Proxy Statement (definitive) (def 14a)
March 26 2020 - 4:05PM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
☑ Filed by the Registrant |
|
☐ Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
|
|
|
Check the
appropriate box: |
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Vulcan Materials Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
Payment of filing
fee (Check the appropriate box): |
☑ |
|
No fee required. |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(I)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
(1) Title of each class of securities to
which transaction applies: |
|
|
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies: |
|
|
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value
of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of
transaction: |
|
|
(5) Total
fee paid: |
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
☐ |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 240.0-11 and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement
No.: |
|
|
(3) Filing Party:
|
|
|
(4) Date
Filed: |
Vulcan Materials Company
Notice of 2020 annual meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement
Dear fellow shareholders,
I am pleased to invite you to our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Friday, May 8, 2020, at 9 a.m., Central
Daylight Time, to be held virtually via the internet. During the Annual Meeting, we will discuss each item of business described in the Notice of Annual Meeting and this proxy statement.
The right products, the right markets, the right people and the right focuson the job before us, and the future ahead.
STRONG FUNDAMENTALS, SOLID GROWTH
Vulcan has
focused on being the best in the business throughout our 63-year history as a publicly traded company. We take a long view of the business, while focusing intently on improving each day. The result is an
organization with unparalleled assets in the best markets in the U.S., supported by unrivalled operations, sales, sourcing and logistics capabilities, and driven by employees committed to serving our customers and working together to be the best in
the business. The strength of our company shows itself in the results, and we are going to keep improving them. We have a winning formula: the right products, the right markets, the right people and the right focuson the job before us, and the
future ahead.
In 2019, we delivered revenues of $4.9 billion, a 12% increase over 2018. Net earnings increased 20% to $618 million. Continued pricing
strength contributed to 8% growth in our industry-leading unit profitability and a 12% increase in Adjusted EBITDA*. Adjusted earnings from continuing operations* increased to $4.70 per diluted share compared to $4.05 in 2018. We also maintained our
world-class safety record for the third year running. I am immensely proud of the men and women of our company who keep a sharp focus on safe operations while continuing to improve a strong business, every day.
LEADING EDGE STRATEGIC INITIATIVES DRIVE SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE
At our Aggregates Day in September 2019, we demonstrated for our investors how we have sharpened our commitments to ongoing excellence and outperformance, with four
strategic initiatives that will have a lasting impact on the strength and health of our business. We firmly believe that our Operations and Commercial Excellence initiatives, along with our initiatives in Logistics Innovation and Strategic Sourcing,
will further separate us from the competition.
The positive impacts are already evident and will continue to grow over time. Since the beginning of the economic
recovery for our industry in the 2nd quarter of 2013, our growth in aggregates shipments has increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7%, pricing has increased at a 4% CAGR and gross profit per tona critical metric for us and a key
indicator of the strength of the businesshas increased by 12% CAGR. As a result, our unit margins are 25% higher than those
of our nearest competitor. EBITDA* has grown at a CAGR of 16%, and our return on invested capital* has more than doubled over this period.
HEALTHY CULTURE FOSTERS ENVIRONMENT OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AND GROWTH
Our people are proud of Vulcan and the jobs they do. This fact is evident in the superior scores we received from our Organizational Health Index survey, conducted by
McKinsey & Company. We rank in the top decile of more than 1,700 participating companies across a variety of metrics that address employee satisfaction and engagement. Our people are goal-driven and results-focused, working together in
teams and across functions to keep improving in all aspects of the business. Every incremental improvement adds to our gross margin per ton of aggregates sold and helps us build a stronger business for you. It is a never-ending process, yielding
near-term successes along with enduring competitive advantages.
During 2019, we:
|
|
Continued our leadership in capital stewardship, with ongoing strong cash generation and return on invested capital improving to 14% on an Adjusted EBITDA* basis. We maintained excellent liquidity, reinvested in our
core operations, maintained our investment grade credit rating, pursued profitable growth opportunities and returned $167 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We maintained a comfortable debt to equity ratio,
reducing debt to $2.8 billion, or 2.2 times trailing |
* |
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted earnings from continuing operations and return on invested capital are non-GAAP financial measures. We provide a reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted earnings from continuing operations and return on invested capital to the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measures in Annex A to this proxy statement. |
|
twelve month (TTM) Adjusted EBITDA* compared to 2.6 times TTM Adjusted EBITDA* in the prior year. |
|
|
Sustained our focused One Vulcan, Locally Led competitive position, leveraging the strengths of a large company across many local markets and empowering our local leaders to make the best decisions with the best tools.
Our strategic initiatives enabled us to continue to grow our industry-leading gross profit per ton margins, provide our customers with multiple solutions to their daily challenges and move our products in the most creative and efficient ways,
whether by truck, rail, barge or ocean-going vessel. We accomplished this while stewarding our resources as we sourced the more than $2 billion in equipment, goods and services necessary to run our businesses each year. |
|
|
Maintained our world-class safety record for the third consecutive year. Our safety focus keeps our people looking out for one another, to stay safe and healthy throughout long and productive careers. That is its own
reward. It also shows that we are focused on the fundamentalsdoing things the right way for the benefit of our employees, neighbors and shareholders. Our cornerstone commitment to safety and health also guides us as we address the
unprecedented challenges of the global pandemic we are all now facing. Our focus from the outset has been to protect our people and do our part in flattening the curve, through a company-wide work-from-home policy in all possible
instances, while taking extraordinary measures to protect our employees at operations across the U.S. that are deemed essential by government in the continuance of vital infrastructure supply. Our company remains strong and healthy in this difficult
time. |
|
|
Launched a major initiative to support Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) through support from the Vulcan Materials Company Foundation and with our internship and recruiting programs. We are committed
to ensuring a more diverse workforce and are making solid strides in doing so. The companys Diversity and Inclusion Council continues its focus on increasing diversity in the hiring of external candidates and recruiting diverse candidates to
serve in leadership positions throughout our company. |
|
|
Continued our focus on sustainability and superior environmental performance. In 2019, our operations were over 98% citation-free regarding environmental inspections by regulatory agencies. Although not listed by the
U.S. EPA as a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, we have still cut these emissions significantly since 2013 and will continue to seek reductions as we employ new technologies, equipment and operational enhancements. We take a long-term
view. For example, we manage our extensive assets with the understanding that mining is an interim use of the land and natural resources. We focus on maximizing the value of our land holdings for the benefit of all stakeholders. We have placed
thousands of acres into mitigation banks and other conservation uses, and have facilitated the reclamation and high-value re-use of former properties for a variety of productive purposes across the U.S. and in
Mexico. |
AN ENGAGED BOARD FOCUSED ON SUPERIOR RESULTS
Vulcans Board is strong, balanced and independent and is deeply engaged in the near- and long-term success of the company. Our Board members bring insights,
experience and perspectives that come with long tenures in top positions at major business enterprises across industries. We benefit enormously from our directors counsel and governance. We focus on Board refreshment and balance, seeking the
right
mix in tenure so we benefit from fresh insights as well as seasoned perspectives from a full business cycle with Vulcan. Our average Board tenure is 5.2 years. We have been recognized nationally
for the gender diversity of our Board, and our Board is currently 36% diverse. We will continue to seek candidates who are diverse in gender, race, background and professional experience. We are grateful to our Board for their critical role in
providing oversight and guidance on the companys strategic direction, continued success and healthy growth.
WE WELCOME YOUR VIEWS
We engage with our shareholders and other key stakeholders throughout the year regarding all aspects of our business, including Environmental, Social and
Governance (ESG) matters that are important to all of us. We find these communications to be of great value. We listen, and we endeavor to respond responsibly. Good governance depends on transparency, candor and open lines of communication conducted
in an environment of trust and respect. We thank you for your engagement with us. Your questions, ideas, criticisms and suggestions make us better and stronger as a company and as leaders at Vulcan.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
On or about March 26,
2020, we began mailing to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders, via the internet. Shareholders
who do not receive the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will receive a paper copy of the Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders, which we also began mailing on or about
March 26, 2020. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials. Copies of our Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and 2019 Annual Report
to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
Whether you own one share or many, your prompt vote is appreciated. It is important that your shares of common
stock are represented at the Annual Meeting so that a quorum may be established. Please read the proxy materials carefully and then vote your proxy as soon as possible. You may vote online, by telephone, or by mailing a completed proxy card.
Additional information is provided in the proxy materials. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you should follow the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020 to vote during the meeting.
Thank you for your ongoing support and continued interest in Vulcan Materials Company. I look forward to your participation in our Annual Meeting.
Sincerely yours,
J. THOMAS HILL
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2020
|
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Vulcan Materials Company
will be held virtually via the internet, on Friday, May 8, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date & time:
Friday May 8, 2020
9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time |
|
Access*:
The Annual Meeting can be accessed virtually at: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020.
|
|
Record Date:
March 11, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to Vote |
|
|
|
|
Online |
|
By Phone |
|
By Mail |
|
|
|
|
Vote online at www.proxyvote.com. |
|
Vote by phone by calling the number located on your proxy
card. |
|
If you received a printed version of these proxy materials, you
may vote by mail. |
|
|
Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2020, are entitled to receive notice of, to attend and to vote at the
Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend, we urge you to review these materials carefully and to vote online or by telephone, or, if you have received a paper copy of the proxy card, you may instead choose to vote by mailing your proxy
card. |
|
|
Voting Matters
|
* In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, for the
safety of all of our people, including our shareholders, and taking into account recent federal, state and local guidance that has been issued, we have determined that the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the
internet, with no physical in-person meeting. We are permitted to hold the meeting in this format given recent legislation in the State of New Jerseythe state in which the company is
incorporatedthat was enacted for the current state of emergency. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see Annual Meeting and Voting Information beginning on page 60 of this proxy statement. Shareholders will be
able to attend, vote and submit questions (both before, and for a portion of, the meeting) from any location via the internet. We intend to resume holding in-person annual meetings of shareholders under normal
circumstances. To participate in the Annual Meeting (e.g., submit questions and/or vote),
you will need the control number provided on your proxy card, voting instruction card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you are not a shareholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the Annual
Meeting as a guest, but you will not be able to participate. |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Summary
BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
We achieved a number of
significant milestones during the course of 2019, in large part due to the continuing dedication of our employees, the leadership of our executive officers and our Board of Directors, and the culture of our company, which binds us all
together. Highlights of 2019 included:
Achieving double-digit growth in revenues and
earnings, with total revenues of $4.9 billion, net earnings of $618 million and Adjusted EBITDA2 of $1.27 billion, an increase of 12%, 20% and 12%, respectively, over the
prior year; Maintaining excellent liquidity, reinvesting in our core operations, maintaining our investment grade credit rating, pursuing profitable growth opportunities and returning
$167 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases;
Accomplishing our third consecutive year of world-class
safety performance, with a combined Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) Reportable and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Recordable Injury Rate of 0.97 in 2019, and an MSHA citation rate of 0.70 compared to the
industry average of 2.12; Continuing our efforts to strengthen our workplace diversity and inclusion by joining CEO Action for Diversity &
Inclusiona nationwide effort to drive inclusivenessand establishing a partnership in support of HBCUs by providing scholarships and internships for students that may lead to
full-time employment upon graduation; and Reducing greenhouse gas emissions as a percentage of revenue and of production tons, and maintaining a citation-free environmental inspection rate of over 98%.
12% compounded annual improvement in aggregates gross profit per
ton since second quarter 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) 2017 net earnings include discrete income tax benefits of $297.0 million, including benefits arising from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
(2) Adjusted EBITDA is a
non-GAAP financial measure. We provide a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure in Annex A to this proxy statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY SUMMARY
BOARD COMPOSITION
The Board seeks a mix of directors with qualities that, together, create a high-functioning, diverse
Board. All of our directors, other than Tom Hill, our Chairman, President and CEO, are independent. Each of our directors has proven leadership, sound judgment and a commitment to the success of our company. We have sought, and will continue to
seek, diverse and experienced leaders with appropriate skills to oversee the management of our company. To that end, we have added
Melissa H. Anderson and George Willis to our Board. We expect their additions will provide valuable perspective and experience and further contribute to an engaged and well-balanced Board. D.
Michael Wilson, who was also added to our Board in 2019, served until his resignation from the Board effective February 26, 2020.
GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
We continued our corporate governance outreach efforts in 2019 and reached out to shareholders representing approximately 60% of our outstanding shares
in order to foster and deepen relationships with the governance teams of our largest shareholders. Our discussions centered on the companys ESG efforts, including sustainability, carbon reduction, diversity and inclusion, culture, executive
compensation and corporate governance matters. We update the Board on our conversations with shareholders, and our directors take into account shareholder feedback when making decisions regarding the companys policies and practices. We value
the views of our shareholders and believe these dialogues are critically important to ensuring that we remain aligned with their interests.
ADOPTION OF PROXY ACCESS
In early 2020, following discussions with certain of our shareholders, our Board adopted a
proxy access bylaw provision, which permits a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials
director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two individuals and (b) 20% of the total number of directors serving on the board of directors (rounded down to the nearest whole number), subject to certain limitations and provided that
the requirements set forth in our bylaws are satisfied.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
We are committed to strong corporate governance policies and practices and believe that this commitment is a critical element in achieving long-term
shareholder value. The following list summarizes certain highlights of our governance policies and practices:
|
|
Majority voting for uncontested director elections |
|
|
Independent lead director with defined duties |
|
|
10 of 11 directors are independent |
|
|
Annual board and committee evaluations and self-assessments |
|
|
Proxy access right for eligible shareholders
|
|
|
Risk oversight by full board and committees with annual enterprise risk management review |
|
|
Comprehensive new director orientation |
|
|
Mandatory director retirement age |
|
|
Policies prohibiting hedging and pledging of our shares |
|
|
Active shareholder engagement on ESG matters
|
|
|
Board participation in executive succession planning |
|
|
Executive sessions of independent directors at every regular board meeting |
|
|
Board review of safety and environmental performance at every regular board meeting |
|
|
No shareholder rights plan |
|
|
Diverse board in terms of gender, race, experience, skills and tenure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY SUMMARY
COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
We believe that the results of the 2019 Say on Pay vote demonstrate continued strong shareholder support for our current
compensation program. Furthermore, in the course of our shareholder outreach efforts, shareholders were generally supportive of our executive compensation program and the accompanying disclosures.
In order to align our executives interests with those of our shareholders, a substantial portion of our NEOs
compensation is at-risk and will vary above or below target levels depending on company performance. As shown in the graphic below, in 2019, 85% of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and an
average of 72% of the compensation of our other NEOs was variable and subject to performance factors.
We encourage you to read the more detailed description of our compensation program in Compensation Discussion and Analysis
beginning on page 27 before voting on Proposal 2: Advisory Vote on Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers.
At our 2019 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, over 98% of votes cast were in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our constituent documents provide that our Board shall be divided into three classes, with the term of office of one class
expiring each year and the number of directors in each class being as nearly equal as possible. At the Annual Meeting, four individuals will be elected to serve for three-year terms expiring in 2023 or until their successors have been duly elected
and qualified. In accordance with the bylaws of our company, our Board of Directors is required to be composed of not fewer than nine nor more than 13 directors.
BOARD COMPOSITION AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
Directors are responsible for reviewing and approving corporate strategy and overseeing
the management of our company to assure that the long-term interests of the shareholders are being served. The Board believes that it needs a diverse skill set among its members to be able to respond to the needs of management and the company. The
Governance Committee and full Board review annually the overall composition of the Board in order to ensure that Board members have the appropriate mix of skills and experience to best serve the company and its shareholders. The Governance
Committee and the Board use a director skills matrix in conducting this review.
The Governance Committee is
also responsible for evaluating each directors individual performance and contributions to the Board, as well as each directors qualifications, skills, independence and competence, prior to recommending an existing director to the Board
for re-nomination. The Board does not have specific diversity quotas, but considers race, ethnicity, gender, age, education and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for the Board.
The following pages list the four directors nominated for re-election at the 2020 Annual Meeting and the seven directors with
continuing terms that expire in subsequent years, as well as biographical information for all directors.
Your Board of Directors recommends
a vote FOR the election of Melissa H. Anderson, O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr., James T. Prokopanko and George Willis as directors for three-year terms expiring in 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
NOMINEES FOR 3-YEAR TERM EXPIRING IN 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Melissa H.
Anderson
AGE: 55 DIRECTOR
SINCE: 2019 COMMITTEES:
Compensation; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Duke Energy Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina (one of the largest energy holding companies in the
United States) since 2015; Senior Vice President of Human Resources of Domtar Corporation, Fort Mill, South Carolina (a leading provider of fiber-based paper and personal care products) from 2010 to 2015; Senior Vice President of Human Resources and
Government Relations of The Pantry Inc., Sanford, North Carolina (a leading independently operated convenience store chain) from 2006 to 2010; Vice President of Human Resources of Global Financing of IBM Corp., Armonk, New York (a multinational
information technology company) from 2003 to 2006.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Ms. Anderson is Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Duke Energy Corporation and has worked as the top human resources executive for three publicly traded companies over the past 13 years.
|
|
|
She serves on the boards of several charitable and industry-focused organizations, including the Charlotte YMCA, the Society for Human Resource Management and the Center for Energy Workforce Development. She is also a
member of the Center for Executive Succession at the University of South Carolinas Darla Moore School of Business. |
|
|
She received a Bachelor of Science in industrial relations from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Master of Science in industrial and labor relations from Cornell University. |
|
|
Ms. Anderson has led large cultural and talent transformations across multiple industries and brings deep expertise in succession planning, executive development and executive compensation to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. B. Grayson
Hall, Jr.
AGE: 62 DIRECTOR
SINCE: 2014 COMMITTEES: Executive;
Finance; Governance |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Retired; Former Executive
Chairman of Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama (one of the nations largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, mortgage and insurance products and services) and Regions Bank from July
2018 to December 2018; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from December 2017 to July 2018; Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from 2013 to 2017; President and Chief Executive Officer from 2010 to 2013.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. Hall is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Regions Financial Corporation. Since he joined Regions in 1980, he served in roles of increasing responsibility, including operations, technology and
commercial banking. |
|
|
He is a former Class A Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, and he is active in many civic and leadership organizations, including the Economic Development Partnership of Alabama and the Birmingham
Business Alliance. |
|
|
He graduated from the University of the South with a bachelors degree in economics. He also received a Master of Business Administration from the University of Alabama and is a graduate of the Stonier Graduate
School of Banking, University of Pennsylvania. |
|
|
Mr. Hall brings extensive management and business experience to our Board as well as a deep understanding of complex issues facing public companies. He further provides our Board with valuable experience in
banking, finance and capital markets. In addition, as the former Chief Operating Officer of Regions, he has a substantial background in issues related to cybersecurity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
NOMINEES FOR 3-YEAR TERM EXPIRING IN 2023
|
|
|
|
|
James T.
Prokopanko
AGE: 66 DIRECTOR
SINCE: 2009 COMMITTEES:
Compensation; Governance
|
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Retired; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of The Mosaic Company, Plymouth, Minnesota (a leading producer and marketer of concentrated phosphate and potash
crop nutrients for the global agriculture industry) from January 2007 to August 2015; Senior Advisor from August 2015 until his retirement in January 2016.
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
|
Regions Financial Corporation |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. Prokopanko joined The Mosaic Company in 2006 and served in various capacities, including as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining
Mosaic, he was with Cargill, Inc., where he served in a wide range of leadership positions, including as Corporate Vice President of Cargill Procurement, a leader of Cargills Ag Producer Services Platform and Vice President of the North
America crops inputs business. |
|
|
Mr. Prokopanko has a bachelors degree in computer science from the University of Manitoba and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Western Ontario. |
|
|
His experience having served as the principal interface between management and the board at a New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)-listed company facilitates his service as lead director of our company as well as our
Boards performance of its oversight function. |
|
|
Mr. Prokopankos executive management experience provides our Board with valuable insight into business, leadership and management issues. Additionally, he brings to our Board considerable knowledge of issues
facing a company engaged in mineral extraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
George
Willis AGE: 55 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2020
COMMITTEES: Audit; Safety, Health and Environmental
Affairs |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
President, U.S. Operations of UPS, Atlanta, Georgia (a global leader in logistics, distribution, transportation and freight services) since 2018; President, West Region
from 2015 to 2018; President, UK, Ireland and Nordics District from 2013 to 2015.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. Willis is President, U.S. Operations of UPS. He has more than 35 years experience in logistics and operations, including in managing a diverse transportation product portfolio in a range of domestic and
international markets. |
|
|
He serves on UPSs Management Committee, which is responsible for long-term strategy and operating plans for the companys worldwide operations. |
|
|
Mr. Willis has a long history of board membership and community involvement. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Airlines for America, is a member of the Executive Leadership Council and serves on the Board
of Trustees for the National Urban League. |
|
|
He holds a bachelors degree in business administration and management from Trinity College and has completed the Columbia Executive Education Program and the Yale CEO College Program. |
|
|
Mr. Willis veteran leadership in logistics and operations, as well as his advocacy for diversity and inclusion, will provide our Board with invaluable insight on matters critical to our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
CONTINUING IN OFFICE: TERM EXPIRING IN 2021
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas A.
Fanning AGE: 63 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2015
COMMITTEES: Executive; Audit; Compensation
|
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company, Atlanta, Georgia (one of the largest energy companies in the U.S. and a leading U.S.
producer of energy) since 2010.
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. Fanning is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company. He has worked for Southern Company for more than 39 years and has held 15 different positions in eight different business units,
including numerous officer positions with a variety of Southern Company subsidiaries in the areas of finance, strategy, international business development and technology. |
|
|
Mr. Fanning previously was Chief Financial Officer of Southern Company, where he was responsible for the accounting, finance, tax, investor relations, treasury and risk management functions. |
|
|
As Co-chairman of both the Electricity Subsector Coordinating Council (ESCC) and Tri Sector Coordinating Council, Mr. Fanning plays a leading role in national efforts to prevent and respond to cyber and physical
terrorism for the U.S. electric system. |
|
|
He has an undergraduate and masters degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology and has completed several executive education programs. |
|
|
As CEO of a large public utility, Mr. Fanning provides our Board with valuable business, leadership and management skills. His prior service as CFO of Southern Company and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta makes him well qualified to serve on our Audit Committee. Additionally, he brings to our Board a deep understanding of key issues facing an industrial company, including governmental and regulatory issues, and safety, health and
environmental matters. |
|
|
|
|
|
J. Thomas
Hill AGE: 61 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2014
COMMITTEES: Executive
|
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman of the Board of the company since January 2016 and President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2014.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. Hill is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company. He has been with the company for 30 years, serving in a variety of operations and general management assignments of increasing
responsibility. Prior to being named Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2014 until July 2014, and Senior Vice PresidentSouth Region from December 2011
to December 2013. He also served as President of the companys former Florida Rock Division and its Southwest Division. |
|
|
Mr. Hill has served in leadership positions in a number of industry trade groups, including the Texas Concrete and Aggregates Association, the Florida Concrete and Products Association and the National Stone, Sand
and Gravel Association. In addition, he serves on the boards of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the United Way of Central Alabama, the Birmingham Business Alliance and the Economic Development Partnership of Alabama. |
|
|
He is a graduate of the University of Pittsburgh and the Wharton School of Business, Executive Management Program. |
|
|
Mr. Hill has over 30 years experience in the aggregates industry, including extensive experience with the company in operations and management over a wide variety of geographic regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
CONTINUING IN OFFICE: TERM EXPIRING IN 2021
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia L.
Hostetler
AGE: 57 DIRECTOR
SINCE: 2014 COMMITTEES: Finance;
Governance |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Trustee of Invesco Funds, Atlanta, Georgia (international mutual funds) since 2017; Director of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC, Los Angeles, California (international
investment fund) since 2013; Trustee of Aberdeen International Funds, New York, New York (international mutual funds) from 2013 to 2017; Director of Artio Global Funds, New York, New York (international mutual funds) from 2010 to 2013; Director of
Edgen Group Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana (energy infrastructure) from 2012 to 2014.
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
|
Resideo Technologies, Inc. |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Ms. Hostetler is the former head of Private Equity and Vice President of Investment Funds at the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and a former president of a regional bank and bank holding company.
|
|
|
She began her career as a corporate lawyer with Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett in New York. |
|
|
Ms. Hostetler earned her bachelors degree from Southern Methodist University and holds a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia School of Law. |
|
|
Ms. Hostetler brings to our Board significant financial, investment and audit committee experience, and has developed risk assessment skills through her bank, private equity and mutual fund leadership. She is an
experienced public and investment company board member, having served on a number of public and private company boards, with committee chair positions that include audit, nominating and governance and investment management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard T.
OBrien
AGE: 66 DIRECTOR
SINCE: 2008 COMMITTEES: Executive;
Audit; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Independent consultant since October 2015; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Boart Longyear Limited, Salt Lake City, Utah (an international provider of
drilling services, drilling equipment and performance tooling for mining and drilling companies) from 2013 to 2015; Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation, Greenwood Village, Colorado (an international gold production company) from
2007 to February 2013.
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. OBrien became a director of Maaden (a Saudi Arabian mining company) in December 2017 and is a member of its executive committee. Mr. OBrien previously served as a director of Newmont
Mining Corporation from 2007 to 2013 and Inergy L.P. from 2006 to 2012. |
|
|
His work includes extensive experience with NYSE-listed companies in finance and accounting, operations and strategic business planning. |
|
|
Mr. OBrien earned his bachelors degree in economics from the University of Chicago and holds a Juris Doctor from the Lewis and Clark Law School. |
|
|
Having served as CFO of four different public companies and as an audit committee financial expert, Mr. OBrien provides the Board with considerable experience and acumen in financial reporting and
accounting matters. |
|
|
As a result of his tenure as CEO and CFO of Newmont Mining, Mr. OBrien brings to the Board significant experience and knowledge of the mining and mineral extraction industry. This gives him insight into the
risks facing the company, particularly with respect to safety, health and environmental issues, and provides him with the tools to effectively assist in overseeing those risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
CONTINUING IN OFFICE: TERM EXPIRING IN 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen L.
Quirk AGE: 56 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2017
COMMITTEES: Audit; Finance
|
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Freeport-McMoRan Inc., Phoenix, Arizona (a leading international mining company and the worlds largest
publicly traded copper producer) since 2007.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Prior to being named its Executive Vice President in 2007 and Chief Financial Officer in 2003, Ms. Quirk served in a variety of capacities with Freeport-McMoRan, including as Treasurer and Vice President, Finance
and Business Development. |
|
|
She received her bachelors degree in accounting from Louisiana State University. |
|
|
Ms. Quirks strong finance and accounting background, including her status as an audit committee financial expert, makes her well qualified to serve as a member of our Audit and Finance Committees.
She also brings to our Board extensive experience in working with debt and equity markets along with a deep knowledge of tax, investor relations, corporate development and treasury management. |
|
|
With over 30 years experience in the mining industry, Ms. Quirk has a keen understanding of the operational, governmental and regulatory issues facing our industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David P.
Steiner AGE: 59 DIRECTOR SINCE: 2017
COMMITTEES: Executive; Finance; Governance
|
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Retired; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc., Houston, Texas (a leading provider of integrated waste management services in North
America) from March 2004 to November 2016.
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Prior to being named Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc., Mr. Steiner served in various capacities with Waste Management, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to
2004, and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from 2001 to 2003. |
|
|
He serves on the board of directors of FedEx Corporation, and formerly served on the boards of TE Connectivity Ltd. (previously known as Tyco Electronics, Ltd.) and Waste Management, Inc. |
|
|
Mr. Steiner earned his bachelors degree in accounting from Louisiana State University and holds a Juris Doctor from the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law. |
|
|
Mr. Steiner brings to our Board valuable insight into business, leadership and management issues facing large industrial companies. His experience as CEO of Waste Management, Inc. and as chair of the nominating and
governance committee of FedEx Corporation makes him well qualified to serve on our Governance and Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs Committees. |
|
|
Additionally, he brings to our Board a keen understanding of issues involving trucking and logistics management, a key component of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
CONTINUING IN OFFICE: TERM EXPIRING IN 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Lee J.
Styslinger, III
AGE: 59 DIRECTOR
SINCE: 2013 COMMITTEES: Executive;
Compensation; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Altec, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama (a holding company for businesses that design, manufacture and market equipment for the electric
and telecommunications industries globally) since 1997 (CEO) and 2011 (Chairman).
OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
|
|
Regions Financial Corporation |
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
|
|
Mr. Styslinger serves as Chairman and CEO of Altec, which has products and services in over 100 countries, and has over 20 years experience leading companies engaged in the heavy equipment industry.
|
|
|
He serves on the boards of many educational, civic and leadership organizations, including the Harvard Business School and the National Association of Manufacturers. He was appointed to the Presidents Export
Council, advising the President of the United States on international trade policy from 2006 to 2008. In 2017, Mr. Styslinger served on the Presidents Manufacturing Council, and he currently serves on the Presidents Advisory Committee
for Trade Policy and Negotiations. |
|
|
He received his Bachelor of Arts from Northwestern University and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard University. |
|
|
Mr. Styslinger brings to our Board a wealth of management and business experience running a large company in todays global market. Additionally, his expertise in the heavy equipment industry greatly benefits
Vulcan, which is a major purchaser of heavy machinery and equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of Melissa H. Anderson, O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr., James T. Prokopanko and George Willis as directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
Proposal 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (SAY ON PAY)
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), we
are asking shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers (NEOs) as disclosed in the Section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and in the compensation tables and
narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement. While this vote is advisory and not binding on our company, it provides information to our Compensation Committee regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy,
policies and practices, which the Compensation Committee will consider when determining executive compensation in the future.
At our 2017 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, our shareholders once again indicated a preference that the advisory vote on the compensation for our NEOs occur on an annual basis. Subsequently, our Board determined to continue its policy for annual Say on Pay advisory
votes. It is expected that the next shareholder vote on the frequency of Say on Pay advisory votes will occur at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders voted over 98% in favor of our Say on Pay proposal. We believe this demonstrated strong support
for our compensation program and policies. We have continued to analyze and make changes to our compensation program, considering new compensation trends and best practices, which led us to add our annual average growth rate of Aggregates Cash Gross
Profit per ton (versus a pre-determined target) as an additional metric, together with Total Shareholder Return, for determining payouts for PSUs granted in 2019. We also participated in dialogues regarding
our executive compensation program with many of our largest shareholders through our corporate governance shareholder engagement program. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section on pages 27 to 43 for an in-depth look at our compensation program and how it was applied to the performance of our NEOs in 2019.
Based on the foregoing, the Board recommends a vote FOR the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to
Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on our company. However, our Board and Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of
the advisory vote when making future compensation decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the compensation of our named executive officers as contained in this proxy statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE
Proposal 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm
for our company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. The function of the independent registered public accounting firm is to audit our accounts and records; to report on the consolidated balance sheet and the
related statements of consolidated comprehensive income, consolidated shareholders equity and consolidated statements of cash flows of our company and its subsidiaries; to audit our internal controls over financial reporting; and to perform
such other appropriate accounting services as may be required and approved by the Audit Committee. Although shareholder ratification is not required, our Board is seeking shareholder ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. Even if the
appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is ratified by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm at any time
during the year if it believes such appointment is in the best interests of the company and the shareholders. If a majority of the votes cast at the meeting fails to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will consider the selection of another independent registered public accounting firm for future years.
The
firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, or its predecessors, has audited our financial statements since 1956. A representative of that firm is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement and will be
available to respond to appropriate questions.
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the
appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
We take our corporate governance responsibilities very seriously and have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that
provide a framework for the governance of our company. These Corporate Governance Guidelines build on practices that we have followed for many years and demonstrate our continuing commitment to corporate governance excellence.
Our Board, with recommendations from our Governance Committee, regularly reviews corporate governance developments and adopts appropriate practices as warranted. We have
a Business Conduct Policy that applies to all of our employees and directors and deals with a variety of corporate compliance issues, including conflicts of interest, harassment, compliance with laws, confidentiality of company information, fair
dealing and use of company assets. All employees and directors are required to fill out a questionnaire (biennially in the case of employees and annually in the case of directors) regarding their personal compliance with the Business Conduct Policy
and are encouraged to report any illegal or unethical behavior of which they become aware.
Our Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. The Code of Ethics
defines Senior Financial Officers to include the Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer. The Code of Ethics covers such topics as financial reporting, conflicts of interest and compliance with laws. If we
make any amendment to, or waiver of, any provision of the Code of Ethics, we will disclose such information on our website as promptly as practicable, as may be required under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and NYSE rules.
You can access our bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Business Conduct Policy and Code of Ethics at our website www.vulcanmaterials.com, or you can obtain a
printed copy free of charge by writing to us at: Corporate Secretary, Vulcan Materials Company, 1200 Urban Center Drive, Birmingham, Alabama 35242. Please note that the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, nor
considered to be a part of, this proxy statement.
We believe that regular, transparent communication with our shareholders is important to our long-term success. In 2019, we
continued our corporate governance engagement program and reached out to shareholders representing approximately 60% of our outstanding shares in order to foster and deepen relationships with the governance teams of our largest shareholders. Our
discussions centered on the companys ESG efforts, including sustainability, carbon reduction, diversity and inclusion, culture, executive compensation and corporate governance matters. Shareholder feedback from the meetings was shared with the
Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee, as well as with the full Board.
In addition, in early 2020, following discussions with certain of our shareholders, our Board adopted a
proxy access bylaw provision, which permits a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials
director nominees constituting up to the greater of (a) two individuals and (b) 20% of the total number of directors serving on the board of directors (rounded down to the nearest whole number), subject to certain limitations and provided that
the requirements set forth in our bylaws are satisfied.
All of our directors, with the exception of Tom Hill, our Chairman, President and CEO, are independent under the NYSE
listing standards, the Boards Director Independence Criteria, and the applicable SEC rules and regulations. The NYSE listing standards provide that a director does not qualify as independent unless our Board affirmatively determines that the
director has no material relationship with our company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with our company). The
NYSE rules require a board to consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances in determining the materiality of a directors relationship with our company and permit the Board to adopt
and disclose standards to assist the Board in making determinations of independence. Accordingly, the Board has adopted the following Director Independence Criteria to assist it in determining whether a director has a material relationship with our
company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE CRITERIA
The Director Independence Criteria provide that a director will be considered independent if he or she:
(a) |
has not been an employee of our company, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, during the last three years;
|
(b) |
has not received more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from our company, or any of its consolidated
subsidiaries, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service) during any twelve-month period within the last
three years; |
(c) |
has not during the last three years personally performed legal or professional services for our company in an amount more
than $10,000; |
(d) |
is not a current partner or employee of our companys independent auditor and has not been employed by the present or
former independent auditor of our company and personally worked on our companys audit during the last three years; |
(e) |
during the last three years, has not been part of an interlocking directorate in which an executive officer of our
company, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, served on the compensation committee of another company that concurrently employs the director; |
(f) |
is not, and has not been in the past three years, an executive officer or an employee of another company (exclusive of
charitable organizations) that makes payments to, or receives payments from, our company, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of the
consolidated gross revenues of such other company;
|
(g) |
has no immediate family member who is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of our company, or
any of its consolidated subsidiaries; |
(h) |
has no immediate family member meeting any of the criteria set forth in (b)(f); except with respect to item (d), in
which case an immediate family member may be an employee (not a partner) of the independent auditor so long as such family member does not personally work on our companys audit; and |
(i) |
has no other material relationship with our company, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries, either directly or as a
partner, shareholder, director or officer of an organization that has a material relationship with our company or any of its consolidated subsidiaries. |
In determining director independence, immediate family member is defined as a spouse, parent, child, sibling, mother or father-in-law, son or daughter-in-law, brother or
sister-in-law, and anyone (other than a domestic employee) who shares the directors home. Individuals who are no longer immediate family members as a result of
legal separation or divorce, or those who have died or become incapacitated, are not taken into consideration when determining a directors independence. The Director Independence Criteria also require our Board to consider all relevant facts
and circumstances, including a directors commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, familial and charitable relationships and such other criteria as our Board may determine from time to time.
In early 2020, the Board conducted an evaluation of director independence for each director, based on the Director Independence Criteria, the NYSE listing standards and
applicable SEC rules and regulations. As a result of this evaluation, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the directors other than our Chairman, President and CEO, Tom Hill, are independent directors under our Boards Director
Independence Criteria, the NYSE listing standards and the applicable SEC rules and regulations.
|
|
|
DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS |
|
|
|
|
The Governance Committee considers director candidates recommended by our shareholders. Any shareholder wishing to
recommend a candidate for election at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit that recommendation in writing, addressed to the Governance Committee, in care of our Corporate Secretary, at 1200 Urban Center Drive, Birmingham, Alabama
35242, in accordance with the deadlines and procedures set forth in our bylaws. The notice should include the following:
|
|
The name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination(s) and of the person or persons to be nominated; |
|
|
A representation that the shareholder is a holder of record or a beneficial holder of stock entitled to vote at the meeting (including the number of shares the shareholder owns) and intends to appear in person or by
proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
A description of all arrangements and understandings between the shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination(s) are to be made by the
shareholder; |
|
|
Such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such shareholder as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed under the proxy rules of the SEC (whether or not such rules are
applicable) had each nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by our Board, including the candidates name, biographical information, and qualifications; and |
|
|
The written consent of each nominee to serve as a director if so elected. |
A shareholder may also nominate and include in
our annual meeting proxy materials a candidate for election at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the proxy access
provisions in our bylaws, subject to certain limitations and provided that the requirements set forth in our bylaws are satisfied.
The Governance Committee will identify nominees by first evaluating the current members of our Board willing to continue in service. Current members of our Board with
skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of our Board with the potential benefits of obtaining
new Board members. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Governance Committee or the Board decides not to nominate a current Board member for re-election, the Governance
Committee may identify the desired skills and experience for a new nominee in light of the above criteria. Directors and members of management also may suggest candidates for Board service. Timely recommendations by our shareholders will receive
equal consideration by the Governance Committee.
|
|
|
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE |
|
|
|
|
Our Board understands the importance of evaluating and determining the optimal leadership structure so as to provide
independent oversight of management. Our Board also understands that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing Board leadership and that given the dynamic and competitive environment in which we operate, the right Board leadership
structure may vary from time to time. For this reason, our Board does not have a policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board has determined that our company should have the
flexibility to combine or separate these functions as circumstances deem appropriate. The Board believes that it is in the best interests of our company and its shareholders to have Tom Hill serve as our Chairman, President and CEO, at this time.
In considering its leadership structure, our Board has taken a number of additional factors into account. The Board, which consists exclusively of independent
directors, other than Mr. Hill, and all of whom are highly qualified and experienced, exercises a strong independent oversight function. This oversight function is enhanced by the fact that all of the Boards committees, other than the
Executive Committee, are comprised entirely of independent directors.
Most significantly, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for an independent lead
director, a position that is elected annually from among the independent directors of our Board.
Among other things, the lead director is responsible for:
|
|
presiding at all meetings or sessions of meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including at executive sessions of the non-management and independent
directors; |
|
|
serving as liaison between the Chairman and the non-management and independent directors; |
|
|
approving Board meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items, as well as meeting agendas and information sent to the Board; |
|
|
having authority to call meetings of the non-management and independent directors; and |
|
|
if requested by major shareholders, ensuring that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication. |
The
duties of the lead director are delineated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at www.vulcanmaterials.com. Mr. Hall currently serves as the lead director.
Our Board believes that these factors provide the appropriate balance between the authority of those who oversee our company and those who manage it on a day-to-day basis. For additional information regarding how oversight is exercised and how the Board receives information from our committees performing risk management and
oversight functions, see Corporate GovernanceEnterprise Risk Management on page 20.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
|
NON-MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE SESSIONS |
|
|
|
|
Our Board has adopted a policy relating to non-management executive sessions. Under
this policy, the Board meets at each regularly scheduled Board meeting in an executive session in which Mr. Hill and other members of management
are not present. During 2019, the non-management directors met in executive session five times. Our current lead director, Mr. Hall, presides over
executive sessions, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In 2019, our Board held five in-person meetings, and each current director then in
office attended 100% of the total number of meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees during 2019 of which he or she was a member.
Our directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In furtherance of this policy, our Board holds a
regularly scheduled Board meeting on the same day as the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of our Board members then in office attended the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person, except Messrs. Steiner and Styslinger, who participated via
teleconference.
|
|
|
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors has established six standing committees as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTOR |
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
|
FINANCE COMMITTEE |
|
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
|
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE |
Melissa H. Anderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas A. Fanning |
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
J. Thomas Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard T. OBrien |
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James T. Prokopanko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathleen L. Quirk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David P. Steiner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
George Willis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of meetings held in 2019 |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
0 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
The charters of the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees are available on our website at
www.vulcanmaterials.com. You can also obtain printed copies free of charge by writing to us at: Corporate Secretary, Vulcan Materials Company, 1200 Urban Center Drive, Birmingham, Alabama 35242.
All of the Board committees, other than the Executive Committee, are composed entirely of independent, non-management directors.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee advises
our Board and management from time to time with respect to internal controls, financial systems and procedures, accounting policies and other
significant aspects of our companys financial management. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee selects our companys independent registered public accounting firm and oversees
the arrangements for, and approves the scope of, the audits to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committees primary responsibilities under its written charter include the following:
|
|
Hiring, evaluating and, when appropriate, replacing the independent registered public accounting firm, whose duty it is to audit our books and accounts and our internal controls over financial reporting for the fiscal
year in which it is appointed; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
Determining the compensation to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm and, in its sole discretion, approving all audit and engagement fees and terms and
pre-approving all auditing and non-auditing services of such firm, other than certain de minimis non-audit services;
|
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with management, the independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors our internal reporting, audit procedures and the adequacy and effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures; |
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the audited financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
the quarterly financial statements to be included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our disclosures under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and the selection, application and disclosure of accounting policies used in our financial statements; |
|
|
Reviewing and discussing with management quarterly earnings press releases and financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies; and |
|
|
Reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of the Audit Committee Charter adopted by our Board, and recommending proposed changes to our Board. |
In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing with management our companys policies with respect to risk assessment and risk
management. Further information about the role of the Audit Committee in risk assessment and risk management are included in the Section entitled Enterprise Risk Management on page 20.
The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all services by the independent registered
public accounting firm. See Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmPre-Approval of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on page 23 for more
information.
The Audit Committee has also established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints received by our
company regarding its accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. See Corporate GovernancePolicy on Reporting of Concerns Regarding Accounting Matters on page 21 for more information.
The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. OBrien (Chair), Fanning and Willis, and Ms. Quirk. All members of
our Audit Committee are non-management directors. Our Board of Directors has determined that each is independent and financially
literate within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and regulations, and the Director Independence Criteria adopted by our Board of Directors and posted on our website at www.vulcanmaterials.com under
Investor Relations under the subheading Corporate Governance. In addition, our Board has determined that both Mr. OBrien and Ms. Quirk are audit committee financial experts as defined by rules
adopted by the SEC. More details about the role of the Audit Committee may be found in the Report of the Audit Committee on page 22 of this proxy statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee determines and oversees the execution of our companys executive compensation
philosophy, and oversees the administration of our companys executive compensation plans.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
|
determining and setting the amount of compensation paid to our CEO and other senior officers; |
|
|
reviewing compensation plans relating to our officers; |
|
|
interpreting and administering the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), the Management Incentive Plan (MIP), the 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2006 Plan) and the 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2016 Plan);
and |
|
|
making recommendations to the Board with respect to compensation paid by our company to any director. |
The Compensation
Committee also reviews and discusses with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by SEC rules to be included in our proxy statement.
The
Compensation Committee retains Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC as its independent compensation consultant. For a description of the process undertaken by the Compensation Committee to set compensation and the role of our independent compensation
consultant in that process, please refer to the Section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this proxy statement.
The members of the
Compensation Committee are Messrs. Fanning (Chair), Prokopanko and Styslinger, and Ms. Anderson. The Compensation Committee is composed solely of non-management directors who are
independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and regulations and the Director Independence Criteria. In addition, each Compensation Committee member is a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
non-employee director as defined in Rule
16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and is an outside director as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code).
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The Executive Committee has
the same powers as our Board, except as limited by the New Jersey Business Corporation Act. Pursuant to its charter, the Executive Committees primary function is to exercise the powers of the Board on urgent matters arising between regularly
scheduled board meetings when a quorum of the full Board is not available. Members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Hill (Chair), Fanning, Hall, OBrien, Steiner and Styslinger.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
The Finance Committee assists
the Board in its oversight of the companys actual and projected financial performance, capital structure and capital allocation, pension plans and 401(k) plans, and other matters of financial significance (e.g., acquisitions). The Finance
Committees primary responsibilities under its written charter are:
|
|
reviewing the companys actual year-to-date financial performance, estimated full year financial performance and projected long-term
financial performance; |
|
|
reviewing the companys capital structure, liquidity, credit metrics and credit ratings relative to its objectives, capital allocation plans and strategies, and projected near-term financing requirements;
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending to the Board, the companys proposals for dividend policy and dividend payments; and |
|
|
ensuring that the pension plans and 401(k) plans assets are managed in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations (e.g., ERISA), and reviewing the funded status of the pension plans to ensure
compliance with minimum funding requirements under all applicable laws and regulations. |
Every member of the Finance Committee is a non-management director who is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and regulations and the Director Independence Criteria. Members of the Finance Committee are
Messrs. Hall (Chair) and Steiner, and Mses. Hostetler and Quirk.
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
The Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and assessing our policies and practices relating to corporate governance, including our Corporate Governance
Guidelines. The Governance Committee also plans for the succession of the CEO and other senior executives. In addition, the Governance Committee serves as the nominating committee
and is responsible for identifying and assessing director candidates, including making recommendations to our Board regarding such candidates. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Governance
Committee, among other things:
|
|
identifies individuals qualified to become Board members consistent with criteria established in its charter; |
|
|
recommends director nominees to our Board for the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders; and |
|
|
evaluates individuals suggested by shareholders as director nominees. |
In recommending director nominees to the Board,
the Governance Committee considers all of the factors listed under Board Composition and Director Qualifications set forth in this proxy statement.
The
Governance Committee believes it appropriate for at least one member of the Board to meet the criteria for an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC rules, and for a substantial majority of the members of the Board to
meet the definition of independent as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and regulations and the Director Independence Criteria.
The Governance Committee also reviews our Boards committee structure and recommends to our Board, for its approval, directors to serve as members of each
committee. The Governance Committee is also responsible for overseeing the evaluations of the Board and its committees.
Members of the Governance Committee are
Messrs. Steiner (Chair), Hall and Prokopanko, and Ms. Hostetler. The Governance Committee is composed solely of non-management directors who are independent within the meaning of the listing
standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and regulations and the Director Independence Criteria.
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE
The Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee has the responsibility for reviewing our policies, practices and programs with respect to
the management of safety, health and environmental affairs. It also monitors our compliance with safety, health and environmental laws and regulations and oversees operational risk. Every member of this Committee is a
non-management director who is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, SEC rules and regulations and the Director Independence Criteria. Members of the Safety, Health
and Environmental Affairs Committee are Messrs. Styslinger (Chair), OBrien and Willis, and Ms. Anderson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
|
|
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT
Our company has a management risk committee that is led by senior corporate officers and draws on the subject matter expertise of senior managers from various functional
departments and from line operations management. The management risk committee meets on a regular basis to discuss and evaluate enterprise risks facing the company. The committee develops mitigation plans in response to identified risks and monitors
the implementation of such plans. The management risk committee makes regular reports to the Board and the Audit and Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs Committees.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Although the Board has the
ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk. In particular, our Audit Committee focuses on financial risk,
including internal controls and cybersecurity risks. Our Audit Committee also assists the Board in fulfilling its duties and oversight responsibilities relating to our companys compliance and ethics programs. In addition, our Safety, Health
and Environmental Affairs Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to monitoring operational risks and compliance with safety, health and environmental laws and regulations and works closely with our companys
legal and regulatory groups. Our Compensation Committee also assists the Board in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to create long-term value for our company, while discouraging behavior that leads to excessive risk taking. Finally, our Finance Committee assists the
Board in managing risk relating to investment of the companys pension fund assets and debt/leverage risks. The Board is kept informed of its committees risk oversight and other activities through reports of the committees chairs to
the Board. These reports are presented at Board meetings and include discussions of committee agenda topics. The Board also considers specific risk topics, including risks associated with our strategic plan, our capital structure, our development
activities and other current risk topics.
We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the
risks facing our company and that our Board structure supports this approach. To further illustrate our approach, the Board devotes significant time and attention to the oversight of cybersecurity and information security risks, and benefits from
the technical expertise of certain of its members, namely Messrs. Fanning and Hall. In particular, the Board and Audit Committee each receives regular reporting on cybersecurity and information security risks. The companys management risk
committee is also focused on the issue. This collaboration between the Board, the Audit Committee and members of management ensures broad oversight of the evolving nature of cybersecurity and information security risks.
|
|
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION |
|
|
|
|
None.
|
|
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS |
|
|
|
|
Transactions in which the company participates and in which any related person of the company has a direct or indirect
material interest are subject to our Business Conduct Policy and are subject to review, approval or ratification, as appropriate under the circumstances, by the company under the standards enumerated in the Business Conduct Policy. Each director,
executive officer and director nominee of the company receives and agrees to abide by our Business Conduct Policy. We also require our directors and executive officers to complete a director and officer questionnaire annually that requires
disclosure of any related party transactions.
In assessing the independence of its members, the Board considers any interests a director may have in any
transactions in which the company participates. The Board
also considers other entities with which the directors are affiliated and any business the company has done with such entities.
Except as discussed below, since the beginning of our last fiscal year, no financial transactions, arrangements or relationships, or any series of them, were disclosed
or proposed through our processes for review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons in which (i) Vulcan was or is to be a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeded $120,000, and (iii) any related person
had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A related person means any director, nominee for director, executive officer or 5% owner of our common stock or an immediate family member of any such person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The company paid approximately $7.8 million in rent and royalty payments to Florida Rock Properties, Inc. (FRP) in
2019 in the ordinary course of its aggregates operations. Mr. Baker, our Chief Operating Officer, is a significant shareholder of FRP Holdings, Inc., the parent company of FRP.
With respect to the transactions involving Messrs. Fanning, Willis and Wilson described below, we do not believe that any individual had a direct or indirect material
interest in the transactions that would impair his independence or status as a non-employee director or outside director under applicable rules of the NYSE, SEC or the Code. Furthermore, the amounts listed below are less than
1% of the revenues of the company, Southern Company, UPS and Ingevity Corporation, as applicable.
In 2019, the company sold approximately $1.8 million worth of product to Southern Company. Mr. Fanning, a member of
our Board of Directors, is the Chairman, President and CEO of Southern Company. Additionally, in 2019, the company purchased approximately $315,000 in miscellaneous shipping services from UPS. Mr. Willis, a member of our Board of Directors, is
the President, U.S. Operations of UPS. The company also purchased in 2019 approximately $170,000 worth of product from Ingevity Corporation. Mr. Wilson, a former member of our Board of Directors, was the President, CEO and a director of
Ingevity Corporation during 2019.
|
|
|
POLICY AGAINST HEDGING AND PLEDGING SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from purchasing financial instruments
(including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of company securities
granted as part of their compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by such person.
Our insider trading
policy also prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from holding company securities in a margin account or pledging company securities as collateral for a loan.
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATION WITH OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
Our Board has established a process for shareholders and other interested parties to communicate directly with the lead
director or with the non-management directors individually or as a group. Any shareholder or other interested party who desires to contact one or more of our
non-management directors, including our Boards lead director, may send correspondence to the following address:
Board
of Directors
(or lead director or name of individual director)
c/o Corporate
Secretary
Vulcan Materials Company
1200 Urban Center Drive
Birmingham, Alabama 35242
All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate director or directors specified in such communications as soon
as practicable in accordance with the Policy on Shareholder Communications with the Board, adopted by the independent directors in February 2004.
|
|
|
POLICY ON REPORTING OF CONCERNS REGARDING ACCOUNTING |
Our Business Conduct Policy (available on our website at www.vulcanmaterials.com under the heading Investor
Relations under the subheading Corporate Governance) sets forth our policies regarding reporting of accounting-related concerns or complaints (as well as reporting of other concerns or complaints) to our Compliance Officer or the
Audit Committee.
Any shareholder or interested party who has any concerns or complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls
or auditing matters, may contact the Audit Committee by writing to the following address:
Vulcan Audit Committee
c/o Corporate Secretary
Vulcan Materials Company
1200 Urban Center Drive
Birmingham, Alabama 35242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for, among other things, reviewing our companys financial statements
with management and our companys independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee acts under a written charter which is available on our website at www.vulcanmaterials.com. Each member of the Audit Committee is
an independent director as determined by our Board, based on the requirements of the NYSE, the SEC and our Director Independence Criteria.
Our companys
management has the primary responsibility for our companys financial statements and financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls. Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, is
responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of our companys audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. Our independent registered public accounting firm also audits, in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the effectiveness of our companys internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and overseeing these processes.
In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our companys audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public
accounting firm. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee has received
from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the
independent accountants communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent accountant its independence. The Audit Committee has also
considered whether the independent registered public accounting firms provision of any non-audit services is compatible with the firms independence. The Audit Committee has concluded that the
independent registered public accounting firm is independent from our company and management.
Based on the reviews and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in our companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for filing with the SEC.
Dated: February 21, 2020
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Richard T. OBrien, Chair
Thomas A. Fanning
Kathleen L. Quirk
D. Michael Wilson (through February
26, 2020)
The Report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or
incorporated by reference into any other company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates the Report of the Audit Committee by reference therein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fees billed to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, by Deloitte & Touche LLP and its
affiliates (all of which are subsidiaries of Deloitte, LLP, the United States member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
Audit Fees(1) |
|
$ |
2,881,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,799,260 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(2) |
|
|
338,500 |
|
|
|
148,500 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,219,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,947,760 |
|
(1) |
Consists of fees for the audit of our financial statements, including the audit of the effectiveness of our internal
controls over financial reporting, reviews of our quarterly financial statements, comfort letters, consents, and other services associated with other SEC filings. |
(2) |
Consists of fees for the audits of our employee benefit plans and subsidiary financial statements.
|
PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES PERFORMED BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
The Audit Committee has policies and procedures that require the pre-approval by
the Audit Committee of all fees paid to, and all services performed by, our companys independent registered public accounting firm. At the beginning of each year, the Audit Committee approves the proposed services, including the nature, type
and scope of services contemplated and the related fees, to be rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm during the year.
During the year,
circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the
Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the
independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee for those
instances when pre-approval is needed prior to a scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The Chair of the Audit Committee must report on such approvals at the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting. The Audit
Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related, tax and other services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
No audit-related, tax or other services were rendered in 2019 pursuant to the de minimis exception to the pre-approval
requirement set forth in Regulation S-X Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS |
|
|
|
|
The following is information regarding persons known to us to have beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock of
our company, which is our only outstanding class of voting securities, as of the dates indicated in the footnotes below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME AND ADDRESS OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER |
|
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
(# OF SHARES) |
|
|
PERCENT OF
CLASS |
|
The Vanguard
Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, PA 19355 |
|
|
14,842,330 |
(1) |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
State Farm
Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Affiliates
One State Farm Plaza Bloomington, IL
61710 |
|
|
11,210,438 |
(2) |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
BlackRock,
Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York,
NY 10055 |
|
|
8,838,604 |
(3) |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
(1) |
Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020. The Vanguard Group
(Vanguard) reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) 204,292 shares and sole power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 14,615,680 shares. Vanguard also reports shared power to vote (or direct the vote of) 34,361 shares and shared
power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 226,650 shares. Vanguard reports an aggregate amount of 14,842,330 shares beneficially owned. |
(2) |
Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on January 28, 2020, by State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Company and various affiliated entities (State Farm). State Farm reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) and dispose (or direct the disposition of) 11,153,100 shares and the shared power to vote (or direct the vote
of) and dispose (or direct the disposition of) 57,338 shares. State Farm reports an aggregate amount of 11,210,438 beneficially owned shares. Each entity listed in the Schedule 13G expressly disclaims beneficial ownership as to all shares as to
which such entity has no right to receive the proceeds of the sale of the security and disclaims that it is part of a group. |
(3) |
Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 6, 2020. BlackRock, Inc.
(BlackRock) reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) 7,665,315 shares and sole power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 8,838,604 shares. BlackRock reports an aggregate amount of 8,838,604 shares beneficially owned. Various persons
have the right to receive, or the power to direct the receipt of, dividends and the proceeds from the sale of the companys common stock. No one persons interest in the companys common stock is more than five percent of the total
outstanding common shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information, unless otherwise indicated, as of March 1, 2020, regarding beneficial ownership of our
companys common stock, our only outstanding class of equity securities, by each of our directors, each of our NEOs identified in the Summary Compensation Table on page 45 of this proxy statement, and our directors and executive officers
as a group. We believe that, for each of the individuals set forth in the table below, such individuals financial interest is aligned with the interests of our other shareholders because the value of such individuals total holdings will
increase or decrease in line with the price of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER |
|
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP (# OF SHARES)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTORS(1) |
|
SHARES OWNED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY |
|
|
PHANTOM SHARES HELD PURSUANT TO PLANS |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
PERCENT OF CLASS |
|
Melissa H. Anderson |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas A. Fanning |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
11,646 |
|
|
|
* |
|
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,346 |
|
|
|
13,346 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,686 |
|
|
|
6,686 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Richard T. OBrien |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
19,375 |
|
|
|
19,375 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James T. Prokopanko |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
17,223 |
|
|
|
17,223 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kathleen L. Quirk |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David P. Steiner |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
18,504 |
|
|
|
22,506 |
|
|
|
* |
|
George Willis(2) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO AND
OTHER NEOS(3) |
|
SHARES OWNED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY |
|
|
EXERCISABLE OPTIONS/ SOSARS |
|
|
DEFERRED LTI PAYMENTS |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
PERCENT OF CLASS |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
128,677 |
(4) |
|
|
138,034 |
|
|
|
46,690 |
|
|
|
313,401 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
473 |
(5) |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
20,410 |
(6) |
|
|
10,234 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
30,644 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
44,066 |
(7) |
|
|
28,767 |
|
|
|
40,487 |
|
|
|
113,320 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David Clement |
|
|
11,077 |
(8) |
|
|
14,781 |
|
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
30,671 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
21,102 |
(9) |
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
58,102 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (20 persons) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,667 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
* |
Less than 1% of issued and outstanding shares of our companys common stock. |
(1) |
Beneficial ownership for our non-employee directors includes all shares held of
record or in street name and, if noted, by trusts or family members. The amounts also include non-forfeitable phantom shares settled in stock accrued under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan and
Deferred Stock Units (DSUs) awarded under the 2006 Plan and the 2016 Plan. |
(2) |
Beneficial ownership for Mr. Willis is shown as of March 11, 2020, the date on which he joined the Board.
|
(3) |
Beneficial ownership for the executive officers includes shares held of record or in street name and, if noted, by trusts
or family members. The amounts also include shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options which are presently exercisable or that will become exercisable on or before April 30, 2020, shares credited to the executives accounts
under our 401(k) Plan and any long-term incentive (LTI) payments from DSUs, Performance Share Units (PSUs) and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) that may have been deferred into the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. |
(4) |
Includes 24,786 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(5) |
Includes 473 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(6) |
Includes 1,920 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan and 14,375 shares held indirectly in trusts.
|
(7) |
Includes 15,804 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(8) |
Includes 3,684 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(9) |
Includes 13 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
The table below sets forth information regarding the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLAN CATEGORY
|
|
NUMBER
OF SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS (A) |
|
|
WEIGHTED- AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE
OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS (B) |
|
|
NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING AVAILABLE
FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS (EXCLUDING SECURITIES REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)) (C) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 Florida Rock Industries Amended & Restated Stock Plan(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
$43.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2000 Florida Rock Industries
Amended & Restated Stock Plan |
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0(2) |
|
2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
719,120 |
|
|
|
$64.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Units |
|
|
131,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
43,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Stock Units for Non-employee
Directors |
|
|
46,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive
Plan |
|
|
940,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0(3) |
|
2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
220,334 |
|
|
|
$119.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Units |
|
|
348,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
168,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Stock Units for Non-employee
Directors |
|
|
35,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive
Plan |
|
|
772,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,753,536 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
NONE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONE |
|
Total of All Plans |
|
|
1,718,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,753,536 |
|
(1) |
All of our companys equity compensation plans have been approved by the shareholders of our company or, in the case
of the 2000 Florida Rock Industries Amended & Restated Stock Plan, by the shareholders of Florida Rock Industries, Inc. prior to our acquisition of that company. Column (A) sets forth the number of shares of common stock issuable upon
the exercise of options, warrants or rights outstanding under the 2000 Florida Rock Industries Amended & Restated Stock Plan, the 2006 Plan and the 2016 Plan. The weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options is shown in
Column (B). The remaining number of shares that may be issued under the equity compensation plans are shown in Column (C). |
(2) |
This plan was approved by the shareholders of Florida Rock Industries, Inc. Shares available have been adjusted for the
merger transaction. Units were only available for granting of awards until September 30, 2010. Future grants will not be made under this plan. The plan will be used only for the administration and payment of grants that are outstanding.
|
(3) |
Future grants will not be made under this plan. The plan will be used only for the administration and payment of grants
that were outstanding when the 2016 Plan was approved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the companys executive compensation philosophy and programs for our named executive officers (NEOs). The
companys NEOs for 2019 were:
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
PRINCIPAL POSITION |
J. Thomas Hill |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Suzanne H. Wood |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Thompson S. Baker, II |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
Stanley G. Bass |
|
Chief Growth Officer |
David P. Clement(1) |
|
Senior Vice President |
Michael R. Mills(2) |
|
Former Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary |
(1) |
Although Mr. Clement was an executive officer for only a portion of 2019, he is a named executive officer based on
his total compensation for 2019. As he was not a member of the companys senior leadership team, his compensation was not subject to direct review by the Compensation Committee in 2019. As a result, where there is discussion herein regarding
decisions made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of each of our NEOs, such decisions with respect to Mr. Clement were made by our CEO, using similar principles and practices, pursuant to the authority delegated to
him by the Compensation Committee. |
(2) |
Mr. Mills served as our Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary until his retirement effective as of
September 15, 2019. |
Vulcans unwavering commitment to reliability, quality and customer service has long provided us with a competitive
edge, and we remain well-positioned as an industry leader. Vulcans mission drives every aspect of our business, including the pay-for-performance philosophy of our
executive
compensation program. We believe that our approach to executive compensation appropriately aligns managements interests with those of our shareholders and encourages a focus on driving
long-term, sustainable shareholder value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our mission is to provide quality products and service; to foster the safety, skills and development of our people; to protect the environment; and to create superior, sustainable value for our
shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
The company again delivered strong top and bottom line growth in 2019, together with world-class safety resultsa testament to the operating strength of our business
and the talent of our people. For the year, we generated double-digit growth in revenues and earnings compared to the prior year, driven by our core aggregates business. Aggregates margins expanded and unit profitability improved again in 2019, and
we are confident in our ability to deliver strong results in the future. Our balance sheet is sound, allowing us the flexibility to grow in all parts of our business cycle.
(1) |
2017 net earnings include discrete income tax benefits of $297.0 million, including benefits arising from the
enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. |
(2) |
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. We provide a reconciliation of
Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure in Annex A to this proxy statement. |
SAFETY PERFORMANCE
Our collective safety performance in 2019 remained world-class, as we achieved a level of 0.97 MSHA/OSHA combined injury incidents per 200,000 hours worked, and
our MSHA citation rate was 0.70 compared to an industry average of 2.12. Our safety performance underscores our strong culture, which is bolstered by an engaged workforce that believes in employee ownership of safety and operational performance. We
believe that the more engaged our managers are with their teams and the more engaged our employees are with each other, the safer and more effective our operations will become.
In addition, each NEOs short-term performance-based bonus is dependent, in part, on the companys safety performance and may be adjusted as much as 25% of
target based on measurable performance in safety. This bonus metric reflects the importance of safety at the highest levels of our management team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that safety culture is a leading indicator of a well-run company, and we are committed to continuous improvement on our world-class
performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Executive Compensation Philosophy
The dedication and performance of our employees, including our NEOs, enable us to accomplish our corporate goals. The compensation program
for our NEOs is intended to motivate them to achieve Vulcans strategic objectives and operational plans while adhering to our high ethical business standards and creating shareholder value.
Vulcans executive compensation program is centered on a pay-for-performance
philosophy, which aligns executive compensation with shareholder value and ultimately impacts our compensation program design.
|
|
|
OUR THREE COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES |
|
|
Link a significant portion of compensation to performance.
We believe that compensation levels should reflect performanceboth Vulcans performance and the NEOs performance. This is accomplished by:
Motivating, recognizing and rewarding individual excellence
Paying
short-term cash incentives based upon company financial performance and individual performance
Linking long-term incentives to company stock performance through the use of
Performance Share Units (PSUs), Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights (SOSARs) |
|
Maintain competitive compensation levels.
We strive to offer programs and levels of compensation that are competitive with those offered by industrial companies of similar size, value and complexity in order to
attract, retain and reward our NEOs. Align managements interests with those of
shareholders. Our program encourages NEOs to remain with us and to increase long-term shareholder value by granting long-term equity-based awards each year and
tying short-term cash incentives to the achievement of economic profit targets closely aligned with the creation of shareholder value. |
Our NEOs are primarily rewarded through performance-based cash and equity incentive awards, with only a small portion of their overall
compensation awarded in the form of base salary. This serves to both encourage and recognize strong company performance and stock price growth, further driving shareholder value.
Long-term equity incentives are awarded through a combination of PSUs, RSUs and SOSARs in order to tie executive compensation more closely to company performance. The
diagrams below depict each element of target compensation expressed as a percentage of total target direct compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs, expressed as an average, for 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following chart summarizes the key pay elements for our NEOs. Each element is described in detail beginning on page 34 in the Section
Elements of Compensation.
* |
EBITDA Economic Profit (EBITDA EP) is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Annex A
for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results reported under GAAP. |
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND SAY ON PAY RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, over 98% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory vote to approve the compensation
of our NEOs (Say on Pay vote). We believe the results of the 2019 Say on Pay vote demonstrate continued strong shareholder support for our current compensation program. Furthermore, during our shareholder engagement discussions
over the course of 2019, shareholders were generally supportive of our executive compensation program and the accompanying disclosures.
We recognize, however,
that we must always strive for continuous improvement. To that end, acting on some of the advice and guidance that we received in the course of our shareholder outreach efforts, we added our annual average growth rate of Aggregates Cash Gross Profit
per ton as a second metric for determining payouts for PSUs granted in 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on input from our shareholders, we added an additional metric for determining payouts of PSUs granted in 2019 to further align our compensation program with company performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our compensation program incorporates best practices that we believe drive performance, while mitigating risk and aligning the interests
of our executives to those of our shareholders. The table below highlights key features of our compensation practices.
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT WE DO |
|
WHAT WE DONT DO |
|
|
Tie pay to performance
by ensuring that a significant portion of NEO compensation is variable and performance-based
Apply a market based approach for determining target compensation
Utilize
PSUs as a substantial portion of long-term incentive awards
Apply Double-Trigger change of control requirement for long-term
incentive awards
Require substantial share ownership under our stock ownership guidelines
Subject
cash and equity-based incentive compensation to a clawback policy
Consider feedback provided by our shareholders related to executive compensation
matters |
|
Provide employment
contracts for our executives
Permit repricing of stock options or SOSARs without shareholder approval
Allow
pledging by our directors and officers of Vulcan shares as collateral for loans or any other purpose
Permit transactions by our directors and officers intended to hedge or offset
the market value of Vulcan stock owned by them Provide excessive change of control benefits. Neither our Change of Control Agreements nor our Change of Control Plan provide for:
Single-trigger termination right;
Inclusion
of long-term incentive value in the calculation of cash severance; or
Excise tax gross-ups
|
|
|
|
THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE |
|
|
|
|
Each NEOs base salary and annual bonus is determined through thoughtful consideration of individual performance, company
performance, competitive market pay and individual responsibilities and experience.
CEO EVALUATION
With respect to our CEO, the independent members of our Board use a formal process for evaluating his performance. Each Board member provides a written evaluation in the
areas of leadership, strategic planning, financial performance, safety performance, customer relations, personnel management, communications, board relations and overall performance. In its performance deliberations, the Compensation Committee has
access to this input from the full Board and independently assesses the CEOs performance.
OTHER NEOS EVALUATION
For our NEOs other than our CEO and Mr. Clement, the Compensation Committee reviews performance reports, as prepared by our CEO. Individual performance is based
primarily on the extent to which each NEO achieves a series of set goals throughout the period. As described above, decisions regarding Mr. Clements compensation were determined by our CEO. Unless otherwise noted below, in setting
Mr. Clements compensation, our CEO engaged in processes and set compensation parameters similar to those used by the Compensation Committee in setting compensation for our other NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our compensation program is intended to motivate our NEOs to achieve Vulcans strategic goals and operational plans while
adhering to our high ethical business standards and creating shareholder value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following are notable individual accomplishments of each NEO in 2019:
|
|
Tom Hill CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
MR. HILLS ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED:
|
|
|
Leading the organization to achieve its third consecutive year of world-class safety incident ratesroughly half that of the industry averagethrough meaningful employee engagement and safety process
initiatives |
|
|
|
Providing strong capital stewardship, reaffirming our capital allocation priorities and adhering to those priorities throughout the year. Under Mr. Hills leadership, the company maintained excellent
liquidity, maintained an investment grade credit rating, pursued strategic growth opportunities and returned excess cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases
|
|
|
Enhancing the organizations One Vulcan, Locally Led competitive positions by refining the companys strategic enterprise initiatives, which focus on continuous improvement through the
establishment of defined, efficient and disciplined processes |
|
|
Demonstrating executive support for the companys diversity and inclusion initiatives by joining CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion and
partnering with Historically Black Colleges and Universities |
|
|
Suzanne Wood SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
MS. WOODS ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED:
|
|
|
Promoting a culture of accountability for operating and financial results by providing financial support and actionable information to operations management, developing comprehensive SAG and GPO reporting and providing
a platform for executive and divisional review and decision making, linking market credibility to shareholder returns |
|
|
|
Improving effectiveness and efficiency of field-facing metric reporting and ensuring that the enterprise internal controls structure, risk management framework and information security systems remain strong and continue
to progress |
|
|
Maintaining discipline in the companys balance sheet and capital allocation, resulting in a net debt to EBITDA leverage reduction |
|
|
Strengthening shareholder outreach and deepening relationships within the investment community through transparent communications, pursuing European investment and proactively engaging with sell-side analysts
|
|
|
Providing executive leadership support to the companys operations and commercial initiatives and aligning priorities of the finance, human resources and information services departments with those of division
management to ensure strategic priorities and margin improvements are fully supported |
|
|
Tom Baker CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER |
MR. BAKERS ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED:
|
|
|
Reducing safety citations per inspection through executive support of internal safety initiatives, SHE team inspections, employee engagement, coordination between SHE and operations teams and executive review of
injuries, accidents and near-misses |
|
|
|
Driving organizational succession planning and talent development efforts, further strengthening the pipeline of talent to achieve short- and long-term organizational goals
|
|
|
|
Providing executive leadership for the implementation of the Operational Excellence initiative, focused on enhanced operating discipline and leadership through established rhythms and clearly defined roles and
responsibilities |
|
|
|
Providing executive leadership in the implementation of a new centrally-led procurement organization and the launch of a new procurement system, resulting in substantial cost
savings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
Stan Bass CHIEF GROWTH OFFICER |
MR. BASS ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED:
|
|
|
Providing executive leadership for the Commercial Excellence and Logistics Innovation initiatives, further establishing Vulcans competitive market advantage through strategic go-to-market approaches, while also leveraging trucking capabilities available through new technology platforms in major metropolitan markets |
|
|
|
Developing a company-wide land management and recycle strategy to identify and secure additional sources of revenue
|
|
|
|
Developing and implementing the Vulcan Way of Construction initiative to provide consistent expectations and leadership in our construction line of business, focusing on financials, cost controls and bid software
systems |
|
|
|
Successfully identifying, pursuing and closing on strategic acquisitions, greenfield sites and distribution yards in support of organizational growth
|
|
|
David Clement SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT |
MR. CLEMENTS ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED:
|
|
|
Exceeding target and prior year EBITDA performance for the Central Division and Southern & Gulf Coast Division |
|
|
|
Providing executive leadership and driving operational focus on environmental and safety initiatives, resulting in 36 plants in the Central Division and 18 plants in the Southern & Gulf Coast Division achieving
Triple Zero status (i.e., no injuries, MSHA/OSHA citations or environmental citations)
|
|
|
Leading efforts to launch the Operational Excellence initiative across the enterprise, including the development and implementation of initiative modules, follow-up review
protocols and coach training for area managers |
|
|
Leading the Logistics Innovation initiative rollout in the companys Central Division, developing the systems and processes that facilitated an accelerated rollout across the organization
|
|
|
Michael Mills FORMER CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND SECRETARY |
MR. MILLS ACCOMPLISHMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDED:
|
|
|
Embedding core tenants of The Vulcan Way, including safety, employee ownership and clear performance goals, into our culture through the establishment and implementation of key initiatives focused on enhancing safety,
diversity and organizational capabilities |
|
|
|
Reinforcing strategic talent management processes through the implementation of key resource enhancements to ensure future leadership continuity and organizational capability |
|
|
Enhancing the companys compensation and benefits practices, including the development and launch of new recognition awards designed to acknowledge significant achievements |
|
|
Leading the international strategy for the organization, including managing international political initiatives, further supporting the development of international leadership and pursuing additional opportunities for
business development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Elements of Compensation
The elements of our executive compensation program, all of which are discussed in greater detail below, include:
Total Direct Compensation Elements:
|
|
Short-term performance-based incentive |
|
|
Long-term equity incentives
|
Other Compensation Program Elements:
|
|
Benefits and perquisites |
|
|
Change of control arrangements |
The base salary element of our compensation program is designed to be competitive with compensation paid to
similarly-situated, competent and skilled executives.
The Compensation Committee uses the following factors to determine if base salary adjustments are appropriate
for our NEOs:
|
|
Performance relative to the pre-established goals and objectives in his or her areas of responsibility |
|
|
Changes in responsibilities |
|
|
Overall managerial effectiveness with respect to leadership planning, personnel development, communications, strategy execution and similar matters |
|
|
Competitive pay levels for similarly-situated executives set forth in compensation surveys and within our peer group |
|
|
Level of expertise and potential for future contributions to the company, retention risks and equity within our overall salary program |
|
|
Economic environment and its impact on the company |
We review the base salaries of the NEOs annually, and
also at the time of any promotion or change in responsibilities. The following table sets forth the annual base salary of each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2019, as well as each NEOs year-over-year percentage increase in base salary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
POSITION |
|
2018 SALARY |
|
2019 SALARY |
|
YEAR-OVER- YEAR INCREASE |
Tom Hill |
|
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
$1,100,000
|
|
|
|
|
$1,130,000
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
$ 650,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ 676,000 |
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Tom Baker(1)
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
$ 608,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ 664,000 |
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Stan Bass |
|
Chief Growth Officer
|
|
|
|
$ 608,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ 633,000 |
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
David Clement(2)
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
$ 362,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ 400,000 |
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Michael Mills |
|
Former Chief Administrative Officer
and Secretary |
|
|
|
$ 608,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ 650,000 |
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
(1) |
Mr. Baker was promoted from Senior Vice President to Chief Operating Officer effective May 1, 2019.
|
(2) |
Mr. Clement was promoted from President, Central Division to Senior Vice President effective May 1, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To further our goal of aligning the executives interests with those of our shareholders, we generally reward superior performance through our short-term cash incentive program and long-term
equity-based incentives rather than through base salary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE |
|
|
|
|
Our short-term cash incentive program is designed to motivate our executives, including the NEOs, and reward them with cash
payments for achieving quantifiable, pre-established business results and individual performance goals. We pay short-term incentives under the shareholder-approved Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) to all of our
NEOs except Mr. Clement, to whom such incentives are paid under the Management Incentive Plan (MIP).
In order for the NEOs to be eligible to receive a cash
bonus, the company must attain a minimum performance threshold for the year, as established by the Compensation Committee. The minimum performance threshold is only used to determine each NEOs eligibility for a short-term cash bonus payment.
For 2019, the minimum threshold was either: (1) cash earnings* in the amount of $300 million; or (2) EBITDA* in the amount of $400 million. If the Compensation Committee determines that either of the minimum performance
thresholds are met, our NEOs may receive a short-term cash bonus. In 2019, company performance exceeded each of these established minimum thresholds.
At the
beginning of the plan year, the Compensation Committee determined the target bonus as well as the maximum bonus payable for each NEO, except Mr. Clement, whose bonus is payable under the MIP, which does not provide for a maximum bonus amount. After
considering 2019 company and individual performance, the Compensation Committee exercised downward discretion from the maximum bonus amount to determine each NEOs actual bonus amount.
The Compensation Committee used EBITDA Economic Profit (EBITDA EP*), which incorporates Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), as its short-term financial incentive metric
in determining the actual bonus amount payable to each NEO. We believe this metric provides an incentive for management
to carefully consider deployment of capital to the extent the company increases capital expenditures during the current economic cycle. EBITDA EP measures the extent to which Adjusted EBITDA*
exceeds an operating capital charge. Adjusted EBITDA EP* is based on Adjusted EBITDA, but includes other performance adjustments, such as business acquisition performance versus planned performance. The operating capital charge is based on our
companys average assets and liabilities associated with Adjusted EBITDA EP multiplied by the estimated pretax cost of capital. We believe that changes in EBITDA EP positively correlate with changes in shareholder value better than other
commonly used financial performance measures.
The 2019 EBITDA EP target of $556.2 million was based on performance during the preceding three years, weighted
most heavily on the most recent fiscal year, less certain gains on sales of property or assets. The Compensation Committee determined actual cash bonuses for 2019 based on EBITDA EP of $683.8 million, which was $127.6 million above the
target.
The Compensation Committee also considered the companys safety performance when determining actual bonuses payable to our NEOs. The companys
actual safety performance is measured against pre-established goals set by the Compensation Committee and can result in an increase in each NEOs bonus multiple by up to 20 points or a decrease by up to
25 points. A bonus multiple point is equal to 1% of the NEOs target bonus. For 2019, the company achieved a world-class safety record with a total MSHA/OSHA combined incident injury rate of 0.97 for every 200,000 employee hours worked.
World-class performance is generally recognized as an injury rate of less than 1.0 per 200,000 employee hours worked. As a result, each NEO received an increase of 15 points to the performance bonus multiple used to calculate his or her bonus for
2019.
The table below shows the target bonus, the maximum
bonus payable under the EIP, and the actual cash bonus paid to each NEO based on 2019 company and individual performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
BASE SALARY
|
|
|
TARGET BONUS AS A PERCENTAGE OF BASE SALARY
|
|
|
TARGET BONUS AMOUNT |
|
|
MAXIMUM
BONUS(1)
|
|
|
CASH BONUS PAID BASED ON 2019 PERFORMANCE
|
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
$1,130,000 |
|
|
|
130% |
|
|
|
$1,469,000 |
|
|
|
$3,672,500 |
|
|
|
$2,384,000 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
$ 676,000 |
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
$ 574,600 |
|
|
|
$1,436,500 |
|
|
|
$ 932,600 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
$ 664,000 |
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
$ 531,200 |
|
|
|
$1,328,000 |
|
|
|
$ 862,100 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
$ 633,000 |
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
$ 506,400 |
|
|
|
$1,266,000 |
|
|
|
$ 821,900 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
$ 400,000 |
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
|
$ 280,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
(2) |
|
|
$ 486,000 |
|
Michael Mills(3) |
|
|
$ 650,000 |
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
$ 520,000 |
|
|
|
$1,300,000 |
|
|
|
$ 844,000 |
|
(1) |
Under the EIP, bonus payments may be up to 4 times each NEOs target amount (but not to exceed $7 million). However,
the amounts in this column equal 2.5 times the NEOs target bonus, which is the maximum allowed by the Compensation Committee. |
(2) |
Mr. Clements bonus is payable under the MIP, which does not provide for a maximum bonus amount.
|
(3) |
Mr. Mills received a bonus based on 2019 performance pursuant to the Letter Agreement, dated as of September 3,
2019, setting forth the terms of his retirement from the company effective as of September 15, 2019. |
* |
Cash earnings, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA EP and Adjusted EBITDA EP are non-GAAP financial measures. See Annex A for
a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results reported under GAAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
|
LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVES |
|
|
|
|
Our long-term equity incentive compensation program rewards the NEOs based on the future performance of our company by
incentivizing the creation of shareholder value. The goals of the long-term incentive program are to:
|
|
Ensure NEOs financial interests are aligned with our shareholders interests |
|
|
Motivate decision-making that improves financial performance over the long-term |
|
|
Recognize and reward superior financial performance of our company |
|
|
Provide a retention element to our compensation program |
|
|
Promote compliance with the stock ownership guidelines for executives |
Based principally on data and analysis from its
independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee establishes a target long-term equity incentive opportunity, expressed as a percentage of each NEOs base salary, to be used when making long-term equity awards.
Our 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2016 Plan), approved by our shareholders at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, includes the following types of awards
that the Compensation Committee may use, at its discretion, for granting long-term incentives:
In recent years, the Compensation Committee has used a combination of PSUs and SOSARs for annual equity incentive
grants to our NEOs. For grants made in 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the addition of RSUs into the long-term incentive award mix for our NEOs.
2019 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE GRANTS
Annually at its February meeting, the Compensation Committee grants long-term incentive awards. All such equity-based awards are valued on the date of the grant.
Typically, equity-based incentive grants are only made annually unless a hire or promotion occurs during the year.
In 2019, the Compensation Committee made annual
long-term incentive grants to the NEOs in the form of a combination of PSUs, RSUs and SOSARs. PSU grants comprised 60% of the total target value of the annual long-term incentive grants made to each NEO, while RSUs and SOSARs each comprised 20%. The
Compensation Committee normally grants a number of equity-based awards that produce an award value on the date of the grant that approximates the 50th percentile level of awards made to similarly-situated executives determined by our competitive
market analysis. However, the Compensation Committee may make adjustments each year to the number of units granted based on its assessment of each executives performance, experience and responsibilities, as well as internal equity
considerations.
A summary of all long-term incentive (LTI) grants made to NEOs in 2019 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
2019 ANNUAL GRANTS
|
|
|
TOTAL LTI
GRANTS |
|
|
SOSARs
|
|
|
PSUs
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Tom Hill
|
|
|
26,100
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
62,100
|
|
Suzanne
Wood |
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
7,900
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
18,100
|
|
Tom
Baker |
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
15,400
|
|
Stan
Bass |
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
David
Clement |
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
Michael
Mills |
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
These awards are also reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 45 and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table on page 46.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Performance Share Units (PSUs)
PSUs, which comprised 60% of each NEOs target LTI award in 2019, provide an opportunity for our executives to earn Vulcan stock if performance goals established by
the Compensation Committee are met over a three-year performance period. For PSUs granted in 2019, performance will be measured 50% based on the companys total shareholder return (TSR) percentile rank relative to the TSR of the S&P 500,
and 50% based on the companys growth rate of Aggregates Cash Gross Profit per ton, each averaged over the three-year period ending December 31, 2021.
The
Compensation Committee chose the S&P 500 as the comparison group for relative TSR performance because it is a broad and stable index group that represents investors alternative capital investment opportunities. Vulcan is also a member of
the S&P 500. In response to feedback we received from our shareholders, beginning with PSUs granted in 2019, the Compensation Committee added our annual average growth rate of Aggregates Cash Gross Profit per ton as an additional metric for
determining payouts. The Compensation Committee believes this additional metric adds balance to our PSU program by including an internal financial measure in combination with our historical use of relative TSR. The Committee views our Aggregates
Cash Gross Profit per ton as an important measure of our long-term financial performance that further aligns our compensation program with company performance.
The
following table shows the payout percentage of 2019 PSUs that will vest over the three-year period based on potential levels of performance:
PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT PAYMENT TABLE(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE-YEAR AVERAGE TSR PERCENTILE
RANK RELATIVE TO S&P 500 INDEX |
|
% OF PSUs
PAYABLE(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL AVERAGE GROWTH RATE
AGGREGATES CASH GROSS PROFIT(3) PER TON |
|
% OF PSUs
PAYABLE(2) |
|
75th or greater
(Maximum) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5% or greater
(Maximum) |
|
|
100 |
|
50th (Target) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5% (Target) |
|
|
50 |
|
25th (Threshold) |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5% (Threshold) |
|
|
12.5 |
|
Less than 25th |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 0.5% |
|
|
0 |
|
(1) |
If the companys three-year average TSR relative to the S&P 500 Index is at the 50th percentile, one half of the
full award is paid. If the companys three-year average annual growth rate of Aggregates Cash Gross Profit per ton is 4.5%, the remaining one half of the full award is paid. The payout is adjusted incrementally for performance above and below
target and can range from 0% to 200%. |
(2) |
Payouts are interpolated for returns between threshold and target, and target and maximum. |
(3) |
Aggregates Cash Gross Profit is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Annex A for a
description of how this amount is calculated from our audited financial statements. |
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights (SOSARs)
SOSARs, which comprised 20% of each NEOs target LTI award in 2019, provide value to the executives only if the market value of our common stock
appreciates over time. SOSARs entitle the recipient to receive, at the time of exercise, shares of Vulcan stock with a market value equal to the excess of the market price of Vulcan stock on the date the SOSARs are exercised, over the exercise price
(the closing price of Vulcan stock on the date of grant) multiplied by the number of SOSARs exercised. SOSARs have a ten-year term and vest at a rate of one-third
annually over the first three years of the term.
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
RSUs, which comprised 20% of each NEOs target LTI award in 2019, provide value through long-term stock price performance, thus aligning the interests of our
executives with those of our shareholders. RSUs vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and are then paid in the form of Vulcan common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
PAYMENTS OF PRIOR GRANTS
In February 2019, our NEOs received payment for PSUs that were granted in 2015, which vested on December 31, 2018, based on our results relative to the established
performance criteria. These PSUs were paid out at 149% of the original grant amount. The PSU payment percentage of 149% was based on TSR performance of our common stock relative to the TSR performance of the companies that comprise the S&P 500
Index during the four-year performance period.
PAYMENT CALCULATION FOR PSUs GRANTED IN 2015 AND PAID FEBRUARY 8, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
UNITS GRANTED IN 2015 |
|
|
PERCENTAGE PAYABLE |
|
|
UNITS PAYABLE |
|
Tom Hill
|
|
|
30,900
|
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
|
|
46,041
|
|
Suzanne Wood(1) |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Tom Baker(2) |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Stan
Bass |
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
|
|
9,238
|
|
David
Clement |
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
Michael
Mills |
|
|
7,100
|
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
|
|
10,579
|
|
(1) |
Ms. Wood joined Vulcan in 2018 and therefore did not receive PSUs in 2015. |
(2) |
Mr. Baker rejoined Vulcan in 2017 and therefore did not receive PSUs in 2015. |
NEOs participate in each of the benefit plans or arrangements that generally are made available to all salaried employees,
including medical and dental benefits and life, accidental death and disability insurance.
We provide individual long-term disability coverage for our NEOs that
insures base salary and target bonus in excess of that insured under the group contract up to a maximum of $700,000 in covered compensation.
We reimburse NEOs for
qualified expenses incurred while using personal vehicles for company business based on a fixed and variable rate reimbursement program.
We also make the
company-owned aircraft available to the CEO and other senior executives for business travel. In addition, the aircraft is available to the CEO for personal use, subject to the policy described below. In certain limited circumstances, such as when a
particular use is incidental to company business or is otherwise extraordinary (e.g., a medical emergency), an NEO may use the aircraft for personal travel without reimbursement to the company, provided that such use is considered for inclusion in
the applicable NEOs taxable income for the year.
Pursuant to a Board-approved policy, the CEO is permitted to use the companys corporate aircraft for
personal travel
outside of the aforementioned limited circumstances, without reimbursement to the company, up to a maximum value of $100,000 per year. Mr. Hill used the company-owned aircraft for such
personal reasons in 2019 on 10 occasions, and the cumulative amount attributable to those uses was less than $100,000.
In addition, in 2019, Ms. Wood used the
company-owned aircraft for commuting on 5 occasions and for personal use on 1 occasion. Messrs. Bass and Clement used the aircraft for personal use on 3 occasions and 1 occasion, respectively.
In accordance with the companys policy, none of the flights mentioned above required reimbursement to the company, and each was considered for inclusion in the
applicable NEOs taxable income for the year. Except as set forth above, none of the other NEOs received a personal benefit from the use of company-owned aircraft.
We do not provide other significant perquisites to the NEOs.
The Compensation
Committee reviews our policies and determines whether and to what extent perquisites should be modified or continued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
|
CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
Effective as of January 1, 2016, Vulcan entered into new Change of Control Employment Agreements (COC Agreements) with
Messrs. Hill, Bass and Mills to replace prior change of control severance agreements. In 2018, Vulcan entered into the same form of COC Agreement with each of Mr. Baker and Ms. Wood. Each of the COC Agreements, except Mr. Mills
agreement, covers a term of three years and will be automatically extended annually for subsequent three-year terms unless Vulcan gives prior notice of non-extension. Mr. Mills COC Agreement
terminated upon his retirement from the company effective as of September 15, 2019.
In the event of a change of control, the COC Agreements entitle the
executives to continue employment with Vulcan for two years following the change of control, during which time period the executive will continue to hold a position and duties, and receive compensation and benefits, commensurate with the practices
in effect during the four-month period prior to the change of control. Severance benefits under each COC Agreement will be payable following a qualifying termination (termination by the executive for good reason or by Vulcan without cause) that
occurs within two years following (or prior to, but in connection with) a change of control. A change of control is defined to include: (a) the acquisition of 30% or more of the outstanding Vulcan stock or voting power by an
individual, entity or group; (b) a change in the majority of the board of directors of Vulcan that is not endorsed by the incumbent board of directors; (c) consummation of a
reorganization, merger, consolidation or similar corporate transaction that results in a new group holding at least 50% of the beneficial ownership of the outstanding Vulcan stock or voting power; and (d) approval by Vulcan shareholders of a
complete liquidation or dissolution of the company.
The COC Agreements provide for a payment of three times the sum of base salary and average bonus upon a change
of control.
Mr. Clement is subject to the Change of Control Severance Plan for Senior Officers (COC Plan), effective as of January 1, 2016, that provides
for payment of 2.5 times the sum of base salary and average bonus upon a change of control. Other than the payout amount, the severance terms of the COC Plan are generally consistent with the COC Agreements.
We utilize change of control arrangements to provide for retention and continuity in order to minimize disruptions during a pending or anticipated change of control. For
a detailed description of these change of control arrangements, refer to Change of Control Arrangements and Related Cash Severance Benefits on page 53.
Retirement benefits are an important component of our executive compensation program. We offer employees, including our NEOs, a program
that provides the opportunity to accumulate income for retirement. We periodically review our benefits program against our peer group with the goal of ensuring that our program remains competitive. The key components of our retirement program are as
follows:
|
|
|
BENEFIT |
|
BACKGROUND |
Retirement
Plan* |
|
The Salaried Pension Plan (Pension
Plan) covers all salaried employees of our company hired prior to July 15, 2007. As of December 31, 2013, benefits under the Pension Plan were frozen. The plan was amended to freeze service accruals effective
December 31, 2013, and pay accruals effective December 31, 2015. |
Supplemental
Plan* |
|
The Vulcan Nonqualified Retirement
Plan (Nonqualified Plan) provides for benefits that are curtailed under the Pension Plan and the 401(k) Plan due to Internal Revenue Service pay and benefit limitations for qualified plans. This plan is designed to provide retirement income
benefits, as a percentage of pay, that are similar for all employees regardless of compensation levels. The Nonqualified Plan eliminates the effect of tax limitations on the payment of retirement benefits, except to the extent that it is an unfunded
plan and a general obligation of our company. As of December 31, 2013, pension plan benefits under the Nonqualified Plan were frozen. The plan was amended to freeze service accruals effective December 31,
2013, and pay accruals effective December 31, 2015. Supplemental 401(k) benefits continue to accrue under this plan. |
401(k)
Plan |
|
This plan has two components:
(1) an employee contribution feature with company matching and (2) an annual employer contribution. |
* |
A discussion of all retirement benefits provided to the NEOs is set forth under the heading Retirement
Benefits beginning on page 50. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Decision Approach
|
|
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
|
|
COMPOSED ENTIRELY OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS |
The Compensation Committee administers our executive compensation program in accordance with our Compensation Committee Charter. The
current charter is available at www.vulcanmaterials.com. On our website, select Investor Relations, then Corporate Governance. From there, you can visit our Committees page, which lists the
composition of our board committees as well as their respective charters.
In accordance with our Compensation Committee Charter, the
Compensation Committee:
|
|
|
Annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the CEOs compensation |
|
|
|
Reviews the CEOs performance and independent compensation consultants recommendations and, accordingly,
determines the CEOs compensation |
|
|
|
Presents the CEOs overall compensation package to the entire Board of Directors for ratification
|
|
|
|
Reviews and sets base salary and short- and long-term incentives for other NEOs |
|
|
|
Monitors market practices and reviews and approves any modifications to the companys executive compensation program
|
|
|
|
Interprets and administers the Executive Incentive Plan, Management Incentive Plan, 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
and 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION
CONSULTANT
|
|
MERIDIAN COMPENSATION PARTNERS, LLC (MERIDIAN) |
Meridian is engaged by and reports to the Compensation Committee, and occasionally meets with management to discuss compensation
initiatives and issues. Meridian does not provide any other services to the company. The Compensation Committee determined that Meridians work as the Compensation Committees compensation consultant did not present any conflicts of
interest in 2019.
In 2019, Meridian:
|
|
|
Provided the Compensation Committee with observations and recommendations on compensation and benefits for our CEO and other
NEOs |
|
|
|
Advised and assisted the Compensation Committee in a review of our peer group for 2019 compensation decisions
|
|
|
|
Conducted a benchmarking market study and analysis of executive compensation practices to ensure that our compensation
program is reasonable and competitive |
|
|
|
Had representatives attend three meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2019 |
|
|
|
Management supports the Compensation Committee by providing information and analyses, and occasionally meets with our
independent compensation consultant to discuss compensation initiatives and competitive practices |
|
|
|
The CEO is responsible for recommending annual performance goals for each of the other NEOs and for conducting annual
performance evaluations against such pre-established goals |
|
|
|
Based on performance and competitive benchmarking reports, the CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee for
the compensation of the other NEOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
|
BENCHMARKING COMPENSATION AND PEER GROUP DEVELOPMENT |
|
|
|
|
On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews a benchmarking analysis of total compensation for our CEO and other NEOs relative
to market data. Our compensation consultant develops market data appropriate for a company of our size using a combination of peer group data and market surveys. The market data, in combination with consideration of each NEOs experience,
responsibilities and performance, assist the Compensation Committee in making informed, market-based decisions regarding our executive pay program.
The Compensation
Committee generally targets each element of compensation for our NEOs at the 50th percentile of the market as determined by the benchmarking analysis, subject to individual variation based on the Compensation Committees assessment of each
executives performance, experience and responsibilities as well as internal equity considerations.
PEER GROUP
The Compensation Committee considered several factors in selecting our peer group, including industry (with a focus on construction, materials and mining), revenue size,
market capitalization and operating margins. At the end of 2019, our revenues approximated the median of the peer group and our market capitalization was above the 75th percentile. Our peer group
for 2019 consisted of the following 27 companies:
|
|
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. |
|
|
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. |
|
|
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
Eastman Chemical Company |
|
|
Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. |
|
|
Lennox International Inc.
|
|
|
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. |
|
|
Minerals Technologies Inc. |
|
|
Newmont Mining Corporation |
|
|
Packaging Corporation of America |
|
|
Westlake Chemical Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In order to align the interests of the NEOs with our shareholders interests and to promote a long-term focus for
these officers, our company has executive stock ownership guidelines for the officers of our company. The guidelines are based on the Compensation Committees assessment of market practices. The stock ownership requirements are higher for the
CEO than for the other NEOs. The following table details the guidelines for each NEO, expressed as a multiple of base salary:
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
STOCK VALUE
AS A MULTIPLE OF BASE SALARY |
Tom Hill
|
|
7x
|
Suzanne
Wood |
|
4x
|
Tom
Baker |
|
4x
|
Stan
Bass |
|
3x
|
David
Clement |
|
3x
|
Michael Mills(1) |
|
3x
|
(1) |
Mr. Mills retired from the company effective as of September 15, 2019, and is no longer subject to the
companys stock ownership guidelines. |
The Compensation Committee reviews compliance with the ownership guidelines on an annual basis. As of
February 1, 2020, all of the NEOs met or exceeded our ownership guidelines except Ms. Wood, who joined Vulcan in September 2018, and Mr. Baker, who rejoined Vulcan in March 2017. Ms. Wood and Mr. Baker have five years from
the date each joined or rejoined the company, respectively, to meet such guidelines.
WHAT COUNTS TOWARD THE GUIDELINE
|
|
shares owned personally |
|
|
shares in the Vulcan 401(k) plan or other qualified retirement plans |
|
|
shares in the companys deferred compensation and nonqualified retirement plans |
|
|
shares owned by a family member, shares held in trust for the benefit of the NEO or a family member, or shares held in trust for which such officer is trustee |
WHAT DOES NOT COUNT TOWARD THE GUIDELINE
|
|
in the money value of vested SOSARs |
SHARE RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
Pursuant to the equity retention policy in our stock ownership guidelines, all NEOs are required to retain 50% of net shares paid as incentive compensation until such
officer meets or exceeds the applicable ownership guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Risk, Accounting and Tax Considerations
Our compensation program is balanced, focused and gives considerable weight to the long-term performance of our company.
Under this structure, the highest amount of compensation can only be achieved through consistent superior performance over sustained periods of time. Goals and objectives reflect a balanced mix of quantitative and qualitative performance measures to
avoid excessive weight on a single performance measure. Likewise, the elements of compensation are balanced among current cash payments and long-term equity-based incentive awards. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust
compensation for quality of performance and adherence to our companys values.
Based on the foregoing features of our compensation program, the Compensation
Committee has concluded that risks arising from compensation policies and practices for employees of the company and its affiliates are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company as a whole.
In administering the compensation program for NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers the consequences under applicable tax law and financial accounting standards in
our analysis of total compensation and the mix of compensation elements, base salary, bonus and long-term incentives. In that
regard, Section 162(m) of the Code generally prohibits public companies from taking a tax deduction for compensation that is paid to any one of certain employees (generally, our Chief
Executive Officer and other NEOs, excluding our Chief Financial Officer in the case of tax years commencing before 2018) in excess of $1,000,000. For tax years prior to January 1, 2018, Section 162(m) allowed us to deduct certain qualified
performance-based compensation. Historically, we therefore intended that bonus payments under the EIP and grants of long-term incentives under our 2016 Plan would qualify as qualified performance-based compensation; however, we have always
maintained the flexibility to grant awards that may not be tax-deductible. Section 162(m) was amended in December 2017, and for taxable years beginning January 1, 2018, the qualified
performance-based compensation deduction is no longer available, except in limited situations that are eligible for transition relief. We are therefore not currently eligible to take a deduction under Section 162(m) for qualified
performance-based compensation except in limited grandfathered situations, for which we may not qualify. The Compensation Committee maintains (and has maintained) the discretion to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from
Section 162(m), to the extent permitted by applicable law and the relevant governing documents, if it determines that such modifications are consistent with Vulcans business needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis as set forth above with management and, based on such review and
discussions, recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Dated: February 13, 2020
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Thomas A. Fanning, Chair
Melissa H. Anderson
James T. Prokopanko
Lee J. Styslinger, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for the three most recently completed fiscal years, information concerning the compensation of our NEOs
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION |
|
YEAR |
|
|
SALARY ($) |
|
|
BONUS ($) |
|
|
STOCK AWARDS(1) ($) |
|
|
OPTION AWARDS(1) ($)
|
|
|
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION(2)
($) |
|
|
CHANGE
IN PENSION VALUE & NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION EARNINGS(3)
($) |
|
|
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(4)
($) |
|
|
TOTAL
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Thomas Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,974,040 |
|
|
|
1,015,290 |
|
|
|
2,384,000 |
|
|
|
713,340 |
|
|
|
344,516 |
|
|
|
9,556,186 |
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
1,086,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,187,840 |
|
|
|
1,189,184 |
|
|
|
2,021,300 |
|
|
|
(121,005 |
) |
|
|
317,423 |
|
|
|
7,681,409 |
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
1,008,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,808,011 |
|
|
|
1,027,939 |
|
|
|
1,722,000 |
|
|
|
342,036 |
|
|
|
290,918 |
|
|
|
7,199,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suzanne H. Wood(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
671,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,159,095 |
|
|
|
295,640 |
|
|
|
932,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,037 |
|
|
|
3,138,039 |
|
and Chief Financial |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
216,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,008 |
|
|
|
1,005,575 |
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson S. Baker(6) |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
654,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982,471 |
|
|
|
252,850 |
|
|
|
862,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,498 |
|
|
|
2,870,586 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
598,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,520 |
|
|
|
288,552 |
|
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,202 |
|
|
|
2,460,607 |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
444,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646,195 |
|
|
|
236,555 |
|
|
|
577,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,950 |
|
|
|
1,930,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley G. Bass |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
628,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
883,120 |
|
|
|
229,510 |
|
|
|
821,900 |
|
|
|
445,056 |
|
|
|
146,103 |
|
|
|
3,154,522 |
|
Chief Growth |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
605,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,520 |
|
|
|
288,552 |
|
|
|
965,000 |
|
|
|
(107,065 |
) |
|
|
137,435 |
|
|
|
2,662,442 |
|
Officer |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
583,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810,681 |
|
|
|
296,769 |
|
|
|
692,900 |
|
|
|
190,271 |
|
|
|
137,490 |
|
|
|
2,711,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David P. Clement(7) |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
393,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,287 |
|
|
|
97,250 |
|
|
|
486,000 |
|
|
|
371,859 |
|
|
|
66,483 |
|
|
|
1,779,546 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Mills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Chief |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
453,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501,544 |
|
|
|
344,232 |
|
|
|
844,000 |
|
|
|
481,237 |
|
|
|
326,787 |
|
|
|
3,951,217 |
|
Administrative Officer |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
605,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,520 |
|
|
|
288,552 |
|
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
(109,142 |
) |
|
|
129,342 |
|
|
|
2,402,272 |
|
and Secretary |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
583,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810,681 |
|
|
|
296,769 |
|
|
|
692,900 |
|
|
|
212,111 |
|
|
|
124,842 |
|
|
|
2,720,638 |
|
(1) |
Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we have provided a grant date fair value for Stock Awards and Option Awards in
accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. For Option Awards (including SOSARs), the fair value is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of certain assumptions, including
the risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility and expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield at the date of grant of a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity period equal to or approximating the options expected
term. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical dividend payouts adjusted for current expectations of future dividend payouts. The volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility, and expectations regarding future
volatility, of our common stock over a period equal to the options expected term. The expected term of options granted is based on historical experience and expectations about future exercises and represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. For Performance Share Units, the fair value is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model. For the highest performance level, the maximum number of shares payable and the estimated
grant date value are 54,000 shares ($5,961,060) for Mr. Hill; 15,800 shares ($1,744,162) for Ms. Wood; 13,400 shares ($1,479,226) for Mr. Baker; 12,000 shares ($1,324,680) for Mr. Bass; 5,000 shares ($551,950) for
Mr. Clement; and 13,000 shares ($2,370,060) for Mr. Mills. Mr. Mills expenses reflect the fair values calculated based on the modification date associated with the Letter Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2019, setting
forth the terms of his retirement from the company effective as of September 15, 2019. We do not believe that the fair values estimated on the grant date, either by the Black-Scholes model or any other model, are necessarily indicative of the
values that might eventually be realized by an executive. |
(2) |
The Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), and with respect to Mr. Clement, Management Incentive Plan (MIP), payments were
made on March 12, 2020, for the previous years performance. See discussion of the EIP under heading Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
(3) |
Includes only the amount of change in pension value because our company does not provide any above market earnings on
deferred compensation balances. The year over year change in pension value was attributable to two primary factors, which were: (i) aging (one year closer to retirement) and (ii) change in actuarial assumptions (change in interest rate
from 4.02% to 2.82%, and mortality table to Pri-2012 Private retirement plan Mortality White Collar Table, adjusted to 2006 base rates, with generational improvements projected using Scale MP-2019). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
AGING
(one year closer to retirement)
($) |
|
|
CHANGE IN ASSUMPTIONS ($) |
|
|
TOTAL
CHANGE ($) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
216,045 |
|
|
|
497,295 |
|
|
|
713,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Suzanne Wood(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Baker(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
107,173 |
|
|
|
337,883 |
|
|
|
445,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
David Clement |
|
|
84,393 |
|
|
|
287,466 |
|
|
|
371,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
121,331 |
|
|
|
359,906 |
|
|
|
481,237 |
|
|
(a) |
Ms. Wood and Mr. Baker were hired after 2007 and are not eligible to participate in the companys defined
benefit plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(4) |
Includes qualified defined contribution plan contributions, company-paid life insurance premiums, personal use of company
automobile, commuting expenses and personal use of company aircraft, as set forth in the following table. |
|
FOOTNOTE 4 Breakout detail of all other compensation shown in table below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
NON-QUALIFIED PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS ($) |
|
|
QUALIFIED 401(K) CONTRIBUTIONS ($) |
|
|
COMPANY PAID LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS ($) |
|
|
PERSONAL USE OF COMPANY AUTOMOBILE ($) |
|
|
RELOCATION
EXPENSES ($) |
|
|
TAXABLE
HEALTH CARE ($) |
|
|
PERSONAL USE OF COMPANY AIRCRAFT ($) |
|
|
TAXABLE
LIFE
INSURANCE ($) |
|
|
RETIREMENT PAYMENTS ($) |
|
|
TOTAL ($) |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
247,838 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
6,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
64,087 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
344,516 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
36,362 |
|
|
|
23,300 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
16,464 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
79,037 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
92,122 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
118,498 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
109,392 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,045 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
146,103 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
39,265 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
66,483 |
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
87,032 |
|
|
|
25,050 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
4,756 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,337 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
189,583 |
(a) |
|
|
326,787 |
|
|
(a) |
This amount reflects payments made pursuant to the Letter Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2019, setting forth the
terms of Mr. Mills retirement from the company effective as of September 15, 2019. |
(5) |
Ms. Wood joined Vulcan on September 1, 2018. |
(6) |
Mr. Baker was rehired by Vulcan on March 10, 2017. |
(7) |
Mr. Clement was not a named executive officer for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017. |
|
|
|
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS |
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the grants of plan-based awards in 2019 to our NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (# OF SHARES) |
|
|
|
|
|
ALL OTHER STOCK AWARDS: NUMBER OF SHARES OF STOCK OR UNITS (#) |
|
|
ALL
OTHER OPTION AWARDS: NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING OPTIONS (#) |
|
|
EXERCISE OR BASE PRICE
OF OPTION AWARDS(1) ($/SH) |
|
|
GRANT DATE FAIR
VALUE OF STOCK AND
OPTION AWARDS(2) ($) |
|
NAME |
|
GRANT DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
THRESHOLD ($) |
|
|
TARGET
($) |
|
|
MAXIMUM ($) |
|
|
|
|
|
THRESHOLD (#) |
|
|
TARGET (#) |
|
|
MAXIMUM (#) |
|
|
|
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,469,000 |
|
|
|
3,672,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
26,100 |
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
4,989,330 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
574,600 |
|
|
|
1,436,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
1,454,735 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
531,200 |
|
|
|
1,328,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
13,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
1,235,321 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
506,400 |
|
|
|
1,266,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
1,112,630 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
461,537 |
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
520,000 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
1,845,776 |
|
(1) |
Exercise price was determined using the closing price of our common stock on the grant date as required under the 2016
Plan. |
(2) |
Amount represents the grant date fair values calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value
of $110.39 for the PSUs granted on February 19, 2019, was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The grant date fair value of $110.39 for the RSUs granted February 19, 2019, reflects the base price of the award adjusted for
dividends foregone during the vesting period. The grant date fair value of $38.90 for the SOSARs granted on February 19, 2019, was calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Fair value was calculated on the number of units granted.
The amounts shown for Mr. Mills reflect the fair values calculated based on the modification date associated with the Letter Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2019, setting forth the terms of his retirement from the company effective as
of September 15, 2019. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END |
|
|
|
|
Certain information concerning unexercised options and stock awards that have not vested for each of the NEOs outstanding as of
December 31, 2019, is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTION AWARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCK AWARDS |
|
NAME |
|
GRANT
DATE |
|
|
NUMBER
OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS (#)
EXERCISABLE |
|
|
NUMBER
OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED OPTIONS (#)
UNEXERCISABLE |
|
|
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING UNEXER- CISED UNEARNED OPTIONS
(#) |
|
|
OPTION EXER- CISE PRICE
($) |
|
|
OPTION EXPIRATION DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE NOT VESTED
(#) |
|
|
MARKET VALUE OF SHARES OR UNITS OF STOCK THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED(12) ($) |
|
|
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: NUMBER OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED(13) (#) |
|
|
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: MARKET OR PAYOUT VALUE OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER RIGHTS
THAT HAVE NOT VESTED(12) ($) |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
3/1/2011 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.63 |
|
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/2013 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.41 |
|
|
|
2/7/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/13/2014 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.00 |
|
|
|
2/13/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2015 |
|
|
|
30,800 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.41 |
|
|
|
2/12/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2016 |
|
|
|
24,075(1) |
|
|
|
8,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.02 |
|
|
|
2/12/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,279(6) |
|
|
|
6,087,753 |
|
|
|
|
2/10/2017 |
|
|
|
15,934(2) |
|
|
|
7,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.60 |
|
|
|
2/10/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,725(7) |
|
|
|
3,128,183 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/2018 |
|
|
|
9,067(4) |
|
|
|
18,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.69 |
|
|
|
2/23/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,200(8) |
|
|
|
3,916,528 |
|
|
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
0(5) |
|
|
|
26,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
2/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000(11) |
|
|
|
1,295,910 |
|
|
|
27,000(9) |
|
|
|
3,887,730 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
9/4/2018 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500(10) |
|
|
|
503,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
2/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600(11) |
|
|
|
374,374 |
|
|
|
7,900(9) |
|
|
|
1,137,521 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
3/13/2017 |
|
|
|
3,667(3) |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.59 |
|
|
|
3/13/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000(7) |
|
|
|
719,950 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/2018 |
|
|
|
2,200(4) |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.69 |
|
|
|
2/23/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,600(8) |
|
|
|
950,334 |
|
|
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
0(5) |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
2/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200(11) |
|
|
|
316,778 |
|
|
|
6,700(9) |
|
|
|
964,733 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
2/12/2015 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.41 |
|
|
|
2/12/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2016 |
|
|
|
6,975(1) |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.02 |
|
|
|
2/12/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,211(6) |
|
|
|
1,758,262 |
|
|
|
2/10/2017 |
|
|
|
4,600(2) |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.60 |
|
|
|
2/10/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,272(7) |
|
|
|
903,105 |
|
|
|
2/23/2018 |
|
|
|
2,200(4) |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.69 |
|
|
|
2/23/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,600(8) |
|
|
|
950,334 |
|
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
0(5) |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
2/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000(11) |
|
|
|
287,980 |
|
|
|
6,000(9) |
|
|
|
863,940 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
2/07/2013 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.41 |
|
|
|
2/7/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/13/2014 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.00 |
|
|
|
2/13/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2015 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.41 |
|
|
|
2/12/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2016 |
|
|
|
2,100(1) |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.02 |
|
|
|
2/12/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,676(6) |
|
|
|
529,307 |
|
|
|
|
2/10/2017 |
|
|
|
1,267(2) |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.60 |
|
|
|
2/10/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,727(7) |
|
|
|
248,671 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/2018 |
|
|
|
634(4) |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.69 |
|
|
|
2/23/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900(8) |
|
|
|
273,581 |
|
|
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
0(5) |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
2/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800(11) |
|
|
|
115,192 |
|
|
|
2,500(9) |
|
|
|
359,975 |
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
2/13/2014 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.00 |
|
|
|
2/13/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2015 |
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.41 |
|
|
|
2/12/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/12/2016 |
|
|
|
6,975(1) |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.02 |
|
|
|
2/12/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,211(6) |
|
|
|
1,758,262 |
|
|
|
|
2/10/2017 |
|
|
|
4,600(2) |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.60 |
|
|
|
2/10/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,272(7) |
|
|
|
903,105 |
|
|
|
|
2/23/2018 |
|
|
|
2,200(4) |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.69 |
|
|
|
2/23/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,600(8) |
|
|
|
950,334 |
|
|
|
|
2/19/2019 |
|
|
|
0(5) |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.16 |
|
|
|
2/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,110(11) |
|
|
|
303,819 |
|
|
|
6,500(9) |
|
|
|
935,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Options in footnote 1 vest at a rate of 25% per year in years 1 4.
(1) |
Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/12/2017, 2/12/2018, 2/12/2019, and 2/12/2020. |
Options in footnote 2, 3, 4, and 5 vest at a rate of 33.3% per year in years 1 3.
(2) |
Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/10/2018, 2/10/2019, 2/10/2020. |
(3) |
Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 3/13/2018, 3/13/2019, 3/13/2020. |
(4) |
Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/23/2019, 2/23/2020, 2/23/2021. |
(5) |
Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/19/2020, 2/19/2021, 2/19/2022. |
PSUs in footnote 6 cliff vest 100% after a four-year performance period.
(6) |
PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2019. |
PSUs in footnote 7, 8, and 9 cliff vest 100% after a three-year performance period.
(7) |
PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2019. |
(8) |
PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2020. |
(9) |
PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2021. |
(10) |
RSUs cliff vest 100% after a three-year period, with a vesting date of 9/4/2021. |
(11) |
RSUs cliff vest 100% after a three-year period, with a vesting date of 2/19/2022. |
(12) |
Based on closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on 12/31/2019, $143.99. |
(13) |
Vested PSUs adjusted for company performance through 12/31/2019. Unvested PSUs reported at target. |
|
|
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN |
|
|
|
|
Our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan was established in 1998 to allow executives to defer a portion of their current years
compensation in a tax-efficient manner. We believe that providing a tax deferral plan gives our executives flexibility in tax and financial planning and provides an additional benefit at little cost to our
shareholders. Our company does not make any contributions to the plan on behalf of the participants, and the only costs to the company related to the plan are administrative costs and any contributions that may be necessary to true-up account balances based on the results of the participants deemed investment elections. The plan allows executives with annual compensation (base salary and target annual short-term incentive) of
$200,000 or more to defer receipt of up to 50% of their base salary, up to 90% of their annual cash incentive and up to 100% (net of FICA and any applicable local taxes) of their long-term incentive awards, which are not excluded from deferral
eligibility by the Code (or regulations thereunder), until a date selected by the participant. The amounts deferred are deemed invested as designated by participants in our companys common stock (a phantom stock account) or in
dollar-denominated accounts that mirror the gains or losses of the various investment options available under our companys 401(k) plan. The plan does not offer any guaranteed return to participants.
The plan is funded by a rabbi trust arrangement owned by our company, which holds assets that correspond to the deemed investments of the plan participants
and pays benefits at the times elected by the participants. Participants have an unsecured contractual commitment from our company for payment when the amounts accrue. Upon the death or disability of a participant or upon a change of control, all
deferred amounts and all earnings related thereto will be paid to the participant or participants beneficiaries in a single lump sum cash payment.
Effective
for deferrals made after January 1, 2007, the plan permits executives to defer payouts of PSUs and RSUs into the plan, which would, absent such deferral, be distributed to the executives and immediately taxable. The PSU and RSU deferrals
generally will be credited to the plan participant accounts in the form of phantom stock, which may not be reallocated to an alternative investment option while in the plan, and an equal number of shares of our common stock will be deposited by our
company into the rabbi trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table shows the contributions, earnings, distributions and year-end account values for the NEOs under the plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
EXECUTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR ($) |
|
|
REGISTRANT CONTRIBUTIONS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR ($) |
|
|
AGGREGATE EARNINGS IN LAST FISCAL
YEAR ($) |
|
|
AGGREGATE WITHDRAWALS/ DISTRIBUTIONS ($) |
|
|
AGGREGATE BALANCE AT LAST FISCAL YEAR END(1) ($) |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
442,317 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,445,020 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
2,833,231 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,081,588 |
|
|
|
(1,077,285 |
) |
|
|
4,804,867 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
485,668 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
274,579 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
907,704 |
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
(1) |
Includes both the executive contributions and the earnings on those contributions. Cash-based salary and cash annual bonus
amounts contributed by the executives are included in the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the year of deferral. PSU and RSU deferrals are included as compensation in the year of the grant. Above-market earnings are not reported
as our company does not provide for such earnings on deferred compensation. |
|
|
|
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED |
|
|
|
|
Certain information concerning each exercise of stock options and each vesting of stock during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2019, for each of the NEOs on an aggregate basis is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
OPTION AWARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCK AWARDS |
|
|
NUMBER OF SHARES ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE (#) |
|
|
VALUE REALIZED ON EXERCISE(1) ($) |
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF SHARES ACQUIRED ON VESTING(2) (#) |
|
|
VALUE REALIZED ON VESTING(3) ($)
|
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
15,485 |
|
|
|
1,099,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,041 |
|
|
|
4,689,736 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
28,900 |
|
|
|
2,663,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,238 |
|
|
|
2,435,623 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
7,320 |
|
|
|
512,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,917 |
|
|
|
500,846 |
|
Michael Mills |
|
|
16,100 |
|
|
|
1,467,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
1,090,304 |
|
(1) |
Calculated by multiplying the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise and the
option exercise price by the number of options exercised. |
(2) |
Represents the payment of PSUs and RSUs. |
(3) |
For PSUs, calculated by multiplying the number of units vested by the closing price of our common stock on
February 7, 2019 as approved by the Compensation Committee. For RSUs, calculated by multiplying the number of units vested by the closing price of our common stock on the vest date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Generally, most full-time salaried employees of our company that were hired prior to July 15, 2007, including Messrs. Hill, Bass,
Clement and Mills, participate in our companys pension plans. Our NEOs are also eligible for nonqualified retirement benefits, as described below. Retirement benefits become payable as early as the date on which participants both attain age 55
and complete one year of service.
The following table provides, for each NEO, the number of years of credited service and the present value of accumulated benefits
as of December 31, 2019, under each plan in which the NEO participates. The narrative that follows this table provides a description of the material features of each plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
PLAN NAME
|
|
NUMBER OF YEARS OF CREDITED
SERVICE (#) |
|
|
PRESENT VALUE OF ACCUMULATED BENEFIT(1) ($)
|
|
|
PAYMENTS DURING LAST FISCAL
YEAR ($) |
|
Tom Hill |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
23 3/12 |
|
|
|
1,409,079 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
23 3/12 |
|
|
|
4,678,512 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
17 7/12 |
|
|
|
1,018,928 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
17 7/12 |
|
|
|
2,077,991 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
David Clement |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
21 9/12 |
|
|
|
1,258,872 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
21 9/12 |
|
|
|
1,212,336 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Michael Mills |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
22 9/12 |
|
|
|
1,327,564 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
22 9/12 |
|
|
|
2,171,847 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
(1) |
The present values of accumulated benefits are based on benefits payable at age 62, the earliest age under the plans at
which benefits are not reduced, or current age if the participant is older than age 62. The following FASB ASC Topic 715 CompensationRetirement Benefits assumptions as of December 31, 2019, were used to determine the present
values: |
|
(i) |
discount rate of 2.82%; |
|
(ii) |
mortality based on the Pri-2012, White Collar Tables, and generational scale MP-2019; |
|
(iii) |
present values for lump sums are based on projected segmented interest rates and the prescribed 2019 IRS Mortality Table;
|
|
(iv) |
Nonqualified Plan benefits assumed to be paid as a 10 Year Certain Annuity; and |
|
(v) |
for the Salaried Pension Plan, 40% of the benefit accrued before December 31, 2001, is assumed to be paid as a lump
sum, with the remainder of the accrued benefit assumed to be paid as a single life annuity. |
SALARIED PENSION PLAN
The Pension Plan provides benefits under a funded noncontributory defined benefit plan and covers most salaried employees, including all executive officers, hired prior
to July 15, 2007. In 2013, the Pension Plan was amended to freeze service accruals effective December 31, 2013, and earnings accruals effective December 31, 2015.
The normal retirement date is defined in the Pension Plan as a participants 65th birthday. The amount of a participants benefit is based on earnings, service
and the age at which a participant commences receiving a benefit. Eligible earnings under the Pension Plan, or Final Average Earnings, is the average of a participants highest 36 consecutive months of earnings prior to December 31,
2015, and includes base monthly salary and cash bonus. Under Section 415 of the Code, the maximum annual benefit allowable under the Pension Plan for a participant retiring at age 65 in 2019 is $225,000.
The Pension Plan formula provides a monthly benefit equal to 0.9% of Final Average Earnings per year of service accrued
prior to age 45, plus 1.2% of Final Average Earnings per year of service accrued after age 44, plus 0.5% of Final Average Earnings in excess of 50% of the Social Security Wage Base applied to all years of service. A vested participant may commence
receiving early retirement benefits under the Pension Plan as early as age 55. The amount of early retirement reduction depends on the age of a participant when active employment ceases. If active employment ceases after age 55 and retirement income
commences at age 62, or later, the monthly benefit is not reduced. However, if the benefit commences prior to age 62, the monthly benefit is reduced at a rate of 7% per year for commencement between ages 55 and 62. If active employment ceases prior
to age 55, the monthly benefit is actuarially reduced for commencement between ages 55 and 65.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The normal form of retirement benefit under the Pension Plan for an unmarried participant is a single life annuity, which
is a monthly payment for life. The normal form of retirement benefit under the Pension Plan for a married participant is a 75% joint and survivor annuity, which is a monthly payment for the life of the participant, and thereafter 75% of that amount
to the surviving spouse payable for his or her lifetime. The Pension Plan also permits the participant to elect, with spousal consent, other annuity options and a lump sum payment for benefits accrued prior to 2002. The optional forms of payment are
subject to actuarial adjustment.
THE VULCAN NONQUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN
The Nonqualified Plan enables our company to pay any person whose pension under the Pension Plan has been reduced as a result of the limitations imposed by Sections 401
and 415 of the Code, an amount equal to the difference between the amount the person would have received under the Pension Plan had there been no limitations and the amount the person will receive under the Pension Plan after giving effect to the
limitations. In 2013, the Nonqualified Plan was also amended to freeze future service and pay accruals in the same manner as described above for the qualified Pension Plan.
The Nonqualified Plan is unfunded and amounts payable to the employees covered thereby are considered to be general
obligations of our company; however, the Nonqualified Plan contains provisions that allow for the funding of a rabbi trust to improve the security of the benefit, to some extent, upon the occurrence of a change of control event (as defined in the
Nonqualified Plan).
The determination of the benefit amount and the payment options under the Nonqualified Plan are the same as the Pension Plan, except as follows.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Nonqualified Plan was amended to allow existing participants to make an election to receive nonqualified pension benefits in the form of installment payments over a period of 10 years, thereby accelerating payout
and minimizing, to some extent, the risk of future non-payment. The installment payments are actuarially equivalent to the various annuity options available under the Pension Plan.
ELIGIBILITY FOR EARLY RETIREMENT
As of
February 1, 2019, Messrs. Hill, Bass, and Clement were eligible for early retirement under the Pension Plan and the Nonqualified Plan.
|
|
|
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL |
|
|
|
|
This Section describes and estimates payments that could be made to the NEOs under different termination and change of
control (COC) events. The estimated payments would be made under the terms of the compensation and benefits programs or the COC Agreements with the NEOs. The amount of the potential payments is calculated as if the different events occurred as of
December 31, 2019, and assumes that the price of our companys common stock is the closing market price as of December 31, 2019 (the last trading day of the fiscal year). Because Mr. Mills retired prior to the end of the year, he
is not included in this Section.
TERMINATION EVENTS
The adjacent list sets forth different types of termination events that can affect the treatment of payments under the compensation and benefit programs:
|
|
Retirement or Retirement EligibleTermination of a NEO who is at least 55 years old and has at least one year of credited service. |
|
|
Involuntary Termination without CauseTermination of a NEO who is not retirement eligible. |
|
|
ResignationVoluntary termination by a NEO who is not retirement eligible. |
|
|
Death or DisabilityTermination of a NEO due to death or disability. |
|
|
Involuntary Termination for CauseTermination of a NEO for cause. Cause includes individual performance below minimum performance standards and misconduct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
TERMINATION PAY AND BENEFITS PROGRAMS
The following chart describes the treatment of different compensation and benefit elements in connection with the aforementioned employment termination events for NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAM |
|
RETIREMENT/
RETIREMENT
ELIGIBLE |
|
INVOLUNTARY
TERMINATION NOT FOR
CAUSE |
|
RESIGNATION |
|
DEATH OR DISABILITY |
|
INVOLUNTARY
TERMINATION FOR
CAUSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement:
Pension Plan
Nonqualified Plan |
|
Participant may commence benefit
payment |
|
Participant is considered
Terminated Vested(1) |
|
Participant is considered
Terminated Vested(1) |
|
In death, spouse may commence
survivor benefit on or after the date that the Participant would have attained age 55 |
|
Participant may commence benefit
payment or will be Terminated Vested(1) depending on age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
Payment made in accordance with deferral
election |
|
Payout made the year following the year
of termination in a lump sum |
|
Payout made the year following the year
of termination in a lump sum |
|
Payout made the year following the year
of death or termination in a lump sum |
|
Payout made the year following the year
of termination in a lump sum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EIP |
|
Eligible to receive prorated payment
|
|
No payment |
|
No payment |
|
Eligible to receive prorated
payment |
|
No payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options/
SOSARs |
|
Full term to exercise vested options; if
62 or older, non-vested options continue to vest; for early retirement prior to age 62, a pro-rata share of options become
non-forfeitable and continue to vest; noncompetition agreement may be required |
|
Non-vested options forfeited; 30 days to exercise vested options |
|
Non-vested options forfeited; 30 days to exercise vested
options |
|
Vesting accelerated; in death, estate has
one year to exercise; in disability, have full remaining term to exercise |
|
Forfeit all, vested and non-vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSUs |
|
If age 62 or older, award becomes non-forfeitable; if age 55 61, a pro-rata share of the award becomes non-forfeitable; noncompetition agreement may be
required |
|
Non-vested units are forfeited |
|
Non-vested units are forfeited |
|
Award
non-forfeitable; in death, vesting is accelerated |
|
Forfeit all, vested but not released and non-vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
If age 62 or older, vesting is
accelerated; if age 55-61, pro-rata vesting; noncompetition agreement may be required |
|
Non-vested units are forfeited |
|
Non-vested units are forfeited |
|
Vesting is accelerated |
|
Forfeit all, vested but not released and non-vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k)
Plan |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
Beneficiary may take distribution or
defer until age 72 |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan
(Defined Contribution) |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
Account distributed by March 1 of
the following year |
|
May take distribution or defer until age
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Benefits |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health
Benefits |
|
May continue to age 65 if eligibility
rules are met |
|
Coverage ceases; eligible for coverage
extension under COBRA |
|
Coverage ceases; eligible for coverage
extension under COBRA |
|
3 months spousal extension, then COBRA;
if eligibility rules are met may continue up to age 65 |
|
Coverage ceases;
eligible for coverage extension under COBRA |
(1) |
Terminated Vested means the participant is no longer employed with our company but continues to have a vested
interest in the applicable plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS AND RELATED CASH SEVERANCE BENEFITS
Our company entered into the COC Agreements, effective as of January 1, 2016, with respect to Messrs. Hill and Bass, effective as of September 1, 2018, with
respect to Ms. Wood and effective as of October 11, 2018, with respect to Mr. Baker. Under the COC Agreements, our NEOs are entitled to a cash severance benefit if, within two years of a COC, their employment is involuntarily
terminated without cause, or they voluntarily resign for good reason. These benefits are subject to standard release of claims requirements.
The COC severance
payment is three times each NEOs annual base salary and short-term bonus, as defined in their COC Agreements. Also, such severance payments include the continuation of health, medical and other fringe benefits for a
period of three years following termination. All of our COC Agreements have a double-trigger termination right (requiring both a COC and a qualifying termination of employment in
order to receive COC severance payments), and do not include the long-term incentive value in the severance calculation or have tax gross-ups. In addition, each COC Agreement provides for the payment of a pro-rata short-term bonus for the year of termination.
Mr. Clement is subject to the Change of Control Severance Plan for
Senior Officers (COC Plan), effective as of January 1, 2016, that provides for payment of 2.5 times the sum of the base salary and short-term bonus. Other than the payout amount, the terms are consistent with the COC Agreements.
The table below reflects an estimate of the severance
payments that would be made to our NEOs if they were terminated as of December 31, 2019, in connection with a COC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
SEVERANCE MULTIPLE |
|
|
2019
BASE SALARY ($) |
|
|
GREATER OF 3-YEAR AVG OR TARGET BONUS
($) |
|
|
TOTAL CASH SEVERANCE PAYMENTS ($) |
|
|
PRO-RATA BONUS ($) |
|
|
CASH SEVERANCE AMOUNT(1) ($) |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,130,000 |
|
|
|
2,183,100 |
|
|
|
9,939,300 |
|
|
|
2,183,100 |
|
|
|
12,122,400 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
676,000 |
|
|
|
574,600 |
|
|
|
3,751,800 |
|
|
|
574,600 |
|
|
|
4,326,400 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
664,000 |
|
|
|
646,200 |
|
|
|
3,930,600 |
|
|
|
646,200 |
|
|
|
4,576,800 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
633,000 |
|
|
|
849,967 |
|
|
|
4,448,900 |
|
|
|
849,967 |
|
|
|
5,298,867 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
323,200 |
|
|
|
1,808,000 |
|
|
|
323,200 |
|
|
|
2,131,200 |
|
(1) |
These amounts represent cash severance payments to be paid to the NEOs under the COC Agreements and for Mr. Clement,
the COC Plan, in the event of a COC and do not include the value of other COC benefits. |
CHANGE OF CONTROL RELATED EVENTS
The following sets forth different types of COC events that can affect the treatment of payments under the compensation and benefit programs. These events also affect
payments to the NEOs under their COC Agreements. None of the COC Agreements provide for a single-trigger; therefore, no payments are made under the COC Agreements unless, within two years of the COC, the officer is involuntarily
terminated or the officer voluntarily terminates for good reason (as described below).
|
|
For purposes of our COC Agreements and equity awards under the 2016 Plan, a COC is defined as: (i) the acquisition by a person or group of 30% or more of the then outstanding common stock or voting securities of
our company; or (ii) a change in the majority of members of the Board of Directors that is not endorsed by the incumbent Board of Directors; or (iii) consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of
all or substantially all of our companys assets unless our companys shareholders before such business
|
|
|
combination or sale own more than 50% of the outstanding common stock following the business combination or sale; or (iv) approval by the shareholders of the company of a complete
liquidation or dissolution of the company. |
|
|
Further, under our COC Agreements and the 2016 Plan, benefits are not triggered unless there has been both a COC and an Involuntary COC Termination or Voluntary COC Termination for Good Reason, where
employment is terminated within two years of a COC, other than for cause, or the employee voluntarily terminates for Good Reason. Good Reason would generally be considered to have occurred if there were a reduction in certain types of
compensation, a relocation under certain circumstances or a diminution in duties and responsibilities. |
|
|
A COC occurs under certain of our companys award agreements executed in connection with the grant of equity awards under the 2006 Plan upon: |
|
(i) |
acquisition by any person or group of more than 50% of the total fair market value or voting power of our
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
common stock. A transfer or issuance of our stock is counted only if the stock remains outstanding after the transaction. An increase in stock ownership as a result of the companys acquisition of its own stock in
exchange for property is counted for purposes of the change in ownership standard; or |
|
(ii) |
(a) acquisition by a person or group during a 12-month period of stock possessing
30% of the total voting power of our stock, or |
|
|
(b) replacement of a majority of our Board of Directors during any 12-month period
by directors not endorsed by a majority of the members of our Board prior to the date of the appointment or election; or
|
|
(iii) |
acquisition by a person or group during a 12-month period of assets from our
company having a total gross fair market value of 40% of the total gross fair market value of our assets immediately prior to such acquisition. An exception exists for a transfer of our assets to a shareholder controlled entity, including transfer
to a person owning 50% or more of the total value or voting power of our shares. |
CHANGE OF CONTROL PAY AND
BENEFITS PROGRAMS
The following table describes treatment of payments under the compensation and benefit programs upon a COC, and upon an employment
termination (voluntary or involuntary) upon a COC:
|
|
|
|
|
PLAN OR PROGRAM |
|
COC |
|
COC WITH TERMINATION (OTHER THAN CAUSE) |
|
|
|
Retirement:
Pension Plan
Nonqualified Plan |
|
No payment to NEOs solely upon the COC |
|
No payment to NEOs solely upon the COC |
|
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
Accelerate all deferred amounts and pay lump sum within 10 business days |
|
Accelerate all deferred amounts and pay lump sum within 10 business days |
|
|
|
EIP |
|
The amount paid will be equal to the greater of (i) the average bonus during the three preceding years or (ii) the target bonus; or the bonus determined
under the Plan for the year in which the COC occurs |
|
The amount paid will be equal to the greater of (i) the average bonus during the three preceding years or (ii) the target bonus or the bonus determined under
the Plan for the year in which the COC occurs |
|
|
|
SOSARs(1) |
|
No accelerated vesting unless awards are not assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, otherwise continued vesting; remaining term to exercise |
|
If awards are assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, immediately deemed fully vested and exercisable; remaining term to exercise |
|
|
|
PSUs(1) |
|
No accelerated vesting unless awards are not assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, otherwise continued vesting; pay within 21/2 months of vesting |
|
If awards are assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, vesting is accelerated; pay within 21/2 months after end of the year in which the COC occurs |
|
|
|
RSUs(1) |
|
No accelerated vesting unless awards are not assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, otherwise continued vesting; pay within 90 days of vesting |
|
If awards are assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, all immediately deemed vested; pay within 90 days following the COC |
|
|
|
401(k) Plan |
|
No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC |
|
Service ceases except to the extent that additional service is provided under the terms of the COC Agreements; participant is eligible for a distribution |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan
(Defined Contribution) |
|
No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC |
|
Participant is eligible for a distribution |
|
|
|
Severance Benefits |
|
No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC |
|
Under the COC Agreements, payment is 3 times the NEOs annual base salary and short-term bonus(2) |
|
|
|
Health Benefits |
|
No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC |
|
3 year coverage extension provided under the terms of the COC Agreements (2) |
(1) |
The vesting and payment benefits shown in this table relate to awards of SOSARs, PSUs and RSUs granted under the 2016
Plan, which contains a double-trigger change of control requirement. Awards granted under the 2006 Plan would immediately vest, SOSARs would have the remaining term to exercise, PSUs would be paid within 21/2 months after the end of the year in which the COC occurs and RSUs would be paid within 90 days following the COC. |
(2) |
The terms of the COC Plan, to which Mr. Clement is subject, provide for payment of 2.5 times the sum of the base
salary and short-term bonus and a 30-month health benefit coverage extension. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
RETIREMENT AND PENSION BENEFITS
The monthly amounts that would have become payable to our NEOs if the termination event occurred as of December 31,
2019, under the Pension Plan, the Nonqualified Plan and the Defined Contribution Plan are itemized in the chart below. The amounts shown in the chart are monthly benefit amounts (other than with respect to the accrued benefits payable upon a COC,
which would be paid in a lump sum) whereas the pension values shown in the Summary Compensation and Retirement Benefits Tables are present values of all the monthly values anticipated to be paid over the lifetimes of our NEOs and their spouses in
the event of their death while actively employed. These plans are described in the notes following the Retirement Benefits Table. Messrs. Hill, Bass
and Clement were retirement eligible on December 31, 2019. The benefits below were determined using the same assumptions used to compute benefit values in the Retirement Benefits Table with
three exceptions. First, the benefit payments were assumed to commence as soon as possible following December 31, 2019, instead of at normal retirement. Second, approximate early retirement reductions were applied. Finally, the benefits were
not adjusted to reflect optional forms of payment. All benefits are the amounts that would be paid monthly over the NEOs life, except for the value of COC-enhanced benefits which would be paid in a lump
sum.
RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
|
|
RETIREMENT (MONTHLY PAYMENTS) ($) |
|
|
RESIGNATION OR INVOLUNTARY RETIREMENT (MONTHLY PAYMENTS)
($) |
|
|
DEATH (MONTHLY PAYMENTS TO A SPOUSE)
($) |
|
|
COC (VALUE OF ENHANCED BENEFITS)(1)
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Hill |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
6,498 |
|
|
|
Terminated Vested |
(2) |
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
30,712 |
|
|
|
Terminated Vested |
(2) |
|
|
19,963 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Defined Contribution |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
894,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
(3) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
(3) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Defined Contribution |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
337,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Baker |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
(3) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
(3) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Defined Contribution |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
353,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stan Bass |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
4,177 |
|
|
|
Terminated Vested |
(2) |
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
12,210 |
|
|
|
Terminated Vested |
(2) |
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Defined Contribution |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
400,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Clement |
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
5,291 |
|
|
|
Terminated Vested |
(2) |
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Plan |
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
Terminated Vested |
(2) |
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Defined Contribution |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
162,720 |
|
(1) |
Value of defined contribution enhancement is payable in a lump sum in the event of a COC. The defined contribution amounts
represent 3 years of company matching contributions for each executive except 2.5 years for Mr. Clement. |
(2) |
Eligible for reduced payments as early as age 55 and unreduced payments at age 62. |
(3) |
Participation in the Pension Plan, including the Nonqualified Plan, was frozen in 2007. Therefore, Ms. Wood and
Mr. Baker are not eligible to participate in that Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS (PSUs)
The chart below shows the number of PSUs for which vesting would be accelerated under certain events. Unvested PSUs were adjusted to the maximum allowed under the
agreements because the performance was unknown at December 31, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETIREMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
COC (WITH OR WITHOUT TERMINATION) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
NUMBER OF PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS WITH ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS FOLLOWING ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS WITH ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS FOLLOWING ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
54,267 |
|
|
|
118,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,400 |
|
|
|
172,404 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
18,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,600 |
|
|
|
31,600 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
31,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,200 |
|
|
|
43,683 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
14,203 |
|
STOCK ONLY STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS (SOSARs)
The chart below shows the number of SOSARs for which vesting would be accelerated under certain events:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETIREMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
COC (WITH OR WITHOUT TERMINATION) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
NUMBER OF SOSARS WITH ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF SOSARS FOLLOWING ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF SOSARS WITH ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF SOSARS FOLLOWING ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
33,759 |
|
|
|
138,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,224 |
|
|
|
164,500 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
12,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,733 |
|
|
|
18,600 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
28,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,925 |
|
|
|
34,900 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
|
14,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS (RSUs)
The chart below shows the number of RSUs for which vesting would be accelerated under certain events:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETIREMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
COC (WITH OR WITHOUT TERMINATION) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
NUMBER OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS WITH ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS FOLLOWING ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS WITH ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS FOLLOWING ACCELERATED VESTING |
|
Tom Hill |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
Suzanne Wood |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
Tom Baker |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Stan Bass |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
David Clement |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
The aggregate balances reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Table would be payable to the NEOs as described in the Termination Pay and Benefits
Programs and Change of Control Pay and Benefits Programs charts above. There is no enhancement or acceleration of payments under this plan associated with termination or COC events, other than the lump sum payment opportunity
described in the above charts. The lump sums that would be payable are those that are reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of
Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the median of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Tom Hill, our Chairman,
President and CEO (our CEO). The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
For 2019, our last completed fiscal year:
|
|
The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO), was $85,562; and |
|
|
The annual total compensation of our CEO was $9,574,528. |
Based on this information, for 2019, the ratio of the annual
total compensation of our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (other than our CEO) was 112 to 1.
To identify our median employee
and to determine the annual total compensation of the median employee and our CEO, we used the following methodology and material assumptions, adjustments and estimates:
1. |
We determined that, as of November 1, 2019, our employee population consisted of approximately 9,175 individuals
working at the company and its consolidated subsidiaries, with 95.5% of these individuals located in the United States and 4.5% located in Mexico. |
2. |
As permitted under SEC rules, we adjusted the employee population to exclude approximately 417 non-U.S. employees (or less than 5% of our employee population)
|
|
all of whom are located in Mexico. After excluding the foregoing non-U.S. employees, our adjusted employee population on November 1, 2019 was 8,758.
|
3. |
To identify the median employee from our adjusted employee population, we reviewed the amount of compensation
reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2, box 1 for 2019 (as reflected in our payroll records) for each of our employees. |
In accordance with SEC rules, we determined the median employees 2019 total annual compensation by taking the sum of the following items:
1. |
$66,968, which represents the amount of the median employees compensation for fiscal 2019 that would have been
reported in the Summary Compensation Table in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K if the employee had been a Named Executive Officer for fiscal 2019. |
2. |
$18,594, which represents the estimated aggregate value of the employees compensation under company sponsored non-discriminatory benefit plans. |
In accordance with SEC rules, we determined our CEOs 2019 total annual
compensation by taking the sum of the following items:
1. |
$9,556,186, which represents the amount reported for our CEO in the Total column of our 2019 Summary
Compensation Table included on page 45 of this proxy statement. |
2. |
$18,342, which represents the estimated aggregate value of our CEOs compensation under company sponsored non-discriminatory benefit plans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Compensation
We use a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board.
In setting director compensation, our Board considers the significant amount of time that directors expend on fulfilling their duties to our company, as well as the limited pool of, and competition among public companies for, well-qualified board
members. Additional amounts are paid to committee chairs in recognition of the substantial responsibilities of the chair. Annually, the Compensation Committees independent compensation consultant evaluates the competitiveness of the
companys non-employee director compensation program relative to peer companies and recommends any changes to the Compensation Committee, which evaluates such proposed changes and recommends any changes
to the full Board for approval.
Directors are subject to a minimum share ownership requirement. Within five years of becoming a director, each director is required
to own at least 5,000 shares of our companys common stock. Shares or units held by a director under our deferred compensation plan are included in calculating the directors ownership.
CASH COMPENSATION PAID TO BOARD MEMBERS
Members
of the Board who are not employees of our company are paid a retainer of $110,000 per year, plus the following fees:
|
|
$25,000 Lead Director retainer fee; |
|
|
$20,000 Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chairs retainer fees; |
|
|
$15,000 Governance Committee chair retainer fee; and |
|
|
$10,000 retainer fee for all other committee chairs. |
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
We maintain a Deferred Compensation Plan for directors who are not employees of our company (Directors Deferred Compensation Plan), under which such
directors are permitted to defer the cash compensation to which they are entitled for specified periods or until they cease to be directors. The deferred amounts, at the election of the director, are either (i) credited with interest at
prescribed rates; or (ii) converted into a number of stock equivalents equal to the number of shares of our companys common stock (based on the market
price at the time of deferral) that could be purchased with the amount deferred. Whenever a dividend is paid on our common stock, the stock equivalent accounts are credited with an additional
number of stock units corresponding to the amount of the dividend. At the end of the deferral period, the stock equivalents are settled in shares of our companys common stock, and interest-based deferrals are settled in cash. The
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan also provides for a lump-sum settlement of a directors deferred compensation account in stock or cash, as applicable, if following a Change in Control (as
defined in the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan): (i) the participating director ceases to be a member of the Board; (ii) the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan is terminated; or (iii) our companys capital structure
is changed materially. The Directors Deferred Compensation Plan was approved by our companys shareholders in 1993.
DEFERRED
STOCK UNITS
Equity-based grants are awarded to our non-management directors on an annual basis. These grants
represent a significant portion of their compensation package. We believe that equity grants promote a greater alignment of interests between our directors and our shareholders through increasing their ownership of our common stock. Further, we
believe that equity grants support our ability to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as directors of our company by affording them an opportunity to share in our future success.
In May 2019, 1,165 DSUs were granted to each non-management director then in office pursuant to the 2016 Plan, which was approved
by our shareholders in 2016. These units were fully non-forfeitable on the date of the grant; however, payment is deferred until the director ceases to serve on the Board or a COC occurs. The DSUs are an
unfunded, unsecured obligation of our company, and no shares have been set aside for these grants. The non-management directors have no right to receive the DSUs until the restrictions imposed either lapse or
are waived. Generally, the restrictions expire when the non-management director ceases to be a director because of retirement, death, disability or a COC. During the period the shares are restricted, the non-management directors have no right to vote the shares. Dividend equivalents are credited as additional DSUs quarterly when dividends are paid on our stock. The DSUs are settled in shares of our common stock when
the restrictions expire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE |
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by our company to non-employee directors for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH ($) |
|
|
STOCK AWARDS(2) ($) |
|
|
OPTION AWARDS ($) |
|
|
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN COMPEN- SATION
($) |
|
|
CHANGE IN PENSION
VALUE AND NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION EARNINGS ($) |
|
|
ALL OTHER COMPEN- SATION(3) ($) |
|
|
TOTAL ($) |
|
Melissa H. Anderson(1) |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Thomas A. Fanning |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,883 |
|
|
|
288,098 |
|
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
305,746 |
|
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,883 |
|
|
|
268,098 |
|
Richard T. OBrien |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
23,528 |
|
|
|
303,743 |
|
James T. Prokopanko |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
20,875 |
|
|
|
281,090 |
|
Kathleen L. Quirk |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
262,781 |
|
David P. Steiner |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
279,245 |
|
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
150,215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,654 |
|
|
|
282,869 |
|
George Willis(1) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
D. Michael Wilson(1) |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
(1) |
Mr. Wilson joined the Board on July 12, 2019 and resigned from the Board effective February 26, 2020.
Ms. Anderson joined the Board on October 11, 2019. Mr. Willis joined the Board on March 11, 2020. |
(2) |
This column represents the accounting expense for the awards granted in 2019; therefore, the values shown are not
representative of the amounts that may eventually be realized by a director. Pursuant to SEC rules, we have provided a grant date fair value for stock awards in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. For DSUs, the fair value is
estimated on the date of grant based on the closing market price of our stock ($128.94) on the grant date (May 10, 2019). At December 31, 2019, the aggregate number of DSUs accumulated on account for all years of service, including dividend
equivalent units, were: |
AGGREGATE ACCUMULATED DSUs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAME |
|
UNITS |
|
Melissa H. Anderson |
|
|
0 |
|
Thomas A. Fanning |
|
|
6,686 |
|
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
|
|
8,833 |
|
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
|
|
6,686 |
|
Richard T. OBrien |
|
|
19,375 |
|
James T. Prokopanko |
|
|
17,223 |
|
Kathleen L. Quirk |
|
|
2,373 |
|
David P. Steiner |
|
|
3,560 |
|
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
|
|
10,555 |
|
George Willis |
|
|
0 |
|
D. Michael Wilson |
|
|
0 |
|
(3) |
None of our directors received perquisites or other personal benefits in excess of $10,000. The amounts set forth in this
column represent the accounting expense for the dividend equivalents earned in 2019 by our directors for DSUs which earn dividend equivalents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Meeting and Voting Information
Why am I receiving these materials?
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by our Board of proxies to be voted at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for the purposes set
forth in the accompanying notice, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy statement is being made available to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2020, for use at the Annual Meeting. This
proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and our 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders are being first mailed or made available to our shareholders on or about March 26, 2020. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via the internet at:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020 on Friday, May 8, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time.
In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, for the safety of all of our people, including our shareholders, and taking into account recent federal, state and local guidance that has been issued, we have determined that the Annual
Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the internet, with no physical in-person meeting. We are permitted to hold the meeting in this format given recent legislation in the State of
New Jerseythe state in which the company is incorporatedthat was enacted for the current state of emergency.
At the virtual Annual Meeting, shareholders
will be able to attend, vote and submit questions via the internet by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the meeting by
one of the methods described in these proxy materials.
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail
instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?
The SEC allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the internet. As a result, we are mailing
to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All shareholders receiving such notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the internet and may
request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Proxy Statement, Form of Proxy and 2019 Annual
Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
How can I access the proxy materials over the internet or obtain a
paper copy?
Your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how to:
|
|
view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the internet; and |
|
|
obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. |
Your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will also
provide instructions on how to receive your future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically. If you choose to receive future proxy materials electronically, we will provide instructions containing a link to the website where those
materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials electronically will remain in effect until you revoke it.
What should I do if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or more than one paper copy of the proxy materials?
You may receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or notice of this proxy statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards.
For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate notice or a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a shareholder of record and your shares
are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one notice or more than one proxy card. To vote all of your
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
shares by proxy, you must either (i) complete, date, sign and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that
you receive, (ii) vote over the internet or telephone the shares represented by each notice that you receive, or (iii) follow the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020 to vote during the meeting.
What proposals are to be presented at the Annual Meeting?
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to (i) elect four nominees as directors, (ii) approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of our named executive officers, (iii) ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for
2020, and (iv) conduct such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
How can I attend the Annual Meeting?
Shareholders as of the close of business on March 11, 2020 (the record date for the Annual Meeting) may attend, vote and submit questions virtually at the Annual
Meeting by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020. To log in, shareholders (or their authorized representatives) will need the control number provided on their proxy card, voting instruction card or Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials. If you are not a shareholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the meeting as a guest, but you will not be able to participate. You may begin to log into the meeting platform beginning at
8:45 a.m., Central Daylight Time on May 8, 2020. The meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time on May 8, 2020.
The virtual
meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Shareholders (or their
authorized representatives) should ensure that they have a strong Wi-Fi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Shareholders (or their authorized representatives) should also give
themselves plenty of time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.
We are committed to ensuring our shareholders
have the same rights and opportunities to participate in the Annual Meeting as if it had been held in a physical location. If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the meeting day, please call the technical
support phone numbers published at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020. Technical support will be available starting at 8:45 a.m., Central Daylight Time on May 8, 2020, and through the conclusion of the meeting.
Can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?
Shareholders as of the close of business on March 11, 2020 (the record date for the Annual Meeting) who attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting
at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020 will have an opportunity to submit questions pertinent to meeting matters live via the internet during a designated portion of the meeting. These shareholders may also submit a question in advance of
the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020. In both cases, shareholders must have available their control number provided on their proxy card, voting instruction card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
Who is entitled to vote?
All of our
shareholders as of the record date, March 11, 2020, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on that date, approximately 132,555,286 shares were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is
entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting.
What is the difference between a shareholder of record and a
beneficial holder of shares?
If your common stock is held directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Shareowner Services, you are
considered a shareholder of record with respect to those shares. If this is the case, the notice or proxy materials have been sent or provided directly to you.
If your common stock is held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial holder of the shares held for you
in what is known as street name. If this is the case, the notice card or proxy materials should have been forwarded to you by your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, or their agent, which is considered the shareholder of record with
respect to these shares. As a beneficial holder, you have the right to direct your bank, broker, trustee or nominee on how to vote the shares by using the voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or
internet.
How do I vote?
Proxies are
solicited to give all shareholders who are entitled to vote on the matters that come before the meeting the opportunity to vote their shares whether or not they attend the meeting. You can vote by one of the following manners:
|
|
By Internet*Shareholders of record may submit proxies over the internet by following the instructions on the
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card (if received by mail). Shareholders who are beneficial holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
|
may vote by internet by following the instructions on the voting instruction card sent to them by their bank, broker, trustee or nominee. |
|
|
By TelephoneShareholders of record who live in the United States or Canada may submit proxies by telephone by calling the toll-free number on the proxy card (if received by mail) and following the
instructions. Shareholders of record will need to have the control number that appears on their proxy card available when voting. In addition, shareholders who are beneficial holders living in the United States or Canada and who have received a
voting instruction card by mail from their bank, broker, trustee or nominee may vote by phone by calling the number specified on the voting instruction card. Those shareholders should check the voting instruction card for telephone voting
availability. |
|
|
By MailShareholders of record who have received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy card and mailing it in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Shareholders who are beneficial holders who have received a voting instruction card from their bank, broker or nominee may return the voting instruction card by mail as set forth on the card.
|
|
|
At the Annual Meeting*Shareholders who attend the virtual Annual Meeting should follow the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/VMC2020 to vote during the meeting. |
* Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders identities, allow shareholders to give their voting instructions and confirm
that shareholders instructions have been recorded properly. We have been advised that the internet and telephone voting procedures that have been made available to you are consistent with applicable legal requirements. Shareholders voting by
internet or telephone should understand that, while we and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. do not charge any fees for voting by internet or telephone, there may still be costs, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone
companies, for which you are responsible.
Shareholders are encouraged to vote their proxies by internet, or voting instruction card, but not by more than one
method. If you vote by more than one method, or vote multiple times using the same method, only the last-dated vote that is received by the inspector of election will be counted, and each previous vote will be disregarded.
If you receive more than one set of proxy materials or more than one proxy card or voting instruction card, it may mean that you hold shares of Vulcan stock in more than
one account. You must return a proxy or voting instruction card or
vote using one of the methods described above for EACH account in which you own shares.
What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?
A majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock entitled to vote, represented at the meeting or by proxy, is required to constitute a quorum.
How many votes are required to approve each of the proposals?
The votes required to approve each matter to be considered by Vulcans shareholders at the Annual Meeting are set forth below:
Proposal 1Election of Directors: Each Vulcan shareholder has the right to vote each share of stock owned by such shareholder on the record date for each of
the four director nominees. Cumulative voting is not permitted. To be elected, a director-nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
counted as votes cast for such purposes and, therefore, will have no effect on the results of the election.
Proposal 2Advisory Vote on Compensation of our
Named Executive Officers (NEOs): The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the NEOs set forth in this proxy statement. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast for such purpose and, therefore, will have no effect on the results of this vote.
Proposal 3Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal
is required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast for such purpose and, therefore, will have no effect on the results
of this vote. Because the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter, there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal,
and a broker will be permitted to exercise its discretion to vote uninstructed shares on this proposal.
Who is soliciting my vote?
Our Board is soliciting your vote for matters being submitted for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting.
Giving us your proxy means that you authorize the proxy holders identified on the proxy card to vote your shares at the meeting in the manner you direct. If you sign and
return the enclosed proxy card but do not specify how your shares are to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
be voted, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. If any other matters are properly
presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration, the persons named as proxies in the proxy card will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.
How does the Board recommend shareholders vote?
The Board recommends that you vote:
|
|
FOR the election of the following four individuals nominated by the Board as directors for three-year terms: Melissa H. Anderson, O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr., James T. Prokopanko and George Willis. |
|
|
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs; and |
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. |
Will my shares be voted if I do nothing?
If you
are a shareholder of record, you must sign and return a proxy card, submit your proxy by telephone or internet, or attend the Annual Meeting, in order for your shares to be voted.
If your common stock is held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you will receive instructions from such entity that you must follow in order to have your shares
voted. You must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is
called a broker non-vote. In these cases, the broker, bank or nominee can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will
not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the NYSE.
If you are a beneficial holder whose shares are held
of record by a broker, bank or nominee, then your broker, bank or nominee has discretionary voting authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for 2020, even if the broker, bank or nominee does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker, bank or nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote on (i) the election of the four nominees as
directors or (ii) the advisory approval of compensation of our NEOs.
How can I revoke my proxy?
If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by taking one of the following actions:
|
|
by giving written notice of the revocation prior to the commencement of the Annual Meeting to: Corporate Secretary, Vulcan Materials Company, 1200 Urban Center Drive, Birmingham, Alabama 35242; |
|
|
by executing and delivering another valid proxy with a later date; |
|
|
by voting by telephone or internet at a later date; or |
|
|
by voting at the Annual Meeting. |
If you are a beneficial holder of your shares and you vote by proxy, you may change
your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your bank, broker or nominee in accordance with that entitys procedures.
If you vote the same shares by
more than one method or vote multiple times with respect to the same shares using the same method, only the last-dated vote that is received will be counted, and each previous vote will be disregarded.
Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions,
ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within our company or to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet
applicable legal requirements; (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote; and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
Who will pay for the costs involved in the solicitation of proxies?
The company is making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing the notices and these proxy materials
and soliciting votes. In addition to the mailing of notices and these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person or by telephone or email by directors, officers or regular employees of the company. In addition, the
company has engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to act as its proxy solicitor and has agreed to pay it approximately $10,000 plus reasonable fees and expenses for such services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
What is householding and how does it affect me?
We have adopted a procedure, approved by the SEC, called householding. Under this procedure, shareholders of record who have the same address and last name
and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials or in notice and access will receive only one copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 2019 Annual Report to Shareholders, unless we are notified
that one or more of these shareholders wishes to continue receiving individual copies. If you and other Vulcan shareholders living in your household do not have the same last name, you also may request to receive only one copy of future proxy
statements and annual reports to shareholders.
Householding reduces our printing costs and postage fees and conserves natural resources. Shareholders who
participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.
If you are eligible for householding but you and other shareholders of record with whom
you share an address currently receive multiple copies of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents, or if you hold Vulcan stock in more than one account, and in either case you wish to receive only a single
copy of each document for your household, please obtain instructions by contacting us at the following address or phone number: Vulcan Materials Company, 1200 Urban Center Drive, Birmingham, Alabama 35242, Attention: Mark D. Warren, Vice
President, Investor Relations, Telephone: (205) 298-3200.
If you participate in householding and wish to receive a
separate copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents, please contact us at the address or phone number indicated above and a separate copy will be sent to you promptly. If you do not wish to continue to
participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, please contact us at the address or phone number indicated above.
If you are a beneficial holder, you can request information about householding from your broker, bank or other holder of record.
Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
As of the mailing date of this proxy statement, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement.
If you return your signed and completed proxy card or vote by telephone or internet and other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for
consideration, your shares will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends or, if no recommendation is given, in the proxys own discretion.
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The
final voting results will be reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days of the Annual Meeting and posted on our website.
Whom should I call if I have questions about the Annual Meeting?
If you have any questions or need any assistance in voting your shares, please contact our proxy solicitor, whose information is listed below:
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
1407 Broadway, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10018
Telephone: (212) 929-5500 (Collect) or
(800) 322-2885 (Toll-Free)
proxy@MacKenziePartners.com
How do I obtain an Annual Report on Form 10-K?
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, will be provided to you without charge upon
written request to:
Mark D. Warren
Vice President, Investor Relations
Vulcan Materials Company
1200 Urban Center Drive
Birmingham, Alabama 35242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Information
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR 2021 |
|
|
|
|
To be eligible for consideration for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for our 2021 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, a shareholders proposal must be received by us at our principal office no later than November 26, 2020. Proposals should be addressed to Denson N. Franklin III, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, 1200
Urban Center Drive, Birmingham, Alabama 35242. Proposals received after that date will be considered untimely and will not be eligible for inclusion in the 2021 proxy statement. If a shareholder desires to bring a matter before our annual meeting
and the matter is submitted outside the process of Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, including with respect to nominations for election as directors, the shareholder must follow the procedures set forth in our bylaws.
Our bylaws provide generally that shareholder proposals and director nominations to be considered at an annual meeting may be made by a shareholder only if (1) the shareholder is a shareholder of record and is entitled to vote at the meeting,
and (2) the shareholder gives timely written notice of the matter to our corporate secretary. To be timely, a shareholders notice must be received at our principal executive offices not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day
and not later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting, or between January 8, 2021, and February 7, 2021, for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. However, in
the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to
the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the date of such annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of
such annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by our company. The notice must set forth the information
required by the provisions of our bylaws dealing with shareholder proposals and nominations of directors.
Our bylaws also contain proxy access provisions, which
permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of our outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to
the greater of (a) two individuals and (b) 20% of the total number of directors serving on the board of directors on the last day on which a proxy access nomination may be submitted (rounded down to the nearest whole number), subject to certain
limitations and provided that the requirements set forth in our bylaws are satisfied, including that the shareholder gives timely written notice of the nomination to our secretary. To be timely, a shareholders notice generally must be received
at our principal executive offices not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary of the date that the corporation mailed its proxy statement for the prior years annual meeting of shareholders, or between
October 27, 2020 and November 26, 2020, for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The notice must set forth the information required by the proxy access provisions of our bylaws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
Certain matters discussed in this proxy statement, including expectations regarding future performance, contain
forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical fact, including statements about Vulcans beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Generally, these statements relate to future financial performance, results of
operations, business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated revenues, expenses, earnings (including EBITDA and other measures), dividend policy, shipment volumes, pricing, levels of capital expenditures, intended cost reductions and cost
savings, anticipated profit improvements and/or planned divestitures and asset sales. These forward-looking statements are sometimes identified by the use of terms and phrases such as believe, should, would,
expect, project, estimate, anticipate, intend, plan, will, can, may or similar expressions elsewhere in this document. These statements are
subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including but not limited to general business conditions, competitive factors, pricing, energy costs, and other risks and uncertainties discussed in the reports Vulcan periodically files
with the SEC.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results, developments, and business decisions may vary significantly
from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The following risks related to Vulcans business, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements:
general economic and business conditions; Vulcans dependence on the construction industry, which is subject to economic cycles; the timing and amount of federal, state and local funding for infrastructure; widespread outbreak of an
illness or any other communicable disease, or any other public health crisis, including the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; changes in the level of spending for private residential and private
nonresidential construction; changes in Vulcans effective tax rate; the increasing reliance on information technology infrastructure, including the risks that the infrastructure does not work as intended, experiences technical difficulties or
is subjected to cyber-attacks; the impact of the state of the global economy on Vulcans
businesses and financial condition and access to capital markets; the highly competitive nature of the construction industry; the impact of future regulatory or legislative actions, including
those relating to climate change, wetlands, greenhouse gas emissions, the definition of minerals, tax policy or international trade; the outcome of pending legal proceedings; pricing of Vulcans products; weather and other natural phenomena,
including the impact of climate change and availability of water; energy costs; costs of hydrocarbon-based raw materials; healthcare costs; the amount of long-term debt and interest expense incurred by Vulcan; changes in interest rates; the impact
of a discontinuation of the London Interback Offered Rate; volatility in pension plan asset values and liabilities, which may require cash contributions to the pension plans; the impact of environmental
clean-up costs and other liabilities relating to existing and/or divested businesses; Vulcans ability to secure and permit aggregates reserves in strategically located areas; Vulcans ability to
manage and successfully integrate acquisitions; the effect of changes in tax laws, guidance and interpretations; significant downturn in the construction industry may result in the impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets; changes in
technologies, which could disrupt the way Vulcan does business and how Vulcans products are distributed; and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the reports filed by Vulcan with the SEC. All forward-looking
statements in this communication are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Vulcan disclaims and does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement in this document except as required by law.
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
DENSON N. FRANKLIN III
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
1200 Urban Center Drive
Birmingham, Alabama
35242
March 26, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex A: Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) does not define Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), and it should not be considered as an alternative to earnings measures defined by GAAP. We use this metric to assess the operating performance of our business and as a basis of strategic
planning and forecasting as we believe that it closely correlates to long-term shareholder value. We do not use this metric as a measure to allocate resources. We adjust EBITDA for certain items to provide a more consistent comparison of earnings
performance from period to period. Reconciliation of this metric to its nearest GAAP measure is presented below:
|
|
|
EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is an acronym for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization and excludes discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN MILLIONS |
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
617.7 |
|
|
$ |
515.8 |
|
|
$ |
601.2 |
|
|
$ |
419.5 |
|
|
$ |
221.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
|
|
(232.1 |
) |
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
129.0 |
|
|
|
137.4 |
|
|
|
291.1 |
|
|
|
133.3 |
|
|
|
220.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Earnings) loss on discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization |
|
|
374.6 |
|
|
|
346.2 |
|
|
|
306.0 |
|
|
|
284.9 |
|
|
|
274.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,261.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,107.0 |
|
|
$ |
958.4 |
|
|
$ |
965.5 |
|
|
$ |
822.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of real estate and businesses |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property donation |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business interruption claims recovery, net of incentives |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges associated with divested operations |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business development, net of termination fee(1) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time bonuses to non-incentive employees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,270.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,131.7 |
|
|
$ |
981.9 |
|
|
$ |
966.0 |
|
|
$ |
834.9 |
|
(1) |
Includes only non-routine business development charges. |
Unlike many of our competitors, we do not exclude share-based compensation from our Adjusted EBITDA earnings metric, as we view it as a recurring operating expense.
Refer to our statements of cash flows for the expense incurred related to our share-based compensation plans.
|
|
|
AGGREGATES CASH GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
Aggregates Cash Gross Profit adds back noncash charges for depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization to aggregates gross profit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
ADJUSTED DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING
|
|
|
OPERATIONS (ADJUSTED DILUTED EPS) CALCULATION |
|
|
|
|
Similar to our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, we present Adjusted Diluted EPS to provide a more consistent comparison of earnings
performance from period to period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2018 |
|
Diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
$ |
3.87 |
|
Items included in Adjusted EBITDA above |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Debt refinancing costs |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Adjusted Diluted EPS from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
4.70 |
|
|
$ |
4.05 |
|
EBITDA EP is EP Adjusted EBITDA less capital charge (average operating capital employed x pretax cost of capital).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN MILLIONS |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,270.0 |
|
|
|
Performance adjustments |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
EP Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,279.5 |
|
|
|
Average operating capital employed |
|
|
5,048.6 |
|
|
|
Pretax cost of capital |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
Capital charge |
|
|
595.7 |
|
|
|
EBITDA EP |
|
$ |
683.8 |
|
Cash earnings are earnings from continuing operations plus depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization, as reported on our
Statement of Comprehensive Income and Statement of Cash Flows, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN MILLIONS |
|
2019 |
|
Earnings froms continuing operations |
|
$ |
622.5 |
|
Depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization |
|
|
374.6 |
|
|
|
Cash earnings |
|
|
997.1 |
|
|
|
|
RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
We define Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) as Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing-twelve months divided by average invested capital (as
illustrated below) during the trailing 5-quarters. Our calculation of ROIC is considered a non-GAAP financial measure because we calculate ROIC using the non-GAAP metric EBITDA. We believe that our ROIC metric is meaningful because it helps
investors assess how effectively we are deploying our assets. Although ROIC is a standard financial metric, numerous methods exist for calculating a companys ROIC. As a result, the method we use to calculate our ROIC may differ from the
methods used by other companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IN MILLIONS |
|
TTM Q4 2019 |
|
|
TTM Q2 2013 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
1,270.0 |
|
|
$ |
403.8 |
|
Total tangible and intangible fixed assets plus net working capital |
|
$ |
9,139.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,403.2 |
|
|
|
|
Return on Invested
Capital |
|
|
13.90 |
% |
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
2020 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting
instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2020 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2020 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access
the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/vmc2020 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the
meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
May 7, 2020 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 5, 2020 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it
in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 1200 URBAN CENTER DRIVE BIRMINGHAM, AL 35242 D06723-P33035 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY The
Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the director nominees listed in proposal 1. For Against Abstain 1. Election of Directors ! ! ! 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the
compensation of our named executive officers. For Against Abstain Nominees: ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. Melissa H. Anderson 3. Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. ! ! ! 1b.
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. ! ! ! 1c. James T. Prokopanko ! ! ! 1d. George Willis Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized
officer.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are
available at www.proxyvote.com. D06724-P33035 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 8, 2020 This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Cynthia L. Hostetler, David P. Steiner and Lee J.
Styslinger, III and each of them, with power to act without the others and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the reverse side, all the shares of Vulcan
Materials Company common stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Friday, May 8,
2020, at 9:00 a.m., local time, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/vmc2020 or any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual Meeting. Shares represented by
this proxy will be voted as directed by the undersigned. If this proxy is signed and no such directions are indicated, the proxies have authority to vote "FOR" election of all director nominees, "FOR" approval, on an advisory basis, of the
compensation of our named executive officers, and "FOR" ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020. Continued and to be signed on reverse side
This regulatory filing also includes additional resources:
d782889ddef14a1.pdf
Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024