 4,754,971 | |
Accrued expenses | |
| 904,770 | |
Contract liabilities | |
| 27,690 | |
Long-term debt, net | |
| 27,109,659 | |
Operating lease liabilities | |
| 30,302,606 | |
Finance lease liabilities | |
| 399,352 | |
Deferred income taxes | |
| 2,610,000 | |
Stockholders’ equity | |
| 26,048,459 | |
| |
$ | 100,599,227 | |
Note 4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following at June 30, 2023:
Tractors & Trailers | |
$ | 46,827,563 | |
Land & Buildings | |
| 875,772 | |
Leasehold improvements | |
| 773,598 | |
Software | |
| 674,778 | |
Vehicles | |
| 37,034 | |
Warehouse equipment | |
| 467,092 | |
Office furniture and equipment | |
| 389,049 | |
| |
| 50,044,886 | |
Accumulated depreciation | |
| (10,299,014 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 39,745,872 | |
Note 5. Leases
The Company recognizes right-of-use (ROU) assets
and lease liabilities for leases with terms greater than 12 months or leases that contain a purchase option that is reasonably certain
to be exercised. Leases are classified as either finance or operating leases This classification dictates whether lease expense is recognized
based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line
basis over the term of the lease.
The Company has operating leases for tractors,
trailers, vehicles, office space and warehouse space, as well as finance leases for equipment. Leasing arrangements require fixed payments
and also include an amount that is probable will be owed under residual value guarantees, if applicable. Lease payments also include payments
related to purchase or termination options when the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise the option or is reasonably certain not to
exercise the option, respectively. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material restrictive covenants. The leases
have remaining terms of 3 months to 9 years.
The Company’s ROU assets and lease liabilities
are recognized on the lease commencement date in an amount that represents the present value of future lease payments over the lease term.
The Company utilizes its collateralized incremental borrowing rate commensurate to the lease term as the discount rate for its leases
unless the Company can specifically determine the lessor s implicit rate. Certain lease contracts contain non-lease components such as
maintenance and utilities. The Company has made a policy election to not separate the lease and non-lease components, and thus recognize
a single lease component for all of its right-of-use assets and liabilities.
Short-term leases (leases with an initial term
of 1 months or less or leases that are cancelable by the lessee and lessor without significant penalties) are not capitalized but are
expensed on a straight -line basis over the lease term. The majority of the Company’s short-term leases relate to equipment rentals.
In evaluating contracts to determine if they qualify
as a lease, the Company considers factors such as if it has obtained substantially all of the rights to the underlying asset through exclusivity,
if the Company can direct the use of the asset by making decisions about how and for what purpose the asset will be used and if the lessor
has substantive substitution rights. Furthermore, the Company assesses whether it is reasonably certain to exercise options to extend
or terminate a lease considering all relevant factors that create economic incentive to exercise such options, including asset, contract,
market, and entity-based factors. These evaluations may require significant judgment.
The components of the Company’s lease cost
for the year ended December 31, 2023, are as follows:
Right-of-use assets | |
| |
Operating lease assets, net | |
$ | 30,229,338 | |
Finance lease assets, net | |
| 400,693 | |
| |
| | |
Lease liabilities | |
| | |
Operating lease liabilities, current | |
| 6,974,517 | |
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent | |
| 23,328,089 | |
| |
$ | 30,302,606 | |
| |
| | |
Finance lease liabilities, current | |
$ | 114,321 | |
Finance lease liabilities, noncurrent | |
| 285,031 | |
Total finance lease liabilities | |
$ | 399,352 | |
The Company’s right-of-use assets and lease
liabilities and other disclosures as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 are as follows:
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
| |
$ | 30,229,338 | |
Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases | |
| 5.5 years | |
Weighted-average remaining lease term - finance leases | |
| 3.4 years | |
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases | |
| 6.61 | % |
Weighted average discount rate - finance leases | |
| 3.25 | % |
Total lease costs for the Company totaled $18,000, which were short-term
lease costs during 2022.
Future payments of lease liabilities at December
31, 2023 are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, | |
Operating Lease | | |
Finance Leases | |
2023 | |
$ | 8,790,889 | | |
$ | 125,836 | |
2024 | |
| 8,453,283 | | |
| 125,836 | |
2025 | |
| 5,278,332 | | |
| 125,836 | |
2026 | |
| 3,732,994 | | |
| 45,374 | |
2027 | |
| 2,551,070 | | |
| – | |
Thereafter | |
| 8,117,901 | | |
| – | |
| |
| 36,924,469 | | |
| 422,882 | |
Less interest | |
| (6,695,131 | ) | |
| (23,530 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 30,229,338 | | |
$ | 399,352 | |
The Company subleases warehouse space through
its trucking and logistics businesses. These leases are short term leases. The Company elected the available practical expedients to account
for its existing operating leases as operating leases, under the new guidance, without reassessing (a) whether any expired or existing
contracts contain a lease, (b) whether classification of capital leases or operating leases would be different in accordance with the
new guidance, or (c) whether the unamortized initial direct costs, if any, before transition adjustments would have met the definition
of initial direct costs in the new guidance at lease commencement. The Company also elected the hindsight practical expedient to determine
the lease term for existing leases. In addition, the organization has made a policy election to not separate the lease and non-lease components
related to tenant lease agreements, where applicable.
Note 6. Line of Credit
At June 30, 2023, Tradition has a $7,000,000 line
of credit agreement and a secondary $2,000,000 line of credit with a bank that expired May 2023 and April 2023, respectively. Borrowings
under the agreements bear interest at the prime rate plus 1% (8.5% at December 31, 2022). The line of credit has commercial sweep feature
connected to certain Company checking accounts, If these accounts fall below the target balance of zero, the excess funds will be automatically
borrowed from the line of credit. The Company has outstanding borrowings under the line of credit of $7,790,557 at June 30, 2023. The
line of credit is collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company and personally guaranteed by certain shareholders of the Company.
The credit agreement is cross collateralized with the other Company loans held by its primary bank (Note 7). The credit agreement places
certain restrictive covenants on the Company including requiring a minimum cash flow coverage ratio, minimum tangible net worth, and maximum
debt to tangible net worth ratio. The Company is in the process of renegotiating terms of the line-of-credit.
Note 7. Long-Term Debt
Notes payable to new primary bank bearing interest
ranging from 4% to 5,75%: payable in various monthly installments through April 2032, secured by guarantees of certain shareholders and
related entities, and secured by substantially all business assets.
Installment notes payable to various financial institutions bearing interest ranging from 3.75% to 6.99%; payable in various monthly installments through October 2029, secured by guarantees of certain shareholders and related entities, and collateralized by related equipment with a net book value of $10,031,281 at June 30, 2023. | |
$ | 13,160,552 | |
Installment notes for acquisition of stock in Tradition; payable in 16 quarterly installments aggregating $1,603,786 including interest at 3%; secured by assignment and pledge of stock in Tradition Transportation Group. | |
| 12,185,327 | |
Installment notes for acquisition of stock in Tradition; payable in 16 quarterly installments aggregating $1,603,786 including interest at 3%; secured by assignment and pledge of stock in Tradition Transportation Group. | |
| 24,092,038 | |
Installment note for acquisition of Tradition; payable in full upon repayment of installment notes above for acquisition of Tradition; non-interest bearing and unsecured. | |
| 1,731,421 | |
Installment notes payable to shareholder, bearing interest at 10%, principal and interest due June 2023. | |
| 244,940 | |
Installment note for redemption of Tradition stock; payable in monthly installments of $34,167 beginning February 2023 through January 2028 unsecured. | |
| 2,050,000 | |
| |
| 53,464,278 | |
Less unamortized debt issuance costs | |
| (286,220 | ) |
Current maturities of long-term debt | |
| (9,105,783 | ) |
| |
$ | 44,072,275 | |
The above notes payable to primary bank are cross
collateralized with all loans with primary bank including those in Note 5. The notes are subject to certain restrictive covenants on the
Company including requiring a minimum cash flow coverage ratio, minimum tangible net worth, and maximum debt to tangible net worth ratio.
The scheduled maturities of long-term debt as
of June 30, 2023, are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, | |
| |
2023 | |
$ | 9,105,783 | |
2024 | |
| 12,128,265 | |
2025 | |
| 11,232,043 | |
2026 | |
| 10,469,640 | |
2027 | |
| 8,151,468 | |
Thereafter | |
| 2,377,079 | |
Total | |
$ | 53,464,278 | |
Note 8. Related Party Transactions
On December 22, 2022, the Company issued a promissory
note to Stephen W. Carnes in exchange for $225,000.00, to be used for the down payment related to the Acquisition, if the SPA were to
be entered into, with interest payable on the unpaid principal at the rate of 10.00 percent per annum, calculated monthly not in advance,
beginning on December 22, 2022. As the Acquisition closed on December 28, 2022, the aforementioned funds were used for the aforementioned
down payment.
Note 9. Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock
The Company has 200,000,000 authorized common
shares with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Each common share entitles the holder to one vote, in person or proxy, on any matter on
which action of the stockholders of the corporation is sought.
There are currently 17,204,180 shares of common
shares issued and outstanding.
On April 22, 2021, the Company issued 100,000
shares of its Common Stock in return for an investment of $200,000 via a Subscription Agreement.
During September 2021, as a result of a court
order, the Company canceled a total of 9,020,138 shares of its common stock. Specifically, 6,330,138 of these shares were held by Silverton
SA as disclosed in prior filings and canceled on September 22, 2021, and 2,690,000 of these shares were held by Paramount Trading Company
and canceled on September 24, 2021.
On November 4, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit
for declaratory relief, seeking an order declaring void 32,942,624 shares of its common stock that were held Mr. Tadashi Ishikawa, the
former CEO of the Company. On May 19, 2022, the Court ruled that the Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgement was granted and the Court
declared the 32,942,624 shares of common stock in APSI issued to Tadashi Ishikawa, held in Book Entry, void and cancelled.
Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to a total of 10,000,000
shares of preferred stock.
There are 6,000,000 shares currently designated.
A designation for 5,000,000 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) with a par value of $0.001
was filed on September 9, 2015, and another designation for 1,000,000 Convertible Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred
Stock”) with a par value of $0.001 was filed on December 7, 2020.
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
There are no shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (the Series A Preferred Stock) issued and outstanding at June 30, 2023, and December 31, 2022.
Each share of Series A Preferred Stock
is entitled to one hundred (100) votes per share on all matters.
Except as provided by law, the holders
of shares of Series A Preferred Stock vote together with the holders of shares of Common Stock as a single class.
In addition, so long as any shares of
Series A Preferred Stock remains outstanding, in addition to any other vote or consent of stockholders required by our certificate of
incorporation, the company will not, without first obtaining the approval (by written consent, as provided by law or otherwise) of the
holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a class: (i) Increase or decrease
(other than by redemption or conversion) the total number of authorized shares of Series A Preferred Stock; (ii) Effect an exchange reclassification,
or cancellation of all or a part of the Series A Preferred Stock, but excluding a stock split or reverse stock split of the Company’s
Common Stock or Preferred Stock; (iii) Effect an exchange, or create a right of exchange, of all or part of the shares of another class
of shares into shares of Series A Preferred Stock; or (iv) Alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of the shares of Series
A Preferred Stock so as to affect adversely the shares of such series, including the rights set forth in this Designation. For clarification,
issuances of additional authorized shares of Series A Preferred under the terms herein shall not require the authorization or approval
of the existing shareholders of Preferred Stock.
The Company is not required to pay dividends
at any specific rate on the Series A Preferred Stock. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, either
voluntarily or involuntarily, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution
of any assets of the Company to the holders of the junior stock by reason of their ownership of such stock, but not prior to any holders
of the Company’s senior securities, which holders shall have priority to the distribution of any assets of the Company, an amount
per share for each share of Series A Preferred Stock held by them equal to the sum of the liquidation preference specified for each share
of preferred stock. If upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the assets of the Company legally available for
distribution to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are insufficient to permit the payment to such holders of the full amounts
of their liquidation preference, subsequent to the payment to the senior securities then the entire remaining assets of the Company following
the payment to the senior securities legally available for distribution shall be distributed with equal priority and pro rata among holders
of the Series A Preferred Stock in proportion to the full amounts they would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to their liquidation
preference. The liquidation preference of Series A Preferred Stock shall be equal to the original issue price per share of Series A Preferred
Stock, as adjusted for any recapitalizations.
Holders of Series A Preferred Stock
shall have the right, exercisable at any time and from time to time (unless otherwise prohibited by law, rule or regulation), to convert
any or all of their shares of the Series A Preferred Stock into Common Stock at the conversion ratio of (1) one Preferred A share to (100)
one hundred common shares.
Holders of Series A Preferred Stock
have no preemptive or subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our Series A Preferred
Stock.
Convertible Series B
Preferred Stock
On December 7, 2020, 500,000 shares
of Convertible Series B Preferred Stock (the Series B Preferred Stock) were issued to Small Cap Compliance, LLC after the Eight Judicial
District Court of Nevada entered an order appointing Small Cap Compliance, LLC as custodian of the Company, authorizing and directing
it to, among other things, take any action reasonable, prudent and for the benefit of the Company, including reinstating the Company under
Nevada law, appointing officers and convening a meeting of stockholders. Small Cap Compliance, LLC was not a shareholder of the Company
on the date that it applied to serve as a custodian of the Company. On that same day, Small Cap Compliance, LLC filed the Certificate
of Reinstatement for the Company, thereby reinstating the Company, appointed Stephen Carnes as the sole officer and director of the Company
and amended the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of up to one million shares of Series B Preferred
Stock.
On January 9, 2023, Stephen Carnes,
the Company’s CEO and President, submitted his resignation as CEO of the Company and the Company’s Board of Directors simultaneously
elected Robert Morris to be appointed as the Company’s new CEO. The Company accepted Mr. Carnes’s resignation as CEO simultaneously
with Mr. Morris’s acceptance of the appointment as CEO. Mr. Morris has been on the Company’s Board of Directors since previously
being appointed on April 27, 2022. Mr. Carnes shall remain on the Company’s Board of Directors and remain the Company’s President.
On January 9, 2023, the Company also provided Mr. Morris with an employment agreement. As part of the agreement, the Company issued Mr.
Morris 250,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
In addition, as part of an employment
agreement on January 10, 2023, with Joseph Davis, as the Company’s President and Treasurer, the Company accepted the relinquishment
of 250,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock by Stephen Carnes and, on January 10, 2023, as part of the agreement, the Company issued
Mr. Davis 250,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.
Each share of Series B Preferred Stock
is entitled to one thousand (1,000) votes per share on all matters. Except as provided by law, the holders of shares of Series B Preferred
Stock vote together with the holders of shares of Common Stock as a single class.
The Series B Preferred Stock is not
entitled to receive any dividends in any amount during which such shares are outstanding.
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company, either voluntary or involuntary, after setting apart or paying in full the preferential amounts due to holders
of senior capital stock, if any, the holders of Series B Preferred Stock and parity capital stock, if any, shall be entitled to receive,
prior and in preference to any distribution of any of the assets or surplus funds of the Company to the holders of junior capital stock,
including Common Stock, an amount equal to $0.001 per share (the “Liquidation Preference”). If upon such liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of the Company, the assets of the Company available for distribution to the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock and
parity capital stock, if any, shall be insufficient to permit in full the payment of the Liquidation Preference, then all such assets
of the Company shall be distributed ratably among the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock and parity capital stock, if any. Neither
the consolidation or merger of the Company nor the sale, lease or transfer by the Company of all or a part of its assets shall be deemed
a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
Each share of Series B Preferred Stock
shall be convertible, at the option of the Holder, into 1,000 (One Thousand) fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Corporation’s
Common Stock. The aforementioned 1 to 1,000 ratio will be adjusted by stock splits, dividends, and distributions, and that adjustment
will apply to reclassifications, consolidations, and mergers.
Holders of Series B Preferred Stock
have no preemptive or subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to our Series B Preferred
Stock.
Note 10. Concentrations
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit
accounts that at times exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is
not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.
Note 11. Contingencies
The Company is subject to disputes or certain
claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company insures against such risks through participation in a loss prevention fund
that receives and manages all claims. Amounts are paid-in as determined by the loss prevention fund which resulted in a prepaid amount
of $259,930 at December 31, 2022.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization
declared Coronavirus (COVID-19) a pandemic. The continued spread of COVID-19, or any similar outbreaks in the future, may adversely impact
the local, regional, national and global economies. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company’s operating results is dependent
on the breadth and duration of the pandemic and could be affected by other factors management is not currently able to predict. Potential
impacts include, but are not limited to, additional costs for responding to COVID-19, shortages of personnel, shortages of supplies, and
delays, loss of, or reduction to, revenue. Management believes the Company is taking appropriate actions to respond to the pandemic, however,
the full impact is unknown and cannot be reasonably estimated at the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.
Note 12. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated subsequent events through
the date these financial statements were available to be issued. Based on our evaluation, there are no material events that have occurred
that require further disclosure.
PART III – EXHIBITS
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
2.1.1* |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation filed August 5, 2014 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
2.1.2* |
|
Certificate of Amendment by Custodian dated December 7, 2020 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
2.2* |
|
Certificate of Designation filed September 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
2.2.1* |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Designation filed December 7, 2020 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
2.3* |
|
Bylaws of the Registrant dated December 9, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
4.1+ |
|
Form of Subscription Agreement |
6.1* |
|
Custodian Services Agreement dated December 1, 2020 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
6.2* |
|
Redemption and Repurchase Agreement (executed August 25, 2022) (and Associated Promissory Note) between Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., its shareholders, and Bulwark Capital, L.L.C., and Robin C. Montel. |
6.3* |
|
Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement between EDSCO Holding Company, LLC and Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC entered into on January 31, 2022. |
6.4* |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Tradition Transportation Company, LLC and Tradition Leasing Systems, LLC, and Karr Transportation Inc., Beers Investment Group, LLC, and its shareholders, Kelly Beers and Albert Beers.pdf |
6.5* |
|
Purchase Agreement of 959 Growth Parkway between Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. (Buyer) and MP Perry Properties, LLC (seller) accepted February 02, 2022 |
6.6* |
|
Lease Agreement (1175 Collins Road Greenwood Indiana) between Tradition Logistics, LLC and Tradition Transportation Group, Inc., and Scannell Properties #529, LLC June 02, 2022 |
6.7* |
|
Lease Agreement (210 S. Progress Drive, Kendallville Indiana) between Miller's Development, Inc. and Anthem Anchor Bolts and Fasteners, LLC dated September 30, 2022 |
6.8* |
|
Original Lease Agreement (300 Growth Parkway, Angola Indiana) between Hanning & Bean Enterprises Inc. and Tradition Logistics, LLC dated January 6, 2022 |
6.9* |
|
Lease Renewal Agreement (300 Growth Parkway, Angola Indiana) between Hanning & Bean Enterprises Inc. and Tradition Logistics, LLC dated January 6, 2022 |
6.10* |
|
Lease Agreement (3000 Tremont Rd. Savannah, GA 31405) between Hager Pacific 1 LP, RJN Properties, LLC, MH Capital, LLC and 98 Street Investment, LLC, and Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. & Tradition Logistics, LLC dated April 6, 2022 |
6.11* |
|
Lease Agreement (333 S. Franklin Rd. Indianapolis, Indiana) between Franklin IN LP, and Tradition Logistics LLC executed November 3, 2022 |
6.12* |
|
Lease Agreement (6644 Old River Road N, Statesboro, GA) between sustainable Logistics, LLC and Tradition Logistics, LLC dated April 1, 2022 |
6.13* |
|
Lease Agreement (Suite 1502, 110 E. "Wayne St. Fort Wayne Indiana) between One Sumit II, LLC and Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC dated October 18, 2021 |
6.14* |
|
Lease Renewal (Suite 1502, 110 E. "Wayne St. Fort Wayne Indiana) between One Sumit II, LLC and Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC dated April 13, 2022 |
6.15* |
|
Lease agreement (Suite 1503, 110 E. Wayne St. Fort Wayne Indiana) between One Sumit II, LLC and Freedom Freight Solutions, LLC dated May 5, 2022 |
6.16* |
|
Sublease Agreement (6887 W 350 N, Greenfield, Indiana) between Adidas Sales Inc and Tradition Logistics LLC dated June 10, 2021 |
6.17* |
|
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Loan #19011000012 - First Financial Bank N.A. - Date 03012021 and Maturity 05152022 |
|
|
|
6.18* |
|
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Loan #19011000040 - First Financial Bank N.A. - Date 07282021 and Maturity 07222026 |
6.19* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan - Elements Financial Credit Union - Date 09152021 and Maturity 10012026 |
6.20* |
|
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Agreement for Letter of Credit #19014000103 - First Financial Bank N.A. - Date 10012021 and Maturity 10012022 |
6.21* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25892894 - Republic Bank - Note Date 10272021 and Maturity 10272024 |
6.22* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25829823 - Republic Bank - Note Date 03082022 and Maturity 09082027 |
6.23* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25892940 - Republic Bank - Note Date 10272021 and Maturity 10272024 |
6.24* |
|
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. - Loan #19011000079 - First Financial Bank N.A. - Date 03162022 and Maturity 09162027 |
6.25* |
|
Anthem Anchor Bolts & Fasteners, L.L.C. - Loan #19011000082 - First Financial Bank N.A. - Date 04012022 and Maturity 04012027 |
6.26* |
|
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Loan #190100085 - First Financial Bank NA - Date 04222022 and Maturity 04222032 |
6.27* |
|
Tradition Transportation Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Loan #19011000109 - First Financial Bank N.A. - Date 07272022 and Maturity 01272027 |
6.28* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25830864 - Republic Bank & Trust Company - Note Date 08162022 and Maturity 08162028 |
6.29* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25830910 - Republic Bank & Trust Company - Note Date 08252022 and Maturity 08252028 |
6.30* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25830929 - Republic Bank & Trust Company - Note Date 08262022 and Maturity 08262028 |
6.31* |
|
Tradition Leasing Systems, L.L.C. - Loan #25831062 - Republic Bank & Trust Company - Note Date 09222022 and Maturity 09222029 |
6.32* |
|
Conformed copy of Promissory Note dated December 22, 2022 issued by APSI to Stephen W. Carnes |
6.33* |
|
Conformed copy of Promissory Note dated December 28, 2022 issued by Joseph M. Davis to Timothy E. Evans |
6.34* |
|
Conformed copy of Promissory Note dated December 28, 2022 issued by James M. Davis to James L. Evans |
6.35* |
|
Conformed copy of Promissory Note dated December 28, 2022 issued by Joseph M. Davis to Bulwark Capital, L.L.C. |
6.36* |
|
Conformed copy of Assignment and Pledge of Stock Agreement dated December 28, 2022 by and between Joseph M. Davis to Timothy E. Evans |
6.37* |
|
Conformed copy of Assignment and Pledge of Stock Agreement dated December 28, 2022 by and between Joseph M. Davis to James L. Evans |
6.38* |
|
Conformed copy of Assignment and Pledge of Stock Agreement dated December 28, 2022 by and between Joseph M. Davis to Bulwark Capital, L.L.C. |
6.39* |
|
Conformed copy of President and CEO Employment Agreement dated December 28, 2022 by and between Tradition and Timothy E. Evans |
6.40* |
|
Conformed copy of Vice President Employment Agreement dated December 28, 2022 by and between Tradition and James L. Evans |
6.41* |
|
Conformed copy of General Counsel Employment Agreement dated December 28, 2022 by and between Tradition and Joseph J. Montel |
6.42* |
|
Conformed copy of Executive Employment Agreement dated January 9, 2023 by and between Aqua Power Systems, Inc. and Robert Morris |
6.43* |
|
Conformed copy of Executive Employment Agreement dated January 17, 2023 by and between Aqua Power Systems, Inc. and Joseph Davis |
7.1* |
|
Conformed copy of Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of December 28, 2022 by and between APSI and Joseph M. Davis. |
7.2* |
|
Conformed copy of Multiparty Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 28, 2022 by and between Joseph M. Davis and Timothy E. Evans, James L. Evans, and Bulwark Capital, L.L.C. |
7.3* |
|
Conformed copy of Contract Assignment agreement dated as of December 28, 2022 by and between APSI and Joseph M. Davis. |
2.1* |
|
Articles of Incorporation filed December 9, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2021). |
11.1+ |
|
Consent of Newlan Law Firm, PLLC (see Exhibit 12.1) |
12.1+ |
|
Opinion of Newlan Law Firm, PLLC |
______________
* Incorporated by reference as indicated.
+ Filed previously.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of Regulation A, the issuer certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form
1-A and has duly caused this offering statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City
of Winter Park, State of Florida, on November 6, 2023.
|
AQUA POWER SYSTEMS INC.
By: /s/ Robert D. Morris
Robert D. Morris
Chief Executive Officer |
This Offering Statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
/s/ Robert D. Morris
Robert D. Morris
Chief Executive Officer [Principal Executive Officer]
and Executive Director |
November 6, 2023 |
|
/s/ Joseph M. Davis
Joseph M. Davis
President, Treasurer [Principal Accounting Officer]
and Director |
November 6, 2023 |
|
/s/ Stephen W. Carnes
Stephen W. Carnes
Secretary and Director |
November 6, 2023 |
Aqua Power Systems (PK) (USOTC:APSI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
Aqua Power Systems (PK) (USOTC:APSI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025