CLEVELAND, Ohio, June 6, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: FCEA and FCEB) today announced EBDT,
net earnings and revenues for the first quarter ended April 30, 2011.
EBDT
First-quarter EBDT (earnings before depreciation, amortization
and deferred taxes) was $127.4
million, an increase of $56.9
million compared with 2010 first-quarter EBDT of
$70.5 million. On a fully
diluted, per-share basis, first-quarter 2011 EBDT was $0.63, a 70.3 percent increase compared with 2010
first quarter EBDT of $0.37.
For an explanation of EBDT variances, see the section titled
"Review of Results" in this news release. EBDT and EBDT per
share are non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (GAAP)
measures. A reconciliation of net earnings (the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to EBDT) to EBDT is provided in the
Financial Highlights table in this news release.
Net Earnings/Loss
First-quarter net earnings attributable to Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. were $47.6 million,
or $0.25 per share, compared with a
net loss of $15.6 million, or
$0.10 per share, in the first quarter
of 2010. After preferred dividends, net earnings attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc. common shareholders was
$43.7 million, or $0.24 per share, for the quarter ended
April 30, 2011.
Revenues
First-quarter 2011 consolidated revenues were $316.9 million compared with $271.5 million last year. The year-over-year
revenue variance was impacted primarily by the same factors
impacting EBDT, as described below under “Review of Results.”
Review of Results
An exhibit illustrating factors impacting first-quarter 2011
EBDT results, compared with results for the comparable period in
2010, is available on the Investor Relations page of the Company’s
web site: www.forestcity.net, and is included in the company’s
first-quarter 2011 Supplemental Package furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
For the three months ended April 30,
2011, the Company’s combined Commercial and Residential
Segments (also referred to as the rental properties portfolio)
provided a pre-tax EBDT increase of $55.7
million, compared with the first quarter of 2010. The
year-over-year increase was primarily the result of initial
proceeds of $42.6 million from the
previously announced sale of land and air rights to Rock Ohio
Caesars Cleveland LLC for construction of a casino in downtown
Cleveland, increased income of
$7.7 million from tax credits, the
ramp-up of new properties of $2.6
million, and decreased interest expense on the mature
portfolio of $2.2 million. These
increases in the portfolio were partially offset by reduced EBDT
from properties sold of $4.6
million.
The Company’s Land Segment provided a pre-tax EBDT increase of
$3.0 million, compared with the same
period in 2010, primarily due to increased sales. The Nets provided
a pre-tax EBDT increase of $3.9
million, compared to the first quarter of 2010, due to the
decrease in Forest City’s share of allocated losses.
Corporate pre-tax EBDT decreased $6.9
million compared with the first quarter of 2010, primarily
as a result of the nonrecurring 2010 gain on early extinguishment
of debt of $6.3 million, related to
the exchange of a portion of the Company’s Senior Notes. Finally,
EBDT was favorably impacted by a larger tax benefit of $1.2 million, compared with the prior year.
NOI, Occupancies and Rent
Overall comparable property net operating income (NOI) was flat
during the first quarter, compared with the same period a year ago.
The retail portfolio was up 2.6 percent. In the residential
portfolio, conventional apartments were up 5.8 percent, but
portfolio-wide results were negatively impacted by an increase in,
and the timing of, operating expenses in the senior-housing
component, resulting in an overall residential increase of 1.8
percent. The office portfolio was down 2.5 percent, compared
with the first quarter of 2010.
Comparable property NOI, defined as NOI from properties operated
in the three months ended April 30,
2011 and 2010, is a non-GAAP financial measure, and is based
on the pro-rata consolidation method, also a non-GAAP financial
measure. Included in this release is a schedule that presents
comparable property NOI on the full-consolidation method.
At April 30, 2011, comparable
retail occupancies were 91.2 percent, compared with 89.7 percent at
April 30, 2010, and regional mall
sales averaged $411 per square foot
on a rolling 12-month basis, an increase of 7.6 percent from the
same period in 2010, while comparable regional mall sales increased
4.5 percent, compared with first quarter of 2010. Comparable office
occupancies increased to 90.7 percent, compared with 90.6 percent
last year. In the residential portfolio, comparable average
occupancies for the three months ended April
30, 2011, were 95.4 percent, compared with 93.4 percent last
year. Comparable residential net rental income (defined as gross
rent less vacancies and concessions) increased to 93.0 percent,
compared with 89.8 percent in the same period in 2010.
Commentary
Portfolio
“Overall, we’re pleased with our first quarter results, which
were in line with our expectations,” said Charles A. Ratner, Forest City president and chief executive
officer. “The year-over-year increase in total EBDT was
driven largely by initial proceeds from our Cleveland casino land and air rights sale, as
well as by increased income from tax credits, and a decrease in our
allocated losses at the Nets.
“Results from our operating portfolio reflect continued
improving fundamentals. Comparable occupancies were up
year-over-year in all major product types, with solid gains in both
retail and multifamily. Results from our retail portfolio, as
measured by comparable property net operating income, showed solid
improvement consistent with industry-wide trends. In our
residential multifamily portfolio, results from our conventional
apartments were up solidly, but the overall increase in multifamily
comparable property net operating income was reduced by a
year-over-year decline in our senior-housing component as a result
of increased operating expenses. Comparable property results
in the office portfolio were negatively impacted, as
anticipated, by lease expirations at our Brooklyn office properties, although
re-leasing efforts to date have exceeded our expectations,
reflecting improvement in the overall New
York office market. In our Land Segment, pre-tax EBDT
was up modestly, but results continue to reflect weak conditions in
our traditional land business, which is largely driven by the sale
of lots to single-family homebuilders.
Capital Raising
“During the quarter, we continued to take advantage of improving
valuations by selectively monetizing assets to generate liquidity
and realize value from the portfolio. In addition to the
casino land sale, transactions in the quarter included the sale of
our interest in Met Lofts, a downtown Los
Angeles apartment property, and the sale of the Charleston
Marriott hotel in Charleston, West
Virginia. The most significant transaction in the
first quarter was the completion of our New York retail joint venture with Madison
International Realty. That transaction, which resulted in an
investment by Madison of $172.3
million, represented a 6.9 percent cap rate on 2010 net
operating income for the 15 properties involved. These and
other transactions we have executed over the past two years
continue to demonstrate the significant value embedded in our
portfolio of high-quality assets in strong markets.
“Since the end of the quarter, we have continued to evaluate and
selectively take advantage of transactional opportunities.
The most recent of these, which was completed May 10, was the sale to USAA Real Estate Company
of the first two completed office buildings at our Waterfront
Station mixed-use project in Washington,
D.C., which opened in the first quarter of 2010. The
sale price was $356.0 million, as
compared to a cost of $245.9 million
at full consolidation, as reflected in our Supplemental Package for
the first quarter. Forest City’s share of net proceeds was
$61 million, a clear demonstration of
our ability to generate real value from our portfolio. Importantly,
following the transaction, we and our partners at Waterfront
Station retain more than a million square feet of additional future
office, residential and retail entitlement. As we have
historically, we will continue to selectively evaluate asset sales
and joint ventures going forward as a means to generate liquidity
and realize value.
“Another notable achievement during the first quarter was the
closing of our new, $450 million
revolving credit facility with a group of 14 banks. The new
credit facility has improved terms, with fewer restrictions and an
extended maturity, compared with the facility it replaced. Finally,
in the first week of May, we executed privately negotiated
exchanges of $40.0 million of our
5.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 for Class A common stock.
Both of these achievements reflect the strength of our
relationships with our lenders and investors, as well as our
commitment to reduce total recourse debt and improve our balance
sheet and debt metrics.
Pipeline
“During the first quarter, we continued to make progress on our
pipeline of under-construction projects. Of particular note
is our 8 Spruce Street apartment high-rise in Lower Manhattan,
which began first-phase lease-up on February
18. Market acceptance of this unique, luxury property has
been remarkable. As of May 31,
202 leases have been signed, representing 22 percent of the
property’s total 903 units at completion. Per-square-foot rates for
leases signed to date are in line with our pro-forma for the
property.
“Also since the beginning of the fiscal year, we have taken
steps to advance new projects that we believe will add to future
growth, both within our portfolio and through new opportunities.
Leveraging existing entitlement at Stapleton in Denver, we expect to break ground this summer
on two new multifamily projects, totaling 338 units. New vertical
development is also anticipated in the near term at both Atlantic
Yards in Brooklyn and The Yards in
Washington, D.C. In the
Dallas suburb of Frisco, we’ve entered into a public/private
partnership with the city and its community development entity to
develop a 320-acre mixed-use project on land we control with our
partner. Finally, in San
Francisco, Forest City has
been selected as developer by the Port of San Francisco to execute the port’s master
plan for “Pier 70,” a 25-acre site in a historic marine industrial
area on that city’s Central Waterfront.”
Openings and Projects Under Construction
At the end of the first quarter, Forest City had four projects under
construction with a total project cost of $1.7 billion at the Company’s pro-rata share
($2.7 billion at full consolidation).
Three of the projects are in New
York: 8 Spruce Street (formerly
Beekman), a 903-unit residential
tower in Manhattan,
Westchester’s Ridge
Hill, a mixed-use retail center in Yonkers, New York, and the Barclays
Center arena, the future home of the NBA Nets in
Brooklyn. The fourth is
Foundry Lofts at The Yards in Washington, D.C.
As referenced above, first-phase lease-up and tenant move-ins on
the lower floors are well underway at 8 Spruce
Street, the Frank
Gehry-designed apartment tower in lower Manhattan. Interior build-out continues
on the upper floors, and additional phases of leasing are expected
to begin later in 2011 and into the first quarter of 2012.
Leasing efforts and construction continue at Westchester’s
Ridge Hill, the company’s
mixed-use retail project in Yonkers, New
York, with commitments currently for 50 percent of the
retail space. In May, the first-phase opening for Cinema De Lux and
REI took place. Additional tenant openings are anticipated
later in 2011, leading up to the opening of anchor Lord &
Taylor in February 2012. The center was the subject
of considerable interest from retailers at the recent annual ICSC
RECon event in Las Vegas.
With economic conditions continuing to improve, retailer
interest and leasing activity is accelerating.
Work continues at the Barclays Center at Atlantic
Yards, and an official opening date of September 28, 2012 has been set for the arena.
Approximately 55 percent of forecasted contractually
obligated revenues for the arena are currently under contract.
In addition to work on the arena, initial planning, design
and engineering work is also underway for the first residential
multifamily building at Atlantic Yards.
In Washington, D.C.,
construction continues on Foundry Lofts, the first
residential building at The Yards mixed-use project. The
apartment building is scheduled for completion and the beginning of
lease-up in the third quarter of 2011. This adaptive reuse of
a former Navy Yard industrial building will offer 170 loft-style
apartments, including 34 two-level penthouse units, together with a
small amount of street-level retail space.
Liquidity and Financing Activity
At April 30, 2011, the Company had
$241.7 million ($204.6 million at full consolidation) in cash on
its balance sheet, and $256.6 million
of available capacity on its revolving line of credit.
Since January 31, 2011, the
Company has addressed, through closed loans and committed
financings, $664.5 million at
full consolidation ($517.0 million at
its pro-rata share) of the $1.2
billion ($1.1 billion at
pro-rata) of long-term debt maturities coming due in fiscal
year 2011. Additionally, the Company addressed $637.3 million ($543.2
million at pro-rata) of loans maturing in future years.
As of April 30, 2011, the
Company's weighted-average cost of nonrecourse debt decreased to
4.95 percent from 5.10 percent at April 30,
2010, primarily due to a decrease in fixed-rate mortgage
debt. Fixed-rate mortgage debt, which represented 69 percent of the
Company's total nonrecourse mortgage debt, and is inclusive of
interest rate swaps, decreased to 5.85 percent at April 30, 2011 from 6.06 percent at April 30, 2010. Variable-rate mortgage debt
increased from 2.87 percent at April 30,
2010, to 2.92 percent at April 30,
2011.
Outlook
“Forest City’s first-quarter results, as well as those for much
of the broader real estate industry, continue to reflect improving
conditions,” Ratner concluded. “In addition, development in key
markets and property types, particularly multifamily, appears to be
coming back into favor as fundamentals improve, asset valuations
strengthen, tenants gain more confidence, and lenders and investors
shift their focus from defensive strategies to future growth.
“We remain optimistic based on the performance of our portfolio,
the strength of our core markets, and the depth of our entitlement.
We retain appropriate caution in our outlook, given the many
headwinds in the macro environment, ranging from the threat of
rising interest rates, to sovereign debt crises in Europe, to federal, state and municipal fiscal
concerns here in the U.S.
”Today, Forest City is
well-positioned to take advantage of improving fundamentals and
market demand. With growth from our portfolio as a strong
foundation, we look forward to, and are prepared to take advantage
of new opportunities as they arise.”
Corporate Description
Forest City Enterprises, Inc. is a NYSE-listed national real
estate company with $11.5 billion in
total assets. The Company is principally engaged in the ownership,
development, management and acquisition of commercial and
residential real estate and land throughout the United States. For more information,
visit www.forestcity.net.
Supplemental Package
Please refer to the Investor Relations section of the Company's
website at www.forestcity.net for a Supplemental Package, which the
Company will also furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) on Form 8-K. This Supplemental Package includes operating
and financial information for the three months ended April 30, 2011, with reconciliations of non-GAAP
financial measures, such as EBDT, comparable NOI and pro-rata
financial statements, to their most directly comparable GAAP
financial measures.
EBDT
The Company uses an additional measure, along with net earnings,
to report its operating results. This non-GAAP measure, referred to
as Earnings Before Depreciation, Amortization and Deferred Taxes
(“EBDT”), is not a measure of operating results or cash flows from
operations as defined by GAAP and may not be directly comparable to
similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
The Company believes that EBDT provides additional information
about its core operations and, along with net earnings, is
necessary to understand its operating results. EBDT is used by the
chief operating decision maker and management in assessing
operating performance and to consider capital requirements and
allocation of resources by segment and on a consolidated basis. The
Company believes EBDT is important to investors because it provides
another method for the investor to measure its long-term operating
performance, as net earnings can vary from year to year due to
property dispositions, acquisitions and other factors that have a
short-term impact.
EBDT is defined as net earnings excluding the following items:
i) gain (loss) on disposition of rental properties, divisions and
other investments (net of tax); ii) the adjustment to recognize
rental revenues and rental expense using the straight-line method;
iii) non-cash charges for real estate depreciation, amortization,
and amortization of mortgage procurement costs; iv) deferred income
taxes; v) preferred payment which is classified as non-controlling
interest expense on the Company's Consolidated Statements of
Operations; vi) impairment of real estate (net of tax); vii)
extraordinary items (net of tax); and viii) cumulative or
retrospective effect of change in accounting principle (net of
tax).
EBDT is reconciled to net earnings (loss), the most comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, in the table
titled Financial Highlights below and in the Company's Supplemental
Package, which the Company will also furnish to the SEC on Form
8-K. The adjustment to recognize rental revenues and rental
expenses on the straight-line method is excluded because it is
management's opinion that rental revenues and expenses should be
recognized when due from the tenants or due to the landlord. The
Company excludes depreciation and amortization expense related to
real estate operations from EBDT because it believes the values of
its properties, in general, have appreciated over time in excess of
their original cost. Deferred income taxes, which are the result of
timing differences of certain net expense items deducted in a
future year for federal income tax purposes, are excluded until the
year in which they are reflected in the Company's current tax
provision. The impairment of real estate is excluded from EBDT
because it varies from year to year based on factors unrelated to
the Company's overall financial performance and is related to the
ultimate gain on dispositions of operating properties. The
Company's EBDT may not be directly comparable to similarly titled
measures reported by other companies.
Pro-Rata Consolidation Method
This press release contains certain financial measures prepared
in accordance with GAAP under the full consolidation accounting
method and certain financial measures prepared in accordance with
the pro-rata consolidation method (non-GAAP). The Company presents
certain financial amounts under the pro-rata method because it
believes this information is useful to investors as this method
reflects the manner in which the Company operates its business. In
line with industry practice, the Company has made a large number of
investments in which its economic ownership is less than 100
percent as a means of procuring opportunities and sharing risk.
Under the pro-rata consolidation method, the Company generally
presents its investments proportionate to its economic share of
ownership. Under GAAP, the full consolidation method is used to
report partnership assets and liabilities consolidated at 100
percent if deemed to be under its control or if the Company is
deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the variable interest
entities ("VIE"), even if its ownership is not 100 percent. The
Company provides reconciliations from the full consolidation method
to the pro-rata consolidation method in the exhibits below and
throughout its Supplemental Package, which the Company will also
furnish to the SEC on Form 8-K.
Safe Harbor Language
Statements made in this news release that state the Company’s or
management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or
predictions of the future are forward-looking statements. The
Company's actual results could differ materially from those
expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements due to
various risks, uncertainties and other factors. Risks and factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the
impact of current lending and capital market conditions on our
liquidity, ability to finance or refinance projects and repay our
debt, the impact of the current economic environment on our
ownership, development and management of our real estate portfolio,
general real estate investment and development risks, vacancies in
our properties, further downturns in the housing market,
competition, illiquidity of real estate investments, bankruptcy or
defaults of tenants, anchor store consolidations or closings,
international activities, the impact of terrorist acts, risks
associated with an investment in a professional sports team, our
substantial debt leverage and the ability to obtain and service
debt, the impact of restrictions imposed by our credit facility and
senior debt, exposure to hedging agreements, the level and
volatility of interest rates, the continued availability of
tax-exempt government financing, the impact of credit rating
downgrades, effects of uninsured or underinsured losses, effects of
a downgrade or failure of our insurance carriers, environmental
liabilities, conflicts of interest, risks associated with the sale
of tax credits, risks associated with developing and managing
properties in partnership with others, the ability to maintain
effective internal controls, compliance with governmental
regulations, increased legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the
financial services industry, volatility in the market price of our
publicly traded securities, inflation risks, litigation
risks, as well as other risks listed from time to time in the
Company’s SEC filings, including but not limited to, the Company’s
annual and quarterly reports.
Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
(dollars in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
April
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Operating
Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations
|
$
42,978
|
$
(21,856)
|
|
$
64,834
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of
tax
|
5,719
|
492
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
48,697
|
(21,364)
|
|
70,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(737)
|
5,823
|
|
(6,560)
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)
|
(393)
|
(21)
|
|
(372)
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
|
$
47,567
|
$
(15,562)
|
|
$
63,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
(3,850)
|
-
|
|
(3,850)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc. common shareholders
|
$
43,717
|
$
(15,562)
|
|
$
59,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Depreciation,
Amortization and Deferred Taxes (EBDT) (2)
|
$
127,376
|
$
70,467
|
|
$
56,909
|
|
80.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Earnings
(Loss) to Earnings Before Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and Deferred Taxes (EBDT) (2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
attributable to Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
|
$
47,567
|
$
(15,562)
|
|
$
63,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization - Real Estate Groups (7)
|
68,829
|
69,954
|
|
(1,125)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of mortgage
procurement costs - Real Estate Groups (7)
|
3,632
|
3,062
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
expense (8)
|
4,813
|
(15,376)
|
|
20,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove deferred income tax
expense for non-Real Estate Groups in 2010 (8)
|
-
|
5,133
|
|
(5,133)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense
on non-operating earnings: (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
rental properties and partial interest in rental
properties
|
30,304
|
13,724
|
|
16,580
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition
included in discontinued operations
|
1,201
|
-
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rent adjustment
(4)
|
(2,224)
|
(3,038)
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference payment
(6)
|
585
|
585
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of consolidated real
estate
|
4,835
|
-
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated
real estate
|
-
|
12,899
|
|
(12,899)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of rental
properties and partial interest in rental properties
|
(9,561)
|
(866)
|
|
(8,695)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
unconsolidated entities
|
(12,567)
|
(48)
|
|
(12,519)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on disposition of rental properties
|
(10,431)
|
-
|
|
(10,431)
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest - Gain on disposition
|
393
|
-
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Depreciation,
Amortization and Deferred Taxes (EBDT) (2)
|
$
127,376
|
$
70,467
|
|
$
56,909
|
|
80.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Depreciation,
Amortization and Deferred Taxes (EBDT) (2) (3) (5)
|
$
0.63
|
$
0.37
|
|
$
0.26
|
|
70.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations
|
$
0.23
|
$
(0.14)
|
|
$
0.37
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of
tax
|
0.03
|
-
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
0.26
|
(0.14)
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(0.01)
|
0.04
|
|
(0.05)
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
(0.01)
|
0.04
|
|
(0.05)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
|
$
0.25
|
$
(0.10)
|
|
$
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
(0.02)
|
-
|
|
(0.02)
|
|
|
|
Interest on convertible
debt
|
0.01
|
-
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
Preferred distribution on Class
A Common Units
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc. common shareholders
|
$
0.24
|
$
(0.10)
|
|
$
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
outstanding (5)
|
165,498,904
|
155,352,050
|
|
10,146,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding (5)
|
204,975,222
|
196,290,633
|
|
8,684,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
(dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
April
30,
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
|
Operating Earnings (a non-GAAP
financial measure) and Reconciliation to Net
Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from real estate
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Group
|
$ 255,287
|
$ 213,210
|
|
$ 42,077
|
|
|
Residential
Group
|
53,504
|
51,392
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
Land Development
Group
|
8,090
|
6,858
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
The Nets
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Corporate
Activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total
Revenues
|
316,881
|
271,460
|
|
45,421
|
16.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
(165,688)
|
(155,291)
|
|
(10,397)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
(67,994)
|
(81,118)
|
|
13,124
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on early
extinguishment of debt
|
(296)
|
6,297
|
|
(6,593)
|
|
|
Amortization of mortgage
procurement costs (7)
|
(3,449)
|
(2,612)
|
|
(837)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
(7)
|
(58,391)
|
(60,071)
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
Interest and other
income
|
15,507
|
6,814
|
|
8,693
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated entities, including impairment
|
19,994
|
(17,124)
|
|
37,118
|
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated
real estate
|
-
|
12,899
|
|
(12,899)
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
unconsolidated entities
|
(12,567)
|
(48)
|
|
(12,519)
|
|
|
Revenues and interest income
from discontinued operations (1)
|
1,293
|
10,262
|
|
(8,969)
|
|
|
Expenses from discontinued
operations (1)
|
(1,293)
|
(9,474)
|
|
8,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss (a non-GAAP
financial measure)
|
43,997
|
(18,006)
|
|
62,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of consolidated real
estate
|
(4,835)
|
-
|
|
(4,835)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated
real estate
|
-
|
(12,899)
|
|
12,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
unconsolidated entities
|
12,567
|
48
|
|
12,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of rental
properties and partial interest in rental properties, net of
noncontrolling interest
|
9,561
|
866
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of rental
properties included in discontinued operations (1)
|
10,431
|
-
|
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
earnings
|
13,294
|
6,975
|
|
6,319
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
(4,813)
|
15,376
|
|
(20,189)
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
rental properties and partial interest in rental
properties
|
(31,505)
|
(13,724)
|
|
(17,781)
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
(expense)
|
(23,024)
|
8,627
|
|
(31,651)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
48,697
|
(21,364)
|
|
70,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(737)
|
5,823
|
|
(6,560)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
earnings
|
-
|
(21)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
rental properties
|
(393)
|
-
|
|
(393)
|
|
|
|
(393)
|
(21)
|
|
(372)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interests
|
(1,130)
|
5,802
|
|
(6,932)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
|
$ 47,567
|
$ (15,562)
|
|
$ 63,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
(3,850)
|
-
|
|
(3,850)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc. common shareholders
|
$ 43,717
|
$ (15,562)
|
|
$ 59,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
All earnings of properties which
have been sold or are held for sale are reported as discontinued
operations assuming no significant continuing
involvement.
|
|
|
|
2)
|
The Company uses an additional
measure, along with net earnings, to report its operating results.
This measure, referred to as Earnings Before Depreciation,
Amortization and Deferred Taxes (“EBDT”), is not a measure of
operating results as defined by generally accepted accounting
principles and may not be directly comparable to similarly-titled
measures reported by other companies. The Company believes that
EBDT provides additional information about its operations, and
along with net earnings, is necessary to understand its operating
results. EBDT is defined as net earnings excluding the
following items: i) gain (loss) on disposition of operating
properties, divisions and other investments (net of tax); ii) the
adjustment to recognize rental revenues and rental expense using
the straight-line method; iii) non-cash charges for real estate
depreciation, amortization (including amortization of mortgage
procurement costs) and deferred income taxes; iv) preferred payment
classified as noncontrolling interest expense on the Company's
Consolidated Statement of Earnings; v) impairment of real estate
(net of tax); vi) extraordinary items (net of tax); and vii)
cumulative or retrospective effect of change in accounting
principle (net of tax). See our discussion of EBDT in the
news release.
|
|
|
|
3)
|
For the three months ended April
30, 2011 and 2010, the calculation of EBDT per share under the
if-converted method requires an adjustment for interest of $1,798
and $2,640, respectively, related to the 3.625% Puttable Senior
Notes and the 5% Convertible Senior Notes. Therefore EBDT for
purposes of calculating per share data is $129,174 and $73,107 for
the three months ended April 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
4)
|
The Company recognizes minimum
rents on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease
pursuant to accounting for leases. The straight-line rent
adjustment is recorded as an increase or decrease to revenue or
operating expense from Forest City Rental Properties Corporation, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,
with the applicable offset to either accounts receivable or
accounts payable, as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
5)
|
For the three months ended April
30, 2011, weighted average shares issuable upon the conversion of
preferred stock of 14,550,257 are not included in the calculation
of earnings per share because they are anti-dilutive. They
are included in the calculation of EBDT per share because they are
dilutive to this measure.
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April
30, 2010, the effect of 40,938,583 shares of dilutive securities
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share because their effect is anti-dilutive to the loss from
continuing operations. (Since these shares are dilutive for
the computation of EBDT per share for the three months ended April
30, 2010, diluted weighted average shares outstanding of
196,290,633 were used to arrive at $0.37/share.)
|
|
|
|
6)
|
The preference payment
represents the respective period's share of the annual preferred
payment in connection with the issuance of Class A Common Units in
exchange for Bruce C. Ratner's noncontrolling interest in the
Forest City Ratner Companies portfolio.
|
|
|
|
7)
|
The following table provides
detail of depreciation and amortization and amortization of
mortgage procurement costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Consolidation
|
$
58,391
|
$
60,071
|
|
|
Non-Real Estate
|
(702)
|
(1,568)
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups Full
Consolidation
|
57,689
|
58,503
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups related to
noncontrolling interest
|
(2,550)
|
(1,785)
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups
Unconsolidated
|
13,690
|
11,368
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups Discontinued
Operations
|
-
|
1,868
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups Pro-Rata
Consolidation
|
$
68,829
|
$
69,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of Mortgage Procurement Costs
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full Consolidation
|
$
3,449
|
$
2,612
|
|
|
Non-Real Estate
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups Full
Consolidation
|
3,449
|
2,612
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups related to
noncontrolling interest
|
(435)
|
(89)
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups
Unconsolidated
|
618
|
484
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups Discontinued
Operations
|
-
|
55
|
|
|
Real Estate Groups Pro-Rata
Consolidation
|
$
3,632
|
$
3,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
2010
|
|
8) The following table provides
detail of Income Tax Expense (Benefit):
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Current
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Earnings
|
$
(13,244)
|
$
(7,105)
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
rental properties and partial interest in rental
properties
|
30,304
|
13,724
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
17,060
|
6,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Earnings
|
(50)
|
130
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
rental properties and partial interest in rental
properties
|
1,201
|
-
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
1,151
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current taxes
|
18,211
|
6,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
$
1,252
|
$
(15,542)
|
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
3,561
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Deferred taxes
|
4,813
|
(15,376)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand
Total
|
$
23,024
|
$
(8,627)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Recap of Grand
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Groups
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
8,519
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
(10,243)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,724)
|
|
|
Non-Real Estate Groups
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
(1,770)
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
(5,133)
|
|
|
|
|
(6,903)
|
|
|
Grand
Total
|
|
$
(8,627)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Operating
Income (non-GAAP) to Net Earnings (Loss) (GAAP) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2011
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus
|
|
|
|
|
Full
|
Less
|
Unconsolidated
|
Plus
|
Pro-Rata
|
|
|
Full
|
Less
|
Unconsolidated
|
Plus
|
Pro-Rata
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
Noncontrolling
|
Investments
at
|
Discontinued
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
Noncontrolling
|
Investments
at
|
Discontinued
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
(GAAP)
|
Interest
|
Pro-Rata
|
Operations
|
(Non-GAAP)
|
|
|
(GAAP)
|
Interest
|
Pro-Rata
|
Operations
|
(Non-GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from real estate operations
|
$
316,881
|
$
17,240
|
$
82,714
|
$
1,293
|
$
383,648
|
|
|
$
271,460
|
$
13,092
|
$
73,473
|
$
10,184
|
$
342,025
|
|
Exclude straight-line rent adjustment (1)
|
(3,435)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(3,435)
|
|
|
(4,117)
|
-
|
-
|
(163)
|
(4,280)
|
|
Adjusted revenues
|
313,446
|
17,240
|
82,714
|
1,293
|
380,213
|
|
|
267,343
|
13,092
|
73,473
|
10,021
|
337,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add interest and other
income
|
15,507
|
(140)
|
117
|
-
|
15,764
|
|
|
6,814
|
899
|
14,816
|
3
|
20,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated entities, including impairment
|
19,994
|
48
|
(20,299)
|
-
|
(353)
|
|
|
(17,124)
|
(6,444)
|
10,953
|
-
|
273
|
|
Exclude gain on disposition of
unconsolidated entities
|
(12,567)
|
-
|
12,567
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
(48)
|
-
|
48
|
-
|
-
|
|
Exclude impairment of
unconsolidated real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
12,899
|
-
|
(12,899)
|
-
|
-
|
|
Exclude depreciation and
amortization of unconsolidated entities (see below)
|
14,308
|
-
|
(14,308)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
11,852
|
-
|
(11,852)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted total
income
|
350,688
|
17,148
|
60,791
|
1,293
|
395,624
|
|
|
281,736
|
7,547
|
74,539
|
10,024
|
358,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
165,688
|
8,967
|
37,684
|
1,247
|
195,652
|
|
|
155,291
|
6,363
|
53,636
|
5,647
|
208,211
|
|
Add back non-Real Estate
depreciation and amortization (b)
|
702
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
702
|
|
|
1,568
|
-
|
878
|
-
|
2,446
|
|
Add back amortization of
mortgage procurement costs for non-Real Estate Groups
(d)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
69
|
-
|
69
|
|
Exclude straight-line rent
adjustment (2)
|
(1,211)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,211)
|
|
|
(1,242)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,242)
|
|
Exclude preference
payment
|
(585)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(585)
|
|
|
(585)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(585)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating
expenses
|
164,594
|
8,967
|
37,684
|
1,247
|
194,558
|
|
|
155,032
|
6,363
|
54,583
|
5,647
|
208,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating
income
|
186,094
|
8,181
|
23,107
|
46
|
201,066
|
|
|
126,704
|
1,184
|
19,956
|
4,377
|
149,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
(67,994)
|
(4,455)
|
(23,107)
|
(46)
|
(86,692)
|
|
|
(81,118)
|
(5,133)
|
(19,956)
|
(1,850)
|
(97,791)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on early
extinguishment of debt
|
(296)
|
(4)
|
-
|
-
|
(292)
|
|
|
6,297
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated entities, including impairment
|
(19,994)
|
(48)
|
20,299
|
-
|
353
|
|
|
17,124
|
6,444
|
(10,953)
|
-
|
(273)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of
unconsolidated entities
|
12,567
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,567
|
|
|
48
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated
real estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
(12,899)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(12,899)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of
unconsolidated entities (see above)
|
(14,308)
|
-
|
14,308
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
(11,852)
|
-
|
11,852
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on disposition of
rental properties and partial interests in rental properties
|
9,561
|
-
|
-
|
10,038
|
19,599
|
|
|
866
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of consolidated real
estate
|
(4,835)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(4,835)
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization -
Real Estate Groups (a)
|
(57,689)
|
(2,550)
|
(13,690)
|
-
|
(68,829)
|
|
|
(58,503)
|
(1,785)
|
(11,368)
|
(1,868)
|
(69,954)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of mortgage
procurement costs - Real Estate Groups (c)
|
(3,449)
|
(435)
|
(618)
|
-
|
(3,632)
|
|
|
(2,612)
|
(89)
|
(484)
|
(55)
|
(3,062)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rent adjustment
(1) + (2)
|
2,224
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,224
|
|
|
2,875
|
-
|
-
|
163
|
3,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference payment
|
(585)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(585)
|
|
|
(585)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(585)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes
|
41,296
|
689
|
20,299
|
10,038
|
70,944
|
|
|
(13,655)
|
621
|
(10,953)
|
767
|
(24,462)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
(18,312)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,712)
|
(23,024)
|
|
|
8,923
|
-
|
-
|
(296)
|
8,627
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated entities, including impairment
|
19,994
|
48
|
(20,299)
|
-
|
(353)
|
|
|
(17,124)
|
(6,444)
|
10,953
|
-
|
273
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations
|
42,978
|
737
|
-
|
5,326
|
47,567
|
|
|
(21,856)
|
(5,823)
|
-
|
471
|
(15,562)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of
tax
|
5,719
|
393
|
-
|
(5,326)
|
-
|
|
|
492
|
21
|
-
|
(471)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
48,697
|
1,130
|
-
|
-
|
47,567
|
|
|
(21,364)
|
(5,802)
|
-
|
-
|
(15,562)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Earnings) loss from continuing
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(737)
|
(737)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
5,823
|
5,823
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
(393)
|
(393)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
(21)
|
(21)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Noncontrolling
interests
|
(1,130)
|
(1,130)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
5,802
|
5,802
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
|
$
47,567
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
47,567
|
|
|
$
(15,562)
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
(15,562)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
(3,850)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(3,850)
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable
to Forest City Enterprises, Inc. common shareholders
|
$
43,717
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
43,717
|
|
|
$
(15,562)
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
(15,562)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Depreciation and
amortization - Real Estate Groups
|
$
57,689
|
$
2,550
|
$
13,690
|
$
-
|
$
68,829
|
|
|
$
58,503
|
$
1,785
|
$
11,368
|
$
1,868
|
$
69,954
|
|
(b) Depreciation and
amortization - Non-Real Estate
|
702
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
702
|
|
|
1,568
|
-
|
878
|
-
|
2,446
|
|
Total
depreciation and amortization
|
$
58,391
|
$
2,550
|
$
13,690
|
$
-
|
$
69,531
|
|
|
$
60,071
|
$
1,785
|
$
12,246
|
$
1,868
|
$
72,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Amortization of
mortgage procurement costs - Real Estate Groups
|
$
3,449
|
$
435
|
$
618
|
$
-
|
$
3,632
|
|
|
$
2,612
|
$
89
|
$
484
|
$
55
|
$
3,062
|
|
(d) Amortization of
mortgage procurement costs - Non-Real Estate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
69
|
-
|
69
|
|
Total
amortization of mortgage procurement costs
|
$
3,449
|
$
435
|
$
618
|
$
-
|
$
3,632
|
|
|
$
2,612
|
$
89
|
$
553
|
$
55
|
$
3,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest City
Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Supplemental
Operating Information
|
|
|
|
Net
Operating Income (dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2011
|
Three Months
Ended April 30, 2010
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full
|
Less
|
Unconsolidated
|
Plus
|
Pro-Rata
|
|
Full
|
Less
|
Unconsolidated
|
Plus
|
Pro-Rata
|
|
Full
|
|
Pro-Rata
|
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
Noncontrolling
|
Investments
at
|
Discontinued
|
Consolidation
|
|
Consolidation
|
Noncontrolling
|
Investments
|
Discontinued
|
Consolidation
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
|
(GAAP)
|
Interest
|
Pro-Rata
|
Operations
|
(Non-GAAP)
|
|
(GAAP)
|
Interest
|
at
Pro-Rata
|
Operations
|
(Non-GAAP)
|
|
(GAAP)
|
|
(Non-GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
$
56,271
|
$
2,838
|
$
6,709
|
$
-
|
$
60,142
|
|
|
$
56,102
|
$
2,848
|
$
5,369
|
$
-
|
$
58,623
|
|
0.3%
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
Total
|
58,986
|
2,893
|
8,372
|
-
|
64,465
|
|
|
61,609
|
2,924
|
5,583
|
2,935
|
67,203
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Office
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
55,465
|
2,086
|
4,816
|
-
|
58,195
|
|
|
58,195
|
2,601
|
4,074
|
-
|
59,668
|
-
|
(4.7%)
|
|
(2.5%)
|
|
|
Total
|
63,224
|
5,148
|
3,182
|
-
|
61,258
|
|
|
63,090
|
3,859
|
4,074
|
-
|
63,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
104
|
-
|
360
|
-
|
464
|
|
|
644
|
-
|
368
|
-
|
1,012
|
|
(83.9%)
|
|
(54.2%)
|
|
|
Total
|
104
|
-
|
360
|
46
|
510
|
|
|
644
|
-
|
368
|
793
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Sales
(2)
|
42,585
|
(782)
|
-
|
-
|
43,367
|
|
|
289
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (1)
|
|
1,064
|
(54)
|
1,938
|
-
|
3,056
|
|
|
(5,508)
|
358
|
1,233
|
-
|
(4,633)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial
Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
111,840
|
4,924
|
11,885
|
-
|
118,801
|
|
|
114,941
|
5,449
|
9,811
|
-
|
119,303
|
|
(2.7%)
|
|
(0.4%)
|
|
|
Total
|
165,963
|
7,205
|
13,852
|
46
|
172,656
|
|
|
120,124
|
7,155
|
11,258
|
3,728
|
127,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apartments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
25,802
|
528
|
6,842
|
-
|
32,116
|
|
|
25,234
|
418
|
6,745
|
-
|
31,561
|
|
2.3%
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
Total
|
29,092
|
1,074
|
8,276
|
-
|
36,294
|
|
|
26,411
|
462
|
7,448
|
649
|
34,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Military
Housing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
5,590
|
-
|
378
|
-
|
5,968
|
|
|
6,477
|
-
|
370
|
-
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
Sales
|
158
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
142
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (1)
|
|
(1,576)
|
(390)
|
452
|
-
|
(734)
|
|
|
(3,879)
|
(228)
|
-
|
-
|
(3,651)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Residential
Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
25,802
|
528
|
6,842
|
-
|
32,116
|
|
|
25,234
|
418
|
6,745
|
-
|
31,561
|
|
2.3%
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
Total
|
33,264
|
700
|
9,106
|
-
|
41,670
|
|
|
29,009
|
234
|
7,818
|
649
|
37,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Rental
Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable
|
137,642
|
5,452
|
18,727
|
-
|
150,917
|
|
|
140,175
|
5,867
|
16,556
|
-
|
150,864
|
|
(1.8%)
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
Total
|
199,227
|
7,905
|
22,958
|
46
|
214,326
|
|
|
149,133
|
7,389
|
19,076
|
4,377
|
165,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Development
Group
|
2,102
|
276
|
149
|
-
|
1,975
|
|
|
(653)
|
18
|
(266)
|
-
|
(937)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Nets
|
(304)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(304)
|
|
|
(10,430)
|
(6,223)
|
1,146
|
-
|
(3,061)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Activities
|
(14,931)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(14,931)
|
|
|
(11,346)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(11,346)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total
|
$
186,094
|
$
8,181
|
$
23,107
|
$
46
|
$
201,066
|
|
|
$ 126,704
|
$
1,184
|
$
19,956
|
$
4,377
|
$
149,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes write-offs of
abandoned development projects, non-capitalizable development costs
and unallocated management and service company overhead, net of
historic and new market tax credit income.
|
|
(2) Includes $42,622 of
NOI generated from the Casino land sale at full and pro-rata
consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Openings and Acquisitions as of
April 30, 2011
|
|
Property
|
Location
|
Dev (D)
Acq (A)
|
Date
Opened
/
Acquired
|
FCE Legal
Ownership
% (a)
|
Pro-Rata
FCE % (a)
(1)
|
Cost at
Full
Consolidation
(GAAP)
(b)
|
Total
Cost
at
100%
(2)
|
Cost at FCE Pro-Rata
Share (Non-GAAP)(c)
(1) X (2)
|
Sq.
ft./
No.
of
Units
|
|
Gross
Leasable
Area
|
|
Lease
Commitment
%
|
|
2011
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 Spruce Street (leasable only) (d) (l)
|
Manhattan, NY
|
D
|
Q1-11/12
|
49.0%
|
70.0%
|
$
0.0
|
$
0.0
|
$
0.0
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Two Years Openings (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
Centers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village at Gulfstream Park
(e)
|
Hallandale Beach, FL
|
D
|
Q1-10
|
50.0%
|
50.0%
|
$
0.0
|
$
196.4
|
$
98.2
|
511,000
|
(k)
|
511,000
|
|
77%
|
|
East River Plaza (e)
(f)
|
Manhattan, NY
|
D
|
Q4-09/2010
|
35.0%
|
50.0%
|
0.0
|
390.6
|
195.3
|
527,000
|
|
527,000
|
|
90%
|
|
Promenade in Temecula
Expansion
|
Temecula, CA
|
D
|
Q1-09
|
75.0%
|
100.0%
|
113.4
|
113.4
|
113.4
|
127,000
|
|
127,000
|
|
80%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
113.4
|
$
700.4
|
$
406.9
|
1,165,000
|
|
1,165,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waterfront
Station
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- East 4th & West 4th
Buildings (g)
|
Washington, D.C.
|
D
|
Q1-10
|
45.0%
|
45.0%
|
$
245.9
|
$
245.9
|
$
110.7
|
631,000
|
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
(h):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presidio
Landmark
|
San Francisco, CA
|
D
|
Q3-10
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
$
94.8
|
$
94.8
|
$
94.8
|
161
|
|
|
|
52%
|
|
North Church
Towers
|
Parma Heights, OH
|
A
|
Q3-09
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
399
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
DKLB BKLN (f)
|
Brooklyn, NY
|
D
|
Q4-09/10
|
80.0%
|
100.0%
|
158.4
|
158.4
|
158.4
|
365
|
|
|
|
96%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
258.2
|
$
258.2
|
$
258.2
|
925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Prior Two Years
Openings (i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
617.5
|
$
1,204.5
|
$
775.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recap of Total Prior Two
Years Openings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
340.7
|
$
927.7
|
$
499.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
276.8
|
276.8
|
276.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Prior Two Years
Openings (i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
617.5
|
$
1,204.5
|
$
775.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See attached
footnotes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects Under Construction as
of April 30, 2011 (4)
|
|
|
Property
|
Location
|
Anticipated
Opening
|
FCE
Legal
Ownership% (a)
|
Pro-Rata
FCE % (a)
(1)
|
|
Cost at
Full
Consolidation
(GAAP) (b)
|
Total Cost
at
100%
(2)
|
Cost at FCE
Pro-Rata Share
(Non-GAAP) (c)
(1) X (2)
|
|
Sq. ft./
No. of
Units
|
|
Gross
Leasable
Area
|
|
Lease
Commitment
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
Centers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westchester's Ridge Hill
(f)
|
Yonkers, NY
|
2011/2012
|
70.0%
|
100.0%
|
|
$
827.4
|
$
827.4
|
$
827.4
|
|
1,336,000
|
|
1,336,000
|
(n)
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 Spruce Street (Total) (l)
|
Manhattan, NY
|
Q1-11/12
|
49.0%
|
70.0%
|
|
$
875.7
|
$
875.7
|
$
613.0
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
22%
(j)
|
|
|
Foundry Lofts
|
Washington, D.C.
|
Q3-11
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
|
60.3
|
60.3
|
60.3
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
936.0
|
$
936.0
|
$
673.3
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arena:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Center
|
Brooklyn, NY
|
Q3-12
|
26.6%
(o)
|
26.6%
|
(o)
|
$
904.3
|
$
904.3
|
$
240.5
|
|
670,000
|
|
18,000
seats
|
(p)
|
55%
(q)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Under Construction
(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
2,667.7
|
$ 2,667.7
|
$
1,741.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sq.ft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas City
Hall
|
Las Vegas, NV
|
Q1-12
|
-
(r)
|
-
(r)
|
|
$
0.0
|
$
146.2
|
$
0.0
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOOTNOTES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
As is customary within the real
estate industry, the Company invests in certain real estate
projects through joint ventures. For some of these projects,
the Company provides funding at percentages that differ from the
Company's legal ownership.
|
|
(b)
|
Amounts are presented on the
full consolidation method of accounting, a GAAP measure. Under full
consolidation, costs are reported as consolidated at 100
percent if we are deemed to have control or to be the primary
beneficiary of our investments in the variable interest entity
("VIE").
|
|
(c)
|
Cost at pro-rata share
represents Forest City's share of cost, based on the Company's
pro-rata ownership of each property (a non-GAAP measure).
Under the pro-rata consolidation method of accounting the
Company determines its pro-rata share by multiplying its pro-rata
ownership by the total cost of the applicable property.
|
|
(d)
|
See the Under Construction
pipeline for cost details of the total property.
|
|
(e)
|
Reported under the equity method
of accounting. This method represents a GAAP measure for
investments in which the Company is not deemed to have control or
to be the primary beneficiary of our investments in a
VIE.
|
|
(f)
|
Phased-in openings. Costs
are representative of the total project.
|
|
(g)
|
Includes 85,000 square feet of
retail space. (Property was disposed of on May 10,
2011.)
|
|
(h)
|
The lease percentage for the
residential properties represents the occupancy as of April 30,
2011.
|
|
(i)
|
The difference between the full
consolidation cost amount (GAAP) of $617.5 million to the Company's
pro-rata share (a non-GAAP measure) of $850.0 million consists of a
reduction to full consolidation for noncontrolling interest of
$135.1 million of cost and the addition of its share of cost for
unconsolidated investments of $367.6 million.
|
|
(j)
|
As of May 31, 2011, 202 leases
have been signed since appointments with prospective residents
began on February 18, 2011, representing 22% of the total 903 units
after construction is complete. As of April 30, 2011, $142.8
million at pro-rata consolidation ($200.7 million at full
consolidation) of costs incurred and $121.2 million at pro-rata
consolidation ($174.2 million at full consolidation) of mortgage
debt were transferred to completed rental properties on the
Company's balance sheet.
|
|
(k)
|
Includes 89,000 square feet of
office space.
|
|
(l)
|
Phased in opening. Costs are
representative of the total project cost, including 372 units
opened as of May 24, 2011.
|
|
(m)
|
The difference between the full
consolidation cost amount (GAAP) of $2,667.7 million to the
Company's pro-rata share (a non-GAAP measure) of $1,741.2 million
consists of a reduction to full consolidation for noncontrolling
interest of $926.5 million.
|
|
(n)
|
Includes 156,000 square feet of
office space.
|
|
(o)
|
On May 2, 2011, the Company
closed on a purchase agreement with a minority interest partner.
As a result, the Company's legal and pro-rata ownership will
increase to approximately 34%.
|
|
(p)
|
The Nets, a member of the NBA,
has a 37 year license agreement to use the arena.
|
|
(q)
|
Represents the percentage of
forecasted contractually obligated arena income that is under
contract. Contractually obligated income, which include
revenue from naming rights, sponsorships, suite licenses, Nets
minimum rent and food concession agreements, accounts for 72% of
total forecasted revenues for the arena.
|
|
(r)
|
This is a fee
development project, owned by the City of Las Vegas.
Therefore, these costs are not included on the full
consolidation or pro-rata balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Requirements for Projects
Under Construction (a)
|
|
As of April 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
Plus
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated
|
Full
|
Less
|
Unconsolidated
|
Pro-Rata
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
Consolidation
|
Noncontrolling
|
Investments
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
100%
|
at
100%
|
(GAAP)
(b)
|
Interest
|
at
Pro-Rata
|
(Non-GAAP)
(c)
|
|
|
(dollars in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost Under Construction
|
$ 2,667.7
|
$
-
|
$
2,667.7
|
$
926.5
|
$
-
|
$
1,741.2
|
|
Total Loan Draws and Other
Sources at Completion (d)
|
1,863.3
|
-
|
1,863.3
|
664.6
|
-
|
1,198.7
|
|
Net Equity at
Completion
|
804.4
|
-
|
804.4
|
261.9
|
-
|
542.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Costs Incurred to Date
(e)
|
1,760.4
|
-
|
1,760.4
|
493.8
|
-
|
1,266.6
|
|
Loan Draws and Other Sources to
Date (e)
|
1,011.9
|
-
|
1,011.9
|
231.9
|
-
|
780.0
|
|
Net Equity to Date
(e)
|
748.5
|
-
|
748.5
|
261.9
|
-
|
486.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
Equity
|
93%
|
|
93%
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Costs
|
907.3
|
-
|
907.3
|
432.7
|
-
|
474.6
|
|
Remaining Loan Draws and Other
Sources (f)
|
851.4
|
-
|
851.4
|
432.7
|
-
|
418.7
|
|
Remaining
Equity
|
$
55.9
|
$
-
|
$
55.9
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
$
55.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
Equity
|
7%
|
|
7%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
This schedule includes only the
four properties listed on the previous page. This does not
include costs associated with phased-in units, operating property
renovations and military housing.
|
|
(b)
|
Amounts are presented on the
full consolidation method of accounting, a GAAP measure. Under full
consolidation, costs are reported as consolidated at 100 percent if
we are deemed to have control or to be the primary beneficiary of
our investments in the variable interest entity ("VIE").
|
|
(c)
|
Cost at pro-rata share
represents Forest City's share of cost, based on the Company's
pro-rata ownership of each property (a non-GAAP measure). Under the
pro-rata consolidation method of accounting the Company determines
its pro-rata share by multiplying its pro-rata ownership by the
total cost of the applicable property.
|
|
(d)
|
"Other Sources" includes
estimates of third party subsidies and tax credit proceeds.
The timing and the amounts may differ from our
estimates.
|
|
(e)
|
Reflects activity through April
30, 2011.
|
|
(f)
|
One of the loan commitments
require specific leasing hurdles to be achieved prior to drawing
the final amount of the loan. The Company estimates that
approximately $45.0 million at 100% and at full consolidation, and
$31.5 million at pro-rata consolidation of loan commitments are at
risk should these leasing hurdles not be achieved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects Under Development
as of April 30, 2011
Below is a summary of our active large scale development
projects, which have yet to commence construction, often referred
to as our "shadow pipeline" which are crucial to our long-term
growth. While we cannot make any assurances on the timing or
delivery of these projects, our track record speaks to our ability
to bring large, complex, projects to fruition when there is demand
and available construction financing. The projects listed
below represent pro-rata costs of $627.0
million ($887.3 million at
full consolidation) of Projects Under Development ("PUD") on our
balance sheet and pro-rata mortgage debt of $111.3 million ($168.3
million at full consolidation).
1) Atlantic Yards - Brooklyn, NY
Atlantic Yards is adjacent to the state-of-the art arena, the
Barclays Center, which is designed by the award-winning firms
Ellerbe Becket and SHoP Architects
and is currently under construction. In addition, Atlantic Yards
will feature more than 6,400 units of housing, including over 2,200
affordable units, approximately 250,000 square feet of retail
space, and more than 8 acres of landscaped open space.
2) LiveWork Las Vegas - Las Vegas, NV
LiveWork Las Vegas is a mixed-use project on a 13.5-acre parcel
in downtown Las Vegas. At
full build-out, the project will have a new 260,000-square-foot
City Hall for Las Vegas and is
also expected to include up to 1 million square feet of office
space and approximately 300,000 square feet of retail. The City
Hall is owned by the city of Las
Vegas and is a fee-development project.
3) The Yards - Washington, D.C.
The Yards is a 42-acre mixed-use project, located in the
neighborhood of the Washington Nationals baseball park in Southeast
D.C. The full development is expected to include up to 2,700
residential units, 1.8 million square feet of office space, and
300,000 square feet of retail and dining space. The Yards
features a 5.5-acre publicly funded public park that is a gathering
place and recreational focus for the community. The first
residential building, Foundry Lofts, commenced construction in
August 2010.
4) The Science + Technology Park at Johns Hopkins - Baltimore, MD
The 31-acre Science + Technology Park at Johns Hopkins is a new center for collaborative
research directly adjacent to the world-renowned Johns Hopkins medical and research complex.
Initial plans call for 1.1 million square feet in five
buildings, with future phases that could support additional
expansion. In 2008, the Company opened the first of those
buildings, 855 North Wolfe Street, a 279,000-square-foot office
building anchored by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s
Institute for Basic Biomedical Sciences.
5) Colorado Science + Technology Park at
Fitzsimons - Aurora,
CO
The 184-acre Colorado Science + Technology Park at Fitzsimons is
becoming a hub for the biotechnology industry in the Rocky Mountain region. Anchored by the University of Colorado at Denver Health Science
Center, the University of Colorado
Hospital and The Denver Children’s Hospital, the park will offer
cost-effective lease rates; build-to-suit office and research
sites; and flexible lab and office layouts in a cutting-edge
research park. The park is also adjacent to Forest City’s
4,700-acre Stapleton mixed-used development.
6) Waterfront Station - Washington, D.C.
Located in Southwest
Washington, Waterfront Station is adjacent to the
Waterfront/Southeastern University
MetroRail station. Waterfront Station is expected to include
660,000 square feet of office space, an estimated 400 residential
units and 40,000 square feet of stores and restaurants.
7) 300 Massachusetts Avenue - Cambridge, MA
Located in the science and technology hub of Cambridge, MA, the 300 Massachusetts Avenue
block represents an expansion of University Park @ MIT. In a 50/50 partnership with
MIT, Forest
City is presently focused on a project that reflects a
development program of approximately 260,000 square feet of lab and
office space. Potential redevelopment of the entire block is
possible with the acquisition of adjacent parcels in future phases,
and would result in an approximately 400,000 square foot
project.
Military Housing as of April
30, 2011
Below is a summary of our equity method investments for Military
Housing Development projects. The Company provides development,
construction and management services for these projects and
receives agreed upon fees for these services. The following
phases still have a percentage of units opened and under
construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anticipated
|
FCE
|
Cost at
Full
|
Total
Cost
|
No.
|
|
|
Property
|
Location
|
Opening
|
Pro-Rata
%
|
Consolidation
|
at
100%
|
of
Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Military Housing - Openings
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navy, Hawaii Increment
III
|
Honolulu, HI
|
2007-2011
|
*
|
$
0.0
|
$ 464.8
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Military Housing Under
Construction (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Northwest
Communities
|
Seattle, WA
|
2007-2011
|
*
|
$
0.0
|
$ 280.5
|
2,985
|
|
|
Marines, Hawaii Increment
II
|
Honolulu, HI
|
2007-2011
|
*
|
0.0
|
292.7
|
1,175
|
|
|
Navy Midwest
|
Chicago, IL
|
2006-2012
|
*
|
0.0
|
200.3
|
1,401
|
|
|
Midwest Millington
|
Memphis, TN
|
2008-2012
|
*
|
0.0
|
33.1
|
318
|
|
|
Air Force Academy
|
Colorado Springs, CO
|
2007-2013
|
50.0%
|
0.0
|
69.5
|
427
|
|
|
Hawaii Phase IV
|
Kaneohe, HI
|
2007-2014
|
*
|
0.0
|
475.1
|
1,141
|
|
|
Total Under
Construction
|
|
|
|
$
0.0
|
$ 1,351.2
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Military
Housing
|
|
|
|
$
0.0
|
$ 1,816.0
|
9,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The Company's share of
residual cash flow ranges from 0-20% during the life cycle of the
project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent commitment not yet
closed
|
|
|
Air Force – Southern Group was
awarded on August 30, 2010. We are currently in exclusive
negotiations with the Air Force. This project is expected to
include 2,185 end state units at four Air Force bases in Sumter,
SC, Manchester, TN, Charleston, SC and Biloxi, MS. There are
330 financially excluded units that will not be encumbered by debt
and which may be removed from the end state at the sole discretion
of the Air Force. The financial closing of the project and
commencement of construction are expected in mid
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development fees related to our military housing projects are
earned based on a contractual percentage of the actual development
costs incurred. We also recognize additional development incentive
fees upon successful completion of certain criteria, such as
incentives to realize development cost savings, encourage small and
local business participation, comply with specified safety
standards and other project management incentives as specified in
the development agreements. NOI from development and development
incentive fees is $1,137,000 for the
three months ended April 30, 2011 and $1,613,000 for the three months ended
April 30, 2010.
Construction management fees are earned based on a contractual
percentage of the actual construction costs incurred. We also
recognize certain construction incentive fees based upon successful
completion of certain criteria as set forth in the construction
contracts. NOI from construction and incentive fees is
$1,180,000 for the three months ended
April 30, 2011 and $1,595,000 recognized during the three months
ended April 30, 2010.
Property management and asset management fees are earned based
on a contractual percentage of the annual net rental income and
annual operating income, respectively, that is generated by the
military housing privatization projects as defined in the
agreements. We also recognize certain property management incentive
fees based upon successful completion of certain criteria as set
forth in the property management agreements. Property
management, management incentive and asset management fees
generated NOI of $3,229,000 during
the three months ended April 30, 2011 and $3,122,000 during the three months ended
April 30, 2010.
Land Held for Development or Sale as of April 30, 2011
The Land Development Group acquires and sells raw land and sells
fully-entitled developed lots to residential, commercial, and
industrial customers. The Land Development Group also owns
and develops raw land into master-planned communities, mixed-use
projects and other residential developments. Below is a
summary of our large Land Development projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
Saleable
|
Option
|
|
|
Location
|
Acres
(1)
|
Acres
(2)
|
Acres
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stapleton - Denver,
CO
|
223
|
140
|
1,359
|
|
|
Mesa del Sol - Albuquerque,
NM
|
3,023
|
1,659
|
5,731
|
|
|
Central Station - Chicago,
IL
|
30
|
30
|
-
|
|
|
Texas
|
2,556
|
1,312
|
-
|
|
|
Carolinas
|
1,248
|
1,024
|
788
|
|
|
Ohio
|
955
|
646
|
470
|
|
|
Arizona
|
667
|
492
|
-
|
|
|
Other
|
898
|
707
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
9,600
|
6,010
|
8,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represent all acres currently
owned including those used for roadways, open spaces and
parks.
|
|
(2)
|
Saleable acres represent the
total of all acres currently owned that will be available for
sales. The Land Development Group may choose to further
develop some of the acres into completed sublots prior to
sale.
|
|
(3)
|
Option acres are those acres
that the Land Development Group has a formal option to acquire.
Typically these options are in the form of purchase
agreements with contingencies for the satisfaction of due diligence
reviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stapleton - Denver,
CO
Stapleton represents one of the nation’s largest urban
redevelopments. At full build out of 4,700 acres or 7.5 square
miles, Stapleton is planned for more than 12,000 homes and
apartments, a projected 3 million square-feet of retail and 10
million square-feet of office/research and development/industrial
space. Centrally located 10 minutes east of Downtown Denver and 20 minutes from
Denver International Airport,
Stapleton will be home to 30,000 residents and 35,000 workers when
complete.
Mesa del Sol -
Albuquerque, NM
Mesa del Sol is a 20-square mile,
mixed-use community on the south mesa of Albuquerque, N.M., five minutes from the
Albuquerque International Airport.
Mesa del Sol’s master plan calls for mixed-use development that
will include 1,400 acres for industrial/commercial and office
development use, 4,400 acres for residential and supporting retail
use, 3,200 acres for open space and parks and 800 acres for schools
and universities.
Central Station - Chicago, IL
Located adjacent to the city’s Museum Campus, and just minutes
from the heart of Chicago's Loop,
the 80-acre Central Station is one of the fastest growing
residential communities in the city, with 3,727 residential units
completed and occupied, 500 units completed and listed for sale and
another 4,000 units in development. Central Station, a 14
million-square-foot development, is being developed in partnership
with The Fogelson Companies.
Other Significant Land Holdings
Legacy Lakes - Aberdeen, NC
Legacy Lakes is a master-planned community located in the
Pinehurst area. This
community is surrounding the Nicklaus-designed Legacy Golf Course.
Legacy Lakes is 406 acres and includes 718 residential lots.
Of the 406 total acres, 265 are saleable acres and 13 acres
have been sold to date.
Gladden Farms -Marana, AZ
Gladden Farms is a master-planned community that includes
residential and commercial uses in a suburban area of northwest
Tucson. This community
includes parks, trails and a school in a rural setting. Gladden
Farms is 1,350 acres and includes approximately 4,142 residential
lots and 223 acres of commercial space. As of April 30, 2011, 1,265 lots and 100 commercial
acres have been sold. Of the 1,350 total acres, 868 are
saleable acres and 408 acres have been sold to date.
Cotton Creek -
Mooresville, NC
Cotton Creek is a
master-planned community located in a northern suburb of
Charlotte, NC. This
community will feature a variety of attached and detached home
sites, which will be sold to a mix of national and local builders.
Cotton Creek is 534 acres. When completed the
development is expected to produce approximately 1,300 residential
lots.
Tangerine Crossing -Tucson, AZ
Tangerine Crossing is a master-planned gated residential
community with a major retail component on the exterior in a
desirable region of the Tucson
metropolitan area. This community includes open space, trails
and recreation. Tangerine Crossing is 309 acres and includes
396 residential lots and a 25-acre retail center. As of
April 30, 2011, 211 lots and the 25
commercial acres have been sold. Of the 309 total acres, 98
are saleable acres and 64 acres have been sold to date.
Three Stones – Prosper, TX
Three Stones is a master-planned community of 2,031 acres
located in the growth corridor north of Dallas in the town of Prosper. The community is fully entitled and
the plan includes approximately 3,090 single family lots, 600 units
of attached housing, over 600 acres of parks and open space and 250
acres for commercial/retail use. A variety of single family
lot sizes will be offered, as well as a complete amenity center.
The development of Phase 1 is expected to be completed in late
2012.
San Antonio Portfolio – San Antonio, TX
Forest City owns four (4)
multi-phase communities and finished lots in three (3) additional
locations in the San Antonio area,
predominantly on the west side. Since January 2008, almost 1,000 of the total 2,563
lots have been sold. The remaining portfolio is comprised of 513
finished lots and 1,112 undeveloped “paper” lots. Our San
Antonio communities serve several different price ranges, and all
lots are under option contract to one of seven (7) different
builders.
Timberlake –
Oak Point (Dallas), TX
Timberlake is a planned
community of approximately 250 acres located in Denton County, north of Dallas.
Forest City entered into this
project earlier in 2011 through the formation of a new partnership
with Taylor Duncan Interests, Inc., with Forest City providing capital for financing
and development. The project is zoned for over 800 single
family lots, and development of Phase 1 is expected to begin in
2012.
Woodforest – Houston,
TX
Woodforest, which is not included in the acres on the previous
page, is an active, 3,000-acre master planned community, located in
southern Montgomery County, north
of Houston. Forest City
entered into this project last year through the formation of a new
partnership with Johnson Development, with Forest City providing capital for financing
and development. The project is zoned for 5,700 units and six
(6) active home builders are currently involved with model homes in
place serving a wide range of prices. Over 200 home sales
have occurred to date. The project is being developed
adjacent to the 27-hole Woodforest Golf Club that opened in 2001
and has been rated one of the top courses in the state.
SOURCE Forest City Enterprises, Inc.